From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 04:34:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 00:34:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528003] Review Request: Xinha - Javascript library for making textarea's WYSIWYG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911010434.nA14Y4uu009471@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528003 --- Comment #11 from Nick Bebout 2009-11-01 00:34:03 EDT --- FYI, Matthew, don't forget your CVS request in here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 04:36:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 00:36:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521724] Review Request: perl-Makefile-DOM - Simple DOM parser for Makefiles In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911010436.nA14aTNR026529@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521724 Nick Bebout changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|medium |high Severity|medium |high -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 04:36:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 00:36:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521723] Review Request: perl-Makefile-Parser - Simple parser for Makefiles In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911010436.nA14aAx1026414@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521723 Nick Bebout changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|medium |high Severity|medium |high -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 04:37:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 00:37:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523343] Review Request: zikula-module-EZComments - Simple Zikula module that provides comment functions to other modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911010437.nA14bi03010536@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523343 --- Comment #7 from Nick Bebout 2009-11-01 00:37:43 EDT --- mchua: ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 04:36:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 00:36:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521724] Review Request: perl-Makefile-DOM - Simple DOM parser for Makefiles In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911010436.nA14af1A010308@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521724 Nick Bebout changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 04:35:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 00:35:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521723] Review Request: perl-Makefile-Parser - Simple parser for Makefiles In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911010435.nA14Zrxk010120@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521723 Nick Bebout changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 04:38:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 00:38:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 511841] Review Request: wordpress-plugin-bad-behavior - Spam prevention plugin for WordPress In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911010438.nA14cH0m026910@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511841 Nick Bebout changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(error at ioerror.us) --- Comment #2 from Nick Bebout 2009-11-01 00:38:15 EDT --- Please see comment #1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 04:38:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 00:38:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 532276] New: Review Request: python-googlevoice - Python language bindings for the Google Voice API Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-googlevoice - Python language bindings for the Google Voice API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532276 Summary: Review Request: python-googlevoice - Python language bindings for the Google Voice API Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jeff at ocjtech.us QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://jcollie.fedorapeople.org/python-googlevoice.spec SRPM URL: http://jcollie.fedorapeople.org/python-googlevoice-0.4-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This project aims to bring the power of the Google Voice API to the Python language in a simple, easy-to-use manner. Currently it allows you to place calls, send sms, download voicemails/recorded messages, and search the various folders of your Google Voice Accounts. You can use the Python API or command line script to schedule calls, check for new received calls/sms, or even sync your recorded voicemails/calls. Works for Python 2 and Python 3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 05:11:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 01:11:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521724] Review Request: perl-Makefile-DOM - Simple DOM parser for Makefiles In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911010511.nA15Blrb002929@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521724 Nick Bebout changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|530910 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 05:11:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 01:11:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 530910] Review Request: hyena - Hyena is a library of GUI and non-GUI C# code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911010511.nA15Bktq002890@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530910 Nick Bebout changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nb at fedoraproject.org Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR), | |521724 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 07:35:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 02:35:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532286] New: Review Request: treeline - Store almost any kind of information in a tree structure Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: treeline - Store almost any kind of information in a tree structure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532286 Summary: Review Request: treeline - Store almost any kind of information in a tree structure Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: thomasj at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/treeline.spec SRPM URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/treeline-1.2.4-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: TreeLine is a versatile tool for working with all kinds of information that fit into a tree-like structure. It can be used to edit bookmark files, create mini-databases (for example, for addresses, tasks, records, or CDs), outline documents, or just collect ideas. It can also be used as a generic editor for XML files. The data schemas for any node in the data tree can be customized and new types of nodes can be defined. The way data is presented on the screen, exported to HTML, or printed can be defined with HTML-like templates. Plug-ins can be written to load and save data from and to custom file formats or external data sources and extend the functionality of TreeLine. TreeLine is written in Python and uses the PyQt bindings to the Qt toolkit, which makes it very portable. [thomas at tusdell SPECS]$ rpmlint treeline.spec ../SRPMS/treeline-1.2.4-1.fc11.src.rpm ../RPMS/x86_64/treeline-*fc11* treeline.x86_64: E: no-binary treeline-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1780865 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 09:02:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 04:02:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532261] Review Request: checkmedia - Checks installation media. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911010902.nA192sB4028659@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532261 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Summary|Checks installation media. |Review Request: checkmedia | |- Checks installation | |media. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 09:59:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 04:59:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532203] Review Reques: jgraph - Java-based Diagram Component and Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911010959.nA19xOt0011856@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532203 --- Comment #2 from D Haley 2009-11-01 04:59:23 EDT --- Oh sorry, one more comment. Please re-instate the changelog entry by Mary, which looks to have been inadvertently deleted +- Added gcj stuff This should be inserted after line 160. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 09:57:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 04:57:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532203] Review Reques: jgraph - Java-based Diagram Component and Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911010957.nA19vfUt011599@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532203 D Haley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mycae at yahoo.com --- Comment #1 from D Haley 2009-11-01 04:57:40 EDT --- Replying to some comments from previous (deadreview) bug (Bug 472793) Notes === $ rpmlint jgraph.spec jgraph.spec:68: W: non-standard-group Development/Documentation I believe this can be ignored, as it matches the template spec files in the java packaging guidelines. jgraph.spec:135: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package) %attr(-,root,root) %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name} Rpmlint is incorrect, rpmlint is failing to detect the %if conditional around the noarch. So no problems here So rpmlint output is OK. === Items to be addressed: === > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472292 >This is pretty much irrelevant to this package review. I believe it may be relevant, as otherwise your -debuginfo package is broken. There are workarounds shown in both that bug (bug 472292) and in bug 191014. Please fix this. I think this package is almost done. Please post a spec fixing the above and I will review the package. === Random comments: === >Umm, no that's definitely not needed for review, feel free to do that yourself >(technically, one architecture-release combination is needed and there's no >clear reason why would they fail, nor indication that packager intends to >create branches for these). When doing your CVS request, please create a branch for F-11 - its is definitely not EOL, and is hence *supported*. F-10 is no longer required as it will very soon be EOL. It is not always clear why a given version will fail (sometimes deps are missing, sometimes compiler crashes, documentation build failure, or whatever may be the case. Providing scratch builds provides assurance that this is not the case. I prefer not to review packages which may fail to work under any given F- distribution that is not near EOL. Note the following SHOULD from the package review checklist: "SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures." >I prefer not using dos2unix for endline conversion >This is a matter of taste and I'd prefer to follow packager's one, thus no >change here. Fair enough. > > Fully standards-compliant (What standard? ISO 9001? Why do I (user) care?) > Interoperability? Apologies for the following rant, feel free to skip it as the current description is good :) -- BEGIN RANT -- ISO9000 and friends have nothing to do with interoperability (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_9001). They are workplace quality systems ISOs, and really have nothing to do with software (or anything really.) They were popular a few years ago amongst marketing and manager types. It is entirely possible that upstream is simply being facetious here, as actual accreditation is a long and complex (and quite boring) procedure, which individual developers would be unlikely to undertake. -- END RANT -- === -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 10:30:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 05:30:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508521] Review Request: jettison - A JSON StAX implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911011030.nA1AUPx6001721@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508521 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-01 05:30:23 EDT --- Good, work; nice and clean! 1.) I suggest you use a %{version} macro here, to ease updates: jar -cf jettison-1.1.jar -C target . Full review: * spec file legible, uses american english * source matches upstream * packages latest version * rpmlint silent * builds fine in mock (scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1780920) * license ok, listed in %doc * javadoc built, conforming to guidelines * no prebuilt stuff * filelists sane * macros used consistently APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 10:48:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 05:48:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485178] Review Request: ruby-dbus -- Ruby D-Bus client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911011048.nA1AmoMh022136@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485178 Victor Bogado changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bogado at bogado.net --- Comment #1 from Victor Bogado 2009-11-01 05:48:49 EDT --- rpmlint gave no warnings. according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby : - naming is correct ok - ruby library provide ruby(dbus) = 0.2.1, you should consider putting %{version} instead, this way you don't risk a new updated package providing a incorrect version. not ok - pure ruby is noarch. ok - Files on ruby_sitelib. ok -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 11:44:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 06:44:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530324] Review Request: perl-V - Print version of the specified Perl modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911011144.nA1BiHGA015672@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530324 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-01 06:44:16 EDT --- perl-V-0.13-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-V-0.13-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 11:44:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 06:44:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530324] Review Request: perl-V - Print version of the specified Perl modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911011144.nA1BiMA8000441@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530324 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-01 06:44:21 EDT --- perl-V-0.13-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-V-0.13-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 12:01:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 07:01:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485178] Review Request: ruby-dbus -- Ruby D-Bus client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911011201.nA1C1BDT007323@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485178 --- Comment #3 from Victor Bogado 2009-11-01 07:01:11 EDT --- Just for information I made a scratch build at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1780928 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 12:00:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 07:00:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485178] Review Request: ruby-dbus -- Ruby D-Bus client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911011200.nA1C0R1v007109@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485178 --- Comment #2 from Victor Bogado 2009-11-01 07:00:25 EDT --- from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : OK * MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review.[1] $ rpmlint '/home/bogado/Download/ruby-dbus-0.2.1-1.fc9.src.rpm' 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint /home/bogado/Download/ruby-dbus-0.2.1-1.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK * MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. The name is correct according to more strict rules for ruby packaging. OK * MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] . OK * MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK * MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK * MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [3] OK * MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] OK * MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] OK * MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] +/- * MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. There is a newer upstream version 0.2.10 OK * MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [7] NOT APPLY * MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8] OK * MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. NOT APPLY * MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9] NOT APPLY * MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] OK * MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.[11] NOT APPLY * MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [12] OK * MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [13] OK * MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [14] OK * MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [15] OK * MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [16] NOT OK * MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [17] see the previous comment, you used the hard coded version instead of %{version} OK * MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [18] NO APPLY * MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [19] OK * MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [19] NOT APPLY * MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [20] NOT APPLY * MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [21] NOT APPLY * MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [22] NOT APPLY * MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [20] NOT APPLY * MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [23] NOT APPLY * MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built.[21] NOT APPLY * MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [24] NOT APPLY * MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [25] OK * MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [26] OK * MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [27] --- in short : check the %{version} thing and optionally update to the last upstream version and all should be fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 12:26:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 07:26:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532276] Review Request: python-googlevoice - Python language bindings for the Google Voice API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911011226.nA1CQTOl024196@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532276 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tomspur at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #1 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-01 07:26:28 EDT --- Just a few comments: - Can you remove the first unneed comment line? in %build the comment is also unneeded and CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" can be removed - When installed, there are 2 directories owed by googlevoice: 100K /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/googlevoice/ 776K /usr/share/doc/python-googlevoice-0.4 Could you split the doc into a subpackage, because if you just want to install the python files and no examples/documentation, you can save 88.6% with 2 extra packages. Possibly, that's why there are 2 sources, the normal tar.gz and the *-extras.zip. Upstream also wants to save space ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 12:29:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 07:29:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532203] Review Reques: jgraph - Java-based Diagram Component and Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911011229.nA1CTEX8013454@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532203 --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-01 07:29:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Replying to some comments from previous (deadreview) bug (Bug 472793) > > Notes > === > $ rpmlint jgraph.spec > jgraph.spec:68: W: non-standard-group Development/Documentation > > I believe this can be ignored, as it matches the template spec files in the > java packaging guidelines. Might be. I replaced this with Documentation, just to be on safe side. > >This is pretty much irrelevant to this package review. > > I believe it may be relevant, as otherwise your -debuginfo package is broken. > There are workarounds shown in both that bug (bug 472292) and in bug 191014. > Please fix this. Ah, sorry, you're right. I thought this was common to all Java packages, not this package's fault. Addressed in new version. > I think this package is almost done. Please post a spec fixing the above and I > will review the package. > === > > Random comments: > === > >Umm, no that's definitely not needed for review, feel free to do that yourself > >(technically, one architecture-release combination is needed and there's no > >clear reason why would they fail, nor indication that packager intends to > >create branches for these). > > When doing your CVS request, please create a branch for F-11 - its is > definitely not EOL, and is hence *supported*. F-10 is no longer required as it > will very soon be EOL. I do not need this anywhere < Fedora 13. Common practice is that if anyone else needs this, he maintains it there. Therefore, if you need the package in F-12, F-11 or even F-10, feel free to maintain it there yourself (once it's in), but the maintenance burden is on your shoulders :) That means -- it's waste of bandwidth and builders cpu cycles from my point of view, since I don't care :) > > > Fully standards-compliant (What standard? ISO 9001? Why do I (user) care?) > > > Interoperability? > > Apologies for the following rant, feel free to skip it as the current > description is good :) I won't pretend I knew what ISO 9001 is :) New package: SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/jgraph.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/jgraph-5.12.2.1-3.fc12.src.rpm scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1780977 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 12:57:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 07:57:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 494171] Review Request: hostapd - WLAN Accesspoint daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911011257.nA1Cvddu031581@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494171 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |tomspur at fedoraproject.org Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #19 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-01 07:57:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > Update from my side, as I no longer have my ath9k card I cannot test if stuff > actually work (my other cards are intel which do not support AP mode yet), so > if someone else want to work on this package feel free to do so. The original submitter so longer won't to package this and Kedar maybe wants to take it? This means, Kedar should make a own review requrest and close this as a DUBPLICATE of the new one. Till then WONTFIX. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 13:05:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 08:05:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530204] Review Request: rubygem-hawler - Hawler, the Ruby HTTP crawler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911011305.nA1D5ewg000899@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530204 --- Comment #6 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-11-01 08:05:39 EDT --- - Added Requires: rubygem(hpricot) - Added patch (but kept tests to not break the build if net connection is not available) New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-hawler.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f12/SRPMS/rubygem-hawler-0.3-5.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 13:07:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 08:07:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532306] New: Review Request: rubygem-ruby-debug - Faster implementation of the standard Debugging Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-ruby-debug - Faster implementation of the standard Debugging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532306 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-ruby-debug - Faster implementation of the standard Debugging Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kanarip at kanarip.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-ruby-debug.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f12/SRPMS/rubygem-ruby-debug-0.10.3-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Faster implementation of the standard debug.rb using a native extension with a new hook Ruby C API. rpmlint is silent but for an empty file and some % in the filenames (it says "wrong macro") koji scratch builds: - dist-f11-updates-candidate: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1780993 - dist-f12-updates-candidate: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1780998 - dist-f13: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1781003 - dist-5E-epel: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1781006 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 13:11:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 08:11:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 498194] Review Request: zarafa - Zarafa Outlook Sharing and Open Source Collaboration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911011311.nA1DBJnL025979@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498194 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #13 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-11-01 08:11:16 EDT --- Compiling with --enable-release toggles the -pedantic switch which makes the compilation process less prune to errors like these. I've been talking to Zarafa about the following spec, which splits up several server/service components and libraries, and they seem to agree this would be the better approach for 6.40: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/zarafa.spec Please let me know what you think. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 13:15:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 08:15:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529073] Review Request: php-phpunit-phploc - A tool for quickly measuring the size of a PHP project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911011315.nA1DFxv1026783@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529073 Christof Damian changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |christof at damian.net Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 13:26:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 08:26:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532309] New: Review Request: rubygem-net-ldap - A full-featured pure-Ruby LDAP client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-net-ldap - A full-featured pure-Ruby LDAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532309 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-net-ldap - A full-featured pure-Ruby LDAP client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kanarip at kanarip.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-net-ldap.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f12/SRPMS/rubygem-net-ldap-0.0.4-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This project will be the focus of development for a pure Ruby LDAP environment. A full-featured pure-Ruby LDAP client is now available. koji scratch builds: - dist-f11-updates-candidate: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1781077 - dist-f12-updates-candidate: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1781081 - dist-f13: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1781083 - dist-5E-epel: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1781085 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 13:32:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 08:32:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529073] Review Request: php-phpunit-phploc - A tool for quickly measuring the size of a PHP project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911011332.nA1DWXKp029947@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529073 Christof Damian changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 13:34:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 08:34:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530857] Review Request: drehatlas-xaporho-fonts - latin typeface inspired by a hobby rock band logo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911011334.nA1DYmAo030196@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530857 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-01 08:34:47 EDT --- drehatlas-xaporho-fonts-1.0.3.2-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drehatlas-xaporho-fonts-1.0.3.2-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 13:35:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 08:35:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529073] Review Request: php-phpunit-phploc - A tool for quickly measuring the size of a PHP project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911011335.nA1DZm7o030607@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529073 Christof Damian changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Christof Damian 2009-11-01 08:35:46 EDT --- OK: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. php-phpunit-phploc.noarch: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. . OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK: The spec file must be written in American English. OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: Each package must consistently use macros. OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. looks good to me: ACCEPT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 13:34:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 08:34:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530857] Review Request: drehatlas-xaporho-fonts - latin typeface inspired by a hobby rock band logo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911011334.nA1DYrnO006272@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530857 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-01 08:34:52 EDT --- drehatlas-xaporho-fonts-1.0.3.2-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drehatlas-xaporho-fonts-1.0.3.2-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 13:51:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 08:51:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527706] Review Request: mingw32-libgeotiff - MinGW port of libgeotiff Georeferenced image library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911011351.nA1Dpp4C009494@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527706 --- Comment #7 from Dave Ludlow 2009-11-01 08:51:50 EDT --- Ping. I believe the package meets the requirements as-is. Comment #3 has been addressed (I'm using SVN instead of a release for a good reason). Comment #4 has also been addressed (LICENSE is not in the upstream source tarball, so I cannot include it). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 13:54:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 08:54:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 498194] Review Request: zarafa - Zarafa Outlook Sharing and Open Source Collaboration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911011354.nA1DsbXw001421@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498194 --- Comment #14 from Robert Scheck 2009-11-01 08:54:34 EDT --- Well, what exactly will Zarafa do for their own RPM package builds for the 6.40 release? Will they split up as same or won't they do? I feel very uncomfortable to do these split-ups, if they don't do the same. And I still don't want to see this package similar over-engineered and unusable such as the current Fedora clamav package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 14:05:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 09:05:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527706] Review Request: mingw32-libgeotiff - MinGW port of libgeotiff Georeferenced image library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911011405.nA1E5D1n012071@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527706 --- Comment #8 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-11-01 09:05:12 EDT --- Dave, I didn't made the full review only because mingw32-proj is still unavailable in Koji, and, therefore, I can't make test rebuild (which is necessary for me, for the review process). I realized that you just requested a movement them to stable, so I'll do a review in a couple of days or so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 14:37:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 09:37:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532315] New: Review Request: nanoxml - Small XML parser for Java Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: nanoxml - Small XML parser for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532315 Summary: Review Request: nanoxml - Small XML parser for Java Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mi at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://v3.sk/~xyzz/rpm/intellij-idea/nanoxml.spec SRPM URL: http://v3.sk/~xyzz/rpm/intellij-idea/nanoxml-2.2.3-4.fc11.src.rpm Description: The intent of NanoXML is to be a small parser which is easy to use. Although many features were added to NanoXML, it is very small. The full parser with builder fits in a JAR file of about 32K. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 14:36:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 09:36:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527706] Review Request: mingw32-libgeotiff - MinGW port of libgeotiff Georeferenced image library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911011436.nA1Eae7H009693@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527706 --- Comment #9 from Dave Ludlow 2009-11-01 09:36:39 EDT --- Got it - thanks. Here is the mingw32-proj Koji page: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=9367 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 14:49:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 09:49:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532315] Review Request: nanoxml - Small XML parser for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911011449.nA1EnHn8012119@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532315 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 15:03:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 10:03:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 494695] Review Request: qutim - Multiplatform Instant Messenger on Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911011503.nA1F3Knw014551@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494695 --- Comment #10 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-11-01 10:03:19 EDT --- BTW, qutim 0.2 is out! http://www.qutim.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=1335 Could you, please, update your package to the latest version? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 15:07:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 10:07:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532315] Review Request: nanoxml - Small XML parser for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911011507.nA1F7wGe023542@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532315 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-01 10:07:57 EDT --- 1.) Please remove jpackage artifacts: section macro: %define section free javadoc symlink (you even create it twice for some reason!?): ln -s %{name}-%{version} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadocdir}/%{name} # ghost symlink 2.) You can probably rely on default file modes: -%defattr(0644,root,root,0755) +%defattr(-,root,root,-) 3.) Please do not include TeX sources in documentation. PDFs ale probably enough. 4.) Please consider renaming nanoxml-manual-lite to nanoxml-lite-manual, which may be more consistent. If you need to retain compatibility and upgrade path from jpackage, use Provides tag and Obsoletes tag for older version to properly replace it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 15:13:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 10:13:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 494695] Review Request: qutim - Multiplatform Instant Messenger on Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911011513.nA1FDQog024754@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494695 --- Comment #11 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-11-01 10:13:25 EDT --- Off course! Gloox release 1.0 also was released yesterday. We speak about it with Ruslan and I prepare both updates (I think do that in 1-3 days). But it is not contain major changes except bugfixes and api stability, can we finally start review?? Update process in the future should be persistent continuous process... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 15:56:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 10:56:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459548] Review Request: php-gtk - GTK PHP extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911011556.nA1Fusb2000590@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459548 --- Comment #31 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-01 10:56:50 EDT --- Again ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 15:54:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 10:54:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 506100] Review Request: opennhrp - An NHRP implementation for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911011554.nA1FsvIn032366@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506100 --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-01 10:54:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > A safe way would be to place the two > script files in their own subpackage, for example opennhrp-ipsec, and have this > one conflict with ipsec-tools < 0.8 but that seems a bit overkill. ... However from your comment without this opennhrp seems completely useless. > Do you have a particular configuration in mind that would work by default and > still be safe? I cannot think of any. - Please don't think that (potential) reviewers know more things about a submitted package than the submitter of the package. However reviewers expect that the submitted package works on Fedora "as it is" (Of course there are some packages which needs some initialization after being installed, however this package is not in the case). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 16:25:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 11:25:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531391] Review Request: gwsmhg - hg/mq GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911011625.nA1GP8AG030615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531391 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-01 11:25:07 EDT --- One issue * Desktop file - Please also remove "Application" category. (In reply to comment #2) > X-Fedora isn't in the freedesktop menuspec whitelist, but is it in any > packaging guideline blacklist? - It is no longer used on Fedora (the discussion is rather old: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-October/msg00723.html http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2006-October/msg00188.html ) "X-Fedora" category seems remains on fedora.us age. Otherwise okay. --------------------------------------------------------- This package (gwsmhg) is APPROVED by mtasaka --------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 16:27:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 11:27:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 515752] Review Request: python-soaplib - python library for creating SOAP services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911011627.nA1GRdxK006920@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515752 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-01 11:27:37 EDT --- @LINBIT: It is appreciated if you would write the summary of your (pre-)review at the end. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 16:53:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 11:53:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527488] Review Request: drbd - drbd tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911011653.nA1Gr7WQ011775@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527488 --- Comment #67 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-01 11:53:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #66) > Bug 515752 updated with several pre-review comments. Well, as I wrote on the bug, would you write the summary of your pre-review (especially about what needs fixing)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 17:51:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 12:51:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911011751.nA1Hph63014562@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-01 12:51:41 EDT --- For 0.0.2.1-1: * Requires - For this, please check my previous comments. (In reply to comment #7) > * Requires > - Please check the dependency for python module related packages (this > cannot be detected automatically by rpmbuild and you have to investigate > this manually by yourself). > ! Example > /usr/bin/gscribble contains: > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > 16 try: > 17 import pygtk > 18 pygtk.require('2.0') > 19 except: > 20 print "Install PyGtk >= 2.0." > 21 sys.exit(1) > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > This means that this package should have "Requiers: pygtk2". * Version specific dependency - Would you explain why you want to write the version dependency ">= 2.0" for BR: python-devel? Note that currently supported branches on Fedora have at least python 2.5.2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 18:08:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 13:08:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530204] Review Request: rubygem-hawler - Hawler, the Ruby HTTP crawler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911011808.nA1I8hSp025832@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530204 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-01 13:08:41 EDT --- ----------------------------------------------------------- This package (rubygem-hawler) is APPROVED by mtasaka ----------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 18:15:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 13:15:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523523] Review Request: clutter-gesture - Gesture Library for Clutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911011815.nA1IF1lK019046@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523523 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|506446(FedoraMoblin20) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 18:15:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 13:15:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523526] Review Request: clutter-box2d - 2D physics simulation layer for Clutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911011815.nA1IF2RK019278@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523526 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|506446(FedoraMoblin20) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 18:22:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 13:22:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523523] Review Request: clutter-gesture - Gesture Library for Clutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911011822.nA1IM1Vf020639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523523 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |532337(FedoraMoblin21) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 18:22:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 13:22:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523526] Review Request: clutter-box2d - 2D physics simulation layer for Clutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911011822.nA1IM230020666@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523526 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |532337(FedoraMoblin21) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 18:39:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 13:39:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516532] Review Request: globus-scheduler-event-generator - Globus Toolkit - Scheduler Event Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911011839.nA1IdLSE023929@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516532 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Steve Traylen 2009-11-01 13:39:20 EDT --- koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1781516 Review of globus-scheduler-event-generator: yes: rpmlint $ rpmlint SRPMS/globus-scheduler-event-generator-2.1-1.fc12.src.rpm \ RPMS/noarch/globus-scheduler-event-generator-doc-2.1-1.fc12.noarch.rpm \ RPMS/x86_64/globus-scheduler-event-generator-* \ SRPMS/globus-scheduler-event-generator-2.1-1.fc12.src.rpm globus-scheduler-event-generator-debuginfo.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long This package provides debug information for package globus-scheduler-event-generator. globus-scheduler-event-generator-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation globus-scheduler-event-generator-progs.x86_64: W: no-documentation 7 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. which is all fine. yes: Package name yes: spec file name yes: general and globus guidelines. yes: license in spec yes: matches actual license. yes: GLOUBUS_LICESNSE file included. yes: English spec file yes: legible spec file. yes: source matches. yes: comnpiles, see koji above. yes: compiles on all arches anyway. yes: build requires good. yes: no locales anyway. yes: calls ldconfig suitably. yes: no system libs. yes: not relocatable. yes: owns all files and dirs. yes: no duplicate files. yes: all default perms. yes: %clean has a rm -rf yes: consistant macros yes: code is present. yes: docs are in a docs package. yes: docs not needed runtime. yes: header files in -devel package. yes: no static files anyway. yes: no .la files. yes: no gui part anyway. yes: does not own files from other packages. yes. %install is cleared first. yes: utf8 filenames. an easy approve: APPROVED: Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 18:40:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 13:40:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516534] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-callout-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus GRAM Jobmanager Callout Errors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911011840.nA1IefNG032432@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516534 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Steve Traylen 2009-11-01 13:40:40 EDT --- Comment #2 satisfies everything. APPROVED Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 19:00:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 14:00:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 195303] Review Request: perl-POE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911011900.nA1J0CCL028705@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195303 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |steve.traylen at cern.ch Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Steve Traylen 2009-11-01 14:00:08 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-POE New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: stevetraylen Response from owner of perl-POE in Fedora: I actually don't use POE that much anymore.... if you want to take them over for both Fedora and EPEL, they'd probably benefit from it :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 19:02:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 14:02:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 498194] Review Request: zarafa - Zarafa Outlook Sharing and Open Source Collaboration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911011902.nA1J2bqT029228@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498194 --- Comment #15 from Axel Thimm 2009-11-01 14:02:36 EDT --- If there are sane use cases where users will really need only parts of the package then split the package there, but splitting for splitting's sake (e.g. like clamav) is not good. Also relying on an external vendor's packaging style is also not sane - when we say that Fedora follows upstream we mean the source code, not the packaging practice. Of course the other way, e.g. persuading upstream packaging to lean on our package style is always fine. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 19:35:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 14:35:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525914] Review Request: perl-Net-GitHub - Perl interface for github.com In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911011935.nA1JZIt7003700@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525914 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jan Klepek 2009-11-01 14:35:17 EDT --- *md5sum source ok *naming ok *rpmlint ok *license ok *build ok *file ownage ok *guidelines & perl specific guidelines ok *latest version *spec legible approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 19:50:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 14:50:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532276] Review Request: python-googlevoice - Python language bindings for the Google Voice API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911011950.nA1Jo9cI014348@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532276 --- Comment #2 from Jeffrey C. Ollie 2009-11-01 14:50:08 EDT --- Spec URL: http://jcollie.fedorapeople.org/python-googlevoice.spec SRPM URL: http://jcollie.fedorapeople.org/python-googlevoice-0.4-2.fc12.src.rpm I've removed the unneeded comments and the CFLAGS settings. However, I don't think that it really makes sense to split a package that's < 1MB installed and only 71KB uninstalled, even if it's mostly docs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 19:54:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 14:54:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530204] Review Request: rubygem-hawler - Hawler, the Ruby HTTP crawler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911011954.nA1JspRW015213@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530204 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-11-01 14:54:50 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-hawler Short Description: Hawler, the ruby HTTP crawler Owners: kanarip Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 20:10:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 15:10:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520278] Review Request: notify-osd - On-screen-display notification agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911012010.nA1KAveD018841@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520278 Bug 520278 depends on bug 520437, which changed state. Bug 520437 Summary: RFE: Rebuild to depend on desktop-notification-daemon and not notification-daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520437 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|DUPLICATE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 21:00:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 16:00:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526444] Review Request: MyGUI - Fast, simple and flexible GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911012100.nA1L0q5Q020334@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526444 --- Comment #14 from Guido Grazioli 2009-11-01 16:00:51 EDT --- Hello, i've made some more work to improve this package: - fix building with cmake - manually install missing library libMyGUI.OgrePlatform.so - create /etc/ld.so.conf.d/mygui.conf to add /usr/{libdir}/MYGUI to ldconfig - remove -msse from flags (to let it build on ppc/ppc64) - remove plugins (actually there was just one plugin) because they need work upstream to work on unix - fix include dir - fix wrapper scripts to use new resources.xml instead of resources.cfg Updated files here: http://guidograzioli.fedorapeople.org/packages/mygui/ Koji build here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1781251 Rpmlint, the package still has warnings: mygui.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink (2 font files) mygui-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation mygui-tools.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package (3 code template files used by LayoutEditor tool) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 21:23:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 16:23:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532368] New: Review Request: ns-bola-fonts A Sans Font Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ns-bola-fonts A Sans Font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532368 Summary: Review Request: ns-bola-fonts A Sans Font Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: john.brown009 at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://tk009.fedorapeople.org/ns-bola-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://tk009.fedorapeople.org/ns-bola-fonts-20080203-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: A chunky and geometric decorative font. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 22:33:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 17:33:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911012233.nA1MXxN3013775@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #84 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-01 17:33:56 EDT --- x11vnc-0.9.8-16.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/x11vnc-0.9.8-16.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 1 22:50:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 17:50:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 500959] Review Request: perl-Task-Padre-Plugin-Deps - Task::Padre::Plugin::Deps Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911012250.nA1MoMj9017393@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500959 --- Comment #16 from Jan Klepek 2009-11-01 17:50:21 EDT --- still same issue, patch is still the same as before. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 00:07:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 19:07:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532382] New: Review Request: fvkbd - Free Virtual Keyboard Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: fvkbd - Free Virtual Keyboard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532382 Summary: Review Request: fvkbd - Free Virtual Keyboard Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 532337 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/fvkbd.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/fvkbd-0.1.6-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: A free virtual keyboard for use in Moblin Internet Devices from Phones to MIDs. koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1781762 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 00:58:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 19:58:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 498194] Review Request: zarafa - Zarafa Outlook Sharing and Open Source Collaboration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911020058.nA20wuIw010248@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498194 --- Comment #16 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-11-01 19:58:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > Well, what exactly will Zarafa do for their own RPM package builds for the 6.40 > release? Will they split up as same or won't they do? I feel very uncomfortable > to do these split-ups, if they don't do the same. And I still don't want to see > this package similar over-engineered and unusable such as the current Fedora > clamav package. Zarafa's Steve Hardy seems to like the split-up for 6.40. I highly doubt they'll change their packaging of 6.30. (In reply to comment #15) > If there are sane use cases where users will really need only parts of the > package then split the package there, but splitting for splitting's sake (e.g. > like clamav) is not good. > I agree with what you're saying here, but all of these are separate components to the Zarafa architecture, and can be installed on separate servers. > Also relying on an external vendor's packaging style is also not sane - when we > say that Fedora follows upstream we mean the source code, not the packaging > practice. Of course the other way, e.g. persuading upstream packaging to lean > on our package style is always fine. :) This is going upstream, yes ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 01:18:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 20:18:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532382] Review Request: fvkbd - Free Virtual Keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911020118.nA21ImuR006504@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532382 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 01:19:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 20:19:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526651] Review Request: xpaint - An X Window System image editing or paint program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911020119.nA21Jk8G014456@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526651 --- Comment #31 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-11-01 20:19:44 EDT --- By the way, all .h files are now in: /usr/include/xpaint -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 02:21:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 21:21:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 509159] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_PragmARC_=E2=80=93_a_comp?= =?utf-8?q?onent_library_for_Ada?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911020221.nA22LDfd021972@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509159 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-01 21:21:12 EDT --- PragmARC-20060427-5.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/PragmARC-20060427-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 02:29:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 21:29:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 509159] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_PragmARC_=E2=80=93_a_comp?= =?utf-8?q?onent_library_for_Ada?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911020229.nA22TFda023786@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509159 Bj?rn Persson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Bj?rn Persson 2009-11-01 21:29:14 EDT --- Package imported, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 02:29:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 21:29:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 509160] Review Request: =?utf-8?b?IG1pbmVfZGV0ZWN0b3Ig4oCT?= =?utf-8?q?_a_mine-finding_game?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911020229.nA22THiM023825@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509160 Bug 509160 depends on bug 509159, which changed state. Bug 509159 Summary: Review Request: PragmARC ? a component library for Ada https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509159 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 06:04:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 01:04:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527488] Review Request: drbd - drbd tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911020604.nA264Omt011947@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527488 --- Comment #68 from LINBIT 2009-11-02 01:04:21 EDT --- Bug 515752 updated with a summary of suggested changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 06:02:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 01:02:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 515752] Review Request: python-soaplib - python library for creating SOAP services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911020602.nA262UPX005091@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515752 --- Comment #12 from LINBIT 2009-11-02 01:02:29 EDT --- So here is my summary of list of items I would suggest to change. - Add "python" to Requires. - Add comment to spec explaining how to create a tar ball from SVN, as suggested in http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control - Add %dir %{python_sitelib}/soaplib to %files section as suggested in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#System_Architecture - Add an %exclude in %files for %{python_sitelib}/tests - Drop SVN rev from Release (optional) Other than that, the package looks fine to me. I suppose the build dependency on python-devel, while superfluous, should probably stay in so as not to confuse others and maintain compliance with http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 06:11:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 01:11:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532402] New: Review Request: APF - Advanced Policy Firewall Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: APF - Advanced Policy Firewall https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532402 Summary: Review Request: APF - Advanced Policy Firewall Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmckinst at nexcess.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mmckinst.nexcess.net/apf/apf.spec SRPM URL: http://mmckinst.nexcess.net/apf/apf-9.7-1.src.rpm Description: APF is an iptables (netfilter) based firewall system designed around the essential needs of today?s Linux servers. The configuration is designed to be very informative and easy to follow. This is my first package and I am looking for a sponsor. This package is on the wishlist: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WishList#A-D -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 06:13:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 01:13:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532402] Review Request: APF - Advanced Policy Firewall In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911020613.nA26DCT8007968@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532402 Mark McKinstry changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 06:43:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 01:43:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526876] Review Request: php-pecl-gmagick - Provides a wrapper to the GraphicsMagick library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911020643.nA26hVXW023160@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526876 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andrew at topdog.za.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |andrew at topdog.za.net Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 06:45:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 01:45:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507585] Review Request: python-psi - Shows real time system information in python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911020645.nA26jX7Y024061@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507585 --- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-11-02 01:45:31 EDT --- Ping, again! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 06:47:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 01:47:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531987] Review Request: wtop - top for webserver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911020647.nA26lFHB018258@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531987 --- Comment #1 from Kushal Das 2009-11-02 01:47:13 EDT --- Koji scratch build link http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1781942 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 06:51:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 01:51:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526876] Review Request: php-pecl-gmagick - Provides a wrapper to the GraphicsMagick library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911020651.nA26pUQu025765@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526876 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-11-02 01:51:29 EDT --- I will do a full review of this later today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 06:54:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 01:54:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507585] Review Request: python-psi - Shows real time system information in python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911020654.nA26s0Hd026211@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507585 Kushal Das changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(kushaldas at gmail.c | |om) | --- Comment #7 from Kushal Das 2009-11-02 01:54:00 EDT --- Sorry for the vanishing act. My main system was broken but now back alive, will look into this within few hours. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 06:51:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 01:51:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526876] Review Request: php-pecl-gmagick - Provides a wrapper to the GraphicsMagick library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911020651.nA26pfEV019673@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526876 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 06:55:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 01:55:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528476] Review Request: php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein - eZ Components PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911020655.nA26tdvs020708@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528476 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |andrew at topdog.za.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |andrew at topdog.za.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 06:54:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 01:54:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528473] Review Request: php-ezc-DatabaseSchema - eZ Components DatabaseSchema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911020654.nA26sqW1020252@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528473 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |andrew at topdog.za.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |andrew at topdog.za.net Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 07:01:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 02:01:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525432] Review Request: openxcap - Fully featured XCAP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911020701.nA271lq5022412@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525432 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |andrew at topdog.za.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |andrew at topdog.za.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 07:05:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 02:05:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525432] Review Request: openxcap - Fully featured XCAP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911020705.nA275hbf029513@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525432 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 07:59:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 02:59:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508521] Review Request: jettison - A JSON StAX implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911020759.nA27xEXI009691@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508521 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Sandro Mathys 2009-11-02 02:59:13 EDT --- Hi Lubomir, thanks for the review :) Glad to see there's nothing to complain about :) will replace jettison-1.1 with %{name}-%{version} in the mentioned line before I push the pkg. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: jettison Short Description: A JSON StAX implementation Owners: red Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 08:26:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 03:26:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516532] Review Request: globus-scheduler-event-generator - Globus Toolkit - Scheduler Event Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911020826.nA28QA7a018560@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516532 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Mattias Ellert 2009-11-02 03:26:08 EDT --- Many thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: globus-scheduler-event-generator Short Description: Globus Toolkit - Scheduler Event Generator Owners: ellert Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 08:26:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 03:26:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516534] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-callout-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus GRAM Jobmanager Callout Errors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911020826.nA28QEoe018594@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516534 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Mattias Ellert 2009-11-02 03:26:12 EDT --- Many thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: globus-gram-job-manager-callout-error Short Description: Globus Toolkit - Globus GRAM Jobmanager Callout Errors Owners: ellert Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 09:07:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 04:07:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529517] Review Request: kcm_touchpad - Synaptics driver based touchpads kcontrol module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911020907.nA297bO5032391@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529517 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jreznik at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jreznik at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-11-02 04:07:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > FYI, Ryan is sponsored now, so any sponsored contributor can review and approve > this package. Kevin, I'll take it as I'm now helping some guy on local Linux forum to set up synaptic. I've already asked him not to report bugs/feature requests to forum but to bugzilla or IRC ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 10:18:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 05:18:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529831] Review Request: opensips - Open Source SIP Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911021018.nA2AIp2V013285@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529831 John A. Khvatov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from John A. Khvatov 2009-11-02 05:18:50 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: opensips Short Description: Open Source SIP Server Owners: ivaxer Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 10:55:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 05:55:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526651] Review Request: xpaint - An X Window System image editing or paint program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911021055.nA2At6eb027951@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526651 --- Comment #32 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-11-02 05:55:03 EDT --- Another possibility with c_scripts in the main package, since they are not real devel files (but rpmlint spits some warnings): SRPM URL:http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/src/xpaint-2.8.6.1-2.fc10.src.rpm I think it is easy to conclude the review now, since there is no much room for new changes. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 11:23:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 06:23:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532315] Review Request: nanoxml - Small XML parser for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911021123.nA2BNJGG009866@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532315 --- Comment #2 from Michal Ingeli 2009-11-02 06:23:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > 1.) Please remove jpackage artifacts: > > section macro: > %define section free done > javadoc symlink (you even create it twice for some reason!?): > ln -s %{name}-%{version} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadocdir}/%{name} # ghost symlink another forgotten fragment of original package > 2.) You can probably rely on default file modes: > > -%defattr(0644,root,root,0755) > +%defattr(-,root,root,-) > > > 3.) Please do not include TeX sources in documentation. PDFs ale probably > enough. done. some files had +x in documentation sources, but as they are not included now in -manual subpacakges, I can rely on defaults. > 4.) Please consider renaming nanoxml-manual-lite to nanoxml-lite-manual, which > may be more consistent. If you need to retain compatibility and upgrade path > from jpackage, use Provides tag and Obsoletes tag for older version to > properly replace it. Renamed. I also added obsoletes and provides with version ranges. Hope I did it right way. Spec URL: http://v3.sk/~xyzz/rpm/intellij-idea/nanoxml.spec SRPM URL: http://v3.sk/~xyzz/rpm/intellij-idea/nanoxml-2.2.3-5.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 11:40:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 06:40:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 512170] Review Request: pidgin-sipe - Pidgin plugin for connecting to MS Communications Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911021140.nA2BeHo3014855@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512170 birger changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |birger at birger.sh --- Comment #23 from birger 2009-11-02 06:40:01 EDT --- 1.7.0 is out now. There would be a lot of interest in this package. Please get it into both fedora and EPEL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 11:56:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 06:56:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 497283] Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate - Port to Perl of the syntax highlight engine of the Kate texteditor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911021156.nA2Bu68j009708@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497283 Marcela Ma?l??ov? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |532278 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 11:55:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 06:55:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 500959] Review Request: perl-Task-Padre-Plugin-Deps - Task::Padre::Plugin::Deps Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911021155.nA2Btimr017989@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500959 Bug 500959 depends on bug 497283, which changed state. Bug 497283 Summary: Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate - Port to Perl of the syntax highlight engine of the Kate texteditor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497283 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 11:55:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 06:55:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 497283] Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate - Port to Perl of the syntax highlight engine of the Kate texteditor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911021155.nA2BthNv017959@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497283 Marcela Ma?l??ov? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Marcela Ma?l??ov? 2009-11-02 06:55:40 EDT --- As a request for Publican #532278 please branch for F-10. Koji build passed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1782002 New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate Short Description: Port to Perl of the syntax highlight engine of the Kate texteditor Owners: mmaslano Branches: F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 14:26:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 09:26:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529517] Review Request: kcm_touchpad - Synaptics driver based touchpads kcontrol module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911021426.nA2EQheb017108@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529517 --- Comment #5 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-11-02 09:26:41 EDT --- Package name OK Summary OK License OK URL & Sources FIXME Sources MD5 FIXME (new version, sources URL, see comment) Buildroot OK Requires - do not require kdelibs4 >= 4.1 qt4 >= 4.4.0 Description OK File attributes OK Documentation installed OK Desktop file OK (KDE service desktop file, no need for validation) Changelog OK Rpmlint SPEC & SRPM OK RPMS OK Builds Scratch OK Local OK Fixme: Group should be User Interfaces/Desktops to match other KControl module packages. New version available - 0.3.0. Sources URL - http://github.com/mishaaq/kcm_touchpad/tarball/kcm_touchpad-0.3.0 or http://download.github.com/mishaaq-kcm_touchpad-000be4c.tar.gz. Could you please update package, so I can check missing checks, thanks. Do not use Requires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 14:38:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 09:38:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532470] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-bad - GStreamer streaming media framework "bad" plug-ins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911021438.nA2EcRGq029859@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532470 Bastien Nocera changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #1 from Bastien Nocera 2009-11-02 09:38:26 EDT --- Notes: - gstreamer-plugins-good would need to be updated to remove plugins backported from -bad (such as the Farsight plugins used by telepathy) - this obsoletes the flumpegdemux plugin (which got moved into -bad some time ago, and that we keep syncing with the package) - The code here shouldn't contain any problematic source code, as this code would usually live in library depedencies) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 14:36:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 09:36:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532470] New: Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-bad - GStreamer streaming media framework "bad" plug-ins Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-bad - GStreamer streaming media framework "bad" plug-ins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532470 Summary: Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-bad - GStreamer streaming media framework "bad" plug-ins Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bnocera at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~hadess/gstreamer-plugins-bad/gstreamer-plugins-bad.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~hadess/gstreamer-plugins-bad/gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.13-11.fc12.src.rpm Description: GStreamer is a streaming media framework, based on graphs of elements which operate on media data. This package contains plug-ins that aren't tested well enough, or the code is not of good enough quality. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 15:40:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 10:40:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 515752] Review Request: python-soaplib - python library for creating SOAP services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911021540.nA2FegxR016938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515752 --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-02 10:40:38 EDT --- Some notes: - "Requires: python" is not needed as rpmbuild automatically adds "Requires: python(abi) = 2.6" to the rebuilt binary rpm. - Adding "%dir %{python_sitelib}/soaplib" is not needed because %files entry "%{python_sitelib}/*" already contains this. Note that ------------------------------------------------------ %files foo/ ------------------------------------------------------ (while foo is a directory) contains the directory foo/ itself and all files/directories/etc under foo/ - I usually recomment to include revision number in the rpm release tag. Other notes: - Now Fedora recommends to use %global instead of %define: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define - python egg file must not be excluded, and it must be created during build process https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#setuptools.2Feggs - For creating tarball from svn, it is also recommended to include revision number in the tarball name. - It is recommended that you put one line between each %changelog entry like: ------------------------------------------------------- * Wed Feb 4 2009 Jordan O'Mara - 0.7.2-2.20080816svn39 - Added patch for manually setting wsdl url * Tue Sep 16 2008 Jordan O'Mara - 0.7.2-1.20080816svn39 - Initial packaging for Fedora. ------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 15:45:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 10:45:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532470] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-bad - GStreamer streaming media framework "bad" plug-ins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911021545.nA2Fjqau018348@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532470 --- Comment #2 from Bill Nottingham 2009-11-02 10:45:51 EDT --- Would this mean that we'd have gst-plugins-bad in Fedora, and some other repos would have additional gst-plugins-bad, or gst-plugins-bad-extras, etc? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 15:53:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 10:53:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532490] New: Review Request: asterisk-sounds-extra - Extra sounds for Asterisk Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: asterisk-sounds-extra - Extra sounds for Asterisk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532490 Summary: Review Request: asterisk-sounds-extra - Extra sounds for Asterisk Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jeff at ocjtech.us QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://jcollie.fedorapeople.org/asterisk-sounds-extra.spec SRPM URL: http://jcollie.fedorapeople.org/asterisk-sounds-extra-1.4.9-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Extra sounds for Asterisk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 16:10:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 11:10:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532470] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-bad - GStreamer streaming media framework "bad" plug-ins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911021610.nA2GAJSc012298@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532470 --- Comment #3 from Bastien Nocera 2009-11-02 11:10:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Would this mean that we'd have gst-plugins-bad in Fedora, and some other repos > would have additional gst-plugins-bad, or gst-plugins-bad-extras, etc? Yep, we'd have the broken code ones, and 3rd-party repos the ones with problematic code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 16:16:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 11:16:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527488] Review Request: drbd - drbd tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911021616.nA2GGFOa025845@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527488 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #69 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-02 11:16:08 EDT --- Well, okay (however please check my comment) ------------------------------------------------------ This package (drbd) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------ To Phil: Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". After you request for sponsorship a mail will be sent to sponsor members automatically (which is invisible for you) which notifies that you need a sponsor. After that, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 10/11/12, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. And thanks to Fabio for pre-review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 16:57:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 11:57:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530198] Review Request: rubygem-columnize - Sorts an array in column order In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911021657.nA2GvmcE024017@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530198 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-02 11:57:47 EDT --- Some notes: * %check - Please add %check section as this package contains test/ directory * License - Well, while I believe this is under GPLv2+, "README" says this is under GPLv2, so it is safer that the license tag is changed to GPLv2. * %define -> %global - We now prefer to use %global rather than %define. * unused macro - The defined macro %ruby_sitelib does not seem to be used. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 17:25:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 12:25:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531912] Review Request: perl-Net-ARP - Create and Send ARP Packets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911021725.nA2HPeI4031329@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531912 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 17:26:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 12:26:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531912] Review Request: perl-Net-ARP - Create and Send ARP Packets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911021726.nA2HQ1Yk031414@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531912 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ruben at rubenkerkhof.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 17:35:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 12:35:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531912] Review Request: perl-Net-ARP - Create and Send ARP Packets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911021735.nA2HZP8Y001765@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531912 --- Comment #1 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-11-02 12:35:24 EDT --- Hi BJ, Initial comments: - Shorten the line [ "%{buildroot}" != "/" ] && %{__rm} -rf %{buildroot} to just rm -rf %{buildroot} (see PackagingGuidelines) - The package Provides ARP.so()(64bit). You might want to filter this out. Have a look at Packaging:Perl for tips on how to do this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 17:45:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 12:45:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532306] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-debug - Faster implementation of the standard Debugging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911021745.nA2Hj6B7016368@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532306 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-02 12:45:05 EDT --- - Please create one srpm per one gem. - Also, you must not strip rebuilt binaries and create debuginfo rpm correctly. Please refer to: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby#Ruby_Gem_with_extension_libraries_written_in_C - Also unless unavoided I don't think to add || : for test results. If test fails, you should debug it first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 17:57:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 12:57:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532519] New: Review request: aopalliance - Java/J2EE AOP standards Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review request: aopalliance - Java/J2EE AOP standards https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532519 Summary: Review request: aopalliance - Java/J2EE AOP standards Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mefoster at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 163776 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/review/aopalliance.spec SRPM URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/review/aopalliance-1.0-7.fc12.src.rpm Description: Java/J2EE AOP standards This package was imported from JPackage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 18:01:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 13:01:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532529] New: Review request: nanoxml - A small XML parser for Java Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review request: nanoxml - A small XML parser for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532529 Summary: Review request: nanoxml - A small XML parser for Java Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mefoster at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 163776 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/review/nanoxml.spec SRPM URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/review/nanoxml-2.2.3-6.fc12.src.rpm Description: The intent of NanoXML is to be a small parser which is easy to use. Although many features were added to NanoXML, it is very small. The full parser with builder fits in a JAR file of about 32K. This package was imported from JPackage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 18:01:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 13:01:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532528] New: Review request: ldapsdk - Enables applications to manage information stored in an LDAP directory Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review request: ldapsdk - Enables applications to manage information stored in an LDAP directory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532528 Summary: Review request: ldapsdk - Enables applications to manage information stored in an LDAP directory Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mefoster at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 163776 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/review/ldapsdk.spec SRPM URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/review/ldapsdk-4.18-3.20091101svn.fc12.src.rpm Description: The Mozilla LDAP SDKs enable you to write applications which access, manage, and update the information stored in an LDAP directory. This package was imported from JPackage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 18:00:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 13:00:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532523] New: Review request: jarjar - Jar Jar Links Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review request: jarjar - Jar Jar Links https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532523 Summary: Review request: jarjar - Jar Jar Links Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mefoster at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 163776 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/review/jarjar.spec SRPM URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/review/jarjar-0.9-3.fc12.src.rpm Description: Jar Jar Links is a utility that makes it easy to repackage Java libraries and embed them into your own distribution. This is useful for two reasons: You can easily ship a single jar file with no external dependencies. You can avoid problems where your library depends on a specific version of a library, which may conflict with the dependencies of another library. This package was imported from JPackage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 18:00:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 13:00:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532524] New: Review request: jcifs - Common Internet File System Client in 100% Java Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review request: jcifs - Common Internet File System Client in 100% Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532524 Summary: Review request: jcifs - Common Internet File System Client in 100% Java Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mefoster at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 163776 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/review/jcifs.spec SRPM URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/review/jcifs-1.3.12-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The jCIFS SMB client library enables any Java application to remotely access shared files and directories on SMB file servers(i.e. a Microsoft Windows "share") in addition to domain, workgroup, and server enumeration of NetBIOS over TCP/IP networks. It is an advanced implementation of the CIFS protocol supporting Unicode, batching, multiplexing of threaded callers, encrypted authentication, transactions, the Remote Access Protocol (RAP), and much more. It is licensed under LGPL which means commercial organizations can legitimately use it with their proprietary code(you just can't sell or give away a modified binary only version of the library itself without reciprocation). This package was imported from JPackage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 18:01:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 13:01:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532525] New: Review request: jexcelapi - A Java API to read, write and modify Excel spreadsheets Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review request: jexcelapi - A Java API to read, write and modify Excel spreadsheets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532525 Summary: Review request: jexcelapi - A Java API to read, write and modify Excel spreadsheets Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mefoster at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 163776 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/review/jexcelapi.spec SRPM URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/review/jexcelapi-2.6.12-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Jexcelapi allows Java developers to read Excel spreadsheets and generate Excel spreadsheets dynamically. In addition, it contains a mechanism which allows Java applications to read a spreadsheet, modify some cells and write the modified spreadsheet. Thanks to jexcelapi non Windows operating systems can run pure Java applications which process and deliver Excel spreadsheets. Because it is Java, this API may be invoked from within a servlet, thus giving access to Excel functionality over internet and intranet web applications. Features: - Reads data from Excel 95, 97, 2000 workbooks - Reads and writes formulas (Excel 97 and later only) - Generates spreadsheets in Excel 97 format - Supports font, number and date formatting - Supports shading and colouring of cells - Modifies existing worksheets This package was imported from JPackage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 18:00:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 13:00:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532520] New: Review request: derby - An open source database implemented entirely in Java Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review request: derby - An open source database implemented entirely in Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532520 Summary: Review request: derby - An open source database implemented entirely in Java Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mefoster at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 163776 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/review/derby.spec SRPM URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/review/derby-10.5.3.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The Derby project develops open source database technology that is: Pure Java, Easy to use, Small footprint, Standards based, Secure. The core of the technology, Derby.s database engine is a full functioned relational embedded database engine. JDBC and SQL are the programming APIs. The Derby network server increases the reach of the Derby database engine by providing traditional client server functionality. The network server allows clients to connect over TCP/IP using the standard DRDA protocol. The network server allows the Derby engine to support networked JDBC, ODBC/CLI, Perl and PHP. Database Utilities: ij -- a tool that allows SQL scripts to be executed against any JDBC database. dblook -- Schema extraction tool for a Derby database. sysinfo -- Utility to display version numbers and class path. This package was imported from JPackage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 18:01:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 13:01:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532530] New: Review request: ognl - Object-Graph Navigation Language Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review request: ognl - Object-Graph Navigation Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532530 Summary: Review request: ognl - Object-Graph Navigation Language Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mefoster at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 163776 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/review/ognl.spec SRPM URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/review/ognl-2.7.3-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: OGNL stands for Object-Graph Navigation Language; it is an expression language for getting and setting properties of Java objects. You use the same expression for both getting and setting the value of a property. The ognl.Ognl class contains convenience methods for evaluating OGNL expressions. You can do this in two stages, parsing an expression into an internal form and then using that internal form to either set or get the value of a property; or you can do it in a single stage, and get or set a property using the String form of the expression directly. Many people have asked exactly what OGNL is good for. Several of the uses to which OGNL has been applied are: * A binding language between GUI elements (textfield, combobox, etc.) to model objects. Transformations are made easier by OGNL's TypeConverter mechanism to convert values from one type to another (String to numeric types, for example). * A data source language to map between table columns and a TableModel. * A binding language between web components and the underlying model objects (WebOGNL, Tapestry and WebWork). * A more expressive replacement for the property-getting language used by the Jakarta Commons BeanUtils package (which only allows simple property navigation and rudimentary indexed properties). Most of what you can do in Java is possible in OGNL, plus other extras such as list projection and selection and lambda expressions. This package was imported from JPackage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 18:00:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 13:00:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532309] Review Request: rubygem-net-ldap - A full-featured pure-Ruby LDAP client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911021800.nA2I0cn0020097@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532309 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-02 13:00:37 EDT --- - The srpm name must be "rubygem-ruby-net-ldap", not "rubygem-net-ldap" ( even if the name seems rather redundant ), because * the installed gem name is actually "ruby-net-ldap", not "net-ldap" ( actually "gem list -b foo" or ruby -e "require 'rubygems' ; gem 'foo'" shows it ). Removing ruby- part from srpm is more confusing. - Please use the defined macro and remove unused macro definition. - Usually gems' source URL are: http://gems.rubyforge.org/gems/-.gem - Mark document files as %doc properly - Please enable test program. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 18:01:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 13:01:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532527] New: Review request: junit-addons - JUnitX helper classes for JUnit Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review request: junit-addons - JUnitX helper classes for JUnit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532527 Summary: Review request: junit-addons - JUnitX helper classes for JUnit Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mefoster at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 163776 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/review/junit-addons.spec SRPM URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/review/junit-addons-1.4-5.fc12.src.rpm Description: JUnit-addons is a collection of helper classes for JUnit. This library can be used with both JUnit 3.7 and JUnit 3.8.x This package was imported from JPackage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 18:01:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 13:01:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532532] New: Review request: vafer-dependency - Analyse and modify class dependencies Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review request: vafer-dependency - Analyse and modify class dependencies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532532 Summary: Review request: vafer-dependency - Analyse and modify class dependencies Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mefoster at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 163776 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/review/vafer-dependency.spec SRPM URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/review/vafer-dependency-0.4-4.fc12.src.rpm Description: This library provides an API to analyse and modify class dependencies. It provides the core to the maven2 minijar plugin and provides something in the middle between jarjar and proguard. This package was imported from JPackage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 18:00:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 13:00:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532522] New: Review request: hessian - Binary web service protocol Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review request: hessian - Binary web service protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532522 Summary: Review request: hessian - Binary web service protocol Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mefoster at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 163776 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/review/hessian.spec SRPM URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/review/hessian-4.0.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The Hessian binary web service protocol makes web services usable without requiring a large framework, and without learning yet another alphabet soup of protocols. Because it is a binary protocol, it is well-suited to sending binary data without any need to extend the protocol with attachments. This package was imported from JPackage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 18:00:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 13:00:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532521] New: Review request: gnu-trove - High performance collections for Java Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review request: gnu-trove - High performance collections for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532521 Summary: Review request: gnu-trove - High performance collections for Java Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mefoster at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 163776 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/review/gnu-trove.spec SRPM URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/review/gnu-trove-2.1.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The GNU Trove library has two objectives: Provide "free" (as in "free speech" and "free beer"), fast, lightweight implementations of the java.util Collections API. These implementations are designed to be pluggable replacements for their JDK equivalents. Whenever possible, provide the same collections support for primitive types. This gap in the JDK is often addressed by using the "wrapper" classes (java.lang.Integer, java.lang.Float, etc.) with Object-based collections. For most applications, however, collections which store primitives directly will require less space and yield significant performance gains. This package was imported from JPackage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 18:01:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 13:01:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532535] New: Review request: xml-security - Implementation of W3C security standards for XML Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review request: xml-security - Implementation of W3C security standards for XML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532535 Summary: Review request: xml-security - Implementation of W3C security standards for XML Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mefoster at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 163776 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/review/xml-security.spec SRPM URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/review/xml-security-1.4.3-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The XML Security project is aimed at providing implementation of security standards for XML. Currently the focus is on the W3C standards : - XML-Signature Syntax and Processing; and - XML Encryption Syntax and Processing. Once these are implemented, XML Key Management is likely to be the next focus for the project. Two libraries are currently available. A Java library, which includes a mature Digital Signature implementation. Encryption is currently under development. A C++ library is also now available. Functionality is currently more basic than that provided by the Java library. This package was imported from JPackage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 18:01:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 13:01:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532526] New: Review request: jrexx - Automaton based regular expression API for Java Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review request: jrexx - Automaton based regular expression API for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532526 Summary: Review request: jrexx - Automaton based regular expression API for Java Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mefoster at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 163776 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/review/jrexx.spec SRPM URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/review/jrexx-1.1.1-5.fc12.src.rpm Description: jrexx is a powerful easy-to-use regular expression API for textual pattern matching. Technically jrexx uses a minimized deterministic FSA (finite state automaton) and compiles the textual representation of the regular expression into such an automaton. Besides the usual pattern matching functionality, jrexx provides an introspection API for exploration of the automaton's structure by 'states' and 'transitions'. Since the automaton is deterministic and minimized the pattern matching alogorithm is extremly fast (compared to the java regular expression API in JDK1.4) and works with huge patterns and input texts. Since FSA can be handled as sets, jrexx also offers all basic set operations for complement, union, intersection and difference, which is not provided by other regex implementations (as far as we know). This package was imported from JPackage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 18:01:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 13:01:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532534] New: Review request: xml-im-exporter - XML Im-/Exporter Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review request: xml-im-exporter - XML Im-/Exporter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532534 Summary: Review request: xml-im-exporter - XML Im-/Exporter Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mefoster at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 163776 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/review/xml-im-exporter.spec SRPM URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/review/xml-im-exporter-1.1-5.fc12.src.rpm Description: XML Im-/Exporter is a low level library to assist you in the straight forward process of importing and exporting XML from and to your Java classes. All of this is designed having performance and simplicity in mind. This package was imported from JPackage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 18:01:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 13:01:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532533] New: Review request: wsdl4j - Web Services Description Language Toolkit for Java Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review request: wsdl4j - Web Services Description Language Toolkit for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532533 Summary: Review request: wsdl4j - Web Services Description Language Toolkit for Java Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mefoster at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 163776 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/review/wsdl4j.spec SRPM URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/review/wsdl4j-1.6.2-2.fc12.src.rpm Description: The Web Services Description Language for Java Toolkit (WSDL4J) allows the creation, representation, and manipulation of WSDL documents describing services. This codebase will eventually serve as a reference implementation of the standard created by JSR110. This package was imported from JPackage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 18:01:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 13:01:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532531] New: Review request: serp - Bytecode manipulation framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review request: serp - Bytecode manipulation framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532531 Summary: Review request: serp - Bytecode manipulation framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mefoster at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 163776 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/review/serp.spec SRPM URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/review/serp-1.14.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The goal of the serp bytecode framework is to tap the full power of bytecode modification while lowering its associated costs. The framework provides a set of high-level APIs for manipulating all aspects of bytecode, from large-scale structures like class member fields to the individual instructions that comprise the code of methods. While in order to perform any advanced manipulation, some understanding of the class file format and especially of the JVM instruction set is necessary, the framework makes it as easy as possible to enter the world of bytecode development. This package was imported from JPackage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 18:32:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 13:32:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530756] Review Request: circuit_macros - A set of macros for drawing high-quality line diagram In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911021832.nA2IWJcL015432@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530756 --- Comment #6 from Ben Boeckel 2009-11-02 13:32:18 EDT --- Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/circuit_macros/circuit_macros.spec SRPM URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/circuit_macros/circuit_macros-6.61-3.fc12.src.rpm The example sources are shipped in an examples subpackage now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 18:51:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 13:51:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532306] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-debug - Faster implementation of the standard Debugging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911021851.nA2IplfK001184@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532306 --- Comment #2 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-11-02 13:51:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > - Please create one srpm per one gem. These gems do not distribute very well separately, they have the same upstream and one requires the other in a %{version}-%{release} specific manner. > - Also, you must not strip rebuilt binaries and create debuginfo rpm > correctly. Please refer to: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby#Ruby_Gem_with_extension_libraries_written_in_C I don't know how to resolve the inclusion of a reference to the buildroot in the binary blob (I did know how to make it disappear in the included Makefile, but not the blob): """ + /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot Binary file /home/jmeeuwen/devel/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/rubygem-ruby-debug-0.10.3-1.fc12.x86_64/usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/x86_64-linux/ruby_debug.so matches Found '/home/jmeeuwen/devel/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/rubygem-ruby-debug-0.10.3-1.fc12.x86_64' in installed files; aborting error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.eZZmKv (%install) """ > - Also unless unavoided I don't think to add || : for test results. > If test fails, you should debug it first. I've fiddled around with it a bit and it now seems OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 18:56:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 13:56:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522210] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-ca In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911021856.nA2IuUhT002747@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522210 --- Comment #12 from John Dennis 2009-11-02 13:56:26 EDT --- using the 1.3 version from subversion one still cannot successfully remove installed rpm's If you try and remove pki components via: rpm -e `rpm -qa pki-\*` It fails with: Shutting down the default instance "/var/lib/pki-ca" PRIOR to uninstalling the "pki-ca" package: This machine is missing all PKI subsystems! error: %preun(pki-ca-1.3.0-3.fc11.noarch) scriptlet failed, exit status 255 The problem seems to be %preun is trying to stop the service but the previously rpm erased the files /usr/bin/{pkiarch,pkiflavor,pkiname} Thus this code in the pki-ca init script causes the init script to abort. if [ ! -x /usr/bin/pkiarch ] || [ ! -x /usr/bin/pkiflavor ] || [ ! -x /usr/bin/pkiname ]; then echo "This machine is missing all PKI subsystems!" exit 255 which then causes %preun to abort, which causes the rpm removal to fail. Also these files are left behind (these are init scripts and the fact they are not removed via rpm -e is a very serious packaging failure) /etc/init.d/pki-ca /etc/init.d/pki-ocsp /etc/init.d/pki-tks /etc/init.d/pki-kra /etc/init.d/pki-ra -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 19:05:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 14:05:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911021905.nA2J5vE6024742@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #17 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-11-02 14:05:54 EDT --- Good: + Local build works fine + Rpmlint quite for source package + Rpmlint quite for binary packages + Local install/uninstall works fine Bad: - Mock seems to hang after the following messages in the build.log: gnus-eyecandy.el:159:24:Warning: `mapcar' called for effect; use `mapc' or `dolist' instead In end of data: gnus-eyecandy.el:193:1:Warning: the following functions are not known to be defined: gnus-group-group-name, gnus-group-entry, gnus-active, gnus-server-get-method, gnus-info-method, gnus-info-marks, gnus-info-level, gnus-info-score, gnus-range-length, gnus-group-timestamp-delta, annotations-at, make-extent, make-annotation, set-extent-property, make-glyph, set-glyph-face Wrote /builddir/build/BUILD/emacs-goodies-el-30.8/elisp/gnus-bonus-el/gnus-eyecandy.elc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 19:35:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 14:35:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532554] New: Review Request: asterisk-sounds-moh-opsound - Music on hold sound files for Asterisk Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: asterisk-sounds-moh-opsound - Music on hold sound files for Asterisk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532554 Summary: Review Request: asterisk-sounds-moh-opsound - Music on hold sound files for Asterisk Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jeff at ocjtech.us QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://jcollie.fedorapeople.org/asterisk-sounds-moh-opsound.spec SRPM URL: http://jcollie.fedorapeople.org/asterisk-sounds-moh-opsound-2.02-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Music on hold sound files for Asterisk. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 19:36:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 14:36:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529517] Review Request: kcm_touchpad - Synaptics driver based touchpads kcontrol module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911021936.nA2JahVL032454@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529517 --- Comment #6 from Ryan Rix 2009-11-02 14:36:41 EDT --- I will update tonight and post latest SRPM etc. Thanks Jaroslav :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 20:10:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 15:10:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 509619] Review Request: srtp - Secure Real-Time Transport Protocol (SRTP) Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911022010.nA2KAJHG008479@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509619 --- Comment #4 from Jeffrey C. Ollie 2009-11-02 15:10:16 EDT --- A couple of comments, 1) Asterisk won't have SRTP support until version 1.8, which won't be available for a very long time. 2) The SRTP library appears to be abandoned by upstream. Do we really want to add another package with no upstream development? Perhaps the Asterisk, CallWeaver, FreeSwitch, etc. developers should get together and restart upstream development. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 20:15:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 15:15:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532535] Review request: xml-security - Implementation of W3C security standards for XML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911022015.nA2KFTRI010293@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532535 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-02 15:15:28 EDT --- This would seem to be a duplicate of 231305, except that seems to be stalled. You should at least try to figure out what's going on with that ticket before filing a new one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 20:13:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 15:13:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479598] Review Request: aopalliance - AOP offers a better solution to many problems than do existing technologies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911022013.nA2KDBLh009580@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479598 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mefoster at gmail.com --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-02 15:13:08 EDT --- *** Bug 532519 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 20:13:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 15:13:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532519] Review request: aopalliance - Java/J2EE AOP standards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911022013.nA2KD9a1009534@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532519 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-02 15:13:08 EDT --- It's pretty easy to search for existing reviews; just go to http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/ and type in a package name. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 479598 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 20:16:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 15:16:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522210] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-ca In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911022016.nA2KGlHM023480@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522210 --- Comment #13 from John Dennis 2009-11-02 15:16:44 EDT --- The package pki-native-tools is doing a number of bogus things. It installs these executable scripts: /usr/bin/pkiarch /usr/bin/pkidist /usr/bin/pkiflavor /usr/bin/pkihost /usr/bin/pkiname whose job is to echo (hardcoded) configuration information. This is not how we store and query configuration information in Fedora (and RHEL). This information should be located in files under /etc. pkiarch returns 'i386', pkidist returns 'fc11' on my machine, Each of the above executable needs to be removed and replaced with mechanisms appropriate to our distributions (e.g. store the information in a configuration file, marked as %config, and read the information out of that file) and/or use the existing mechanisms to determine the arch, release, etc. If the packages need executables like pkiarch and pkidist then it's an indication of bad packaging practices elsewhere which also will need to be corrected. The package pki-native-tools also installs a symbolic link /usr/bin/pkiperl which points to /usr/bin/perl Then all the perl scripts in all the pki packages have this in their shebang line: #!/usr/bin/pkiperl This also is bad packaging practice. If you need a specific version of perl then that needs to be specified in the spec file so that rpm can resolve those dependencies. Scripts then invoke /usr/bin/perl. Setting up links in /usr/bin to specific versions of interpreters is likely to create all sorts of problems in RPM managed systems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 20:17:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 15:17:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532533] Review request: wsdl4j - Web Services Description Language Toolkit for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911022017.nA2KHqxd011073@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532533 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-02 15:17:51 EDT --- How does this differ from the existing wsdl4j package that's already in Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 20:24:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 15:24:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532526] Review request: jrexx - Automaton based regular expression API for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911022024.nA2KOCjL025659@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532526 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-02 15:24:11 EDT --- Is this an attempt to bring the jrexx package back into Fedora? It's dead.package'd in devel but it's present in F-11. There seem to be some interesting differences between your submission and what's currently in the shipping distros. At least the scriptlets and the installation of the pom files come to mind. For the sake of any reviewers you may get, you should at least comment on the fact that the package is already in the distro in a different form and describe any differences between your package and what they'll see if they check it out from our CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 20:26:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 15:26:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532523] Review request: jarjar - Jar Jar Links In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911022026.nA2KQ2vS013349@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532523 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |viveklak at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-02 15:26:00 EDT --- *** Bug 252082 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 20:26:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 15:26:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 252082] Review Request: jarjar - Jar Jar Links In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911022026.nA2KQ1Ft013315@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252082 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-02 15:26:00 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 532523 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 20:25:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 15:25:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532521] Review request: gnu-trove - High performance collections for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911022025.nA2KP9PB026313@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532521 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-02 15:25:08 EDT --- A dup of bug 504891? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 20:27:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 15:27:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532520] Review request: derby - An open source database implemented entirely in Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911022027.nA2KRpjV027016@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532520 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |viveklak at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-02 15:27:49 EDT --- *** Bug 252059 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 20:27:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 15:27:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 252059] Review Request: derby - Derby DB (ex Cloudscape) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911022027.nA2KRoHM026987@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252059 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) | Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-02 15:27:49 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 532520 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 20:28:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 15:28:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532057] Review Request: eclipse-jgit - Eclipse JGit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911022028.nA2KS4XH027102@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532057 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |overholt at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Andrew Overholt 2009-11-02 15:28:03 EDT --- I thought jgit was the BSD-licensed library that egit needed. Is it okay that this is being installed into %{eclipse_home} instead of %{java_dir}? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 20:27:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 15:27:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532523] Review request: jarjar - Jar Jar Links In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911022027.nA2KRGsU014000@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532523 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rafaels at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-02 15:27:14 EDT --- *** Bug 227066 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 20:26:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 15:26:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532522] Review request: hessian - Binary web service protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911022026.nA2KQdYC013744@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532522 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |viveklak at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-02 15:26:37 EDT --- *** Bug 252095 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 20:27:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 15:27:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227066] Review Request: jarjar-0.6-2jpp - Jar Jar Links In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911022027.nA2KRFpn013962@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227066 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) | Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-02 15:27:14 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 532523 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 20:26:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 15:26:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 252095] Review Request: hessian - Hessian binary web service protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911022026.nA2KQcTR013712@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252095 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) | Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-02 15:26:37 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 532522 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 20:32:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 15:32:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526126] Review Request: python3 - Python 3.x (backwards incompatible version) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911022032.nA2KWeDL015514@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126 Dave Malcolm changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |226342 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 20:32:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 15:32:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226342] Merge Review: python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911022032.nA2KWcrn015443@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226342 Dave Malcolm changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |526126 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 20:42:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 15:42:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532203] Review Reques: jgraph - Java-based Diagram Component and Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911022042.nA2KgCTu030639@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532203 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |viveklak at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-02 15:42:10 EDT --- *** Bug 252084 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 20:42:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 15:42:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 252084] Review Request: jgraph - JGraph Diagram Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911022042.nA2KgBIX030605@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252084 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) | Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-02 15:42:10 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 532203 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 20:42:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 15:42:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532203] Review Reques: jgraph - Java-based Diagram Component and Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911022042.nA2KgUmV018143@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532203 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mefoster at gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-02 15:42:28 EDT --- *** Bug 472793 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 20:42:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 15:42:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472793] Review Request: jgraph - Java graph visualization and layout In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911022042.nA2KgTw8018110@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472793 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) | Resolution|CANTFIX |DUPLICATE --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-02 15:42:28 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 532203 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 20:48:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 15:48:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532534] Review request: xml-im-exporter - XML Im-/Exporter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911022048.nA2KmE2L019598@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532534 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |viveklak at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-02 15:48:12 EDT --- *** Bug 252048 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 20:47:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 15:47:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532315] Review Request: nanoxml - Small XML parser for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911022047.nA2KlAe0019387@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532315 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mefoster at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-02 15:47:08 EDT --- *** Bug 532529 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 20:48:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 15:48:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 252048] Review Request: xml-im-exporter - XML Im-/Exporter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911022048.nA2KmDwV019568@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252048 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) | Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-02 15:48:12 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 532534 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 20:47:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 15:47:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532529] Review request: nanoxml - A small XML parser for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911022047.nA2Kl9VS019354@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532529 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-02 15:47:08 EDT --- Just submitted yesterday. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 532315 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 21:16:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 16:16:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532315] Review Request: nanoxml - Small XML parser for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911022116.nA2LGA1O006670@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532315 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-02 16:16:08 EDT --- It looks like the fedora-cvs flag has been mistakenly set, instead of the fedora-review flag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 21:52:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 16:52:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532590] New: Review Request: yaws - Web server for dynamic content written in Erlang Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: yaws - Web server for dynamic content written in Erlang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532590 Summary: Review Request: yaws - Web server for dynamic content written in Erlang Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/yaws.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/yaws-1.85-1.fc11.src.rpm scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1783838 Description: HTTP 1.0 and HTTP 1.1 web server capable of both static content page delivery and dynamic content generation using embedded Erlang code in the HTML pages. It provides virtual hosting capabilities and implements HTTP tracing and other debugging functionality such as interactive interpreter environment. Performance can be boosted with built-in support for RAM caching and streaming capabilities of dynamically generated content. Among security features are SSL and support for WWW-Authenticated pages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 2 21:59:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 16:59:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532315] Review Request: nanoxml - Small XML parser for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911022159.nA2LxEpD019230@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532315 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-02 16:59:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > It looks like the fedora-cvs flag has been mistakenly set, instead of the > fedora-review flag. Yup, I meant to set the review flag. The package looks fine now. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 01:15:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 20:15:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523343] Review Request: zikula-module-EZComments - Simple Zikula module that provides comment functions to other modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030115.nA31FZg5004285@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523343 Mel Chua changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(mel at redhat.com) | --- Comment #8 from Mel Chua 2009-11-02 20:15:33 EDT --- Argh, sorry about the bottlenecking, Nick - travel went and ate my soul last week. Finally sat down with Sebastian Dziallas, added the licensing email, knocked out the last couple errors in rpmlint, and I think we're done. Updated spec is at http://mchua.fedorapeople.org/packages/zikula-module-EZComments/zikula-module-EZComments.spec Updated srpm is at http://mchua.fedorapeople.org/packages/zikula-module-EZComments/zikula-module-EZComments-0.1.61-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 01:53:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 20:53:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523343] Review Request: zikula-module-EZComments - Simple Zikula module that provides comment functions to other modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030153.nA31rLWT012197@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523343 --- Comment #9 from Mel Chua 2009-11-02 20:53:20 EDT --- jds2001 points out that the zikula website has changed and now offers a static option for a download URL (rather than the earlier dynamic-only one that was the bane of my existence for awhile). Updated spec is at http://mchua.fedorapeople.org/packages/zikula-module-EZComments/zikula-module-EZComments.spec Updated srpm is at http://mchua.fedorapeople.org/packages/zikula-module-EZComments/zikula-module-EZComments-0.1.61-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 01:57:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 20:57:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516533] Review Request: globus-gatekeeper - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gatekeeper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030157.nA31v7bF013049@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516533 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-02 20:57:06 EDT --- globus-gatekeeper-5.0-1.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 01:58:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 20:58:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516519] Review Request: globus-gram-client - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Client Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030158.nA31wWvr013259@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516519 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-02 20:58:31 EDT --- globus-gram-client-7.2-1.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 01:58:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 20:58:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516520] Review Request: globus-data-conversion - Globus Toolkit - Data Conversion In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030158.nA31wxkj013351@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516520 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-02 20:58:58 EDT --- globus-data-conversion-2.1-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 01:59:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 20:59:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516520] Review Request: globus-data-conversion - Globus Toolkit - Data Conversion In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030159.nA31xIWt013407@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516520 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-02 20:59:18 EDT --- globus-data-conversion-2.1-1.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 01:58:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 20:58:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516529] Review Request: globus-gass-cache - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030158.nA31wAo0013181@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516529 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|5.4-1.el4 |5.4-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 01:59:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 20:59:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516520] Review Request: globus-data-conversion - Globus Toolkit - Data Conversion In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030159.nA31xMMI013439@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516520 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.1-1.el5 |2.1-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 01:58:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 20:58:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516518] Review Request: globus-gram-protocol - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Protocol Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030158.nA31wMgN013223@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516518 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|7.4-1.fc11 |7.4-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 01:56:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 20:56:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516513] Review Request: globus-authz-callout-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus authz error library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030156.nA31ulUR012995@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516513 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.4-1.fc11 |0.4-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 01:58:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 20:58:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516516] Review Request: globus-gridftp-server-control - Globus Toolkit - Globus GridFTP Server Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030158.nA31whnk013297@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516516 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-02 20:58:42 EDT --- globus-gridftp-server-control-0.36-1.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 01:59:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 20:59:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516521] Review Request: globus-mp - Globus Toolkit - Message Passing Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030159.nA31xnlP001985@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516521 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-02 20:59:48 EDT --- globus-mp-2.1-1.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 01:56:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 20:56:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516521] Review Request: globus-mp - Globus Toolkit - Message Passing Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030156.nA31ut3a001221@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516521 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-02 20:56:54 EDT --- globus-mp-2.1-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 02:00:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 21:00:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516514] Review Request: globus-authz - Globus Toolkit - Globus authz library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030200.nA320lJV002692@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516514 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-02 21:00:47 EDT --- globus-authz-0.7-1.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 02:00:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 21:00:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516514] Review Request: globus-authz - Globus Toolkit - Globus authz library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030200.nA320awY002635@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516514 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-02 21:00:36 EDT --- globus-authz-0.7-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 01:57:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 20:57:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516533] Review Request: globus-gatekeeper - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gatekeeper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030157.nA31vecV001457@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516533 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-02 20:57:39 EDT --- globus-gatekeeper-5.0-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 01:57:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 20:57:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516529] Review Request: globus-gass-cache - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030157.nA31vJPB001355@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516529 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-02 20:57:18 EDT --- globus-gass-cache-5.4-1.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 01:58:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 20:58:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516529] Review Request: globus-gass-cache - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030158.nA31w5JY001613@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516529 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-02 20:58:04 EDT --- globus-gass-cache-5.4-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 01:59:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 20:59:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516521] Review Request: globus-mp - Globus Toolkit - Message Passing Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030159.nA31xrJ9002027@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516521 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.1-1.el5 |2.1-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 01:57:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 20:57:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516521] Review Request: globus-mp - Globus Toolkit - Message Passing Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030157.nA31v0u9001257@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516521 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.1-1.fc11 |2.1-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 01:58:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 20:58:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516518] Review Request: globus-gram-protocol - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Protocol Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030158.nA31wHMO001653@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516518 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-02 20:58:16 EDT --- globus-gram-protocol-7.4-1.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 01:57:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 20:57:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516533] Review Request: globus-gatekeeper - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gatekeeper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030157.nA31vjEh001490@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516533 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|5.0-1.el4 |5.0-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 02:00:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 21:00:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516518] Review Request: globus-gram-protocol - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Protocol Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030200.nA320FNA002500@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516518 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-02 21:00:14 EDT --- globus-gram-protocol-7.4-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 01:59:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 20:59:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516520] Review Request: globus-data-conversion - Globus Toolkit - Data Conversion In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030159.nA31x342001849@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516520 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.1-1.fc11 |2.1-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 01:58:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 20:58:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516519] Review Request: globus-gram-client - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Client Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030158.nA31wasq001722@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516519 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|7.2-1.fc11 |7.2-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 01:57:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 20:57:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516529] Review Request: globus-gass-cache - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030157.nA31vOBg001397@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516529 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|5.4-1.fc11 |5.4-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 01:57:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 20:57:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516533] Review Request: globus-gatekeeper - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gatekeeper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030157.nA31vCCT001320@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516533 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|5.0-1.fc11 |5.0-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 02:00:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 21:00:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516518] Review Request: globus-gram-protocol - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Protocol Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030200.nA320J5m002533@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516518 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|7.4-1.el4 |7.4-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 01:56:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 20:56:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516513] Review Request: globus-authz-callout-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus authz error library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030156.nA31uhWj001173@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516513 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-02 20:56:41 EDT --- globus-authz-callout-error-0.4-1.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 02:00:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 21:00:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516513] Review Request: globus-authz-callout-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus authz error library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030200.nA320QEu002571@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516513 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-02 21:00:25 EDT --- globus-authz-callout-error-0.4-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 02:00:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 21:00:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516516] Review Request: globus-gridftp-server-control - Globus Toolkit - Globus GridFTP Server Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030200.nA3204xE002415@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516516 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.36-1.el4 |0.36-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 01:58:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 20:58:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516516] Review Request: globus-gridftp-server-control - Globus Toolkit - Globus GridFTP Server Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030158.nA31wmS7001763@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516516 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.36-1.fc11 |0.36-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 02:00:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 21:00:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516516] Review Request: globus-gridftp-server-control - Globus Toolkit - Globus GridFTP Server Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030200.nA3200Ru002066@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516516 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-02 20:59:59 EDT --- globus-gridftp-server-control-0.36-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 01:59:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 20:59:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 492810] Review Request: RabbIT - proxy for a faster web In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030159.nA31xEQC001892@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492810 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-02 20:59:09 EDT --- RabbIT-4.1-9.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update RabbIT'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0780 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 01:58:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 20:58:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030158.nA31w0Zq001583@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #85 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-02 20:57:51 EDT --- x11vnc-0.9.8-16.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update x11vnc'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0777 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 01:59:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 20:59:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516519] Review Request: globus-gram-client - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Client Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030159.nA31xcD0013641@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516519 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-02 20:59:38 EDT --- globus-gram-client-7.2-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 02:00:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 21:00:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516514] Review Request: globus-authz - Globus Toolkit - Globus authz library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030200.nA320qMo014372@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516514 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.7-1.el5 |0.7-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 02:00:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 21:00:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516514] Review Request: globus-authz - Globus Toolkit - Globus authz library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030200.nA320fSq014283@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516514 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.7-1.fc11 |0.7-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 01:59:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 20:59:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516519] Review Request: globus-gram-client - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Client Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030159.nA31xg8T013682@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516519 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|7.2-1.el4 |7.2-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 02:00:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 21:00:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516513] Review Request: globus-authz-callout-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus authz error library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030200.nA320UGe014232@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516513 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.4-1.el4 |0.4-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 02:00:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 21:00:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523343] Review Request: zikula-module-EZComments - Simple Zikula module that provides comment functions to other modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030200.nA320kGe014334@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523343 Jon Stanley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jonstanley at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jonstanley at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #10 from Jon Stanley 2009-11-02 21:00:45 EDT --- taking review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 02:32:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 21:32:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 231861] Merge Review: cyrus-imapd - high-performance mail server (IMAP, POP3, ...) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030232.nA32WVEL009329@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231861 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: cyrus-imapd |Merge Review: cyrus-imapd - |- high-performance mail |high-performance mail |server (IMAP, POP3, ...) |server (IMAP, POP3, ...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 02:32:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 21:32:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464141] Review Request: perl-Text-Trac - Perl extension for formatting text with Trac Wiki Style In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030232.nA32W5ok009272@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464141 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(timosha at gmail.com | |) --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-02 21:32:03 EDT --- It's been quite some time since comment #8 with no response from the submitter of this ticket. I guess it should be closed soon if nothing further happens. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 02:51:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 21:51:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523343] Review Request: zikula-module-EZComments - Simple Zikula module that provides comment functions to other modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030251.nA32pNWI013553@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523343 --- Comment #11 from Jon Stanley 2009-11-02 21:51:21 EDT --- OK, this is quite interesting. This package technically looks fine to me, but in doing a formal review I ran into a little glitch. First, the upstream URL (that's listed as a direct link on the download page) gives me a 403 when I try to get it with wget. That's excusable, somewhat. What's not is that when I went to the upstream webpage and downloaded the source, the md5sum didn't match: ef71cfcec8a3cc4dcde845dc0ca47240 module_EZComments_1-61.zip c8ed22422179645bd244f768ec513ad7 ../rpmbuild/SOURCES/module_EZComments_1-61.zip Upon further investigation into this discrepancy, I found that apparently some translations were included in the version that I had downloaded that were not in the (ostensibly same) version in the SRPM: [jstanley at rugrat ~]$ diff zik-dl.find zikula-tmp/zik-pk.find 27d26 < ./modules/EZComments/pnlang/spa/common.php 29,30d27 < ./modules/EZComments/pnlang/fra/template_Standard.php < ./modules/EZComments/pnlang/fra/common.php 33d29 < ./modules/EZComments/pnlang/ces/common.php 35d30 < ./modules/EZComments/pnlang/nor/common.php 37d31 < ./modules/EZComments/pnlang/ita/common.php 39,40d32 < ./modules/EZComments/pnlang/nld/template_Standard.php < ./modules/EZComments/pnlang/nld/common.php 45,46d36 < ./modules/EZComments/pnlang/deu/template_Standard.php < ./modules/EZComments/pnlang/deu/common.php [jstanley at rugrat ~]$ cd zikula-tmp/ [jstanley at rugrat zikula-tmp]$ ls -l ./modules/EZComments/pnlang/deu/common.php ls: cannot access ./modules/EZComments/pnlang/deu/common.php: No such file or directory I'm not exactly sure what to do about this - this is poor upstream release practices, but failing the most basic check in the package review process sort of blocks it from Fedora, but it also doesn't seem right to block a package simply because upstream doesn't have their act together. Upstream should: 1) Provide a static URL that will forever lead to the *same* version of a package - no additional translations, no additional code, etc - the md5sum/sha1sum should be identical. 2) Refrain from releasing a new version with simply more translated strings without bumping the version (sorta a natural consequence of item 1). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 02:59:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 21:59:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532521] Review request: gnu-trove - High performance collections for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030259.nA32xN8B026345@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532521 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|163776(FE-NEW) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 03:59:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 22:59:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523343] Review Request: zikula-module-EZComments - Simple Zikula module that provides comment functions to other modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030359.nA33xroP009335@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523343 --- Comment #12 from Mel Chua 2009-11-02 22:59:52 EDT --- Wow. This is... we'll need to have a talk with upstream. Rebuilt with current source, added comment to spec saying that md5sum can change without version number changing. Updated spec is at http://mchua.fedorapeople.org/packages/zikula-module-EZComments/zikula-module-EZComments.spec Updated srpm is at http://mchua.fedorapeople.org/packages/zikula-module-EZComments/zikula-module-EZComments-0.1.61-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 04:14:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 23:14:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 500746] Review Request: 389-admin - renamed from fedora-ds-admin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030414.nA34EbWW000898@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500746 Michael Stahnke changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mastahnke at gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #22 from Michael Stahnke 2009-11-02 23:14:34 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: 389-admin Short Description: Admin Server for 389 Directory Server Owners: stahnma Branches: EL-4, EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 04:12:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 23:12:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 500713] Review Request: 389-ds-base - renamed from fedora-ds-base In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030412.nA34CCRR000601@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500713 Michael Stahnke changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mastahnke at gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Michael Stahnke 2009-11-02 23:12:09 EDT --- Spoke with Rich Megginson about maintaining in EPEL. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: 389-ds-base Short Description: 389 Directory Server base package Owners: stahnma Branches: EL-4, EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 04:16:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 23:16:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 500506] Review Request: 389-adminutil - renamed from adminutil In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030416.nA34GsUu013187@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500506 Michael Stahnke changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mastahnke at gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Michael Stahnke 2009-11-02 23:16:52 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: 389-adminutil Short Description: Utility library for 389 administration Owners: stahnma Branches: EL4, EL5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 04:17:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 23:17:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 501400] Review Request: 389-ds - 389 Directory, Administration, and Console Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030417.nA34HuKC013337@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501400 Michael Stahnke changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mastahnke at gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Michael Stahnke 2009-11-02 23:17:54 EDT --- Spoke with Rich Megginson, I can maintain in EPEL. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: 389-ds Short Description: 389 Directory, Administration, and Console Suite Owners: stahnma Branches: EL4, EL5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 04:22:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 23:22:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 501393] Review Request: 389-dsgw - 389 Directory Server Gateway In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030422.nA34Mohp014483@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501393 Michael Stahnke changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mastahnke at gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Michael Stahnke 2009-11-02 23:22:48 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: 389-dsgw Short Description: 389 Directory Server Gateway web apps Owners: stahnma Branches: stahnma -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 04:21:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 23:21:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 501383] Review Request: 389-ds-console - 389 Directory Server Management Console In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030421.nA34L33F014196@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501383 Michael Stahnke changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mastahnke at gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Michael Stahnke 2009-11-02 23:21:01 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: 389-ds-console Short Description: 389 Directory Server Management Console Owners: stahnma Branches: EL4, EL5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 04:24:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 23:24:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 501381] Review Request: 389-console - A Java based remote management console used for managing 389 Administration Server and 389 Directory Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030424.nA34OK5K014722@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501381 Michael Stahnke changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mastahnke at gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Michael Stahnke 2009-11-02 23:24:18 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: 389-console Short Description: A Java based console used for managing 389 Administration Server and 389 Directory Server. Owners: stahnma Branches: EL4 EL5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 04:21:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 23:21:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 501385] Review Request: 389-admin-console - 389 Admin Server Management Console In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030421.nA34LhGX002649@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501385 Michael Stahnke changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mastahnke at gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Michael Stahnke 2009-11-02 23:21:41 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: 389-admin-console Short Description: 389 Admin Server Management Console Owners: stahnma Branches: EL4, EL5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 04:33:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 23:33:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529831] Review Request: opensips - Open Source SIP Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030433.nA34XudB005541@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529831 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-02 23:33:55 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 04:34:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 23:34:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508521] Review Request: jettison - A JSON StAX implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030434.nA34Ygh2005678@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508521 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-02 23:34:41 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 04:35:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 23:35:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530204] Review Request: rubygem-hawler - Hawler, the Ruby HTTP crawler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030435.nA34ZVEM006121@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530204 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-02 23:35:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 04:38:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 23:38:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 497283] Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate - Port to Perl of the syntax highlight engine of the Kate texteditor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030438.nA34cljL018104@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497283 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-02 23:38:46 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 04:39:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 23:39:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 500506] Review Request: 389-adminutil - renamed from adminutil In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030439.nA34daAl007124@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500506 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-02 23:39:34 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 04:40:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 23:40:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 500713] Review Request: 389-ds-base - renamed from fedora-ds-base In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030440.nA34exnS007767@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500713 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-02 23:40:58 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 04:40:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 23:40:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 501400] Review Request: 389-ds - 389 Directory, Administration, and Console Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030440.nA34eWbZ007650@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501400 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-02 23:40:31 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 04:40:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 23:40:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 501383] Review Request: 389-ds-console - 389 Directory Server Management Console In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030440.nA34e3Y4007524@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501383 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-02 23:40:02 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 04:37:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 23:37:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516532] Review Request: globus-scheduler-event-generator - Globus Toolkit - Scheduler Event Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030437.nA34b1Xh006577@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516532 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-02 23:36:59 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 04:37:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 23:37:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516534] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-callout-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus GRAM Jobmanager Callout Errors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030437.nA34boHN006732@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516534 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-02 23:37:49 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 04:43:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 23:43:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 195303] Review Request: perl-POE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030443.nA34hmsY019521@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195303 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-02 23:43:47 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 04:43:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 23:43:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 501393] Review Request: 389-dsgw - 389 Directory Server Gateway In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030443.nA34hDHX019425@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501393 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-02 23:43:11 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 04:41:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 23:41:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 500746] Review Request: 389-admin - renamed from fedora-ds-admin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030441.nA34fgqw019077@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500746 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #23 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-02 23:41:40 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 04:42:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 23:42:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 501385] Review Request: 389-admin-console - 389 Admin Server Management Console In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030442.nA34gXvm019291@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501385 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-02 23:42:32 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 04:45:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 23:45:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 501381] Review Request: 389-console - A Java based remote management console used for managing 389 Administration Server and 389 Directory Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030445.nA34jijO009050@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501381 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-02 23:45:42 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 04:48:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 23:48:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523343] Review Request: zikula-module-EZComments - Simple Zikula module that provides comment functions to other modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030448.nA34mWci020760@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523343 Jon Stanley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Jon Stanley 2009-11-02 23:48:30 EDT --- Lifting FE-LEGAL due to email from upstream included in %doc, as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 04:47:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 23:47:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523343] Review Request: zikula-module-EZComments - Simple Zikula module that provides comment functions to other modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030447.nA34l7lR009417@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523343 --- Comment #13 from Jon Stanley 2009-11-02 23:47:06 EDT --- OK, we've seen many and varied md5sums of the upstream zip file. For the record, the zikula.md5sum file was generated by doing a 'find . -type f | xargs md5sum > zikula.md5sum', and the results compared with a upstream downloaded copy. The results are provided below: [jstanley at rugrat 1]$ find . | md5sum -c /home/jstanley/zikula.md5sum ./modules/index.html: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnmigrateapi/news.php: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnmigrateapi/pnProfile.php: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnmigrateapi/index.html: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnmigrateapi/polls.php: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnmigrateapi/pnComments.php: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnmigrateapi/pnFlashGames.php: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnmigrateapi/dummy.php: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnmigrateapi/reviews.php: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnblocks/index.html: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnblocks/ezcomments.php: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnuser.php: OK ./modules/EZComments/pndocs/credits.txt: OK ./modules/EZComments/pndocs/todo.txt: OK ./modules/EZComments/pndocs/index.html: OK ./modules/EZComments/pndocs/install.txt: OK ./modules/EZComments/pndocs/license.txt: OK ./modules/EZComments/pndocs/changelog.txt: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnstyle/index.html: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnstyle/style.css: OK ./modules/EZComments/index.html: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnmyprofileapi.php: OK ./modules/EZComments/pntables.php: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnsearchapi.php: OK ./modules/EZComments/pninit.php: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnlang/spa/index.html: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnlang/fra/index.html: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnlang/index.html: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnlang/ces/index.html: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnlang/nor/index.html: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnlang/ita/index.html: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnlang/nld/index.html: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnlang/eng/index.html: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnlang/eng/template_Standard.php: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnlang/eng/common.php: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnlang/deu/index.html: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnaccountapi.php: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnincludes/index.html: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnincludes/ezcomments_admin_modifyhandler.class.php: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnincludes/ezcomments_user_modifyhandler.class.php: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnincludes/ezcomments_admin_modifyconfighandler.class.php: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnincludes/common.php: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnimages/fra/sendpm.gif: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnimages/fra/index.html: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnimages/fra/go_up.gif: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnimages/fra/go_down.gif: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnimages/fra/profile.gif: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnimages/yellow.gif: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnimages/index.html: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnimages/nld/sendpm.gif: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnimages/nld/index.html: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnimages/nld/go_up.gif: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnimages/nld/go_down.gif: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnimages/nld/profile.gif: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnimages/green.gif: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnimages/comment.gif: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnimages/red.gif: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnimages/admin.gif: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnimages/eng/sendpm.gif: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnimages/eng/index.html: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnimages/eng/go_up.gif: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnimages/eng/go_down.gif: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnimages/eng/profile.gif: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnimages/deu/sendpm.gif: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnimages/deu/index.html: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnimages/deu/go_up.gif: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnimages/deu/go_down.gif: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnimages/deu/profile.gif: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnimages/mycommentsbutton.gif: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnversion.php: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnuserapi.php: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnadminapi.php: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnjavascript/index.html: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnjavascript/toggle.js: OK ./modules/EZComments/pntemplates/ezcomments_myprofile_tab.htm: OK ./modules/EZComments/pntemplates/ezcomments_admin_delete.htm: OK ./modules/EZComments/pntemplates/ezcomments_admin_stats.htm: OK ./modules/EZComments/pntemplates/plugins/modifier.commentstatus.php: OK ./modules/EZComments/pntemplates/plugins/index.html: OK ./modules/EZComments/pntemplates/plugins/modifier.formatezcomment.php: OK ./modules/EZComments/pntemplates/plugins/modifier.issued.php: OK ./modules/EZComments/pntemplates/plugins/modifier.modified.php: OK ./modules/EZComments/pntemplates/plugins/function.ezcommentsstylesheet.php: OK ./modules/EZComments/pntemplates/plugins/function.ezcommentsimg.php: OK ./modules/EZComments/pntemplates/ezcomments_mail_newcomment.htm: OK ./modules/EZComments/pntemplates/ezcomments_admin_modulestats.htm: OK ./modules/EZComments/pntemplates/Standard/index.html: OK ./modules/EZComments/pntemplates/Standard/ezcomments_user_view.htm: OK ./modules/EZComments/pntemplates/Standard/style.css: OK ./modules/EZComments/pntemplates/ezcomments_admin_deleteitem.htm: OK ./modules/EZComments/pntemplates/index.html: OK ./modules/EZComments/pntemplates/ezcomments_admin_applyrules_results.htm: OK ./modules/EZComments/pntemplates/ezcomments_block_ezcomments.htm: OK ./modules/EZComments/pntemplates/ezcomments_admin_menu.htm: OK ./modules/EZComments/pntemplates/ezcomments_user_header.htm: OK ./modules/EZComments/pntemplates/ezcomments_admin_purge.htm: OK ./modules/EZComments/pntemplates/ezcomments_search_form.htm: OK ./modules/EZComments/pntemplates/ezcomments_admin_cleanup.htm: OK ./modules/EZComments/pntemplates/ezcomments_admin_modify.htm: OK ./modules/EZComments/pntemplates/ezcomments_user_atom.htm: OK ./modules/EZComments/pntemplates/ezcomments_user_main.htm: OK ./modules/EZComments/pntemplates/ezcomments_admin_modifyconfig.htm: OK ./modules/EZComments/pntemplates/ezcomments_block_ezcomments_modify.htm: OK ./modules/EZComments/pntemplates/ezcomments_mail_modcomment.htm: OK ./modules/EZComments/pntemplates/ezcomments_user_modify.htm: OK ./modules/EZComments/pntemplates/ezcomments_user_rss.htm: OK ./modules/EZComments/pntemplates/ezcomments_admin_migrate.htm: OK ./modules/EZComments/pntemplates/ezcomments_admin_applyrules_form.htm: OK ./modules/EZComments/pntemplates/ezcomments_admin_deletemodule.htm: OK ./modules/EZComments/pntemplates/ezcomments_admin_view.htm: OK ./modules/EZComments/pnadmin.php: OK ./module_EZComments_1-61.zip: FAILED md5sum: WARNING: 1 of 112 computed checksums did NOT match At this point, I'm confident saying that the source is genuine, even if they do a *really* poor job of release management. This is a simple package and follows all applicable guidelines. APPROVED. Please put a link to this bug in the imported package, and note the exception granted to upstream md5sum matching, since all of the individual files appear to match. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 04:49:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 23:49:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030449.nA34nvhq021051@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #18 from Arun SAG 2009-11-02 23:49:56 EDT --- I haven't tried building packages in my local machine with mock, will try it soon; But koji uses mock ( version 0.9.14 ) too and the build was successful http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1778231&name=build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 06:02:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 01:02:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523343] Review Request: zikula-module-EZComments - Simple Zikula module that provides comment functions to other modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030602.nA362wrI006454@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523343 Mel Chua changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Mel Chua 2009-11-03 01:02:55 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: zikula-module-EZComments Short Description: Simple Zikula module that provides comment functions to other modules Owners: mchua Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 06:03:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 01:03:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528003] Review Request: Xinha - Javascript library for making textarea's WYSIWYG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030603.nA363hcG028246@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528003 --- Comment #12 from Mel Chua 2009-11-03 01:03:42 EDT --- for reference: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 06:38:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 01:38:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525914] Review Request: perl-Net-GitHub - Perl interface for github.com In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030638.nA36cfq3016073@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525914 --- Comment #5 from Chris Weyl 2009-11-03 01:38:40 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Net-GitHub Short Description: Perl interface for github.com Owners: cweyl Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 06:39:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 01:39:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525914] Review Request: perl-Net-GitHub - Perl interface for github.com In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030639.nA36dsIJ005457@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525914 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 07:27:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 02:27:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508521] Review Request: jettison - A JSON StAX implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030727.nA37Rw99000505@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508521 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-03 02:27:57 EDT --- jettison-1.1-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jettison-1.1-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 07:26:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 02:26:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508521] Review Request: jettison - A JSON StAX implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030726.nA37Quum023180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508521 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-03 02:26:55 EDT --- jettison-1.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jettison-1.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 07:32:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 02:32:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508521] Review Request: jettison - A JSON StAX implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030732.nA37W90Q003308@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508521 --- Comment #6 from Sandro Mathys 2009-11-03 02:32:08 EDT --- Building for EL-4 didn't work (probably a problem with the Java version) and F-12 currently doesn't accept updates except through requesting manual tagging. Will update this as the one or the other gets fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 07:32:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 02:32:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030732.nA37Wpk7026365@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #19 from Arun SAG 2009-11-03 02:32:49 EDT --- I have re-uploaded the source rpm; Found md5 mismatch; Please recheck mock build; Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 07:43:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 02:43:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 497283] Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate - Port to Perl of the syntax highlight engine of the Kate texteditor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030743.nA37hcea007664@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497283 Marcela Ma?l??ov? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 07:43:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 02:43:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 500959] Review Request: perl-Task-Padre-Plugin-Deps - Task::Padre::Plugin::Deps Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030743.nA37hdrO007693@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500959 Bug 500959 depends on bug 497283, which changed state. Bug 497283 Summary: Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate - Port to Perl of the syntax highlight engine of the Kate texteditor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497283 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 08:20:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 03:20:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464141] Review Request: perl-Text-Trac - Perl extension for formatting text with Trac Wiki Style In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030820.nA38Kc8N018610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464141 Timon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(timosha at gmail.com | |) | --- Comment #11 from Timon 2009-11-03 03:20:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > 1] > please bump everytime you provide new version of package release number and > post links to new version in your reply I have some problems with public web server. So I attach spec and SRPM. > 2] > %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) > do you have any reason why not to use %defatter(-,root,root,-) ? > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_Permissions fixed > 3] cp in makefile is without -p switch, write patch that cp in Makefile will be > performed with -p switch (sed during prep will be good enough) > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps This is CPAN Package and Makefile generates using Makefile.PL perl script. I can sed in %build section, but I don't think this is good idea. I looked into other SRPM made from CPAN, but didn't find any resolutions of this problem. > 4] > BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) > BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod) fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 08:22:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 03:22:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464141] Review Request: perl-Text-Trac - Perl extension for formatting text with Trac Wiki Style In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030822.nA38MPcn009623@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464141 Timon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #348670|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #12 from Timon 2009-11-03 03:22:23 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=367264) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=367264) perl-Text-Trac.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 08:34:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 03:34:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532057] Review Request: eclipse-jgit - Eclipse JGit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030834.nA38YTqY022248@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532057 --- Comment #4 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-11-03 03:34:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > I thought jgit was the BSD-licensed library that egit needed. Is it okay that > this is being installed into %{eclipse_home} instead of %{java_dir}? It's ok because current jgit contains only parts needed by newer egit without other parts. Upstream devs are redoing their standalone jar building with maven and once they are ready I'll update it and install in %{_javadir} but meantime I want to get egit updated because current one is filling Error log when installed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 08:39:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 03:39:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530275] Review Request: rubygem-erubis - A fast and extensible eRuby implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030839.nA38dB6e013826@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530275 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-03 03:39:09 EDT --- rubygem-erubis-2.6.5-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-erubis-2.6.5-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 08:38:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 03:38:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531408] Review Request: rubygem-archive-tar-minitar - Provides POSIX tar archive management from Ruby programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030838.nA38c5LO013632@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531408 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-03 03:38:03 EDT --- rubygem-archive-tar-minitar-0.5.2-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-archive-tar-minitar-0.5.2-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 08:45:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 03:45:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532635] New: Review Request: rurple - A Python Learning Environment Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rurple - A Python Learning Environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532635 Summary: Review Request: rurple - A Python Learning Environment Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: promac at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/SPECS/rurple.spec SRPM URL: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/src/rurple-1.0-0.1.rc3.fc10.src.rpm Description: With the assistance of a robot named Reeborg, one can explore the fun of programming in the Python language. A "Python Learning Environment" is a Python implementation of a "robot environment" as introduced by R. Pattis in 1981. RUR is similar in spirit to GvR, although it uses Python syntax. It also includes a Python shell. Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1784662 rpmlint is not clean because internal scripts with extension .rur, .wld, and html files are requested to have a shebang. All these files are in /usr/share/rurple. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 08:48:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 03:48:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464141] Review Request: perl-Text-Trac - Perl extension for formatting text with Trac Wiki Style In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030848.nA38mCGb026245@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464141 --- Comment #14 from Timon 2009-11-03 03:48:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > please bump everytime you provide new version of package release number and > post links to new version in your reply perl-Text-Trac-0.15-1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=367267 - perl-Text-Trac-0.15-1.fc12.src.rpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=367264 - perl-Text-Trac.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 08:45:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 03:45:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464141] Review Request: perl-Text-Trac - Perl extension for formatting text with Trac Wiki Style In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030845.nA38jddk025585@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464141 Timon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #348669|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #13 from Timon 2009-11-03 03:45:38 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=367267) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=367267) perl-Text-Trac-0.15-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 08:48:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 03:48:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529605] Review Request: ohai - Profiles your system and emits JSON In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030848.nA38mOBZ016870@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529605 --- Comment #9 from Matthew Kent 2009-11-03 03:48:22 EDT --- Still waiting on legal in http://tickets.opscode.com/browse/OHAI-137 (In reply to comment #8) > About your mail: > I would package this from gem (as it seems the simplest, I prefer > simpleness), and if non-gem support scripts on other packages can > be avoided, it is better. However I leave it to you how to package > this software. Thank you for your input. I agree it would be simpler to use the gem but after some discussion with upstream and having packaged it's main parent package, Chef, I think I'll pursue this submission with dependencies on rubygem-* packages (option b) for the time being. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 08:57:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 03:57:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527488] Review Request: drbd - drbd tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030857.nA38vGS7019715@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527488 --- Comment #70 from Fabio Massimo Di Nitto 2009-11-03 03:57:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #69) > > And thanks to Fabio for pre-review. It was a real pleasure to work with you and it?s been good to learn some more things. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 09:39:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 04:39:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525432] Review Request: openxcap - Fully featured XCAP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911030939.nA39dWux000737@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525432 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-11-03 04:39:31 EDT --- OK: rpmlint must be run on every package rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/openxcap-1.1.2-1.fc11.noarch.rpm ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/openxcap-1.1.2-1.fc11.src.rpm openxcap.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 16, tab: line 4) 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. - The warning is not a deal breaker you can fix that. OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK: The spec file name must match the base package OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license OK: License text included OK: The spec file must be written in American English OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source sha1sum openxcap-1.1.2.tar.gz rpmbuild/SOURCES/openxcap-1.1.2.tar.gz 9ed0917ae69dae7bd8eb05e8d81653cb54a0dea0 openxcap-1.1.2.tar.gz 9ed0917ae69dae7bd8eb05e8d81653cb54a0dea0 rpmbuild/SOURCES/openxcap-1.1.2.tar.gz OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1784722 N\A: ExcludeArch OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires N\A: The spec file MUST handle locales properly N\A: Must call ldconfig in %post and %postun N\A: If the package is designed to be relocatable OK: A package must own all directories that it creates OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once OK: Permissions on files must be set properly OK: Each package must have a %clean section FAIL: Each package must consistently use macros If you are using the %{__python} style macros, then you need to be consistent and use %{__install}, %{__rm} etc OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content N\A: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application OK: Header files must be in a -devel package N\A: Static libraries must be in a -static package N\A: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' N\A: Library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package N\A: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package OK: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives N\A: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8 - Please fix the issues raised before requesting CVS. ------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (openxcap) is APPROVED by topdog ------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 10:08:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 05:08:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516532] Review Request: globus-scheduler-event-generator - Globus Toolkit - Scheduler Event Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031008.nA3A8Nim019715@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516532 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-03 05:08:22 EDT --- globus-scheduler-event-generator-2.1-1.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-scheduler-event-generator-2.1-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 10:08:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 05:08:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516534] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-callout-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus GRAM Jobmanager Callout Errors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031008.nA3A8Kuv019658@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516534 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-03 05:08:19 EDT --- globus-gram-job-manager-callout-error-0.2-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gram-job-manager-callout-error-0.2-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 10:08:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 05:08:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516534] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-callout-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus GRAM Jobmanager Callout Errors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031008.nA3A8L7C019685@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516534 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-03 05:08:19 EDT --- globus-gram-job-manager-callout-error-0.2-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gram-job-manager-callout-error-0.2-1.fc11 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-03 05:08:20 EDT --- globus-gram-job-manager-callout-error-0.2-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gram-job-manager-callout-error-0.2-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 10:08:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 05:08:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516532] Review Request: globus-scheduler-event-generator - Globus Toolkit - Scheduler Event Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031008.nA3A8FXH010347@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516532 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-03 05:08:13 EDT --- globus-scheduler-event-generator-2.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-scheduler-event-generator-2.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 10:08:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 05:08:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516532] Review Request: globus-scheduler-event-generator - Globus Toolkit - Scheduler Event Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031008.nA3A8HNL010384@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516532 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-03 05:08:15 EDT --- globus-scheduler-event-generator-2.1-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-scheduler-event-generator-2.1-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 10:08:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 05:08:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516534] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-callout-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus GRAM Jobmanager Callout Errors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031008.nA3A8SBA010447@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516534 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-03 05:08:27 EDT --- globus-gram-job-manager-callout-error-0.2-1.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gram-job-manager-callout-error-0.2-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 10:08:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 05:08:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526876] Review Request: php-pecl-gmagick - Provides a wrapper to the GraphicsMagick library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031008.nA3A88Ig010292@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526876 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-11-03 05:08:06 EDT --- OK: rpmlint must be run on every package rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/php-pecl-gmagick-1.0.2b1-2.fc11.src.rpm rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/php-pecl-gmagick-1.0.2b1-2.fc11.i586.rpm 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK: The spec file name must match the base package OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license OK: License text included OK: The spec file must be written in American English FIX: The spec file for the package MUST be legible OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture N\A: ExcludeArch OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires N\A: The spec file MUST handle locales properly N\A: Must call ldconfig in %post and %postun N\A: If the package is designed to be relocatable OK: A package must own all directories that it creates OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once OK: Permissions on files must be set properly OK: Each package must have a %clean section FIX: Each package must consistently use macros OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content N\A: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application N\A: Header files must be in a -devel package N\A: Static libraries must be in a -static package N\A: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' N\A: Library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package N\A: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package OK: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives N\A: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8 Issues to fix. * Consistent use of macros - if using the %{__make} style macros then you need to be consistent, i.e use %{__install}, %{__rm}, %{__chmod} etc * Make the spec more eligible by formatting it correctly, at the moment the directives at the top are not aligned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 10:15:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 05:15:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528473] Review Request: php-ezc-DatabaseSchema - eZ Components DatabaseSchema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031015.nA3AFvY8013215@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528473 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-11-03 05:15:56 EDT --- Issues to fix before full review. * Consistent use of macros - if using the %{__pear} style macros then you need to be consistent, i.e use %{__install}, %{__rm}, %{__mv} etc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 10:17:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 05:17:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528476] Review Request: php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein - eZ Components PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031017.nA3AHtMM013933@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528476 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-11-03 05:17:54 EDT --- Issues to fix before full review. * Consistent use of macros - if using the %{__pear} style macros then you need to be consistent, i.e use %{__install}, %{__rm}, %{__mv} e -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 10:29:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 05:29:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526876] Review Request: php-pecl-gmagick - Provides a wrapper to the GraphicsMagick library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031029.nA3ATVYT027314@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526876 --- Comment #6 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-11-03 05:29:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > * Consistent use of macros > - if using the %{__make} style macros then you need to be consistent, i.e use > %{__install}, %{__rm}, %{__chmod} etc %{__make} replaced to plain make. Additionally %{?_smp_mflags} added. > * Make the spec more eligible by formatting it correctly, at the moment the > directives at the top are not aligned. Top directives are ALIGNED with tabs by width 5 spaces. Please read my first post. http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/php-pecl-gmagick/php-pecl-gmagick-1.0.2b1-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 10:38:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 05:38:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526876] Review Request: php-pecl-gmagick - Provides a wrapper to the GraphicsMagick library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031038.nA3AcjdZ021063@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526876 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-11-03 05:38:43 EDT --- The %{__make} install needs to be fixed as well, you can do that before requesting CVS ------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (php-pecl-gmagick) is APPROVED by topdog ------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 10:58:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 05:58:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477526] Review Request: rubygem-hpricot - A Fast, Enjoyable HTML Parser for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031058.nA3Aww36004772@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477526 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kanarip at kanarip.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-11-03 05:58:55 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: rubygem-hpricot New Branches: EL-5 Owners: kanarip -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 11:04:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 06:04:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532315] Review Request: nanoxml - Small XML parser for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031104.nA3B45HE029496@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532315 Michal Ingeli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Michal Ingeli 2009-11-03 06:04:02 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: nanoxml Short Description: Small XML parser for Java Owners: ksyz Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 11:03:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 06:03:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526876] Review Request: php-pecl-gmagick - Provides a wrapper to the GraphicsMagick library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031103.nA3B3oN8029401@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526876 --- Comment #8 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-11-03 06:03:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > The %{__make} install needs to be fixed as well, you can do that before > requesting CVS Upss, sorry. Thanks, I'll fix it. > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > This package (php-pecl-gmagick) is APPROVED by topdog > ------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 11:49:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 06:49:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532203] Review Request: jgraph - Java-based Diagram Component and Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031149.nA3BnLee017923@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532203 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Reques: jgraph - |Review Request: jgraph - |Java-based Diagram |Java-based Diagram |Component and Editor |Component and Editor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 11:53:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 06:53:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532664] New: Review Request: saxon - Version 8 of Java XPath, XSLT 2.0 and XQuery implementation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: saxon - Version 8 of Java XPath, XSLT 2.0 and XQuery implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532664 Summary: Review Request: saxon - Version 8 of Java XPath, XSLT 2.0 and XQuery implementation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/saxon8.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/saxon8-8.7-1.fc11.src.rpm scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1784869 Description: This package does not contain latest version of Saxon, Version 8 is provided purely for compatibility purposes. Saxon B is Saxonica's non-schema-aware implementation of the XPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0, and XQuery 1.0 specifications aligned with the W3C Candidate Recommendation published on 3 November 2005. It is a complete and conformant implementation, providing all the mandatory features of those specifications and nearly all the optional features. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 11:51:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 06:51:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532590] Review Request: yaws - Web server for dynamic content written in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031151.nA3BpwAO009535@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532590 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-03 06:51:57 EDT --- Fiddled with a package a bit to make it build in el5, but hussssh, don't tell anyone! SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/yaws.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/yaws-1.85-1.fc11.src.rpm scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1784864 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 11:55:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 06:55:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532664] Review Request: saxon8 - Version 8 of Java XPath, XSLT 2.0 and XQuery implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031155.nA3Btwrp019706@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532664 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: saxon - |Review Request: saxon8 - |Version 8 of Java XPath, |Version 8 of Java XPath, |XSLT 2.0 and XQuery |XSLT 2.0 and XQuery |implementation |implementation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 11:55:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 06:55:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532664] Review Request: saxon - Version 8 of Java XPath, XSLT 2.0 and XQuery implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031155.nA3BtMLl019593@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532664 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-03 06:55:21 EDT --- RPMLint: saxon8.noarch: W: no-documentation saxon8-sql.noarch: W: no-documentation saxon8-jdom.noarch: W: no-documentation saxon8-dom.noarch: W: no-documentation saxon8-xom.noarch: W: no-documentation saxon8-xpath.noarch: W: no-documentation saxon8-demo.noarch: W: no-documentation Separate documentation subpackage is provided. saxon8.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/java/jaxp_transform_impl.jar /etc/alternatives Not dangling, dependency on alternatives tooling satisfies it. A common practice. saxon8-javadoc.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%post rm Is fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 11:59:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 06:59:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532664] Review Request: saxon8 - Version 8 of Java XPath, XSLT 2.0 and XQuery implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031159.nA3Bx2O4011281@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532664 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rafaels at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-03 06:58:58 EDT --- *** Bug 227115 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 11:59:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 06:59:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227115] Review Request: saxon8-B.8.7-1jpp - Java Basic XPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0, and XQuery 1.0 implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031159.nA3Bx1T8011248@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227115 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #9 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-03 06:58:58 EDT --- Most of comment #2 objections addressed in bug #532664 apart from marking %doc/conditions/intro.html as documentation in the main package. It's doesn't cover the licensing annyway and there's no good reason for duplication it since it is in separate documentation package. Several other small changes were done, such as changes to summary, description, getting rid sed-ding and unused macros. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 532664 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 12:14:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 07:14:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532664] Review Request: saxon8 - Version 8 of Java XPath, XSLT 2.0 and XQuery implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031214.nA3CExEo023706@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532664 --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-03 07:14:58 EDT --- Wait a second... probably I'll need saxon9 instead, and it would probably make more sense to package... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 13:14:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 08:14:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529831] Review Request: opensips - Open Source SIP Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031314.nA3DE3XR005049@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529831 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-03 08:14:02 EDT --- opensips-1.6.0-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/opensips-1.6.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 13:12:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 08:12:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529831] Review Request: opensips - Open Source SIP Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031312.nA3DCq90027418@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529831 John A. Khvatov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from John A. Khvatov 2009-11-03 08:12:51 EDT --- Builds fine. Submitting to updates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 13:27:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 08:27:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532677] New: Review Request: perl-HTML-SuperForm - HTML form generator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-SuperForm - HTML form generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532677 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-SuperForm - HTML form generator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-HTML-SuperForm/perl-HTML-SuperForm.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-HTML-SuperForm/perl-HTML-SuperForm-1.09-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This module provides an interface for generating basic HTML form elements much like HTML::StickyForms does. The main difference is HTML::SuperForm returns HTML::SuperForm::Field objects rather than plain HTML. This allows for more flexibilty when generating forms for a complex application. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 13:41:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 08:41:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031341.nA3Df1fd001145@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #20 from Peter Galbraith 2009-11-03 08:41:00 EDT --- Are you guys content having the debian/ directory (with the patches that you need) in the separate .diff.gz file? Or would you rather it all be bundled together in the orig.tar.gz file? Just wondering... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 13:51:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 08:51:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532677] Review Request: perl-HTML-SuperForm - HTML form generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031351.nA3DpIV0003573@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532677 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-11-03 08:51:17 EDT --- will check this tomorrow -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 14:03:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 09:03:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031403.nA3E3LYc017124@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #21 from Arun SAG 2009-11-03 09:03:20 EDT --- The patches are kept in separate .diff file; -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 14:22:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 09:22:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 512170] Review Request: pidgin-sipe - Pidgin plugin for connecting to MS Communications Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031422.nA3EMT5U022487@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512170 Konstantin Ryabitsev changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |icon at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #24 from Konstantin Ryabitsev 2009-11-03 09:22:27 EDT --- SPEC and SRPM updated to 1.7.0: http://icon.fedorapeople.org/f/pidgin-sipe.spec http://icon.fedorapeople.org/f/pidgin-sipe-1.7.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Koji scratch build (F12): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1785119 I'll get it into fedora as soon as someone actually reviews the submission. It's been sitting in the queue for several months now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 14:28:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 09:28:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527488] Review Request: drbd - drbd tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031428.nA3ESFvO013613@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527488 --- Comment #71 from Philipp Reisner 2009-11-03 09:28:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #69) > Well, okay (however please check my comment) > > ------------------------------------------------------ > This package (drbd) is APPROVED by mtasaka > ------------------------------------------------------ > > To Phil: > Please follow the procedure written on: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join > from "Get a Fedora Account". > After you request for sponsorship a mail will be sent to sponsor > members automatically (which is invisible for you) which notifies > that you need a sponsor. After that, please also write on > this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and > your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. > Ok, I assume that "the request for sponsorship" is the request to join the packager group. I just issued that request. My FAS name is "reisner". Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 14:38:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 09:38:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530754] Review Request: scour - A script to clean SVG files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031438.nA3Ec5tW027028@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530754 --- Comment #4 from Ben Boeckel 2009-11-03 09:38:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Problems: > - Package does not work as described on my pc. Odd. Could you post the source SVGs that didn't work? I'll do more tests here on more files and see if I can reproduce the issues. > - rpmlint: remove the sheband, see > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingTricks#Remove_shebang_from_files It was executable here, so the shebang line got missed. Will fix. > - license issue, as described above. Well, from what I can tell, the svg_regex.py is from Inkscape which is BSD. Putting a Requires: on inkscape is sort of counter-productive to what (at least I would) use this for: taking an SVG and making it easier to edit in a text editor and not having to lug inkscape around. Unfortunately this means it's not using the "system copy" and I doubt inkscape will be splitting just to poke this one file out. I don't like shipping this file, but Requires: inkscape is just too much. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 14:40:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 09:40:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 512170] Review Request: pidgin-sipe - Pidgin plugin for connecting to MS Communications Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031440.nA3Eel2l028126@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512170 --- Comment #25 from Stefan Becker 2009-11-03 09:40:46 EDT --- But who will do that? It seems to me that all who have contributed up to now are on the requester side, but none from "the powers that be" side. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 14:43:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 09:43:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031443.nA3Eh7fR017946@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #22 from Peter Galbraith 2009-11-03 09:43:05 EDT --- My patches are. So you are happy with this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 14:56:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 09:56:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526876] Review Request: php-pecl-gmagick - Provides a wrapper to the GraphicsMagick library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031456.nA3Eu26u021508@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526876 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-11-03 09:56:00 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pecl-gmagick Short Description: Provides a wrapper to the GraphicsMagick library Owners: hubbitus Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 14:56:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 09:56:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428226] Review Request: idm-console-framework: Core console package used by Fedora Directory Server and other IDM projects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031456.nA3Eu8SK021627@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428226 Michael Stahnke changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mastahnke at gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Michael Stahnke 2009-11-03 09:56:06 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: idm-console-framework Short Description: Core console used by Fedora Directory Server and IDM projects Owners: stahnma Branches: EL4 EL5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 15:01:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:01:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532664] Review Request: saxon8 - Version 8 of Java XPath, XSLT 2.0 and XQuery implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031501.nA3F1gAk001470@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532664 --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-03 10:01:41 EDT --- SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/saxon9.spec SRPMS: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/saxon9-9.2.0.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Here's 9 version. Not much difference, xmlbeans 2.4 builds against this, but I'm not sure if I can use that yet. Oh, how I love you, stable java apis. If you intend to start reviewing now, this two different packages shouldn't cause much trouble to you -- the packages are nearly identical. I'll try to clarify this ASAP! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 15:13:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:13:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532635] Review Request: rurple - A Python Learning Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031513.nA3FDPCs004925@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532635 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |limb at jcomserv.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net --- Comment #1 from Jon Ciesla 2009-11-03 10:13:23 EDT --- First look: There are end-of-line encoding errors on several .htm and .css files, please fix. There are also .rur and .wld files set executable with no shebang, they should be chmodded -x unless they really need to be executable. In build and install, it would be better to use a python macro, see the numpy spec, including the first few lines thereof. In the desktop-file install, don't add the Application category. Mock build is in progress, but will probably be fine as it's noarch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 15:26:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:26:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532635] Review Request: rurple - A Python Learning Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031526.nA3FQtnK009272@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532635 --- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla 2009-11-03 10:26:54 EDT --- Mock build was good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 15:25:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:25:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532699] New: Review Request: ClanLib1 - Cross platform C++ game library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ClanLib1 - Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532699 Summary: Review Request: ClanLib1 - Cross platform C++ game library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: hdegoede at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~jwrdegoede/ClanLib1.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~jwrdegoede/ClanLib1-1.0.0-4.fc11.src.rpm Description: ClanLib is a cross platform C++ game library. This is a rename review from ClanLib to ClanLib1, so that the ClanLib package name can be used for the new 2.x series, without dropping ClanLib-1.x from the distro as most ClanLib packages still need 1.x to build / run. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 15:25:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:25:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 515053] Review Request: sugar-getiabooks - Internet Archive Books receiver for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031525.nA3FPpEl009101@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515053 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-03 10:25:50 EDT --- Hmm, it's been longer than I thought since I looked at this. Builds fine; rpmlint just says sugar-getiabooks.noarch: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities which is OK; I'm not sure why rpmlint still complains about this as we don't particularly care what goes in group anyway. The NEWS file seems to be present twice in the final package. Nothing seems to own /usr/share/sugar/activities. (Well, etoys owns it, but that's not in the dependency chain.) I think this is probably a bug in sugar, but absent that it's a bug in the guidelines and this package should own %{sugaractivitydir}. I've inquired on the fedora-packaging list. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: fa25987241db043235b132c2c12aba56b1865947e35180990ea32c431c326fa4 GetIABooks-3.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK (though it's no longer required at all). * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: sugar-getiabooks = 3-1.fc12 = /usr/bin/env sugar (python is pulled in indirectly via sugar) ? nothing seems to own %{sugaractivitydir}. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. X NEWS seems to be duplicated. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 15:37:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:37:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522777] Review Request: perl-Verilog-Perl - Verilog parsing routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031537.nA3FbE4m012179@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522777 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-03 10:37:12 EDT --- Congratulations on your marriage; I hope everything went well. Absent the macros, I've no further issues with this package. I trust you'll clean things up appropriately when you check in. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 15:37:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:37:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 513775] Review Request: pyfuzzy - Python framework for fuzzy sets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031537.nA3FboH0000706@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513775 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-03 10:37:49 EDT --- Any update? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 15:40:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:40:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 499875] Review Request: libdasm - Library for disassembling x86 code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031540.nA3Feion001820@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499875 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-03 10:40:42 EDT --- So, it's been quite some time since the last progress on this review; is there any chance that we could move forward, or should this just be closed out? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 15:39:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:39:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 505154] Tracker: Review Requests for Science and Technology related packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031539.nA3FdIH1001226@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|509658 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 15:39:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:39:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 509658] Review Request: h5py - A Python interface to the HDF5 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031539.nA3FdESG001159@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509658 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Blocks|505154(FE-SCITECH) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(josephsmidt at gmail | |.com) | --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-03 10:39:11 EDT --- Well, close to three months later there's been no response. I'm closing this out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 15:43:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:43:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 501958] Review Request: scotch - Graph, mesh and hypergraph partitioning library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031543.nA3FhGZD014359@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501958 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-03 10:43:15 EDT --- Four months with no response to the above review commentary; I'll close this out soon if there's no further progress. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 15:41:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:41:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 497001] Review Request: auto-nng - A software for analysis and classification of data, using AI NN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031541.nA3FfjcG002468@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497001 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-03 10:41:43 EDT --- So I approved this review months ago; is there some reason that no CVS request has been made? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 15:42:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:42:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 502991] Review Request: erlang-erlsom - Support for XML Schema in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031542.nA3FgaT0002769@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502991 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-03 10:42:34 EDT --- It's been four months since my previous review commentary with no response; I'll go ahead and close this ticket soon if nothing further happens. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 15:46:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:46:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528003] Review Request: Xinha - Javascript library for making textarea's WYSIWYG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031546.nA3Fk3m4015571@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528003 Eric Christensen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |eric at christensenplace.us --- Comment #13 from Eric Christensen 2009-11-03 10:46:01 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: Xinha Short Description: A WYSIWIG HTML editor component in Javascript Owners: danielsmw sparks Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 InitialCC: ke4qqq -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 15:46:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:46:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528003] Review Request: Xinha - Javascript library for making textarea's WYSIWYG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031546.nA3Fkl92004486@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528003 Eric Christensen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 15:51:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:51:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532664] Review Request: saxon8 - Version 8 of Java XPath, XSLT 2.0 and XQuery implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031551.nA3FpCj4017225@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532664 --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-03 10:51:10 EDT --- *** Bug 532709 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 15:51:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:51:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532709] Review Request: xmlbeans - XML-Java binding tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031551.nA3FpB5M017198@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532709 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-03 10:51:10 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 532664 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 15:53:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:53:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532709] Review Request: xmlbeans - XML-Java binding tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031553.nA3FrMSK017724@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532709 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-03 10:53:20 EDT --- The above is obviously a mistake. To build the package for the first time, either install xmlbeans from JPackage, or build it with rpmbuild --with bootstrap, install and then rebuild again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 15:50:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:50:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532709] New: Review Request: xmlbeans - XML-Java binding tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xmlbeans - XML-Java binding tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532709 Summary: Review Request: xmlbeans - XML-Java binding tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/xmlbeans.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/xmlbeans-2.4.0-4.fc11.src.rpm Description: XMLBeans is a tool that allows you to access the full power of XML in a Java friendly way. It is an XML-Java binding tool. The idea is that you can take advantage the richness and features of XML and XML Schema and have these features mapped as naturally as possible to the equivalent Java language and typing constructs. XMLBeans uses XML Schema to compile Java interfaces and classes that you can then use to access and modify XML instance data. Using XMLBeans is similar to using any other Java interface/class, you will see things like getFoo or setFoo just as you would expect when working with Java. While a major use of XMLBeans is to access your XML instance data with strongly typed Java classes there are also API's that allow you access to the full XML infoset (XMLBeans keeps full XML Infoset fidelity) as well as to allow you to reflect into the XML schema itself through an XML Schema Object model. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 15:52:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:52:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532664] Review Request: saxon8 - Version 8 of Java XPath, XSLT 2.0 and XQuery implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031552.nA3FqCoJ006231@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532664 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |532709 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 15:52:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:52:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532709] Review Request: xmlbeans - XML-Java binding tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031552.nA3FqBr9006192@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532709 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Depends on| |532664 Resolution|DUPLICATE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 15:58:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:58:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031558.nA3Fw4HK018894@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #23 from Arun SAG 2009-11-03 10:58:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > My patches are. So you are happy with this? Yeah! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 16:00:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 11:00:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530754] Review Request: scour - A script to clean SVG files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031600.nA3G0ZEo019698@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530754 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-03 11:00:34 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=367321) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=367321) Test case for scour With this file, it only shows white and that's it... License issue: """ you *HAVE* to add a comment, why you choose multiple licensing and split the files in the %files section, too. If you want to split the files into several subpackages, as suggested there, is your choice ;) """ You don't need to to a different package for just the single file, just comment it in the code, why you have a multiple license... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 16:04:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 11:04:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 233946] Review Request: secondlife - The Second Life client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031604.nA3G4lLi009236@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233946 Arne Woerner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |arne_woerner at yahoo.com --- Comment #37 from Arne Woerner 2009-11-03 11:04:39 EDT --- today i built a Snowglobe-x86_64-1.1.3.0.tar.bz2 package without the embedded www browser support (llmozlib2)... took me some hours, but it was quite easy (mostly some unusual notations (like "#define ABC() def" or "if (a || b && c)")... and bad include paths (-I)...)... it likes pulseaudio with openal-soft... but voice still works with the original 32-bit voice binary (SLVoice), which doesnt need so many 32-bit libraries, so that it doesnt take too much main mem... i hope that my 2GiB main mem will be sufficient now... the 32 bit client sometimes almost halted the whole box due to not enough memory (swapping made things worse)... :-) -arne -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 16:05:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 11:05:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 497001] Review Request: auto-nng - A software for analysis and classification of data, using AI NN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031605.nA3G544i021075@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497001 --- Comment #9 from Fabian Deutsch 2009-11-03 11:05:03 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: auto-nng Short Description: A software for analysis and classification of data, using AI NN Owners: fabiand Branches: F-12 InitialCC: fabiand tibbs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 16:10:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 11:10:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507083] Review Request: poco - C++ class libraries for network-centric applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031610.nA3GA0Ga010891@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507083 --- Comment #7 from Michal Schmidt 2009-11-03 11:09:58 EDT --- Hello, I'd like to see poco in Fedora. A project I'd like to package uses it. Has this review stalled? Are we just waiting for a sponsor here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 16:09:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 11:09:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532635] Review Request: rurple - A Python Learning Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031609.nA3G9IYQ010731@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532635 --- Comment #3 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-11-03 11:09:17 EDT --- Fixed. Spec URL: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/SPECS/rurple.spec SRPM URL: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/src/rurple-1.0-0.2.rc3.fc10.src.rpm rpmlint is clean now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 16:19:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 11:19:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532635] Review Request: rurple - A Python Learning Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031619.nA3GJnTt013370@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532635 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla 2009-11-03 11:19:48 EDT --- The default file save location is the same as the default file open location. The user won't have write access there, and it fails silently. Is there a place in .rurple that could be used? If not, patch to default to the user's home if possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 16:24:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 11:24:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527488] Review Request: drbd - drbd tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031624.nA3GOvYV026554@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527488 --- Comment #72 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-03 11:24:55 EDT --- Okay, now I am sponsoring you. Please follow "Join" wiki again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 16:39:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 11:39:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 499875] Review Request: libdasm - Library for disassembling x86 code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031639.nA3Gd3QO019003@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499875 Dave Malcolm changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #9 from Dave Malcolm 2009-11-03 11:39:01 EDT --- I no longer have a need for this library, and too many other things to be doing, so I'm going to close this as WONTFIX. If someone else wants to pick it up, that would be great. Jason: thanks for all your help with this, I'm sorry to drop the ball on this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 16:45:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 11:45:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 501958] Review Request: scotch - Graph, mesh and hypergraph partitioning library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031645.nA3GjUkd021631@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501958 --- Comment #7 from Deji Akingunola 2009-11-03 11:45:28 EDT --- I'm so sorry for the lack of update on the bug, it has somehow fallen off my radar. I've implemented your suggestions of putting the libs directly under $libdir, and made the -static subpackage require the -devel subpackage. I've also updated to the latest upstream version (v_5.1.7) thus solving the tarball mdsum mismatch issue (upstream must have subtly changed it). Thanks. Spec URL: http://deji.fedorapeople.org/scotch.spec SRPM URL: http://deji.fedorapeople.org/scotch-5.1.7-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 16:49:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 11:49:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529387] Review Request: rcrpanel - Create a front panel for an electronics device In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031649.nA3GndoN022394@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529387 --- Comment #15 from David Nalley 2009-11-03 11:49:37 EDT --- As noted before - I can't sponsor you - but this looks pretty good IMO: OK: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [ke4qqq at nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint rcrpanel.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/rcrpanel-3.5-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/i586/rcrpanel-3.5-1.fc11.i586.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . GPLv2+ OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. License field GPLv2+ - code = GPLv2+ OK: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK: The spec file must be written in American English. OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. [ke4qqq at nalleyx60 SOURCES]$ md5sum rcrpanel-3.5.tar.gz* 5e3f974eafc98ce1a87eab0e0b866242 rcrpanel-3.5.tar.gz 5e3f974eafc98ce1a87eab0e0b866242 rcrpanel-3.5.tar.gz.1 OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. Works on at least x86 NA: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. NA: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. NA: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. OK: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. OK: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: Each package must consistently use macros. Though I will note that you could use them more to make life simpler for yourself going forward. For instance - in your source0 line - you have: Source0: http://qslmaker.mi-nts.org/downloads/rcrpanel-3.5.tar.gz That could have been: Source0: http://qslmaker.mi-nts.org/downloads/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz That would be one less line to remember to update/have to update each time you increment version number. OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. NA: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. NA: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. OK: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. NA: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 16:51:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 11:51:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532739] New: Review Request: emacs-cedet - Collection of Emacs Development Environment Tools Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: emacs-cedet - Collection of Emacs Development Environment Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532739 Summary: Review Request: emacs-cedet - Collection of Emacs Development Environment Tools Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kklic at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://kklic.fedorapeople.org/emacs-cedet.spec SRPM URL: http://kklic.fedorapeople.org/emacs-cedet-1.0-0.1.pre6.fc11.src.rpm Description: CEDET is a Collection of Emacs Development Environment Tools written with the end goal of creating an advanced development environment in Emacs. CEDET tools include: * EIEIO - CLOS layer for Emacs Lisp * Semantic - Parser Infrastructure for Emacs * Speedbar - Everything browser * EDE - File manager/ Makefile generator * SRecode - Templte manager/ code generator * COGRE - Connected Graph Editor This package contains the files for the GNU Emacs package. CEDET is already packed for XEmacs in xemacs-packages-extra. This package will enable the possibility to pack Emacs Code Browser. rpmlint Output -------------- rpmlint ./emacs-cedet-1.0-0.1.pre6.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint ./emacs-cedet.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint ./emacs-cedet-1.0-0.1.pre6.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint ./emacs-cedet-el-1.0-0.1.pre6.fc11.noarch.rpm emacs-cedet-el.noarch: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 16:52:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 11:52:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532306] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-debug - Faster implementation of the standard Debugging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031652.nA3GqtPZ023510@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532306 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-03 11:52:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > - Please create one srpm per one gem. > > These gems do not distribute very well separately, they have the same upstream > and one requires the other in a %{version}-%{release} specific manner. - Ah, I checked two gems and actually dependency is in loop... > > - Also, you must not strip rebuilt binaries and create debuginfo rpm > > correctly. Please refer to: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby#Ruby_Gem_with_extension_libraries_written_in_C > > I don't know how to resolve the inclusion of a reference to the buildroot in > the binary blob (I did know how to make it disappear in the included Makefile, > but not the blob): > > """ > + /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot > Binary file > /home/jmeeuwen/devel/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/rubygem-ruby-debug-0.10.3-1.fc12.x86_64/usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/x86_64-linux/ruby_debug.so > matches > Found > '/home/jmeeuwen/devel/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/rubygem-ruby-debug-0.10.3-1.fc12.x86_64' > in installed files; aborting > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.eZZmKv (%install) > """ - The above guideline is actually for resolving this issue. The reason check-buildroot fails is that gem is installed under %buildroot directly. Also find-debuginfo rpm expects that compilation of C codes is done under %_builddir. Please follow this lines: --------------------------------------------------------------- # First, %prep stage must contain %setup -q -c -T to create the directory where C libraries are compiled. # Then at %build stage the Ruby Gem must be installed under the directory created at %prep stage to get C libraries compiled under there. --------------------------------------------------------------- For example: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/rubygem-hpricot/devel/rubygem-hpricot.spec?view=co -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 17:16:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 12:16:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507083] Review Request: poco - C++ class libraries for network-centric applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031716.nA3HGqBZ007546@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507083 --- Comment #9 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-11-03 12:16:51 EDT --- s/"ill be"/"will be"/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 17:16:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 12:16:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031716.nA3HGxNK007601@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #24 from Peter Galbraith 2009-11-03 12:16:57 EDT --- Ok, great. Let me know about what you'd like concerning the "verbatim copy of the license" at some point. I suppose I could add copies of the various GPL flavors used in the top directory of the tar ball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 17:15:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 12:15:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507083] Review Request: poco - C++ class libraries for network-centric applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031715.nA3HFnjR007363@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507083 --- Comment #8 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-11-03 12:15:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Hello, > I'd like to see poco in Fedora. A project I'd like to package uses it. > Has this review stalled? Are we just waiting for a sponsor here? Hello, Michal! Unfortunately, I have no spare time to complete this review. Feel free to re-assign this to yourself. Regardins sponsorship - I'll sponsor Maxim, when your review ill be finished. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 17:28:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 12:28:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507083] Review Request: poco - C++ class libraries for network-centric applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031728.nA3HS0lc010409@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507083 Michal Schmidt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lemenkov at gmail.com |mschmidt at redhat.com --- Comment #10 from Michal Schmidt 2009-11-03 12:27:59 EDT --- OK, I'm reassigning the review to myself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 17:35:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 12:35:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507083] Review Request: poco - C++ class libraries for network-centric applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031735.nA3HZcJ4012710@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507083 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 17:47:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 12:47:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532635] Review Request: rurple - A Python Learning Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031747.nA3HlbCp004037@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532635 --- Comment #5 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-11-03 12:47:36 EDT --- Generally, people want to save in the same directory where the file has been read from. If I patch to save in /home, it will always save there, even if the file has been read from a user directory. I can check if it is the first time, that is, the user has just typed a program (has not read it from anywhere): The same thing would have to be done for saving the world. The file /usr/bin/rur_start.py would have a test like the one below, which uses a new variable init_dir. What do you think? def SaveProgramFile(self, dummy): if self.isRunning: return global code code = self.ProgramEditor.GetText() no_error, mesg = parser.ParseProgram(code) if no_error: wildcard = _("Program files (*.rur)|*.rur| All files (*.*)|*.*") fname = os.path.basename(self.filename) if ( self.filename == "" ): init_dir = os.environ.get('HOME') else: init_dir = misc.PRGM_DIR dlg = wx.FileDialog(self, _("Save new program as"), init_dir, fname, wildcard, wx.SAVE| wx.CHANGE_DIR ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 18:02:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 13:02:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531541] Review Request: rho - An SSH system profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031802.nA3I2RjH020548@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531541 --- Comment #4 from Adrian Likins 2009-11-03 13:02:27 EDT --- version 0.0.12 avaiable at http://alikins.fedorapeople.org/files/rho/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 18:06:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 13:06:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532635] Review Request: rurple - A Python Learning Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031806.nA3I61E7021793@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532635 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla 2009-11-03 13:06:00 EDT --- Issues from full review: See #4. License tag should be GPLv2+ Should really be named rur-ple IMHO. The tarball is rurple, but the project is rur-ple. It's up to you, just my $0.02. Otherwise it looks good. Re: #5 You could always make a copy or the base material to a hidden folder in the user's home, so they'd each have their own copy. Check out cylindrix in CVS and see what's been done there. Assuming my reading of your code snippet is correct, you might not even need to do that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 18:23:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 13:23:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031823.nA3INeMK015254@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #25 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-11-03 13:23:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > I have re-uploaded the source rpm; Found md5 mismatch; Please recheck mock > build; Thanks I have re-downloaded the package and retry to mack a mock build without any success. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 18:37:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 13:37:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226639] Merge Review: xorg-x11-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031837.nA3IbSWn029719@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226639 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(mcepl at redhat.com) --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-11-03 13:37:26 EDT --- Please remove the needinfo when this bug is ready to move -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 18:38:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 13:38:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531912] Review Request: perl-Net-ARP - Create and Send ARP Packets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031838.nA3IcL19019096@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531912 --- Comment #2 from BJ Dierkes 2009-11-03 13:38:20 EDT --- Both have been resolved. Scratch build is at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1785686 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 18:44:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 13:44:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507083] Review Request: poco - C++ class libraries for network-centric applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031844.nA3IiPuD020163@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507083 --- Comment #11 from Michal Schmidt 2009-11-03 13:44:24 EDT --- Maxim, For now I have just a couple of suggestions: - Please do not use the "-s" option for make. Full logs from the compilation should always be present in Koji builds. - You don't have to use perl to do simple substitutions. sed is capable enough and it's always present in the buildroots. For example: sed -i.orig -e 's|$(INSTALLDIR)/lib\b|$(INSTALLDIR)/%{_lib}|g' Makefile The other two substitutions use the same script, so they can even be merged into a single sed invocation. Oh, and %{_libdir} is nicer than /usr/%{_lib}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 18:45:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 13:45:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507083] Review Request: poco - C++ class libraries for network-centric applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031845.nA3IjLaO031617@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507083 Michal Schmidt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 18:52:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 13:52:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532739] Review Request: emacs-cedet - Collection of Emacs Development Environment Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031852.nA3IqsmZ001038@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532739 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |beolnix at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-03 13:52:52 EDT --- *** Bug 490352 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 18:52:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 13:52:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 490352] Review Request: emacs-cedet - modules for GNU Emacs text editor: semantic, speedbar, eieio, ede In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031852.nA3IqrJx001006@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490352 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-03 13:52:52 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 532739 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 18:56:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 13:56:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526126] Review Request: python3 - Python 3.x (backwards incompatible version) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031856.nA3Iutd2023414@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126 --- Comment #41 from Dave Malcolm 2009-11-03 13:56:50 EDT --- Thanks; I've addressed most of the above; here's the latest work-in-progress: Updated specfile: http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/python3.spec Updated SRPM: http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/python3-3.1.1-8.fc11.src.rpm Diff between 3.1.1-7 and 3.1.1-8: http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/python3-from-3.1.1-7-to-3.1.1-8.diff rpmlint results are as before. Still to do: (i) analysis of shebang files still (ii) installation of rpm macros (iii) anything else I've missed Re (ii), is there a standard way for a -devel package to drop macros into a directory (e.g. /usr/lib/rpm ) in such a way that rpm will automatically use them? Is this acceptable practice? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 19:12:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 14:12:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525914] Review Request: perl-Net-GitHub - Perl interface for github.com In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031912.nA3JCe5E006579@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525914 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-03 14:12:39 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 19:11:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 14:11:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526876] Review Request: php-pecl-gmagick - Provides a wrapper to the GraphicsMagick library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031911.nA3JBAmG006109@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526876 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-03 14:11:08 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 19:11:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 14:11:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532315] Review Request: nanoxml - Small XML parser for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031911.nA3JBuI1027834@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532315 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-03 14:11:54 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 19:13:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 14:13:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523343] Review Request: zikula-module-EZComments - Simple Zikula module that provides comment functions to other modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031913.nA3JDYD9028093@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523343 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-03 14:13:32 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 19:19:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 14:19:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477526] Review Request: rubygem-hpricot - A Fast, Enjoyable HTML Parser for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031919.nA3JJHt4008535@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477526 --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-03 14:19:15 EDT --- Mamoru: Are you ok with kanarip maintaining this package for EL-5? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 19:15:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 14:15:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 492895] Review Request: xml-security-c - C++ Implementation of W3C security standards for XML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031915.nA3JFA0D007864@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492895 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #18 from Steve Traylen 2009-11-03 14:15:08 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: xml-security-c New Branches: EL-4 Owners: stevetraylen anttix -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 19:17:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 14:17:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428226] Review Request: idm-console-framework: Core console package used by Fedora Directory Server and other IDM projects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031917.nA3JHRno029197@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428226 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-03 14:17:26 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 19:19:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 14:19:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528003] Review Request: Xinha - Javascript library for making textarea's WYSIWYG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031919.nA3JJonh008723@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528003 --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-03 14:19:49 EDT --- Should the name here be 'xinha' (ie, lower case) as that seems to be what the package name is per the src.rpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 19:28:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 14:28:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031928.nA3JSvpi011111@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(psatpute at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #28 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-11-03 14:28:52 EDT --- Please lift the NEEDINFO when you're ready to pass to the next stage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 19:31:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 14:31:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528003] Review Request: Xinha - Javascript library for making textarea's WYSIWYG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031931.nA3JVKDl032478@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528003 --- Comment #15 from Matthew Daniels 2009-11-03 14:31:19 EDT --- I suppose so; I've already starting working in CVS and I've been using 'xinha', so someone might have caught that along the way already. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 19:27:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 14:27:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532231] Review Request: gdouros-akkadian-fonts - A font for Sumero-Akkadian cuneiform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031927.nA3JR5U7031541@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532231 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ozamosi at flukkost.nu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-11-03 14:27:04 EDT --- Nothing to say here, clean font and clean packaging ??? APPROVED ??? You can now continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a Nice work. repo-font-audit notes the font could be extended easily to cover more scripts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 19:34:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 14:34:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 497001] Review Request: auto-nng - A software for analysis and classification of data, using AI NN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031934.nA3JYjCn001201@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497001 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-03 14:34:44 EDT --- You need to set the fedora-cvs flag to '?' if you want the CVS admins to see your request. Also, please don't CC me on tickets I review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 19:43:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 14:43:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532779] New: Review Request: gtraffic - Simple traffic usage counter for mobile broadband connections Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gtraffic - Simple traffic usage counter for mobile broadband connections https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532779 Summary: Review Request: gtraffic - Simple traffic usage counter for mobile broadband connections Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tomspur at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/review/gtraffic.spec SRPM URL: http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/review/gtraffic-1.01-2.fc11.src.rpm Description: gtraffic is a very quick and simple network traffic counter. It has the ability to manually change the used traffic, for example if used between two computers. It features a reset, so the usage can be reset at required intervals. This utility will only work with network manager and a mobile broadband connection, otherwise no data will be counted. ______________________ $ rpmlint gtraffic.spec gtraffic-1.01-2.fc11.src.rpm noarch/gtraffic-1.01-2.fc11.noarch.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ______________________ Builds in Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1786420 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 19:46:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 14:46:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 497001] Review Request: auto-nng - A software for analysis and classification of data, using AI NN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031946.nA3Jk7vl015838@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497001 Fabian Deutsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Fabian Deutsch 2009-11-03 14:46:05 EDT --- Thanks for your hints. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 19:58:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 14:58:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530754] Review Request: scour - A script to clean SVG files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911031958.nA3JwCrT007219@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530754 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-03 14:58:11 EDT --- Here is an exemple for the license issue: bug #532590 current SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/yaws.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 20:00:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 15:00:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532057] Review Request: eclipse-jgit - Eclipse JGit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911032000.nA3K0hx3007844@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532057 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Overholt 2009-11-03 15:00:42 EDT --- - naming fine X please fix the release to follow: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#PreReleasePackages Peter is right that there should be a 1. before the "git..." - licensing fine (EDL is BSD) - macros fine - locations good - %files fine - simplicity = good :) X rpmlint output clean except directory permission error: 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. eclipse-jgit.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/jgit/eclipse/features/org.eclipse.jgit_0.6.0.200911031418 0775 A standard directory should have permission set to 0755. If you get this message, it means that you have wrong directory permissions in some dirs included in your package. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 20:06:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 15:06:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516527] Review Request: globus-gass-server-ez - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Server_ez In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911032006.nA3K6SPg009214@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516527 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |516535 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 20:06:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 15:06:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516535] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-scripts - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Job ManagerScripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911032006.nA3K6RaA009187@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516535 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |516527 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 20:12:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 15:12:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530880] Review Request: ns-tiza-fonts - A Slab-Serif Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911032012.nA3KCxaD021603@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530880 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-11-03 15:12:57 EDT --- Hi Edward, 1. You seem to have based your packaging on an old (pre-fedora-11) template. Please rebase on the fonts template found in fontpackages-devel. It will considerably simplify your packaging and do more things such as generating rpm metadata for the font auto-installer 2. description: inspired on ? inspired by ? accent marks ? diacritics http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diacritic ASCII ? basic latin http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U0000.pdf 3. summary: you need to find a short statement that describes the font without using its name (the font name is already included in the package name, and every package manager will display the package name next to the summary) 4. repo-font-audit notes your rpm is not including font metadata (due to the previously mentioned bad template choice) and that the font could be easily extended to cover more scripts (to relay upstream) af(1) { 0149 } az-az(8) { 011e 011f 0130 0131 015e 015f 018f 0259 } bin(6) { 0300 0301 1eb8 1eb9 1ecc 1ecd } bm(8) { 014a 014b 0186 0190 019d 0254 025b 0272 } ca(2) { 013f 0140 } co(5) { 00c6 00e6 0152 0153 0178 } crh(6) { 011e 011f 0130 0131 015e 015f } csb(8) { 0104 0105 0141 0142 0143 0144 017b 017c } da(2) { 00c6 00e6 } de(1) { 00df } et(4) { 0160 0161 017d 017e } fi(4) { 0160 0161 017d 017e } fo(3) { 00c6 00e6 00f0 } fr(5) { 00c6 00e6 0152 0153 0178 } fy(1) { 00df } gn(4) { 0129 0169 1ebd 1ef9 } ha(8) { 0181 018a 0198 0199 01b3 01b4 0253 0257 } hu(4) { 0150 0151 0170 0171 } hz(5) { 032f 1e12 1e13 1e4a 1e4b } ig(6) { 1eca 1ecb 1ecc 1ecd 1ee4 1ee5 } is(5) { 00c6 00de 00e6 00f0 00fe } ki(4) { 0128 0129 0168 0169 } kl(7) { 00c6 00e6 0128 0129 0138 0168 0169 } kr(4) { 018e 01dd 024c 024d } ku-tr(2) { 015e 015f } lb(1) { 00df } lg(2) { 014a 014b } ln(9) { 011a 011b 0186 0190 0254 025b 0301 0302 030c } mt(8) { 010a 010b 0120 0121 0126 0127 017b 017c } na(2) { 0168 0169 } nb(2) { 00c6 00e6 } nds(1) { 00df } nn(2) { 00c6 00e6 } no(2) { 00c6 00e6 } nso(2) { 0160 0161 } ny(2) { 0174 0175 } qu(1) { 02c8 } ro(6) { 0102 0103 0218 0219 021a 021b } sco(4) { 01b7 021c 021d 0292 } shs(1) { 0313 } sm(1) { 02bb }tig(221) tk(6) { 0147 0148 015e 015f 017d 017e } tn(2) { 0160 0161 } to(1) { 02bb } tr(6) { 011e 011f 0130 0131 015e 015f }vi(110) vo(0) vot(4) { 0160 0161 017d 017e } wo(2) { 014a 014b } 5. the OFL license joined to the file claims the author reserves the name as "Tiza Chalk", but the name the font declares is just "Tiza", so maybe upstream did a mistake here. It's very unusual to reserve a name different from the name the font declares. If upstream decides the font is Tiza Chalk after all you'll have to rename the package which is much easier to do before inclusion in Fedora (also need to update the fontconfig rules, but this part is easy) 6. Please ask upstream to update the licensing info in the font file next time they update it (the font file still claims its licensing is CC-By, not OFL) 7. It would probably also be a good idea to check fontlint, though its messages are clear as mud as usual -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 20:14:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 15:14:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530880] Review Request: ns-tiza-fonts - A Slab-Serif Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911032014.nA3KEb3x010914@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530880 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(john.brown009 at gma | |il.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 20:15:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 15:15:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532664] Review Request: saxon9 - Java XPath, XSLT 2.0 and XQuery implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911032015.nA3KFjDr011393@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532664 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: saxon8 - |Review Request: saxon9 - |Version 8 of Java XPath, |Java XPath, XSLT 2.0 and |XSLT 2.0 and XQuery |XQuery implementation |implementation | --- Comment #6 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-03 15:15:44 EDT --- So, making this a purely saxon9 review. scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1785185 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 20:17:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 15:17:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528003] Review Request: xinha - Javascript library for making textarea's WYSIWYG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911032017.nA3KHAak011772@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528003 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com Summary|Review Request: Xinha - |Review Request: xinha - |Javascript library for |Javascript library for |making textarea's WYSIWYG |making textarea's WYSIWYG Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-11-03 15:17:08 EDT --- cvs done. Sorry for not marking this when I did that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 20:55:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 15:55:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230262] Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (JSS) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911032055.nA3Ktbgb031084@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230262 Michael Stahnke changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mastahnke at gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #24 from Michael Stahnke 2009-11-03 15:55:33 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: jss Short Description: Java Security Services (JSS) is a java native interface which provides a bridge for java-based applications to use native Network Security Services (NSS). Owners: stahnma Branches: EL4 EL5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 21:04:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 16:04:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531040] Review Request: jsMath-fonts - A collection of Math symbol fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911032104.nA3L4Qxb032536@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531040 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(rdieter at math.unl. | |edu) --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-11-03 16:04:25 EDT --- 1. Please use a lowercase package name as per Fedora font packaging guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Naming 2. Please use the font packaging templates in fontpackages-devel as per Fedora font packaging guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Technical_implementation (otherwise no font metadata will be generated at build time; note that it won't work on mixed case packages) 3. Please check what repo-font-audit says about your package, a. install fontpackages-tools from http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=139320 b. put your rpms in a dir c. run createrepo on it d. run repo-font-audit test file://absolute-path-to-the-dir it will catch this kind of mistake (also identify other problems that need to be relayed upstream) 4. the font splitup and naming seems a giant pre-unicode pre-wws mess. the different files are probably all parts of the same font family, except they're not properly named and their symbols not properly mapped at the right unicode points (granted, some math codepoints are only being standardised today thanks to the nice work of the stix project). For this reason, it's probably better to suff all the files in the same package, and not create a subpackage for each of them (you gotta love when upstreams decide to create their own non-standard conventions to confuse everyone else) 5. a fontconfig file would be nice, if only to document the font should be put at a very low priority in fontconfig stacks (but since fontconfig relies on font naming, and this font naming is weird, that may not be sufficient) 6. Please check with spot this font is not on his TEX blacklist 7. When there is no obvious version in a font set we usually use the timestamp of the most recent font file in the archive upstream released as version 8. Other font packages use User Interface/X as group (which is arguably not ideal, but not worth creating inconsistencies with other packages) 9. If you wanted to package this for non-fedora distros such as epel, it'd probably be more effective to push fontpackages there than add conditionals in specs. Pushing fontpackages is not difficult you only need to : 1. put back in the spec templates the warts that could be removed in Fedora thanks to recent rpm enhancements 2. check the yum-utils is recent enough to run repo-font-audit (else remove this part) 3. check the fontconfig is recent enough to accept split config files in /etc/fonts/conf.d (else remove the fontconfig templates) fontpackages has few deps, only the templates included in it depend on particular enhancements and need "porting" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 21:05:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 16:05:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532368] Review Request: ns-bola-fonts A Sans Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911032105.nA3L5jcI000728@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532368 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-11-03 16:05:44 EDT --- Will look at this one when Tiza is finished -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 21:37:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 16:37:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526564] Review Request: unittest - C++ unit testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911032137.nA3Lb4ci029640@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526564 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tomspur at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #8 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-03 16:37:02 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: [] devel/i386 [] devel/x86_64 [] F11/i386 [x] F11/x86_64 _______________________ [!] Rpmlint output: $ rpmlint unittest.spec unittest-0.50-62.4.fc11.src.rpm x86_64/* unittest.spec:40: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %prep %{__sed} -i 's|@libdir@|%{buildroot}%{_libdir}|g' Makefile.in unittest.spec:44: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build make %{?_smp_mflags} libdir=%{buildroot}%{_libdir} unittest.spec:69: W: macro-in-%changelog %doc unittest.src:40: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %prep %{__sed} -i 's|@libdir@|%{buildroot}%{_libdir}|g' Makefile.in unittest.src:44: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build make %{?_smp_mflags} libdir=%{buildroot}%{_libdir} unittest.src:69: W: macro-in-%changelog %doc unittest-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 6 warnings. - For the empty-debuginfo-package, please add a %global debug_package %{nil} - for the macro-in-%changelog: replace %doc with %%doc - The other ones are ok. _____________________ [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: BSD [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Upstream source: 6eaa2823620c2e21fc745bd8da6a26b2 Build source: 6eaa2823620c2e21fc745bd8da6a26b2 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. ______________________________ [!] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. -devel should require : %{name} = %{version}-%{release} I believe, it's usefull to also add a Requires: %{name}-devel = %{version}-%{release} to the main package, because most users would just run a 'yum install unittest' ______________________________ [-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1786671 [x] Package functions as described (no hardware to test with). There is a testsuite for this. _______________________________ TODO: - use %global instead %define in first line - rpmlint: * For the empty-debuginfo-package, please add a %global debug_package %{nil} to avoid building a debuginfo package * for the macro-in-%changelog: replace %doc with %%doc - Fully versioned dependency in subpackage - add a %check section: %check ./test/unittesttest Not much to do :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 21:50:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 16:50:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532231] Review Request: gdouros-akkadian-fonts - A font for Sumero-Akkadian cuneiform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911032150.nA3Lotkw032099@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532231 Robin Sonefors changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Robin Sonefors 2009-11-03 16:50:55 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gdouros-akkadian-fonts Short Description: A font for Sumero-Akkadian cuneiform Owners: ozamosi Branches: F11 F12 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 21:53:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 16:53:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531912] Review Request: perl-Net-ARP - Create and Send ARP Packets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911032153.nA3LrshW010849@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531912 --- Comment #3 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-11-03 16:53:53 EDT --- Ah, thanks! The normal procedure is for you to update the release field in the spec file, and post a link to the updated spec and srpm here. You haven't addressed the first issue yet (rm -rf %{buildroot}) Just a few more comments: - /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/auto/Net/ARP/ARP.bs is an empty file and I don't think it's needed. - Rename the .spec to perl-Net-ARP.spec (with capitals R and P). The spec has to have the same name as the package. (rpmlint also complains about this when you run it on the src.rpm). - Why not make pure_install? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 21:54:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 16:54:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 497001] Review Request: auto-nng - A software for analysis and classification of data, using AI NN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911032154.nA3LsRkE000525@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497001 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-03 16:54:26 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 21:53:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 16:53:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532231] Review Request: gdouros-akkadian-fonts - A font for Sumero-Akkadian cuneiform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911032153.nA3LrSiw000314@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532231 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-03 16:53:27 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 21:56:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 16:56:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 492895] Review Request: xml-security-c - C++ Implementation of W3C security standards for XML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911032156.nA3LuK9O011756@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492895 --- Comment #19 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-03 16:56:19 EDT --- Anntti: Are you ok with Steve maintaining this for EL-4? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 21:55:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 16:55:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529517] Review Request: kcm_touchpad - Synaptics driver based touchpads kcontrol module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911032155.nA3LtK3k011585@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529517 --- Comment #7 from Ryan Rix 2009-11-03 16:55:18 EDT --- Updated. http://rrix.fedorapeople.org/kcm_touchpad/kcm_touchpad-0.3.0-1.fc12.src.rpm http://rrix.fedorapeople.org/kcm_touchpad/kcm_touchpad.spec http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1786723 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 21:55:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 16:55:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230262] Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (JSS) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911032155.nA3LtF7F011531@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230262 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #25 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-03 16:55:14 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 22:03:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 17:03:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 492895] Review Request: xml-security-c - C++ Implementation of W3C security standards for XML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911032203.nA3M3g7i003722@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492895 --- Comment #20 from Steve Traylen 2009-11-03 17:03:41 EDT --- Hi Kevin, Should have been more verbose. After discussion I am joint owner for all releases and this has been been requested and approved via pkgdb. Quoting from Anntti's mail. Do You want to co-maintain the xml-security-c package? This way you could prepare that branch Yourself and probably get a faster result. I'm happy to do this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 22:19:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 17:19:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532813] New: Review Request: gummi - A simple LaTeX editor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gummi - A simple LaTeX editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532813 Summary: Review Request: gummi - A simple LaTeX editor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/gummi.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/gummi-0.4.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Project URL: http://gummi.midnightcoding.org Description: Gummi is a LaTeX editor written in the Python programming language using the PyGTK interface toolkit. It was designed with simplicity and the novice user in mind, but also offers features that speak to the more advanced user. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1786646 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop016 SRPMS]$ rpmlint gummi-0.4.2-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop016 noarch]$ rpmlint gummi-0.4.2-1.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 22:19:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 17:19:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516527] Review Request: globus-gass-server-ez - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Server_ez In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911032219.nA3MJVDC018961@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516527 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |steve.traylen at cern.ch AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |steve.traylen at cern.ch Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen 2009-11-03 17:19:30 EDT --- Review of globus-gass-server-ez: Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1786494 yes: rpmlint $ rpmlint SPECS/globus-gass-server-ez.spec \ RPMS/x86_64/globus-gass-server-ez-* \ SRPMS/globus-gass-server-ez-2.5-1.fc12.src.rpm globus-gass-server-ez-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation globus-gass-server-ez-progs.x86_64: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. yes: package named as per-globus. yes: spec file correct. yes: globus guidelines good. yes: ASL 2.0 in .spec yes: contents is also ASL 2.0 yes: GLOBUS_LICEENSE include. yes: english .spec yes: legible spec. yes: upstream matches. $ diff --recursive --brief globus_gass_server_ez-2.5 ~/globus/gt4.2.1-all-source-installer/source-trees/gass/server_ez/source/ Only in globus_gass_server_ez-2.5: GLOBUS_LICENSE which is expected. yes: compiles , see koji above. yes: builds on all archs. yes: builds on all archs. yes: build dependencies sane. yes: no locales anyway. yes: ldoconfig called correctly. yes: no statics. yes: owns all directories. yes: no duplicate files. yes: all %defattr. yes: %clean is cleaned. yes: contains code. yes: no large docs anyway. yes: doc not needed. yes: headers are in devel. yes: pkgconfig required. yes: devel does require base explicitly. yes: no gui. yes: owns all files or directories or pulls them in. yes: %install is cleaned. yes: utf8. yes it's a very boring package. APPROVED. Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 22:30:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 17:30:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516527] Review Request: globus-gass-server-ez - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Server_ez In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911032230.nA3MUkGQ022433@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516527 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 22:30:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 17:30:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532739] Review Request: emacs-cedet - Collection of Emacs Development Environment Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911032230.nA3MUqCY022465@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532739 Xavier Maillard changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xma at gnu.org --- Comment #2 from Xavier Maillard 2009-11-03 17:30:51 EDT --- Perfect ! Tested it onto my rawhide setup. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 22:32:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 17:32:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516522] Review Request: globus-nexus - Globus Toolkit - Nexus Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911032232.nA3MW3UJ022664@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516522 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |steve.traylen at cern.ch Bug 516522 depends on bug 516521, which changed state. Bug 516521 Summary: Review Request: globus-mp - Globus Toolkit - Message Passing Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516521 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |ERRATA Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 516522 depends on bug 516520, which changed state. Bug 516520 Summary: Review Request: globus-data-conversion - Globus Toolkit - Data Conversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516520 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |ERRATA Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 22:33:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 17:33:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532819] New: Review Request: gdouros-symbola-fonts - A symbol font Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gdouros-symbola-fonts - A symbol font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532819 Summary: Review Request: gdouros-symbola-fonts - A symbol font Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ozamosi at flukkost.nu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ozamosi.fedorapeople.org/gdouros-symbola-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://ozamosi.fedorapeople.org/gdouros-symbola-fonts-2.52-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Symbola covers the following scripts and symbols supported by The Unicode Standard 5.2: Basic Latin, Latin-1 Supplement, Latin Extended-A, IPA Extensions, Spacing Modifier Letters, Greek and Coptic, Cyrillic, Cyrillic Supplementary, General Punctuation, Superscripts and Subscripts, Combining Diacritical Marks for Symbols, Letterlike Symbols, Number Forms, Arrows, Mathematical Operators, Miscellaneous Technical, Control Pictures, Optical Character Recognition, Box Drawing, Block Elements, Geometric Shapes, Miscellaneous Symbols, Dingbats, Miscellaneous Mathematical Symbols-A, Supplemental Arrows-A, Supplemental Arrows-B, Miscellaneous Mathematical Symbols-B, Supplemental Mathematical Operators, Miscellaneous Symbols and Arrows, Supplemental Punctuation, CJK Symbols and Punctuation, Yijing Hexagram Symbols, Vertical Forms, Combining Half Marks, CJK Compatibility Forms, Specials, Tai Xuan Jing Symbols, Counting Rod Numerals, Mathematical Alphanumeric Symbols, Mahjong Tile Symbols, Domino Tile Symbols. It was created by George Douros. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 22:33:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 17:33:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532817] New: Review Request: gdouros-analecta-fonts - An eccleastic scripts font Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gdouros-analecta-fonts - An eccleastic scripts font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532817 Summary: Review Request: gdouros-analecta-fonts - An eccleastic scripts font Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ozamosi at flukkost.nu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ozamosi.fedorapeople.org/gdouros-analecta-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://ozamosi.fedorapeople.org/gdouros-analecta-fonts-2.52-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Analecta is an ecclesiastic scripts font, covering Basic Latin, Greek and Coptic, some Punctuation and other Symbols, Coptic, typographica varia, Specials, Gothic and Deseret. It was created by George Douros. rpmlint gives a no-documentation warning. Upstream distributes no documentation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 22:33:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 17:33:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532818] New: Review Request: gdouros-musica-fonts - A font for musical symbols Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gdouros-musica-fonts - A font for musical symbols https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532818 Summary: Review Request: gdouros-musica-fonts - A font for musical symbols Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ozamosi at flukkost.nu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ozamosi.fedorapeople.org/gdouros-musica-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://ozamosi.fedorapeople.org/gdouros-musica-fonts-2.52-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Musica covers the following scripts and symbols supported by The Unicode Standard 5.2: Basic Latin, Greek and Coptic, some Punctuation and other Symbols, Byzantine Musical Symbols, (Western) Musical Symbols, Archaic Greek Musical Notation. It was created by George Douros. rpmlint gives a no-documentation warning. Upstream distributes no documentation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 22:33:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 17:33:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532816] New: Review Request: gdouros-alexander-fonts - A Greek typeface inspired by Alexander Wilson Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gdouros-alexander-fonts - A Greek typeface inspired by Alexander Wilson https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532816 Summary: Review Request: gdouros-alexander-fonts - A Greek typeface inspired by Alexander Wilson Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ozamosi at flukkost.nu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ozamosi.fedorapeople.org/gdouros-alexander-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://ozamosi.fedorapeople.org/gdouros-alexander-fonts-3.01-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: A text typeface using the Greek letters designed by Alexander Wilson (1714-1786), a Scottish doctor, astronomer, and typefounder, who established a typefoundry in Glasgow in 1744. The type was especially designed for an edition of Homer?s epics, published in 1756-8 by Andrew and Robert Foulis, printers to the University of Glasgow. A modern revival, Wilson Greek, was designed by Matthew Carter in 1995. Peter S. Baker is also using Wilson?s Greek type in his Junicode font for medieval scholars (2007). Latin and Cyrillic are based on a Garamond typeface. The font covers the Windows Glyph List, IPA Extensions, Greek Extended, Ancient Greek Numbers, Byzantine and Ancient Greek Musical Notation, various typographic extras and several Open Type features (Case-Sensitive Forms, Small Capitals, Subscript, Superscript, Numerators, Denominators, Fractions, Old Style Figures, Historical Forms, Stylistic Alternates, Ligatures). It was created by George Douros. rpmlint gives a no-documentation warning. Upstream distributes no documentation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 22:48:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 17:48:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516522] Review Request: globus-nexus - Globus Toolkit - Nexus Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911032248.nA3MmiON026724@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516522 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |steve.traylen at cern.ch Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen 2009-11-03 17:48:43 EDT --- Review of globus-nexus: Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1786846 yes: rpmlint $ rpmlint SPECS/globus-nexus.spec RPMS/x86_64/globus-nexus-* SRPMS/globus-nexus-6.7-1.fc12.src.rpm globus-nexus-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. yes: package named as per-globus. yes: spec file correct. yes: globus guidelines good. yes: ASL 2.0 in .spec yes: contents is also ASL 2.0 yes: GLOBUS_LICEENSE include. yes: english .spec yes: legible spec. yes: upstream matches. $ diff --brief --recursive gt4.2.1-all-source-installer/source-trees/nexus/source ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/globus_nexus-6.7 Only in /home/steve/rpmbuild/SOURCES/globus_nexus-6.7: GLOBUS_LICENSE which is expected. yes: compiles , see koji above. yes: builds on all archs. yes: builds on all archs. yes: build dependencies sane. yes: no locales anyway. yes: ldoconfig called correctly. yes: no statics. yes: owns all directories. yes: no duplicate files. yes: all %defattr. yes: %clean is cleaned. yes: contains code. yes: no large docs anyway. yes: doc not needed. yes: headers are in devel. yes: pkgconfig required. yes: devel does require base explicitly. yes: no gui. yes: owns all files or directories or pulls them in. yes: %install is cleaned. yes: utf8. just libs all easy. APPROVED. Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 22:50:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 17:50:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531912] Review Request: perl-Net-ARP - Create and Send ARP Packets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911032250.nA3MosbQ016098@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531912 --- Comment #4 from BJ Dierkes 2009-11-03 17:50:53 EDT --- My mistake, I had changed the name of the spec but must have been after that version of the .src.rpm was built. I had originally used pure_install but had some errors, I can't remember what though. This time seemed fine so I have reverted to pure_install. I believe all above issues are now resolved. http://5dollarwhitebox.org/tmp/perl-Net-ARP.spec http://5dollarwhitebox.org/tmp/perl-Net-ARP-1.0.6-2.src.rpm [wdierkes at 220805-mock00 perl-Net-ARP]$ rpmlint SPECS/perl-Net-ARP.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Thanks Ruben. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 22:52:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 17:52:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516531] Review Request: globus-gass-cache-program - Globus Toolkit - Tools to manipulate local and remote GASS cache s In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911032252.nA3MqOXU027870@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516531 Bug 516531 depends on bug 516519, which changed state. Bug 516519 Summary: Review Request: globus-gram-client - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Client Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516519 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 22:51:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 17:51:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516517] Review Request: globus-gridftp-server - Globus Toolkit - Globus GridFTP Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911032251.nA3MpFki027523@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516517 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |steve.traylen at cern.ch Bug 516517 depends on bug 516516, which changed state. Bug 516516 Summary: Review Request: globus-gridftp-server-control - Globus Toolkit - Globus GridFTP Server Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516516 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |ERRATA Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 516517 depends on bug 516514, which changed state. Bug 516514 Summary: Review Request: globus-authz - Globus Toolkit - Globus authz library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516514 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |ERRATA Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 516517 depends on bug 516515, which changed state. Bug 516515 Summary: Review Request: globus-gfork - Globus Toolkit - GFork https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516515 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA Resolution| |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 23:01:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 18:01:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516527] Review Request: globus-gass-server-ez - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Server_ez In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911032301.nA3N1Cuc019957@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516527 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |516531 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 23:01:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 18:01:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516531] Review Request: globus-gass-cache-program - Globus Toolkit - Tools to manipulate local and remote GASS cache s In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911032301.nA3N1BEN019908@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516531 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |516527 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 23:20:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 18:20:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532813] Review Request: gummi - A simple LaTeX editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911032320.nA3NKmeZ003871@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532813 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |tomspur at fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tomspur at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-03 18:20:47 EDT --- Why do you have: BuildRequires: gtk2-devel BuildRequires: gnome-python2 BuildRequires: gnome-python2-extras BuildRequires: pango BuildRequires: pygtksourceview It builds without them: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1786917 Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: [] devel/i386 [] devel/x86_64 [] F11/i386 [x] F11/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: $ rpmlint gummi.spec gummi-0.4.2-1.fc11.src.rpm noarch/gummi-0.4.2-1.fc11.noarch.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: MIT ______________________________ [!] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. The license file is in /gummi/docs/LICENSE, but not in %doc ______________________________ [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [?] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Upstream source: e71a4c66ed3eed6e8072033f67decf13 Build source: e71a4c66ed3eed6e8072033f67decf13 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch _______________________________ [!] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. See above. _______________________________ [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [x] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Package functions as described (no hardware to test with). [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. ######################## Issues: - License file not in %doc - too much BR -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 23:24:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 18:24:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516517] Review Request: globus-gridftp-server - Globus Toolkit - Globus GridFTP Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911032324.nA3NOFfR025928@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516517 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |steve.traylen at cern.ch Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen 2009-11-03 18:24:14 EDT --- Review of globus-gridftp-server Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1786926 almost: rpmlint $ rpmlint SPECS/globus-gridftp-server.spec \ RPMS/x86_64/globus-gridftp-server-* \ SRPMS/globus-gridftp-server-3.17-1.fc12.src.rpm globus-gridftp-server.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libglobus_gridftp_server.so.0.3.17 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 globus-gridftp-server.x86_64: W: no-documentation globus-gridftp-server-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation globus-gridftp-server-progs.x86_64: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. yes: package named as per-globus. yes: spec file correct. yes: globus guidelines good. yes: ASL 2.0 in .spec yes: contents is also ASL 2.0 yes: GLOBUS_LICEENSE include. yes: english .spec yes: legible spec. yes: upstream matches. $ md5sum globus_gridftp_server-3.17.tar.gz ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/globus_gridftp_server-3.17.tar.gz 4f1b25af2672acd1f9eaee3e6a6be40e globus_gridftp_server-3.17.tar.gz 4f1b25af2672acd1f9eaee3e6a6be40e /home/steve/rpmbuild/SOURCES/globus_gridftp_server-3.17.tar.gz yes: compiles , see koji above. yes: builds on all archs. yes: builds on all archs. yes: build dependencies sane. yes: no locales anyway. yes: ldoconfig called correctly. yes: no statics. yes: owns all directories. yes: no duplicate files. yes: all %defattr. yes: %clean is cleaned. yes: contains code. yes: no large docs anyway. yes: doc not needed. yes: headers are in devel. yes: pkgconfig required. yes: devel does require base explicitly. yes: no gui. yes: owns all files or directories or pulls them in. yes: %install is cleaned. yes: utf8. At last a package that actually does something useful :-) Can you submit a bug upstream on 0 exit from lib and I'll approve. Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 23:49:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 18:49:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 285801] Review Request: simias - Collection-Oriented Data Storage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911032349.nA3NnPsl010334@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285801 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |steve.traylen at cern.ch --- Comment #28 from Steve Traylen 2009-11-03 18:49:21 EDT --- Hi Chris. build fails with a checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes checking for LIBFLAIM... yes checking for UUID... configure: error: Package requirements (uuid) were not met: No package 'uuid' found -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 23:51:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 18:51:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532813] Review Request: gummi - A simple LaTeX editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911032351.nA3NpQeK032410@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532813 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cwickert at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #2 from Christoph Wickert 2009-11-03 18:51:25 EDT --- Please add "Publishing" as additional category during desktop-file-install to allow nested menus. While we are at it: Please finish bug 510376 before requesting new reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 23:57:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 18:57:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532739] Review Request: emacs-cedet - Collection of Emacs Development Environment Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911032357.nA3Nv2EY012456@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532739 --- Comment #3 from Karel Kl?? 2009-11-03 18:57:01 EDT --- Spec URL: http://kklic.fedorapeople.org/emacs-cedet.spec SRPM URL: http://kklic.fedorapeople.org/emacs-cedet-1.0-0.2.pre6.fc11.src.rpm I found an error during my testing. Please check attached version. * Wed Nov 4 2009 Karel Klic - 1.0-0.2.pre6 - Install ezimage.el in the main package, because it is probed by the code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 23:55:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 18:55:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530754] Review Request: scour - A script to clean SVG files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911032355.nA3Nth28012248@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530754 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Kofler 2009-11-03 18:55:42 EDT --- There's no need to split the package into several subpackages, and splitting %files with comments is also not needed. It's enough to use "and" in the License tag and to add a comment above it saying e.g.: # svg_regex.py is BSD, the rest is ASL 2.0 See also: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios According to that guideline page, it is sufficient to EITHER split %files with comments specifying the license OR use a comment like the above OR refer to a %doc file which tells what part is under what license (such files are sometimes shipped by upstream, in which case it's enough to reference them). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 23:57:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 18:57:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 285801] Review Request: simias - Collection-Oriented Data Storage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911032357.nA3NvQWO001423@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285801 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |BuildFails -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 3 23:59:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 18:59:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532635] Review Request: rurple - A Python Learning Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911032359.nA3Nxf8O012922@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532635 --- Comment #7 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-11-03 18:59:40 EDT --- Jon, I did what you asked: I created an script that copies the data to .rurple. Same URLs. Regarding the package name, I do not know. It seems easier for me to remember "yum install rurple", than having an extra "-" in the name. But we can choose the name at the end of the revision. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 00:06:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 19:06:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526311] Review Request: mysql-mmm - Multi-Master Replication Manager for MySQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911040006.nA4067Qe003662@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526311 --- Comment #10 from BJ Dierkes 2009-11-03 19:06:06 EDT --- This has been updated due to source change upstream, as well as a number of added patches/changes to clean up a few things: http://5dollarwhitebox.org/tmp/mysql-mmm.spec http://5dollarwhitebox.org/tmp/mysql-mmm-2.0.10-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 00:01:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 19:01:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 285801] Review Request: simias - Collection-Oriented Data Storage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911040001.nA401g85002611@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285801 --- Comment #29 from Steve Traylen 2009-11-03 19:01:41 EDT --- There definitely some Apache licensed code in there as well e.g simias-1.6/src/core/Simias.log4net/src so some reviewing of the licensing is needed. but also log4net is in Fedora already though I've not checked if this actually the same thing. Also it looks like the private gsoap is being used again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 00:08:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 19:08:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531912] Review Request: perl-Net-ARP - Create and Send ARP Packets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911040008.nA408XGd004031@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531912 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-11-03 19:08:32 EDT --- Thanks, everything looks fine now. This package is approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 00:16:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 19:16:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532699] Review Request: ClanLib1 - Cross platform C++ game library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911040016.nA40GGLQ016554@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532699 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |xavier at bachelot.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |xavier at bachelot.org Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-11-03 19:16:15 EDT --- ClanLib1 review: +:ok, =:needs attention, -:needs fixing. n/a:not applicable. MUST Items: [+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. ClanLib1.i386: W: obsolete-not-provided ClanLib ClanLib1.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libclanGL.so.1.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0 ClanLib1-devel.i386: W: obsolete-not-provided ClanLib-devel ClanLib1-devel.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/ClanLib1-devel-1.0.0/html/Tutorial/TicTacToe/tictactoe.zip 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. 1st warning is OK. 2nd warning is an upstream bug, not a packaging bug, so OK. 3rd warning is OK, just like 1st is. 4th warning is bogus, this is a zip file, not a text file. [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. 281e64a463155474d0f1270686286811 [+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [n/a] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [n/a] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. [+] MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [n/a] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. [n/a] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage. [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [n/a] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [+] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [+] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [+] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [n/a] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: [n/a] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [n/a] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [?] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. [n/a] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. [n/a] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [+] SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. [n/a] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. [+] SHOULD: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. I still need to check the upgrade path. At least, I need to understand why 'yum localinstall ClanLib1' doesn't try to remove the older ClanLib package. The Obsoletes: look fine to me though. Nitpick, you might want to change the suffix for Source1 and Patch[01] from ClanLib to ClanLib1 to avoid conflict with the files included in the current current ClanLib package. Also, patches aren't referencing upstream bugs, as required for some time by the guidelines. Don't know if it's a must or a should, I need to check that too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 00:23:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 19:23:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532523] Review request: jarjar - Jar Jar Links In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911040023.nA40NbTs017716@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532523 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |steve.traylen at cern.ch AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |steve.traylen at cern.ch Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 00:22:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 19:22:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532779] Review Request: gtraffic - Simple traffic usage counter for mobile broadband connections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911040022.nA40MD5X006642@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532779 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |cwickert at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 00:26:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 19:26:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531912] Review Request: perl-Net-ARP - Create and Send ARP Packets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911040026.nA40Q8KT007357@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531912 BJ Dierkes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from BJ Dierkes 2009-11-03 19:26:07 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Net-ARP Short Description: Create and Send ARP Packets Owners: derks Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 00:32:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 19:32:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521724] Review Request: perl-Makefile-DOM - Simple DOM parser for Makefiles In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911040032.nA40Wwrd019951@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521724 Nick Bebout changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 00:33:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 19:33:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526595] Review Request: zikula-module-filterutil - Pagesetter like filter rules for Zikula In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911040033.nA40Xk0N020202@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526595 Nick Bebout changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 00:33:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 19:33:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 519483] Review Request: zikula-module-pagemaster - Creates pages with dynamic content like news, articles, etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911040033.nA40XUZT020129@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519483 Nick Bebout changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 00:32:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 19:32:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521723] Review Request: perl-Makefile-Parser - Simple parser for Makefiles In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911040032.nA40WxMG019982@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521723 Bug 521723 depends on bug 521724, which changed state. Bug 521724 Summary: Review Request: perl-Makefile-DOM - Simple DOM parser for Makefiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521724 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 00:33:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 19:33:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 519483] Review Request: zikula-module-pagemaster - Creates pages with dynamic content like news, articles, etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911040033.nA40XlxC020233@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519483 Bug 519483 depends on bug 526595, which changed state. Bug 526595 Summary: Review Request: zikula-module-filterutil - Pagesetter like filter rules for Zikula https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526595 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 00:32:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 19:32:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521723] Review Request: perl-Makefile-Parser - Simple parser for Makefiles In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911040032.nA40WC7C008533@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521723 Nick Bebout changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 00:34:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 19:34:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521569] Review Request: perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettext - Joins the gettext and Maketext frameworks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911040034.nA40Yqcl009158@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521569 Nick Bebout changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |nb at fedoraproject.org Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 00:33:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 19:33:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532699] Review Request: ClanLib1 - Cross platform C++ game library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911040033.nA40XZup008906@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532699 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-11-03 19:33:34 EDT --- > I still need to check the upgrade path. At least, I need to understand why 'yum > localinstall ClanLib1' doesn't try to remove the older ClanLib package. The > Obsoletes: look fine to me though. > Works fine when the package is in a local repo. > Nitpick, you might want to change the suffix for Source1 and Patch[01] from > ClanLib to ClanLib1 to avoid conflict with the files included in the current > current ClanLib package. Also, patches aren't referencing upstream bugs, as > required for some time by the guidelines. Don't know if it's a must or a > should, I need to check that too. This is a "should' APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 00:35:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 19:35:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532739] Review Request: emacs-cedet - Collection of Emacs Development Environment Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911040035.nA40Z8or020962@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532739 --- Comment #4 from Xavier Maillard 2009-11-03 19:35:07 EDT --- There is another glitch: emacs -q --no-init-file M-x ede-new RET Make RET => Cannot open load file: semantic-ede-grammar If I install the emacs-decet-el it works. Thank you for packaging it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 00:47:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 19:47:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526263] Review Request: l7-protocols - Protocol definitions files for l7-filter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911040047.nA40lttM023018@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526263 --- Comment #4 from Christoph Wickert 2009-11-03 19:47:54 EDT --- Marcus, what happened to your server? All the files are returning 404. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 00:44:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 19:44:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532779] Review Request: gtraffic - Simple traffic usage counter for mobile broadband connections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911040044.nA40iWJQ022374@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532779 --- Comment #1 from Christoph Wickert 2009-11-03 19:44:31 EDT --- REVIEW for 7f6282bd6420f2ac611fd5a33e7b28a1 gtraffic-1.01-2.fc11.src.rpm OK - MUST: rpmlint silent OK - MUST: named according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK - MUST: spec file name matches the base package %{name} OK - MUST: package meets the Packaging Guidelines OK - MUST: Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines: GPLv3+ OK - MUST: License field in spec file matches the actual license N/A - MUST: license file included in %doc OK - MUST: spec is in American English OK - MUST: spec is legible OK - MUST: sources match the upstream source by MD5 4e3b45e8bbc7c111ee277944da754f80 OK - MUST: successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on all arches OK - MUST: all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires N/A - MUST: handles locales properly with %find_lang N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun N/A - MUST: Not designed to be relocatable (none) OK - MUST: owns all directories that it creates OK - MUST: no duplicate files in the %files listing OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly, includes %defattr(...) OK - MUST: package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} OK - MUST: consistently uses macros OK - MUST: package contains code N/A - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix, then library files that end in .so must go in a -devel package N/A - MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives OK - MUST: The package contains a GUI application and includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file is properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. OK - MUST: packages does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: at the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} OK - MUST: all filenames valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: N/A - SHOULD: Source package includes license text(s) as a separate file N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages OK - SHOULD: builds in mock OK - SHOULD: compiles and builds into binary rpms on all supported architectures OK - SHOULD: functions as described N/A - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency N/A - SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in a -devel pkg N/A - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Other items: OK - latest stable version OK - SourceURL valid N/A - Compiler flags ok N/A - Debuginfo complete Issues: - Missing Requires: gnome-python2-gconf (this will also pull in all other deps such as pygtk2) - require NetworkManager (or even NetworkManager-gnome) - Description: change "network manager" to "NetworkManager" - I'm not really happy with %{_bindir}/trafficd. How about renaming it to gtrafficd? Just an idea and only if it doesn't cause too much trouble. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 01:20:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 20:20:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524238] Review Request: libclaw - C++ Library Absolutely Wonderful In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911040120.nA41KAug017870@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524238 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |xavier at bachelot.org Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-11-03 20:20:09 EDT --- libclaw review : +:ok, =:needs attention, -:needs fixing. n/a:not applicable MUST Items: [+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. b5e9902c85e6ba7213ce4bde75574b7b [+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [n/a] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [n/a] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. [+] MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [n/a] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. [n/a] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage. [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [n/a] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [n/a] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [+] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [+] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [n/a] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: [n/a] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [n/a] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [n/a] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. [n/a] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [n/a] SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. [n/a] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. [+] SHOULD: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 01:24:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 20:24:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526126] Review Request: python3 - Python 3.x (backwards incompatible version) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911040124.nA41OrWJ029737@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126 --- Comment #42 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-11-03 20:24:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #41) > Re (ii), is there a standard way for a -devel package to drop macros into a > directory (e.g. /usr/lib/rpm ) in such a way that rpm will automatically use > them? Is this acceptable practice? Yes. Create the macros in a file named macros.python3 (and macros.python for the python2 macros) and drop them into %{_sysconfdir}/rpm/. For instance, /etc/rpm/macros.perl in the perl-devel file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 03:43:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 22:43:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911040343.nA43hWZO031040@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #26 from Arun SAG 2009-11-03 22:43:31 EDT --- Yes, tried to build the package with mock 0.9.17 ; Mock hangs; It seems to be executing '/usr/bin/idn --quiet --idna-to-ascii --usestd3asciirules' with gnus-filterhist.el ; Killed idn, then everything went well; Don't know the reason yet for this issue; @PSG you have anything to say on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 04:01:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 23:01:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911040401.nA441AuV003061@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #27 from Arun SAG 2009-11-03 23:01:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > Ok, great. > > Let me know about what you'd like concerning the "verbatim copy of the license" > at some point. I suppose I could add copies of the various GPL flavors used in > the top directory of the tar ball. yes, please add a COPYING file on top level directory of emacs-goodies package; -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 04:03:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 23:03:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911040403.nA4434wY024219@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(psatpute at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #29 from Pravin Satpute 2009-11-03 23:03:00 EDT --- i will resolve the above problem, will try to resolve it else will drop it. is anything to do more from my side? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 04:34:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 23:34:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477526] Review Request: rubygem-hpricot - A Fast, Enjoyable HTML Parser for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911040434.nA44YQoc030986@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477526 --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-03 23:34:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > Mamoru: Are you ok with kanarip maintaining this package for EL-5? Yes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 04:37:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 23:37:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911040437.nA44b6Ze011074@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #28 from Peter Galbraith 2009-11-03 23:37:05 EDT --- I don't know why the build is failing. Concerning the COPYING file, some are GPL-2-or-later and some are GPL-3-or-later. Should I use a COPYING file that includes both? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 04:37:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 23:37:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470696] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911040437.nA44bhwI011234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 Michael Stahnke changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mastahnke at gmail.com --- Comment #53 from Michael Stahnke 2009-11-03 23:37:36 EDT --- So, October is over, and there still a ruby community eager to have passenger on Fedora/RHEL. Are we any closer to reaching an end to this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 05:43:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 00:43:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911040543.nA45hLm9025663@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #29 from Arun SAG 2009-11-04 00:43:20 EDT --- Either Add both licenses in COPYING file or use two files COPYING-GPLV2 COPYING-GPLV3; Its your choice ; -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 05:42:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 00:42:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524437] Review Request: nss_updatedb - Maintains a local cache of network directory user and group information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911040542.nA45gG9Z025501@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524437 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 06:09:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 01:09:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532874] New: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-wacom - Xorg X11 wacom input driver Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-wacom - Xorg X11 wacom input driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532874 Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-wacom - Xorg X11 wacom input driver Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: peter.hutterer at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~whot/wacom.spec SRPM URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~whot/xorg-x11-drv-wacom-0.10.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: X.Org X11 wacom input driver for Wacom tablets. Note: xorg-x11-drv-wacom is the forked linuxwacom driver now hosted on X.Org infrastructure (and maintained in git). This driver supports X servers 1.7 and newer while the linuxwacom driver goes into maintenance mode for X servers up to including 1.6. We currently maintain a patchset for linuxwacom to build against our X server, in the future linuxwacom will be declared obsolete by this driver. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 06:20:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 01:20:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521166] Review Request: OpenGTL - Graphics Transformation Languages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911040620.nA46KKpq002973@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521166 --- Comment #13 from Rex Dieter 2009-11-04 01:20:18 EDT --- SPEC: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/OpenGTL/OpenGTL.spec SRPM: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/OpenGTL/OpenGTL-0.9.11-1.fc12.src.rpm f12 scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1787446 %changelog * Wed Nov 04 2009 Rex Dieter - 0.9.11-1 - OpenGTL-0.9.11 (this release supports llvm-2.6, woo!) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 06:28:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 01:28:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521166] Review Request: OpenGTL - Graphics Transformation Languages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911040628.nA46SZgp025289@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521166 --- Comment #14 from Rex Dieter 2009-11-04 01:28:34 EDT --- Well, builds on x86_64, ppc (at least), not so much, CMakeLists reports: llvm was build with PIC enabled, this is not surported on 32bits. Added ExcludeArch: ppc for now, until I can look closer at that. New scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1787453 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 06:53:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 01:53:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525914] Review Request: perl-Net-GitHub - Perl interface for github.com In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911040653.nA46rSsx013011@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525914 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Chris Weyl 2009-11-04 01:53:27 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 07:02:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 02:02:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524238] Review Request: libclaw - C++ Library Absolutely Wonderful In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911040702.nA472XUT015742@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524238 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-04 02:02:32 EDT --- Thank you! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libclaw Short Description: C++ Library Absolutely Wonderful Owners: lkundrak xavierb Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 07:45:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 02:45:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525909] Review Request: sysprof - A system-wide Linux profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911040745.nA47jXJx026020@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525909 Gianluca Sforna changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Gianluca Sforna 2009-11-04 02:45:30 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: sysprof InitialCC: sandmann at daimi.au.dk Upstream would like to CCed on sysprof bugs using this address -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 08:05:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 03:05:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470696] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911040805.nA485CHe030791@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 --- Comment #54 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-11-04 03:05:05 EDT --- My status is I'm slowly growing some more C coding skills to fold oxt/boost/passenger back onto what is available outside of the passenger realm ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 08:24:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 03:24:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529517] Review Request: kcm_touchpad - Synaptics driver based touchpads kcontrol module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911040824.nA48Orip023037@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529517 --- Comment #8 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-11-04 03:24:52 EDT --- Ryan, please fix remaining issues - group and source url. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 08:41:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 03:41:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530880] Review Request: ns-tiza-fonts - A Slab-Serif Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911040841.nA48fwC5009197@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530880 TK009 changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(john.brown009 at gma | |il.com) | --- Comment #2 from TK009 2009-11-04 03:41:52 EDT --- 1. I used one of your spec files as a template, oops =). I have correct that and am now using the template from fontpackages-devel. 2. Those were choices made by the creator and I didn't feel comfortable changing them. I have corrected all of them. 3. The font name is not in either the Summary or the %description, only here in the Review Request. No action needed. 4a. Corrected missing metadata. 4b. I have advised the creator of the missing glyph's via email. 5. Awaiting clarification from the creator on this one. 6. I have advised the creator via email of this issue. 7. I ran repo-font-audit, rpmlint and fontlint correcting all but the warning about the license. Will the license issue need to be corrected before this can pass review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 08:53:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 03:53:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526564] Review Request: unittest - C++ unit testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911040853.nA48rVBn012822@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526564 --- Comment #9 from Ionu? Ar??ri?i 2009-11-04 03:53:29 EDT --- Thanks for picking this up, Thomas! I added all of your changes, however: > Requires: %{name}-devel = %{version}-%{release} > to the main package, because most users would just run a > 'yum install unittest' How does this work if there is no main package? http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/unittest/unittest-0.50-62.5.fc12.src.rpm http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/unittest/unittest.spec * Wed Nov 4 2009 Ionu? Ar??ri?i - 0.50-62.5 - use %%global instead of %%define - comment escape doc macro - added subpackage requires - declare that there is no debug package - add %%check -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 09:14:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 04:14:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530880] Review Request: ns-tiza-fonts - A Slab-Serif Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911040914.nA49E3hp006594@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530880 Paul Flo Williams changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul at frixxon.co.uk --- Comment #4 from Paul Flo Williams 2009-11-04 04:14:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > > Will the license issue need to be corrected before this can pass review? It should at least be "OFL", not "OLF" ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 09:13:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 04:13:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530880] Review Request: ns-tiza-fonts - A Slab-Serif Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911040913.nA49D1Zj006332@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530880 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-11-04 04:13:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > 1. I used one of your spec files as a template, oops =). I have correct that > and am now using the template from fontpackages-devel. We used to package fonts that way but it was changed for Fedora 11 to accomodate the font autoinstaller and simplify things. > 2. Those were choices made by the creator and I didn't feel comfortable > changing them. I have corrected all of them. Thanks, > 3. The font name is not in either the Summary or the %description, only here in > the Review Request. No action needed. It was in the spec file I checked. Maybe you published the wrong version? > 7. I ran repo-font-audit, rpmlint and fontlint correcting all but the warning > about the license. > > Will the license issue need to be corrected before this can pass review? No, this is not a blocker, just something it is a very good idea to fix upstream, as it confuses users when the licensing they see in font browsers is not the same the package declares (also I suppose that when Fedora does licensing audits it makes things a lot harder than it should be) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 09:17:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 04:17:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470696] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911040917.nA49HYrv007950@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 --- Comment #55 from Hongli Lai 2009-11-04 04:17:30 EDT --- Sorry, still too busy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 09:17:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 04:17:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911040917.nA49H3T7007790@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 --- Comment #30 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-11-04 04:16:57 EDT --- I didn't find anything else so far. Of course I add new tests regularly when a problem reports makes me realise there is something else that needs to be checked in existing packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 09:20:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 04:20:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530880] Review Request: ns-tiza-fonts - A Slab-Serif Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911040920.nA49Khlb009191@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530880 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-11-04 04:20:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #2) > > > > Will the license issue need to be corrected before this can pass review? > > It should at least be "OFL", not "OLF" ;-) This is the kind of typo which is very hard for humans to notice, sorry :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 09:27:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 04:27:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530880] Review Request: ns-tiza-fonts - A Slab-Serif Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911040927.nA49R8uj024177@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530880 --- Comment #6 from TK009 2009-11-04 04:27:06 EDT --- Thank you for catching it. Stupid mistake on my part. Thanks for helping get this up to speed as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 09:56:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 04:56:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529073] Review Request: php-phpunit-phploc - A tool for quickly measuring the size of a PHP project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911040956.nA49u7gH031739@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529073 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 09:55:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 04:55:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529073] Review Request: php-phpunit-phploc - A tool for quickly measuring the size of a PHP project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911040955.nA49tScl031628@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529073 --- Comment #5 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-11-04 04:55:27 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-phpunit-phploc Short Description: A tool for quickly measuring the size of a PHP project Owners: llaumgui cdamian Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 10:05:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 05:05:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532699] Review Request: ClanLib1 - Cross platform C++ game library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041005.nA4A5elp022068@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532699 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Hans de Goede 2009-11-04 05:05:38 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ClanLib1 Short Description: Cross platform C++ game library Owners: jwrdegoede Branches: F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 10:25:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 05:25:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 492895] Review Request: xml-security-c - C++ Implementation of W3C security standards for XML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041025.nA4AP0UU007381@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492895 --- Comment #21 from Antti Andreimann 2009-11-04 05:24:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > Anntti: Are you ok with Steve maintaining this for EL-4? Yes I'm OK with Steve co-maintaining the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 10:59:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 05:59:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532315] Review Request: nanoxml - Small XML parser for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041059.nA4Ax6S0008290@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532315 --- Comment #8 from Michal Ingeli 2009-11-04 05:59:03 EDT --- thanks for review and cvs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 11:15:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 06:15:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 519282] Review Request: calibre - e-book converter and library manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041115.nA4BFFTf013456@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519282 Ionu? Ar??ri?i changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 11:20:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 06:20:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526263] Review Request: l7-protocols - Protocol definitions files for l7-filter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041120.nA4BKMES027608@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526263 --- Comment #5 from Marcus Moeller 2009-11-04 06:20:21 EDT --- Should work again. Sorry. Best Regards Marcus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 11:39:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 06:39:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526876] Review Request: php-pecl-gmagick - Provides a wrapper to the GraphicsMagick library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041139.nA4Bd7pt032373@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526876 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-04 06:39:05 EDT --- php-pecl-gmagick-1.0.2b1-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pecl-gmagick-1.0.2b1-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 11:41:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 06:41:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530473] Review Request: lessfs - Lessfs is an inline data deduplicating filesystem. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041141.nA4BfMtg000785@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530473 --- Comment #6 from Michael Schwendt 2009-11-04 06:41:20 EDT --- * The %description could be a bit more verbose than the %summary in explaining what this package supplies. * In the %summary it is good practise to not repeat %name and reduce the summary to headline/title-style: "Inline data deduplicating filesystem" > export CFLAGS="-ggdb2 -O2" No comment on why Fedora's global %optflags are not being used? > rm -rf %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name} Such activity asks for a comment in the .spec file. > %post -p /sbin/ldconfig > %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig No shared library are included in this package. > %{_mandir}/man1/lessfs.1.gz Typically, the '*' wildcard is used instead of hardcoding the gzip compression suffix ".gz". That way rpmbuild may change the compression technique without requiring spec updates. > /etc/init.d/lessfs An initscript without corresponding chkconfig/service scriptlets in the .spec file? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 11:46:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 06:46:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526876] Review Request: php-pecl-gmagick - Provides a wrapper to the GraphicsMagick library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041146.nA4Bkr2o002072@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526876 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-04 06:46:53 EDT --- php-pecl-gmagick-1.0.2b1-3.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pecl-gmagick-1.0.2b1-3.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:01:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:01:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530857] Review Request: drehatlas-xaporho-fonts - latin typeface inspired by a hobby rock band logo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041201.nA4C165U026061@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530857 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-04 07:01:04 EDT --- drehatlas-xaporho-fonts-1.0.3.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:01:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:01:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530857] Review Request: drehatlas-xaporho-fonts - latin typeface inspired by a hobby rock band logo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041201.nA4C1Bcc026110@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530857 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.0.3.2-2.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:04:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:04:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527704] Review Request: mingw32-proj - MinGW port of the proj cartographic projection library package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041204.nA4C4iMe027357@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527704 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-04 07:04:41 EDT --- mingw32-proj-4.6.1-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:09:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:09:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526122] Review Request: vim-latex - Tools to view, edit and compile LaTeX documents in Vim In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041209.nA4C96F8009446@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526122 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.5-3.20091002.r1074.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:05:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:05:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527241] Review Request: libvtemm - C++ bindings for vte In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041205.nA4C5rHr008700@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527241 --- Comment #2 from Michael Schwendt 2009-11-04 07:05:31 EDT --- * The package naming guidelines answer your question: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Spec_file_name https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#MultiplePackages > Having API docs without devel package does not make much sense. Sure it does! One can read documentation and evaluate an API without needing to install -devel package dependency-chains. One could even create a Documentation spin, which would not be possible with superfluous unresolvable dependencies on -devel packages. > # Documentation is moved from its original directory to one > owned by gtk-doc. > # Why it is done is unclear for me. > Requires: gtk-doc Um, what? That comment caused some head-scratching. It's *you* who moves the documentation during %install. As why you do that, one reason for moving it from %_docdir to gtk-doc's place is to make it available to the "devhelp" tool. > %install > rm -rf %{buildroot} docs-to-include > rm -rf %{buildroot} The second one is redundant. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:11:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:11:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 495669] Review Request: sgpio - Intel SGPIO enclosure management utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041211.nA4CB7S7030303@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495669 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-04 07:11:05 EDT --- sgpio-1.2.0.10-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:10:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:10:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 496133] Review Request: EMBOSS - The European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041210.nA4CAmxP030172@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496133 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-04 07:10:45 EDT --- EMBOSS-6.1.0-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:09:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:09:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526122] Review Request: vim-latex - Tools to view, edit and compile LaTeX documents in Vim In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041209.nA4C91TY029366@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526122 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-04 07:08:59 EDT --- vim-latex-1.5-3.20091002.r1074.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:10:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:10:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531408] Review Request: rubygem-archive-tar-minitar - Provides POSIX tar archive management from Ruby programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041210.nA4CAWl8030018@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531408 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-04 07:10:31 EDT --- rubygem-archive-tar-minitar-0.5.2-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:11:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:11:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 495669] Review Request: sgpio - Intel SGPIO enclosure management utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041211.nA4CBDKg030364@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495669 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.2.0.10-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:09:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:09:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 514911] Review Request: sil-padauk-fonts - Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041209.nA4C9rEr029561@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514911 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.4-6.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:10:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:10:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531408] Review Request: rubygem-archive-tar-minitar - Provides POSIX tar archive management from Ruby programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041210.nA4CAcBG030061@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531408 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.5.2-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:09:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:09:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 514911] Review Request: sil-padauk-fonts - Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041209.nA4C9gct009898@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514911 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-04 07:09:41 EDT --- sil-padauk-fonts-2.4-6.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:10:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:10:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 496133] Review Request: EMBOSS - The European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041210.nA4CAtAH010567@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496133 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |6.1.0-5.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:13:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:13:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529831] Review Request: opensips - Open Source SIP Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041213.nA4CDkDM031644@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529831 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-04 07:13:45 EDT --- opensips-1.6.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:15:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:15:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 503490] Review Request: ayttm - Universal Instant Messaging Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041215.nA4CF9Pj032604@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503490 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-04 07:15:06 EDT --- ayttm-0.6.0-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:15:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:15:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527840] Review Request: parole - Media player for the Xfce desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041215.nA4CFOUr032700@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527840 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-04 07:15:23 EDT --- parole-0.1.91-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:14:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:14:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528949] Review Request: drehatlas-widelands-fonts - Widelands font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041214.nA4CEghB032197@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528949 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-04 07:14:41 EDT --- drehatlas-widelands-fonts-1.0.2.2-6.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:14:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:14:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528949] Review Request: drehatlas-widelands-fonts - Widelands font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041214.nA4CExmC032266@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528949 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.0.2.2-6.fc10 |1.0.2.2-6.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:15:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:15:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529323] Review Request: gdouros-aegean-fonts - Font for ancient scripts in the Aegean vicinity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041215.nA4CFeJD000341@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529323 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-04 07:15:39 EDT --- gdouros-aegean-fonts-3.01-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:15:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:15:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527840] Review Request: parole - Media player for the Xfce desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041215.nA4CFUl9032746@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527840 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.1.91-1.fc11 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:16:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:16:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530324] Review Request: perl-V - Print version of the specified Perl modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041216.nA4CGHAX000633@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530324 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-04 07:16:16 EDT --- perl-V-0.13-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-V'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-10944 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:14:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:14:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528949] Review Request: drehatlas-widelands-fonts - Widelands font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041214.nA4CEs5f011813@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528949 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-04 07:14:53 EDT --- drehatlas-widelands-fonts-1.0.2.2-6.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:14:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:14:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528949] Review Request: drehatlas-widelands-fonts - Widelands font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041214.nA4CElDR011761@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528949 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.0.2.2-6.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:15:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:15:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 503490] Review Request: ayttm - Universal Instant Messaging Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041215.nA4CFE7S012180@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503490 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.6.0-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:17:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:17:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530205] Review Request: AntTweakBar - GUI library for videogame property editing UIs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041217.nA4CHcv0012829@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530205 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.13-5.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:19:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:19:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530342] Review Request: kcm-gtk - Configure the appearance of GTK apps in KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041219.nA4CJaGO002408@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530342 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-04 07:19:36 EDT --- kcm-gtk-0.5.3-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:18:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:18:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 496133] Review Request: EMBOSS - The European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041218.nA4CIus6002097@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496133 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-04 07:18:55 EDT --- EMBOSS-6.1.0-5.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:17:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:17:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530205] Review Request: AntTweakBar - GUI library for videogame property editing UIs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041217.nA4CHWRN001604@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530205 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-04 07:17:31 EDT --- AntTweakBar-1.13-5.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:20:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:20:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530275] Review Request: rubygem-erubis - A fast and extensible eRuby implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041220.nA4CKt9m003234@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530275 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-04 07:20:54 EDT --- rubygem-erubis-2.6.5-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:19:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:19:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 496133] Review Request: EMBOSS - The European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041219.nA4CJ2O8002144@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496133 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|6.1.0-5.fc10 |6.1.0-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:19:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:19:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530342] Review Request: kcm-gtk - Configure the appearance of GTK apps in KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041219.nA4CJkf4002493@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530342 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.5.3-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:21:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:21:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530275] Review Request: rubygem-erubis - A fast and extensible eRuby implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041221.nA4CL0YK014469@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530275 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.6.5-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:24:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:24:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528096] Review Request: kmagnet - KDE puzzle game with built in editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041224.nA4COOVZ004661@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528096 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-04 07:24:23 EDT --- kmagnet-0.03-5.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:21:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:21:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524605] Review Request: gtrayicon - Generic tray icon for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041221.nA4CLxG3004116@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524605 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-04 07:21:57 EDT --- gtrayicon-1.1-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:24:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:24:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524605] Review Request: gtrayicon - Generic tray icon for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041224.nA4COcQh004737@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524605 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-04 07:24:37 EDT --- gtrayicon-1.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:24:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:24:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524605] Review Request: gtrayicon - Generic tray icon for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041224.nA4COg64004785@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524605 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.1-2.fc11 |1.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:22:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:22:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524605] Review Request: gtrayicon - Generic tray icon for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041222.nA4CMdWJ004226@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524605 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.1-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:28:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:28:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529494] Review Request: drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts - A decorative, hairy font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041228.nA4CSv3Q017157@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529494 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.0.1.1-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:24:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:24:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508521] Review Request: jettison - A JSON StAX implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041224.nA4COXoq015490@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508521 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-04 07:24:32 EDT --- jettison-1.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update jettison'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-10967 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:27:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:27:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041227.nA4CRbs8006142@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #30 from Peter Galbraith 2009-11-04 07:27:35 EDT --- Sweet, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:27:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:27:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528096] Review Request: kmagnet - KDE puzzle game with built in editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041227.nA4CRfdH006177@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528096 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-04 07:27:41 EDT --- kmagnet-0.03-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:31:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:31:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526122] Review Request: vim-latex - Tools to view, edit and compile LaTeX documents in Vim In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041231.nA4CVEkB007520@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526122 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-04 07:31:13 EDT --- vim-latex-1.5-3.20091002.r1074.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:28:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:28:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529494] Review Request: drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts - A decorative, hairy font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041228.nA4CSqwq006488@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529494 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-04 07:28:51 EDT --- drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts-1.0.1.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:27:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:27:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528096] Review Request: kmagnet - KDE puzzle game with built in editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041227.nA4CRmdw006232@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528096 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.03-5.fc10 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:29:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:29:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530324] Review Request: perl-V - Print version of the specified Perl modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041229.nA4CT79T006549@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530324 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-04 07:29:06 EDT --- perl-V-0.13-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-V'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-10980 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:33:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:33:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520479] Review Request: myproxy - Manage X.509 Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041233.nA4CXPgL019205@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520479 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-04 07:33:22 EDT --- myproxy-4.8-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:32:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:32:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529494] Review Request: drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts - A decorative, hairy font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041232.nA4CWwb0019085@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529494 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.0.1.1-1.fc11 |1.0.1.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:32:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:32:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529494] Review Request: drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts - A decorative, hairy font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041232.nA4CWq05019039@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529494 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-04 07:32:51 EDT --- drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts-1.0.1.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:31:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:31:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530857] Review Request: drehatlas-xaporho-fonts - latin typeface inspired by a hobby rock band logo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041231.nA4CVnON018735@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530857 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-04 07:31:48 EDT --- drehatlas-xaporho-fonts-1.0.3.2-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:31:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:31:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530857] Review Request: drehatlas-xaporho-fonts - latin typeface inspired by a hobby rock band logo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041231.nA4CVslM018785@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530857 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.0.3.2-2.fc10 |1.0.3.2-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:31:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:31:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526122] Review Request: vim-latex - Tools to view, edit and compile LaTeX documents in Vim In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041231.nA4CVJax018598@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526122 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.5-3.20091002.r1074.fc10 |1.5-3.20091002.r1074.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:35:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:35:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516532] Review Request: globus-scheduler-event-generator - Globus Toolkit - Scheduler Event Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041235.nA4CZCZp009221@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516532 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-04 07:35:10 EDT --- globus-scheduler-event-generator-2.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:35:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:35:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516532] Review Request: globus-scheduler-event-generator - Globus Toolkit - Scheduler Event Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041235.nA4CZGsC009267@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516532 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.1-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:37:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:37:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516534] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-callout-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus GRAM Jobmanager Callout Errors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041237.nA4Cb6Xv021000@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516534 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-04 07:37:05 EDT --- globus-gram-job-manager-callout-error-0.2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:37:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:37:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527704] Review Request: mingw32-proj - MinGW port of the proj cartographic projection library package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041237.nA4CbNKi010416@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527704 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-04 07:37:21 EDT --- mingw32-proj-4.6.1-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:40:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:40:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532306] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-debug - Faster implementation of the standard Debugging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041240.nA4Ce63D011541@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532306 --- Comment #4 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-11-04 07:40:05 EDT --- I modified the procedure just a little bit, as I generally want to prevent installing anything in %prep; in this case, it works out just fine (I think). New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-ruby-debug.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f12/SRPMS/rubygem-ruby-debug-0.10.3-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:37:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:37:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527704] Review Request: mingw32-proj - MinGW port of the proj cartographic projection library package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041237.nA4CbUCN010480@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527704 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |4.6.1-4.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:37:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:37:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516534] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-callout-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus GRAM Jobmanager Callout Errors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041237.nA4CbCau010340@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516534 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.2-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 12:39:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:39:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522613] Review Request: python-tornado - Scalable, non-blocking web server and tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041239.nA4Cdblb011092@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522613 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-04 07:39:34 EDT --- python-tornado-0.2-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-tornado'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-11024 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 14:11:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 09:11:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532739] Review Request: emacs-cedet - Collection of Emacs Development Environment Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041411.nA4EB8gk006563@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532739 --- Comment #5 from Karel Kl?? 2009-11-04 09:11:07 EDT --- Spec URL: http://kklic.fedorapeople.org/emacs-cedet.spec SRPM URL: http://kklic.fedorapeople.org/emacs-cedet-1.0-0.3.pre6.fc12.src.rpm Thanks for testing. This one was hard to solve (3 patches). * Wed Nov 4 2009 Karel Klic - 1.0-0.3.pre6 - Added semantic-ede-grammar, allow-noninteger-inode, and fix-parent-project patches. Fixes project creation using ede-new. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 14:39:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 09:39:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532635] Review Request: rurple - A Python Learning Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041439.nA4EdRjm014508@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532635 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla 2009-11-04 09:39:26 EDT --- Whoops forgot the flag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 15:26:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 10:26:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532635] Review Request: rurple - A Python Learning Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041526.nA4FQh7u028305@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532635 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla 2009-11-04 10:26:42 EDT --- Hmm. Now it won't start: Line 43, No such file or directory, rur_images -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 15:32:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 10:32:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532635] Review Request: rurple - A Python Learning Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041532.nA4FWWJh006566@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532635 --- Comment #10 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-11-04 10:32:31 EDT --- Have you deleted your old ~/.rurple directory? The first time, we need to create the links. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 15:40:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 10:40:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532635] Review Request: rurple - A Python Learning Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041540.nA4FeP6c000408@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532635 --- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla 2009-11-04 10:40:24 EDT --- No, I haven't. Shouldn't the script check for the links in the .rurple directory, and remove and recreate if they aren't present? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 15:47:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 10:47:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532635] Review Request: rurple - A Python Learning Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041547.nA4Flh7U011222@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532635 --- Comment #12 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-11-04 10:47:42 EDT --- I just copied the cylindrix script, and that was I did not like. If everything is working for you, I can improve the script, by testing each individual link separately. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 15:47:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 10:47:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527241] Review Request: libvtemm - C++ bindings for vte In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041547.nA4FlKdA011165@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527241 --- Comment #3 from Krzesimir Nowak 2009-11-04 10:47:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > * The package naming guidelines answer your question: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Spec_file_name > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#MultiplePackages > > Ok. I renamed package to libvtemm. > > Having API docs without devel package does not make much sense. > > Sure it does! One can read documentation and evaluate an API without needing > to install -devel package dependency-chains. One could even create a > Documentation spin, which would not be possible with superfluous unresolvable > dependencies on -devel packages. > Oh, but I wonder if anyone ever complained that gtkmm/glibmm/othermm-docs package depend on -devel one. But what you say has much sense, so I removed the dependency. > > > # Documentation is moved from its original directory to one > > owned by gtk-doc. > > # Why it is done is unclear for me. > > Requires: gtk-doc > > Um, what? That comment caused some head-scratching. It's *you* who moves the > documentation during %install. As why you do that, one reason for moving it > from %_docdir to gtk-doc's place is to make it available to the "devhelp" tool. > I move it, because I noticed that in gtkmm/glibmm Fedora maintainer did it, so at first I wanted to be consistent. Devhelp argument is false - I made a scratch build[1] of libvtemm-0.20.6 (so I could install it on my Fedora 11) and installed only -docs package, which had documentation in %{_docdir}/libvtemm-1.2 and .devhelp2 file in %{_datadir}/devhelp/books/libvtemm-1.2/. After installation in devhelp's book list libvtemm appeared. So there are two ways of installing documentation: 1. let the documentation lie, where developer of library (me) decided - this adds devhelp dependency to -docs package. 2. move documentation to %{_datadir}/gtk-doc, like in gtkmm/glibmm/othermm Fedora packages - this adds probably gtk-doc dependency to -docs package. (Probably, because in gtkmm/glibmm/othermm-docs such dependency doesn't exist. The same in in for example glib2-devel, which puts documentation into gtk-doc directory.) > > > %install > > rm -rf %{buildroot} docs-to-include > > rm -rf %{buildroot} > > The second one is redundant. That one I forgot to remove. :) new spec: http://krnowak.fedorapeople.org/libvtemm.spec new srpm: http://krnowak.fedorapeople.org/libvtemm-0.22.1-2.fc11.src.rpm new koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1787913 new rpmlint outputs: libvtemm.spec: 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. libvtemm-0.22.1-2.fc11.src.rpm: 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. libvtemm-0.22.1-2.fc12.i686.rpm: 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. libvtemm-debuginfo-0.22.1-2.fc12.i686.rpm: 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. libvtemm-devel-0.22.1-2.fc12.i686.rpm: 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. libvtemm-docs-0.22.1-2.fc12.i686.rpm: 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [1] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1787855 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 15:59:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 10:59:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526651] Review Request: xpaint - An X Window System image editing or paint program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041559.nA4FxE9J014006@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526651 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |limb at jcomserv.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #33 from Jon Ciesla 2009-11-04 10:59:11 EDT --- Hmm, a few issues on a full review. One, they didn't update the GPL licensing text in all places, but that's OK since the GPLv2 stuff says GPLv2+. Given that, might want to change license tage to GPLv3+. Source URL should be Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz, modified for the project name. Why is the URL tag pointing to the SF project, and not the SF web page? Mock build and BRs are OK. I've also read this entire review and considered the issues raised and their solutions. I think once the various tags above are fixed, I could approve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 16:02:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 11:02:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532635] Review Request: rurple - A Python Learning Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041602.nA4G24eC015000@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532635 --- Comment #13 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-11-04 11:02:03 EDT --- This is the new /usr/bin/rurple script: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- #!/bin/bash #if no .rurple in home if [ ! -d ~/.rurple ]; then #make .rurple in home mkdir ~/.rurple || : fi #link to data if [ ! -d ~/.rurple/lessons ]; then ln -s /usr/share/rurple/lessons ~/.rurple/lessons || : fi if [ ! -d ~/.rurple/python_files ]; then ln -s /usr/share/rurple/python_files ~/.rurple/python_files || : fi if [ ! -d ~/.rurple/rur_images ]; then ln -s /usr/share/rurple/rur_images ~/.rurple/rur_images || : fi if [ ! -d ~/.rurple/rur_locale ]; then ln -s /usr/share/rurple/rur_locale ~/.rurple/rur_locale || : fi #copy mutable data if [ ! -d ~/.rurple/rur_programs ]; then cp -R -p /usr/share/rurple/rur_programs ~/.rurple/ || : fi if [ ! -d ~/.rurple/world_files ]; then cp -R -p /usr/share/rurple/world_files ~/.rurple/ || : fi cd ~/.rurple exec /usr/bin/rur_start.py "$@" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 16:15:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 11:15:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532635] Review Request: rurple - A Python Learning Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041615.nA4GFOcT018597@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532635 --- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla 2009-11-04 11:15:23 EDT --- Not at the old link yet. I'd like to test it. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 16:26:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 11:26:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526651] Review Request: xpaint - An X Window System image editing or paint program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041626.nA4GQVPd013821@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526651 --- Comment #34 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-11-04 11:26:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #33) > Hmm, a few issues on a full review. > > One, they didn't update the GPL licensing text in all places, but that's OK > since the GPLv2 stuff says GPLv2+. Given that, might want to change license > tage to GPLv3+. Done, and there is a new version 2.8.7 available. > > Source URL should be Source0: > http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz, modified > for the project name. http://downloads.sourceforge.net/sf-xpaint/xpaint-2.8.7.tar.gz redirects to: http://sourceforge.net/projects/sf-xpaint/files/ > > Why is the URL tag pointing to the SF project, and not the SF web page? Because the SF web page does not have any downloadable link, as you can see: http://sf-xpaint.sourceforge.net/ It is kind of unusable, IMHO. > > Mock build and BRs are OK. > > I've also read this entire review and considered the issues raised and their > solutions. > > I think once the various tags above are fixed, I could approve. SPEC: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/SPECS/xpaint.spec SRPM: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/src/xpaint-2.8.7-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 16:39:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 11:39:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532635] Review Request: rurple - A Python Learning Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041639.nA4GdbSv016435@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532635 --- Comment #15 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-11-04 11:39:37 EDT --- http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/src/rurple-1.0-0.3.rc3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 17:28:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 12:28:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532635] Review Request: rurple - A Python Learning Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041728.nA4HSf5w003929@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532635 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #16 from Jon Ciesla 2009-11-04 12:28:40 EDT --- Brilliant! All of the above fixed, I respect your judgment on the name. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 17:37:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 12:37:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524423] Review Request: ciso - iso to cso converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041737.nA4HboQO006245@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524423 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-04 12:37:49 EDT --- I note that this ticket is assigned, but the fedora-review flag is not set, which is an odd state of affairs. However, the packager also needs a sponsor, and as fas as I can tell, hguemar is not one and thus cannot review this submission. Did I overlook something? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 17:49:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 12:49:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526126] Review Request: python3 - Python 3.x (backwards incompatible version) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041749.nA4HnNmW032642@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126 --- Comment #43 from Dave Malcolm 2009-11-04 12:49:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #42) > (In reply to comment #41) > > Re (ii), is there a standard way for a -devel package to drop macros into a > > directory (e.g. /usr/lib/rpm ) in such a way that rpm will automatically use > > them? Is this acceptable practice? > > Yes. Create the macros in a file named macros.python3 (and macros.python for > the python2 macros) and drop them into %{_sysconfdir}/rpm/. > > For instance, /etc/rpm/macros.perl in the perl-devel file. Updated specfile: http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/python3.spec Updated SRPM: http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/python3-3.1.1-9.fc11.src.rpm Diff between 3.1.1-8 and 3.1.1-9: http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/python3-from-3.1.1-8-to-3.1.1-9.diff I've tested this with a sample specfile and it works. One possible drawback is that the macro files are read (with rpmInitMacros) and expanded on every rpm operation, which means that when python3-devel is installed, every "rpm" invocation is going to be quietly invoking /usr/bin/python3 twice on startup. None of the existing macro files seem to invoke subprocess during expansion. Having said that, it only affects systems with python-devel installed, so I don't see this as a problem. I'll look at doing something similar for the main "python-devel" package. rpmlint output is as before (see comment #38) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 17:50:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 12:50:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526126] Review Request: python3 - Python 3.x (backwards incompatible version) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041750.nA4HoADJ009123@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126 --- Comment #44 from Dave Malcolm 2009-11-04 12:50:08 EDT --- > Having said that, it only affects systems with python-devel installed, so I "python3-devel", rather than "python-devel", obviously -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 17:55:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 12:55:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526651] Review Request: xpaint - An X Window System image editing or paint program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041755.nA4HtNW2010555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526651 --- Comment #35 from Jon Ciesla 2009-11-04 12:55:22 EDT --- Sounds reasonable re: URL. Re: Source0. Yes, that's what it redirects to. Today. We use the one in the guidelines in case it eventually redirects elsewhere, to prevent breakage. Switch, and we're good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 18:01:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 13:01:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 515053] Review Request: sugar-getiabooks - Internet Archive Books receiver for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041801.nA4I1UYZ012084@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515053 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-04 13:01:29 EDT --- Turns out that this package is doing the right thing with respect to %{sugaractivitydir}; the main sugar package will be fixed to own it. That just leaves the NEWS file, which should be easy to either fix up or justify. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 18:05:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 13:05:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528108] Review Request: Vuurmuur - Firewall manager built on top of iptables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041805.nA4I5wSP013101@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528108 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-04 13:05:55 EDT --- Some random remarks from one of the sponsor members: A. Summary, description, etc * EVR (Epoch-Version-Release) - For formally released (i.e. non-snapshot) package, the release number must begin with 1%{?dist}, and then be incremented every time you modify your spec file (and should be reset to 1%{?dist} then version is upgrade): https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Package_Release * Vendor - "Vendor" item should be removed on Fedora. Fedora buildsystem (koji) automatically sets this value. * License - The license tag for this package should be "GPLv2+". ref: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#.22or_later_version.22_licenses * BR (BuildRequires) - This package does not build. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1787887 Please try to rebuild your srpm with mock: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/MockTricks to check if all needed BuildRequires are included. ( Note: perhaps "BR: libtool automake ncurses-devel" are also needed for this package ) * Dependency between subpackages - All subpacakges other than "Vuurnuur" binary rpm should have "Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}": https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package B. %prep, %build * Working directory - At the beginning of %build, %install, the working directory is %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version} (by default, unless you explicitly change this value at %setup). So I suggest to write something like: -------------------------------------------------------------- %build cd libvuurmuur-%{version} LIBVUDIR=$(pwd) %configure --with-plugindir=%{_libdir}/vuurmuur/plugins sed ... .... make %{?_smp_mflags} cd ../vuurmuur-%{version} %configure --with-libvuurmuur-includes=${LIBVUDIR}/src .... ..... --------------------------------------------------------------- Also I suggest not to repeat somewhat long "%{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/libvuurmuur-%{version}" string and use some variable. * Parallel make - Support parallel make unless impossible: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Parallel_make If parallel make cannot be supported, please write some comments on the spec file. C %install * About the following lines --------------------------------------------------------------- cd %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/vuurmuur-%{version} make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT for i in `find %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/vuurmuur-%{version}/skel -name .keep` do rm -rf $i done --------------------------------------------------------------- - Would you explain why .keep files under %_builddir (not $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) have to be removed after the installation is already done by the above line? * %{_initddir} - Use %{_initddir} instead of %{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#Initscripts_on_the_filesystem D. Scriptlets * SysVinit scrptlets related dependency - Add proper Requires(post) or to to -daemon subpackage: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#Initscripts_in_spec_file_scriptlets E. %files * plugin - From libvuurmuur-0.7/src/backendapi.c: --------------------------------------------------------------- 137 if(snprintf(plugin_location, sizeof(plugin_location), "%s/plugins/lib%s.so", conf.plugdir, plugin_name) >= (int)sizeof(plugin_location)) 138 { 143 return(-1); 144 } 146 plugin->handle = open_plugin(debuglvl, plugin_location); 147 if(!plugin->handle) 148 { 151 return(-1); 152 } --------------------------------------------------------------- Like this, usually plugins are expected to have the names of libfoo.so, not libfoo.so.X.Y as these are plugins, not libraries. So splitting %{_libdir}/vuurmuur/plugins/libtextdir.so.* and %{_libdir}/vuurmuur/plugins/libtextdir.so into defferent subpackages is perhaps nonsense (and plugin files should not be packaged in -devel subpackage). Note that usually %{_libdir}/libbar.so have to be installed in XXX-devel package, however plugin files named libfoo.so can be installed in non-devel package * Manfile - Files under %_mandir are automatically marked as %doc - Files under %{_mandir}/ru/ should be marked as %lang(ru). * Static archive - Static archives (*.a files) must not be packages unless needed: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries_2 * Duplicate files ----------------------------------------------------------------- $ rpm -qlp *rpm | sort | uniq -d /usr/share/man/man8/vuurmuur_conf.8.gz /usr/share/man/ru/man8/vuurmuur_conf.8.gz /usr/share/vuurmuur/config /usr/share/vuurmuur/config/config.conf.sample /usr/share/vuurmuur/config/vuurmuur_conf.conf.sample /usr/share/vuurmuur/help /usr/share/vuurmuur/help/vuurmuur-fr.hlp /usr/share/vuurmuur/help/vuurmuur-ru.UTF-8.hlp /usr/share/vuurmuur/help/vuurmuur-ru.hlp /usr/share/vuurmuur/help/vuurmuur.hlp ----------------------------------------------------------------- - These files are installed in more than 2 packages. Please fix %files list so that all files are listed only once. F. And more... >From rpmlint: * Vuurmuur-daemon.i686: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/vuurmuur - vuurmuur service is enabled by default after install, which is usually not desired. The line ----------------------------------------------------------------- 9 # chkconfig: 345 91 9 ----------------------------------------------------------------- should be changed to: ----------------------------------------------------------------- # chkconfig: - 91 9 ----------------------------------------------------------------- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#.23_chkconfig:_line * Vuurmuur-daemon.i686: E: no-status-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/vuurmuur - "status" option should usually be supported. * %{_localstatedir}/log/vuurmuur - From %{_sysconfdir}/logrotate.d/vuurmuur, vuurmuur service creates log files under %{_localstatedir}/log/vuurmuur, however no package seems to own this directory, which is perhaps wrong. Please make this directory owned by some package. When you modify your spec file, please post the URLs new spec file/srpm on this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 18:09:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 13:09:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526126] Review Request: python3 - Python 3.x (backwards incompatible version) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041809.nA4I9fvZ004816@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126 --- Comment #45 from Dave Malcolm 2009-11-04 13:09:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #43) > I'll look at doing something similar for the main "python-devel" package. Filed as bug 533022 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 18:13:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 13:13:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526651] Review Request: xpaint - An X Window System image editing or paint program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041813.nA4IDjA8014790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526651 --- Comment #36 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-11-04 13:13:44 EDT --- Done. In fact, I posted the wrong link. This is the right one: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/sf-xpaint/xpaint-2.8.7.tar.bz2 Same URLS, which are already updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 18:29:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 13:29:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487913] Review Request: culmus-fancy-fonts - Fancy fonts for Hebrew In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041829.nA4IT0RG018591@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487913 --- Comment #4 from Dan Kenigsberg 2009-11-04 13:28:58 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=367518) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=367518) spec with fixes to sever of the comments It might be just about at the packaging standard, but certainly has several of the comments unfixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 18:27:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 13:27:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 501958] Review Request: scotch - Graph, mesh and hypergraph partitioning library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041827.nA4IReFT018386@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501958 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-04 13:27:38 EDT --- I still seem to be getting a different tarball than what's in the package, and the differences are quite significant (18000 lines of patch between what's in your src.rpm and the one I got with spectool -g scotch.spec. To double check, I manually did the substitution in the Source0: line and fetched it via wget and links and what I downloaded was still different. I think we need to get to the bottom of this before this package can be accepted. It looks like all of the other issues are resolved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 18:37:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 13:37:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526651] Review Request: xpaint - An X Window System image editing or paint program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041837.nA4IbhDY020702@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526651 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #37 from Jon Ciesla 2009-11-04 13:37:42 EDT --- Looks good, APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 18:50:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 13:50:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 501958] Review Request: scotch - Graph, mesh and hypergraph partitioning library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041850.nA4Io2U5014095@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501958 --- Comment #9 from Deji Akingunola 2009-11-04 13:50:01 EDT --- My fault; I forgot to update the source url. Done than now, and hopefully fix the issue. Spec URL: http://deji.fedorapeople.org/scotch.spec SRPM URL: http://deji.fedorapeople.org/scotch-5.1.7-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 18:55:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 13:55:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 501958] Review Request: scotch - Graph, mesh and hypergraph partitioning library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041855.nA4ItpWJ024826@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501958 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-04 13:55:50 EDT --- Oh, hmm, their system does make it a bit difficult to figure that out, doesn't it? Indeed, everything looks good now. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 19:21:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 14:21:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532739] Review Request: emacs-cedet - Collection of Emacs Development Environment Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041921.nA4JL75B020265@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532739 Neal Becker changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ndbecker2 at gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Neal Becker 2009-11-04 14:21:06 EDT --- The installed info files don't seem to appear in info listing. In emacs C-h i, and search for semantic, or ede. Didn't find either. I do see that 'dir' file has been updated, and the files are installed in /usr/share/info. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 19:52:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 14:52:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532813] Review Request: gummi - A simple LaTeX editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911041952.nA4JqdgI027642@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532813 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-11-04 14:52:39 EDT --- While you're at it, replace Requires: texlive-latex with Requires: tex(latex) which is more general. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 20:04:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 15:04:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507083] Review Request: poco - C++ class libraries for network-centric applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911042004.nA4K4Xi7008643@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507083 --- Comment #12 from Maxim Udushlivy 2009-11-04 15:04:31 EDT --- Spec URL: http://crow-designer.sourceforge.net/temp/3/poco.spec SRPM URL: http://crow-designer.sourceforge.net/temp/3/poco-1.3.5-3.fc11.src.rpm CHANGES ======= - Each POCO component is now put in its own binary package. The 'poco' package is now a meta package. - Option "-s" was removed from the "make" invocation commands. - "perl" was replaced by "sed" for string substitutions in Makefile's. RPMLINT ======= $ rpmlint *.rpm poco.x86_64: E: devel-dependency poco-devel poco.x86_64: E: no-binary poco-crypto.x86_64: W: no-documentation poco-data.x86_64: W: no-documentation poco-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on poco/poco-libs/libpoco poco-doc.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/poco-doc-1.3.5/css/styles.css poco-doc.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/poco-doc-1.3.5/css/prettify.css poco-foundation.x86_64: W: no-documentation poco-mysql.x86_64: W: no-documentation poco-net.x86_64: W: no-documentation poco-netssl.x86_64: W: no-documentation poco-odbc.x86_64: W: no-documentation poco-sqlite.x86_64: W: no-documentation poco-testing.x86_64: W: no-documentation poco-util.x86_64: W: no-documentation poco-xml.x86_64: W: no-documentation poco-zip.x86_64: W: no-documentation 16 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 15 warnings. $ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 20:13:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 15:13:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524423] Review Request: ciso - iso to cso converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911042013.nA4KDeNR032671@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524423 Ha?kel Gu?mar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|karlthered at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #11 from Ha?kel Gu?mar 2009-11-04 15:13:39 EDT --- My apologies, i thought that i could do the review, then ping a sponsor to approve it but i was wrong. That's why the fedora-review flag was not set. I've unassigned myself from the review. To sum up the review: - no legal problem detected. - the patch is ok (needed for x86_64). - packaging guidelines are respected apart tarball checksums which is easily fixable. If any sponsor wants to review it, this is a quickie, or i can swap reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 20:37:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 15:37:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532813] Review Request: gummi - A simple LaTeX editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911042037.nA4KbeG1005696@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532813 --- Comment #4 from Christoph Wickert 2009-11-04 15:37:39 EDT --- Last but not least change the RPM group to ether Applications/Editors or Applications/Publishing (I prefer the latter). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 21:43:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 16:43:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533075] New: Review Request: libertas-sd8686-firmware - Marvell SD8686 wifi firmware Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libertas-sd8686-firmware - Marvell SD8686 wifi firmware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533075 Summary: Review Request: libertas-sd8686-firmware - Marvell SD8686 wifi firmware Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dsd at laptop.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/20091104/libertas-sd8686-firmware.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/20091104/libertas-sd8686-firmware-9.70.7.p0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This is the firmware used by the in-mainline kernel libertas_sdio driver. It is needed for the OLPC XO-1.5 The package is based on the existing libertas-usb8388-firmware package with only the minimal changes needed. So hopefully this is a simple review :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 21:59:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 16:59:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527539] Review Request: 9wm - Emulation of the Plan 9 window manager 8 1/2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911042159.nA4LxGYs031565@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527539 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-11-04 16:59:15 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: 9wm Short Description: Emulation of the Plan 9 window manager 8 1/2 Owners: spot Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 devel InitialCC: ... and it's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 22:22:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 17:22:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484279] Review Request: BareBonesBrowserLaunch - Simple library to launch a browser window from Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911042222.nA4MMS7V016134@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484279 Vedran Mileti? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rivanvx at gmail.com Flag| |needinfo?(jmatthew at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #3 from Vedran Mileti? 2009-11-04 17:22:26 EDT --- Hi, is anyone working on this? I'm very interested in having Hadoop in Fedora, and willing to help it happen if I can. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 22:29:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 17:29:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481667] Review Request: xmlenc - XML output library for java. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911042229.nA4MTJwN017966@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481667 Vedran Mileti? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rivanvx at gmail.com --- Comment #11 from Vedran Mileti? 2009-11-04 17:29:17 EDT --- Hi, I just found this bug searching for Hadoop. I see it's just because Fabian's link includes hadoop. Fabian, does that mean that this was a part of an idea to bring Hadoop package to Fedora, or is it something else entirely? There is also bug 484279 and bug 484281, which are about Hadoop dependencies, but haven't been touched for a while. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 22:36:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 17:36:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527539] Review Request: 9wm - Emulation of the Plan 9 window manager 8 1/2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911042236.nA4Ma1KC010006@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527539 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-04 17:36:00 EDT --- 9wm-1.2-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/9wm-1.2-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 22:36:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 17:36:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527539] Review Request: 9wm - Emulation of the Plan 9 window manager 8 1/2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911042236.nA4Ma5j4010118@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527539 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-04 17:36:05 EDT --- 9wm-1.2-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/9wm-1.2-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 22:44:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 17:44:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521979] New Package for Dogtag PKI: tomcatjss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911042244.nA4Mi9S6021175@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521979 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 22:42:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 17:42:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 498277] Review Request: pam_yubico - A Pluggable Authentication Module for yubikeys In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911042242.nA4Mgsdr011338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498277 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 22:50:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 17:50:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532739] Review Request: emacs-cedet - Collection of Emacs Development Environment Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911042250.nA4MoZaV012750@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532739 --- Comment #7 from Xavier Maillard 2009-11-04 17:50:34 EDT --- srecode and ede template files are not installed with your spec file. I modified it and posted an updated version here: http://xavier.maillard.im/public/emacs-cedet.spec There are other problems in the semantic installation (I can't use semantic-symref for example) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 22:52:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 17:52:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481667] Review Request: xmlenc - XML output library for java. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911042252.nA4MqSWL022837@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481667 --- Comment #12 from Fabian Deutsch 2009-11-04 17:52:27 EDT --- Yes it was a plan to bring hadoop to fedora, because of some needs of spacewalk (lucene). But I stopped working on it after some release of hadoop, because the dependencies of hadoop grew massively ... Currently I am not packaing anything for hadoop because of this dependency hell :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 23:00:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 18:00:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533091] New: Review Request: emacs-etach - Emacs extension for MIME processing Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: emacs-etach - Emacs extension for MIME processing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533091 Summary: Review Request: emacs-etach - Emacs extension for MIME processing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: xma at gnu.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://xavier.maillard.im/public/emacs-etach.spec SRPM URL: http://xavier.maillard.im/public/emacs-etach-1.4.3-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Etach is an add-on for GNU Emacs for MIME processing tasks. This package is really useful for all Rmail users. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 23:04:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 18:04:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507083] Review Request: poco - C++ class libraries for network-centric applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911042304.nA4N4Jla015587@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507083 --- Comment #13 from Michal Schmidt 2009-11-04 18:04:18 EDT --- Hello Maxim, thanks for updating the package. At the same time I've been doing a detailed review of your previous version (1.3.5-2). I found several problems. Here are my results so far. rpmlint output: poco-doc.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/poco-doc-1.3.5/css/styles.css poco-doc.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/poco-doc-1.3.5/css/prettify.css poco-mysql.x86_64: W: no-documentation poco-odbc.x86_64: W: no-documentation poco-testing.x86_64: W: no-documentation poco-zip.x86_64: W: no-documentation poco.src: W: no-buildroot-tag 9 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings. All these rpmlint warning can be ignored. Though the BuildRoot tag might be useful to add if you are going to have an EL-5 branch too. Let's see if the package meets Review Guidelines ( http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines ): OK rpmlint OK name meets Package Naming Guidelines (Personally I preferred the original name of "poco-testing", i.e. "poco-debug", because it has a precedent in "kernel-debug", but it's not a strong requirement. I'll leave the decision to you.) OK the spec file name matches the base package name Package must meet the Packaging Guidelines: BAD versioning: please use %{?dist} (not %{dist}) in the Release field. OK licensing ("Boost" is an approved license) BAD pre-built binaries found in the source tarball: Crypto/include/Poco/.DS_Store Crypto/include/Poco/._.DS_Store These must be removed during the %prep step. You should also ask upstream to remove them from future releases. (See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#No_inclusion_of_pre-built_binaries_or_libraries ) OK spec is legible OK architecture support OK filesystem layout (FHS) OK changelog entries OK tags OK buildroot cleaned for %install OK buildroot cleaned in %clean OK Requires OK no PreReq OK no file dependencies outside allowed dirs OK BuildRequires OK Summary and Description (English, descriptive, no trademarks) OK encoding (ASCII) OK documentation (main documentation is split into *-doc) BAD compilation does not respect Fedora's compiler flags (%{optflags}) While observing the running build process, I could not see any mention of FORTIFY_SOURCE, stack-protector, etc. on the command lines of g++ invocations. OK debuginfo OK devel package OK subpackages require base package with fully versioned dep OK ldconfig OK no static lib BAD duplication of system libraries: poco-1.3.5-all/Foundation/src/ contains internal copies of zlib and pcre libraries. poco-1.3.5-all/XML/src/ contains a copy of expat. poco-1.3.5-all/Data/SQLite/src/ contains a copy of sqlite (the whole in a single 3.5 MB source *.c file!) The package must be modified to use system libraries. (See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Duplication_of_system_libraries ) OK no rpath N/A config files N/A initscripts N/A desktop files OK macro usage N/A locale files N/A timestamps OK parallel make OK scriptlets N/A conditional deps OK file and dir ownership OK file permissions N/A users and groups N/A web apps OK no conflicts OK no kernel modules OK no files in /srv OK no bundling of multiple projects (combining the -all and -doc tarballs is acceptable, they're a single project) N/A bug links and comments for patches OK no epoch N/A no symlink hackery OK License field matches actual license (Boost) OK LICENSE file is packaged as %doc OK spec file is written in American English (AFAICT) OK sources match upstream source. sha256sums: 88bce8880bd380c2ca600cf170388eb0180b0c46fe500240efecc05bc62c618a poco-1.3.5-all.tar.bz2 48465ad08c9114f0fa16835344e775714fdebe93a564f4ce9b9843454aa48225 poco-1.3.5-doc.tar.gz OK package builds in Koji on all primary architectures OK package contains code or permissible content OK large doc in -doc subpackage OK missing doc should not affect runtime OK headers are in -devel N/A no pkgconfig files OK .so files in -devel OK no .la files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 23:16:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 18:16:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507083] Review Request: poco - C++ class libraries for network-centric applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911042316.nA4NGL0w028305@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507083 --- Comment #14 from Michal Schmidt 2009-11-04 18:16:20 EDT --- What's the rationale for breaking the package into so many subpackages in revision 3? I understood that a separate poco-mysql made sense because that part is of poco is not always used and it drags in a mysql dependency. But what benefit does it bring to split -xml, -net, -netssl, -zip? Isn't it taking it a bit too far? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 23:23:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 18:23:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507083] Review Request: poco - C++ class libraries for network-centric applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911042323.nA4NN3MW020003@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507083 --- Comment #15 from Michal Schmidt 2009-11-04 18:23:02 EDT --- BTW, it seems that Debian maintainers noticed the bundled zlib copy in poco too and patched it away already. See the patch 30_use-system-zlib.dpatch from http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/p/poco/poco_1.3.5-1.diff.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 23:23:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 18:23:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521983] New package for Dogtag PKI: osutil In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911042323.nA4NNt2D020174@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521983 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dennis at ausil.us Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-11-04 18:23:52 EDT --- 843573b28350f1ad93fb552c6dd3cb1e869fd39cc2d5e967e6da53c02d7e085a osutil-1.3.0.tar.gz 843573b28350f1ad93fb552c6dd3cb1e869fd39cc2d5e967e6da53c02d7e085a fedora/SOURCES/osutil-1.3.0.tar.gz source matches upstream rpmlint is quiet all files and directories owned correctly. spec file is clear, in english and meets the naming and packaging guidelines. approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 23:24:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 18:24:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522210] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-ca In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911042324.nA4NOhix030164@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522210 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dennis at ausil.us Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 00:05:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 19:05:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533094] New: Review Request: xskat - The card game Skat Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xskat - The card game Skat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533094 Summary: Review Request: xskat - The card game Skat Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chkr at plauener.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://chkr.fedorapeople.org/review/xskat.spec SRPM URL: http://chkr.fedorapeople.org/review/xskat-4.0.0-1.src.rpm Description: XSkat lets you play the card game Skat as defined by the official Skat Order. Features: * Single- and multiplayer mode * Playing over LAN or IRC * Game lists and logs * Three types of scoring * English or German text * German or French suited cards * Selectable computer playing strength * Pre-definable card distributions * Variations: Ramsch, Bock, Kontra & Re, ... Please note that rpmlint's complaint about the license is a false positive - the license was recently reviewed on the fedora-legal-list and added to the acceptable licenses of Fedora: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/XSkat_License -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 00:28:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 19:28:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522895] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-native-tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911050028.nA50SCiJ011033@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522895 --- Comment #3 from Matthew Harmsen 2009-11-04 19:28:11 EDT --- Comment From John Dennis (jdennis at redhat.com) 2009-11-02 15:16:44 EDT: The package pki-native-tools is doing a number of bogus things. It installs these executable scripts: /usr/bin/pkiarch /usr/bin/pkidist /usr/bin/pkiflavor /usr/bin/pkiname whose job is to echo (hardcoded) configuration information. This is not how we store and query configuration information in Fedora (and RHEL). This information should be located in files under /etc. pkiarch returns 'i386', pkidist returns 'fc11' on my machine, Each of the above executable needs to be removed and replaced with mechanisms appropriate to our distributions (e.g. store the information in a configuration file, marked as %config, and read the information out of that file) and/or use the existing mechanisms to determine the arch, release, etc. If the packages need executables like pkiarch and pkidist then it's an indication of bad packaging practices elsewhere which also will need to be corrected. The package pki-native-tools also installs a symbolic link /usr/bin/pkiperl which points to /usr/bin/perl Then all the perl scripts in all the pki packages have this in their shebang line: #!/usr/bin/pkiperl This also is bad packaging practice. If you need a specific version of perl then that needs to be specified in the spec file so that rpm can resolve those dependencies. Scripts then invoke /usr/bin/perl. Setting up links in /usr/bin to specific versions of interpreters is likely to create all sorts of problems in RPM managed systems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 01:39:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 20:39:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522895] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-native-tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911050139.nA51dIfb015514@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522895 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dennis at ausil.us --- Comment #4 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-11-04 20:39:17 EDT --- the currently posted build does not build in mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 02:26:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 21:26:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507106] Review Request: msp430-libc - C library for use with GCC on Texas Instruments MSP430 microcontrollers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911050226.nA52QZvu001219@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507106 --- Comment #9 from Robert Spanton 2009-11-04 21:26:34 EDT --- Hi, Sorry about the delay. Yes, as Till says, it does build OK on koji. So I think this means that this package has passed its review. Cheers, Rob -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 02:34:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 21:34:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 501958] Review Request: scotch - Graph, mesh and hypergraph partitioning library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911050234.nA52YVbn024675@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501958 Deji Akingunola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Deji Akingunola 2009-11-04 21:34:29 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: scotch Short Description: Graph, mesh and hypergraph partitioning library Owners: deji Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 02:40:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 21:40:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 509159] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_PragmARC_=E2=80=93_a_comp?= =?utf-8?q?onent_library_for_Ada?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911050240.nA52eGrQ025805@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509159 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-04 21:40:15 EDT --- PragmARC-20060427-6.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/PragmARC-20060427-6.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 02:58:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 21:58:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529517] Review Request: kcm_touchpad - Synaptics driver based touchpads kcontrol module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911050258.nA52wp9q006441@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529517 --- Comment #9 from Ryan Rix 2009-11-04 21:58:49 EDT --- http://rrix.fedorapeople.org/kcm_touchpad/kcm_touchpad-0.3.0-2.fc12.src.rpm http://rrix.fedorapeople.org/kcm_touchpad/kcm_touchpad.spec Source checksum unchanged, no koji scratch build submitted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 03:45:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 22:45:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507030] Review Request: pymunk - Python wrapper for the chipmunk 2D physics engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911050345.nA53jLDW018011@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507030 --- Comment #13 from Robert Spanton 2009-11-04 22:45:20 EDT --- Hi Jussi, Sorry about the long delay :-/ I've done the things you said, and I've also bumped up to pymunk 0.8.4 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python recommends using %{__python} in the sitelib statement, and I think I'd rather stick with the tried and tested method. Spec: http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/rds/rpm/pymunk/pymunk.spec SRPM: http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/rds/rpm/pymunk/pymunk-0.8.4-1.fc11.src.rpm Cheers, Rob -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 04:56:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 23:56:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516517] Review Request: globus-gridftp-server - Globus Toolkit - Globus GridFTP Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911050456.nA54uCTa026076@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516517 --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert 2009-11-04 23:56:11 EDT --- Reported upstream: http://bugzilla.globus.org/globus/show_bug.cgi?id=6881 Mattias -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 04:56:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 23:56:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516522] Review Request: globus-nexus - Globus Toolkit - Nexus Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911050456.nA54uORP026131@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516522 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert 2009-11-04 23:56:23 EDT --- Thank you for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: globus-nexus Short Description: Globus Toolkit - Nexus Library Owners: ellert Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 04:56:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 23:56:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516527] Review Request: globus-gass-server-ez - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Server_ez In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911050456.nA54uWCg026172@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516527 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert 2009-11-04 23:56:31 EDT --- Thank you for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: globus-gass-server-ez Short Description: Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Server_ez Owners: ellert Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 04:58:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 23:58:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531987] Review Request: wtop - top for webserver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911050458.nA54wN4g003824@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531987 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-11-04 23:58:22 EDT --- after I installed this on F-11, I am getting IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/var/log/apache2/access_log' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 05:18:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 00:18:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531987] Review Request: wtop - top for webserver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911050518.nA55IOf2000591@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531987 --- Comment #3 from Kushal Das 2009-11-05 00:18:24 EDT --- You have to edit the configuration file properly , details can be found http://code.google.com/p/wtop/wiki/Installing Also it requires a bit high traffic to show any output. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 05:35:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 00:35:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532382] Review Request: fvkbd - Free Virtual Keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911050535.nA55ZGVm013417@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532382 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-11-05 00:35:14 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1781762 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM is silent. + source files match upstream url(sha1sum) 4c270a703ffa3895a992351dbb4768a550e8dd2f fvkbd-0.1.6.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Desktop file installed correctly. + Package fvkbd-0.1.6-1.fc13.i686 => Provides: libfvkbd-0.1.so.0 libfvkbd-gtk-0.1.so.0 Requires: /usr/bin/python libX11.so.6 libXtst.so.6 libatk-1.0.so.0 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libcairo.so.2 libfakekey.so.0 libfontconfig.so.1 libfreetype.so.6 libfvkbd-0.1.so.0 libfvkbd-gtk-0.1.so.0 libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 libgio-2.0.so.0 libglib-2.0.so.0 libgmodule-2.0.so.0 libgobject-2.0.so.0 libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 libpango-1.0.so.0 libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 libunique-1.0.so.0 libxml2.so.2 libxml2.so.2(LIBXML2_2.4.30) libxml2.so.2(LIBXML2_2.6.0) rtld(GNU_HASH) + Package fvkbd-devel-0.1.6-1.fc13.i686 => Requires: libfvkbd-0.1.so.0 libfvkbd-gtk-0.1.so.0 + GUI application Suggestions 1) I don't think you need Requires: pkgconfig remove it. 2) menu entry in Accessories is conflicting with matchbox-keyboard name "Keyboard" though once see difference in icon But I suggest you change it to "Free Virtual Keyboard" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 05:51:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 00:51:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532677] Review Request: perl-HTML-SuperForm - HTML form generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911050551.nA55pEUo017424@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532677 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-11-05 00:51:13 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1789154 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url(sha1sum) 65e5b7e5a3792a430ad44b07a141c027ce545e47 HTML-SuperForm-1.09.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. + Package perl-HTML-SuperForm-1.09-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(HTML::SuperForm) = 1.09 perl(HTML::SuperForm::Field) perl(HTML::SuperForm::Field::Checkbox) perl(HTML::SuperForm::Field::CheckboxGroup) perl(HTML::SuperForm::Field::Hidden) perl(HTML::SuperForm::Field::Password) perl(HTML::SuperForm::Field::Radio) perl(HTML::SuperForm::Field::RadioGroup) perl(HTML::SuperForm::Field::Reset) perl(HTML::SuperForm::Field::Select) perl(HTML::SuperForm::Field::Submit) perl(HTML::SuperForm::Field::Text) perl(HTML::SuperForm::Field::Textarea) Requires: perl(Carp) perl(HTML::SuperForm::Field) perl(base) perl(overload) perl(strict) + Not a GUI application APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 05:50:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 00:50:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516280] Review Request: perl-Config-Model-CursesUI - Curses interface to edit config data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911050550.nA55oeDe017318@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516280 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ Bug 516280 depends on bug 516271, which changed state. Bug 516271 Summary: Review Request: perl-Curses-UI - Curses based OO user interface framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516271 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA --- Comment #8 from Parag AN(????) 2009-11-05 00:50:39 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1789156 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM. perl-Config-Model-CursesUI.noarch: W: invalid-license LGPL ==> Fix this + source files match upstream url(sha1sum) d79c4a2ad400efa725806f3344495b86bcda9294 Config-Model-CursesUI-1.103.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=3, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.01 sys + 0.24 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.29 CPU) + Package perl-Config-Model-CursesUI-1.103-2.fc12.noarch=> Provides: perl(Config::Model::CursesUI) = 1.103 Requires: perl(Carp) perl(Config::Model::Exception) perl(Config::Model::ObjTreeScanner) perl(Curses::UI) perl(Exception::Class) perl(Exporter) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application Suggestions: 1) Correct license is LGPLv2+ so change it before you import this package in cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 06:18:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 01:18:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531987] Review Request: wtop - top for webserver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911050618.nA56Ixnb015188@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531987 --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) 2009-11-05 01:18:58 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1781942 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM. wtop.src: W: no-buildroot-tag ==> Ok to ignore + source files match upstream url(sha1sum) 9f715744779b997935840a2cf97211533a446aca wtop-0.6.1.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application Suggestions you can change that path in spec in %prep as sed -i -e "s|/var/log/apache2/|/var/log/httpd/|" wtop.cfg APPROVED. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 07:58:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 02:58:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516517] Review Request: globus-gridftp-server - Globus Toolkit - Globus GridFTP Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911050758.nA57wAvQ018672@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516517 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Steve Traylen 2009-11-05 02:58:10 EDT --- APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 08:03:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 03:03:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532739] Review Request: emacs-cedet - Collection of Emacs Development Environment Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911050803.nA583jAK012449@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532739 --- Comment #8 from Karel Kl?? 2009-11-05 03:03:44 EDT --- Spec URL: http://kklic.fedorapeople.org/emacs-cedet.spec SRPM URL: http://kklic.fedorapeople.org/emacs-cedet-1.0-0.5.pre6.fc11.src.rpm RPMs URL: http://kklic.fedorapeople.org/emacs-cedet-1.0-0.5.pre6.fc11.noarch.rpm http://kklic.fedorapeople.org/emacs-cedet-el-1.0-0.5.pre6.fc11.noarch.rpm Xavier, thanks for the update. Neal, the info files should be visible now. * Wed Nov 5 2009 Karel Klic - 1.0-0.5.pre6 - Installed info files are visible in the info listing - Optional parts of speedbar are now included in the base package * Wed Nov 4 2009 Xavier Maillard - 1.0-0.4.pre6 - Install srecode and ede template files (srt) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 08:11:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 03:11:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532779] Review Request: gtraffic - Simple traffic usage counter for mobile broadband connections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911050811.nA58BAcf014343@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532779 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-05 03:11:09 EDT --- * Thu Nov 05 2009 Thomas Spura - 1.01-3 - Missing R: NetworkManager, BR: gnome-python2-gconf - only just %%{buildroot} - change trafficd into gtrafficd I'm not really happy with renaming to gtrafficd, because it's a decision from upstram. If other users from other distros have problems and want to search for a solution, they all might get confused. But as this is a really small and possibly unknown programm, this would be, ok. So I renamed it in the spec, your choice, what to use. ;) Spec URL: http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/review/gtraffic.spec SRPM URL: http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/review/gtraffic-1.01-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 08:16:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 03:16:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516517] Review Request: globus-gridftp-server - Globus Toolkit - Globus GridFTP Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911050816.nA58GET7023274@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516517 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Mattias Ellert 2009-11-05 03:16:13 EDT --- Thank you for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: globus-gridftp-server Short Description: Globus Toolkit - Globus GridFTP Server Owners: ellert Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 08:26:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 03:26:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524437] Review Request: nss_updatedb - Maintains a local cache of network directory user and group information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911050826.nA58Q5WJ017268@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524437 --- Comment #7 from Kashyap Chamarthy 2009-11-05 03:26:03 EDT --- Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1789279 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 08:38:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 03:38:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526564] Review Request: unittest - C++ unit testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911050838.nA58cADO021204@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526564 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-05 03:38:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Thanks for picking this up, Thomas! You are welcome. :) > I added all of your changes, however: > > > Requires: %{name}-devel = %{version}-%{release} > > to the main package, because most users would just run a > > 'yum install unittest' > > How does this work if there is no main package? Hmm, good question ;) I read something similar here: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/boost/devel/boost.spec?view=markup # boost is an "umbrella" package that pulls in all other boost components Requires: ...... and no %files section. So there will be a 'unittest' package laterly in the repos, which install nothing, without the Requires: unittest-devel. Now it does. Why did you a "Requires: %{name}-devel = %{version}-%{release}" in the devel package? It should be "%{name} = %{version}-%{release}". It's just needed in the main package. If you require it here, it won't be installable (I believe ;)). This way the devel package requires itself and on the first install, it will fail. Please remove the -devel. All other issues are done. I don't want to wait now for another release, to see if you can delete a word :-D -> approving this now. ________________________ APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 08:46:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 03:46:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507106] Review Request: msp430-libc - C library for use with GCC on Texas Instruments MSP430 microcontrollers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911050846.nA58kS4f031212@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507106 Steve Whitehouse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Steve Whitehouse 2009-11-05 03:46:26 EDT --- Yes, I agree. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 08:46:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 03:46:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533094] Review Request: xskat - The card game Skat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911050846.nA58kiW0024009@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533094 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tomspur at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #1 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-05 03:46:43 EDT --- This programm does not start: $ xskat Font 10x20 not found -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 08:57:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 03:57:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481667] Review Request: xmlenc - XML output library for java. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911050857.nA58vxuM002149@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481667 --- Comment #13 from Vedran Mileti? 2009-11-05 03:57:57 EDT --- Well, can you at least estimate how many packages would we need to bring to Fedora in order to build Hadoop? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 09:00:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 04:00:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532677] Review Request: perl-HTML-SuperForm - HTML form generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911050900.nA590ibx028442@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532677 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-11-05 04:00:43 EDT --- Thank you for the review. Requesting CVS. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-HTML-SuperForm Short Description: HTML form generator Owners: eseyman Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 09:11:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 04:11:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529517] Review Request: kcm_touchpad - Synaptics driver based touchpads kcontrol module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911050911.nA59B3dM006178@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529517 --- Comment #10 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-11-05 04:11:01 EDT --- Hmm, looks like http://github.com/mishaaq/kcm_touchpad/tarball/kcm_touchpad-0.3.0 is better Source URL as they do some magic with waitdownload, download URLs... So the question is how to handle correctly GitHub downloads? Could you update it? Sorry, I thought it would work :( Checksum is OK, once you change Source URL again, I'll approve it. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 09:52:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 04:52:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531988] Review Request: lekhonee-gnome - The gnome frontend for lekhonee wordpress client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911050952.nA59qVro011206@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531988 --- Comment #1 from Kushal Das 2009-11-05 04:52:29 EDT --- Updated SRPM : http://kushaldas.in/tmp/lekhonee-gnome-0.8-2.fc11.src.rpm Updated SPEC: http://kushaldas.in/tmp/lekhonee-gnome.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 10:12:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 05:12:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533075] Review Request: libertas-sd8686-firmware - Marvell SD8686 wifi firmware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911051012.nA5ACblE025732@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533075 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-11-05 05:12:36 EDT --- I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 10:12:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 05:12:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457916] Review Request: lmbench - lmbench benchmark tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911051012.nA5ACiDO017481@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457916 Thorsten Leemhuis changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at leemhuis.info --- Comment #13 from Thorsten Leemhuis 2009-11-05 05:12:41 EDT --- Eric, do you still have a spec file for lmbench or even maintain one privately? I tend to think it might be nice to have lmbench as package in a well known 3rd party repo for Fedora / EL ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 10:18:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 05:18:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507106] Review Request: msp430-libc - C library for use with GCC on Texas Instruments MSP430 microcontrollers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911051018.nA5AIlbo019440@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507106 Robert Spanton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Robert Spanton 2009-11-05 05:18:46 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: msp430-libc Short Description: C library for use with GCC on Texas Instruments MSP430 microcontrollers Owners: rspanton Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 10:26:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 05:26:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481667] Review Request: xmlenc - XML output library for java. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911051026.nA5AQ7bW029836@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481667 --- Comment #14 from Fabian Deutsch 2009-11-05 05:26:05 EDT --- Some dependencies for 0.19 are listed here https://fedorahosted.org/spacewalk/wiki/GettingPackagesIntoFedora/Nutch But the 0.20 release needs ivj, some new buidltool, that stopped me. Also other dependecies might have been changed/added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 10:27:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 05:27:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529517] Review Request: kcm_touchpad - Synaptics driver based touchpads kcontrol module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911051027.nA5ARFYk022479@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529517 --- Comment #11 from Kevin Kofler 2009-11-05 05:27:13 EDT --- That's not a good source URL, as it doesn't have the .tar.bz2. Another issue is that these tarballs are generated on demand and thus don't have reproducible checksums. I think in this case it's safer to just leave the URL as a comment and add only a specific downloaded tarball as Source0. We also need to complain to upstream about this, those "autogenerate tarball" features in repository browsers are not intended to serve as a substitute for actual releases! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 10:30:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 05:30:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529517] Review Request: kcm_touchpad - Synaptics driver based touchpads kcontrol module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911051030.nA5AU9dx031442@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529517 --- Comment #12 from Kevin Kofler 2009-11-05 05:30:07 EDT --- To be more precise, that URL is a redirect, so it can't be used as a Source URL at all. The last component of the Source URL MUST match the file name on disk. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 10:31:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 05:31:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911051031.nA5AVR3U031816@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 --- Comment #22 from Conrad Meyer 2009-11-05 05:31:25 EDT --- License response: """ Hi, The intention was GPLv2. The license block in the Cabal says GPL, but the License file it points at is the GPLv2. I'd rather not annotate every source code file with a license, but I will try and find what the Haskell/Cabal approved way is to mark GPL versions in the license field. HLint has already been packaged by a couple of other distros, so I'm curious what they did. I'll have to check. As someone packaging HLint, is there anything else that would help you? Some of the other distros asked for a changelog that is now available at http://community.haskell.org/~ndm/darcs/hlint/CHANGES.txt . Thanks, Neil """ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 10:44:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 05:44:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533141] New: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIx-Class - Access a DBIx::Class Schema from a CGI::Application Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIx-Class - Access a DBIx::Class Schema from a CGI::Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533141 Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIx-Class - Access a DBIx::Class Schema from a CGI::Application Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIx-Class/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIx-Class.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIx-Class/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIx-Class-0.093011-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This module helps you to map various DBIx::Class features to CGI parameters. For the most part that means it will help you search, sort, and paginate with a minimum of effort and thought. Currently it uses the connection from CGI::Application::Plugin::DBH. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 10:42:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 05:42:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475110] Review Request: monkeystudio - Free crossplatform Qt 4 IDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911051042.nA5AgRVR027497@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475110 Nicoleau Fabien changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #28 from Nicoleau Fabien 2009-11-05 05:42:23 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: monkeystudio New Branches: F-11 Owners: eponyme -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 10:44:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 05:44:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533075] Review Request: libertas-sd8686-firmware - Marvell SD8686 wifi firmware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911051044.nA5AitIs027963@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533075 --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-11-05 05:44:54 EDT --- Few notes: * I advice you to add the following line to the %prep section (to avoid copying firmware blobs directly into ~/rpmbuild/BUILD directory): %setup -c -T * Also, I advice you to fix line ending in LICENSE file in %prep section instead of fixing it in the %install section. * The file, with license, must not be placed in /lib/firmware. You must mark it as %doc instead. * Since you're using /lib/firmware/ then you should add "Requires: udev" (the owner of this directory). See rpm -qf /lib/firmware * No need to explicitly create "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/firmware" in your case. Just add -D switch to install command. * You're using %{__install} macro instead of plain "install". Why? I don't see any reasons to do so. This is not a blocker, actually - I just want to know :). Other things looks sane for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 11:02:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 06:02:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533075] Review Request: libertas-sd8686-firmware - Marvell SD8686 wifi firmware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911051102.nA5B2bXI008410@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533075 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Drake 2009-11-05 06:02:35 EDT --- Thanks for reviewing! %{__install} is being used as this spec file is a copy of libertas-usb8388-firmware.spec with only a couple of small changes to make it for sd8686 instead. The macro is being used there. (incidentally, all of your feedback applies there too) Fixed version at http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/20091105/libertas-sd8686-firmware.spec http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/20091105/libertas-sd8686-firmware-9.70.7.p0-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 11:10:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 06:10:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529517] Review Request: kcm_touchpad - Synaptics driver based touchpads kcontrol module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911051110.nA5BAAqv003559@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529517 --- Comment #13 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-11-05 06:10:09 EDT --- Checksums are same - these released files are not regenerated, only redirected. That's why asked my question. Maybe bringing it to fedora-devel is now the best we can do regarding this issue. So thanks Kevin, I think your proposed solution with comment is really best right now, but it's not solution as Source URLs are checked occasionaly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 11:10:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 06:10:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531988] Review Request: lekhonee-gnome - The gnome frontend for lekhonee wordpress client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911051110.nA5BAKlv003610@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531988 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-11-05 06:10:18 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1789391 + rpmlint is not silent for SRPM and for RPM. lekhonee-gnome.src: W: no-buildroot-tag lekhonee-gnome.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency lekhonee-lib ==> Both can be ignored. + source files match upstream url(sha1sum) 178cec79d757a7f1a30475af0e35558e0e67d1b2 lekhonee-gnome-0.8.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Desktop file installed correctly. + GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 11:14:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 06:14:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529517] Review Request: kcm_touchpad - Synaptics driver based touchpads kcontrol module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911051114.nA5BE8Vd011845@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529517 --- Comment #14 from Kevin Kofler 2009-11-05 06:14:06 EDT --- Unfortunately, there are several upstream servers where the download URLs are unusable due to weird redirects like that. Our guidelines for source URLs suggest using a comment for the real URL in such cases. Of course this means they can't be automatically checked, but that's just life. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 11:16:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 06:16:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527241] Review Request: libvtemm - C++ bindings for vte In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911051116.nA5BG1t0012805@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527241 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mschwendt at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Michael Schwendt 2009-11-05 06:16:00 EDT --- > Oh, but I wonder if anyone ever complained that > gtkmm/glibmm/othermm-docs package depend on -devel one. One could complain all day long about many issues and not have any time left for other things. ;) Eventually packagers find out for themselves or simply change their mind (many even reformat .spec files from time to time just to meet personal preferences). [devhelp/gtk-doc] Without putting the .devhelp2 book definition anywhere, documentation placed below /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/ is found by devhelp already. And by any other tool that searches in that directory by default. Whether other Fedora packages move the documentation even if they store a .devhelp2 file doesn't matter much. More important is how you decide to do it and whether you agree with the solution. Those other packages ought to add a comment on why they relocate the docs. Else it's nothing else than dubious and shouldn't be copied to other rpms. Moving the docs breaks the related values in the pkgconfig file, for example: | $ cat libvtemm-1.2.pc|grep doc | docdir=${datarootdir}/doc/libvtemm-1.2 | doxytagfile=${docdir}/reference/libvtemm-1.2.tag | htmlrefdir=${docdir}/reference/html And $docdir not even points to the %doc files as they are stored in %_docdir/libvtemm-0.22.1 instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 11:26:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 06:26:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533141] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIx-Class - Access a DBIx::Class Schema from a CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911051126.nA5BQHuA008326@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533141 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-11-05 06:24:55 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1789541 - rpmlint is NOT silent for SRPM and for RPM. perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIx-Class.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIx-Class-0.093011/README perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIx-Class.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIx-Class-0.093011/META.json perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIx-Class.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIx-Class-0.093011/dist.ini perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIx-Class.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIx-Class-0.093011/LICENSE perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIx-Class.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIx-Class-0.093011/Changes + source files match upstream url fc3499c707002c21d1cc9008fcb49e9fe3140b2a CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIx-Class-0.093011.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=21, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.05 usr 0.01 sys + 0.79 cusr 0.04 csys = 0.89 CPU) + Package perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIx-Class-0.093011-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(CGI::Application::Plugin::DBIx::Class) = 0.093011 Requires: perl(Carp) perl(Exporter) perl(parent) perl(strict) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application Suggestion: 1) Just add following line to %prep section sed -i 's/\r//' Changes LICENSE dist.ini META.json README This will fix rpmlint messages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 11:44:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 06:44:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526651] Review Request: xpaint - An X Window System image editing or paint program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911051144.nA5Bi4ko019165@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526651 Paulo Roma Cavalcanti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #38 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-11-05 06:44:03 EDT --- Thanks Jon, for finishing this review, and Hans de Goede for all of his suggestions for improving this packages. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xpaint Short Description: An X Window System image editing or paint program Owners: roma Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 InitialCC: roma -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 11:47:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 06:47:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532635] Review Request: rurple - A Python Learning Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911051147.nA5BlPGl020042@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532635 Paulo Roma Cavalcanti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-11-05 06:47:24 EDT --- Thanks Jon, for the fast review and the valuable suggestions. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rurple Short Description: A Python Learning Environment Owners: roma Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 InitialCC: roma -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 11:49:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 06:49:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533075] Review Request: libertas-sd8686-firmware - Marvell SD8686 wifi firmware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911051149.nA5Bn1kQ020336@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533075 --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-11-05 06:48:59 EDT --- One new issue - do NOT move SOURCE4, or your next build attempt will be failed. Just "cp -p" it as other sources. Ok, assuming, that you'll fixed it (easyfix, actually), here is my REVIEW: + rpmlint is silent [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/libertas-sd8686-firmware-9.70.7.p0-1.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ + The package ?? named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . + The spec file name match?? the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines . + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines . + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. + The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included in %doc.[4] + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package, match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ sha256sum LICENSE* sd8686* 8baf6df7462fdb1a9710e94d230d11b2fd1901be34f9388ab0ad5efd2fa32898 LICENSE 8baf6df7462fdb1a9710e94d230d11b2fd1901be34f9388ab0ad5efd2fa32898 LICENSE.1 ffa1e1fc047772eccc27e9c1df8293545051fa45a5273a89554115c69df83e39 sd8686-9.70.7.p0.bin ffa1e1fc047772eccc27e9c1df8293545051fa45a5273a89554115c69df83e39 sd8686-9.70.7.p0.bin.1 c1d9fadcdda1e14544d9e6e3560464a3e16aca276592351d5768cb569a4122ea sd8686-9.70.7.p0.bin.md5 c1d9fadcdda1e14544d9e6e3560464a3e16aca276592351d5768cb569a4122ea sd8686-9.70.7.p0.bin.md5.1 b0157d1f4518e806c0bc5128ab302a7f97d78ee34b84cb41cb4f2bbbb2a00e6d sd8686_helper.bin b0157d1f4518e806c0bc5128ab302a7f97d78ee34b84cb41cb4f2bbbb2a00e6d sd8686_helper.bin.1 bb1ed4e85a8ffa94339f0547f2234d75cb7925bbf333cba6a08b42401ff2559e sd8686_helper.bin.md5 bb1ed4e85a8ffa94339f0547f2234d75cb7925bbf333cba6a08b42401ff2559e sd8686_helper.bin.md5.1 [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. 0 No need to handle locales. 0 No shared library files. + The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries. + The package is not designed to be relocatable. + The package owns all directories that it creates. + The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + The package consistently uses macros. + The package contains code, or permissible content. 0 No extremely large documentation files. + Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. 0 No header files. 0 No static libraries. 0 No pkgconfig(.pc) files. 0 The package doesn't contain library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1). 0 No devel sub-package. + The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives. 0 Not a GUI application. + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. Please, adjust your spec to not mv LICENSE, and I'll finish the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 11:58:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 06:58:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533075] Review Request: libertas-sd8686-firmware - Marvell SD8686 wifi firmware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911051158.nA5Bwgig022670@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533075 --- Comment #5 from Daniel Drake 2009-11-05 06:58:41 EDT --- Thanks fixed versions http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/20091105/try2/libertas-sd8686-firmware.spec http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/20091105/try2/libertas-sd8686-firmware-9.70.7.p0-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 12:06:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 07:06:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 512170] Review Request: pidgin-sipe - Pidgin plugin for connecting to MS Communications Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911051206.nA5C6vUf024626@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512170 --- Comment #26 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-11-05 07:06:55 EDT --- Unless you are branching for EPEL, you can drop the build root definition and cleaning of buildroot in the %install section, other than this looks good. I will do the usual quick checks and (hopefully) approve shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 12:05:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 07:05:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 512170] Review Request: pidgin-sipe - Pidgin plugin for connecting to MS Communications Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911051205.nA5C5Z62024425@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512170 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sundaram at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 12:07:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 07:07:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533075] Review Request: libertas-sd8686-firmware - Marvell SD8686 wifi firmware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911051207.nA5C7u1x017494@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533075 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-11-05 07:07:55 EDT --- Ok, good. This package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 12:18:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 07:18:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533075] Review Request: libertas-sd8686-firmware - Marvell SD8686 wifi firmware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911051218.nA5CI3OG027296@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533075 Daniel Drake changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Daniel Drake 2009-11-05 07:18:02 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libertas-sd8686-firmware Short Description: Firmware for Marvell Libertas SD 8686 Network Adapter Owners: dsd cjb pbrobinson Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 12:16:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 07:16:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532779] Review Request: gtraffic - Simple traffic usage counter for mobile broadband connections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911051216.nA5CGu7R027103@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532779 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Christoph Wickert 2009-11-05 07:16:54 EDT --- Hmm, I don't like the way you rename trafficd. Why cp and rm, why not simply mv? I don't even like touching things in %{buildroot} after install, IMO this should be patched in the Makefile/in setup.py. After all, it's us decision if you want to rename the program, I wouldn't call it a blocker. ATM there are no collisions with trafficd, but in long term at least theoretically there could be some. I suggest to leave it trafficd for now and ask upstream if renaming is ok for him. If you need something to support your point of view, tell him about https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_tricks#Use_of_common_namespace Items to check: Ok - Requires: are correct now OK - Spelling of NetworkManager is correct One last thing: Changelog is wrong: gnome-python2-gconf is R instead of BR. I suggest you change that line to "Require NetworkManager and gnome-python2-gconf", this is what everybody will understand. Anyway, the package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 12:44:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 07:44:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525432] Review Request: openxcap - Fully featured XCAP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911051244.nA5Ci42A002275@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525432 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-11-05 07:44:03 EDT --- Thanks, Andrew! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: openxcap Short Description: Fully featured XCAP server Owners: peter Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 12:53:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 07:53:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 502991] Review Request: erlang-erlsom - Support for XML Schema in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911051253.nA5CrKP9005676@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502991 --- Comment #7 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-11-05 07:53:18 EDT --- Oh, I thought that I submitted updated spec, but it seems, that I lost this task in my TODO list. Here is it: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-erlsom.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-erlsom-1.2.1-3.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: - No more using macros for rm/install/mv - License filed now is GPLv3+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 13:11:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 08:11:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533167] New: Review Request: emacs-ecb - Emacs Code Browser Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: emacs-ecb - Emacs Code Browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533167 Summary: Review Request: emacs-ecb - Emacs Code Browser Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kklic at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://kklic.fedorapeople.org/emacs-ecb.spec SRPM URL: http://kklic.fedorapeople.org/emacs-ecb-2.40-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: ECB stands for "Emacs Code Browser". It displays a number of informational windows that allow for easy source code navigation and overview. The informational windows can contain: * A directory tree, * a list of source files in the current directory * a list of functions/classes/methods in the current file * a history of recently visited files, * a direct and auto-updated ecb-window for the semantic-analyzer for some intellisense, * the Speedbar and * output from compilation and other modes like help, grep etc. or whatever a user defines to be displayed in this window. This package contains the files for the GNU Emacs package. XEmacs ECB package is a part of xemacs-packages-extra. Requires emacs-cedet: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532739 rpmlint Output -------------- rpmlint emacs-ecb-2.40-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint ./emacs-ecb-2.40-1.fc11.noarch.rpm emacs-ecb.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/info/ecb.info-2.gz emacs-ecb.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/info/ecb.info-1.gz emacs-ecb.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/info/ecb.info-3.gz emacs-ecb.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/emacs-ecb-2.40/NEWS 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. Is it necessary to patch these files? rpmlint ./emacs-ecb-el-2.40-1.fc11.noarch.rpm emacs-ecb-el.noarch: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 13:14:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 08:14:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533141] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIx-Class - Access a DBIx::Class Schema from a CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911051314.nA5DEoaE004428@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533141 --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-11-05 08:14:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > > Suggestion: > 1) Just add following line to %prep section > sed -i 's/\r//' Changes LICENSE dist.ini META.json README D'oh! Done. Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIx-Class/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIx-Class.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIx-Class/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIx-Class-0.093011-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 13:42:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 08:42:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476530] Review Request: projxp - Agile project management server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911051342.nA5DgYut018706@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476530 --- Comment #4 from Darryl L. Pierce 2009-11-05 08:42:33 EDT --- Updated release is available: Spec URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/projxp.spec SRPM URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/projxp-0.3.0-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 14:08:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 09:08:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533141] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIx-Class - Access a DBIx::Class Schema from a CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911051408.nA5E8wR5019773@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533141 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-11-05 09:08:56 EDT --- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 14:15:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 09:15:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533141] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIx-Class - Access a DBIx::Class Schema from a CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911051415.nA5EFCox029680@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533141 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-11-05 09:15:11 EDT --- Thank you, Parag. Requesting CVS. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIx-Class Short Description: Access a DBIx::Class Schema from a CGI::Application Owners: eseyman Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 14:32:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 09:32:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 512170] Review Request: pidgin-sipe - Pidgin plugin for connecting to MS Communications Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911051432.nA5EWtT5002166@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512170 --- Comment #27 from birger 2009-11-05 09:32:53 EDT --- I assume this is a package that EPEL will want also, since it is very useful in corporate environments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 14:38:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 09:38:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507030] Review Request: pymunk - Python wrapper for the chipmunk 2D physics engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911051438.nA5EcUPS003782@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507030 --- Comment #14 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-11-05 09:38:29 EDT --- - Fix the tabbing of the version, release, summary and license fields of the spec file, now it looks terrible. - Please conserve time stamps during sed - instead of sed -i -e 's/\r//g' docs/api/*.{html,txt,css,js} examples/*.py *.txt PKG-INFO run for file in docs/api/*.{html,txt,css,js} examples/*.py *.txt PKG-INFO; do sed -e 's/\r//g' docs/api/*.{html,txt,css,js} $file > $file.new && touch -r $file $file.new && mv $file.new $file done ** rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. NEEDSWORK - See top of comment. MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. NEEDSWORK - See above. MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. N/A MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 14:58:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 09:58:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527706] Review Request: mingw32-libgeotiff - MinGW port of libgeotiff Georeferenced image library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911051458.nA5Ew4PZ010051@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527706 Bug 527706 depends on bug 527704, which changed state. Bug 527704 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-proj - MinGW port of the proj cartographic projection library package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527704 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA --- Comment #10 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-11-05 09:58:03 EDT --- Koji scratchbuild for F-11 (success): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1789938 Koji scratchbuild for F-12 (success): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1789940 Koji scratchbuild for EL-5 (FAILURE!): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1789943 Review: + rpmlint is silent +/- The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines, except one small issue in the versioning scheme - since you're packaging pre-release (from VCS), then "Release" field should start from 0. E.g. Release: 0.1.svn1664%{?dist} + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines . + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. +/- The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, should be included in %doc, but, unfortunately, upstream does not ship this file in their VCS. This issue was reported upstream (see comments above) and may be ignoired here. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. +/- The sources used to build the package, must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. However, since this is a pre-release and no tarball was provided by upstream, the only way to check the integrity of the sources, is to make diff against freshly checked out VCS tree. So, please, provide the instructions in comments somewhere within spec-file on how to create this checkout. See this spec, for example: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/superiotool/devel/superiotool.spec?view=markup +/- The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. Unfortunately, the package failed to build on EL-5 due to missing dependencies on mingw32-{libtiff|proj}. Please, keep this in mind, then you'll requesting cvs branches. + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. 0 No need to handle locales. 0 No shared library files. + The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries. + The package is not designed to be relocatable. + The package owns all directories that it creates. + The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + The package consistently uses macros. + The package contains code, or permissible content. 0 No extremely large documentation files. + Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. + The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives. 0 Not a GUI application. - The package must NOT own files or directories already owned by other packages. Unfortunately, it owns %{_mingw32_libdir}/pkgconfig which is already owned by mingw32-filesystem. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8 Please, fixissues noted above, and I'll continue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 15:31:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 10:31:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527241] Review Request: libvtemm - C++ bindings for vte In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911051531.nA5FVZnb027743@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527241 --- Comment #5 from Krzesimir Nowak 2009-11-05 10:31:33 EDT --- In the end I decided to: - leave documentation and doxytagfile in original place, that is - %{_docdir}/libvtemm-1.2/. - put .devhelp2 file to gtk-doc dir, that is - %{_datadir}/gtkdoc/html/libvtemm-1.2/. - leave examples in original place also, that is - %{_datadir}/libvtemm-1.2/. So: - docs package depend on gtk-doc, instead of devhelp. - packaging is easier, because I don't have to process certain files (.devhelp2, .pc, .tag) with sed to set new paths. - documentation sits where it should, that is - in %{_docdir}. With this, docs are still readable by devhelp. About other tools I don't know - they could use .devhelp2 file sitting in path they are reading. new spec: http://krnowak.fedorapeople.org/libvtemm.spec new srpm: http://krnowak.fedorapeople.org/libvtemm-0.22.1-3.fc11.src.rpm new koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1789971 new rpmlint outputs: libvtemm.spec: libvtemm-0.22.1-3.fc11.src.rpm: libvtemm-0.22.1-3.fc12.i686.rpm: libvtemm-debuginfo-0.22.1-3.fc12.i686.rpm: libvtemm-devel-0.22.1-3.fc12.i686.rpm: libvtemm-docs-0.22.1-3.fc12.i686.rpm: 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 15:49:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 10:49:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532057] Review Request: eclipse-jgit - Eclipse JGit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911051549.nA5FnBah019980@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532057 --- Comment #6 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-11-05 10:49:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > - naming fine > X please fix the release to follow: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#PreReleasePackages > > Peter is right that there should be a 1. before the "git..." > Fixed. > - licensing fine (EDL is BSD) > - macros fine > - locations good > - %files fine > - simplicity = good :) > > X rpmlint output clean except directory permission error: > > 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. > eclipse-jgit.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm > /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/jgit/eclipse/features/org.eclipse.jgit_0.6.0.200911031418 > 0775 I don't see this error when build locally > A standard directory should have permission set to 0755. If you get this > message, it means that you have wrong directory permissions in some dirs > included in your package. > > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. New sources: Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-jgit.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-jgit-0.6.0-0.git20091029.1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 16:14:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 11:14:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530301] Review Request: bmpanel2 - NETWM compliant panel for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911051614.nA5GEd7w027610@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530301 --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-05 11:14:38 EDT --- 2.1 pre1 seems released 4 days ago, which contains COPYING file. Would you have a plan to update to this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 16:25:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 11:25:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531051] Review Request: glite-security-util-java - Java Utilities for GSI Credentials In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911051625.nA5GPpZT031050@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531051 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 16:24:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 11:24:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532057] Review Request: eclipse-jgit - Eclipse JGit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911051624.nA5GOAVc030504@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532057 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Andrew Overholt 2009-11-05 11:24:08 EDT --- I think you meant: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-jgit-0.6.0-0.1.git20091029.fc11.src.rpm I don't know why I'm getting the non-standard directory permission thing. I've seen it other times as well and couldn't reproduce on another machine so I'll chalk it up to some oddities with my setup. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 16:31:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 11:31:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507030] Review Request: pymunk - Python wrapper for the chipmunk 2D physics engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911051631.nA5GVaoM032717@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507030 --- Comment #15 from Robert Spanton 2009-11-05 11:31:35 EDT --- > Fix the tabbing of the version, release, summary and license fields of the spec file, now it looks terrible. Not sure what you mean here. I can't see anything wrong with these fields -- they're all indented using tabs. rpmlint checks for this sort of thing too, and doesn't output any warnings or errors about it (deliberately injecting some spaces dos). I've done the timestamp thing. New SRPM: http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/rds/rpm/pymunk/pymunk-0.8.4-2.fc11.src.rpm Spec: http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/rds/rpm/pymunk/pymunk.spec Cheers, Rob -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 17:22:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 12:22:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507030] Review Request: pymunk - Python wrapper for the chipmunk 2D physics engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911051722.nA5HMA7R005164@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507030 --- Comment #16 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-11-05 12:22:09 EDT --- For me in chromium Name: pymunk Version: 0.8.4 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Python wrapper for the chipmunk 2D physics engine Group: Development/Languages # pymunx is under GPL+ License: MIT and GPL+ URL: http://code.google.com/p/pymunk/ Source0: http://pymunk.googlecode.com/files/pymunk-%{version}.zip # Use the shared library provided by the chipmunk package Patch0: pymunk-sharedlib.patch so there's clearly something wrong. Have you changed your editor's tab width setting? Please set the width to 8 characters, or convert the tabs into spaces so that the spec file looks nice by default. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 17:41:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 12:41:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507030] Review Request: pymunk - Python wrapper for the chipmunk 2D physics engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911051741.nA5HfKj7020836@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507030 --- Comment #17 from Robert Spanton 2009-11-05 12:41:19 EDT --- I think the problem is in your chromium. Here's a set of screenshots in a variety of text editors and browsers on my system: http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/rds/rpm/pymunk/whitespace/ Note that *all* of them are aligned correctly. Also, you can look at the contents of the file in a hex-editor if you like to see that the tab characters are there. Rob -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 18:14:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 13:14:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507030] Review Request: pymunk - Python wrapper for the chipmunk 2D physics engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911051814.nA5IEKg1020851@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507030 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #18 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-11-05 13:14:18 EDT --- Well, I'll be. Mea culpa :) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 18:21:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 13:21:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507030] Review Request: pymunk - Python wrapper for the chipmunk 2D physics engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911051821.nA5ILK2D023014@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507030 Robert Spanton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #19 from Robert Spanton 2009-11-05 13:21:19 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pymunk Short Description: Python wrapper for the chipmunk 2D physics engine Owners: rspanton Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 18:53:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 13:53:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533094] Review Request: xskat - The card game Skat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911051853.nA5Ir9tj000355@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533094 --- Comment #2 from Christian Krause 2009-11-05 13:53:08 EDT --- It looks like that xksat requires explicitly an 10x20 font. I've not seen this issue before since I had this font already installed. I've added a Requires: tag for the package which contains this font. Spec URL: http://chkr.fedorapeople.org/review/xskat.spec SRPM URL: http://chkr.fedorapeople.org/review/xskat-4.0.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 19:29:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 14:29:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524896] Review Request: perl-Nagios-NSCA - Perl client for Nagios - NSCA. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911051929.nA5JT4M4019458@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524896 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-05 14:29:03 EDT --- perl-Nagios-NSCA-0.1-3.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Nagios-NSCA-0.1-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 20:42:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 15:42:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 517488] Review Request: vhostmd - Virtualization host metrics daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911052042.nA5KgdoG011352@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517488 --- Comment #21 from Russell Doty 2009-11-05 15:42:38 EDT --- Frank Danapfel reports that the package has been tested and meets SAP's requirements. Please proceed with building the package for RHEL 5.4 (and above) and release it into the SAP RHN channel. Russell Doty -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 21:04:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 16:04:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 502991] Review Request: erlang-erlsom - Support for XML Schema in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911052104.nA5L4RaJ011379@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502991 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-05 16:04:26 EDT --- Looks good to me now, although I think it's worth a comment to see how the license tag actually gets to be GPLv3+. I'd expect anyone not familiar with this ticket to be confused by that, given that none of the code in question actually carries that license. Did you check with upstream on that? If so, it may be a good idea to include that correspondence in the package. In any case, I don't think that issue should block the package at this point. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 21:26:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 16:26:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527049] Review Request: python-ssl - SSL wrapper for socket objects (2.3, 2.4, 2.5 compatible) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911052126.nA5LQ9o5028422@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527049 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-05 16:26:08 EDT --- python-ssl-1.15-3.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 21:28:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 16:28:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520479] Review Request: myproxy - Manage X.509 Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911052128.nA5LS2Es021606@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520479 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-05 16:28:00 EDT --- myproxy-4.8-4.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 21:27:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 16:27:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528290] Review Request: yapet - Curses based password encryption tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911052127.nA5LRmsL021487@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528290 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-05 16:27:47 EDT --- yapet-0.6-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 21:27:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 16:27:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528290] Review Request: yapet - Curses based password encryption tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911052127.nA5LRXhx021377@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528290 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-05 16:27:32 EDT --- yapet-0.6-2.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 21:26:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 16:26:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527049] Review Request: python-ssl - SSL wrapper for socket objects (2.3, 2.4, 2.5 compatible) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911052126.nA5LQuxs021115@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527049 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-05 16:26:56 EDT --- python-ssl-1.15-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 21:27:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 16:27:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528290] Review Request: yapet - Curses based password encryption tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911052127.nA5LRr24021533@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528290 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.6-2.el4 |0.6-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 21:27:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 16:27:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528290] Review Request: yapet - Curses based password encryption tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911052127.nA5LRbJL021426@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528290 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.6-2.el4 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 21:27:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 16:27:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508521] Review Request: jettison - A JSON StAX implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911052127.nA5LR5lL021186@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508521 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-05 16:27:04 EDT --- jettison-1.1-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update jettison'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0793 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 21:28:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 16:28:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526876] Review Request: php-pecl-gmagick - Provides a wrapper to the GraphicsMagick library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911052128.nA5LS9Zc021687@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526876 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-05 16:28:08 EDT --- php-pecl-gmagick-1.0.2b1-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-pecl-gmagick'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0795 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 21:26:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 16:26:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911052126.nA5LQg61028752@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 --- Comment #51 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-05 16:26:36 EDT --- mathgl-1.9-8.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 21:28:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 16:28:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520479] Review Request: myproxy - Manage X.509 Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911052128.nA5LSE6v029342@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520479 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-05 16:28:13 EDT --- myproxy-4.8-5.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 21:26:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 16:26:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911052126.nA5LQlTN028891@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version|1.9-6.fc11 |1.9-8.el5 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 21:50:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 16:50:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533291] New: Review Request: ruby-ffi - Foreign Function Interface package for Ruby Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ruby-ffi - Foreign Function Interface package for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533291 Summary: Review Request: ruby-ffi - Foreign Function Interface package for Ruby Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bkearney at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://bkearney.fedorapeople.org/ruby-ffi-spec SRPM URL: http://bkearney.fedorapeople.org/ruby-ffi-0.5.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Ruby-ffi is a package which allows for ruby code to access C libraries without the need for writing messy ext code. The website for the library is http://wiki.github.com/ffi/ffi. Koji Scratch Build F11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1791211 Koji Scratch Build F12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1791220 rpmlint is clean on the spec file, SRPM, and locally build RPMs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 22:43:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 17:43:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 501116] Review Request: perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple - Perl Module for Generating HTML Calendars In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911052243.nA5MhYTd021022@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501116 --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-05 17:43:33 EDT --- Any reason this is still open? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 22:44:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 17:44:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480572] Review Request: xgridloc - An application for the calculation of Maidenhead QRA Locators In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911052244.nA5Mi28x021154@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480572 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-05 17:44:01 EDT --- Any reason this ticket is still open? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 22:46:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 17:46:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 492609] Review Request: hmaccalc - Tools for computing and checking HMAC values for files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911052246.nA5MkS6R022032@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492609 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-05 17:46:26 EDT --- Is there any reason for this ticket to remain open? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 22:47:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 17:47:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447368] Review Request: schroot - Execute commands in a chroot environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911052247.nA5MlXsl015433@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447368 --- Comment #22 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-05 17:47:28 EDT --- Is there any reason for this ticket to remain open? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 22:48:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 17:48:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 510822] Review Request: maloc - Minimal Abstraction Layer for Object-oriented C/C++ programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911052248.nA5MmcBD015719@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510822 --- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-05 17:48:37 EDT --- Is there any reason for this ticket to remain open? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 22:45:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 17:45:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 510913] Review Request: php-pecl-ncurses - Terminal screen handling and optimization package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911052245.nA5Mjufw014953@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510913 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-05 17:45:55 EDT --- Any reason this ticket is still open? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 22:48:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 17:48:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507675] Review Request: poppler-data - Encoding files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911052248.nA5MmSUx023077@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507675 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-05 17:48:26 EDT --- Is there any reason for this ticket to remain open? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 22:48:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 17:48:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 505259] Review Request: python-utmp - Python modules for utmp records In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911052248.nA5Mm41U022927@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505259 --- Comment #20 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-05 17:48:02 EDT --- Is there any reason for this ticket to remain open? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 22:52:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 17:52:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 510913] Review Request: php-pecl-ncurses - Terminal screen handling and optimization package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911052252.nA5Mqg97016899@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510913 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Remi Collet 2009-11-05 17:52:41 EDT --- No, just an omission. Really used to have review closed by bodhi ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 22:56:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 17:56:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447368] Review Request: schroot - Execute commands in a chroot environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911052256.nA5MuAMP017962@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447368 Zach Carter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #23 from Zach Carter 2009-11-05 17:56:08 EDT --- nope. CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 23:09:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 18:09:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 510822] Review Request: maloc - Minimal Abstraction Layer for Object-oriented C/C++ programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911052309.nA5N966a028428@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510822 --- Comment #16 from Tim Fenn 2009-11-05 18:09:05 EDT --- no, should be closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 23:09:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 18:09:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 510822] Review Request: maloc - Minimal Abstraction Layer for Object-oriented C/C++ programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911052309.nA5N9dLC021014@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510822 Tim Fenn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 23:09:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 18:09:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 497622] Review Request: apbs - adaptive poisson boltzmann solver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911052309.nA5N9erY021041@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622 Bug 497622 depends on bug 510822, which changed state. Bug 510822 Summary: Review Request: maloc - Minimal Abstraction Layer for Object-oriented C/C++ programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510822 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 23:19:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 18:19:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 497622] Review Request: apbs - adaptive poisson boltzmann solver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911052319.nA5NJUsF024689@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622 Tim Fenn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 23:22:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 18:22:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507675] Review Request: poppler-data - Encoding files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911052322.nA5NMw5T032692@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507675 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #11 from Rex Dieter 2009-11-05 18:22:57 EDT --- Nope, thanks for the poke. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 5 23:53:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 18:53:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459874] Review Request: zeromq - Fast messaging system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911052353.nA5Nrnpx008832@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459874 --- Comment #29 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-05 18:53:46 EDT --- I wasn't sure if I should wait for those fixes, but it's been several weeks. I can verify that 1.0.1-1 builds fine and has only the unused-direct-shlib-dependency issues listed in comment 27. I do think the libsctp one is worth a fix if possible, but in the end zeromq-c depends on zeromq which depends on libsctp so it actually makes no difference to the dependency chain. Just let me know what you'd like to do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 00:04:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 19:04:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528290] Review Request: yapet - Curses based password encryption tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911060004.nA604Pfd005619@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528290 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-05 19:04:24 EDT --- yapet-0.6-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 00:00:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 19:00:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530880] Review Request: ns-tiza-fonts - A Slab-Serif Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911060000.nA600aVv004389@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530880 --- Comment #7 from TK009 2009-11-05 19:00:35 EDT --- Spec URL: http://tk009.fedorapeople.org/ns-tiza-chalk-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://tk009.fedorapeople.org/ns-tiza-chalk-fonts-20080210-1.fc11.src.rpm I believe I've made all the requested corrections. I have also spoken with the creator and he will be adding the glyph's at a future point, as well as correcting the license in the font file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 00:03:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 19:03:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521983] New package for Dogtag PKI: osutil In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911060003.nA603xd3005524@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521983 Kevin Wright changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Kevin Wright 2009-11-05 19:03:58 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: osutil Short Description: The osutil JNI package supplies various native OS operations to Java programs. Owners: kwright Branches: F-10 F-11, F-12, F-13 InitialCC: ausil -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 00:05:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 19:05:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527539] Review Request: 9wm - Emulation of the Plan 9 window manager 8 1/2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911060005.nA605xwJ012783@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527539 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.2-2.fc10 |1.2-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 00:05:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 19:05:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527539] Review Request: 9wm - Emulation of the Plan 9 window manager 8 1/2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911060005.nA605WKd012658@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527539 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.2-2.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 00:02:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 19:02:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533302] New: Review Request: rst2pdf - Tool for transforming reStructuredText to PDF Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rst2pdf - Tool for transforming reStructuredText to PDF https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533302 Summary: Review Request: rst2pdf - Tool for transforming reStructuredText to PDF Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sergio.pasra at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/rst2pdf.spec SRPM URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/rst2pdf-0.12.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Tool for transforming reStructuredText to PDF using ReportLab -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 00:05:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 19:05:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527539] Review Request: 9wm - Emulation of the Plan 9 window manager 8 1/2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911060005.nA605tgb006997@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527539 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-05 19:05:54 EDT --- 9wm-1.2-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 00:05:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 19:05:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527539] Review Request: 9wm - Emulation of the Plan 9 window manager 8 1/2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911060005.nA605RCC006885@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527539 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-05 19:05:26 EDT --- 9wm-1.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 00:06:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 19:06:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528290] Review Request: yapet - Curses based password encryption tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911060006.nA606UZq007186@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528290 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-05 19:06:29 EDT --- yapet-0.6-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 00:06:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 19:06:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528290] Review Request: yapet - Curses based password encryption tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911060006.nA606Ybh007224@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528290 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.6-2.fc11 |0.6-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 00:04:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 19:04:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528290] Review Request: yapet - Curses based password encryption tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911060004.nA604URn005706@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528290 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.6-2.el5 |0.6-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 01:25:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 20:25:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480572] Review Request: xgridloc - An application for the calculation of Maidenhead QRA Locators In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911060125.nA61PXgr028411@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480572 Randall Berry changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Randall Berry 2009-11-05 20:25:32 EDT --- closing open ticket -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 03:55:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 22:55:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526544] Review Request: stomppy - Python stomp client for messaging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911060355.nA63tCjh004373@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526544 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-05 22:55:11 EDT --- stomppy-2.0.4-1.el4.1 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/stomppy-2.0.4-1.el4.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 03:55:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 22:55:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526544] Review Request: stomppy - Python stomp client for messaging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911060355.nA63tbJY000646@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526544 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-05 22:55:37 EDT --- stomppy-2.0.4-1.el5.1 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/stomppy-2.0.4-1.el5.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 04:41:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 23:41:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507491] Review Request: perl-forks - A drop-in replacement for Perl threads using fork() In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911060441.nA64f1Wv014456@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507491 --- Comment #4 from Bernard Johnson 2009-11-05 23:41:00 EDT --- Currently awaiting comments from upstream regarding a bug revealed in 'make test': http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=49878 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 05:21:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 00:21:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 513896] Review Request: pcp - performance monitoring and collection service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911060521.nA65LV6p024290@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513896 Mark Goodwin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #364404|0 |1 is obsolete| | Flag| |review?(jarod at redhat.com) --- Comment #26 from Mark Goodwin 2009-11-06 00:21:26 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=367782) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=367782) updated pcp spec for Fedora, matching pcp-3.0.1-2 community release Minor update to the Fedora spec after the pcp-3.0.1-2 community release. Note there is one new rpmlint 'E': fter doing some upgrade testing, we changed /etc/pcp.conf to be tagged as %config rather than %config(noreplace). Jarod, I'd appreciate an ack on this if you have time :) Thanks -- Mark -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 05:56:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 00:56:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521895] Review Request: json_simple - Simple Java toolkit for JSON In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911060556.nA65uMJe001279@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521895 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-06 00:56:21 EDT --- json_simple-1.1-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 05:56:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 00:56:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 512021] Review Request: zikula-module-advanced_polls - Advanced voting system for Zikula In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911060556.nA65u84h001216@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512021 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.5.1-1.fc11 |1.5.1-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 05:56:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 00:56:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 512021] Review Request: zikula-module-advanced_polls - Advanced voting system for Zikula In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911060556.nA65u4ci001124@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512021 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-06 00:56:03 EDT --- zikula-module-advanced_polls-1.5.1-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 05:57:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 00:57:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527308] Review Request: xmltooling - XML signing and encrytion library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911060557.nA65v4iQ030202@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527308 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-06 00:57:03 EDT --- xmltooling-1.2.2-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 06:26:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 01:26:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533291] Review Request: ruby-ffi - Foreign Function Interface package for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911060626.nA66QuY0010959@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533291 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-06 01:26:55 EDT --- Would you consider to create your srpm from gem? It seems that 0.5.1 gem is available on the usual rubyforge gem URL: http://gems.rubyforge.org/gems/%{gemname}-%{version}.gem . If you have some reason to use git based 0.5.2 source, still it is preferable that you create gem archive and install it. Note that while I don't know if 0.5.2 is formally released or not, please refer to Naming guideline: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 07:57:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 02:57:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530892] Review Request: kde-style-nitrogen - A KDE 4 widget style In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911060757.nA67vaKY004600@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530892 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-11-06 02:57:35 EDT --- The version I downloaded from kde-look is actually 1.0.5. Could you update the SRPM? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 08:07:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 03:07:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530288] Review Request: stonevpn - easy OpenVPN certificate and configuration management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911060807.nA687xHq004487@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530288 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-06 03:07:56 EDT --- Some notes: * EVR (Epoch-Version-Release) - For released tarball, the version tag should begin with 1%{?dist} (not 0), should be incremented every time you change your spec file, and be reset to 1%{?dist} when version is upgraded: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Package_Release * License tag - The license tag for this package should be "GPLv2+". Ref: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ#How_do_I_figure_out_what_version_of_the_GPL.2FLGPL_my_package_is_under.3F * SourceURL - For sourceforge hosted tarball, follow: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net * Seemingly unneeded files ----------------------------------------------------------- /usr/share/StoneVPN/COPYING /usr/share/StoneVPN/Changelog /usr/share/StoneVPN/README /usr/share/StoneVPN/TODO ----------------------------------------------------------- - These files are also installed under /usr/share/doc/stonevpn-0.4.3 ----------------------------------------------------------- /usr/share/StoneVPN/patches/pyOpenSSL-0.9-crl_and_revoked.patch /usr/share/StoneVPN/rpm/stonevpn.spec ----------------------------------------------------------- - Are these files really needed? * Usability ----------------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ stonevpn File /etc/stonevpn.conf does not exist! ----------------------------------------------------------- - Please install /etc/stonevpn. Note that we usually expect that the installed application works as it is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 08:45:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 03:45:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532779] Review Request: gtraffic - Simple traffic usage counter for mobile broadband connections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911060845.nA68jwAF018856@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532779 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cwickert at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 08:45:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 03:45:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532779] Review Request: gtraffic - Simple traffic usage counter for mobile broadband connections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911060845.nA68j6Ld015554@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532779 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-06 03:45:05 EDT --- Thanks for reviewing this. I've corrected the changelog and asked upstream about renaming, but will wait for an answer till the first checkin... New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gtraffic Short Description: Simple traffic usage counter for mobile broadband connections Owners: cwickert, tomspur Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 09:25:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 04:25:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533094] Review Request: xskat - The card game Skat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911060925.nA69PtJi032217@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533094 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tomspur at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-06 04:25:52 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: [] devel/i386 [] devel/x86_64 [] F11/i386 [x] F11/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: $ rpmlint xskat.spec xskat-4.0.0-2.src.rpm x86_64/xskat-* xskat.src: W: invalid-license XSkat xskat.x86_64: W: invalid-license XSkat xskat-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license XSkat 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: XSkat [-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Upstream source: 6744cea48a890771736b75083e7ea2b5 Build source: 6744cea48a890771736b75083e7ea2b5 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [?] Permissions on files are set properly. I'm unsure if: -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/xskat-4.0.0/README.IRC -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/xskat-4.0.0/README.IRC-de -r--r--r-- /usr/share/man/de/man6/xskat.6.gz -r--r--r-- /usr/share/man/man6/xskat.6.gz -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/pixmaps/xskat.xpm is completely correct. It's unusual to use -r--r--r--, but it works, so, ok. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [x] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [!] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. in %files: %{_datadir}/applications is wrong, should be %{_datadir}/applications/* === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1791883 [x] Package functions as described (no hardware to test with). [x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. Issues: - in %files: %{_datadir}/applications is wrong, should be %{_datadir}/applications/* - a comment about the permissions would be good ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 09:36:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 04:36:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533094] Review Request: xskat - The card game Skat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911060936.nA69aG68002838@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533094 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-06 04:36:15 EDT --- Forgot to add use %global and not %define: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 09:50:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 04:50:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530301] Review Request: bmpanel2 - NETWM compliant panel for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911060950.nA69ov3m003656@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530301 --- Comment #3 from Marcus Moeller 2009-11-06 04:50:56 EDT --- Updated to upstream version 2.1pre1: Spec URL: http://marcus-moeller.de/share/build/bmpanel2/2.1-0.1.pre1-1/bmpanel2.spec SRPM URL: http://marcus-moeller.de/share/build/bmpanel2/2.1-0.1.pre1-1/bmpanel2-2.1-0.1.pre1.fc11.src.rpm rpmlint SPECS/bmpanel2.spec RPMS/i586/bmpanel2-2.1-0.1.pre1.fc11.i586.rpm RPMS/i586/bmpanel2-debuginfo-2.1-0.1.pre1.fc11.i586.rpm SRPMS/bmpanel2-2.1-0.1.pre1.fc11.src.rpm 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 10:15:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 05:15:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530288] Review Request: stonevpn - easy OpenVPN certificate and configuration management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911061015.nA6AFHRn011515@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530288 --- Comment #2 from Leon Keijser 2009-11-06 05:15:13 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=367803) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=367803) updated SPEC file Updated SPEC file according to comment #2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 10:22:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 05:22:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530288] Review Request: stonevpn - easy OpenVPN certificate and configuration management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911061022.nA6AMNfg020070@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530288 --- Comment #3 from Leon Keijser 2009-11-06 05:22:21 EDT --- Hi Mamoru, thanks for your notes. My comments are below, prefixed with '+': * EVR (Epoch-Version-Release) + fixed * License tag + fixed * SourceURL + fixed. Entire SourceURL pointed to the wrong address. * Seemingly unneeded files + fixed: i've removed them. Although now rpmlint complains about missing documentation. Shouldn't i at least include the README file? * Usability + fixed by adding an {__install} method to %install and including it in %files as %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/%{name}.conf Updated SPEC file is attached to this bug report (since github fails to recognize it as a new file and stupidly shows the older version). Updated SRPM: http://cloud.github.com/downloads/lkeijser/stonevpn/stonevpn-0.4.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 10:22:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 05:22:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530288] Review Request: stonevpn - easy OpenVPN certificate and configuration management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911061022.nA6AMP16020095@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530288 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #367803|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | --- Comment #3 from Leon Keijser 2009-11-06 05:22:21 EDT --- Hi Mamoru, thanks for your notes. My comments are below, prefixed with '+': * EVR (Epoch-Version-Release) + fixed * License tag + fixed * SourceURL + fixed. Entire SourceURL pointed to the wrong address. * Seemingly unneeded files + fixed: i've removed them. Although now rpmlint complains about missing documentation. Shouldn't i at least include the README file? * Usability + fixed by adding an {__install} method to %install and including it in %files as %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/%{name}.conf Updated SPEC file is attached to this bug report (since github fails to recognize it as a new file and stupidly shows the older version). Updated SRPM: http://cloud.github.com/downloads/lkeijser/stonevpn/stonevpn-0.4.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 10:34:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 05:34:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507083] Review Request: poco - C++ class libraries for network-centric applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911061034.nA6AY9KX023358@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507083 --- Comment #16 from Maxim Udushlivy 2009-11-06 05:34:05 EDT --- Hello, this update fixes some of the problems that you mentioned. With regard to subpackages - decided to go the same route as in Debian's POCO and Fedora's Boost. Please make it clear if you insist on merging subpackages and which of them. Spec URL: http://crow-designer.sourceforge.net/temp/4/poco.spec SRPM URL: http://crow-designer.sourceforge.net/temp/4/poco-1.3.5-4.fc11.src.rpm CHANGES ======= - The name of 'poco-testing' subpackage was reverted to 'poco-debug'. - The "Release" field was fixed to use "%{?dist}". - The ".*DS_Store" files removal was moved to the "prep" section. - Fedora compilation flags (%{optflags}) are now injected into the "configure" script. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 10:46:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 05:46:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527336] Review Request: opensaml - Security Assertion Markup Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911061046.nA6AkIoK026926@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527336 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-06 05:46:16 EDT --- opensaml-2.2.1-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/opensaml-2.2.1-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 10:47:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 05:47:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527336] Review Request: opensaml - Security Assertion Markup Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911061047.nA6AlvSY027356@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527336 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 11:19:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 06:19:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507083] Review Request: poco - C++ class libraries for network-centric applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911061119.nA6BJrNj004776@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507083 --- Comment #17 from Michal Schmidt 2009-11-06 06:19:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > With regard to subpackages - decided to go the same route as in Debian's POCO > and Fedora's Boost. Please make it clear if you insist on merging subpackages > and which of them. I will not insist on merging the subpackages back. The similarity with Boost packaging is a good enough reason to leave them separated. Thanks for the explanation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 11:35:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 06:35:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532057] Review Request: eclipse-jgit - Eclipse JGit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911061135.nA6BZvaa009460@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532057 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-11-06 06:35:55 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: eclipse-jgit Short Description: Java implementation of the Git version control system. Owners: akurtakov Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 12:48:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 07:48:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527488] Review Request: drbd - drbd tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911061248.nA6Cmkdp022568@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527488 Philipp Reisner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 12:51:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 07:51:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527488] Review Request: drbd - drbd tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911061251.nA6CpOY5029734@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527488 --- Comment #73 from Philipp Reisner 2009-11-06 07:51:18 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: drbd Short Description: Userland tools and scripts for DRBD Owners: Philipp Reisner Branches: F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 13:09:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 08:09:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533291] Review Request: ruby-ffi - Foreign Function Interface package for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911061309.nA6D9FId002636@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533291 --- Comment #2 from Bryan Kearney 2009-11-06 08:09:14 EDT --- I did not read the guidelines [1] as requiring a gem. Has that changed? 0.5.2 is released, so I did believe I needed to refer to it as an alpha. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 13:14:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 08:14:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527488] Review Request: drbd - drbd tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911061314.nA6DESUf030514@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527488 --- Comment #74 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-06 08:14:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #73) > New Package CVS Request For Owners, please write FAS account name instead of your mail address. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 13:16:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 08:16:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 494695] Review Request: qutim - Multiplatform Instant Messenger on Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911061316.nA6DGnWu005004@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494695 --- Comment #12 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-11-06 08:16:45 EDT --- Builds fine now. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1791960 REVIEW: + rpmlint is not silent: [petro at Workplace ~]$ rpmlint Desktop/qutim-* qutim-debuginfo.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/qutim/plugins/icq/clientidentify.h qutim-debuginfo.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/qutim/src/3rdparty/qtwin/qtwin.cpp qutim-debuginfo.i586: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/src/debug/qutim/src/3rdparty/qtwin/qtwin.cpp qutim-debuginfo.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/qutim/plugins/icq/buddycaps.h qutim-debuginfo.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/qutim/src/3rdparty/qtwin/qtwin.h qutim-debuginfo.i586: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/src/debug/qutim/src/3rdparty/qtwin/qtwin.h qutim-debuginfo.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/qutim/plugins/icq/clientidentify.cpp qutim-devel.i586: W: no-documentation qutim-icq.i586: W: no-documentation qutim-irc.i586: W: no-documentation qutim-jabber.i586: W: no-documentation qutim-mrim.i586: W: no-documentation 7 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 10 warnings. [petro at Workplace ~]$ These issues should be fixed at %prep stage. + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. - The package does not fully meet the Packaging Guidelines. There are some unlisted Requires and some unneeded calls for ldconfig. Also, and most important, I can;t find a package, who provides /usr/share/icons/mini. So, you should add the following explicit requires: hicolor-icon-theme (for /usr/share/icons/hicolor/64x64/apps ) cmake (for /usr/share/cmake/Modules ) + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines . + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. + The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included in %doc. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. +/- The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Since it's a pre-release, and new version was recently released, I'll wait until you update srpm to ver. 0.2. + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. See koji log above. + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. 0 No need to handle locales. 0 No shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths. + The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries. + The package is not designed to be relocatable. - The package must own all directories that it creates. Please, add %{_libdir}/%{name} to the main package's %files section as %dir. Also add %{_includedir}/%{name} as %dir in devel sub-package. - A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. Unfortunately, you're listing %{_bindir}/%{name} twice in main package's %files section. - Permissions on files must be set properly, but there are some rpmlint complaints regarding wrong permissions. See rpmlint log posted above. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + The package consistently uses macros. + The package contains code, or permissible content. 0 No extremely large documentation files. 0 Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. + Header files are placed in a -devel package. 0 No static libraries. 0 No pkgconfig(.pc) files. 0 The package does not contain library files with a suffix. + The devel package requires the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} + The packages does NOT contain any .la libtool archives. + The package includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file is properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + All filenames in the package are valid UTF-8. So, please, fix issues noted above, and I'll continue with review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 13:29:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 08:29:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527488] Review Request: drbd - drbd tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911061329.nA6DT9mK002209@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527488 --- Comment #75 from Philipp Reisner 2009-11-06 08:29:07 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: drbd Short Description: Userland tools and scripts for DRBD Owners: reisner Branches: F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 13:45:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 08:45:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529024] Review Request: GNUsTicker - Gnome RSS feed reader applet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911061345.nA6DjfdF012078@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529024 --- Comment #7 from Neil Horman 2009-11-06 08:45:39 EDT --- ping, any further thoughts? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 13:49:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 08:49:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533291] Review Request: ruby-ffi - Foreign Function Interface package for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911061349.nA6Dnhci012873@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533291 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-06 08:49:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > I did not read the guidelines [1] as requiring a gem. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby#Packaging_for_Gem_and_non-Gem_use Some trouble happens when someone else want to use ffi gem on Fedora and will try to import ffi gem package into Fedora. In such cases, current Fedora guideline requests that gem based rpm (i.e. rubygem-foo rpm) must be created first and non-gem support (i.e. ruby-foo) must be created as the subpackage of rubygem-foo. gem has some additional usages (although many of them can be replaced by rpm usage) and generally creating rpm from gem (if available) is preferable. (In reply to comment #2) > 0.5.2 > is released, If 0.5.2 is already released formally, please follow https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Post-Release_packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 13:53:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 08:53:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529024] Review Request: GNUsTicker - Gnome RSS feed reader applet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911061353.nA6Drct0008570@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529024 --- Comment #8 from Martin Gieseking 2009-11-06 08:53:37 EDT --- Sorry, I'm completely busy with my job at the moment and currently don't have the time to do full reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 14:35:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 09:35:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532779] Review Request: gtraffic - Simple traffic usage counter for mobile broadband connections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911061435.nA6EZqi8022050@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532779 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-06 09:35:51 EDT --- - Upstream agreed to the rename. - I used cp and rm and not mv, because I thought mv would not preserve the timestamps, but now using mv. - renaming is now in %prep and not in %install anymore Spec URL: http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/review/gtraffic.spec SRPM URL: http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/review/gtraffic-1.01-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 14:46:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 09:46:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529024] Review Request: GNUsTicker - Gnome RSS feed reader applet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911061446.nA6EkUVY029768@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529024 --- Comment #9 from Neil Horman 2009-11-06 09:46:29 EDT --- no worries, just checking in -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 15:08:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 10:08:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531541] Review Request: rho - An SSH system profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911061508.nA6F8ggE006616@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531541 --- Comment #5 from Adrian Likins 2009-11-06 10:08:41 EDT --- version 0.0.15 available now at http://alikins.fedorapeople.org/files/rho/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 15:08:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 10:08:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532470] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-bad - GStreamer streaming media framework "bad" plug-ins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911061508.nA6F85k4009109@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532470 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-11-06 10:08:04 EDT --- I still wonder who invented such ugly naming scheme for gstreamer plugins? Who is this completely braindamaged guy, who combines all plugins into several packs, which names says nothing about their actual content. I still hope, that sometimes there will be a great developer, who will split these good/bad/ugly/etc packages into something more suitable for end-users. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 15:19:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 10:19:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532874] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-wacom - Xorg X11 wacom input driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911061519.nA6FJrwS010433@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532874 --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-11-06 10:19:52 EDT --- It seems that Linux Wacom is still active (they released 0.8.4 very recently). Could you, please, add more details about the reasons, which led to the fork?, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 15:28:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 10:28:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532874] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-wacom - Xorg X11 wacom input driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911061528.nA6FSfm0014280@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532874 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tomspur at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #2 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-06 10:28:39 EDT --- Just a few comments about the spec: - rpmlint: xorg-x11-drv-wacom.src: E: invalid-spec-name xorg-x11-drv-wacom.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 6, tab: line 54) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. The spec should be xorg-x11-drv-wacom.spec? - In the devel package is a *.pc file, so at least the devel package should require pkg-config - %global over %define, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define - Does the devel package really need to own %{_includedir}/xorg? I'd say, that you should require xorg-x11-server-devel to get this folder and don't own this dir. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 16:12:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 11:12:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533302] Review Request: rst2pdf - Tool for transforming reStructuredText to PDF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911061612.nA6GC9Qv027349@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533302 Dominic Hopf changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 16:11:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 11:11:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533302] Review Request: rst2pdf - Tool for transforming reStructuredText to PDF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911061611.nA6GBovV027280@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533302 Dominic Hopf changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dmaphy at fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dmaphy at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 16:14:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 11:14:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530288] Review Request: stonevpn - easy OpenVPN certificate and configuration management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911061614.nA6GECOJ027731@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530288 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-06 11:14:11 EDT --- Well, what I meant is that for me the following 6 files --------------------------------------------------------- /usr/share/StoneVPN/COPYING /usr/share/StoneVPN/Changelog /usr/share/StoneVPN/README /usr/share/StoneVPN/TODO /usr/share/StoneVPN/patches/pyOpenSSL-0.9-crl_and_revoked.patch /usr/share/StoneVPN/rpm/stonevpn.spec --------------------------------------------------------- seems unneeded (and should be removed), because - The former 4 files are also installed (on -0 spec file) under /usr/share/doc/stonevpn-0.4.3 via %doc (i.e. what I am saying is that while /usr/share/doc/stonevpn-0.4.3/COPYING should be kept, /usr/share/StoneVPN/COPYING or so seems unneeded) - Currently I don't understand why a patch or a rpm spec file have to be installed under /usr/share/StoneVPN . All these 6 files are still installed with -1 srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 16:57:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 11:57:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530288] Review Request: stonevpn - easy OpenVPN certificate and configuration management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911061657.nA6GvJU3006271@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530288 --- Comment #5 from Leon Keijser 2009-11-06 11:57:18 EDT --- You're right and the setup.py installed these in /usr/share/StoneVPN. Since i am the author of stonevpn i modified setup.py so the documentation files, patches and spec file are not installed but kept in the tarball only. I have updated the spec file (github _does_ work, although it takes some time for the changes to take effect) and SRPM. SPEC: http://cloud.github.com/downloads/lkeijser/stonevpn/stonevpn.spec SRPM: http://cloud.github.com/downloads/lkeijser/stonevpn/stonevpn-0.4.3-2.fc11.src.rpm Since the %doc section now includes the files again, rpmlint showed no warning/errors anymore. Files that are now installed are: /etc/stonevpn.conf /usr/bin/stonevpn /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/StoneVPN /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/StoneVPN/__init__.py /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/StoneVPN/__init__.pyc /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/StoneVPN/__init__.pyo /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/StoneVPN/app.py /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/StoneVPN/app.pyc /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/StoneVPN/app.pyo /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/stonevpn-0.4.3-py2.6.egg-info /usr/share/doc/stonevpn-0.4.3 /usr/share/doc/stonevpn-0.4.3/COPYING /usr/share/doc/stonevpn-0.4.3/Changelog /usr/share/doc/stonevpn-0.4.3/README /usr/share/doc/stonevpn-0.4.3/TODO -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 17:03:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 12:03:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527488] Review Request: drbd - drbd tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911061703.nA6H35bG007775@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527488 --- Comment #76 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-11-06 12:03:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #75) why not EL-5 too ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 17:07:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 12:07:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 492609] Review Request: hmaccalc - Tools for computing and checking HMAC values for files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911061707.nA6H7MBL012564@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492609 --- Comment #9 from Nalin Dahyabhai 2009-11-06 12:07:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Did you intend to push this package to F-10 and F-11? (Obviously it's too late > to push to F-9.) Yes. Things keep distracting me from it, though. (In reply to comment #8) > Is there any reason for this ticket to remain open? Not that I'm aware of...? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 17:23:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 12:23:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526564] Review Request: unittest - C++ unit testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911061723.nA6HN0mn016659@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526564 --- Comment #11 from Ionu? Ar??ri?i 2009-11-06 12:22:58 EDT --- After talking a bit more with folks on #fedora-devel concerning the "umbrella" package issue, it seems there's no need for a -devel subpackage, since the whole unittest package is a developmental one (another good example is gcc). So I removed it altogether and now everything is in the main unittest package. The obligatory rpmlint warnings are there, of course, but they should be ok: $ rpmlint unittest-0.50-62.6.fc12.x86_64.rpm unittest.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libunittest.a unittest.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/unittest/ExistingBase.hpp unittest.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/unittest/Registry.hpp unittest.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/unittest/UnitTest.hpp 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/unittest/unittest.spec http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/unittest/unittest-0.50-62.6.fc12.src.rpm I'll wait for another go ahead from you before making the CVS request since this is probably not the little change you had in mind when approving :). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 17:40:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 12:40:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225785] Merge Review: gdm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911061740.nA6HeKhw016684@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225785 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tomspur at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #3 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-06 12:40:19 EDT --- - %global over %define https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define - comments to the patches would be good: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 17:50:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 12:50:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526564] Review Request: unittest - C++ unit testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911061750.nA6HoocX022474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526564 --- Comment #12 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-06 12:50:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > I'll wait for another go ahead from you before making the CVS request since > this is probably not the little change you had in mind when approving :). Hehe, true^^ You added the provides %{name}-static, so it's completely ok... 'Go ahead' ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 18:10:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 13:10:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530288] Review Request: stonevpn - easy OpenVPN certificate and configuration management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911061810.nA6IAI9h026919@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530288 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-06 13:10:17 EDT --- Some questions: ------------------------------------------------------------------- 29147 2009-10-22 16:50 stonevpn-0.4.3-0.fc11.src/stonevpn-0.4.3.tar.gz 29320 2009-11-07 01:41 stonevpn-0.4.3-2.fc11.src/stonevpn-0.4.3.tar.gz ------------------------------------------------------------------- - Source tarball changed. Would you explain what happened? We expect that if a static URL is used as Source0, its source archive does not change (as long as %version or so does not change). If the tarball is not the one formally released as "0.4.3" but one created from git, please follow: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Post-Release_packages https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control i.e. - Include the revision string of git tree or the date when the tarball was created to the tarball name and the release number of the srpm. - Would you have any plan to submit your patch "pyOpenSSL-0.9-crl_and_revoked.patch" to pyOpenSSL upstream? * At least I guess Fedora's pyOpenSSL won't accept this patch unless pyOpenSSL upstream accepts it and if you want to support CRL with this software on Fedora submitting your patch to pyOpenSSL upstream is really needed: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WhyUpstream -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 18:13:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 13:13:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 502130] Review Request: openocd - Open On-Chip Debugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911061813.nA6ID4bn024004@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502130 Dean Glazeski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #24 from Dean Glazeski 2009-11-06 13:13:01 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: openocd New Branches: F-12 Owners: dnglaze -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 18:25:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 13:25:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 502130] Review Request: openocd - Open On-Chip Debugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911061825.nA6IPidR030685@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502130 Dean Glazeski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #25 from Dean Glazeski 2009-11-06 13:25:43 EDT --- My bad. I didn't use the right command to get the F-12 branch. Everything is fine, I'm just new at this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 18:27:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 13:27:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507697] Review Request: python-migrate0.5 - schema migration tools for SQLAlchemy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911061827.nA6IRnWl027895@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507697 Alan Pevec changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #15 from Alan Pevec 2009-11-06 13:27:46 EDT --- Sorry for the delay, let's wrap this up today! MUST Items: [+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. python-migrate0.5.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/sqlalchemy_migrate-0.5.3-py2.4.egg/migrate/versioning/templates/manage.py_tmpl 0644 /usr/bin/env => ok, this is a template, not a script. [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [n/a] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. 8ce48470efac8cbcdf4ee9af725efd70 sqlalchemy-migrate-0.5.3.tar.gz [+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. scratch build in Koji dist-5E-epel-testing-candidate: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1791956 also builds on RHEL5.4 with python-migrate-0.4.5-3.el5 installed [n/a] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [n/a] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. [n/a] MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [n/a] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage. [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [n/a] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [n/a] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [n/a] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [n/a] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [n/a] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [n/a] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [n/a] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. APPROVED for EL-5 and F-10(if needed) since >= F-11 have python-migrate >= 0.5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 18:32:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 13:32:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526564] Review Request: unittest - C++ unit testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911061832.nA6IWLWo032667@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526564 Ionu? Ar??ri?i changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 18:32:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 13:32:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526564] Review Request: unittest - C++ unit testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911061832.nA6IW6HE032565@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526564 --- Comment #13 from Ionu? Ar??ri?i 2009-11-06 13:32:04 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: unittest Short Description: C++ unit testing framework Owners: mapleoin Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 19:13:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 14:13:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532779] Review Request: gtraffic - Simple traffic usage counter for mobile broadband connections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911061913.nA6JDHHk029316@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532779 --- Comment #6 from Christoph Wickert 2009-11-06 14:13:15 EDT --- Much better, thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 19:21:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 14:21:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 502130] Review Request: openocd - Open On-Chip Debugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911061921.nA6JLhxj030353@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502130 --- Comment #26 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-11-06 14:21:42 EDT --- FYI: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/openocd this can be handy to figure out quickly your branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 20:04:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 15:04:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225785] Merge Review: gdm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911062004.nA6K41sq017814@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225785 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-06 15:04:00 EDT --- Some other items, I just found: - DOES NOT BUILD IN KOJI: see below - macros in %changelog, %pre in line 2098 and %doc in line 2259 please use %%pre and %%doc instead - Prereq: /usr/sbin/useradd is deprecated: please use Requires: instead - 122 Obsoletes: fast-user-switch-applet 123 Provides: fast-user-switch-applet = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release} Should that not be: Obsoletes: fast-user-switch-applet < %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release} ? - DOES NOT BUILD IN KOJI: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1792744 CC gdm-product-display.o CC gdm-manager.o CC gdm-slave-proxy.o sed -e 's,[@]sbindir[@],/usr/sbin,g' <./gdm.in >gdm CCLD gdm-simple-slave gdm-manager.c:36:1: warning: "DBUS_API_SUBJECT_TO_CHANGE" redefined : warning: this is the location of the previous definition gdm-manager.c: In function 'gdm_manager_set_xdmcp_enabled': gdm-manager.c:299: error: 'GdmManagerPrivate' has no member named 'xdmcp_factory' gdm-manager.c:301: error: 'GdmManagerPrivate' has no member named 'xdmcp_factory' gdm-manager.c:305: error: 'GdmManagerPrivate' has no member named 'xdmcp_factory' gdm-manager.c:308: error: 'GdmManagerPrivate' has no member named 'xdmcp_factory' gdm-manager.c:309: error: 'GdmManagerPrivate' has no member named 'xdmcp_factory' make[3]: *** [gdm-manager.o] Error 1 make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... make[3]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/gdm-2.28.1/daemon' make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/gdm-2.28.1/daemon' make[2]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/gdm-2.28.1' make: *** [all] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.laAClY (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.laAClY (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 20:23:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 15:23:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507030] Review Request: pymunk - Python wrapper for the chipmunk 2D physics engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911062023.nA6KNvjP023246@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507030 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #20 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-06 15:23:55 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 20:22:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 15:22:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525432] Review Request: openxcap - Fully featured XCAP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911062022.nA6KM5sc026190@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525432 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-06 15:22:03 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 20:23:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 15:23:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532779] Review Request: gtraffic - Simple traffic usage counter for mobile broadband connections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911062023.nA6KNEcw026525@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532779 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-06 15:23:13 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 20:28:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 15:28:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532057] Review Request: eclipse-jgit - Eclipse JGit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911062028.nA6KSfcl024914@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532057 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-06 15:28:40 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 20:29:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 15:29:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532677] Review Request: perl-HTML-SuperForm - HTML form generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911062029.nA6KTTfS025118@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532677 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-06 15:29:28 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 20:27:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 15:27:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532635] Review Request: rurple - A Python Learning Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911062027.nA6KRuHe028036@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532635 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #18 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-06 15:27:55 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 20:27:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 15:27:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533075] Review Request: libertas-sd8686-firmware - Marvell SD8686 wifi firmware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911062027.nA6KRCmn027920@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533075 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-06 15:27:11 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 20:33:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 15:33:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516522] Review Request: globus-nexus - Globus Toolkit - Nexus Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911062033.nA6KXTlC026394@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516522 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-06 15:33:28 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 20:34:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 15:34:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516527] Review Request: globus-gass-server-ez - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Server_ez In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911062034.nA6KY8Yc026504@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516527 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-06 15:34:07 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 20:31:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 15:31:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533141] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIx-Class - Access a DBIx::Class Schema from a CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911062031.nA6KVKdm026038@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533141 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-06 15:31:19 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 20:32:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 15:32:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531912] Review Request: perl-Net-ARP - Create and Send ARP Packets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911062032.nA6KW7sl029465@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531912 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-06 15:32:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 20:32:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 15:32:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516517] Review Request: globus-gridftp-server - Globus Toolkit - Globus GridFTP Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911062032.nA6KWlKC029573@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516517 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-06 15:32:46 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 20:36:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 15:36:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507106] Review Request: msp430-libc - C library for use with GCC on Texas Instruments MSP430 microcontrollers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911062036.nA6KaXja030732@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507106 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-06 15:36:32 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 20:37:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 15:37:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532699] Review Request: ClanLib1 - Cross platform C++ game library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911062037.nA6KbwTJ031153@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532699 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-06 15:37:57 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 20:37:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 15:37:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 501958] Review Request: scotch - Graph, mesh and hypergraph partitioning library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911062037.nA6KbEPJ031046@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501958 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-06 15:37:13 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 20:39:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 15:39:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529073] Review Request: php-phpunit-phploc - A tool for quickly measuring the size of a PHP project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911062039.nA6Kda3O031424@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529073 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-06 15:39:35 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 20:40:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 15:40:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533094] Review Request: xskat - The card game Skat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911062040.nA6KesW9032028@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533094 --- Comment #5 from Christian Krause 2009-11-06 15:40:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) Thank you very much for the detailed review. > Issues: > - in %files: %{_datadir}/applications is wrong, > should be %{_datadir}/applications/* > - a comment about the permissions would be good ;) (In reply to comment #4) > Forgot to add use %global and not %define: All mentioned issues are fixed in the new package: %changelog * Fri Nov 06 2009 Christian Krause - 4.0.0-3 - Don't own /usr/share/applications - Fix permissions of man pages - Use %%global instead of %%define Spec URL: http://chkr.fedorapeople.org/review/xskat.spec SRPM URL: http://chkr.fedorapeople.org/review/xskat-4.0.0-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 20:41:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 15:41:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521983] New package for Dogtag PKI: osutil In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911062041.nA6KfNf0028632@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521983 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-06 15:41:22 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 20:42:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 15:42:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527488] Review Request: drbd - drbd tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911062042.nA6KgckJ028834@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527488 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #77 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-06 15:42:36 EDT --- cvs done. (likely no EL-5 is due to the kernel there not having the drbd module... ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 20:44:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 15:44:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526564] Review Request: unittest - C++ unit testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911062044.nA6KiDOK000544@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526564 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-06 15:44:12 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 20:43:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 15:43:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526651] Review Request: xpaint - An X Window System image editing or paint program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911062043.nA6KhONn000390@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526651 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #39 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-06 15:43:23 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 20:45:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 15:45:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524238] Review Request: libclaw - C++ Library Absolutely Wonderful In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911062045.nA6KjPR0029825@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524238 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-06 15:45:24 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 20:48:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 15:48:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477526] Review Request: rubygem-hpricot - A Fast, Enjoyable HTML Parser for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911062048.nA6KmG4M030242@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477526 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-06 15:48:14 EDT --- Thanks. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 20:48:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 15:48:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475110] Review Request: monkeystudio - Free crossplatform Qt 4 IDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911062048.nA6Kmkvl001820@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475110 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #29 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-06 15:48:45 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 20:49:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 15:49:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 492895] Review Request: xml-security-c - C++ Implementation of W3C security standards for XML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911062049.nA6KnrVR002000@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492895 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #22 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-06 15:49:50 EDT --- Thanks for the info! cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 20:47:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 15:47:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525909] Review Request: sysprof - A system-wide Linux profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911062047.nA6KlcSe001629@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525909 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-06 15:47:37 EDT --- We cannot add arbitrary initialcc addresses. ;( If they sign up for a fas account we can add them then. Feel free to reset the flag when/if they get a fedora account. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 21:04:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 16:04:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530880] Review Request: ns-tiza-fonts - A Slab-Serif Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911062104.nA6L44Ue003094@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530880 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(john.brown009 at gma | |il.com) --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-11-06 16:04:02 EDT --- The spec file is now clean The font is also clean However it seems I had forgotten to check your fontconfig file (bad bad tired reviewer) and it is not clean: A. please make sure it conforms to the latest basic template in fontpackages-devel B. please make sure you use the actual font name in it (can check it with fc-cache). Fontconfig can only act on the name the font files declares, so for your rules to work you need an exact match C. Please make sure you use the correct generic family for this kind of font (see fontconfig-generics.txt in fontpackages-devel) D. It's probably not a good idea to put the font at 60, since it lacks bold, italic, etc variants. Let fonts with more variants claim the first places, and increase your prefix value (see fontconfig-priorities.txt in fontpackages-devel) Anyway that's nice progress on your part, just the last mile to go now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 21:06:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 16:06:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533291] Review Request: ruby-ffi - Foreign Function Interface package for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911062106.nA6L6F9M004170@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533291 --- Comment #4 from Bryan Kearney 2009-11-06 16:06:14 EDT --- Is the rubygem requirement a hard and fast rule? The current gem does not package the test library, and I think given the nature of this plugin having the ability to run the tests is more valuable then having a gem. Plus, since I already had to patch this earlier in the process, i dont see how building from the gem allows us to add patches to the C code. Unless I pack and pack the gem. -- bk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 21:09:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 16:09:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525432] Review Request: openxcap - Fully featured XCAP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911062109.nA6L9Vh6004851@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525432 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-06 16:09:30 EDT --- openxcap-1.1.2-1.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openxcap-1.1.2-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 21:09:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 16:09:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525432] Review Request: openxcap - Fully featured XCAP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911062109.nA6L9aQT004951@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525432 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-06 16:09:35 EDT --- openxcap-1.1.2-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openxcap-1.1.2-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 21:09:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 16:09:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525432] Review Request: openxcap - Fully featured XCAP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911062109.nA6L9fCJ004988@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525432 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-06 16:09:40 EDT --- openxcap-1.1.2-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openxcap-1.1.2-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 21:44:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 16:44:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532816] Review Request: gdouros-alexander-fonts - A Greek typeface inspired by Alexander Wilson In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911062144.nA6LiN0v020658@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532816 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ozamosi at flukkost.nu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-11-06 16:44:21 EDT --- Spec is clean. Regarding the fontconfig part: 1. a Greek font belongs to the < 65 range (? 65 is anything that does not fit in Latin - Greek - Cyrillic, see fontconfig-priorities.txt) 2. are you sure this is a fantasy font? I seems quite usable in a professional context to me (see fontconfig-generics.txt) However both elements are quite easy to tweak even after inclusion and you've been a solid packager to far. Therefore I'm going to approve the package and let you the judge on them. ??? APPROVED ??? You can now continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a I hope the process was pleasant, and that it will inspire you to package a other fonts for Fedora. Please do not hesitate to suggest improvements to our organisation or documentation on the fonts mailing list. Thank you for another contribution to our font package pool. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 21:50:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 16:50:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525909] Review Request: sysprof - A system-wide Linux profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911062150.nA6Lohjq022332@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525909 --- Comment #15 from S?ren Sandmann Pedersen 2009-11-06 16:50:42 EDT --- Also, sandmann at daimi.au.dk does have a Red Hat bugzilla account, just not an fas account. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 21:49:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 16:49:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525909] Review Request: sysprof - A system-wide Linux profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911062149.nA6LnuNS018548@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525909 --- Comment #14 from S?ren Sandmann Pedersen 2009-11-06 16:49:55 EDT --- Well, sandmann at daimi.au.dk is the same person as sandmann at redhat.com. Is it possible to add more than one email address to an fas account? I'm not really interested in getting more bug spam to my redhat account. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 22:01:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 17:01:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532816] Review Request: gdouros-alexander-fonts - A Greek typeface inspired by Alexander Wilson In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911062201.nA6M1cN4021651@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532816 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-11-06 17:01:37 EDT --- (It may be a good idea to package the pdf of samples on the author's page as %doc BTW) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 22:02:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 17:02:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532817] Review Request: gdouros-analecta-fonts - An eccleastic scripts font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911062202.nA6M2xi6025819@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532817 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ozamosi at flukkost.nu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-11-06 17:02:58 EDT --- Review: 1. typo in the summary (eccleastic?) 2. should have fontconfig prefix < 65 (coptic is a greek-like script, see fontconfig-priorities.txt) Nevertheless, these are all minor problems you're quite capable to fix, an not blockers ??? APPROVED ??? You can now continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a I hope the process was pleasant, and that it will inspire you to package a other fonts for Fedora. Please do not hesitate to suggest improvements to our organisation or documentation on the fonts mailing list. Thank you for another contribution to our font package pool. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 6 22:19:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 17:19:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532818] Review Request: gdouros-musica-fonts - A font for musical symbols In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911062219.nA6MJ3NU025453@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532818 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ozamosi at flukkost.nu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-11-06 17:19:02 EDT --- Review: 1. I'd say this is a serif font but probably does not matter much for a symbol font 2. Needs fontconfig prio < 65, nothing really exotic in there 3. repo-font audit suggests extending it to cover more scripts But his is all minor ??? APPROVED ??? Nice to see Unicode 5.2 fonts are already appearing You can now continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a I hope the process was pleasant, and that it will inspire you to package a other fonts for Fedora. Please do not hesitate to suggest improvements to our organisation or documentation on the fonts mailing list. Thank you for another contribution to our font package pool. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 00:17:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 19:17:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532779] Review Request: gtraffic - Simple traffic usage counter for mobile broadband connections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911070017.nA70HGFl013535@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532779 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-06 19:17:16 EDT --- gtraffic-1.01-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gtraffic-1.01-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 00:16:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 19:16:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532779] Review Request: gtraffic - Simple traffic usage counter for mobile broadband connections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911070016.nA70GY1j013428@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532779 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-06 19:16:34 EDT --- gtraffic-1.01-4.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gtraffic-1.01-4.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 00:21:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 19:21:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526055] Review Request: alure - AL Utilities REtooled In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911070021.nA70LhKK014919@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526055 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-06 19:21:42 EDT --- alure-1.0-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 00:24:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 19:24:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529016] Review Request: yaml-cpp - A YAML parser and emitter for C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911070024.nA70O1pp015557@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529016 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-06 19:24:00 EDT --- yaml-cpp-0.2.2-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 00:22:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 19:22:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527308] Review Request: xmltooling - XML signing and encrytion library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911070022.nA70MCeY015100@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527308 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-06 19:22:11 EDT --- xmltooling-1.2.2-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 00:21:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 19:21:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526055] Review Request: alure - AL Utilities REtooled In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911070021.nA70LmPe014980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526055 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.0-4.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 00:22:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 19:22:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526055] Review Request: alure - AL Utilities REtooled In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911070022.nA70MlVV028642@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526055 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-06 19:22:46 EDT --- alure-1.0-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 00:22:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 19:22:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526055] Review Request: alure - AL Utilities REtooled In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911070022.nA70MrnK028695@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526055 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.0-4.fc10 |1.0-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 00:24:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 19:24:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529016] Review Request: yaml-cpp - A YAML parser and emitter for C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911070024.nA70O6x4029107@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529016 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.2.2-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 00:24:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 19:24:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521895] Review Request: json_simple - Simple Java toolkit for JSON In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911070024.nA70Ocq7015860@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521895 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-06 19:24:37 EDT --- json_simple-1.1-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 00:35:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 19:35:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533520] New: Review Request: ogre-pagedgeometry - Ogre addon for realtime rendering of dense forests Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ogre-pagedgeometry - Ogre addon for realtime rendering of dense forests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533520 Summary: Review Request: ogre-pagedgeometry - Ogre addon for realtime rendering of dense forests Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bruno at wolff.to QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://wolff.to/bruno/ogre-pagedgeometry.spec SRPM URL: http://wolff.to/bruno/ogre-pagedgeometry-1.05-2.2721svn.fc12.src.rpm Description: Real-time rendering of massive, dense forests, with not only trees, but bushes, grass, rocks, and other "clutter". Supports dynamic transitioned LOD between batched geometry and static impostors (extendable). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 00:39:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 19:39:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533520] Review Request: ogre-pagedgeometry - Ogre addon for realtime rendering of dense forests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911070039.nA70dusx018603@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533520 --- Comment #1 from Bruno Wolff III 2009-11-06 19:39:55 EDT --- There is a scratch build at: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1793274 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 00:45:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 19:45:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530880] Review Request: ns-tiza-fonts - A Slab-Serif Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911070045.nA70j4cr001361@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530880 TK009 changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(john.brown009 at gma | |il.com) | --- Comment #9 from TK009 2009-11-06 19:45:03 EDT --- I have a question, where is the '60' prefix coming from? both my uploaded spec and the spec in the srpm it is '61'. Is this set somewhere else that I've missed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 00:52:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 19:52:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532677] Review Request: perl-HTML-SuperForm - HTML form generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911070052.nA70qi4G003072@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532677 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-06 19:52:43 EDT --- perl-HTML-SuperForm-1.09-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTML-SuperForm-1.09-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 00:52:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 19:52:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532677] Review Request: perl-HTML-SuperForm - HTML form generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911070052.nA70qmuP003105@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532677 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-06 19:52:48 EDT --- perl-HTML-SuperForm-1.09-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTML-SuperForm-1.09-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 00:52:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 19:52:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532677] Review Request: perl-HTML-SuperForm - HTML form generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911070052.nA70qrxK003139@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532677 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-06 19:52:53 EDT --- perl-HTML-SuperForm-1.09-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTML-SuperForm-1.09-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 01:56:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 20:56:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 503019] Review Request: kde-plasma-daisy - a simple application launcher for Plasma In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911070156.nA71uZqR003258@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503019 --- Comment #5 from Ben Boeckel 2009-11-06 20:56:33 EDT --- I'm going to close this in 22 days (6 months after filed) if there isn't any progress. Others who would like to take this, just make this a duplicate of yours. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 02:01:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 21:01:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532203] Review Request: jgraph - Java-based Diagram Component and Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911070201.nA7215eu018289@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532203 --- Comment #6 from D Haley 2009-11-06 21:01:03 EDT --- Hello, I started reviewing this, and noticed that upstream have just undergone some changes, which I think we need to track. In particular a project called "jgraphx" (aka jgraph-6 apparently) has been released by the author. For now, please update to jgraph-5.13. Also we may need to package jgraphx at a later date (this is jgraph5 + namespace move + some changes?) -- it is unclear if upstream plan to maintain jgraph-5.13 as a separate library. However this (jgraphx) I believe should be handled separately (but would appreciate comments). Unfortunately I am still getting those debuginfo errors with your latest SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 02:01:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 21:01:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532203] Review Request: jgraph - Java-based Diagram Component and Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911070201.nA721uSg004489@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532203 --- Comment #7 from D Haley 2009-11-06 21:01:55 EDT --- Oh and note that the author has relicenced under BSD for 5.13. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 02:18:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 21:18:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530754] Review Request: scour - A script to clean SVG files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911070218.nA72ISvf021347@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530754 Ben Boeckel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED --- Comment #8 from Ben Boeckel 2009-11-06 21:18:27 EDT --- Actually, *ALL* of this package is shipped in Inkscape. I'll close this and see if I can get Inkscape maintainers to split it out somehow. If I that fails, I'll see about continuing with this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 02:23:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 21:23:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525432] Review Request: openxcap - Fully featured XCAP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911070223.nA72NHE5008626@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525432 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-06 21:23:17 EDT --- openxcap-1.1.2-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update openxcap'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0806 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 02:23:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 21:23:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525432] Review Request: openxcap - Fully featured XCAP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911070223.nA72NDo5008585@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525432 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-06 21:23:12 EDT --- openxcap-1.1.2-1.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update openxcap'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-4/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0804 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 02:33:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 21:33:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530880] Review Request: ns-tiza-fonts - A Slab-Serif Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911070233.nA72XOV1010639@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530880 --- Comment #10 from TK009 2009-11-06 21:33:23 EDT --- I should have been clearer in my comment. This is the second time you've seen something in the review that I didn't upload. The first was the font name in the description. I thought it was somehow an error on my part. I checked for the name in the file but made no change as it wasn't there. Now the font prefix is not correct (I am not sure 61 is correct either, it was a guess after talking to another fonts packager about the setting). Both my spec file and srpm spec have 61 as the prefix, I am concerned we are not seeing the same file and I am trying to determine the cause. If Serif is not correct for generic family I will change it to Fantasy, however, I am not sure you see Serif in the file can you confirm that is what you see in the review? Again I ask this because I am concerned we are not working with the same file? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 03:38:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 22:38:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533520] Review Request: ogre-pagedgeometry - Ogre addon for realtime rendering of dense forests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911070338.nA73cJYU026114@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533520 --- Comment #2 from Bruno Wolff III 2009-11-06 22:38:18 EDT --- I have an updated SRPM at: http://wolff.to/bruno/ogre-pagedgeometry-1.05-3.2721svn.fc12.src.rpm pkgconfig wasn't really being used and I had the case wrong on the include directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 07:08:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 02:08:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529441] Review Request: pdfbox - Java PDF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911070708.nA778vT1009789@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529441 --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-11-07 02:08:56 EDT --- Can you resubmit the scratch lucene build? It has disappeared from koji. After that, let me know. I can review this package so it will be ready to go when lucene is officially updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 07:14:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 02:14:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911070714.nA77EA9l011056@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 --- Comment #40 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-11-07 02:14:06 EDT --- Andrew? Did you give up too? In case no one steps forward to work on this I may be able to find time to work around new year's. That's 2 months from now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 07:23:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 02:23:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530880] Review Request: ns-tiza-fonts - A Slab-Serif Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911070723.nA77NTOm012998@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530880 --- Comment #11 from TK009 2009-11-07 02:23:29 EDT --- Spec URL: http://linuxkommando.com/dev/ns-tiza-chalk-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxkommando.com/dev/ns-tiza-chalk-fonts-20080210-1.fc12.src.rpm A. Used basic template in fontpackages-devel. B. Changed the name in fontconfig to 'Tiza'. C. Changed generic family to 'fantasy'. I am assuming rule #1 overrides all other rules in fontconfig-generics.txt. D. Changed prefix from '61' to '64'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 07:45:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 02:45:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911070745.nA77jmsJ031522@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 --- Comment #41 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-11-07 02:45:46 EDT --- I can work on this sometime next week, i totally forgot about it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 07:54:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 02:54:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 498218] Review Request: picturetile - Tiles a bunch of images into one large "photo wall" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911070754.nA77safZ000899@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498218 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #6 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-11-07 02:54:34 EDT --- Thanks for packaging this nice small handy script. I made the full review on this. The *'s are the only blockers. The rest is remarks and questions: - rpmlint is silent * The license is MIT https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/MIT old style. One of the oldest software licenses out there. ! Guidelines say: "If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc." in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text" But this package does not even have a tarball. Is there any other examples of Fedora packages that just cut the license text from the soure file? If not, I would say it is best to obey the guideline. ? Shall we rename the executable to just picturetile? That is the upstream project name. ! It would be better to install the executable with "install -pm 755 ..." and not use %attr(0755,root,root) to comply with general Fedora conventions.. ? I am a bit reluctant about the provides: Provides: picturetile.pl = 20050314 Do we really need this? ? I would go with the suggestion in comment #2 for version and release numbers. Even if upstream decides to make a 0.1 release we'll be in trouble. * The first 5 lines of the %build should probably go into %prep. Also could you use the "%setup -qcT" macro in %prep so that the package gets built in its own directory? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 07:57:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 02:57:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 498218] Review Request: picturetile - Tiles a bunch of images into one large "photo wall" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911070757.nA77vIUI020992@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498218 --- Comment #7 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-11-07 02:57:17 EDT --- ! ah. also it would be nice to have the source file downloaded with wget -N http://... so we have the correct timestamp. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 08:18:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 03:18:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516522] Review Request: globus-nexus - Globus Toolkit - Nexus Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911070818.nA78IJbC026143@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516522 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-07 03:18:18 EDT --- globus-nexus-6.7-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-nexus-6.7-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 08:18:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 03:18:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516522] Review Request: globus-nexus - Globus Toolkit - Nexus Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911070818.nA78IOUP026189@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516522 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-07 03:18:24 EDT --- globus-nexus-6.7-1.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-nexus-6.7-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 08:18:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 03:18:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516527] Review Request: globus-gass-server-ez - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Server_ez In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911070818.nA78IXXP026246@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516527 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-07 03:18:32 EDT --- globus-gass-server-ez-2.5-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gass-server-ez-2.5-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 08:18:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 03:18:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516517] Review Request: globus-gridftp-server - Globus Toolkit - Globus GridFTP Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911070818.nA78IAht026058@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516517 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-07 03:18:08 EDT --- globus-gridftp-server-3.17-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gridftp-server-3.17-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 08:18:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 03:18:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516517] Review Request: globus-gridftp-server - Globus Toolkit - Globus GridFTP Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911070818.nA78IFFf026103@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516517 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-07 03:18:14 EDT --- globus-gridftp-server-3.17-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gridftp-server-3.17-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 08:18:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 03:18:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516527] Review Request: globus-gass-server-ez - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Server_ez In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911070818.nA78IYYV026273@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516527 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-07 03:18:33 EDT --- globus-gass-server-ez-2.5-1.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gass-server-ez-2.5-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 08:18:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 03:18:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516522] Review Request: globus-nexus - Globus Toolkit - Nexus Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911070818.nA78INbI006948@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516522 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-07 03:18:22 EDT --- globus-nexus-6.7-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-nexus-6.7-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 08:18:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 03:18:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516522] Review Request: globus-nexus - Globus Toolkit - Nexus Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911070818.nA78IHEI006902@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516522 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-07 03:18:16 EDT --- globus-nexus-6.7-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-nexus-6.7-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 08:18:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 03:18:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516527] Review Request: globus-gass-server-ez - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Server_ez In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911070818.nA78IS3A006991@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516527 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-07 03:18:27 EDT --- globus-gass-server-ez-2.5-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gass-server-ez-2.5-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 08:18:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 03:18:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516527] Review Request: globus-gass-server-ez - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Server_ez In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911070818.nA78ITxj007019@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516527 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-07 03:18:27 EDT --- globus-gass-server-ez-2.5-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gass-server-ez-2.5-1.fc12 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-07 03:18:28 EDT --- globus-gass-server-ez-2.5-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gass-server-ez-2.5-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 08:28:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 03:28:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532368] Review Request: ns-bola-fonts A Sans Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911070828.nA78SX0t028552@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532368 --- Comment #2 from TK009 2009-11-07 03:28:32 EDT --- Spec URL: http://linuxkommando.com/dev/ns-bola-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxkommando.com/dev/ns-bola-fonts-20080203-1.fc12.src.rpm Changed file location. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 09:30:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 04:30:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530880] Review Request: ns-tiza-fonts - A Slab-Serif Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911070930.nA79UM38023885@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530880 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |john.brown009 at gmail.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-11-07 04:30:21 EDT --- Thanks I'm going to approve the package, but please do not forget to reference the licensing file in %doc (don't know if I missed this before or if your removed it since the start of review) ??? APPROVED ??? I'm going to look at Bola now and sponsor you if Bola's packaging is ok As soon as you're sponsored, you'll be able to continue from: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a I hope the process was pleasant, and that it will inspire you to package a other fonts for Fedora. Please do not hesitate to suggest improvements to our organisation or documentation on the fonts mailing list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 09:34:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 04:34:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533520] Review Request: ogre-pagedgeometry - Ogre addon for realtime rendering of dense forests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911070934.nA79Yq3w024652@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533520 Guido Grazioli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |guido.grazioli at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |guido.grazioli at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Guido Grazioli 2009-11-07 04:34:50 EDT --- Specfile is in good shape, taking review of this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 09:34:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 04:34:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530880] Review Request: ns-tiza-fonts - A Slab-Serif Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911070934.nA79YlxQ011545@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530880 --- Comment #13 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-11-07 04:34:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > If Serif is not correct for generic family I will change it to Fantasy, > however, I am not sure you see Serif in the file can you confirm that is what > you see in the review? > Again I ask this because I am concerned we are not working with the same file? I'm behind a proxy. If you upload a file on a web server that sets expiry time to a high value I won't necessarily see the changes (a common way to avoid this is to increment the Release number each time you have a change, numbers are cheap and having several files with the same id is always dangerous Lastly, I always work from the spec in the srpm file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 09:42:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 04:42:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530880] Review Request: ns-tiza-fonts - A Slab-Serif Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911070942.nA79gw2O026562@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530880 --- Comment #14 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-11-07 04:42:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > C. Changed generic family to 'fantasy'. I am assuming rule #1 overrides all > other rules in fontconfig-generics.txt. fontconfig-generics.txt is a decision graph. A font could be fantasy and serif and monospace at the same time, so you need common rules for everyone to chose the same category in the same circumstances -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 09:56:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 04:56:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533520] Review Request: ogre-pagedgeometry - Ogre addon for realtime rendering of dense forests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911070956.nA79ugRe029822@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533520 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dan at danny.cz --- Comment #4 from Dan Hor?k 2009-11-07 04:56:41 EDT --- Setting -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS:BOOL=ON explicitely on the command line shouldn't be needed, the %cmake macro already contains that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 09:57:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 04:57:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508518] Review Request: Meiga - Easy tool for file sharing and content publishing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911070957.nA79vGoi029908@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508518 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |tomspur at fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tomspur at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-07 04:57:14 EDT --- There is a new version, after updating I'll review this this week, at maximum next weekend? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 10:06:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 05:06:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530568] Review Request: ghmm - A library with data structures and algorithms for Hidden Markov Models In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911071006.nA7A6poM032135@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530568 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-07 05:06:49 EDT --- You told 'make update' the old bug number, and not this one, so this will never get closed on its own... I can't close this right now, because I still can't find this package build in devel... Did you run a 'make build' in the devel directory? It seems, you don't; please do so? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 10:23:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 05:23:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533558] New: Review Request: gtkwhiteboard - GTK Wiimote Whiteboard Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gtkwhiteboard - GTK Wiimote Whiteboard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533558 Summary: Review Request: gtkwhiteboard - GTK Wiimote Whiteboard Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: promac at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/SPECS/gtkwhiteboard.spec SRPM URL: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/src/gtkwhiteboard-1.3-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: Wii whiteboard python implementation. This is a linux implementation for Johnny Lee's whiteboard: http://johnnylee.net/projects/wii/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 10:47:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 05:47:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530568] Review Request: ghmm - A library with data structures and algorithms for Hidden Markov Models In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911071047.nA7Al62H029718@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530568 --- Comment #10 from D Haley 2009-11-07 05:47:03 EDT --- >Did you run a 'make build' in the devel directory? >It seems, you don't; please do so? The build was done a week ago: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=138832 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 10:56:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 05:56:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456353] Review Request: libffado - Free firewire audio driver library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911071056.nA7AuV6h032648@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456353 --- Comment #9 from Alex Kanavin 2009-11-07 05:56:28 EDT --- What's the current status? libffado is still not in rawhide as far as I can see. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 11:01:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 06:01:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530568] Review Request: ghmm - A library with data structures and algorithms for Hidden Markov Models In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911071101.nA7B1Tnx015121@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530568 --- Comment #11 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-07 06:01:28 EDT --- Strange. It's not in community: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/community/?search=ghmm#search Not on the webservers: http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/x86_64/os/Packages/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 11:00:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 06:00:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 512170] Review Request: pidgin-sipe - Pidgin plugin for connecting to MS Communications Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911071100.nA7B06BL001242@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512170 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #28 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-11-07 06:00:03 EDT --- Looks good to go except that I am unable to test the functionality since I don't have a Windows box handy. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 11:05:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 06:05:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533141] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIx-Class - Access a DBIx::Class Schema from a CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911071105.nA7B57lR016084@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533141 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-07 06:05:06 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIx-Class-0.093011-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIx-Class-0.093011-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 11:05:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 06:05:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533141] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIx-Class - Access a DBIx::Class Schema from a CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911071105.nA7B52SK002722@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533141 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-07 06:05:02 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIx-Class-0.093011-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIx-Class-0.093011-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 11:29:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 06:29:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530568] Review Request: ghmm - A library with data structures and algorithms for Hidden Markov Models In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911071129.nA7BTDMC006966@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530568 D Haley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA --- Comment #12 from D Haley 2009-11-07 06:29:12 EDT --- Its odd that it is not on the webserver. I can see it in community, though it has some kind of warning on the page "Error loading the data for this page element": https://admin.fedoraproject.org/community/?package=ghmm#package_maintenance -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 13:49:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 08:49:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526564] Review Request: unittest - C++ unit testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911071349.nA7DnVcX000953@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526564 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-07 08:49:28 EDT --- unittest-0.50-62.6.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/unittest-0.50-62.6.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 14:30:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 09:30:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532470] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-bad - GStreamer streaming media framework "bad" plug-ins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911071430.nA7EU403008780@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532470 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hdegoede at redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Hans de Goede 2009-11-07 09:30:02 EDT --- I think it is a very good idea to put the eligible parts of -bad into Fedora and I would like to review this. But I would first like to see a review by Spot of the assertion: "The code here shouldn't contain any problematic source code, as this code would usually live in library depedencies [sic])" I find at least some of the muxes worrying. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 14:53:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 09:53:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530754] Review Request: scour - A script to clean SVG files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911071453.nA7Eruwp012786@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530754 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 14:55:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 09:55:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530880] Review Request: ns-tiza-fonts - A Slab-Serif Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911071455.nA7EtSXP027056@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530880 --- Comment #15 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-11-07 09:55:25 EDT --- (the fontlint warning More points in a glyph than PostScript allows is probably worth looking at upstream too) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 14:55:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 09:55:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 492609] Review Request: hmaccalc - Tools for computing and checking HMAC values for files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911071455.nA7Eto4C027122@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492609 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-07 09:55:47 EDT --- Well, it's up to you; close the ticket out when you no longer want it around to remind you of anything. My job has long since been done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 15:04:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 10:04:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530568] Review Request: ghmm - A library with data structures and algorithms for Hidden Markov Models In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911071504.nA7F4oZq028552@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530568 --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-07 10:04:47 EDT --- Note: The "devel" branch on Fedora CVS and koji (in comment 10) currently points to F-13, which is not available on Fedora mirror servers, while currently "rawhide" (i.e. "development" tree on Fedora mirror servers, in comment 11) is for F-12. dist-f12 (on koji) tree is already locked and now you have to submit push request for F-12 on bodhi: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ and packages for F-12 (currently called as "rawhide") won't appear until F-12 is formally released. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 15:08:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 10:08:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533520] Review Request: ogre-pagedgeometry - Ogre addon for realtime rendering of dense forests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911071508.nA7F8LYv029360@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533520 --- Comment #5 from Bruno Wolff III 2009-11-07 10:08:20 EDT --- I'll retest it. That may have been when I was trying to work around them forcing a static library build. I ended up having to use a patch to do that instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 15:10:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 10:10:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 501958] Review Request: scotch - Graph, mesh and hypergraph partitioning library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911071510.nA7FAAlM029971@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501958 Deji Akingunola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Deji Akingunola 2009-11-07 10:10:07 EDT --- Imported and built in all branches. Thanks Jason for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 15:10:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 10:10:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 445068] Review Request: ocaml-bin-prot - Read and write OCaml values in a type-safe binary protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911071510.nA7FAKYT030033@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445068 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-07 10:10:17 EDT --- OK, I'm going to try for a third time to review this. The first time, firefox crashed and I lost the review; the second time, the USB controller on my motherboard fried and I had no keyboard with which to complete the review. Not a good couple of days for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 15:17:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 10:17:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 502991] Review Request: erlang-erlsom - Support for XML Schema in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911071517.nA7FH6rr017203@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502991 --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-07 10:17:03 EDT --- *** Bug 445797 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 15:17:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 10:17:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533520] Review Request: ogre-pagedgeometry - Ogre addon for realtime rendering of dense forests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911071517.nA7FHaXp017290@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533520 --- Comment #6 from Bruno Wolff III 2009-11-07 10:17:34 EDT --- I rebuilt the src rpm without using -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS:BOOL=ON and replaced the spec file and added a new src rpm. http://wolff.to/bruno/ogre-pagedgeometry-1.05-4.2721svn.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 15:17:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 10:17:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 445797] Review Request: erlsom - Support for XML Schema in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911071517.nA7FH4bt017172@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445797 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-07 10:17:03 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 502991 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 15:16:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 10:16:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532368] Review Request: ns-bola-fonts A Sans Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911071516.nA7FGeQk017108@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532368 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |john.brown009 at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-11-07 10:16:39 EDT --- Review 1. fontlint states "In GID 76 the advance width (2499) is greatert than the stated maximum (999)" ? please relay upstream 2. repo-font-audit identifies some scripts the font could easily be extended to cover ? please check and relay upstream 3. you do not need to use Mixed Case In Summary; just the first letter in the sentence will do 4. It supports diacritics ? It includes diacritics ? 5. You've forgotten to add the license file to %doc 6. It would be nice if the font metadata said OFL like the detached license file ? please relay upstream The rest is fine ??? APPROVED ??? You can now continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a I hope the process was pleasant, and that it will inspire you to package a other fonts for Fedora. Please do not hesitate to suggest improvements to our organisation or documentation on the fonts mailing list. Thank you for another contribution to our font package pool. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 15:39:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 10:39:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532819] Review Request: gdouros-symbola-fonts - A symbol font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911071539.nA7FdR2P022025@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532819 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 15:38:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 10:38:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532819] Review Request: gdouros-symbola-fonts - A symbol font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911071538.nA7FcbAD003227@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532819 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ozamosi at flukkost.nu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-11-07 10:38:36 EDT --- Review 1. The description is particularly difficult to digest ? please try to come up with something better with upstream (not blocking). The specific reference to Unicode 5.2 in particular will force you to change the description each time the font and the standard are updated 2. fontlint notes "More points in a glyph than PostScript allows" ? please relay upstream (not blocking) 3. repo-font-audit notes partial script and unicode coverage ? please relay upstream (not blocking) 4. the unicode points are unusual but the style is not exotic, I'd say it's a serif not fantasy font (not blocking) 5. It would be nice if upstream added a .txt licensing file to the zip ??? APPROVED ??? You can now continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a I hope the process was pleasant, and that it will inspire you to package a other fonts for Fedora. Please do not hesitate to suggest improvements to our organisation or documentation on the fonts mailing list. Thank you for another contribution to our font package pool. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 15:49:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 10:49:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533520] Review Request: ogre-pagedgeometry - Ogre addon for realtime rendering of dense forests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911071549.nA7Fnb7S023884@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533520 --- Comment #7 from Bruno Wolff III 2009-11-07 10:49:36 EDT --- I made a new scratch build for -4 to make it easy to review build logs. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1794203 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 16:01:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 11:01:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529441] Review Request: pdfbox - Java PDF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911071601.nA7G1iTC008717@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529441 --- Comment #4 from Orion Poplawski 2009-11-07 11:01:43 EDT --- lucene 2.4.1 on F-12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1794228 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 16:10:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 11:10:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531051] Review Request: glite-security-util-java - Java Utilities for GSI Credentials In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911071610.nA7GAqUg010600@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531051 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert 2009-11-07 11:10:50 EDT --- Fedora review glite-security-util-java 2009-11-07 + OK - Needs work ? Needs explanation $ rpmlint glite-security-util-java-* glite-security-util-java.src:123: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package) %attr(-,root,root) %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.jar.* 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. + rpmlint OK + Package named according to Java guidelines (name same as jarfile) + Specfile named after package + License tag "ASL 2.0 and EU Datagrid" is a Fedora apporved license + The tag corresponds to the license in the sources (most is ASL 2.0, but the code in src/org/glite/security/voms/ac is EU Datagrid + LICENSE file is listed as %doc + Specfile is written in legible English + Sources corresponds to upstream (following the description in the specfile) + Package compiles as a mock build + Build requirements are sane - The source tree contains an embedded copy of the source for the vomsjapi library in src/org/glite/security/voms, bundling copies of system libraries is not allowed - use the system version instead This can be achieved by adding the following lines to the %prep section ... rm -rf src/org/glite/security/voms sed s/org.glite.security.voms.VOMSValidator/org.glite.voms.VOMSValidator/ \ -i src/org/glite/security/SecurityContext.java ... and adding vomsjapi to BuildRequires, Requires and build-classpath It might then also be possible to change the License tag to only "ASL 2.0" since the code under the other license is then not used. - Package does not own /usr/lib64/gcj/glite-security-util-java + No duplicate files + Permissions are sane and %files has %defattr. Though the %attr(-,root,root) tag for the gcj AOT files is redundant - covered by the default. + %clean clears buildroot + Specfile uses macros consistently + Package contains code - The javadoc package does not have a versioned directory and a symlink + Package does not own others' directories + %install clears buildroot + Filenames are UTF8 ? axis and servlet are listed as BuildRequires but not as Requires - why? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 16:16:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 11:16:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533594] New: Review Request: Pootle - Localization and translation management web application Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Pootle - Localization and translation management web application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533594 Summary: Review Request: Pootle - Localization and translation management web application Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dwayne at translate.org.za QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dwayne.fedorapeople.org/pootle-1.3.0-0.3.beta4.spec SRPM URL: http://dwayne.fedorapeople.org/pootle-1.3.0-0.3.beta4.fc11.src.rpm You will need this version of the Translate Toolkit which is currently in F11 updates-testing: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-11035 to test v1.3 of Pootle. Description: Localization and translation management web application Pootle is web application for managing distributed or crowdsourced translation. It's features include:: * Translation of Gettext PO and XLIFF files. * Submitting to remote version control systems (VCS). * Managing groups of translators * Online webbased or offline translation * Quality checks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 16:36:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 11:36:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532819] Review Request: gdouros-symbola-fonts - A symbol font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911071636.nA7GaFAJ001764@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532819 Robin Sonefors changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Robin Sonefors 2009-11-07 11:36:14 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gdouros-symbola-fonts Short Description: A symbol font Owners: ozamosi Branches: F11 F12 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 16:37:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 11:37:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532818] Review Request: gdouros-musica-fonts - A font for musical symbols In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911071637.nA7GbBUE001916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532818 Robin Sonefors changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Robin Sonefors 2009-11-07 11:37:10 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gdouros-musica-fonts Short Description: A font for musical symbols Owners: ozamosi Branches: F11 F12 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 16:36:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 11:36:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532817] Review Request: gdouros-analecta-fonts - An eccleastic scripts font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911071636.nA7GajYt001856@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532817 Robin Sonefors changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Robin Sonefors 2009-11-07 11:36:44 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gdouros-analecta-fonts Short Description: An eccleastic scripts font Owners: ozamosi Branches: F11 F12 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 16:36:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 11:36:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532816] Review Request: gdouros-alexander-fonts - A Greek typeface inspired by Alexander Wilson In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911071636.nA7GaXne001817@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532816 Robin Sonefors changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Robin Sonefors 2009-11-07 11:36:31 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gdouros-alexander-fonts Short Description: A Greek typeface inspired by Alexander Wilson Owners: ozamosi Branches: F11 F12 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 16:49:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 11:49:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532306] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-debug - Faster implementation of the standard Debugging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911071649.nA7GnLc5004150@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532306 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-07 11:49:20 EDT --- Well, - Please package linecache first. %check fails without linecache and even without %check ruby-debug-base actually needs linecache (see ruby-debug-base-0.10.3/lib/ruby-debug-base.rb) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1794237 ( Does your srpm actually builds for you? ) - "head" command or so is very dangerous when binary files exist. Actually --------------------------------------------------------------- 61 # Fix anything executable that does not have a shebang 62 for file in `find %{buildroot}/%{geminstdir} %{buildroot}/%{geminstdir2} -type f -perm /a+x`; do 63 [ -z "`head -n 1 $file | grep \"^#!/\"`" ] && chmod -v 644 $file 64 done --------------------------------------------------------------- changes the permission of ruby_debug.so to 0644 and currently debuginfo rpm is not correctly created. - Executing %check under %buildroot is wrong for this package because "rake test" again tries to create ruby_debug.so under %buildroot%{geminstdir2}/ext/ because we move this file to %buildroot%ruby_sitearch --------------------------------------------------------------- 853 Executing(%check): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.5gRRsq 860 + rake -f ../ruby-debug-0.10.3/Rakefile test 865 gcc -shared -o ruby_debug.so breakpoint.o ruby_debug.o -L. -L/usr/lib -L. -rdynamic -Wl,-export-dynamic -lruby -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lcrypt -lm -lc --------------------------------------------------------------- %check must be done under %_builddir for this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 17:00:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 12:00:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528473] Review Request: php-ezc-DatabaseSchema - eZ Components DatabaseSchema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911071700.nA7H0FVb020764@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528473 --- Comment #2 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-11-07 12:00:13 EDT --- SPEC updated : http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/ez_components/php-ezc-DatabaseSchema.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 17:03:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 12:03:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528476] Review Request: php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein - eZ Components PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911071703.nA7H3Vxe021395@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528476 --- Comment #2 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-11-07 12:03:30 EDT --- SPEC Updated : http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/ez_components/php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 17:11:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 12:11:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530204] Review Request: rubygem-hawler - Hawler, the Ruby HTTP crawler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911071711.nA7HBgP5023113@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530204 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-07 12:11:39 EDT --- Please submit push request on bodhi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 17:15:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 12:15:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 445068] Review Request: ocaml-bin-prot - Read and write OCaml values in a type-safe binary protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911071715.nA7HFduJ009894@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445068 --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-07 12:15:37 EDT --- OK, this builds fine and rpmlint is silent In multiple licensing scenarios, you'll need to add some indication of which files are under which license. The easiest way is to just add a comment to the spec. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios You've duplicated the license files between -devel and the main package. This is clearly against the guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Duplicate_Files but I know we've gone back and forth on this so I've requested that we get an opinion from legal and get the guidelines modified if necessary. The -devel package includes a .ml file; the OCaml guidelines say that these shouldn't be included except in specific circumstances. I can't determine from the information I have whether or not those circumstances apply here, and there's no comment in the spec about it. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 1a8569a75195b35ec17348046b3aa8823f9f27e451214717692a86075cfbdb9b release-1.2.20.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: ocaml-bin-prot-1.2.20-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm dllbin_prot_stubs.so()(64bit) ocaml(Bin_prot) = 68b4c083005ed9d5cde0767b0e6a9782 ocaml(Pa_bin_prot) = d894b67ca8604bc43a9721e774c08303 ocaml-bin-prot = 1.2.20-1.fc12 ocaml-bin-prot(x86-64) = 1.2.20-1.fc12 = ocaml(Arg) = b6513be035dc9c8a458c189cd8841700 ocaml(Array) = 9c9fa5f11e2d6992c427dde4d1168489 ocaml(Bigarray) = fc2b6c88ffd318b9f111abe46ba99902 ocaml(Buffer) = 23af67395823b652b807c4ae0b581211 ocaml(Callback) = 71e1f9b7f211661f1dfeedab5ffae0cc ocaml(CamlinternalLazy) = ed280fb9736e9200aa47db73c5ff077f ocaml(Camlp4) = bb930f7c2bed5d057c794fe07dc8596a ocaml(Camlp4_config) = 80b5d58834366711574a5ec4dfb123fd ocaml(Camlp4_import) = 4d17b58763ba1f0aac92fd5dbb558b59 ocaml(Char) = 3da72249626c7db769beafc97036cb4f ocaml(Complex) = 73899d718b62e5534e8737bb363dbf71 ocaml(Filename) = 7cd172f02b7ee9b8d7bda3bb92144951 ocaml(Format) = b7ba3152a5eec5609d6ab86e6c51eebb ocaml(Hashtbl) = ee2a3220e38a4350c5bc131ce9f3f6ce ocaml(Int32) = b2545c419b6b6a173cac4c0a3e7e0277 ocaml(Int64) = d501d6e89fdce41c79f274fb464995d5 ocaml(Lazy) = 4c7ed568fa7b5f73a2aa02eeb0e5e12b ocaml(Lexing) = 4d17267334f1a6c75730dc3fae21fb9b ocaml(List) = a0e2e49d266ff302f8667651a43f71ba ocaml(Nativeint) = 7233ce5207a538fea4f0c61ed411ea2c ocaml(Obj) = c827f726ce05da709cf7de58fc15e324 ocaml(Parsing) = 29c3f123280f8e6e639cfb025b3c9a3f ocaml(Pa_type_conv) = 917c39ac24d30438f1e78e6e58840e45 ocaml(Pervasives) = 88cb1505c8bdf9a4dcd2cdf3452732b4 ocaml(Printf) = 807ecd3a1538992580464c03462c9964 ocaml(Queue) = 56b5e04dcda600ae0cdf49a37f17fcd9 ocaml(Set) = c4be5d24d30c129dd60d2739e54db7dd ocaml(Stream) = 91a43ea7fb16bf36f3f10c0dc7d08a0e ocaml(String) = ecc403546c1c50056801131811c39017 ocaml(Sys) = 21bf525b2b3f3a46a54b96163adfe387 ocaml(Unix) = 0596a58544f8cd88fed5bf5432a53d43 ocaml(runtime) = 3.11.1 ocaml-bin-prot-devel-1.2.20-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm ocaml-bin-prot-devel = 1.2.20-1.fc12 ocaml-bin-prot-devel(x86-64) = 1.2.20-1.fc12 = ocaml-bin-prot = 1.2.20-1.fc12 * %check is present and all tests pass: Ran: 67 tests in: 0.35 seconds. OK msgs: 100000 msg length: 461 write time: 2.548s write rate: 39244.14 msgs/s write throughput: 17.25 MB/s read time: 2.619s read rate: 38181.64 msgs/s read throughput: 16.79 MB/s * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. X license files are duplicated. * file permissions are appropriate. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * .cma, .cmi, .so, .so.owner, META files in the main package. * .a, .cmxa, .cmx and .mli files are in the -devel subpackage. ? a .ml file is included * .so files have no rpath -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 17:21:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 12:21:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528469] Review Request: php-ezc-EventLogDatabaseTiein - eZ Components EventLogDatabaseTiein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911071721.nA7HLKeY010940@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528469 --- Comment #1 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-11-07 12:21:19 EDT --- SPEC updated : http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/ez_components/php-ezc-EventLogDatabaseTiein.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 17:32:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 12:32:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 509856] Review Request: qrencode - The libqrencode library and application encodes QR Code symbols (2d barcodes) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911071732.nA7HWgVq013138@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509856 --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-07 12:32:39 EDT --- I will close this bug as NOTABUG within one week if no response is received from the reporter within ONE WEEK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 17:35:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 12:35:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459548] Review Request: php-gtk - GTK PHP extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911071735.nA7HZ48j027720@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459548 --- Comment #32 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-07 12:35:00 EDT --- I will close this bug as NOTABUG if no response is received from the reporter with ONE WEEK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 17:45:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 12:45:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532817] Review Request: gdouros-analecta-fonts - An eccleastic scripts font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911071745.nA7Hj2Pr015695@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532817 --- Comment #3 from Robin Sonefors 2009-11-07 12:45:02 EDT --- Sorry, that description is wrong. Correct description: An ecclesiastic scripts font -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 18:10:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 13:10:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529542] Review Request: php-phpunit-phpcpd - Copy/Paste Detector (CPD) for PHP code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911071810.nA7IAxRf002994@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529542 --- Comment #2 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-11-07 13:10:58 EDT --- SPEC updated : http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/php-phpunit-phpcpd.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 18:25:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 13:25:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487913] Review Request: culmus-fancy-fonts - Fancy fonts for Hebrew In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911071825.nA7IPISU023825@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487913 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-11-07 13:25:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Created an attachment (id=367518) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=367518) [details] > spec with fixes to sever of the comments > > It might be just about at the packaging standard, but certainly has several of > the comments unfixed. Can you post a srpm please? It's a lot easier to review when you can build the package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 18:36:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 13:36:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526311] Review Request: mysql-mmm - Multi-Master Replication Manager for MySQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911071836.nA7Iaeiu007775@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526311 --- Comment #11 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-11-07 13:36:38 EDT --- Since this are all architecture-independent perl libraries, you have to add BuildArch: noarch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 19:16:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 14:16:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487913] Review Request: culmus-fancy-fonts - Fancy fonts for Hebrew In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911071916.nA7JGVJr015112@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487913 Dan Kenigsberg changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #367518|spec with fixes to sever of |spec with fixes to several description|the comments |of the comments -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 19:15:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 14:15:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487913] Review Request: culmus-fancy-fonts - Fancy fonts for Hebrew In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911071915.nA7JF8TZ000376@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487913 --- Comment #6 from Dan Kenigsberg 2009-11-07 14:15:07 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=367959) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=367959) srpm with fixes to several of the problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 20:04:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 15:04:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529441] Review Request: pdfbox - Java PDF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911072004.nA7K4Q2j010821@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529441 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |529283 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 20:04:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 15:04:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529283] Review Request: fontbox - Java library for working with PDF fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911072004.nA7K4RQI010842@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529283 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |529441 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 20:43:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 15:43:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529283] Review Request: fontbox - Java library for working with PDF fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911072043.nA7KhZ7B001345@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529283 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-11-07 15:43:34 EDT --- I reviewed this. There are very minor issues that can be fixed before you import: * rpmlint says: W: non-standard-group Development Documentation This should be just "Documentation" W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package) %attr(-,root,root) %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name} rpmlint is wrong. This one can be ignored. - Patches should be explained and be submitted to upstream. Since this is a pure Fedora specific patch we can ignore the upstream part. ! %if %{with_gcj} %attr(-,root,root) %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name} %endif Here %attr(-,root,root) is not needed. I know this is in the guidelines but they have to be corrected. (I proposed this a while ago but things are going a little slow with updating these guidelines.) ------------------------------------------ This package (fontbox) is APPROVED by oget ------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 22:02:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 17:02:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530204] Review Request: rubygem-hawler - Hawler, the Ruby HTTP crawler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911072202.nA7M2bNF007694@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530204 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-07 17:02:37 EDT --- rubygem-hawler-0.3-5.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-hawler-0.3-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 7 22:02:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 17:02:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530204] Review Request: rubygem-hawler - Hawler, the Ruby HTTP crawler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911072202.nA7M2WiJ022325@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530204 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-07 17:02:32 EDT --- rubygem-hawler-0.3-5.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-hawler-0.3-5.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 00:05:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 19:05:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532470] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-bad-free - GStreamer streaming media framework "bad" plug-ins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911080005.nA805g5w021985@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532470 Bastien Nocera changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |gstreamer-plugins-bad - |gstreamer-plugins-bad-free |GStreamer streaming media |- GStreamer streaming media |framework "bad" plug-ins |framework "bad" plug-ins --- Comment #6 from Bastien Nocera 2009-11-07 19:05:40 EDT --- scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1794399 Spec file: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~hadess/gstreamer-plugins-bad/gstreamer-plugins-bad-free.spec SRPM: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~hadess/gstreamer-plugins-bad/gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-0.10.16-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 00:24:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 19:24:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529441] Review Request: pdfbox - Java PDF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911080024.nA80O07o012254@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529441 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-11-07 19:23:58 EDT --- I made the preliminary review on this package. It needs some work. I also need to see this building in koji in all archs before approving. * These need to be added otherwise, package will not build in mock and/or will have broken deps: BuildRequires: ant-nodeps BuildRequires: junit BuildRequires: jakarta-commons-logging Requires: jakarta-commons-logging export CLASSPATH=$( ... jakarta-commons-logging junit) You don't necessarily need "Requires: junit". See below. - Patches should be explained and be submitted to upstream. Since this is a pure Fedora specific patch we can ignore the upstream part. * rpmlint says: pdfbox.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/pdfbox-0.8.0/RELEASE-NOTES.txt This can be corrected in %prep easily via sed 's|\r||' or similar. pdfbox-javadoc.x86_64: W: non-standard-group Development Documentation Simply use "Documentation" pdfbox.src:120: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package) %attr(-,root,root) %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name} This can be ignored. * This package includes fonts that are already available in Fedora. This is not allowed by the guidelines. You will need to patch the source to remove these fonts from the jar file and use the system ones instead. This will require adding Requires: bitstream-vera-sans-fonts See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy ! It would be good to run the supplied tests in %check via "ant test". But for this, you may need to add BuildRequires(check): ant-junit and *possibly* add this to classpath before you call "ant test" ? Test classes are being packaged (they end up in the final jar). Is this necessary? If yes, then you will need to add Requires: junit If not sure, please contact upstream. ! %attr(-,root,root) is not needed as I explained in the previous review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 01:27:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 20:27:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464757] Review Request: openssl-tpm-engine - OpenSSL engine for TSS API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911080127.nA81RQ8O027842@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464757 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |BuildFails --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-07 20:27:24 EDT --- Indicating that this doesn't build; please clear the whiteboard when that's been fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 01:28:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 20:28:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475934] Review Request: m6812-elf-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at m68hc12 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911080128.nA81ShSX028090@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475934 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-07 20:28:41 EDT --- Given nearly four months of silence, I'm going to assume that's a big no and close this out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 01:25:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 20:25:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911080125.nA81P4xs027313@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #53 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-07 20:24:58 EDT --- I've had no time for reviews recently, but I have a little now. This builds find on rawhide, but not F11 because of the clipper-devel dependency. A version build for F12 will install on F11 but won't run. My "not-quite-F12" boxes are all at work, which makes testing difficult; I can run it remotely, but it fails with "*** Cannot find the double-buffered visual." Looks like you just can't go GLX over SSH, which I swear used to work OK. Unfortunately I can't really do a proper review if I can't do any testing. Anyway, I can make a few comments: The build is fine; rpmlint has just the expected unused-direct-shlib-dependency complaints, along with a couple of shared-lib-calls-exit and a single no-documentation complaint, all of which are OK. When I installed this I tried to find the icon, only to find that it shows up in the Graphics category. Unfortunately the desktop file spec doesn't really have a top-level category that fits this package, but I'd at least expect to see "Graphics;Science;", maybe with Engineering or DataVisualization if they're appropriate. Honestly the only real issue I see at this point is the wholesale inclusion of unrelated upstream projects in the coot/scheme directory. Generally we don't do that kind of thing; it's basically the situation from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries I didn't really notice before that those were separate projects; I originally thought they were part of coot but carried different licenses. Now I see that they are merely prerequisites that shouldn't be part of this package. Honestly I don't know what to do about that. I guess I'd package guile-gui, goosh and net-http separately (although probably using a "guile-" prefix for the latter two) and then figure out how to make this package use the packaged versions. Unfortunately I know very little about guile; jugding from the guile-lib package, it should be as simple as sticking the scheme files in %{_datadir}/guile/site/goosh or whatever. Getting coot to use those files may be more difficult; I'm not at all sure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 01:54:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 20:54:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466331] Review Request: rcov - ruby code coverage tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911080154.nA81slcU019110@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466331 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |BuildFails Flag| |needinfo?(cdahlin at redhat.co | |m) --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-07 20:54:43 EDT --- Still no buildable package after more than half a year; I guess this should just be closed. I'll do that soon if there's no further response, but in the meantime I'll indicate that this fails to build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 02:09:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 21:09:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 498073] Review Request: python-ekg - Community Health Reporter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911080209.nA829HHQ023343@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498073 Max Spevack changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mspevack at redhat.com --- Comment #11 from Max Spevack 2009-11-07 21:09:15 EDT --- Seeing as this particular code -- python-ekg -- is not being actively worked on, I just wanted those reading this bug to realize that this package review, and our desire to get this code packaged into Fedora's repositories, is not urgent right now. If at some point we have more resources, or folks interested in python-ekg, perhaps we'll ressurect this package review. For the time being, the EKG project is trying to proceed in a different direction. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 02:23:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 21:23:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 498073] Review Request: python-ekg - Community Health Reporter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911080223.nA82NBYf026771@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498073 --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-07 21:23:10 EDT --- Max, are you suggesting that this review ticket should be closed out? I suppose you could leave it open if neither Jeroen nor Yaakov mind, but it sounds like there's not much point in proceeding at this point. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 02:34:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 21:34:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469474] Review Request: sovix - A website revision system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911080234.nA82Y6i3012050@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469474 --- Comment #18 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-07 21:34:03 EDT --- A few comments: For multiple license scenarios, you need to indicate which parts of the package are under which license. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios I do not fully understand what requirements the AGPL places on the Fedora package. I don't know if we somehow have to make sure that the source is exposed somehow. I've asked on fedora-legal-list. No supported version of Fedora shipped with a mysql-server older than 5.0.67 or a php older than 5.2.6, so the versioned dependencies are kind of pointless. Even RHEL4 has newer versions than that. Is there any reason why mysql-server would be required? The upstream web page indicates that both mysql and postgres are supported and that use of a database is optional. Not only that, but I can't imagine a situation that would force the database server to be running on the same machine. At worst you'd require the client libraries, and even if you somehow did require the server, you're still missing a dependency on the php interface to the database. Your %description looks like it's been badly word-wrapped. Generally for web applications we provide an apache config file to make the files properly visible to the web. Is there any specific reason for not doing that here? (I realize that makes the package actually require apache itself, but that's now petty much every other packaged webapp does things.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 02:37:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 21:37:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469613] Review Request: gnue-appserver - GNU Enterprise Application Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911080237.nA82bOLa030804@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469613 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |BuildFails --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-07 21:37:23 EDT --- Just checking old review tickets. This one fails to build because patch1 fails to apply. Please clear the whiteboard when you have a fixed package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 02:44:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 21:44:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530772] Review Request: pxe-kexec - Linux boots Linux via network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911080244.nA82iEip014272@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530772 --- Comment #2 from Scott Collier 2009-11-07 21:44:13 EDT --- Koji builds are successful: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1794541 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1794546 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1794551 rpmlint is clean. May I please get a sponsor? I think the package is ready to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 02:57:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 21:57:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469931] Review Request: ipmiutil - IPMI Management Utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911080257.nA82vqRH017506@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469931 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |BuildFails --- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-07 21:57:49 EDT --- The package in comment 14 fails to build for me: + cd /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/ipmiutil-2.4.3-1.x86_64/usr/share/man/man8 + gzip -f '*.8' gzip: *.8: No such file or directory I'm not sure what's gone wrong, but do note that you shouldn't try to compress the manpages yourself; rpmbuild will do it automatically. The %ifarch doesn't seem at all relevant to Fedora, and I have to admit that I can't understand why you would define all of those macros that are pretty much the same as existing macros or are longer than the strings they replace. I don't understand the purpose of %pre; packages cannot produce output in scriptlets, so the whole thing seems to be pointless. And the checks for SuSE and Montavista in %post have no place in Fedora. Many other portions of the scriptlets don't seem relevant to Fedora. Please clear the whiteboard when you have a package which builds. I checked the account system and it looks like you are not in the packager group, so I've indicated that you need a sponsor. Please read through http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers for more information on becoming a Fedora packager. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 03:08:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 22:08:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474012] Review Request: qodem - terminal emulator and communications package. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911080308.nA838sSQ005321@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474012 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-07 22:08:52 EDT --- There's been no response in many months; I'm just going to go ahead and close this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 03:44:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 22:44:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478806] Review Request: simh - A highly portable, multi-system emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911080344.nA83iMVl014261@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478806 --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-07 22:44:20 EDT --- The generate-tarball.sh file seems to have nothing to do with this package. It seems that you've done more than just remove files from the tarball. The change to the makefile is the kind of thing that's better done as a patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 03:45:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 22:45:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911080345.nA83jlJo029686@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 --- Comment #23 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-07 22:45:46 EDT --- As long as the source itself is unclear, that information needs to be included within the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 04:13:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 23:13:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477683] Review Request: fltk2 - C++ user interface toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911080413.nA84D5DV021120@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477683 --- Comment #23 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-07 23:13:02 EDT --- Just FYI, outside of the rpmlint complaints posted in comment 17, there are also a very large number of undefined-non-weak-symbol complaints along with a few unused-direct-shlib-dependency warnings. There are a couple hundred complaints in total; to see them, install the package and run "rpmlint fltk2". It is possible that these aren't problematic; the undefined-non-weak-symbol complaints indicate that you can't make use of the library without also linking to the libraries which provide those symbols. Bad practise and good to fix if possible, but probably not a serious issue. The unused-direct-shlib-dependency complaints indicate that the libraries in question are linked against various libraries but don't actually call into them. Again, this may not be problematic; if there aren't any extra dependencies caused by this and the libraries are going to be in memory anyway. You should check those and verify that there aren't any actual problems indicated. The versioning of this package doesn't seem to follow Fedora guidelines, although I can't really tell. What do you expect the actual release version to be? If it's 2.0.0 or something, then note that you'll have to use epoch to keep ordering. because '0' (or indeed any digit) is less than 'x'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 04:20:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 23:20:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 513779] Review Request: python-simplesettings - Simple settings initialization for Python libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911080420.nA84KiBE022877@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513779 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(fabian at bernewirel | |ess.net) --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-07 23:20:42 EDT --- I guess I'll close this soon if there's no response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 04:29:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 23:29:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516311] Review Request: ueagle-atm-firmware123 - Firmwares for usb adsl modems based on Eagle I, II and III chipsets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911080429.nA84TPtZ024799@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516311 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-07 23:29:24 EDT --- Without any indication of the license I don't believe that this can be reviewed. I'll block FE-Legal, but there's not much they can do either without someone indicating the actual license on these files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 04:29:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 23:29:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911080429.nA84TVVt006362@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 --- Comment #24 from Conrad Meyer 2009-11-07 23:29:30 EDT --- Sure, it can be added to a README.Fedora (or LicensingClarification.txt, whatever you would like). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 04:49:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 23:49:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532739] Review Request: emacs-cedet - Collection of Emacs Development Environment Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911080449.nA84nUpQ010706@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532739 --- Comment #9 from Xavier Maillard 2009-11-07 23:49:29 EDT --- As said before M-x semantic-symref did not work due to installation missing files. The current spec is taking care of them: http://xavier.maillard.im/public/emacs-cedet.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 04:52:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 23:52:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516312] Review Request: ueagle-atm-firmware4 - Firmwares for usb adsl modems based on Eagle IV chipset In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911080452.nA84qRVT030070@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516312 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(hicham.haouari at gm | |ail.com) --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-07 23:52:26 EDT --- So it's been nearly two months since comment 2 and over a month since FE-Legal was lifted; did you intend to comment on the issues raised? Or should this ticket be closed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 07:37:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 02:37:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532470] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-bad-free - GStreamer streaming media framework "bad" plug-ins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911080737.nA87bmjV007419@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532470 --- Comment #7 from Hans de Goede 2009-11-08 02:37:47 EDT --- Spot to be clear, you were added to the CC because of comment #5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 10:10:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 05:10:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478806] Review Request: simh - A highly portable, multi-system emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911081010.nA8AA0GN021277@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478806 --- Comment #12 from Lucian Langa 2009-11-08 05:09:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > The generate-tarball.sh file seems to have nothing to do with this package. I'm having the same problem over and over perhaps because the naming of this file. > It seems that you've done more than just remove files from the tarball. The > change to the makefile is the kind of thing that's better done as a patch In the makfile I just removed ibm1130 from ALL target. Do I need to specifically remove entire ibm1130 makefile definitions ? Updated file: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/simh-3.8.1-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 10:15:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 05:15:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523523] Review Request: clutter-gesture - Gesture Library for Clutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911081015.nA8AFFRh023259@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523523 Christian Krause changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |chkr at plauener.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chkr at plauener.de Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 10:39:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 05:39:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530756] Review Request: circuit_macros - A set of macros for drawing high-quality line diagram In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911081039.nA8Ad5Pi010075@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530756 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |chitlesh at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chitlesh at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-11-08 05:39:03 EDT --- #001: Requires README states : REQUIRED SOFTWARE: Preferred setup: m4, dpic (see below), TeX or LaTeX, PSTricks, dvips Update your Requires accordingly #002: Requires of Sub package - examples Requires: %{name} should rather be Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} #003: I think you are forgetting *.m4 found in the -doc directory. #004: 2 directories for documentation ? The main package has /usr/share/doc/circuit_macros-6.61/ for its %doc The sub package has /usr/share/doc/circuit_macros/examples for its %doc I prefer that there is only ONE directory for ALL documentation. It is simply because while giving the user more examples cases, we should not drown the user into confusion. #005: You are missing the subdirectories found in the examples directory. These should found their way to your -examples subpackage #006: the *.tex from the examples should also be added to the -examples subpackage. It is an example (and source) how to use those symbols into one's latex document. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 10:40:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 05:40:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530755] Review Request: dpic - A compiler for the pic language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911081040.nA8AedJU030739@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530755 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chitlesh at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-11-08 05:40:22 EDT --- Can you please update this srpm for review ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 10:43:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 05:43:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911081043.nA8AhBeP011503@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 --- Comment #16 from Roshan Singh 2009-11-08 05:43:08 EDT --- > * Version specific dependency > - Would you explain why you want to write the version dependency > ">= 2.0" for BR: python-devel? > Note that currently supported branches on Fedora have at least > python 2.5.2. I saw a similar application which needed PyQt4-devel, so I thought it may be needed. Well the version is because I have used many functions which are specfific to version >= 2.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 14:42:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 09:42:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530755] Review Request: dpic - A compiler for the pic language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911081442.nA8Eg5MR031164@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530755 --- Comment #4 from Ben Boeckel 2009-11-08 09:42:03 EDT --- Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/dpic/dpic.spec SRPM URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/dpic/dpic-20091009-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 14:45:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 09:45:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527488] Review Request: drbd - drbd tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911081445.nA8EjObS020066@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527488 --- Comment #78 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-08 09:45:19 EDT --- Please rebuild this also for F-13. Also for F-12, please submit push request on bodhi: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 14:53:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 09:53:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530756] Review Request: circuit_macros - A set of macros for drawing high-quality line diagram In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911081453.nA8Erqju000687@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530756 --- Comment #8 from Ben Boeckel 2009-11-08 09:53:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > #001: Requires > > README states : > > REQUIRED SOFTWARE: > Preferred setup: > m4, dpic (see below), TeX or LaTeX, PSTricks, dvips Added dpic, tex(latex), texlive-texmf, and texlive-dvips. > Update your Requires accordingly > > #002: Requires of Sub package - examples > > Requires: %{name} > should rather be > Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} Fixed. > #003: I think you are forgetting *.m4 found in the -doc directory. See below. > #004: 2 directories for documentation ? > > The main package has /usr/share/doc/circuit_macros-6.61/ for its %doc > > The sub package has /usr/share/doc/circuit_macros/examples for its %doc > > I prefer that there is only ONE directory for ALL documentation. It is simply > because while giving the user more examples cases, we should not drown the user > into confusion. Problem is RPM. + cd /home/boeckb/rpmbuild/BUILD + cd Circuit_macros6.61 + DOCDIR=/home/boeckb/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/circuit_macros-6.61-3.fc12.x86_64/usr/share/doc/circuit_macros-6.61 + export DOCDIR + rm -rf /home/boeckb/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/circuit_macros-6.61-3.fc12.x86_64/usr/share/doc/circuit_macros-6.61 Anything I install to there is blown away when the main package grabs the files from its %doc list. Any way to avoid this? See below for a possible workaround. > #005: You are missing the subdirectories found in the examples directory. > These should found their way to your -examples subpackage > > #006: the *.tex from the examples should also be added to the -examples > subpackage. It is an example (and source) how to use those symbols into one's > latex document. Would it just be easier to: %doc doc/ examples/ in this case? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 14:57:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 09:57:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530772] Review Request: pxe-kexec - Linux boots Linux via network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911081457.nA8Evxsv022110@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530772 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-08 09:57:57 EDT --- Hi Scott, I'm not a sponsor? Have you read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored ? You should show, that you understood the Guidelines and do some other reviews and so on, so that you future sponsor will see, what reviews you have done. You can read more about this on the link above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 15:10:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 10:10:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530756] Review Request: circuit_macros - A set of macros for drawing high-quality line diagram In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911081510.nA8FA8cM003819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530756 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-08 10:10:07 EDT --- How about not installing the examples, just a %doc examples/*.m4 examples/examples.* in the examples package? If you really want to have one doc folder, you could remove the %doc CHANGES Copying README doc/CMman.pdf from the main package and add it to the subpackage. But I think 'Copying' and 'README' belongs to the main package, so two directories would be ok... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 15:23:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 10:23:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 498218] Review Request: picturetile - Tiles a bunch of images into one large "photo wall" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911081523.nA8FNqVM006313@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498218 --- Comment #8 from Edwin ten Brink 2009-11-08 10:23:49 EDT --- Orcan, thanks for your review. My responses marked with + have been incorporated, -, not, and ? are pending your response (not yet incorporated). (In reply to comment #6) > * The license is MIT > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/MIT > old style. One of the oldest software licenses out there. + Thanks, missed that one. > ! Guidelines say: "If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the > license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the > license(s) for the package must be included in %doc." in > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text" > But this package does not even have a tarball. Is there any other examples of > Fedora packages that just cut the license text from the soure file? If not, I > would say it is best to obey the guideline. ? I'm unaware of any such practices (or cases where it might be applicable for that matter). I preferred to have the README out of the script in a %doc file, and figured when I did so, I could just as well generate a COPYING. It seems that I either should do it this way, or drop all generated %doc files entirely. Which option do you recommend? > ? Shall we rename the executable to just picturetile? That is the upstream > project name. - I agree that an extension of .pl is not necessary, but fspot looks for an executable picturetile.pl in $PATH, so unless we want a symlink from picturetile.pl to picturetile, I suggest to drop this comment. > ! It would be better to install the executable with "install -pm 755 ..." and > not use %attr(0755,root,root) to comply with general Fedora conventions.. + Agreed. > ? I am a bit reluctant about the provides: > Provides: picturetile.pl = 20050314 > Do we really need this? ? No, not really. I just added it in case someone decides to make a Requires in fspot. I can drop this without any adverse effects, should I? > ? I would go with the suggestion in comment #2 for version and release numbers. > Even if upstream decides to make a 0.1 release we'll be in trouble. + Ok. Although the version number is now fool proof, I doubt that it will be necessary. > * The first 5 lines of the %build should probably go into %prep. Also could you > use the "%setup -qcT" macro in %prep so that the package gets built in its own > directory? + Agreed. > ! ah. also it would be nice to have the source file downloaded with > wget -N http://... > so we have the correct timestamp. + Agreed. Though I unfortunately need some fussing around with timestamping since the file has to be converted to UTF-8. ? I'm not quite happy with the hardcoded URL in two places though. Isn't there a way to refer to Source0 directly (without rpm rewriting it to the local SOURCES directory)? Changes so far have been included in the following files: Spec URL: http://fedora.tenbrink-bekkers.nl/picturetile/picturetile.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.tenbrink-bekkers.nl/picturetile/picturetile-0.1.20050314-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 15:52:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 10:52:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529496] Review Request: libmtag - An advanced C music tagging library with a simple API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911081552.nA8Fq2qc012415@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529496 --- Comment #8 from Felipe Contreras 2009-11-08 10:52:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > > That's the COPYING file, which I already said I'm going to include. > Then please do so now. I already said I will. Since I'm doing this on my free time I'll do so at my earliest convenience. > In other words: keep your upstream and Fedora packager's role separate. > I.e. first release a tarball, then package this tarball for Fedora, not vice > versa. What's the point of releasing a package that doesn't meet Fedora's standards? I would need to make another release just after receiving more feedback. I'll rather wait. > > The > > question was about source-code files. In Michael's words: "confirm the > > licensing in the source files". > > I can only guess what he meant. My guess would be, he is asking you to add a > copyright/license disclaimer line to each of the source files. I don't see anything on the license that *requires* to add copyright/license disclaimers to each file. It says it's *desirable*, but ultimately an "upstream" choice. > However, this also is upstream business. Yes, it's "upstream" business, but if it was *only* upstream business, then you would have accepted this packages already, and you clearly have issues with it that "upstream" (me) doesn't have strong feelings about. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 15:54:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 10:54:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911081554.nA8FsS50001153@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 --- Comment #25 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-08 10:54:27 EDT --- It makes no difference, and the guidelines don't specify. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Clarification Just include the full mail headers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 16:26:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 11:26:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529496] Review Request: libmtag - An advanced C music tagging library with a simple API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911081626.nA8GQ7sl019280@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529496 --- Comment #9 from Felipe Contreras 2009-11-08 11:26:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > With "confirm the licensing in the source files" I actually refer to the > Appendix of the GPL and LGPL. Worth reading. That text says "It is safest" to do that, but there's no actual *requirement*. You can find many source files in the linux kernel that don't have such notices. > > I didn't get those warnings > > Try again. They are printed with default %optflags on Fedora 11. Plain > rpmbuild. Not even mock is necessary. Right. I saved the output and now I can see it. It's a bit difficult to spot them with so much noise. But anyway, those are fixed now. > > rpmlint > > > Warnings not always need to be fixed. > > The ReviewGuidelines (which are not specific to package reviewers, because > packagers ought to review their own packages, too), say: > > | MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should > | be posted in the review.[1] > > The second part of that rule is just a "should", but if you are in search of a > sponsor, you ought to follow such recommendations and do this homework. At the > same time you could explain why you don't fix things rpmlint reports. I followed the "Package Review Process" and I don't see this in any of the steps for my role of "Contributor". I see it on the list of things for the reviewer, but the reference points to: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#rpmlint If you want people to post rpmlint output on the first run, then the review process document must be updated. > > Strange, I don't have that in my .spec file. Maybe I send an outdated one. > > I explicitly referred to the pkgconfig file, NOT the .spec file. Take your time > when reading reviews, don't rush. Ok. I don't seem to find any documentation that says which dependencies I should put there, and which not. Anyway, I guess it makes sense to remove it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 16:36:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 11:36:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532306] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-debug - Faster implementation of the standard Debugging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911081636.nA8Ga8EO009533@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532306 --- Comment #6 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-11-08 11:36:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Well, > - Please package linecache first. > %check fails without linecache and even without %check ruby-debug-base > actually needs linecache (see ruby-debug-base-0.10.3/lib/ruby-debug-base.rb) > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1794237 > ( Does your srpm actually builds for you? ) > It does build on my machine locally but then again I already have a linecache package; this package is part of a bunch of packages I'm working on. I'll be submitting rubygem-linecache for review asap, and create a dependency between the two reviews. > - "head" command or so is very dangerous when binary files exist. > Actually > --------------------------------------------------------------- > 61 # Fix anything executable that does not have a shebang > 62 for file in `find %{buildroot}/%{geminstdir} > %{buildroot}/%{geminstdir2} -type f -perm /a+x`; do > 63 [ -z "`head -n 1 $file | grep \"^#!/\"`" ] && chmod -v 644 $file > 64 done > --------------------------------------------------------------- > changes the permission of ruby_debug.so to 0644 and currently > debuginfo rpm is not correctly created. > This should also filter on -name "*.rb", which I fixed. > - Executing %check under %buildroot is wrong for this package > because "rake test" again tries to create ruby_debug.so under > %buildroot%{geminstdir2}/ext/ because we move this file to > %buildroot%ruby_sitearch > --------------------------------------------------------------- > 853 Executing(%check): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.5gRRsq > 860 + rake -f ../ruby-debug-0.10.3/Rakefile test > 865 gcc -shared -o ruby_debug.so breakpoint.o ruby_debug.o -L. -L/usr/lib > -L. -rdynamic -Wl,-export-dynamic -lruby -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lcrypt -lm > -lc > --------------------------------------------------------------- > %check must be done under %_builddir for this package. Fixed this too. New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-ruby-debug.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f12/SRPMS/rubygem-ruby-debug-0.10.3-3.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 16:35:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 11:35:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529496] Review Request: libmtag - An advanced C music tagging library with a simple API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911081635.nA8GZ9JO020890@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529496 --- Comment #10 from Felipe Contreras 2009-11-08 11:35:08 EDT --- I've made the following changes upstream: * Fix all compilation warnings * Add LICENSE file * Added copyright and license notices: --- /* * Copyright (C) 2007-2009 Felipe Contreras * * This code is licenced under the LGPLv2.1. */ --- * Removed taglib as dependency from the pkg-config file The code is in the usual place: git://github.com/felipec/libmtag.git If there's no more feedback I would like to release 0.3.2 and I guess the spec file would just work as is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 16:51:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 11:51:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530301] Review Request: bmpanel2 - NETWM compliant panel for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911081651.nA8GpwMX024557@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530301 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-08 11:51:57 EDT --- Build fails: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1794894 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 17:14:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 12:14:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532699] Review Request: ClanLib1 - Cross platform C++ game library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911081714.nA8HE6Dx028371@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532699 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from Hans de Goede 2009-11-08 12:14:05 EDT --- Built for devel, Xavier let me know if you also want ClanLib-2.1 in F-12, then I'll build both ClanLib1 and an updated ClanLib (to 2.1) there and push them in one go to updates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 17:41:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 12:41:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 512170] Review Request: pidgin-sipe - Pidgin plugin for connecting to MS Communications Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911081741.nA8HfK6n022476@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512170 --- Comment #29 from birger 2009-11-08 12:41:18 EDT --- The functionality is good. It lets me connect to my OCS server both from the inside and the outside. Windows users cannot tell that I am not on windows as long as we just chat. I get presence information, and as far as I know the others get that on mee as well. Of course the FOSS world needs video conferencing that works with MS OCS as well, but I understand that that has to wait for the 'next generation' framework. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 17:41:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 12:41:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 519521] Review Request: kompozer - Web Authoring System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911081741.nA8HfZvv022528@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519521 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-08 12:41:33 EDT --- OK, this does build for me. I'm not really ready to review this; it will probably take work my more than one person. But I do have some comments: Source0: should be a URL, so that spectool -g will work if possible. I don't suppose there's a URL for the manpage, but if there is then you should inclide that as well. I'm not sure what the nvu-related Provides: and Obsoletes: is about; is nvu available in any Fedora repository currently? You have Requires(pre): desktop-file-utils, but no %pre scriptlet at all. Similarly, you call update-desktop-database and ldconfig in %post and %postun, but have no dependencies for them. This provides a whole lot of libraries that are also provided by xulrunner. I think this is a significant problem. Seamonkey manages to avoid this by turning off the dependency generator and managing some of the dependency generation itself. I can't really offer any suggestions on how to do it properly, though I'd bet the firefox/xulrunner/seamonkey maintainers (all the same people) would have some suggestions. The correct set of Fedora compiler flags are not used, and the debuginfo package seems to be broken. These are related. You will need to get the propler set of compiler flags (from %{optflags}) passed to the compiler. Seamonkey seems to do this properly. The biggest issue I see, however, is that this is basically yet another forked mozilla. Distributing a forked copy of something that's updated with security issues once a week isn't something we should go about lightly; I'd want to see discussion with the firefox/xulrunner maintainers and probably FESCo as well (the latter due to the requirements of the no-bundled-libraries policy). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 18:02:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 13:02:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532402] Review Request: APF - Advanced Policy Firewall In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911081802.nA8I2tVA004927@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532402 Scott Collier changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |boodle11 at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Scott Collier 2009-11-08 13:02:54 EDT --- Hi Mark, I'm not a sponsor, I just have some general recommendations about your package. This is my first review, so please let me know if there are any questions. 1. The package didn't build on my system due to permissions on directories on /etc/apf http://boodle.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/error.out 2. rpmlint has a few messages: $ rpmlint apf.spec apf.spec: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install apf.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 6, tab: line 1) $ rpmlint ../SRPMS/apf-9.7-1.src.rpm apf.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog apf.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install apf.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 6, tab: line 1) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. Please correct these. 3. Your buildroot is probably fine, but Fedora does have preferences, please use a buildroot from: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag 4. source0 should be URL to source file, please see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL 5. Add a version to the last changelog entry -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 18:05:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 13:05:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530772] Review Request: pxe-kexec - Linux boots Linux via network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911081805.nA8I5W1C026239@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530772 --- Comment #4 from Scott Collier 2009-11-08 13:05:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Hi Scott, > > I'm not a sponsor? > > Have you read > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored ? > > You should show, that you understood the Guidelines and do some other reviews > and so on, so that you future sponsor will see, what reviews you have done. > > You can read more about this on the link above. Thanks for the advice Thomas. I will certainly review some packages, here's my first review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532402#c1 I'll do some more and hopefully get a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 18:05:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 13:05:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525909] Review Request: sysprof - A system-wide Linux profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911081805.nA8I5pHq005699@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525909 William Lovaton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |walovaton at yahoo.com.mx --- Comment #16 from William Lovaton 2009-11-08 13:05:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Jussi, is that on a 2.6.31 kernel? Soren, I am running Fedora 12 Rawhide with the latest updates running a 2.6.31 kernel and I get the following when I press the play button in sysprof as root: [root at localhost ~]# sysprof Time to populate 161.459000 perf_counter_open: No such device The kernel I am using is: 2.6.31.5-122.fc12.i686.PAE, maybe my CPU does not support perf counters, how can I check for that? My CPU is an Intel Core Duo T2400 @ 1.83GHz Thanks for your help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 18:42:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 13:42:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462458] Review Request: drupal-workspace - Allows users to have a central place to view and manage their content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911081842.nA8IghEj011669@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462458 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-08 13:42:41 EDT --- I'm back to looking over ancient review tickets again. Again, I know zilch about dupal, but nobody else has looked at this in 14 months and fortunately the package still seems to be current, so.... Note that you no longer need BuildRoot: or the first line of %install in Fedora. You can probably remove them unless someone plans to update to drupal 6 in EPEL. The license in the spec is still GPLv2, though it seems as though you intended to change it. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: d2defb65cc4572a24869dd0ff2d67c4876e2307b649a52b94cc16d7b2e858002 workspace-6.x-1.4-rc1.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. X license field does not match the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (none). * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: drupal-workspace = 6.x.1.4-0.rc1.fc12 = drupal >= 6.0 * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 18:59:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 13:59:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526651] Review Request: xpaint - An X Window System image editing or paint program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911081859.nA8IxGUa014091@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526651 Paulo Roma Cavalcanti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 19:01:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 14:01:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463035] Review Request: pyroman - Very fast firewall configuration tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911081901.nA8J1Uf7003241@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463035 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(bloch at verdurin.co | |m) --- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-08 14:01:28 EDT --- Was there ever a decision as to whether this ticket would be pursued? It's been a month since comment #14, so I guess I'll go ahead and close this soon if there's no further activity. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 18:59:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 13:59:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532635] Review Request: rurple - A Python Learning Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911081859.nA8IxlFq014234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532635 Paulo Roma Cavalcanti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 19:18:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 14:18:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463233] Review Request: ace-console-wui - Web App for Appliance Management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911081918.nA8JIOc1017738@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463233 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-08 14:18:22 EDT --- This ticket is terribly old. I'm not planning to review this package, but I can make some comments. Still builds OK. rpmlint says: ace-console-wui.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/ace/ace-console-wui/tmp /var/lib/%{inst_name}/tmp You didn't address this above. There's only one occurrence of "%{inst_name}" in the spec; it's not defined anywhere, so it's just used verbatim. This is almost certainly some sort of oversight. Your %description should be at least one complete sentence. It seems to be missing punctuation currently. Your macro usage is inconsistent. If for whatever reason you really want to type a lot and use "%{__mv}" and the like, you need to use "%{__rm} as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 19:20:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 14:20:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 498073] Review Request: python-ekg - Community Health Reporter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911081920.nA8JKa8p007188@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498073 --- Comment #13 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-11-08 14:20:35 EDT --- It's up to Yaakov and Max ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 19:16:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 14:16:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533721] New: Review Request: perl-Net-CIDR - Manipulate IPv4/IPv6 netblocks in CIDR notation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-CIDR - Manipulate IPv4/IPv6 netblocks in CIDR notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533721 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-CIDR - Manipulate IPv4/IPv6 netblocks in CIDR notation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Net-CIDR.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Net-CIDR-0.13-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Manipulate IPv4/IPv6 netblocks in CIDR notation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 19:21:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 14:21:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533723] New: Review Request: perl-Guard - Safe cleanup blocks Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Guard - Safe cleanup blocks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533723 Summary: Review Request: perl-Guard - Safe cleanup blocks Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Guard.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Guard-1.021-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Safe cleanup blocks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 19:25:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 14:25:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 448613] Review Request: perl-EV - Wrapper for the libev high-performance event loop library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911081925.nA8JPbOP008200@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448613 Bug 448613 depends on bug 458785, which changed state. Bug 458785 Summary: Review Request: libev - High-performance event loop/event model with lots of features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458785 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-11-08 14:25:33 EDT --- SPEC: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-EV.spec SRPM: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-EV-3.8-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Wrapper for the libev high-performance event loop library Update to 3.8 no progress on using the libev shared, upstream stop responding after saying it was not relevant for perl-EV to link a shared version of libev. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 19:27:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 14:27:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533723] Review Request: perl-Guard - Safe cleanup blocks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911081927.nA8JRSfe008505@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533723 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |452521(perl-Coro) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 19:27:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 14:27:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452521] Review Request: perl-Coro - Coroutine process abstraction In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911081927.nA8JRRu2008484@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452521 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |533723 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-11-08 14:27:26 EDT --- SPEC: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Coro.spec SRPMS: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Coro-5.2-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Coroutine process abstraction Update to 5.2 (still depends on perl-EV review) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 19:34:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 14:34:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 448613] Review Request: perl-EV - Wrapper for the libev high-performance event loop library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911081934.nA8JYMS9009631@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448613 --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-08 14:34:19 EDT --- I suppose if you want to not use the system library, you can request an exemption from FESCo. Personally I believe that given recent history it is very unlikely that you will receive one, but you're welcome to try. I believe that at this point that is the only issue blocking this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 19:41:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 14:41:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 448613] Review Request: perl-EV - Wrapper for the libev high-performance event loop library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911081941.nA8JfPSo011146@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448613 --- Comment #13 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-11-08 14:41:24 EDT --- Fesco exeption are for static linking, are they for perl 'shared' pod libraries ?! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 19:40:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 14:40:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533725] New: Review Request: rubygem-linecache - Caches (Ruby source) files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-linecache - Caches (Ruby source) files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533725 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-linecache - Caches (Ruby source) files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kanarip at kanarip.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-linecache.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f12/SRPMS/rubygem-linecache-0.43-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: LineCache - caches (Ruby source) files as might be used in a debugger or a tool that works with sets of Ruby source files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 19:41:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 14:41:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533725] Review Request: rubygem-linecache - Caches (Ruby source) files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911081941.nA8JfOF0022288@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533725 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |532306 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 19:41:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 14:41:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532306] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-debug - Faster implementation of the standard Debugging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911081941.nA8JfPg6022317@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532306 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |533725 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 19:51:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 14:51:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478683] Review Request: perl-Net-Google-AuthSub - Provides interface to interact with sites that implement Google style AuthSub In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911081951.nA8JpDLo024088@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478683 --- Comment #10 from Andy Shevchenko 2009-11-08 14:51:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > any progress on packaging 0.5 version? If you are not interested anymore, let > me know, I will take over this package. Please, look at http://starua.com/~andy/Fedora/perl-Net-Google-AuthSub.spec and http://starua.com/~andy/Fedora/perl-Net-Google-AuthSub-0.5-1.sh7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 19:53:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 14:53:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478683] Review Request: perl-Net-Google-AuthSub - Provides interface to interact with sites that implement Google style AuthSub In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911081953.nA8Jr4Hr013281@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478683 Andy Shevchenko changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 19:55:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 14:55:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463035] Review Request: pyroman - Very fast firewall configuration tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911081955.nA8JtbxF025055@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463035 Adam Huffman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(bloch at verdurin.co | |m) | --- Comment #16 from Adam Huffman 2009-11-08 14:55:35 EDT --- Yes - I'd rather expend my energy on actively maintained packages. Thanks for the efforts of the reviewers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 20:27:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 15:27:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 448613] Review Request: perl-EV - Wrapper for the libev high-performance event loop library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911082027.nA8KR608020492@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448613 --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-08 15:27:04 EDT --- I can't parse that sentence as I'm not sure what a "pod library" is. If you want to use the copy of the library included in the source code of this module instead of linking against the system copy of the library, you'll need to ask FESCo for an exception. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 20:29:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 15:29:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530755] Review Request: dpic - A compiler for the pic language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911082029.nA8KTmDq031593@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530755 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tomspur at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-08 15:29:47 EDT --- It would be better to install the examples into %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}/ There are too much files in it. Makefile, and 3 *.log files Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: [] devel/i386 [] devel/x86_64 [] F11/i386 [x] F11/x86_64 [!] Rpmlint output: $ rpmlint dpic.spec dpic-20091009-1.fc11.src.rpm x86_64/dpic-* dpic-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package dpic-examples.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. - The CFLAGS are not honored in the Makefile, probably therefore there is no debuginfo package. - no-docu is ok, when you install them into %{_defaultdocdir} this would be gone - The examples should be noarch [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: BSD [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Upstream source: 78dc2f9d3d401868d1833eee62b01ab4 Build source: 78dc2f9d3d401868d1833eee62b01ab4 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [x] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. not needed for the examples [-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [-] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [!] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. no BR: tex(latex) Builds then: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1795163 Issues: - proberly install examples (into defaultdocdir - examples subpackage should be noarch - patch the makefile for using CFLAGS - BR: tex(latex) is missing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 20:32:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 15:32:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533738] New: Review Request: bwa - Burrows-Wheeler Alignment Tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: bwa - Burrows-Wheeler Alignment Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533738 Summary: Review Request: bwa - Burrows-Wheeler Alignment Tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: albert.bogdanowicz at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://students.mimuw.edu.pl/~ab277290/Fedora/bwa.spec SRPM URL: http://students.mimuw.edu.pl/~ab277290/Fedora/bwa-0.5.4-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: I just packaged bwa (I think correctly). It's my first package, so I appreciate any suggestions what could be improved. Burrows-Wheeler Aligner (BWA) is an efficient program that aligns relatively short nucleotide sequences against a long reference sequence such as the human genome. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 20:36:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 15:36:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533738] Review Request: bwa - Burrows-Wheeler Alignment Tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911082036.nA8Kasbx022234@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533738 Albert Bogdanowicz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |albert.bogdanowicz at gmail.co | |m Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 21:00:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 16:00:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533094] Review Request: xskat - The card game Skat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911082100.nA8L0JRk026284@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533094 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-08 16:00:18 EDT --- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 20:57:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 15:57:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533738] Review Request: bwa - Burrows-Wheeler Alignment Tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911082057.nA8Kv20d025704@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533738 Scott Collier changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |boodle11 at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Scott Collier 2009-11-08 15:57:01 EDT --- Hi Albert, I'm not a sponsor, but I do have some suggestions: 1. Package did not build for me by default: http://boodle.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/bwa_install_error.out 2. Source0: should point to URL, please see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL 3. You can add this to your make: CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" Then it will compile. 4. For the %install: You can use install instead of cp, for example: install -Dp -m0755 bwa %{buildroot}/%{_bindir}/ and change the permissions to whatever you'd like. After these changes, rpmlint is clean: $ rpmlint bwa.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint bwa.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 21:02:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 16:02:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 498194] Review Request: zarafa - Zarafa Outlook Sharing and Open Source Collaboration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911082102.nA8L2Klp004752@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498194 --- Comment #17 from Axel Thimm 2009-11-08 16:02:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > (In reply to comment #15) > > If there are sane use cases where users will really need only parts of the > > package then split the package there, but splitting for splitting's sake (e.g. > > like clamav) is not good. > > I agree with what you're saying here, but all of these are separate components > to the Zarafa architecture, and can be installed on separate servers. We need to think about whether it will be done that way, not whether it can be done. Even for the rare cases where an admin will be splitting out parts of the services he will probably not mind installing the bundle but using only part of it. > > Also relying on an external vendor's packaging style is also not sane - when we > > say that Fedora follows upstream we mean the source code, not the packaging > > practice. Of course the other way, e.g. persuading upstream packaging to lean > > on our package style is always fine. :) > > This is going upstream, yes ;-) Well, the argument above was "Upstream packaging is doing something not really Fedoraish, but since it's upstream let's adopt Fedora's package to do the same" which we should not do as we only follow upstream on the code level and hopefully know better how to package bits for Fedora. So the decision on granularity of package should remain a distribution's choice, and if upstream has decided to package up differently, then how is this "going upstream"? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 21:06:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 16:06:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533094] Review Request: xskat - The card game Skat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911082106.nA8L6g5X027489@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533094 Christian Krause changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Christian Krause 2009-11-08 16:06:41 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xskat Short Description: The card game Skat Owners: chkr Branches: F-11 F-12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 21:08:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 16:08:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516312] Review Request: ueagle-atm-firmware4 - Firmwares for usb adsl modems based on Eagle IV chipset In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911082108.nA8L84sb027745@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516312 Hicham HAOUARI changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(hicham.haouari at gm | |ail.com) | --- Comment #5 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-11-08 16:08:03 EDT --- 1. Origin of the Name: >From Fedora Package Guidelines : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Binary_Firmware "Firmware packages must be named -firmware, where is the driver or other hardware component that the firmware is for." The driver name is ueagle-atm, the number 4 because this firmware is for Chipset 4. 2.Summary is inconsistent with description : Fixed 3.Missing Requires: udev for ownership of /lib/firmware : Fixed 4.Unowned directory /lib/firmware/ueagle-atm : Fixed 5.Inconsistent macro usage (%{buildroot} vs. $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) : Fixed 6.cp -rf -p <- surely cp -p is enough? : fixed 7. Fedora Legal status : Fixed in comment 3 Spec URL : http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/ueagle-atm-firmware4.spec SRPM URL : http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/ueagle-atm-firmware4-1.0-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 21:14:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 16:14:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 491497] Review Request: dmapd - A server that provides DAAP and DPAP shares In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911082114.nA8LEaYV029587@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491497 Christian Krause changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |chkr at plauener.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chkr at plauener.de Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 21:20:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 16:20:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533744] New: Review Request: ImageJ - Image Processing and Analysis in Java Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ImageJ - Image Processing and Analysis in Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533744 Summary: Review Request: ImageJ - Image Processing and Analysis in Java Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabien.georget at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.bde.espci.fr/~george27/ImageJ.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bde.espci.fr/~george27/ImageJ-1.43-0.1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Image Processing and Analysis in Java It can display, edit, analyze, process, save and print many image formats. It supports "stacks", a series of images that share a single window. It can calculate area and pixel value statistics of user-defined selections. It can measure distances and angles. It can create density histograms and line profile plots. It supports standard image processing functions such as contrast manipulation, sharpening, smoothing, edge detection and median filtering. ImageJ was designed with an open architecture that provides extensibility via Java plugins. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 21:44:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 16:44:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470830] Review Request: open64 - The Open64 compiler suite (C, C++, Fortran) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911082144.nA8LiOwT005258@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830 --- Comment #36 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2009-11-08 16:44:22 EDT --- Full review: open64.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary Open64 open64.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary Open64 open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2.1/32/libopenmp.a open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2.1/32/libfortran.a open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2.1/libinstr.a open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2.1/libgcc.a open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2.1/libstdc++.a open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2.1/libopenmp.a open64.x86_64: E: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2.1/libfortran.a open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2.1/32/libgcc.a open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2.1/32/libffio.a open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2.1/32/libinstr.a open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2.1/libffio.a open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2.1/libmv.a open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2.1/32/libstdc++.a open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2.1/32/libmv.a Summary could be improved not to repeat the name. /usr/lib/gcc-lib ownership issue is I think bogus, because no package in Fedora owns it. The other warnings can be ignored as this is a compiler. Source is downloadable and MD5 hash matches. 73096667243fbfab605630b1aea380dd open64-4.2.1-0.src.tar.bz2 Builds in mock/rawhide/x86_64. Please ask upstream to include GPLv2 text in the next release tarball. There's still an issue of included pre-built static libraries (find . -name "*.a" shows a bunch), but since this is a compiler, you can ask for an initial exception from FESCo, per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#No_inclusion_of_pre-built_binaries_or_libraries . Also I wasn't able to build open64 again using itself in rawhide mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 21:47:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 16:47:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 498194] Review Request: zarafa - Zarafa Outlook Sharing and Open Source Collaboration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911082147.nA8LlVGc016738@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498194 --- Comment #18 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-11-08 16:47:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > (In reply to comment #16) > > I agree with what you're saying here, but all of these are separate components > > to the Zarafa architecture, and can be installed on separate servers. > > We need to think about whether it will be done that way, not whether it can be > done. Even for the rare cases where an admin will be splitting out parts of the > services he will probably not mind installing the bundle but using only part of > it. > Well then have you got some arguments for or against what I've put in c#13? It makes no sense to me to go all philosophical on the issue. It's more efficient to address the facts, especially since -like I said- upstream likes the concept. > > This is going upstream, yes ;-) > > Well, the argument above was "Upstream packaging is doing something not really > Fedoraish, but since it's upstream let's adopt Fedora's package to do the same" > which we should not do as we only follow upstream on the code level and > hopefully know better how to package bits for Fedora. > > So the decision on granularity of package should remain a distribution's > choice, and if upstream has decided to package up differently, then how is this > "going upstream"? This argument makes no sense to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 21:46:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 16:46:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523523] Review Request: clutter-gesture - Gesture Library for Clutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911082146.nA8LkCvk016544@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523523 --- Comment #1 from Christian Krause 2009-11-08 16:46:11 EDT --- Here is the full review of the package: * rpmlint: ? rpmlint SRPMS/clutter-gesture-0.0.2-1.fc12.src.rpm RPMS/i686/clutter-gesture-* SPECS/clutter-gesture.spec clutter-gesture-devel.i686: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Rpmlint looks clean - in general is a missing documentation acceptable for devel packages. However, searching for clutter-gesture on moblin.org I've found a document describing the clutter-gesture API: http://moblin.org/sites/all/files/Clutter-Gesture-API-0.5.pdf Depending on its "up-to-date status", would it be an option to package this as the documentation for the devel package? * naming: OK - name matches upstream - spec file name matches package name * sources: OK - md5sum: de0e3e5c01f0a328cc04a46198776ebe clutter-gesture-0.0.2.tar.bz2 - sources matches upstream - Source0 tag ok - spectool -g works * URL tag: ? clutter-gesture has its own project page: http://moblin.org/projects/clutter-gesture Would it make sense to use this one? * License: TODO - License LGPLv2+ acceptable - License in spec file does not match the actual license: In general it does, but one source file (engine/stroke.c) is actual under the MIT license: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/MIT#Old_Style_with_legal_disclaimer_2 - So the license in the spec file should be "LGPLv2+ and MIT" (according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios ). Please also add a comment about this issue to the spec file. - License file packaged - It would be morer clearer if upstream would provide a standard license file with a proper name like COPYING (and not "NEWS" ;-) ). According to the Review guidelines the packager is encouraged to query upstream to include it. However this will not block the review. ;-) * spec file written in English and legible: OK * compilation: TODO - supports parallel build: OK - RPM_OPT_FLAGS are correctly used: OK - builds in koji for F13 and F12: OK - uncommon configure flags: IMHO it shouldn't be necessary to add "--with-pic", since "--enable-dynamic" is the default anyway - uncommon CFLAGS: auto*/libtool usually take care of compiling with the correct parameters for shared libs - For testing purposes I've removed "--with-pic" and the CFLAGS definition at all and according to the output during compilation the library is still compiled with the correct flags. * BuildRequires: OK * locales handling: OK (n/a) * ldconfig in %post and %postun: OK * package owns all directories that it creates: OK * no files listed twice in %files: OK * file permissions: OK - %defattr used - actual permissions in packages ok * %clean section: OK * macro usage: OK * code vs. content: OK (only code) * large documentation into subpackage: OK (n/a) * header files in -devel subpackage: OK * header files: TODO - clutter-gesture.h includes "config.h" and there is no "config.h" in /usr/include/clutter-gesture/ - this means, it is not possible to include the public API - possible solutions: a) header file should not include "config.h" b) use an conditional #include directive like #ifdef HAVE_CONFIG_H #include "config.h" #endif or c) have a "config.h" in the include directory (this should not be done with the config.h generated by configure) * static libraries in -static package: OK (n/a) * package containing *.pc files must "Requires: pkgconfig": OK * *.so link in -devel package: OK * devel package requires base package using fully versioned dependency: OK * packages must not contain *.la files: OK * GUI applications must provide *.desktop file: OK (n/a) * packages must not own files/dirs already owned by other packages: OK * rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT at the beginning of %install: OK * all filenames UTF-8: OK * functional test: ? How can I test this package? The tests in tests/ just crash if I try to execute them... * debuginfo sub-package: OK - non-empty Summary ------- nice to have: - Package API documentation - Let URL tag point to specific project page on moblin.org - What would be a proper functional test? blocking: - Add MIT to license tag - Fix public header files - Remove unusual %configure flags / CFLAGS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 21:49:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 16:49:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532523] Review request: jarjar - Jar Jar Links In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911082149.nA8LnbrT006333@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532523 --- Comment #3 from Steve Traylen 2009-11-08 16:49:36 EDT --- Looking now, can you do the whole gcj thing: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#GCJ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 21:57:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 16:57:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470830] Review Request: open64 - The Open64 compiler suite (C, C++, Fortran) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911082157.nA8Lv1Mp008329@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830 --- Comment #37 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-11-08 16:57:00 EDT --- Additionally, it seems I have to disable the automatic provide and require generation of RPM due to some generic names such as libstdc++, libgcc and libfortran provided by open64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 23:22:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 18:22:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526204] Review Request: ucs-fixed-fonts selected set of bitmap fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911082322.nA8NMk9f028142@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526204 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Pravin Satpute 2009-11-08 18:22:45 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ucs-fixed-fonts Short Description: Selected set of bitmap fonts Owners: pravins Branches: InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 8 23:41:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 18:41:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533753] New: Review Request: python-pep8 - Python style guide checker Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-pep8 - Python style guide checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533753 Summary: Review Request: python-pep8 - Python style guide checker Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ian at ianweller.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/python-pep8/0.4.2-1/python-pep8.spec SRPM URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/python-pep8/0.4.2-1/python-pep8-0.4.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: pep8 is a tool to check your Python code against some of the style conventions in PEP 8. It has a plguin architecture, making new checks easy, and its output is parseable, making it easy to jump to an error location in your editor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 00:17:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 19:17:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 509159] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_PragmARC_=E2=80=93_a_comp?= =?utf-8?q?onent_library_for_Ada?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911090017.nA90HXc2009678@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509159 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-08 19:17:32 EDT --- PragmARC-20060427-6.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/PragmARC-20060427-6.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 00:51:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 19:51:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 498218] Review Request: picturetile - Tiles a bunch of images into one large "photo wall" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911090051.nA90pWdq029345@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498218 --- Comment #9 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-11-08 19:51:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Orcan, thanks for your review. My responses marked with + have been > incorporated, -, not, and ? are pending your response (not yet incorporated). > You are welcome. I see that almost everything is resolved. Yet, there is a misunderstanding that was probably my fault. > (In reply to comment #6) > > But this package does not even have a tarball. Is there any other examples > > of Fedora packages that just cut the license text from the soure file? If > > not, I would say it is best to obey the guideline. > > ? I'm unaware of any such practices (or cases where it might be applicable for > that matter). I preferred to have the README out of the script in a %doc file, > and figured when I did so, I could just as well generate a COPYING. It seems > that I either should do it this way, or drop all generated %doc files > entirely. Which option do you recommend? > I am really not sure about this. The guideline might be interpreted either way. Could you ask this in the fedora-packaging list? > > ? Shall we rename the executable to just picturetile? That is the upstream > > project name. > > - I agree that an extension of .pl is not necessary, but fspot looks for an > executable picturetile.pl in $PATH, so unless we want a symlink from > picturetile.pl to picturetile, I suggest to drop this comment. > Your choice :) I am fine either way. > > > ? I am a bit reluctant about the provides: > > Provides: picturetile.pl = 20050314 > > Do we really need this? > > ? No, not really. I just added it in case someone decides to make a Requires > in fspot. I can drop this without any adverse effects, should I? > I would say, drop it. One RPM package providing two different versions of the same thing might confuse people or depsolvers. > > ? I would go with the suggestion in comment #2 for version and release > > numbers. Even if upstream decides to make a 0.1 release we'll be in trouble. > + Ok. Although the version number is now fool proof, I doubt that it will be necessary Oh I meant something like Version: 0 Release: 1.20050314 I prefer that we leave the Version to upstream vendors and use our conventions only in Release. But as you said, it is unlikely that this will cause a problem in the future, thus I leave this up to you. > > > ! ah. also it would be nice to have the source file downloaded with > > wget -N http://... > > so we have the correct timestamp. > > + Agreed. Though I unfortunately need some fussing around with timestamping > since the file has to be converted to UTF-8. > ? I'm not quite happy with the hardcoded URL in two places though. Isn't there > a way to refer to Source0 directly (without rpm rewriting it to the local > SOURCES directory)? > Here is the misunderstanding. No, you can't use wget in a spec file. koji has no outside access while building a package. Besides this may be considered as a security risk. What I meant was roughly: - Go to your SOURCES directory and use wget -N there, so that your original source0 file has the correct timestamp. - Then go to your SPECS directory and and use rpmbuild -ba (Don't use wget inside the SPEC file) - Now you can check your newly built rpm via rpm -qplv picturetile-.rpm and you will see that your /usr/bin/picturetile.pl file does have the correct timestamp. Sorry that I caused a confusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 00:55:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 19:55:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 498218] Review Request: picturetile - Tiles a bunch of images into one large "photo wall" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911090055.nA90t1ek020152@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498218 --- Comment #10 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-11-08 19:55:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > > > > ? I am a bit reluctant about the provides: > > > Provides: picturetile.pl = 20050314 > > > Do we really need this? > > > > ? No, not really. I just added it in case someone decides to make a > > Requires in fspot. I can drop this without any adverse effects, should I? > > > > I would say, drop it. One RPM package providing two different versions of the > same thing might confuse people or depsolvers. > I realized that what I said is not true, since the package name is not "picturetile.pl". So having that Provides is harmless. I don't know if it brings us anything though. I leave it up to you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 01:03:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 20:03:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532874] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-wacom - Xorg X11 wacom input driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911090103.nA913CN4022275@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532874 --- Comment #3 from Peter Hutterer 2009-11-08 20:03:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > It seems that Linux Wacom is still active (they released 0.8.4 very recently). > Could you, please, add more details about the reasons, which led to the fork?, Ping (upstream linuxwacom maintainer) and I agreed that a fork is best for getting a cleaner and more efficient X driver. linuxwacom has become a hard-to maintain piece of code, with the X driver trying to support everything from XFree86 3 up to X.Org Server 1.6. I have the experience with X drivers, so the first thing we agreed on was to ditch pre X server 1.6 support and go with 1.7 and later. in terms of future development, linuxwacom and xf86-input-wacom will be developed in parallel when it comes to new hardware support and general bug fixes. linuxwacom will not see the updates to server 1.7, so any attempt of supporting this in F12 will be a messy patch set (like it is now already). note that Ping is a kernel developer responsible for new hardware support. The X driver should not have any special hardware dependencies - that's what the kernel is for. the forked driver is a major step towards that. New specfile coming up in a minute. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 01:13:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 20:13:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532470] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-bad-free - GStreamer streaming media framework "bad" plug-ins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911090113.nA91D6Vo001524@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532470 --- Comment #8 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-11-08 20:13:05 EDT --- I'll have to get to this when I have the proper time, but in general, code that simply does mux/demux is okay for Fedora. I'm out of the country for meetings for the next 7 days or so, so this won't happen anytime soon. Hans, if you or someone else can generate a list of the modules and the formats they support (and if possible, the types of operations they do), that will save me some time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 01:18:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 20:18:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516312] Review Request: ueagle-atm-firmware4 - Firmwares for usb adsl modems based on Eagle IV chipset In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911090118.nA91IN0q025594@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516312 --- Comment #6 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-11-08 20:18:22 EDT --- You should either move the 4 to the version or have it appended to the name. I suggest: ueagle-atm4-firmware -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 01:27:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 20:27:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532874] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-wacom - Xorg X11 wacom input driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911090127.nA91RLYL005440@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532874 --- Comment #4 from Peter Hutterer 2009-11-08 20:27:20 EDT --- New spec file and srpm: http://people.freedesktop.org/~whot/xorg-x11-drv-wacom.spec http://people.freedesktop.org/~whot/xorg-x11-drv-wacom-0.10.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Changes: - spec file renamed to xorg-x11-drv-wacom.spec - leftover tab replaced with spaces - s/define/global/ - devel package requires pkgconfig and xorg-x11-server-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 01:41:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 20:41:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516312] Review Request: ueagle-atm-firmware4 - Firmwares for usb adsl modems based on Eagle IV chipset In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911090141.nA91fWpT031294@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516312 --- Comment #7 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-11-08 20:41:31 EDT --- ok spot, seems a good suggestion Spec URL: http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/ueagle-atm4-firmware.spec SRPM URL: http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/ueagle-atm4-firmware-1.0-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 01:43:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 20:43:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516312] Review Request: ueagle-atm4-firmware - Firmwares for USB ADSL Modems based on Eagle IV Chipset In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911090143.nA91hGfL009415@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516312 --- Comment #8 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-11-08 20:43:16 EDT --- oops, Spec URL: http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/ueagle-atm4-firmware.spec SRPM URL: http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/ueagle-atm4-firmware-1.0-3.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 01:42:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 20:42:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516312] Review Request: ueagle-atm4-firmware - Firmwares for USB ADSL Modems based on Eagle IV Chipset In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911090142.nA91gEuQ009207@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516312 Hicham HAOUARI changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |ueagle-atm-firmware4 - |ueagle-atm4-firmware - |Firmwares for usb adsl |Firmwares for USB ADSL |modems based on Eagle IV |Modems based on Eagle IV |chipset |Chipset -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 01:53:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 20:53:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911090153.nA91rdYY012437@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 --- Comment #31 from Pravin Satpute 2009-11-08 20:53:34 EDT --- updated srpm and spec http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/bitmap-fonts-0.3-14.fc12.src.rpm http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/bitmap-fonts.spec removed console8x8.pcf for now will try to solve problem in free time -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 02:20:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 21:20:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486570] Review Request: courier-authlib - The Courier authentication library provides authentication services for other Courier applications. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911090220.nA92KY4h008649@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486570 --- Comment #10 from Rafael Gomes 2009-11-08 21:20:29 EDT --- Any news? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 02:22:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 21:22:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530251] Review Request: gearbox - A collection of usable peer-reviewed robotics-related libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911090222.nA92Muw1019357@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530251 --- Comment #7 from Rich Mattes 2009-11-08 21:22:55 EDT --- New update: I've fixed the following issues * Fixed a small bug to enable ppc support. Now the only arch that isn't supported is ppc64, because of missing dependancies (ice) * Fixed some static cmake files with wrong paths, so they get generated with the correct paths during the build process. * Made it so ALL cmake files go into /usr/share/gearbox/cmake * Fixed a typo that prevented pkg-config fixes from being applied. * Upstream further clarified their licenses, so I patched the LICENSE file to their most recent svn revision. Spec URL: http://www.richmattes.com/rpms/gearbox/gearbox.spec SRPM URL: http://www.richmattes.com/rpms/gearbox/gearbox-9.07-3.fc11.src.rpm koji dist-f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1795294 koji dist-f12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1795298 rpmlint: $ rpmlint gearbox.spec ../RPMS/i586/gearbox* 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 02:35:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 21:35:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530892] Review Request: kde-style-nitrogen - A KDE 4 widget style In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911090235.nA92ZlYe012032@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530892 --- Comment #5 from Teemu Rytilahti 2009-11-08 21:35:46 EDT --- Yup, updated the file now. Though the only change in there actually was the license change, but apparently it isn't fixed still. Anyways, if someone wants to check the SRPM here's the new one: http://stetson.frozenhat.fi/~tpr/fedora/kde-style-nitrogen-1.0.5-1.fc11.src.rpm . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 02:37:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 21:37:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530895] Review Request: nitrogen-kwin-theme - A window decoration for KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911090237.nA92bpeK022511@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530895 --- Comment #3 from Teemu Rytilahti 2009-11-08 21:37:50 EDT --- Bumped to new upstream version: http://stetson.frozenhat.fi/~tpr/fedora/nitrogen-kwin-theme-3.3.0-1.fc11.src.rpm . Looks like there's a problem with the licensing stuff, about which I'll speak with the author later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 02:48:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 21:48:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533763] New: Review Request: tex-cjw - LaTeX class for writing resumes and cover letters Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: tex-cjw - LaTeX class for writing resumes and cover letters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533763 Summary: Review Request: tex-cjw - LaTeX class for writing resumes and cover letters Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mike at flyn.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/tex-cjw.spec SRPM URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/tex-cjwltx-20090907-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: cjwltx is a LaTeX class for writing resumes, cover letters and other common documents. This package does not contain a clear, consistent copyright notice. I have contacted the author and he has agreed on the LPPL in an email. However, I have not yet seen a new release referencing the LPPL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 03:02:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 22:02:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533765] New: Review Request: fedora-accessibility-guide-en-US - Using Fedora with a visual, hearing, or mobility impairment Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: fedora-accessibility-guide-en-US - Using Fedora with a visual, hearing, or mobility impairment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533765 Summary: Review Request: fedora-accessibility-guide-en-US - Using Fedora with a visual, hearing, or mobility impairment Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: eric at christensenplace.us QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/Packages/fedora-accessibility-guide/fedora-accessibility-guide-en-US.spec SRPM URL: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/Packages/fedora-accessibility-guide/fedora-accessibility-guide-en-US-0.7-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This document describes some of the hardware devices, applications and utilities available to assist people with disabilities to use a computer with the Fedora operating system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 03:26:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 22:26:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 498073] Review Request: python-ekg - Community Health Reporter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911090326.nA93QaD5025206@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498073 --- Comment #14 from Max Spevack 2009-11-08 22:26:34 EDT --- The only reason I commented here yesterday anyway was for the sake of cleanliness, and in that same spirit, I think this review request can be closed, and re-opened or a new one created if necessary at a future point. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 04:28:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 23:28:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472096] Review Request: perl-Regexp-Assemble - Assemble multiple Regular Expressions into a single RE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911090428.nA94SH2Q019002@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472096 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Iain Arnell 2009-11-08 23:28:16 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Regexp-Assemble New Branches: EL-5 Owners: iarnell kwizart InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 05:07:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 00:07:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911090507.nA9573v6028772@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 --- Comment #26 from Conrad Meyer 2009-11-09 00:07:02 EDT --- Added. http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/hlint.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/hlint-1.6.11-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 06:32:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 01:32:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533778] New: Review Request: zsync : File transfer program which downloads the iso diff Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: zsync : File transfer program which downloads the iso diff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533778 Summary: Review Request: zsync : File transfer program which downloads the iso diff Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: huzaifas at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/spec/zsync.spec SRPM URL: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/srpms/zsync-0.6.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: File transfer program which downloads the iso diff Here is F12 build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1795435 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 07:35:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 02:35:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533778] Review Request: zsync : File transfer program which downloads the iso diff In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911090735.nA97ZFdB003572@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533778 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dan at danny.cz --- Comment #1 from Dan Hor?k 2009-11-09 02:35:14 EDT --- There is already one review request for zsync as bug #490140, but it's blocked now due the issue with the internal forked copy of the zlib library. It's also discussed on FESCo level, for details see https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/134 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 08:08:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 03:08:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 490140] Review Request: zsync - Client-side implementation of the rsync algorithm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911090808.nA988241003254@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490140 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |huzaifas at redhat.com --- Comment #8 from Dan Hor?k 2009-11-09 03:07:59 EDT --- *** Bug 533778 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 08:08:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 03:08:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533778] Review Request: zsync : File transfer program which downloads the iso diff In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911090808.nA9881vB003214@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533778 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Dan Hor?k 2009-11-09 03:07:59 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 490140 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 08:31:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 03:31:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457279] Review Request: cerebro - Cerebro provides mesh network services and presence information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911090831.nA98V3lh020789@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 --- Comment #45 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-11-09 03:30:57 EDT --- @Polychronis: In case you are interested in this package .. you will need to find sponsorship. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group has details. In case you are not interested we can close this bug and deferrer its inclusion till someone else gets interested. Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 09:09:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 04:09:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532699] Review Request: ClanLib1 - Cross platform C++ game library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911090909.nA999rFt024257@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532699 --- Comment #6 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-11-09 04:09:52 EDT --- Yes, please build it for F-12 too. As F-12 is just about to be released and thus as a full life span to live, I think it would be handy to have both ClanLib 1 and ClanLib 2 available. It might even worth it to have both in F-11 too, but I see the F11 ClanLib is still 0.8, so it might be a bit more troublesome. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 09:16:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 04:16:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532699] Review Request: ClanLib1 - Cross platform C++ game library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911090916.nA99GbmA004351@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532699 --- Comment #7 from Hans de Goede 2009-11-09 04:16:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Yes, please build it for F-12 too. As F-12 is just about to be released and > thus as a full life span to live, I think it would be handy to have both > ClanLib 1 and ClanLib 2 available. Ok will do, I will put them in updates-testing for now, let me know when you need them to go to stable. > It might even worth it to have both in F-11 > too, but I see the F11 ClanLib is still 0.8, so it might be a bit more > troublesome. Erm, 0.8 has a different soname, so for F-11 I would like to avoid this if possbile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 09:16:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 04:16:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530756] Review Request: circuit_macros - A set of macros for drawing high-quality line diagram In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911090916.nA99GWVU004232@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530756 Paul Howarth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul at city-fan.org --- Comment #10 from Paul Howarth 2009-11-09 04:16:30 EDT --- You can have multiple subpackages use the same directory for documentation if you only use absolute pathnames with %doc; if you use relative pathnames, rpm clears out the directory as it processes each subpackage. This is the approach I used in libpng10: %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %dir %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/ %doc %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/ANNOUNCE %doc %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/CHANGES %doc %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/LICENSE %doc %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/README %doc %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/TODO %doc %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/Y2KINFO ... %files devel %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/example.c %doc %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/libpng-%{version}.txt ... It's a bit ugly but it works. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 09:52:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 04:52:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533803] New: Review Request: libcue - CUE sheet parser library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libcue - CUE sheet parser library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533803 Summary: Review Request: libcue - CUE sheet parser library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lemenkov at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/libcue.spec SRPM URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/libcue-1.3.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Libcue is intended to parse a so called cue sheet from a char string or a file pointer. For handling of the parsed data a convenient API is available. rpmlint output: [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/ppc/libcue-* libcue.ppc: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libcue.so.1.0.3 exit at GLIBC_2.0 libcue-devel.ppc: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. koji scratchbuild for F-11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1795571 This package is a requirement for CUE support in MPD. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 10:03:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 05:03:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 445068] Review Request: ocaml-bin-prot - Read and write OCaml values in a type-safe binary protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911091003.nA9A3lgh022369@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445068 --- Comment #12 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-11-09 05:03:45 EDT --- I looked at the actual code and what the author has done is to take an earlier BSD licensed program ("tywith") and has substantially derived from and rewritten that code to produce this package. The new package is entirely licensed under LGPLv2+ with the standard OCaml linking exception. In all the files that were derived from tywith there is an acknowledgement of the earlier provenance of the code, but there are no separate files that are still BSD licensed. Therefore I have changed the license to: License: LGPLv2+ with exceptions I made the other changes as you suggested. Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-bin-prot.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-bin-prot-1.2.20-2.fc11.src.rpm * Mon Nov 9 2009 Richard W.M. Jones - 1.2.20-2 - The final license of the code is LGPLv2+ with the OCaml linking exception. It was derived from earlier BSD code. - Don't duplicate the license files across base and -devel packages. - Add note to spec about inclusion of *.ml file in -devel package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 10:04:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 05:04:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524238] Review Request: libclaw - C++ Library Absolutely Wonderful In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911091004.nA9A4lHD011818@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524238 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-09 05:04:44 EDT --- Imported and build. Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 10:04:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 05:04:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524283] Review Request: plee-the-bear - 2D platform game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911091004.nA9A4nKD011853@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524283 Bug 524283 depends on bug 524238, which changed state. Bug 524238 Summary: Review Request: libclaw - C++ Library Absolutely Wonderful https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524238 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 10:15:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 05:15:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532203] Review Request: jgraph - Java-based Diagram Component and Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911091015.nA9AFARY026677@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532203 --- Comment #8 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-09 05:15:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > For now, please update to jgraph-5.13. Good catch, thank you. Done. > Also we may need to package jgraphx at a > later date (this is jgraph5 + namespace move + some changes?) -- it is unclear > if upstream plan to maintain jgraph-5.13 as a separate library. However this > (jgraphx) I believe should be handled separately (but would appreciate > comments). You're completely right. Given how big is the tendency of Java programmers to often completely redesign APIs and namespace hierarchies it's not uncommon (in fact it is very common) to keep older versions of packages as long as they are being depended on and package new ones with another name (see junit - junit4, saxon - saxon8 (jpackage), etc. not even bothering to follow the -compat package naming). I currently have no need to package jgraphx, but as you correctly noted that would really be handled separately. > Unfortunately I am still getting those debuginfo errors with your latest SRPM. Did -debuginfo generate correctly for you? For me and the scratch build as well, it did. Please don't get confused with messages about complaints about problems finding files with dollar sign characters ("$") in their file names -- they're really not to be found, it's just the result of how does find-debuginfo determine the .java files paths from .class-es embedded in jars. (In reply to comment #7) > Oh and note that the author has relicenced under BSD for 5.13. Changed. New package: SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/jgraph.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/jgraph-5.13.0.0-1.fc12.src.rpm scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1795473 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 10:19:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 05:19:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532470] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-bad-free - GStreamer streaming media framework "bad" plug-ins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911091019.nA9AJmUu028222@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532470 --- Comment #9 from Hans de Goede 2009-11-09 05:19:43 EDT --- Ok, below is a list, note that it only contains plugins in -bad which have all the code in -bad, I did not list the ones which are just wrappers around external libraries, as I assume that any problematic code for those will live in the libraries not in the wrappers. I also left out plugins which we are already patching into our current gstreamer-plugins-good (former farsight plugins, mpeg demux). And I also left out all the system specific plugins which are plugins which talk to operating system provided API's like oss4 on linux, amc on windows, etc. aacparse: ADIF and ADTS stream parser adpcmdec: adpcm decoder based on ADPCM decoders in libsndfile aiffparse: AIFF (.wav file) header parser amrparse: .amr file header parser asfmux: ASF muxer bayer: bayer decoder (does not seem to use one of the problem algos) camerabin: High level api for DC (Digital Camera) application cdxaparse: Parse a .dat file from (S)VCD into raw MPEG-1 dccp: transfer data over the network via DCCP debugutils: Collection of elements that may be useful for debugging dvdspu: DVD Sub-picture Overlay element festival: Synthesizes plain text into audio freeze: Stream freezer frei0r: glue plugin to be able to use frei0r plugins in gstreamer h264parse: Element parsing raw h264 streams hdvparse: HDV private stream parser id3tag: ID3 v1 and v2 muxing plugin legacyresample: Resamples audio (which used to be in gst-plugins-base) librfb: Connects to a VNC server and decodes RFB stream mpeg4videoparse: MPEG-4 video parser mpegpsmux: MPEG-PS muxer mpegtsmux: MPEG-TS muxer mpegvideoparse: MPEG-1 and MPEG-2 video parser mve: Interplay MVE movie format demux/mux & dec/enc mxf: MXF muxer and demuxer nsf: Nsf decoder nuvdemux: Demuxes MythTVs NuppelVideo .nuv files pcapparse: Element parsing raw pcap streams pnm: PNM encoder / decoder qtmux: QT muxer rawparse: Parses byte streams into raw frames real: Decode real audio / video using realplayer binary plugins scaletempo: Scale audio tempo in sync with playback rate sdp: configure streaming sessions using SDP selector: input/output stream selector elements shapewipe: Shape Wipe transition filter siren: Siren encoder/decoder speed: Set speed/pitch on audio/raw streams (resampler) stereo: Muck with the stereo signal, enhance it's 'stereo-ness' subenc: subtitle encoders tta: TTA lossless audio format handling videomeasure: Various video measurers videosignal: Various video signal analysers vmnc: a decoder for the VMWare VMnc video codec (essentially a serialisation of RFB, the VNC protocol) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 10:28:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 05:28:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533721] Review Request: perl-Net-CIDR - Manipulate IPv4/IPv6 netblocks in CIDR notation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911091028.nA9AStVL020411@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533721 Paul Howarth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |paul at city-fan.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |paul at city-fan.org Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Paul Howarth 2009-11-09 05:28:22 EDT --- Looks OK at first glance except License: should be "GPL+ or Artistic". Full review to follow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 11:26:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 06:26:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532315] Review Request: nanoxml - Small XML parser for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911091126.nA9BQGEb006769@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532315 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-09 06:26:14 EDT --- nanoxml-2.2.3-6.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nanoxml-2.2.3-6.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 11:24:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 06:24:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526451] Review Request: crunchyfrog - A multi-engine SQL client and database front-end In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911091124.nA9BObBf015659@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526451 --- Comment #6 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-11-09 06:24:33 EDT --- For license issue I am contacting upstream and will wait for few days for there response. http://code.google.com/p/crunchyfrog/issues/detail?id=75 Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 11:41:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 06:41:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477683] Review Request: fltk2 - C++ user interface toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911091141.nA9BfG2H021028@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477683 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #24 from Michal Nowak 2009-11-09 06:41:12 EDT --- Jason, thanks for bringing it once again to my attention. fltk2 is broken in several POVs. It's not released software (but apps are using it), it's not progressing much (just humble changes in SVN tree), fltk2 as a shared lib is not supported (static is), so, that's why there are so much so-related problems. >From dillo m-l I know that fltk2 is dying in favor of fltk1.3, which should have release "soon" (whatever it meens...) and then dillo might move to this fltk implementation. I have no time & no interest in fixing what's broken by design. If anyone needs fltk2 for dillo, feel free to use this RPMs, they "works" but I won't update to newer snapshots anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 11:53:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 06:53:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530301] Review Request: bmpanel2 - NETWM compliant panel for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911091153.nA9BrNis014629@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530301 --- Comment #5 from Marcus Moeller 2009-11-09 06:53:22 EDT --- - Added python-devel build requirement - Fixed docbook stylesheet reference Spec URL: http://www.marcus-moeller.de/share/build/bmpanel2/2.1-0.2.pre1/bmpanel2.spec SRPM URL: http://www.marcus-moeller.de/share/build/bmpanel2/2.1-0.2.pre1/bmpanel2-2.1-0.2.pre1.fc11.src.rpm Builds fine in mock and Koji (sb: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1795775) Best Regards Marcus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 12:44:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 07:44:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533721] Review Request: perl-Net-CIDR - Manipulate IPv4/IPv6 netblocks in CIDR notation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911091244.nA9CiZ2f029053@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533721 --- Comment #2 from Paul Howarth 2009-11-09 07:44:34 EDT --- perl-Net-CIDR review: rpmlint output: perl-Net-CIDR.noarch: W: invalid-license Distributable, see COPYING perl-Net-CIDR.src: W: invalid-license Distributable, see COPYING These needs fixing, by changing the license tag to "GPL+ or Artistic" - package and spec file naming OK - package meets guidelines - package is licensed same as perl but license tag needs fixing to reflect this - no upstream license text to include, though the COPYING file refers to the licenses under which the software is licensed, and this file is included - spec file written in English and is legible - source matches upstream - package builds OK in mock for Rawhide x86_64 - buildreqs OK - no locale data, shared or static libs, or devel files to worry about - package not relocatable - no duplicate files or directory ownership issues - %defattr(...) present and correct - %clean section present and correct - macro usage is consistent - code, not content - no large docs - not a GUI app -> no desktop file needed - buildroot cleaned correctly at the start of %install - filenames all ASCII - no scriptlets or subpackages Notes: * License should be "GPL+ or Artistic" * No point including Net-CIDR.spec as %doc * Why use wildcards for single items in %files list: %{perl_vendorlib}/* could be %{perl_vendorlib}/Net/ %{_mandir}/man3/* could be %{_mandir}/man3/Net::CIDR.3pm* This is just a style issue really but IMHO the more explicit entries are more readable and informative Only the license issue is a blocker here. Fix that and I'll approve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 13:20:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 08:20:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533721] Review Request: perl-Net-CIDR - Manipulate IPv4/IPv6 netblocks in CIDR notation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911091320.nA9DKKTv007978@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533721 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-11-09 08:20:19 EDT --- Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Net-CIDR.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Net-CIDR-0.13-2.fc11.src.rpm Description: Manipulate IPv4/IPv6 netblocks in CIDR notation Changelog: - Fix License tag - Remove Net-CIDR.spec from %%doc - List files more explicitely -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 13:22:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 08:22:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530288] Review Request: stonevpn - easy OpenVPN certificate and configuration management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911091322.nA9DMLnu008926@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530288 --- Comment #7 from Leon Keijser 2009-11-09 08:22:19 EDT --- - Source tarball changed. Would you explain what happened? + Yes, i accidentally uploaded a modified version under the same name. Stupid mistake. Since there were several other outstanding changes, i made a new version (0.4.4) and created an updated SPEC/SRPM/tarball. - Would you have any plan to submit your patch + It's not my patch, but from Rick Dean. It's already proposed for merge into main. See https://bugs.launchpad.net/pyopenssl/+bug/404436 Updated SPEC: http://cloud.github.com/downloads/lkeijser/stonevpn/stonevpn.spec Updated SRPM: http://cloud.github.com/downloads/lkeijser/stonevpn/stonevpn-0.4.4-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 13:58:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 08:58:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533721] Review Request: perl-Net-CIDR - Manipulate IPv4/IPv6 netblocks in CIDR notation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911091358.nA9DwovR031151@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533721 Paul Howarth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Paul Howarth 2009-11-09 08:58:49 EDT --- rpmlint now clean. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 14:14:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 09:14:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466331] Review Request: rcov - ruby code coverage tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911091414.nA9EElRb026497@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466331 Casey Dahlin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(cdahlin at redhat.co | |m) | --- Comment #4 from Casey Dahlin 2009-11-09 09:14:44 EDT --- Sorry. Last time I looked at this upstream's website had vanished and I wasn't sure if the project was dead or not. I'll poke it again and see if its still worth packaging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 14:11:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 09:11:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533721] Review Request: perl-Net-CIDR - Manipulate IPv4/IPv6 netblocks in CIDR notation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911091411.nA9EBjfI025986@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533721 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-11-09 09:11:44 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Net-CIDR Short Description: Manipulate IPv4/IPv6 netblocks in CIDR notation Owners: kwizart Branches: F-12 F-11 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 15:11:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 10:11:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 233946] Review Request: secondlife - The Second Life client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911091511.nA9FBcvm023330@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233946 Arne Woerner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |533384 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 15:35:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 10:35:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480146] Review Request: python-bicyclerepair - Python Refactoring Browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911091535.nA9FZxCc020589@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480146 --- Comment #16 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-11-09 10:35:57 EDT --- Ping Jerome If I not see any feedback until 12/9/2009, I max drop this review reqest. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 15:43:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 10:43:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533877] New: Review Request: iwl6000-firmware - Firmware for Intel(R) Wireless WiFi Link 6000 Series AGN Adapter Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: iwl6000-firmware - Firmware for Intel(R) Wireless WiFi Link 6000 Series AGN Adapter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533877 Summary: Review Request: iwl6000-firmware - Firmware for Intel(R) Wireless WiFi Link 6000 Series AGN Adapter Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: linville at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://linville.fedorapeople.org/iwl6000-firmware.spec SRPM URL: http://linville.fedorapeople.org/iwl6000-firmware-9.176.4.1-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: This package contains the firmware required by the iwlagn driver for Linux to support the iwl6000 hardware. Usage of the firmware is subject to the terms and conditions contained inside the provided LICENSE file. Please read it carefully. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 15:56:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 10:56:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521719] Review Request: pycryptopp - Python wrappers for the Crypto++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911091556.nA9Fu0gH006354@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521719 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |tomspur at fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tomspur at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #6 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-09 10:55:58 EDT --- It's been quite a while, since Jason wanted to review this, but set no review flag. So I guess, I can do the review. Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: [] devel/i386 [] devel/x86_64 [] F11/i386 [x] F11/x86_64 [!] Rpmlint output: $ rpmlint pycryptopp.spec pycryptopp-0.5.17-1.fc11.src.rpm x86_64/pycryptopp-* pycryptopp.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.5.17-3 ['0.5.17-1.fc11', '0.5.17-1'] 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Should be 0.5.17-1 in the changelog [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [!] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPLv2+ License looks strange. It's mostly said, that's GPLv2+, but in file 'copyright' looks like BSD. I'm unsure, if GPLv2+ is enought as license tag... [!] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. copyright is not in %doc Changelog belongs there too... [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Upstream source: b3d19e7203531f8bd241ae58062f99e4 Build source: b3d19e7203531f8bd241ae58062f99e4 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x] Package functions as described (no hardware to test with). [x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. Other: Removing the tests and not wasting space is really nice :) Issues: - Not sure about license. Please make a comment about this, if you are sure about it or not. If not, too, maybe we'll get a second opinion from Jason. - add changelog to %doc - correnct version in changelog -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 16:03:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 11:03:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456353] Review Request: libffado - Free firewire audio driver library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911091603.nA9G3GIS029545@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456353 --- Comment #10 from Jay Fenlason 2009-11-09 11:03:13 EDT --- It doesn't work yet. ffado does not yet work with the new firewire stack. I've written some patches for libffado's sources and libraw1394, which get it closer to working, but no success yet. As of Friday I had the streaming subsystem starting, but libffado does not recognize that streaming is running and shuts down. Stay tuned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 16:10:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 11:10:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521719] Review Request: pycryptopp - Python wrappers for the Crypto++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911091610.nA9GAuXZ032099@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521719 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-09 11:10:54 EDT --- Sorry, I just noticed that when building it tries to download darcsver... Definately a blocker... + CFLAGS='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic' + /usr/bin/python setup.py build /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Pyrex/Compiler/Errors.py:17: DeprecationWarning: BaseException.message has been deprecated as of Python 2.6 self.message = message Installed /home/tom/rpmbuild/BUILD/pycryptopp-0.5.17/setuptools_darcs-1.2.8-py2.6.egg Searching for darcsver>=1.2.0 Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/darcsver/ Reading http://allmydata.org/trac/darcsver Best match: darcsver 1.5.1 Downloading http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/d/darcsver/darcsver-1.5.1.tar.gz#md5=9f2ddddb63c787ae9922cbece85e75cf Processing darcsver-1.5.1.tar.gz Running darcsver-1.5.1/setup.py -q bdist_egg --dist-dir /tmp/easy_install-dX6Hw5/darcsver-1.5.1/egg-dist-tmp-mEufgw So this should depend on darcserv, which is not yet packaged in fedora, or maybe you can patch it to not require it to use. In setup.py is described, that it's just needed for correctly grepping the version, see lines 210-221. Maybe just deleting the [aliases] in the setup.cfg. ( I believe so, but have not tested it...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 16:12:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 11:12:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533725] Review Request: rubygem-linecache - Caches (Ruby source) files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911091612.nA9GCJfV011920@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533725 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-09 11:12:17 EDT --- Some notes: * We now prefer to use %global rather than %define. * Defined %ruby_sitelib macro is not used and seems unneeded. * License tag should be GPLv2 * Make build.log more verbose (gem -V should do this), so that we can check if Fedora specific compilation flags are correctly honored. * Please don't strip binaries by yourself and create debuginfo rpm correctly. * Enable %check, because this gem contains test/ directory * Mark %geminstdir/AUTHORS or so as %doc properly. * This package should not own the directory %{ruby_sitearch}/ itself. * I don't think %{geminstdir}/lib can be removed. * Please use defined macro (especially %geminstdir) also in other place (like in %files) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 16:30:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 11:30:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533887] New: Review Request: raw-thumbnailer - thumbnailer for raw images on gnome Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: raw-thumbnailer - thumbnailer for raw images on gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533887 Summary: Review Request: raw-thumbnailer - thumbnailer for raw images on gnome Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bogado at bogado.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://static.bogado.net/rpm/raw-thumbnailer.spec SRPM URL: http://static.bogado.net/rpm/raw-thumbnailer-0.99.1-1.bog12.src.rpm Description: Nautilus file manager thumbnailer for RAW images -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 16:44:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 11:44:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522895] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-native-tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911091644.nA9GicKI011572@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522895 --- Comment #5 from Matthew Harmsen 2009-11-09 11:44:36 EDT --- Comment #3 has been resolved in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522895 Comment #4 will be addressed in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533534 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 17:10:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 12:10:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533899] Review Request: activemq-cpp - C++ implementation of JMS-like messaging client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911091710.nA9HAepU019499@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533899 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |activemq-cpp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 17:10:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 12:10:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533899] New: Review Request: activemq-cpp - C++ implementation of JMS-like messaging client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: activemq-cpp - C++ implementation of JMS-like messaging client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533899 Summary: Review Request: activemq-cpp - C++ implementation of JMS-like messaging client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve.traylen at cern.ch QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/activemq-cpp/activemq-cpp.spec SRPM URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/activemq-cpp/activemq-cpp-2.2.6-2.fc12.src.rpm Description: activemq-cpp is a JMS-like API for C++ for interfacing with Message Brokers such as Apache ActiveMQ. C++ messaging service helps to make your C++ client code much neater and easier to follow. To get a better feel for CMS try the API Reference. ActiveMQ-CPP is a client only library, a message broker such as Apache ActiveMQ is still needed for your clients to communicate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 17:18:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 12:18:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533887] Review Request: raw-thumbnailer - thumbnailer for raw images on gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911091718.nA9HIg9o000566@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533887 --- Comment #1 from Victor Bogado 2009-11-09 12:18:42 EDT --- There was some missing build-requires, I fix them : Spec URL: http://static.bogado.net/rpm/raw-thumbnailer.spec SRPM URL: http://static.bogado.net/rpm/raw-thumbnailer-0.99.1-2.bog12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 17:19:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 12:19:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532470] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-bad-free - GStreamer streaming media framework "bad" plug-ins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911091719.nA9HJk3w000904@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532470 --- Comment #10 from Bill Nottingham 2009-11-09 12:19:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > I still wonder who invented such ugly naming scheme for gstreamer plugins? Who > is this completely braindamaged guy, who combines all plugins into several > packs, which names says nothing about their actual content. Sergio Leone. The other options were 'gstreamer-a-fistful-of-plugins' and 'gstreamer-a-few-plugins-more'. > I still hope, that sometimes there will be a great developer, who will split > these good/bad/ugly/etc packages into something more suitable for end-users. More seriously, I would think this is less of an issue with the current gst plugin auto-install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 17:33:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 12:33:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530288] Review Request: stonevpn - easy OpenVPN certificate and configuration management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911091733.nA9HXsJc006020@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530288 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 17:49:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 12:49:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530288] Review Request: stonevpn - easy OpenVPN certificate and configuration management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911091749.nA9HnBcX011229@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530288 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-09 12:49:09 EDT --- Well, I think that latest srpm is okay, so: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (NOTE: please don't choose "Merge Review") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ It seems that you are the upstream of this software, however still I want to see at least one pre-review (by you) or another review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 18:11:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 13:11:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531051] Review Request: glite-security-util-java - Java Utilities for GSI Credentials In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911091811.nA9IB93Q004864@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531051 --- Comment #2 from Steve Traylen 2009-11-09 13:11:08 EDT --- New packages: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/glite-security-util-java/glite-security-util-java.spec http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/glite-security-util-java/glite-security-util-java-2.0.3-6.fc11.src.rpm Removes the unneeded code and hence EU Datagrid license. Now includes /usr/lib64/gcj/glite-security-util-java explicitly. Documentation now in versioned directory with symlink. axis and servlet now Required as well. Forgotten. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 18:23:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 13:23:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530473] Review Request: lessfs - Lessfs is an inline data deduplicating filesystem. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911091823.nA9INTnw020642@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530473 --- Comment #7 from Adam Miller 2009-11-09 13:23:28 EDT --- Fixed the mentions listed in the last comment, also a new upstream release. Spec URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/lessfs.spec SRPM URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/lessfs-0.8.1-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 18:55:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 13:55:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 492609] Review Request: hmaccalc - Tools for computing and checking HMAC values for files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911091855.nA9ItDkY029021@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492609 Nalin Dahyabhai changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Nalin Dahyabhai 2009-11-09 13:55:10 EDT --- Good enough for me. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 19:02:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 14:02:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226305] Merge Review: poppler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911091902.nA9J2Mls018059@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226305 --- Comment #7 from Rex Dieter 2009-11-09 14:02:21 EDT --- I'm on as comaintainer here, and would be happy to work with a reviewer to complete this merge. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 19:04:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 14:04:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 512170] Review Request: pidgin-sipe - Pidgin plugin for connecting to MS Communications Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911091904.nA9J4vh5018520@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512170 Konstantin Ryabitsev changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #30 from Konstantin Ryabitsev 2009-11-09 14:04:54 EDT --- Ah, excellent! Thanks for the review, Rahul. I'll start with F-12 and F-11, and then I'll work on getting it into EL-5 (if possible). New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pidgin-sipe Short Description: Pidgin plugin for connecting to MS Communications Server Owners: icon Branches: F-12 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 19:08:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 14:08:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533919] New: Review Request: mplus fonts - The M+ family of fonts designed by Coji Morishita Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mplus fonts - The M+ family of fonts designed by Coji Morishita https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533919 Summary: Review Request: mplus fonts - The M+ family of fonts designed by Coji Morishita Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: igshaan.mesias at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.box.net/shared/y6divetbvo SRPM URL: http://www.box.net/shared/n6hgdrds4v Description: The M+ outline fonts is a superfamily of fonts designed by Coji Morishita. There are 7 families of which, 4 are combinations of proportinal font families. This is my very first submission please be gentle ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 19:16:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 14:16:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 506844] Review Request: audex - kde4 audio ripper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911091916.nA9JGrXd022070@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506844 --- Comment #26 from Terje R??sten 2009-11-09 14:16:50 EDT --- Why is this ticket still open? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 19:31:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 14:31:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526928] Review Request: blokkal - A KDE blogging client that supports multiple protocols and sites In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911091931.nA9JVtQt007494@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526928 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Janssen 2009-11-09 14:31:54 EDT --- Stupid me. The Changelog is here: http://www.kde-apps.org/content/show.php/Blokkal?content=53644 This release adds support for configuring accounts with RSD and fixes some bugs. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 19:55:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 14:55:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531040] Review Request: jsMath-fonts - A collection of Math symbol fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911091955.nA9JtO0P030578@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531040 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(rdieter at math.unl. | |edu) | --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter 2009-11-09 14:55:23 EDT --- Oh boy, ok, here's a start anyway, %changelog * Mon Nov 09 2009 Rex Dieter 20090708-1 - lower case pkg name - Version: 20090708 (time stamp of newest included font) - use fontpackages-devel - drop subpkg baggage - Group: User Interface/X SPEC: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/jsMath-fonts/jsmath-fonts.spec SRPM: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/jsMath-fonts/jsmath-fonts-20090708-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 20:01:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 15:01:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531255] Review Request: CGSI-gSOAP - GSI plugin for gSOAP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911092001.nA9K1TG4031924@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531255 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |steve.traylen at cern.ch AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |steve.traylen at cern.ch Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 19:58:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 14:58:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532523] Review request: jarjar - Jar Jar Links In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911091958.nA9JwQ6V031299@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532523 --- Comment #4 from Steve Traylen 2009-11-09 14:58:25 EDT --- The directories in your package: /etc/maven/fragments /etc/maven /usr/share/maven2/poms /usr/share/maven2 are not specified in your package and your requires do not require packages that contain them. There should be symlink from /usr/share/javadoc/jarjar to /usr/share/javadoc/jarjar-0.9 Everything else looks good I would say at the moment, if you can fix those two and gcj items I'll do the review. Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 20:02:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 15:02:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525909] Review Request: sysprof - A system-wide Linux profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911092002.nA9K2nrt032273@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525909 --- Comment #17 from S?ren Sandmann Pedersen 2009-11-09 15:02:47 EDT --- Which version of the sysprof package is that? Also, if you can open a separate bug (and cc sandmann at daimi.au.dk), that would be appreciated. Please attach /proc/cpuinfo. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 20:04:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 15:04:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531040] Review Request: jsmath-fonts - A collection of Math symbol fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911092004.nA9K4m4U013863@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531040 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |jsMath-fonts - A collection |jsmath-fonts - A collection |of Math symbol fonts |of Math symbol fonts --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter 2009-11-09 15:04:47 EDT --- Adjusting summary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 20:12:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 15:12:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484363] Review Request: ggz-base-libs - Base libraries for GGZ gaming zone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911092012.nA9KCPdp001751@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484363 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 20:12:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 15:12:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 500902] Review Request: kdelibs-experimental - KDE libraries with experimental or unstable api/abi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911092012.nA9KCgtB001896@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500902 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 20:12:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 15:12:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452212] Review Request: heimdal - Heimdal Kerberos libraries and KDC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911092012.nA9KC1KI001674@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452212 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(abartlet at samba.or | |g) --- Comment #15 from Rex Dieter 2009-11-09 15:11:57 EDT --- Sorry for my going awol here for awhile, I can still do sponsoring if still needed, Andrew, can you chime in on the current state of affairs here, and offer something newish to continue the review (if available)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 20:17:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 15:17:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530473] Review Request: lessfs - Lessfs is an inline data deduplicating filesystem. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911092017.nA9KHwOX016914@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530473 --- Comment #8 from Adam Miller 2009-11-09 15:17:57 EDT --- New upstream release today. Spec URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/lessfs.spec SRPM URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/lessfs-0.8.2-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 20:18:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 15:18:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531255] Review Request: CGSI-gSOAP - GSI plugin for gSOAP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911092018.nA9KI18g016949@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531255 --- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen 2009-11-09 15:18:00 EDT --- 1) What's the reason for the Provides: CGSI_gSOAP = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: CGSI_gSOAP < 1.3.2.2-3 where was CGSI_gSOAP released? 2) I read in another review that %{_docdir}/%{name}-devel-%{version} should not be marked as a %doc but only the items inside it though to be honest it makes more sense to me if it is a %doc to be left out upon installing with no %docs. 3) Given the cvs tag is a date should the release number not reflect this? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages Other than that looking good. Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 20:25:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 15:25:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520637] Review Request: mdk - GNU MIX Development Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911092025.nA9KPCxf019014@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520637 Dave Malcolm changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dmalcolm at redhat.com --- Comment #16 from Dave Malcolm 2009-11-09 15:25:09 EDT --- FWIW, for me, gmixvm doesn't show the 100% CPU issue and launches OK. I don't have Assistive Technology enabled. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 20:29:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 15:29:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466331] Review Request: rcov - ruby code coverage tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911092029.nA9KTZxB006559@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466331 --- Comment #5 from Casey Dahlin 2009-11-09 15:29:32 EDT --- I've pinged upstream to make sure they're still alive. In the meantime here's an updated spec/srpm. http://sadmac.fedorapeople.org/rcov-0.8.1.2-2.fc11.src.rpm http://sadmac.fedorapeople.org/rcov.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 21:00:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 16:00:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523540] Review Request: opentracker - BitTorrent Tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911092100.nA9L02gU013764@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523540 --- Comment #40 from Simon Wesp 2009-11-09 16:00:00 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=368288) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=368288) build log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 21:11:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 16:11:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523540] Review Request: opentracker - BitTorrent Tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911092111.nA9LBaaf016552@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523540 --- Comment #41 from Simon Wesp 2009-11-09 16:11:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #36) > This is working much better now, thank you. I installed your libowfat-devel > package on my F11 box, and after building opentracker to link against this new > version, I can start both the IPv4 and IPv6 trackers in parallel. mh, okay, i think we made a mistake, as we build libowfat-devel against libc instead of dietlibc... Take a look at the build.log. I'm no t a c guru and haven't found the error yet. http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/opentracker/opentracker-0-0.7.20090915cvs.fc12.src.rpm > The Makefile now links in -lgcc to avoid a pthread_cancel error on exit: Don't realize why -lpthread doesn't do this trick, but okay > But, I haven't figured out the syntax for putting IPv6 addresses in the > /etc/opentracker-ipv6/opentracker-ipv6.conf file. From the code, the config > file _should_ be: > > listen.tcp [::1]:6969 > > but that fails: > > # opentracker-ipv6 > Parse error in config file: listen.tcp [::1]:6969 > > > If you can figure out the config file syntax and fix up the provided .conf > files, that should take care of it all. https://erdgeist.org/cvsweb/opentracker/opentracker.c.diff?r2=1.225&r1=1.224&f=u -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 21:13:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 16:13:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 517488] Review Request: vhostmd - Virtualization host metrics daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911092113.nA9LDaMP016132@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517488 Beth Zeranski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |533941(5.5EPMFlatAll) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 21:22:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 16:22:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 513544] Review Request: python-lockfile - Platform-independent file locking module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911092122.nA9LMwwN019923@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513544 Silas Sewell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Silas Sewell 2009-11-09 16:22:56 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-lockfile New Branches: F-11 EL-5 Owners: silas Per request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513546#c2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 21:25:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 16:25:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452212] Review Request: heimdal - Heimdal Kerberos libraries and KDC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911092125.nA9LP1Bj020429@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452212 Andrew Bartlett changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(abartlet at samba.or | |g) | --- Comment #16 from Andrew Bartlett 2009-11-09 16:24:58 EDT --- We have not yet made Samba4 use the external Heimdal libs, so this isn't required for now. I'm also no longer in the packaging game, so this will be for someone else to pick up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 21:28:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 16:28:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516280] Review Request: perl-Config-Model-CursesUI - Curses interface to edit config data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911092128.nA9LSbeE027853@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516280 --- Comment #9 from David Hannequin 2009-11-09 16:28:36 EDT --- New spec file and srpm with LGPLv2 Spec URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/perl-modules/perl-Config-Model-CursesUI/perl-Config-Model-CursesUI.spec SRPM URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/perl-modules/perl-Config-Model-CursesUI/perl-Config-Model-CursesUI-1.103-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 21:25:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 16:25:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 513544] Review Request: python-lockfile - Platform-independent file locking module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911092125.nA9LP9b3026940@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513544 --- Comment #6 from Silas Sewell 2009-11-09 16:25:08 EDT --- Sorry, branch should only be EL-5, disregard #5. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-lockfile New Branches: EL-5 Owners: silas Per request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513546#c2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 21:28:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 16:28:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452212] Review Request: heimdal - Heimdal Kerberos libraries and KDC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911092128.nA9LSbJ1027826@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452212 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #17 from Rex Dieter 2009-11-09 16:28:33 EDT --- Fair enough then, thanks for the update. I'll close this then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 21:59:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 16:59:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527241] Review Request: libvtemm - C++ bindings for vte In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911092159.nA9Lxl8G005480@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527241 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mschwendt at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 22:01:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:01:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533753] Review Request: python-pep8 - Python style guide checker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911092201.nA9M1pgk000789@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533753 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |tomspur at fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tomspur at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-09 17:01:49 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. Using just 'pep8' and not 'python-pep8' won't makes sense. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: [] devel/i386 [] devel/x86_64 [] F11/i386 [x] F11/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: $ rpmlint python-pep8.spec python-pep8-0.4.2-1.fc11.src.rpm noarch/python-pep8-0.4.2-1.fc11.noarch.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: Expat or MIT -> MIT [-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Upstream source: da8562ef0b18ae9ced210cff742a2d1b Build source: da8562ef0b18ae9ced210cff742a2d1b [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [!] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. Missing BR: python-setuptools [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [!] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Missing BR. With python-setuptools: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1797324 [x] Package functions as described (no hardware to test with). [x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. Issues: - Missing BR: python-setuptools Anything else is fine. ________________________________ APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 22:12:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:12:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527488] Review Request: drbd - drbd tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911092212.nA9MCfYB004270@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527488 --- Comment #79 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-09 17:12:34 EDT --- drbd-8.3.6-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drbd-8.3.6-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 22:15:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:15:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533753] Review Request: python-pep8 - Python style guide checker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911092215.nA9MFSXW004953@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533753 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Ian Weller 2009-11-09 17:15:27 EDT --- I'll be attaching a diff of the spec in a sec for transparency. Consists of a release bump, adding the necessary BR, and fixing a syntax error in the %changelog. Also, I just noticed the upstream URL was incorrect for that particular package from pypi, so that was adjusted. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-pep8 Short Description: Python style guide checker Owners: ianweller Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 22:16:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:16:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533753] Review Request: python-pep8 - Python style guide checker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911092216.nA9MGOsH010558@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533753 --- Comment #3 from Ian Weller 2009-11-09 17:16:23 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=368301) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=368301) diff of approved spec and the spec I plan to check in -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 22:23:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:23:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527488] Review Request: drbd - drbd tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911092223.nA9MNsoV006792@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527488 --- Comment #80 from Philipp Reisner 2009-11-09 17:23:52 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: drbd New Branches: F-13 Owners: reisner -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 22:24:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:24:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527488] Review Request: drbd - drbd tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911092224.nA9MORvt006913@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527488 Philipp Reisner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 22:28:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:28:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516280] Review Request: perl-Config-Model-CursesUI - Curses interface to edit config data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911092228.nA9MS3xH007931@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516280 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pnemade at redhat.com --- Comment #10 from Parag 2009-11-09 17:28:01 EDT --- APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 22:36:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:36:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527488] Review Request: drbd - drbd tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911092236.nA9Ma1eQ009893@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527488 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #81 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-11-09 17:35:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #80) there are no F-13 branch, at this moment F-13 is the devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 22:41:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:41:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533976] New: secondlife - The Second Life client for AMD64 / x86_64 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: secondlife - The Second Life client for AMD64 / x86_64 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533976 Summary: secondlife - The Second Life client for AMD64 / x86_64 Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: arne_woerner at yahoo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: The Second Life client ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secondlife ) is currently not officially available for x86_64 platforms and the officially provided i686 package seems to be less efficient on x86_64. I guess it uses so many i686 libraries (X11, gtk, gdk, GL), that the main memory gets crowded... Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): SecondLife-x86_64-1.23.5.136262.tar.bz2 (27579624bytes) I needed to tweak 1. some makefiles, because compiler warnings should be ignored... 2. some C/H-files, because gcc doesnt like empty parameter lists after a #define (e. g. "#define ABC() bla;")... 3. some linker instructions, because they wanted "-ldb-4.2" or so (i gave it "-ldb", which works fine, 2...)... Problems: 1. That package needs several x86_64 bit libs, but i dont know how to build a rpm, that includes dependencies (if i try to do it, it might look like Homer Simpson's Tax Day letter to the IRS...)... :-) 2. Some libraries that r not provided by fc11 r statically linked (e. g. xmlrpc-epi-0.54.1, ELFIO-1.0.3, libndofdev-0.2) and some r in a libs-directory local to the SecondLife-tar-ball (e. g. a patched openjpeg_v1_3 (see bug# 533384))... 3. Maybe Linden Labs (the publisher of the Secondlife viewer source code) might be unhappy, if we call my home-brew compilation "SecondLife-..."... :-) 4. FMOD is used by the official (beta) release, but not by mine (but there seems to be some stereo effect)... 5. the SecondLife Voice is taken from the official (beta) release and still i686, but it uses less libraries, so that it doesnt waste too many resources... 6. my compilation uses openal-soft and thereby it works nicely with pulseaudio (i can c multiple output (SL, SLVoice, media, music) and 1 input channel in pavucontrol)... 7. I dont know where to put my tar-ball... Advantage: The user would just need to run "yum install secondlife", if we get the rpm right (while currently at least a tar-ball-extraction is necessary; and if the box is a little weak, it is even necessary to compile the viewer)... Additional info: previous attempt: 233946 related bug: 533384 official attempt: http://jira.secondlife.com/browse/VWR-13793 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 9 23:42:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 18:42:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533899] Review Request: activemq-cpp - C++ implementation of JMS-like messaging client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911092342.nA9NgATq030458@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533899 --- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen 2009-11-09 18:42:09 EDT --- Sorry make a mistake, new packages: Spec URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/activemq-cpp/activemq-cpp.spec SRPM URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/activemq-cpp/activemq-cpp-2.2.6-3.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 00:05:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 19:05:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 511841] Review Request: wordpress-plugin-bad-behavior - Spam prevention plugin for WordPress In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911100005.nAA05MXo032391@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511841 Nick Bebout changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(error at ioerror.us) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 00:06:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 19:06:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 511841] Review Request: wordpress-plugin-bad-behavior - Spam prevention plugin for WordPress In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911100006.nAA0630i005053@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511841 --- Comment #3 from Nick Bebout 2009-11-09 19:06:02 EDT --- I'm resolving this as CLOSED NOTABUG per the Policy for stalled package reviews. I will fix the issues and submit a new review. I'd like to get this into Fedora as we use it for Fedora Blogs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 00:16:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 19:16:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529517] Review Request: kcm_touchpad - Synaptics driver based touchpads kcontrol module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911100016.nAA0GGj6002637@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529517 --- Comment #15 from Ryan Rix 2009-11-09 19:16:15 EDT --- Apologies, the bugzilla mail fell into my oblivion of an inbox. I am confused in regards to what exactly I should be putting for Source0? I currently have: Source0: http://download.github.com/mishaaq-kcm_touchpad-000be4c.tar.gz As far as I can tell, this is a direct download (There is not a 301 or anything reported in wget) Jreznik suggested http://github.com/mishaaq/kcm_touchpad/tarball/kcm_touchpad-0.3.0 which is a 302 to the above Source0 Which should I use to keep this review moving? The folder both of these tar.gz extract to is mishaaq-kcm_touchpad-000be4c leading to ridiculous %setup -q -n mishaaq-kcm_touchpad-000be4c in either case. This situation in general sucks, and I'll ask upstream to clarify this in the future. Again, sorry for the delay -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 00:12:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 19:12:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533993] New: Review Request: wordpress-plugin-bad-behavior - Spam prevention plugin for WordPress Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: wordpress-plugin-bad-behavior - Spam prevention plugin for WordPress Alias: wp-bad-behavior https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533993 Summary: Review Request: wordpress-plugin-bad-behavior - Spam prevention plugin for WordPress Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nb at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://nb.fedorapeople.org/review/wordpress-plugin-bad-behavior.spec SRPM URL: http://nb.fedorapeople.org/review/wordpress-plugin-bad-behavior-2.0.32-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Bad Behavior is a PHP-based solution for blocking link spam and the robots which deliver it. Bad Behavior complements other link spam solutions by acting as a gatekeeper, preventing spammers from ever delivering their junk, and in many cases, from ever reading your site in the first place. This keeps your site's load down, makes your site logs cleaner, and can help prevent denial of service conditions caused by spammers. Bad Behavior also transcends other link spam solutions by working in a completely different, unique way. Instead of merely looking at the content of potential spam, Bad Behavior analyzes the delivery method as well as the software the spammer is using. In this way, Bad Behavior can stop spam attacks even when nobody has ever seen the particular spam before. [nb at epsilon SPECS]$ rpmlint wordpress-plugin-bad-behavior.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [nb at epsilon SRPMS]$ rpmlint wordpress-plugin-bad-behavior-2.0.32-1.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [nb at epsilon noarch]$ rpmlint wordpress-plugin-bad-behavior-2.0.32-1.fc12.noarch.rpm wordpress-mu-plugin-bad-behavior-2.0.32-1.fc12.noarch.rpm 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 00:18:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 19:18:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533993] Review Request: wordpress-plugin-bad-behavior - Spam prevention plugin for WordPress In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911100018.nAA0IfDC003394@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533993 Ryan Rix changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |phrkonaleash at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |phrkonaleash at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Ryan Rix 2009-11-09 19:18:40 EDT --- I'll take this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 00:54:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 19:54:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911100054.nAA0sChG016953@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #54 from Tim Fenn 2009-11-09 19:54:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #53) > I've had no time for reviews recently, but I have a little now. > Thanks again for helping with this. > This builds find on rawhide, but not F11 because of the clipper-devel > dependency. A version build for F12 will install on F11 but won't run. My > "not-quite-F12" boxes are all at work, which makes testing difficult; I can run > it remotely, but it fails with "*** Cannot find the double-buffered visual." > Looks like you just can't go GLX over SSH, which I swear used to work OK. > Unfortunately I can't really do a proper review if I can't do any testing. > You can grab the clipper .src.rpm from F12 and build it under F11, it should build OK, if that helps... > > When I installed this I tried to find the icon, only to find that it shows up > in the Graphics category. Unfortunately the desktop file spec doesn't really > have a top-level category that fits this package, but I'd at least expect to > see "Graphics;Science;", maybe with Engineering or DataVisualization if they're > appropriate. > Yeah, I just followed what I did with pymol (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251), I really wasn't sure what to put there. I'll make the change to Graphics;Science (and in pymol as well, for that matter). > Honestly the only real issue I see at this point is the wholesale inclusion of > unrelated upstream projects in the coot/scheme directory. Generally we don't > do that kind of thing; it's basically the situation from > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries > I didn't really notice before that those were separate projects; I originally > thought they were part of coot but carried different licenses. Now I see that > they are merely prerequisites that shouldn't be part of this package. > I brought this up with upstream. My concern was that guile net-http and guile-gui are unsupported, and goosh is part of the guile os process, and thus isn't maintained as its own package anymore. Therefore, I figured it wasn't worth separating them out into their own packages. Paul (upstream) has suggested he'll just include the code as part of the coot distribution and maintain it himself, but this was a few months ago - I'll ask him again about this and post an update soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 02:48:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 21:48:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521730] Review Request: fossil - A distributed SCM with bug tracking and wiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911100248.nAA2mjVN009104@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521730 Cristian Ciupitu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cristian.ciupitu at yahoo.com --- Comment #7 from Cristian Ciupitu 2009-11-09 21:48:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Fossil uses copies of sqlite3.h and sqlite3.c that are bundled with the > tarball. I fear it's necessary to remove them and use the development files > from package sqlite-devel instead > (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/No_Bundled_Libraries). > > It's not too complicated to modify the sources. However, the code also > references the internal sqlite function sqlite3StrICmp that is not available > through libsqlite3. So it must probably be patched in somewhere. Indeed it's not too complicated to modify the sources. I have attached a patch for the latest version of fossil (from the development repository), but it works just as well with fossil-src-20091103194336.tar.gz (it's listed on the "Download" page). The only catch is that it doesn't work with the current sqlite-devel, but it does work sqlite-devel-3.6.17-1.fc11.x86_64 which is available in the updates-testing repository. I assume that after some time it will be available in the updates repository. Also, all the fossil automated tests pass with 0 errors. @Silas Sewell If you still want to package fossil, don't forget to run "tclsh src/makemake.tcl > src/main.mk" after applying the patch. Also, delete the sqlite3 bundled files to be sure you're not compiling them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 02:50:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 21:50:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521730] Review Request: fossil - A distributed SCM with bug tracking and wiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911100250.nAA2olAc009746@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521730 --- Comment #8 from Cristian Ciupitu 2009-11-09 21:50:46 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=368322) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=368322) Makes fossil to use the sqlite3 library provided by the system Fossil comes with its own sqlite3 library, but we want to use the one provided by the system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 03:21:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 22:21:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516522] Review Request: globus-nexus - Globus Toolkit - Nexus Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911100321.nAA3LTpc013461@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516522 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-09 22:21:27 EDT --- globus-nexus-6.7-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update globus-nexus'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0819 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 03:21:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 22:21:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528892] Review Request: mingw32-freeglut - Fedora MinGW alternative to the OpenGL Utility Toolkit (GLUT) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911100321.nAA3LnFZ017743@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528892 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-09 22:21:47 EDT --- mingw32-freeglut-2.6.0-0.1.rc1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 03:23:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 22:23:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526595] Review Request: zikula-module-filterutil - Pagesetter like filter rules for Zikula In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911100323.nAA3NCgt018226@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526595 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-09 22:23:11 EDT --- zikula-module-pagemaster-0.3.1-3.el5, zikula-module-filterutil-0-0.2.20090915svn15.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 03:23:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 22:23:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 519483] Review Request: zikula-module-pagemaster - Creates pages with dynamic content like news, articles, etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911100323.nAA3NIDN018293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519483 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-09 22:23:16 EDT --- zikula-module-pagemaster-0.3.1-3.el5, zikula-module-filterutil-0-0.2.20090915svn15.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 03:23:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 22:23:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 519483] Review Request: zikula-module-pagemaster - Creates pages with dynamic content like news, articles, etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911100323.nAA3NUjC018384@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519483 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.3.1-3.el5 Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 03:21:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 22:21:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528892] Review Request: mingw32-freeglut - Fedora MinGW alternative to the OpenGL Utility Toolkit (GLUT) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911100321.nAA3Lsdv017805@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528892 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.6.0-0.1.rc1.el5 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 03:24:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 22:24:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516527] Review Request: globus-gass-server-ez - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Server_ez In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911100324.nAA3O0Ei018539@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516527 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-09 22:23:59 EDT --- globus-gass-server-ez-2.5-1.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update globus-gass-server-ez'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-4/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0834 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 03:24:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 22:24:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528847] Review Request: Netpipe - A protocol independent network performance tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911100324.nAA3OkF8014874@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528847 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |3.7.1-2.el5 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 03:23:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 22:23:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526595] Review Request: zikula-module-filterutil - Pagesetter like filter rules for Zikula In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911100323.nAA3NOXi014399@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526595 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.3.1-3.el5 Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 03:23:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 22:23:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516522] Review Request: globus-nexus - Globus Toolkit - Nexus Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911100323.nAA3N4WY014262@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516522 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-09 22:23:03 EDT --- globus-nexus-6.7-1.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update globus-nexus'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-4/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0829 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 03:23:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 22:23:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516527] Review Request: globus-gass-server-ez - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Server_ez In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911100323.nAA3Nf4c014507@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516527 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-09 22:23:39 EDT --- globus-gass-server-ez-2.5-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update globus-gass-server-ez'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0832 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 03:24:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 22:24:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528847] Review Request: Netpipe - A protocol independent network performance tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911100324.nAA3OeqZ018990@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528847 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-09 22:24:39 EDT --- NetPIPE-3.7.1-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 03:40:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 22:40:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529283] Review Request: fontbox - Java library for working with PDF fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911100340.nAA3ePGZ024152@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529283 Orion Poplawski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Orion Poplawski 2009-11-09 22:40:24 EDT --- Thanks for the review. Changes have been made to the spec. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fontbox Short Description: Java library for working with PDF fonts Owners: orion Branches: F-12 F-11 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 04:37:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 23:37:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533993] Review Request: wordpress-plugin-bad-behavior - Spam prevention plugin for WordPress In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911100437.nAA4bNVO006404@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533993 --- Comment #2 from Ryan Rix 2009-11-09 23:37:22 EDT --- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. +YES MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . +YES MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. +YES MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . +YES MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . +YES MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. +YES NOTE: GPLv2+ in the source; is the comment in specfile necessary? MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. +YES MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. +YES MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. +YES MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. +YES MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. +YES MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. +N/A Built noarch. MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. +YES MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. +N/A No languages included, noted in spec. NOTE:You say in -mu's description " Additional language files are available in the wordpress-mu-plugin-%{plugin_name} package." But later on you write "Note, no %find_lang since there are no language files" Please pick one or the other :) MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. +N/A MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. +N/A MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. +N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. +YES MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. +YES MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. +YES MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). +YES MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. +YES MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. +YES MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). +N/A no large docs MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. +YES MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. +N/A no headers MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. +N/A no static libraries MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). +N/A no pc files MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. +N/A no shared libraries MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} +N/A no devel package MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. +YES MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. +N/A no GUI MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. +YES MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). +YES MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. +YES SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. +N/A SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. -NO SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. +YES builds fine, task 1797837 SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. +N/A Noarch. SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. +N/A I don't have a wordpress or wordpress-mu install. SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. +N/A SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. +N/A SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. +N/A no pc files SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. +N/A ======================== Everything looks good; please clear up the Languages ambiguity, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 04:39:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 23:39:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521730] Review Request: fossil - A distributed SCM with bug tracking and wiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911100439.nAA4d1TL003419@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521730 --- Comment #9 from Silas Sewell 2009-11-09 23:39:00 EDT --- Thanks for submitting the patching. I guess I don't have enough interest to properly maintain this package (gits good enough for me), but hopefully someone who is interested can combine the patch+spec and have a pretty decent start. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 06:24:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:24:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533723] Review Request: perl-Guard - Safe cleanup blocks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911100624.nAA6OSdG031943@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533723 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-11-10 01:24:26 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide x86_64). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1797857 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url a2e6ca5a8336add12c5a75cbd7408e14f62d2a77 Guard-1.021.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=4, Tests=33, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.02 sys + 0.03 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.09 CPU) + Package perl-Guard-1.021-1.fc12.x86_64 Provides: Guard.so()(64bit) perl(Guard) = 1.021 Requires: libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 06:43:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:43:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534021] New: Review Request: apache-ivy - Java-based dependency manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: apache-ivy - Java-based dependency manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534021 Summary: Review Request: apache-ivy - Java-based dependency manager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/apache-ivy.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/apache-ivy-2.1.0-1.fc12.src.rpm scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1797332 Description: Apache Ivy is a tool for managing (recording, tracking, resolving and reporting) project dependencies. It is designed as process agnostic and is not tied to any methodology or structure. while available as a standalone tool, Apache Ivy works particularly well with Apache Ant providing a number of powerful Ant tasks ranging from dependency resolution to dependency reporting and publication. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 07:03:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:03:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533723] Review Request: perl-Guard - Safe cleanup blocks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911100703.nAA735OZ007197@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533723 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-11-10 02:03:04 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Guard Short Description: Safe cleanup blocks Owners: kwizart Branches: F-12 F-11 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 08:18:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 03:18:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529517] Review Request: kcm_touchpad - Synaptics driver based touchpads kcontrol module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911100818.nAA8IqK9031470@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529517 --- Comment #16 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-11-10 03:18:50 EDT --- If the first one is a direct download, then I think it's OK to let it there. The second one is better from name point of view - it's in %{name}-%{version} scheme. But it's redirect :( And it extracts to that not very nice directory... It would be nice to ask upstream for real and proper release going with usual release standards. Other issues are solved, I think I can approve it. Kevin what do you think about letting current sources URL? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 08:42:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 03:42:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516280] Review Request: perl-Config-Model-CursesUI - Curses interface to edit config data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911100842.nAA8gXjk007202@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516280 David Hannequin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 08:41:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 03:41:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516280] Review Request: perl-Config-Model-CursesUI - Curses interface to edit config data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911100841.nAA8fq6o007003@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516280 --- Comment #11 from David Hannequin 2009-11-10 03:41:51 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Config-Model-CursesUI Short Description: This class provides a Curses::UI interface to configuration data managed by Config::Model Owners: hvad Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 08:47:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 03:47:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528476] Review Request: php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein - eZ Components PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911100847.nAA8lvx1009236@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528476 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-11-10 03:47:56 EDT --- OK: rpmlint must be run on every package rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein-1.3-1.fc11.src.rpm ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein-1.3-1.fc11.noarch.rpm 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK: The spec file name must match the base package FIX: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines The package MUST require php-pear(PEAR) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:PHP#PEAR_Packages_from_a_non_standard_channel.2Frepository OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license OK: License text included OK: The spec file must be written in American English OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source sha1sum PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein-1.3.tgz rpmbuild/SOURCES/PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein-1.3.tgz 0c822da6b3921a21f6fa2456ee0dd20a85a0624d PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein-1.3.tgz 0c822da6b3921a21f6fa2456ee0dd20a85a0624d rpmbuild/SOURCES/PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein-1.3.tgz OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture N\A: ExcludeArch OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires N\A: The spec file MUST handle locales properly N\A: Must call ldconfig in %post and %postun N\A: If the package is designed to be relocatable OK: A package must own all directories that it creates OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once OK: Permissions on files must be set properly OK: Each package must have a %clean section OK: Each package must consistently use macros OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content N\A: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application N\A: Header files must be in a -devel package N\A: Static libraries must be in a -static package N\A: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' N\A: Library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package N\A: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package N\A: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives N\A: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8 Please fix the requires before requesting CVS, and please note that you need to increment the package version each time you make a change, this was not done for the previous changes. ------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein) is APPROVED by topdog ------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 08:52:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 03:52:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530288] Review Request: stonevpn - easy OpenVPN certificate and configuration management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911100852.nAA8qtLJ007176@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530288 --- Comment #9 from Leon Keijser 2009-11-10 03:52:52 EDT --- Okay, thanks. I will do so as soon as time allows. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 08:58:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 03:58:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528473] Review Request: php-ezc-DatabaseSchema - eZ Components DatabaseSchema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911100858.nAA8wZ1a012745@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528473 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-11-10 03:58:34 EDT --- OK: rpmlint must be run on every package rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/php-ezc-DatabaseSchema-1.4.2-1.fc11.src.rpm rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/php-ezc-DatabaseSchema-1.4.2-1.fc11.noarch.rpm rpmbuild/SPECS/php-ezc-DatabaseSchema.spec 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK: The spec file name must match the base package FIX: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines You need requires php-pear(PEAR) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:PHP#PEAR_Packages_from_a_non_standard_channel.2Frepository OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license OK: License text included OK: The spec file must be written in American English OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source sha1sum DatabaseSchema-1.4.2.tgz rpmbuild/SOURCES/DatabaseSchema-1.4.2.tgz 038e22b157acdca81f45990fa9957d9e3b6655a7 DatabaseSchema-1.4.2.tgz 038e22b157acdca81f45990fa9957d9e3b6655a7 rpmbuild/SOURCES/DatabaseSchema-1.4.2.tgz OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture N\A: ExcludeArch OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires N\A: The spec file MUST handle locales properly N\A: Must call ldconfig in %post and %postun N\A: If the package is designed to be relocatable OK: A package must own all directories that it creates OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once OK: Permissions on files must be set properly OK: Each package must have a %clean section OK: Each package must consistently use macros OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content N\A: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage N\A: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application N\A: Header files must be in a -devel package N\A: Static libraries must be in a -static package N\A: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' N\A: Library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package N\A: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package N\A: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives N\A: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8 Please fix the requires before requesting CVS, and remember to increment the package version ------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (php-ezc-DatabaseSchema) is APPROVED by topdog ------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 09:01:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:01:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 494695] Review Request: qutim - Multiplatform Instant Messenger on Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911100901.nAA91s6L014263@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494695 --- Comment #13 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-11-10 04:01:51 EDT --- Peter, you was right - in release many changes... (In reply to comment #12) > Builds fine now. > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1791960 > > REVIEW: > > + rpmlint is not silent: > > [petro at Workplace ~]$ rpmlint Desktop/qutim-* > qutim-debuginfo.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/src/debug/qutim/plugins/icq/clientidentify.h > qutim-debuginfo.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/src/debug/qutim/src/3rdparty/qtwin/qtwin.cpp > qutim-debuginfo.i586: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding > /usr/src/debug/qutim/src/3rdparty/qtwin/qtwin.cpp > qutim-debuginfo.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/src/debug/qutim/plugins/icq/buddycaps.h > qutim-debuginfo.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/src/debug/qutim/src/3rdparty/qtwin/qtwin.h > qutim-debuginfo.i586: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding > /usr/src/debug/qutim/src/3rdparty/qtwin/qtwin.h > qutim-debuginfo.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/src/debug/qutim/plugins/icq/clientidentify.cpp > qutim-devel.i586: W: no-documentation > qutim-icq.i586: W: no-documentation > qutim-irc.i586: W: no-documentation > qutim-jabber.i586: W: no-documentation > qutim-mrim.i586: W: no-documentation > 7 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 10 warnings. spurious-executable-perm fixed in %prep. Add BR dos2unix and fix lineendings qtwin to avoid rpmlint complain wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding. But is it really needed for files inytended for Windows (just delete break build, but it nothing doing on Linux)? > and some unneeded calls for ldconfig. Why calls to ldconfig is unneeded? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Shared_Libraries says: Whenever possible (and feasible), Fedora Packages containing libraries should build them as shared libraries. In addition, every binary RPM package which contains shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. > Also, and most > important, I can;t find a package, who provides /usr/share/icons/mini. Hm, yes, I too. May be I simple should delete this file? > So, you should add the following explicit requires: > > hicolor-icon-theme (for /usr/share/icons/hicolor/64x64/apps ) Added. > cmake (for /usr/share/cmake/Modules ) Added to -devel subpackage. > + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. There I find some issues: Several files like (3rdparty/qtsolutions/*, plugins/plugman/libs/QZipReader) is 3dparty and have licensing similar to QT: Commercial/LGPL with exceptions in LGPL_EXCEPTION.txt/GPLv3. This is free software, but it is not under GPLv2+ license as full package. And I in frustration - can we ship it? If you can't answer on this question, please set "legal" flag for Spot. > +/- The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as > provided in the spec URL. Since it's a pre-release, and new version was > recently released, I'll wait until you update srpm to ver. 0.2. I update it. Also several new plugins appeared in release. > - A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's > %files listings. Unfortunately, you're listing %{_bindir}/%{name} twice in main > package's %files section. Yes, it with comment from old times, when symlink was also been installed. Fixed. http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/qutim/qutim-0.2.0-1.17.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 09:30:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:30:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528473] Review Request: php-ezc-DatabaseSchema - eZ Components DatabaseSchema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911100930.nAA9U19F022804@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528473 --- Comment #4 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-11-10 04:29:59 EDT --- You need requires php-pear(PEAR) => php-pear is already requiered by php-pear(%{channel}/Base) >= 1.6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 09:30:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:30:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528476] Review Request: php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein - eZ Components PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911100930.nAA9UNpU023236@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528476 --- Comment #4 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-11-10 04:30:21 EDT --- You need requires php-pear(PEAR) => php-pear is already requiered by php-pear(%{channel}/Base) >= 1.6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 09:30:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:30:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 509856] Review Request: qrencode - The libqrencode library and application encodes QR Code symbols (2d barcodes) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911100930.nAA9UG8U023193@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509856 Bowe Strickland changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(bowe at redhat.com) | --- Comment #16 from Bowe Strickland 2009-11-10 04:30:11 EDT --- yep... at this point, i'm finding myself motivated to maintain this package, but can't find the motivation to carve out some time to learn to review others. if that's not a fit with the fedora mentality, i'd understand, and may try again later when life has less competing requirements. --b -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 09:39:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:39:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528476] Review Request: php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein - eZ Components PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911100939.nAA9dvmX026260@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528476 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-11-10 04:39:55 EDT --- That is a build requires, NOT a requires, that only gets checked during building not when then user is installing the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 09:50:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:50:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529517] Review Request: kcm_touchpad - Synaptics driver based touchpads kcontrol module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911100950.nAA9oitQ025982@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529517 --- Comment #17 from Kevin Kofler 2009-11-10 04:50:43 EDT --- http://download.github.com/mishaaq-kcm_touchpad-000be4c.tar.gz is the correct Source URL to use. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 09:59:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:59:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528476] Review Request: php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein - eZ Components PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911100959.nAA9xDel032227@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528476 --- Comment #6 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-11-10 04:59:11 EDT --- php-channel-ezc.spec (http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/php-channel-ezc/devel/php-channel-ezc.spec?view=markup) have Requieres & BuildRequieres : > BuildRequires: php-pear(PEAR) > Requires: php-pear(PEAR) php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein.spec (http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/ez_components/php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein.spec) have BR & inherits Requieres by php-pear-ezc-DatabaseSchema php-channel-ezc : > BuildRequires: php-pear >= 1:1.4.9-1.2 > Requires: php-pear(%{channel}/DatabaseSchema) >= 1.2 --> > Requires: php-pear(%{channel}/Base) >= 1.6.1 --> > Requires: php-pear(PEAR) It's not good ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 10:09:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 05:09:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528476] Review Request: php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein - eZ Components PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101009.nAAA94Zd031392@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528476 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-11-10 05:09:03 EDT --- I would feel better if you explicitly add that there, although the dependencies can be satisfied by the chain of packages required, this information in the spec could be used for other purposes (like finding packages which require pear when doing a mass rebuild for example). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 10:16:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 05:16:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533877] Review Request: iwl6000-firmware - Firmware for Intel(R) Wireless WiFi Link 6000 Series AGN Adapter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101016.nAAAGFUL004939@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533877 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-11-10 05:16:13 EDT --- One issue still remains - since the package places something in /lib/firmware, when it should contain "Requires: udev". This should be aded to others firmware packages (some f them you;re maintaining). REVIEW: + rpmlint is silent [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/iwl6000-firmware-9.176.4.1-1.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. - The package meets the Packaging Guidelines, except the issue, noted above. + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. + The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included in %doc. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package, match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ sha256sum iwlwifi-6000-ucode-9.176.4.1.tgz* ac1923870c5d041d238d1a919b8dbb9cea46eaa28e7d06ef7bb5b0dbef316fbb iwlwifi-6000-ucode-9.176.4.1.tgz ac1923870c5d041d238d1a919b8dbb9cea46eaa28e7d06ef7bb5b0dbef316fbb iwlwifi-6000-ucode-9.176.4.1.tgz.1 [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. 0 No need to handle locales. 0 No shared library files. + The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries. + The package is not designed to be relocatable. + The package owns all directories that it creates. + The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + The package consistently uses macros. + The package contains code, or permissible content. 0 No extremely large documentation files. + Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. 0 No header files. 0 No static libraries. 0 No pkgconfig(.pc) files. 0 The package doesn't contain library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1). 0 No devel sub-package. + The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives. 0 Not a GUI application. + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. Please, fix the only issue, and I'll continue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 10:30:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 05:30:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532203] Review Request: jgraph - Java-based Diagram Component and Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101030.nAAAUQHl009177@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532203 --- Comment #9 from D Haley 2009-11-10 05:30:21 EDT --- Key: [+] - OK [N] - Not applicable [!] - Attention required [+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. == $ cat tmp Wrote: /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/jgraph-5.13.0.0-1.fc10.i386.rpm Wrote: /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/jgraph-javadoc-5.13.0.0-1.fc10.i386.rpm Wrote: /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/jgraph-debuginfo-5.13.0.0-1.fc10.i386.rpm $ rpmlint `cat tmp | awk '{print $2}'` 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint jgraph.spec jgraph.spec:139: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package) %attr(-,root,root) %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name} 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ sudo rpm -i ../RPMS/i386/jgraph-5.13.0.0-1.fc10.i386.rpm $ sudo rpm -i ../RPMS/i386/jgraph-javadoc-5.13.0.0-1.fc10.i386.rpm $ rpmlint jgraph jgraph-javadoc 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. == rpmlint is wrong here, as discussed earlier. So OK [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. Upstream: $ md5sum jgraph-5.13.0.0-bsd-src.jar 16b0e3af6c5ac3e776d9c95e9a1f54fe jgraph-5.13.0.0-bsd-src.jar SRPM: 16b0e3af6c5ac3e776d9c95e9a1f54fe jgraph-latest-bsd-src.jar OK [+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [N] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [!] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. Am I being a bit dense, or is there a "Requires: java" missing? [N] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. [N] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [+] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. [N] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [+] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [N] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [N] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [N] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [N] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [N] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [N] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. [N] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [N] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [N] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Koji: F11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1798071 F12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1795473 [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. We have koji builds for F11, F12. [!] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. The examples do not compile. This requires the "l2fprod-common" jar. This is in the repos, so please create a README.fedora describing how to install deps for and run the examples. You may wish to compile the examples directory with ant compile-examples during build time -- obviously you need to then add BuildRequires: l2fprod-common. [N] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. [+] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [N] SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. [N] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. If you fix these issues, then I will approve the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 11:04:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 06:04:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469894] Review Request: cglib - Code generation library for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101104.nAAB4KvA019568@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469894 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk --- Comment #13 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-10 06:04:18 EDT --- I'm not sure why was this closed, did it get stalled due to lack of reviewers? If it is the case, I can review this (and in any case, you can always mail fedora-devel-list or join #fedora-devel channel at freenode to find someone to review your packages, or exchange a review with someone else). Mary, do you still plan getting this in? Please open a new ticket with current package or let me know if you no longer need the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 11:03:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 06:03:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529517] Review Request: kcm_touchpad - Synaptics driver based touchpads kcontrol module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101103.nAAB3IXf015596@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529517 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #18 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-11-10 06:03:16 EDT --- Ok, thanks! APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 11:23:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 06:23:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 501116] Review Request: perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple - Perl Module for Generating HTML Calendars In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101123.nAABNLoP023396@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501116 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-11-10 06:23:19 EDT --- No particular reason, was just forgotten. thanks for the head up, Jason. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 11:45:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 06:45:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533520] Review Request: ogre-pagedgeometry - Ogre addon for realtime rendering of dense forests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101145.nAABjT7p001599@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533520 Guido Grazioli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Guido Grazioli 2009-11-10 06:45:27 EDT --- OK - rpmlint output ogre-pagedgeometry.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. OK - The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - The spec file name must match the base package %{name} OK - The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc (no license file) OK - The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines (license is zlib) OK - Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun OK - The package MUST successfully compile and build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1794203 OK - The spec file must be written in American English. OK - The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK - The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. The package is exported from svn. NA - The spec file MUST handle locales properly (no translations) NA - package not relocatable OK - A package must own all directories that it creates OK - A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings OK - Permissions on files must be set properly OK - Each package must have a %clean section OK - Each package must consistently use macros OK - The package must contain code, or permissable content NA - Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage (no large doc, 4 odt file with devel documentation totalling 50k) OK - If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application OK - Header files must be in a -devel package (devel package present) NA - Static libraries must be in a -static package (no static package) OK - Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (no .pc files) OK - Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives NA - Packages containing GUI applications MUST include a .desktop file OK - No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK - At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} OK - All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8 OK - The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK - %{?dist} tag is used in release -- Some notes: - /usr/%{libdir}/sse/OGRE should be owned by ogre. Until it is fixed in that package, it's safe to own it here. - no doc in main package: GettingStarted.txt contains a brief description of the project, you could move it to main package - the samples (currently unpackaged) do explicitly load ogre-cg in the code. As ogre-cg depends on nvidia cg, and both area only available in rpmfusion-nonfree, samples cant be accepted in main repository without modification. -- Package APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 11:55:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 06:55:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526746] Review Request: yaz - Z39.50/SRW/SRU programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101155.nAABtmv1004358@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526746 Guido Grazioli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Guido Grazioli 2009-11-10 06:55:47 EDT --- Updated package now in stable repositories, closing bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 12:02:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:02:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533744] Review Request: ImageJ - Image Processing and Analysis in Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101202.nAAC2b0D006167@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533744 D Haley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mycae at yahoo.com --- Comment #1 from D Haley 2009-11-10 07:02:36 EDT --- Quick comments: *Group is not really that great. I would recommend Applications/Engineering over Amusements/Graphics, but I am open to debate. Neither fit, but amusements is more for games and "toy" applications. ImageJ is targeted towards scientific applciations *Why do you include a build for x86-64 as Source2? It would be better to provide a repack script if you only need a few files. remember that ij142-linux64 includes its own vm -- which is really unneccesary as it is massive and we already have one. It might possibly even be against fedora guidelines, depending on what gets bundled in the VM (not all of the sun code is free), don't quote me on that though. *Description is a bit short, the one you have included above is better. Or maybe something like below or something else. Just try to distinguish it from say, gimp or inkscape, which are targeted towards artistic, rather than scientific analysis: ImageJ is a public domain Java image processing program. It can display, edit, analyze a wide variety of image data, including image sequences. Imagej can be used for quantitative analysis of engineering and scientific image data. *Patch names are not descriptive. Please include a comment above the patches to say what they do. You may wish to send the script patch upstream. If you do, please make a note in the spec. *Version tag is a bit wrong, as it does not say which exactly upstream version of ImageJ you are using (a, b,c,d, ...) . You may need to follow the guidelines at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Non-Numeric_Version_in_Release -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 12:06:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:06:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101206.nAAC66ji005831@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 --- Comment #42 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-11-10 07:06:00 EDT --- The changes requested have been made and i have bumped to the latest upstream version. http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/dpkg/dpkg.spec http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/dpkg/dpkg-1.15.4.1-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 12:07:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:07:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101207.nAAC7sZL007790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 12:20:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:20:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532203] Review Request: jgraph - Java-based Diagram Component and Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101220.nAACKBSM011833@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532203 --- Comment #10 from D Haley 2009-11-10 07:20:09 EDT --- >If you fix these issues, then I will approve the package. Just to clarify, I am not a sponsor. I will be happy with the review, however. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 12:22:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:22:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534061] Review Request: hostname - Utility to set/show the host name or domain name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101222.nAACMpjE012440@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534061 Jiri Popelka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |534060 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 12:21:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:21:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 513239] Review Request: ansel - Full featured photo management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101221.nAACLoqp012221@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513239 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-11-10 07:21:47 EDT --- The author has responded with. With the exception of builder.js and slideshow.js all of those files would be licensed under the same license as Ansel - GPLv2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 12:21:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:21:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534061] New: Review Request: hostname - Utility to set/show the host name or domain name Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hostname - Utility to set/show the host name or domain name https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534061 Summary: Review Request: hostname - Utility to set/show the host name or domain name Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jpopelka at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://jpopelka.fedorapeople.org/hostname.spec SRPM URL: http://jpopelka.fedorapeople.org/hostname-3.01-1.src.rpm Description: This package provides commands which can be used to display the system's DNS name, and to display or set its hostname or NIS domain name. Up to now netplug has been part of net-tools package. See. Bug #534060 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 12:59:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:59:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532368] Review Request: ns-bola-fonts A Sans Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101259.nAACxKJl023162@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532368 TK009 changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from TK009 2009-11-10 07:59:18 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ns-bola-fonts Short Description: Chunky geometric fonts Owners: TK009 Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 13:00:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:00:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530880] Review Request: ns-tiza-fonts - A Slab-Serif Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101300.nAAD0eTS023865@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530880 TK009 changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from TK009 2009-11-10 08:00:38 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ns-tisa-chalk-fonts Short Description: Chalky slab-serif fonts Owners: TK009 Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 13:58:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:58:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529517] Review Request: kcm_touchpad - Synaptics driver based touchpads kcontrol module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101358.nAADwD7T007896@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529517 --- Comment #19 from Ryan Rix 2009-11-10 08:58:12 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kcm_touchpad Short Description: Synaptics driver based touchpads kcontrol module Owners: rrix Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 13:59:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:59:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529517] Review Request: kcm_touchpad - Synaptics driver based touchpads kcontrol module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101359.nAADxqDl008667@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529517 Ryan Rix changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 14:04:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:04:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 494292] Review Request: spacewalk-proxy-html - The HTML component for Spacewalk Proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101404.nAAE4L1i007275@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494292 Leon Keijser changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |keijser at stone-it.com --- Comment #1 from Leon Keijser 2009-11-10 09:04:20 EDT --- This is a comment (pre-review) only, following http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group#Reviewing_Packages instructions. * MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. - rpmlint is not completely silent: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-11-x86_64/result/spacewalk-proxy-html-0.4.2-1.fc11.noarch.rpm spacewalk-proxy-html.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided rhns-proxy-html spacewalk-proxy-html.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/html/_rhn_proxy/index.html 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. I'm quite sure the second warning can be safely ignored though. * MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . - OK * MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. - OK * MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . - MINOR ISSUE: typo in %description: 'displays' instead of 'display' ;) * MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . - OK * MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. - OK * MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] - N/A * MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - OK * MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. - OK * MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. - OK * MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. - N/A (noarch) * MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. - N/A (noarch) * MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. - OK * MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. - N/A * MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. - N/A * MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.[11] - OK * MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. - N/A * MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [13] - OK * MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. - OK * MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [15] - NOTICE: spacewalk-proxy-html changes the group ownership of /var/www/html: %attr(755,root,apache) %dir %{htmldir} Why? The default is root.root * MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - OK * MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. - OK * MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. - OK * MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). - N/A * MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - OK * MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. - N/A * MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. - N/A * MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). - N/A * MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. - N/A * MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} - N/A * MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. - N/A * MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. - N/A * MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. - NOTICE: spacewalk-proxy-html creates /var/www/html while also be dependent on httpd. Isn't this line unnecessary: install -m 755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{htmldir} * MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - OK * MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. - OK SHOULD Items: Items marked as SHOULD are things that the package (or reviewer) SHOULD do, but is not required to do. * SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. - N/A * SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. - N/A * SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. - OK * SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. - N/A (noarch) * SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. - OK * SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. - N/A * SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. - NOTICE: doesn't spacewalk-proxy-html require package 'spacewalk-proxy' or package 'spacewalk' ? * SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. - N/A * SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. - OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 14:07:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:07:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530288] Review Request: stonevpn - easy OpenVPN certificate and configuration management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101407.nAAE78fp008566@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530288 --- Comment #10 from Leon Keijser 2009-11-10 09:07:06 EDT --- Created a pre-review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494292 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 14:46:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:46:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532203] Review Request: jgraph - Java-based Diagram Component and Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101446.nAAEkaXN021775@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532203 --- Comment #11 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-10 09:46:34 EDT --- Thanks for your time and review. (In reply to comment #9) > [!] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for > any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; > inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. > Am I being a bit dense, or is there a "Requires: java" missing? You're right. In fact, I the package should depend on jpackage-utils since it owns /usr/share/java this package used. Added a dependency on jpackage-utils, it also depends on java so it's not necessary to list it twice. > [!] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A > package should not segfault instead of running, for example. > The examples do not compile. This requires the "l2fprod-common" jar. This is > in the repos, so please create a README.fedora describing how to install deps > for and run the examples. You may wish to compile the examples directory with > ant compile-examples during build time -- obviously you need to then add > BuildRequires: l2fprod-common. I'm quite reluctant to do this since it's extra work for virtually no benefit (and just a SHOULD, not MUST). It's not a common practice either. If you insist on verifying functionality you insist on doing so I suggest you try to build something that depends on it (say, microba, see bug #532205). It would be rather uncommon for a Java library not to function once it compiles though. (In reply to comment #10) > >If you fix these issues, then I will approve the package. > Just to clarify, I am not a sponsor. I will be happy with the review, however. I am already sponsored (in fact, I'm a sponsor), so I don't need a sponsor to review packages. Anyone who's in the packager group (e.g. you) can review my packages (this ticket would block FE_NEEDSPONSOR if I needed a sponsor). New package: SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/jgraph.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/jgraph-5.13.0.0-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 14:49:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:49:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516343] Review Request: metadata-extractor - JPEG metadata extraction framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101449.nAAEn9hO025183@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516343 Guido Grazioli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |guido.grazioli at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 14:52:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:52:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533993] Review Request: wordpress-plugin-bad-behavior - Spam prevention plugin for WordPress In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101452.nAAEqjQ5026396@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533993 Nick Bebout changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Nick Bebout 2009-11-10 09:52:44 EDT --- Setting fedora-review to ? for Ryan. Will upload new SPEC and SRPM tonight. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 15:10:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:10:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534094] New: Review Request: delta - testcase minimization tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: delta - testcase minimization tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534094 Summary: Review Request: delta - testcase minimization tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ajax at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://ajax.fedorapeople.org/delta/delta.spec SRPM URL: http://ajax.fedorapeople.org/delta/delta-2008.08.03-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: see http://delta.tigris.org/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 15:10:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:10:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522169] Review Request: netplug - Daemon that responds to network cables being plugged in and out In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101510.nAAFABhE031593@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522169 Jiri Popelka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|522888 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 15:14:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:14:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534095] New: Review Request: oxygen-molecule-gnome-theme - Oxygen Molecule GTK Theme Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: oxygen-molecule-gnome-theme - Oxygen Molecule GTK Theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534095 Summary: Review Request: oxygen-molecule-gnome-theme - Oxygen Molecule GTK Theme Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mail at marcus-moeller.ch QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.marcus-moeller.de/share/build/oxygen-molecule-gnome-theme/2.1-1/oxygen-molecule-gnome-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://www.marcus-moeller.de/share/build/oxygen-molecule-gnome-theme/2.1-1/oxygen-molecule-gnome-theme-2.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: http://www.marcus-moeller.de/share/build/oxygen-molecule-gnome-theme/2.1-1/oxygen-molecule-gnome-theme-2.1-1.fc11.src.rpm rpmlint SPECS/oxygen-molecule-gnome-theme.spec SRPMS/oxygen-molecule-gnome-theme-2.1-1.fc11.src.rpm RPMS/noarch/oxygen-molecule-gnome-theme-2.1-1.fc11.noarch.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Builds fine in mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 15:12:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:12:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533744] Review Request: ImageJ - Image Processing and Analysis in Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101512.nAAFC4wt029752@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533744 --- Comment #2 from Fabien Georget 2009-11-10 10:12:03 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.bde.espci.fr/~george27/ImageJ.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bde.espci.fr/~george27/ImageJ-1.43-0.2.j.fc12.src.rpm Thanks for these comments 1) I agree, I wasn't very happy with "Amusement/Graphics". (This is not a funny tool ^^) But I didn't know the best group. Your choice seems correct. 2) This source is only for the launch script and some macros not included in the source package but quite useful. I don't use anything else (not the jre nor the .jar file) in the final package. But yes, I don't think about this, maybe include them in the src.rpm is against fedora guidelines I will try to get them from an other way. 3) Yes I forgot to change the description for the one above. But your description looks better (more concise) 4) I added some comments 5) Changed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 15:15:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:15:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516343] Review Request: metadata-extractor - JPEG metadata extraction framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101515.nAAFFUGD030697@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516343 --- Comment #24 from Guido Grazioli 2009-11-10 10:15:19 EDT --- OK - rpmlint output 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK - The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - The spec file name must match the base package %{name} OK - The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc (no license file) OK - The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines (license is Public Domain) NA - Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun OK - The package MUST successfully compile and build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1798401 OK - The spec file MUST be written in American English. OK - The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK - The sources used to build the package MUST match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. b2f8d9ade3cc8008ed41ad62c1e80bc2 metadata-extractor-2.3.1-src.jar NA - The spec file MUST handle locales properly (no translations) NA - package not relocatable OK - A package MUST own all directories that it creates OK - A Fedora package MUST NOT list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings OK - Permissions on files MUST be set properly OK - Each package MUST have a %clean section OK - Each package MUST consistently use macros OK - The package MUST contain code, or permissable content OK - Large documentation files MUST go in a -doc subpackage (javadocs in -javadoc subpackage) OK - IF a package includes something as %doc, it MUST not affect the runtime of the application NA - Header files MUST be in a -devel package (java package) NA - Static libraries MUST be in a -static package (no static package) NA - Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files MUST 'Requires: pkgconfig' OK - Packages MUST NOT contain any .la libtool archives NA - Packages containing GUI applications MUST include a .desktop file OK - No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK - At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} OK - All filenames in rpm packages MUST be valid UTF-8 OK - The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK - %{?dist} tag is used in release OK - Jar file naming (versioned jar file and unversioned symlink) OK - BuildRequires and Requires (Java and Ant Rs and BRs used consistently with guidelines) OK - Pre-built JAR files / Other bundled software (not present) NEEDSWORK - Java Directory structure: all jars in %{_javadir} and all javadocs in %{_javadocdir} OK - Javadoc scriptlets not present NOTES: For -javadoc subpackage, you dont want a versioned dir and an unversioned link pointing to that. (See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#ant_2 ). With that fixed, i will approve the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 15:15:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:15:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534095] Review Request: oxygen-molecule-gnome-theme - Oxygen Molecule GTK Theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101515.nAAFF6U3000678@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534095 Marcus Moeller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 15:23:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:23:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516343] Review Request: metadata-extractor - JPEG metadata extraction framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101523.nAAFNlgL000380@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516343 --- Comment #25 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-11-10 10:23:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > NOTES: > For -javadoc subpackage, you dont want a versioned dir and an unversioned link > pointing to that. (See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#ant_2 ). > > With that fixed, i will approve the package. Are you sure about this? I ask because during the review of gettext-commons (#515136) the reviewer required me to do so. I'm a newbie at Java packaging and I'm really confused now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 15:30:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:30:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534094] Review Request: delta - testcase minimization tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101530.nAAFUouE005479@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534094 Matthew Garrett changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mjg at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mjg at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 15:44:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:44:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516343] Review Request: metadata-extractor - JPEG metadata extraction framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101544.nAAFiMha006871@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516343 Guido Grazioli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #26 from Guido Grazioli 2009-11-10 10:44:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > (In reply to comment #24) > > NOTES: > > For -javadoc subpackage, you dont want a versioned dir and an unversioned link > > pointing to that. (See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#ant_2 ). > > > > With that fixed, i will approve the package. > > Are you sure about this? I ask because during the review of gettext-commons > (#515136) the reviewer required me to do so. I'm a newbie at Java packaging and > I'm really confused now. I could not find any reference about that convention in the guidelines, not even in the old jpackage guidelines which only ask (it's "shall", not "must") to symlink unversioned jars to versioned ones. Maybe there were talks about it in the -packaging list, however I can confirm that most java packages installed in my system adhere to that convention; the ant and maven specfile templates found in the wiki should be updated though. That said, package is APPROVED, as it is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 15:56:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:56:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533993] Review Request: wordpress-plugin-bad-behavior - Spam prevention plugin for WordPress In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101556.nAAFuIhe014270@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533993 Ryan Rix changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 15:59:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:59:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516343] Review Request: metadata-extractor - JPEG metadata extraction framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101559.nAAFxr3I012627@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516343 Andrea Musuruane changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #27 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-11-10 10:59:51 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: metadata-extractor Short Description: JPEG metadata extraction framework Owners: musuruan Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 16:23:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:23:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 509856] Review Request: qrencode - The libqrencode library and application encodes QR Code symbols (2d barcodes) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101623.nAAGNj3I020770@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509856 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW AssignedTo|mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-10 11:23:43 EDT --- Well, as written above I request all submitter who needs sponsorship to either submit another review request or do at least one pre-review if _I_ am going to sponsor him/her. So without it I am not going to sponsor you, however some other sponsor (sponsors are not only me) may want to sponsor you. So for now I will revoke the role of reviewing this ticket so that you can find other sponsor and get sponsored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 16:46:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:46:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533877] Review Request: iwl6000-firmware - Firmware for Intel(R) Wireless WiFi Link 6000 Series AGN Adapter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101646.nAAGkdx3029981@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533877 John W. Linville changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(lemenkov at gmail.co | |m) --- Comment #2 from John W. Linville 2009-11-10 11:46:38 EDT --- Spec URL: http://linville.fedorapeople.org/iwl6000-firmware.spec SRPM URL: http://linville.fedorapeople.org/iwl6000-firmware-9.176.4.1-2.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 16:52:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:52:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532057] Review Request: eclipse-jgit - Eclipse JGit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101652.nAAGqo7g032620@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532057 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-11-10 11:52:48 EDT --- Built in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 16:52:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:52:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533877] Review Request: iwl6000-firmware - Firmware for Intel(R) Wireless WiFi Link 6000 Series AGN Adapter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101652.nAAGqELj032367@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533877 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review?, |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(lemenkov at gmail.co | |m) | --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-11-10 11:52:13 EDT --- Ok, now the package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 16:59:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:59:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534127] [RENAME] Review Request: kbluetooth - The KDE Bluetooth Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101659.nAAGx6HB032648@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534127 --- Comment #1 from Lorenzo Villani 2009-11-10 11:59:05 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=368440) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=368440) Changes to the .spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 16:56:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:56:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534127] New: [RENAME] Review Request: kbluetooth - The KDE Bluetooth Framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [RENAME] Review Request: kbluetooth - The KDE Bluetooth Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534127 Summary: [RENAME] Review Request: kbluetooth - The KDE Bluetooth Framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lvillani at binaryhelix.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~arbiter/kbluetooth.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~arbiter/kbluetooth-0.3-5.fc12.src.rpm Description: The KDE Bluetooth Framework is a set of tools built on top of Linux' Bluetooth (Bluez) stack. The goal is to provide easy access to the most common Bluetooth profiles and to make data exchange with Bluetooth enabled devices as straightforward as possible. ** NOTE: ** This is a review request to rename from kdebluetooth to kbluetooth. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 17:15:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:15:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533520] Review Request: ogre-pagedgeometry - Ogre addon for realtime rendering of dense forests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101715.nAAHFTqp008343@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533520 Bruno Wolff III changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Bruno Wolff III 2009-11-10 12:15:28 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ogre-pagedgeometry Short Description: Ogre addon for realtime rendering of dense forests Owners: bruno Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 17:19:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:19:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469894] Review Request: cglib - Code generation library for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101719.nAAHJu3E006960@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469894 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |534135 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 17:19:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:19:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534135] New: Review Request: xstream - Java XML serialization library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xstream - Java XML serialization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534135 Summary: Review Request: xstream - Java XML serialization library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 469894 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/xstream.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/xstream-1.2.2-2.src.rpm Description: XStream is a simple library to serialize objects to XML and back again. A high level facade is supplied that simplifies common use cases. Custom objects can be serialized without need for specifying mappings. Speed and low memory footprint are a crucial part of the design, making it suitable for large object graphs or systems with high message throughput. No information is duplicated that can be obtained via reflection. This results in XML that is easier to read for humans and more compact than native Java serialization. XStream serializes internal fields, including private and final. Supports non-public and inner classes. Classes are not required to have default constructor. Duplicate references encountered in the object-model will be maintained. Supports circular references. By implementing an interface, XStream can serialize directly to/from any tree structure (not just XML). Strategies can be registered allowing customization of how particular types are represented as XML. When an exception occurs due to malformed XML, detailed diagnostics are provided to help isolate and fix the problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 17:22:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:22:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534135] Review Request: xstream - Java XML serialization library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101722.nAAHMrV6008046@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534135 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-10 12:22:52 EDT --- RPMLint: xstream.src:198: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package) %dir %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name} xstream.src:199: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package) %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name}/%{name}-*%{version}.jar.* False alarms, rpmlint does not grok %if-s. xstream.i686: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/xstream-1.2.2/LICENSE.txt Some packagers prefer not to touch license files and I am one of them. Note to reviewer: I made this depend on bug #469894 which is a dead review. I hope it come back to life, if not I'll open a new one. However, to review this a package you can get there (cglib) is needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 17:27:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:27:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533744] Review Request: ImageJ - Image Processing and Analysis in Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101727.nAAHRStE009391@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533744 --- Comment #3 from Fabien Georget 2009-11-10 12:27:27 EDT --- new package about comment #2 : Spec URL: http://www.bde.espci.fr/~george27/ImageJ.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bde.espci.fr/~george27/ImageJ-1.43-0.3.j.fc12.src.rpm I searched in the website and found : Source2: http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/macros/macros.zip Source3: http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/download/linux/unix-script.txt The files packages need. It's better to get them directly. All seems to work except the "Compile and Run" in the menu "Plugins". I don't know how to fix it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 17:42:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:42:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528847] Review Request: Netpipe - A protocol independent network performance tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101742.nAAHgSTK015209@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528847 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-10 12:42:26 EDT --- NetPIPE-3.7.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 17:44:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:44:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532779] Review Request: gtraffic - Simple traffic usage counter for mobile broadband connections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101744.nAAHiVsD015890@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532779 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-10 12:44:30 EDT --- gtraffic-1.01-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gtraffic'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-11177 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 17:42:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:42:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528847] Review Request: Netpipe - A protocol independent network performance tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101742.nAAHgWV0013751@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528847 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.7.1-2.el5 |3.7.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 17:42:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:42:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532315] Review Request: nanoxml - Small XML parser for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101742.nAAHgekv013808@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532315 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-10 12:42:39 EDT --- nanoxml-2.2.3-6.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update nanoxml'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-11161 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 17:46:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:46:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532677] Review Request: perl-HTML-SuperForm - HTML form generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101746.nAAHkb2r015468@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532677 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-10 12:46:35 EDT --- perl-HTML-SuperForm-1.09-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-HTML-SuperForm'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-11202 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 17:44:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:44:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533141] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIx-Class - Access a DBIx::Class Schema from a CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101744.nAAHiP5S014352@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533141 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-10 12:44:25 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIx-Class-0.093011-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIx-Class'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-11175 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 17:44:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:44:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516522] Review Request: globus-nexus - Globus Toolkit - Nexus Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101744.nAAHihYk016240@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516522 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-10 12:44:42 EDT --- globus-nexus-6.7-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 17:48:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:48:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516522] Review Request: globus-nexus - Globus Toolkit - Nexus Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101748.nAAHmphe018006@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516522 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|6.7-1.fc12 |6.7-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 17:44:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:44:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 509159] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_PragmARC_=E2=80=93_a_comp?= =?utf-8?q?onent_library_for_Ada?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101744.nAAHiaVR016011@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509159 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-10 12:44:35 EDT --- PragmARC-20060427-6.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 17:48:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:48:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516517] Review Request: globus-gridftp-server - Globus Toolkit - Globus GridFTP Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101748.nAAHmRWA017734@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516517 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |3.17-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 17:44:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:44:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516522] Review Request: globus-nexus - Globus Toolkit - Nexus Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101744.nAAHimWr016286@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516522 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |6.7-1.fc12 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 17:46:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:46:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533141] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIx-Class - Access a DBIx::Class Schema from a CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101746.nAAHkPPG017258@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533141 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-10 12:46:24 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIx-Class-0.093011-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIx-Class'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-11199 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 17:48:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:48:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516522] Review Request: globus-nexus - Globus Toolkit - Nexus Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101748.nAAHmkFo016476@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516522 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-10 12:48:44 EDT --- globus-nexus-6.7-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 17:50:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:50:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516527] Review Request: globus-gass-server-ez - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Server_ez In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101750.nAAHoaH5017291@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516527 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-10 12:50:35 EDT --- globus-gass-server-ez-2.5-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 17:49:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:49:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532779] Review Request: gtraffic - Simple traffic usage counter for mobile broadband connections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101749.nAAHnLBv016601@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532779 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-10 12:49:21 EDT --- gtraffic-1.01-4.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 17:48:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:48:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516517] Review Request: globus-gridftp-server - Globus Toolkit - Globus GridFTP Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101748.nAAHmMRB016399@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516517 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-10 12:48:21 EDT --- globus-gridftp-server-3.17-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 17:47:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:47:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101747.nAAHlUSx015955@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-10 12:47:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > Well the version is because I have used many functions which are specfific to > version >= 2.0 As I said above currently all python package on Fedora is >= 2.0 (in fact >= 2.5.2), so this is just redundant. And also please fix the other issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 17:50:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:50:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516527] Review Request: globus-gass-server-ez - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Server_ez In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101750.nAAHof8Y017334@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516527 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.5-1.fc12 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 17:47:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:47:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530204] Review Request: rubygem-hawler - Hawler, the Ruby HTTP crawler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101747.nAAHlMX2015878@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530204 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-10 12:47:21 EDT --- rubygem-hawler-0.3-5.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rubygem-hawler'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-11208 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 17:53:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:53:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533976] secondlife - The Second Life client for AMD64 / x86_64 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101753.nAAHrlSl020121@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533976 Arne Woerner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |533384 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 17:53:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:53:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532677] Review Request: perl-HTML-SuperForm - HTML form generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101753.nAAHrcr4020017@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532677 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-10 12:53:37 EDT --- perl-HTML-SuperForm-1.09-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-HTML-SuperForm'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-11252 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 17:53:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:53:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526564] Review Request: unittest - C++ unit testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101753.nAAHrjNH020091@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526564 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-10 12:53:43 EDT --- unittest-0.50-62.6.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update unittest'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-11254 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 17:55:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:55:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533976] secondlife - The Second Life client for AMD64 / x86_64 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101755.nAAHtcf1020063@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533976 Arne Woerner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |SL_VWR_lnx_amd64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 17:56:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:56:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516527] Review Request: globus-gass-server-ez - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Server_ez In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101756.nAAHuXh7020461@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516527 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-10 12:56:32 EDT --- globus-gass-server-ez-2.5-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 17:56:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:56:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528847] Review Request: Netpipe - A protocol independent network performance tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101756.nAAHu219020185@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528847 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.7.1-2.fc10 |3.7.1-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 17:56:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:56:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516527] Review Request: globus-gass-server-ez - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Server_ez In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101756.nAAHucTQ020505@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516527 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.5-1.fc12 |2.5-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 17:55:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:55:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525432] Review Request: openxcap - Fully featured XCAP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101755.nAAHtWY7020005@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525432 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-10 12:55:31 EDT --- openxcap-1.1.2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update openxcap'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-11280 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 17:53:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:53:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532677] Review Request: perl-HTML-SuperForm - HTML form generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101753.nAAHrpjA019045@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532677 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-10 12:53:50 EDT --- perl-HTML-SuperForm-1.09-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-HTML-SuperForm'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-11258 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 17:55:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:55:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528847] Review Request: Netpipe - A protocol independent network performance tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101755.nAAHtvED021525@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528847 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-10 12:55:56 EDT --- NetPIPE-3.7.1-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 17:55:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:55:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 509159] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_PragmARC_=E2=80=93_a_comp?= =?utf-8?q?onent_library_for_Ada?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101755.nAAHtnn3021392@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509159 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-10 12:55:48 EDT --- PragmARC-20060427-6.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 17:58:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:58:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516517] Review Request: globus-gridftp-server - Globus Toolkit - Globus GridFTP Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101758.nAAHwTAj022391@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516517 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-10 12:58:28 EDT --- globus-gridftp-server-3.17-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 17:58:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:58:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101758.nAAHwvT7022509@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 --- Comment #18 from Roshan Singh 2009-11-10 12:58:56 EDT --- > As I said above currently all python package on Fedora is >= 2.0 (in fact > >= 2.5.2), so this is just redundant. So I have not mentioned the version in spec file. I had not written it to target a particular distro, so I think it should be there, it wont cause any harm. I have fixed all the issues discussed in earlier messages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 17:58:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:58:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516517] Review Request: globus-gridftp-server - Globus Toolkit - Globus GridFTP Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101758.nAAHwYsn021645@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516517 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.17-2.fc11 |3.17-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 17:57:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:57:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530204] Review Request: rubygem-hawler - Hawler, the Ruby HTTP crawler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101757.nAAHvqHt021425@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530204 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-10 12:57:51 EDT --- rubygem-hawler-0.3-5.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rubygem-hawler'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-11298 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 18:08:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:08:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101808.nAAI83Bw025251@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 --- Comment #19 from Roshan Singh 2009-11-10 13:08:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > > As I said above currently all python package on Fedora is >= 2.0 (in fact > > >= 2.5.2), so this is just redundant. > I had initially not written version of python-devel in spec file, later I was later suggested to write the version. So should I remove the version of python-devel from the spec file? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 18:19:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:19:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101819.nAAIJS0Z028249@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-10 13:19:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > (In reply to comment #18) > > > As I said above currently all python package on Fedora is >= 2.0 (in fact > > > >= 2.5.2), so this is just redundant. > > I had initially not written version of python-devel in spec file, later I was > later suggested to write the version. So should I remove the version of > python-devel from the spec file? - I suggest to remove this. Guidelines related to this: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Explicit_Requires ------------------------------------------------------------ For instance in the example above, when no current Fedora release shipped with libfubar < 1.2.3-7, it is no longer necessary to list the explicit, versioned requirement. ------------------------------------------------------------ (In reply to comment #18) > I have fixed all the issues discussed in earlier messages. - Please fix this (the following comments are from me) (In reply to comment #7) > Some notes: > * Requires > - Please check the dependency for python module related packages (this > cannot be detected automatically by rpmbuild and you have to investigate > this manually by yourself). > ! Example > /usr/bin/gscribble contains: > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > 16 try: > 17 import pygtk > 18 pygtk.require('2.0') > 19 except: > 20 print "Install PyGtk >= 2.0." > 21 sys.exit(1) > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > This means that this package should have "Requiers: pygtk2". Note that here I am talking about "Requires", not "BuildRequires". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 18:47:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:47:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530892] Review Request: kde-style-nitrogen - A KDE 4 widget style In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101847.nAAIl3w6004996@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530892 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu --- Comment #6 from Rex Dieter 2009-11-10 13:47:02 EDT --- Is this the same nitrogen that will be included in kde-4.4 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 18:56:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:56:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534127] [RENAME] Review Request: kbluetooth - The KDE Bluetooth Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101856.nAAIu02H006185@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534127 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rdieter at math.unl.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter 2009-11-10 13:55:58 EDT --- Looks dead-simple, but I'd recommend Versioning the Obsoletes/Provides, it's safer, use something like: Obsoletes: kdebluetooth < 1:0.3-1 Provides: kdebluetooth = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release} For upgrade path for older stuff, may want to keep these for awhile (or not), Obsoletes: kdebluetooth-libs < 1:0.2 Obsoletes: kdebluetooth-devel < 1:0.2 (I saw that you dropped these in the diff). Add the versioning, and we should be good to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 18:58:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:58:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530301] Review Request: bmpanel2 - NETWM compliant panel for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101858.nAAIwPpO008154@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530301 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-10 13:58:23 EDT --- Well, * License - The following files (and perhaps the image files in the same directories) are under CC-BY-NC-SA, which is not accepted. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Bad_Licenses_3 ------------------------------------------------------------------- CC-BY-NC-SA: ./themes/alduin-glossy/theme ./themes/alduin-smooth/theme ./themes/auriel-blue-opaque/theme ./themes/auriel-blue-smooth/theme ./themes/auriel-green-opaque/theme ./themes/auriel-green-smooth/theme ./themes/auriel-pink-opaque/theme ./themes/auriel-pink-smooth/theme ./themes/curvy-blue/theme ./themes/curvy-green/theme ./themes/curvy-pink/theme ./themes/flora-blue/theme ./themes/flora-green/theme ./themes/flora-pink/theme ./themes/striped/theme -------------------------------------------------------------------- First please remove these files from tarball. see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#When_Upstream_uses_Prohibited_Code Also it is highly recommended to contact the upstream. Then some notes * Requires - "Requires: pango cairo" are redundant and should be removed, because these library related dependencies are automatically detected by rpmbuild itself and these dependencies are added to the rebuilt binary rpm. - Also "Requires: python" is unneeded because python(abi) dependency is automatically added (but please also see below) - For python related packages, please check the dependency for python-module related rpm by yourself. For example, /usr/bin/bmpanel2cfg contains: --------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 import bmpanel2 4 import gtk, gobject 5 from gtk import gdk --------------------------------------------------------------------- This means that -cfg package should have "Requires: pygtk2". * %changelog - As it is convenient when using Fedora CVS, it is recommended that you add one line between each %changelog entry like: --------------------------------------------------------------------- * Mon Nov 09 2009 Marcus Moeller - 2.1-0.2.pre1 - Added python-devel build requirement - Fixed docbook stylesheet reference * Fri Nov 06 2009 Marcus Moeller - 2.1-0.1.pre1 - Updated to upstream version 2.1pre1 - Seperated cfg package * Thu Oct 20 2009 Marcus Moeller - 2.0.1a-1 - Initial Release --------------------------------------------------------------------- For now, blocking FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 18:58:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:58:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534127] [RENAME] Review Request: kbluetooth - The KDE Bluetooth Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101858.nAAIwZf5006893@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534127 --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter 2009-11-10 13:58:34 EDT --- Oops, make that, Provides: kdebluetooth = 1:%{version}-%{release} the rename allows us to drop the Epoch, woo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 19:10:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:10:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523540] Review Request: opentracker - BitTorrent Tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101910.nAAJAYYx012106@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523540 --- Comment #42 from Simon Wesp 2009-11-10 14:10:33 EDT --- ah, damn... i'm blind will work with F10 and F11 because the -4 libowfat is in this releases... matt, please test it! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 19:10:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:10:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534127] [RENAME] Review Request: kbluetooth - The KDE Bluetooth Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101910.nAAJA6pW011822@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534127 --- Comment #4 from Lorenzo Villani 2009-11-10 14:10:05 EDT --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~arbiter/kbluetooth.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~arbiter/kbluetooth-0.3-6.fc12.src.rpm * Tue Nov 10 2009 Lorenzo Villani - 0.3-6 - Rename package kdebluetoooth -> kbluetooth -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 19:16:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:16:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530301] Review Request: bmpanel2 - NETWM compliant panel for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101916.nAAJGaCS012313@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530301 --- Comment #7 from Marcus Moeller 2009-11-10 14:16:35 EDT --- Contacted Upstream. Is it perhaps possible not to include these themes within the resulting package? Best Regards Marcus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 19:13:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:13:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101913.nAAJD8do011258@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #55 from Tim Fenn 2009-11-10 14:13:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #54) > (In reply to comment #53) > > > Honestly the only real issue I see at this point is the wholesale inclusion of > > unrelated upstream projects in the coot/scheme directory. Generally we don't > > do that kind of thing; it's basically the situation from > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries > > I didn't really notice before that those were separate projects; I originally > > thought they were part of coot but carried different licenses. Now I see that > > they are merely prerequisites that shouldn't be part of this package. > > > > I brought this up with upstream. My concern was that guile net-http and > guile-gui are unsupported, and goosh is part of the guile os process, and thus > isn't maintained as its own package anymore. Therefore, I figured it wasn't > worth separating them out into their own packages. Paul (upstream) has > suggested he'll just include the code as part of the coot distribution and > maintain it himself, but this was a few months ago - I'll ask him again about > this and post an update soon. OK, upstream will be removing net-http in favor of libcurl and remove the goosh dependency (instead using the guile os process). guile-gui is still maintained, so I'll package that independently and pull it in as a requirement. I'll work on that today/tomorrow, and update this bugreport once upstream removes the net-http/goosh dependencies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 19:18:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:18:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534127] [RENAME] Review Request: kbluetooth - The KDE Bluetooth Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101918.nAAJIS4J014098@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534127 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter 2009-11-10 14:18:27 EDT --- Oops, I goofed in my suggestion, will need Obsoletes: kdebluetooth < 1:0.3-6 at least for the upgrade path to work. Otherwise, APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 19:21:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:21:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534127] [RENAME] Review Request: kbluetooth - The KDE Bluetooth Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101921.nAAJL48M014958@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534127 --- Comment #6 from Lorenzo Villani 2009-11-10 14:21:03 EDT --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~arbiter/kbluetooth.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~arbiter/kbluetooth-0.3-6.fc12.src.rpm updated -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 19:31:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:31:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534135] Review Request: xstream - Java XML serialization library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101931.nAAJVxI8017820@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534135 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |534168 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 19:31:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:31:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534021] Review Request: apache-ivy - Java-based dependency manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101931.nAAJVwSV017793@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534021 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |534168 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 19:30:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:30:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534127] [RENAME] Review Request: kbluetooth - The KDE Bluetooth Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101930.nAAJU2G5017223@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534127 Lorenzo Villani changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Lorenzo Villani 2009-11-10 14:30:01 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kbluetooth Short Description: The KDE Bluetooth Framework Owners: arbiter, rdieter, kkofler Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 19:31:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:31:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534168] New: Review Request: groovy - Agile dynamic language for the Java Platform Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: groovy - Agile dynamic language for the Java Platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534168 Summary: Review Request: groovy - Agile dynamic language for the Java Platform Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 534021,534135 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/groovy.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/groovy-1.6.5-1.fc12.src.rpm Desktop: Groovy is an agile and dynamic language for the Java Virtual Machine, built upon Java with features inspired by languages like Python, Ruby and Smalltalk. It seamlessly integrates with all existing Java objects and libraries and compiles straight to Java bytecode so you can use it anywhere you can use Java. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 19:45:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:45:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507697] Review Request: python-migrate0.5 - schema migration tools for SQLAlchemy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911101945.nAAJj6qm021557@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507697 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Luke Macken 2009-11-10 14:45:03 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-migrate0.5 Short Description: schema migration tools for SQLAlchemy Owners: lmacken toshio Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 20:06:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:06:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534168] Review Request: groovy - Agile dynamic language for the Java Platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911102006.nAAK6FfK025787@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534168 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-10 15:06:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > Desktop: Description: ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 20:04:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:04:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533976] secondlife - The Second Life client for AMD64 / x86_64 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911102004.nAAK4dXb024987@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533976 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-10 15:04:37 EDT --- This is a rather odd review request; it doesn't look as if you have any actual package to submit. Could you perhaps start at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers and follow the instructions there? If you're not submitting an actual package for review according to the process at that URL then I'm not sure what to do with this ticket. You should't open a package review ticket until you have a package to review; if you just want to work with a group of people to get something together then I suppose you could start with thhe Games SIG (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Games). Given the lack of anything to review, I'm going to set the whiteboard accordingly so this ticket won't appear in the review queue. If you do produce a package that you'd like to have reviewed, please clear the whiteboard. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 20:08:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:08:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 504891] Review Request: trove - Efficient Java collections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911102008.nAAK8Y6R026435@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504891 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mefoster at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-10 15:08:30 EDT --- *** Bug 532521 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 20:08:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:08:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532521] Review request: gnu-trove - High performance collections for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911102008.nAAK8XmT026400@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532521 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-10 15:08:30 EDT --- I'm somewhat disappointed that there's been no response; what's the point of dumping so many packages on the reviewers if their comments will be ignored? In the absence of other guidance, I'll go ahead and close this as a dup. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 504891 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 20:14:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:14:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533877] Review Request: iwl6000-firmware - Firmware for Intel(R) Wireless WiFi Link 6000 Series AGN Adapter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911102014.nAAKExx4027909@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533877 John W. Linville changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from John W. Linville 2009-11-10 15:14:58 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: iwl6000-firmware Short Description: Firmware for Intel(R) Wireless WiFi Link 6000 Series AGN Adapter Owners: linville Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: linville -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 20:22:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:22:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462458] Review Request: drupal-workspace - Allows users to have a central place to view and manage their content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911102022.nAAKMvUa030762@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462458 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla 2009-11-10 15:22:55 EDT --- Looks like you're right. . . SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal-workspace/drupal-workspace-6.x.1.4-1.rc1.fc11.src.rpm SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal-workspace/drupal-workspace.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 20:58:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:58:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 513239] Review Request: ansel - Full featured photo management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911102058.nAAKwdat007257@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513239 --- Comment #11 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-11-10 15:58:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > The author has responded with. > > With the exception of builder.js and slideshow.js all of those files would be > licensed under the same license as Ansel - GPLv2. Hmm, really? Author got write permissions for example to publish cropper.js under GPLv2 except of BSD? What with slideshow.js and builder.js? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 21:10:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:10:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477542] Review Request: mpdscribble - A mpd client which submits information about tracks being played to Last.fm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911102110.nAALADUr009995@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477542 Jaroslaw Gorny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #28 from Jaroslaw Gorny 2009-11-10 16:10:10 EDT --- Package: mpdscribble-0.18.1-1.fc13 Tag: dist-f13 Status: complete Built by: jaroslav ID: 140666 Started: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 21:02:33 UTC Finished: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 21:05:32 UTC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 21:22:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:22:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526311] Review Request: mysql-mmm - Multi-Master Replication Manager for MySQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911102122.nAALMfmU012541@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526311 --- Comment #12 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-11-10 16:22:39 EDT --- I've almost got a master-master configuration running under mysql-mmm. I bumped into a few small things, mainly because I've never used mmm before and the documentation is pretty sparse. - the monitor subpackage is missing a dependency on dbd::mysql - starting the agent with the default configuration caused it to die with an error, but it was restarted over and over again. I just got 2GB of emails from the agent :-) We might want to create more sensible defaults for logging in Fedora... - The upstream init scripts are ok, but a bit verbose. It would be nice if you created a Fedora specific init script, using the functions from /etc/init.d/functions. I'll do a proper review when I get mysql-mmm running. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 21:24:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:24:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527241] Review Request: libvtemm - C++ bindings for vte In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911102124.nAALOYX6012936@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527241 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Michael Schwendt 2009-11-10 16:24:33 EDT --- * When checking in the files into cvs, please add V=1 to the "make" invocation in %build to enable verbose build output. > # library is LGPLv3+, examples are GPLv3+. > License: LGPLv3+ and GPLv3+ This is okay with regard to: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios Creating a sub-package for 13KB of source code examples would be overhead. * src.rpm will only build on F-12 or newer due to "vte >= 0.22.0" requirement. [...] APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 21:42:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:42:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533976] secondlife - The Second Life client for AMD64 / x86_64 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911102142.nAALgLmq020665@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533976 --- Comment #2 from Arne Woerner 2009-11-10 16:42:20 EDT --- ohoh i could just upload that tar ball to some place... SRPM sounds like i have to write a script for all those little changes, that i did manually, whenever the compiler gave up... cant i submit a binary package somehow? -arne -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 22:10:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:10:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530617] Review Request: libixp - Stand-alone client/server 9P library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911102210.nAAMAQ9F030230@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530617 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mschwendt at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Michael Schwendt 2009-11-10 17:10:25 EDT --- > %{_libdir}/*.a You build a static library only. You put it into the -devel package with a virtual -static package name. Then why do you run /sbin/ldconfig in post/postun scriptlets? > %package -n ixpc > Summary: Plan9 file protocol client > Group: Applications/System > Requires: %{name}-static = %{version}-%{release} Why does a client binary require the static library package? > make %{?_smp_mflags} CC="%{__cc} -c %{optflags}" This doesn't make the package adhere to the optflags guidelines. The project's internal CFLAGS override some of the optflags. It would be more clean if you could patch mk/gcc.mk and append $RPM_OPT_FLAGS (or %optflags) to $CFLAGS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 22:09:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:09:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536683] New: Review Request: eclipse-mdt-uml2 - Implementation of the UML2 OMG metamodel for Eclipse Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-mdt-uml2 - Implementation of the UML2 OMG metamodel for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536683 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-mdt-uml2 - Implementation of the UML2 OMG metamodel for Eclipse Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at matbooth.co.uk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/eclipse-mdt-uml2.spec SRPM URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/eclipse-mdt-uml2-3.0.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: UML2 is an EMF-based implementation of the Unified Modeling Language (UML) 2.x OMG metamodel for the Eclipse platform. The objectives of the UML2 component are to provide: * a usable implementation of the UML metamodel to support the development of modeling tools. * a common XMI schema to facilitate interchange of semantic models. * test cases as a means of validating the specification. * validation rules as a means of defining and enforcing levels of compliance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 22:10:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:10:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536684] New: Review Request: eclipse-mdt-ocl - Implementation of the OCL OMG metamodel for Eclipse Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-mdt-ocl - Implementation of the OCL OMG metamodel for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536684 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-mdt-ocl - Implementation of the OCL OMG metamodel for Eclipse Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at matbooth.co.uk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This package depends eclipse-mdt-uml2, whose review request is bug #536683. Spec URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/eclipse-mdt-ocl.spec SRPM URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/eclipse-mdt-ocl-1.3.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: OCL is an implementation of the Object Constraint Language (OCL) OMG standard for EMF-based models. The OCL component provides the following capabilities to support OCL integration: * Defines APIs for parsing and evaluating OCL constraints and queries on EMF models. * Defines an Ecore implementation of the OCL abstract syntax model, including support for serialization of parsed OCL expressions. * Provides a Visitor API for analyzing/transforming the AST model of OCL expressions. * Provides an extensibility API for clients to customize the parsing and evaluation environments used by the parser. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 22:10:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:10:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536683] Review Request: eclipse-mdt-uml2 - Implementation of the UML2 OMG metamodel for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911102210.nAAMAXeq027638@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536683 Mat Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |536684 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 22:10:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:10:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536684] Review Request: eclipse-mdt-ocl - Implementation of the OCL OMG metamodel for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911102210.nAAMAWka027616@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536684 Mat Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |536683 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 22:11:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:11:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536683] Review Request: eclipse-mdt-uml2 - Implementation of the UML2 OMG metamodel for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911102211.nAAMBAuH027850@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536683 Mat Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |536684 Depends on|536684 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 22:11:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:11:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536684] Review Request: eclipse-mdt-ocl - Implementation of the OCL OMG metamodel for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911102211.nAAMB9uT027826@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536684 Mat Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|536683 | Depends on| |536683 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 22:15:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:15:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532739] Review Request: emacs-cedet - Collection of Emacs Development Environment Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911102215.nAAMFKWg032053@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532739 --- Comment #10 from Karel Kl?? 2009-11-10 17:15:19 EDT --- Spec URL: http://kklic.fedorapeople.org/emacs-cedet.spec SRPM URL: http://kklic.fedorapeople.org/emacs-cedet-1.0-0.7.20091110cvs.fc12.src.rpm RPMs URL: http://kklic.fedorapeople.org/emacs-cedet-1.0-0.7.20091110cvs.fc12.noarch.rpm http://kklic.fedorapeople.org/emacs-cedet-el-1.0-0.7.20091110cvs.fc12.noarch.rpm >From reading CVS logs I got an impression there are many bugs in 1.0pre6. 1.0pre6 crashes while parsing /usr/include/bits/confname.h. Changes: * Tue Nov 10 2009 Karel Klic - 1.0-0.7.20091110cvs - Requires emacs - Updated to CVS pre-release version, because pre6 version contains too many bugs - Removed patches included in current version - Added patch for proper adebug loading - Install cogre template files (srt) * Sat Nov 7 2009 Xavier Maillard - 1.0-0.6.pre6 - Install missing semantic symref and ctags -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 23:03:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:03:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533976] secondlife - The Second Life client for AMD64 / x86_64 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911102303.nAAN3Q54007681@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533976 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-10 18:03:25 EDT --- Under no circumstances can we accept a binary package of the second life client. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#No_inclusion_of_pre-built_binaries_or_libraries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 23:00:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:00:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526311] Review Request: mysql-mmm - Multi-Master Replication Manager for MySQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911102300.nAAN0oOO007286@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526311 --- Comment #13 from BJ Dierkes 2009-11-10 18:00:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Since this are all architecture-independent perl libraries, you have to add > BuildArch: noarch. Not sure how I missed that, but it has been added. (In reply to comment #12) > - the monitor subpackage is missing a dependency on dbd::mysql Was removed based on comment #4 ;). Added back in. > - starting the agent with the default configuration caused it to die with an > error, but it was restarted over and over again. I just got 2GB of emails from > the agent :-) We might want to create more sensible defaults for logging in > Fedora... I ran into the same issue. I believe setting the IP for db1 in mmm_common.conf to 127.0.0.1 by default will atleast keep the process from dying and causing havoc with logs/email. I did added comments to the config to encourage the IP be set right, but I know I always try starting the process before anything else. Regardless, I've reported the following upstream when I first came across it: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mysql-mmm/+bug/473446 > - The upstream init scripts are ok, but a bit verbose. It would be nice if you > created a Fedora specific init script, using the functions from > /etc/init.d/functions. I will look into rewriting/cleaning up the init scripts. Thanks Ruben. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 23:10:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:10:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 509160] Review Request: =?utf-8?b?IG1pbmVfZGV0ZWN0b3Ig4oCT?= =?utf-8?q?_a_mine-finding_game?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911102310.nAANAxtt012592@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509160 --- Comment #6 from Bj?rn Persson 2009-11-10 18:10:57 EDT --- Fixed to link libgnat and libgcc dynamically: http://www.rombobj?rn.se/packages/mine_detector.spec http://www.rombobj?rn.se/packages/mine_detector-6.0-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 23:27:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:27:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 491497] Review Request: dmapd - A server that provides DAAP and DPAP shares In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911102327.nAANR4P3012718@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491497 --- Comment #7 from Christian Krause 2009-11-10 18:27:02 EDT --- Before I do the full review here are some issues which should be fixed before: 1. does not build if dbus-devel is not installed - please add it to the build requires (and probably to the configure script ;-) ) 2. lots of warnings when using rpmlint: rpmlint SPECS/dmapd.spec RPMS/i686/dmapd-* SRPMS/dmapd-0.0.14-1.fc12.src.rpm dmapd.i686: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/sysconfig/dmapd dmapd.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/dmapd/0.0.14/modules/libdb-gdir.so dmapd.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/dmapd-dpap-record.h dmapd.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/dmapd-daap-record.h dmapd.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/pkgconfig/dmapd.pc dmapd.i686: W: non-standard-uid /var/run/dmapd dmapd dmapd.i686: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/run/dmapd 0700 dmapd.i686: E: postin-without-ldconfig /usr/lib/libdmapd.so.0.0.0 dmapd.i686: E: postun-without-ldconfig /usr/lib/libdmapd.so.0.0.0 dmapd.i686: W: non-standard-uid /var/cache/dmapd dmapd dmapd.i686: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/cache/dmapd 0700 dmapd.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libdmapd.so dmapd.i686: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/sysconfig/dmapd dmapd.i686: E: script-without-shebang /etc/sysconfig/dmapd dmapd.i686: W: percent-in-%pre dmapd.i686: W: percent-in-%postun dmapd.i686: W: dangerous-command-in-%postun userdel 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 6 errors, 11 warnings. There are some false positives, but at least the devel-file-in-non-devel-package should be fixed first. Please create either a -devel subpackage or delete the devel files in the %install section if it is not intended to build something based in libdmapd.so. 3. /etc/sysconfig/dmapd should not be executable 4. add ldconfig to %post and %postun 5. I have to second Fabian's request to enhance the formatting of the spec file: - there are lots of unneeded empty lines - the order of the main sections is unusual, e.g. %doc is not directly after %files, but somewere later in the file - the scriptlets in the %preund and %postun sections are squeezed into single lines which makes them hard to read / verify Probably you can enhance/tweak the tool which generates the spec file a little bit. ;-) 6. the way of creation/deletion of the user and groups is not the official one (and it doesn't work at all) rpm -U ~rpmbuild/RPMS/i686/dmapd-0.0.14-1.fc12.i686.rpm /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.K6nmcB: line 1: fg: no job control /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.K6nmcB: line 2: fg: no job control warning: user dmapd does not exist - using root warning: user dmapd does not exist - using root rpm -e dmapd /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.RHEC9n: line 2: fg: no job control /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.RHEC9n: line 3: fg: no job control /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.RHEC9n: line 5: fg: no job control warning: %postun(dmapd-0.0.14-1.fc12.i686) scriptlet failed, exit status 1 Please change it according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UsersAndGroups (which is the official specification). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 23:36:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:36:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530301] Review Request: bmpanel2 - NETWM compliant panel for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911102336.nAANanLD018626@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530301 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-10 18:36:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Is it perhaps possible not to include these themes within the resulting > package? Currently (i.e. unless the license of the files above changes), it is a must to remove those files from the srpm, and of course the rebuilt binary rpm must not include those files. If your question means "does this package work even without those themes?", perhaps it works because some other themes are not under CC-BY-NC-SA. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 23:51:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:51:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536694] New: Review Request: clamtk - GUI frontend for ClamAV Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: clamtk - GUI frontend for ClamAV https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536694 Summary: Review Request: clamtk - GUI frontend for ClamAV Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dave.nerd at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://clamtk.sourceforge.net/fedora/clamtk.spec SRPM URL: http://clamtk.sourceforge.net/fedora/clamtk-4.20-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: ClamTk is a frontend for ClamAV using gtk2-perl. It is intended to be an easy to use, lightweight scanner for Linux systems. This is my first package for Fedora and I am in need of a sponsor. Reference: Bugzilla # 530709 My FAS username is davem . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 23:54:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536694] Review Request: clamtk - GUI frontend for ClamAV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911102354.nAANsOr3023037@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536694 Dave M changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dave.nerd at gmail.com Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 00:37:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:37:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 504891] Review Request: trove - Efficient Java collections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911110037.nAB0bBxO030366@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504891 Guido Grazioli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |guido.grazioli at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Guido Grazioli 2009-11-10 19:37:09 EDT --- I'm interested in this package, Jerry are you still working on it? Some quick things: - renaming to trove4j seems reasonable (other distros did that also) - prefer %global over %define - group Development/Libraries/Java is not standard, change it to Development/Libraries - -javadoc subpackage should Requires: jpackage-utils too - would packaging lastest stable ver 2.1.0 be feasible? - as per gcj guidelines, in %%files: %if %{with_gcj} - %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name} + %attr(-,root,root) %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name} %endif -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 01:21:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:21:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 506844] Review Request: audex - kde4 audio ripper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911110121.nAB1LmlZ011052@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506844 Roland Wolters changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #27 from Roland Wolters 2009-11-10 20:21:46 EDT --- Terje, thanks for pointing out. Closing but as NEXTRELEASE since the package is part of Fedora already quite some time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 01:45:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:45:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533993] Review Request: wordpress-plugin-bad-behavior - Spam prevention plugin for WordPress In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911110145.nAB1jJ77019890@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533993 Ryan Rix changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 01:47:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:47:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533993] Review Request: wordpress-plugin-bad-behavior - Spam prevention plugin for WordPress In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911110147.nAB1lRHO017731@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533993 --- Comment #4 from Nick Bebout 2009-11-10 20:47:27 EDT --- Spec URL: http://nb.fedorapeople.org/review/wordpress-plugin-bad-behavior.spec SRPM URL: http://nb.fedorapeople.org/review/wordpress-plugin-bad-behavior-2.0.32-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 02:36:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 21:36:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536718] New: Review Request: tlomt-sniglet-fonts - A rounded, sans-serif font useful for headlines Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: tlomt-sniglet-fonts - A rounded, sans-serif font useful for headlines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536718 Summary: Review Request: tlomt-sniglet-fonts - A rounded, sans-serif font useful for headlines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/tlomt-sniglet-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/tlomt-sniglet-fonts-1.000-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Sniglet is a fun rounded, sans-serif font useful for headlines and other creative treaments. The font was created by Haley Fiege, and it supports a full Latin character set including accent marks. Notably, it has full coverage for Icelandic and French characters. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 02:47:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 21:47:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911110247.nAB2lvD6030275@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 --- Comment #21 from Roshan Singh 2009-11-10 21:47:55 EDT --- * Removed the version from python-devel * Added pygtk2 to Requires SPEC: http://lug.nitdgp.ac.in/users/roshan/gscribble-0.0.2.1-1.spec RPM: http://lug.nitdgp.ac.in/users/roshan/gscribble-0.0.2.1-1.fc11.noarch.rpm SRPM: http://lug.nitdgp.ac.in/users/roshan/gscribble-0.0.2.1-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 02:56:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 21:56:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911110256.nAB2uO5k001976@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 --- Comment #22 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-10 21:56:23 EDT --- Please: (In reply to comment #9) > Please change the release number of your spec file every > time you modify it to avoid confusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 03:00:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:00:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911110300.nAB309go000309@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 --- Comment #23 from Roshan Singh 2009-11-10 22:00:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > Please: > > (In reply to comment #9) > > Please change the release number of your spec file every > > time you modify it to avoid confusion. Should I change the version of the RPM (0.0.2.1-2, 0.0.2.1-2), I appended a version to the spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 03:34:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:34:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 512170] Review Request: pidgin-sipe - Pidgin plugin for connecting to MS Communications Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911110334.nAB3YBZE011914@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512170 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #31 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-10 22:34:07 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 03:36:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:36:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507697] Review Request: python-migrate0.5 - schema migration tools for SQLAlchemy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911110336.nAB3aVkn010193@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507697 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-10 22:36:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 03:40:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:40:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530880] Review Request: ns-tiza-fonts - A Slab-Serif Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911110340.nAB3eauf014005@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530880 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-10 22:40:35 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 03:38:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:38:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516343] Review Request: metadata-extractor - JPEG metadata extraction framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911110338.nAB3cVb0013295@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516343 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #28 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-10 22:38:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 03:39:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:39:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533520] Review Request: ogre-pagedgeometry - Ogre addon for realtime rendering of dense forests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911110339.nAB3dH7b013493@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533520 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-10 22:39:16 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 03:43:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:43:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529283] Review Request: fontbox - Java library for working with PDF fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911110343.nAB3hfXP011912@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529283 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-10 22:43:40 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 03:42:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:42:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533877] Review Request: iwl6000-firmware - Firmware for Intel(R) Wireless WiFi Link 6000 Series AGN Adapter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911110342.nAB3ggNv011727@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533877 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-10 22:42:41 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 03:46:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:46:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532818] Review Request: gdouros-musica-fonts - A font for musical symbols In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911110346.nAB3kPgq015664@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532818 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-10 22:46:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 03:45:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:45:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532817] Review Request: gdouros-analecta-fonts - An eccleastic scripts font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911110345.nAB3jcZY015434@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532817 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-10 22:45:37 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 03:41:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:41:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529517] Review Request: kcm_touchpad - Synaptics driver based touchpads kcontrol module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911110341.nAB3fpZB014505@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529517 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #20 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-10 22:41:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 03:44:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:44:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532816] Review Request: gdouros-alexander-fonts - A Greek typeface inspired by Alexander Wilson In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911110344.nAB3ilsA014977@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532816 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-10 22:44:46 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 03:49:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:49:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533723] Review Request: perl-Guard - Safe cleanup blocks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911110349.nAB3nwRY016448@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533723 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-10 22:49:57 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 03:47:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:47:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532819] Review Request: gdouros-symbola-fonts - A symbol font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911110347.nAB3lBRn015888@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532819 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-10 22:47:10 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 03:51:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:51:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533721] Review Request: perl-Net-CIDR - Manipulate IPv4/IPv6 netblocks in CIDR notation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911110351.nAB3p6Hv017043@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533721 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-10 22:51:05 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 03:48:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:48:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516280] Review Request: perl-Config-Model-CursesUI - Curses interface to edit config data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911110348.nAB3mZpC016122@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516280 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-10 22:48:34 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 03:53:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:53:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533094] Review Request: xskat - The card game Skat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911110353.nAB3r1rq014299@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533094 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-10 22:52:58 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 03:55:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:55:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526204] Review Request: ucs-fixed-fonts selected set of bitmap fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911110355.nAB3tDn1018198@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526204 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-10 22:55:12 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 03:53:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:53:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533753] Review Request: python-pep8 - Python style guide checker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911110353.nAB3rvem017718@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533753 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-10 22:53:56 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 03:52:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:52:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534127] [RENAME] Review Request: kbluetooth - The KDE Bluetooth Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911110352.nAB3q42i017360@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534127 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-10 22:52:03 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 03:56:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:56:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 513544] Review Request: python-lockfile - Platform-independent file locking module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911110356.nAB3u0IJ015254@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513544 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-10 22:55:59 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 03:58:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:58:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472096] Review Request: perl-Regexp-Assemble - Assemble multiple Regular Expressions into a single RE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911110358.nAB3wH4g015584@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472096 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-10 22:58:16 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 03:57:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:57:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532368] Review Request: ns-bola-fonts A Sans Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911110357.nAB3vNd3018672@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532368 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-10 22:57:22 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 04:04:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:04:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526204] Review Request: ucs-fixed-fonts selected set of bitmap fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911110404.nAB44sN1020150@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526204 --- Comment #13 from Pravin Satpute 2009-11-10 23:04:53 EDT --- Thanks Kevin for CVS work i am waiting for bitmap-fonts merge-review bug once that will also over i will build both these package simultaneously. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 04:20:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:20:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529441] Review Request: pdfbox - Java PDF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911110420.nAB4KtwX023911@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529441 Bug 529441 depends on bug 529283, which changed state. Bug 529283 Summary: Review Request: fontbox - Java library for working with PDF fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529283 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 04:20:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:20:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529283] Review Request: fontbox - Java library for working with PDF fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911110420.nAB4KsuA023883@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529283 Orion Poplawski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Orion Poplawski 2009-11-10 23:20:53 EDT --- Checked in and built. Thanks all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 04:45:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:45:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533753] Review Request: python-pep8 - Python style guide checker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911110445.nAB4jJXo031835@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533753 --- Comment #5 from Ian Weller 2009-11-10 23:45:18 EDT --- thanks, kevin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 04:54:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:54:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507697] Review Request: python-migrate0.5 - schema migration tools for SQLAlchemy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911110454.nAB4ssb2031353@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507697 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-10 23:54:53 EDT --- python-migrate0.5-0.5.3-7.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-migrate0.5-0.5.3-7.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 05:25:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:25:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 491497] Review Request: dmapd - A server that provides DAAP and DPAP shares In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911110525.nAB5P4Sr005553@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491497 --- Comment #8 from W. Michael Petullo 2009-11-11 00:25:03 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/dmapd.spec SRPM URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/dmapd-0.0.15-1.fc12.src.rpm - New upstream version. - Require dbus-devel to build. - Properly set permissions of /etc/sysconfig/dmapd. - Run ldconfig. - Fix user creation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 07:28:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 02:28:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536737] New: Review Request: yum-langpacks - langpacks plugin for yum Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: yum-langpacks - langpacks plugin for yum https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536737 Summary: Review Request: yum-langpacks - langpacks plugin for yum Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: petersen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: yum-langpacks.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/yum-langpacks/yum-langpacks.spec Description: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/yum-langpacks/yum-langpacks-0.1.3-1.fc12.src.rpm https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/YumLangpackPlugin This is a simple YUM plugin which when installed enables automatic installation of langpacks of packages when they get installed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 07:48:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 02:48:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911110748.nAB7mOTd009633@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l | |aposte.net) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 08:23:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:23:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530301] Review Request: bmpanel2 - NETWM compliant panel for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911110823.nAB8N2Nh020870@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530301 --- Comment #9 from Marcus Moeller 2009-11-11 03:23:00 EDT --- Hi, Thanks for your reply. I know that it would work technically. I am going to rebuild the package without those themes. The author won't change the license of these files and he will also not remove them from the source package. Updated spec follows. Best Regards Marcus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 09:01:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 04:01:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508518] Review Request: Meiga - Easy tool for file sharing and content publishing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911110901.nAB91IcI003068@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508518 --- Comment #5 from Rajeesh 2009-11-11 04:01:17 EDT --- Hi, The {S,R}PMs and SPEC have been updated to the latest version, and can be found here: http://rajeeshknambiar.fedorapeople.org/meiga.spec http://rajeeshknambiar.fedorapeople.org/meiga-0.3.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Koji scratch build : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1800417 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 10:58:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 05:58:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533976] secondlife - The Second Life client for AMD64 / x86_64 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111058.nABAwNPZ005509@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533976 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-11-11 05:58:22 EDT --- The whole point of a writing a spec file is to automate all the things that you had to do manually so that users can install it easily. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 11:23:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:23:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533723] Review Request: perl-Guard - Safe cleanup blocks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111123.nABBNQlQ015593@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533723 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-11 06:23:25 EDT --- perl-Guard-1.021-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Guard-1.021-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 11:24:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:24:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533723] Review Request: perl-Guard - Safe cleanup blocks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111124.nABBOBmD015731@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533723 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-11 06:24:10 EDT --- perl-Guard-1.021-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Guard-1.021-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 11:21:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:21:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533721] Review Request: perl-Net-CIDR - Manipulate IPv4/IPv6 netblocks in CIDR notation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111121.nABBLCJR015151@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533721 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-11 06:21:12 EDT --- perl-Net-CIDR-0.13-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Net-CIDR-0.13-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 11:21:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:21:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533721] Review Request: perl-Net-CIDR - Manipulate IPv4/IPv6 netblocks in CIDR notation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111121.nABBLcGS015235@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533721 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-11 06:21:37 EDT --- perl-Net-CIDR-0.13-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Net-CIDR-0.13-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 11:20:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:20:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533721] Review Request: perl-Net-CIDR - Manipulate IPv4/IPv6 netblocks in CIDR notation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111120.nABBKkDD015055@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533721 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-11 06:20:45 EDT --- perl-Net-CIDR-0.13-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Net-CIDR-0.13-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 11:22:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:22:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533721] Review Request: perl-Net-CIDR - Manipulate IPv4/IPv6 netblocks in CIDR notation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111122.nABBMGaD015364@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533721 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-11 06:22:16 EDT --- perl-Net-CIDR-0.13-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Net-CIDR-0.13-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 11:25:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:25:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533723] Review Request: perl-Guard - Safe cleanup blocks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111125.nABBP2O5014225@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533723 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-11 06:25:01 EDT --- perl-Guard-1.021-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Guard-1.021-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 11:25:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:25:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533723] Review Request: perl-Guard - Safe cleanup blocks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111125.nABBPVbt014463@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533723 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-11 06:25:30 EDT --- perl-Guard-1.021-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Guard-1.021-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 11:46:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:46:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 494695] Review Request: qutim - Multiplatform Instant Messenger on Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111146.nABBkF3u020971@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494695 --- Comment #14 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-11-11 06:46:12 EDT --- Add epoch in gloox dependency: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/qutim/qutim-0.2.0-1.18.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 11:57:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:57:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530301] Review Request: bmpanel2 - NETWM compliant panel for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111157.nABBvrFk024949@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530301 --- Comment #10 from Marcus Moeller 2009-11-11 06:57:51 EDT --- - Removed themes with legal problems from source tarball - Removed unnecessary Requires - Added pygtk2 requirement Spec URL: http://www.marcus-moeller.de/share/build/bmpanel2/2.1-0.3.pre1/bmpanel2.spec SRPM URL: http://www.marcus-moeller.de/share/build/bmpanel2/2.1-0.3.pre1/bmpanel2-2.1-0.3.pre1.fc11.src.rpm Best Regards Marcus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 12:00:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 07:00:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530301] Review Request: bmpanel2 - NETWM compliant panel for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111200.nABC0kSA027628@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530301 Marcus Moeller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|530302 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 12:00:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 07:00:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530302] Review Request: bmpanel2-themes - Additional themes for bmpanel2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111200.nABC0juD027600@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530302 Marcus Moeller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|530301 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 12:01:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 07:01:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530302] Review Request: bmpanel2-themes - Additional themes for bmpanel2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111201.nABC1wqt027952@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530302 Marcus Moeller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX --- Comment #2 from Marcus Moeller 2009-11-11 07:01:56 EDT --- Not going to package this because of legal problems. Best Regards Marcus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 12:29:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 07:29:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536796] Review Request: kde-plasma-smooth-tasks - KDE taskbar replacement with window peeking ability In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111229.nABCTMt1000638@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536796 Thomas Janssen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sven at lank.es --- Comment #1 from Thomas Janssen 2009-11-11 07:29:21 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1800740 [thomas at tusdell SPECS]$ rpmlint kde-plasma-smooth-tasks.spec ../SRPMS/kde-plasma-smooth-tasks-0.0.1-0.1.wip20091111.fc11.src.rpm ../RPMS/x86_64/kde-plasma-smooth-tasks-* 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 12:27:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 07:27:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536796] New: Review Request: kde-plasma-smooth-tasks - KDE taskbar replacement with window peeking ability Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: kde-plasma-smooth-tasks - KDE taskbar replacement with window peeking ability https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536796 Summary: Review Request: kde-plasma-smooth-tasks - KDE taskbar replacement with window peeking ability Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: thomasj at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/kde-plasma-smooth-tasks.spec SRPM URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/kde-plasma-smooth-tasks-0.0.1-0.1.wip20091111.fc11.src.rpm Description: This taskbar replacement has window peeking similar to Windows 7 when you use the kwin 'highlite window' effect. Even if this effect is not used you can click the tooltip in order to activate the corresponding window. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 12:50:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 07:50:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527241] Review Request: libvtemm - C++ bindings for vte In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111250.nABCoApI007452@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527241 Krzesimir Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Krzesimir Nowak 2009-11-11 07:50:08 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libvtemm Short Description: C++ bindings for vte Owners: krnowak Branches: F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 12:52:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 07:52:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536694] Review Request: clamtk - GUI frontend for ClamAV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111252.nABCqV9Z010119@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536694 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-11-11 07:52:30 EDT --- Uhh. This package is already in Fedora, so there's no need for this review ticket. I see you're the upstream maintainer, and think that the ClamTk package hasn't had the TLC it needs. You should contact the ClamTk Fedora maintainer and ask him to update the package to the newest release. This you can do either by opening a bug against clamtk here in Bugzilla, or by mailing clamtk-owner at fedoraproject.org . If you want to get involved in Fedora packaging you need to open up a review ticket on something that isn't in Fedora. Closing this ticket as NOTABUG. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 12:54:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 07:54:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536737] Review Request: yum-langpacks - langpacks plugin for yum In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111254.nABCsWKV010855@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536737 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tomspur at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #1 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-11 07:54:31 EDT --- Just a few comments: - BR: python-setuptools is enought not -devel - Could not download the source -> 404, had to unpack the src.rpm - rpmlint: $ rpmlint yum-langpacks.spec yum-langpacks-0.1.3-1.fc11.src.rpm noarch/yum- langpacks-0.1.3-1.fc11.noarch.rpm yum-langpacks.spec:36: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/yum-plugins /langpacks.py* yum-langpacks.src:36: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/yum-plugins /langpacks.py* yum-langpacks.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.1.2-1 ['0.1.3-1.fc11', '0.1.3-1'] yum-langpacks.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/yum-plugins /langpacks.py 0644 /bin/env 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 1 warnings. * non-execuatble-script: see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingTricks#Remove_shebang_from_files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 12:54:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 07:54:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536694] Review Request: clamtk - GUI frontend for ClamAV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111254.nABCs3lD008415@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536694 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-11-11 07:54:02 EDT --- PS. If you become a Fedora packager, you can apply for maintainership of clamtk from the current clamtk package owner. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 12:56:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 07:56:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533976] secondlife - The Second Life client for AMD64 / x86_64 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111256.nABCu39r011872@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533976 Arne Woerner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #5 from Arne Woerner 2009-11-11 07:56:02 EDT --- ohoh without binaries it is a lot more work than i had before, because the linden labs build tool installs a lot of binaries... so i close this review request... :-) -arne -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 12:58:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 07:58:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507083] Review Request: poco - C++ class libraries for network-centric applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111258.nABCw0xC009872@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507083 --- Comment #18 from Maxim Udushlivy 2009-11-11 07:57:55 EDT --- Spec URL: http://crow-designer.sourceforge.net/temp/5/poco.spec SRPM URL: http://crow-designer.sourceforge.net/temp/5/poco-1.3.5-5.fc11.src.rpm CHANGES ======= - A patch "poco-1.3.5-syslibs.patch" was added. The build process now does not use bundled versions of the system libraries (zlib, pcre, sqlite and expat). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 13:37:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:37:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536694] Review Request: clamtk - GUI frontend for ClamAV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111337.nABDbiJV025634@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536694 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-11 08:37:43 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 474535 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 13:37:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:37:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474535] Review Request: clamtk - Easy to use front-end for ClamAV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111337.nABDbkdl025668@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474535 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dave.nerd at gmail.com --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-11 08:37:43 EDT --- *** Bug 536694 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 13:40:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:40:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536694] Review Request: clamtk - GUI frontend for ClamAV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111340.nABDep2C026884@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536694 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 13:40:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:40:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536694] Review Request: clamtk - GUI frontend for ClamAV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111340.nABDecMm026795@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536694 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Depends on| |530709 Resolution|DUPLICATE | --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-11 08:40:37 EDT --- Ah, reopening, until there is some movement on bug 530709. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 13:44:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:44:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536694] Review Request: clamtk - GUI frontend for ClamAV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111344.nABDircf024078@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536694 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-11 08:44:52 EDT --- ref: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-November/msg00371.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 14:03:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:03:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536694] Review Request: clamtk - GUI frontend for ClamAV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111403.nABE3qs7030698@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536694 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-11-11 09:03:51 EDT --- Oh OK, sorry. Some notes: - Source needs to honor Source URL guideline http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL - Missing Requires: desktop-file-utils due to usage of update-desktop-database. - Mixing of "clamtk" and "%{name}" in %files is IMHO bad style. Change %{_datadir}/pixmaps/clamtk.png to %{_datadir}/pixmaps/%{name}.png or replace occurrences of "%{name}" with "clamtk". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 14:17:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:17:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533291] Review Request: ruby-ffi - Foreign Function Interface package for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111417.nABEHY7V006408@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533291 --- Comment #5 from Bryan Kearney 2009-11-11 09:17:33 EDT --- Just following up. this is against standard, but any issues with starting from a tarball and building a gem? This breaks the rubygem source _MUST_ be a gem, but it gets me the test code and test C libraries and I can build the gem from there. -- bk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 14:20:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:20:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536694] Review Request: clamtk - GUI frontend for ClamAV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111420.nABEKEUB007815@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536694 --- Comment #7 from Dave M 2009-11-11 09:20:13 EDT --- Thank you for your suggestions. Spec URL: http://clamtk.sourceforge.net/fedora/clamtk.spec SRPM URL: http://clamtk.sourceforge.net/fedora/clamtk-4.20-2.fc11.src.rpm Fixed and still rpmlint clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 14:29:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:29:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529278] Review Request: eclipse-ptp - Eclipse Parallel Tools Platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111429.nABETtA3010608@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529278 --- Comment #6 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-11-11 09:29:54 EDT --- Rpmlint is really angry on this package: 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 66 errors, 149 warnings Most of the problems are W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package which I doubt are really useful but I may be wrong. There are also sources for libaif and maybe other libraries included in the binary rpm. One more problem I see is that fragments for other OSs (aix, macosx) and archs different(ppc, x86_64) than the build one (x86) get installed. Let me know if you think some of these are needed and if yes why? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 14:41:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:41:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526034] Review Request: ocaml-xmlm - OCaml library for streaming XML input and output In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111441.nABEfwPw010458@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526034 --- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-11-11 09:41:57 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-xmlm.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-xmlm-1.0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm * Wed Nov 11 2009 Richard W.M. Jones - 1.0.2-1 - New upstream release 1.0.2. - Fixes a potential security hole where a large, malicious XML document could cause a stack overflow in native code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 14:48:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:48:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507083] Review Request: poco - C++ class libraries for network-centric applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111448.nABEmv13012313@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507083 --- Comment #19 from Michal Schmidt 2009-11-11 09:48:55 EDT --- Hello Maxim. Very good, you fixed the major issue I had with the package. I suggest you to add a comment before the Patch0:... line to explain why the patch is needed (Also see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment ). Have you contacted upstream developers to discuss their bundling of libraries? It would be nice if they could stop doing that or at least make it optional with a ./configure settings. Though it's not strictly necessary, it is a good idea to keep a live relationship with upstream. Your main package "poco" depends on "poco-devel". This is unusual and I don't recommend it. You said Boost packaging was your inspiration when you separated the package into several subpackages, but Boost does not do this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 14:55:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:55:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529465] Review Request: thunar-vcs-plugin - SVN integration for the Thunar filemanager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111455.nABEti5U018494@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529465 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-11 09:55:43 EDT --- thunar-vcs-plugin-0.1.2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update thunar-vcs-plugin'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-10695 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 14:54:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:54:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529465] Review Request: thunar-vcs-plugin - SVN integration for the Thunar filemanager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111454.nABEstFv017818@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529465 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-11 09:54:53 EDT --- thunar-vcs-plugin-0.1.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update thunar-vcs-plugin'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-10632 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 15:02:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:02:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527488] Review Request: drbd - drbd tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111502.nABF29Qb021392@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527488 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #82 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-11 10:02:01 EDT --- drbd-8.3.6-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update drbd'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-11357 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 15:05:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:05:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522613] Review Request: python-tornado - Scalable, non-blocking web server and tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111505.nABF5hYo023521@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522613 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-11 10:05:39 EDT --- python-tornado-0.2-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 15:05:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:05:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522613] Review Request: python-tornado - Scalable, non-blocking web server and tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111505.nABF5nkH023593@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522613 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.2-3.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 15:23:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:23:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 512170] Review Request: pidgin-sipe - Pidgin plugin for connecting to MS Communications Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111523.nABFNE4f029122@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512170 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-11 10:23:12 EDT --- pidgin-sipe-1.7.0-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pidgin-sipe-1.7.0-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 15:23:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:23:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 512170] Review Request: pidgin-sipe - Pidgin plugin for connecting to MS Communications Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111523.nABFN8KV024682@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512170 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-11 10:23:04 EDT --- pidgin-sipe-1.7.0-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pidgin-sipe-1.7.0-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 15:38:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:38:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533877] Review Request: iwl6000-firmware - Firmware for Intel(R) Wireless WiFi Link 6000 Series AGN Adapter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111538.nABFcjut001391@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533877 John W. Linville changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |536847 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 15:39:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:39:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536847] add iwl6000-firmware package to F-12 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111539.nABFdGL9001505@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536847 John W. Linville changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-package-review at redha | |t.com, lemenkov at gmail.com, | |linville at redhat.com, | |notting at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 15:38:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:38:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536847] New: add iwl6000-firmware package to F-12 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: add iwl6000-firmware package to F-12 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536847 Summary: add iwl6000-firmware package to F-12 Product: Fedora Version: 12 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: iwl6000-firmware AssignedTo: linville at redhat.com ReportedBy: linville at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, linville at redhat.com, lemenkov at gmail.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 533877 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Clone Of: 533877 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #533877 +++ Spec URL: http://linville.fedorapeople.org/iwl6000-firmware.spec SRPM URL: http://linville.fedorapeople.org/iwl6000-firmware-9.176.4.1-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: This package contains the firmware required by the iwlagn driver for Linux to support the iwl6000 hardware. Usage of the firmware is subject to the terms and conditions contained inside the provided LICENSE file. Please read it carefully. --- Additional comment from lemenkov at gmail.com on 2009-11-10 05:16:13 EDT --- One issue still remains - since the package places something in /lib/firmware, when it should contain "Requires: udev". This should be aded to others firmware packages (some f them you;re maintaining). REVIEW: + rpmlint is silent [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/iwl6000-firmware-9.176.4.1-1.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. - The package meets the Packaging Guidelines, except the issue, noted above. + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. + The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included in %doc. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package, match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ sha256sum iwlwifi-6000-ucode-9.176.4.1.tgz* ac1923870c5d041d238d1a919b8dbb9cea46eaa28e7d06ef7bb5b0dbef316fbb iwlwifi-6000-ucode-9.176.4.1.tgz ac1923870c5d041d238d1a919b8dbb9cea46eaa28e7d06ef7bb5b0dbef316fbb iwlwifi-6000-ucode-9.176.4.1.tgz.1 [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. 0 No need to handle locales. 0 No shared library files. + The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries. + The package is not designed to be relocatable. + The package owns all directories that it creates. + The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + The package consistently uses macros. + The package contains code, or permissible content. 0 No extremely large documentation files. + Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. 0 No header files. 0 No static libraries. 0 No pkgconfig(.pc) files. 0 The package doesn't contain library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1). 0 No devel sub-package. + The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives. 0 Not a GUI application. + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. Please, fix the only issue, and I'll continue. --- Additional comment from linville at redhat.com on 2009-11-10 11:46:38 EDT --- Spec URL: http://linville.fedorapeople.org/iwl6000-firmware.spec SRPM URL: http://linville.fedorapeople.org/iwl6000-firmware-9.176.4.1-2.fc13.src.rpm --- Additional comment from lemenkov at gmail.com on 2009-11-10 11:52:13 EDT --- Ok, now the package is APPROVED. --- Additional comment from linville at redhat.com on 2009-11-10 15:14:58 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: iwl6000-firmware Short Description: Firmware for Intel(R) Wireless WiFi Link 6000 Series AGN Adapter Owners: linville Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: linville --- Additional comment from kevin at tummy.com on 2009-11-10 22:42:41 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 15:40:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:40:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533877] Review Request: iwl6000-firmware - Firmware for Intel(R) Wireless WiFi Link 6000 Series AGN Adapter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111540.nABFecnL029443@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533877 John W. Linville changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |536851 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 15:41:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:41:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533877] Review Request: iwl6000-firmware - Firmware for Intel(R) Wireless WiFi Link 6000 Series AGN Adapter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111541.nABFfvO9002487@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533877 John W. Linville changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 15:47:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:47:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526311] Review Request: mysql-mmm - Multi-Master Replication Manager for MySQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111547.nABFla9j031253@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526311 --- Comment #14 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-11-11 10:47:34 EDT --- > - the monitor subpackage is missing a dependency on dbd::mysql >> Was removed based on comment #4 ;). Added back in. rpm uses /usr/lib/rpm/perldeps.pl to find perl packages. That script parses perl code for 'use' statements. It missed dbd::mysql in this case. > I ran into the same issue. I believe setting the IP for db1 in mmm_common.conf > to 127.0.0.1 by default will atleast keep the process from dying and causing > havoc with logs/email. I did added comments to the config to encourage the IP > be set right, but I know I always try starting the process before anything > else. Regardless, I've reported the following upstream when I first came > across it: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/mysql-mmm/+bug/473446 I've added a log4perl config file to my setup: [ruben at db2 ~]$ sudo cat /etc/mysql-mmm/mmm_agent_log.conf log4perl.logger = INFO, FileInfo log4perl.appender.FileInfo = Log::Log4perl::Appender::File log4perl.appender.FileInfo.Threshold = INFO log4perl.appender.FileInfo.filename = /var/log/mysql-mmm/mmmd_agent.log log4perl.appender.FileInfo.recreate = 1 log4perl.appender.FileInfo.layout = PatternLayout log4perl.appender.FileInfo.layout.ConversionPattern = %d %5p %m%n This takes care of the mail problem. Something like this might be a nice default for Fedora, but we'll have to rotate that log too. Regards, Ruben -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 15:58:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:58:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527488] Review Request: drbd - drbd tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111558.nABFw9ZN001965@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527488 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |NEW Flag| |needinfo?(philipp.reisner at l | |inbit.com) --- Comment #83 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-11-11 10:58:04 EDT --- will you build the devel branch ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 16:08:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 11:08:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226305] Merge Review: poppler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111608.nABG8t74004886@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226305 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla 2009-11-11 11:08:51 EDT --- Ok, on full review: rpmlint: [limb at fawkes SPECS]$ rpmlint -i ../SRPMS/poppler-0.12.1-3.fc11.src.rpm poppler.src:105: W: unversioned-explicit-provides pdftohtml The specfile contains an unversioned Provides: token, which will match all older, equal, and newer versions of the provided thing. This may cause update problems and will make versioned dependencies, obsoletions and conflicts on the provided thing useless -- make the Provides versioned if possible. poppler.src:106: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes pdftohtml The specfile contains an unversioned Obsoletes: token, which will match all older, equal and newer versions of the obsoleted thing. This may cause update problems, restrict future package/provides naming, and may match something it was originally not inteded to match -- make the Obsoletes versioned if possible. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Since I'm under the impression pdf2html is long gone, couldn't his be removed? [limb at fawkes SPECS]$ rpmlint -i ../RPMS/i586/poppler-* poppler.i586: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libpoppler.so.5.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0 This library package calls exit() or _exit(), probably in a non-fork() context. Doing so from a library is strongly discouraged - when a library function calls exit(), it prevents the calling program from handling the error, reporting it to the user, closing files properly, and cleaning up any state that the program has. It is preferred for the library to return an actual error code and let the calling program decide how to handle the situation. Eeeew. Is there a good reason upstream does this? poppler-debuginfo.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/poppler-0.12.1/goo/GooTimer.h The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. Fix. poppler-glib.i586: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. poppler-glib-devel.i586: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. poppler-qt.i586: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. poppler-qt4.i586: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. poppler-qt4-devel.i586: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. poppler-qt-devel.i586: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. Not sure if this is fixable, both doc files are tiny. poppler-utils.i586: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/man1/pdftohtml.1.gz The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in the specfile's %prep section for example using iconv(1). Fix. 10 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings. Name is good, looks like it's in adherence to the guidlines. License raises an eyebrow. Tag is GPLv2, but lots of files have "or later". English, legible, etc. Source URL and md5 are good. Builds on i586. Mock build in process, to check BRs, but since it's the SRPM from koji, I suspect it's fine. I'll post the result. Locales an ldconfig are good. No bundled libs. Not relocatable. No obvious unowned dirs, perms ok. Install and clean are good. Macros are reasonable. Code is permissible. Docs are tiny. There are devel packages, no static libs. Pkgconfig files are OK, and pkgconfig is Required. .so/.so.* setup is correct. -devel package requires look good. No libool archives. Not a GUI app. No conflicts I'm aware of. All UTF-8, except for the above. So, in summary: pdf2html, exit(), spurious-executable term, license tag, non-UTF-8 file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 16:16:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 11:16:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527488] Review Request: drbd - drbd tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111616.nABGGhVc012801@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527488 Philipp Reisner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(philipp.reisner at l | |inbit.com) | --- Comment #84 from Philipp Reisner 2009-11-11 11:16:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #83) > will you build the devel branch ? Just building, I am still learning all those Fedora processes... http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1801358 BTW, did you set the status of the bug to "new" by intention ? It was "on_qa" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 17:00:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:00:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521719] Review Request: pycryptopp - Python wrappers for the Crypto++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111700.nABH0ui8021370@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521719 --- Comment #8 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-11-11 12:00:54 EDT --- Hi Thomas, Thanks for the review, I'll correct the issues you found. I'm sure I patched out the downloading of darcsver, but I'll have another look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 17:21:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:21:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516515] Review Request: globus-gfork - Globus Toolkit - GFork In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111721.nABHLDmO026977@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516515 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-11 12:21:12 EDT --- globus-gfork-0.2-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 17:21:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:21:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516515] Review Request: globus-gfork - Globus Toolkit - GFork In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111721.nABHLXGE027064@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516515 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.2-3.el5 |0.2-3.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 17:21:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:21:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516515] Review Request: globus-gfork - Globus Toolkit - GFork In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111721.nABHLSmT032114@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516515 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-11 12:21:27 EDT --- globus-gfork-0.2-3.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 17:21:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:21:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516515] Review Request: globus-gfork - Globus Toolkit - GFork In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111721.nABHLIS3032072@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516515 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.2-3.fc11 |0.2-3.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 17:22:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:22:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533723] Review Request: perl-Guard - Safe cleanup blocks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111722.nABHMBeY032212@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533723 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-11 12:22:10 EDT --- perl-Guard-1.021-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Guard'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0843 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 17:20:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:20:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507697] Review Request: python-migrate0.5 - schema migration tools for SQLAlchemy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111720.nABHKZ8A031766@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507697 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-11 12:20:31 EDT --- python-migrate0.5-0.5.3-7.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-migrate0.5'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0839 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 17:22:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:22:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533721] Review Request: perl-Net-CIDR - Manipulate IPv4/IPv6 netblocks in CIDR notation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111722.nABHM5rp027381@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533721 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-11 12:22:04 EDT --- perl-Net-CIDR-0.13-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Net-CIDR'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0842 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 17:29:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:29:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521719] Review Request: pycryptopp - Python wrappers for the Crypto++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111729.nABHTH8k001606@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521719 --- Comment #9 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-11-11 12:29:16 EDT --- I talked about the license with the author of pycryptopp a while ago. He removed mars.cpp from the upstream tarball, since pycryptopp doesn't use that and it had an incompatible license. Since we're linking against cryptopp in fedora, and don't use the embedded version in the upstream tarball, I think we're good. I added a clarification to the specfile. New version: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/pycryptopp.spec http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/pycryptopp-0.5.17-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 17:28:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:28:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527488] Review Request: drbd - drbd tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111728.nABHSRXg029102@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527488 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 17:44:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:44:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530301] Review Request: bmpanel2 - NETWM compliant panel for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111744.nABHi183000673@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530301 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-11 12:44:00 EDT --- Removing FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 17:45:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:45:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226305] Merge Review: poppler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111745.nABHjHRt006381@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226305 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla 2009-11-11 12:45:16 EDT --- Mock was OK, so BRs are good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 17:47:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:47:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529278] Review Request: eclipse-ptp - Eclipse Parallel Tools Platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111747.nABHljJi006789@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529278 --- Comment #7 from Orion Poplawski 2009-11-11 12:47:44 EDT --- May need to wait until we are really composing F-13 as rawhide to get farther, but: - Looks like this isn't a noarch package. - Latest from upstream seems to be needing cdt 6.0.2 which isn't released yet too. - Looks like it may only be libaif, which I don't see released anywhere else, in which case I would think it would be permissible to package in here. Have to see how it is used too. Thanks, will post back when things have settled a little. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 17:53:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:53:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530880] Review Request: ns-tiza-fonts - A Slab-Serif Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111753.nABHr1Ur008215@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530880 TK009 changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #18 from TK009 2009-11-11 12:52:59 EDT --- Correction for typo in package name. No commits or builds have been done. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ns-tiza-chalk-fonts Short Description: Chalky slab-serif fonts Owners: TK009 Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 18:15:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:15:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522895] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-native-tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111815.nABIFlX9009328@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522895 Kevin Wright changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #6 from Kevin Wright 2009-11-11 13:15:46 EDT --- Updated spec file and src rpm: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-native-tools/pki-native-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-native-tools/pki-native-tools-1.3.0-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 18:18:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:18:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522272] New Package for Dogtag PKI: symkey In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111818.nABIIMuN010227@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522272 Kevin Wright changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 18:23:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:23:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530301] Review Request: bmpanel2 - NETWM compliant panel for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111823.nABINmTE016180@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530301 --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-11 13:23:46 EDT --- Well ! For packaging issue: * Desktop file - rpms containing GUI applications should also include the corresponding desktop files: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files * Shebang - From rpmlint: -------------------------------------------------------------- bmpanel2-cfg.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/bmpanel2.py 0644 /usr/bin/env -------------------------------------------------------------- bmpanel2.py contains shebang, however this file does not have executionable permission. This script seems to be called from /usr/bin/bmpanel2cfg only, so the shebang doesn't seem to be needed and should be removed. ! For usability - When I try bmpanel2: --------------------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ bmpanel2 (2.1pre1/bmpanel.c:158) Missing theme parameter, trying default "native" FATAL (2.1pre1/panel.c:358) Too many widgets here, try to remove one or more --------------------------------------------------------------- Is this normal? (note that I am using GNOME). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 18:25:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:25:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527488] Review Request: drbd - drbd tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111825.nABIPIe5016904@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527488 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #85 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-11 13:25:15 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 18:31:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:31:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522272] New Package for Dogtag PKI: symkey In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111831.nABIVvXY018543@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522272 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 18:41:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:41:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530743] Review Request: tmux - A terminal multiplexer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111841.nABIfSfJ016957@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530743 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-11 13:41:27 EDT --- tmux-1.1-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tmux-1.1-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 18:54:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:54:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516280] Review Request: perl-Config-Model-CursesUI - Curses interface to edit config data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111854.nABIsQS6020438@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516280 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-11 13:54:25 EDT --- perl-Config-Model-CursesUI-1.103-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Config-Model-CursesUI-1.103-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 19:11:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:11:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532368] Review Request: ns-bola-fonts A Sans Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111911.nABJBcOe030258@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532368 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-11 14:11:38 EDT --- ns-bola-fonts-20080203-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ns-bola-fonts-20080203-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 19:11:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:11:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532368] Review Request: ns-bola-fonts A Sans Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111911.nABJBXXH030224@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532368 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-11 14:11:32 EDT --- ns-bola-fonts-20080203-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ns-bola-fonts-20080203-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 19:11:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:11:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 503336] Review Request: newsbeuter - console based feed reader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111911.nABJBv1n030336@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503336 --- Comment #12 from Jan Klepek 2009-11-11 14:11:55 EDT --- 1] ncurses-devel is still missing in BR 2] there is directory "test" which contains test suites, however it requires tuitest ruby package which is not yet in fedora. what about performing tests in %check? *license ok *rpmlint ok *package naming ok *it is working *license present *package legible *source url / md5sum ok *build ok *utf-8 ok Will be approved when 1] is fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 19:24:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:24:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516280] Review Request: perl-Config-Model-CursesUI - Curses interface to edit config data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111924.nABJO4P3001309@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516280 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-11 14:24:03 EDT --- perl-Config-Model-CursesUI-1.103-3.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Config-Model-CursesUI-1.103-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 19:27:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:27:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521719] Review Request: pycryptopp - Python wrappers for the Crypto++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111927.nABJRaqO002391@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521719 --- Comment #10 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-11 14:27:35 EDT --- You wrote now in the spec file: 10 # we don't use the embedded cryptopp library 11 # but link against the one in Fedora 12 # 13 # all the files we distribute in the binary rpm 14 # are GPLv2+ or TGPPL 15 # 16 # see copyright for details So doesn't the license tag need to be 'GPLV2+ or TGPPL'? It should, but I can't find TGPPL in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing... And from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Valid_License_Short_Names: ''' The License: field must be filled with the appropriate license Short License identifier(s) from the "Good License" tables on the Fedora Licensing page. If your license does not appear in the tables, it needs to be sent to fedora-legal-list at redhat.com (note that this list is moderated, only members may directly post). If the license is approved, it will be added to the appropriate table. ''' I think you should ask there, what to do, but this license looks GPL-compatible at the first sight. So this license 'issue' is now, to just use 'GPLv2+' or 'GPLv2+ or TGPPLv1+'. ____________ Anything else is fine now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 19:38:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:38:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533291] Review Request: ruby-ffi - Foreign Function Interface package for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111938.nABJccvX001658@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533291 --- Comment #6 from Bryan Kearney 2009-11-11 14:38:37 EDT --- Here is an update. Changes made: * Changed name to rubygem-ffi. * I am still building from the source tarball which is against a "must" rule, but I build them gem from source and then install from it * The version number is not changed since this is not a post release package. This is release 0.5.2. The github UI * rpmlint is clean on the spec and SRPM. One warning on the RPM: [bkearney at localhost ~]$ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/rubygem-ffi-0.5.2-1.fc11.i586.rpm rubygem-ffi.i586: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ffi-0.5.2/.require_paths 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. * clean koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1802185 Updated SRPM: http://bkearney.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-ffi-0.5.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Updated Spec File: http://bkearney.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-ffi.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 19:58:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:58:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531541] Review Request: rho - An SSH system profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911111958.nABJwts3011052@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531541 --- Comment #6 from Adrian Likins 2009-11-11 14:58:54 EDT --- version 0.0.16 available now at http://alikins.fedorapeople.org/files/rho/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 20:13:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:13:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 194559] Review Request: perl-Event In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911112013.nABKDBOO011836@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=194559 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |steve.traylen at cern.ch Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Steve Traylen 2009-11-11 15:13:08 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Event New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: stevetraylen I mailed the perl-Event owner 4 and 9 days ago to check if I could take this to which no response and in an earlier mail he mentioned to be stepping away from EPEL anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 21:07:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:07:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 503336] Review Request: newsbeuter - console based feed reader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911112107.nABL7rvg030249@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503336 --- Comment #13 from Thomas Janssen 2009-11-11 16:07:52 EDT --- Sorry, my bad. Looks like i did everything but not uploading the new Spec. I did play around with %check and the lcov-run-all.sh, but it gave me a real hard time, failing on koji. Like: ruby: command not found lcov: command not found and so on. I removed it again. If it's not badly needed to run the tests, i would keep it out for now. Spec URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/newsbeuter.spec SRPM URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/newsbeuter-2.0-8.fc11.src.rpm [thomas at tusdell ~]$ rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/newsbeuter.spec rpmbuild/SRPMS/newsbeuter-2.0-8.fc11.src.rpm rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/newsbeuter-*8*fc11* 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1802301 -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 21:11:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:11:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531541] Review Request: rho - An SSH system profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911112111.nABLBXYk028171@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531541 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dennis at ausil.us Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 21:12:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:12:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531541] Review Request: rho - An SSH system profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911112112.nABLC71G028341@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531541 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #7 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-11-11 16:12:07 EDT --- in the future please paste links to the spec and srpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 21:16:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:16:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536944] New: Review Request: jai-imageio-core - Core Java Advanced Imaging Image I/O Tools API Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jai-imageio-core - Core Java Advanced Imaging Image I/O Tools API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536944 Summary: Review Request: jai-imageio-core - Core Java Advanced Imaging Image I/O Tools API Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: adam at spicenitz.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~agoode/tmp/jai-imageio-core.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~agoode/tmp/jai-imageio-core-1.2-0.1.20091111cvs.fc11.src.rpm Description: This package contains the core Java Advanced Imaging Image I/O Tools API, minus JPEG 2000, JAI Image I/O operations, and the C-based codecLib, giving Java programs the ability to read and write BMP, GIF, PCX, PNM, "Raw" (not digital camera RAW), TIFF, PCX, WBMP. Note that only BSD-licensed code is included in the SRPM, the other stuff has been cleaned out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 21:23:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:23:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534127] [RENAME] Review Request: kbluetooth - The KDE Bluetooth Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911112123.nABLNWhK031178@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534127 Lorenzo Villani changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Lorenzo Villani 2009-11-11 16:23:31 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: kbluetooth New Branches: F-11 F-12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 21:55:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:55:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507083] Review Request: poco - C++ class libraries for network-centric applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911112155.nABLtNHr012573@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507083 --- Comment #20 from Maxim Udushlivy 2009-11-11 16:55:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > Have you contacted upstream developers to discuss their bundling of libraries? > It would be nice if they could stop doing that or at least make it optional > with a ./configure settings. > Though it's not strictly necessary, it is a good idea to keep a live > relationship with upstream. If I recall correctly, somebody already asked POCO developers to do something about bundled libraries problem and there was a refusal. However, a good patch that adds an appropriate option to the "configure" script may change their minds. Such a patch may be written at some point in the future. > Your main package "poco" depends on "poco-devel". This is unusual and I don't > recommend it. You said Boost packaging was your inspiration when you separated > the package into several subpackages, but Boost does not do this. Unusual, but not without benefits. "poco" is a metapackage that helps the developer to install the whole toolkit at once, including headers ("poco-devel") and documentation ("poco-doc"). If this layout is not welcome, it may be reorganized: instead of "poco", "poco-devel" package becomes a new toplevel, not depending on "poco-doc". The name of the spec file will have to be "poco-devel.spec" in this case. The boost toplevel package depends only on binary subpackages which has little meaning to either developers or users. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 21:56:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:56:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534021] Review Request: apache-ivy - Java-based dependency manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911112156.nABLu0JU012961@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534021 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-11-11 16:55:59 EDT --- Good: + Name fullfill naming guidelines + URL tags shows on proper project homepage + Consistently usage of rpm macros + Package contains most recent release of the software + License tag exclaim ASL 2.0 as valid OSS license + Package contains verbatin copy of the license text + Copyright notes on source files headers maches with license tag + Package contains several subpackages + Requires on the subpackages are ok + Could download upstream source via spectool -g + Package tar ball matches with upstram (md5sum: 49130a0c8beb74d77653e5) + Package will be built for nonarch + Package has proper Builtroot defintion + Local build works fine + Buildroot will cleaned at the beginning of %clean and %install + Rpmlint is quite on source package + Rpmlint is quite on binary package + Rpmlint is quite on javadoc package + Local install/uninstall works fine + Javadoc documentation is stroed in a separate subpackage + Files has proper file permissions + All files belong to the package + No duplicated entries in the %files stanza + No files of the package belong to another package + file system sructure matches with java guidelines + Main package has a small %doc stanza + Package has proper %changelog ** APPROVED ** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 22:19:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:19:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516517] Review Request: globus-gridftp-server - Globus Toolkit - Globus GridFTP Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911112219.nABMJhPQ016967@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516517 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-11 17:19:42 EDT --- globus-gridftp-server-3.17-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gridftp-server-3.17-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 22:19:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:19:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516517] Review Request: globus-gridftp-server - Globus Toolkit - Globus GridFTP Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911112219.nABMJmLk021659@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516517 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-11 17:19:48 EDT --- globus-gridftp-server-3.17-2.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gridftp-server-3.17-2.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 22:44:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:44:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530880] Review Request: ns-tiza-fonts - A Slab-Serif Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911112244.nABMiuko027464@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530880 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #19 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-11-11 17:44:55 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 23:15:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:15:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 491497] Review Request: dmapd - A server that provides DAAP and DPAP shares In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911112315.nABNFNQe002212@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491497 --- Comment #9 from Christian Krause 2009-11-11 18:15:22 EDT --- The new version 0.0.15 does not compile against the current version of libdmapsharing because a header file is missing: Version of libdmapsharing-devel: libdmapsharing-devel-1.9.0.10-1.fc12.i686 The compile error of dmapd: [...] In file included from av-meta-reader.c:21: av-meta-reader.h:24:33: error: libdmapsharing/dmap.h: No such file or directory In file included from av-meta-reader.c:21: [...] libdmapsharing-devel does not provide this file so far. By looking at the source I'm assuming you've restructured the include files in both the lib and the daemon. ;-) Please either update the libdmapsharing package as well or keep using 0.0.14 for the review and do both updates later. That's up to you... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 00:10:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:10:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521719] Review Request: pycryptopp - Python wrappers for the Crypto++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911120010.nAC0AtRc013746@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521719 --- Comment #11 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-11-11 19:10:54 EDT --- IANAL, but I picked GPLv2, since the included 'copyright' file says: You may use this package under the GNU General Public License, version 2 or, at your option, any later version. You may use this package under the Transitive Grace Period Public Licence, version 1.0 or, at your option, any later version. (You may choose to use this package under the terms of either licence, at your option.) In this case I choose GPLv2+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 00:25:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:25:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521989] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-util In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911120025.nAC0Pl4m012109@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521989 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Wright 2009-11-11 19:25:46 EDT --- >From the changelog: * Mon Nov 2 2009 Matthew Harmsen 1.3.0-2 - Bugzilla Bug #521989 - packaging for Fedora Dogtag - Take ownership of directories Updated spec file and src rpm: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-util/pki-util.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-util/pki-util-1.3.0-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 00:50:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:50:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 512170] Review Request: pidgin-sipe - Pidgin plugin for connecting to MS Communications Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911120050.nAC0ooVP018990@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512170 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-11 19:50:48 EDT --- pidgin-sipe-1.7.0-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pidgin-sipe'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-11395 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 00:53:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:53:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533723] Review Request: perl-Guard - Safe cleanup blocks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911120053.nAC0rZji025384@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533723 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-11 19:53:34 EDT --- perl-Guard-1.021-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Guard'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-11408 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 00:53:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:53:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533723] Review Request: perl-Guard - Safe cleanup blocks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911120053.nAC0reHx025429@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533723 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-11 19:53:39 EDT --- perl-Guard-1.021-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Guard'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-11409 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 00:54:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:54:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533721] Review Request: perl-Net-CIDR - Manipulate IPv4/IPv6 netblocks in CIDR notation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911120054.nAC0sJcm025602@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533721 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-11 19:54:18 EDT --- perl-Net-CIDR-0.13-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Net-CIDR'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-11412 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 00:56:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:56:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 501957] Review Request: perl-Tk-ProgressBar-Mac - Mac ProgressBar for Perl::Tk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911120056.nAC0uQQe021312@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501957 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-11 19:56:24 EDT --- perl-Tk-ProgressBar-Mac-1.2-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 00:56:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:56:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533721] Review Request: perl-Net-CIDR - Manipulate IPv4/IPv6 netblocks in CIDR notation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911120056.nAC0ub2R021412@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533721 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-11 19:56:37 EDT --- perl-Net-CIDR-0.13-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Net-CIDR'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-11423 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 00:56:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:56:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 501957] Review Request: perl-Tk-ProgressBar-Mac - Mac ProgressBar for Perl::Tk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911120056.nAC0uVS6021369@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501957 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(david.hannequin at g | |mail.com) | Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.2-3.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 00:59:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:59:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 501957] Review Request: perl-Tk-ProgressBar-Mac - Mac ProgressBar for Perl::Tk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911120059.nAC0xQls028071@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501957 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.2-3.fc11 |1.2-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 00:55:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:55:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533723] Review Request: perl-Guard - Safe cleanup blocks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911120055.nAC0tMXG026740@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533723 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-11 19:55:21 EDT --- perl-Guard-1.021-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Guard'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-11418 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 00:58:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:58:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533721] Review Request: perl-Net-CIDR - Manipulate IPv4/IPv6 netblocks in CIDR notation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911120058.nAC0wM88027708@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533721 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-11 19:58:21 EDT --- perl-Net-CIDR-0.13-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Net-CIDR'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-11429 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 00:59:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:59:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 501957] Review Request: perl-Tk-ProgressBar-Mac - Mac ProgressBar for Perl::Tk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911120059.nAC0xLlr022730@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501957 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-11 19:59:20 EDT --- perl-Tk-ProgressBar-Mac-1.2-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 00:59:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:59:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 512170] Review Request: pidgin-sipe - Pidgin plugin for connecting to MS Communications Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911120059.nAC0xGUG022674@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512170 --- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-11 19:59:15 EDT --- pidgin-sipe-1.7.0-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pidgin-sipe'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-11439 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 03:04:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:04:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531051] Review Request: glite-security-util-java - Java Utilities for GSI Credentials In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911120304.nAC34fSP026990@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531051 --- Comment #3 from Mattias Ellert 2009-11-11 22:04:40 EDT --- There is a typo in the Requires - should be vomsjapi: Requires: vomjapi The following line in the filelist is redundant - the parent directory is already listed: %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.jar.* Also there are several places in comments and changelog where it says vomsapi instead of vomsjapi: # remove private copy of vomsapi and use the provided package. - Don't use private vomsapi and use vomsapi package instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 03:30:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:30:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533993] Review Request: wordpress-plugin-bad-behavior - Spam prevention plugin for WordPress In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911120330.nAC3Ue9i002227@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533993 Ryan Rix changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Ryan Rix 2009-11-11 22:30:39 EDT --- Looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 03:51:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:51:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531255] Review Request: CGSI-gSOAP - GSI plugin for gSOAP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911120351.nAC3phPp002355@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531255 --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert 2009-11-11 22:51:42 EDT --- New version available: Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/CGSI-gSOAP.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/CGSI-gSOAP-1.3.3.2-2.20090920cvs.fc11.src.rpm The release tag now contains the cvs date. The Provides/Obsoletes for the old package name that was never in Fedora is removed. Since all files inside the doc directory are also doc I see no problem with marking the directory doc too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 05:58:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:58:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532382] Review Request: fvkbd - Free Virtual Keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911120558.nAC5wQU1032443@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532382 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-11-12 00:58:25 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 06:00:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 01:00:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531988] Review Request: lekhonee-gnome - The gnome frontend for lekhonee wordpress client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911120600.nAC60Yux006328@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531988 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-11-12 01:00:33 EDT --- ping? you can request for cvs module -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 05:59:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:59:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531987] Review Request: wtop - top for webserver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911120559.nAC5xvRT005825@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531987 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 06:28:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 01:28:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531255] Review Request: CGSI-gSOAP - GSI plugin for gSOAP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911120628.nAC6SuWf007937@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531255 --- Comment #3 from Steve Traylen 2009-11-12 01:28:55 EDT --- Provides: CGSI_gSOAP-devel = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: CGSI_gSOAP-devel < 1.3.2.2-3 to go as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 06:29:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 01:29:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 504476] Review Request: rubygem-newgem - Bundle Ruby libraries into a RubyGem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911120629.nAC6T35l007987@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504476 --- Comment #8 from Jan Klepek 2009-11-12 01:29:01 EDT --- 1] rpmlint complaining rubygem-newgem.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.4.1-3 ['1.5.2-1.fc12', '1.5.2-1'] rubygem-newgem.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/newgem-1.5.2/rubygems_generators/executable/templates/bin/app.rb.erb 0644 /usr/bin/env rubygem-newgem.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/newgem-1.5.2/test/fixtures/home/.rubyforge rubygem-newgem.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/newgem-1.5.2/test/fixtures/home/.rubyforge rubygem-newgem.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/newgem-1.5.2/website/version.js rubygem-newgem.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/newgem-1.5.2/newgem_theme_generators/plain_theme/USAGE rubygem-newgem.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/newgem-1.5.2/app_generators/newgem_simple/templates/lib/templates.rb rubygem-newgem.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/newgem-1.5.2/test/test_helper.rb rubygem-newgem.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/newgem-1.5.2/newgem_theme_generators/long_box_theme/USAGE rubygem-newgem.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/newgem-1.5.2/app_generators/newgem/templates/script/console.erb 0644 /usr/bin/env rubygem-newgem.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/newgem-1.5.2/rubygems_generators/executable/USAGE rubygem-newgem.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/newgem-1.5.2/newgem_generators/install_website/templates/script/txt2html 0644 /usr/bin/env 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 8 errors, 4 warnings. *license ok *naming ok *spec file legible *build ok please fix rpmlint messages SPEC file here and in src.rpm seems different -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 06:29:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 01:29:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 504479] Review Request: rubygem-cucumber - Tool to execute plain-text documents as functional tests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911120629.nAC6TmTe013448@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504479 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #15 from Jan Klepek 2009-11-12 01:29:46 EDT --- builded and pushed into updates -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 06:29:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 01:29:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 504476] Review Request: rubygem-newgem - Bundle Ruby libraries into a RubyGem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911120629.nAC6TnKF013477@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504476 Bug 504476 depends on bug 504479, which changed state. Bug 504479 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-cucumber - Tool to execute plain-text documents as functional tests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504479 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 06:51:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 01:51:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530880] Review Request: ns-tiza-fonts - A Slab-Serif Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911120651.nAC6pcov014118@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530880 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-12 01:51:36 EDT --- ns-tiza-chalk-fonts-20080210-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ns-tiza-chalk-fonts-20080210-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 06:51:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 01:51:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530880] Review Request: ns-tiza-fonts - A Slab-Serif Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911120651.nAC6pia8014231@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530880 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-12 01:51:43 EDT --- ns-tiza-chalk-fonts-20080210-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ns-tiza-chalk-fonts-20080210-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 07:34:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 02:34:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531255] Review Request: CGSI-gSOAP - GSI plugin for gSOAP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911120734.nAC7YUsv024178@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531255 --- Comment #4 from Mattias Ellert 2009-11-12 02:34:29 EDT --- Of course. Fixed. http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/CGSI-gSOAP.spec http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/CGSI-gSOAP-1.3.3.2-2.20090920cvs.fc11.src.rpm Mattias -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 08:37:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 03:37:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533075] Review Request: libertas-sd8686-firmware - Marvell SD8686 wifi firmware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911120837.nAC8bj6J012682@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533075 --- Comment #9 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-11-12 03:37:44 EDT --- Ping, Daniel. We're all waiting for you :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 09:35:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 04:35:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533075] Review Request: libertas-sd8686-firmware - Marvell SD8686 wifi firmware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911120935.nAC9ZiGN001779@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533075 Daniel Drake changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Daniel Drake 2009-11-12 04:35:42 EDT --- Sorry, mistyped this bug number in the update submission and forgot to close it manually. This package is now in F11 and F12 updates-testing. Thanks for your help! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 10:14:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 05:14:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533763] Review Request: tex-cjw - LaTeX class for writing resumes and cover letters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911121014.nACAET2d017112@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533763 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-11-12 05:14:27 EDT --- Just a few notes: Change Requires: texlive-latex to Requires: tex(latex). If you're using braces around %{texpkgdir} use them also with %{buildroot}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 10:15:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 05:15:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534021] Review Request: apache-ivy - Java-based dependency manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911121015.nACAFUJa013608@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534021 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-12 05:15:28 EDT --- Thank you Jochen! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: apache-ivy Short Description: Java-based dependency manager Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 10:38:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 05:38:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 503189] Review Request: python-gnutls - Python wrapper for the GNUTLS library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911121038.nACAcCpW023779@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503189 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-11-12 05:38:10 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-gnutls New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: peter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 11:17:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 06:17:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532382] Review Request: fvkbd - Free Virtual Keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911121117.nACBHgRj031681@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532382 --- Comment #3 from Peter Robinson 2009-11-12 06:17:41 EDT --- Sorry, been away from computer and very busy. I hope to have an update shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 11:23:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 06:23:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537066] New: Review Request: cglib - Code generation library for Java Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cglib - Code generation library for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537066 Summary: Review Request: cglib - Code generation library for Java Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/cglib.spec SRPM: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/cglib-2.2-5.fc10.src.rpm Description: cglib is a powerful, high performance and quality code generation library for Java. It is used to extend Java classes and implements interfaces at runtime. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 11:26:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 06:26:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537066] Review Request: cglib - Code generation library for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911121126.nACBQNqg008859@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537066 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-12 06:26:22 EDT --- The package here is from bug #537066, I was satisfied with it (it would pass my review as-is if I were reviewing it), so I did not make any changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 11:25:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 06:25:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537066] Review Request: cglib - Code generation library for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911121125.nACBP9ZT008522@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537066 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mefoster at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-12 06:25:05 EDT --- *** Bug 469894 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 11:25:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 06:25:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469894] Review Request: cglib - Code generation library for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911121125.nACBP8uQ008494@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469894 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #14 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-12 06:25:05 EDT --- Review resubmitted here: bug #537066 Mary, feel free to steal the ticket/package if you like, I'd be happy if you maintained it. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 537066 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 11:29:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 06:29:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532709] Review Request: xmlbeans - XML-Java binding tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911121129.nACBTvKG009817@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532709 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rafaels at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-12 06:29:55 EDT --- *** Bug 227122 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 11:29:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 06:29:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227122] Review Request: xmlbeans-2.1.0-3jpp - XML-Java binding tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911121129.nACBTuk1009781@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227122 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE --- Comment #7 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-12 06:29:55 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 532709 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 11:36:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 06:36:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532709] Review Request: xmlbeans - XML-Java binding tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911121136.nACBaanU005794@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532709 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|Reopened | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 11:39:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 06:39:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537066] Review Request: cglib - Code generation library for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911121139.nACBdr88006729@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537066 --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-12 06:39:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > The package here is from bug #537066 bug #469894 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 12:01:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 07:01:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530301] Review Request: bmpanel2 - NETWM compliant panel for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911121201.nACC1i9x020808@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530301 --- Comment #13 from Marcus Moeller 2009-11-12 07:01:42 EDT --- - I have now added a desktop file for bmpanel2cfg. IMHO it does not make much sense to add a desktop file for the panel itself. - Added Icon reference - Removed shebang / contacted upstream on that Spec URL: http://www.marcus-moeller.de/share/build/bmpanel2/2.1-0.4.pre1/bmpanel2.spec SRPM URL: http://www.marcus-moeller.de/share/build/bmpanel2/2.1-0.4.pre1/bmpanel2-2.1-0.4.pre1.fc11.src.rpm The application starts fine on my GNOME Box, just got the following errors if there is another widget active: (2.1pre1/bmpanel.c:158) Missing theme parameter, trying default "native" (2.1pre1/widget-systray.c:169) There is another tray selection owner, disabling tray (2.1pre1/panel.c:269) Failed to create widget: "systray" Best Regards Marcus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 13:04:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 08:04:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537084] New: Review Request: mpc-complex - C library for multiple precision complex arithmetic Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mpc-complex - C library for multiple precision complex arithmetic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537084 Summary: Review Request: mpc-complex - C library for multiple precision complex arithmetic Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pmachata at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/~pmachata/mpc-complex/mpc-complex.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~pmachata/mpc-complex/mpc-complex-0.8-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: MPC is a C library for the arithmetic of complex numbers with arbitrarily high precision and correct rounding of the result. It is built upon and follows the same principles as Mpfr. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 13:13:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 08:13:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537084] Review Request: mpc-complex - C library for multiple precision complex arithmetic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911121313.nACDDsFq006872@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537084 --- Comment #2 from Petr Machata 2009-11-12 08:13:54 EDT --- $ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/mpc-complex-* ../SRPMS/mpc-complex-* mpc-complex.spec 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 13:13:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 08:13:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537084] Review Request: mpc-complex - C library for multiple precision complex arithmetic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911121313.nACDDPhc032004@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537084 --- Comment #1 from Petr Machata 2009-11-12 08:13:25 EDT --- Note that the upstream distribution is called "mpc", but there already is a package called "mpc" in the distribution ("Command-line client for MPD"). I called the library mpc-complex, but I'm open to other ideas. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 13:28:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 08:28:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537084] Review Request: mpc-complex - C library for multiple precision complex arithmetic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911121328.nACDSQnL010550@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537084 --- Comment #3 from Petr Machata 2009-11-12 08:28:25 EDT --- Forgot to note, the reason I'm packaging this is that GCC 4.5 will likely require it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 14:17:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:17:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537084] Review Request: mpc-complex - C library for multiple precision complex arithmetic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911121417.nACEHsTe016572@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537084 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #4 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-11-12 09:17:53 EDT --- Some comments on your spec: * BuildRequires: gmp mpfr .. This doesn't make sense. AFAIS, you either want BR: gmp-devel mpfr-devel or remove both of these BRs. Probably related to this: The package doesn't build in mock (fedora-12-x86_64): ... configure: error: libgmp not found or uses a different ABI. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.DIaEc2 (%build) Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.DIaEc2 (%build) * You are packaging the infos into the "main" package. This package however is a pure library package, i.e. all the docs it contains are only of interest to developers => I recommend you to move the infos into the *-devel subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 14:48:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:48:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524283] Review Request: plee-the-bear - 2D platform game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911121448.nACEmndv001106@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524283 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cassmodiah at fedoraproject.or | |g AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cassmodiah at fedoraproject.or | |g Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 15:15:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:15:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537084] Review Request: mpc-complex - C library for multiple precision complex arithmetic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911121515.nACFFuYf009679@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537084 --- Comment #5 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-11-12 10:15:54 EDT --- Further findings: * package name: Why did you choose "mpc-complex"? Of cause, to avoid a package name conflict with the "other mpc". However, to me, you naming appears to be an "arkward" choice. I would prefer using libmpc or similar. * Why are you trying to build *.ps docs? a) It's broken (missing deps) b) I don't see any benefits in doing so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 15:29:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:29:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507083] Review Request: poco - C++ class libraries for network-centric applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911121529.nACFTSIS004918@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507083 --- Comment #21 from Michal Schmidt 2009-11-12 10:29:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > Unusual, but not without benefits. "poco" is a metapackage that helps the > developer to install the whole toolkit at once, including headers > ("poco-devel") and documentation ("poco-doc"). I believe that developers are used to installing a *-devel package and a *-doc package when they need them and therefore such a convenience package is of limited usefulness. So I'd drop the "poco" package completely and have the spec file produce only subpackages. The %description paragraph would have to be copied to every subpackage. And the MANIFEST file should not be packaged at all, it's of no use. On the other hand, such a convenience package does not break any guidelines, so if you really like to have it, I won't push for the change. > If this layout is not welcome, > it may be reorganized: instead of "poco", "poco-devel" package becomes a new > toplevel, not depending on "poco-doc". The name of the spec file will have to > be "poco-devel.spec" in this case. Please no. That would be ugly. > The boost toplevel package depends only on binary subpackages which has little > meaning to either developers or users. Agreed. Please take a look at "rpm -q --changelog poco". You'll see macros got expanded there. Use %% to prevent macro expansion in the changelog. Or just avoid the % character completely. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 15:35:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:35:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484279] Review Request: BareBonesBrowserLaunch - Simple library to launch a browser window from Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911121535.nACFZKBc015892@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484279 John Matthews changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(jmatthew at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #4 from John Matthews 2009-11-12 10:35:18 EDT --- Hello Vedran, If you would like to pick this up, and finish the packaging, feel free. As to the work done for bringing Hadoop into Fedora. We created a wiki page for Spacewalk below, listing out the deps and what was needed, as you'll see this was for an older Nutch/Hadoop. https://fedorahosted.org/spacewalk/wiki/GettingPackagesIntoFedora/Nutch Regards, John -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 16:11:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 11:11:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469474] Review Request: sovix - A website revision system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911121611.nACGBkDF018262@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469474 --- Comment #19 from Vivek Shah 2009-11-12 11:11:43 EDT --- Hi Jason, Thanks for the review. I will look into the blockers and update the srpm and spec and post it in a couple of days. Tied down with work currently. Thanks and Regards, Vivek -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 16:18:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 11:18:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484279] Review Request: BareBonesBrowserLaunch - Simple library to launch a browser window from Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911121618.nACGIXq3028576@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484279 --- Comment #5 from Vedran Mileti? 2009-11-12 11:18:31 EDT --- Sure, I will look into it these days and see if I can do something. Can Cloudera packages be helpful in this case? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 16:36:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 11:36:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537084] Review Request: mpc-complex - C library for multiple precision complex arithmetic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911121636.nACGaBuC001823@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537084 --- Comment #6 from Petr Machata 2009-11-12 11:36:11 EDT --- New files: http://people.redhat.com/~pmachata/libmpc/libmpc.spec http://people.redhat.com/~pmachata/libmpc/libmpc-0.8-2.fc11.src.rpm - Renamed the package to libmpc, which is indeed a much better name. - Fixed BRs. - Infos moved to -devel. - Peeked into the postscript and it's indeed not that interesting, it's all in the info pages. So I dropped it. - Actually tried to build in mock this time, and it worked. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 17:28:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:28:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537066] Review Request: cglib - Code generation library for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911121728.nACHSlRv015043@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537066 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 17:28:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:28:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537066] Review Request: cglib - Code generation library for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911121728.nACHSVIr006929@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537066 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-11-12 12:28:30 EDT --- Good: + Package fullfill naming guidelines + Consistently rpm macro usage + URL shows on proper homepage + License tag exclaim ASL 2.0 as valid OSS license + Package contains verbatin copy of the license text + Copyright notes in the sources matches with license tag + Could download upstream sources via spectool -g + Package tar ball matches with upstream (md5sum: b1e6ebfb76ec7071b6a3f5f9d7df2e57) + Patch seams to be reliable + Package will build as noarch + Package has proper BuildRoot definition + Local build works fine + Rpmlint is silent for source package + Rpmlint is silent for binary package + Rpmlint is silent for javadoc package + Koji build works fine + Package as javadoc subpackage for Java API documentation + %doc stanza is small + Files stanza has proper file permissions definitions + All java class are put in a singel jar file + Package contains versioned and unversioned jar file + Files stanza has no duplicated entries + all package files are owned by the package + Package has no files which may belongs to other packages + Package has proper change log *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 17:36:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:36:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533302] Review Request: rst2pdf - Tool for transforming reStructuredText to PDF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911121736.nACHarjg009754@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533302 --- Comment #1 from Dominic Hopf 2009-11-12 12:36:51 EDT --- $ rpmlint rst2pdf.spec rst2pdf.spec: W: no-buildroot-tag 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. This warning can be ignored since we're using RPM versions greater than 4.6. $ rpmlint rst2pdf-0.12.2-1.fc11.src.rpm rst2pdf.src: W: no-buildroot-tag 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. As above. $ rpmlint rst2pdf-0.12.2-1.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines [x] Specfile name matches %{name}.spec [x] Package seems to meet Packaging Guidelines [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary RPMs on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: Fedora 11/x86_64; This is a noarch package [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: see above binary RPM: empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] License in specfile matches actual License and meets Licensing Guidelines License: MIT [x] License file is included in %doc. [x] Specfile is legible and written in AE [x] Sourcefile in the Package is the same as provided in the mentioned Source SHA1SUM of Source: ce588073e4965b6b889be853ac84898b0abdb4e5 [x] Package compiles successfully [!] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires [-] Specfile handles locales properly there are no locales installed with this package [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required [!] Package owns directorys it creates [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not list a file more than once in the %files listing [x] %files section includes %defattr and permissions are set properly [x] %clean section is there and contains rm -rf %{buildroot} [x] Macros are consistently used [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage [x] Program runs properly without files listed in %doc [-] Header files are in a -devel package [-] Static libraries are in a -static package [-] Package requires pkgconfig if .pc files are present [-] .so-files are put into a -devel subpackage [-] Subpackages include fully versioned dependency for the base package [-] Any libtool archives (*.la) are removed [-] contains desktop file (%{name}.desktop) if it is a GUI application [!] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] %{buildroot} is removed at beginning of %install [-] Filenames are encoded in UTF-8 === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Package contains latest upstream version [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] non-English translations for description and summary [x] Package builds in mock Tested on: F11/x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures. tested build with koji [x] Program runs [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] pkgconfig (*.pc) files are placed in a -devel package [-] require package providing a file instead of the file itself no files outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin are required === Python Specific === [x] Python egg is built from source. [x] Python egg does not download any dependencies during the build process [x] egg-info files are included in the package [-] installs using easy_install -m so it won't conflict with the main package this is no compat package [-] one of the packages contains a default version that is usable via "import MODULE" with no prior setup. there no multiple versions of this package [x] A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. Found issues: * Please remove the unneccessary comment in the first line * Please change the project URL to http://rst2pdf.googlecode.com/. * The program actually seems to require python-pygments, but the package doesn't. * Please run any install commands with the -p attribute to preserve timestamps * Please be more specific with listing files in the %files-section * Running the program does output some warnings: $ rst2pdf README /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/reportlab/pdfgen/canvas.py:17: DeprecationWarning: the md5 module is deprecated; use hashlib instead import md5 /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/uniconvertor/app/utils/locale_utils.py:9: DeprecationWarning: The popen2 module is deprecated. Use the subprocess module. from popen2 import popen2 Cannot list directory /home/dmaphy/.uniconvertor:[Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/home/dmaphy/.uniconvertor' ignoring it in font_path [WARNING] createpdf.py:2419 You are using Reportlab version 2.1. The suggested version is 2.3 or higher [WARNING] styles.py:489 Using a borderPadding list in style admonition with wordaxe <= 0.3.2 or Reportlab < 2.3. That is not supported, so it will probably look wrong Please report these to upstream if neccessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 17:48:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:48:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527986] Review Request: taoframework - Multimedia bindings for Mono In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911121748.nACHmOpN020556@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527986 --- Comment #7 from Paul Lange 2009-11-12 12:48:23 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=369274) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=369274) changes in this version diff from last revision to latest. what I forgot: The build I'm referring to is here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1803729 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 17:46:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:46:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527986] Review Request: taoframework - Multimedia bindings for Mono In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911121746.nACHko3F020199@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527986 --- Comment #6 from Paul Lange 2009-11-12 12:46:48 EDT --- New spec-file is online. http://palango.fedorapeople.org/tao/taoframework.spec However one thing is strange. The new spec-file builds fine on x86_64 but fails to build on x86. This worked before and fails at a position where no problem is shown on x86_64. Any ideas on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 18:14:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:14:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527986] Review Request: taoframework - Multimedia bindings for Mono In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911121814.nACIEH7u028949@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527986 --- Comment #8 from Paul Lange 2009-11-12 13:14:16 EDT --- Forget the last 2 comments. I thought I tested parallel build - but i apparently didn't. The diff is more or less the same. only killed the parallel build. The new files are here: http://palango.fedorapeople.org/tao/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 18:14:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:14:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530288] Review Request: stonevpn - easy OpenVPN certificate and configuration management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911121814.nACIEM79020488@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530288 --- Comment #11 from Leon Keijser 2009-11-12 13:14:21 EDT --- Btw, i thought it would be nice if i added some manpages to it. Do you think this would be good to have in Fedora or does the --help function + README suffice? I've added stonevpn (1) and stonevpn.conf (5). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 18:27:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:27:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537066] Review Request: cglib - Code generation library for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911121827.nACIRpKv024338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537066 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-12 13:27:49 EDT --- Danke schon Jochen! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cglib Short Description: Code generation library for Java Owners: lkundrak mef Branches: F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 18:38:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:38:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 498218] Review Request: picturetile - Tiles a bunch of images into one large "photo wall" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911121838.nACIcaKk004443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498218 --- Comment #11 from Edwin ten Brink 2009-11-12 13:38:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > > (In reply to comment #6) > > > But this package does not even have a tarball. Is there any other examples > > > of Fedora packages that just cut the license text from the soure file? If > > > not, I would say it is best to obey the guideline. > > > > ? I'm unaware of any such practices (or cases where it might be applicable for > > that matter). I preferred to have the README out of the script in a %doc file, > > and figured when I did so, I could just as well generate a COPYING. It seems > > that I either should do it this way, or drop all generated %doc files > > entirely. Which option do you recommend? > > > > I am really not sure about this. The guideline might be interpreted either way. > Could you ask this in the fedora-packaging list? When writing my mail to fedora-packaging, I re-read the actual line several times. It seems I've over-interpreted it at the time of packaging: "If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its *own file*, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc." The crux here is the *own file*. It does not include the text in it's own file COPYING. It is therefore incorrect to generate the file (because if the "If (and only if)"). Therefore, I'll strip out the generation of these files, as per your original suggestion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 18:42:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:42:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 498218] Review Request: picturetile - Tiles a bunch of images into one large "photo wall" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911121842.nACIglTc029242@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498218 --- Comment #12 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-11-12 13:42:46 EDT --- This only applies to the COPYING filse though. You can keep the other one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 18:50:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:50:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 498218] Review Request: picturetile - Tiles a bunch of images into one large "photo wall" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911121850.nACIoRiK031479@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498218 --- Comment #13 from Edwin ten Brink 2009-11-12 13:50:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > This only applies to the COPYING filse though. You can keep the other one. As a gesture to the user, that would probably not be harmful. Agreed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 18:50:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:50:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 498218] Review Request: picturetile - Tiles a bunch of images into one large "photo wall" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911121850.nACIogsg008442@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498218 --- Comment #14 from Edwin ten Brink 2009-11-12 13:50:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > (In reply to comment #8) > > > > > > > ? I am a bit reluctant about the provides: > > > > Provides: picturetile.pl = 20050314 > > > > Do we really need this? > > > > > > ? No, not really. I just added it in case someone decides to make a > > > Requires in fspot. I can drop this without any adverse effects, should I? > > > > > > > I would say, drop it. One RPM package providing two different versions of the > > same thing might confuse people or depsolvers. > > > > I realized that what I said is not true, since the package name is not > "picturetile.pl". So having that Provides is harmless. I don't know if it > brings us anything though. > > I leave it up to you. I'll leave it in, in order to make it easier for users to find this package. The typical use-case would be following: - user installs f-spot - user downloads additional extension PictureTile via fspot's Add-In manager - user runs Tools -> Create Photowall - user receives error message "picturetile.pl not found" - user tries to find "picturetile.pl", not "picturetile" Including the Provides makes it easier for rpmfind and the likes to serve this use-case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 19:09:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:09:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 498218] Review Request: picturetile - Tiles a bunch of images into one large "photo wall" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911121909.nACJ9Oxw004447@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498218 --- Comment #15 from Edwin ten Brink 2009-11-12 14:09:23 EDT --- Ok, I've incorporated all your comments. I'd like to go for a final review. New files can be found at: Spec URL: http://fedora.tenbrink-bekkers.nl/picturetile/picturetile.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.tenbrink-bekkers.nl/picturetile/picturetile-0-4.20050314.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 19:26:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:26:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507083] Review Request: poco - C++ class libraries for network-centric applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911121926.nACJQeWw009273@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507083 --- Comment #22 from Maxim Udushlivy 2009-11-12 14:26:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > > Please no. That would be ugly. > Yes, ugly, but you said that you'd drop the "poco" toplevel package - how to do this in a more pleasing way? Can you give an example (or reference)? Why the full description must be in every subpackage, may be just "poco-devel" will suffice? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 19:32:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:32:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469474] Review Request: sovix - A website revision system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911121932.nACJWof1011240@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469474 --- Comment #20 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-12 14:32:49 EDT --- The answer from the legal folks is that AGPL places no restrictions or requirement on the packaging; it is up to the end user to properly comply with the license when they deploy the software. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 19:36:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:36:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 503336] Review Request: newsbeuter - console based feed reader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911121936.nACJa4VL012229@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503336 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Jan Klepek 2009-11-12 14:36:02 EDT --- approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 19:33:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:33:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531051] Review Request: glite-security-util-java - Java Utilities for GSI Credentials In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911121933.nACJXBxq011296@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531051 --- Comment #4 from Steve Traylen 2009-11-12 14:33:10 EDT --- Thanks again, items in Comment #3 addressed. http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/glite-security-util-java/glite-security-util-java.spec http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/glite-security-util-java/glite-security-util-java-2.0.3-7.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 19:39:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:39:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537084] Review Request: libmpc - C library for multiple precision complex arithmetic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911121939.nACJdDe6022435@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537084 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: mpc-complex |Review Request: libmpc - C |- C library for multiple |library for multiple |precision complex |precision complex |arithmetic |arithmetic -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 19:59:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:59:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 499394] Review Request: ampache - web based audio/video streaming application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911121959.nACJxEnr027378@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499394 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jan.klepek at hp.com Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #11 from Jan Klepek 2009-11-12 14:59:11 EDT --- Hi David, If this package is not suitable for fedora, please follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process and close it with short explanation and set fedora.review- Hi Paul, If you are not willing to fix missing dependency, please close this request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 20:20:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:20:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533094] Review Request: xskat - The card game Skat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911122020.nACKKaFp024108@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533094 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-12 15:20:35 EDT --- xskat-4.0.0-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xskat-4.0.0-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 20:19:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:19:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533094] Review Request: xskat - The card game Skat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911122019.nACKJ8i1023104@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533094 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-12 15:19:07 EDT --- xskat-4.0.0-4.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xskat-4.0.0-4.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 20:22:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:22:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531255] Review Request: CGSI-gSOAP - GSI plugin for gSOAP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911122022.nACKM3gJ024842@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531255 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Steve Traylen 2009-11-12 15:22:02 EDT --- Review of CGSI-gSOAP.spec Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1804012 + rpmlint clean $ rpmlint SPECS/CGSI-gSOAP.spec SRPMS/CGSI-gSOAP-1.3.3.2-2.20090920cvs.fc12.src.rpm RPMS/x86_64/CGSI-gSOAP-* 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + Package name good. + Spec file name good. + Meets the pkg guidelines. + Spec Licensed with ASL 2.0 + Code is also ASL 2.0 + A LICENSE file is present. + English spec + Legible spec. + Source matches upstream. diff -r --brief CGSI-gSOAP-1.3.3.2 /tmp/CGSI-gSOAP-1.3.3.2 + Builds as per koji above. + Builds on all arches. + BR sensible. + No locales present. + ldconfig called correctly. + No system libs. + Not relocatable. + Owns all directories it creates or pulls them in. + No file duplicates. + All %defattr + %clean is cleaned. + Consitant use of macros. + Contain code. + No large docs. + %doc not needed for runtime. + headers in devel. + No pkg-config files. + .so in devel. + "-devel" requires explicitly "" + no .la files. + No gui + Does not own forign package files. + %install does clean. + utf8. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 20:34:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:34:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 498218] Review Request: picturetile - Tiles a bunch of images into one large "photo wall" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911122034.nACKYXtn027764@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498218 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #16 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-11-12 15:34:31 EDT --- It seems all good now. Thanks! ---------------------------------------------- This package (picturetile) is APPROVED by oget ---------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 20:47:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:47:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516280] Review Request: perl-Config-Model-CursesUI - Curses interface to edit config data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911122047.nACKlh09031055@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516280 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-12 15:47:42 EDT --- perl-Config-Model-CursesUI-1.103-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Config-Model-CursesUI-1.103-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 20:59:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:59:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 503336] Review Request: newsbeuter - console based feed reader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911122059.nACKxRmG009180@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503336 Thomas Janssen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 20:58:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:58:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 503336] Review Request: newsbeuter - console based feed reader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911122058.nACKweGv001078@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503336 --- Comment #15 from Thomas Janssen 2009-11-12 15:58:39 EDT --- Thanks for the review Jan Klepek. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: newsbeuter Short Description: Configurable text-based feed reader Owners: thomasj Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 22:10:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:10:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531773] Review Request: synfig - Vector-based 2D animation rendering backend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911122210.nACMArWG020415@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531773 Luya Tshimbalanga changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |luya at fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |luya at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Luya Tshimbalanga 2009-11-12 17:10:51 EDT --- - $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/synfig-0.61.09-4.fc11.src.rpm synfig.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 64) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. + Package complies to Package Naming guideline + Spec file name matches the base package %{name}, synfig in this case, in the format %{name}.spec + Package meets the Packaging guideline with the removal of rpath listed in spec file + License filed in package spec match the factual license which is GPLv2+ + Text of licnse included in %doc + Spec file is legible and written in American English + Succesfully build in all architectures http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1776478 + Locale handled using %find_lang + %post and %postun called + No bundle copies of system libraries. + All created directories are owned by the package + Permission on files is properly set + Header files are in -devel package + No .la libtool archived - Missing %{name}.desktop file because synfig is a GuI application + All filename in rpm package are valid UTF-8 I am unable to match md5sum because sourceforge seems to be down. Please correct those comments listed in "-" line. Also I had trouble to locally rebuild package with this result: checking how to run the C++ preprocessor... /lib/cpp configure: error: in `/home/luya/rpmbuild/BUILD/synfig-0.61.09': configure: error: C++ preprocessor "/lib/cpp" fails sanity check See `config.log' for more details. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.WcYKNa (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 22:28:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:28:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534061] Review Request: hostname - Utility to set/show the host name or domain name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911122228.nACMSder024009@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534061 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |steve.traylen at cern.ch AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |steve.traylen at cern.ch --- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen 2009-11-12 17:28:38 EDT --- $ rpmlint hostname.spec hostname.spec: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install hostname.spec: W: no-buildroot-tag other that that it looks to be an easy review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 22:43:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:43:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533738] Review Request: bwa - Burrows-Wheeler Alignment Tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911122243.nACMhbmX002393@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533738 --- Comment #2 from Albert Bogdanowicz 2009-11-12 17:43:36 EDT --- I think it should work now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 23:03:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:03:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530021] Review Request: moovida - Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911122303.nACN3930006738@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530021 Alex Lancaster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |alexl at users.sourceforge.net --- Comment #11 from Alex Lancaster 2009-11-12 18:03:08 EDT --- Graeme Gillies will be taking over this review as per bug #510965 comment #13. I will step up and take the review (taking bug, but not marking review flag until package submitted). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 23:16:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:16:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 504891] Review Request: trove - Efficient Java collections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911122316.nACNGYAg002369@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504891 --- Comment #5 from Jerry James 2009-11-12 18:16:32 EDT --- Actually, my reason for wanting this package in Fedora vanished a couple of months ago. I'm still willing to see it through if nobody else wants to so do, but if someone else is interested in maintaining, I'm happy to pass the baton. Otherwise, I'll fix the problems noted in comment 4 sometime in the next 24 hours or so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 23:24:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:24:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531773] Review Request: synfig - Vector-based 2D animation rendering backend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911122324.nACNOHj5011029@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531773 --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-12 18:24:16 EDT --- Thanks for the review: (In reply to comment #3) > - $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/synfig-0.61.09-4.fc11.src.rpm synfig.src: W: > mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 64) Fixed. (This tiny change being the only one, I did not bump a release number.) > - Missing %{name}.desktop file because synfig is a GuI application It's not, please read the description. synfigstudio is, see bug #479527 > checking how to run the C++ preprocessor... /lib/cpp > configure: error: in `/home/luya/rpmbuild/BUILD/synfig-0.61.09': > configure: error: C++ preprocessor "/lib/cpp" fails sanity check > See `config.log' for more details. > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.WcYKNa (%build) That's probably you don't have the build group installed [1] (presumably the cpp package). Either install it, or use mock to do the build. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 New package: SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/synfig.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/synfig-0.61.09-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 23:43:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:43:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529517] Review Request: kcm_touchpad - Synaptics driver based touchpads kcontrol module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911122343.nACNhFfV015726@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529517 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-12 18:43:14 EDT --- kcm_touchpad-0.3.0-5.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kcm_touchpad-0.3.0-5.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 23:43:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:43:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529517] Review Request: kcm_touchpad - Synaptics driver based touchpads kcontrol module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911122343.nACNhLtd015774@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529517 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-12 18:43:20 EDT --- kcm_touchpad-0.3.0-5.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kcm_touchpad-0.3.0-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 23:47:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:47:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478806] Review Request: simh - A highly portable, multi-system emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911122347.nACNl32i009652@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478806 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-12 18:47:00 EDT --- I think you misunderstood; I don't think it's necessary to remove all mention of ibm1130 from the makefile, I just found changes to the "nopatents" tarball (which is misnamed, since the issue isn't one of patents) that went beyond actually deleting files. Now that I can see the script which generates that file, I can see you sed that out, which is an unusual way to do it but which doesn't violate any guidelines as far as I know. %description mentions the removed IBM 1130 support. I also don't know if the 33 number is still accurate. In a multiple licensing scenario, you need to include some comment in your spec indicating which files are under which license. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios Spot provided that information in comment 9 so this should be a trivial addition. I did try to test these, but honestly I've no idea what I'm doing so I can't really do that. I did run simh-altair and entered "go"; it segfaulted immediately. simh-hp2100 just spun forever; I let it run for five minutes and it did nothing. The others seemed to behave as I'd expect (breaking with HALT instructions and the like. Can you check those two and verify that they work as expected for you? * source files match upstream (confirmed by manual inspection). * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. X description still mentions removed content. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: simh = 3.8.1-2.fc12 simh(x86-64) = 3.8.1-2.fc12 = libpcap.so.1()(64bit) * owns the directory it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 23:51:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:51:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537265] New: Review Request: acovea - Analysis of compiler options via evolutionary algorithm Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: acovea - Analysis of compiler options via evolutionary algorithm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537265 Summary: Review Request: acovea - Analysis of compiler options via evolutionary algorithm Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bos at serpentine.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.serpentine.com/bos/files/acovea.spec SRPM URL: http://www.serpentine.com/bos/files/acovea-5.1.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: ACOVEA (Analysis of Compiler Options via Evolutionary Algorithm) implements a genetic algorithm to find the "best" options for compiling programs with the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC) C and C++ compilers. "Best", in this context, is defined as those options that produce the fastest executable program from a given source code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 12 23:51:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:51:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462458] Review Request: drupal-workspace - Allows users to have a central place to view and manage their content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911122351.nACNpYlZ017451@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462458 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-12 18:51:32 EDT --- I'm not sure what you changed. The license field is still not correct (should be GPL+) , and the other bits like buildroot and the deletion of the buildroot in %install are still there (though I don't know if you intend to remove those). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 00:50:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:50:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465159] Review Request: tcexam - A Web-based Computer-Based Assessment (CBA) software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130050.nAD0ohbc031629@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465159 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-12 19:50:41 EDT --- Wow, this is ancient. Are you still interested in contributing this package? If so, here are a few comments: I note that the current version has a significantly larger version number, which is not surprising. The selinux subpackage is going to be scary for most reviewers; I certainly don't feel qualified to review it. Have the selinux folks (dwalsh, etc.) had a look at your policy? I have significant doubts about files in /usr/share being configuration files. Group is completely unimportant; put whatever you want there. The proper way to classify such applications is using comps. If tcpdf.org is actually a separate package (separate tarball, differing release cycle), it cannot be bundled as part of this one. The fonts cannot be bundled; they must be packaged (if they aren't already) and the code must use the packaged versions. Don't try to output information in scriptlets; you can't expect that it will be seen by anyone. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 00:59:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:59:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477948] Review Request: simple-ccsm - Simplified plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130059.nAD0xHDL000675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477948 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(kagesenshi.87 at gma | |il.com) --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-12 19:59:16 EDT --- Wow, there's been no response to review commentary in nearly eleven months; I guess I'll close this soon if there's no further response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 01:14:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:14:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 494695] Review Request: qutim - Multiplatform Instant Messenger on Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130114.nAD1E2X1004255@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494695 --- Comment #15 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-11-12 20:13:58 EDT --- Delete invoke ldconfig: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/qutim/qutim-0.2.0-1.19.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 01:21:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:21:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 509160] Review Request: =?utf-8?b?IG1pbmVfZGV0ZWN0b3Ig4oCT?= =?utf-8?q?_a_mine-finding_game?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130121.nAD1LdbT030680@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509160 --- Comment #7 from Bj?rn Persson 2009-11-12 20:21:38 EDT --- Now that PargmARC is in I've made a scratch build of Mine Detector. It worked without errors on i586, x86_64, ppc and ppc64: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1804288 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 01:25:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:25:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533738] Review Request: bwa - Burrows-Wheeler Alignment Tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130125.nAD1PkUQ007236@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533738 --- Comment #3 from Scott Collier 2009-11-12 20:25:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > I think it should work now. I still had errors building. http://boodle.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/bwa2_errors Try changing your make line to: make %{?_smp_mflags} \ CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" Then it compiles. I'm happy to test again once you've made the change. Everything else looks OK to me. Perhaps someone with more experience would like to give it a once over? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 01:41:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:41:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478388] Review Request: UDAV - data visualisation program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130141.nAD1fIWx010783@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478388 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |BuildFails Bug 478388 depends on bug 478372, which changed state. Bug 478372 Summary: Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-12 20:41:16 EDT --- This fails to build for me; a scratch build is at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1804299 Please clear the whiteboard when you have a package which builds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 01:50:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:50:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 498604] Review Request: apron - Abstract numerical domain library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130150.nAD1oqku012862@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498604 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(amdunn at gmail.com) --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-12 20:50:50 EDT --- Was there any progress? It's been four months since the last comment with no response; I'll go ahead and close this out soon if nothing further happens. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 01:58:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:58:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530880] Review Request: ns-tiza-fonts - A Slab-Serif Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130158.nAD1wY0Q014503@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530880 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-12 20:58:32 EDT --- ns-tiza-chalk-fonts-20080210-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ns-tiza-chalk-fonts-20080210-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 02:01:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:01:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532368] Review Request: ns-bola-fonts A Sans Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130201.nAD21Qus015350@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532368 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-12 21:01:25 EDT --- ns-bola-fonts-20080203-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ns-bola-fonts-20080203-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 02:05:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:05:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 504178] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-fc - Future Composer input plugin for GStreamer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130205.nAD25w0U016189@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504178 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-12 21:05:57 EDT --- I'm just looking over some old review tickets. The answer to "Why?" is http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define I don't think it particularly matters in this case, but it's in the guidelines and if for some reason you really want to use %define instead of %global you should expect reviewers to ask you to justify it. I didn't have any problem downloading the source, but the tarball I got doesn't match the one in this package. The contents seem to be the same; perhaps they just recompressed the file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 02:13:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:13:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479527] Review Request: synfigstudio - Vector-based 2D animation studio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130213.nAD2DqUY017340@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479527 Luya Tshimbalanga changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |luya at fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |luya at fedoraproject.org Alias| |synfigstudio -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 02:21:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:21:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 491497] Review Request: dmapd - A server that provides DAAP and DPAP shares In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130221.nAD2LIkn010294@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491497 --- Comment #10 from W. Michael Petullo 2009-11-12 21:21:17 EDT --- I've just queued a libdmapsharing 1.9.0.13 update for F-11, F-12 and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 02:23:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:23:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516280] Review Request: perl-Config-Model-CursesUI - Curses interface to edit config data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130223.nAD2NkeH010654@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516280 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-12 21:23:45 EDT --- perl-Config-Model-CursesUI-1.103-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Config-Model-CursesUI'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-11450 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 02:26:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:26:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 498873] Review Request: thrift - A multi-language RPC and serialization framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130226.nAD2QqY9020391@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498873 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |BuildFails --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-12 21:26:50 EDT --- Just looking over some old tickets; this one fails to build for me. Here's a scratch build in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1804331 Please clear the whiteboard if you provide a package that builds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 02:29:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:29:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525192] Review Request: python-mpmath - A pure Python library for multiprecision floating-point arithmetic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130229.nAD2TP4O012459@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525192 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.13-5.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 02:31:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:31:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529465] Review Request: thunar-vcs-plugin - SVN integration for the Thunar filemanager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130231.nAD2VTdQ013356@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529465 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-12 21:31:28 EDT --- thunar-vcs-plugin-0.1.2-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update thunar-vcs-plugin'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-10695 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 02:28:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:28:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529465] Review Request: thunar-vcs-plugin - SVN integration for the Thunar filemanager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130228.nAD2SA0n012241@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529465 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-12 21:28:09 EDT --- thunar-vcs-plugin-0.1.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update thunar-vcs-plugin'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-10632 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 02:31:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:31:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530880] Review Request: ns-tiza-fonts - A Slab-Serif Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130231.nAD2V6m1013190@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530880 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-12 21:31:05 EDT --- ns-tiza-chalk-fonts-20080210-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 02:29:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:29:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525192] Review Request: python-mpmath - A pure Python library for multiprecision floating-point arithmetic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130229.nAD2TKqS012416@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525192 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-12 21:29:18 EDT --- python-mpmath-0.13-5.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 02:33:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:33:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530880] Review Request: ns-tiza-fonts - A Slab-Serif Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130233.nAD2Xsm0023901@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530880 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|20080210-2.fc10 |20080210-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 02:31:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:31:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530880] Review Request: ns-tiza-fonts - A Slab-Serif Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130231.nAD2VBD1023113@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530880 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |20080210-2.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 02:36:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:36:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516280] Review Request: perl-Config-Model-CursesUI - Curses interface to edit config data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130236.nAD2aCna015425@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516280 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-12 21:36:11 EDT --- perl-Config-Model-CursesUI-1.103-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Config-Model-CursesUI'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-11479 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 02:33:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:33:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530880] Review Request: ns-tiza-fonts - A Slab-Serif Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130233.nAD2Xnrg014392@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530880 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-12 21:33:48 EDT --- ns-tiza-chalk-fonts-20080210-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 02:35:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:35:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530743] Review Request: tmux - A terminal multiplexer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130235.nAD2ZbvG015206@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530743 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-12 21:35:36 EDT --- tmux-1.1-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update tmux'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-11477 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 02:37:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:37:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532368] Review Request: ns-bola-fonts A Sans Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130237.nAD2bavQ025537@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532368 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-12 21:37:36 EDT --- ns-bola-fonts-20080203-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 02:36:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:36:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522988] Review Request: afraid-dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130236.nAD2aNQ3025318@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 --- Comment #48 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-12 21:36:21 EDT --- afraid-dyndns-1.0-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 02:38:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:38:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487128] Review Request: eventReceivers - Command Center Event Receivers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130238.nAD2cOqP025855@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487128 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(msuchy at redhat.com | |) --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-12 21:38:22 EDT --- The above problem is still present, and there's been no response in over four months. I'll go ahead and close this soon if there's no further progress. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 02:36:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:36:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522988] Review Request: afraid-dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130236.nAD2aSu0025366@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.0-5.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 02:37:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:37:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532368] Review Request: ns-bola-fonts A Sans Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130237.nAD2bPPW016059@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532368 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-12 21:37:24 EDT --- ns-bola-fonts-20080203-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 02:38:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:38:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130238.nAD2c8YE016280@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #86 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-12 21:38:02 EDT --- x11vnc-0.9.8-14.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 02:37:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:37:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532368] Review Request: ns-bola-fonts A Sans Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130237.nAD2bf5K016129@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532368 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|20080203-2.fc11 |20080203-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 02:37:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:37:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532368] Review Request: ns-bola-fonts A Sans Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130237.nAD2bTWe016092@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532368 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |20080203-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 02:45:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:45:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531773] Review Request: synfig - Vector-based 2D animation rendering backend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130245.nAD2jpLL027822@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531773 Luya Tshimbalanga changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Luya Tshimbalanga 2009-11-12 21:45:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Thanks for the review: > > (In reply to comment #3) > > - $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/synfig-0.61.09-4.fc11.src.rpm synfig.src: W: > > mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 64) > > Fixed. (This tiny change being the only one, I did not bump a release number.) > > - Missing %{name}.desktop file because synfig is a GuI application > > It's not, please read the description. synfigstudio is, see bug #479527 Ok. I am also talikg synfigstudio for review as well. > > checking how to run the C++ preprocessor... /lib/cpp > > configure: error: in `/home/luya/rpmbuild/BUILD/synfig-0.61.09': > > configure: error: C++ preprocessor "/lib/cpp" fails sanity check > > See `config.log' for more details. > > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.WcYKNa (%build) > > That's probably you don't have the build group installed [1] (presumably the > cpp package). Either install it, or use mock to do the build. > It was gcc-c++ package that was not installed although it should with the use of yum-builddep command with src package (might be a bug but it is another story). Back to the review: + $ rpmlint Downloads/synfig-0.61.09-4.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + md5sum rpmbuild/SOURCES/synfig-0.61.09.tar.gz Downloads/synfig-0.61.09.tar.gz 0330521fe46b9e8a39df7081ec64c5d5 rpmbuild/SOURCES/synfig-0.61.09.tar.gz 0330521fe46b9e8a39df7081ec64c5d5 Downloads/synfig-0.61.09.tar.gz + sha512sum rpmbuild/SOURCES/synfig-0.61.09.tar.gz Downloads/synfig-0.61.09.tar.gz 799c076a2ba8d00b02273ee191421ffb2379081107b1d5e101db010bb0c347ea75e89ba17891fe367f0fe2d7bb979e7660317240afb402fe11147c268c0592ea rpmbuild/SOURCES/synfig-0.61.09.tar.gz 799c076a2ba8d00b02273ee191421ffb2379081107b1d5e101db010bb0c347ea75e89ba17891fe367f0fe2d7bb979e7660317240afb402fe11147c268c0592ea Downloads/synfig-0.61.09.tar.gz + Source package succesfully built on all architecture using Koji and also built locally In conclusion, the package fully complies with packaging guideline. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 02:47:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:47:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531773] Review Request: synfig - Vector-based 2D animation rendering backend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130247.nAD2lPGS018204@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531773 --- Comment #6 from Luya Tshimbalanga 2009-11-12 21:47:25 EDT --- BTW, once you have created cvs. Make sure to update to latest upstream version (0.62). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 02:59:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:59:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 232790] Review Request: ming - SWF output library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130259.nAD2xMCD020203@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232790 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(cbalint at redhat.co | |m) --- Comment #22 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-12 21:59:19 EDT --- So it's been over a year since the last comment. I'm thinking that it's time to close this out, and I'll do that soon if nobody objects. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 03:37:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:37:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 510743] Review Request: aranym - Atari Running on Any Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130337.nAD3bvX9007756@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510743 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #23 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-12 22:37:53 EDT --- Still no spec or package after another five weeks; it's time this was closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 03:54:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:54:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477948] Review Request: simple-ccsm - Simplified plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130354.nAD3s0uD011700@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477948 Mohd Izhar Firdaus Ismail changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.co | |m --- Comment #4 from Mohd Izhar Firdaus Ismail 2009-11-12 22:53:59 EDT --- eek sorry i totally forgotten i submitted this >.< seems like i need to update it to 0.8.2 first .. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 04:26:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 23:26:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479527] Review Request: synfigstudio - Vector-based 2D animation studio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130426.nAD4Qi4a008331@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479527 Luya Tshimbalanga changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Luya Tshimbalanga 2009-11-12 23:26:43 EDT --- Here is review: + $ rpmlint Downloads/synfigstudio-0.61.09-1.el5.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + spec and source file matches the package name and comply with Package Naming Guideline + License is GPLv2 + Spec file is legible and written in American English + Package is a GUI application. desktop-file-utils requirement is provided and .desktop is used as required by Packaging Guideline + $ md5sum rpmbuild/SOURCES/synfigstudio-0.61.09.tar.gz Downloads/synfigstudio-0.61.09.tar.gz 09dac04ce8b6b8ac0ff15fde4b041eed rpmbuild/SOURCES/synfigstudio-0.61.09.tar.gz 09dac04ce8b6b8ac0ff15fde4b041eed Downloads/synfigstudio-0.61.09.tar.gz Downloads path is taken from upstream thus match the source package from src file. + Usage of Macros are consistent in spec file + Source URL matches upstream and is fully functional + All .la are excluded from the package + The package owns directory and files it creates + Package is succesfully compiled and build with synfig devel package from #531773. No sure if I should let pass synfigstudio because of missing synfig-devel otherwise it can be accepted once synfig package is available on repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 05:28:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 00:28:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530688] Review Request: ghc-language-c - Haskell language-c library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130528.nAD5SkJA021079@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530688 Bryan O'Sullivan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bos at serpentine.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2009-11-13 00:28:45 EDT --- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. $ rpmlint ghc-language-c-devel-0.3.1.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ghc-language-c-doc-0.3.1.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ghc-language-c-prof-0.3.1.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm ghc-language-c-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-language-c-devel ghc-language-c-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-language-c-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.10.3/language-c-0.3.1.1/libHSlanguage-c-0.3.1.1_p.a 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. OK. All expected. MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK. MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. OK. MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. OK. MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK. MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK. MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK. MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK. MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK. MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK. MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. OK. MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. OK. MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. OK. MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. NA. MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. NA. MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. NA. MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable,... NA. MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. OK. MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK. MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK. MUST: Each package must have a %clean section OK. MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. OK. MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK. MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK. MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. OK. MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA. MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA. MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA. MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1) NA. MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK. MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. OK. MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must NA. MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK. MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK. MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [27] OK. This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 06:28:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 01:28:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537084] Review Request: libmpc - C library for multiple precision complex arithmetic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130628.nAD6SMfo001218@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537084 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-11-13 01:28:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) Much better, now ;) Launching formal review: Mostly OK, except: * (MUSTFIX) /usr/include/mpc.h includes "mpfr.h" and "gmp.h", i.e. there is a hard dependency between *-devel and mpfr-devel+gmp-devel => *-devel must Require: mpfr-devel gmp-devel * (SHOULD) What is the reason for you to explicitly pass --entry ... while installing the infos? Except of cases, when the infos are broken, such a step should not be necessary and thus be avoided. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 06:42:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 01:42:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537325] New: Review Request: lv2-fil-plugins - Four-band parametric equalisers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lv2-fil-plugins - Four-band parametric equalisers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537325 Summary: Review Request: lv2-fil-plugins - Four-band parametric equalisers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oget.fedora at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/lv2-fil-plugins.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/lv2-fil-plugins-2.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Stereo and mono LV2 plugins, four-band parametric equalisers. Each section has an active/bypass switch, frequency, bandwidth and gain controls. There is also a global bypass switch and gain control. The 2nd order resonant filters are implemented using a Mitra-Regalia style lattice filter, which has the nice property of being stable even while parameters are being changed. All switches and controls are internally smoothed, so they can be used 'live' whithout any clicks or zipper noises. This should make this plugin a good candidate for use in systems that allow automation of plugin control ports, such as Ardour, or for stage use. The GUI provides knobs and toggle buttons for tweaking filter parameters. It also provides frequency response widget with differently coloured curve for each section and separate curve for total equalization effect. rpmlint is silent. The package name is set for compliance with other lv2 plugins we have. Should be an easy review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 07:04:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 02:04:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534061] Review Request: hostname - Utility to set/show the host name or domain name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130704.nAD74Tlt008866@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534061 --- Comment #3 from Jiri Popelka 2009-11-13 02:04:28 EDT --- There should be "Up to now *hostname* has been part of net-tools package." in the description of this Review Request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 07:03:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 02:03:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534061] Review Request: hostname - Utility to set/show the host name or domain name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130703.nAD730wh008677@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534061 --- Comment #2 from Jiri Popelka 2009-11-13 02:02:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > $ rpmlint hostname.spec > hostname.spec: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install > hostname.spec: W: no-buildroot-tag > > other that that it looks to be an easy review. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag "The RPM in Fedora 10 defines a default buildroot so in Fedora 10 and above it is no longer necessary to define a buildroot tag." https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Prepping_BuildRoot_For_.25install "The current redhat-rpm-config package in Fedora 10 and newer automatically deletes and creates the buildroot at %install, so in Fedora 10 and newer, it is not necessary for packages to manually Prepare the BuildRoot for install as described below." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 07:12:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 02:12:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537265] Review Request: acovea - Analysis of compiler options via evolutionary algorithm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130712.nAD7Cg5Y021100@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537265 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #1 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-11-13 02:12:41 EDT --- Question: Is there a special reason why the packages this submission consists of can't be packaged as independent packages? I would suggest you to reconsider your plan and to try submitting independent packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 07:12:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 02:12:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526263] Review Request: l7-protocols - Protocol definitions files for l7-filter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130712.nAD7CctJ021062@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526263 --- Comment #6 from Marcus Moeller 2009-11-13 02:12:37 EDT --- Contacted the author concerning the tests He stated that they are only for testing the speeds of the patterns and are completely unnecessary for production running and that it would not make a sense to make a separate package for them. This is why tests have now been removed from the package. Spec URL: http://www.marcus-moeller.de/share/build/l7-protocols/20090528-3/l7-protocols.spec SRPM URL: http://www.marcus-moeller.de/share/build/l7-protocols/20090528-3/l7-protocols-20090528-3.fc11.src.rpm Best Regards Marcus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 07:16:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 02:16:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537265] Review Request: acovea - Analysis of compiler options via evolutionary algorithm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130716.nAD7GiM3011571@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537265 --- Comment #2 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2009-11-13 02:16:44 EDT --- Those packages are not used by anything other than acovea, so I don't see the point of splitting them out. That's something I'd prefer to do if the need ever arises, which I strongly doubt will occur. The only component that anyone actually cares about is the runacovea executable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 07:31:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 02:31:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 498873] Review Request: thrift - A multi-language RPC and serialization framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130731.nAD7VQ23024930@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498873 Silas Sewell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|BuildFails | --- Comment #8 from Silas Sewell 2009-11-13 02:31:25 EDT --- The build errors should be fixed and I've updated to the latest snapshot. Unfortunately thrift now only build against devel because of the introduction of slf4j into the Java library. Also note the spec file url has changed. Spec: http://github.com/silas/rpms/raw/master/thrift/thrift.spec SRPM: http://cloud.github.com/downloads/silas/rpms/thrift-0.2-0.20091112svn835538.fc12.src.rpm Diff: http://github.com/silas/rpms/commit/3d6a44f91b8532e88452f6fa9cf358eb332ba81c -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 07:43:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 02:43:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537265] Review Request: acovea - Analysis of compiler options via evolutionary algorithm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130743.nAD7hiGv027539@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537265 --- Comment #3 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-11-13 02:43:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Those packages are not used by anything other than acovea, so I don't see the > point of splitting them out. That's something I'd prefer to do if the need ever > arises, which I strongly doubt will occur. The only component that anyone > actually cares about is the runacovea executable. I regret having to say so, but in this case, I strongly recommend to reject this submission, because packages which lump together independent libraries are non-maintainable in longer terms. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 08:16:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 03:16:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531051] Review Request: glite-security-util-java - Java Utilities for GSI Credentials In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130816.nAD8GSNG003272@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531051 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Mattias Ellert 2009-11-13 03:16:26 EDT --- Package approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 08:21:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 03:21:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531773] Review Request: synfig - Vector-based 2D animation rendering backend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130821.nAD8Ldpt004411@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531773 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-13 03:21:38 EDT --- Thanks a lot for review Luya! (In reply to comment #5) > It was gcc-c++ package that was not installed although it should with the use > of yum-builddep command with src package (might be a bug but it is another > story). That might be a valid point. You could probably try opening a ticket against yum-utils. (In reply to comment #6) > BTW, once you have created cvs. Make sure to update to latest upstream version > (0.62). Surely, I'll do. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: synfig Short Description: Vector-based 2D animation rendering backend Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 08:35:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 03:35:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531255] Review Request: CGSI-gSOAP - GSI plugin for gSOAP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130835.nAD8ZcGg030264@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531255 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Mattias Ellert 2009-11-13 03:35:36 EDT --- Many thanks for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: CGSI-gSOAP Short Description: GSI plugin for gSOAP Owners: ellert Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 08:53:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 03:53:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531051] Review Request: glite-security-util-java - Java Utilities for GSI Credentials In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130853.nAD8rvWJ003078@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531051 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Steve Traylen 2009-11-13 03:53:56 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: stevetraylen Short Description: Java Utilities for GSI Credentials Owners: stevetraylen Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 08:57:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 03:57:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530892] Review Request: kde-style-nitrogen - A KDE 4 widget style In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130857.nAD8v8pn004114@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530892 --- Comment #7 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-11-13 03:57:07 EDT --- Good question. Teemu, did you check kdesvn to see what kind of nitrogen they imported? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 09:53:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 04:53:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537084] Review Request: libmpc - C library for multiple precision complex arithmetic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911130953.nAD9r4WQ031632@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537084 --- Comment #8 from Petr Machata 2009-11-13 04:53:03 EDT --- New files: http://people.redhat.com/~pmachata/libmpc/libmpc.spec http://people.redhat.com/~pmachata/libmpc/libmpc-0.8-3.fc11.src.rpm - Require mpfr-devel, gmp-devel in -devel subpackage - Don't pass --entry to install-info (checked that it installs the info entry correctly) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 10:02:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 05:02:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531541] Review Request: rho - An SSH system profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131002.nADA22Fj001227@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531541 --- Comment #9 from Mark McLoughlin 2009-11-13 05:02:01 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=369392) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=369392) misc fixes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 10:01:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 05:01:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531541] Review Request: rho - An SSH system profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131001.nADA1KN0001112@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531541 Mark McLoughlin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |markmc at redhat.com --- Comment #8 from Mark McLoughlin 2009-11-13 05:01:19 EDT --- This looks mostly fine to me, with the exception that python packages must now package eggs if they're built: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python/Eggs Also, you can drop the -O1 arg to 'setup.py install', the .pyo files are automatically generated Attaching a patch to fix those and a couple of other trivial things Other things checked: - rpmlint passes with no warnings/errors - adheres to python packaging guidelines - basic package meta-data is correct - source url is correct - both BuildRequires are actually required - can't see any missing BuildRequires - ditto for Requires - all requires are available in Fedora - build procedure is correct - .pyc and .pyo files are packaged, as per guidelines - all dirs are packaged - %changelog format is correct - etc. etc. I'd be happy to give this a fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 10:15:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 05:15:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533738] Review Request: bwa - Burrows-Wheeler Alignment Tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131015.nADAFmKe024226@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533738 --- Comment #4 from Albert Bogdanowicz 2009-11-13 05:15:47 EDT --- Thanks for help. Fixed that, hope it's fine now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 10:18:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 05:18:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537363] New: Review Request: lv2-c++-tools - Support library for writing LV2 plugins in C++ Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lv2-c++-tools - Support library for writing LV2 plugins in C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537363 Summary: Review Request: lv2-c++-tools - Support library for writing LV2 plugins in C++ Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oget.fedora at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/lv2-c++-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/lv2-c++-tools-1.0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This software package contains libraries and programs that should make it easier to write LV2 plugins in C++. rpmlint says: lv2-c++-tools.src:43: W: configure-without-libdir-spec This is not the usual GNU configure. Passing libdir to this configure is useless. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 10:44:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 05:44:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537366] New: Review Request: cgal-python - Python bindings for the CGAL library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cgal-python - Python bindings for the CGAL library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537366 Summary: Review Request: cgal-python - Python bindings for the CGAL library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: promac at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/SPECS/cgal-python.spec SRPM URL: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/src/cgal-python-0.9.4-0.7.beta1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The goal of the CGAL-Python project is to provide Python bindings for the CGAL library. CGAL is the Computational Geometry Algorithms Library, a C++ library of generic, efficient and robust geometric algorithms. CGAL-Python is implemented using Boost.Python, which allows to mimic a large part of the original C++ interface of CGAL. Since CGAL is heavily based on the generic programming paradigm (templates), some choices have been made to accommodate the Python programming model instead. Python allows much faster prototyping than C++, by simplifying the complexity of the language and removing the typical long compilation times of C++. We also hope that CGAL-Python can be used for teaching geometric algorithms, without requiring knowledge of C++ as is currently the case with CGAL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 10:47:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 05:47:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 504178] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-fc - Future Composer input plugin for GStreamer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131047.nADAljSG011544@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504178 --- Comment #4 from Michael Schwendt 2009-11-13 05:47:44 EDT --- Okay. All that was wrong was the tarball file extension: $ file gstreamer-plugin-fc-0.1.tar.bz2 gstreamer-plugin-fc-0.1.tar.bz2: gzip compressed data, from Unix, last modified: Tue Oct 14 13:36:25 2008 $ md5sum gstreamer-plugin-fc-0.1.tar.bz2 69af63d11dd3eae161969cc9ede10d4f gstreamer-plugin-fc-0.1.tar.bz2 $ md5sum gstreamer-plugin-fc-0.1.tar.gz 69af63d11dd3eae161969cc9ede10d4f gstreamer-plugin-fc-0.1.tar.gz I've replaced the tarball with the .bz2 release. [...] Usage of %define in this very short .spec file is fine and doesn't cause any problems. No nested macro expansion is needed. [...] Spec URL: http://mschwendt.fedorapeople.org/gstreamer-plugins-fc.spec SRPM URL: http://mschwendt.fedorapeople.org/gstreamer-plugins-fc-0.1-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 10:56:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 05:56:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533302] Review Request: rst2pdf - Tool for transforming reStructuredText to PDF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131056.nADAu3TB013950@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533302 --- Comment #2 from Sergio Pascual 2009-11-13 05:56:02 EDT --- I think I've fixed everything in this new specfile. Spec URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/rst2pdf.spec SRPM URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/rst2pdf-0.12.2-2.fc12.src.rpm The warning are related with reportlab version being < 2.3, not directly with rst2pdf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 10:58:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 05:58:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521719] Review Request: pycryptopp - Python wrappers for the Crypto++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131058.nADAwOeJ014374@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521719 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-13 05:58:22 EDT --- I was unsure, if we *have* to use both licenses or can just use one. But on the other hand, why not just using one license... If someone else, wants to use this software under TGPPL, (s)he needs to download it again from their servers and not from fp.o, so this is ok... (Sorry, my error in reasoning. ;)) _____________ APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 11:03:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 06:03:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536718] Review Request: tlomt-sniglet-fonts - A rounded, sans-serif font useful for headlines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131103.nADB35FK015900@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536718 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-11-13 06:03:02 EDT --- Hey, Nice to see you packaging some fonts again. Review: 1. (nitpick) the exact term for "accent marks" is diactritics (includes stuff like cedilla which is not strictly speaking an accent mark) 2. repo-font-audit found some partial coverage, and that rpmlint is not completely happy with the font (to relay upstream, see attached archive) 3. (nitpick) you don't really need to define a common_desc when there's only one package produced. It's useful for multi-subpackages 4. Please check with upstream they'll actually increment the version next time the font is updated. If 1.000 is an eternal unchanging version, using the timestamp of the font file as version is more useful. 5. You forgot the Requires: fontpackages-filesystem ? fails review :( 6. Not too sure looping on one fontconf file is useful 7. Maybe it would be a good idea to bundle the licensing email as %doc ? Some old font packages did this and it's invaluable when all the web references have moved 20 times since packaging 8. There is no licensing info, either as detached txt file, or as metadata in the font (just confirming your finds). Doing both is best 9. This is not really a general-purpose sans-serif font, please change your fontconfig file (see /usr/share/fontconfig/templates/fontconfig-generics.txt and /usr/share/fontconfig/templates/basic-font-template.* ) ? Needs a little more work, even though it's already a pretty nice srpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 11:05:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 06:05:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536718] Review Request: tlomt-sniglet-fonts - A rounded, sans-serif font useful for headlines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131105.nADB51aF004222@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536718 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-11-13 06:04:59 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=369404) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=369404) repo-font-audit output for the package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 11:27:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 06:27:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531040] Review Request: jsmath-fonts - A collection of Math symbol fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131127.nADBRve0011147@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531040 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(rdieter at math.unl. | |edu) --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-11-13 06:27:55 EDT --- /me cries for all the ifdefing At this point you should use the simple font template. The multi style of packaging is only useful if you produce more than one font subpackage That's probably the only thing needed to bring it to "good enough" level of packaging. Though you will receive regularly packaging alerts because of the non-standard font naming (see attached file, the only pure packager alert is test #3 and it's a consequence of this font set state ; the rest needs relaying upstream) I hope STIX finally publishes a non-beta version so we can tell TeXies to drop this kind of gross legacy font hack -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 11:29:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 06:29:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531040] Review Request: jsmath-fonts - A collection of Math symbol fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131129.nADBTcOs023113@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531040 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-11-13 06:29:36 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=369405) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=369405) repo-font-audit report for this package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 11:39:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 06:39:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529542] Review Request: php-phpunit-phpcpd - Copy/Paste Detector (CPD) for PHP code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131139.nADBdIHp025534@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529542 Christof Damian changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |christof at damian.net Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 11:51:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 06:51:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529542] Review Request: php-phpunit-phpcpd - Copy/Paste Detector (CPD) for PHP code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131151.nADBpcwN029181@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529542 Christof Damian changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Christof Damian 2009-11-13 06:51:35 EDT --- OK: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. php-phpunit-phpcpd.noarch: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. . OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK: The spec file must be written in American English. OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: Each package must consistently use macros. OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 11:52:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 06:52:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529544] Review Request: php-phpunit-bytekit - A command-line tool built on the PHP Bytekit extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131152.nADBqoD6017423@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529544 Christof Damian changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |christof at damian.net Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 12:19:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 07:19:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529544] Review Request: php-phpunit-bytekit - A command-line tool built on the PHP Bytekit extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131219.nADCJknS003404@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529544 Christof Damian changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(llaumgui at gmail.co | |m) --- Comment #1 from Christof Damian 2009-11-13 07:19:45 EDT --- OK: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. php-phpunit-bytekit.noarch: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. . OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK: The spec file must be written in American English. OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. FAIL: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. needs some work to build on F10 and F11, because of PEAR version. Builds ok on rawhide. OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: Each package must consistently use macros. OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 12:28:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 07:28:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507083] Review Request: poco - C++ class libraries for network-centric applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131228.nADCSAco005287@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507083 --- Comment #23 from Michal Schmidt 2009-11-13 07:28:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > Yes, ugly, but you said that you'd drop the "poco" toplevel package - how to > do this in a more pleasing way? Can you give an example (or reference)? Something like this will prevent the generation of the toplevel binary package: --- poco.spec.orig 2009-11-11 13:50:27.000000000 +0100 +++ poco.spec 2009-11-12 16:00:44.865027561 +0100 @@ -21,9 +21,6 @@ BuildRequires: sqlite-devel BuildRequires: expat-devel -Requires: poco-devel = %{version}-%{release} -Requires: poco-doc = %{version}-%{release} - %description The POCO C++ Libraries (POCO stands for POrtable COmponents) are open source C++ class libraries that simplify and accelerate the @@ -95,10 +92,6 @@ %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -%files -%defattr(-, root, root, -) -%doc MANIFEST - %package foundation Summary: The Foundation POCO component Group: System Environment/Libraries > Why the full description must be in every subpackage, may be just "poco-devel" > will suffice? OK, it will be sufficient. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 13:02:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 08:02:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533738] Review Request: bwa - Burrows-Wheeler Alignment Tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131302.nADD2XW3000709@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533738 --- Comment #5 from Scott Collier 2009-11-13 08:02:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Thanks for help. Fixed that, hope it's fine now. works for me now. One more thing, in your spec file you have % files listed twice: %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc COPYING NEWS ChangeLog %{_bindir}/* %files devel %defattr(-,root,root,-) %{_includedir}/* You can get rid of one and compress it down to: %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc COPYING NEWS ChangeLog %{_bindir}/* %{_includedir}/* rpmlint has one more trivial warning: $ rpmlint bwa.spec bwa.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 20, tab: line 1) 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Go ahead and fix that, then I think you are good to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 13:17:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 08:17:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537084] Review Request: libmpc - C library for multiple precision complex arithmetic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131317.nADDHWpk004425@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537084 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-11-13 08:17:30 EDT --- Thanks for your quick responses. Package is APPROVED. Additional, private, personal request: Please also branch for FC11 and FC12. I would personally need this package on FC11 and FC12, very soon. TIA. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 13:28:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 08:28:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533302] Review Request: rst2pdf - Tool for transforming reStructuredText to PDF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131328.nADDSjnW018558@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533302 Dominic Hopf changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Dominic Hopf 2009-11-13 08:28:43 EDT --- Just a small addition to the %files-section: %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc CHANGES.txt Contributors.txt LICENSE.txt README.txt doc/manual.pdf %{_bindir}/%{name} %{python_sitelib}/%{name}* %{_mandir}/man1/* The %{name} macros are important to make sure no files other than the ones delivered with your package are affected. (See check point "Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages." in the list above.). The %{python_sitelib}-line actually was okay, but the %{name} macro is a bit more elegant. Before you import your Specfile to CVS, please add those macros. Anything else is okay now. The package is approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 13:45:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 08:45:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537084] Review Request: libmpc - C library for multiple precision complex arithmetic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131345.nADDjvtx022628@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537084 Petr Machata changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Petr Machata 2009-11-13 08:45:56 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libmpc Short Description: C library for multiple precision complex arithmetic Owners: pmachata Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 14:14:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:14:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533738] Review Request: bwa - Burrows-Wheeler Alignment Tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131414.nADEEKHW028896@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533738 --- Comment #6 from Scott Collier 2009-11-13 09:14:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > Thanks for help. Fixed that, hope it's fine now. > > works for me now. One more thing, in your spec file you have % files listed > twice: > > %files > %defattr(-,root,root,-) > %doc COPYING NEWS ChangeLog > %{_bindir}/* > > %files devel > %defattr(-,root,root,-) > %{_includedir}/* > > > You can get rid of one and compress it down to: > > %files > %defattr(-,root,root,-) > %doc COPYING NEWS ChangeLog > %{_bindir}/* > %{_includedir}/* > Sorry, missed the %files devel tag, nevermind the comment above. %files devel is fine. That just leaves the rpmlint warning. > rpmlint has one more trivial warning: > > $ rpmlint bwa.spec > bwa.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 20, tab: line 1) > 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. > > Go ahead and fix that, then I think you are good to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 14:20:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:20:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521719] Review Request: pycryptopp - Python wrappers for the Crypto++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131420.nADEKU0l019462@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521719 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-11-13 09:20:28 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pycryptopp Short Description: Python wrappers for the Crypto++ library Owners: ruben Branches: F-11 F-12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 14:33:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:33:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532203] Review Request: jgraph - Java-based Diagram Component and Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131433.nADEXXm3022729@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532203 --- Comment #12 from D Haley 2009-11-13 09:33:31 EDT --- I've managed to get the examples to work in jgraph, with your current SRPM, so this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 14:38:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:38:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462458] Review Request: drupal-workspace - Allows users to have a central place to view and manage their content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131438.nADEcmx3023826@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462458 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla 2009-11-13 09:38:46 EDT --- I changed the license tag to GPLv2+, since Version 2 is what's included and they say that or any later version. I don't want to remove the buildroot bit, in case someone wants this for EPEL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 14:44:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:44:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533738] Review Request: bwa - Burrows-Wheeler Alignment Tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131444.nADEiDN2003570@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533738 --- Comment #7 from Albert Bogdanowicz 2009-11-13 09:44:12 EDT --- Fixed, no tabs now. I only get a warning about no documentation for the devel package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 14:47:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:47:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532203] Review Request: jgraph - Java-based Diagram Component and Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131447.nADEl255004647@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532203 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-13 09:47:01 EDT --- Thank you! (I'm also creating F-11 and F-12 branches as you requested and will orphan them as soon as they are created. Feel free to take them in pkgdb then). By the way, you seem to have forgotten to set the review flag to '+'. Please do so when you approve the package. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: jgraph Short Description: Java-based Diagram Component and Editor Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 14:55:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:55:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462458] Review Request: drupal-workspace - Allows users to have a central place to view and manage their content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131455.nADEtlsb027531@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462458 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-13 09:55:46 EDT --- Where do they say "that or any later version"? That's what I asked in my first comment; you didn't answer. I grepped for any string I could think of, but I could not find it. I only see the standard GPL text with no statement of the license versioning in the code, which implies GPL+. (I'm sure you've done enough reviews to know that the version of the GPL text included has no bearing on the version of the GPL the code is under.) Also, I hope you know that EPEL doesn't have drupal 6, and thus this package can't be built for EPEL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 15:08:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 10:08:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462458] Review Request: drupal-workspace - Allows users to have a central place to view and manage their content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131508.nADF8QHM009207@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462458 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla 2009-11-13 10:08:25 EDT --- Ok, I obviously got confused, it's not there. Maybe it was in the original or something. In any case, if Version 2 of the GPL is there, and there's no 'or later' anywhere, then it really ought to by GPLv2, not GPL+. Agreed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 15:11:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 10:11:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462458] Review Request: drupal-workspace - Allows users to have a central place to view and manage their content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131511.nADFBf1b030726@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462458 --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-13 10:11:40 EDT --- Definitely not agreed. Please read the GPL text that's in the package, the last sentence of section 9 in particular. If the source code does not indicate a GPL version, you may use any version ever published. GPL+ is the proper license tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 15:13:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 10:13:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533744] Review Request: ImageJ - Image Processing and Analysis in Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131513.nADFDE78031230@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533744 --- Comment #4 from D Haley 2009-11-13 10:13:13 EDT --- >All seems to work except the "Compile and Run" in the menu "Plugins". I don't know how to fix it. This is important and needs to work "out of the box". ImageJ is on debians package tracker, and I believe they get around this by setting JAVA_HOME appropriately in their imagej script. you may want to check the contents of http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/i/imagej/imagej_1.43g-1.diff.gz for the script. Actually their changes to the script are extensive, and probably worth a quick diff. More comments: * Currently the build is dumping files into ~/rpmbuild/BUILD/ for me which is causing problems. Please fix the uncompress. I think upstream are a bit odd with how they make their release archives. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 15:17:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 10:17:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462458] Review Request: drupal-workspace - Allows users to have a central place to view and manage their content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131517.nADFHlTW011349@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462458 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla 2009-11-13 10:17:46 EDT --- Huh. I was not aware of that clause. Learn something new every day. Thanks for pointing that out. Fixed: SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal-workspace/drupal-workspace-6.x.1.4-2.rc1.fc11.src.rpm SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal-workspace/drupal-workspace.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 15:20:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 10:20:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533738] Review Request: bwa - Burrows-Wheeler Alignment Tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131520.nADFKNGg032732@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533738 --- Comment #8 from Scott Collier 2009-11-13 10:20:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Fixed, no tabs now. I only get a warning about no documentation for the devel > package. Great. Thanks Albert. At this point you just need an "offical" review and approval. It looks good to me. Is there anyone with some time who can review please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 15:24:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 10:24:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531541] Review Request: rho - An SSH system profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131524.nADFO1c6000929@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531541 --- Comment #10 from Adrian Likins 2009-11-13 10:24:00 EDT --- Patch applied and new versions built: http://alikins.fedorapeople.org/files/rho/rho.spec http://alikins.fedorapeople.org/files/rho/rho-0.0.17-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 15:43:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 10:43:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487128] Review Request: eventReceivers - Command Center Event Receivers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131543.nADFhnxK016679@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487128 Miroslav Such? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(msuchy at redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #3 from Miroslav Such? 2009-11-13 10:43:48 EDT --- I will submit the missing dependency soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 15:45:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 10:45:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530892] Review Request: kde-style-nitrogen - A KDE 4 widget style In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131545.nADFjio6005661@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530892 --- Comment #8 from Teemu Rytilahti 2009-11-13 10:45:43 EDT --- Hi again, yup, talked with the author and the work is merged to trunk already + there may be fixes and features which are not available in nitrogen. So basially the only reason this package would be useful is to be able to use the same style in KDE < 4.4. Perhaps it isn't worth to have in repository, I think. The same thing applies to #530895 (nitrogen kwin-style). Should I just close these bugs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 15:48:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 10:48:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534061] Review Request: hostname - Utility to set/show the host name or domain name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131548.nADFmiWX006043@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534061 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-13 10:48:43 EDT --- Those two rpmlint warnings are completely bogus; I'll report a bug against rpmlint. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 16:01:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:01:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 494292] Review Request: spacewalk-proxy-html - The HTML component for Spacewalk Proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131601.nADG1COb008828@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494292 --- Comment #2 from Miroslav Such? 2009-11-13 11:01:11 EDT --- OK, I will address this comments on Tuesday. I only have comment to: >- NOTICE: spacewalk-proxy-html creates /var/www/html while also be dependent on >httpd. Isn't this line unnecessary: > >install -m 755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{htmldir} this is necessery, since httpd is not present in build time, but this one can be removed from %files: %dir %{htmldir} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 16:00:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:00:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531541] Review Request: rho - An SSH system profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131600.nADG0xLE020331@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531541 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-11-13 11:00:58 EDT --- sha256sum rho-0.0.17.tar.gz fedora/SOURCES/rho-0.0.17.tar.gz 7e0c0aebcf712f6960cb865ce766a329bda5b425e5b1e76ba553645e864282d4 rho-0.0.17.tar.gz 7e0c0aebcf712f6960cb865ce766a329bda5b425e5b1e76ba553645e864282d4 fedora/SOURCES/rho-0.0.17.tar.gz upstream source matches packaging meets guidelines Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 16:01:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:01:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537431] New: Review Request: mono-bouncycastle - Bouncy Castle Crypto Package for Mono Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mono-bouncycastle - Bouncy Castle Crypto Package for Mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537431 Summary: Review Request: mono-bouncycastle - Bouncy Castle Crypto Package for Mono Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kalev at smartlink.ee QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/mono-bouncycastle.spec SRPM URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/mono-bouncycastle-1.5-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The Bouncy Castle Crypto package is a C# implementation of cryptographic algorithms. It is a port of the Bouncy Castle Java APIs, with approximately 80% of the functionality ported. The C# API is constantly kept uptodate with bug fixes and new test cases from the Java build (and vice versa sometimes), thus benefitting from the large user base and real-world use the Java version has seen. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 16:09:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:09:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537431] Review Request: mono-bouncycastle - Bouncy Castle Crypto Package for Mono In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131609.nADG9fMN010750@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537431 Kalev Lember changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |langel at redhat.com Alias| |mono-bouncycastle --- Comment #1 from Kalev Lember 2009-11-13 11:09:40 EDT --- About naming: There is already bouncycastle Java package [1] in Fedora, which is why I used "bouncycastle" as part of the name. Another option would have been "bccrypto" (from upstream zip file name). There doesn't seem to be any official guidelines about Mono package names, so I chose to prefix it with mono-, resulting in mono-bouncycastle. I'm CC-ing the Java package maintainer in case he has some suggestions about naming / packaging of this library. [1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/bouncycastle -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 16:10:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:10:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462458] Review Request: drupal-workspace - Allows users to have a central place to view and manage their content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131610.nADGAA7W022495@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462458 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-13 11:10:09 EDT --- For reference, that is mentioned explicitly in the entry for GPL+ at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 16:17:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:17:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537431] Review Request: mono-bouncycastle - Bouncy Castle Crypto Package for Mono In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131617.nADGH4dF024014@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537431 Kalev Lember changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |537437(itextsharp) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 16:17:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:17:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537437] Review Request: itextsharp - Mono library for generating PDF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131617.nADGH3m1023980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537437 Kalev Lember changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |537431(mono-bouncycastle) Alias| |itextsharp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 16:15:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:15:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537437] New: Review Request: itextsharp - Mono library for generating PDF files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: itextsharp - Mono library for generating PDF files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537437 Summary: Review Request: itextsharp - Mono library for generating PDF files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kalev at smartlink.ee QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/itextsharp.spec SRPM URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/itextsharp-4.1.6-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: iText# (iTextSharp) is a port of the iText open source java library for PDF generation, written entirely in C# for the .NET platform. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 16:23:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:23:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532203] Review Request: jgraph - Java-based Diagram Component and Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131623.nADGNHsC014054@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532203 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-13 11:23:16 EDT --- Sorry, but this ticket isn't assigned to anyone, is still in NEW state, and the fedora-review flag is unset. It doesn't look like it's quite time for CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 16:33:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:33:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528108] Review Request: Vuurmuur - Firewall manager built on top of iptables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131633.nADGXUKo027892@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528108 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(stjepan.gros at gmai | |l.com) --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-13 11:33:27 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 16:44:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:44:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131644.nADGiC3Q019207@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 --- Comment #24 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-13 11:44:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) > Should I change the version of the RPM (0.0.2.1-2, 0.0.2.1-2), I appended a > version to the spec file. What do you mean here? Anyway please post the URL of the new srpm (i.e. srpm which has newer EVR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 16:50:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:50:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537265] Review Request: acovea - Analysis of compiler options via evolutionary algorithm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131650.nADGo5Yo032540@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537265 --- Comment #4 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2009-11-13 11:50:04 EDT --- But they're *not* independent. They are shipped in separate tarballs, but libcoyotl is used by libevocosm, libacovea uses both libevocosm and libcoyotl, and nothing else in the entire world uses any of the three of them. In fact, libcoyotl predates and overlaps heavily with the STL, and contains mostly code that it wouldn't make any sense for a modern C++ application to even consider using. I'll redo the submission if I have to, but let me be clear that you are asking me to waste my time for no good reason. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 17:05:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:05:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462458] Review Request: drupal-workspace - Allows users to have a central place to view and manage their content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131705.nADH5d7E003768@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462458 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla 2009-11-13 12:05:38 EDT --- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: drupal-workspace Short Description: Allows users to have a central place to view and manage their content Owners: limb Branches: F-12 F-11 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 17:10:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:10:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531541] Review Request: rho - An SSH system profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131710.nADHA1S5004400@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531541 Adrian Likins changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Adrian Likins 2009-11-13 12:10:00 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rho Short Description: An SSH system profiler. Owners: alikins jmrodri dgoodwin Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 InitialCC: alikins jmrodri dgoodwin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 17:13:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:13:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537452] Review Request: eclipse-emf-validation - Verify the integrity of EMF models In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131713.nADHDir1025730@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537452 Mat Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |537454 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 17:14:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:14:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537452] Review Request: eclipse-emf-validation - Verify the integrity of EMF models In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131714.nADHEf2P025908@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537452 Mat Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |536684 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 17:13:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:13:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537451] Review Request: eclipse-emf-query - Specify and execute queries against EMF models In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131713.nADHDh9w025713@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537451 Mat Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |537454 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 17:14:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:14:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536684] Review Request: eclipse-mdt-ocl - Implementation of the OCL OMG metamodel for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131714.nADHEgh4025929@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536684 Mat Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |537452 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 17:13:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:13:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537454] Review Request: eclipse-emf-transaction - A model management layer for managing EMF resources In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131713.nADHDgS8025692@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537454 Mat Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |537451, 537452 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 17:12:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:12:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537452] New: Review Request: eclipse-emf-validation - Verify the integrity of EMF models Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-emf-validation - Verify the integrity of EMF models https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537452 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-emf-validation - Verify the integrity of EMF models Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at matbooth.co.uk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This package depends eclipse-mdt-ocl, whose review request is bug #536684. Spec URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/eclipse-emf-validation.spec SRPM URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/eclipse-emf-validation-1.3.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The validation component provides the following capabilities. * Constraint Definition - Provides API for defining constraints for any EMF meta-model (batch and live constraints). * Customizable model traversal algorithms - Extensibility API to support meta-models that require custom strategies for model traversal. * Constraint parsing for languages - Provides support for parsing the content of constraint elements defined in specific languages. The validation framework provides support for two languages: Java and OCL. * Configurable constraint bindings to application contexts - API support to define "client contexts" that describe the objects that need to be validated and to bind them to constraints that need to be enforced on these objects. * Validation listeners - Support for listening to validation events. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 17:12:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:12:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537451] New: Review Request: eclipse-emf-query - Specify and execute queries against EMF models Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-emf-query - Specify and execute queries against EMF models https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537451 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-emf-query - Specify and execute queries against EMF models Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at matbooth.co.uk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This package depends eclipse-mdt-ocl, whose review request is bug #536684. Spec URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/eclipse-emf-query.spec SRPM URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/eclipse-emf-query-1.3.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The query component facilitates the process of search and retrieval of model elements of interest in a flexible yet controlled and structured manner. Provides API support for the basic EObject based Condition objects that are used to formulate queries for EMF models. * The IEObjectSource interface provides the search scope elements to be used in a query. * The SELECT class implements a template-function that does the iteration over model elements and applies the search condition on each; it collects the resulting elements into a QueryResultSet object and returns it to the caller * The FROM class represents the elements to search. It is responsible of providing an appropriate iterator for the elements in the search space. * The WHERE class applies the search conditions over the elements in the search set. * The UPDATE class passes the elements who satisfy the search condition to a caller-supplied modification function. It collects the modified elements into a QueryResultSet object and returns it to the caller. * The QueryResultSet class represents the set of elements returned by a given query. * The EObjectCondition class is the abstract parent of all conditions that deal with model-elements (i.e., EObjects). It incorporates the services of a PruneHandler in order to answers whether or not to prune the element tree at a specific element and thus ignore its children. * The ConditionPolicy class is used to allow the user to decide how to apply a given condition on a collection of a model-element EAttributes or EReferences values. Supports both the: exists (ANY) and for-all (ALL) semantics. * The EObjectStructuralFeatureValueCondition class is the parent class for conditions that are responsible for checking the values held in model- elements attributes or references. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 17:13:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:13:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537454] New: Review Request: eclipse-emf-transaction - A model management layer for managing EMF resources Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-emf-transaction - A model management layer for managing EMF resources https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537454 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-emf-transaction - A model management layer for managing EMF resources Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at matbooth.co.uk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This package depends on eclipse-emf-query and eclipse-emf-validation, whose review requests are bug #537451 and bug #537452, respectively. Spec URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/eclipse-emf-transaction.spec SRPM URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/eclipse-emf-transaction-1.3.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The transaction component provides the following capabilities. * Multi-threading - Supports a protocol for clients to read and write EMF models on multiple threads. * Model Integrity - Semantic integrity is ensured by automatic validation to detect invalid changes and semantic procedures to proactively maintain correctness of semantic dependencies. * Batched Events - Clients are notified of groups of related changes in batches, rather than as a stream of EMF notifications. In particular, this allows applications to analyze change sets in their entirety. * Undo/Redo - For a simplified programming model, the API automatically tracks changes applied to models without the need for client code to use EMF edit Commands. These changes are encapsulated in transactions/operations that can undo and redo themselves. * Editing Domain - Support cooperative editing of models by multiple editors/ applications. EMF resources can be shared amongst different editing domains. * Eclipse Workspace - The API provides traceability between EMF resources and workspace resources. Multi-threaded access is coordinated via the Eclipse jobs API and its integration with the workspace. * Eclipse Operations - The API supports the Eclipse operation history as an undo stack for undo/redo of resource changes. The API provides a framework for undoable operations that automatically capture undo/redo information, which can be interleaved on the same history with dependent operations that do not modify the EMF model. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 17:14:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:14:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536684] Review Request: eclipse-mdt-ocl - Implementation of the OCL OMG metamodel for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131714.nADHEjTA005674@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536684 Mat Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |537451 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 17:14:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:14:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537451] Review Request: eclipse-emf-query - Specify and execute queries against EMF models In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131714.nADHEiBr005653@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537451 Mat Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |536684 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 17:18:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:18:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131718.nADHIBxs026953@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 --- Comment #25 from Roshan Singh 2009-11-13 12:18:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > What do you mean here? Anyway please post the URL of the new srpm (i.e. > srpm which has newer EVR) Latest specs and rpms: SPEC: http://lug.nitdgp.ac.in/users/roshan/gscribble-0.0.2.1-1.spec RPM: http://lug.nitdgp.ac.in/users/roshan/gscribble-0.0.2.1-1.fc11.noarch.rpm SRPM: http://lug.nitdgp.ac.in/users/roshan/gscribble-0.0.2.1-1.fc11.src.rpm I meant that everytime I create a new rpm, should I change the version also ? Till now I have been using the same version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 17:22:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:22:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530288] Review Request: stonevpn - easy OpenVPN certificate and configuration management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131722.nADHMjJ3028242@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530288 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-13 12:22:43 EDT --- Well, I will approve this package. ------------------------------------------------------------- ???This package (stonevpn) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Install the Client Tools (Koji)". Now I am sponsoring you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 11/12, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. Removing NEEDSPONSOR. (In reply to comment #11) > Btw, i thought it would be nice if i added some manpages to it. Do you think > this would be good to have in Fedora or does the --help function + README > suffice? I've added stonevpn (1) and stonevpn.conf (5). Adding man files is not mandatory, however adding useful documents are always recommended. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 17:34:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:34:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537265] Review Request: acovea - Analysis of compiler options via evolutionary algorithm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131734.nADHYNXm010414@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537265 --- Comment #5 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-11-13 12:34:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > But they're *not* independent. They are shipped in separate tarballs, That's exactly what qualifies them as independent. > I'll redo the submission if I have to, but let me be clear that you are asking > me to waste my time for no good reason. Pardon? I am intending to prevent you from running into a classical beginner-packager's mistake: "lumping together libs". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 18:19:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:19:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131819.nADIJmmn008543@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 --- Comment #26 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-13 13:19:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > I meant that everytime I create a new rpm, should I change the version also ? - As I said I am asking you to change the "release" number every time you modify your spec file (i.e. if version number stays as 0.0.2.1, EVR of rpm should be chaged as 0.0.2.1-1%{?dist} -> 0.0.2.1-2%{?dist} -> 0.0.2.1-3%{?dist} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 19:14:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:14:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 194559] Review Request: perl-Event In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131914.nADJE8dK032204@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=194559 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-13 14:14:07 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 19:17:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:17:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527241] Review Request: libvtemm - C++ bindings for vte In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131917.nADJH0rf020961@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527241 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-13 14:16:59 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 19:27:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:27:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534127] [RENAME] Review Request: kbluetooth - The KDE Bluetooth Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131927.nADJRkwB002901@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534127 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-13 14:27:45 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 19:30:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:30:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534021] Review Request: apache-ivy - Java-based dependency manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131930.nADJU42m023676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534021 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-13 14:30:03 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 19:31:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:31:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 503189] Review Request: python-gnutls - Python wrapper for the GNUTLS library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131931.nADJVEB6023928@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503189 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-13 14:31:13 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 19:33:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:33:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 361941] Review Request: python-ZSI - Zolera SOAP Infrastructure In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131933.nADJX001004157@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=361941 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-13 14:32:59 EDT --- python-ZSI-2.0-6.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 19:32:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:32:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524896] Review Request: perl-Nagios-NSCA - Perl client for Nagios - NSCA. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131932.nADJWrR2004018@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524896 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-13 14:32:51 EDT --- perl-Nagios-NSCA-0.1-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 19:33:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:33:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 503336] Review Request: newsbeuter - console based feed reader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131933.nADJXMJX004272@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503336 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-13 14:33:21 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 19:32:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:32:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 361941] Review Request: python-ZSI - Zolera SOAP Infrastructure In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131932.nADJWjpS024327@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=361941 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-13 14:32:42 EDT --- python-ZSI-2.0-6.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 19:32:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:32:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537066] Review Request: cglib - Code generation library for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131932.nADJWX2k024277@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537066 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-13 14:32:32 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 19:35:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:35:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531255] Review Request: CGSI-gSOAP - GSI plugin for gSOAP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131935.nADJZRbj025034@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531255 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-13 14:35:26 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 19:34:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:34:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531773] Review Request: synfig - Vector-based 2D animation rendering backend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131934.nADJYHU1024560@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531773 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-13 14:34:16 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 19:36:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:36:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531051] Review Request: glite-security-util-java - Java Utilities for GSI Credentials In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131936.nADJaLSs025245@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531051 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-13 14:36:20 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 19:38:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:38:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537084] Review Request: libmpc - C library for multiple precision complex arithmetic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131938.nADJc73S005547@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537084 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-13 14:38:06 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 19:40:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:40:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531541] Review Request: rho - An SSH system profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131940.nADJewgO026485@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531541 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-13 14:40:56 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 19:38:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:38:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521719] Review Request: pycryptopp - Python wrappers for the Crypto++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131938.nADJcmMi025798@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521719 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-13 14:38:47 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 19:39:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:39:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462458] Review Request: drupal-workspace - Allows users to have a central place to view and manage their content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131939.nADJdjtK005911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462458 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-13 14:39:44 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 19:46:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:46:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531051] Review Request: glite-security-util-java - Java Utilities for GSI Credentials In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911131946.nADJkCTX028006@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531051 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ | --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-13 14:46:11 EDT --- Oops. "Package Name: stevetraylen". Can you confirm that the package name you actually wanted was glite-security-util-java and give me a revised CVS request? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 20:01:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:01:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523650] Review Request: qmpdclient - A Qt4 based MPD client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911132001.nADK10Qe031686@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523650 --- Comment #27 from xandry 2009-11-13 15:00:58 EDT --- Julian, new version is available on project homepage http://bitcheese.net/wiki/QMPDClient ;) Why not to build it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 20:03:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:03:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 194559] Review Request: perl-Event In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911132003.nADK3SEt012260@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=194559 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-13 15:03:26 EDT --- perl-Event-1.13-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Event-1.13-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 20:13:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:13:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477542] Review Request: mpdscribble - A mpd client which submits information about tracks being played to Last.fm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911132013.nADKDgQN014312@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477542 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-13 15:13:38 EDT --- mpdscribble-0.18.1-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mpdscribble-0.18.1-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 20:13:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:13:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477542] Review Request: mpdscribble - A mpd client which submits information about tracks being played to Last.fm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911132013.nADKDlLi001838@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477542 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-13 15:13:46 EDT --- mpdscribble-0.18.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mpdscribble-0.18.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 20:13:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:13:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531051] Review Request: glite-security-util-java - Java Utilities for GSI Credentials In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911132013.nADKDk9m001796@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531051 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Steve Traylen 2009-11-13 15:13:45 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: glite-security-util-java Short Description: Java Utilities for GSI Credentials Owners: stevetraylen Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: That will be why it will not checkout from CVS. Thanks yes the package name glite-security-util-java and apologies its such a long name, decided upstream. Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 20:15:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:15:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 194559] Review Request: perl-Event In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911132015.nADKFFXZ014878@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=194559 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-13 15:15:14 EDT --- perl-Event-1.13-1.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Event-1.13-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 20:25:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:25:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530772] Review Request: pxe-kexec - Linux boots Linux via network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911132025.nADKPp2I016847@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530772 Matt Domsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matt_domsch at dell.com Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #5 from Matt Domsch 2009-11-13 15:25:50 EDT --- I'm Scott's sponsor. This package still needs a reviewer. Thanks, Matt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 20:32:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:32:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 513775] Review Request: pyfuzzy - Python framework for fuzzy sets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911132032.nADKWhUO005034@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513775 --- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter 2009-11-13 15:32:42 EDT --- The guy from upstream is still working on a new release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 20:37:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:37:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507083] Review Request: poco - C++ class libraries for network-centric applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911132037.nADKbZv3018787@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507083 --- Comment #24 from Maxim Udushlivy 2009-11-13 15:37:34 EDT --- Spec URL: http://crow-designer.sourceforge.net/temp/6/poco.spec SRPM URL: http://crow-designer.sourceforge.net/temp/6/poco-1.3.5-6.fc11.src.rpm CHANGES ======= - The generation of the "poco" metapackage is now suppressed. - A comment for the patch was added. - The usage of %% symbol in the %%changelog section was fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 20:54:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:54:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531051] Review Request: glite-security-util-java - Java Utilities for GSI Credentials In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911132054.nADKsIHl021915@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531051 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-13 15:54:18 EDT --- glite-security-util-java-2.0.3-7.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glite-security-util-java-2.0.3-7.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 20:53:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:53:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531051] Review Request: glite-security-util-java - Java Utilities for GSI Credentials In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911132053.nADKrIrW021797@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531051 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-13 15:53:17 EDT --- CVS done (hopefully correctly this time). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 20:58:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:58:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531051] Review Request: glite-security-util-java - Java Utilities for GSI Credentials In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911132058.nADKw1A6009882@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531051 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-13 15:58:01 EDT --- glite-security-util-java-2.0.3-7.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glite-security-util-java-2.0.3-7.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 21:01:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:01:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531051] Review Request: glite-security-util-java - Java Utilities for GSI Credentials In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911132101.nADL1JG2023516@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531051 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 21:24:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:24:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462458] Review Request: drupal-workspace - Allows users to have a central place to view and manage their content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911132124.nADLOJCd027549@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462458 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-13 16:24:19 EDT --- drupal-workspace-6.x.1.4-2.rc1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal-workspace-6.x.1.4-2.rc1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 21:24:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:24:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462458] Review Request: drupal-workspace - Allows users to have a central place to view and manage their content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911132124.nADLOEDl027519@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462458 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-13 16:24:13 EDT --- drupal-workspace-6.x.1.4-2.rc1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal-workspace-6.x.1.4-2.rc1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 21:24:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:24:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462458] Review Request: drupal-workspace - Allows users to have a central place to view and manage their content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911132124.nADLOORT014281@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462458 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-13 16:24:24 EDT --- drupal-workspace-6.x.1.4-2.rc1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal-workspace-6.x.1.4-2.rc1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 21:37:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:37:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527549] Review Request: osm2go - A simple openstreetmap editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911132137.nADLbA7N030219@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527549 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2009-11-13 16:37:09 EDT --- I reported this issue upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 22:50:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:50:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532203] Review Request: jgraph - Java-based Diagram Component and Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911132250.nADMomL8014577@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532203 D Haley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 13 23:31:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:31:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 515053] Review Request: sugar-getiabooks - Internet Archive Books receiver for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911132331.nADNVQhF010241@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515053 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2009-11-13 18:31:24 EDT --- Thanks for the review Jason. The issue with the NEWS file is fixed now. Here are the updated files: Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-getiabooks.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-getiabooks-3-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 00:06:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:06:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532203] Review Request: jgraph - Java-based Diagram Component and Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911140006.nAE06Npu017016@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532203 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 02:05:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 21:05:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516312] Review Request: ueagle-atm4-firmware - Firmwares for USB ADSL Modems based on Eagle IV Chipset In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911140205.nAE258B3014737@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516312 Hicham HAOUARI changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |537526 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 02:15:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 21:15:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537527] New: Review request: jgraphx - Graph component for Java Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review request: jgraphx - Graph component for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537527 Summary: Review request: jgraphx - Graph component for Java Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mycae at yahoo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/jgraphx.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/jgraphx-1.0.2.8-1.fc10.src.rpm Jgraphx is the a lightweight and feature-rich graph component for Java, and the successor to jgraph. It provides automatic 2D layout and routing for diagrams. Object and relations can be displayed in any Swing UI via provided zoomable component. Koji: F11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1805838 Note that the spec is essentially a modified version of what is in bug 532203 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 03:00:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:00:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478388] Review Request: UDAV - data visualisation program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911140300.nAE30tnP004229@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478388 D Haley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|BuildFails | --- Comment #12 from D Haley 2009-11-13 22:00:53 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/udav SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/udav-0.5.2-2.fc10.src.rpm F11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1805869 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 03:02:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:02:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911140302.nAE32Rxi004371@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 --- Comment #27 from Roshan Singh 2009-11-13 22:02:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > (In reply to comment #25) > > I meant that everytime I create a new rpm, should I change the version also ? > - As I said I am asking you to change the "release" number every time you > modify > your spec file (i.e. if version number stays as 0.0.2.1, EVR of rpm should > be chaged as 0.0.2.1-1%{?dist} -> 0.0.2.1-2%{?dist} -> 0.0.2.1-3%{?dist} Thank you, I was confused over it for quite sometime. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 03:01:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:01:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478388] Review Request: UDAV - data visualisation program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911140301.nAE31jE9025261@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478388 --- Comment #13 from D Haley 2009-11-13 22:01:45 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/udav-0.5.2-2.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/udav-0.5.2-2.fc10.src.rpm F11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1805869 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 06:30:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 01:30:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477948] Review Request: simple-ccsm - Simplified plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911140630.nAE6UfPF015178@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477948 Mohd Izhar Firdaus Ismail changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(kagesenshi.87 at gma | |il.com) | --- Comment #5 from Mohd Izhar Firdaus Ismail 2009-11-14 01:30:39 EDT --- added 0.8.2 (because compiz in fedora is 0.8.2) http://izhar.fedorapeople.org/simple-ccsm/simple-ccsm.spec http://izhar.fedorapeople.org/simple-ccsm/simple-ccsm-0.8.2-1.fc12.src.rpm - update to 0.8.2 - added requires pygtk - changed license to GPLv2+ - gdk.threads_init caused simple-ccsm 0.8.2 to hang, remove it for now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 07:06:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 02:06:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530892] Review Request: kde-style-nitrogen - A KDE 4 widget style In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911140706.nAE762kg022557@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530892 --- Comment #9 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-11-14 02:06:01 EDT --- Yeah you can get the package in, then you retire it when KDE 4.4 comes out. But I don't think it's worth. Just close the bugs (unless you really want to have these packaged for KDE4.3). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 07:41:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 02:41:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481527] Review Request: bucardo - asynchronous PostgreSQL replication system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911140741.nAE7fPNv018560@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481527 --- Comment #8 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-11-14 02:41:24 EDT --- bucardo 4.4 http://itamarjp.fedorapeople.org/bucardo/bucardo.spec http://itamarjp.fedorapeople.org/bucardo/bucardo-4.4.0-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 09:19:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 04:19:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533803] Review Request: libcue - CUE sheet parser library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911140919.nAE9J6BV010125@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533803 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mschwendt at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mschwendt at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt 2009-11-14 04:19:05 EDT --- * "Group" tag of base package should be: System Environment/Libraries * Source URL points at a web page instead of the source tarball. Use this (it follows the guidelines, too): http://downloads.sourceforge.net/libcue/libcue-%{version}.tar.bz2 > %description > Libcue is intended to parse a so called [...] Correct English IMO would be: Libcue is intended for parsing a so-called [...] > W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libcue.so.1.0.3 exit at GLIBC_2.0 Not good, since this is a library. Libraries ought to return error values instead of terminating the process. This exit call is in a fatal error function inside the generated flex scanner code. * Two source files rem.c and rem.h contain a BSD license header and the name of the current developer. According to Fedora's Licensing Guidelines, this must be reflected in the "License" tag plus a comment in the spec file: # Files libcue/rem.{c,h} contain a BSD header License: GPLv2 and BSD https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios The project's file "COPYING" comments on the two licences and explicitly acknowledges that the whole libcue project uses the GPLv2. Preferably, the current developer removes the ambiguity and explicitly applies the GPLv2 inside the rem.c/rem.h files, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 10:09:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 05:09:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520569] Review Request: uboot-mkimage - U-Boot mkimage utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141009.nAEA9RFP003324@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520569 --- Comment #6 from Dan Hor?k 2009-11-14 05:09:26 EDT --- New release is available, now based on the official U-Boot sources. It includes both mkimage and the environment r/w tool. This is really a work-in-progress and the final look of the package should be discussed between the interested parties. Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/uboot-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/uboot-tools-2009.08-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 10:50:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 05:50:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531255] Review Request: CGSI-gSOAP - GSI plugin for gSOAP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141050.nAEAoLfA001162@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531255 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-14 05:50:19 EDT --- CGSI-gSOAP-1.3.3.2-2.20090920cvs.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/CGSI-gSOAP-1.3.3.2-2.20090920cvs.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 10:50:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 05:50:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531255] Review Request: CGSI-gSOAP - GSI plugin for gSOAP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141050.nAEAoPAw001210@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531255 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-14 05:50:25 EDT --- CGSI-gSOAP-1.3.3.2-2.20090920cvs.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/CGSI-gSOAP-1.3.3.2-2.20090920cvs.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 11:13:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 06:13:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527706] Review Request: mingw32-libgeotiff - MinGW port of libgeotiff Georeferenced image library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141113.nAEBDJvX006800@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527706 --- Comment #11 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-11-14 06:13:18 EDT --- Ping, Dave. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 11:18:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 06:18:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530688] Review Request: ghc-language-c - Haskell language-c library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141118.nAEBIsFe008163@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530688 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bos at serpentine.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 11:49:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 06:49:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141149.nAEBnT4q027924@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #24 from Jens Petersen 2009-11-14 06:49:26 EDT --- I think it is better just to move haskell-mode-init.patch into "Source1: haskell-mode-init.el" - doing it as a patch doesn't really make sense. Have you submitted the Makefile patch upstream - it looks pretty sane and non-fedora specific to me. Otherwise I think the package looks pretty reasonable to me. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Emacs#Template_for_a_add-on_package_for_GNU_Emacs_only -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 12:12:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 07:12:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141212.nAECCctG000569@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |petersen at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #27 from Jens Petersen 2009-11-14 07:12:35 EDT --- Thanks for the update and continued effort on this package. I think we are getting nearly there. :) (In reply to comment #22) > The intention was GPLv2. The license block in the Cabal says GPL, but > the License file it points at is the GPLv2. Likely Neil (the author) is not familiar with the Fedora's distinction of GPLv2 vs GPLv2+, > but I will try and find what > the Haskell/Cabal approved way is to mark GPL versions in the license > field. AFAIK there isn't one :-( so we should probably complain to cabal/hackage about it, and request adding of GPLvN but getting it fine-grained enough for Fedora will probably be hard I suspect. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 12:36:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 07:36:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141236.nAECahNP005747@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 --- Comment #28 from Jens Petersen 2009-11-14 07:36:42 EDT --- I see 1.6.12 is out: http://hackage.haskell.org/package/hlint Also I tried a scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1806154 which failed since you should BR ghc-cpphs-devel not cpphs. (Would be nice to update the deps for f11, so that it will build there too.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 12:43:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 07:43:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141243.nAEChXvA026717@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 --- Comment #29 from Jens Petersen 2009-11-14 07:43:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #28) > I see 1.6.12 is out: http://hackage.haskell.org/package/hlint Though it seems to require haskell-src-exts >=1.3. > which failed since you should BR ghc-cpphs-devel not cpphs. However even after it still fails for me mysteriously: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1806161 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 12:54:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 07:54:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537563] New: Review Request: mingw32-plib - Fedora mingw set of portable game related libraries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-plib - Fedora mingw set of portable game related libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537563 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-plib - Fedora mingw set of portable game related libraries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fgfs.stefan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://riemens.org/fs/mingw32-plib.spec SRPM URL: http://riemens.org/fs/mingw32-plib-1.8.5-0.fc12.src.rpm Description: This is a set of OpenSource (LGPL) libraries that will permit programmers to write games and other realtime interactive applications that are 100% portable across a wide range of hardware and operating systems. Here is what you need - it's all free and available with LGPL'ed source code on the web. All of it works well together. This is the fedora mingw cross-compiled version rpmlint output: mingw32-plib.src: W: macro-in-%description %{_mingw32_description} I believe this one can be safely ignored mingw32-plib-debuginfo.noarch: E: empty-debuginfo-package I'm not sure what to think of this one... mingw32-plib-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibsm.a mingw32-plib-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibpsl.a mingw32-plib-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibul.a mingw32-plib-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibssg.a mingw32-plib-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibnet.a mingw32-plib-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibsl.a mingw32-plib-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibjs.a mingw32-plib-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibpw.a mingw32-plib-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibpuaux.a mingw32-plib-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibsg.a mingw32-plib-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibfnt.a mingw32-plib-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibpu.a mingw32-plib-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibssgaux.a 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 14 errors, 1 warnings. These can all be ignored, as they are normal for static mingw packages Mingw packaging guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1806163 PS, I'm still in need of a sponsor... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 12:59:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 07:59:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537563] Review Request: mingw32-plib - Fedora mingw set of portable game related libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141259.nAECx8A2029907@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537563 --- Comment #1 from Stefan Riemens 2009-11-14 07:59:07 EDT --- I forgot to mention that these binaries work fine with a x-compiled flightgear.... Stefan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 12:57:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 07:57:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537563] Review Request: mingw32-plib - Fedora mingw set of portable game related libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141257.nAECv3bF029620@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537563 Stefan Riemens changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-mingw at lists.fedorapr | |oject.org Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 13:03:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 08:03:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533302] Review Request: rst2pdf - Tool for transforming reStructuredText to PDF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141303.nAED3hc3030922@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533302 Sergio Pascual changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Sergio Pascual 2009-11-14 08:03:42 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rst2pdf Short Description: Tool for transforming reStructuredText to PDF Owners: sergiopr Branches: F-12 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 13:20:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 08:20:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516343] Review Request: metadata-extractor - JPEG metadata extraction framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141320.nAEDKDUj002224@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516343 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-14 08:20:11 EDT --- metadata-extractor-2.3.1-5.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/metadata-extractor-2.3.1-5.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 13:21:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 08:21:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516343] Review Request: metadata-extractor - JPEG metadata extraction framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141321.nAEDLIh1002590@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516343 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-14 08:21:18 EDT --- metadata-extractor-2.3.1-5.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/metadata-extractor-2.3.1-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 13:22:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 08:22:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516343] Review Request: metadata-extractor - JPEG metadata extraction framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141322.nAEDMVoZ015449@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516343 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-14 08:22:30 EDT --- metadata-extractor-2.3.1-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/metadata-extractor-2.3.1-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 13:23:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 08:23:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516343] Review Request: metadata-extractor - JPEG metadata extraction framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141323.nAEDNwQ2003154@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516343 Andrea Musuruane changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #32 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-11-14 08:23:57 EDT --- Built. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 13:24:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 08:24:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508351] Review Request: josm - java openstreetmap editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141324.nAEDO1Yk003238@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508351 Bug 508351 depends on bug 516343, which changed state. Bug 516343 Summary: Review Request: metadata-extractor - JPEG metadata extraction framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516343 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 13:24:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 08:24:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527241] Review Request: libvtemm - C++ bindings for vte In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141324.nAEDOo7X015881@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527241 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-14 08:24:48 EDT --- libvtemm-0.22.1-4.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libvtemm-0.22.1-4.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 13:32:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 08:32:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508351] Review Request: josm - java openstreetmap editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141332.nAEDWT98005638@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508351 --- Comment #17 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-11-14 08:32:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > I have updated to last josm tested revision and change $RPM_BUILD_ROOT by > %{buildroot} in SPEC file. > > http://cedric.olivier.free.fr/rpms/josm.spec > http://cedric.olivier.free.fr/rpms/josm-snapshot-2255svn.1.fc11.src.rpm You cannot use "snapshot" as a Version and Release is wrong. Please read again the following guideline: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 13:46:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 08:46:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 513775] Review Request: pyfuzzy - Python framework for fuzzy sets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141346.nAEDkjba020875@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513775 --- Comment #8 from Ren? Liebscher 2009-11-14 08:46:43 EDT --- Hi, I am always working on new releases, but you might have missed the last one from 2009-10-18, see https://sourceforge.net/projects/pyfuzzy/files/. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 14:11:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 09:11:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 498218] Review Request: picturetile - Tiles a bunch of images into one large "photo wall" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141411.nAEEBr0G026770@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498218 Edwin ten Brink changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Edwin ten Brink 2009-11-14 09:11:50 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: picturetile Short Description: Tiles a bunch of images into one large "photo wall" Owners: edwintb Branches: F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 14:49:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 09:49:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141449.nAEEnVvR003597@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 --- Comment #30 from Jens Petersen 2009-11-14 09:49:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #29) > > I see 1.6.12 is out: http://hackage.haskell.org/package/hlint > Though it seems to require haskell-src-exts >=1.3. Ok I went ahead and built ghc-haskell-src-exts-1.3.0 in dist-f13. > However even after it still fails for me mysteriously: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1806161 Fixed in same build adding missing "Requires: ghc-cpphs-devel". So hopefully hlint-1.6.12 should build there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 14:54:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 09:54:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479763] Review Request: seam - The Simple Extensible Abstract Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141454.nAEEs6tg024878@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479763 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-11-14 09:54:04 EDT --- Upstream doesn't seam to be active any more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 14:55:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 09:55:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 513779] Review Request: python-simplesettings - Simple settings initialization for Python libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141455.nAEEtJcN025433@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513779 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |WONTFIX Flag|needinfo?(fabian at bernewirel | |ess.net) | --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2009-11-14 09:55:18 EDT --- At the moment I'm a bit short on time because of that I don't want to go on with this request for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 15:50:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 10:50:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481527] Review Request: bucardo - asynchronous PostgreSQL replication system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141550.nAEFoq63016922@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481527 --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-14 10:50:51 EDT --- This builds but does not seem to install due to a missing dependency on perl(Test::Dynamic). It's odd that anything in Test would be required at runtime; can you explain why the three dependencies under "#testsuite" would need to be runtime dependencies instead of build-time dependencies, or why Test::Dynamic is required for anything? It doesn't seem to appear in the source at all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 16:03:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 11:03:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527706] Review Request: mingw32-libgeotiff - MinGW port of libgeotiff Georeferenced image library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141603.nAEG3UKV019223@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527706 --- Comment #12 from Dave Ludlow 2009-11-14 11:03:29 EDT --- Sorry, was out of town. Will get to this shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 16:04:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 11:04:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141604.nAEG4sOX006972@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 --- Comment #28 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-14 11:04:53 EDT --- So would you change the release number? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 16:26:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 11:26:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532874] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-wacom - Xorg X11 wacom input driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141626.nAEGQlKl023532@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532874 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-14 11:26:46 EDT --- Peter, I have the hp touchsmart tx2 and on some webpages, there is mentioned, that this is a wacom tablet pc, so it should be working with this driver... But I can't get it working with F-12. Is there anything I can help with testing? Maybe I'm doing something wrong, but shouldn't the display be autodetected anyway, when this driver is installed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 16:38:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 11:38:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141638.nAEGcqYL012830@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 --- Comment #29 from Roshan Singh 2009-11-14 11:38:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #28) > So would you change the release number? As of now, let it be like this, if I need to make any further changes to the spec file, I will definitely change the release number. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 16:39:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 11:39:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532203] Review Request: jgraph - Java-based Diagram Component and Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141639.nAEGdl9P012950@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532203 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-14 11:39:46 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 16:44:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 11:44:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 513775] Review Request: pyfuzzy - Python framework for fuzzy sets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141644.nAEGiF01026302@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513775 --- Comment #9 from Fabian Affolter 2009-11-14 11:44:13 EDT --- Hmmm, I missed that. I will provide a new package soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 16:40:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 11:40:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533302] Review Request: rst2pdf - Tool for transforming reStructuredText to PDF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141640.nAEGePYN025816@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533302 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-14 11:40:24 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 16:42:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 11:42:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 498218] Review Request: picturetile - Tiles a bunch of images into one large "photo wall" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141642.nAEGgNTV026060@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498218 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #18 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-14 11:42:22 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 17:17:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 12:17:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536737] Review Request: yum-langpacks - langpacks plugin for yum In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141717.nAEHHA4R032568@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536737 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-14 12:17:09 EDT --- Is this related to bug 512663 in any way? Does one depend on the other? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 17:23:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 12:23:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530301] Review Request: bmpanel2 - NETWM compliant panel for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141723.nAEHNiUC021398@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530301 --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-14 12:23:42 EDT --- Well, still I cannot launch bmpanel2 on GNOME, it launches on XFCE, so I will continue this review request. For -0.4: * Source - For source, please write the URL of the original source as a comment, and rename the stripped tarball to like "%{name}-%{upstream_version}-stripped.tar.gz" or so. * icon cache updating - Please follow https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache ( You are using the old template ) - As you are using %{_datadir}/icons/gnome/ (not %_datadir/icons/hicolor), the scriptlet should also be using this directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 17:26:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 12:26:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533558] Review Request: gtkwhiteboard - GTK Wiimote Whiteboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141726.nAEHQeGR002094@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533558 Rich Mattes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |richmattes at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Rich Mattes 2009-11-14 12:26:39 EDT --- informal review: * You're supposed to put up the rpmlint output: $ rpmlint gtkwhiteboard.spec ../RPMS/noarch/gtkwhiteboard-1.3-2.fc11.noarch.rpm gtkwhiteboard.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-xlib gtkwhiteboard.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/gtkwhiteboard-1.3/linuxWiimoteLib.py 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings. There's a couple errors there that you can fix. To find out more, do rpmlint -I error (i.e. rpmlint -I explicit-lib-dependency) * There's no LICENSE file provided in the %doc section -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 18:15:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 13:15:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537585] New: Review Request: picocontainer - Dependency-injection container Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: picocontainer - Dependency-injection container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537585 Summary: Review Request: picocontainer - Dependency-injection container Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mi at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://v3.sk/~xyzz/rpm/intellij-idea/picocontainer.spec SRPM URL: http://v3.sk/~xyzz/rpm/intellij-idea/picocontainer-1.3-5.fc11.src.rpm Description: Lightweight and highly embeddable inversion of controll container for components that honour dependency injection. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 18:17:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 13:17:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508518] Review Request: Meiga - Easy tool for file sharing and content publishing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141817.nAEIHgth011791@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508518 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-14 13:17:41 EDT --- Review: - Sources match upstream - $ rpmlint meiga.spec meiga-0.3.1-1.fc12.src.rpm x86_64/meiga-0.3.1-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm x86_64/meiga-debuginfo-0.3.1-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. - file permissions ok - %files section ok - properly install locales - license GPLv2+ ok - package works as expected Issues: - Gnome users are currently forced to install kde-filesystem. If you split the .desktop files for kde into a subpackage, this would help a lot. But this is no requirement. - When installing there is a gtk-update-icon-cache: No theme index file. Don't not how to eliminate this, but not a blocker atm. - When building, there is a intltoolize: 'po/Makefile.in.in' exists: use '--force' to overwrite So please add --force to intltoolize This are only minor issues, so this package is: ___________________________ APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 18:17:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 13:17:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537585] Review Request: picocontainer - Dependency-injection container In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141817.nAEIHNW9031846@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537585 --- Comment #1 from Michal Ingeli 2009-11-14 13:17:22 EDT --- Builds in mock and koji [1], rpmlint quiet. [1] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1806166 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 18:20:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 13:20:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 512608] Review Request: mozilla-noscript - Javascript whitelist extension for Mozilla Firefox In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141820.nAEIKDRL012404@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512608 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-14 13:20:12 EDT --- Ping, Andreas, any update? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 18:27:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 13:27:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520637] Review Request: mdk - GNU MIX Development Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141827.nAEIRjGJ013630@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520637 --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-14 13:27:43 EDT --- Well, for unknown reason, currently I can run gmixvm on F-12 i686 system without any problem. Now I will restart this review ticket. Then for 1.2.5-1: * BR - Add "BuildRequires: intltool". http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1806518 Otherwise okay. By the way, as this is needsponsor ticket, I want to wait for the approval of this ticket until you update bug 528108. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 18:29:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 13:29:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532306] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-debug - Faster implementation of the standard Debugging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141829.nAEITuTR001340@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532306 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-14 13:29:54 EDT --- (Just putting a note that I postpone reviewing this review request until bug 533725 is completed) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 18:31:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 13:31:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459548] Review Request: php-gtk - GTK PHP extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141831.nAEIVji5014368@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459548 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(metal3d at gmail.com | |) | --- Comment #33 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-14 13:31:41 EDT --- Once closing. If someone wants to import this package into Fedora, please open a new review request and mark this package as a duplicate of the new one. Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 18:33:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 13:33:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537587] New: Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 Summary: Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nathanael at gnat.ca QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.gnat.ca/dspam.spec SRPM URL: http://www.gnat.ca/dspam-3.9.0-BETA4.src.rpm Description: The DSPAM agent masquerades as the email server's local delivery agent and filters/learns spams using an advanced Bayesian statistical approach (based on Baye's theorem of combined probabilities) which provides an administratively maintenance-free, easy-learning Anti-Spam service custom tailored to each individual user's behavior. Advanced because on top of standard Bayesian filtering is also incorporated the use of Chained Tokens, de-obfuscation, and other enhancements. DSPAM works great with Sendmail and Exim, and should work well with any other MTA that supports an external local delivery agent (postfix, qmail, etc.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 18:32:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 13:32:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533302] Review Request: rst2pdf - Tool for transforming reStructuredText to PDF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141832.nAEIWlOo002013@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533302 Sergio Pascual changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 18:36:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 13:36:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531391] Review Request: gwsmhg - hg/mq GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141836.nAEIafHS015247@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531391 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(mads at kiilerich.co | |m) --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-14 13:36:39 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 18:35:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 13:35:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532309] Review Request: rubygem-net-ldap - A full-featured pure-Ruby LDAP client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141835.nAEIZlsj015162@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532309 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(kanarip at kanarip.c | |om) --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-14 13:35:46 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 18:37:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 13:37:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 509936] Review Request: tortoisehg - Mercurial gui tools and nautilus plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141837.nAEIbelf015362@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509936 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(mads at kiilerich.co | |m) --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-14 13:37:37 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 18:37:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 13:37:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 506100] Review Request: opennhrp - An NHRP implementation for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141837.nAEIb9UC002815@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506100 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(tjarls at gmail.com) --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-14 13:37:06 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 18:54:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 13:54:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141854.nAEIsGD7005621@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-14 13:54:15 EDT --- ( From the message of the submitter on fedora-devel-list blocking needsponsor ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 18:55:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 13:55:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527549] Review Request: osm2go - A simple openstreetmap editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141855.nAEItwOk018906@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527549 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NEEDSWORK --- Comment #5 from Martin Gieseking 2009-11-14 13:55:57 EDT --- Ok, fine. I think it's better to wait for an upstream release that also works with the upcoming F-12 and the devel branch rather than approving the current package for F-11 only. Please clear the whiteboard when a new release/revision is ready to be reviewed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 18:57:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 13:57:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141857.nAEIv0Hf006508@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lvillani at binaryhelix.net --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-14 13:56:58 EDT --- *** Bug 435121 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 18:56:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 13:56:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435121] Review Request: dspam - Scalable and open-source content-based spam filter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141856.nAEIuxns006476@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435121 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #33 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-14 13:56:57 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 537587 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 19:05:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 14:05:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141905.nAEJ5s3C021469@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 --- Comment #31 from Conrad Meyer 2009-11-14 14:05:53 EDT --- Ok, I've made these changes, but I can't build it locally due to not being able to find haskell-src-exts-devel >= 1.3. I've got to run, but here is the new spec/srpm: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/hlint.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/hlint-1.6.12-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 19:19:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 14:19:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 503336] Review Request: newsbeuter - console based feed reader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141919.nAEJJTju024730@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503336 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-14 14:19:26 EDT --- newsbeuter-2.0-8.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/newsbeuter-2.0-8.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 19:36:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 14:36:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478806] Review Request: simh - A highly portable, multi-system emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141936.nAEJaX9K028647@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478806 --- Comment #14 from Lucian Langa 2009-11-14 14:36:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > I did try to test these, but honestly I've no idea what I'm doing so I can't > really do that. I did run simh-altair and entered "go"; it segfaulted > immediately. Looks like a valid bug there, I will address it upstream. I've updated the files with regard to above comments. http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/simh.spec http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/simh-3.8.1-3.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 19:55:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 14:55:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532309] Review Request: rubygem-net-ldap - A full-featured pure-Ruby LDAP client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911141955.nAEJtcv5019653@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532309 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(kanarip at kanarip.c | |om) | --- Comment #3 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-11-14 14:55:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > - The srpm name must be "rubygem-ruby-net-ldap", not "rubygem-net-ldap" > ( even if the name seems rather redundant ), because > * the installed gem name is actually "ruby-net-ldap", not "net-ldap" > ( actually "gem list -b foo" or ruby -e "require 'rubygems' ; gem 'foo'" > shows it ). > Removing ruby- part from srpm is more confusing. > Fixed. > - Please use the defined macro and remove unused macro definition. > Fixed. > - Usually gems' source URL are: > http://gems.rubyforge.org/gems/-.gem > Fixed. > - Mark document files as %doc properly > > - Please enable test program. These tests will mostly fail because; 1) there isn't any adequate testing 2) tests do not have an LDAP server to connect to I enabled them anyway and made sure they would hold back the rpm build New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-ruby-net-ldap.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f12/SRPMS/rubygem-ruby-net-ldap-0.0.4-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 20:18:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 15:18:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534061] Review Request: hostname - Utility to set/show the host name or domain name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911142018.nAEKIaAp005387@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534061 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pahan at hubbitus.info --- Comment #5 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-11-14 15:18:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Those two rpmlint warnings are completely bogus; I'll report a bug against > rpmlint. If you read explanation of rpmlint you undarstand what all correct: hostname.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install You should clean $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in the %clean section and in the beginning of the %install section. Use "rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT". Some rpm configurations do this automatically; if your package is only going to be built in such configurations, you can ignore this warning for the section(s) where your rpm takes care of it. hostname.src: W: no-buildroot-tag The BuildRoot tag isn't used in your spec. It must be used in order to allow building the package as non root on some systems. For some rpm versions (e.g. rpm.org >= 4.6) the BuildRoot tag is not necessary in specfiles and is ignored by rpmbuild; if your package is only going to be built with such rpm versions you can ignore this warning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 21:34:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 16:34:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 509965] Review Request: snmptt - SNMPTT (SNMP Trap Translator) is an SNMP trap handler written in Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911142134.nAELY8mX019796@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509965 --- Comment #9 from Ville Skytt? 2009-11-14 16:34:06 EDT --- Gary: ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 21:37:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 16:37:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 509965] Review Request: snmptt - SNMPTT (SNMP Trap Translator) is an SNMP trap handler written in Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911142137.nAELbLW8006990@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509965 --- Comment #10 from Gary T. Giesen 2009-11-14 16:37:20 EDT --- Updated URLs: http://giesen.fedorapeople.org/snmptt/snmptt.spec http://giesen.fedorapeople.org/snmptt/snmptt-1.3-0.1.beta2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 21:39:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 16:39:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 509965] Review Request: snmptt - SNMPTT (SNMP Trap Translator) is an SNMP trap handler written in Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911142139.nAELd7JN007173@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509965 --- Comment #11 from Gary T. Giesen 2009-11-14 16:39:05 EDT --- Still waiting for a 1.3 from the author, I'll ping him. In the meantime, the packaging shouldn't change from 1.3b2 to 1.3 release so I think a review is still worthwhile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 21:42:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 16:42:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481527] Review Request: bucardo - asynchronous PostgreSQL replication system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911142142.nAELgFsG021746@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481527 --- Comment #10 from Greg Sabino Mullane 2009-11-14 16:42:14 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=369554) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=369554) Cleaned up spec for 4.4.0 Removed some duplicated modules, changed Mail::Sendmail to Net::SMTP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 21:39:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 16:39:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537585] Review Request: picocontainer - Dependency-injection container In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911142139.nAELdgs3020859@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537585 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-14 16:39:41 EDT --- 1.) BuildRoot, please fix it up according to guidelines. BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root 2.) No useless comments please #setup -q -c -n %{name}-%{version} 3.) Please don't do the jpackage javadoc magic: ln -s %{name}-%{version} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadocdir}/%{name} %ghost %doc %{_javadocdir}/%{name} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 21:46:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 16:46:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508351] Review Request: josm - java openstreetmap editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911142146.nAELkDd7022997@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508351 --- Comment #18 from C?dric OLIVIER 2009-11-14 16:46:11 EDT --- I was misunderstanding "%{name}-%{version}.jar will be "josm-0" for a long time. I wonder if you should call it like upstream "josm-snapshot-svn_version". It's now corrected : http://cedric.olivier.free.fr/rpms/josm.spec http://cedric.olivier.free.fr/rpms/josm-0-0.1.2255svn.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 22:02:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 17:02:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 515898] Review Request: imapfilter - A flexible client side mail filtering utility for IMAP servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911142202.nAEM25Rs012596@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ian at ianweller.org --- Comment #15 from Ian Weller 2009-11-14 17:02:03 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 22:06:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 17:06:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528108] Review Request: Vuurmuur - Firewall manager built on top of iptables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911142206.nAEM6XNs027659@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528108 Stjepan Gros changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(stjepan.gros at gmai | |l.com) | --- Comment #4 from Stjepan Gros 2009-11-14 17:06:30 EDT --- Ok, here is the changed packet. There are few clarifications/notes: C. %install I'm removing .keep files in %{_buildroot} because they are not installed with the usual 'make install' command but those directories are marked as %doc. Spec URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/vuurmuur/Vuurmuur.spec SRPM URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/vuurmuur/Vuurmuur-0.7-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 22:27:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 17:27:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481527] Review Request: bucardo - asynchronous PostgreSQL replication system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911142227.nAEMRgtA032436@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481527 --- Comment #11 from Greg Sabino Mullane 2009-11-14 17:27:41 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=369558) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=369558) Improved version of replica script to test Bucardo Minor tweaks: avoids direct SQL calls -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 23:18:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 18:18:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479527] Review Request: synfigstudio - Vector-based 2D animation studio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911142318.nAENIngg029076@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479527 Luya Tshimbalanga changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Luya Tshimbalanga 2009-11-14 18:18:48 EDT --- Further review: + Each files section is include in %deffrag{...} and permission are properly set. + Header files are in -devel package + On spec file, base package is required in -devel package + Filenames are valid UTF-8 Since synfig version is 0.62 on Koji, using koji will fail on this current version. However, the resulting built from previous version synfig used for review was successful on my local machine. the application is fully functional and can be removed without issue. In conclusion, synfigstudio fully complies with Packaging Guideline. Make sure to update this package in 0.62. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 14 23:25:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 18:25:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481528] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Safe - Safer access to your database through a DBI database handle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911142325.nAENPD6q030492@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481528 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-11-14 18:25:11 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-DBIx-Safe New Branches: EL-5 Owners: itamarjp InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 00:39:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 19:39:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465159] Review Request: tcexam - A Web-based Computer-Based Assessment (CBA) software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911150039.nAF0dJ0q015145@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465159 --- Comment #3 from Oron Peled 2009-11-14 19:39:17 EDT --- > Wow, this is ancient. Are you still interested in contributing this package? Yes, I am. I rebuilt an updated package, NOT to be pushed to Fedora as is, but to be used as a working reference while we work on resolving the different issues. It is located in: SPEC: http://oron.fedorapeople.org/tcexam/tcexam.spec SRPM: http://oron.fedorapeople.org/tcexam/tcexam-9.0.035-1.fc11.src.rpm Work plan: * Package tcpdf.org: - Font issues -- started with Fedora font SIG: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-list/2009-November/msg00013.html - Maybe need to package ttf2ufm and/or afm2pfm - Coordinate with moodle packager. During my search for ttf2ufm upstream I found that tcpdf and its fonts are bundled with moodle (including in the Fedora package :-O * Verify selinux policy with dwalsh * Finally package tcexam.org itself. Can you review all this stuff, step by step, as I move along? - If yes, I will start working on the items. For every new package needed, I will add here a link to its bug report so you can easily find them. - If you do not have the time for this, I will regretfully have to return to my numb mode until someone find this bug report... Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 01:21:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 20:21:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533725] Review Request: rubygem-linecache - Caches (Ruby source) files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911150121.nAF1L4AZ026160@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533725 --- Comment #2 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-11-14 20:21:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Some notes: > > * We now prefer to use %global rather than %define. > Fixed. > * Defined %ruby_sitelib macro is not used and seems unneeded. > Fixed. > * License tag should be GPLv2 > Fixed. > * Make build.log more verbose (gem -V should do this), so that > we can check if Fedora specific compilation flags are correctly > honored. > Fixed, and it does. > * Please don't strip binaries by yourself and create debuginfo > rpm correctly. > Fixed. > * Enable %check, because this gem contains test/ directory > Fixed. > * Mark %geminstdir/AUTHORS or so as %doc properly. > Fixed this file, and other files as well. > * This package should not own the directory %{ruby_sitearch}/ > itself. > Fixed. > * I don't think %{geminstdir}/lib can be removed. > Fixed. > * Please use defined macro (especially %geminstdir) also > in other place (like in %files) Fixed. New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-linecache.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f12/SRPMS/rubygem-linecache-0.43-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 02:22:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 21:22:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537585] Review Request: picocontainer - Dependency-injection container In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911150222.nAF2MTMY022544@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537585 --- Comment #3 from Michal Ingeli 2009-11-14 21:22:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > 1.) BuildRoot, please fix it up according to guidelines. > > BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root Looking at [1], buildroot seems to be rather valid and according to guidelines. > 2.) No useless comments please > > #setup -q -c -n %{name}-%{version} Right, removed that one. > 3.) Please don't do the jpackage javadoc magic: > > ln -s %{name}-%{version} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadocdir}/%{name} > %ghost %doc %{_javadocdir}/%{name} Removed. Also decided to removed -target 1.5 and -encoding param for javac as it is may be better not force thing. And forgotten -verbose. Spec URL: http://v3.sk/~xyzz/rpm/intellij-idea/picocontainer.spec SRPM URL: http://v3.sk/~xyzz/rpm/intellij-idea/picocontainer-1.3-6.fc11.src.rpm [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 03:52:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 22:52:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911150352.nAF3q0eo007751@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #25 from Arun SAG 2009-11-14 22:51:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > I think it is better just to move haskell-mode-init.patch > into "Source1: haskell-mode-init.el" - doing it as a patch > doesn't really make sense. Moved the haskell-mode-init.patch to source1 SPEC : http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/emacs-haskell-mode.spec SRPM : http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/emacs-haskell-mode-2.5.1-2.fc11.src.rpm koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1807135 > > Have you submitted the Makefile patch upstream - it looks > pretty sane and non-fedora specific to me. > Not submitted, but asked the maintainer about the Makefile his reply was "> I tried to package emacs-haskell-mode addon ( > http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~monnier/elisp/haskell-mode.tar.gz ), when i > examined the Makefile, it didn't really compile haskell-ghci.el and > haskell-hugs.el. Is there any specific reason for not compiling those files? They're obsolete, only left there for those few people who insist on using them." I will send the patch to the maintainer. > Otherwise I think the package looks pretty reasonable to me. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Emacs#Template_for_a_add-on_package_for_GNU_Emacs_only Thanks for the review, hope someone sponsors this package ; -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 03:59:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 22:59:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911150359.nAF3xtlm009107@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #31 from Arun SAG 2009-11-14 22:59:54 EDT --- Yesterday i built version 30.11 , Same ,local mock build hangs running /usr/bin/idn. Thanks Peter for adding the license file :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 04:15:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 23:15:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911150415.nAF4FF9L011951@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #32 from Peter Galbraith 2009-11-14 23:15:14 EDT --- > Thanks Peter for adding the license file :) No problem! Just uploaded 31.0-1 today. It adds vm-bogofilter.el in vm-bonus-el. Up to you whether you want to add it... There's a patch for it under debian/patches Peter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 05:06:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 00:06:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483421] Review Request: apophysis-j - Fractal flame editor and creator, based on Apophysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911150506.nAF56bLT006763@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483421 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #9 from Ian Weller 2009-11-15 00:06:35 EDT --- Giving up. I don't know enough Java to understand what's necessary here. Hopefully someone can pick this up in a new bug and deal with the licensing problems there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 07:17:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 02:17:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508518] Review Request: Meiga - Easy tool for file sharing and content publishing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911150717.nAF7HVBP016393@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508518 Rajeesh changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Rajeesh 2009-11-15 02:17:30 EDT --- Hi Thomas, Thanks for the review and approval! Your comments are addressed in the new build, except the gtk-update-icon-cache issue. I guess this is due to running gtk-update-icon-cache on /usr/share/pixmaps. I don't know how to fix it, or can it be simply omitted? http://rajeeshknambiar.fedorapeople.org/meiga.spec http://rajeeshknambiar.fedorapeople.org/meiga-0.3.1-2.fc11.src.rpm http://rajeeshknambiar.fedorapeople.org/meiga-0.3.1-2.fc11.i586.rpm http://rajeeshknambiar.fedorapeople.org/meiga-kde-0.3.1-2.fc11.i586.rpm I am requesting for the CVS access. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: meiga Short Description: Easy to use tool to share selected local directories via web Owners: rajeeshknambiar Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 09:06:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 04:06:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530473] Review Request: lessfs - Lessfs is an inline data deduplicating filesystem. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911150906.nAF96SmC012643@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530473 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 09:06:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 04:06:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530473] Review Request: lessfs - Lessfs is an inline data deduplicating filesystem. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911150906.nAF96JNf012593@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530473 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pahan at hubbitus.info AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pahan at hubbitus.info Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #9 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-11-15 04:06:17 EDT --- If no one argue I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 09:15:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 04:15:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520637] Review Request: mdk - GNU MIX Development Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911150915.nAF9FFDJ032403@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520637 --- Comment #18 from Stjepan Gros 2009-11-15 04:15:14 EDT --- I added BR to the spec file. The new spec and srpm files are here: Spec URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/mdk/mdk.spec SRPM URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/mdk/mdk-1.2.5-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 09:24:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 04:24:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 424841] Review Request: ndisc6 - IPv6 diagnostic tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911150924.nAF9OeNC018077@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424841 --- Comment #18 from Stjepan Gros 2009-11-15 04:24:34 EDT --- What happened with this package? I don't see it appeared in rawhide or F12. This ticket is still open. Did anyone taken it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 09:45:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 04:45:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537631] New: Review Request: moblin-panel-web - Moblin Panel for Web Browsing Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: moblin-panel-web - Moblin Panel for Web Browsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537631 Summary: Review Request: moblin-panel-web - Moblin Panel for Web Browsing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 506446 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/moblin-panel-web.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/moblin-panel-web-0.1.4-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Moblin internet panel for use with the Moblin Web Browser. koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1807344 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 10:05:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 05:05:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532382] Review Request: fvkbd - Free Virtual Keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911151005.nAFA5CJ0027217@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532382 --- Comment #4 from Peter Robinson 2009-11-15 05:05:11 EDT --- Package updated with the above 2 suggestions. SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/fvkbd.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/fvkbd-0.1.6-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 10:50:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 05:50:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911151050.nAFAoZuS024366@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br --- Comment #3 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-11-15 05:50:33 EDT --- I recommend you to read fedora packaging guidelines. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 10:55:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 05:55:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537585] Review Request: picocontainer - Dependency-injection container In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911151055.nAFAtXJs008077@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537585 Michal Ingeli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |viveklak at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Michal Ingeli 2009-11-15 05:55:30 EDT --- *** Bug 252119 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 10:55:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 05:55:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 252119] Review Request: picocontainer - Dependency-injection container In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911151055.nAFAtW9K008042@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252119 Michal Ingeli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mi at v3.sk Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from Michal Ingeli 2009-11-15 05:55:30 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 537585 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 11:11:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 06:11:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532261] Review Request: checkmedia - Checks installation media. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911151111.nAFBBmUx012245@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532261 --- Comment #1 from xandry 2009-11-15 06:11:47 EDT --- Update to 2.3 version. Spec URL: http://narod.ru/disk/15071047000/checkmedia.spec.html SRPM URL: http://narod.ru/disk/15071127000/checkmedia-2.3-2.fc11.src.rpm.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 11:17:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 06:17:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537585] Review Request: picocontainer - Dependency-injection container In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911151117.nAFBHYJE013704@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537585 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-15 06:17:32 EDT --- Looks good now. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 11:18:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 06:18:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479527] Review Request: synfigstudio - Vector-based 2D animation studio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911151118.nAFBIe6J013880@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479527 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-15 06:18:39 EDT --- Thank you. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: synfigstudio Short Description: Vector-based 2D animation studio Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 11:19:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 06:19:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 517643] Review Request: php-doctrine-Doctrine - PHP Object Relational Mapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911151119.nAFBJ4Ys031601@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517643 Christof Damian changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Christof Damian 2009-11-15 06:19:01 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: php-doctrine-Doctrine New Branches: F-12 Owners: cdamian -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 11:48:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 06:48:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537639] New: Review Request: hyena - A C# library used to make awesome applications Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hyena - A C# library used to make awesome applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537639 Summary: Review Request: hyena - A C# library used to make awesome applications Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sebastian at when.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/hyena.spec SRPM URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/hyena-0.2-1.fc12.src.rpm Koji Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1806982 Description: Hyena is a required build dependency for PDF Mod. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 11:49:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 06:49:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533558] Review Request: gtkwhiteboard - GTK Wiimote Whiteboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911151149.nAFBnG13021211@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533558 --- Comment #2 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-11-15 06:49:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > informal review: > > * You're supposed to put up the rpmlint output: > $ rpmlint gtkwhiteboard.spec ../RPMS/noarch/gtkwhiteboard-1.3-2.fc11.noarch.rpm > gtkwhiteboard.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-xlib This is a noarch package. It contains only python scripts. It will not force the installation of anything. > gtkwhiteboard.noarch: E: script-without-shebang > /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/gtkwhiteboard-1.3/linuxWiimoteLib.py This script is not supposed to be called directly. > 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings. > > There's a couple errors there that you can fix. To find out more, do > rpmlint -I error (i.e. rpmlint -I explicit-lib-dependency) > > * There's no LICENSE file provided in the %doc section The license agreement is in the README file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 11:50:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 06:50:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537639] Review Request: hyena - A C# library used to make awesome applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911151150.nAFBoNhs007005@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537639 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |537640 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 11:50:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 06:50:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537640] Review Request: pdfmod - A simple application for modifying PDF documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911151150.nAFBoMsU006979@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537640 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |537639 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 11:50:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 06:50:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537640] New: Review Request: pdfmod - A simple application for modifying PDF documents Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pdfmod - A simple application for modifying PDF documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537640 Summary: Review Request: pdfmod - A simple application for modifying PDF documents Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sebastian at when.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/pdfmod.spec SRPM URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/pdfmod-0.8-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This package requires Hyena to build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 12:13:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 07:13:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 517643] Review Request: php-doctrine-Doctrine - PHP Object Relational Mapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911151213.nAFCDjq8012928@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517643 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tomspur at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #16 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-15 07:13:43 EDT --- Hmm, what do you want? The F-12 branch should be created automatically. At http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewvc/F-12/php-doctrine-Doctrine/ there is already one. Maybe you forgot a 'cvs update'? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 12:19:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 07:19:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537585] Review Request: picocontainer - Dependency-injection container In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911151219.nAFCJNRk028594@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537585 Michal Ingeli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Michal Ingeli 2009-11-15 07:19:22 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: picocontainer Short Description: Dependency-injection container Owners: ksyz Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 12:45:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 07:45:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 517643] Review Request: php-doctrine-Doctrine - PHP Object Relational Mapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911151245.nAFCjH5N020574@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517643 --- Comment #17 from Christof Damian 2009-11-15 07:45:16 EDT --- I did, but I am an idiot anyway. I should have done "cvs update -dP" cheers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 12:52:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 07:52:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 517643] Review Request: php-doctrine-Doctrine - PHP Object Relational Mapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911151252.nAFCqAS0004206@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517643 Christof Damian changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 13:32:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 08:32:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507083] Review Request: poco - C++ class libraries for network-centric applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911151332.nAFDW4E7031605@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507083 --- Comment #25 from Michal Schmidt 2009-11-15 08:32:01 EDT --- Maxim, even though there is no top-level binary package now, the Group, Summary and %description fields should still be filled. They will be used for the source package itself (you can see them with rpm -qip poco*.src.rpm). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 13:50:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 08:50:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536684] Review Request: eclipse-mdt-ocl - Implementation of the OCL OMG metamodel for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911151350.nAFDoitr003307@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536684 Mat Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |537652 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 13:50:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 08:50:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537652] Review Request: eclipse-m2m-qvtoml - Implementation of Operational QVT for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911151350.nAFDojC9003330@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537652 Mat Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |536684 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 13:50:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 08:50:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537652] New: Review Request: eclipse-m2m-qvtoml - Implementation of Operational QVT for Eclipse Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-m2m-qvtoml - Implementation of Operational QVT for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537652 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-m2m-qvtoml - Implementation of Operational QVT for Eclipse Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at matbooth.co.uk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This package depends on eclipse-mdt-ocl, whose review request is bug #536684. Spec URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/eclipse-m2m-qvtoml.spec SRPM URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/eclipse-m2m-qvtoml-2.0.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Model-to-model transformation is a key aspect of model-driven development (MDD). The M2M project provides a framework for model-to-model transformation languages. Transformations are executed by transformation engines. This package provides a transformation engine that is an implementation of Operational QVT. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 14:57:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 09:57:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483421] Review Request: apophysis-j - Fractal flame editor and creator, based on Apophysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911151457.nAFEvK22017600@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483421 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Status Whiteboard|NotReady | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 15:47:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 10:47:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 491980] Review Request: bauble - Biodiversity collection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911151547.nAFFl6xY011702@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491980 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 15:51:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 10:51:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524283] Review Request: plee-the-bear - 2D platform game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911151551.nAFFp1m5012985@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524283 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Simon Wesp 2009-11-15 10:50:59 EDT --- FIX - MUST: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-12-ppc/result/* plee-the-bear.ppc: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/libbear_communication.so libbear_communication.so plee-the-bear.ppc: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/libbear_debug.so libbear_debug.so plee-the-bear.ppc: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/libbear_generic_items.so libbear_generic_items.so plee-the-bear.ppc: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/libplee_the_bear.so libplee_the_bear.so plee-the-bear.ppc: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/libbear_input.so libbear_input.so plee-the-bear.ppc: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/libbear_engine.so libbear_engine.so plee-the-bear.ppc: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/libbear-editor.so libbear-editor.so plee-the-bear.ppc: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/libbear_visual.so libbear_visual.so plee-the-bear.ppc: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/libbear_gui.so libbear_gui.so plee-the-bear.ppc: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/libbear_time.so libbear_time.so plee-the-bear.ppc: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/libbear_audio.so libbear_audio.so plee-the-bear.ppc: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/libbear_universe.so libbear_universe.so 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 12 errors, 0 warnings. OK - MUST: Named according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK - MUST: Spec file name matches the base package %{name} OK - MUST: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines OK - MUST: Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines: FIX - MUST: License field in spec file doesn't matches the actual license: License: GPLv2+ and CC-BY-SA OK - MUST: License files included in %doc OK - MUST: Spec is in American English OK - MUST: Spec is legible OK - MUST: Sources match the upstream source by MD5 5bb295d36aa92aa7c84e3fceda73e47b OK - MUST: Successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on ppc N/A - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. OK - MUST: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. OK - MUST: Handles locales properly with %find_lang OK - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review. OK - MUST: Owns all directories that it creates OK - MUST: No duplicate files in the %files listing OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly, includes %defattr(...) OK - MUST: Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: Consistently uses macros OK - MUST: Package contains code, or permissable content N/A - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix, then library files that end in .so must go in a -devel package. Doesn't make sense for this package N/A - MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. OK - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: All filenames valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: OK - SHOULD: Source package includes license text(s) as a separate file. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK - SHOULD: Builds in mock. OK - SHOULD: Compiles and builds into binary rpms on all supported architectures. N/A - SHOULD: Functions as described. FIX - SHOULD: Scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. update icon cache scriplet is missing https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A - SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in a -devel pkg N/A - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Other items: OK - latest stable version OK - SourceURL valid OK - Compiler flags ok OK - Debuginfo complete FIX - Timestamps INSTALL="install -p" SOURCE0 original = 03 Sep 2009 02:32:34 CEST SOURCE0 package = 16 Sep 2009 00:01 CEST -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 16:00:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 11:00:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530892] Review Request: kde-style-nitrogen - A KDE 4 widget style In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911151600.nAFG0sKL015746@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530892 Teemu Rytilahti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Teemu Rytilahti 2009-11-15 11:00:53 EDT --- Ok. Closing this as Nitrogen is merged into KDE trunk and will be available in KDE 4.4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 16:00:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 11:00:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530895] Review Request: nitrogen-kwin-theme - A window decoration for KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911151600.nAFG0vKv015781@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530895 Teemu Rytilahti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Teemu Rytilahti 2009-11-15 11:00:56 EDT --- Ok. Closing this as Nitrogen is merged into KDE trunk and will be available in KDE 4.4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 16:41:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 11:41:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 517643] Review Request: php-doctrine-Doctrine - PHP Object Relational Mapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911151641.nAFGf9xr025438@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517643 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cwickert at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #18 from Christoph Wickert 2009-11-15 11:41:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > The F-12 branch should be created automatically. No, now we are already past mass branching and it's F-13 that is created automatically. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 16:47:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 11:47:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527986] Review Request: taoframework - Multimedia bindings for Mono In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911151647.nAFGlYFa027190@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527986 --- Comment #9 from Christian Krause 2009-11-15 11:47:33 EDT --- I've reviewed the new package - here are the some minor remaining issues: - very minor issue: please add a comment in the %build section that parallel build doesn't work - thanks for adding the dependencies - most of them are OK, but for some of them there are some inconsistencies between the *.config files and the provided libraries: I've seen that sometimes the required libraries are not included in Fedora but only in one of the rpmfusion repositories. I'm a little bit unsure, whether it is OK if a Fedora package requires an rpmfusion package, but on the other hand IMHO there is more harm done if the user tries to use the taoframework subpackage (without having the required native library installed) and the mono runtime will just abort and give backtraces. So I would vote for adding the requirements even if they are not in the official Fedora repository. Sure, the package can't be installed then on a Fedora-only system, but it doesn't matter because it wouldn't work anyway. ;-) Additionally sometimes the major version of the libraries differ between the required ones in the config files and the ones provided in the system. Is there any possibility to test, whether a respective binding works? - ffmpeg the config files maps the following libraries: I haven't found them in any fedora or rpmfusion package. Probably the name is mis-spelled? - lua the config file claims to use the following shared object however, lua in Fedora provides only: /usr/lib/liblua-5.1.so Please adjust the config file. - ode the config files maps the following library: but in it is named in Fedora: /usr/lib/libode.so.1 Please adjust the config file. - physfs: vs. /usr/lib/libphysfs-1.0.so.1 Please adjust the config file. - SDL: requires smpeg-libs from rpmfusion-free, I suggest to add smpeg-libs to the requirements mismatch in SDL_gfx: vs /usr/lib/libSDL_gfx.so.0 Please adjust the config file. - cg: requires /usr/lib/Cg.so and libCgGL.so which are provided by libCg in rpmfusion-nonfree - glfw: should be better -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 16:51:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 11:51:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528108] Review Request: Vuurmuur - Firewall manager built on top of iptables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911151651.nAFGpvru028468@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528108 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-15 11:51:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > C. %install > > I'm removing .keep files in %{_buildroot} because they are not installed with > the usual 'make install' command but those directories are marked as %doc. - Ah, thank you. My additional comments will follow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 16:55:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 11:55:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537631] Review Request: moblin-panel-web - Moblin Panel for Web Browsing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911151655.nAFGtLGD014178@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537631 Christian Krause changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chkr at plauener.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chkr at plauener.de Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 16:58:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 11:58:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520306] Review Request: python-editobj - Tkinter dialog box for editing any Python object In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911151658.nAFGwXxj014853@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520306 Adrien Schreque changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 17:05:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 12:05:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 517643] Review Request: php-doctrine-Doctrine - PHP Object Relational Mapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911151705.nAFH5K3o031889@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517643 --- Comment #19 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-15 12:05:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > (In reply to comment #16) > > > The F-12 branch should be created automatically. > > No, now we are already past mass branching and it's F-13 that is created > automatically. Ok, adding 'have been'. -> The F-12 branch should 'have been' created automatically. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 17:26:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 12:26:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530251] Review Request: gearbox - A collection of usable peer-reviewed robotics-related libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911151726.nAFHQ1vc021684@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530251 --- Comment #8 from Rich Mattes 2009-11-15 12:26:00 EDT --- News: I've been working with upstream, they're ready to make a new release after cleaning up their buildsystem to support 32/64bit architectures. They're concerned that other projects that rely on theirs won't build correctly the libraries libraries and cmake files are moved out of %{_libdir}/gearbox. I've been emailing the fedora-packaging list for a little clarification, but haven't gotten a response yet. I'm ready to submit a package with either configuration, just waiting on some more feedback from the expert packagers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 17:46:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 12:46:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 517743] Review Request: PyPE - Lightweight but powerful graphical editor for developers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911151746.nAFHk1VI009543@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517743 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |tomspur at fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tomspur at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-15 12:45:59 EDT --- Review: OK - rpmlint is clean - .desktop file ok for fedora, for RHEL see issues - no missing BR - no locales - owns all dirctories, it should - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - constantly macros - nothing in %doc for runtime - no subpackages needed - latest version packaged - sources match upstream both f286464ad703c3cceec2331a01d88971 Issues: - .desktop file needs Encoding=UTF-8 if you want to ship this into RHEL. (at least desktop-file-validate fails without this, desktop-file-install probably too) Just for fedora, this is not needed. - install: the icons are in the wrong place. When starting pype searchs in the python_site_packages_dir. Please install them into: /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/PyPE/icons/ and adjust the desktop file or place a link into the other icons directory. - License GPLv2 and LGPLv2 and wxWidgets is partly wrong, partly unknown: At least plugins/exparse.py is LGPLv2+. The other files (I checked for now) contained no license header so you don't know, if it should be (L)GPLv2 ONLY or v2+. Please query upstream to add license headers and ask them, if v2 only of v2+. - %doc: changelog is missing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 18:33:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 13:33:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528108] Review Request: Vuurmuur - Firewall manager built on top of iptables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911151833.nAFIXJmZ004132@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528108 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-15 13:33:17 EDT --- For -2: ! BuildRequires - It is up to you, however usually all BuildRequires are written in the main package section. * Parallel make - Still parallel make is missing in two places (if possible, please enable it) --------------------------------------------------------- 90 sed -i 's|^hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=.*|hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=""|g' libtool 91 sed -i 's|^runpath_var=LD_RUN_PATH|runpath_var=DIE_RPATH_DIE|g' libtool 92 make 116 sed -i 's|^hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=.*|hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=""|g' libtool 117 sed -i 's|^runpath_var=LD_RUN_PATH|runpath_var=DIE_RPATH_DIE|g' libtool 118 make --------------------------------------------------------- * Timestamp - Please consider to use: --------------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" --------------------------------------------------------- to keep timestamps on installed files. This method usually works for Makefiles generated by recent autotools. * Directory ownership issue - Some directories are not owned by any packages, ref: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UnownedDirectories#Common_Mistakes On i686: ---------------------------------------------------------- /usr/lib/vuurmuur/plugins/ /usr/share/vuurmuur/ /usr/share/vuurmuur/config/ ---------------------------------------------------------- ! Note At least with rpm >= 4.7, $ rpm -ivv *.rpm will show such information like ---------------------------------------------------------- D: Vuurmuur-0.7-2.fc12.i686: Header SHA1 digest: OK (84243c0b26f8e16c6b9f0bd2d14909735bf4f266) D: install: Vuurmuur-0.7-2.fc12 has 10 files, test = 0 D: opening db index /var/lib/rpm/Triggername create mode=0x42 Vuurmuur-0.7-2.fc12 D: ========== Directories not explicitly included in package: D: 0 /usr/lib/ D: 1 /usr/lib/vuurmuur/plugins/ D: 2 /usr/share/doc/ D: ========== D: /usr/lib/vuurmuur directory created with perms 0755, no context. D: /usr/lib/vuurmuur/plugins directory created with perms 0755, no context. D: fini 120777 1 ( 0, 0) 20 /usr/lib/libvuurmuur.so.0;4b003ba3 D: fini 100755 1 ( 0, 0) 255652 /usr/lib/libvuurmuur.so.0.6.0;4b003ba3 ---------------------------------------------------------- See the lines which shows "directory created with perms 0755, no context." * Service ----------------------------------------------------------- [root at localhost ~]# service vuurmuur status vuurmuur ???????? vuurmuur_log ???????? [root at localhost ~]# service vuurmuur start Starting vuurmuur:Error (-1): could not open configfile '/etc/vuurmuur/config.conf': No such file or directory (in: init_config). Initializing config failed. [??] ----------------------------------------------------------- ( Well, "????????" is "is stopped", "??" is "FAILED", currently due to the bug in initscripts (bug 537682) I cannot change these messages into English... ) - I think it is preferable to install the default /etc/vuurmuur/config.conf file (Fedora prefers that the package works as it is by default) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 18:37:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 13:37:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533744] Review Request: ImageJ - Image Processing and Analysis in Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911151837.nAFIbRLA005134@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533744 --- Comment #5 from Fabien Georget 2009-11-15 13:37:26 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.bde.espci.fr/~george27/imagej.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bde.espci.fr/~george27/imagej-1.43-0.4.j.fc12.src.rpm thanks for the links, it works now :) I correct the problem of files in ~/rpmbuild/BUILD/ and of some permissions too. The output on rpmlint is now : imagej-javadoc.noarch: W: non-standard-group Development Documentation 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. The group for javadoc was found in an example in the packaging guidelines for java : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java so it is correct or no ? I change the name from ImageJ to imagej, because upstream use both, and the program create a ${HOME}/.imagej directory, so I think it is more coherent . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 18:54:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 13:54:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520637] Review Request: mdk - GNU MIX Development Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911151854.nAFIs3gq024605@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520637 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-15 13:54:02 EDT --- Okay. ------------------------------------------------------- This package (mdk) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". After you request for sponsorship a mail will be sent to sponsor members automatically (which is invisible for you) which notifies that you need a sponsor. After that, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 11/12, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 18:55:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 13:55:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 512523] Review Request: graphem - Mouse Gesture based Authentication Program and Screen Locker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911151855.nAFIt6Sf009436@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512523 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-15 13:55:04 EDT --- graphem-0.3.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/graphem-0.3.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 18:55:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 13:55:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537687] New: Review Request: mediawiki-SyntaxHighlight_GeSHi - MediaWiki syntax highlighter Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-SyntaxHighlight_GeSHi - MediaWiki syntax highlighter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537687 Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-SyntaxHighlight_GeSHi - MediaWiki syntax highlighter Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ian at ianweller.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/mediawiki-SyntaxHighlight_GeSHi/58966-1/mediawiki-SyntaxHighlight_GeSHi.spec SRPM URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/mediawiki-SyntaxHighlight_GeSHi/58966-1/mediawiki-SyntaxHighlight_GeSHi-58966-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This extension adds the tag to present formatted source code for a multitude of languages. (Fedora Infrastructure ticket 543) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 19:25:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 14:25:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 511998] Review Request: zikula-module-menutree - Menutree allows to create multilevel, hierarchical (tree-like) menu. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911151925.nAFJPOIu031919@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511998 --- Comment #6 from David Nalley 2009-11-15 14:25:22 EDT --- Eric: Received this message from Jusuff yesterday evening: Maybe you'll be interested - menutree without licensing issues is ready :) You can find it at extDB on community.zikula.org or at my CoZi project svn (http://code.zikula.org/bianor). There are two versions: 2.1 is for zikula 1.1.x series 2.2 is for zikula 1.2 In extDB there are also versions with "BT" sufix - but this releases contains templates which are licensed under not opensource licenses. I have not looked at source to verify that all of the licensing issues are indeed resolved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 19:37:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 14:37:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 512523] Review Request: graphem - Mouse Gesture based Authentication Program and Screen Locker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911151937.nAFJb0B0002088@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512523 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #16 from Sven Lankes 2009-11-15 14:36:59 EDT --- all done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 19:47:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 14:47:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 517743] Review Request: PyPE - Lightweight but powerful graphical editor for developers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911151947.nAFJleHg004378@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517743 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cwickert at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #6 from Christoph Wickert 2009-11-15 14:47:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Issues: > - .desktop file needs Encoding=UTF-8 if you want to ship this into RHEL. > (at least desktop-file-validate fails without this, desktop-file-install > probably too) Just for fedora, this is not needed. And should not be there in fact. An easy way to achieve this is to have the Encoding in the desktop file and remove it if it's installed in Fedora: desktop-file-install --dir=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications \ %if 0%{?fedora} >= 10 --remove-key=Encoding \ %endif %{SOURCE1} BTW: /usr/share/ is hardcoded in the desktop file, you should at least use sed to make sure it is always correct. And please preserve timestamps during cp. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 19:52:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 14:52:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530288] Review Request: stonevpn - easy OpenVPN certificate and configuration management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911151952.nAFJqXMd005645@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530288 Leon Keijser changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Leon Keijser 2009-11-15 14:52:32 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: stonevpn Short Description: Easy OpenVPN certificate and configuration management Owners: leon Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 19:56:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 14:56:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528108] Review Request: Vuurmuur - Firewall manager built on top of iptables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911151956.nAFJu90g022813@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528108 --- Comment #7 from Stjepan Gros 2009-11-15 14:56:07 EDT --- Ok, I fixed all except the default configuration part. The problem is that it is very hard to create default configuration that would allow vuurmuur to start without any user intervention. The reason is that at least one rule has to be defined (otherwise, vuurmuur refuses to start), which, in turn, requires that at least one interface is defined. This is very hard to do in general case. So, I added some configuration files, and switched services from shared directory to /etc/vuurmuur but the user has to start vuurmuur_conf tool to create initial configuration. What I can do is include check in init.d script to notify user about this in case it tries to start vuurmuur without configuring it first. Is this OK? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 20:00:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 15:00:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537694] New: Review Request: texmakerx - LaTex Editor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: texmakerx - LaTex Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537694 Summary: Review Request: texmakerx - LaTex Editor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jochen at herr-schmitt.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/texmakerx/texmakerx.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/texmakerx/texmakerx-1.9.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Texmakerx is a program, that integrates many tools needed to develop documents with LaTeX, in just one application. Texmakerx runs on unix, macosx and windows systems and is released under the GPL license -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 20:26:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 15:26:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534135] Review Request: xstream - Java XML serialization library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911152026.nAFKQxOq030108@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534135 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de --- Comment #2 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-11-15 15:26:58 EDT --- Question: Do you really want the gcj stuff. This will produced an architecture depending package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 21:03:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 16:03:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911152103.nAFL3Hoq005906@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 --- Comment #4 from Nathanael Noblet 2009-11-15 16:03:16 EDT --- I have been. The file I posted has been updated probably 4 times since I posted it. I basically got it to the point where rpmlint no longer issued any warnings and I just learned I could run rpmlint on the actual rpms as well so I'm cleaning those up as well. I've also looked over the duplicate bug that was closed and tried to learn a bit from there as well. I will continue to update this spec as I find pieces that don't meet the guidelines but some of it is simply that I'm not familiar enough with the guidelines as I go through it to notice infractions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 00:50:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 19:50:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 509936] Review Request: tortoisehg - Mercurial gui tools and nautilus plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160050.nAG0oLF1024274@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509936 Mads Kiilerich changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(mads at kiilerich.co |fedora-cvs? |m) | --- Comment #15 from Mads Kiilerich 2009-11-15 19:50:19 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tortoisehg Short Description: Mercurial gui tools and nautilus plugin Owners: kiilerix Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 00:54:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 19:54:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531391] Review Request: gwsmhg - hg/mq GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160054.nAG0sMKq025383@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531391 Mads Kiilerich changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(mads at kiilerich.co |fedora-cvs? |m) | --- Comment #5 from Mads Kiilerich 2009-11-15 19:54:20 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gwsmhg Short Description: A PyGTK GUI wrapper for hg and mq Owners: kiilerix Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 01:13:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 20:13:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 512663] Review Request: langpack-support - Meta packages for Yum langpack support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160113.nAG1DQIR015940@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512663 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2009-11-15 20:13:25 EDT --- I think I will close this for now since it is no longer needed by yum-langpacks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 02:14:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 21:14:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530021] Review Request: moovida - Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160214.nAG2E2qY032733@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530021 --- Comment #12 from Graeme Gillies 2009-11-15 21:14:01 EDT --- Hi, I have had a look at the moovida RPMS supplied by Matthias and the comments on this issue and have refactored the spec files and SRPMS for moovida, as well as updating them to the latest release (1.0.8) and they are available for review at moovida.spec: http://sites.google.com/site/ggilliesrpms/home/moovida.spec?attredirects=0&d=1 moovida-1.0.8-1.fc11.src.rpm: http://sites.google.com/site/ggilliesrpms/home/moovida-1.0.8-1.fc11.src.rpm?attredirects=0&d=1 moovida-plugins-good.spec: http://sites.google.com/site/ggilliesrpms/home/moovida-plugins-good.spec?attredirects=0&d=1 moovida-plugins-good-1.0.8-1.fc11.src.rpm: http://sites.google.com/site/ggilliesrpms/home/moovida-plugins-good-1.0.8-1.fc11.src.rpm?attredirects=0&d=1 moovida-plugins-bad.spec: http://sites.google.com/site/ggilliesrpms/home/moovida-plugins-bad.spec?attredirects=0&d=1 moovida-plugins-bad-1.0.8-1.fc11.src.rpm: http://sites.google.com/site/ggilliesrpms/home/moovida-plugins-bad-1.0.8-1.fc11.src.rpm?attredirects=0&d=1 Sorry about the hosting it was all I had :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 02:30:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 21:30:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536737] Review Request: yum-langpacks - langpacks plugin for yum In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160230.nAG2UgXY004755@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536737 --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2009-11-15 21:30:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Is this related to bug 512663 in any way? Thanks for asking - I got round to closing it today: I think it is no longer needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 02:29:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 21:29:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536737] Review Request: yum-langpacks - langpacks plugin for yum In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160229.nAG2Tjqp004146@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536737 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |433512 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2009-11-15 21:29:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > - BR: python-setuptools is enough not -devel This is my first python package and I believe you, but what about http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python/Eggs#Providing_Eggs_using_Setuptools ? (I "stole" the spec file from yum-presto fwiw;) So I think the Packaging Guidelines need updating then? > - Could not download the source -> 404, had to unpack the src.rpm Thanks - fixed. > yum-langpacks.spec:36: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/yum-plugins > /langpacks.py* > yum-langpacks.src:36: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/yum-plugins > /langpacks.py* I can use _prefix but I think this is basically correct for yum-plugins. At least other plugins packages are doing the same thing. > yum-langpacks.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.1.2-1 > ['0.1.3-1.fc11', '0.1.3-1'] fixing > yum-langpacks.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/yum-plugins > /langpacks.py 0644 /bin/env thanks - fixed. Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/yum-langpacks/yum-langpacks.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/yum-langpacks/yum-langpacks-0.1.4-1.fc12.src.rpm Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1808500 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 03:33:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 22:33:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537727] New: Review Request: Slack - A lazy systems administration configuration management toolkit. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Slack - A lazy systems administration configuration management toolkit. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537727 Summary: Review Request: Slack - A lazy systems administration configuration management toolkit. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: matt.proud at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.nerp.net/~khanreaper/slack.spec SRPM URL: http://www.nerp.net/~khanreaper/slack-0.15.2.src.rpm Description: Configuration management program for lazy systems administrators. Slack allows centralized configuration management with a bare minimum of effort. Usually, just putting a file in the right place will cause the right thing to be done. It uses rsync to copy files around, so it can use any sort of source that rsync supports---e.g., SSH over remote host, NFS, etc. It is most useful for initial configuration turn-ups or places where the desired configuration is static and do not depend on the destination's state. TAGS: FIRST-PACKAGE FE-NEEDSPONSOR -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 03:36:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 22:36:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537727] Review Request: Slack - A lazy systems administration configuration management toolkit. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160336.nAG3ahHq003229@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537727 Matt T. Proud changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #1 from Matt T. Proud 2009-11-15 22:36:42 EDT --- The submitted spec file is based off Slack's distribution one, but it has been updated and sanitized to conform to Fedora 11 and beyond's expectations. This is my first package, so please be patient. I share employment with the principal author of this software. It has been incorporated into Debian already by another friend and co-worker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 04:38:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 23:38:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537687] Review Request: mediawiki-SyntaxHighlight_GeSHi - MediaWiki syntax highlighter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160438.nAG4cZrP016481@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537687 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-15 23:38:34 EDT --- Isn't the geshi code bundled in the tarball actually a separate upstream project? http://qbnz.com/highlighter/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 04:50:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 23:50:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537687] Review Request: mediawiki-SyntaxHighlight_GeSHi - MediaWiki syntax highlighter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160450.nAG4oiWY019046@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537687 --- Comment #2 from Ian Weller 2009-11-15 23:50:43 EDT --- The "Downloads" link from http://qbnz.com/highlighter/ goes to the same sf.net page that is linked to from the extension's wiki page, so they're the same upstream. (The Fedora copy one is just a little old. Should I bug the php-geshi maintainer?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 07:27:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:27:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527241] Review Request: libvtemm - C++ bindings for vte In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160727.nAG7RiFQ005475@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527241 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-16 02:27:43 EDT --- libvtemm-0.22.1-4.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 07:24:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:24:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530324] Review Request: perl-V - Print version of the specified Perl modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160724.nAG7OvKJ004146@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530324 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-16 02:24:56 EDT --- perl-V-0.13-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 07:27:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:27:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530324] Review Request: perl-V - Print version of the specified Perl modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160727.nAG7RuHH005576@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530324 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-16 02:27:56 EDT --- perl-V-0.13-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 07:29:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:29:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522988] Review Request: afraid-dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160729.nAG7TSxu006060@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.0-5.fc10 |1.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 07:28:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:28:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530324] Review Request: perl-V - Print version of the specified Perl modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160728.nAG7S1LZ005634@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530324 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.13-1.fc10 |0.13-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 07:25:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:25:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530324] Review Request: perl-V - Print version of the specified Perl modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160725.nAG7P2rW004485@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530324 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.13-1.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 07:29:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:29:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522988] Review Request: afraid-dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160729.nAG7Tc5N020650@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 --- Comment #50 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-16 02:29:37 EDT --- afraid-dyndns-1.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 07:29:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:29:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522988] Review Request: afraid-dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160729.nAG7TNIx020554@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 --- Comment #49 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-16 02:29:20 EDT --- afraid-dyndns-1.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 07:28:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:28:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 491980] Review Request: bauble - Biodiversity collection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160728.nAG7SHrj020066@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491980 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-16 02:28:13 EDT --- bauble-0.9.5-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 07:28:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:28:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531255] Review Request: CGSI-gSOAP - GSI plugin for gSOAP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160728.nAG7SsHB020324@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531255 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-16 02:28:54 EDT --- CGSI-gSOAP-1.3.3.2-2.20090920cvs.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 07:29:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:29:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522988] Review Request: afraid-dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160729.nAG7TiMF020715@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.1-2.fc10 |1.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 07:28:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:28:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 491980] Review Request: bauble - Biodiversity collection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160728.nAG7SLig020119@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491980 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.9.5-2.fc10 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 07:27:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:27:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527241] Review Request: libvtemm - C++ bindings for vte In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160727.nAG7RnTD019909@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527241 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.22.1-4.fc12 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 07:28:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:28:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531255] Review Request: CGSI-gSOAP - GSI plugin for gSOAP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160728.nAG7Sx1F020369@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531255 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.3.3.2-2.20090920cvs.fc12 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 07:30:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:30:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533094] Review Request: xskat - The card game Skat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160730.nAG7UmZj007141@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533094 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-16 02:30:47 EDT --- xskat-4.0.0-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 07:32:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:32:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532368] Review Request: ns-bola-fonts A Sans Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160732.nAG7WUfO007779@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532368 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-16 02:32:29 EDT --- ns-bola-fonts-20080203-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 07:30:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:30:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530880] Review Request: ns-tiza-fonts - A Slab-Serif Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160730.nAG7UTQZ007031@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530880 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-16 02:30:27 EDT --- ns-tiza-chalk-fonts-20080210-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 07:31:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:31:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530275] Review Request: rubygem-erubis - A fast and extensible eRuby implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160731.nAG7VFgV007329@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530275 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-16 02:31:13 EDT --- ruby-1.8.6.383-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 07:30:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:30:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530880] Review Request: ns-tiza-fonts - A Slab-Serif Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160730.nAG7UZcB007080@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530880 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|20080210-2.fc11 |20080210-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 07:32:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:32:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532368] Review Request: ns-bola-fonts A Sans Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160732.nAG7WYwe007809@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532368 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|20080203-2.fc10 |20080203-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 07:30:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:30:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533094] Review Request: xskat - The card game Skat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160730.nAG7UqB3007185@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533094 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |4.0.0-4.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 07:35:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:35:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533094] Review Request: xskat - The card game Skat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160735.nAG7Z7IB022909@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533094 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-16 02:35:06 EDT --- xskat-4.0.0-4.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 07:35:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:35:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533094] Review Request: xskat - The card game Skat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160735.nAG7ZCqe022963@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533094 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|4.0.0-4.fc11 |4.0.0-4.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 07:32:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:32:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524896] Review Request: perl-Nagios-NSCA - Perl client for Nagios - NSCA. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160732.nAG7Ww3V022068@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524896 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-16 02:32:57 EDT --- perl-Nagios-NSCA-0.1-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 07:36:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:36:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462458] Review Request: drupal-workspace - Allows users to have a central place to view and manage their content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160736.nAG7a359023255@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462458 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-16 02:36:02 EDT --- drupal-workspace-6.x.1.4-2.rc1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 07:36:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:36:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462458] Review Request: drupal-workspace - Allows users to have a central place to view and manage their content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160736.nAG7a8uh023382@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462458 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |6.x.1.4-2.rc1.fc12 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 07:34:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:34:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516280] Review Request: perl-Config-Model-CursesUI - Curses interface to edit config data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160734.nAG7YWYe022398@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516280 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-16 02:34:31 EDT --- perl-Config-Model-CursesUI-1.103-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Config-Model-CursesUI'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-11591 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 07:35:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:35:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529517] Review Request: kcm_touchpad - Synaptics driver based touchpads kcontrol module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160735.nAG7ZhKN023157@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529517 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-16 02:35:42 EDT --- kcm_touchpad-0.3.0-5.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update kcm_touchpad'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-11601 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 07:36:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:36:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 503336] Review Request: newsbeuter - console based feed reader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160736.nAG7aNRV009380@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503336 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-16 02:36:22 EDT --- newsbeuter-2.0-8.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 07:38:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:38:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 491980] Review Request: bauble - Biodiversity collection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160738.nAG7c498009822@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491980 --- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-16 02:38:03 EDT --- bauble-0.9.5-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 07:38:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:38:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531255] Review Request: CGSI-gSOAP - GSI plugin for gSOAP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160738.nAG7cRYb009924@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531255 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-16 02:38:26 EDT --- CGSI-gSOAP-1.3.3.2-2.20090920cvs.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 07:38:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:38:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 515136] Review Request: gettext-commons - Java internationalization (i18n) library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160738.nAG7cJkc009881@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515136 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-16 02:38:19 EDT --- gettext-commons-0.9.6-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 07:37:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:37:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 515136] Review Request: gettext-commons - Java internationalization (i18n) library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160737.nAG7b9Mh009633@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515136 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-16 02:37:08 EDT --- gettext-commons-0.9.6-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 07:38:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:38:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531255] Review Request: CGSI-gSOAP - GSI plugin for gSOAP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160738.nAG7cVZJ009959@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531255 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.3.3.2-2.20090920cvs.fc12 |1.3.3.2-2.20090920cvs.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 07:36:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:36:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462458] Review Request: drupal-workspace - Allows users to have a central place to view and manage their content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160736.nAG7awv0009558@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462458 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-16 02:36:57 EDT --- drupal-workspace-6.x.1.4-2.rc1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 07:37:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:37:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462458] Review Request: drupal-workspace - Allows users to have a central place to view and manage their content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160737.nAG7bHir009679@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462458 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-16 02:37:16 EDT --- drupal-workspace-6.x.1.4-2.rc1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 07:37:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:37:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462458] Review Request: drupal-workspace - Allows users to have a central place to view and manage their content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160737.nAG7b2uK009592@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462458 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|6.x.1.4-2.rc1.fc12 |6.x.1.4-2.rc1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 07:36:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:36:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 503336] Review Request: newsbeuter - console based feed reader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160736.nAG7aSEg009437@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503336 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.0-8.fc12 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 07:35:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:35:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529517] Review Request: kcm_touchpad - Synaptics driver based touchpads kcontrol module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160735.nAG7Zr6x009181@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529517 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-16 02:35:52 EDT --- kcm_touchpad-0.3.0-5.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update kcm_touchpad'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-11605 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 07:38:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:38:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 491980] Review Request: bauble - Biodiversity collection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160738.nAG7cA1s024125@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491980 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.9.5-2.fc10 |0.9.5-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 07:37:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:37:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462458] Review Request: drupal-workspace - Allows users to have a central place to view and manage their content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160737.nAG7bMIq023940@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462458 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|6.x.1.4-2.rc1.fc11 |6.x.1.4-2.rc1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 07:55:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:55:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530021] Review Request: moovida - Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160755.nAG7t45s028387@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530021 --- Comment #13 from Felix Kaechele 2009-11-16 02:55:03 EDT --- If you have a FAS account (which I assume you have because you are submitting a package for Fedora) you get some webspace with it. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/fedorapeople.org So no need for Google sites ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 09:06:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 04:06:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528473] Review Request: php-ezc-DatabaseSchema - eZ Components DatabaseSchema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160906.nAG96MHQ018422@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528473 --- Comment #5 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-11-16 04:06:19 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-ezc-DatabaseSchema Short Description: A set of classes that allow you to use information from a database schema Owners: llaumgui Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 09:07:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 04:07:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528473] Review Request: php-ezc-DatabaseSchema - eZ Components DatabaseSchema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160907.nAG977BF004700@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528473 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 09:09:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 04:09:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528476] Review Request: php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein - eZ Components PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160909.nAG99Pne018925@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528476 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-11-16 04:09:24 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein Short Description: Automatic generation of PersistentObject from DatabaseSchema definitions Owners: llaumgui Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 09:16:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 04:16:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529542] Review Request: php-phpunit-phpcpd - Copy/Paste Detector (CPD) for PHP code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160916.nAG9G4x6007269@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529542 --- Comment #4 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-11-16 04:16:02 EDT --- @Christof Damian > You approve ? If you approve, please add a line like : ------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (php-phpunit-phpcpd) is APPROVED by Christof Damian ------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 09:16:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 04:16:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529544] Review Request: php-phpunit-bytekit - A command-line tool built on the PHP Bytekit extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160916.nAG9GsZU021307@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529544 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(llaumgui at gmail.co | |m) | --- Comment #2 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-11-16 04:16:53 EDT --- OK, I will update my SPEC file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 09:38:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 04:38:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507083] Review Request: poco - C++ class libraries for network-centric applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160938.nAG9cvpP029231@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507083 --- Comment #26 from Maxim Udushlivy 2009-11-16 04:38:54 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://crow-designer.sourceforge.net/temp/7/poco.spec SRPM URL: http://crow-designer.sourceforge.net/temp/7/poco-1.3.5-7.fc11.src.rpm CHANGES ======= - A removal of the "Foundation/src/MSG00001.bin" binary file was added to the "%%prep" section. - Values for the top "Summary", "Group" and "%%description" were restored. - A "BuildRoot" tag was added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 09:43:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 04:43:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537631] Review Request: moblin-panel-web - Moblin Panel for Web Browsing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160943.nAG9hWT7017215@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537631 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 09:44:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 04:44:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 515898] Review Request: imapfilter - A flexible client side mail filtering utility for IMAP servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911160944.nAG9iKQe017435@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898 --- Comment #16 from David Sommerseth 2009-11-16 04:44:17 EDT --- I'm ready for some work on this package now, after some ?ber hectic weeks. Going to read through a lot of the documentation about sponsorship again, to refresh what I need to do now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 10:01:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 05:01:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529542] Review Request: php-phpunit-phpcpd - Copy/Paste Detector (CPD) for PHP code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911161001.nAGA1xHs023732@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529542 --- Comment #5 from Christof Damian 2009-11-16 05:01:58 EDT --- This package (php-phpunit-phpcpd) is APPROVED by Christof Damian -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 10:22:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 05:22:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529542] Review Request: php-phpunit-phpcpd - Copy/Paste Detector (CPD) for PHP code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911161022.nAGAMfjQ029793@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529542 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-11-16 05:22:40 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-phpunit-phpcpd Short Description: Copy/Paste Detector (CPD) for PHP code Owners: llaumgui cdamian Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 10:54:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 05:54:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526444] Review Request: MyGUI - Fast, simple and flexible GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911161054.nAGAsPIS007285@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526444 --- Comment #15 from Thomas Janssen 2009-11-16 05:54:22 EDT --- [fix] Release should be: 0.2.2332svn%{?dist} So you get a 3.0.0-0.2.2332svn package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Package_Release [fix] You use a mix of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot} [fix] You use %cmake but no macro for the rest of the commands like install, sed. [fix] No need for VERBOSE=1 in %build I rebuilt it here and it was running after i installed mygui and mygui-tools (i tried the LayoutEditor). Does it make sense to have mygui installed alone? Can one do anything with it, without the tools? If not, make the tools installed with the mainpackage, or maybe merge the tool package into the main package. As well it couldn't load anything from the list (within the load dialog). Maybe just me. Are the code template files needed outside a develpackage? Does the program work without them installed? You could move them into the devel package and make that installed by default as well. [fix] rpmlint -I dangling-symlink dangling-symlink: The target of the symbolic link does not exist within this package or its file based dependencies. Verify spelling of the link target and that the target is included in a package in this package's dependency chain. [fix] rpmlint from installed packages: mygui.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libMyGUIEngine.so.3.0.0 dlsym mygui.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libMyGUIEngine.so.3.0.0 uuid_generate mygui.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libMyGUIEngine.so.3.0.0 dlopen mygui.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libMyGUIEngine.so.3.0.0 dlcloserpmlint -I undefined-non-weak-symbol undefined-non-weak-symbol: The binary contains undefined non-weak symbols. This may indicate improper linkage; check that the binary has been linked as expected. You might check that linking problem with upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 12:24:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 07:24:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 515898] Review Request: imapfilter - A flexible client side mail filtering utility for IMAP servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911161224.nAGCOi6e015441@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-16 07:24:04 EDT --- Now I am sponsoring you. Please follow "Join" wiki again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 13:30:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 08:30:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 424841] Review Request: ndisc6 - IPv6 diagnostic tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911161330.nAGDUUED002999@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424841 --- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla 2009-11-16 08:30:25 EDT --- I never got an answer to #17. Are you back? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 13:37:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 08:37:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 515898] Review Request: imapfilter - A flexible client side mail filtering utility for IMAP servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911161337.nAGDbu0i026103@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898 David Sommerseth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 13:36:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 08:36:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 515898] Review Request: imapfilter - A flexible client side mail filtering utility for IMAP servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911161336.nAGDad5W025820@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898 --- Comment #18 from David Sommerseth 2009-11-16 08:36:38 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: imapfilter Short Description: A flexible client side mail filtering utility for IMAP servers Owners: dsommers Branches: F11 F21 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 13:38:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 08:38:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537084] Review Request: libmpc - C library for multiple precision complex arithmetic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911161338.nAGDcfqH004910@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537084 Petr Machata changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #12 from Petr Machata 2009-11-16 08:38:40 EDT --- Built and requested an update for F11 and F12. Thanks for cooperation! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 13:40:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 08:40:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537823] New: Review Request: hunspell-ht - Haitian Creole hunspell dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-ht - Haitian Creole hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537823 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-ht - Haitian Creole hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hunspell-ht.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hunspell-ht-0.02-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Haitian Creole hunspell dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 13:47:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 08:47:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537823] Review Request: hunspell-ht - Haitian Creole hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911161347.nAGDlHKa029187@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537823 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 13:49:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 08:49:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537727] Review Request: Slack - A lazy systems administration configuration management toolkit. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911161349.nAGDnVp4029469@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537727 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-11-16 08:49:30 EDT --- Just a few notes: - the name of the patch should be something of the lines of slack-0.15.2-fileplacement.patch The most important thing is that it begins with slack- so that if one builds the RPM with rpmbuild the source files of different packages are easily separated. - You shouldn't need to define %defattr for the normal files, just use %defattr(-,root,root,-) For the privileged items you can use the special permissions, although I'd change %defattr(0755,root,root,0700) to %defattr(0700,root,root,0700) to keep things logical.. - I'm wondering whether the use of slack_libdir="%{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/%{name}/lib" is reasonable. Wouldn't slack_libdir="%{buildroot}/%{_libdir}/%{name}" be more logical? Or, in the case of architecture independent files just slack_libdir="%{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/%{name}" Also, please note that currently you don't own the directory %{_datadir}/%{name} that is created by the rpm. - I wouldn't use compression suffixes in the man files, since they can change in the future, so change e.g. %{_mandir}/man1/slack-diff.1.gz to %{_mandir}/man1/slack-diff.1.* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 14:47:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 09:47:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466331] Review Request: rcov - ruby code coverage tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911161447.nAGElOC3011623@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466331 Casey Dahlin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #6 from Casey Dahlin 2009-11-16 09:47:21 EDT --- Its been a week. No reply. I'm thinking this project is stillborn. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 15:10:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:10:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 515898] Review Request: imapfilter - A flexible client side mail filtering utility for IMAP servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911161510.nAGFAMll028152@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898 --- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-16 10:10:21 EDT --- F21 is perhaps F12. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 15:37:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:37:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528108] Review Request: Vuurmuur - Firewall manager built on top of iptables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911161537.nAGFbCkK004584@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528108 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-16 10:37:09 EDT --- Well, sounds good, however I want to check what you actually want to do anyway. Note that I think %_sysconfdir/vuurmuur/config.conf should be marked (included) as %ghost. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 15:42:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:42:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530473] Review Request: lessfs - Lessfs is an inline data deduplicating filesystem. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911161542.nAGFghtQ006569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530473 --- Comment #10 from Adam Miller 2009-11-16 10:42:42 EDT --- New upstream release yesterday. Spec URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/lessfs.spec SRPM URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/lessfs-0.8.3-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 16:03:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 11:03:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911161603.nAGG3Hoh014871@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 Joel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jdy at cryregarder.com --- Comment #87 from Joel 2009-11-16 11:03:01 EDT --- Any progress on songbird? I tried building the latest src.rpm on fc11 but it doesn't go through (can post if not common knowledge). I'm really looking forward to this package in fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 16:14:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 11:14:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 515230] Review Request: python-dmidecode - python extension module to access DMI data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911161614.nAGGEZTo018057@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515230 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-16 11:14:34 EDT --- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 16:38:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 11:38:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 424841] Review Request: ndisc6 - IPv6 diagnostic tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911161638.nAGGc2oo013963@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424841 --- Comment #20 from Stjepan Gros 2009-11-16 11:38:01 EDT --- Actually, I'm here for some time already. But I thought that everything was settled with this entry, i.e. that you'll take it, so I didn't post anything to this thread? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 16:45:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 11:45:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 424841] Review Request: ndisc6 - IPv6 diagnostic tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911161645.nAGGj6lu027400@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424841 --- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla 2009-11-16 11:45:04 EDT --- Nope, it's a resounding nothing. I've had a. . .full. . .personal life since post #17, so I've not touched it. If you want to do the practice reviews, we can pick up where we left off. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 16:48:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 11:48:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528108] Review Request: Vuurmuur - Firewall manager built on top of iptables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911161648.nAGGmPK4028261@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528108 --- Comment #10 from Stjepan Gros 2009-11-16 11:48:24 EDT --- Ups, sorry, the right links are: Spec URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/vuurmuur/Vuurmuur.spec SRPM URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/vuurmuur/Vuurmuur-0.7-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 16:47:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 11:47:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528108] Review Request: Vuurmuur - Firewall manager built on top of iptables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911161647.nAGGlomh028159@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528108 --- Comment #9 from Stjepan Gros 2009-11-16 11:47:48 EDT --- I just noticed that this check was already included in the init.d script but it wasn't working because it requires some basic configuration to be present, which now is. I didn't specify %ghost for config.conf because it is installed. Here is the new package: Spec URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/vuurmuur/Vuurmuur.spec SRPM URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/vuurmuur/Vuurmuur-0.7-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 17:16:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:16:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520637] Review Request: mdk - GNU MIX Development Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911161716.nAGHGYLc003582@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520637 --- Comment #20 from Stjepan Gros 2009-11-16 12:16:32 EDT --- I already have FAS account, the user name is sgros. And I did install client side certificate. What puzzles me now is the part "After you request for sponsorship..." because I can not find where exactly to request sponsorship? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 17:17:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:17:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 424841] Review Request: ndisc6 - IPv6 diagnostic tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911161717.nAGHHPN6004142@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424841 --- Comment #22 from Stjepan Gros 2009-11-16 12:17:24 EDT --- Ok, I'll repackage ndisc6 (there is a new version) and submit it here and then we'll see what to do next. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 17:36:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:36:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 509965] Review Request: snmptt - SNMPTT (SNMP Trap Translator) is an SNMP trap handler written in Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911161736.nAGHad03029835@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509965 Ville Skytt? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ville.skytta at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #12 from Ville Skytt? 2009-11-16 12:36:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > http://giesen.fedorapeople.org/snmptt/snmptt-1.3-0.1.beta2.fc11.src.rpm Version 1.3 was released yesterday it seems. Anyway here's a partial review from skimming the above beta2 specfile, will complete the review when the package has been updated to 1.3: - Summary isn't very helpful wrt. what the package does. In my package I used "SNMP Trap Translator" which isn't perfect but IMO slightly better the current one. - %description doesn't actually describe snmptt but snmptrapd. In my snmptt package I had this: SNMPTT (SNMP Trap Translator) is an SNMP trap handler written in Perl for use with the Net-SNMP / UCD-SNMP snmptrapd program. It can be used to translate trap output from snmptrapd to more descriptive and human friendly form, supports logging, invoking external programs, and has the ability to accept or reject traps based on a number of parameters. - A number of installed files that contain hardcoded paths are installed using macros. This is a non-blocker as far as this review is concerned, however I'd recommend either using those hardcoded paths in the specfile or implementing something to replace those hardcoded paths in installed files with the expansions of macros. - snmptthandler is installed as %{_sbindir}/snmptthandler, %{_bindir}/snmpttconvert, and %{_bindir}/snmpttconvertmib which doesn't look right to me. - %post and %preun are not guarded for non-zero exit status See my old package in comment #3, it has fixes/improvements for all of the above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 17:40:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:40:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 509965] Review Request: snmptt - SNMPTT (SNMP Trap Translator) is an SNMP trap handler written in Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911161740.nAGHehBB009870@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509965 --- Comment #13 from Ville Skytt? 2009-11-16 12:40:42 EDT --- One more thing: I shipped snmptt-net-snmp-test in my snmptt package. I'm not sure if I ever used it but it is referred to in upstream docs so I'd just like to confirm if you omitted it on purpose or if it was an oversight. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 17:42:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:42:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508518] Review Request: Meiga - Easy tool for file sharing and content publishing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911161742.nAGHgSud031407@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508518 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-16 12:42:27 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 17:40:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:40:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481528] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Safe - Safer access to your database through a DBI database handle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911161740.nAGHex6w031074@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481528 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-16 12:40:58 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 17:44:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:44:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537585] Review Request: picocontainer - Dependency-injection container In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911161744.nAGHirYD010818@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537585 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-16 12:44:52 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 17:44:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:44:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479527] Review Request: synfigstudio - Vector-based 2D animation studio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911161744.nAGHi5Gt010681@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479527 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-16 12:44:04 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 17:48:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:48:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531391] Review Request: gwsmhg - hg/mq GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911161748.nAGHmZnR000396@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531391 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-16 12:48:34 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 17:45:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:45:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530288] Review Request: stonevpn - easy OpenVPN certificate and configuration management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911161745.nAGHjoel032326@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530288 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-16 12:45:49 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 17:47:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:47:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 509936] Review Request: tortoisehg - Mercurial gui tools and nautilus plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911161747.nAGHlhpJ032736@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509936 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-16 12:47:42 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 17:49:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:49:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520637] Review Request: mdk - GNU MIX Development Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911161749.nAGHnGWI000523@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520637 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |limb at jcomserv.net --- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla 2009-11-16 12:49:15 EDT --- You have requested sponsorship, on the ndisc6 review. Mamoru, ndisc6 is also ready to approve. If you want to sponsor Stjepan, be my guest. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 17:49:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:49:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528473] Review Request: php-ezc-DatabaseSchema - eZ Components DatabaseSchema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911161749.nAGHnETa012130@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528473 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-16 12:49:13 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 17:50:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:50:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528476] Review Request: php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein - eZ Components PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911161750.nAGHoplC012721@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528476 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-16 12:50:50 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 17:52:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:52:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529542] Review Request: php-phpunit-phpcpd - Copy/Paste Detector (CPD) for PHP code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911161752.nAGHqa3n001804@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529542 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-16 12:52:34 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 17:53:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:53:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533725] Review Request: rubygem-linecache - Caches (Ruby source) files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911161753.nAGHrdAu013449@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533725 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 17:55:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:55:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533725] Review Request: rubygem-linecache - Caches (Ruby source) files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911161755.nAGHt1O2013922@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533725 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-16 12:55:01 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=369756) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=369756) Patch so that linecache gem actually works For -2: * %define -> %global - Still %define is used in the first line. * BR - "BuildRequires: rubygem(rake)" is needed for "rake test". * %{geminstdir}/ext - I don't think this directory is needed and should completely be removed. ! Note - To avoid trace_nums.so regeneration in %check, rake test should be done under %_builddir%geminstdir, not under %buildroot%geminstdir * Usability ------------------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ irb irb(main):001:0> require 'rubygems' => true irb(main):002:0> require 'linecache' LoadError: no such file to load -- /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/linecache-0.43/lib/../lib/trace_nums from /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `gem_original_require' from /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `require' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/linecache-0.43/lib/tracelines.rb:12 from /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `gem_original_require' from /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `require' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/linecache-0.43/lib/linecache.rb:63 from /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:36:in `gem_original_require' from /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:36:in `require' from (irb):2 from /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/version.rb:33 ------------------------------------------------------------- - i.e. Currently the installed linecache gem does not work. This is because we move trace_nums.so from %geminstdir/ext to %ruby_sitearch. The attached patch (for example) is needed (on Fedora). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 17:57:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:57:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 515898] Review Request: imapfilter - A flexible client side mail filtering utility for IMAP servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911161757.nAGHvY1q003253@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #20 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-16 12:57:32 EDT --- CVS done (with F-11 and F-12 branches instead of "F11 F21"). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 18:03:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:03:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537897] New: Review Request: mingw32-openjpeg - mingw32 package for openjpeg Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-openjpeg - mingw32 package for openjpeg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537897 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-openjpeg - mingw32 package for openjpeg Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: adam at spicenitz.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~agoode/tmp/mingw32-openjpeg.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~agoode/tmp/mingw32-openjpeg-1.3-5.fc13.src.rpm Description: mingw32 package for openjpeg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 18:08:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:08:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520637] Review Request: mdk - GNU MIX Development Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911161808.nAGI8mS8005738@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520637 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #22 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-16 13:08:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > Mamoru, ndisc6 is also > ready to approve. If you want to sponsor Stjepan, be my guest. Thank you. (In reply to comment #20) > What puzzles me now is the part "After you request for sponsorship..." because > I can not find where exactly to request sponsorship? As I received the mail (on sponsors-mailing-list), I guess you did the proper procedure. Now I am sponsoring you. Please follow "Join" wiki again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 18:14:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:14:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 424841] Review Request: ndisc6 - IPv6 diagnostic tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911161814.nAGIEAOB007373@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424841 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #23 from Jon Ciesla 2009-11-16 13:14:08 EDT --- Removed NEEDSPONSOR blocker. I'll look over the new version when you post it, and approve it nothing new creeps up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 18:31:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:31:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532309] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-net-ldap - A full-featured pure-Ruby LDAP client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911161831.nAGIVl0t011908@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532309 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |rubygem-net-ldap - A |rubygem-ruby-net-ldap - A |full-featured pure-Ruby |full-featured pure-Ruby |LDAP client |LDAP client -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 18:31:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:31:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911161831.nAGIVGcf011814@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 --- Comment #30 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-16 13:31:14 EDT --- Okay, now: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on my wiki page: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mtasaka#B._Review_request_tickets (Check "No one is reviewing") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ You are the upstream of this package so you may not want to submit another review request, however still I want to see at least one pre-review done by you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 18:46:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:46:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911161846.nAGIkF35015599@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 --- Comment #31 from Roshan Singh 2009-11-16 13:46:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #30) > Okay, now: Its a great day (actually night) for me. I will submit "2 more review requests". I maintain one package and the other is something that I have to compile from source always whenever I format my laptop. I have written the spec files. But now that I know that a lot has to be done in the spec, I will check it properly for possible errors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 18:57:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:57:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481528] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Safe - Safer access to your database through a DBI database handle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911161857.nAGIvr9j029123@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481528 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-16 13:57:51 EDT --- perl-DBIx-Safe-1.2.5-6.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-DBIx-Safe-1.2.5-6.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 19:02:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:02:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 515898] Review Request: imapfilter - A flexible client side mail filtering utility for IMAP servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911161902.nAGJ2MEV019897@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-16 14:02:21 EDT --- imapfilter-2.0.11-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/imapfilter-2.0.11-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 19:02:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:02:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 515898] Review Request: imapfilter - A flexible client side mail filtering utility for IMAP servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911161902.nAGJ2SVO019944@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-16 14:02:27 EDT --- imapfilter-2.0.11-3.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/imapfilter-2.0.11-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 19:20:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:20:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508518] Review Request: meiga - Easy tool for file sharing and content publishing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911161920.nAGJKRrf002591@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508518 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: Meiga - |Review Request: meiga - |Easy tool for file sharing |Easy tool for file sharing |and content publishing |and content publishing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 19:17:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:17:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530473] Review Request: lessfs - Lessfs is an inline data deduplicating filesystem. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911161917.nAGJHpHh001807@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530473 --- Comment #11 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-11-16 14:17:50 EDT --- Rpmlint is verbose: $ rpmlint * lessfs.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary Lessfs lessfs.src:97: W: macro-in-%changelog %config lessfs.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 7, tab: line 1) lessfs.spec:97: W: macro-in-%changelog %config lessfs.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 7, tab: line 1) lessfs-debuginfo.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/lessfs-0.8.2/lessfsck.c lessfs.i686: W: name-repeated-in-summary Lessfs lessfs.i686: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/lessfs-0.8.2/COPYING /usr/share/automake-1.10/COPYING lessfs.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/lessfs-0.8.2/ChangeLog lessfs.i686: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/lessfs.cfg lessfs.i686: E: script-without-shebang /etc/lessfs.cfg lessfs.i686: E: no-status-entry /etc/init.d/lessfs lessfs.i686: W: no-reload-entry /etc/init.d/lessfs 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 10 warnings. Please fix it before formal review starts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 20:05:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:05:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 515053] Review Request: sugar-getiabooks - Internet Archive Books receiver for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911162005.nAGK52Rg014847@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515053 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-16 15:05:01 EDT --- Note that the spec above doesn't match what's in the srpm above; the latter elicits an incoherent-version-in-changelog complaint from rpm. I guess you fixed that in the separate spec. Please let me know that you're doing things like that to avoid confusion. Anyway, aside from that rpmlint complaint which you've already fixed, this looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 21:24:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:24:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532533] Review request: wsdl4j - Web Services Description Language Toolkit for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911162124.nAGLOBf6024863@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532533 Mary Ellen Foster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #2 from Mary Ellen Foster 2009-11-16 16:24:10 EDT --- Sorry, it doesn't differ at all -- the JPackage version has a different name and I didn't realise that this was the same package ultimately. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 21:26:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:26:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 504891] Review Request: trove - Efficient Java collections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911162126.nAGLQut8025889@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504891 --- Comment #6 from Mary Ellen Foster 2009-11-16 16:26:54 EDT --- I have a package-in-progress of version 2.1 in bug 532521 if anyone's interested -- Jerry, do you still want to package this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 21:30:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:30:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 231305] Review Request: xml-security - Implementation of W3C security standards for XML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911162130.nAGLU2P2026432@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231305 Mary Ellen Foster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mefoster at gmail.com --- Comment #13 from Mary Ellen Foster 2009-11-16 16:30:00 EDT --- Is anyone working on this? Now that OpenJDK is around, building against sun.* is no longer a showstopper ... I have a newer review request at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532535 if anyone else is still interested in it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 21:39:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:39:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 504891] Review Request: trove - Efficient Java collections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911162139.nAGLdpBt028817@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504891 --- Comment #7 from Jerry James 2009-11-16 16:39:50 EDT --- Not really. The package I wanted to push that depended on this turned out to have some severe license problems. Please go ahead and take it. I'm not sure what the proper bugzilla etiquette is, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 22:39:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:39:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478806] Review Request: simh - A highly portable, multi-system emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911162239.nAGMdraH011480@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478806 --- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-16 17:39:50 EDT --- Now I'm getting a broken debuginfo package; it's missing the sources causing rpmlint to complain: simh-debuginfo.x86_64: E: debuginfo-without-sources Looking at the build log, I see: + make -j16 -e 'OPT=-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic' USE_NETWORK=1 make: Nothing to be done for `all'. and no calls to the compiler, which is pretty odd. Then I checked your tarball, and it seems to have the compiled sources already there in a BIN directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 23:11:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:11:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537631] Review Request: moblin-panel-web - Moblin Panel for Web Browsing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911162311.nAGNB42f031249@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537631 --- Comment #1 from Christian Krause 2009-11-16 18:11:02 EDT --- Before I do the full review here are some issues I've seen so far: 1. the Source0 URL seems to be not working, the server returns "404 Not found" (probably we should ask upstream to tag the releases in git ;-) ) IMHO it would be better to use only the file name as Source0 (the complete URL could be kept in a comment for later when upstream has tagged the releases) - otherwise it is misleading... 2. it looks like that the BR xulrunner-devel is not needed 3. are you planning to package the moblin web browser as well? In this case I would recommend that moblin-panel-web requires the moblin-web-browser (otherwise it just won't do anything... ;-) ) 4. regarding the License I'm not sure: the sources in common/ are LGPLv2.1 but the main application seems to be GPLv2+ - I've asked on the fedora-legal mailing list for clarification... I'm really looking forward to get a full moblin UI for Fedora! ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 23:19:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:19:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537631] Review Request: moblin-panel-web - Moblin Panel for Web Browsing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911162319.nAGNJfQ1022562@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537631 --- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson 2009-11-16 18:19:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Before I do the full review here are some issues I've seen so far: > > 1. the Source0 URL seems to be not working, the server returns "404 Not found" > (probably we should ask upstream to tag the releases in git ;-) ) Yes, your correct. See the two lines at the top of the spec file to create the tar file. > IMHO it would be better to use only the file name as Source0 (the complete URL > could be kept in a comment for later when upstream has tagged the releases) - > otherwise it is misleading... Yes, I meant to update it as that URL is in my Moblin spec template. > 2. it looks like that the BR xulrunner-devel is not needed Oh! > 3. are you planning to package the moblin web browser as well? In this case I > would recommend that moblin-panel-web requires the moblin-web-browser > (otherwise it just won't do anything... ;-) ) Yes, Its in progress and I believe in the mean time it will use the default browser instead so in the short term it will still be useful when used with Firefox. > 4. regarding the License I'm not sure: the sources in common/ are LGPLv2.1 but > the main application seems to be GPLv2+ - I've asked on the fedora-legal > mailing list for clarification... I'll clarify with upstream. I looked in common and what was in the upstream Moblin specfile. I suspect its a mix of both because of what the other moblin-panel packages use. > I'm really looking forward to get a full moblin UI for Fedora! ;-) Me too! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 23:24:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:24:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527986] Review Request: taoframework - Multimedia bindings for Mono In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911162324.nAGNOUJQ002174@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527986 --- Comment #10 from Paul Lange 2009-11-16 18:24:29 EDT --- I think it would be wrong to add dependencies for packages only available on rpmfusion. I'm not sure about it, but I think it would be impossible to install this package without having enabled rpmfusion. I think it's better to make the dependencies as good as possible. If there are any products which use this packages they should care about the required dependencies. Fixed config files: - lua - ode - physfs - SDL_gfx - glfw don't fixed because of rpmfusion requirement: - cg - sdl: libsmpeg - ffmpeg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 16 23:54:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:54:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911162354.nAGNsNiW009271@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 --- Comment #5 from Nathanael Noblet 2009-11-16 18:54:22 EDT --- Very few rpmlint messages now... * Mon Nov 16 2009 Nathanael Noblet - 3.9.0-BETA4 - Revise permission on /etc/dspam.conf and /var/lib/dspam - Remove compression on documentation - Move driver documentation to subpackages - Remove sqlite_drv.txt if neither sqlite driver is being built - Remove .la and .a files - Disable install-strip for the debuginfo package * Sun Nov 15 2009 Stevan Bajic - 3.9.0-BETA4 - Splitting into libdspam package and driver package - Moving static libs and libtool archives into libdspam-devel package - Enabling build of single storage driver statically linked into DSPAM - Enabling build of single storage driver as dynamically loaded module - Compressing SQL files and documentation - Added version tag to change log - Renamed cron and logrotate scripts to follow Fedora packing guidelines - Added post/postun for libdspam and all libdspam storage drivers - Replaced all tabs with softtabs (don't know if this is needed but Nathanael had it that way) - Enabled install-strip - Extended package description -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 00:06:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:06:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532874] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-wacom - Xorg X11 wacom input driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911170006.nAH06Jcx002791@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532874 --- Comment #6 from Peter Hutterer 2009-11-16 19:06:18 EDT --- Thomas - please file a separate bugreport for this issue, let's not use the review request for actual bugs on this driver. Please attach the output of lshal and your Xorg.log to the new bug (if you're using this driver, temporarily file under linuxwacom and note that you're using xf86-input-wacom instead). Make sure you assign the bug to me to avoid confusion. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 00:09:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:09:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911170009.nAH09dlV003492@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 --- Comment #6 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-11-16 19:09:37 EDT --- what are your fedora account user name ? Can you post a updated spec file + src.rpm file ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 00:26:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:26:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533291] Review Request: ruby-ffi - Foreign Function Interface package for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911170026.nAH0QJZi019805@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533291 --- Comment #7 from Bryan Kearney 2009-11-16 19:26:19 EDT --- Any feedback on the new spec file? Should I kill this bug and re-submit under the new name? -- bk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 01:18:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:18:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481527] Review Request: bucardo - asynchronous PostgreSQL replication system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911170118.nAH1IDpl003405@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481527 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |david at gnsa.us AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |david at gnsa.us Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 01:27:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:27:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537971] New: Review Request: ghc-mmap - Haskell binding to mmap Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-mmap - Haskell binding to mmap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537971 Summary: Review Request: ghc-mmap - Haskell binding to mmap Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: petersen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-mmap/ghc-mmap.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-mmap/ghc-mmap-0.4.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This library provides a wrapper to mmap(2) or MapViewOfFile, allowing files or devices to be lazily loaded into memory as strict or lazy ByteStrings, ForeignPtrs or plain Ptrs, using the virtual memory subsystem to do on-demand loading. Modifications are also supported. This required for ghc-hashed-storage which is a dep of darcs 2.3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 01:31:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:31:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481527] Review Request: bucardo - asynchronous PostgreSQL replication system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911170131.nAH1VgsD028946@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481527 --- Comment #12 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-11-16 20:31:41 EDT --- updated spec file with changes from Greg. http://itamarjp.fedorapeople.org/bucardo/bucardo.spec http://itamarjp.fedorapeople.org/bucardo/bucardo-4.4.0-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 02:02:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:02:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481527] Review Request: bucardo - asynchronous PostgreSQL replication system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911170202.nAH22ddi005478@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481527 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from David Nalley 2009-11-16 21:02:37 EDT --- Itamar: Thanks for updating the SRPM in such a timely manner. I just installed and it appears to work well. OK: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [ke4qqq at nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint bucardo.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/bucardo-4.4.0-2.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/bucardo-4.4.0-2.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . LICENSE file contains BSD Source code refers to License file While I don't think it affects the package, the INSTALL file appears to claim a different license for a library, and upstream may want to take note. OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK: The spec file must be written in American English. OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. [ke4qqq at nalleyx60 SOURCES]$ md5sum Bucardo-4.4.0.tar.gz* bf32b4dc7302baa1bc269dd34ff65da5 Bucardo-4.4.0.tar.gz bf32b4dc7302baa1bc269dd34ff65da5 Bucardo-4.4.0.tar.gz.1 OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. NA: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. NA: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. NA: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. OK: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. NA: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: Each package must consistently use macros. OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. NA: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. NA: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. NA: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. APPROVED Thanks for all of the work! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 02:06:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:06:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537971] Review Request: ghc-mmap - Haskell binding to mmap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911170206.nAH26Ds3017698@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537971 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |537979 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 02:06:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:06:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537979] Review Request: ghc-hashed-storage - Hashed file storage support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911170206.nAH26Cpv017675@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537979 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-haskell-list at redhat. | |com Depends on| |537971 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 02:05:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:05:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537979] New: Review Request: ghc-hashed-storage - Hashed file storage support Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-hashed-storage - Hashed file storage support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537979 Summary: Review Request: ghc-hashed-storage - Hashed file storage support Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: petersen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-hashed-storage/ghc-hashed-storage.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-hashed-storage/ghc-hashed-storage-0.3.9-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Support code for reading and manipulating hashed file storage (where each file and directory is associated with a cryptographic hash, for corruption-resistant storage and fast comparisons). The supported storage formats include darcs hashed pristine, a plain filesystem tree and an indexed plain tree (where the index maintains hashes of the plain files and directories). Needed by darcs 2.3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 02:29:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:29:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537979] Review Request: ghc-hashed-storage - Hashed file storage support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911170229.nAH2Tfml013973@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537979 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |522953 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 02:37:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:37:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481527] Review Request: bucardo - asynchronous PostgreSQL replication system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911170237.nAH2b3Ap016229@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481527 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-11-16 21:37:02 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bucardo Short Description: asynchronous PostgreSQL replication system Owners: itamarjp Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 02:42:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:42:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537983] Review Request: vpython - 3D Programming In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911170242.nAH2gPwr017698@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537983 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |brad.longo at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-16 21:42:23 EDT --- *** Bug 455152 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 02:42:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:42:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455152] Review Request: visual-4.beta26-1.fc9.i386.rpm - Visual Modelling Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911170242.nAH2gO7Z017659@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455152 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tomspur at fedoraproject.org Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE --- Comment #7 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-16 21:42:22 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 537983 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 02:41:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:41:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537983] New: Review Request: vpython - 3D Programming Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: vpython - 3D Programming https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537983 Summary: Review Request: vpython - 3D Programming Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tomspur at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/review/vpython.spec SRPM URL: http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/review/vpython-5.13-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: VPython makes it easy to create navigable 3D displays and animations, even for those with limited programming experience. Because it is based on Python, it also has much to offer for experienced programmers and researchers. Builds in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1810799 rpmlint: $ rpmlint vpython.spec vpython-5.13-1.fc12.src.rpm x86_64/* vpython.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 12) vpython.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 12) vpython.x86_64: E: devel-dependency vpython-devel vpython-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on vpython/vpython-libs/libvpython vpython-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation vpython-devel.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/cvisualmodule.so cvisualmodule.so.3.0.0 vpython-doc.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/vpython-doc-5.13/visual/VisualRef.css 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 6 warnings. - I don't see any tabs anymore... - Don't know what to do with no-dependency-on vpython/vpython-libs/libvpython - dangling-relative-symlink seems ok to me - wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding: Tried to fix this with converting the file to UTF-8, didn't work. In documentation, is it ignorable? - devel-file-depency: Should I delete the devel package and ship the *.so file with the main package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 03:19:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 22:19:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537727] Review Request: Slack - A lazy systems administration configuration management toolkit. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911170319.nAH3JDv6005372@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537727 --- Comment #3 from Matt T. Proud 2009-11-16 22:19:12 EDT --- Hi Jussi, Thank you for the prompt feedback. I have gone ahead and incorporated your suggestions: - Patch naming, - Privileges, - Using %{_datadir}/%{name} due to the item being architecture-independent, - Ownership of the %{_datadir}/%{name}, and - The format-agnosticness of the manual pages. I did make an error in the URL for the SRPM supra. The correct address is http://www.nerp.net/~khanreaper/slack-0.15.2-2.fc11.src.rpm. Let me know if there's anything else I can do! - M. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 05:40:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:40:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530021] Review Request: moovida - Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911170540.nAH5ehXl028715@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530021 Alex Lancaster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #14 from Alex Lancaster 2009-11-17 00:40:42 EDT --- Taking review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 05:51:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:51:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530021] Review Request: moovida - Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911170551.nAH5pCaD031247@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530021 --- Comment #15 from Alex Lancaster 2009-11-17 00:51:12 EDT --- As a @redhat.com person have you have already been sponsored? I can't find any packages you own on PackageDB: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/ggillies -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 05:55:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:55:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530021] Review Request: moovida - Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911170555.nAH5tlVE010607@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530021 --- Comment #16 from Graeme Gillies 2009-11-17 00:55:47 EDT --- Sorry no I totally forgot to mention that this is my first package submission and I have not been sponsored yet. Sorry for the confusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 06:02:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 01:02:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911170602.nAH6239d001315@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 --- Comment #7 from Nathanael Noblet 2009-11-17 01:02:02 EDT --- account user name is gnat. The spec file + src.rpm file is at the url provided. I've been updating them directly each time I make a change. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 06:08:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 01:08:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911170608.nAH68v1v013494@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 --- Comment #8 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-11-17 01:08:56 EDT --- please bump the version and post a updated version after each change. spec file. src.rpm also a koji scratch build should be welcome -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 06:11:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 01:11:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478806] Review Request: simh - A highly portable, multi-system emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911170611.nAH6BfAv014270@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478806 --- Comment #16 from Lucian Langa 2009-11-17 01:11:38 EDT --- I've added the wrong source file. Hopefully should be ok now: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/simh.spec http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/simh-3.8.1-4.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 06:40:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 01:40:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530021] Review Request: moovida - Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911170640.nAH6eANk020621@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530021 Alex Lancaster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) AssignedTo|alexl at users.sourceforge.net |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #17 from Alex Lancaster 2009-11-17 01:40:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > Sorry no I totally forgot to mention that this is my first package submission > and I have not been sponsored yet. Sorry for the confusion. Ah, so then unfortunately your first review needs to be done by a sponsor, which I am not, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process#Reviewer I can do an informal review, but can't do the official one. :( So I'm unassigning this and setting the blocker bug FE-NEEDSPONSOR. Perhaps you can pester some redhat colleagues who are also sponsors. Meanwhile I will make some quick remarks here and on a followup comment: Summmary: should not include the package name and should use upstream (US) spelling as described on http://www.moovida.com/ so: Summary: Media center -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 06:39:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 01:39:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533899] Review Request: activemq-cpp - C++ implementation of JMS-like messaging client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911170639.nAH6dfEx009594@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533899 --- Comment #2 from Steve Traylen 2009-11-17 01:39:40 EDT --- Am more happy with these after trying to build something else on top. http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/activemq-cpp/activemq-cpp-2.2.6-4.fc12.src.rpm http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/activemq-cpp/activemq-cpp.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 06:46:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 01:46:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530021] Review Request: moovida - Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911170646.nAH6kuQF022425@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530021 --- Comment #18 from Alex Lancaster 2009-11-17 01:46:55 EDT --- For the moovida-base package though, it would probably make sense to include the name "moovida" in the Summary since it isn't really the one that's usually installed by end users. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 06:50:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 01:50:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530021] Review Request: moovida - Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911170650.nAH6oeRU012563@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530021 Alex Lancaster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |moovida -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 07:02:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 02:02:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530021] Review Request: moovida - Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911170702.nAH72CbX015637@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530021 --- Comment #19 from Alex Lancaster 2009-11-17 02:02:11 EDT --- OK, to start the ball rolling here's the output for rpmlint for the binary packages: # rpmlint * moovida.noarch: W: name-repeated-in-summary Moovida moovida-base.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/elisa/core/launcher.py 0644 /usr/bin/python moovida-base.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/elisa/core/utils/mswin32/structures.py 0644 /usr/bin/python moovida-base.noarch: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/elisa/core/utils/mswin32/structures.py moovida-base.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/elisa/core/tests/test_launcher.py 0644 /usr/bin/python moovida-plugins-bad.noarch: W: no-documentation moovida-plugins-bad.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/elisa/plugins/database/i18n/cs/LC_MESSAGES/elisa-plugin-database.mo moovida-plugins-bad.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/elisa/plugins/database/i18n/de/LC_MESSAGES/elisa-plugin-database.mo moovida-plugins-bad.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/elisa/plugins/database/i18n/es/LC_MESSAGES/elisa-plugin-database.mo moovida-plugins-bad.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/elisa/plugins/database/i18n/fr/LC_MESSAGES/elisa-plugin-database.mo moovida-plugins-bad.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/elisa/plugins/database/i18n/gl/LC_MESSAGES/elisa-plugin-database.mo moovida-plugins-bad.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/elisa/plugins/database/i18n/hu/LC_MESSAGES/elisa-plugin-database.mo moovida-plugins-bad.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/elisa/plugins/database/i18n/it/LC_MESSAGES/elisa-plugin-database.mo moovida-plugins-bad.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/elisa/plugins/database/i18n/pl/LC_MESSAGES/elisa-plugin-database.mo moovida-plugins-bad.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/elisa/plugins/database/i18n/pt_BR/LC_MESSAGES/elisa-plugin-database.mo moovida-plugins-bad.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/elisa/plugins/dvd/i18n/cs/LC_MESSAGES/elisa-plugin-dvd.mo moovida-plugins-bad.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/elisa/plugins/dvd/i18n/de/LC_MESSAGES/elisa-plugin-dvd.mo moovida-plugins-bad.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/elisa/plugins/dvd/i18n/es/LC_MESSAGES/elisa-plugin-dvd.mo moovida-plugins-bad.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/elisa/plugins/dvd/i18n/fr/LC_MESSAGES/elisa-plugin-dvd.mo moovida-plugins-bad.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/elisa/plugins/dvd/i18n/gl/LC_MESSAGES/elisa-plugin-dvd.mo moovida-plugins-bad.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/elisa/plugins/dvd/i18n/hu/LC_MESSAGES/elisa-plugin-dvd.mo moovida-plugins-bad.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/elisa/plugins/dvd/i18n/it/LC_MESSAGES/elisa-plugin-dvd.mo moovida-plugins-bad.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/elisa/plugins/dvd/i18n/pl/LC_MESSAGES/elisa-plugin-dvd.mo moovida-plugins-bad.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/elisa/plugins/dvd/i18n/pt_BR/LC_MESSAGES/elisa-plugin-dvd.mo moovida-plugins-bad.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/elisa/plugins/poblesec/i18n/cs/LC_MESSAGES/elisa-plugin-poblesec.mo moovida-plugins-bad.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/elisa/plugins/poblesec/i18n/de/LC_MESSAGES/elisa-plugin-poblesec.mo moovida-plugins-bad.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/elisa/plugins/poblesec/i18n/es/LC_MESSAGES/elisa-plugin-poblesec.mo moovida-plugins-bad.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/elisa/plugins/poblesec/i18n/fr/LC_MESSAGES/elisa-plugin-poblesec.mo moovida-plugins-bad.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/elisa/plugins/poblesec/i18n/gl/LC_MESSAGES/elisa-plugin-poblesec.mo moovida-plugins-bad.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/elisa/plugins/poblesec/i18n/hu/LC_MESSAGES/elisa-plugin-poblesec.mo moovida-plugins-bad.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/elisa/plugins/poblesec/i18n/it/LC_MESSAGES/elisa-plugin-poblesec.mo moovida-plugins-bad.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/elisa/plugins/poblesec/i18n/pl/LC_MESSAGES/elisa-plugin-poblesec.mo moovida-plugins-bad.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/elisa/plugins/poblesec/i18n/pt_BR/LC_MESSAGES/elisa-plugin-poblesec.mo moovida-plugins-good.noarch: W: no-documentation moovida-plugins-good.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/elisa/plugins/base/i18n/cs/LC_MESSAGES/elisa-plugin-base.mo moovida-plugins-good.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/elisa/plugins/base/i18n/de/LC_MESSAGES/elisa-plugin-base.mo moovida-plugins-good.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/elisa/plugins/base/i18n/es/LC_MESSAGES/elisa-plugin-base.mo moovida-plugins-good.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/elisa/plugins/base/i18n/fr/LC_MESSAGES/elisa-plugin-base.mo moovida-plugins-good.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/elisa/plugins/base/i18n/gl/LC_MESSAGES/elisa-plugin-base.mo moovida-plugins-good.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/elisa/plugins/base/i18n/hu/LC_MESSAGES/elisa-plugin-base.mo moovida-plugins-good.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/elisa/plugins/base/i18n/it/LC_MESSAGES/elisa-plugin-base.mo moovida-plugins-good.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/elisa/plugins/base/i18n/pl/LC_MESSAGES/elisa-plugin-base.mo moovida-plugins-good.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/elisa/plugins/base/i18n/pt_BR/LC_MESSAGES/elisa-plugin-base.mo 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 39 warnings. Some issues that need to be fixed are: 1. addressing the file permissions 2. one line encoding issue 3. handling the locale files correctly, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Handling_Locale_Files The no documentation thing can probably be ignored. It also points out the problem with the duplicate name in summary that I already pointed out. The SRPMS pretty much pass the tests, with the exception of the Summary already noted: # rpmlint *.src.rpm moovida.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary Moovida 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. And, yes, it would be great if you could use your webspace on fedorapeople.org to post the updated .specs and srpms for the subsequent iteration. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 07:19:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 02:19:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 424841] Review Request: ndisc6 - IPv6 diagnostic tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911170719.nAH7Jjgk019968@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424841 --- Comment #24 from Stjepan Gros 2009-11-17 02:19:44 EDT --- Here is the new version: Spec URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/ndisc6/ndisc6.spec SRPM URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/ndisc6/ndisc6-0.9.9-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 07:35:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 02:35:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520637] Review Request: mdk - GNU MIX Development Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911170735.nAH7ZcHg002105@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520637 Stjepan Gros changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #23 from Stjepan Gros 2009-11-17 02:35:37 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mdk Short Description: GNU MIX Development Kit Owners: sgros Branches: F-12 InitialCC: sgros -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 07:36:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 02:36:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 251805] Review Request: orafce - Implementation of some Oracle functions into PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911170736.nAH7ajvJ002432@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251805 --- Comment #23 from Miroslav Such? 2009-11-17 02:36:40 EDT --- >http://yum.pgsqlrpms.org/srpms/8.4/fedora/fedora-11-i386/orafce-3.0.1-1.f11.src.rpm 404 Not Found Anyway, from quick look on spec itself, I still see, that two of my previous comments has not been addressed: > %{_docdir}/pgsql/contrib/*.orafunc > That should be > %doc COPYRIGHT.orafunc INSTALL.orafunc README.orafunc And: >Do you really want to requires postgresql, I suppose that correct should be be >postgresql-server, but IMHO. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 07:45:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 02:45:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911170745.nAH7japC004200@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 --- Comment #9 from Nathanael Noblet 2009-11-17 02:45:34 EDT --- Looks like it completed successfully. Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1811003 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 08:47:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 03:47:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529544] Review Request: php-phpunit-bytekit - A command-line tool built on the PHP Bytekit extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911170847.nAH8ls6e024125@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529544 --- Comment #3 from Christof Damian 2009-11-17 03:47:52 EDT --- Thanks. Please also update the revision and generate new RPMs when you change the SPEC file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 10:29:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 05:29:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532521] Review request: gnu-trove - High performance collections for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171029.nAHAT0cI014964@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532521 Mary Ellen Foster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|DUPLICATE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 10:27:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 05:27:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459548] Review Request: php-gtk - GTK PHP extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171027.nAHARW3L014674@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459548 --- Comment #34 from Patrice FERLET 2009-11-17 05:27:27 EDT --- Back... Sorry for latence... But my account had troubles... And I had problems to login. For now, PHP-GTK 5.3 won't work... lot of bugs... lot of crashes. I am doing some patches. I know that I take my time to give you fresh news, but please, let me some time... I packaged 3 other rpms... and time is hard to find ! ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 10:29:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 05:29:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532521] Review request: gnu-trove - High performance collections for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171029.nAHATbAV015174@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532521 Mary Ellen Foster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |loganjerry at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Mary Ellen Foster 2009-11-17 05:29:34 EDT --- *** Bug 504891 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 10:29:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 05:29:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 504891] Review Request: trove - Efficient Java collections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171029.nAHATa0t015149@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504891 Mary Ellen Foster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #8 from Mary Ellen Foster 2009-11-17 05:29:34 EDT --- How reversing the "closed duplicate" direction of the two bugs? *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 532521 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 10:30:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 05:30:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532521] Review request: gnu-trove - High performance collections for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171030.nAHAUYZu026193@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532521 Mary Ellen Foster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW --- Comment #4 from Mary Ellen Foster 2009-11-17 05:30:33 EDT --- Following feedback in the other bug, I've closed it as a duplicate of this one instead. I'll incorporate changes from and comments on that package into this one shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 10:33:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 05:33:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532523] Review request: jarjar - Jar Jar Links In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171033.nAHAXpdB026997@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532523 --- Comment #5 from Mary Ellen Foster 2009-11-17 05:33:50 EDT --- Thanks for the comments (and sorry for the delay)! Updated files are now here: Spec URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/review/jarjar.spec SRPM URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/review/jarjar-0.9-4.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 10:37:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 05:37:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 494292] Review Request: spacewalk-proxy-html - The HTML component for Spacewalk Proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171037.nAHAbI7C017673@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494292 --- Comment #3 from Miroslav Such? 2009-11-17 05:37:16 EDT --- Updated spec: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/spacewalk-proxy-html/spacewalk-proxy-html.spec Updated SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/spacewalk-proxy-html/spacewalk-proxy-html-0.7.1-1.src.rpm I fixed that typo in %description, used defattrs, removed ownership of directory, which already own httpd and add versioned Provides. I did not add dependency to spacewalk-proxy-managements, since this is not subpackage and it will lead to circular dependency. I did not address rpmlint warning: spacewalk-proxy-html.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/html/_rhn_proxy/index.html since I want to replace it during upgrade. The reason is that this package is updated very rarely and when is update we probably want to have visible change. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 10:45:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 05:45:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487128] Review Request: eventReceivers - Command Center Event Receivers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171045.nAHAjU5U030897@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487128 Miroslav Such? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #4 from Miroslav Such? 2009-11-17 05:45:29 EDT --- :( Sorry, this package is transitively dependent on DBD::Oracle and I will have no time in near feature to remove this dependency. Closing for now. Will reopen when right time will come. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 10:57:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 05:57:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507083] Review Request: poco - C++ class libraries for network-centric applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171057.nAHAvn6j002823@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507083 Michal Schmidt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|mschmidt at redhat.com |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #27 from Michal Schmidt 2009-11-17 05:57:44 EDT --- Almost perfect. I noticed that the poco-debuginfo package does not contain useful debuginfo for the non-debug versions of the libraries. It is because poco's build process strips the "release" binaries. Please fix it. An easy way is to redefine the STRIP variable to a command with no effect, like this: make %{?_smp_mflags} STRIP=/bin/true (See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Debuginfo for more information about debuginfo packages.) This will be the last change necessary to pass the review. So after you've done this change, consider the package APPROVED. I'm reassigning this BZ back to Peter who will sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 11:05:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 06:05:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530288] Review Request: stonevpn - easy OpenVPN certificate and configuration management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171105.nAHB589P027045@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530288 --- Comment #15 from Leon Keijser 2009-11-17 06:05:06 EDT --- One question though: i'm building the package now through koji for F-11, F-12 and rawhide. However, when i want to build for EL-5 (epel), it fails on a missing egg-info file that probably won't be installed in epel but is listed in the %files section of the spec file. Now i could make an if-then statement that checks for the distro and only includes the egg-info file for F-* but what is the proper way? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 11:06:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 06:06:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538035] New: Review Request: openvas-libraries - Support libraries for Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: openvas-libraries - Support libraries for Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538035 Summary: Review Request: openvas-libraries - Support libraries for Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: stjepan.gros at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora There is already a bugzilla entry for openvas libraries but it's for the version 1 (the previous version) and also the entry hasn't been changed for a while. So, I'm opening a new entry for libraries and the rest of the stuff will follow soon. Spec URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/openvas/openvas-libraries.spec SRPM URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/openvas/openvas-libraries-2.0.4-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: openvas-libraries is the base library for the OpenVAS network security scanner. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 11:24:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 06:24:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 491088] Review Request: rhncfg - Red Hat Network Configuration Client Libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171124.nAHBOSoi032184@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491088 --- Comment #2 from Miroslav Such? 2009-11-17 06:24:27 EDT --- Updated SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rhncfg/rhncfg.spec Update SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rhncfg/rhncfg-5.9.13-1.src.rpm Not sure what you meant by "make is missing build-flags" - do you meant compiler flags? This is noarch package... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 11:29:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 06:29:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532205] Review Request: microba - Set of JFC (Swing) components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171129.nAHBTFVM000918@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532205 Bug 532205 depends on bug 532203, which changed state. Bug 532203 Summary: Review Request: jgraph - Java-based Diagram Component and Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532203 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 11:29:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 06:29:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532203] Review Request: jgraph - Java-based Diagram Component and Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171129.nAHBTDQI000895@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532203 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #16 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-17 06:29:11 EDT --- Imported and built. Thank you for Review and CVS. (orphaning in F-11 and F-12, feel free to pick it up) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 11:40:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 06:40:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538035] Review Request: openvas-libraries - Support libraries for Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171140.nAHBeDQd004253@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538035 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |huzaifas at redhat.com, | |xavier at bachelot.org --- Comment #1 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-11-17 06:40:11 EDT --- I'm definitely interested in this. I have already filed a bug against the outdated openvas-libraries (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525159), but no answer so far. The current maintainer is probably not interested anymore, as only the libs are packaged and even the libs are obviously unmaintained. As the package already exist, this review request probably needs to be closed and the current package orphaned and then be adopted by a new maintainer. I'm adding the maintainer to the CC: of this bug, it would be really nice to get a comment on what he plans to do. I went ahead an started to build my own packages for the whole openvas 2 stack. Here are my unfinished specs and SRPMs, in case it's of any help. http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/openvas-client.spec http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/openvas-libnasl.spec http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/openvas-libraries.spec http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/openvas-plugins.spec http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/openvas-server.spec http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/openvas-client-2.0.5-1.fc10.src.rpm http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/openvas-libnasl-2.0.2-1.fc10.src.rpm http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/openvas-libraries-2.0.4-1.fc10.src.rpm http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/openvas-plugins-1.0.7-1.fc10.src.rpm http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/openvas-server-2.0.3-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 11:46:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 06:46:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537983] Review Request: vpython - 3D Programming In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171146.nAHBkrrN017203@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537983 Stefan Riemens changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fgfs.stefan at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Stefan Riemens 2009-11-17 06:46:50 EDT --- Just a quick comment, i haven't looked at the package closely, but the wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding can probably be fixed by either dos2unix or (preferably) using: sed -i 's/\r//' See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Common_Rpmlint_Issues#wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 12:22:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 07:22:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538046] New: Review Request: spacewalk-certs-tools - Spacewalk SSL Key/Cert Tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: spacewalk-certs-tools - Spacewalk SSL Key/Cert Tool Alias: spacewalk-certs-tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538046 Summary: Review Request: spacewalk-certs-tools - Spacewalk SSL Key/Cert Tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: msuchy at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 452450 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/spacewalk-certs-tools/spacewalk-certs-tools.spec SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/spacewalk-certs-tools/spacewalk-certs-tools-0.7.1-1.src.rpm rpmlint is silent scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1811428 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 12:26:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 07:26:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524283] Review Request: plee-the-bear - 2D platform game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171226.nAHCQpJ7028405@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524283 --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-17 07:25:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > FIX - MUST: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-12-ppc/result/* [ ... lots of unverisoned sonames in /usr/lib/libbear_*.so ... ] These are OK. They are used exclusively by the binaries shipped with the game, we don't even provide a -devel subpackage. > FIX - MUST: License field in spec file doesn't matches the actual license: > License: GPLv2+ and CC-BY-SA Good catch. Fixed. > FIX - SHOULD: Scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. > update icon cache scriplet is missing > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache Fixed. > FIX - Timestamps > INSTALL="install -p" > SOURCE0 original = 03 Sep 2009 02:32:34 CEST > SOURCE0 package = 16 Sep 2009 00:01 CEST Done New package: SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/plee-the-bear.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/plee-the-bear-0.4.1-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 12:31:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 07:31:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537066] Review Request: cglib - Code generation library for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171231.nAHCVCFL022566@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537066 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-17 07:31:11 EDT --- Thanks for review and CVS. Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 13:03:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 08:03:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 424841] Review Request: ndisc6 - IPv6 diagnostic tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171303.nAHD3iBG031770@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424841 --- Comment #25 from Jon Ciesla 2009-11-17 08:03:40 EDT --- SRPM is 404. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 13:16:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 08:16:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453109] Review Request: nocpulse-common - Add NOCpulse users and includes common files for NOCpulse. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171316.nAHDGTLp003010@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453109 Miroslav Such? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |nocpulse-common -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 13:23:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 08:23:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538057] New: Review Request: rhnmd - Red Hat Network Monitoring Daemon Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rhnmd - Red Hat Network Monitoring Daemon Alias: rhnmd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538057 Summary: Review Request: rhnmd - Red Hat Network Monitoring Daemon Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: msuchy at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 452450 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rhnmd/rhnmd.spec SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rhnmd/rhnmd-5.3.3-1.src.rpm Scratch build: rpmlint is ... full of errors: rhnmd.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/sbin/rhnmd sshd can be waived, sshd is required rhnmd.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/nocpulse/.ssh/authorized_keys nocpulse rhnmd.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/nocpulse/.ssh/authorized_keys nocpulse rhnmd.noarch: E: non-readable /var/lib/nocpulse/.ssh/authorized_keys 0600 should be owned by user nocpulse and non readable to other, to be safe with sshd. rhnmd.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/nocpulse nocpulse rhnmd.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/nocpulse nocpulse this is home of nocpulse user rhnmd.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/nocpulse/.ssh nocpulse rhnmd.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/nocpulse/.ssh nocpulse rhnmd.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /var/lib/nocpulse/.ssh rhnmd.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/nocpulse/.ssh 0700 rhnmd.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /var/lib/nocpulse/.ssh ssh configuration for nocpulse user rhnmd.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%pre rm what to say? yes, I know :) rhnmd.noarch: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/rhnmd rhnmd.noarch: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/rhnmd same as sshd. if we install it, we want it on by default. Just for background - rhnmd is just wrapper around sshd, to allow user configure and setup sshd and rhnmd independently. Usually for users who want to block sshd, but want to allow sshd for nocpulse to allow monitoring capability of Spacewalk. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 13:33:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 08:33:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 424841] Review Request: ndisc6 - IPv6 diagnostic tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171333.nAHDX4CB015750@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424841 --- Comment #26 from Stjepan Gros 2009-11-17 08:33:03 EDT --- Ops, sorry, the right link(s) are: Spec URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/ndisc6/ndisc6.spec SRPM URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/ndisc6/ndisc6-0.9.9-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 13:33:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 08:33:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532534] Review request: xml-im-exporter - XML Im-/Exporter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171333.nAHDX9t9015786@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532534 Miroslav Such? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |msuchy at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |msuchy at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 13:39:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 08:39:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523650] Review Request: qmpdclient - A Qt4 based MPD client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171339.nAHDdA5O009189@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523650 --- Comment #28 from Julian G 2009-11-17 08:39:08 EDT --- http://files.4-web.net/qmpdclient/qmpdclient-1.1.2-1.fc10.src.rpm http://files.4-web.net/qmpdclient/qmpdclient.spec rpmlint SPECS/qmpdclient.spec SRPMS/qmpdclient-1.1.2-1.fc10.src.rpm RPMS/i386/qmpdclient-1.1.2-1.fc10.i386.rpm RPMS/i386/qmpdclient-debuginfo-1.1.2-1.fc10.i386.rpm qmpdclient-debuginfo.i386: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/src/debug/qmpdclient/.ui qmpdclient-debuginfo.i386: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/src/debug/qmpdclient/.ui qmpdclient-debuginfo.i386: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/src/debug/qmpdclient/.moc qmpdclient-debuginfo.i386: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/src/debug/qmpdclient/.moc qmpdclient-debuginfo.i386: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/src/debug/qmpdclient/.res qmpdclient-debuginfo.i386: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/src/debug/qmpdclient/.res 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 13:36:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 08:36:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536796] Review Request: kde-plasma-smooth-tasks - KDE taskbar replacement with window peeking ability In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171336.nAHDamDK016868@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536796 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sven at lank.es -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 13:44:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 08:44:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530301] Review Request: bmpanel2 - NETWM compliant panel for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171344.nAHDi826018691@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530301 --- Comment #15 from Marcus Moeller 2009-11-17 08:44:07 EDT --- Updated according to your advice. Spec URL: http://www.marcus-moeller.de/share/build/bmpanel2/2.1-0.5.pre1/bmpanel2.spec SRPM URL: http://www.marcus-moeller.de/share/build/bmpanel2/2.1-0.5.pre1/bmpanel2-2.1-0.5.pre1.fc11.src.rpm Concerning the error message you get while trying to start bmpanel2 from GNOME, I guess you got a lot of open systray apps: if (total_constants_width + total_separators_width > panel->width - min_fill_size) { XDIE("Too many widgets here, try to remove one or more"); } Best Regards Marcus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 14:14:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:14:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 424841] Review Request: ndisc6 - IPv6 diagnostic tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171414.nAHEESMj019658@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424841 --- Comment #27 from Jon Ciesla 2009-11-17 09:14:27 EDT --- This looks good too, APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 14:26:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:26:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532521] Review request: gnu-trove - High performance collections for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171426.nAHEQf2d022917@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532521 --- Comment #5 from Mary Ellen Foster 2009-11-17 09:26:40 EDT --- New packages here: Spec URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/review/trove4j.spec SRPM URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/review/trove4j-2.1.0-2.fc12.src.rpm Changelog: - Rename to trove4j - Re-add GCJ stuff per discussion on fedora-java-devel-list - Link javadoc to unversioned directory - Fix License tag and include all documentation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 14:30:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:30:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532521] Review request: trove4j - High performance collections for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171430.nAHEUPZ4031500@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532521 Mary Ellen Foster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review request: gnu-trove - |Review request: trove4j - |High performance |High performance |collections for Java |collections for Java -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 15:18:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 10:18:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532470] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-bad-free - GStreamer streaming media framework "bad" plug-ins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171518.nAHFI8RV003851@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532470 --- Comment #11 from Bastien Nocera 2009-11-17 10:18:07 EDT --- Updated for 0.10.17: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~hadess/gstreamer-plugins-bad/gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-0.10.17-1.fc12.src.rpm http://people.fedoraproject.org/~hadess/gstreamer-plugins-bad/gstreamer-plugins-bad-free.spec and build at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1811660 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 15:26:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 10:26:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468804] Review Request: python-tg-devtools - Development tools and templates for TurboGears2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171526.nAHFQ6w5006488@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468804 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-17 10:26:03 EDT --- python-tg-devtools-2.0.2-5.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-tg-devtools-2.0.2-5.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 15:32:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 10:32:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529831] Review Request: opensips - Open Source SIP Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171532.nAHFW7ch008239@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529831 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-17 10:32:06 EDT --- opensips-1.6.0-4.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/opensips-1.6.0-4.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 15:44:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 10:44:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538087] New: Review Request: dgc - A system for the creation of digital circuits Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dgc - A system for the creation of digital circuits https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538087 Summary: Review Request: dgc - A system for the creation of digital circuits Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: shakthimaan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/dgc.spec SRPM URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/dgc-0.98-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Digital Gate Compiler is a tool for the creation of digital netlists. DGC does an optimization and technology mapping for an abstract description of boolean functions and state machines. Output formats are EDIF, XNF and VHDL. Input formats are KISS, PLA and others. Successful Koji builds for F-10, F-11, F-12 and EPEL: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1811644 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1811668 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1811692 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1811705 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 15:54:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 10:54:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530288] Review Request: stonevpn - easy OpenVPN certificate and configuration management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171554.nAHFs9Q4023675@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530288 --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-17 10:54:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) You can use %if macro, or you can modify EL-5 spec file only if you don't want to use %if macro. You can do either way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 16:01:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:01:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530288] Review Request: stonevpn - easy OpenVPN certificate and configuration management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171601.nAHG1QZk025616@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530288 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-17 11:01:25 EDT --- Now closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 16:00:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:00:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538087] Review Request: dgc - A system for the creation of digital circuits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171600.nAHG0JVi015069@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538087 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |chitlesh at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chitlesh at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 16:04:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:04:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532521] Review request: trove4j - High performance collections for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171604.nAHG4kuG015742@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532521 Guido Grazioli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |guido.grazioli at gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Guido Grazioli 2009-11-17 11:04:45 EDT --- Is the jboss stuff relevant in Fedora or just a jpackage feature? I think you should at least enclose the repolib package building inside a conditional, or drop it. About maven, are you missing the installation of the pom file? (is maven used at all in building?). Other notes: - change %define-s with %global-s - you are missing BuildRequire: java-devel and Require: java - better use name and version macros in Source0 - is there a reason why you dont run junit tests? - -repolib subpackage should not own %{_javadir}/repository.jboss.com , but %{repodir} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 16:31:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:31:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520637] Review Request: mdk - GNU MIX Development Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171631.nAHGVprv022981@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520637 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #24 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-17 11:31:50 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 16:32:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:32:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481527] Review Request: bucardo - asynchronous PostgreSQL replication system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171632.nAHGWnoA023210@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481527 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-17 11:32:48 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 16:44:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:44:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530473] Review Request: lessfs - Lessfs is an inline data deduplicating filesystem. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171644.nAHGifPU026356@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530473 --- Comment #12 from Adam Miller 2009-11-17 11:44:39 EDT --- Fixed the rpmlint issues aside from the mixed tabs and spaces one, I can't seem to find what will make that one happy. Spec URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/lessfs.spec SRPM URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/lessfs-0.8.3-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 16:53:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:53:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530473] Review Request: lessfs - Lessfs is an inline data deduplicating filesystem. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171653.nAHGrSSZ028585@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530473 --- Comment #13 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-11-17 11:53:27 EDT --- As rpmlint complains, you have tabs in the beginning and spaces starting from line 7. Either change all tab characters into spaces, or vice versa. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 16:52:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:52:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532309] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-net-ldap - A full-featured pure-Ruby LDAP client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171652.nAHGq4t4028271@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532309 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-17 11:52:03 EDT --- For 0.0.4-2: * License - As far as I checked the whole source codes, the license tag should be "GPLv2+". * Obsoletes - I don't think "Obsoletes: rubygem-net-ldap <= %{version}" is needed because rubygem-net-ldap is not imported into Fedora yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 16:54:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:54:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530198] Review Request: rubygem-columnize - Sorts an array in column order In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171654.nAHGsj77007317@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530198 --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-17 11:54:44 EDT --- Would you update this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 16:53:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:53:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 515898] Review Request: imapfilter - A flexible client side mail filtering utility for IMAP servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171653.nAHGrKbo007032@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #23 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-17 11:53:19 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 16:55:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:55:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537983] Review Request: vpython - 3D Programming In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171655.nAHGtlfp007856@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537983 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-17 11:55:45 EDT --- Thanks Stefan. $ rpmlint vpython.spec vpython-5.13-1.fc12.src.rpm noarch/vpython-doc-5.13-1.fc12.noarch.rpm x86_64/vpython-* vpython.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 13) vpython.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 13) vpython.x86_64: E: devel-dependency vpython-devel vpython-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation vpython-devel.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/cvisualmodule.so cvisualmodule.so.3.0.0 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings. Ignorable issues from my side: - tabs-vs-spaces - dangling-relative-symlink Remaining issues: - devel-file-depency: Should I delete the devel package and ship the *.so file with the main package? Nothing is mentioned in Guidelines:Python about this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 16:59:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:59:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537983] Review Request: vpython - 3D Programming In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171659.nAHGxirR008808@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537983 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-17 11:59:43 EDT --- Spec URL: http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/review/vpython.spec SRPM URL: http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/review/vpython-5.13-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 17:00:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:00:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532309] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-net-ldap - A full-featured pure-Ruby LDAP client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171700.nAHH0k0H031307@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532309 --- Comment #5 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-11-17 12:00:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > For 0.0.4-2: > > * License > - As far as I checked the whole source codes, the license > tag should be "GPLv2+". > Fixed. > * Obsoletes > - I don't think "Obsoletes: rubygem-net-ldap <= %{version}" > is needed because rubygem-net-ldap is not imported into Fedora > yet. It has been deployed in production already -also the reason why I'm submitting the package-; it must have the Obsoletes at least for the first build/release. New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-ruby-net-ldap.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f13/SRPMS/rubygem-ruby-net-ldap-0.0.4-3.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 17:07:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:07:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538035] Review Request: openvas-libraries - Support libraries for Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171707.nAHH72cj000308@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538035 --- Comment #2 from Stjepan Gros 2009-11-17 12:07:01 EDT --- I'll integrate bits of your specs into the ones I made. I'm thought to hold them because I can not try to build them in mock as buildrequires (e.g. openvas-libraries) are not yet in the repository. Anyway, I'll put them tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 17:13:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:13:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532309] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-net-ldap - A full-featured pure-Ruby LDAP client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171713.nAHHD6fU012273@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532309 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-17 12:13:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > > * Obsoletes > > - I don't think "Obsoletes: rubygem-net-ldap <= %{version}" > > is needed because rubygem-net-ldap is not imported into Fedora > > yet. > > It has been deployed in production already -also the reason why I'm submitting > the package-; What do you mean here? I googled rubygem-net-ldap and it seems that only Suse uses it, and I don't think we should take care of Suse's naming way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 17:19:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:19:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537563] Review Request: mingw32-plib - Fedora mingw set of portable game related libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171719.nAHHJ8MR014133@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537563 --- Comment #2 from Stefan Riemens 2009-11-17 12:19:07 EDT --- My other review request (posted because I need a sponsor): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529423 thanks, Stefan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 17:18:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:18:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529423] Review Request: mingw32-OpenSceneGraph - Fedora mingw high performance real-time graphics toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171718.nAHHI2b9013898@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529423 --- Comment #2 from Stefan Riemens 2009-11-17 12:18:00 EDT --- My other review request (posted since I need a sponsor): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537563 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 17:17:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:17:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530756] Review Request: circuit_macros - A set of macros for drawing high-quality line diagram In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171717.nAHHHSA4013726@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530756 --- Comment #11 from Ben Boeckel 2009-11-17 12:17:26 EDT --- Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/circuit_macros/circuit_macros.spec SRPM URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/circuit_macros/circuit_macros-6.61-4.fc12.src.rpm I've gone with doing the %doc magic manually. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 17:31:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:31:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526444] Review Request: MyGUI - Fast, simple and flexible GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171731.nAHHVb8L017841@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526444 --- Comment #16 from Guido Grazioli 2009-11-17 12:31:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > [fix] > Release should be: 0.2.2332svn%{?dist} > So you get a 3.0.0-0.2.2332svn package > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Package_Release > > [fix] > You use a mix of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot} > > [fix] > No need for VERBOSE=1 in %build > Ok, i'm working on the above issues. > [fix] > You use %cmake but no macro for the rest of the commands like install, sed. > I have seen use of core commands without macros in other packages; are macros mandatory? %cmake does a lot of things while %install and %sed are just wrappers > I rebuilt it here and it was running after i installed mygui and mygui-tools (i > tried the LayoutEditor). > Does it make sense to have mygui installed alone? Can one do anything with it, > without the tools? > If not, make the tools installed with the mainpackage, or maybe merge the tool > package into the main package. MyGUI is a library that allows to build UIs defined with xml files, so yes, i think most installations will only involve the main package. The LayoutEditor is a (ongoing development) tool to help create those xml files, helping developers in designing uis. I could require -devel for the -tools to render that explicit, even if the tools works alone. Please share your thoughts. > As well it couldn't load anything from the list (within the load dialog). > Maybe just me. The current file dialog doesnt filter out unsupported files, and the working directory is a dotdir that contains some other files needed to run the editor. Can you please report if saving a simple design (a window with a button for instance), closing the editor, then loading it again works? > Are the code template files needed outside a develpackage? Does the program > work without them installed? You could move them into the devel package and > make that installed by default as well. The templates are meant for code generation by LayoutEditor, that's why they included them in Media subdirectory; note that code generation is not in LayoutEditor yet. atm LayoutEditor will work without them, but i included those files here to pass under the review process. I can only add that suse folks have packaged the templates in {_datadir} as well. > [fix] > rpmlint -I dangling-symlink > dangling-symlink: > The target of the symbolic link does not exist within this package or its file > based dependencies. Verify spelling of the link target and that the target is > included in a package in this package's dependency chain. Need help here; the two fonts linked are provided by package dejavu-sans-fonts, which is among requires. After installation, the symlinks are working. Should i add a file based require? Adding BRs is not enough to make warning go away. > [fix] > rpmlint from installed packages: > > mygui.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libMyGUIEngine.so.3.0.0 > dlsym > mygui.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libMyGUIEngine.so.3.0.0 > uuid_generate > mygui.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libMyGUIEngine.so.3.0.0 > dlopen > mygui.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libMyGUIEngine.so.3.0.0 > dlcloserpmlint -I undefined-non-weak-symbol > > undefined-non-weak-symbol: > The binary contains undefined non-weak symbols. This may indicate improper > linkage; check that the binary has been linked as expected. > > You might check that linking problem with upstream. ok, i'm not on rawhide and my rpmlint wasnt reporting those warnings, i will investigate the problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 17:59:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:59:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481527] Review Request: bucardo - asynchronous PostgreSQL replication system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171759.nAHHxTqX014033@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481527 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-17 12:59:28 EDT --- bucardo-4.4.0-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bucardo-4.4.0-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 17:59:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:59:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481527] Review Request: bucardo - asynchronous PostgreSQL replication system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171759.nAHHxYr8014076@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481527 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-17 12:59:33 EDT --- bucardo-4.4.0-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bucardo-4.4.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 17:59:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:59:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481527] Review Request: bucardo - asynchronous PostgreSQL replication system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171759.nAHHxNoL025000@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481527 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-17 12:59:22 EDT --- bucardo-4.4.0-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bucardo-4.4.0-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 18:07:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:07:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530755] Review Request: dpic - A compiler for the pic language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171807.nAHI7Znu027322@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530755 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |530756 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 18:07:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:07:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530756] Review Request: circuit_macros - A set of macros for drawing high-quality line diagram In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171807.nAHI7X2b027276@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530756 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |530755 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 18:14:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:14:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530755] Review Request: dpic - A compiler for the pic language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171814.nAHIEqS5018286@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530755 --- Comment #6 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-11-17 13:14:50 EDT --- I would advice you to change the version to something similar to this (here "pcb" is the name of another software") ------------------------ %global pcbver 20091103 Name: pcb Version: 0.%{pcbver} ---------------------------------- If your upstream decides for some reason to start versioning with 1.0 or 2.0 instead of the date, you will encounter some tagging issues with the fedora build system. It would be nice to fix it before it reaches the repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 18:17:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:17:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528108] Review Request: Vuurmuur - Firewall manager built on top of iptables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171817.nAHIHBKG029822@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528108 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-17 13:17:08 EDT --- For -3: * Parallel make ------------------------------------------------------------------- 110 cd ../vuurmuur_conf-%{version} 111 %configure \ 112 --with-libvuurmuur-includes=${LIBVUDIR}/src/ \ 113 --with-libvuurmuur-libraries=${LIBVUDIR}/src/.libs/ 114 115 # Configure ignores --disable-rpath so we have to solve it this way 116 sed -i 's|^hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=.*|hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=""|g' libtool 117 sed -i 's|^runpath_var=LD_RUN_PATH|runpath_var=DIE_RPATH_DIE|g' libtool 118 make %{?_smp_mflags} ------------------------------------------------------------------- - With koji this parallel make (line 118) failed with -j4: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1812437 For this part please disable parallel make and comment on the spec file that parallel make fails on this part. * -daemon <-> -tui (In reply to comment #7) > So, I added some configuration files, and switched services from shared > directory to /etc/vuurmuur but the user has to start vuurmuur_conf tool to > create initial configuration. - Well, then * it seems more logical that -daemon subpackage should have "Requires: %{name}-tui = %{version}-%{release}" (in such case "Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}" on -daemon subpackage is no longer needed because -tui subpackage already depends on the main package). * Or maybe -daemon and -tui subpackages should just be unified. * Directory ownership issue - Still the following directories are not owned by any packages: -------------------------------------------------------------------- %{_libdir}/vuurmuur/plugins/ -------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 18:46:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:46:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530301] Review Request: bmpanel2 - NETWM compliant panel for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171846.nAHIkFEs005273@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530301 --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-17 13:46:14 EDT --- For -0.5: * Desktop icon - I just reconsidered icon symlink treatment, and I found that * leaving "Requires: gnome-icon-theme" as it is * and replacing "Icon=bmpanel2cfg" in bmpanel2cfg.desktop with "Icon=preferences-system-windows" will suffice and all symlinks treatment in current bmpanel2.spec is not needed. Also all scripts related to GTK icon cache update should not be needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 18:51:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:51:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 509936] Review Request: tortoisehg - Mercurial gui tools and nautilus plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171851.nAHIpPcl006712@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509936 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-17 13:51:22 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 18:48:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:48:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526263] Review Request: l7-protocols - Protocol definitions files for l7-filter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171848.nAHImm4R005773@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526263 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-17 13:48:47 EDT --- @Christoph: Currently I am reviewing another review request by Marcus (bug 530301), which I think can be approved with a few left work. Would you tell me if you are going to sponsor Marcus or not? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 18:52:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:52:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534061] Review Request: hostname - Utility to set/show the host name or domain name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171852.nAHIq1CA028503@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534061 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Steve Traylen 2009-11-17 13:52:00 EDT --- Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1812747 Review of hostname: yes: rpmlint $ rpmlint hostname.spec ../SRPMS/hostname-3.01-1.fc13.src.rpm ../RPMS/x86_64/hostname-*fc13* hostname.spec: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install hostname.spec: W: no-buildroot-tag hostname.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install hostname.src: W: no-buildroot-tag 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. which are fine as explained in Comment #2. yes: Package is named well. yes: spec file name good. yes: meets packaging guidelines. yes: packge marked as GPLv2+ yes: source matches GPLv2+ yes: COPYRIGHT file included. yes: spec in english. yes: spec legible. yes: $ md5sum /tmp/hostname_3.01.tar.gz ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/hostname_3.01.tar.gz 866c4250583960bf730fb7a8815dbb03 /tmp/hostname_3.01.tar.gz 866c4250583960bf730fb7a8815dbb03 /home/steve/rpmbuild/SOURCES/hostname_3.01.tar.gz yes: compiles, see koji build above. yes: compiles for all arches, see koji. yes: build deps sane, there are none. yes: no localles present. yes; contain no libraries. yes: not relocatable. yes: Everything in /bin doc or a man. Yes: Does not create any directories. yes: no file duplicates. yes: All fikes are %defattr. yes: clean buildroot on %clean. yes: macro use consistant. yes: Contains the hostname command. yes: no large docs. yes: docs not needed. yes: no header files. yes: no pkgconfig files. yes: no .so files anyway. yes: no devel packaes. yes: no .la files. yes: no gui present. yes: does share files with net-tools < 1.60-99 but has an explictit Conflicts: net-tools < 1.60-99 this is intentional and justified. yes: %install does not need rm -rf with this new rpm. yes: valid utf8. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 18:58:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:58:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 491088] Review Request: rhncfg - Red Hat Network Configuration Client Libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171858.nAHIw9d3030193@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491088 --- Comment #3 from Sandro Mathys 2009-11-17 13:58:08 EDT --- That's exactly what I meant. I missed the noarch instruction, you're right, of course. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 19:11:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:11:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530756] Review Request: circuit_macros - A set of macros for drawing high-quality line diagram In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171911.nAHJBrVL001601@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530756 --- Comment #12 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-11-17 14:11:52 EDT --- -example subpackage : You are missing the directories found in the examples/ directory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 19:14:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:14:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530473] Review Request: lessfs - Lessfs is an inline data deduplicating filesystem. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171914.nAHJEqma012582@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530473 --- Comment #14 from Adam Miller 2009-11-17 14:14:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > As rpmlint complains, you have tabs in the beginning and spaces starting from > line 7. Either change all tab characters into spaces, or vice versa. Yes, but when I edited line 7 then it said some other line was causing the inconsistency and as I recall this is not a blocker for review so I just left it for sake of personal sanity. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 19:20:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:20:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538087] Review Request: dgc - A system for the creation of digital circuits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171920.nAHJKkvP014151@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538087 --- Comment #1 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-11-17 14:20:45 EDT --- #001: use the sourceforge url as URL #002: the build failed checking for ANSI C header files... (cached) yes checking for cos in -lm... yes checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config checking for xml2-config... /usr/bin/xml2-config configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating Makefile config.status: creating replace/Makefile config.status: creating util/Makefile config.status: creating cube/Makefile config.status: creating encoding/Makefile config.status: creating syl/Makefile config.status: creating data/Makefile config.status: creating gnet/Makefile config.status: creating app/Makefile config.status: creating config.h config.status: executing depfiles commands ./config.status: line 1337: replace/Makefile: No such file or directory sed: can't read util/Makefile: No such file or directory sed: can't read cube/Makefile: No such file or directory sed: can't read encoding/Makefile: No such file or directory sed: can't read syl/Makefile: No such file or directory sed: can't read data/Makefile: No such file or directory sed: can't read gnet/Makefile: No such file or directory sed: can't read app/Makefile: No such file or directory config.status: executing libtool commands ./config.status: line 1435: libtoolT: No such file or directory ./config.status: line 1848: libtoolT: No such file or directory ./config.status: line 1853: libtoolT: No such file or directory ./config.status: line 2025: libtoolT: No such file or directory ./config.status: line 2050: libtoolT: No such file or directory mv: cannot stat `libtoolT': No such file or directory cp: cannot stat `libtoolT': No such file or directory chmod: cannot access `libtool': No such file or directory ./configure: line 14272: config.log: No such file or directory error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.rHxLnd (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 19:24:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:24:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538087] Review Request: dgc - A system for the creation of digital circuits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171924.nAHJOXHV015019@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538087 --- Comment #2 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-11-17 14:24:33 EDT --- forget #002, sorry I miscopy-paste. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 19:26:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:26:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538087] Review Request: dgc - A system for the creation of digital circuits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171926.nAHJQnaK015791@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538087 --- Comment #3 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-11-17 14:26:48 EDT --- By just launching "dgc" from the console, it crashes (reproduce-able everytime): Searchpath: . /home/chitlesh/.dgc *** glibc detected *** dgc: munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer: 0x08c025a0 *** ======= Backtrace: ========= /lib/libc.so.6(+0x6e261)[0x260261] dgc[0x80491f4] /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe6)[0x208bb6] dgc[0x8048991] ======= Memory map: ======== 00110000-0018a000 r-xp 00000000 fd:00 125904 /usr/lib/libdgccube.so.0.0.0 0018a000-0018c000 rw-p 00079000 fd:00 125904 /usr/lib/libdgccube.so.0.0.0 0018c000-001c6000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 001c6000-001e1000 r-xp 00000000 fd:00 125912 /usr/lib/libdgcutil.so.0.0.0 001e1000-001e2000 rw-p 0001a000 fd:00 125912 /usr/lib/libdgcutil.so.0.0.0 001e2000-001f2000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 001f2000-00360000 r-xp 00000000 fd:00 57627 /lib/libc-2.11.so 00360000-00361000 ---p 0016e000 fd:00 57627 /lib/libc-2.11.so 00361000-00363000 r--p 0016e000 fd:00 57627 /lib/libc-2.11.so 00363000-00364000 rw-p 00170000 fd:00 57627 /lib/libc-2.11.so 00364000-00367000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 00367000-0036a000 r-xp 00000000 fd:00 57632 /lib/libdl-2.11.so 0036a000-0036b000 r--p 00002000 fd:00 57632 /lib/libdl-2.11.so 0036b000-0036c000 rw-p 00003000 fd:00 57632 /lib/libdl-2.11.so 00457000-00469000 r-xp 00000000 fd:00 59907 /lib/libz.so.1.2.3 00469000-0046a000 rw-p 00011000 fd:00 59907 /lib/libz.so.1.2.3 004f6000-00505000 r-xp 00000000 fd:00 125910 /usr/lib/libdgcsyl.so.0.0.0 00505000-00508000 rw-p 0000f000 fd:00 125910 /usr/lib/libdgcsyl.so.0.0.0 00508000-00516000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 006ca000-006d6000 r-xp 00000000 fd:00 125906 /usr/lib/libdgcencode.so.0.0.0 006d6000-006d7000 rw-p 0000c000 fd:00 125906 /usr/lib/libdgcencode.so.0.0.0 0071a000-0071b000 r-xp 00000000 00:00 0 [vdso] 00bd6000-00d1a000 r-xp 00000000 fd:00 59958 /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2.7.6 00d1a000-00d1f000 rw-p 00143000 fd:00 59958 /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2.7.6 00d1f000-00d20000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 00d25000-00d4d000 r-xp 00000000 fd:00 57634 /lib/libm-2.11.so 00d4d000-00d4e000 r--p 00027000 fd:00 57634 /lib/libm-2.11.so 00d4e000-00d4f000 rw-p 00028000 fd:00 57634 /lib/libm-2.11.so 00dc0000-00ddd000 r-xp 00000000 fd:00 8183 /lib/libgcc_s-4.4.2-20091027.so.1 00ddd000-00dde000 rw-p 0001c000 fd:00 8183 /lib/libgcc_s-4.4.2-20091027.so.1 00e81000-00ed3000 r-xp 00000000 fd:00 125908 /usr/lib/libdgcgnet.so.0.0.0 00ed3000-00ed6000 rw-p 00052000 fd:00 125908 /usr/lib/libdgcgnet.so.0.0.0 00fdb000-00ff9000 r-xp 00000000 fd:00 5264 /lib/ld-2.11.so 00ff9000-00ffa000 r--p 0001d000 fd:00 5264 /lib/ld-2.11.so 00ffa000-00ffb000 rw-p 0001e000 fd:00 5264 /lib/ld-2.11.so 08048000-0804b000 r-xp 00000000 fd:00 125897 /usr/bin/dgc 0804b000-0804f000 rw-p 00002000 fd:00 125897 /usr/bin/dgc 0804f000-0805f000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 08c02000-08c23000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 [heap] b779e000-b77a1000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 b77c3000-b77c6000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 bfd8e000-bfda4000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 [stack] Aborted (core dumped) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 19:46:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:46:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476056] Review Request: gnustep-back - The GNUstep backend library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171946.nAHJkPD6021851@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476056 Bug 476056 depends on bug 475861, which changed state. Bug 475861 Summary: Review Request: gnustep-gui - The GNUstep gui library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475861 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 19:46:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:46:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475861] Review Request: gnustep-gui - The GNUstep gui library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171946.nAHJkOug021824@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475861 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #14 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-11-17 14:46:21 EDT --- Packages built and pushed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 19:44:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:44:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526311] Review Request: mysql-mmm - Multi-Master Replication Manager for MySQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171944.nAHJi982021071@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526311 --- Comment #15 from BJ Dierkes 2009-11-17 14:44:08 EDT --- I have added a patch to lib/Common/Lib.pm to essentially do the same thing your mmm_agent_log.conf does, but makes it the global default for all services (not just agent). I've also reworked the patch I submitted upstream for the infinit loop on error condition. http://5dollarwhitebox.org/tmp/mysql-mmm-2.0.10-2.src.rpm http://5dollarwhitebox.org/tmp/mysql-mmm.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 19:47:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:47:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476056] Review Request: gnustep-back - The GNUstep backend library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171947.nAHJlff2011048@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476056 --- Comment #2 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-11-17 14:47:40 EDT --- Ping Michel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 19:49:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:49:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532874] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-wacom - Xorg X11 wacom input driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171949.nAHJnSv4011470@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532874 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tomspur at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-17 14:49:27 EDT --- REVIEW: Good: - spec legible - %global is used - correct spec name - compiler optflags are in %configure - no static libs - %clean section exists - removing .la files - BR/R are ok - buildroot ok - builds in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1812867 - License GPLv2+ ok, but no license text, see should items. - source match upstream, both md5 91af5fab1637c6ce52e3f9418d53e22b - Groups ok - %files section is ok, except missing docs see below Needswork: - permissions not ok, see rpmlint - rpmlint: $ rpmlint xorg-x11-drv-wacom.spec xorg-x11-drv-wacom-0.10.0-1.fc12.src.rpm x86_64/xorg-x11-drv-wacom-* xorg-x11-drv-wacom-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/xf86-input-wacom-0.10.0/src/xf86WacomDefs.h xorg-x11-drv-wacom-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/xf86-input-wacom-0.10.0/src/wcmCommon.c xorg-x11-drv-wacom-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/xf86-input-wacom-0.10.0/src/wcmCompat.c xorg-x11-drv-wacom-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/xf86-input-wacom-0.10.0/src/wcmConfig.c xorg-x11-drv-wacom-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/xf86-input-wacom-0.10.0/src/xf86Wacom.h xorg-x11-drv-wacom-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/xf86-input-wacom-0.10.0/src/xf86Wacom.c xorg-x11-drv-wacom-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/xf86-input-wacom-0.10.0/src/wcmUSB.c xorg-x11-drv-wacom-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/xf86-input-wacom-0.10.0/src/wcmISDV4.c xorg-x11-drv-wacom-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/xf86-input-wacom-0.10.0/src/wcmFilter.c xorg-x11-drv-wacom-devel.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot Xorg X11 wacom input driver development package. xorg-x11-drv-wacom-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 11 warnings. * for the spurious permission: e.g. run in %prep: find -type f -name '*.c' | xargs chmod -x * no-documentation in devel is ignorable - no documentation in main package: There is AUTHORS, ChangeLog, README. _____________________ Should: - xorg-x11-drivers requires linuxwacom. When this package is build, the drivers package should require this one instead. - Add a the license text upstream and add it to %doc, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text - devel package just contains text files -> should be noarch You should bump the release and change the changelog, when you make changes to the spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 19:51:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:51:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526444] Review Request: MyGUI - Fast, simple and flexible GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911171951.nAHJpAcR012476@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526444 --- Comment #17 from Thomas Janssen 2009-11-17 14:51:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > (In reply to comment #15) > > [fix] > > You use %cmake but no macro for the rest of the commands like install, sed. > > > > I have seen use of core commands without macros in other packages; are macros > mandatory? %cmake does a lot of things while %install and %sed are just > wrappers Just saying, use macros, or not :) Consistency. > > I rebuilt it here and it was running after i installed mygui and mygui-tools (i > > tried the LayoutEditor). > > Does it make sense to have mygui installed alone? Can one do anything with it, > > without the tools? > > If not, make the tools installed with the mainpackage, or maybe merge the tool > > package into the main package. > > MyGUI is a library that allows to build UIs defined with xml files, so yes, i > think most installations will only involve the main package. The LayoutEditor > is a (ongoing development) tool to help create those xml files, helping > developers in designing uis. I could require -devel for the -tools to render > that explicit, even if the tools works alone. Please share your thoughts. Hmm.. Ok, then the %description of the main and -tools package are confusing. Summary: Fast, simple and flexible GUI for Ogre <== shouldn't that be library instead of GUI? Or gui creator %description MyGUI is a GUI library for Ogre Rendering Engine which aims to be fast, flexible and simple in using. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^same here %description tools This package contains the GUI tools... <== complete this sentence as you think it would fit best. That way it's obviously there are GUI tools. That gets me to another point i forgot in the last post. There's no desktop file for the GUI apps. Means nothing shows up here in my menu (KDE menu with search function). I was able to start it via terminal/krunner. You should add desktop files for the GUI apps. To find out how this works isn't very user friendly (not to blame you). One has to run MyGUI-Tools in a terminal to find out that there are three things he can run. Would be great from my point of view to have .desktop files to start it from the menu. > > As well it couldn't load anything from the list (within the load dialog). > > Maybe just me. > > The current file dialog doesnt filter out unsupported files, and the working > directory is a dotdir that contains some other files needed to run the editor. > Can you please report if saving a simple design (a window with a button for > instance), closing the editor, then loading it again works? Yes it does work, sorry, haven't thought about that. > > Are the code template files needed outside a develpackage? Does the program > > work without them installed? You could move them into the devel package and > > make that installed by default as well. > > The templates are meant for code generation by LayoutEditor, that's why they > included them in Media subdirectory; note that code generation is not in > LayoutEditor yet. atm LayoutEditor will work without them, but i included those > files here to pass under the review process. I can only add that suse folks > have packaged the templates in {_datadir} as well. Ok. To have the templates in %{_datadir} isn't the problem. I was just asking because of the rpmlint warnings about the devel files. Package the devel files (code templates) into the -devel package and make the -tools package require the -devel package installed. > > [fix] > > rpmlint -I dangling-symlink > > dangling-symlink: > > The target of the symbolic link does not exist within this package or its file > > based dependencies. Verify spelling of the link target and that the target is > > included in a package in this package's dependency chain. > > Need help here; the two fonts linked are provided by package dejavu-sans-fonts, > which is among requires. After installation, the symlinks are working. Should i > add a file based require? Adding BRs is not enough to make warning go away. Hmm.. I have to digg deeper into that as well. Looking at my last paste (at bottom) you can see the warning is after it's installed. > > [fix] > > rpmlint from installed packages: > > > > mygui.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libMyGUIEngine.so.3.0.0 > > dlsym > > mygui.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libMyGUIEngine.so.3.0.0 > > uuid_generate > > mygui.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libMyGUIEngine.so.3.0.0 > > dlopen > > mygui.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libMyGUIEngine.so.3.0.0 > > dlcloserpmlint -I undefined-non-weak-symbol > > > > undefined-non-weak-symbol: > > The binary contains undefined non-weak symbols. This may indicate improper > > linkage; check that the binary has been linked as expected. > > > > You might check that linking problem with upstream. > > ok, i'm not on rawhide and my rpmlint wasnt reporting those warnings, i will > investigate the problem. You get those rpmlint output running rpmlint on the installed packages: [thomas at tusdell ~]$ rpmlint mygui mygui-tools mygui-devel mygui-demos mygui-debuginfo mygui.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libMyGUIEngine.so.3.0.0 dlsym mygui.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libMyGUIEngine.so.3.0.0 uuid_generate mygui.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libMyGUIEngine.so.3.0.0 dlopen mygui.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libMyGUIEngine.so.3.0.0 dlclose mygui.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/MyGUI/Media/MyGUI_Media/DejaVuSans-ExtraLight.ttf /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-ExtraLight.ttf mygui.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/MyGUI/Media/MyGUI_Media/DejaVuSans.ttf /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans.ttf mygui-tools.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/MyGUI/Media/Tools/LayoutEditor/CodeTemplates/BaseLayoutCPP/BaseLayoutTemplate.cpp mygui-tools.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/MyGUI/Media/Tools/LayoutEditor/CodeTemplates/BaseLayoutCPP/BaseLayoutTemplate.h mygui-tools.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/MyGUI/Media/Tools/LayoutEditor/CodeTemplates/BaseLayoutCPP/EventTemplate.cpp mygui-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 10 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 20:09:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:09:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526263] Review Request: l7-protocols - Protocol definitions files for l7-filter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911172009.nAHK9KTc017075@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526263 --- Comment #8 from Christoph Wickert 2009-11-17 15:09:19 EDT --- I am definitely going to sponsor Marcus, but the l7 packages still need a lot work. Marcus and I have talked about this on IRC and in private, sorry it's not in bugzilla. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 20:10:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:10:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 498218] Review Request: picturetile - Tiles a bunch of images into one large "photo wall" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911172010.nAHKATnm028654@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498218 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-17 15:10:27 EDT --- picturetile-0-4.20050314.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/picturetile-0-4.20050314.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 20:14:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:14:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526444] Review Request: MyGUI - Fast, simple and flexible GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911172014.nAHKEGAV029536@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526444 --- Comment #18 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-17 15:14:15 EDT --- I just wanted to point out that there's no requirement at all that you use useless macros like %{__rm} or %{__sed} if you use something required like %configure or %cmake. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 20:19:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:19:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538172] New: Review Request: pyactivemq - Python wrapper around activemq-cpp for messaging Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pyactivemq - Python wrapper around activemq-cpp for messaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538172 Summary: Review Request: pyactivemq - Python wrapper around activemq-cpp for messaging Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve.traylen at cern.ch QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/pyactivemq/pyactivemq.spec SRPM URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/pyactivemq/pyactivemq-0.1.0-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: pyactivemq is a Python module for communicating with the message brokers which implement the Java Message Service specification or stomp. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 20:21:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:21:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533899] Review Request: activemq-cpp - C++ implementation of JMS-like messaging client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911172021.nAHKL5e1020512@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533899 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |538172 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 20:21:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:21:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538172] Review Request: pyactivemq - Python wrapper around activemq-cpp for messaging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911172021.nAHKL43U020487@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538172 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |533899(activemq-cpp) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 20:23:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:23:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507083] Review Request: poco - C++ class libraries for network-centric applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911172023.nAHKNCsV020908@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507083 --- Comment #28 from Maxim Udushlivy 2009-11-17 15:23:09 EDT --- Thankee, Michal! SPEC URL: http://crow-designer.sourceforge.net/temp/8/poco.spec SRPM URL: http://crow-designer.sourceforge.net/temp/8/poco-1.3.5-8.fc12.src.rpm CHANGES ======= - The "make" invocation command in the %%build section was modified to skip premature symbol stripping from retail libraries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 20:25:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:25:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537897] Review Request: mingw32-openjpeg - mingw32 package for openjpeg In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911172025.nAHKPffL000504@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537897 Stefan Riemens changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fgfs.stefan at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Stefan Riemens 2009-11-17 15:25:39 EDT --- Let's go for an informal review (I'm not yet sponsored, so I can't officially approve a package) rpmlint output: mingw32-openjpeg.src: W: macro-in-%description %{_mingw32_description} mingw32-openjpeg-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. This is fine OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guideline. OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] . OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK: The spec file must be written in American English. OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. $ md5sum openjpeg* f9a3ccfa91ac34b589e9bf7577ce8ff9 openjpeg_v1_3.tar.gz f9a3ccfa91ac34b589e9bf7577ce8ff9 openjpeg_v1_3.tar.gz.orig OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. It builds fine in mock OK: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9] not applicable OK: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. not applicable OK: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. OK: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. not applicable OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: Each package must consistently use macros. OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK: Header files must be in a -devel package. Mingw packaging guidelines explicitly allow header files in the main package OK: Static libraries must be in a -static package. No static libs are packaged OK: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). not applicable OK: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. not applicable for mingw packages OK: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} not applicable, no devel subpackage present nor needed OK: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. not applicable (besides, mingw guidelines allow la files to be present) OK: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. not applicable OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. not applicable OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. not applicable Ok: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. not available OK: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. it builds OK: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. not applicable, this is a noarch package ?: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. I haven't tried it OK: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. There are no scriptlets involved OK: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. not applicable -- there are no subpackages OK: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. not applicable, there are no pkgconfig files OK: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. not appplicable This package looks good to me BTW, shouldn't the file ChangeLog be included as %doc? hope this helps, Stefan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 20:30:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:30:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226048] Merge Review: libtheora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911172030.nAHKUqQw023599@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226048 Bug 226048 depends on bug 478651, which changed state. Bug 478651 Summary: Violates package naming guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478651 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 20:30:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:30:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225865] Merge Review: gstreamer-plugins-base In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911172030.nAHKUp6o023583@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225865 Bug 225865 depends on bug 478651, which changed state. Bug 478651 Summary: Violates package naming guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478651 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 20:33:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:33:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516539] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-setup-lsf - Globus Toolkit - LSF Job Manager Setup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911172033.nAHKXrwN024336@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516539 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |steve.traylen at cern.ch --- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen 2009-11-17 15:33:52 EDT --- Question and LSF job manager requires LSF to function at runtime. Can/Should this be added? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 20:39:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:39:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531252] Review Request: lfc - LCG File Catalog (LFC) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911172039.nAHKd1lk025611@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531252 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |steve.traylen at cern.ch AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |steve.traylen at cern.ch Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 20:35:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:35:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516535] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-scripts - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Job ManagerScripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911172035.nAHKZTc2025127@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516535 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |steve.traylen at cern.ch Bug 516535 depends on bug 516527, which changed state. Bug 516527 Summary: Review Request: globus-gass-server-ez - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Server_ez https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516527 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA Resolution| |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #5 from Steve Traylen 2009-11-17 15:35:27 EDT --- Caio 'kaio' Chance I'm going to review this in the next few days unless you have any more comments on the documentation? Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 20:44:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:44:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537563] Review Request: mingw32-plib - Fedora mingw set of portable game related libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911172044.nAHKiSKZ027049@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537563 Stefan Riemens changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |mingw32-plib -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 20:46:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:46:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538046] Review Request: spacewalk-certs-tools - Spacewalk SSL Key/Cert Tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911172046.nAHKkdGa007675@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538046 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-11-17 15:46:38 EDT --- Good: + Name of the package fullfill naming guidelines + Basename of the SPEC file matches with package name + Text in package is written in English + URL shows on proper homepage of the project + Should downloading upstream tarball via spectool -g + Package sources matches with upstream tar ball + License tag exlaim GPLv2 as a valis OSS license + Copyrigh notes on the head of source files matches with license statement of the license tag (md5sum: 8060d39e6f3ea5984cdd643405bfebb1) + Package will build as noarch + Package has no subpackages + Package has proper definition of the BuildRoot + Local build works fine + BuildRoot will be cleaned at beginning of %clean and %install + Rpmlint is silent on source rpm + Rpmlint is silent on binary rpm + Locan install/uninstall works fine + Scratch build works fine on koji + %files stanza has no duplicates entries + Ammount of documentation is small, so we need no doc subpackages + Package has proper Changelog Bad: - Package doesn't contains a verbatin copy ot the license text (No blocker, but please contact upstream to include one into the upstream package) - Please use %global instead of %define - Please use %global rhnroot %{_datadir}/rhn instead of %define rhnroot %{_prefix}/share/rhn - We prefer %defattr(-,root,root,-) - question: Who should ownd %{rhnroot} and %{rhnroot}/certs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 20:45:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:45:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529423] Review Request: mingw32-OpenSceneGraph - Fedora mingw high performance real-time graphics toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911172045.nAHKjLa6027736@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529423 Stefan Riemens changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |mingw32-OSG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 20:47:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:47:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531252] Review Request: lfc - LCG File Catalog (LFC) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911172047.nAHKltM6028231@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531252 --- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen 2009-11-17 15:47:54 EDT --- Hi, Question: There is this lfc building mysql variant and Bug #531252 building a postgres variant. Both look to be build from the same source file? Is it possible not to merge these two packages? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 20:54:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:54:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531252] Review Request: lfc - LCG File Catalog (LFC) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911172054.nAHKsIKq010027@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531252 --- Comment #2 from Steve Traylen 2009-11-17 15:54:17 EDT --- rpmlint errors. lfc-mysql.x86_64: E: incoherent-logrotate-file /etc/logrotate.d/lfcdaemon I've not looked at the file at the logrotate file at all. Also it seems not to like "backend" as not being a en_US word. Hyphenate I guess: lfc-mysql.x86_64: W: spelling-error-in-summary en_US backend Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 20:52:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:52:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526126] Review Request: python3 - Python 3.x (backwards incompatible version) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911172052.nAHKqnUx009472@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126 --- Comment #46 from Dave Malcolm 2009-11-17 15:52:43 EDT --- I read through the history here, and tried to summarize the remaining review issues. Here's what I think remains: - a reviewer needs to go through the full review guidelines on this - fixup the factual errors in the comment describing redefinition of __os_install_post - perhaps fixup rpm-build to avoid needing find-provides-without-python-sonames.sh - fixup macros.python3 to bake in the definitions, avoid invoking python3 each time - verify the script in comment #17 still works and that it verifies the 2 and 3 packages are independent - cosmetic issue: exec vs find | xargs noted in comment #36 - what files are affected when modifying shebangs, and how (see commment #39) - anything else I've missed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 21:02:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:02:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538190] New: Review Request: unicornscan - Scalable, accurate, flexible and efficient network probing Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: unicornscan - Scalable, accurate, flexible and efficient network probing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538190 Summary: Review Request: unicornscan - Scalable, accurate, flexible and efficient network probing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, jsimon at fedoraproject.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/unicornscan.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/unicornscan-0.4.7-1.src.rpm Description: Unicornscan is an attempt at a user-land distributed TCP/IP stack. It is intended to provide a researcher a superior interface for introducing a stimulus into and measuring a response from a TCP/IP enabled device or network. Although it currently has hundreds of individual features, a main set of abilities include: Asynchronous stateless TCP scanning with all variations of TCP flags, asynchronous stateless TCP banner grabbing, asynchronous protocol specific UDP scanning (sending enough of a signature to elicit a response), active and passive remote OS, application and component identification by analyzing responses, PCAP file logging and filtering, relational database output, custom module support, customized data-set views. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 21:05:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:05:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538190] Review Request: unicornscan - Scalable, accurate, flexible and efficient network probing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911172105.nAHL58m5013380@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538190 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |537805 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 21:10:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:10:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 491088] Review Request: rhncfg - Red Hat Network Configuration Client Libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911172110.nAHLAYW1002058@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491088 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Sandro Mathys 2009-11-17 16:10:33 EDT --- NEEDSWORK - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. $ rpmlint {SPECS,RPMS/noarch,SRPMS}/rhncfg* rhncfg.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency libselinux-python rhncfg.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency rhnlib rhncfg.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency rhnlib 10 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings. rhnlib seems to be a special case and you can ignore those warning, but please remove libselinux-python. OK - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. . OK - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. NEEDSWORK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. License should be "GPLv2 and Python" (e.g. compile.py is based on Python-licensed code) - asked spot about this to be sure. NEEDSWORK - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. PYTHON-LICENSES.txt should be added to %doc OK - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. $ md5sum rhncfg-5.9.13.tar.gz SOURCES/rhncfg-5.9.13.tar.gz 71374b0b5a61b32affc762079d1b688b rhncfg-5.9.13.tar.gz 71374b0b5a61b32affc762079d1b688b SOURCES/rhncfg-5.9.13.tar.gz OK - MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. N/A - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. OK - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. N/A - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. OK - MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. NEEDSWORK - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. %{rhnroot} (i.e. %{_datadir}/rhn) is used in every package but rhn-client-tools is only required in rhncfg-actions. This require should be moved up to the main package. %{rhnconf} (i.e. %_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/rhn) is used in the client and management subpackages which is to be found in rhn-client-tools as well. OK - MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. OK - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. N/A - MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). OK - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} N/A - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. N/A - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. N/A - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. OK - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. N/A - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. N/A - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. OK - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. N/A - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Some more remarks from my side: - IMHO you shouldn't repeat the summary in the description. And the 'A' or 'The' at the beginning of the description can be removed as well as it doesn't matter whether it's one-of-many or the-only-one package doing something (and this might change in future anyway). Both are no blocker, tho. - I wasn't sure if the 'Provides:' in the spec file are sane so I asked some more experienced guys (thm and rsc from #fedora-de) about them. Fact is that provides only make sense if the provided package is obsoleted in the same package which isn't the case here. Therefore please remove all provides from the spec file unless you have a proper explanation for them. As a side note: even if the provides were sane, no two packages (i.e. base and subpackage) should ever feature the same provides. Fix those tiny bits and we should be ready to get this into Fedora :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 21:33:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:33:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536796] Review Request: kde-plasma-smooth-tasks - KDE taskbar replacement with window peeking ability In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911172133.nAHLXcW1019885@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536796 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Sven Lankes 2009-11-17 16:33:37 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: f12/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: clean binary RPM: clean [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License: GPLv2+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: f73fd7956a989d7ccd812fd65374ec2ba3d729bc 101586-smooth-tasks-src-wip-2009-11-11.tar.bz2 [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [x] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [!] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: f11/x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: x86_64 [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. Please update to the latest released version (20091116) before commit. *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 21:44:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:44:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526126] Review Request: python3 - Python 3.x (backwards incompatible version) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911172144.nAHLiZmx010634@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126 --- Comment #47 from Andrew McNabb 2009-11-17 16:44:32 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=369966) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=369966) patch to version 9 of the spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 21:56:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:56:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526126] Review Request: python3 - Python 3.x (backwards incompatible version) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911172156.nAHLupRI027836@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126 --- Comment #48 from Andrew McNabb 2009-11-17 16:56:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #46) > - fixup the factual errors in the comment describing redefinition of > __os_install_post > - cosmetic issue: exec vs find | xargs noted in comment #36 These two issues should be fixed in python3-10.patch, which I just attached. > - what files are affected when modifying shebangs, and how (see commment #39) I wouldn't worry too much about this problem. The shebang doesn't actually do anything for a file without executable permissions, so removing the shebang line doesn't make it any less executable than it already was. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 22:02:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:02:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526126] Review Request: python3 - Python 3.x (backwards incompatible version) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911172202.nAHM2TxN030326@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126 --- Comment #49 from Andrew McNabb 2009-11-17 17:02:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #48) > > I wouldn't worry too much about this problem. The shebang doesn't actually do > anything for a file without executable permissions, so removing the shebang > line doesn't make it any less executable than it already was. I forgot to mention that leaving the shebang lines in doesn't make a file any more executable than it already was. It probably wouldn't hurt to just remove the shebang removal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 22:10:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:10:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526444] Review Request: MyGUI - Fast, simple and flexible GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911172210.nAHMAZ4S000326@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526444 --- Comment #19 from Thomas Janssen 2009-11-17 17:10:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > I just wanted to point out that there's no requirement at all that you use > useless macros like %{__rm} or %{__sed} if you use something required like > %configure or %cmake. Looks like i learned it wrong. Thanks for the pointer Jason. @Guido Forget the part then, sorry for the cry wolf. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 22:47:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:47:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531252] Review Request: lfc - LCG File Catalog (LFC) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911172247.nAHMlM3k028963@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531252 --- Comment #3 from Steve Traylen 2009-11-17 17:47:21 EDT --- 1) # rpm -Uvh lfc-1.7.3.1-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm error: Failed dependencies: liblcgdm.so.1()(64bit) is needed by lfc-1.7.3.1-1.fc13.x86_64 which is course provided by lcgdm-1.7.3.1-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm it seems to be normal in these case to explicitly require lcgdb = %{version}-%{release} where the provides comes from one of the sub packages so as not to end up with mixed versions of package. similar for lfc-mysql as well. 2) # /etc/init.d/lfc-mysql start Starting lfcdaemon: FAILED : config file /etc/NSCONFIG empty So this file should probably be there as an example or something? I guess they come from these files which are apparently duplicated. # cat /usr/lib64/lfc-mysql/NSCONFIG.templ /@ [root at rawhide x86_64]# cat /usr/share/lfc/NSCONFIG.templ /@ 3) The INSTALL-server-mysql is rather misleading to this RPM installation. 4) A quick read of the init.d script has /etc/grid-security/$LFCUSER/lfccert.pem so that directory should probably exist. 5) The same LICENSE file looks to be duplicated in both lfc and lfc-mysql 6) I'm guessing a schema or at least a database has to be created? Maybe a README.Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 23:05:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:05:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527706] Review Request: mingw32-libgeotiff - MinGW port of libgeotiff Georeferenced image library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911172305.nAHN5RJD001045@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527706 --- Comment #13 from Dave Ludlow 2009-11-17 18:05:26 EDT --- +/- The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines, except one small issue in the versioning scheme - since you're packaging pre-release (from VCS), then "Release" field should start from 0. Done +/- The sources used to build the package, must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. However, since this is a pre-release and no tarball was provided by upstream, the only way to check the integrity of the sources, is to make diff against freshly checked out VCS tree. So, please, provide the instructions in comments somewhere within spec-file on how to create this checkout. Done +/- The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. Unfortunately, the package failed to build on EL-5 due to missing dependencies on mingw32-{libtiff|proj}. Please, keep this in mind, then you'll requesting cvs branches. Noted - The package must NOT own files or directories already owned by other packages. Unfortunately, it owns %{_mingw32_libdir}/pkgconfig which is already owned by mingw32-filesystem. Fixed SPEC: http://adsllc.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/SPECS/mingw32-libgeotiff.spec Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1813287 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 23:05:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:05:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911172305.nAHN5dOY001116@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 --- Comment #11 from Nathanael Noblet 2009-11-17 18:05:38 EDT --- In the first post is the following: Spec URL: http://www.gnat.ca/dspam.spec SRPM URL: http://www.gnat.ca/dspam-3.9.0-BETA4.src.rpm The message *just* before yours is: Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1811003 For my koji scratch build. I fail to see how I'm not following instructions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 22:43:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:43:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911172243.nAHMhYnK009394@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 --- Comment #10 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-11-17 17:43:33 EDT --- looks like my english is too bad, because I have asked you to post spec file + src.rpm + koji scratch build, I am sorry, you don't want to follow my instructions then I don't want to help you! I think no one will help you, if you don't follow instructions please stop wasting the time of others good luck! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 23:37:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:37:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911172337.nAHNbW43022622@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|Triaged | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 23:42:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:42:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521995] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-java-tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911172342.nAHNgC5p009532@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521995 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Wright 2009-11-17 18:42:10 EDT --- * Mon Nov 16 2009 Kevin Wright 1.3.0-2 - Bugzilla Bug #521995 - Packaging for Fedora Dogtag PKI - Take ownership of directories Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-java-tools/pki-java-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-java-tools/pki-java-tools-1.3.0-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 23:06:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:06:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911172306.nAHN6dan001256@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 --- Comment #12 from Nathanael Noblet 2009-11-17 18:06:38 EDT --- I will from now on bump the version as I work on it, but currently what is posted up there is the latest and greatest. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 00:00:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:00:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911180000.nAI00YiK027601@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 --- Comment #13 from Nathanael Noblet 2009-11-17 19:00:33 EDT --- Updated version info as per the naming guidelines. http://www.gnat.ca/dspam.spec http://www.gnat.ca/dspam-3.9.0-0.1.BETA4.fc12.src.rpm Nothing has changes except the version number. About all the conditionals. I can remove them if required. However upstream would like to stay in sync with this rpm package, so was hoping we could keep the conditionals in there incase someone wanted to get the srpm and build with some conditionals to get a different package. Originally the spec file had one default of not building any of the sub packages. It has now been setup with the most sensible defaults allowing users to pick their backend storage on fedora. If the conditionals are a problem (I looked and saw nothing in the guidelines about it). I can remove them, however as stated above upstream would then keep its own copy of the spec for whatever reason and fedora users that wanted to rebuild dspam with other options for whatever reason would have to hack the specfile. Let me know if conditionals like that are a no no, like I said I didn't see anything in the guidelines about it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 17 23:37:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:37:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911172337.nAHNbKgR022547@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Triaged -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 01:19:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:19:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522208] New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-ca-ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911180119.nAI1JFYP031634@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522208 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Wright 2009-11-17 20:19:14 EDT --- * Mon Nov 17 2009 Kevin Wright 1.3.0-2 - Bugzilla Bug #522208 - Packaging for Fedora Dogtag - Take ownership of directories Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/dogtag-pki-ca-ui/dogtag-pki-ca-ui.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/dogtag-pki-ca-ui/dogtag-pki-ca-ui-1.3.0-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 01:33:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:33:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522204] New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-common-ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911180133.nAI1XfFY016667@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522204 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Wright 2009-11-17 20:33:40 EDT --- * Mon Nov 17 2009 Kevin Wright 1.3.0-2 - Bugzilla Bug #522204 - Packaging for Fedora Dogtag PKI - Take ownership of directories Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/dogtag-pki-common-ui/dogtag-pki-common-ui.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/dogtag-pki-common-ui/dogtag-pki-common-ui-1.3.0-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 01:48:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:48:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531391] Review Request: gwsmhg - hg/mq GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911180148.nAI1mTSk005678@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531391 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-17 20:48:29 EDT --- gwsmhg-0.8.2-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gwsmhg-0.8.2-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 01:51:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:51:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516311] Review Request: ueagle-atm-firmware123 - Firmwares for usb adsl modems based on Eagle I, II and III chipsets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911180151.nAI1pZFq021906@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516311 Hicham HAOUARI changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #4 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-11-17 20:51:34 EDT --- closing it as wontfix since i didn't get any reponse from Ikanos -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 01:47:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:47:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531391] Review Request: gwsmhg - hg/mq GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911180147.nAI1lBWO020799@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531391 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-17 20:47:10 EDT --- gwsmhg-0.8.2-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gwsmhg-0.8.2-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 01:50:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:50:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532874] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-wacom - Xorg X11 wacom input driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911180150.nAI1omnW006453@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532874 --- Comment #8 from Peter Hutterer 2009-11-17 20:50:47 EDT --- Thanks for the review, items are addressed: http://people.freedesktop.org/~whot/xorg-x11-drv-wacom.spec http://people.freedesktop.org/~whot/xorg-x11-drv-wacom-0.10.0-2.fc12.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1813431 Changes (this time with changelog in specfile): - Obsolete linuxwacom, don't Conflict with it. - Remove trailing dot from summary (rpmlint warning). - Remove spurious executable bits from source files (rpmlint warning). - Add AUTHORS, ChangeLog, README to doc For the reasons outlined in Comment #3, I think it's better to obsolete linuxwacom instead of just conflicting with it. This should also solve the issue with xorg-x11-drivers (though I will update that to require xorg-x11-drv-wacom). > - rpmlint: $ rpmlint xorg-x11-drv-wacom.spec This didn't give me any of the warnings when I ran it here, is there a specific flag I have to provide? > - Add a the license text upstream and add it to %doc, see > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text done, file was already upstream, just missed out on being included in the tarball. Will be in the next version. > - devel package just contains text files -> should be noarch noarch requires installing the .pc file into _datadir to avoid 64-bit conflicts. This again seems to require upstream changes and is a bit iffy anyway in light of all the other xorg-x11-drivers installing into _libdir. This should be cleaned up in one go across all drivers to maintain consistency. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 02:32:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:32:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526444] Review Request: MyGUI - Fast, simple and flexible GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911180232.nAI2WkEt031809@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526444 --- Comment #20 from Guido Grazioli 2009-11-17 21:32:44 EDT --- No problem, i'm still learning; about the dangling symlinks, i can confirm that if i add file based requires: Requires: %{_datadir}/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans.ttf Requires: %{_datadir}/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-ExtraLight.ttf i get no more warnings. I read somewhere in the wiki that adding file based requires is unsafe, am i wrong? Alternatives? -- About the other warning: [makerpm at localhost SPECS]$ ldd -d -r /usr/lib64/libMyGUIEngine.so.3.0.0 undefined symbol: dlsym (/usr/lib64/libMyGUIEngine.so.3.0.0) undefined symbol: uuid_generate (/usr/lib64/libMyGUIEngine.so.3.0.0) undefined symbol: dlopen (/usr/lib64/libMyGUIEngine.so.3.0.0) undefined symbol: dlclose (/usr/lib64/libMyGUIEngine.so.3.0.0) linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fffa3bff000) libfreetype.so.6 => /usr/lib64/libfreetype.so.6 (0x0000003fe6e00000) libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 (0x0000003ff1000000) libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x0000003fe3600000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x0000003fed800000) libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x0000003fe3200000) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0000003fe2c00000) they miss -ldl, but -luuid is there; can be a problem with the move of uuid.h from e2fsprog-devel to libuuid-devel ? -- .desktop files: you have a good point here. In the guidelines we have that each package that contains a gui must have a corresponding desktop entry; however, adding an icon for each demo and each tool - even if in a specific submenu entry - seems chaotic in my opinion. Would it be feasible to add only a desktop entry for LayoutEditor, which is the only really (well, in the future) useful tool? In that case, "Graphics" or "Development"? -- Summaries and descriptions: ok! I just copied some sentences i found in their site, willing to fix them later, but i forgot it.. -- Moving code templates to -devel and make -tools require -devel: ok, seems reasonable -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 03:00:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:00:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526126] Review Request: python3 - Python 3.x (backwards incompatible version) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911180300.nAI30Sjg005277@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126 --- Comment #50 from Dave Malcolm 2009-11-17 22:00:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #47) > Created an attachment (id=369966) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=369966) [details] > patch to version 9 of the spec file Thanks Andrew! Updated specfile: http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/python3.spec Updated SRPM: http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/python3-3.1.1-10.fc11.src.rpm Diff: purely the changes from your attachment rpmlint output as before -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 03:00:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:00:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521255] New package for Dogtag PKI: pki-selinux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911180300.nAI30F2n022220@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521255 --- Comment #9 from Kevin Wright 2009-11-17 22:00:13 EDT --- * Tue Nov 17 2009 Kevin Wright 1.3.0-2 - Bugzilla Bug #521255 - Packaging for Fedora Dogtag PKI - Remove un-necessary installation steps. Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-setup/pki-selinux.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-setup/pki-selinux-1.3.0-2.fc11.src.rpm rpmlint SRPMS/pki-selinux-1.3.0-2.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 03:03:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:03:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532874] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-wacom - Xorg X11 wacom input driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911180303.nAI33BZe005986@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532874 Peter Hutterer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |538036 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 05:28:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:28:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911180528.nAI5SgIu025010@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 --- Comment #32 from Pravin Satpute 2009-11-18 00:28:37 EDT --- should i proceed with devel build? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 05:29:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:29:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529323] Review Request: gdouros-aegean-fonts - Font for ancient scripts in the Aegean vicinity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911180529.nAI5Txtc009273@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529323 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-18 00:29:58 EDT --- gdouros-aegean-fonts-3.01-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gdouros-aegean-fonts-3.01-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 05:30:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:30:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527706] Review Request: mingw32-libgeotiff - MinGW port of libgeotiff Georeferenced image library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911180530.nAI5Utbq009701@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527706 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-11-18 00:30:53 EDT --- Ok, I don't see any other issues, so this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 05:32:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:32:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530190] Review Request: gdouros-aegyptus-fonts - A font for Egyptian hieroglyphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911180532.nAI5W3GM009995@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530190 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-18 00:32:02 EDT --- gdouros-aegyptus-fonts-2.52-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gdouros-aegyptus-fonts-2.52-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 05:35:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:35:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532231] Review Request: gdouros-akkadian-fonts - A font for Sumero-Akkadian cuneiform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911180535.nAI5ZN77026547@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532231 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-18 00:35:22 EDT --- gdouros-akkadian-fonts-2.52-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gdouros-akkadian-fonts-2.52-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 05:39:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:39:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532231] Review Request: gdouros-akkadian-fonts - A font for Sumero-Akkadian cuneiform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911180539.nAI5dCK3027037@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532231 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-18 00:39:12 EDT --- gdouros-akkadian-fonts-2.52-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gdouros-akkadian-fonts-2.52-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 05:58:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:58:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538087] Review Request: dgc - A system for the creation of digital circuits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911180558.nAI5wgep030954@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538087 --- Comment #4 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-11-18 00:58:41 EDT --- #Comment 3: A bug :) In app/dgc.c main() function, there is: 319: char *s; 320: s = b_get_ff_searchpath(); 324: free (s); But, b_get_ff_searchpath() is invoked in util/b_ff.c, where memory is allocated for 's', and the pointer 's' is returned. So, trying to free() the memory in the calling function, dumps :) But, giving proper lib file and examples as input, doesn't enter this logic, and hence doesn't hit this error. You can copy the /usr/share/doc/dgc-0.98/tests/*.sh to any folder, chmod +x *.sh, and running them should run the test cases. I will update this, and make an updated release by EOD. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 07:03:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 02:03:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531391] Review Request: gwsmhg - hg/mq GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911180703.nAI73xpe015252@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531391 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-18 02:03:58 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 07:07:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 02:07:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526998] Review Request: volpack - Portable library for fast volume rendering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911180707.nAI77jXs016462@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526998 --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-18 02:07:43 EDT --- Please submit push requests on bodhi for F-11/12 and close this review request when done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 07:26:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 02:26:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538296] New: Review Request: openvas-libnasl - Support for NASL scripting language in OpenVAS Server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: openvas-libnasl - Support for NASL scripting language in OpenVAS Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538296 Summary: Review Request: openvas-libnasl - Support for NASL scripting language in OpenVAS Server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: stjepan.gros at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/openvas/openvas-libnasl.spec SRPM URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/openvas/openvas-libnasl-2.0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Libraries module for the Open Vulnerability Assessment System (OpenVAS) containing support for the NASL scripting languague. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 07:27:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 02:27:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538297] New: Review Request: openvas-server - Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: openvas-server - Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538297 Summary: Review Request: openvas-server - Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: stjepan.gros at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/openvas/openvas-server.spec SRPM URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/openvas/openvas-server-2.0.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Server module for the Open Vulnerability Assessment System (OpenVAS). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 07:29:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 02:29:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538298] New: Review Request: openvas-plugins - Security check plugins for OpenVAS server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: openvas-plugins - Security check plugins for OpenVAS server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538298 Summary: Review Request: openvas-plugins - Security check plugins for OpenVAS server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: stjepan.gros at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/openvas/openvas-plugins.spec SRPM URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/openvas/openvas-plugins-1.0.7-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Security check plugins for OpenVAS server. You have to install this in order to be able to check for security vulnerabilities. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 07:30:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 02:30:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538299] New: Review Request: openvas-client - Client component of Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: openvas-client - Client component of Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538299 Summary: Review Request: openvas-client - Client component of Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: stjepan.gros at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/openvas/openvas-client.spec SRPM URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/openvas/openvas-client-2.0.5-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: OpenVAS-Client is a client component that is used to access and control OpenVAS server. It is also used to perform analysis task of results provided by the server component. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 07:43:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 02:43:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538087] Review Request: dgc - A system for the creation of digital circuits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911180743.nAI7hX1E008765@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538087 --- Comment #5 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-11-18 02:43:32 EDT --- --- (In reply to comment #4) | So, trying to free() the memory in | the calling function, dumps :) \-- To be more precise, util/b_ff.c includes "mwc.h" that redefines free() and that is the instance of free() that crashes. When you use the free() available from glibc, freeing of memory works. I will disable the b_get_ff_searchpath() in those dgc tools that use it, as it simply prints the search path, which is not required or used since we are packaging it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 07:51:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 02:51:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479667] Review Request: perl-ORLite-Migrate - Extremely light weight SQLite-specific schema migration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911180751.nAI7pG1A029655@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479667 Bug 479667 depends on bug 479669, which changed state. Bug 479669 Summary: Review Request: perl-File-pushd - Change directory temporarily for a limited scope https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479669 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 07:51:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 02:51:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479669] Review Request: perl-File-pushd - Change directory temporarily for a limited scope In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911180751.nAI7pG37029634@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479669 Marcela Ma?l??ov? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Marcela Ma?l??ov? 2009-11-18 02:51:13 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-File-pushd Short Description: Change directory temporarily for a limited scope Owners: mmaslano Branches: EPEL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 07:58:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 02:58:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528108] Review Request: Vuurmuur - Firewall manager built on top of iptables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911180758.nAI7wlAO032637@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528108 --- Comment #12 from Stjepan Gros 2009-11-18 02:58:45 EDT --- Ok, I disabled parallel make and also fixed an error in init.d script (by mistake it source named's configuration file, this was leftover from the template). I also fixed directory ownership. Now, for this daemon vs. tui stuff, it's a bit tricky actually. Namely, you can run daemon without tui package. There is potential scenario in which you run daemon on one machine and you do configuration on another one, syncing in some way between the two. Now, if this will be used or not, I don't know, but IMHO, I would always install least I can. Anyway, I can do it anyway you think it should be done. Spec URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/vuurmuur/Vuurmuur.spec SRPM URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/vuurmuur/Vuurmuur-0.7-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 08:01:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:01:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 424841] Review Request: ndisc6 - IPv6 diagnostic tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911180801.nAI8105s016750@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424841 Stjepan Gros changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #28 from Stjepan Gros 2009-11-18 03:00:53 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ndisc6 Short Description: IPv6 diagnostic tools Owners: sgros Branches: F-12 InitialCC: sgros -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 08:06:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:06:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526444] Review Request: MyGUI - Fast, simple and flexible GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911180806.nAI862Re019026@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526444 --- Comment #21 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-11-18 03:05:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > No problem, i'm still learning; about the dangling symlinks, i can confirm that > if i add file based requires: > Requires: %{_datadir}/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans.ttf > Requires: %{_datadir}/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-ExtraLight.ttf > i get no more warnings. I read somewhere in the wiki that adding file based > requires is unsafe, am i wrong? Alternatives? It's not unsafe, but it is not recommended to use file requires since it means that file lists need to be downloaded and resolved to figure out the dependencies. Just add Requires: dejavu-sans-fonts, which provides both of the aforementioned files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 08:14:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:14:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536796] Review Request: kde-plasma-smooth-tasks - KDE taskbar replacement with window peeking ability In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911180814.nAI8ErpI007799@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536796 Thomas Janssen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Thomas Janssen 2009-11-18 03:14:51 EDT --- Thank you for the review Sven. Spec URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/kde-plasma-smooth-tasks.spec SRPM URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/kde-plasma-smooth-tasks-0.0.1-0.1.wip20091116.fc11.src.rpm Done. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kde-plasma-smooth-tasks Short Description: KDE taskbar replacement with window peeking ability Owners: thomasj Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 08:23:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:23:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526126] Review Request: python3 - Python 3.x (backwards incompatible version) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911180823.nAI8NaO0011914@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126 Rudolf Kastl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |che666 at gmail.com --- Comment #51 from Rudolf Kastl 2009-11-18 03:23:28 EDT --- hmm i am curious why not call python3 -> python and the old version python-compat2.6 or whatever? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 08:22:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:22:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526444] Review Request: MyGUI - Fast, simple and flexible GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911180822.nAI8MCKF011342@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526444 --- Comment #22 from Thomas Janssen 2009-11-18 03:22:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > (In reply to comment #20) > > No problem, i'm still learning; about the dangling symlinks, i can confirm that > > if i add file based requires: > > Requires: %{_datadir}/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans.ttf > > Requires: %{_datadir}/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-ExtraLight.ttf > > i get no more warnings. I read somewhere in the wiki that adding file based > > requires is unsafe, am i wrong? Alternatives? > > It's not unsafe, but it is not recommended to use file requires since it means > that file lists need to be downloaded and resolved to figure out the > dependencies. > > Just add Requires: dejavu-sans-fonts, which provides both of the aforementioned > files. Hmm.. The problem/warning is with already added requires dejavu-sans-fonts and when you run rpmlint on the installed packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 08:29:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:29:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537823] Review Request: hunspell-ht - Haitian Creole hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911180829.nAI8TGBL029838@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537823 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-11-18 03:28:15 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1813610 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream (sha1sum). c704446d8793509265bdc5574e584a54784f7a1e hunspell-ht-0.02.oxt + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 08:33:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:33:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532382] Review Request: fvkbd - Free Virtual Keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911180833.nAI8XGt1016919@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532382 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) 2009-11-18 03:33:14 EDT --- thanks. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 08:32:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:32:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538303] New: Review Request: rubygem-minitest - Small and fast replacement for ruby's huge and slow test/unit Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-minitest - Small and fast replacement for ruby's huge and slow test/unit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538303 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-minitest - Small and fast replacement for ruby's huge and slow test/unit Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mkent at magoazul.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SPECS/rubygem-minitest.spec SRPM URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SRPMS/rubygem-minitest-1.4.2-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: minitest/unit is a small and fast replacement for ruby's huge and slow test/unit. This is meant to be clean and easy to use both as a regular test writer and for language implementors that need a minimal set of methods to bootstrap a working unit test suite. miniunit/spec is a functionally complete spec engine. miniunit/mock, by Steven Baker, is a beautifully tiny mock object framework. f13 build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1813620 mkent at fedora-devel-chef:~/rpmbuild/SPECS$ rpmlint rubygem-minitest.spec /var/tmp/results/rubygem-minitest-* rubygem-minitest-doc.noarch: W: no-documentation rubygem-minitest-doc.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/minitest-1.4.2/.autotest rubygem-minitest-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/minitest-1.4.2/ri/MiniTest/Unit/output%3d-c.yaml %3d rubygem-minitest-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/minitest-1.4.2/ri/MiniTest/Assertions/_assertions%3d-i.yaml %3d rubygem-minitest-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/minitest-1.4.2/ri/MiniTest/Unit/TestCase/passed%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-minitest-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/minitest-1.4.2/ri/MiniTest/Spec/nuke_test_methods%21-c.yaml %21 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. The .autotest file seems valid and can be used by ZenTest autotest, though I'm not familiar with it's operation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 08:39:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:39:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468701] Merge Review: desktop-file-utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911180839.nAI8dfMg020392@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468701 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 --- Comment #1 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 23:18:04 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Comment #2 from Bug Zapper 2009-11-18 03:39:39 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 10 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 10. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '10'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 10's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 10 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 08:55:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:55:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526444] Review Request: MyGUI - Fast, simple and flexible GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911180855.nAI8tafo029053@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526444 --- Comment #23 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-11-18 03:55:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > (In reply to comment #21) > > Just add Requires: dejavu-sans-fonts, which provides both of the aforementioned > > files. > > Hmm.. The problem/warning is with already added requires dejavu-sans-fonts and > when you run rpmlint on the installed packages. If it still complains and the symlinks aren't broken, then it's a false warning. Just ignore it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 09:04:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 04:04:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525432] Review Request: openxcap - Fully featured XCAP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911180904.nAI94PDo016778@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525432 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-18 04:04:23 EDT --- openxcap-1.1.2-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openxcap-1.1.2-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 09:03:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 04:03:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524283] Review Request: plee-the-bear - 2D platform game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911180903.nAI93UIH016460@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524283 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Simon Wesp 2009-11-18 04:03:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > FIX - MUST: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-12-ppc/result/* > [ ... lots of unverisoned sonames in /usr/lib/libbear_*.so ... ] > > These are OK. They are used exclusively by the binaries shipped with the game, > we don't even provide a -devel subpackage. Wasn't sure. rpmlint is a good help, but it can't know all... +APPROVED+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 09:05:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 04:05:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523540] Review Request: opentracker - BitTorrent Tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911180905.nAI95KvF002459@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523540 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(matt_domsch at dell. | |com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 09:07:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 04:07:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 491088] Review Request: rhncfg - Red Hat Network Configuration Client Libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911180907.nAI97FnB003138@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491088 --- Comment #5 from Miroslav Such? 2009-11-18 04:07:13 EDT --- > rhnlib seems to be a special case and you can ignore those warning yes, it is special case > but please remove libselinux-python. I would like, but if I remove it, it is not included. I build test package with that Requirese: removed and got: $ rpm -qpR /tmp/spacewalk-build/rpmbuild-rhncfg-git-c9cd2e0cf23a7bd6eaed93435c305d7b1c975378/noarch/rhncfg-5.9.13-1.git.c9cd2e0cf23a7bd6eaed93435c305d7b1c975378.noarch.rpm python rhnlib rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 > License should be "GPLv2 and Python" (e.g. compile.py is based on > Python-licensed code) - asked spot about this to be sure Did not know. Done. > PYTHON-LICENSES.txt should be added to %doc Done > This require should be moved up to the main package. Done. > Therefore please remove all provides from > the spec file unless you have a proper explanation for them. Old heritage. I tracked it to year 2003 and could not find reason, why it has been added. Dropped. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 09:10:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 04:10:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 491088] Review Request: rhncfg - Red Hat Network Configuration Client Libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911180910.nAI9AZn9020210@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491088 --- Comment #6 from Miroslav Such? 2009-11-18 04:10:33 EDT --- Updated SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rhncfg/rhncfg-5.9.14-1.src.rpm Updated SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rhncfg/rhncfg.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 09:07:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 04:07:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528333] Review Request: gnunet-gtk - GNUnet GTK+ User Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911180907.nAI97fvu018864@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528333 Felix Kaechele changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |felix at fetzig.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |felix at fetzig.org Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 09:07:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 04:07:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528332] Review Request: GNUnet - Secure peer-to-peer networking framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911180907.nAI97iuc018909@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528332 Felix Kaechele changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |felix at fetzig.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |felix at fetzig.org Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 09:07:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 04:07:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528379] Review Request: gnunet-fuse - FUSE filesystem for GNUnet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911180907.nAI97c0P018809@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528379 Felix Kaechele changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |felix at fetzig.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |felix at fetzig.org Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 09:29:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 04:29:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528379] Review Request: gnunet-fuse - FUSE filesystem for GNUnet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911180929.nAI9TnUa030665@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528379 --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-11-18 04:29:47 EDT --- "Requires: fuse" is missing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 09:37:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 04:37:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532309] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-net-ldap - A full-featured pure-Ruby LDAP client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911180937.nAI9bsEi003616@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532309 --- Comment #7 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-11-18 04:37:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > > * Obsoletes > > > - I don't think "Obsoletes: rubygem-net-ldap <= %{version}" > > > is needed because rubygem-net-ldap is not imported into Fedora > > > yet. > > > > It has been deployed in production already -also the reason why I'm submitting > > the package-; > > What do you mean here? I googled rubygem-net-ldap and it seems > that only Suse uses it, and I don't think we should take care of > Suse's naming way. https://terminal.ogd.nl - it's in production in a private environment -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 09:43:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 04:43:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538326] New: Review Request: perl-LWP-Online - Module for accessing web by proccess Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-LWP-Online - Module for accessing web by proccess https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538326 Summary: Review Request: perl-LWP-Online - Module for accessing web by proccess Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-LWP-Online.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-LWP-Online-1.07-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This module attempts to answer, as accurately as it can, one of the nastiest technical questions there is. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1813700 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 09:43:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 04:43:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538327] New: Review Request: otpd - One Time Password daemon Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: otpd - One Time Password daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538327 Summary: Review Request: otpd - One Time Password daemon Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gpaterno at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.gpaterno.com/external/otpd.spec SRPM URL: http://www.gpaterno.com/external/otpd-3.2.0-1.src.rpm Description: Hi! I've created a fork of the original OTP daemon from TRI-D Systems, acquired by Red Hat. The project is at http://otpd.googlecode.com. It is a one time password daemon capable of authenticating HOTP-compliant devices, such as softtokens and hardtokens. I'd really appreciate if you can review this to be included in fedora extra and (later) in EPEL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 09:46:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 04:46:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538046] Review Request: spacewalk-certs-tools - Spacewalk SSL Key/Cert Tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911180946.nAI9kZqX024245@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538046 --- Comment #2 from Miroslav Such? 2009-11-18 04:46:34 EDT --- > Package doesn't contains a verbatin copy ot the license > text (No blocker, but please contact upstream to include > one into the upstream package) Since I'm part of upstream, I added it there. I also changed license to GPL2 and Python (been notified yesterday in review 491088). > Please use %global instead of %define Done > We prefer %defattr(-,root,root,-) Done. > question: Who should ownd %{rhnroot} rhn-client-tools. Added to Requires. Nice catch. > and %{rhnroot}/certs This package should. Done. Updated SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/spacewalk-certs-tools/spacewalk-certs-tools.spec Updated SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/spacewalk-certs-tools/spacewalk-certs-tools-0.7.2-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 09:48:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 04:48:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532309] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-net-ldap - A full-featured pure-Ruby LDAP client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911180948.nAI9mUvu009279@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532309 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-18 04:48:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > https://terminal.ogd.nl - it's in production in a private environment ... What is this? (it seems to be asking me to enter some password in the language I cannot understand), and I doubt Fedora should take care of this project(?) (it is almost impossible for Fedora to take care of every such private project). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 09:48:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 04:48:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537823] Review Request: hunspell-ht - Haitian Creole hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911180948.nAI9mVtQ009286@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537823 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2009-11-18 04:48:29 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-ht Short Description: Haitian Creole hunspell dictionaries Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 09:50:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 04:50:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538327] Review Request: otpd - One Time Password daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911180950.nAI9oC6B026214@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538327 --- Comment #1 from Giuseppe Paterno 2009-11-18 04:50:12 EDT --- Sorry, I mentioned extra, but I meant fedora :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 09:54:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 04:54:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532309] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-net-ldap - A full-featured pure-Ruby LDAP client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911180954.nAI9sTnq012730@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532309 --- Comment #9 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-11-18 04:54:28 EDT --- Look, this is my company's project and my company is (partly) taking care of pushing the project's dependencies into Fedora. It doesn't really matter whether we have an extra Obsoletes just for the first real release of this package through Fedora now does it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 09:52:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 04:52:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538332] New: Review Request: covered - Verilog code coverage analyzer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: covered - Verilog code coverage analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538332 Summary: Review Request: covered - Verilog code coverage analyzer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chitlesh at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/covered.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/covered-0.7.7-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Covered is a Verilog code-coverage utility using VCD/LXT style dumpfiles and the design to generate line, toggle, memory, combinational logic, FSM state/arc and assertion coverage reports. Covered also contains a built-in race condition checker and GUI report viewer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 09:57:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 04:57:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538335] New: Review Request: dia-CMOS - Dia CMOS Shapes Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dia-CMOS - Dia CMOS Shapes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538335 Summary: Review Request: dia-CMOS - Dia CMOS Shapes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chitlesh at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/dia-CMOS.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/dia-CMOS-0.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The following shapes are included in the package: * NMOS Transistor * PMOS Transistor * Ground * Vdd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 09:59:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 04:59:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538337] Review Request: dia-Digital - Dia Digital Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911180959.nAI9xmQk015400@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538337 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: dia-CMOS - |Review Request: dia-Digital |Dia Digital Shapes |- Dia Digital Shapes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 10:00:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 05:00:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538339] New: Review Request: dia-electric2 - Dia electric2 Shapes Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dia-electric2 - Dia electric2 Shapes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538339 Summary: Review Request: dia-electric2 - Dia electric2 Shapes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chitlesh at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/dia-electric2.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/dia-electric2-0.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The following shapes are included in the package: * CKT Breaker * Generator * Isolator * Transformer -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 10:01:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 05:01:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538340] New: Review Request: dia-electronic - Dia electronic Shapes Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dia-electronic - Dia electronic Shapes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538340 Summary: Review Request: dia-electronic - Dia electronic Shapes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chitlesh at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/dia-electronic.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/dia-electronic-0.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The following shapes are included in the package: * Antenna * Bell * Button * Capacitor * Electrolytic capacitor * Crystal * Di-Gate .... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 09:58:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 04:58:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538337] New: Review Request: dia-CMOS - Dia Digital Shapes Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dia-CMOS - Dia Digital Shapes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538337 Summary: Review Request: dia-CMOS - Dia Digital Shapes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chitlesh at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/dia-Digital.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/dia-Digital-0.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The following shapes are included in the package: * Buffer * Inverter * AND * NAND * OR * NOR * XOR * XNOR * Multiplexer/Demultiplexer * Adder/Subtractor/Multiplier/Divider * Register * Connection Point -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 10:00:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 05:00:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 494292] Review Request: spacewalk-proxy-html - The HTML component for Spacewalk Proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181000.nAIA03dZ015800@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494292 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sm at sandro-mathys.ch Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Sandro Mathys 2009-11-18 05:00:01 EDT --- OK - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. $ rpmlint {SPECS,RPMS/noarch,SRPMS}/spacewalk-proxy-html* spacewalk-proxy-html.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/html/_rhn_proxy/index.html 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Save to ignore. OK - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. . NEEDSWORK - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. Please use %global instead of %define (and move it to the top of the spec file as people would look for it there): http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define Please don't obsolete a package that didn't exist in Fedora/EPEL before. This also makes the provides unnecessary. OK - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. $ md5sum spacewalk-proxy-html-0.7.1.tar.gz SOURCES/spacewalk-proxy-html-0.7.1.tar.gz fea871e8665d756cbde595ca6932281d spacewalk-proxy-html-0.7.1.tar.gz fea871e8665d756cbde595ca6932281d SOURCES/spacewalk-proxy-html-0.7.1.tar.gz OK - MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. N/A - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. OK - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. N/A - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. OK - MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. OK - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK - MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. OK - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. N/A - MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). OK - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} N/A - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. N/A - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. N/A - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. OK - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. N/A - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. N/A - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. N/A - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Please fix the single NEEDSWORK and I'll be able to approve this afterwards. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 10:09:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 05:09:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 491088] Review Request: rhncfg - Red Hat Network Configuration Client Libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181009.nAIA9eX3020571@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491088 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Sandro Mathys 2009-11-18 05:09:37 EDT --- All issues have been correctly addressed. ------------------------------------------------------------- This package (rhncfg) is APPROVED by red (Sandro Mathys) ------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 10:23:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 05:23:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528473] Review Request: php-ezc-DatabaseSchema - eZ Components DatabaseSchema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181023.nAIANN9b010777@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528473 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-18 05:23:23 EDT --- php-ezc-DatabaseSchema-1.4.2-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-DatabaseSchema-1.4.2-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 10:23:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 05:23:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 491088] Review Request: rhncfg - Red Hat Network Configuration Client Libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181023.nAIANThB010818@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491088 Miroslav Such? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 10:23:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 05:23:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528473] Review Request: php-ezc-DatabaseSchema - eZ Components DatabaseSchema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181023.nAIANISj027970@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528473 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-18 05:23:17 EDT --- php-ezc-DatabaseSchema-1.4.2-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-DatabaseSchema-1.4.2-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 10:23:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 05:23:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528473] Review Request: php-ezc-DatabaseSchema - eZ Components DatabaseSchema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181023.nAIANUGP028068@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528473 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-18 05:23:29 EDT --- php-ezc-DatabaseSchema-1.4.2-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-DatabaseSchema-1.4.2-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 10:23:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 05:23:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 491088] Review Request: rhncfg - Red Hat Network Configuration Client Libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181023.nAIAN8jo027898@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491088 --- Comment #8 from Miroslav Such? 2009-11-18 05:23:06 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rhncfg Short Description: Red Hat Network Configuration Client Libraries Owners: msuchy Branches: F-11, F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 10:37:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 05:37:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 494292] Review Request: spacewalk-proxy-html - The HTML component for Spacewalk Proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181037.nAIAbbut018282@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494292 --- Comment #5 from Miroslav Such? 2009-11-18 05:37:35 EDT --- > Please use %global instead of %define Done > Please don't obsolete a package that didn't exist in Fedora/EPEL before. Done. Although I disagree with such step. Updated SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/spacewalk-proxy-html/spacewalk-proxy-html.spec Updated SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/spacewalk-proxy-html/spacewalk-proxy-html-0.7.2-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 10:35:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 05:35:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478388] Review Request: UDAV - data visualisation program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181035.nAIAZt1d017681@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478388 --- Comment #14 from Bug Zapper 2009-11-18 05:35:52 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 10 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 10. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '10'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 10's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 10 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 10:43:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 05:43:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530986] Review Request: janino - An embedded Java compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181043.nAIAhttO021176@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530986 Mary Ellen Foster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Mary Ellen Foster 2009-11-18 05:43:54 EDT --- Oops, just realised that the fedora-cvs flag never got set on this ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 10:45:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 05:45:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530986] Review Request: janino - An embedded Java compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181045.nAIAjfc0022552@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530986 --- Comment #9 from Mary Ellen Foster 2009-11-18 05:45:39 EDT --- Also, the proper link for the final SRPM is http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/sesame/janino-2.5.15-3.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 10:51:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 05:51:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528332] Review Request: GNUnet - Secure peer-to-peer networking framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181051.nAIAp4H1024819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528332 Felix Kaechele changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Felix Kaechele 2009-11-18 05:51:01 EDT --- A first check after a mock build yields: GNUnet.src: W: strange-permission gnunetd.init 0755 Can be solved by setting that file to chmod 644 and installing it with install -m 755 instead of using cp. GNUnet.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/run/gnunetd gnunet GNUnet.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/run/gnunetd gnunet GNUnet.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/gnunetd gnunet GNUnet.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/log/gnunetd gnunet Can be ignored GNUnet.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/gnunetd GNUnet.x86_64: W: missing-lsb-keyword Default-Stop in /etc/rc.d/init.d/gnunetd GNUnet.x86_64: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/gnunetd $prog Please fix. I also get a flood of GNUnet.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency when running rpmlint on the installed packages. Please check this as well. Furthermore please add comments to the patches as to where they come from and if they have been brought to upstream's notice at some point (bugzilla etc.). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 11:00:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 06:00:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484386] Review Request: gri - A language for scientific illustration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181100.nAIB0Fg7014760@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484386 --- Comment #21 from Bug Zapper 2009-11-18 06:00:12 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 10 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 10. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '10'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 10's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 10 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 11:04:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 06:04:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528476] Review Request: php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein - eZ Components PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181104.nAIB4M4v016773@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528476 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-18 06:04:22 EDT --- php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein-1.3-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein-1.3-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 11:04:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 06:04:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528476] Review Request: php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein - eZ Components PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181104.nAIB4HSk016723@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528476 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-18 06:04:15 EDT --- php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein-1.3-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein-1.3-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 11:04:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 06:04:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528476] Review Request: php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein - eZ Components PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181104.nAIB4RRl016812@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528476 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-18 06:04:26 EDT --- php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein-1.3-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein-1.3-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 11:08:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 06:08:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181108.nAIB8Tk5000808@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l | |aposte.net) | --- Comment #33 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-11-18 06:08:23 EDT --- You can build in rawhide however please do not close this, I need to find time to review the result properly and approve the merge review (unfortunately, it seems I'm a bit under water those past days) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 11:31:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 06:31:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538360] New: Review Request: perl-CPAN-Inject - Base class for injecting distributions into CPAN sources Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-CPAN-Inject - Base class for injecting distributions into CPAN sources https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538360 Summary: Review Request: perl-CPAN-Inject - Base class for injecting distributions into CPAN sources Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-CPAN-Inject.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-CPAN-Inject-0.11-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Following the release of CPAN::Mini, the CPAN::Mini::Inject module was created to add additional distributions into a minicpan mirror. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 11:32:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 06:32:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468701] desktop-mime-type.prov should be in redhat-rpm-config. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181132.nAIBWWjd013003@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468701 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|10 |rawhide Summary|Merge Review: |desktop-mime-type.prov |desktop-file-utils |should be in | |redhat-rpm-config. --- Comment #3 from Patrice Dumas 2009-11-18 06:32:30 EDT --- desktop-mime-type.prov from desktop-file-utils should certainly be in that package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 11:37:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 06:37:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538360] Review Request: perl-CPAN-Inject - Base class for injecting distributions into CPAN sources In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181137.nAIBbn9B015550@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538360 Marcela Ma?l??ov? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |538361 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 11:37:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 06:37:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538361] New: Review Request: perl-CPAN-Checksums - Write a CHECKSUMS file for a directory as on CPAN Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-CPAN-Checksums - Write a CHECKSUMS file for a directory as on CPAN https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538361 Summary: Review Request: perl-CPAN-Checksums - Write a CHECKSUMS file for a directory as on CPAN Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 538360 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-CPAN-Checksums.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-CPAN-Checksums-2.04-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Write a CHECKSUMS file for a directory as on CPAN. Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1813940 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 11:43:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 06:43:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532382] Review Request: fvkbd - Free Virtual Keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181143.nAIBhZUH018216@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532382 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Peter Robinson 2009-11-18 06:43:34 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fvkbd Short Description: Free Virtual Keyboard Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 11:48:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 06:48:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 496689] Review Request: monodevelop-java - Java language integration with MonoDevelop based on ikvm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181148.nAIBm2SO020379@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496689 --- Comment #1 from Bug Zapper 2009-11-18 06:48:01 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 10 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 10. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '10'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 10's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 10 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 11:49:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 06:49:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538326] Review Request: perl-LWP-Online - Module for accessing web by proccess In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181149.nAIBngsa007566@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538326 Marcela Ma?l??ov? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |538363 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 11:49:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 06:49:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538360] Review Request: perl-CPAN-Inject - Base class for injecting distributions into CPAN sources In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181149.nAIBnhJq007584@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538360 Marcela Ma?l??ov? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |538363 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 11:49:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 06:49:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538363] New: Review Request: perl-pip - Perl Installation Program Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-pip - Perl Installation Program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538363 Summary: Review Request: perl-pip - Perl Installation Program Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 538326,538360 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-pip.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-pip-0.13-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The pip ("Perl Installation Program") console application is used to install Perl distributions in a wide variety of formats, both from CPAN and from external third-party locations, while supporting module dependencies that go across the boundary from third-party to CPAN. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 11:47:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 06:47:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 496633] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-gdb - GDB Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181147.nAIBlrfT007083@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496633 --- Comment #17 from Bug Zapper 2009-11-18 06:47:51 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 10 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 10. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '10'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 10's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 10 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 11:47:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 06:47:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 496688] Review Request: monodevelop-database - Addin for MonoDevelop for an integrated database explorer and editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181147.nAIBlvkG007137@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496688 --- Comment #1 from Bug Zapper 2009-11-18 06:47:56 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 10 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 10. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '10'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 10's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 10 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 11:53:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 06:53:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529542] Review Request: php-phpunit-phpcpd - Copy/Paste Detector (CPD) for PHP code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181153.nAIBr84w022668@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529542 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-18 06:53:07 EDT --- php-phpunit-phpcpd-1.2.0-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-phpunit-phpcpd-1.2.0-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 11:53:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 06:53:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529542] Review Request: php-phpunit-phpcpd - Copy/Paste Detector (CPD) for PHP code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181153.nAIBr2RZ022612@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529542 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-18 06:53:01 EDT --- php-phpunit-phpcpd-1.2.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-phpunit-phpcpd-1.2.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 11:53:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 06:53:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 498723] Review Request: eZ Publish In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181153.nAIBri55022907@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498723 --- Comment #8 from Bug Zapper 2009-11-18 06:53:42 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 10 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 10. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '10'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 10's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 10 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 11:52:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 06:52:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529542] Review Request: php-phpunit-phpcpd - Copy/Paste Detector (CPD) for PHP code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181152.nAIBqvCr009867@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529542 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-18 06:52:56 EDT --- php-phpunit-phpcpd-1.2.0-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-phpunit-phpcpd-1.2.0-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 12:04:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 07:04:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536683] Review Request: eclipse-mdt-uml2 - Implementation of the UML2 OMG metamodel for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181204.nAIC4hIf015621@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536683 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 12:06:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 07:06:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530301] Review Request: bmpanel2 - NETWM compliant panel for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181206.nAIC6Ps0016707@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530301 --- Comment #17 from Marcus Moeller 2009-11-18 07:06:23 EDT --- - Added preferences-system-windows icon reference to bmpanel2cfg.desktop - As icon cache re-generation seems to be unnecessary now, it has been removed Spec URL: http://www.marcus-moeller.de/share/build/bmpanel2/2.1-0.6.pre1/bmpanel2.spec SRPM URL: http://www.marcus-moeller.de/share/build/bmpanel2/2.1-0.6.pre1/bmpanel2-2.1-0.6.pre1.fc11.src.rpm I would prefer if you could sponsor me as the 'l7 review' associated with Christoph may still take some time. Best Regards Marcus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 12:05:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 07:05:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 505813] Review Request: Ballview - Molecule and protien visualisation and analysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181205.nAIC5sKt016381@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505813 --- Comment #2 from Bug Zapper 2009-11-18 07:05:53 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 10 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 10. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '10'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 10's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 10 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 12:06:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 07:06:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181206.nAIC6cVJ030245@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 --- Comment #32 from Jens Petersen 2009-11-18 07:06:36 EDT --- $ koji build --scratch dist-f13 hlint-1.6.12-1.fc11.src.rpm : Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1813996 : 1813996 build (dist-f13, hlint-1.6.12-1.fc11.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 12:12:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 07:12:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 518857] Review Request: django-extensions - django command line extensions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181212.nAICCbKe020233@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518857 --- Comment #1 from Bug Zapper 2009-11-18 07:12:36 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 10 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 10. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '10'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 10's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 10 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 12:40:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 07:40:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520637] Review Request: mdk - GNU MIX Development Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181240.nAICe9SU003236@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520637 --- Comment #25 from Stjepan Gros 2009-11-18 07:40:07 EDT --- Ok, I imported files into CVS for devel and F-12 branches. Build in koji was also successful. I suppose this bug entry could be now closed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 13:09:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 08:09:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 444428] Review Request: ocaml-cmigrep - Search OCaml compiled interface (cmi) files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181309.nAID9ZWP030792@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444428 Bug 444428 depends on bug 450551, which changed state. Bug 450551 Summary: OCaml binaries give rpmlint warning about executable-stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450551 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 13:09:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 08:09:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 505813] Review Request: Ballview - Molecule and protien visualisation and analysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181309.nAID9jeT018707@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505813 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|10 |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 13:14:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 08:14:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520637] Review Request: mdk - GNU MIX Development Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181314.nAIDEsdh020936@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520637 --- Comment #26 from Jon Ciesla 2009-11-18 08:14:53 EDT --- Did you file an update for F-12 in bodhi? If not, when you do, you can put this BZ # in the update, and have it close the BZ when the package is pushed to stable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 14:00:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:00:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 165552] Review Request: banner - Prints a short string to the console in very large letters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181400.nAIE0cCS007129@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=165552 Oliver Falk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Oliver Falk 2009-11-18 09:00:36 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: banner New Branches: EL-5 Owners: jima oliver -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 14:23:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:23:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 494292] Review Request: spacewalk-proxy-html - The HTML component for Spacewalk Proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181423.nAIENQdD031520@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494292 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Sandro Mathys 2009-11-18 09:23:25 EDT --- All issues have been correctly addressed. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (spacewalk-proxy-html) is APPROVED by red (Sandro Mathys) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 14:34:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:34:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526204] Review Request: ucs-miscfixed-fonts selected set of bitmap fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181434.nAIEY2TH020312@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526204 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |ucs-fixed-fonts selected |ucs-miscfixed-fonts |set of bitmap fonts |selected set of bitmap | |fonts --- Comment #14 from Pravin Satpute 2009-11-18 09:34:00 EDT --- oops, looks like i have done cvs request with wrong package name :( really sorry for that it should be usc-miscfixed-fonts New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ucs-miscfixed-fonts Short Description: Selected set of bitmap fonts Owners: pravins Branches: InitialCC: fonts-sig can we do something now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 14:36:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:36:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 518857] Review Request: django-extensions - django command line extensions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181436.nAIEaVEd003356@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518857 Luca Botti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|10 |12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 14:40:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:40:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538420] Review Request:
- In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181440.nAIEeSk0004671@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538420 Albert Bogdanowicz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 14:39:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:39:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538420] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538420 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: albert.bogdanowicz at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://students.mimuw.edu.pl/~ab277290/Fedora/samtools.spec SRPM URL: https://students.mimuw.edu.pl/~ab277290/Fedora/samtools-0.1.7a-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Another bioinformatics package. SAM Tools provide various utilities for manipulating alignments in the SAM format, including sorting, merging, indexing and generating alignments in a per-position format. URL: http://samtools.sourceforge.net/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 14:47:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:47:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 500959] Review Request: perl-Task-Padre-Plugin-Deps - Task::Padre::Plugin::Deps Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181447.nAIElDho006783@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500959 --- Comment #17 from Marcela Ma?l??ov? 2009-11-18 09:47:11 EDT --- Ok, now I really applied correct patch. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1814160&name=build.log http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Task-Padre-Plugin-Deps-0.12-4.fc12.src.rpm But still there are problems in requirements, you might find in build log lines like: Warning: prerequisite Acme::PlayCode 0 not found. These ^ are problems of mentioned three packages, which I have to fix first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 14:55:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:55:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 424841] Review Request: ndisc6 - IPv6 diagnostic tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181455.nAIEt6iV009052@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424841 --- Comment #29 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-11-18 09:55:05 EDT --- why not F-11 and EL-5 too ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 14:57:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:57:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 494292] Review Request: spacewalk-proxy-html - The HTML component for Spacewalk Proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181457.nAIEve9k028358@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494292 Miroslav Such? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Miroslav Such? 2009-11-18 09:57:39 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: spacewalk-proxy-html Short Description: The HTML component for Spacewalk Proxy Owners: msuchy Branches: F-11, F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 14:59:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:59:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538420] Review Request: samtools - SAM (Sequence Alignment/Map) format is a generic format for storing large nucleotide sequence alignments. Tools for sorting, merging etc. sam format files. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181459.nAIExu88028701@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538420 Albert Bogdanowicz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- |Alignment/Map) format is a | |generic format for storing | |large nucleotide sequence | |alignments. Tools for | |sorting, merging etc. sam | |format files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 15:05:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:05:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 424841] Review Request: ndisc6 - IPv6 diagnostic tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181505.nAIF5VWV031132@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424841 --- Comment #30 from Stjepan Gros 2009-11-18 10:05:26 EDT --- No particular reason, inertia primarily. I can request CVS branches for F-11 and EL-5 too, but first I'll have to look how that's done. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 15:10:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:10:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 424841] Review Request: ndisc6 - IPv6 diagnostic tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181510.nAIFAeBP014039@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424841 --- Comment #31 from Jon Ciesla 2009-11-18 10:10:39 EDT --- Similarly to #28. Set the cvs flag to ?, and see this: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 15:14:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:14:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484386] Review Request: gri - A language for scientific illustration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181514.nAIFE1ab001373@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484386 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|10 |rawhide --- Comment #22 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-18 10:13:59 EDT --- (Changing the version to rawhide) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 15:13:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:13:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477948] Review Request: simple-ccsm - Simplified plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181513.nAIFDspm001328@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477948 Julian Aloofi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |julian.fedora at googlemail.co | |m AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |julian.fedora at googlemail.co | |m Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 15:22:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:22:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479594] Review Request: email - A command line SMTP client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181522.nAIFMgkL004113@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479594 --- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter 2009-11-18 10:22:40 EDT --- Last week I sent again a message to upstream about the naming issue. So fare no answer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 15:30:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:30:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526126] Review Request: python3 - Python 3.x (backwards incompatible version) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181530.nAIFUibb006297@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126 --- Comment #52 from Dave Malcolm 2009-11-18 10:30:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #51) > hmm i am curious why not call python3 -> python and the old version > python-compat2.6 or whatever? Python 3 is intended by upstream to be the future of Python, but we have many critical components that use Python 2. Python 2 and Python 3 are sufficiently different that we need both (try writing "print" in each). Python 2 will be around for a long time. Changing the meaning of "python" to mean python 3 rather than python 2 in specfiles/yum/rpmdb would have a very high chance of breaking something during updates, and I don't see any real benefit. Hence the plan is to continue to use "python-" to mean the existing python 2 stack, and "python3-" for the new parallel-installable python3 stack. For more information see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Python3F13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 15:34:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:34:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520637] Review Request: mdk - GNU MIX Development Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181534.nAIFYOhO020855@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520637 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-18 10:34:23 EDT --- mdk-1.2.5-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mdk-1.2.5-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 15:32:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:32:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477948] Review Request: simple-ccsm - Simplified plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181532.nAIFW8fJ020255@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477948 Julian Aloofi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #6 from Julian Aloofi 2009-11-18 10:32:07 EDT --- OK, I'm taking this. rpmlint output on the spec file is clean so far, a full review is coming soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 15:45:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:45:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532205] Review Request: microba - Set of JFC (Swing) components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181545.nAIFjLnt024492@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532205 Michal Ingeli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mi at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mi at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 16:07:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:07:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538087] Review Request: dgc - A system for the creation of digital circuits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181607.nAIG7w4r031776@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538087 --- Comment #6 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-11-18 11:07:56 EDT --- * Updated URL to use sourceforge.net project website. * dgc-0.98 will not print searchpath, as it is not required. Spec URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/dgc.spec SRPM URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/dgc-0.98-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 16:09:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:09:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538451] New: Review Request: perl-Devel-Refactor - Perl extension for refactoring Perl code Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-Refactor - Perl extension for refactoring Perl code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538451 Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-Refactor - Perl extension for refactoring Perl code Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Devel-Refactor.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Devel-Refactor-0.05-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The Devel::Refactor module is for code refactoring. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 16:11:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:11:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526263] Review Request: l7-protocols - Protocol definitions files for l7-filter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181611.nAIGBpnW000793@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526263 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-18 11:11:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > I am definitely going to sponsor Marcus, but the l7 packages still need a lot > work. Marcus and I have talked about this on IRC and in private, sorry it's not > in bugzilla. Well, then will you sponsor Marcus soon if he applies for the sponsorship? Now bmpanel2 review request (bug 530301) can be approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 16:12:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:12:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530301] Review Request: bmpanel2 - NETWM compliant panel for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181612.nAIGCLVx019497@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530301 --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-18 11:12:19 EDT --- For sponsorship issue, please wait for a moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 16:16:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:16:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538458] New: Review Request: perl-Format-Human-Bytes - Format a bytecount and make it human readable Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Format-Human-Bytes - Format a bytecount and make it human readable https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538458 Summary: Review Request: perl-Format-Human-Bytes - Format a bytecount and make it human readable Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-pip.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-pip-0.13-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This module returns you a printable string which is more readable by humans than a simple bytecount. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 16:17:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:17:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516535] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-scripts - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Job ManagerScripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181617.nAIGHQen002511@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516535 --- Comment #6 from Caio 'kaio' Chance 2009-11-18 11:17:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Caio 'kaio' Chance > > I'm going to review this in the next few days unless you have any more > comments on the documentation? > > Steve no thx -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 16:19:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:19:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532382] Review Request: fvkbd - Free Virtual Keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181619.nAIGJt9E003221@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532382 Bastien Nocera changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bnocera at redhat.com --- Comment #7 from Bastien Nocera 2009-11-18 11:19:53 EDT --- Should this replace the matchbox-keyboard? I believe it's supposed to be the successor to the matchbox-keyboard, as it handles CJK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 16:26:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:26:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527706] Review Request: mingw32-libgeotiff - MinGW port of libgeotiff Georeferenced image library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181626.nAIGQLdM006729@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527706 Dave Ludlow changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Dave Ludlow 2009-11-18 11:26:20 EDT --- Thanks Peter! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-libgeotiff Short Description: MinGW port of libgeotiff Georeferenced image library Owners: adsllc Branches: F-11 F-12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 16:27:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:27:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538465] Review Request: libmx - A clutter toolkit for Moblin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181627.nAIGRfEp025280@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538465 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |538447(MoblinFuture) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 16:26:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:26:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532382] Review Request: fvkbd - Free Virtual Keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181626.nAIGQn7o024546@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532382 --- Comment #8 from Peter Robinson 2009-11-18 11:26:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Should this replace the matchbox-keyboard? I believe it's supposed to be the > successor to the matchbox-keyboard, as it handles CJK. That's what I believe is suppose to happen but I figured it could obsolete it at a later point once its been tested etc. Thoughts? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 16:27:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:27:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538465] New: Review Request: libmx - A clutter toolkit for Moblin Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libmx - A clutter toolkit for Moblin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538465 Summary: Review Request: libmx - A clutter toolkit for Moblin Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/libmx.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/libmx-0.1.1-1.fc12.src.rpm %description The Moblin User Experience is a GUI toolkit, using Clutter and is optimised for Moblin. It consists of various classes useful for building UIs such as Buttons, Tooltips, Scrollbars and others. It also supports styling through CSS stylesheets. NOTE: the upstream name for this package is mx but there is a conflicting python package called mx already. koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1814556 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 16:39:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:39:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532382] Review Request: fvkbd - Free Virtual Keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181639.nAIGdup4028713@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532382 --- Comment #9 from Bastien Nocera 2009-11-18 11:39:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7) > > Should this replace the matchbox-keyboard? I believe it's supposed to be the > > successor to the matchbox-keyboard, as it handles CJK. > > That's what I believe is suppose to happen but I figured it could obsolete it > at a later point once its been tested etc. Thoughts? That'd be fine by me. Mind filing a bug to that effect? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 16:46:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:46:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520637] Review Request: mdk - GNU MIX Development Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181646.nAIGkrKd012807@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520637 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #28 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-18 11:46:52 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 16:46:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:46:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528108] Review Request: Vuurmuur - Firewall manager built on top of iptables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181646.nAIGk6M4012627@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528108 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-18 11:46:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > There is potential scenario in which you run > daemon on one machine and you do configuration on another one, syncing in some > way between the two. - Well, I will admit it. > Spec URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/vuurmuur/Vuurmuur.spec > SRPM URL: > http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/vuurmuur/Vuurmuur-0.7-4.fc11.src.rpm Checked -5 (-4 is 404) * Macros in %changelog Vuurmuur.src:272: W: macro-in-%changelog %{_libdir} Vuurmuur.src:281: W: macro-in-%changelog %{_datadir} - In %changelog, please use %% instead of % so that macros won't be expanded, i.e. ---------------------------------------------------------- - Fixed ownership of the directory %%{_libdir}/vuurmuur/plugins ---------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------- This package (Vuurmuur) is APPROVED by mtasaka ---------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 17:03:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:03:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526444] Review Request: MyGUI - Fast, simple and flexible GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181703.nAIH36tR002200@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526444 --- Comment #24 from Guido Grazioli 2009-11-18 12:03:04 EDT --- OK here are the updated files: http://guidograzioli.fedorapeople.org/packages/mygui/mygui.spec http://guidograzioli.fedorapeople.org/packages/mygui/mygui-3.0.0-0.3.2332svn.fc11.src.rpm Changelog: * Wed Nov 18 2009 Guido Grazioli - 3.0.0-0.3.2332svn - Fix macros usage - Fix Release tag - Add desktop entry for LayoutEditor - Update patch to fix missing undefined non-weak symbols - Improve summaries and descriptions - Remove redundant VERBOSE flag - Add graphviz BR to generate doxygen graphs Notes: * W: dangling symlinks ignored * Move code templates to -devel and make -tools require -devel: unfortunately if i do that, rpmlint complains: # rpmlint -i mygui-tools mygui-tools.x86_64: E: devel-dependency mygui-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. Thus i'm leaving things as they are (getting W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package) There is a new koji build here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1814631 as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 17:24:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:24:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532309] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-net-ldap - A full-featured pure-Ruby LDAP client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181724.nAIHOrIX022475@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532309 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-18 12:24:52 EDT --- So please write in the spec file what is really related to Fedora. In your logic you can add arbitrary Obsoletes because "it is used by my project", however no other person knows it and it is just unneeded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 17:44:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:44:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537631] Review Request: moblin-panel-web - Moblin Panel for Web Browsing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181744.nAIHi8GP027879@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537631 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|506446(FedoraMoblin20) |532337(FedoraMoblin21) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 17:44:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:44:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477948] Review Request: simple-ccsm - Simplified plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181744.nAIHiIOW028029@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477948 --- Comment #7 from Julian Aloofi 2009-11-18 12:44:17 EDT --- rpmlint output is clean. 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. N/A MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. N/A SHOULD: The package builds in mock. - successfully builds in mock for fedora-12-i386, fedora-rawhide-i386 and fedora-11-i386 NOTE: The package must Require: compiz-fusion, as it won't run without compiz and compiz-fusion -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 17:53:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:53:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525540] Review Request: mingw32-gtkhtml - MinGW Windows port of GtkHTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181753.nAIHrOQb015942@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525540 Kalev Lember changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kalev at smartlink.ee, | |mbarnes at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kalev at smartlink.ee Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Kalev Lember 2009-11-18 12:53:22 EDT --- Fedora review mingw32-gtkhtml-3.28.0-1.fc12.src.rpm 2009-11-18 + OK ! needs attention rpmlint says: mingw32-gtkhtml.src: W: spelling-error-in-summary en_US webbrowser mingw32-gtkhtml.noarch: W: spelling-error-in-summary en_US webbrowser mingw32-gtkhtml-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgtkhtml-editor.a mingw32-gtkhtml-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.a mingw32-gtkhtml-static.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw32-gtkhtml-debuginfo.noarch: W: spelling-error-in-summary en_US mingw mingw32-gtkhtml-debuginfo.noarch: W: spelling-error-in-description en_US mingw mingw32-gtkhtml-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 5 warnings. ! I guess rpmlint is right about 'webbrowser', but other errors are harmless and expected for mingw32 packages. ! The matching native package is named 'gtkhtml3', and I think this one should also be named mingw32-gtkhtml3 (with '3'). + Package follows the Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines + The stated license (LGPLv2+) is a Fedora approved license ! The stated license differs from the native Fedora package (LGPLv2+ and GPLv2) + The package contains the license file (COPYING) + Spec file is written in American English + Spec file is legible + Upstream sources match sources in the srpm. sha1sum: b0abcf98447acf385a108061bb7f80769bc18a0e gtkhtml-3.28.0.tar.bz2 b0abcf98447acf385a108061bb7f80769bc18a0e Download/gtkhtml-3.28.0.tar.bz2 + Package builds in koji + BuildRequires look sane + The spec file handles locales properly + Does not use Prefix: /usr + Package owns all directories it creates + No duplicate files in %files + %files has %defattr + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Consistent use of macros + Package contains code or permissible content + Files marked %doc should not affect package n/a Header files should be in -devel Fedora MinGW guidelines allow headers in main package + Static libraries are in mingw32-gtkhtml-static subpackage + Packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' + Although ReviewGuidlines says that packages should not contain libtool .la files, MinGW guidelines allow them. + Packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install begins with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Filenames are valid UTF-8 While you are at it, can you also update the package to match the version of gtkhtml3 in F-12? CC-ing native gtkhtml3 package maintainer in case he has any comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 18:25:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:25:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 499987] Review Request: mingw32-curl - MinGW Windows port of curl and libcurl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181825.nAIIPnB0008808@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499987 Kalev Lember changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kalev at smartlink.ee AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kalev at smartlink.ee Flag| |fedora-review? Bug 499987 depends on bug 499986, which changed state. Bug 499986 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libidn - MinGW Windows Internationalized Domain Name support library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499986 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 499987 depends on bug 499979, which changed state. Bug 499979 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libssh2 - MinGW Windows library implementation of the SSH2 protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499979 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #1 from Kalev Lember 2009-11-18 13:25:48 EDT --- Taking for review. Eric, can you update it to the version of native Fedora curl package before I go on? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 18:43:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:43:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526682] Review Request: django-debug-toolbar - Django debug information about the current request/response In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181843.nAIIh0JH013084@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526682 --- Comment #1 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-11-18 13:42:59 EDT --- Update package: Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-debug-toolbar/django-debug-toolbar.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-debug-toolbar/django-debug-toolbar-0.8.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1814834 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 19:39:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:39:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532874] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-wacom - Xorg X11 wacom input driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181939.nAIJdIIt029038@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532874 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-18 14:39:17 EDT --- > Obsolete linuxwacom, don't Conflict with it. I think, this can't work, because in bug #538036, you say, I should copy the fdi file from linuxwacom and that this file will be included in this package too. If you don't rename this file, when adding here, this would probably cause problems, when both are installed. If you rename the file -> Obsolete, no rename -> Conflict. Maybe name it 10-wacom.fdi... > > - rpmlint: $ rpmlint xorg-x11-drv-wacom.spec > This didn't give me any of the warnings when I ran it here, is there a specific > flag I have to provide? No, this was a full copy from my terminal. I ran rpmlint on the spec, the src.rpm and all generated rpms in one command. See one line below: - rpmlint: $ rpmlint xorg-x11-drv-wacom.spec xorg-x11-drv-wacom-0.10.0-1.fc12.src.rpm x86_64/xorg-x11-drv-wacom-* One last thing: - run make %{?_smp_mflags} and not just make to enable building targets in parallel, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Parallel_make ____________________ All other issues, except the 'non-working' at least for me, are fixed: -> APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 19:46:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:46:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538557] New: Review Request: gnome-screensaver-londonpictures - GNOME Screensaver Slideshow of London Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gnome-screensaver-londonpictures - GNOME Screensaver Slideshow of London https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538557 Summary: Review Request: gnome-screensaver-londonpictures - GNOME Screensaver Slideshow of London Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: englishextra at yandex.ru QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://englishextra.org/pub/rpm/SPECS/gnome-screensaver-londonpictures.spec SRPM URL: http://englishextra.org/pub/rpm/SOURCES/gnome-screensaver-londonpictures-0.1.tar.bz2 Description: gnome-screensaver-londonpictures is an addon screen saver for GNOME Screensaver that provides a slideshow of freely distributable frog pictures. Requires: gnome-screensaver -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 19:46:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:46:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538558] New: Review Request: kde-partitionmanager - KDE Partition Manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: kde-partitionmanager - KDE Partition Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538558 Summary: Review Request: kde-partitionmanager - KDE Partition Manager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: thomasj at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/kde-partitionmanager.spec SRPM URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/kde-partitionmanager-1.0.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: KDE Partition Manager is a utility program to help you manage the disk devices, partitions and file systems on your computer. It allows you to easily create, copy, move, delete, resize without losing data, backup and restore partitions. KDE Partition Manager supports a large number of file systems, including ext2/3/4, reiserfs, NTFS, FAT16/32, jfs, xfs and more. It makes use of external programs to get its job done, so you might have to install additional software (preferably packages from your distribution) to make use of all features and get full support for all file systems. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1814928 [thomas at tusdell SPECS]$ rpmlint kde-partitionmanager.spec ../SRPMS/kde-partitionmanager-1.0.0-1.fc11.src.rpm ../RPMS/x86_64/kde-partitionmanager-* kde-partitionmanager.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libpartitionmanagerprivate.so libpartitionmanagerprivate.so 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. shlib error is there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 19:51:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:51:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538557] Review Request: gnome-screensaver-londonpictures - GNOME Screensaver Slideshow of London In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181951.nAIJp7ju032307@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538557 --- Comment #1 from Bill Nottingham 2009-11-18 14:51:05 EDT --- Obvious comment: frog pictures? (in the description) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 19:58:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:58:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538557] Review Request: gnome-screensaver-londonpictures - GNOME Screensaver Slideshow of London In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911181958.nAIJwKkp018717@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538557 --- Comment #2 from Serguei Shimansky 2009-11-18 14:58:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Obvious comment: frog pictures? (in the description) Not exactly. At first it was used to distribute thru commands in terminal. su cd /usr/share/applications/screensavers rm -f --verbose londonpictures-slideshow.desktop cd /usr/share/pixmaps/backgrounds rm -rf --verbose londonpictures if [[ "$HOME" != "/root" ]] then su fi cd /home/$USER residefolder="http://englishextra.org/pub" targetfoldername="londonpictures" archievename="$targetfoldername.tar.bz2" wget `echo "$residefolder/$archievename"` tar xjvf `echo "$targetfoldername.tar.bz2"` mv -f `echo "$targetfoldername/${targetfoldername}-slideshow.desktop"` "/usr/share/applications/screensavers" #mv -f `echo "$targetfoldername/${targetfoldername}.xml"` "/usr/share/applications/screensavers" mv -f `echo "$targetfoldername"` /usr/share/pixmaps/backgrounds #gconftool-2 --type string --set /schemas/apps/gnome-screensaver/lock_dialog_theme "$targetfoldername" rm -f `echo "$targetfoldername.tar.bz2"` rm -f `echo "$targetfoldername.tar"` zenity --info --text="Vyberite \'${targetfoldername}\' v kachestve zastavki" if [[ "$HOME" == "/root" ]] then exit fi /usr/bin/gnome-screensaver-preferences #/schemas/apps/gnome-screensaver When it came to building a noarch RPM the Frogs spec file was used as a template. Is it a barrier for something, please let me know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 20:09:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:09:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538557] Review Request: gnome-screensaver-londonpictures - GNOME Screensaver Slideshow of London In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911182009.nAIK9dSA022173@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538557 --- Comment #4 from Serguei Shimansky 2009-11-18 15:09:39 EDT --- Thanks. Will be done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 20:08:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:08:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538557] Review Request: gnome-screensaver-londonpictures - GNOME Screensaver Slideshow of London In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911182008.nAIK839b021786@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538557 --- Comment #3 from Bill Nottingham 2009-11-18 15:08:02 EDT --- It's not a barrier, you just likely want to fix the description. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 20:15:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:15:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538557] Review Request: gnome-screensaver-londonpictures - GNOME Screensaver Slideshow of London In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911182015.nAIKFYRW024195@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538557 Serguei Shimansky changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://englishextra.org/abo | |ut/gnome-screensaver-london | |pictures/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 20:19:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:19:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516532] Review Request: globus-scheduler-event-generator - Globus Toolkit - Scheduler Event Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911182019.nAIKJLrO007647@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516532 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-18 15:19:20 EDT --- globus-scheduler-event-generator-2.1-1.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 20:19:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:19:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468804] Review Request: python-tg-devtools - Development tools and templates for TurboGears2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911182019.nAIKJauL007718@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468804 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-18 15:19:34 EDT --- python-tg-devtools-2.0.2-5.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-tg-devtools'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0851 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 20:21:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:21:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466047] Review Request: tcl-mysqltcl - MySQL interface for Tcl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911182021.nAIKLdup025994@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466047 --- Comment #43 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-18 15:21:38 EDT --- tcl-mysqltcl-3.05-8.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 20:19:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:19:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516532] Review Request: globus-scheduler-event-generator - Globus Toolkit - Scheduler Event Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911182019.nAIKJRPt025006@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516532 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.1-1.fc11 |2.1-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 20:19:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:19:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466047] Review Request: tcl-mysqltcl - MySQL interface for Tcl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911182019.nAIKJscL007923@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466047 --- Comment #42 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-18 15:19:51 EDT --- tcl-mysqltcl-3.05-8.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 20:21:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:21:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466047] Review Request: tcl-mysqltcl - MySQL interface for Tcl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911182021.nAIKLk3C008946@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466047 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.05-8.el5 |3.05-8.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 20:21:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:21:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 512016] Review Request: zikula-module-Polls - Simple voting system for Zikula In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911182021.nAIKL42t008716@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512016 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.0.2-3.fc11 |2.0.2-3.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 20:20:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:20:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 512016] Review Request: zikula-module-Polls - Simple voting system for Zikula In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911182020.nAIKKx7v008675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512016 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-18 15:20:58 EDT --- zikula-module-Polls-2.0.2-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 20:21:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:21:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516532] Review Request: globus-scheduler-event-generator - Globus Toolkit - Scheduler Event Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911182021.nAIKLGSh008798@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516532 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.1-1.el4 |2.1-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 20:21:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:21:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516532] Review Request: globus-scheduler-event-generator - Globus Toolkit - Scheduler Event Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911182021.nAIKLBn4008752@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516532 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-18 15:21:10 EDT --- globus-scheduler-event-generator-2.1-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 20:20:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:20:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516534] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-callout-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus GRAM Jobmanager Callout Errors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911182020.nAIKKCID008358@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516534 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.2-1.fc11 |0.2-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 20:20:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:20:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466047] Review Request: tcl-mysqltcl - MySQL interface for Tcl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911182020.nAIKK0Un007987@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466047 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |3.05-8.el5 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 20:20:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:20:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516534] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-callout-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus GRAM Jobmanager Callout Errors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911182020.nAIKK7gH008324@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516534 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-18 15:20:06 EDT --- globus-gram-job-manager-callout-error-0.2-1.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 20:22:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:22:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516534] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-callout-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus GRAM Jobmanager Callout Errors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911182022.nAIKMCHh026287@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516534 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.2-1.el4 |0.2-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 20:22:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:22:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516534] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-callout-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus GRAM Jobmanager Callout Errors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911182022.nAIKM8Um026245@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516534 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-18 15:22:07 EDT --- globus-gram-job-manager-callout-error-0.2-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 21:12:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:12:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538557] Review Request: gnome-screensaver-londonpictures - GNOME Screensaver Slideshow of London In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911182112.nAILCoH4024721@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538557 --- Comment #5 from Serguei Shimansky 2009-11-18 16:12:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > Spec URL: > http://englishextra.org/pub/rpm/SPECS/gnome-screensaver-londonpictures.spec > SRPM URL: > http://englishextra.org/pub/rpm/SOURCES/gnome-screensaver-londonpictures-0.1.tar.bz2 > Description: gnome-screensaver-londonpictures is an addon screen saver for > GNOME Screensaver that provides a slideshow of freely distributable frog > pictures. Requires: gnome-screensaver The Description has been edited for the reason described by Bill Nottingham (notting at redhat.com) in a comment below. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 21:17:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:17:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526126] Review Request: python3 - Python 3.x (backwards incompatible version) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911182117.nAILHcFH026136@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126 --- Comment #53 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-18 16:17:35 EDT --- I can't get runtests.sh working... When running, all tests are failing because of: "./python: error while loading shared libraries: libpython3.1.so.1.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory" If this is fixed, you could add a %check section and run the tests there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 21:38:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:38:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538558] Review Request: kde-partitionmanager - KDE Partition Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911182138.nAILcpD3031948@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538558 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-11-18 16:38:50 EDT --- Good: + Basename of the SPEC file matches with package name + Package name fullfill naming guidelines + Package has proper BuildRoot defintion + Consitently usage of rpm macros + License tag declared GPLv2+ as a valid OSS license + Copyright notes in source files matches with declaration of license tag + Package contains verbatin copy of the license text + URL tags shows on proper project homepage + Could download upstream sources via spectool -g + Packaged upstream tar ball matches with upstream (md5sum: 07046e0c61ca3f06129580ffd7f9c66e) + Package has no subpackages + Rpmlint is silent on source package + Rpmlint is silent on debuginfo package + Debuginfo files contains source files + buildroot will be cleaned at the beginning of %clean and %install + Package has small %doc stanza, so no separate doc subpackage in required. + Local build works fine + Build is SMP clean + Local install and uninstall of the package works fine + Start of the application works without crash + Scratch build on koji works properly + Files stanza has proper default permisions + Files stanza has no duplicate entries + All fires and dirs are owned by the package + No files or dirs belong to another package + Package has proper Changelog stanza Bad - Rpmlint complaints on binary package: $ rpmlint kde-partitionmanager-1.0.0-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm kde-partitionmanager.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libpartitionmanagerprivate.so libpartitionmanagerprivate.so 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. Please contact upstream author to fix it. - Please mof the desktop-file-validate command to the %install stanza - qt4-devel is not required as a BR, because kdelibs4-devel requires qt4-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 21:49:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:49:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530473] Review Request: lessfs - Lessfs is an inline data deduplicating filesystem. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911182149.nAILn2KQ019827@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530473 --- Comment #15 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-11-18 16:49:00 EDT --- Yes, it is because you really use mesh of tabs and spaces. I don't see any problem convert all spaces to tabs, for example: http://hubbitus.fedorapeople.org/lessfs.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 22:09:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:09:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477948] Review Request: simple-ccsm - Simplified plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911182209.nAIM9fQD026911@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477948 --- Comment #8 from Christoph Wickert 2009-11-18 17:09:38 EDT --- SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. FIX: Please update the icon-cache scriptlets to the latest version from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 22:21:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:21:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538327] Review Request: otpd - One Time Password daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911182221.nAIMLsrg015313@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538327 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tomspur at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #2 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-18 17:21:52 EDT --- Just a few comments for now: - License GPL is wrong: GPLv2+ is the right one - The builds fails: gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -D_REENTRANT -DUSE_SOCKET -DHAVE_CLOCK_GETTIME -DVERSION=\"3.2.0\" -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -Wshadow -Wsign-compare -Werror -c -o failover_thread.o failover_thread.c cc1: warnings being treated as errors failover_thread.c: In function 'failover_thread': failover_thread.c:109: error: dereferencing pointer 'uicp' does break strict-aliasing rules failover_thread.c:109: note: initialized from here failover_thread.c:110: error: dereferencing pointer 'uicp' does break strict-aliasing rules failover_thread.c:110: note: initialized from here failover_thread.c:162: error: dereferencing pointer 'uicp' does break strict-aliasing rules failover_thread.c:162: note: initialized from here failover_thread.c:267: error: dereferencing pointer '({anonymous})' does break strict-aliasing rules failover_thread.c:267: note: initialized from here make: *** [failover_thread.o] Error 1 - run make %{?_smp_mflags} and not just make, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Parallel_make - use make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT and not %makeinstall, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Why_the_.25makeinstall_macro_should_not_be_used - in %clean, please just run rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT - Source needs to contains a url, where you downloaded it, e.g. http://otpd.googlecode.com/files/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz - I'm unsure, if the Packager and Vendor tag is in fedora only not used or not allowed. From https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Rpmlint_Errors it's just not used... - The description is misleading (at least for me): "otpd is part of a suite of software"... Which suite? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 22:27:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:27:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532874] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-wacom - Xorg X11 wacom input driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911182227.nAIMRNpt002181@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532874 Peter Hutterer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Peter Hutterer 2009-11-18 17:27:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > > Obsolete linuxwacom, don't Conflict with it. > > I think, this can't work, because in bug #538036, you say, I should copy the > fdi file from linuxwacom and that this file will be included in this package > too. If you don't rename this file, when adding here, this would probably cause > problems, when both are installed. > If you rename the file -> Obsolete, > no rename -> Conflict. > Maybe name it 10-wacom.fdi... ok, I'll make sure to do that and check the conflicts. note that 0.10.0 is a developer release, hence the less-than optimal fdi file installation. http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2009-November/047927.html hotplugging is fixed upstream, i'll get a new release out soon to avoid this. > One last thing: > - run make %{?_smp_mflags} and not just make to enable building targets in > parallel, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Parallel_make done, will be in the import. thanks for the review. > All other issues, except the 'non-working' at least for me, are fixed: > > -> APPROVED New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xorg-x11-drv-wacom Short Description: Xorg X11 wacom input driver Owners: whot Branches: F-12 InitialCC: xgl-maint -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 22:57:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:57:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533723] Review Request: perl-Guard - Safe cleanup blocks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911182257.nAIMvaE1026928@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533723 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-18 17:57:36 EDT --- perl-Guard-1.021-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Guard'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0843 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 22:57:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:57:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533721] Review Request: perl-Net-CIDR - Manipulate IPv4/IPv6 netblocks in CIDR notation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911182257.nAIMvQwb026865@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533721 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-18 17:57:25 EDT --- perl-Net-CIDR-0.13-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Net-CIDR'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0842 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 23:01:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:01:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538558] Review Request: kde-partitionmanager - KDE Partition Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911182301.nAIN1G9l013684@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538558 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Janssen 2009-11-18 18:01:15 EDT --- Thanks for doing the review. (In reply to comment #1) > Bad > - Rpmlint complaints on binary package: > $ rpmlint kde-partitionmanager-1.0.0-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm > kde-partitionmanager.x86_64: E: invalid-soname > /usr/lib64/libpartitionmanagerprivate.so libpartitionmanagerprivate.so > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. > Please contact upstream author to fix it. I asked about that rpmlint output in #fedora-kde before i upped this review request and got answers from rdieter and Kevin_Kofler that it's only a private lib. "It's perfectly normal for a KCM to be an unversioned .so, it's a plugin, not a library, it gets dlopened. Nothing else will use it." Any further thoughts on that? > - Please mof the desktop-file-validate command to the %install stanza Moved to %install > - qt4-devel is not required as a BR, because kdelibs4-devel requires > qt4-devel Removed the BR -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 23:11:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:11:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538327] Review Request: otpd - One Time Password daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911182311.nAINBcXT031398@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538327 --- Comment #3 from R P Herrold 2009-11-18 18:11:36 EDT --- An inauspicious start as it does not build under CentOS 5, with minimal stuff brought down from RawHide as SRPMs and recompiled to solution gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -D_REENTRANT -DUSE_SOCKET -DHAVE_CLOCK_GETTIME -DVERSION=\"3.2.0\" -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -Wshadow -Wsign-compare -Werror -c -o resynctool.o resynctool.c cc1: warnings being treated as errors resynctool.c: In function 'main': resynctool.c:219: warning: format '%llu' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'uint64_t' resynctool.c:223: warning: format '%llu' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'uint64_t' resynctool.c:240: warning: format '%llu' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'uint64_t' make: *** [resynctool.o] Error 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.43739 (%build) I have to scratch my head at that warning enhancement, but ... -- Russ herrold -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 00:45:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 19:45:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 165552] Review Request: banner - Prints a short string to the console in very large letters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911190045.nAJ0jZHO027982@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=165552 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-18 19:45:34 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 01:25:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:25:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538657] New: Some Fedora 12 packages have versions that do not supersede the versions of Fedora 11 packages, Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Some Fedora 12 packages have versions that do not supersede the versions of Fedora 11 packages, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538657 Summary: Some Fedora 12 packages have versions that do not supersede the versions of Fedora 11 packages, Product: Fedora Version: 12 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: przemek at nist.gov QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Some Fedora 12 packages have versions that do not supersede the versions of Fedora 11 packages, preventing a complete upgrade to FC12. A partial list is: tigervnc-1.0.0-2.fc11.i586 gst-mixer-2.26.0-3.fc11.i586 libotf-0.9.9-3.fc11.i586 nautilus-cd-burner-libs-2.25.3-7.fc11.i586 lame-libs-3.98.2-3.fc11.i586 iptstate-2.2.2-3.fc11.i586 kmodtool-1-18.fc11.noarch preupgrade-1.1.2-1.fc11.noarch parrot-docs-1.6.0-2.fc11.noarch mod_dnssd-0.6-2.fc11.i586 libnetfilter_conntrack-0.0.100-1.fc11.i586 a52dec-0.7.4-15.fc11.i586 faad2-libs-2.7-1.fc11.i586 libvolume_id-141-7.fc11.i586 twolame-libs-0.3.12-4.fc11.i586 parrot-1.6.0-2.fc11.i586 parrot-devel-1.6.0-2.fc11.i586 parrot-tools-1.6.0-2.fc11.i586 faac-1.28-1.fc11.1.i586 iw-0.9.17-3.fc11.i586 sos-1.8-17.fc11.noarch gnome-mount-0.8-5.fc11.i586 For example, 'yum update iw' does nothing; 'yum install iw' results in an error message Transaction Check Error: package iw-0.9.17-3.fc11.i586 (which is newer than iw-0.9.17-2.fc12.i686) is already installed Similar behavior for all other packages on the list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 01:37:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:37:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538657] Some Fedora 12 packages have versions that do not supersede the versions of Fedora 11 packages, In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911190137.nAJ1bZMF030714@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538657 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |sundaram at redhat.com Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-11-18 20:37:33 EDT --- Package review component is for reviewing NEW packages not in the repository yet. Please post to fedora-devel list instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 01:43:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:43:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911190143.nAJ1hsOD014561@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com --- Comment #14 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-11-18 20:43:53 EDT --- Please remove the conditionals especially things like "# use "rpmbuild --with single_dyn_drv" or "rpm --define '_with_single_dyn_drv 1'" (for RPM 3.x)" It doesn't make any sense whatsoever for a new package in Fedora to have a conditional for a non current RPM release. All the conditionals just looks very convoluted. You can keep a minimum number of them if really required with comments on where this is useful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 02:58:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:58:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911190258.nAJ2wKAq006735@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 --- Comment #15 from Nathanael Noblet 2009-11-18 21:58:18 EDT --- Removed all conditionals. http://www.gnat.ca/dspam.spec http://www.gnat.ca/dspam-3.9.0-0.4.BETA4.fc12.src.rpm I'm also trying to find out about the two setgid binaries rpmlint complains about. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 02:58:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:58:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538673] New: Review Request: libunitstring - GNU Unicode string library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libunitstring - GNU Unicode string library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538673 Summary: Review Request: libunitstring - GNU Unicode string library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: p at draigbrady.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.pixelbeat.org/patches/libunistring/libunistring.spec SRPM URL: http://www.pixelbeat.org/patches/libunistring/libunistring-0.9.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This is a new portable unicode library by Bruno Haible and is used in Guile and soon to be used in coreutils. It's already included in debian and mandrake. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 03:01:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:01:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911190301.nAJ31hSO024959@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 --- Comment #16 from Nathanael Noblet 2009-11-18 22:01:42 EDT --- I'm also wondering what to do about the URL: Source0: tags... The files are on sourceforge and I've seen posts on fedora-devel list about making sure that URL/Source0 can actually download the file. Are there other spec files with sourceforge downloads I can look at? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 03:04:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:04:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911190304.nAJ343DM008398@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 --- Comment #17 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-11-18 22:04:01 EDT --- every fedora distro have perl and sed. Requires: sed Requires: perl no need to have this is requires, also you can remove versioning in requires mysql-devel >= 4.0 etc... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 03:08:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:08:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911190308.nAJ38uFI010731@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 --- Comment #19 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-11-18 22:08:54 EDT --- A note on Requires at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Requires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 03:05:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:05:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911190305.nAJ35Q6t009214@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 --- Comment #18 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-11-18 22:05:25 EDT --- For source URL, refer to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL There are several thousands of spec files at http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 03:41:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:41:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911190341.nAJ3fTop006211@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 --- Comment #20 from Nathanael Noblet 2009-11-18 22:41:27 EDT --- http://www.gnat.ca/dspam.spec http://www.gnat.ca/dspam-3.9.0-0.5.BETA4.fc12.src.rpm Thanks for the link re: Source0 * Wed Nov 18 2009 Nathanael Noblet - 3.9.0-0.5.BETA4 - Cleanup Requires - Stop building web ui as some perl dependancies are unmet - Fixed Source0 url -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 03:46:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:46:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911190346.nAJ3kkWV024925@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 --- Comment #21 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-11-18 22:46:44 EDT --- for me no reason to use versioning. BuildRequires: sqlite-devel >= 3.0 BuildRequires: autoconf >= 2.5 BuildRequires: automake >= 1.7 also at the bottom # make some dirs this is not necessary, you can use install -Dp -m , this will create directory's if necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 03:47:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:47:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911190347.nAJ3le4a008405@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 --- Comment #22 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-11-18 22:47:39 EDT --- you can move dspam-web-ui.conf out of spec file and use it as SOURCE4, this will make your spec file small and more readable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 04:15:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:15:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911190415.nAJ4FYcC017013@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 --- Comment #23 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-11-18 23:15:32 EDT --- According to packaging guidelines: "The Vendor tag should not be used. It is set automatically by the build system" If you build only for Fedora, you can drop "Buildroot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-root" and after the %install line, drop "[ "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" != "/" ] && %{__rm} -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" after the %clean line, change to %{__rm} -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT !=/ check is unnecessary. RPM takes care of that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 04:20:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:20:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911190420.nAJ4Kc49018724@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 --- Comment #24 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-11-18 23:20:37 EDT --- Another question: Why are you packaging the BETA release instead of the latest stable version? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 04:27:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:27:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911190427.nAJ4Rc83005037@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 --- Comment #25 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-11-18 23:27:36 EDT --- > If you build only for Fedora, you can drop > > "Buildroot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-root" please leave the build root, I want it for EL-5 look -> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 05:28:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:28:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530021] Review Request: moovida - Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911190528.nAJ5SdEs008339@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530021 Graeme Gillies changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |graeme.r.gillies at gmail.com --- Comment #20 from Graeme Gillies 2009-11-19 00:28:37 EDT --- Hi I have made the requested changes. I wasn't able to use %find_lang to correctly mark all the locale data unfortunately because it's in a non-standard directory, I'm not sure if there is a better way to mark it than what I have done. moovida.spec: http://ggillies.fedorapeople.org/moovida.spec moovida-1.0.8-2.fc11.src.rpm: http://ggillies.fedorapeople.org/moovida-1.0.8-2.fc11.src.rpm moovida-plugins-good.spec: http://ggillies.fedorapeople.org/moovida-plugins-good.spec moovida-plugins-good-1.0.8-2.fc11.src.rpm: http://ggillies.fedorapeople.org/moovida-plugins-good-1.0.8-2.fc11.src.rpm moovida-plugins-bad.spec: http://ggillies.fedorapeople.org/moovida-plugins-bad.spec moovida-plugins-bad-1.0.8-2.fc11.src.rpm: http://ggillies.fedorapeople.org/moovida-plugins-bad-1.0.8-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 05:34:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:34:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530021] Review Request: moovida - Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911190534.nAJ5Y2Gu025510@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530021 --- Comment #21 from Graeme Gillies 2009-11-19 00:34:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > Hi I have made the requested changes. I wasn't able to use %find_lang to > correctly mark all the locale data unfortunately because it's in a non-standard > directory, I'm not sure if there is a better way to mark it than what I have > done. > > moovida.spec: > http://ggillies.fedorapeople.org/moovida.spec > > moovida-1.0.8-2.fc11.src.rpm: > http://ggillies.fedorapeople.org/moovida-1.0.8-2.fc11.src.rpm > > moovida-plugins-good.spec: > http://ggillies.fedorapeople.org/moovida-plugins-good.spec > > moovida-plugins-good-1.0.8-2.fc11.src.rpm: > http://ggillies.fedorapeople.org/moovida-plugins-good-1.0.8-2.fc11.src.rpm > > moovida-plugins-bad.spec: > http://ggillies.fedorapeople.org/moovida-plugins-bad.spec > > moovida-plugins-bad-1.0.8-2.fc11.src.rpm: > http://ggillies.fedorapeople.org/moovida-plugins-bad-1.0.8-2.fc11.src.rpm Apologies I was accidentaly logged into my old bugzilla account when I posted that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 05:35:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:35:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538326] Review Request: perl-LWP-Online - Module for accessing web by proccess In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911190535.nAJ5ZEU2010488@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538326 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-11-19 00:35:12 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1813700 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url (sha1sum) f1391f2b17d2e18b1c1396fb58a52cdf7efe40ec LWP-Online-1.07.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=5, Tests=3, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.01 sys + 0.23 cusr 0.03 csys = 0.30 CPU) + Package perl-LWP-Online-1.07-1.fc13.noarch => Provides: perl(LWP::Online) = 1.07 Requires: perl >= 0:5.005 perl(Carp) perl(LWP::Simple) perl(strict) perl(vars) + Not a GUI application Suggestions: 1) please remove following Requires as I see they are auto pulled by yum Requires: perl(LWP::Simple) Requires: perl(URI) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 05:36:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:36:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911190536.nAJ5aPKn026507@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 --- Comment #26 from Nathanael Noblet 2009-11-19 00:36:24 EDT --- I've tried removing the # make some dirs parts so for example I now have %{__install} -Dp -m 644 src/tools.mysql_drv/*.sql.gz $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/%{name}/sql-scripts/mysql/ But it fails /usr/bin/install: target `/home/gnat/Projects/Packages/BUILDROOT/dspam-3.9.0-0.6.BETA4.fc12.x86_64/usr/share/dspam/sql-scripts/mysql/' is not a directory: No such file or directory I've tried looking at man install, so I'm a bit confused the -D should work should it not? About the BETA release. 3.8.0 is REALLY old, and upstream has basically taken 3.8 and applied a bunch of fixes and community patches. Upstream had gone dead twice in the last 3 years. The original author had his software purchased by a company. That company did nothing, and released it fully open to the community that wanted to continue development. Packaging 3.8 would be a waste of time as 3.9 should be out soon enough, and is really 3.8 + fixes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 05:49:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:49:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538361] Review Request: perl-CPAN-Checksums - Write a CHECKSUMS file for a directory as on CPAN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911190549.nAJ5nQfb030062@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538361 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-11-19 00:49:25 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1813940 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url (sha1sum) 2e1aa5110006511eb293d581b5e987eca9b4ca4b CPAN-Checksums-2.04.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=4, Tests=22, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.01 sys + 0.33 cusr 0.04 csys = 0.41 CPU) + Package perl-CPAN-Checksums-2.04-1.fc13.noarch => Provides: perl(CPAN::Checksums) = 2.04 Requires: perl(Compress::Bzip2) perl(Compress::Zlib) perl(Data::Compare) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(Digest::MD5) perl(Digest::SHA) perl(DirHandle) perl(Exporter) perl(File::Spec) perl(File::Temp) perl(IO::File) perl(strict) perl(vars) + Not a GUI application Suggestions: 1) please remove requires from spec Requires: perl(Compress::Bzip2) Requires: perl(Compress::Zlib) Requires: perl(Data::Compare) Requires: perl(Digest::SHA) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 05:52:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:52:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538360] Review Request: perl-CPAN-Inject - Base class for injecting distributions into CPAN sources In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911190552.nAJ5qXGh031172@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538360 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 05:56:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:56:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911190556.nAJ5uHn8016455@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 --- Comment #27 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-11-19 00:56:16 EDT --- for what reason you're running this ? %build aclocal -I m4 sh ./autogen.sh autoheader automake --add-missing autoconf umask 022 I think inside o autogen.sh it's run all required commands. It's also seems to work without this, have you tried ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 06:33:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 01:33:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530021] Review Request: moovida - Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911190633.nAJ6Xh3G011217@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530021 --- Comment #22 from Alex Lancaster 2009-11-19 01:33:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > (In reply to comment #20) > > Hi I have made the requested changes. I wasn't able to use %find_lang to > > correctly mark all the locale data unfortunately because it's in a non-standard > > directory, I'm not sure if there is a better way to mark it than what I have > > done. > > > > moovida.spec: > > http://ggillies.fedorapeople.org/moovida.spec > > > > moovida-1.0.8-2.fc11.src.rpm: > > http://ggillies.fedorapeople.org/moovida-1.0.8-2.fc11.src.rpm > > > > moovida-plugins-good.spec: > > http://ggillies.fedorapeople.org/moovida-plugins-good.spec > > > > moovida-plugins-good-1.0.8-2.fc11.src.rpm: > > http://ggillies.fedorapeople.org/moovida-plugins-good-1.0.8-2.fc11.src.rpm > > > > moovida-plugins-bad.spec: > > http://ggillies.fedorapeople.org/moovida-plugins-bad.spec > > > > moovida-plugins-bad-1.0.8-2.fc11.src.rpm: > > http://ggillies.fedorapeople.org/moovida-plugins-bad-1.0.8-2.fc11.src.rpm > > Apologies I was accidentaly logged into my old bugzilla account when I posted > that. Thanks. This doesn't need a new spec bump right away, but when you update for the next round could you use "center" (US spelling) rather than "centre" in the Summary. Although I generally use centre myself (being from a Commonwealth country), upstream uses "center" http://www.moovida.com/ so we should stick with that. Did you have any luck with finding a sponsor? The best way to get a sponsor is to help out post suggestions/on other reviews which shows you know the packaging guidelines and to become more generally known on the packaging side of the Fedora community. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 07:27:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 02:27:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532205] Review Request: microba - Set of JFC (Swing) components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911190727.nAJ7RJUa012769@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532205 --- Comment #1 from Michal Ingeli 2009-11-19 02:27:18 EDT --- - clean spec file - good requires - all java specifics are according to java packaging guidelines - good license - rpmlint silent * as this is built with ant, I am missing it as a BuildRequire. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 07:59:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 02:59:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538326] Review Request: perl-LWP-Online - Module for accessing web by proccess In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911190759.nAJ7xgEv003861@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538326 Marcela Ma?l??ov? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Marcela Ma?l??ov? 2009-11-19 02:59:41 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-LWP-Online Short Description: Module for accessing web by proccess Owners: mmaslano Branches: devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 08:10:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 03:10:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538361] Review Request: perl-CPAN-Checksums - Write a CHECKSUMS file for a directory as on CPAN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911190810.nAJ8AL9R023551@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538361 --- Comment #2 from Marcela Ma?l??ov? 2009-11-19 03:06:07 EDT --- Useless requirements removed, thank you for your review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 08:12:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 03:12:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538361] Review Request: perl-CPAN-Checksums - Write a CHECKSUMS file for a directory as on CPAN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911190812.nAJ8CKIl007099@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538361 Marcela Ma?l??ov? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Marcela Ma?l??ov? 2009-11-19 03:10:58 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-CPAN-Checksums Short Description: Write a CHECKSUMS file for a directory as on CPAN Owners: mmaslano Branches: devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 08:19:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 03:19:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528108] Review Request: Vuurmuur - Firewall manager built on top of iptables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911190819.nAJ8J6l5008630@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528108 --- Comment #14 from Stjepan Gros 2009-11-19 03:19:03 EDT --- I messed up versioning and skipped unintentionally over release 4. Anyway, continuing with 6. Changelog is now fixed, here are new SRPM and spec file and I'm going to request CVS entry next. Spec URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/vuurmuur/Vuurmuur.spec SRPM URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/vuurmuur/Vuurmuur-0.7-6.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 08:20:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 03:20:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528108] Review Request: Vuurmuur - Firewall manager built on top of iptables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911190820.nAJ8Ke1Z009475@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528108 Stjepan Gros changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Stjepan Gros 2009-11-19 03:20:36 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: vuurmuur Short Description: Firewall manager built on top of iptables Owners: sgros Branches: F-12 InitialCC: sgros -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 08:21:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 03:21:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 424841] Review Request: ndisc6 - IPv6 diagnostic tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911190821.nAJ8LwX2026774@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424841 --- Comment #32 from Stjepan Gros 2009-11-19 03:21:56 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ndisc6 Short Description: IPv6 diagnostic tools Owners: sgros Branches: F-11 F-12 EPEL InitialCC: sgros -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 08:57:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 03:57:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 511277] Review Request: comoonics-cluster-py - general cluster library for querying different clusters (used for open-sharedroot) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911190857.nAJ8vWho022808@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511277 Nils Philippsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 08:56:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 03:56:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538673] Review Request: libunitstring - GNU Unicode string library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911190856.nAJ8u8K4022226@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538673 P?draig Brady

changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bruno at clisp.org, | |jim at meyering.net --- Comment #1 from P?draig Brady

2009-11-19 03:56:05 EDT --- Oops, obviously the package name is libunistring not libunitstring. Also adding Jim and Bruno to CC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 08:58:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 03:58:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531988] Review Request: lekhonee-gnome - The gnome frontend for lekhonee wordpress client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911190858.nAJ8wWra023116@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531988 Kushal Das changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Kushal Das 2009-11-19 03:58:31 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lekhonee-gnome Short Description: The gnome frontend for lekhonee wordpress client Owners: kushal Branches: F-12 InitialCC: kushal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 08:57:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 03:57:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 511280] Review Request: comoonics-cdsl-py - Cdsl tools written in python to manage cdsl (base on the open-sharedroot) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911190857.nAJ8vYlD022847@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511280 Bug 511280 depends on bug 511277, which changed state. Bug 511277 Summary: Review Request: comoonics-cluster-py - general cluster library for querying different clusters (used for open-sharedroot) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511277 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 08:57:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 03:57:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 511276] Review Request: comoonics-base-py - Comoonics minimum baselibraries written in Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911190857.nAJ8v3fQ006808@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511276 Nils Philippsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 08:57:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 03:57:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531987] Review Request: wtop - top for webserver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911190857.nAJ8voKE007087@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531987 Kushal Das changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Kushal Das 2009-11-19 03:57:47 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: wtop Short Description: top for webserver Owners: kushal Branches: F-12 InitialCC: kushal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 08:57:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 03:57:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 511277] Review Request: comoonics-cluster-py - general cluster library for querying different clusters (used for open-sharedroot) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911190857.nAJ8v5Uu006845@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511277 Bug 511277 depends on bug 511276, which changed state. Bug 511276 Summary: Review Request: comoonics-base-py - Comoonics minimum baselibraries written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511276 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 10:05:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 05:05:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531912] Review Request: perl-Net-ARP - Create and Send ARP Packets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191005.nAJA5WTK013452@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531912 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 10:05:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 05:05:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526311] Review Request: mysql-mmm - Multi-Master Replication Manager for MySQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191005.nAJA5Y9l013493@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526311 Bug 526311 depends on bug 531912, which changed state. Bug 531912 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-ARP - Create and Send ARP Packets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531912 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 10:10:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 05:10:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225681] Merge Review: desktop-file-utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191010.nAJAAwjH015203@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225681 Bug 225681 depends on bug 468701, which changed state. Bug 468701 Summary: desktop-mime-type.prov should be in redhat-rpm-config. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468701 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 10:10:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 05:10:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468701] desktop-mime-type.prov should be in redhat-rpm-config. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191010.nAJAAvCw015185@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468701 Panu Matilainen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Panu Matilainen 2009-11-19 05:10:55 EDT --- The mime type provides script has been in rpm itself since February 2009: * Wed Feb 04 2009 Panu Matilainen - 4.6.0-0.rc4.3 - extract mimehandler provides from .desktop files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 10:17:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 05:17:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538673] Review Request: libunistring - GNU Unicode string library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191017.nAJAHVsI017057@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538673 Jim Meyering changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |meyering at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |meyering at redhat.com Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |libunitstring - GNU Unicode |libunistring - GNU Unicode |string library |string library --- Comment #2 from Jim Meyering 2009-11-19 05:17:30 EDT --- Thanks! I'll take it. Corrected the title. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 10:35:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 05:35:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526311] Review Request: mysql-mmm - Multi-Master Replication Manager for MySQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191035.nAJAZ6au022796@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526311 --- Comment #16 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-11-19 05:35:04 EDT --- Great, nice work! Ok, another couple comments: * package is still x86_64, should be noarch * mysql-mmm-monitor still needs the DBD::MySQL Requires * I don't mind the Provides, but use %{version}-%{release} * The files section contains 2 entries for /var/run/mysql-mmm * Replace /var/log/mysql-mmm with %{_localstatedir}/log/mysql-mmm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 11:02:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 06:02:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526311] Review Request: mysql-mmm - Multi-Master Replication Manager for MySQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191102.nAJB2kv6031841@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526311 --- Comment #17 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-11-19 06:02:45 EDT --- Oh, and 2 more ;-) > %post agent > /sbin/chkconfig --add mysql-mmm-agent > /sbin/chkconfig mysql-mmm-agent off > if [ $1 -eq 2 ] ; then > /sbin/service mysql-mmm-agent status >/dev/null > if [ $? = 0 ]; then > /sbin/service mysql-mmm-agent restart > fi >fi This sets the mysql-mmm-agent service to off at an update of the package. > %preun agent > if [ $1 = 0 ]; then Use -eq here > %preun monitor > if [ $1 = 0 ]; then Same here -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 11:04:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 06:04:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538451] Review Request: perl-Devel-Refactor - Perl extension for refactoring Perl code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191104.nAJB4FSZ004071@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538451 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-11-19 06:04:14 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1815776 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 6d94f77e2a0a2841784fd453bf0f58605c481761 Devel-Refactor-0.05.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=83, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.01 sys + 0.19 cusr 0.00 csys = 0.23 CPU) + Package perl-Devel-Refactor-0.05-1.fc13.noarch => Provides: perl(Devel::Refactor) = 0.05 Requires: perl(Cwd) perl(Exporter) perl(File::Basename) perl(strict) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 11:13:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 06:13:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538451] Review Request: perl-Devel-Refactor - Perl extension for refactoring Perl code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191113.nAJBDcqD003122@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538451 Marcela Ma?l??ov? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Marcela Ma?l??ov? 2009-11-19 06:13:37 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Devel-Refactor Short Description: Perl extension for refactoring Perl code Owners: mmaslano Branches: devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 11:18:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 06:18:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538335] Review Request: dia-CMOS - Dia CMOS Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191118.nAJBIiwU004264@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538335 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 11:14:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 06:14:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538673] Review Request: libunistring - GNU Unicode string library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191114.nAJBEjY1003333@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538673 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-11-19 06:14:44 EDT --- oops while working on this review I guess Jim already took this. Anyway here is my review work Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1815778 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url (sha1sum) 75e9d6f79a321a62497f1808db35a1b52b7ba765 libunistring-0.9.1.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Package contains code, not content. + no .pc file present. + -devel subpackage present. + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Package libunistring-0.9.1-1.fc13.i686 => Provides: libunistring.so.0 Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libunistring.so.0 rtld(GNU_HASH) + Package libunistring-devel-0.9.1-1.fc13.i686 => Requires: libunistring.so.0 + Not a GUI application Suggestions: 1) you can simply write description for -devel package as Development files for programs using libunistring. 2) to preserve timestamps of upstream files that are copied as it is use make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" 3)defattr for devel should be %defattr(-,root,root,-) 4) Good if you follow same way of writing macros as defined at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros though %_libdir is same as %{_libdir} 5) Use scriptlet format given at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Texinfo including changing Requires also. 6) I don't see any use of including Requires: pkgconfig for -devel package. Please remove it. 7) you don't need BuildRequires: automake libtool remove them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 11:19:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 06:19:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538337] Review Request: dia-Digital - Dia Digital Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191119.nAJBJ1D9008937@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538337 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 11:25:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 06:25:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538673] Review Request: libunistring - GNU Unicode string library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191125.nAJBPQsY006471@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538673 --- Comment #4 from Jim Meyering 2009-11-19 06:25:23 EDT --- Hi Parag, you're welcome to do the review. I didn't know you'd started. Please reassign to yourself, if you can, or let me know and I'll do it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 11:54:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 06:54:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 165552] Review Request: banner - Prints a short string to the console in very large letters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191154.nAJBsoLV000662@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=165552 Oliver Falk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |538076 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 11:54:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 06:54:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 165552] Review Request: banner - Prints a short string to the console in very large letters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191154.nAJBsd6T000603@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=165552 Oliver Falk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Oliver Falk 2009-11-19 06:54:36 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: banner New Branches: EL-4 Owners: jima oliver Sorry. Forgot EL-4 :-( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 12:11:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 07:11:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 505813] Review Request: Ballview - Molecule and protien visualisation and analysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191211.nAJCB9ns005387@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505813 D Haley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |FE-DEADREVIEW --- Comment #3 from D Haley 2009-11-19 07:11:06 EDT --- I'm sorry, work has caught up to me, and I will not be able to attend to this package for the next two months. I have marked it FE-DEADREVIEW until then. If someone needs/wants it urgently, feel free to take the package over. I did make some of the changes you suggested, and will post this in the next few days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 12:14:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 07:14:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478388] Review Request: UDAV - data visualisation program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191214.nAJCE0wL020502@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478388 D Haley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|10 |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 12:21:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 07:21:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538465] Review Request: libmx - A clutter toolkit for Moblin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191221.nAJCLNom023545@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538465 --- Comment #1 from Peter Robinson 2009-11-19 07:21:23 EDT --- New upstream SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/libmx-0.1.2-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 12:32:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 07:32:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538673] Review Request: libunistring - GNU Unicode string library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191232.nAJCWYWg027104@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538673 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|meyering at redhat.com |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) 2009-11-19 07:32:32 EDT --- Thanks you. I will review this. Please feel free to comment if I miss anything to check in this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 13:00:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:00:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532309] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-net-ldap - A full-featured pure-Ruby LDAP client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191300.nAJD0OSg019842@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532309 --- Comment #11 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-11-19 08:00:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > So please write in the spec file what is really related to Fedora. > In your logic you can add arbitrary Obsoletes because "it is used > by my project", however no other person knows it and it is just unneeded. That's not my logic, nor the scope of this package, and it is needed since the package was renamed, and *may* have been deployed throughout more then one environment already -we know of at least one situation where it is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 13:40:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:40:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538458] Review Request: perl-Format-Human-Bytes - Format a bytecount and make it human readable In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191340.nAJDeMa4019574@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538458 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |needinfo?(mmaslano at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-11-19 08:40:20 EDT --- I assume you mean http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Format-Human-Bytes.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 13:52:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:52:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538458] Review Request: perl-Format-Human-Bytes - Format a bytecount and make it human readable In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191352.nAJDqaZl024178@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538458 Marcela Ma?l??ov? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(mmaslano at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #2 from Marcela Ma?l??ov? 2009-11-19 08:52:35 EDT --- Oh my, yes(In reply to comment #1) > I assume you mean > http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Format-Human-Bytes.spec Oh my, yes I meant this ^ I'm sorry, too many packages at once... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 14:00:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:00:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538458] Review Request: perl-Format-Human-Bytes - Format a bytecount and make it human readable In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191400.nAJE04Z9027217@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538458 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-11-19 09:00:04 EDT --- no problem.I will take this for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 14:02:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:02:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538820] New: Review Request: roboptim-core - Numerical optimization for robotics Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: roboptim-core - Numerical optimization for robotics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538820 Summary: Review Request: roboptim-core - Numerical optimization for robotics Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: thomas.moulard at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://homepages.laas.fr/~tmoulard/fedora/roboptim-core-0.4-1.spec SRPM URL: http://homepages.laas.fr/~tmoulard/fedora/roboptim-core-0.4-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Hi! Here is a robotics package I have developed and packaged. It is the first software I package for Fedora so please forgive the errors I may have done. RobOptim provide C++ numerical optimization libraries for robotics. RobOptim core focuses on providing abstractions for optimization problem definition and infrastructure to allow the use of existing solvers as a back-end. RobOptim is composed of several packages: core, trajectory (for trajectory optimization) and plug-ins (two packages have been developed but only one is acceptable by Fedora). I will request reviews for the two others if this one gets accepted. A successful Koji build (i386 / f12) of this package is available here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1816570 Thanks you by advance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 14:05:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:05:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538820] Review Request: roboptim-core - Numerical optimization for robotics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191405.nAJE5o6w009354@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538820 Thomas Moulard changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 14:12:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:12:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538820] Review Request: roboptim-core - Numerical optimization for robotics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191412.nAJEC0uj011420@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538820 --- Comment #1 from Thomas Moulard 2009-11-19 09:11:59 EDT --- rpmlint output: $ rpmlint -i ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/roboptim-core-0.4-1.fc11.i586.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint -i ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/roboptim-core-devel-0.4-1.fc11.i586.rpm roboptim-core-devel.i586: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. roboptim-core-devel.i586: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/roboptim-core-dummy-plugin.so roboptim-core-dummy-plugin.so.1.0.1 The target of the symbolic link does not exist within this package or its file based dependencies. Verify spelling of the link target and that the target is included in a package in this package's dependency chain. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint -i ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/roboptim-core-doc-0.4-1.fc11.i586.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. comments: roboptim-core-devel.i586: W: no-documentation There is a separate documentation package so I do not have anything to put in this one. roboptim-core-devel.i586: W: dangling-relative-symlink As stated in [1] in ``Devel Packages'' section, the unversioned shared library /only/ is in the devel package, the versioned one is in the ``roboptim-core'' package. So package dependency provides the symlink target. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Packaging:Guidelines&oldid=133795 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 14:49:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:49:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538657] Some Fedora 12 packages have versions that do not supersede the versions of Fedora 11 packages, In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191449.nAJEnanG012495@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538657 --- Comment #2 from przemek at nist.gov 2009-11-19 09:49:35 EDT --- Package review component is for reviewing NEW packages not in the repository yet. Please post to fedora-devel list instead. OK, I had no idea where to put this report---it's a packaging system issue as much as a specific package issue so I went by a name that seemed plausible, in absence of better information on what the components actually cover. Look, I was trying to do the right thing. Can't you help me by suggesting a Bugzilla component/category that this belongs in, instead of dismissing this to some mailing list? I think it'd be better if this gets captured in the regular workflow. You closed the issue with status NOTABUG which implies that it is fixed but it is not, and if unsolved it could eventually affect RHEL customers upgrading from previous versions. If there isn't any existing category, it should be created, in my opinion---the alternative being to report umpteen package versioning issues against the individual packages in question. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 14:48:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:48:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538673] Review Request: libunistring - GNU Unicode string library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191448.nAJEmg6j023686@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538673 --- Comment #6 from P?draig Brady

2009-11-19 09:48:40 EDT --- Thanks for the quick review. Update now at http://www.pixelbeat.org/patches/libunistring/libunistring.spec http://www.pixelbeat.org/patches/libunistring/libunistring-0.9.1-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 14:50:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:50:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530473] Review Request: lessfs - Lessfs is an inline data deduplicating filesystem. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191450.nAJEoJ9b013261@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530473 --- Comment #16 from Adam Miller 2009-11-19 09:50:16 EDT --- [08:39:15][adam at turnip][Desktop]+ wget -c http://hubbitus.fedorapeople.org/lessfs.spec --2009-11-19 08:39:18-- http://hubbitus.fedorapeople.org/lessfs.spec Resolving hubbitus.fedorapeople.org... 128.197.185.45 Connecting to hubbitus.fedorapeople.org|128.197.185.45|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 9375 (9.2K) [text/plain] Saving to: `lessfs.spec' 100%[======================================>] 9,375 --.-K/s in 0.04s 2009-11-19 08:39:18 (220 KB/s) - `lessfs.spec' saved [9375/9375] [08:40:17][adam at turnip][Desktop]+ rpmlint lessfs.spec lessfs.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 63, tab: line 1) 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. ---------------------------------------------- As much fun as it is being petty over this, I'd like to move on with the review of the package. I've fixed the spaces/tabs issue. ---------------------------------------------- [08:46:53][adam at turnip][SPECS]+ wget -c http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/lessfs.spec --2009-11-19 08:47:09-- http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/lessfs.spec Resolving maxamillion.fedorapeople.org... 128.197.185.45 Connecting to maxamillion.fedorapeople.org|128.197.185.45|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 9487 (9.3K) [text/plain] Saving to: `lessfs.spec' 100%[======================================>] 9,487 --.-K/s in 0.03s 2009-11-19 08:47:09 (292 KB/s) - `lessfs.spec' saved [9487/9487] [08:47:09][adam at turnip][SPECS]+ rpmlint lessfs.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ------------------------- For the record though, this has never been a violation during review before. So if the policy changed then I do apologize and would like to politely request a reference to that which I had previously violated. Thank you. Spec URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/lessfs.spec SRPM URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/lessfs-0.8.3-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 14:59:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:59:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538657] Some Fedora 12 packages have versions that do not supersede the versions of Fedora 11 packages, In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191459.nAJExprs027685@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538657 --- Comment #3 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-11-19 09:59:48 EDT --- I suggested what I thought was the quickest path. If you want to do it properly, individual bug reports against each of the components would be the way to go. Catch all components are not useful since each package is maintained by a different person. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 15:06:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 10:06:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508518] Review Request: meiga - Easy tool for file sharing and content publishing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191506.nAJF6GDN030506@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508518 Rajeesh changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #9 from Rajeesh 2009-11-19 10:06:14 EDT --- Built and submitted update for Fedora 11. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-11709 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 15:25:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 10:25:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191525.nAJFPnRq001952@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 --- Comment #28 from Nathanael Noblet 2009-11-19 10:25:47 EDT --- http://www.gnat.ca/dspam.spec http://www.gnat.ca/dspam-3.9.0-0.6.BETA4.fc12.src.rpm * Thu Nov 19 2009 Nathanael Noblet - 3.9.0-0.6.BETA4 - Use install -Dp -m instead of pre-creating the directories - Move dspam-webui.conf to Source4 - Removed some of the autoX calls -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 15:45:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 10:45:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191545.nAJFjL9M018478@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 --- Comment #29 from Nathanael Noblet 2009-11-19 10:45:20 EDT --- http://www.gnat.ca/dspam.spec http://www.gnat.ca/dspam-3.9.0-0.7.BETA4.fc12.src.rpm * Thu Nov 19 2009 Nathanael Noblet - 3.9.0-0.7.BETA4 - Changed BuildRoot definition - Don't test for buildroot in install section -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 16:06:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:06:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538558] Review Request: kde-partitionmanager - KDE Partition Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191606.nAJG6MY1019450@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538558 --- Comment #3 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-11-19 11:06:21 EDT --- It may be nice, if you can upload the new release and post the URL to it as a comment in this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 16:16:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:16:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191616.nAJGG9Gb007133@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 --- Comment #30 from Nathanael Noblet 2009-11-19 11:16:07 EDT --- also in release 0.7... - Remove setgid on dspamc - Moved css* binaries to disabled dspam-web subpackage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 16:17:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:17:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538673] Review Request: libunistring - GNU Unicode string library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191617.nAJGH9V6026000@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538673 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #7 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-11-19 11:17:06 EDT --- These BuildRequires: glibc-devel texinfo also not needed. Please remove them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 16:21:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:21:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532816] Review Request: gdouros-alexander-fonts - A Greek typeface inspired by Alexander Wilson In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191621.nAJGLD2Z028206@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532816 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-19 11:21:11 EDT --- gdouros-alexander-fonts-3.01-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gdouros-alexander-fonts-3.01-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 16:27:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:27:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530617] Review Request: libixp - Stand-alone client/server 9P library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191627.nAJGRIRd012503@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530617 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-11-19 11:27:16 EDT --- Please work out the comments of mschwendt and upload the fixed release of your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 16:32:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:32:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538327] Review Request: otpd - One Time Password daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191632.nAJGWC0e014506@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538327 --- Comment #4 from Giuseppe Paterno 2009-11-19 11:32:10 EDT --- I should have fixed the above: SRPMS: http://www.gpaterno.com/external/otpd-3.2.1-1.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.gpaterno.com/external/otpd.spec I have no way to check if resynctool.c is fixed today under rawhide, however I casted it to long long unsigned int and compile fine under F12. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 16:36:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:36:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538558] Review Request: kde-partitionmanager - KDE Partition Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191636.nAJGa864016617@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538558 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Janssen 2009-11-19 11:36:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > It may be nice, if you can upload the new release and post the URL to it as a > comment in this bug. Sure, sorry. Spec URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/kde-partitionmanager.spec SRPM URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/kde-partitionmanager-1.0.0-2.fc11.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1816855 -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 16:41:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:41:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538673] Review Request: libunistring - GNU Unicode string library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191641.nAJGfvsj005575@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538673 --- Comment #8 from Parag AN(????) 2009-11-19 11:41:55 EDT --- Thanks Ralf. P?draig can you please update again SRPM? Also change following lines rm -f ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/%{_infodir}/dir rm -f ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/%{_libdir}/%{name}.la to rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_infodir}/dir rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/%{name}.la -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 16:42:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:42:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191642.nAJGgY9O005781@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 --- Comment #31 from Nathanael Noblet 2009-11-19 11:42:32 EDT --- http://www.gnat.ca/dspam.spec http://www.gnat.ca/dspam-3.9.0-0.8.BETA4.fc12.src.rpm * Thu Nov 19 2009 Nathanael Noblet - 3.9.0-0.8.BETA4 - Restored css* binaries they are hash driver utilities I'm talking with upstream about renaming their hash utils from csscompress to dspam-hash-compress or something along those lines, the names are deceiving and conflict with CRM114 if it ever got packaged. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 16:44:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:44:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538558] Review Request: kde-partitionmanager - KDE Partition Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191644.nAJGixL5008050@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538558 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-11-19 11:44:58 EDT --- Good: + desktop-file-validate was moved to %install + BR qt4-devel was removed. *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 16:58:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:58:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538673] Review Request: libunistring - GNU Unicode string library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191658.nAJGwt22029261@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538673 --- Comment #9 from P?draig Brady

2009-11-19 11:58:54 EDT --- Now no BuildRequires at all and ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} -> $RPM_BUILD_ROOT http://www.pixelbeat.org/patches/libunistring/libunistring.spec http://www.pixelbeat.org/patches/libunistring/libunistring-0.9.1-3.fc11.src.rpm cheers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 17:09:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:09:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531987] Review Request: wtop - top for webserver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191709.nAJH9VkF001744@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531987 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br --- Comment #6 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-11-19 12:09:29 EDT --- why not EL-5 and F-11 too ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 17:27:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:27:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539230] New: Review Request: perl-Authen-Simple - Simple Authentication Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Authen-Simple - Simple Authentication https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539230 Summary: Review Request: perl-Authen-Simple - Simple Authentication Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Authen-Simple/perl-Authen-Simple.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Authen-Simple/perl-Authen-Simple-0.4-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Simple and consistent framework for authentication. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 17:30:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:30:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 515053] Review Request: sugar-getiabooks - Internet Archive Books receiver for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191730.nAJHUSUU026542@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515053 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter 2009-11-19 12:30:27 EDT --- Sorry, it seams that I fixed the incoherent-version-in-changelog issue after the rpm build process and uploaded the stuff before make a new srpm. Thanks for the hint. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sugar-getiabooks Short Description: Internet Archive Books receiver for Sugar Owners: fab Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 17:29:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:29:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539231] New: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm - Create sticky forms with HTML::SuperForm Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm - Create sticky forms with HTML::SuperForm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539231 Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm - Create sticky forms with HTML::SuperForm Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm-0.4-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Create sticky HTML forms in CGI::Application run modes using HTML::SuperForm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 17:40:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:40:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 505813] Review Request: ballview - Molecule and protien visualisation and analysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191740.nAJHevbn020861@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505813 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: Ballview - |Review Request: ballview - |Molecule and protien |Molecule and protien |visualisation and analysis |visualisation and analysis Status Whiteboard|FE-DEADREVIEW |NotReady BuildFails --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-19 12:40:56 EDT --- FYI, FE-DEADREVIEW is what we put in the "Blocks" field after we close a ticket due to inactivity. I suspect you just wanted to drop this out of the review queue, which I've done with "NotReady". BTW, the original package fails to build for me in mock on rawhide. I get quite a lot of build output, and then: creating dependencies for PYTHON/EXTENSIONS... pyBALLSipHelper.C:8:30: error: sipBALLComposite.h: No such file or directory and several similar errors. I've also indicated the build failure in the whiteboard. All of these whiteboard and blocker strings are documented in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process if you're curious. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 17:42:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:42:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538420] Review Request: samtools - Tools for sorting, merging etc. SAM format files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191742.nAJHgSIK030572@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538420 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: samtools - |Review Request: samtools - |SAM (Sequence |Tools for sorting, merging |Alignment/Map) format is a |etc. SAM format files |generic format for storing | |large nucleotide sequence | |alignments. Tools for | |sorting, merging etc. sam | |format files. | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 18:02:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:02:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479669] Review Request: perl-File-pushd - Change directory temporarily for a limited scope In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191802.nAJI2L6j004742@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479669 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-19 13:02:18 EDT --- This is confusing; are you just asking for an EL-5 branch? If so, in the future please make a package change request according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVS_admin_requests#Package_Change_Requests_for_existing_packages I've created an EL-5 branch but made no other changes; if that's not what was desired, please explain what you needed and set the fedora-cvs flag back to '?'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 18:04:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:04:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537823] Review Request: hunspell-ht - Haitian Creole hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191804.nAJI4Vjd027232@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537823 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-19 13:04:30 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 18:03:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:03:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536796] Review Request: kde-plasma-smooth-tasks - KDE taskbar replacement with window peeking ability In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191803.nAJI3Mih027077@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536796 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-19 13:03:21 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 18:06:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:06:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530986] Review Request: janino - An embedded Java compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191806.nAJI6be5027928@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530986 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-19 13:06:35 EDT --- I see no CVS request here. Please submit a CVS request as described in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVS_admin_requests and set the fedora-cvs flag back to '?'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 18:05:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:05:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 491088] Review Request: rhncfg - Red Hat Network Configuration Client Libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191805.nAJI5lsI027709@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491088 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-19 13:05:44 EDT --- How did this ticket get all the way to CVS without being assigned to anyone? Please folks, at least take a ticket when you're going to review it. CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 18:08:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:08:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538558] Review Request: kde-partitionmanager - KDE Partition Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191808.nAJI8uhC007415@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538558 Thomas Janssen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Thomas Janssen 2009-11-19 13:08:55 EDT --- Thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kde-partitionmanager Short Description: KDE Partition Manager Owners: thomasj Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 18:14:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:14:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 439627] Review Request: gluegen - Java/JNI glue code generator to call out to ANSI C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191814.nAJIEMKC031186@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439627 Bug 439627 depends on bug 167525, which changed state. Bug 167525 Summary: Review Request: cpptasks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167525 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 18:14:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:14:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167525] Review Request: cpptasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191814.nAJIELKm031144@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167525 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #26 from Jerry James 2009-11-19 13:14:16 EDT --- This is available on all supported releases, so I'm closing the bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 18:21:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:21:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 491088] Review Request: rhncfg - Red Hat Network Configuration Client Libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191821.nAJILDDT000962@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491088 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sm at sandro-mathys.ch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 18:21:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:21:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 494292] Review Request: spacewalk-proxy-html - The HTML component for Spacewalk Proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191821.nAJILo9Z012685@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494292 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sm at sandro-mathys.ch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 18:27:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:27:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 494292] Review Request: spacewalk-proxy-html - The HTML component for Spacewalk Proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191827.nAJIRmQQ014118@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494292 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-19 13:27:47 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 18:29:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:29:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527706] Review Request: mingw32-libgeotiff - MinGW port of libgeotiff Georeferenced image library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191829.nAJIT4nQ014426@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527706 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-19 13:29:02 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 18:29:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:29:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532382] Review Request: fvkbd - Free Virtual Keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191829.nAJITqAX014764@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532382 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-19 13:29:50 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 18:34:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:34:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537823] Review Request: hunspell-ht - Haitian Creole hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191834.nAJIYme9005315@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537823 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Caolan McNamara 2009-11-19 13:34:47 EDT --- thanks guys -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 18:59:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:59:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532874] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-wacom - Xorg X11 wacom input driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191859.nAJIxWFI024947@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532874 --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-19 13:59:30 EDT --- I've done CVS but the new pkgdb is having issues accepting the CC of xgl-maint for some reason, so I'll leave this in the CVS queue to remind me to get back to it when that's been fixed up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 19:01:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:01:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539268] New: Review Request: rubygem-will_paginate - Most awesome pagination solution for Rail Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-will_paginate - Most awesome pagination solution for Rail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539268 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-will_paginate - Most awesome pagination solution for Rail Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dpierce at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-will_paginate.spec SRPM URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-will_paginate-2.3.11-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The will_paginate library provides a simple, yet powerful and extensible API for ActiveRecord pagination and rendering of pagination links in ActionView templates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 19:46:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:46:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532309] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-net-ldap - A full-featured pure-Ruby LDAP client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191946.nAJJk7gF001543@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532309 --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-19 14:46:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > and it is needed since the > package was renamed If what you mean here is "since the review request is opened", I have already seen many cases where packages are renamed during review process. Well, I am not going to approve this package unless you remove such Obsoletes which is completely unneeded on Fedora. If you still want to persist, please post your opinion to fedora-packaging-list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 19:55:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:55:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538558] Review Request: kde-partitionmanager - KDE Partition Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191955.nAJJtWoo005039@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538558 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jochen at herr-schmitt.de -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 19:57:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:57:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526311] Review Request: mysql-mmm - Multi-Master Replication Manager for MySQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911191957.nAJJvmM3014841@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526311 --- Comment #18 from BJ Dierkes 2009-11-19 14:57:47 EDT --- I apologize for a few of these. I had a hard drive crash and lost the current stuff I was working with, and forgot to re-implement some of the changes. These should all be handled. Note that perl-DBD-MySQL actually provides perl(DBD::mysql) which was added for the monitor subpackage. I also re-wrote the init scripts for agent/monitor so they are a lot cleaner and use init.d/functions, as well as implement a condrestart that is now used in %post. http://5dollarwhitebox.org/tmp/mysql-mmm.spec http://5dollarwhitebox.org/tmp/mysql-mmm-2.0.10-3.src.rpm %changelog * Thu Nov 19 2009 BJ Dierkes - 2.0.10-3 - BuildArch: noarch - Monitor subpackage Requires: perl(DBD::mysql) - Provides full version-release for mmm, mysql-master-master - Removed redundant /var/run/mysql-mmm entry - Use _localstatedir macro for /var/log/mysql-mmm file listing - Fixed logic in post and postun scripts to properly handle install/upgrade conditions. - Post scripts now perform condrestart - Added Source3: mysql-mmm-agent.init - Added Source4: mysql-mmm-monitor.init -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 20:43:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:43:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486757] Review Request: divine-mc - Multi-core model checking system for proving specifications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911192043.nAJKhpM3021808@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486757 --- Comment #23 from Petr Rockai 2009-11-19 15:43:47 EDT --- Hello! In the meantime, I have released version 2.0 of DiVinE. It should address the packaging problems you have encountered -- the jar files can be provided externally if needed and so on. Please consider using this new version instead of DiVinE MC 1.4 for packaging. As for what changed since 1.4, there is a list of changes available at http://divine.fi.muni.cz/page.php?page=whatsnew (the tarball can be gotten at http://divine.fi.muni.cz/page.php?page=download). Yours, Petr. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 22:15:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:15:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532205] Review Request: microba - Set of JFC (Swing) components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911192215.nAJMFrh9029969@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532205 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-19 17:15:52 EDT --- Barzdo dzi?kuj?. ant BR added (sorry I did not mockbuild before, deps were not in yet.) New package: SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/microba.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/microba-0.4.4.3-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 23:00:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:00:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538326] Review Request: perl-LWP-Online - Module for accessing web by proccess In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911192300.nAJN0e3r009838@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538326 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-19 18:00:38 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 23:01:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:01:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538361] Review Request: perl-CPAN-Checksums - Write a CHECKSUMS file for a directory as on CPAN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911192301.nAJN1VPK010044@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538361 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-19 18:01:30 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 23:05:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:05:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528108] Review Request: Vuurmuur - Firewall manager built on top of iptables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911192305.nAJN57XE006527@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528108 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- --- Comment #16 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-19 18:05:04 EDT --- Could you please clarify whether you wish this package to be named withan upper- or lower-case 'V' and reset the fedora-cvs flag? The ticket summary as well as the spec and package name in comment #14 use initial upper case, but your CVS request uses lower case. Everything should match. (Personally I prefer lower case to match the binaries and libraries that you install, but in the end it's up to you.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 23:08:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:08:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538451] Review Request: perl-Devel-Refactor - Perl extension for refactoring Perl code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911192308.nAJN8RJh011907@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538451 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-19 18:08:26 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 23:07:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:07:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531988] Review Request: lekhonee-gnome - The gnome frontend for lekhonee wordpress client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911192307.nAJN7di0011748@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531988 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-19 18:07:38 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 23:06:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:06:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 424841] Review Request: ndisc6 - IPv6 diagnostic tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911192306.nAJN6CNs011499@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424841 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- --- Comment #33 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-19 18:06:06 EDT --- Your CVS request is not well-formed; there is no branch named "EPEL". We can make either EL-4 or EL-5 branches (or both); please indicate which you would like in a corrected CVS request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 23:15:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:15:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 165552] Review Request: banner - Prints a short string to the console in very large letters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911192315.nAJNFUbZ014439@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=165552 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-19 18:15:28 EDT --- I can't find any indication of an ack from the current package owner, but I guess this was already branched for EL-5 so an EL-4 branch probably isn't going to hurt anything. In the future, please follow EPEL policy when requesting EPEL branches of existing packages that you do not own. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Getting_a_Fedora_package_in_EPEL CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 23:29:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:29:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 445224] Review Request: stapitrace - user space instruction trace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911192329.nAJNTU4i020077@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445224 Maynard Johnson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 23:28:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:28:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 445224] Review Request: stapitrace - user space instruction trace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911192328.nAJNSt00014036@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445224 Maynard Johnson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |maynardj at us.ibm.com --- Comment #19 from Maynard Johnson 2009-11-19 18:28:50 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: stapitrace New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 23:42:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:42:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538557] Review Request: gnome-screensaver-londonpictures - GNOME Screensaver Slideshow of London In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911192342.nAJNgJEO025074@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538557 --- Comment #6 from Serguei Shimansky 2009-11-19 18:42:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Obvious comment: frog pictures? (in the description) > > Not exactly. At first it was used to distribute thru commands in terminal. > > su > cd /usr/share/applications/screensavers > rm -f --verbose londonpictures-slideshow.desktop > cd /usr/share/pixmaps/backgrounds > rm -rf --verbose londonpictures > > if [[ "$HOME" != "/root" ]] > then su > fi > cd /home/$USER > residefolder="http://englishextra.org/pub" > targetfoldername="londonpictures" > archievename="$targetfoldername.tar.bz2" > wget `echo "$residefolder/$archievename"` > tar xjvf `echo "$targetfoldername.tar.bz2"` > mv -f `echo "$targetfoldername/${targetfoldername}-slideshow.desktop"` > "/usr/share/applications/screensavers" > #mv -f `echo "$targetfoldername/${targetfoldername}.xml"` > "/usr/share/applications/screensavers" > mv -f `echo "$targetfoldername"` /usr/share/pixmaps/backgrounds > #gconftool-2 --type string --set > /schemas/apps/gnome-screensaver/lock_dialog_theme "$targetfoldername" > rm -f `echo "$targetfoldername.tar.bz2"` > rm -f `echo "$targetfoldername.tar"` > zenity --info --text="Vyberite \'${targetfoldername}\' v kachestve zastavki" > if [[ "$HOME" == "/root" ]] > then exit > fi > /usr/bin/gnome-screensaver-preferences > #/schemas/apps/gnome-screensaver > > > When it came to building a noarch RPM the Frogs spec file was used as a > template. Is it a barrier for something, please let me know. The installation code in terminal is now as follows: su -c ' cd /usr/share/applications/screensavers rm -f --verbose londonpictures-slideshow.desktop cd /usr/share/pixmaps/backgrounds rm -rf --verbose londonpictures yum remove gnome-screensaver-londonpictures cd /tmp wget http://englishextra.org/pub/rpm/RPMS/noarch/gnome-screensaver-londonpictures-0.1-1.noarch.rpm rpm -Uvh http://englishextra.org/pub/rpm/RPMS/noarch/gnome-screensaver-londonpictures-0.1-1.noarch.rpm' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 23:48:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:48:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532382] Review Request: fvkbd - Free Virtual Keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911192348.nAJNmIeG026649@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532382 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #11 from Peter Robinson 2009-11-19 18:48:17 EDT --- Bastien, will do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 23:56:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:56:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532874] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-wacom - Xorg X11 wacom input driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911192356.nAJNuH6E028682@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532874 Peter Hutterer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #12 from Peter Hutterer 2009-11-19 18:56:15 EDT --- Imported and built for devel. F12 packages coming soon. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 23:56:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:56:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539388] New: Review Request: xmlrpc-epi - An implementation of the XML-RPC protocol in C. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xmlrpc-epi - An implementation of the XML-RPC protocol in C. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539388 Summary: Review Request: xmlrpc-epi - An implementation of the XML-RPC protocol in C. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bos at serpentine.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.serpentine.com/bos/files/xmlrpc-epi.spec SRPM URL: http://www.serpentine.com/bos/files/xmlrpc-epi-0.54.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: An implementation of the XML-RPC protocol in C. This is needed by the Second Life client. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 19 23:56:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:56:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539387] New: Review Request: InsightToolkit - Medical imaging processing library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: InsightToolkit - Medical imaging processing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539387 Summary: Review Request: InsightToolkit - Medical imaging processing library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mrceresa at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.4shared.com/file/155554417/4e7f103a/InsightToolkit.html SRPM URL: http://www.4shared.com/file/155554414/d7764180/InsightToolkit-3160-1fc12src.html Description: ITK is an open-source software toolkit for performing registration and segmentation. Segmentation is the process of identifying and classifying data found in a digitally sampled representation. Typically the sampled representation is an image acquired from such medical instrumentation as CT or MRI scanners. Registration is the task of aligning or developing correspondences between data. For example, in the medical environment, a CT scan may be aligned with a MRI scan in order to combine the information contained in both. I've been using the library for a while and I thought I might contribute this back to the Fedora community. I need a sponsor because this is my first package! These are rpmlint's outputs: $ rpmlint InsightToolkit.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint InsightToolkit-3.16.0-1.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint InsightToolkit-3.16.0-1.fc12.i686.rpm InsightToolkit.i686: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog InsightToolkit-3.16.0-1.fc12 ['3.16.0-1.fc12', '3.16.0-1'] InsightToolkit.i686: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint InsightToolkit-devel-3.16.0-1.fc12.i686.rpm InsightToolkit-devel.i686: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Builds ok with: mock -r fedora-12-i386 rebuild InsightToolkit-3.16.0-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 00:01:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:01:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539387] Review Request: InsightToolkit - Medical imaging processing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200001.nAK010ki024957@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539387 Mario Ceresa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 00:01:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:01:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539387] Review Request: InsightToolkit - Medical imaging processing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200001.nAK01jPa030110@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539387 Mario Ceresa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |InsightToolkit -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 00:18:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:18:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521993] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-setup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200018.nAK0IC5C001017@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521993 Kevin Wright changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 00:44:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:44:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539388] Review Request: xmlrpc-epi - An implementation of the XML-RPC protocol in C. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200044.nAK0iJeG012530@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539388 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |seg at haxxed.com --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-19 19:44:17 EDT --- *** Bug 231809 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 00:44:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:44:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 231809] Review Request: xmlrpc-epi - An implementation of the xmlrpc protocol in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200044.nAK0iInO012503@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231809 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #24 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-19 19:44:17 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 539388 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 00:45:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:45:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532874] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-wacom - Xorg X11 wacom input driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200045.nAK0juh3010545@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532874 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-19 19:45:54 EDT --- pkgdb is fixed now so I've added the requested CC entry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 01:20:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:20:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531987] Review Request: wtop - top for webserver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200120.nAK1KpgC021450@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531987 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-19 20:20:48 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 01:22:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:22:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538558] Review Request: kde-partitionmanager - KDE Partition Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200122.nAK1ML1a028030@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538558 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-19 20:22:20 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 01:21:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:21:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 515053] Review Request: sugar-getiabooks - Internet Archive Books receiver for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200121.nAK1LRni027847@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515053 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-19 20:21:26 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 01:26:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:26:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 445224] Review Request: stapitrace - user space instruction trace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200126.nAK1QNpP029842@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445224 --- Comment #20 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-19 20:26:21 EDT --- Could we get an ack from the current owner of this package? He hasn't indicated any preference with respect to EPEL branches, so we can't just go ahead and create them. The EPEL policy is at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Getting_a_Fedora_package_in_EPEL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 01:46:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:46:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539230] Review Request: perl-Authen-Simple - Simple Authentication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200146.nAK1kqOw004696@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539230 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 01:47:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:47:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539231] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm - Create sticky forms with HTML::SuperForm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200147.nAK1l3f0004760@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539231 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 02:02:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:02:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 445224] Review Request: stapitrace - user space instruction trace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200202.nAK22wfs009382@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445224 --- Comment #21 from Josh Boyer 2009-11-19 21:02:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > Could we get an ack from the current owner of this package? The fact that Maynard isn't listed as the primary package owner is an oversight. He owns this for all intents and purposes and he is listed as a fully authorized co-maintainer on all branches. He has my ACK to do whatever he wants with this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 02:40:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:40:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465159] Review Request: tcexam - A Web-based Computer-Based Assessment (CBA) software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200240.nAK2ecAX014306@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465159 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-19 21:40:36 EDT --- I'm willing to answer questions if you ask and I actually understand enough to answer, but I'm not sure there's any point in anyone reviewing this package until the known issues are closer to being fixed. The moodle problem is indeed an issue; it might have been missed on review, or it might have been added after review. Regardless, tcpdf should certainly be split out so that both packages can use it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 02:52:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:52:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225755] Merge Review: firefox In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200252.nAK2qsE2021649@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225755 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com Depends on| |521704 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 02:55:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:55:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538657] Some Fedora 12 packages have versions that do not supersede the versions of Fedora 11 packages, In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200255.nAK2tiG7022542@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538657 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-19 21:55:43 EDT --- There's a "distribution" component that is far, far more appropriate than "Package Review". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 03:49:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:49:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530021] Review Request: moovida - Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200349.nAK3nwri032098@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530021 --- Comment #23 from Graeme Gillies 2009-11-19 22:49:56 EDT --- I have rolled back the spec bump, changed the spelling, and uploaded new specs/SRPMS (now built on my F12 machine). moovida.spec: http://ggillies.fedorapeople.org/moovida.spec moovida-1.0.8-1.fc12.src.rpm: http://ggillies.fedorapeople.org/moovida-1.0.8-1.fc12.src.rpm moovida-plugins-good.spec: http://ggillies.fedorapeople.org/moovida-plugins-good.spec moovida-plugins-good-1.0.8-1.fc12.src.rpm: http://ggillies.fedorapeople.org/moovida-plugins-good-1.0.8-1.fc12.src.rpm moovida-plugins-bad.spec: http://ggillies.fedorapeople.org/moovida-plugins-bad.spec moovida-plugins-bad-1.0.8-1.fc12.src.rpm: http://ggillies.fedorapeople.org/moovida-plugins-bad-1.0.8-1.fc12.src.rpm Still trying to track down a sponsor, thanks for the suggestion about assisting with other package reviews, I will try that :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 04:11:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:11:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 502699] Review Request: crosstool-ng - A toolchain building utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200411.nAK4BEPO005792@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502699 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |BuildFails --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-19 23:11:13 EDT --- Did you plan to to update this package to the newer version? It fails to build for me: Computing version string... 1.3.2 Checking for '/bin/bash'... /bin/bash: wrong version string: expecting regexp '^GNU bash, version 3\.' Bailing out... I guess it won't work with anything that has bash 4 (F11 and up). Please clear the whiteboard if that gets fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 04:12:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:12:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200412.nAK4Ceh3012751@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #56 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-19 23:12:33 EDT --- Feel free to CC me on any other packages you submit that lead up to this one and I'll try to get them reviewed for you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 04:20:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:20:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530021] Review Request: moovida - Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200420.nAK4K2Kj008491@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530021 --- Comment #24 from Alex Lancaster 2009-11-19 23:20:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) > I have rolled back the spec bump, changed the spelling, and uploaded new > specs/SRPMS (now built on my F12 machine). Actually when I said "This doesn't need a new spec bump right away", I meant that there was no need to up the release tag and create and post new .specs and .srpms until after the next major review (i.e. just keep of a note of it until you do the next major revision). I didn't mean rolling back the release tag to version 1. Sorry if I wasn't clearer about that. Actually you should *always* update the release tag when you post a new version. So actually technically this should have been version 1.0.8-3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 04:22:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:22:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530021] Review Request: moovida - Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200422.nAK4MJV1009090@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530021 --- Comment #25 from Alex Lancaster 2009-11-19 23:22:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > (In reply to comment #23) > > I have rolled back the spec bump, changed the spelling, and uploaded new > > specs/SRPMS (now built on my F12 machine). > > Actually when I said "This doesn't need a new spec bump right away", I meant > that there was no need to up the release tag and create and post new .specs and > .srpms until after the next major review (i.e. just keep of a note of it until > you do the next major revision). I didn't mean rolling back the release tag to > version 1. Sorry if I wasn't clearer about that. > > Actually you should *always* update the release tag when you post a new > version. So actually technically this should have been version 1.0.8-3. And of course for each new release tag, document that in the %changelog, then it makes it easier to diff the old and new specs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:00:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:00:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531987] Review Request: wtop - top for webserver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200500.nAK50QM3025842@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531987 --- Comment #8 from Kushal Das 2009-11-20 00:00:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > why not EL-5 and F-11 too ? If you want them there, please co-maintain the branches :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:10:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:10:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530190] Review Request: gdouros-aegyptus-fonts - A font for Egyptian hieroglyphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200510.nAK5Av4M021893@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530190 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 00:10:56 EDT --- gdouros-aegyptus-fonts-2.52-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:13:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:13:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533721] Review Request: perl-Net-CIDR - Manipulate IPv4/IPv6 netblocks in CIDR notation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200513.nAK5DO37029293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533721 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 00:13:22 EDT --- perl-Net-CIDR-0.13-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:14:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:14:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533721] Review Request: perl-Net-CIDR - Manipulate IPv4/IPv6 netblocks in CIDR notation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200514.nAK5E23E029396@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533721 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 00:14:01 EDT --- perl-Net-CIDR-0.13-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:14:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:14:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533141] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIx-Class - Access a DBIx::Class Schema from a CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200514.nAK5Eaoj029532@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533141 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 00:14:34 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIx-Class-0.093011-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:12:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:12:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532677] Review Request: perl-HTML-SuperForm - HTML form generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200512.nAK5C51e028914@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532677 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.09-1.fc12 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:15:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:15:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531391] Review Request: gwsmhg - hg/mq GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200515.nAK5Firh023486@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531391 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 00:15:43 EDT --- gwsmhg-0.8.2-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:12:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:12:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532677] Review Request: perl-HTML-SuperForm - HTML form generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200512.nAK5C0TT022318@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532677 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 00:11:59 EDT --- perl-HTML-SuperForm-1.09-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:14:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:14:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533721] Review Request: perl-Net-CIDR - Manipulate IPv4/IPv6 netblocks in CIDR notation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200514.nAK5E7PY022828@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533721 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.13-2.fc11 |0.13-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:13:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:13:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532779] Review Request: gtraffic - Simple traffic usage counter for mobile broadband connections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200513.nAK5DbHg022680@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532779 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 00:13:36 EDT --- gtraffic-1.01-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:13:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:13:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533721] Review Request: perl-Net-CIDR - Manipulate IPv4/IPv6 netblocks in CIDR notation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200513.nAK5DT4a022640@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533721 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.13-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:13:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:13:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532779] Review Request: gtraffic - Simple traffic usage counter for mobile broadband connections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200513.nAK5Djo4022719@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532779 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.01-4.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:14:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:14:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533141] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIx-Class - Access a DBIx::Class Schema from a CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200514.nAK5EeZI022986@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533141 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.093011-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:16:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:16:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481527] Review Request: bucardo - asynchronous PostgreSQL replication system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200516.nAK5GA3n023660@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481527 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 00:16:07 EDT --- bucardo-4.4.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update bucardo'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-11754 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:14:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:14:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529542] Review Request: php-phpunit-phpcpd - Copy/Paste Detector (CPD) for PHP code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200514.nAK5Epm9023043@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529542 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 00:14:50 EDT --- php-phpunit-phpcpd-1.2.0-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-phpunit-phpcpd'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-11738 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:15:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:15:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532231] Review Request: gdouros-akkadian-fonts - A font for Sumero-Akkadian cuneiform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200515.nAK5FEp7030390@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532231 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 00:15:12 EDT --- gdouros-akkadian-fonts-2.52-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:15:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:15:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532816] Review Request: gdouros-alexander-fonts - A Greek typeface inspired by Alexander Wilson In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200515.nAK5FTQf030548@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532816 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 00:15:27 EDT --- gdouros-alexander-fonts-3.01-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:15:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:15:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531391] Review Request: gwsmhg - hg/mq GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200515.nAK5FqHI030647@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531391 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.8.2-1.fc12 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:16:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:16:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528476] Review Request: php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein - eZ Components PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200516.nAK5G0Ri030692@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528476 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 00:15:58 EDT --- php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein-1.3-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-11752 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:21:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:21:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532677] Review Request: perl-HTML-SuperForm - HTML form generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200521.nAK5LHLR025892@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532677 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 00:21:16 EDT --- perl-HTML-SuperForm-1.09-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:21:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:21:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528473] Review Request: php-ezc-DatabaseSchema - eZ Components DatabaseSchema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200521.nAK5L6B7025814@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528473 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 00:21:05 EDT --- php-ezc-DatabaseSchema-1.4.2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-ezc-DatabaseSchema'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-11760 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:21:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:21:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532677] Review Request: perl-HTML-SuperForm - HTML form generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200521.nAK5LMBt000766@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532677 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.09-1.fc12 |1.09-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:22:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:22:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481527] Review Request: bucardo - asynchronous PostgreSQL replication system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200522.nAK5M2ne000942@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481527 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 00:22:01 EDT --- bucardo-4.4.0-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update bucardo'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-11772 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:22:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:22:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528473] Review Request: php-ezc-DatabaseSchema - eZ Components DatabaseSchema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200522.nAK5MAo9000997@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528473 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 00:22:09 EDT --- php-ezc-DatabaseSchema-1.4.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-ezc-DatabaseSchema'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-11774 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:21:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:21:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528476] Review Request: php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein - eZ Components PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200521.nAK5LCZX000713@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528476 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 00:21:11 EDT --- php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein-1.3-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-11761 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:24:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:24:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529831] Review Request: opensips - Open Source SIP Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200524.nAK5OEMc026948@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529831 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 00:24:13 EDT --- opensips-1.6.0-4.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:24:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:24:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533723] Review Request: perl-Guard - Safe cleanup blocks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200524.nAK5OM9L026987@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533723 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 00:24:21 EDT --- perl-Guard-1.021-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:25:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:25:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 509936] Review Request: tortoisehg - Mercurial gui tools and nautilus plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200525.nAK5PQWH027563@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509936 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 00:25:24 EDT --- tortoisehg-0.9-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:24:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:24:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532677] Review Request: perl-HTML-SuperForm - HTML form generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200524.nAK5OuE7027168@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532677 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 00:24:55 EDT --- perl-HTML-SuperForm-1.09-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:24:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:24:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530190] Review Request: gdouros-aegyptus-fonts - A font for Egyptian hieroglyphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200524.nAK5OmSd027125@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530190 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 00:24:47 EDT --- gdouros-aegyptus-fonts-2.52-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:25:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:25:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 509936] Review Request: tortoisehg - Mercurial gui tools and nautilus plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200525.nAK5PU29027607@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509936 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.9-1.fc12 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:24:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:24:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533723] Review Request: perl-Guard - Safe cleanup blocks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200524.nAK5ORTK027027@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533723 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.021-1.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:22:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:22:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507106] Review Request: msp430-libc - C library for use with GCC on Texas Instruments MSP430 microcontrollers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200522.nAK5MQ31026514@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507106 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 00:22:24 EDT --- msp430-libc-0-3.20090726cvs.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update msp430-libc'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-11662 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:25:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:25:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531391] Review Request: gwsmhg - hg/mq GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200525.nAK5P9PW002471@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531391 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 00:25:08 EDT --- gwsmhg-0.8.2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:28:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:28:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525432] Review Request: openxcap - Fully featured XCAP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200528.nAK5Sakv003513@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525432 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 00:28:35 EDT --- openxcap-1.1.2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:29:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:29:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520637] Review Request: mdk - GNU MIX Development Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200529.nAK5T3kd003640@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520637 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 00:29:01 EDT --- mdk-1.2.5-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:25:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:25:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531391] Review Request: gwsmhg - hg/mq GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200525.nAK5PDf7002513@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531391 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.8.2-1.fc12 |0.8.2-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:25:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:25:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532677] Review Request: perl-HTML-SuperForm - HTML form generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200525.nAK5P0EQ002106@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532677 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.09-1.fc10 |1.09-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:29:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:29:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520637] Review Request: mdk - GNU MIX Development Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200529.nAK5T8mJ003700@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520637 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.2.5-2.fc12 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:28:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:28:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528473] Review Request: php-ezc-DatabaseSchema - eZ Components DatabaseSchema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200528.nAK5SVJG003481@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528473 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 00:28:30 EDT --- php-ezc-DatabaseSchema-1.4.2-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-ezc-DatabaseSchema'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-11806 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:30:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:30:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533141] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIx-Class - Access a DBIx::Class Schema from a CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200530.nAK5UT7a029533@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533141 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 00:30:28 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIx-Class-0.093011-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:28:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:28:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525432] Review Request: openxcap - Fully featured XCAP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200528.nAK5SfMu028800@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525432 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.1.2-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:34:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:34:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533723] Review Request: perl-Guard - Safe cleanup blocks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200534.nAK5YFZM005741@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533723 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 00:34:14 EDT --- perl-Guard-1.021-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:34:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:34:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533723] Review Request: perl-Guard - Safe cleanup blocks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200534.nAK5YJ7a005772@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533723 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.021-1.fc10 |1.021-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:30:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:30:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 498218] Review Request: picturetile - Tiles a bunch of images into one large "photo wall" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200530.nAK5UBas004578@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498218 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 00:30:09 EDT --- picturetile-0-4.20050314.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:30:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:30:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533141] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIx-Class - Access a DBIx::Class Schema from a CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200530.nAK5UY7o004755@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533141 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.093011-2.fc11 |0.093011-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:29:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:29:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529542] Review Request: php-phpunit-phpcpd - Copy/Paste Detector (CPD) for PHP code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200529.nAK5Tl1j004066@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529542 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 00:29:46 EDT --- php-phpunit-phpcpd-1.2.0-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-phpunit-phpcpd'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-11821 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:36:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:36:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533723] Review Request: perl-Guard - Safe cleanup blocks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200536.nAK5aYCw031944@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533723 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 00:36:33 EDT --- perl-Guard-1.021-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:33:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:33:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533721] Review Request: perl-Net-CIDR - Manipulate IPv4/IPv6 netblocks in CIDR notation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200533.nAK5XpwI030939@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533721 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 00:33:51 EDT --- perl-Net-CIDR-0.13-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:32:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:32:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529323] Review Request: gdouros-aegean-fonts - Font for ancient scripts in the Aegean vicinity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200532.nAK5WisV030653@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529323 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 00:32:43 EDT --- gdouros-aegean-fonts-3.01-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:33:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:33:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533721] Review Request: perl-Net-CIDR - Manipulate IPv4/IPv6 netblocks in CIDR notation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200533.nAK5XuHW030974@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533721 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.13-2.fc10 |0.13-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:33:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:33:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539428] New: Review Request: sparcy - Command line utility for Sparc Systems GPS loggers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sparcy - Command line utility for Sparc Systems GPS loggers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539428 Summary: Review Request: sparcy - Command line utility for Sparc Systems GPS loggers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kushaldas at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kushaldas.in/tmp/sparcy.spec SRPM URL: http://kushaldas.in/tmp/sparcy-0.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Command line utility for Sparc Systems GPS loggers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:36:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:36:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533723] Review Request: perl-Guard - Safe cleanup blocks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200536.nAK5ac8o007208@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533723 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.021-1.fc12 |1.021-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:37:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:37:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481527] Review Request: bucardo - asynchronous PostgreSQL replication system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200537.nAK5bp2l007615@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481527 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 00:37:50 EDT --- bucardo-4.4.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update bucardo'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-11865 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:38:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:38:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528476] Review Request: php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein - eZ Components PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200538.nAK5c8VT007685@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528476 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 00:38:07 EDT --- php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein-1.3-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-11869 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:37:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:37:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 509936] Review Request: tortoisehg - Mercurial gui tools and nautilus plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200537.nAK5bXk8032467@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509936 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 00:37:31 EDT --- tortoisehg-0.9-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:38:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:38:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532231] Review Request: gdouros-akkadian-fonts - A font for Sumero-Akkadian cuneiform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200538.nAK5cJYD032746@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532231 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 00:38:18 EDT --- gdouros-akkadian-fonts-2.52-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:37:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:37:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 509936] Review Request: tortoisehg - Mercurial gui tools and nautilus plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200537.nAK5bcc0032513@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509936 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.9-1.fc12 |0.9-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:37:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:37:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529542] Review Request: php-phpunit-phpcpd - Copy/Paste Detector (CPD) for PHP code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200537.nAK5bkTo032572@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529542 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 00:37:44 EDT --- php-phpunit-phpcpd-1.2.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-phpunit-phpcpd'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-11864 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:48:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:48:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532816] Review Request: gdouros-alexander-fonts - A Greek typeface inspired by Alexander Wilson In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200548.nAK5mOhA011182@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532816 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 00:48:23 EDT --- gdouros-alexander-fonts-3.01-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gdouros-alexander-fonts-3.01-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:53:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:53:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538339] Review Request: dia-electric2 - Dia electric2 Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200553.nAK5rO4L012871@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538339 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-11-20 00:53:23 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1818818 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url(sha1sum) 4690e02618ff35d7088e91ebc5cc2895e7b38e07 electric2.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application Suggestions: License should be GPLv2+ APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:53:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:53:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538335] Review Request: dia-CMOS - Dia CMOS Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200553.nAK5rrpM005607@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538335 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-11-20 00:53:52 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1818824 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url(sha1sum) 5b27b98a32316db76e0bda67fb697b8ab3f7d6e1 cmos.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application Suggestions: License should be GPLv2+ APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:53:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:53:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538337] Review Request: dia-Digital - Dia Digital Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200553.nAK5raEm005530@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538337 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-11-20 00:53:35 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1818822 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url(sha1sum) bbb5887fdc51b8463cb0ad7700b9b60b250212e7 digital.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application Suggestions: License should be GPLv2+ APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:53:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:53:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538340] Review Request: dia-electronic - Dia electronic Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200553.nAK5rtxN005635@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538340 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-11-20 00:53:54 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1818820 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url (sha1sum) 46fad718e785abfe41c7aaef4116fcaa234186a6 electronic.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application Suggestions: License should be GPLv2+ APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 05:56:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:56:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539428] Review Request: sparcy - Command line utility for Sparc Systems GPS loggers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200556.nAK5ulBA006502@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539428 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 06:16:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 01:16:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539230] Review Request: perl-Authen-Simple - Simple Authentication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200616.nAK6GqH0019534@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539230 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-11-20 01:16:51 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1818826 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url (sha1sum) 5c58c9f8bd279214121a4cff0a96a33fe3ea5097 Authen-Simple-0.4.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=9, Tests=54, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.03 sys + 0.33 cusr 0.12 csys = 0.52 CPU) + Package perl-Authen-Simple-0.4-1.fc13.noarch => Provides: perl(Authen::Simple) = 0.4 perl(Authen::Simple::Adapter) perl(Authen::Simple::Apache) perl(Authen::Simple::Log) perl(Authen::Simple::Password) Requires: perl(Authen::Simple::Adapter) perl(Authen::Simple::Log) perl(Authen::Simple::Password) perl(Carp) perl(Crypt::PasswdMD5) perl(Digest::MD5) perl(Digest::SHA) perl(IO::Handle) perl(MIME::Base64) perl(Params::Validate) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 06:17:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 01:17:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538458] Review Request: perl-Format-Human-Bytes - Format a bytecount and make it human readable In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200617.nAK6H6IR012076@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538458 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) 2009-11-20 01:17:05 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1818830 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url (sha1sum) 03cd933d75076170ffb81f62ebe791dee983ed98 Format-Human-Bytes-0.04.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=216, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.00 sys + 0.10 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.16 CPU) + Package perl-Format-Human-Bytes-0.04-1.fc13.noarch => Provides: perl(Format::Human::Bytes) = 0.04 Requires: perl(strict) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 06:25:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 01:25:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539231] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm - Create sticky forms with HTML::SuperForm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200625.nAK6POH0014229@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539231 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-11-20 01:25:23 EDT --- add BR for Test/More.pm see http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1818829&name=build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 06:24:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 01:24:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539428] Review Request: sparcy - Command line utility for Sparc Systems GPS loggers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200624.nAK6OHQM013729@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539428 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-11-20 01:24:16 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1818832 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM. sparcy.src: W: no-buildroot-tag ==> can be ignored. + source files match upstream url (sha1sum) e5776d60f44942779e095b468757c8cdf9c4f9d5 sparcy-0.1.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 06:31:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 01:31:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538673] Review Request: libunistring - GNU Unicode string library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200631.nAK6VChk023420@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538673 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Parag AN(????) 2009-11-20 01:31:11 EDT --- Looks ok now. koji build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1818869 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 06:49:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 01:49:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532817] Review Request: gdouros-analecta-fonts - An eccleastic scripts font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200649.nAK6njq6028491@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532817 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 01:49:44 EDT --- gdouros-analecta-fonts-2.52-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gdouros-analecta-fonts-2.52-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 06:59:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 01:59:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539428] Review Request: sparcy - Command line utility for Sparc Systems GPS loggers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200659.nAK6xoep031491@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539428 Kushal Das changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Kushal Das 2009-11-20 01:59:49 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sparcy Short Description: Command line utility for Sparc Systems GPS loggers Owners: kushal Branches: F-12 InitialCC: kushal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 07:15:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:15:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538332] Review Request: covered - Verilog code coverage analyzer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200715.nAK7Fxhg027569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538332 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-11-20 02:15:58 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1818896 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM. covered.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency tklib covered.i686: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/covered/.coveredrc ==> can be ignored + source files match upstream url (sha1sum) 334783f26365d9c12c11773b48da790c45b51eb4 covered-0.7.7.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + gtk-update-icon-cache scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + Desktop file installed correctly. + file permissions are appropriate. + Package covered-0.7.7-1.fc13.i686 => Provides: covered.cver.so covered.vpi Requires: libX11.so.6 libXft.so.2 libXrender.so.1 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.11) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.7) libdl.so.2 libfontconfig.so.1 libfreetype.so.6 libm.so.6 libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libtcl8.5.so libtk8.5.so libz.so.1 rtld(GNU_HASH) + GUI application Suggestions: 1) you can use Source URL as simple as http://downloads.sourceforge.net/covered/covered-0.7.7.tar.gz Reference:-http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net 2) License should be GPLv2+ APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 07:17:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:17:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532817] Review Request: gdouros-analecta-fonts - An eccleastic scripts font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200717.nAK7HLxT002943@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532817 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 02:17:20 EDT --- gdouros-analecta-fonts-2.52-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gdouros-analecta-fonts-2.52-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 07:30:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:30:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225755] Merge Review: firefox In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200730.nAK7UtNx030608@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225755 Bug 225755 depends on bug 521704, which changed state. Bug 521704 Summary: Firefox spec in F-11 lacks URL or description of how to grab source https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521704 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 07:40:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:40:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538326] Review Request: perl-LWP-Online - Module for accessing web by proccess In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200740.nAK7euXA000666@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538326 Marcela Ma?l??ov? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 07:40:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:40:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538361] Review Request: perl-CPAN-Checksums - Write a CHECKSUMS file for a directory as on CPAN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200740.nAK7eknB000599@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538361 Marcela Ma?l??ov? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 07:40:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:40:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538363] Review Request: perl-pip - Perl Installation Program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200740.nAK7euZk000688@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538363 Bug 538363 depends on bug 538326, which changed state. Bug 538326 Summary: Review Request: perl-LWP-Online - Module for accessing web by proccess https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538326 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 07:40:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:40:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538360] Review Request: perl-CPAN-Inject - Base class for injecting distributions into CPAN sources In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200740.nAK7ellu000623@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538360 Bug 538360 depends on bug 538361, which changed state. Bug 538361 Summary: Review Request: perl-CPAN-Checksums - Write a CHECKSUMS file for a directory as on CPAN https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538361 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 07:41:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:41:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538451] Review Request: perl-Devel-Refactor - Perl extension for refactoring Perl code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200741.nAK7ftFt008172@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538451 Marcela Ma?l??ov? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 07:39:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:39:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479667] Review Request: perl-ORLite-Migrate - Extremely light weight SQLite-specific schema migration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200739.nAK7dxCq007462@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479667 Bug 479667 depends on bug 479669, which changed state. Bug 479669 Summary: Review Request: perl-File-pushd - Change directory temporarily for a limited scope https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479669 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 07:44:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:44:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538458] Review Request: perl-Format-Human-Bytes - Format a bytecount and make it human readable In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200744.nAK7iBJk008513@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538458 Marcela Ma?l??ov? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Marcela Ma?l??ov? 2009-11-20 02:44:10 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Format-Human-Bytes Short Description: Format a bytecount and make it human readable Owners: mmaslano Branches: devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 07:39:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:39:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479669] Review Request: perl-File-pushd - Change directory temporarily for a limited scope In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200739.nAK7dwox007440@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479669 Marcela Ma?l??ov? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Marcela Ma?l??ov? 2009-11-20 02:39:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > This is confusing; are you just asking for an EL-5 branch? If so, in the > future please make a package change request according to > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVS_admin_requests#Package_Change_Requests_for_existing_packages > > I've created an EL-5 branch but made no other changes; if that's not what was > desired, please explain what you needed and set the fedora-cvs flag back to > '?'. I'm sorry I'll be using the correct request. Thank you for your changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 07:47:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:47:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539442] New: Review Request: rubygem-ZenTest - Automated test scaffolding for Ruby Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-ZenTest - Automated test scaffolding for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539442 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-ZenTest - Automated test scaffolding for Ruby Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mkent at magoazul.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SPECS/rubygem-ZenTest.spec SRPM URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SRPMS/rubygem-ZenTest-4.1.4-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: ZenTest is an automated test scaffolding for Ruby that provides 4 different tools: zentest, unit_diff, autotest and multiruby. These tools can be used for test conformance auditing and rapid XP. mkent at fedora-devel-chef:~/rpmbuild/SPECS$ rpmlint rubygem-ZenTest.spec /var/tmp/results/rubygem-ZenTest-* rubygem-ZenTest-doc.noarch: W: no-documentation rubygem-ZenTest-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/ZenTest-4.1.4/ri/Autotest/RCov/command%3d-c.yaml %3d rubygem-ZenTest-doc.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ZenTest-4.1.4/.autotest rubygem-ZenTest-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/ZenTest-4.1.4/ri/Autotest/AutoUpdate/sleep_time%3d-c.yaml %3d rubygem-ZenTest-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/ZenTest-4.1.4/ri/Autotest/RCov/pattern%3d-c.yaml %3d rubygem-ZenTest-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/ZenTest-4.1.4/ri/Autotest/AutoUpdate/update_cmd%3d-c.yaml %3d 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 07:47:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:47:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539442] Review Request: rubygem-ZenTest - Automated test scaffolding for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200747.nAK7lHfk002207@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539442 Matthew Kent changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |538303 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 07:47:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:47:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538303] Review Request: rubygem-minitest - Small and fast replacement for ruby's huge and slow test/unit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200747.nAK7lIcj002232@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538303 Matthew Kent changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |539442 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 07:53:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:53:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 424841] Review Request: ndisc6 - IPv6 diagnostic tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200753.nAK7rWv6010797@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424841 --- Comment #34 from Stjepan Gros 2009-11-20 02:53:26 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ndisc6 Short Description: IPv6 diagnostic tools Owners: sgros Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 InitialCC: sgros -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 07:55:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:55:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 424841] Review Request: ndisc6 - IPv6 diagnostic tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200755.nAK7t9WC011330@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424841 Stjepan Gros changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 08:02:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 03:02:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528108] Review Request: Vuurmuur - Firewall manager built on top of iptables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200802.nAK82att013117@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528108 --- Comment #17 from Stjepan Gros 2009-11-20 03:02:34 EDT --- Well, upstream mixes letters too. It uses uppercase V for the main archive, while lower case v for archives within this archive. So, srpm and spec file are with upper case V, while binary rpms start with lower case v. I also prefer small caps but maybe in this case it should be better to use upper case V for CVS? I'll wait for sponsor's comment on this before changing fedora-cvs flag again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 08:05:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 03:05:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528108] Review Request: Vuurmuur - Firewall manager built on top of iptables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200805.nAK8561A006461@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528108 Stjepan Gros changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #18 from Stjepan Gros 2009-11-20 03:05:05 EDT --- Ups, sorry. I should think a bit before posting as I just now realized everything ends up in upper case V. So, it's probably better that it is upper case in CVS after all. I'm changing fedora-cvs flag and here is CVS request again. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: Vuurmuur Short Description: Firewall manager built on top of iptables Owners: sgros Branches: F-12 InitialCC: sgros -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 08:11:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 03:11:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532205] Review Request: microba - Set of JFC (Swing) components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200811.nAK8BBXY015091@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532205 Michal Ingeli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Michal Ingeli 2009-11-20 03:11:10 EDT --- Seems fine now. Builds locally and with mock for f12, although build fails for rawhide mock while building javadoc sub-package. Looking at exception, it's javadoc fault. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 08:23:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 03:23:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200823.nAK8Nn0A010825@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #57 from Tim Fenn 2009-11-20 03:23:12 EDT --- so upon further investigation, guile-gui requires guile-gtk, which has been replaced by guile-gnome. So guile-gui would need to be updated to use guile-gnome, which it seems won't happen (even though there is a maintainer, it seems he isn't working on it actively). Coot allows for the building of guile support, but not guile-gtk support, which will just disable a bunch of the extensions. This isn't a big deal, and upstream does have plans to move all the guile-gtk stuff to use guile-gnome instead, so I'll just flip the switch when the code is updated to support guile-gnome. tl;dr: no guile-gui package, disable guile-gtk in coot, lose a few of the extensions, enable extensions when coot supports guile-gnome. I'm currently waiting for upstream to implement libcurl support in place of net-http (the goosh dependency is gone now), then all should be good to go. Will update when that is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 08:30:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 03:30:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 165552] Review Request: banner - Prints a short string to the console in very large letters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200830.nAK8UMUt019375@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=165552 --- Comment #14 from Oliver Falk 2009-11-20 03:30:20 EDT --- See comment in #537805 :-) The same is true for this... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 08:48:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 03:48:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532205] Review Request: microba - Set of JFC (Swing) components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200848.nAK8m9FO017216@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532205 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-20 03:48:07 EDT --- Apparently a known sinjdoc issue bug #449851. Build with OpenJDK sinjdoc succeeded: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1819012 Thanks for review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: microba Short Description: Set of JFC (Swing) components Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 08:55:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 03:55:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539231] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm - Create sticky forms with HTML::SuperForm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200855.nAK8tV0U019570@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539231 --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-11-20 03:55:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > > add BR for Test/More.pm Don't know how I missed this. perl(Test::More) and perl(Test::Pod) added to BRs. Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm-0.4-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 08:53:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 03:53:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539230] Review Request: perl-Authen-Simple - Simple Authentication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200853.nAK8rPF9018874@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539230 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-11-20 03:53:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > > APPROVED. Thanks for the review, Parag! Requesting CVS. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Authen-Simple Short Description: Simple Authentication Owners: eseyman Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 09:14:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 04:14:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 510843] Review Request: samtools - Tools for nucleotide sequence alignments in the SAM format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200914.nAK9ECC6032256@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510843 Rasmus Ory Nielsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |albert.bogdanowicz at gmail.co | |m --- Comment #9 from Rasmus Ory Nielsen 2009-11-20 04:14:09 EDT --- *** Bug 538420 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 09:14:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 04:14:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538420] Review Request: samtools - Tools for sorting, merging etc. SAM format files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200914.nAK9EAo4032217@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538420 Rasmus Ory Nielsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |ron at ron.dk Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Rasmus Ory Nielsen 2009-11-20 04:14:09 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 510843 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 09:18:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 04:18:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539231] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm - Create sticky forms with HTML::SuperForm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200918.nAK9IVjM002206@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539231 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-11-20 04:18:29 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1819061 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url (sha1sum) 99376e7e79b527738cc4b9fd48cb1556ea05ed50 CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm-0.4.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=9, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.00 sys + 0.12 cusr 0.03 csys = 0.17 CPU) + Package perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm-0.4-2.fc13.noarch => Provides: perl(CGI::Application::Plugin::SuperForm) = 0.4 Requires: perl(Exporter) perl(HTML::SuperForm) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 09:17:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 04:17:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532818] Review Request: gdouros-musica-fonts - A font for musical symbols In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200917.nAK9HsLn026161@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532818 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 04:17:53 EDT --- gdouros-musica-fonts-2.52-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gdouros-musica-fonts-2.52-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 09:26:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 04:26:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539231] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm - Create sticky forms with HTML::SuperForm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200926.nAK9QEjf005310@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539231 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-11-20 04:26:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > > APPROVED. Thanks! Requesting CVS. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm Short Description: Create sticky forms with HTML::SuperForm Owners: eseyman Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 09:42:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 04:42:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539469] New: Review Request: OpenSRF - Open Scalable Request Framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: OpenSRF - Open Scalable Request Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539469 Summary: Review Request: OpenSRF - Open Scalable Request Framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kanarip at kanarip.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/OpenSRF.spec SRPM URL: Description: Open Scalable Request Framework (OpenSRF, pronounced ?open surf?) is a framework that allows the development of software without requiring a detailed knowledge of Evergreen's structure. First package and make available the dependencies. Till that time, this review request can barely move. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 09:45:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 04:45:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539472] Review Request: libmemcache - C API to memcache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200945.nAK9jb6P011692@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539472 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |539469 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 09:45:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 04:45:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539469] Review Request: OpenSRF - Open Scalable Request Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200945.nAK9jdAX011721@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539469 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |539472 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 09:46:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 04:46:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539472] Review Request: libmemcache - C API to memcached In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911200946.nAK9kf7f011925@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539472 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: libmemcache |Review Request: libmemcache |- C API to memcache |- C API to memcached -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 09:45:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 04:45:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539472] New: Review Request: libmemcache - C API to memcache Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libmemcache - C API to memcache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539472 Summary: Review Request: libmemcache - C API to memcache Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kanarip at kanarip.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/libmemcache.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f13/SRPMS/libmemcache-1.4.0-0.1rc2.fc13.src.rpm Description: libmemcache is a C API library to the memcached server (http://danga.com/memcached). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 09:44:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 04:44:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539471] New: Review Request: libserializer - JFreeReport General Serialization Framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libserializer - JFreeReport General Serialization Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539471 Summary: Review Request: libserializer - JFreeReport General Serialization Framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/libserializer.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/libserializer-1.1.2-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: This JFreeReport General Serialization Framework is a dependency of jfreereport which itself is a dependency of the reportdesigner extension of OpenOffice.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 10:11:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 05:11:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539480] New: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL - Simple http server class with SSL support Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL - Simple http server class with SSL support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539480 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL - Simple http server class with SSL support Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve.traylen at cern.ch QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL/perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL.spec SRPM URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL/perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL-1.04-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: Instances of the HTTP::Daemon::SSL class are HTTP/1.1 servers that listen on a socket for incoming requests. The HTTP::Daemon::SSL is a sub-class of IO::Socket::SSL, so you can perform socket operations directly on it too. $ rpmlint SPECS/perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL.spec \ RPMS/noarch/perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL-1.04-1.fc13.noarch.rpm \ SRPMS/perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL-1.04-1.fc13.src.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1819132 Hopefully an easy review. Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 10:30:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 05:30:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536796] Review Request: kde-plasma-smooth-tasks - KDE taskbar replacement with window peeking ability In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911201030.nAKAUQK2024608@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536796 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 05:30:24 EDT --- kde-plasma-smooth-tasks-0.0.1-0.1.wip20091116.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kde-plasma-smooth-tasks-0.0.1-0.1.wip20091116.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 10:40:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 05:40:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 491088] Review Request: rhncfg - Red Hat Network Configuration Client Libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911201040.nAKAeMlJ027633@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491088 Miroslav Such? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 10:39:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 05:39:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 494292] Review Request: spacewalk-proxy-html - The HTML component for Spacewalk Proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911201039.nAKAdhTB027063@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494292 Miroslav Such? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 10:43:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 05:43:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528332] Review Request: GNUnet - Secure peer-to-peer networking framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911201043.nAKAhs2G018928@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528332 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Kahl 2009-11-20 05:43:52 EDT --- Spec URL: http://akahl.fedorapeople.org/GNUnet/GNUnet.spec SRPM URL: http://akahl.fedorapeople.org/GNUnet/GNUnet-0.8.0c-1.fc12.src.rpm > A first check after a mock build yields: > GNUnet.src: W: strange-permission gnunetd.init 0755 > Can be solved by setting that file to chmod 644 and installing it with install > -m 755 instead of using cp. Hmm odd. Done. > GNUnet.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/gnunetd Done. Also added "Requires: logrotate". > GNUnet.x86_64: W: missing-lsb-keyword Default-Stop in /etc/rc.d/init.d/gnunetd This is a false positive and even contradicts with the guidelines: "Each Fedora SysV-style initscript which needs to start by default in any runlevel must include this line in the LSB Header (if the # Default-Start: line is present, then there must also be a # Default-Stop: line.). If the service does not start by default in any runlevel, this line should be omitted." (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SysVInitScript#.23_Default-Stop:_line) There is no Default-Start contrary to what rpmlint utters and there should never be for GNUnet: "(Default-Start:) Only services which are really required for a vital system should define runlevels here." (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SysVInitScript#.23_Default-Start:_line) > GNUnet.x86_64: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/gnunetd $prog rpmlint is just too stupid to interpolate sh variables - if you replace all instances of $prog with its value ("gnunetd"), the warning vanishes. The line in question should be: lockfile=/var/lock/subsys/$prog Really want me to change that? > I also get a flood of GNUnet.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency when > running rpmlint on the installed packages. Please check this as well. Looks like all dload'able plugins are linked against the same set of so:s; definitely an issue for upstream. Shall I report to upstream first to have this fixed? Should be an issue of splitting up some Makefile.am:s. > Furthermore please add comments to the patches as to where they come from and > if they have been brought to upstream's notice at some point (bugzilla etc.). All patches written by myself; patch0: GNUnet build assumes postgres includes use the "postgresql" prefix which is not true for Fedora. patch1: GNUnet build assumes Qt4's moc and uic preprocessing tools to be available under that name but for Fedora it's moc-qt4 and uic-qt4. patch2: GNUnet build assumes dialog's headers to be in $prefix/include but for Fedora it uses a prefix with the same name (dialog). patch3: This fixes really a GNUnet bug naming cpp defines wrong when using dialog, for cdialog the bug is not present but cdialog is not available for Fedora. patch4: This one is also a real bug where GNUnet's plugin path is always assumed to be $prefix/lib/GNUnet despite $plugindir being used in other places correctly which is expanded to the arch-dependent lib dir at build time. For patches 0-2 we have to find out whether Fedora uses file locations and names from the vanilla build of postgres, Qt4 and dialog; in this case, upstream most probably uses Debian-specific locations and names (seems to be their primary development distro) so it'd be their issue. In any other case, the problem is ours and subject of further investigation with the corresponding packages' maintainers. The problem addressed by patch4 *could* be caused by Debian-specific behavior of GNUnet, do you know whether Debian uses /usr/lib for plugins independent from installed architecture? Patch3 is obviously an issue for upstream. Shall we fix the upstream-related stuff before proceeding any further? I can report everything after investigation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 10:59:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 05:59:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539486] New: Review Request: perl-Data-AsObject - Easy OO access to complex perl data structures Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-AsObject - Easy OO access to complex perl data structures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539486 Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-AsObject - Easy OO access to complex perl data structures Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Data-AsObject/perl-Data-AsObject.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Data-AsObject/perl-Data-AsObject-0.05-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Data::AsObject provides easy object-oriented access to complex and arbitrarily nested perl data structures. It is particulary suitable for working with hash-based representation of XML data, as generated by modules like XML::Complie or XML::TreePP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 11:16:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 06:16:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536796] Review Request: kde-plasma-smooth-tasks - KDE taskbar replacement with window peeking ability In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911201116.nAKBG33G004419@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536796 --- Comment #6 from Neal Becker 2009-11-20 06:16:01 EDT --- Just tried on F12. Using 'add-widgets' I get this plasma popup: This object could not be created for the following reason: could not find component: smooth-tasks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 11:33:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 06:33:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538327] Review Request: otpd - One Time Password daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911201133.nAKBX6BV008779@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538327 --- Comment #5 from Giuseppe Paterno 2009-11-20 06:32:34 EDT --- New SRPMS that fixes manpages to reflect the fork and included missing man page of otppasswd (from: Russ herrold) Confirmed that this package builds on rawhide (credit of: Russ herrold) SRPMS: http://www.gpaterno.com/external/otpd-3.2.2-1.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.gpaterno.com/external/otpd.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 11:41:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 06:41:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536796] Review Request: kde-plasma-smooth-tasks - KDE taskbar replacement with window peeking ability In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911201141.nAKBfkWk011690@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536796 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Janssen 2009-11-20 06:41:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Just tried on F12. Using 'add-widgets' I get this plasma popup: > > This object could not be created for the following reason: could not find > component: smooth-tasks *bummer* That was gone during the review. Can you open a seperate bug for it please. I will digg into it again. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 11:45:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 06:45:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539486] Review Request: perl-Data-AsObject - Easy OO access to complex perl data structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911201145.nAKBjv1n012957@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539486 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 11:48:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 06:48:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532818] Review Request: gdouros-musica-fonts - A font for musical symbols In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911201148.nAKBmVJP004316@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532818 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 06:48:29 EDT --- gdouros-musica-fonts-2.52-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gdouros-musica-fonts-2.52-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 12:28:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 07:28:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536796] Review Request: kde-plasma-smooth-tasks - KDE taskbar replacement with window peeking ability In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911201228.nAKCStm7015083@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536796 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Janssen 2009-11-20 07:28:54 EDT --- Ok, maybe we have a quick fix. You need KDE 4.3.3 to have it working. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 12:34:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 07:34:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538335] Review Request: dia-CMOS - Dia CMOS Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911201234.nAKCY16h027297@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538335 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-11-20 07:33:59 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dia-CMOS Short Description: Dia CMOS Shapes Owners: chitlesh Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 12:33:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 07:33:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538337] Review Request: dia-Digital - Dia Digital Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911201233.nAKCXX3c027162@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538337 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-11-20 07:33:32 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dia-Digital Short Description: Dia Digital Shapes Owners: chitlesh Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 12:33:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 07:33:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538339] Review Request: dia-electric2 - Dia electric2 Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911201233.nAKCX94o027075@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538339 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-11-20 07:33:06 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dia-electric2 Short Description: Dia electric2 Shapes Owners: chitlesh Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 12:34:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 07:34:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538332] Review Request: covered - Verilog code coverage analyzer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911201234.nAKCYsdm016683@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538332 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 12:34:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 07:34:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538332] Review Request: covered - Verilog code coverage analyzer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911201234.nAKCYfcU016630@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538332 --- Comment #2 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-11-20 07:34:40 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: covered Short Description: Verilog code coverage analyzer Owners: chitlesh Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 12:32:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 07:32:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538340] Review Request: dia-electronic - Dia electronic Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911201232.nAKCWiml016258@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538340 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-11-20 07:32:42 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dia-electronic Short Description: Dia electronic Shapes Owners: chitlesh Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 12:56:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 07:56:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538327] Review Request: otpd - One Time Password daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911201256.nAKCuQrM023250@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538327 --- Comment #6 from R P Herrold 2009-11-20 07:56:19 EDT --- this was what a private email to the maintainer referecned in #5 1) I see a lot of marketing cruft mentioning TRI-D in the files in the README* --- would it be possible to re-write these to remove the 'marketing' aspect? 2) I suspect that the 'changelog' entries convention of mentioning the V and R was not known to you: compare: * Mon Feb 11 2008 Frank Cusack 3.1.0-1 to * Thu Nov 19 2009 Giuseppe Paterno' 3) the man page URL field is probably stale 4) the man page mentions two additional man pages not present: [herrold at dhcp-103 otpd]$ man gsmd No manual entry for gsmd [herrold at dhcp-103 otpd]$ man otppasswd No manual entry for otppasswd 5) a commented sample /etc/otppasswd is REALLY needed, to show what is possible, and marked as a (config) file 6) [herrold at dhcp-103 otpd]$ rpm -ql otpd | grep reqs The 'reqsynctool' binary -- probably living in either /usr/bin/ or /usr/sbin/ is missing? ===================== I an in a TUI only environment presently -- I will file this later today in the bugzilla, or you might do it for me? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 13:04:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 08:04:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538327] Review Request: otpd - One Time Password daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911201304.nAKD4lSh026279@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538327 --- Comment #7 from R P Herrold 2009-11-20 08:04:45 EDT --- sadly, the patch worked an a completely stock C5, i386, but fails a bit later on a souped up x86_64 build box: gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -D_REENTRANT -DUSE_SOCKET -DHAVE_CLOCK_GETTIME -DVERSION=\"3.2.1\" -Wall -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -Wshadow -Wsign-compare -Werror -c -o failover_thread.o failover_thread.c cc1: warnings being treated as errors failover_thread.c: In function 'failover_thread': failover_thread.c:112: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size failover_thread.c:113: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size make: *** [failover_thread.o] Error 1 make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.28908 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.28908 (%build) [herrold at centos-5 otpd]$ gcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: x86_64-redhat-linux Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --enable-checking=release --with-system-zlib --enable-__cxa_atexit --disable-libunwind-exceptions --enable-libgcj-multifile --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,obj-c++,java,fortran,ada --enable-java-awt=gtk --disable-dssi --enable-plugin --with-java-home=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-1.4.2.0/jre --with-cpu=generic --host=x86_64-redhat-linux Thread model: posix gcc version 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-46) [herrold at centos-5 otpd]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 15:20:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:20:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538327] Review Request: otpd - One Time Password daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911201520.nAKFKJCS005433@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538327 --- Comment #8 from Giuseppe Paterno 2009-11-20 10:20:18 EDT --- Let's try again :))) SRPM: http://www.gpaterno.com/external/otpd-3.2.3-1.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.gpaterno.com/external/otpd.spec I tried only i386, x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 15:28:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:28:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474549] Review Request: ca-cacert.org - CAcert.org CA root certificates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911201528.nAKFSO7u007810@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-20 10:28:21 EDT --- Could someone perhaps update the status of this ticket? There's a ticket before FESCo relating to the CAcert certificates and it would be good to know where things stand today. Given that as of the last comment there were still license issues, I'm going to block FE-Legal so perhaps we can get a more formal statement of what needs to change before this can be considered acceptable for Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 15:38:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:38:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522777] Review Request: perl-Verilog-Perl - Verilog parsing routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911201538.nAKFcBQS021770@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522777 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-11-20 10:38:09 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Verilog-Perl Short Description: Verilog parsing routines Owners: chitlesh Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 15:44:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:44:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534135] Review Request: xstream - Java XML serialization library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911201544.nAKFi9Ie012115@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534135 --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-20 10:44:07 EDT --- Jochen, it's conditionally disabled and in fact still used on ppc. I personally don't add it to new packages, but when it's already there I'm reluctant to remove it since it still might be useful for some (powerpc). More on topic: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-java-list/2009-November/msg00024.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 15:44:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:44:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532664] Review Request: saxon9 - Java XPath, XSLT 2.0 and XQuery implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911201544.nAKFikk5012390@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532664 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |akurtako at redhat.com --- Comment #7 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-11-20 10:44:44 EDT --- According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Multiple_packages_with_the_same_base_name this should become saxon and current saxon should become saxon6 if still needed. Maybe you should contact saxon maintainer on that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 15:48:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:48:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 498604] Review Request: apron - Abstract numerical domain library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911201548.nAKFmCt8024854@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498604 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(amdunn at gmail.com) | --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-20 10:48:10 EDT --- No response; closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 15:59:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:59:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538673] Review Request: libunistring - GNU Unicode string library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911201559.nAKFx4vk016836@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538673 P?draig Brady

changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from P?draig Brady

2009-11-20 10:59:02 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libunistring Short Description: GNU Unicode string library Owners: pbrady meyering Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: i18n-team -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 16:31:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:31:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538327] Review Request: otpd - One Time Password daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911201631.nAKGVBa4027668@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538327 --- Comment #9 from R P Herrold 2009-11-20 11:31:10 EDT --- compiled on x86_64 -- thank you Comment 6, item 5 The /etc/ file mentioned /etc/otppasswd does not exist in the binary RPM Newly noticed: looks like there is a spelling or man page section error at the bottom of: ... /usr/share/man/man8/otppasswd.5.gz /usr/share/man/man8/resynctool.8.gz /var/run/otpd [herrold at centos-5 ~]$ man otpd [herrold at centos-5 ~]$ man otppasswd No manual entry for otppasswd [herrold at centos-5 ~]$ but otppasswd(5) and NOT otpasswd or otppasswd(8) appears there ... I suspect you have it mis-placed in examining the file /usr/share/man/man8/otppasswd.5.gz and that sed -e '@man8 at man5@' is intended [herrold at centos-5 otpd]$ sudo rpm -Uvh /home/herrold/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/otpd-3.2.3-1.x86_64.rpm Password: Preparing... ########################################### [100%] 1:otpd ########################################### [100%] [herrold at centos-5 otpd]$ rpm -qlp /home/herrold/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/otpd-3.2.3-1.x86_64.rpm | grep etc /etc/otpd.conf /etc/rc.d/init.d/otpd /etc/sysconfig/otpd [herrold at centos-5 otpd]$ thank you -- Russ herrold -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 16:32:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:32:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538558] Review Request: kde-partitionmanager - KDE Partition Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911201632.nAKGWKLr007138@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538558 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 11:32:19 EDT --- kde-partitionmanager-1.0.0-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kde-partitionmanager-1.0.0-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 16:44:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:44:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532664] Review Request: saxon9 - Java XPath, XSLT 2.0 and XQuery implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911201644.nAKGiAhc031520@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532664 --- Comment #8 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-20 11:44:09 EDT --- Good point, Alexander. Raised to fedora-devel [1], saxon's packager on Cc. [1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-November/msg01531.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 17:29:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:29:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539609] New: Review Request: gtest - Google's framework for writing C++ tests on a variety of platforms Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gtest - Google's framework for writing C++ tests on a variety of platforms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539609 Summary: Review Request: gtest - Google's framework for writing C++ tests on a variety of platforms Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bos at serpentine.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.serpentine.com/bos/files/gtest.spec SRPM URL: http://www.serpentine.com/bos/files/gtest-1.4.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Google's framework for writing C++ tests on a variety of platforms (Linux, Mac OS X, Windows, Cygwin, Windows CE, and Symbian). Based on the xUnit architecture. Supports automatic test discovery, a rich set of assertions, user-defined assertions, death tests, fatal and non-fatal failures, value- and type-parameterized tests, various options for running the tests, and XML test report generation. This is needed by the Second Life viewer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 17:27:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:27:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539606] New: Review Request: rubygem-marc - Ruby library for MARC catalog Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-marc - Ruby library for MARC catalog https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539606 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-marc - Ruby library for MARC catalog Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-marc/rubygem-marc.spec SRPM URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-marc/rubygem-marc-0.3.0-1.fc.src.rpm Description: marc is a ruby library for reading and writing MAchine Readable Cataloging (MARC). More information about MARC can be found at . Koji scratch build For F-13: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1819759 For F-12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1819760 Note that this srpm creates ruby-marc subpackage, which will replace ruby-marc rpm which is already available on Fedora: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/ruby-marc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 17:41:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:41:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539613] New: Review Request: gmock - Google's framework for writing and using C++ mock classes Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gmock - Google's framework for writing and using C++ mock classes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539613 Summary: Review Request: gmock - Google's framework for writing and using C++ mock classes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bos at serpentine.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.serpentine.com/bos/files/gmock.spec SRPM URL: http://www.serpentine.com/bos/files/gtest-1.4.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Inspired by jMock, EasyMock, and Hamcrest, and designed with C++'s specifics in mind, Google C++ Mocking Framework (or Google Mock for short) is a library for writing and using C++ mock classes. This library is needed for the Second Life client. It depends on gtest, for which see Bug 539609. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 17:41:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:41:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539613] Review Request: gmock - Google's framework for writing and using C++ mock classes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911201741.nAKHfflt025741@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539613 --- Comment #1 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2009-11-20 12:41:41 EDT --- Oops, correct URLs: Spec URL: http://www.serpentine.com/bos/files/gmock.spec SRPM URL: http://www.serpentine.com/bos/files/gmock-1.4.0-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 17:41:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:41:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539613] Review Request: gmock - Google's framework for writing and using C++ mock classes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911201741.nAKHfsiB016714@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539613 Bryan O'Sullivan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |539609 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 17:41:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:41:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539609] Review Request: gtest - Google's framework for writing C++ tests on a variety of platforms In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911201741.nAKHftjX016739@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539609 Bryan O'Sullivan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |539613 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 18:19:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:19:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 498218] Review Request: picturetile - Tiles a bunch of images into one large "photo wall" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911201819.nAKIJibZ004307@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498218 Edwin ten Brink changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 19:19:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:19:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532402] Review Request: APF - Advanced Policy Firewall In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911201919.nAKJJW63021859@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532402 --- Comment #2 from Mark McKinstry 2009-11-20 14:19:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) Thanks for taking the time to look at my first package. > 1. The package didn't build on my system due to permissions on directories on > /etc/apf Fixed. > 2. rpmlint has a few messages: Fixed. > 3. Your buildroot is probably fine, but Fedora does have preferences, please > use a buildroot from: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag Fixed. > 4. source0 should be URL to source file, please see: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL Unfortunately the author does not provide a way to download a specific version, you can only download the latest -current. I've added a note to the spec file explaining the situation. > 5. Add a version to the last changelog entry Done. The updated SPEC and SRPM are at: http://mmckinst.nexcess.net/apf/apf.spec http://mmckinst.nexcess.net/apf/apf-9.7.1-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 19:18:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:18:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526126] Review Request: python3 - Python 3.x (backwards incompatible version) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911201918.nAKJI3dd012172@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126 --- Comment #54 from Dave Malcolm 2009-11-20 14:17:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #53) > I can't get runtests.sh working... I'm not sure what you mean by "runtests.sh" here. > When running, all tests are failing because of: > "./python: error while loading shared libraries: libpython3.1.so.1.0: cannot > open shared object file: No such file or directory" > > If this is fixed, you could add a %check section and run the tests there. I think you need to prefix the invocation of "./python" with this: LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. so that it can find the libpython library from the build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 19:50:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:50:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522272] New Package for Dogtag PKI: symkey In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911201950.nAKJosns001477@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522272 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dennis at ausil.us Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-11-20 14:50:52 EDT --- upstream sources match sha256sum symkey-1.3.0.tar.gz fedora/SOURCES/symkey-1.3.0.tar.gz 7c0dd957b4318efbd35742a026c9f42213c0ef95bcc06fece9fe0b714c1a8c0d symkey-1.3.0.tar.gz 7c0dd957b4318efbd35742a026c9f42213c0ef95bcc06fece9fe0b714c1a8c0d fedora/SOURCES/symkey-1.3.0.tar.gz rpmlint is clean spec is clear meets naming and packaging guidelines approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 19:54:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:54:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521989] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-util In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911201954.nAKJsvjV025763@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521989 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dennis at ausil.us Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 19:54:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:54:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521255] New package for Dogtag PKI: pki-selinux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911201954.nAKJs9l5025477@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521255 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dennis at ausil.us Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #10 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-11-20 14:54:07 EDT --- srpm gives a 404 error. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 20:23:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:23:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539693] New: Review Request: plowsahre - command-line downloader/uploader for some of the most popular file-sharing websites Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: plowsahre - command-line downloader/uploader for some of the most popular file-sharing websites https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539693 Summary: Review Request: plowsahre - command-line downloader/uploader for some of the most popular file-sharing websites Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pahan at hubbitus.info QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/plowshare/plowshare.spec SRPM URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/plowshare/plowshare-0.8.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: plowshare is a command-line downloader/uploader for some of the most popular file-sharing websites. It works on UNIX-like systems and presently supports Megaupload, Rapidshare, 2Shared, 4Shared, ZShare, Badongo, DepositFiles and Mediafire. Refer to the README for more info. P.S. Spec file formatted by tabs with 5 space width. Please, do not start review if it is a problem for you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 20:32:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:32:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521255] New package for Dogtag PKI: pki-selinux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202032.nAKKWNk0021648@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521255 --- Comment #11 from Kevin Wright 2009-11-20 15:32:21 EDT --- fixed the urls: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-selinux/pki-selinux.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-selinux/pki-selinux-1.3.0-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 20:37:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:37:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521989] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-util In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202037.nAKKbqvs014518@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521989 --- Comment #6 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-11-20 15:37:50 EDT --- from the java guidelines Directory structure All JAR files MUST go into %{_javadir}. Exceptions include JNI-using JAR files , and application-specific JAR files (ie. JAR files that can only reasonably be used as part of an application and therefore constitute application-private data). Java API documentation uses a system known as javadoc. All javadocs MUST be installed into %{_javadocdir}. I feel like the jars should be in %{_javadir} not %{_datadir}/java/pki/ if there is a valid reason that im missing for it to be elsewhere. either way it should be using the correct %{_javadir} macros. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 20:41:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:41:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522272] New Package for Dogtag PKI: symkey In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202041.nAKKfwUK016249@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522272 Kevin Wright changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Kevin Wright 2009-11-20 15:41:54 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: symkey Short Description: The Symmetric Key Java Native Interface (JNI) package supplies various native symmetric key operations to Java programs. Owners: kwright Branches: F-10 F-11, F-12, F-13 InitialCC: ausil -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 20:54:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:54:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469931] Review Request: ipmiutil - IPMI Management Utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202054.nAKKslwC031936@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469931 --- Comment #16 from Andy Cress 2009-11-20 15:54:44 EDT --- The gzip was an artifact from older version that wasn't needed, but hadn't caused problems before. I've taken it out now, and cleaned up more stuff in the spec file. I have moved any distro-specific logic from the spec file and handled it via configure.in. Those changes are now committed to SVN, the updated spec file is at http://ipmiutil.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ipmiutil/trunk/doc/ipmiutil.spec and this will be included in ipmiutil-2.5.1 soon. I have also applied to be a Fedora packager (as user arcress). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 21:32:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:32:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522272] New Package for Dogtag PKI: symkey In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202132.nAKLWRTw011273@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522272 --- Comment #9 from Kevin Wright 2009-11-20 16:32:26 EDT --- Branches: F-11, F-12, EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 21:31:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:31:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522272] New Package for Dogtag PKI: symkey In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202131.nAKLVofI011096@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522272 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Wright 2009-11-20 16:31:48 EDT --- changing the request for cvs branches: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: symkey Short Description: The Symmetric Key Java Native Interface (JNI) package supplies various native symmetric key operations to Java programs. Owners: kwright Branches: F-11, F-12 InitialCC: ausil -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 21:34:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:34:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522272] New Package for Dogtag PKI: symkey In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202134.nAKLY5Bp000820@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522272 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-11-20 16:34:03 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 21:35:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:35:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527986] Review Request: taoframework - Multimedia bindings for Mono In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202135.nAKLZ2YA001278@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527986 --- Comment #11 from Christian Krause 2009-11-20 16:35:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > I think it would be wrong to add dependencies for packages only available on > rpmfusion. I'm not sure about it, but I think it would be impossible to install > this package without having enabled rpmfusion. Yes, I fully agree now.... ;-) > I think it's better to make the dependencies as good as possible. If there are > any products which use this packages they should care about the required > dependencies. Hm, I think I disagree with this statement. IMHO the packages in Fedora should follow these rules: - the requirements of a package should include all prerequisites which are necessary to use the package (this includes e.g. the native libraries which are used by the late binding in C#) - if a package would not be usable without another one, it must be included in the requirements - a Fedora package must be installable on a Fedora-only system Given these two rules, there would be only the one solution to exclude these bindings which need native libs from rpmfusion completely and - if needed - package them in rpmfusion. I know, this would somehow "split" the taoframework package - but IMHO this would be the best solution. Do you think this would be a reasonable way? Otherwise the package looks good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 21:46:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:46:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537631] Review Request: moblin-panel-web - Moblin Panel for Web Browsing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202146.nAKLkGjU015603@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537631 --- Comment #3 from Christian Krause 2009-11-20 16:46:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > 3. are you planning to package the moblin web browser as well? In this case I > > would recommend that moblin-panel-web requires the moblin-web-browser > > (otherwise it just won't do anything... ;-) ) > > Yes, Its in progress and I believe in the mean time it will use the default > browser instead so in the short term it will still be useful when used with > Firefox. I've tested the package on my netbook, but unfortunately when using the URL bar nothing happens at all. I've checked netpanel/moblin-netbook-netpanel.c and it looks like that it tries to start "moblin-web-browser" explicitly. Do you plan to package the moblin-web-browser soon so that both packages can be tested together? ;-) > > 4. regarding the License I'm not sure: the sources in common/ are LGPLv2.1 but > > the main application seems to be GPLv2+ - I've asked on the fedora-legal > > mailing list for clarification... > > I'll clarify with upstream. I looked in common and what was in the upstream > Moblin specfile. I suspect its a mix of both because of what the other > moblin-panel packages use. According to the response from Tom Callaway on the fedora-legal list ( https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2009-November/msg00027.html ) you can either mention both licenses or just use "GPLv2+". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 21:46:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:46:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469931] Review Request: ipmiutil - IPMI Management Utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202146.nAKLkmow004539@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469931 --- Comment #17 from Andy Cress 2009-11-20 16:46:47 EDT --- The new src.rpm is now at http://ipmiutil.sourceforge.net/FILES/ipmiutil-2.5.1-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 21:49:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:49:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532205] Review Request: microba - Set of JFC (Swing) components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202149.nAKLnnBu016232@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532205 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-11-20 16:49:48 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 21:54:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:54:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538332] Review Request: covered - Verilog code coverage analyzer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202154.nAKLsOcd017440@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538332 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-11-20 16:54:23 EDT --- CVS done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 22:05:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:05:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 512170] Review Request: pidgin-sipe - Pidgin plugin for connecting to MS Communications Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202205.nAKM5t79009280@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512170 --- Comment #36 from Stefan Becker 2009-11-20 17:05:51 EDT --- FYI: the bug fix release 1.7.1 is out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 22:06:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:06:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 513775] Review Request: pyfuzzy - Python framework for fuzzy sets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202206.nAKM60ZL020909@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513775 --- Comment #10 from Fabian Affolter 2009-11-20 17:05:59 EDT --- Here are the updated files Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/pyfuzzy.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/pyfuzzy-0.1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1820590 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 22:08:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:08:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 491497] Review Request: dmapd - A server that provides DAAP and DPAP shares In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202208.nAKM8pJH009838@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491497 Christian Krause changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #11 from Christian Krause 2009-11-20 17:08:50 EDT --- I've tested the newest package with the libdmapshare package from updates-testing: Please use rpmlint. ;-) It reveals not only minor problems but also major issues: 1. %doc must be inside of a %files section 2. the FAQ file should not be packaged since it doesn't contain anything 3. the package contains a library but doesn't call ldconfig http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Shared_Libraries 4. the source tarball which is available upstream is not the same as the one in the provided src.rpm: d1b81cc2a5f3d4bb76366d12914cfcc9 dmapd-0.0.15.tar.gz (upstream) dc00b094845c758a5e193e4968439de5 SOURCES/dmapd-0.0.15.tar.gz (from src.rpm) 5. dmapd can't be started: /usr/lib/dmapd/0.0.15/modules/libphoto-meta-reader-graphicsmagick.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory ** ERROR **: Error opening /usr/lib/dmapd/0.0.15/modules/libphoto-meta-reader-graphicsmagick.so aborting... Aborted -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 22:33:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:33:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538335] Review Request: dia-CMOS - Dia CMOS Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202233.nAKMX47t027718@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538335 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-11-20 17:33:03 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 22:34:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:34:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538337] Review Request: dia-Digital - Dia Digital Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202234.nAKMYOTi027931@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538337 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-11-20 17:34:23 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 22:36:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:36:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538340] Review Request: dia-electronic - Dia electronic Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202236.nAKMagsf017288@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538340 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-11-20 17:36:40 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 22:35:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:35:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538339] Review Request: dia-electric2 - Dia electric2 Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202235.nAKMZ8Px016947@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538339 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-11-20 17:35:07 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 22:38:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:38:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538673] Review Request: libunistring - GNU Unicode string library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202238.nAKMcHGP029045@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538673 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-11-20 17:38:16 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 22:39:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:39:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539230] Review Request: perl-Authen-Simple - Simple Authentication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202239.nAKMdBER017717@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539230 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-11-20 17:39:10 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 22:40:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:40:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539231] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm - Create sticky forms with HTML::SuperForm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202240.nAKMeEx8018230@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539231 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-11-20 17:40:13 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 22:44:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:44:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 424841] Review Request: ndisc6 - IPv6 diagnostic tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202244.nAKMiSZi031347@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424841 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #35 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-11-20 17:44:26 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 22:43:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:43:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539428] Review Request: sparcy - Command line utility for Sparc Systems GPS loggers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202243.nAKMh2Ro031128@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539428 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-11-20 17:43:01 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 22:43:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:43:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522777] Review Request: perl-Verilog-Perl - Verilog parsing routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202243.nAKMhbjT019046@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522777 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-11-20 17:43:36 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 22:48:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:48:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 445224] Review Request: stapitrace - user space instruction trace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202248.nAKMmjBA000366@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445224 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #22 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-11-20 17:48:44 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 22:45:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:45:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528108] Review Request: Vuurmuur - Firewall manager built on top of iptables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202245.nAKMjUXe032403@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528108 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #19 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-11-20 17:45:29 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 22:46:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:46:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538458] Review Request: perl-Format-Human-Bytes - Format a bytecount and make it human readable In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202246.nAKMkvs6032578@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538458 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-11-20 17:46:56 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 23:25:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:25:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 492810] Review Request: RabbIT - proxy for a faster web In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202325.nAKNPutU029695@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492810 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 18:25:52 EDT --- RabbIT-4.1-9.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 23:26:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:26:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 492810] Review Request: RabbIT - proxy for a faster web In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202326.nAKNQ0VQ029739@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492810 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |4.1-9.el5 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 23:27:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:27:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525210] Review Request: rubygem-trollop - A command-line option parsing library for ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202327.nAKNRE9m011022@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525210 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.5-4.fc11 |1.15-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 23:27:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:27:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 491490] Review Request: ghmm - A library with data structures and algorithms for Hidden Markov Models In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202327.nAKNRlqu011181@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491490 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.7-4.svn2286.el5 Resolution|DUPLICATE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 23:26:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:26:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202326.nAKNQsk8030107@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #87 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 18:26:47 EDT --- x11vnc-0.9.8-16.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 23:27:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:27:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 491490] Review Request: ghmm - A library with data structures and algorithms for Hidden Markov Models In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202327.nAKNRgiV030400@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491490 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 18:27:39 EDT --- ghmm-0.7-4.svn2286.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 23:27:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:27:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525210] Review Request: rubygem-trollop - A command-line option parsing library for ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202327.nAKNR9Jp030257@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525210 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 18:27:07 EDT --- rubygem-trollop-1.15-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 23:26:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:26:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202326.nAKNQx9W030190@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.9.8-16.el5 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 23:44:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:44:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538335] Review Request: dia-CMOS - Dia CMOS Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202344.nAKNiFm3015385@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538335 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 18:44:14 EDT --- dia-CMOS-0.1-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dia-CMOS-0.1-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 23:44:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:44:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538335] Review Request: dia-CMOS - Dia CMOS Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202344.nAKNiOTQ002645@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538335 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 18:44:24 EDT --- dia-CMOS-0.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dia-CMOS-0.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 23:44:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:44:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538335] Review Request: dia-CMOS - Dia CMOS Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202344.nAKNiKQ2002596@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538335 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 18:44:19 EDT --- dia-CMOS-0.1-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dia-CMOS-0.1-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 23:46:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:46:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538339] Review Request: dia-electric2 - Dia electric2 Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202346.nAKNklX4003438@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538339 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 18:46:46 EDT --- dia-electric2-0.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dia-electric2-0.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 23:46:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:46:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538339] Review Request: dia-electric2 - Dia electric2 Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202346.nAKNkge4003406@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538339 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 18:46:41 EDT --- dia-electric2-0.1-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dia-electric2-0.1-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 23:45:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:45:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538337] Review Request: dia-Digital - Dia Digital Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202345.nAKNjNEC016040@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538337 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 18:45:22 EDT --- dia-Digital-0.1-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dia-Digital-0.1-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 23:45:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:45:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538337] Review Request: dia-Digital - Dia Digital Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202345.nAKNjSo5016078@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538337 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 18:45:27 EDT --- dia-Digital-0.1-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dia-Digital-0.1-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 23:45:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:45:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538337] Review Request: dia-Digital - Dia Digital Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202345.nAKNjW0O016116@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538337 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 18:45:32 EDT --- dia-Digital-0.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dia-Digital-0.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 23:47:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:47:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538340] Review Request: dia-electronic - Dia electronic Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202347.nAKNlhCp016467@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538340 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 18:47:42 EDT --- dia-electronic-0.1-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dia-electronic-0.1-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 23:47:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:47:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538340] Review Request: dia-electronic - Dia electronic Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202347.nAKNlqTH016622@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538340 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 18:47:52 EDT --- dia-electronic-0.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dia-electronic-0.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 23:49:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:49:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538340] Review Request: dia-electronic - Dia electronic Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202349.nAKNnYL4004014@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538340 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 18:49:33 EDT --- covered-0.7.7-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/covered-0.7.7-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 23:46:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:46:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538339] Review Request: dia-electric2 - Dia electric2 Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202346.nAKNkph9003533@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538339 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 18:46:51 EDT --- dia-electric2-0.1-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dia-electric2-0.1-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 23:47:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:47:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538340] Review Request: dia-electronic - Dia electronic Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202347.nAKNlmsx003755@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538340 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 18:47:47 EDT --- dia-electronic-0.1-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dia-electronic-0.1-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 23:49:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:49:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538340] Review Request: dia-electronic - Dia electronic Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202349.nAKNnccB004051@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538340 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 18:49:38 EDT --- covered-0.7.7-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/covered-0.7.7-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 23:47:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:47:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 515053] Review Request: sugar-getiabooks - Internet Archive Books receiver for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202347.nAKNlF4G003617@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515053 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 18:47:14 EDT --- sugar-getiabooks-3-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sugar-getiabooks-3-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 20 23:47:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:47:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 515053] Review Request: sugar-getiabooks - Internet Archive Books receiver for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911202347.nAKNlJha003655@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515053 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 18:47:19 EDT --- sugar-getiabooks-3-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sugar-getiabooks-3-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 00:02:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:02:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522272] New Package for Dogtag PKI: symkey In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911210002.nAL02pwP007372@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522272 --- Comment #11 from Kevin Wright 2009-11-20 19:02:50 EDT --- F11 koji build complete: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=142307 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 00:02:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:02:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532402] Review Request: APF - Advanced Policy Firewall In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911210002.nAL02RNP007264@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532402 --- Comment #3 from Scott Collier 2009-11-20 19:02:26 EDT --- No problem. Just a couple more things here. Please make the changes and I'll have another look. 1. Now it does build. rpmlint has issues with the rpm: $ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/apf-9.7.1-2.noarch.rpm apf.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/apf/allow_hosts.rules 0640 apf.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/apf/internals/multicast.networks 0640 apf.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/apf/internals/multicast.networks apf.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/apf/apf 0750 apf.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm /etc/apf/apf 0750 apf.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/apf/internals/private.networks 0640 apf.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/apf/internals/private.networks apf.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/apf/VERSION 0640 apf.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/apf/VERSION 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 55 errors, 21 warnings. You can get information on these errors / warnings here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues You can also get more verbose info with "rpmlint -i" 2. I'd take out the BuildArch: noarch tag. 3. add the %{?dist} tag to release. 4. Please don't chkconfig a service on by default: chkconfig --level 345 apf on See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SysVInitScript#Why_don.27t_we.... 5. instead of defining basedir: %define basedir /etc/apf you can use the %{_sysconfdir} tag. which would change: find %{buildroot}%{basedir}/ -type f -exec chmod 640 {} \; to: find %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/apf -type f -exec chmod 640 {} \; and a few other places as well... 6. You can take out these two lines: mkdir -p %{buildroot}/%{_docdir}/%{name} cp -pf COPYING.GPL CHANGELOG README.apf %{buildroot}/%{_docdir}/%{name}/ and use the %doc tag (something like): %doc COPYING.GPL CHANGELOG README.apf so, in your %files, %doc %{_docdir}/apf/CHANGELOG take out the %{_docdir}/apf/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 00:10:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:10:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522272] New Package for Dogtag PKI: symkey In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911210010.nAL0AtIm022378@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522272 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 19:10:54 EDT --- symkey-1.3.0-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/symkey-1.3.0-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 00:51:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:51:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539230] Review Request: perl-Authen-Simple - Simple Authentication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911210051.nAL0pKFE019206@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539230 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 19:51:19 EDT --- perl-Authen-Simple-0.4-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Authen-Simple-0.4-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 00:51:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:51:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539230] Review Request: perl-Authen-Simple - Simple Authentication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911210051.nAL0pO2w019238@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539230 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 19:51:24 EDT --- perl-Authen-Simple-0.4-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Authen-Simple-0.4-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 00:53:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:53:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539231] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm - Create sticky forms with HTML::SuperForm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911210053.nAL0rCpL030943@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539231 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 19:53:11 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm-0.4-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm-0.4-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 00:53:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:53:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539231] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm - Create sticky forms with HTML::SuperForm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911210053.nAL0rHn2030975@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539231 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 19:53:16 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm-0.4-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm-0.4-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 00:52:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:52:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522272] New Package for Dogtag PKI: symkey In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911210052.nAL0qlt4019686@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522272 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-20 19:52:45 EDT --- symkey-1.3.0-4.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/symkey-1.3.0-4.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 02:59:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:59:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527402] Review Request: gmock - Google C++ Mocking Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911210259.nAL2xJJk016969@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527402 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bos at serpentine.com --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-20 21:59:16 EDT --- *** Bug 539613 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 03:01:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:01:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539609] Review Request: gtest - Google's framework for writing C++ tests on a variety of platforms In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911210301.nAL31Mbq017707@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539609 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-20 22:01:21 EDT --- gtest is already in the distribution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 03:01:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:01:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539613] Review Request: gmock - Google's framework for writing and using C++ mock classes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911210301.nAL31N3c017735@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539613 Bug 539613 depends on bug 539609, which changed state. Bug 539609 Summary: Review Request: gtest - Google's framework for writing C++ tests on a variety of platforms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539609 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 02:59:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:59:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539613] Review Request: gmock - Google's framework for writing and using C++ mock classes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911210259.nAL2xHj6016930@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539613 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-20 21:59:16 EDT --- Perhaps you'd care to review the existing submission. Note that it's easy to search for existing review tickets at http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/ *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 527402 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 03:05:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:05:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538298] Review Request: openvas-plugins - Security check plugins for OpenVAS server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911210305.nAL35XcY027402@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538298 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-20 22:05:32 EDT --- This doesn't build due to several missing dependencies. If this ticket needs to be reviewed after some of the others you've submitted, please properly set the "Depends on" and "Blocks" fields. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 03:08:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:08:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538557] Review Request: gnome-screensaver-londonpictures - GNOME Screensaver Slideshow of London In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911210308.nAL38wh7019352@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538557 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-20 22:08:57 EDT --- Serguei, I can't find any existing Fedora account that looks like it matches your name or email address. Do you have a Fedora account? Have you already been sponsored into the packager group? If not, please read through http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 03:28:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:28:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533744] Review Request: ImageJ - Image Processing and Analysis in Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911210328.nAL3Sika025475@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533744 --- Comment #6 from D Haley 2009-11-20 22:28:42 EDT --- Argh. I wrote all of this, then firefox crashed as I was about to submit it. Anyway here is the condensed version * Please modify setup to use the -c parameter, creating a folder %{name}-%{version}. creating a dir called "source" in BUILD is not desirable. See http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm/s1-rpm-inside-macros.html * I concur that plugins work, isntalled in user dir and in imagej/plugins which is great. * I don't think you need all the rm -fs at the start # erase binary and useless files rm -rf .FBC* rm -rf macros/.FBC* rm macros/build.xml rm -f .gdb_history rm -rf __MACOSX * To make maintenance a bit easier, this can (at your option) be changed from: chmod 755 macros chmod 644 macros/About\ Startup\ Macros chmod 644 macros/*.txt chmod 644 macros/data/*.txt chmod 644 macros/tools/*.txt chmod 755 macros/data chmod 755 macros/tools to: find ./macros -name \*.txt -type f -exec chmod 644 {} \; find ./macros -type d -exec chmod 755 {} \; I'll do a full review on the next version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 05:43:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:43:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538557] Review Request: gnome-screensaver-londonpictures - GNOME Screensaver Slideshow of London In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911210543.nAL5h6j2025614@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538557 --- Comment #8 from Serguei Shimansky 2009-11-21 00:43:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Serguei, I can't find any existing Fedora account that looks like it matches > your name or email address. Do you have a Fedora account? Have you already > been sponsored into the packager group? > > If not, please read through > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers Account Name: englishextra Full Name: Serguei Shimansky Email: englishextra at yandex.ru Telephone Number: ........................... Country: RU PGP Key: ........................... Public SSH Key: ........................... Comments: Priavte teacher of English, based in Moscow, Russia, would like to submit some some rpms to fedoraproject Password: Valid (change) Account Status: Active CLA: CLA Done Privacy: Account Information Private Write me if something hasn't been done yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 08:44:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:44:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530617] Review Request: libixp - Stand-alone client/server 9P library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911210844.nAL8iODX011720@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530617 --- Comment #4 from Simon Wesp 2009-11-21 03:44:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Then why do you run /sbin/ldconfig in post/postun scriptlets? the ldconfig scriptlets are in the lib* template. i forgot to remove them! > Why does a client binary require the static library package? Doesn't make sense, because they are built static in the binary. sorry > This doesn't make the package adhere to the optflags guidelines. The project's > internal CFLAGS override some of the optflags. It would be more clean if you > could patch mk/gcc.mk and append $RPM_OPT_FLAGS (or %optflags) to $CFLAGS. mh, I don't understand that -current- CC="gcc -c -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i686 -mtune=atom -fasynchronous-unwind-tables" CFLAGS="-I$(echo .:../include:/usr/local/include:/usr/include|sed 's/:/ -I/g') -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=600 -std=c99 -pedantic -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -Wimplicit -Wmissing-prototypes -Wno-comment -Wno-missing-braces -Wno-parentheses -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-switch -Wpointer-arith -Wreturn-type -Wstrict-prototypes -Wtrigraphs -g -O1 -fno-builtin -fno-inline -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-optimize-sibling-calls -fno-unroll-loops -DIXPlint -O0 -DVERSION=\"0.5\" -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=600" ../util/compile ixpc.o ixpc.c -new?- CC="gcc -c -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i686 -mtune=atom -fasynchronous-unwind-tables" CFLAGS="-I$(echo .:../include:/usr/local/include:/usr/include|sed 's/:/ -I/g') -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=600 -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i686 -mtune=atom -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -std=c99 -pedantic -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -Wimplicit -Wmissing-prototypes -Wno-comment -Wno-missing-braces -Wno-parentheses -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-switch -Wpointer-arith -Wreturn-type -Wstrict-prototypes -Wtrigraphs -g -O1 -fno-builtin -fno-inline -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-optimize-sibling-calls -fno-unroll-loops -DIXPlint -O0 -DVERSION=\"0.5\" -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=600" ../util/compile ixpc.o ixpc.c I know these outputs are different, but i printed it and tallied it. in the new is not a flag more or less then in the current and reverse. Or not? The order of the flags is important, or? In the new? output i sorted it fedora_optflags and upstream_flags. You said that upstream_flags override some fedora_optflags, so it should be upstream_flags and fedora_optflags, the secound mentoined which conflicts with the first mentoined will override the first mentoined, or? (This sounds logical to me) -upstream and fedora instead of fedora and upstream- CC="gcc -c -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i686 -mtune=atom -fasynchronous-unwind-tables" CFLAGS="-I$(echo .:../include:/usr/local/include:/usr/include|sed 's/:/ -I/g') -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=600 -std=c99 -pedantic -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -Wimplicit -Wmissing-prototypes -Wno-comment -Wno-missing-braces -Wno-parentheses -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-switch -Wpointer-arith -Wreturn-type -Wstrict-prototypes -Wtrigraphs -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i686 -mtune=atom -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -g -O1 -fno-builtin -fno-inline -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-optimize-sibling-calls -fno-unroll-loops -DIXPlint -O0 -DVERSION=\"0.5\" -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=600" ../util/compile ixpc.o ixpc.c This output is equal to the current-output... I'm confused, sorry! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 09:14:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:14:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529375] Review Request: emerillon - A map viewer for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911210914.nAL9EWvb019322@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529375 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cassmodiah at fedoraproject.or | |g, | |josephine.tannhauser at google | |mail.com, lkundrak at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cassmodiah at fedoraproject.or | |g Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 09:19:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:19:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538327] Review Request: otpd - One Time Password daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911210919.nAL9JXwG020629@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538327 --- Comment #10 from Giuseppe Paterno 2009-11-21 04:19:30 EDT --- I will fix the manpage. However I'm torn to include or not to include an empty /etc/otppasswd file. The file is similar to /etc/passwd and contains the otp secrets in the format: user:otp-type:secret And it's not meant to be commented, in a similar way of /etc/passwd. What should I do?? Create an empty file? Insert two demo users??? (might be a security concern tough of default conf!) Any suggestion is appreciated. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 09:17:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:17:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529374] Review Request: ethos - Plugin framework for GLib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911210917.nAL9HMrE020231@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529374 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cassmodiah at fedoraproject.or | |g, | |josephine.tannhauser at google | |mail.com, lkundrak at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cassmodiah at fedoraproject.or | |g Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 09:19:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:19:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532590] Review Request: yaws - Web server for dynamic content written in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911210919.nAL9JdiD008748@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532590 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cassmodiah at fedoraproject.or | |g, | |josephine.tannhauser at google | |mail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cassmodiah at fedoraproject.or | |g Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 09:50:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:50:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539837] New: Review Request: mppenc - Musepack audio compressor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mppenc - Musepack audio compressor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539837 Summary: Review Request: mppenc - Musepack audio compressor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mschwendt at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mschwendt.fedorapeople.org/mppenc.spec SRPM URL: http://mschwendt.fedorapeople.org/mppenc-1.16-0.1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This is a Musepack StreamVersion7 encoder. Musepack is an audio compression format with a strong emphasis on high quality. It's not lossless, but it is designed for transparency, so that you won't be able to hear differences between the original wave file and the much smaller MPC file. It is based on the MPEG-1 Layer-2 / MP2 algorithms, but has rapidly developed and vastly improved and is now at an advanced stage in which it contains heavily optimized and patentless code. [...] Currently, Fedora includes only libmpcdec (the Musepack SV7 decoding library). The heavily changed "Musepack SV8 libs & tools (r435)" upstream distribution will include libraries and tools for compression and decompression. The new compressor will be called "mpcenc" not "mppenc", so the tools can coexist [for some time]. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 11:08:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:08:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539837] Review Request: mppenc - Musepack audio compressor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911211108.nALB8ppo004162@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539837 David Timms changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |dtimms at iinet.net.au AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dtimms at iinet.net.au -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 11:30:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:30:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532590] Review Request: yaws - Web server for dynamic content written in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911211130.nALBU2L0008614@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532590 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-21 06:28:23 EDT --- New package, modified to install to erlang lib directory and bundle source. First change causes the package to be no longer noarch, despite it contains arch-independent bytecode only, because it installs file in %{_libdir} hierarchy. Source is essential for run-time debugging and is not split to separate subpackage since it's not done for other erlang packages (such as erlang itself). SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/yaws.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/yaws-1.85-2.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 11:30:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:30:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532590] Review Request: yaws - Web server for dynamic content written in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911211130.nALBU3N5008653@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532590 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-21 06:28:23 EDT --- New package, modified to install to erlang lib directory and bundle source. First change causes the package to be no longer noarch, despite it contains arch-independent bytecode only, because it installs file in %{_libdir} hierarchy. Source is essential for run-time debugging and is not split to separate subpackage since it's not done for other erlang packages (such as erlang itself). SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/yaws.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/yaws-1.85-2.fc13.src.rpm --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-21 06:29:50 EDT --- New package, modified to install to erlang lib directory and bundle source. First change causes the package to be no longer noarch, despite it contains arch-independent bytecode only, because it installs file in %{_libdir} hierarchy. Source is essential for run-time debugging and is not split to separate subpackage since it's not done for other erlang packages (such as erlang itself). SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/yaws.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/yaws-1.85-2.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 11:43:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:43:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539863] New: Review Request: perl-Pod-PseudoPod - Extending the POD tags for book manuscripts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Pod-PseudoPod - Extending the POD tags for book manuscripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539863 Summary: Review Request: perl-Pod-PseudoPod - Extending the POD tags for book manuscripts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gp at zimt.uni-siegen.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: ftp://ftp.uni-siegen.de/pub/parrot.rpms/PseudoPod/perl-Pod-PseudoPod.spec SRPM URL: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1821155&name=perl-Pod-PseudoPod-0.15-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: PseudoPOD is an extended set of POD tags for book manuscripts. Standard POD doesn't have all the markup options you might want for marking up files for publishing production. PseudoPOD adds a few extra tags for footnotes and tables, and has extended uses of "=begin" elements. See Pod::PseudoPod::Tutorial. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 11:49:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:49:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539863] Review Request: perl-Pod-PseudoPod - Extending the POD tags for book manuscripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911211149.nALBnHIg023584@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539863 Gerd Pokorra changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://search.cpan.org/dist | |/Pod-PseudoPod/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 11:52:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:52:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538087] Review Request: dgc - A system for the creation of digital circuits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911211152.nALBqE0P012474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538087 --- Comment #7 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-11-21 06:52:12 EDT --- #001: Summary I think the summary should be "Digital Gate Compiler" which reflects the letters "dgc". #002: Incorrect Path In /usr/share/doc/dgc-0.98/tests/d_latch.dgd import "../data/ should be import "/usr/share/dgc/ #003: %doc ChangeLog and TODO is missing in the %doc. Actually, you don't need to create an extra doc directory for -devel. In that case, you will end up having 2 directory for docs and users are confused to where to search for docs. The package looks fine and for final review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 12:19:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 07:19:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539837] Review Request: mppenc - Musepack audio compressor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911211219.nALCJQRM017651@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539837 --- Comment #1 from David Timms 2009-11-21 07:19:25 EDT --- rpmlint /home/davidt/dev/packaging/reviews/mppenc/mppenc.spec /home/davidt/dev/packaging/reviews/mppenc/mppenc.spec: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %clean /home/davidt/dev/packaging/reviews/mppenc/mppenc.spec: W: no-buildroot-tag /home/davidt/dev/packaging/reviews/mppenc/mppenc.spec: W: no-%clean-section 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. The built packages are rpmlint free. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 12:43:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 07:43:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539873] New: netgen-mesher - automatic 3d tetrahedral mesh generator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: netgen-mesher - automatic 3d tetrahedral mesh generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539873 Summary: netgen-mesher - automatic 3d tetrahedral mesh generator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/netgen-mesher/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nuovodna at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC file:http://pastebin.com/m6909a2de NETGEN is an automatic 3d tetrahedral mesh generator. It accepts input from constructive solid geometry (CSG) or boundary representation (BRep) from STL file format. It requires togl v 1.7 library URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/togl/files/ SPEC file : http://pastebin.com/m6a68a615 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 12:48:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 07:48:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539873] netgen-mesher - automatic 3d tetrahedral mesh generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911211248.nALCmRj3003702@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539873 --- Comment #1 from nuovodna at gmail.com 2009-11-21 07:48:26 EDT --- Togl17 fixed spec file : http://pastebin.com/m76b38136 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 13:04:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:04:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533744] Review Request: ImageJ - Image Processing and Analysis in Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911211304.nALD4PFn028521@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533744 --- Comment #7 from Fabien Georget 2009-11-21 08:04:23 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.bde.espci.fr/~george27/imagej.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bde.espci.fr/~george27/imagej-1.43-0.5.j.fc12.src.rpm ---- 1) is modified 2) yes, but in the previous version the wrapper script was not correct, dependencies too ... For compiling plugins, you need java-devel. But rpmlint raises an error [builder at cafeline result]$ rpmlint *.rpm imagej.noarch: E: devel-dependency java-devel imagej-javadoc.noarch: W: non-standard-group Development Documentation 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. 3) I kept removing files in macros directory for not copy them 4) You are right, it is better (and shorter) than my solution I don't change the version to 1.43-1 because the rpmlint error. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 13:12:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:12:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532590] Review Request: yaws - Web server for dynamic content written in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911211312.nALDC0Oq008599@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532590 --- Comment #5 from Josephine Tannh?user 2009-11-21 08:11:59 EDT --- This is just a test review of the release 2 for myself, not an official one! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 13:11:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:11:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532590] Review Request: yaws - Web server for dynamic content written in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911211311.nALDBVsW008465@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532590 --- Comment #4 from Josephine Tannh?user 2009-11-21 08:11:29 EDT --- NOT OKAY - MUST: $ rpmlint yaws.i686: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/erlang/lib/yaws/priv/lib/setuid_drv.so yaws.i686: W: no-soname /usr/lib/erlang/lib/yaws/priv/lib/setuid_drv.so yaws.i686: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/erlang/lib/yaws/priv/lib/yaws_sendfile_drv.so yaws.i686: W: no-soname /usr/lib/erlang/lib/yaws/priv/lib/yaws_sendfile_drv.so yaws.i686: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/erlang/lib/yaws/priv/lib/epam yaws.i686: E: zero-length /usr/lib/erlang/lib/yaws/src/charset.def yaws-devel.i686: W: no-documentation - You have *.so-files, so you should have a Debug-Package - zero lenght? I think this can be removed OK - MUST: Named according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK - MUST: Spec file name matches the base package %{name} OK - MUST: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines OK - MUST: Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines OK - MUST: License field in spec file matches the actual license NOT OKAY - MUST: License files included in %doc ./test/ibrowse/LICENSE is missing (you have to rename it to avoid doubled filenames in %doc) OK - MUST: Spec is in American English OK - MUST: Spec is legible OK - MUST: Sources match the upstream source by MD5 2d6bd52af002f356d6738900a67550c5531a0b4a OK - MUST: Successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on i686 CAN'T TEST, BECAUSE I HAVEN'T AN ACCESS TO KOJI - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. OK - MUST: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. N/A - MUST: Handles locales properly with %find_lang N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager muststate this fact in the request for review. OK - MUST: Owns all directories that it creates OK - MUST: No duplicate files in the %files listing OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly, includes %defattr(...) OK - MUST: Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: Consistently uses macros OK - MUST: Package contains code, or permissable content N/A - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package NOT OKAY - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix, then library files that end in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. OK - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: All filenames valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: NOT OKAY, BECAUSE NOT ALL LICENSE TEXTS ARE IN A SEPERATE LICENSE FILE- SHOULD: Source package includes license text(s) as a separate file. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK - SHOULD: Builds in mock. OK - SHOULD: Compiles and builds into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK - SHOULD: Functions as described. OK - SHOULD: Scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. OK - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK - SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in a -devel pkg N/A - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Other items: OK - latest stable version OK - SourceURL valid OK - Compiler flags ok NOT OKAY - Debuginfo complete You have .so-files you should have a debugpackage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 13:41:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:41:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539837] Review Request: mppenc - Musepack audio compressor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911211341.nALDfKDk004531@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539837 --- Comment #2 from David Timms 2009-11-21 08:41:18 EDT --- Things to look at: 1. Missing following stanza (as indicated by rpmlint). %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT 2. missing buildroot stuff BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) 3. order of stanzas. It seems that normally Name comes first before summary (and some of the other items based on the order that newspec creates. Is there a good reason to go against suggestions from rpmdev-newspec ? 4. the Install file mentions ossaudio (bsd only). is that a real requirement ? (I wouldn't think so, since it shouldn't need to actually use audio output or input.) 5. Install also mentions use of: 'cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX:=/myPath' Seems it installs into a fedora happy location anyway. So I do not know if this is needed. 6. patch cmake. Is this to ignore the default build params and ensure Fedora's get used. It might be useful to explain that above the patch definition, but I'm not insisting. 7. license: website says License: GNU LGPL most src files state: License: GNU LGPL v2.1 or later. It seems the intent is probably LGPLv2+ which matches a standard Fedora license designator, that is provided in the spec. Is it worth querying upstream to get some license info in the remaining src files " OK: named as upstream package. OK. md5sum in archive inside src.rpm matches upstream: $ md5sum mppenc-1.16.tar.bz2 mppenc-1.16-0.1.fc11.src/mppenc-1.16.tar.bz2 f1456141283814efcc012cfa15609bc6 mppenc-1.16.tar.bz2 f1456141283814efcc012cfa15609bc6 mppenc-1.16-0.1.fc11.src/mppenc-1.16.tar.bz2 OK. rpmbuild -ba succeeds in creating src, bin and bin-debuginfo rpms. OK. app works as expected to create a mpc file from wav input. The created mpc is playable with audacious-plugins. on i686 OK. the remaining must items pass, or are not relevant to this package. Most of the should items are also not relevant. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 14:09:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:09:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524992] Review Request: toppler - platform game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911211409.nALE9Xe6021226@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524992 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |hdegoede at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Hans de Goede 2009-11-21 09:09:31 EDT --- Hi, Full review (md5sum, license, spec file readability, etc.) done, the package looks good. I have only one remark. I'm not completely happy with how the highscore file is handled. My problem is that toppler does not drop its sgid rights, it changes its egid, but it keeps the rights. So if someone is able to take control of the toppler process, he can then use the sgid games rights to get access to highscore files of other games, which in turn could be used to inject data into other people's processes with the purpose of taking over control of said process. I would like to see toppler patched to open the highscore file at startup (in rw mode) as the first thing in main, and then drop the sgid rights completely. This means the lock file will have to go, this lack of highscore file locking is a problem with many games in general, but one which is usually just ignored as in practice it never gets triggered. Regards, Hans -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 14:10:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:10:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532590] Review Request: yaws - Web server for dynamic content written in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911211410.nALEAkKB021792@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532590 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #6 from Simon Wesp 2009-11-21 09:10:44 EDT --- It's not a test review for yourself, it's an informal one! OK - MUST: License field in spec file matches the actual license @Lubomir @Josephine: License must be LGPLv2+ This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.. Josephine: Licensetexts with the "any later version" phrase, always means to add a + to the current license in the license-field in spec-file. OK - MUST: Sources match the upstream source by MD5 2d6bd52af002f356d6738900a67550c5531a0b4a @ Josephine: This is the sha1sum, but it is equal to the md5sum 6941ea52638805246973bf94fd6e9a52 CAN'T TEST, BECAUSE I HAVEN'T AN ACCESS TO KOJI - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. should be okay, because Lubomir already built it in koji, see top post N/A - MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency why N/A? The devel package meets this requirement. it's okay OK - SHOULD: Functions as described. You tested it? Me not, but i trust Lubomir that this pkg will work. NOT OKAY, BECAUSE NOT ALL LICENSE TEXTS ARE IN A SEPERATE LICENSE FILE- SHOULD: Source package includes license text(s) as a separate file. It's just a should item and the guideline says: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. I leave it up to Lubomir, but this isn't a blocker! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 14:14:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:14:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530204] Review Request: rubygem-hawler - Hawler, the Ruby HTTP crawler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911211414.nALEEtGp010660@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530204 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-21 09:14:53 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 14:25:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:25:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538327] Review Request: otpd - One Time Password daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911211425.nALEPubs024150@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538327 Antoine Brenner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |brenner-redhatbugzilla at gymg | |lish.com --- Comment #11 from Antoine Brenner 2009-11-21 09:25:53 EDT --- Hello, Suggestion concerning #10: As a potential user of otpd, I think that an empty /etc/otppasswd file would be OK provided that an example otppasswd file is made available in the docs since a real-life looking example is always nice to have. Of course the example file should have comments explaining that comments are not supported and that the secrets in the example file are NOT to be used: a command like "dd if=/dev/random bs=4096 count=1 |sha1sum" should be used instead. By the way, do you know what TRI-D Systems became ? Their home page said something like "We've been bought, we'll be back soon" and nothing came, and nowadays the domain www.tri-dsystems.com does not resolve any more... I've read somewhere that Redhat was the buyer, and that they were investigating the "IP"... Best regards, Antoine -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 14:26:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:26:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539837] Review Request: mppenc - Musepack audio compressor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911211426.nALEQpr9024255@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539837 --- Comment #3 from Michael Schwendt 2009-11-21 09:26:50 EDT --- Thanks for the quick review! As of an RPM update in Fedora 10 and later, * %buildroot is defined by default, * BuildRoot definition in the spec file is ignored, * %buildroot tree is removed automatically at beginning of %install, * a default %clean section is provided by rpmbuild. This package actually is my first public one to omit all these items as they are no longer necessary. See "rpmbuild --clean --rebuild mppenc-1.16-0.1.fc11.src.rpm" > Is there a good reason to go against suggestions from rpmdev-newspec ? Personal taste. The order in rpmdev-newspec was completely arbitrary and based on personal taste, too. > ossaudio mpp.h says: | on some systems you also must link the libossaudio library, | so maybe you also must edit the Makefile However, with Fedora there is no dependency on anything like that. No extra header inclusion either. The code path, which evaluates the USE_OSS_AUDIO preprocessor variable, doesn't do anything special. The code reuses a header and definitions from the mpc decoder mppdec. > 5. Install also mentions use of: > 'cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX:=/myPath' > Seems it installs into a fedora happy location anyway. See "rpm --eval %cmake". > 6. patch cmake. Is this to ignore the default build params and > ensure Fedora's get used. It might be useful to explain that > above the patch definition, Good suggestion, as I normally do that unless a patch is really obvious. > 7. license: A mail to upstream is on its way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 14:33:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:33:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508351] Review Request: josm - java openstreetmap editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911211433.nALEXQbL025499@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508351 --- Comment #19 from Guido Grazioli 2009-11-21 09:33:22 EDT --- Some notes: - man page should not be in %doc, and better glob extension as well - you need to update icon cache because you install a new icon: # ScriptletSnippet from Fedora Packaging on Icon Cache %post touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor &>/dev/null || : %postun if [ $1 -eq 0 ] ; then touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor &>/dev/null gtk-update-icon-cache %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor &>/dev/null || : fi %posttrans gtk-update-icon-cache %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor &>/dev/null || : - why aren't you keeping change history in %changelog? - you could set file permissions within install command instead of running chmod after it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 14:41:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:41:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538046] Review Request: spacewalk-certs-tools - Spacewalk SSL Key/Cert Tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911211441.nALEfMVR015958@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538046 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jochen at herr-schmitt.de -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 14:42:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:42:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534021] Review Request: apache-ivy - Java-based dependency manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911211442.nALEgFD4027432@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534021 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jochen at herr-schmitt.de -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 14:45:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:45:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522895] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-native-tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911211445.nALEjEPt016799@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522895 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-21 09:45:12 EDT --- ( fedora-review flag must be set by the reviewer, not the submitter. Revoking for now ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 15:22:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:22:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527986] Review Request: taoframework - Multimedia bindings for Mono In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911211522.nALFMZWW004336@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527986 --- Comment #12 from Paul Lange 2009-11-21 10:22:32 EDT --- I fully agree with you! Only including binding for libraries that we support in fedora sound like the best way. Is there a way to exclude some subpackages from being built? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 15:35:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:35:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539912] New: Review Request: javacsv - Stream-based Java library for reading and writing CSV and other delimited data Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: javacsv - Stream-based Java library for reading and writing CSV and other delimited data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539912 Summary: Review Request: javacsv - Stream-based Java library for reading and writing CSV and other delimited data Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: th0br0 at mkdir.name QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://th0br0.fedorapeople.org/javacsv-2.0/javacsv.spec SRPM URL: http://th0br0.fedorapeople.org/javacsv-2.0/javacsv-2.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Java CSV is a small fast open source Java library for reading and writing CSV and plain delimited text files. All kinds of CSV files can be handled, text qualified, Excel formatted, etc. Currently, there are no %doc files being installed, this is due to upstream not shipping any. I have contacted upstream as the license text is missing, which is a violation of the GPL. This will be fixed of course before any build is done, once upstream releases an update, I shall update the package immediately. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 15:54:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:54:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539472] Review Request: libmemcache - C API to memcached In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911211554.nALFsxQH002532@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539472 --- Comment #1 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-11-21 10:54:59 EDT --- New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/libmemcache.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f13/SRPMS/libmemcache-1.4.0-0.2rc2.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 16:01:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 11:01:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538087] Review Request: dgc - A system for the creation of digital circuits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911211601.nALG14ej013918@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538087 --- Comment #8 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-11-21 11:01:02 EDT --- #001: Summary updated #002: Fixed the path. #003: Added ChangeLog and moved TODO to base package. Ignoring rpmlint warning for -devel package on no documentation. Latest package, now from Fedora 12: SPEC: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/dgc.spec SRPM: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/dgc-0.98-3.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 16:45:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 11:45:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538303] Review Request: rubygem-minitest - Small and fast replacement for ruby's huge and slow test/unit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911211645.nALGj1wO016350@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538303 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-21 11:45:00 EDT --- I will take this. Instead I will appreciate it if you would review my rubygem-marc review request (bug 539606) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 17:24:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:24:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538303] Review Request: rubygem-minitest - Small and fast replacement for ruby's huge and slow test/unit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911211724.nALHOU07024847@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538303 --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-21 12:24:30 EDT --- For 1.4.2-1: * Source - http://gems.rubyforge.org/gems/minitest-1.4.2.gem works, so please use this. * Requires/BuildRequires - Would you check if "Requires: rubygem(hoe)" is really needed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 17:52:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:52:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532205] Review Request: microba - Set of JFC (Swing) components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911211752.nALHquV2031073@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532205 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-21 12:52:54 EDT --- Thank you for review and CVS. Imported and built. \o/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 18:08:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:08:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225697] Merge Review: distcache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911211808.nALI8Num003283@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225697 --- Comment #3 from Steve Traylen 2009-11-21 13:08:22 EDT --- Ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 18:23:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:23:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539948] =?utf-8?q?_Review_Rquest=EF=BC=9A_fqterm_---BBS_clie?= =?utf-8?q?nt_based_on_Qt_library_in_linux?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911211823.nALINb3S014251@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539948 Todd Zullinger changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|tmz at pobox.com |fedora-package-review at redha | |t.com, notting at redhat.com Component|paperkey |Package Review AssignedTo|tmz at pobox.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 18:25:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:25:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508351] Review Request: josm - java openstreetmap editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911211825.nALIPACZ007023@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508351 --- Comment #20 from C?dric OLIVIER 2009-11-21 13:25:08 EDT --- Thanks. http://cedric.olivier.free.fr/rpms/josm-0-0.3.2255svn.fc11.src.rpm http://cedric.olivier.free.fr/rpms/josm.spec - Update icon cache added in spec file. - I wasn't kept change history in %changelog because version number wasn't correct. I have now updated all version of this rpm as there would be. - Is it better to run chmod after install command? why? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 18:24:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:24:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539948] =?utf-8?q?_Review_Rquest=EF=BC=9A_fqterm_---BBS_clie?= =?utf-8?q?nt_based_on_Qt_library_in_linux?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911211824.nALIOwVl014462@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539948 --- Comment #3 from Todd Zullinger 2009-11-21 13:24:57 EDT --- Please see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageReviewProcess for setting the proper component and flags for a review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 18:42:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:42:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508351] Review Request: josm - java openstreetmap editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911211842.nALIgmR8010986@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508351 --- Comment #21 from Guido Grazioli 2009-11-21 13:42:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > - Is it better to run chmod after install command? why? Actually i was proposing the opposite, ie: install -Dp -m 644 %SOURCE4 %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1/%{name}.1 instead of: mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1 install -p %SOURCE4 %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1/ chmod -x %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1/%{name}.1 It's just a matter of style however. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 18:53:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:53:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536683] Review Request: eclipse-mdt-uml2 - Implementation of the UML2 OMG metamodel for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911211853.nALIr1F0020804@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536683 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-21 13:53:00 EDT --- Good work, Mat. * Package name and version are in accordance with packaging guidelines * SPEC file clean, legible and well-commented * License tag correct, license packaged as %doc * Builds fine in mock http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1821764 * RPMLint happy (a couple of false positives about spelling errors in fc13) * Filelist okay * Provides/Require list ok A few objections: 1.) Why do you check stuff out from CVS? There seem to be a source/sdk bundle available at the downloads page: http://www.eclipse.org/modeling/mdt/downloads/?project=uml2 2.) Please don't pretty-format the Description. It does not always look well in package management front-ends. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 19:10:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:10:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536683] Review Request: eclipse-mdt-uml2 - Implementation of the UML2 OMG metamodel for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911211910.nALJA7kS025329@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536683 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 19:10:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:10:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536684] Review Request: eclipse-mdt-ocl - Implementation of the OCL OMG metamodel for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911211910.nALJA1JE024991@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536684 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-21 14:09:59 EDT --- * Package name and version are in accordance with packaging guidelines * SPEC file clean, legible and well-commented * License tag correct, license packaged as %doc * Local mockbuild with eclipse-mdt-uml2 dragged in succeeded * RPMLint happy * a couple of warnings spelling errors in fc13, all of them false positives * warning about symlink target not being in package; ok since it's in dependnecy * Filelist okay * Provides/Require list ok Objections: 1.) Why do you check stuff out from CVS and make up a qualifier? There seem to be a source bundle available at the downloads page: http://www.eclipse.org/modeling/mdt/downloads/?project=ocl 2.) Please don't pretty-format the Description. It does not always look well in package management front-ends. 3.) Please use build-classpath to get the file name of lpgjavaruntime.jar. Like: ln -s ../../../../../../../$(build-classpath lpgjavaruntime) \ net.sourceforge.lpg.lpgjavaruntime_1.1.0.jar -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 19:17:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:17:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539442] Review Request: rubygem-ZenTest - Automated test scaffolding for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911211917.nALJHjUS019208@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539442 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-21 14:17:44 EDT --- For 4.1.4-1 * Source0: - Please use http://gems.rubyforge.org/gems/%{gemname}-%{version}.gem * Requires/BuildRequires - Please recheck the need of "Requires: rubygem(hoe)". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 19:31:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:31:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529496] Review Request: libmtag - An advanced C music tagging library with a simple API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911211931.nALJVIqK022067@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529496 --- Comment #11 from Felipe Contreras 2009-11-21 14:31:17 EDT --- Ok. I've made the 0.3.2 release which deals with all these comments from here. Anything else pending acceptance? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 19:28:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:28:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537452] Review Request: eclipse-emf-validation - Verify the integrity of EMF models In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911211928.nALJS32i021180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537452 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-21 14:28:02 EDT --- * Package name and version are in accordance with packaging guidelines * SPEC file clean, legible and well-commented * License tag correct, license packaged as %doc * RPMLint happy * a couple of warnings spelling errors in fc13, all of them false positives * Filelist okay, for directories it uses and does now it depends on packages that provide them * Provides/Require list ok (mock build did not finish yet) Objections: 1.) Why do you check stuff out from CVS? 2.) Please don't pretty-format the Description, please use complete sentences. It does not always look well in package management front-ends. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 19:27:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:27:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537451] Review Request: eclipse-emf-query - Specify and execute queries against EMF models In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911211927.nALJRltQ021124@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537451 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-21 14:27:46 EDT --- * Package name and version are in accordance with packaging guidelines * SPEC file clean, legible and well-commented * License tag correct, license packaged as %doc * Filelist okay, for directories it uses and does now it depends on packages that provide them * Provides/Require list ok (mock build did not finish yet) Objections: 1.) Why do you check stuff out from CVS? 2.) Please don't pretty-format the Description, please use complete sentences. It does not always look well in package management front-ends. 3.) RPMLint: eclipse-emf-query.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/eclipse-emf-query-1.3.0/epl-v10.html The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. eclipse-emf-query.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/eclipse-emf-query-1.3.0/notice.html The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 20:04:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:04:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538303] Review Request: rubygem-minitest - Small and fast replacement for ruby's huge and slow test/unit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911212004.nALK4jB7028303@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538303 --- Comment #3 from Matthew Kent 2009-11-21 15:04:44 EDT --- Hi! Will take a look at your package shortly. (In reply to comment #2) > For 1.4.2-1: > > * Source > - http://gems.rubyforge.org/gems/minitest-1.4.2.gem works, > so please use this. > Ah your right, didn't see the nice redirection they've done. > * Requires/BuildRequires > - Would you check if "Requires: rubygem(hoe)" is really needed? Seems to be. The Rakefile uses hoe's lib/hoe/test.rb to provide the following tasks: rake test # test # Run the test suite. rake test_deps # test # Show which test files fail when run alone. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 20:03:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:03:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539268] Review Request: rubygem-will_paginate - Most awesome pagination solution for Rail In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911212003.nALK3SF1028171@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539268 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-21 15:03:27 EDT --- Some quick notes: * %define -> %global - Now Fedora prefers to use %global than %define: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define * License - is MIT * Source - Please use http://gems.rubyforge.org/gems/%{gemname}-%{version}.gem * Requires/BuildRequires - "Requires: ruby(abi) = 1.8" is a must: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby#Ruby_Packaging_Guidelines Also I usually suggest to add "BuildRequires: ruby(abi) = 1.8" for consistency. - Please check the needed Requires manually. For example (only an example), lib/will_paginate.rb contains: ------------------------------------------------------------- 1 require 'active_support' ------------------------------------------------------------- This means this binary rpm should have at least "Requires: rubygem(activesupport)". ! Note: use "rubygem(activesupport)" virtual Provides style for Requires instead of using rpm names directly, ref: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#Perl_Requires_and_Provides * Using macros - As %geminstdir is defined, please replace %{gemdir}/gems/%{gemname}-%{version}/ (in %files) with this. - %ruby_sitelib seems to be used nowhere (in this spec file). * Duplicate files - Please fix below: ------------------------------------------------------------- 57 warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/will_paginate-2.3.11/CHANGELOG.rdoc 58 warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/will_paginate-2.3.11/LICENSE 59 warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/will_paginate-2.3.11/README.rdoc ------------------------------------------------------------- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Duplicate_Files - Note: please keep these files marked as %doc. * Test program - As this rpm contains %geminstdir/test/ please add %check section and execute some test program (some extra BuildRequires are also needed). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 20:06:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:06:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539469] Review Request: OpenSRF - Open Scalable Request Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911212006.nALK664B004509@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539469 --- Comment #1 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-11-21 15:06:05 EDT --- New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/OpenSRF.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f13/SRPMS/OpenSRF-1.2.0-1.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 20:20:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:20:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539442] Review Request: rubygem-ZenTest - Automated test scaffolding for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911212020.nALKKf9V031696@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539442 --- Comment #2 from Matthew Kent 2009-11-21 15:20:41 EDT --- Spec URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SPECS/rubygem-ZenTest.spec SRPM URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SRPMS/rubygem-ZenTest-4.1.4-2.fc13.src.rpm * Sat Nov 21 2009 Matthew Kent - 4.1.4-2 - Better Source (#539442). - More standard permissions on files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 20:19:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:19:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538303] Review Request: rubygem-minitest - Small and fast replacement for ruby's huge and slow test/unit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911212019.nALKJr0p031298@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538303 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-21 15:19:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > > * Requires/BuildRequires > > - Would you check if "Requires: rubygem(hoe)" is really needed? > > Seems to be. The Rakefile uses hoe's lib/hoe/test.rb to provide the following > tasks: However - In my opinition, to begin with Rakefile is usually somewhat similar with Makefiles on autotool based tarball. So I usually put Rakefile to -doc subpackage as I don't think people usually need Rakefile. - As you know usually I always request to execute "rake test" in rpmbuild (i.e. executing test should be done by _us_, like "make check"). If the dependency for "rake test" is needed, perhaps we have to add "Requires: rubygem(rake)" (not BuildRequires) for binary gem-based rpm, which I think is not desired. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 20:22:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:22:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538303] Review Request: rubygem-minitest - Small and fast replacement for ruby's huge and slow test/unit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911212022.nALKMUCC008179@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538303 --- Comment #5 from Matthew Kent 2009-11-21 15:22:29 EDT --- Spec URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SPECS/rubygem-minitest.spec SRPM URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SRPMS/rubygem-minitest-1.4.2-2.fc13.src.rpm * Sat Nov 21 2009 Matthew Kent - 1.4.2-2 - Better Source (#538303). - More standard permissions on files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 20:30:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:30:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538303] Review Request: rubygem-minitest - Small and fast replacement for ruby's huge and slow test/unit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911212030.nALKUsWa009864@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538303 --- Comment #6 from Matthew Kent 2009-11-21 15:30:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > > * Requires/BuildRequires > > > - Would you check if "Requires: rubygem(hoe)" is really needed? > > > > Seems to be. The Rakefile uses hoe's lib/hoe/test.rb to provide the following > > tasks: > > However > - In my opinition, to begin with Rakefile is usually somewhat similar > with Makefiles on autotool based tarball. So I usually put Rakefile > to -doc subpackage as I don't think people usually need Rakefile. > > - As you know usually I always request to execute "rake test" in > rpmbuild (i.e. executing test should be done by _us_, like "make check"). > If the dependency for "rake test" is needed, perhaps we have to > add "Requires: rubygem(rake)" (not BuildRequires) for binary gem-based > rpm, which I think is not desired. Oh sorry! I missed the Requires line for hoe and was looking at the BuildRequires. Your right, the Requires for hoe isn't necessary. And putting the Rakefile in doc seems like a good idea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 20:36:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:36:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539983] New: Review Request: qjson - qt-based library that maps JSON data to QVariant object Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: qjson - qt-based library that maps JSON data to QVariant object https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539983 Summary: Review Request: qjson - qt-based library that maps JSON data to QVariant object Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: eli at orbsky.homelinux.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://orbsky.homelinux.org/packages/qjson.spec SRPM URL: http://orbsky.homelinux.org/packages/qjson-0.6.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: JSON is a lightweight data-interchange format. It can represents integer, real number, string, an ordered sequence of value, and a collection of name/value pairs.QJson is a qt-based library that maps JSON data to QVariant objects. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 20:40:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:40:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539442] Review Request: rubygem-ZenTest - Automated test scaffolding for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911212040.nALKeJSa003589@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539442 --- Comment #3 from Matthew Kent 2009-11-21 15:40:18 EDT --- Spec URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SPECS/rubygem-ZenTest.spec SRPM URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SRPMS/rubygem-ZenTest-4.1.4-3.fc13.src.rpm * Sat Nov 21 2009 Matthew Kent - 4.1.4-3 - Drop Requires on hoe, only used by Rakefile (#539442). - Move Rakefile to -doc (#539442). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 20:39:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:39:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538303] Review Request: rubygem-minitest - Small and fast replacement for ruby's huge and slow test/unit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911212039.nALKdmZV011636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538303 --- Comment #7 from Matthew Kent 2009-11-21 15:39:47 EDT --- Spec URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SPECS/rubygem-minitest.spec SRPM URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SRPMS/rubygem-minitest-1.4.2-3.fc13.src.rpm * Sat Nov 21 2009 Matthew Kent - 1.4.2-3 - Drop Requires on hoe, only used by Rakefile (#538303). - Move Rakefile to -doc (#538303). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 20:43:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:43:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539606] Review Request: rubygem-marc - Ruby library for MARC catalog In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911212043.nALKhIv0004173@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539606 Matthew Kent changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mkent at magoazul.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mkent at magoazul.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 20:49:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:49:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539983] Review Request: qjson - qt-based library that maps JSON data to QVariant object In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911212049.nALKnNYP005278@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539983 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 20:58:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:58:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539989] New: Review Request: nettop - top-like program for network packets Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: nettop - top-like program for network packets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539989 Summary: Review Request: nettop - top-like program for network packets Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bjohnson at symetrix.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~bjohnson/nettop.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~bjohnson/nettop-0.2.3-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Nettop is a program which looks like top, but is for network packets. $ rpmlint *rpm nettop.src: W: summary-not-capitalized top-like program for network packets nettop.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized top-like program for network packets 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. These warning can be ignored because it is the proper capitalization for this program name, it just happens to be at the beginning of the line. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 21:16:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:16:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539983] Review Request: qjson - qt-based library that maps JSON data to QVariant object In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911212116.nALLGr3J010668@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539983 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-11-21 16:16:52 EDT --- Here is my review: ! All relevant doc files should be packaged. - I don't think we need the INSTALL file in %doc - There is doxygen documentation in the doc directory that can be built and packaged. * rpmlint says: qjson.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary QJson qjson.x86_64: W: invalid-license LGPL qjson.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libqjson.so qjson.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/qjson/serializer.h qjson.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/qjson/parser.h qjson.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/qjson/qjson_export.h qjson.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/qjson/serializerrunnable.h qjson.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/QJson.pc qjson.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib64/libqjson.so.0.6.3 qjson.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib64/libqjson.so.0.6.3 qjson.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/qjson/parserrunnable.h qjson-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license LGPL qjson.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary QJson qjson.src: W: invalid-license LGPL -The header files, .pc file and the *.so file should go to the devel package. Also the doxygen doc, if built, should go to the devel package. The devel package must require pkgconfig in addition to %{name} = %{version}-%{release} -Summary can simply be "qt-based library that maps JSON data to QVariant objects" -There is GPLv2+ code in the src/ directory, making the effective license GPLv2+. Please verify this, possibly via upstream, as they claim that the library is LGPL. ! The tests in the tests/ directory can be run in %check ! If you can, please make the description more descriptive. Not just a copy of the summary. * Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. ? Do we need to keep those commented out lines in the specfile? * %{_includedir}/qjson/ is not owned. * What package owns the directory? %{_datadir}/apps/cmake/modules/ That package needs to be in Requires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 21:22:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:22:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539606] Review Request: rubygem-marc - Ruby library for MARC catalog In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911212122.nALLMqxF020860@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539606 --- Comment #1 from Matthew Kent 2009-11-21 16:22:51 EDT --- (First time reviewing) Initial notes for 0.3.0-1: * %prep: - Looks like gem is creating a .gem directory outside the BuildRoot. From the build.log: + gem install --local --install-dir ./usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8 --force --rdoc -V /builddir/build/SOURCES/marc-0.3.0.gem Installing gem marc-0.3.0 Using local gem /builddir/.gem/ruby/1.8/cache/marc-0.3.0.gem adding mkdir -p .%{gemdir} prior to the gem install appears to correct it. * %package -n ruby-%{gemname} Summary - Summary is different from main rubygem- package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 21:44:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:44:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539837] Review Request: mppenc - Musepack audio compressor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911212144.nALLiou9017126@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539837 --- Comment #4 from Michael Schwendt 2009-11-21 16:44:49 EDT --- Spec URL: http://mschwendt.fedorapeople.org/mppenc.spec SRPM URL: http://mschwendt.fedorapeople.org/mppenc-1.16-0.2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 21:53:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:53:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539997] Review Request: python-cryptopp - Python wrappers for the Crypto++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911212153.nALLrMqq028158@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539997 Bernard Johnson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #1 from Bernard Johnson 2009-11-21 16:53:21 EDT --- Blocked FE-LEGAL for license review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 21:51:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:51:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539997] New: Review Request: python-cryptopp - Python wrappers for the Crypto++ library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-cryptopp - Python wrappers for the Crypto++ library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539997 Summary: Review Request: python-cryptopp - Python wrappers for the Crypto++ library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bjohnson at symetrix.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~bjohnson/python-cryptopp.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~bjohnson/python-cryptopp-0.5.17-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Python wrappers for the Crypto++ library. RSA-PSS-SHA256, SHA-256 hashes, and AES-CTR enryption $ rpmlint *rpm python-cryptopp.src: W: invalid-license TGPPL python-cryptopp.x86_64: W: invalid-license TGPPL python-cryptopp-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license TGPPL 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 22:18:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:18:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534135] Review Request: xstream - Java XML serialization library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911212218.nALMIuqF027029@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534135 Michal Ingeli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mi at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mi at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 22:25:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:25:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524992] Review Request: toppler - platform game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911212225.nALMPK8U028995@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524992 --- Comment #8 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-11-21 17:25:19 EDT --- Thanks for the review, Hans. I'll follow up on the highscore file issue with upstream. I have already some issues going on with the 1.1.4 version, which includes some of the patches I added to 1.1.3, but also introduces some regressions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 23:50:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:50:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537451] Review Request: eclipse-emf-query - Specify and execute queries against EMF models In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911212350.nALNombm021348@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537451 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-21 18:50:47 EDT --- * built fine in mock -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 23:51:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:51:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537452] Review Request: eclipse-emf-validation - Verify the integrity of EMF models In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911212351.nALNp9ec026565@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537452 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-21 18:51:08 EDT --- * mock build succeeded -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 23:59:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:59:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537652] Review Request: eclipse-m2m-qvtoml - Implementation of Operational QVT for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911212359.nALNx8Ae027740@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537652 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-21 18:59:07 EDT --- * Package name and version are in accordance with packaging guidelines * SPEC file clean, legible and well-commented * License tag correct, license packaged as %doc * RPMLint silent * Filelist okay, for directories it uses and does now it depends on packages that provide them * Provides/Require list ok * Built fine in mock (with dependency repository added) Objections: 1.) Why do you check stuff out from CVS? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 21 23:56:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:56:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537454] Review Request: eclipse-emf-transaction - A model management layer for managing EMF resources In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911212356.nALNueFS027501@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537454 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-21 18:56:38 EDT --- * Package name and version are in accordance with packaging guidelines * SPEC file clean, legible and well-commented * License tag correct, license packaged as %doc * RPMLint happy * a couple of warnings spelling errors in fc13, all of them false positives * Filelist okay, for directories it uses and does now it depends on packages that provide them * Provides/Require list ok * Built fine in mock (with dependency repository added) Objections: 1.) Why do you check stuff out from CVS? 2.) Please don't pretty-format the Description, please use complete sentences. It does not always look well in package management front-ends. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 00:15:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:15:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538327] Review Request: otpd - One Time Password daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911220015.nAM0FTee025672@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538327 --- Comment #12 from Alexander Bostr?m 2009-11-21 19:15:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > not supported and that the secrets in the example file are NOT to be used: a > command like "dd if=/dev/random bs=4096 count=1 |sha1sum" should be used > instead. Try "mkpasswd". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 00:20:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:20:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540034] New: Review Request: lxdm - Lightweight X11 Display Manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lxdm - Lightweight X11 Display Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540034 Summary: Review Request: lxdm - Lightweight X11 Display Manager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cwickert at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxdm-0.0.3-0.1.20091116svn2145.fc13.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxdm.spec Description: LXDM is the future display manager of LXDE, the Lightweight X11 Desktop environment. It is designed as a lightweight alternative to replace GDM or KDM in LXDE distros. It's still in very early stage of development. $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/lxdm-* lxdm.src:27: W: unversioned-explicit-provides service(graphical-login) lxdm.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/lxdm/Xsession lxdm.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/lxdm.log The first is a virtual provides that all login managers have to indicate that anaconda should boot into runlevel 5 after install. The second can be ignored The latter can IMO be ignored too, lxdm will clear the log on shutdown, so there is no need for logrotate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 00:23:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:23:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540034] Review Request: lxdm - Lightweight X11 Display Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911220023.nAM0NNxb032123@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540034 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tomspur at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 00:23:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:23:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539948] =?utf-8?q?_Review_Rquest=EF=BC=9A_fqterm_---BBS_clie?= =?utf-8?q?nt_based_on_Qt_library_in_linux?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911220023.nAM0NIMM032099@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539948 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu --- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter 2009-11-21 19:23:17 EDT --- small suggestion, leave out "based on Qt library on linux" from package description/summary. We already know it's linux, and 99% of users won't need to know or care what toolkit the app is written for. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 01:56:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:56:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540034] Review Request: lxdm - Lightweight X11 Display Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911220156.nAM1uhTY013187@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540034 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-21 20:56:42 EDT --- Review: Good: - sources generated as described: made a diff -r diff -r was not completely empty, some diffs in .svn If you'd have done tar ... --exclude=.svn ... this would be gone. (and a smaler package) - rpmlint ok as described - (version) naming according guidelines - Group ok - buildroot ok - macros everywhere - parallel builds enabled - permissions are ok - %files section is good, bad to look add, because of many %ghost and %config, but no packager fault - BR and R ok - nothing from %doc is required Needswork: - There is a GPLv3 COPYING, but some files contain GPLv2+ headers, other contain nothing at all. So some files are GPLv3 and others are GPLv2+. Probably they want to have anything GPLv2+. But for now, till this issue is resolved, you need to use GPLv3... Approving this, if you change it to GPLv3. ______________________ APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 02:49:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:49:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540034] Review Request: lxdm - Lightweight X11 Display Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911220249.nAM2nBsh022077@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540034 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Christoph Wickert 2009-11-21 21:49:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > If you'd have done tar ... --exclude=.svn ... this would be gone. > (and a smaler package) fixed > Approving this, if you change it to GPLv3. Ok, but I' pretty sure that it shuold be GPLv2+. Until I have confirmation from upstream, I'll use GPLv3+. Updated file at http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxdm-0.0.3-0.2.20091116svn2145.fc13.src.rpm New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lxdm Short Description: Lightweight X11 Display Manager Owners: cwickert Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 03:19:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:19:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539837] Review Request: mppenc - Musepack audio compressor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911220319.nAM3J20K028428@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539837 David Timms changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from David Timms 2009-11-21 22:19:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Thanks for the quick review! No probs. > As of an RPM update in Fedora 10 and later, > > * %buildroot is defined by default, > * BuildRoot definition in the spec file is ignored, > * %buildroot tree is removed automatically at beginning of %install, > * a default %clean section is provided by rpmbuild. > > This package actually is my first public one to omit all these items as they > are no longer necessary. OK, that explains why rpmbuild actually succeeds, and the package works. Closest info I found was in bug #455387, but is there a specific reference in wiki / lists that we can point to ? Thanks for explanations / info about the other items. I notice the -0.1, -0.2 package release numbers. It was pointed out to me that these don't meet the packaging standards (because it isn't a beta/prerelease package; I assume you'll import and commit with version -1 ? I notice there is a lot of warnings during the build on i386/f12, but AFAIK we don't expect packagers to resolve those, so I consider this package: Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 03:25:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:25:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 491497] Review Request: dmapd - A server that provides DAAP and DPAP shares In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911220325.nAM3Pa7U029862@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491497 W. Michael Petullo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #12 from W. Michael Petullo 2009-11-21 22:25:33 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/dmapd.spec SRPM URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/dmapd-0.0.16-1.fc12.src.rpm - New upstream version - Move %doc to %files - No empty FAQ - Require GraphicsMagick-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 06:13:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:13:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539948] =?utf-8?q?_Review_Rquest=EF=BC=9A_fqterm_---BBS_clie?= =?utf-8?q?nt_based_on_Qt_library_in_linux?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911220613.nAM6Dcva002337@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539948 --- Comment #5 from supercyper 2009-11-22 01:13:37 EDT --- Hello, thanks for the suggestion. I modified the package description/summary and fix the SPEC file(%cmake -> %cmake-DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS:BOOL=OFF ) for 'requires' problem. SPEC file: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/fqterm-0.9.5.2-1.fc12.src.rpm SRPM file: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/fqterm.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 07:19:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:19:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539983] Review Request: qjson - qt-based library that maps JSON data to QVariant object In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911220719.nAM7J29j020014@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539983 --- Comment #2 from Eli Wapniarski 2009-11-22 02:19:00 EDT --- OK... Its gonna be obvious now that I'm no developer. I've managed to address some of the issues as detailed below. - Split off development libraries to its own package - Modified licensing in spec file to reflect GPL2 code though docs state that qjson licensed under LPGL - Uncommeted and corrected sed line in this spec file I'm open to any suggestions and comments you may have regarding the following issues: - I have no idea how to run the tests. - How do I compile the doxygen doc? Can that be done during rpmbuild? - Since this is a development package, it would probably be best if this was a multilib package. How do I accomplish that? - I thought the %defattr macro conferred ownership to files and directories being installed. Please correct me. - Where can I find an example to properly add FindQJSON.cmake as a requirment? Or better yet and quicker if you could detail the correct line. Looking very forward to your feedback and thankyou very much for your help Spec URL: http://orbsky.homelinux.org/packages/qjson.spec SRPM URL: http://orbsky.homelinux.org/packages/qjson-0.6.3-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 07:49:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:49:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539983] Review Request: qjson - qt-based library that maps JSON data to QVariant object In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911220749.nAM7nGZY023389@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539983 --- Comment #3 from Eli Wapniarski 2009-11-22 02:49:15 EDT --- Oh... One other thing. I think that the "test" is not neccessary as it isn't mentioned at all in the INSTALL doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 09:45:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:45:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529375] Review Request: emerillon - A map viewer for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911220945.nAM9jXgv021193@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529375 --- Comment #3 from Josephine Tannh?user 2009-11-22 04:45:32 EDT --- I can't rebuild emerillon the problem is not that libethos isn't in repo or BuildRequeres: intltool is missing. The problem is the dependency of rest quote of the build.log: checking for SEARCH_DEPS... configure: error: Package requirements ( rest >= 0.6 ) were not met: No package 'rest' found Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you installed software in a non-standard prefix. Alternatively, you may set the environment variables SEARCH_DEPS_CFLAGS and SEARCH_DEPS_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config. See the pkg-config man page for more details. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 09:46:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:46:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529374] Review Request: ethos - Plugin framework for GLib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911220946.nAM9k7Ir026065@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529374 --- Comment #1 from Josephine Tannh?user 2009-11-22 04:46:04 EDT --- Just an informal review OK - MUST: $ rpmlint ethos.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ethos/plugin-loaders/libcloader.so ethos.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ethos/plugin-loaders/libpythonloader.so ethos.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ethos/plugin-loaders/libjsloader.so these libfiles are needed, so it doesn't make sense to move them to -devel. if so, the basepkg will require the develpkg by default. this would be senseless ethos-devel.i686: W: no-documentation ethos-python.i686: W: no-documentation ethos-vala.i686: W: no-documentation you have a doc package, so this should be okay NOT OKAY - MUST: Named according to the Package Naming Guidelines the name of the package should be libethos, because it is a lib Group: System Environment/Libraries NOT OKAY - MUST: Spec file name matches the base package %{name} should be libethos OK - MUST: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines NOT OKAY - MUST: Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines License is LGPLv2+, and this is a good license NOT OKAY - MUST: License field in spec file matches the actual license License: LGPLv2+ OK - MUST: License files included in %doc OK - MUST: Spec is in American English OK - MUST: Spec is legible NOT OKAY - MUST: Sources match the upstream source by MD5 your command "git clone git://git.dronelabs.com/ethos" give me a newer revision, you should add the command to co this version. then the md5sum od DL and pacakge should match. OK - MUST: Successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on i686 CAN'T TEST IT, I HAVEN'T A KOJI-ACCESS - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. If you want to import this to f12, too, you should do a kojibuild for f12 to see if this will be build on all f12 supported architectures. OK - MUST: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. N/A - MUST: Handles locales properly with %find_lang OK - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager muststate this fact in the request for review. OK - MUST: Owns all directories that it creates OK - MUST: No duplicate files in the %files listing OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly, includes %defattr(...) OK - MUST: Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: Consistently uses macros OK - MUST: Package contains code, or permissable content OK - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package OK - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix, then library files that end in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. OK - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: All filenames valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: OK - SHOULD: Source package includes license text(s) as a separate file. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK - SHOULD: Builds in mock. CAN'T TEST, BECAUSE I HAVEN'T AN ACCESS TO KOJI - SHOULD: Compiles and builds into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK - SHOULD: Functions as described. Is required for emerillon. and emerillon works for me, so this should working, too.... OK - SHOULD: Scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. OK - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK - SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in a -devel pkg N/A - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Other items: N/A - latest stable version git snapshot NOT OKAY - SourceURL valid # git clone git://git.dronelabs.com/ethos you have girrevision: 9d3aae9 as source0 you should add the command how to co (explicit) this version and not the newest one. If i tried this I would get a newer one co OK - Compiler flags ok OK - Debuginfo complete -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 10:07:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:07:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524992] Review Request: toppler - platform game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911221007.nAMA7fOu030382@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524992 David Timms changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dtimms at iinet.net.au --- Comment #9 from David Timms 2009-11-22 05:07:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Full review (md5sum, license, spec file readability, etc.) done, the package > looks good. I have only one remark. I'm not completely happy with how the > highscore file is handled. Just wanted to run a possible solution past you guys: - each high score gets added to individual gamename-highscores-username.file - game loads and merges all gamename-highscores-usernames.file - sorts by high score, throws away any record below the h.s.table count. - even if you haven't made the top table, it would be nice for your best score to date to be displayed ;-) I'm still not sure about where the game, run as a user, would store such a file, possible a local .config/games/highscore file. It would make sense that while joeb is playing, only the -joeb.file needs to be writable by joeb (which works out, since it is in his directory). But when jenc is playing, and the game is playing as jenc, to display the hs table, the game needs to read all -username.file from all available home dirs; that would require all users on the machine to be able to read other user's high scores. That might also trouble selinux. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 10:33:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:33:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911221033.nAMAXAM7030898@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #88 from Michal Nowak 2009-11-22 05:33:02 EDT --- 3.4.1 in fp.o: http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.4.1-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 11:09:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:09:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533744] Review Request: ImageJ - Image Processing and Analysis in Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911221109.nAMB9AUb005728@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533744 D Haley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from D Haley 2009-11-22 06:09:07 EDT --- > For compiling plugins, you need java-devel. But rpmlint > raises an error I think we can ignore RPMlint on this one. This is required for application functionality. > I kept removing files in macros directory for not copy them OK ==== Review: x - OK ! - Needs attention ? - Query N - Not applicable [x] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. $ rpmlint imagej-1.43-0.5.j.fc12.src.rpm ../RPMS/noarch/imagej-1.43-0.5.j.fc12.noarch.rpm ../RPMS/noarch/imagej-1.43-0.5.j.fc12.noarch.rpm imagej imagej-javadoc imagej.noarch: E: devel-dependency java-devel imagej.noarch: E: devel-dependency java-devel imagej.noarch: E: devel-dependency java-devel imagej-javadoc.noarch: W: non-standard-group Development Documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 1 warnings. I am not concerned about the E, and the W I believe to be behind the times. [x] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . [x] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [x] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . [x] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . [x] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [x] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [x] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [x] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [x] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. $ for i in `cat imagej.spec | grep Source | grep http | awk '{ print $2} '` ; do wget $i; done; .... $ md5sum unix-script.txt ij143j-src.zip macros.zip 71d3aea1cbadf88cef04948411881b6c unix-script.txt 66fec8e25e46de0dce86ffea0e738b1f ij143j-src.zip 8161ec95aa84e9fa3e46e68a00fada4d macros.zip $ md5sum ../SOURCES/unix-script.txt ../SOURCES/ij143j-src.zip ../SOURCES/macros.zip 71d3aea1cbadf88cef04948411881b6c ../SOURCES/unix-script.txt 66fec8e25e46de0dce86ffea0e738b1f ../SOURCES/ij143j-src.zip 8161ec95aa84e9fa3e46e68a00fada4d ../SOURCES/macros.zip OK [x] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. I was able to build it locally, and builds in Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1822281 [N] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [x] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. [N] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. [N] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [x] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. [N] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [x] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [x] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [x] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [x] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [x] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [x] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [x] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [N] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [N] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [N] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [N] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [N] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [x] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. [x] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [x] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [x] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [!] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. Please contact upstream to include a file somewhere about this. [N] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. F11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1822281 F12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1822296 [x] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. [N] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. [x] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [N] SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. [N] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. So in summary, please contact upstream and tell them to include a LICENCE.txt or similar in the zip file. This package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 11:14:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:14:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911221114.nAMBEcWw006850@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #89 from Thomas Moschny 2009-11-22 06:14:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #88) > 3.4.1 in fp.o: > http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.4.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Looks broken: It has a size of only 16k. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 11:25:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:25:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540090] New: Review Request: perl-Data-AsObject - Easy OO access to complex perl data structures Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-AsObject - Easy OO access to complex perl data structures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540090 Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-AsObject - Easy OO access to complex perl data structures Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Data-AsObject/perl-Data-AsObject.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Data-AsObject/perl-Data-AsObject-0.05-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Data::AsObject provides easy object-oriented access to complex and arbitrarily nested perl data structures. It is particulary suitable for working with hash-based representation of XML data, as generated by modules like XML::Complie or XML::TreePP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 11:57:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:57:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540090] Review Request: perl-Data-AsObject - Easy OO access to complex perl data structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911221157.nAMBv7Mb020857@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540090 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 12:12:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:12:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508922] Review Request: system-config-selinux - GUI Code for system-config-selinux, polgen, and lockdown In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911221212.nAMCC3oH024411@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508922 --- Comment #24 from David Timms 2009-11-22 07:11:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > source rpm: > http://fedorahosted.org/releases/s/y/system-config-selinux/system-config-selinux-0.2-5.fc11.src.rpm Sorry, getting back to this... Builds OK. Clicking system|administration|selinux management Runtime: ===== $ system-config-selinux Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/system-config-selinux", line 265, in win = MainWindow() File "/usr/bin/system-config-selinux", line 55, in __init__ self.startup() File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/scselinux/async.py", line 24, in rplc return function(*pargs,**kargs) File "/usr/bin/system-config-selinux", line 59, in startup self.selinux = scselinux.Transaction() File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/scselinux/proxy.py", line 36, in __init__ dbus_object = bus.get_object ("org.fedoraproject.selinux.config",'/org/fedoraproject/selinux/transaction') File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/dbus/bus.py", line 244, in get_object follow_name_owner_changes=follow_name_owner_changes) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/dbus/proxies.py", line 241, in __init__ self._named_service = conn.activate_name_owner(bus_name) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/dbus/bus.py", line 183, in activate_name_owner self.start_service_by_name(bus_name) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/dbus/bus.py", line 281, in start_service_by_name 'su', (bus_name, flags))) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/dbus/connection.py", line 630, in call_blocking message, timeout) dbus.exceptions.DBusException: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.Spawn.ChildExited: Launch helper exited with unknown return code 1 ===== # system-config-selinux Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/system-config-selinux", line 265, in win = MainWindow() File "/usr/bin/system-config-selinux", line 55, in __init__ self.startup() File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/scselinux/async.py", line 24, in rplc return function(*pargs,**kargs) File "/usr/bin/system-config-selinux", line 86, in startup self.Pages = [general_config.Page(self),files_object.Page(self),file_equiv_object.Page(self),users_object.Page(self),ports_object.Page(self),processes_object.Page(self),policy_config.Page(self),booleans_config.Page(self)] File "/usr/share/system-config-selinux/pages/general_config.py", line 47, in __init__ self.builder.add_from_file("ui/general_config.ui") glib.GError: Duplicate object id 'vbox3' on line 469 (previously on line 11) ===== So, at least under F12, i686 there is some trouble to sort out... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 12:25:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:25:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508922] Review Request: system-config-selinux - GUI Code for system-config-selinux, polgen, and lockdown In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911221225.nAMCPLfE027317@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508922 --- Comment #25 from David Timms 2009-11-22 07:24:58 EDT --- There is a possibility that the above error is caused by something going wrong with nautilus (dbus error), yet: I also got an selinux notification (note "system-config-s" not the full name): ===== Summary: SELinux is preventing /usr/bin/python "getsched" access. Detailed Description: SELinux denied access requested by system-config-s. It is not expected that this access is required by system-config-s and this access may signal an intrusion attempt. It is also possible that the specific version or configuration of the application is causing it to require additional access. Allowing Access: You can generate a local policy module to allow this access - see FAQ (http://fedora.redhat.com/docs/selinux-faq-fc5/#id2961385) Please file a bug report. Additional Information: Source Context system_u:system_r:semanage_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 Target Context system_u:system_r:semanage_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 Target Objects None [ process ] Source system-config-s Source Path /usr/bin/python Port Host davidtdesktop Source RPM Packages python-2.6.2-2.fc12 Target RPM Packages Policy RPM selinux-policy-3.6.32-46.fc12 Selinux Enabled True Policy Type targeted Enforcing Mode Enforcing Plugin Name catchall Host Name davidtdesktop Platform Linux davidtdesktop 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE #1 SMP Sat Nov 7 21:25:57 EST 2009 i686 athlon Alert Count 4 First Seen Sun 22 Nov 2009 10:56:40 PM EST Last Seen Sun 22 Nov 2009 11:09:30 PM EST Local ID 796a9ac4-bdba-4327-baca-49f471fda2c6 Line Numbers Raw Audit Messages node=davidtdesktop type=AVC msg=audit(1258891770.762:1341): avc: denied { getsched } for pid=13802 comm="system-config-s" scontext=system_u:system_r:semanage_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tcontext=system_u:system_r:semanage_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tclass=process node=davidtdesktop type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1258891770.762:1341): arch=40000003 syscall=157 success=no exit=-13 a0=35ea a1=ffffffc8 a2=6feff4 a3=b77576c0 items=0 ppid=13801 pid=13802 auid=4294967295 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=(none) ses=4294967295 comm="system-config-s" exe="/usr/bin/python" subj=system_u:system_r:semanage_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 key=(null) ===== SELinux Policy Generation Tool: starts up, but is delayed by maybe 5 seconds, giving me the impression that it isn't going to work, or that something has gone wrong. Actually, the delay to any form of GUI appears is: time selinux-polgengui real 0m11.499s user 0m10.022s sys 0m0.064s My preference would be for the GUI to appear immediately on the screen, but then show some sort of progress bar to indicate that it needs to do something (what) before it's is ready for user input. It's especially helpful if there are say 500 records to read, that the bar progresses appropriately (please don't implement Knight Rider ~progress bards). The alternate is to call that function that makes an item appear in the task bar during the app start... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 12:36:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:36:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521719] Review Request: pycryptopp - Python wrappers for the Crypto++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911221236.nAMCa18T024874@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521719 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bjohnson at symetrix.com --- Comment #15 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-11-22 07:35:58 EDT --- *** Bug 539997 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 12:36:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:36:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539997] Review Request: python-cryptopp - Python wrappers for the Crypto++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911221236.nAMCa0Vi024837@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539997 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |ruben at rubenkerkhof.com Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-11-22 07:35:58 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 521719 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 12:41:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:41:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508922] Review Request: system-config-selinux - GUI Code for system-config-selinux, polgen, and lockdown In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911221241.nAMCfj3I030381@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508922 --- Comment #26 from David Timms 2009-11-22 07:41:44 EDT --- SELinux Policy Generation Tool: If you choose LoginUsers: Minimal Terminal user role. move to the: Select additional roles for this user: , the list has two items named system. I don't really understand how/why etc, but I would suggest two identical items is at the very least confusing, and either a bug in this tool, or in the data that it access from elsewhere. Trying to apply those settings (I don;t actually know what I'm doing) generated an AVC, same as before. Nothing is written to the policy folder that I requested to create as part of the tool. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 13:23:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:23:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524992] Review Request: toppler - platform game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911221323.nAMDN99n002998@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524992 --- Comment #10 from Hans de Goede 2009-11-22 08:23:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Just wanted to run a possible solution past you guys: > - each high score gets added to individual gamename-highscores-username.file > - game loads and merges all gamename-highscores-usernames.file > - sorts by high score, throws away any record below the h.s.table count. > - even if you haven't made the top table, it would be nice for your best score > to date to be displayed ;-) > user's home dirs are by default not readable by other users, so this wont work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 13:25:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:25:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536683] Review Request: eclipse-mdt-uml2 - Implementation of the UML2 OMG metamodel for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911221325.nAMDPYRY003627@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536683 --- Comment #2 from Mat Booth 2009-11-22 08:25:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > A few objections: > > 1.) Why do you check stuff out from CVS? There seem to be a source/sdk bundle > available at the downloads page: > http://www.eclipse.org/modeling/mdt/downloads/?project=uml2 Because although the SDK distribution does contain the source plugins, they don't contain enough information in order to build it. The source plugins are there to aid development of plugins that use the plugins in this package (so you can do source level debugging and what have you). Checking out from source control directly gives us everything we need, indeed this is how we'd build the source plugins in the first place. This generally goes for all plugins from the Eclipse project. > > 2.) Please don't pretty-format the Description. It does not always look well in > package management front-ends. Ok, I will reformat the description, that's no problem. Spec URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/eclipse-mdt-uml2.spec SRPM URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/eclipse-mdt-uml2-3.0.1-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 13:35:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:35:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537452] Review Request: eclipse-emf-validation - Verify the integrity of EMF models In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911221335.nAMDZPch006261@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537452 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-22 08:35:24 EDT --- 1.) is answered in bug #536683. Please re-format the description before importing to CVS! APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 13:33:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:33:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536683] Review Request: eclipse-mdt-uml2 - Implementation of the UML2 OMG metamodel for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911221333.nAMDXJhe005601@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536683 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-22 08:33:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) ... > This generally goes for all plugins from the Eclipse project. Okay, sounds fair enough. Thank you. > Ok, I will reformat the description, that's no problem. Thanks. This itself definitely wouldn't be a problem. As it, along with the source tarballs which were sufficiently explained, was the only complain in some of your other reviews, I'm going to approve them as well. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 13:35:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:35:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537652] Review Request: eclipse-m2m-qvtoml - Implementation of Operational QVT for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911221335.nAMDZoFW010694@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537652 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-22 08:35:49 EDT --- 1.) is sufficiently answered in bug #536683. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 13:34:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:34:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537454] Review Request: eclipse-emf-transaction - A model management layer for managing EMF resources In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911221334.nAMDYxOu010106@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537454 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-22 08:34:57 EDT --- 1.) is answered in bug #536683. Please re-format the description before importing to CVS! APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 13:57:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:57:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540127] New: =?utf-8?q?_Review_Rquest=EF=BC=9A_qterm_---_BBS?= =?utf-8?q?_client_designed_for_BBS_browsing?= Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Rquest? qterm --- BBS client designed for BBS browsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540127 Summary: Review Rquest? qterm --- BBS client designed for BBS browsing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://qterm.sourceforge.net OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: supercyper at 163.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, supercyper at 163.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora QTerm is a BBS client for X Window System. It supports telnet,ssh1 and ssh2 protocols. It also supports zmodem, URL detect, mouse action. SPEC file: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/qterm.spec SRPM file: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/qterm-0.5.7-0.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 14:11:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 09:11:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536684] Review Request: eclipse-mdt-ocl - Implementation of the OCL OMG metamodel for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911221411.nAMEBOip019815@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536684 --- Comment #2 from Mat Booth 2009-11-22 09:11:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > * Package name and version are in accordance with packaging guidelines > * SPEC file clean, legible and well-commented > * License tag correct, license packaged as %doc > * Local mockbuild with eclipse-mdt-uml2 dragged in succeeded > * RPMLint happy > * a couple of warnings spelling errors in fc13, all of them false positives > * warning about symlink target not being in package; ok since it's in > dependnecy > * Filelist okay > * Provides/Require list ok > > Objections: > > 1.) Why do you check stuff out from CVS and make up a qualifier? There seem to > be a source bundle available at the downloads page: > http://www.eclipse.org/modeling/mdt/downloads/?project=ocl > See the eclipse-mdt-uml2 review. The qualifier comes from the release tag we use to check the source out of version control - see get-mdt-ocl.sh. > 2.) Please don't pretty-format the Description. It does not always look well in > package management front-ends. > Ok, no probs. > 3.) Please use build-classpath to get the file name of lpgjavaruntime.jar. > Like: > ln -s ../../../../../../../$(build-classpath lpgjavaruntime) \ > net.sourceforge.lpg.lpgjavaruntime_1.1.0.jar Ok, sure. Spec URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/eclipse-mdt-ocl.spec SRPM URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/eclipse-mdt-ocl-1.3.0-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 14:17:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 09:17:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536683] Review Request: eclipse-mdt-uml2 - Implementation of the UML2 OMG metamodel for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911221417.nAMEHWCC021022@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536683 Mat Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Mat Booth 2009-11-22 09:17:31 EDT --- Thanks for the speedy feedback and swift review, Lubomir. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: eclipse-mdt-uml2 Short Description: Implementation of the UML2 OMG metamodel for Eclipse Owners: mbooth Branches: F-12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 14:20:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 09:20:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473184] Review Request: clamz - Amazon Downloader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911221420.nAMEKeSu016595@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473184 Andy Campbell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugzilla at starsend.force9.co | |.uk --- Comment #16 from Andy Campbell 2009-11-22 09:20:36 EDT --- Has the patch been applied that allows absolute paths ? http://code.google.com/p/clamz/issues/detail?id=16#c0 Couldn't see any patches in the spec - but then again I've never really done any packaging ? Thanks Andy -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 15:02:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:02:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537652] Review Request: eclipse-m2m-qvtoml - Implementation of Operational QVT for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911221502.nAMF2Zwx026798@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537652 Mat Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Mat Booth 2009-11-22 10:02:34 EDT --- Thanks, Lubomir. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: eclipse-m2m-qvtoml Short Description: Implementation of Operational QVT for Eclipse Owners: mbooth Branches: F-12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 15:39:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:39:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 491497] Review Request: dmapd - A server that provides DAAP and DPAP shares In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911221539.nAMFdikb008036@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491497 --- Comment #13 from Christian Krause 2009-11-22 10:39:42 EDT --- I've tested the newest package. It looks better, but there are still a couple of problems: 1. The spec file you provided does not match the spec file inside the src.rpm. Please make sure that you also provide a consistent pair of spec file and src.rpm . 2. According to the used directory and file owners ("dmapd") I assume the service should run as the user dmapd. If the daemon is started via /etc/init.d/dmapd, the service runs as root. 3. The ldconfig call in %post is correct, but the second one in %preun is wrong - it must be in %postun. 4. Here is the current rpmlint output: rpmlint RPMS/i686/dmapd-*16* SRPMS/dmapd-0.0.16-1.fc12.src.rpm SPECS/dmapd.spec dmapd.i686: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/sysconfig/dmapd dmapd.i686: W: non-standard-uid /var/db/Storage/Movies dmapd dmapd.i686: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/db/Storage/Movies 0700 dmapd.i686: W: non-standard-uid /var/db/Storage dmapd dmapd.i686: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/db/Storage 0700 dmapd.i686: W: non-standard-uid /var/run/dmapd dmapd dmapd.i686: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/run/dmapd 0700 dmapd.i686: W: non-standard-uid /var/cache/dmapd dmapd dmapd.i686: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/cache/dmapd 0700 dmapd.i686: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/dmapd-0.0.16/NEWS dmapd.i686: W: non-standard-uid /var/db/Storage/Pictures dmapd dmapd.i686: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/db/Storage/Pictures 0700 dmapd.i686: W: non-standard-uid /var/db/Storage/Music dmapd dmapd.i686: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/db/Storage/Music 0700 dmapd.i686: E: postun-without-ldconfig /usr/lib/libdmapd.so.0.0.16 dmapd.i686: W: non-standard-dir-in-var db dmapd-devel.i686: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 8 errors, 9 warnings. Please fix: dmapd.i686: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/dmapd-0.0.16/NEWS dmapd.i686: E: postun-without-ldconfig /usr/lib/libdmapd.so.0.0.16 (see 3.) Please comment to: dmapd.i686: W: non-standard-dir-in-var db Especially: What's the purpose of this directory? Could it be probably put somewhere else? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 16:23:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:23:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538303] Review Request: rubygem-minitest - Small and fast replacement for ruby's huge and slow test/unit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911221623.nAMGNXOt018120@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538303 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-22 11:23:31 EDT --- ----------------------------------------------------------- This package (rubygem-minitest) is APPROVED by mtasaka ----------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 16:42:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:42:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527986] Review Request: taoframework - Multimedia bindings for Mono In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911221642.nAMGgdjD022988@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527986 --- Comment #13 from Christian Krause 2009-11-22 11:42:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > I fully agree with you! Only including binding for libraries that we support in > fedora sound like the best way. > > Is there a way to exclude some subpackages from being built? I don't know of any other way than just to comment out all references to the unwanted sub-packages in the spec file. Additionally it is necessary to get rid of the unwanted bindings during build and install. The best way would be to make a patch against sources/src/Makefile.am to exclude the sub-directories which are not needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 16:44:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:44:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539442] Review Request: rubygem-ZenTest - Automated test scaffolding for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911221644.nAMGiDPB017948@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539442 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-22 11:44:11 EDT --- -------------------------------------------------------- This package (rubygem-ZenTest) is approved by mtasaka -------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 17:10:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:10:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539606] Review Request: rubygem-marc - Ruby library for MARC catalog In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911221710.nAMHAPxX024395@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539606 --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-22 12:10:24 EDT --- Thank you for the review. (In reply to comment #1) > * %prep: > * %package -n ruby-%{gemname} Summary Both fixed. http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-marc/rubygem-marc-0.3.0-2.fc.src.rpm http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-marc/rubygem-marc.spec * Mon Nov 23 2009 Mamoru Tasaka - 0.3.0-2 - Fix Summary - Surely create .%%{gemdir} before installing gem file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 17:09:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:09:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530251] Review Request: gearbox - A collection of usable peer-reviewed robotics-related libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911221709.nAMH9nkM029481@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530251 --- Comment #9 from Rich Mattes 2009-11-22 12:09:48 EDT --- Update: upgraded to release 9.11. This release includes fixes for the build issues 9.07 had. Spec URL: http://www.richmattes.com/rpms/gearbox/gearbox.spec SRPM URL: http://www.richmattes.com/rpms/gearbox/gearbox-9.11-4.fc12.src.rpm $ rpmlint gearbox.spec ../RPMS/i686/gearbox* 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. koji dist-f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1823514 koji dist-f12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1823518 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 17:30:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:30:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526866] Review Request: torium - A minimalistic, easily configurable torrent client for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911221730.nAMHUDx3002442@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526866 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #18 from Christoph Wickert 2009-11-22 12:30:11 EDT --- Closing as it's in updates-released now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 17:47:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:47:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521719] Review Request: pycryptopp - Python wrappers for the Crypto++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911221747.nAMHlRUN000706@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521719 --- Comment #16 from Bernard Johnson 2009-11-22 12:47:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > *** Bug 539997 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Ooops. I could have sworn I searched before I submitted. (In reply to comment #0) > This is one of the needed dependencies for the Tahoe-LAFS distributed > filesystem. That's where I was headed as well. Do you have a bug # I could follow for this one? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 20:36:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:36:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521719] Review Request: pycryptopp - Python wrappers for the Crypto++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911222036.nAMKa8Sw015352@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521719 --- Comment #17 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-11-22 15:36:07 EDT --- > Ooops. I could have sworn I searched before I submitted. No problem :-) > That's where I was headed as well. Do you have a bug # I could follow for this > one? There's python-zfec (#521716) and python-setuptools_trial (#523034). I have packaged Tahoe itself, but haven't opened a review request for it yet. The srpm is here: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/allmydata-tahoe-1.5.0-1.fc11.src.rpm. Pycryptopp doesn't want to build in koji a.t.m., once I figure that out I can continue with the other packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 20:48:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:48:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537727] Review Request: Slack - A lazy systems administration configuration management toolkit. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911222048.nAMKmTRb013267@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537727 --- Comment #4 from Matt T. Proud 2009-11-22 15:48:28 EDT --- Hi Jussi, Just a polite ping. Is everything progressing well with the review? If not, do you think you could forward this off to someone else? - M. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 21:05:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:05:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537727] Review Request: Slack - A lazy systems administration configuration management toolkit. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911222105.nAML5Bdj017857@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537727 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-11-22 16:05:10 EDT --- I haven't taken the review, yet. When someone takes it, the bug status is changed to ASSIGNED, the Assigned To: field is modified accordingly and the fedora_review flag is set to '?'... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 21:14:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:14:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521719] Review Request: pycryptopp - Python wrappers for the Crypto++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911222114.nAMLE9Ik020203@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521719 --- Comment #18 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-22 16:14:08 EDT --- What's wrong with koji? F12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1823664 In F13, the build hangs in the %check section. How about commenting testing out and with any new version from upstream, you can try if it builds with checking? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 21:17:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:17:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539837] Review Request: mppenc - Musepack audio compressor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911222117.nAMLHbuu021239@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539837 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Michael Schwendt 2009-11-22 16:17:35 EDT --- > buildroot The Wiki is partially up-to-date, at least here in the blue boxes: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag It isn't editable, though, so one cannot easily edit the section about %clean. > compilation warnings Yes, seen them too. It's unlikely for this project to see a new release, as the Musepack Project continues with the SV8 suite. > versioning Yeah, the 0.X scheme is only used during review, to avoid that %release jumps up quickly, and to allow for the first official build, which will start at 1. It's entirely harmless to use this scheme while it would worse if a pre-release did not use it. ;) [...] New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mppenc Short Description: Musepack SV7 audio file encoder Owners: mschwendt Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 22:06:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:06:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 491497] Review Request: dmapd - A server that provides DAAP and DPAP shares In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911222206.nAMM6lGR001041@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491497 --- Comment #14 from W. Michael Petullo 2009-11-22 17:06:46 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/dmapd.spec SRPM URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/dmapd-0.0.17-1.fc12.src.rpm - New upstream version (fixes run as dmapd) - Fix ldconfig placement - No empty NEWS - Move data directory to /var/db/dmapd I changed /var/db/Storage to /var/db/dmapd. I feel this is the correct place for this data. While most of the filesystem may be mounted read-only, a user might want to add media to this directory (thus /var). It is a database, though I admit not a very sophisticated one (thus /var/db). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 23:03:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:03:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528150] Review Request: invulgotracker - Tasks & projects tracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911222303.nAMN391L021846@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528150 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cwickert at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 23:23:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:23:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 518546] Review Request: libva - VAAPI video playback acceleration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911222323.nAMNNZYQ020051@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518546 --- Comment #14 from Bernard Johnson 2009-11-22 18:23:33 EDT --- Hunted around and found most recent SRPM: http://www.happyassassin.net/video-experimental/rawhide/SRPMS/libva-0.31.0.1.sds7-1.fc13.src.rpm (which contained +sds5? +sds8 being the newest available) I could probably give you a review once it clears legal. It appears I also have hardware that I can test with: $ vainfo libva: libva version 0.31.0-sds3 libva: va_getDriverName() returns 0 libva: Trying to open /usr/lib64/va/drivers/i965_drv_video.so libva: va_openDriver() returns 0 vainfo: VA API version: 0.31 vainfo: Driver version: i965 Driver 0.1 vainfo: Supported profile and entrypoints VAProfileMPEG2Simple : VAEntrypointVLD VAProfileMPEG2Main : VAEntrypointVLD -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 22 23:39:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:39:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521719] Review Request: pycryptopp - Python wrappers for the Crypto++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911222339.nAMNdV5m023630@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521719 --- Comment #19 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-22 18:39:30 EDT --- I was told, this should be an ext4 problem. But with disabling the tests, it builds in F13: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1823865 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 00:20:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:20:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 442473] Review Request: parcellite - A lightweight GTK+ clipboard manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911230020.nAN0KVgj032226@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442473 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #23 from Christoph Wickert 2009-11-22 19:20:28 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: parcellite New Branches: EL-5 Owners: cwickert -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 00:32:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:32:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473184] Review Request: clamz - Amazon Downloader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911230032.nAN0W2VL002012@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473184 --- Comment #17 from Jim Radford 2009-11-22 19:32:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > Has the patch been applied that allows absolute paths ? Yes I had already run into this problem, wrote a patch, and sent it to the author. > Couldn't see any patches in the spec - but then again I've never really done > any packaging ? Here's the line in the spec: Patch2: clamz-allow-creating-absolute-paths.patch The patches themselves can be found in the source RPM above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 03:06:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:06:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528108] Review Request: Vuurmuur - Firewall manager built on top of iptables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911230306.nAN36wsg019085@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528108 --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-22 22:06:54 EDT --- For build failure on F-12: Please recheck my comment 11. Disabling parallel make should be done under vuurmuur_conf-%{version} directory, not under libvuurmuur-%{version} directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 03:16:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:16:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540328] New: Review Request: gtkhash - GTK+ utility for computing message digests or checksums Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gtkhash - GTK+ utility for computing message digests or checksums https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540328 Summary: Review Request: gtkhash - GTK+ utility for computing message digests or checksums Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cwickert at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/gtkhash.spec SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/gtkhash-0.3.0-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: GtkHash is a GTK+ utility for computing message digests or checksums using the mhash library. Currently supported hash functions include MD5, SHA1, SHA256, SHA512, RIPEMD, HAVAL, TIGER and WHIRLPOOL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 03:30:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:30:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526263] Review Request: l7-protocols - Protocol definitions files for l7-filter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911230330.nAN3Uh25025616@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526263 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-22 22:30:41 EDT --- Christoph? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 03:47:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:47:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 510376] Review Request: bluemodem - A bluetooth modem configuration utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911230347.nAN3lsRZ029830@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510376 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(fabian at bernewirel | |ess.net) --- Comment #3 from Christoph Wickert 2009-11-22 22:47:52 EDT --- Please let me know if you are still interested in maintaining this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 03:47:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:47:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478362] Review Request: fmirror - Mirror directories from ftp servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911230347.nAN3lTkt029743@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478362 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(fabian at bernewirel | |ess.net) --- Comment #3 from Christoph Wickert 2009-11-22 22:47:26 EDT --- Please let me know if you are still interested in maintaining this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 03:54:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:54:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433174] Review Request: squeeze - A modern and advanced archive manager for the Xfce Desktop Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911230354.nAN3seSQ031083@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433174 --- Comment #4 from Christoph Wickert 2009-11-22 22:54:37 EDT --- Has the problem ever been reported upstream? I see there is not much happening in git these days, only translation updates. However there were a couple of code changes back in July 2007. You want to give this another try with a git version or should we close this review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 05:16:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:16:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539486] Review Request: perl-Data-AsObject - Easy OO access to complex perl data structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911230516.nAN5GUiu017191@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539486 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-11-23 00:16:28 EDT --- *** Bug 540090 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 05:16:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:16:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540090] Review Request: perl-Data-AsObject - Easy OO access to complex perl data structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911230516.nAN5GTZA017164@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540090 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-11-23 00:16:28 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 539486 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 06:35:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:35:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526204] Review Request: ucs-miscfixed-fonts selected set of bitmap fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911230635.nAN6ZpFM003991@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526204 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(kevin at tummy.com) --- Comment #15 from Pravin Satpute 2009-11-23 01:35:50 EDT --- should i raise cvs-request flag again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 06:45:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:45:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539606] Review Request: rubygem-marc - Ruby library for MARC catalog In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911230645.nAN6jxuY006252@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539606 Matthew Kent changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 06:49:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:49:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539606] Review Request: rubygem-marc - Ruby library for MARC catalog In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911230649.nAN6nfWL006759@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539606 --- Comment #3 from Matthew Kent 2009-11-23 01:49:40 EDT --- -------------------------------------------------------- This package (rubygem-marc) is approved by mkent -------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 06:52:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:52:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539442] Review Request: rubygem-ZenTest - Automated test scaffolding for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911230652.nAN6qJHi011211@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539442 Matthew Kent changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Matthew Kent 2009-11-23 01:52:18 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-ZenTest Short Description: Automated test scaffolding for Ruby Owners: mkent Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 06:52:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:52:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538303] Review Request: rubygem-minitest - Small and fast replacement for ruby's huge and slow test/unit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911230652.nAN6qSh9011242@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538303 Matthew Kent changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Matthew Kent 2009-11-23 01:52:26 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-minitest Short Description: Small and fast replacement for ruby's huge and slow test/unit Owners: mkent Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 07:43:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:43:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540368] New: llk_linux - A very popular game from internet Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: llk_linux - A very popular game from internet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540368 Summary: llk_linux - A very popular game from internet Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://llk-linux.sourceforge.net/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: supercyper at 163.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, supercyper at 163.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora A popular game written in GTK. Your mission in this game is to remove all blocks from the game board. A matching pair of blocks can be removed, if they are 'free', which means the connection between these two blocks does not cross other block and have at most two turns. SPEC: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/llk_linux.spec SRPM: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/llk_linux-2.3-0.1.beta1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 07:48:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:48:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540368] Review Request: llk_linux - A very popular game from internet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911230748.nAN7mguW019562@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540368 supercyper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|llk_linux - A very popular |Review Request: llk_linux - |game from internet |A very popular game from | |internet -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 07:52:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:52:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539948] =?utf-8?q?_Review_Rquest=EF=BC=9A_fqterm_---BBS_clie?= =?utf-8?q?nt_based_on_Qt_library_in_linux?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911230752.nAN7qRm8023473@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539948 --- Comment #6 from supercyper 2009-11-23 02:52:26 EDT --- SPEC file clean up. SPEC: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/2/fqterm.spec SRPM: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/2/fqterm-0.9.5.2-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 07:58:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:58:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528150] Review Request: invulgotracker - Tasks & projects tracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911230758.nAN7w9QB021934@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528150 --- Comment #4 from Tareq Al Jurf 2009-11-23 02:58:08 EDT --- Spec URL: http://taljurf.fedorapeople.org/Packages/i586/invulgotracker/invulgotracker.spec SRPM URL: http://taljurf.fedorapeople.org/Packages/i586/invulgotracker/invulgotracker-0.53.1-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: These are the final ones. For F13. And I've applied to Fedora Packager CVS Commit Group. Simple application to track time usage on your tasks & projects. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 08:10:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:10:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 509936] Review Request: tortoisehg - Mercurial gui tools and nautilus plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911230810.nAN8AdNO024814@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509936 Tomek Wa?kuski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tomek.walkuski at gmail.com --- Comment #20 from Tomek Wa?kuski 2009-11-23 03:08:42 EDT --- tortoisehg-0.9-1.fc12.x86_64 wants mercurial >= 1.4 which is present in version 1.3.1 in F12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 08:19:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:19:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538327] Review Request: otpd - One Time Password daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911230819.nAN8JLQH029780@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538327 --- Comment #14 from Giuseppe Paterno 2009-11-23 03:19:20 EDT --- Sorry ... I forgot to thank you!!! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 08:18:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:18:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538327] Review Request: otpd - One Time Password daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911230818.nAN8IgYC029656@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538327 --- Comment #13 from Giuseppe Paterno 2009-11-23 03:18:40 EDT --- I cannot comment on #11 on TRI-D as I'm a Red Hat employee. This code came off the TRI-D public web site *before* it has been acquired. Please consider this a fork from the original project and the long-term goal is to get rid of the hooks to the proprietary code and introduce new algorithms and database support. However, in this relase I created an empty /etc/otppasswd, examples are provided in the man page otppasswd.5 (which has been fixed however for #9). New pakages SRPM: http://www.gpaterno.com/external/otpd-3.2.4-1.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.gpaterno.com/external/otpd.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 08:21:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:21:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540368] Review Request: llk_linux - A very popular game from internet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911230821.nAN8LYgu027851@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540368 --- Comment #1 from supercyper 2009-11-23 03:21:33 EDT --- See http://allmyapps.com/app/ubuntu-9.10/llk-linux-llk_linux for More informations and screenshots. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 09:36:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 04:36:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527402] Review Request: gmock - Google C++ Mocking Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911230936.nAN9aLps017255@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527402 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |terjeros at phys.ntnu.no --- Comment #3 from Terje R??sten 2009-11-23 04:36:19 EDT --- You may want to open a bugzilla ticket to get the gtest package in Fedora updated to 1.4, current version in Fedora is gtest 1.3.0-1.20090601svn257. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 09:57:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 04:57:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 502991] Review Request: erlang-erlsom - Support for XML Schema in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911230957.nAN9vCfB025094@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502991 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-11-23 04:57:10 EDT --- Added comments about the resulting language. No other changes in spec file were made. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: erlang-erlson Short Description: Support for XML Schema in Erlang Owners: peter Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 10:13:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:13:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533803] Review Request: libcue - CUE sheet parser library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911231013.nANADnDD026665@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533803 --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-11-23 05:13:47 EDT --- Fi(In reply to comment #1) > * "Group" tag of base package should be: System Environment/Libraries Fixed. > * Source URL points at a web page instead of the source tarball. Use this (it > follows the guidelines, too): > http://downloads.sourceforge.net/libcue/libcue-%{version}.tar.bz2 Fixed. > > %description > > Libcue is intended to parse a so called [...] > > Correct English IMO would be: Libcue is intended for parsing a so-called [...] Fixed. > > W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libcue.so.1.0.3 exit at GLIBC_2.0 > > Not good, since this is a library. Libraries ought to return error values > instead of terminating the process. This exit call is in a fatal error function > inside the generated flex scanner code. I'll sent a message upstream regarding this issue. > * Two source files rem.c and rem.h contain a BSD license header and the name of > the current developer. According to Fedora's Licensing Guidelines, this must be > reflected in the "License" tag plus a comment in the spec file: > > # Files libcue/rem.{c,h} contain a BSD header > License: GPLv2 and BSD Fixed. http://peter.fedorapeople.org/libcue.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/libcue-1.3.0-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 10:30:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:30:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 509936] Review Request: tortoisehg - Mercurial gui tools and nautilus plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911231030.nANAUWeK031302@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509936 --- Comment #21 from Mads Kiilerich 2009-11-23 05:30:29 EDT --- Yes, I pushed tortoisehg to updates too early; I hadn't noticed that the push request for mercurial 1.4 package only was to updates-testing. Mercurial 1.4 was requested pushed to updates friday (3 days ago) but is still waiting in the release engineering queue. The only solution is to wait. As a workaround you can get mercurial 1.4 from updates-testing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 10:36:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:36:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533803] Review Request: libcue - CUE sheet parser library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911231036.nANAaRji000330@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533803 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Michael Schwendt 2009-11-23 05:36:23 EDT --- With those changes, libcue-1.3.0-2.fc12.src.rpm is good to go: APPROVED [...] Note that in Fedora 10 and newer you can omit: * the BuildRoot tag * removal of buildroot at beginning of %install * the entire %clean section Plus in current Fedora 11 and later, there are automatic pkgconfig dependencies. So on those platforms, the "Requires: pkgconfig" is redundant. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 10:50:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:50:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 494695] Review Request: qutim - Multiplatform Instant Messenger on Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911231050.nANAo04b006885@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494695 --- Comment #16 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-11-23 05:49:57 EDT --- Still not addressed: * %global _miconsdir %{_datadir}/icons/mini There is no such package in Fedora repositories, which owns this directory. Also your package doesn't own it. This should be fixed. I believe, that this icon should be placed in some other directory than %{_datadir}/icons/mini . * The macro %{_iconsdir} is superfluous. %global _iconsdir %{_datadir}/icons %global _hiconsdir %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor Take a look at both places, where you're using %{_iconsdir} - actually, you should use %{_hiconsdir} macro there. I advice you to shorten the number of macro being used. * Directory ownership issues: %{_libdir}/%{name} should be owned by the main package. %{_includedir}/%{name} should be owned by *-devel sub-package * Also consider removing entirely %doc sections from plugin sub-packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 10:58:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:58:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533803] Review Request: libcue - CUE sheet parser library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911231058.nANAw14I006221@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533803 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-11-23 05:58:00 EDT --- Thanks! (In reply to comment #3) > With those changes, libcue-1.3.0-2.fc12.src.rpm is good to go: > Note that in Fedora 10 and newer you can omit: > > * the BuildRoot tag > * removal of buildroot at beginning of %install > * the entire %clean section > > Plus in current Fedora 11 and later, there are automatic pkgconfig > dependencies. So on those platforms, the "Requires: pkgconfig" is redundant. I plan to provide libcue for EPEL too, so in order to simplify maintenance, I won't delete all these redundant tags, at least until EPEL will get our new rpm and support for EL-5 will be dropped :) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libcue Short Description: Cue sheet parser library Owners: peter Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 11:20:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:20:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911231120.nANBKdlN015191@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #90 from Michal Nowak 2009-11-23 06:20:29 EDT --- Thanks for letting me know - re-uploaded now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 12:15:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:15:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 424841] Review Request: ndisc6 - IPv6 diagnostic tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911231215.nANCFn2V032746@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424841 --- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-23 07:15:43 EDT --- ndisc6-0.9.9-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ndisc6-0.9.9-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 12:18:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:18:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 424841] Review Request: ndisc6 - IPv6 diagnostic tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911231218.nANCIjIC003058@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424841 --- Comment #37 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-23 07:18:43 EDT --- ndisc6-0.9.9-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ndisc6-0.9.9-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 12:20:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:20:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 424841] Review Request: ndisc6 - IPv6 diagnostic tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911231220.nANCKRU1003930@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424841 --- Comment #38 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-23 07:20:25 EDT --- ndisc6-0.9.9-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ndisc6-0.9.9-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 13:05:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:05:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540328] Review Request: gtkhash - GTK+ utility for computing message digests or checksums In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911231305.nAND54B2017188@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540328 --- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt 2009-11-23 08:05:02 EDT --- > # enable/disable nautilus extension > %global _with_nautilus 1 > > %if 0%{?_with_nautilus:1} > ... > %endif The superior conditional build implementation for this package would do this instead: # by default build nautilus extension %bcond_without nautilus %if %{with nautilus} ... %endif And that would give you a "--without nautilus" option for rpmbuild. And if you ever need to disable the subpackage by default, you would simply replace %bcond_without with %bcond_with and no other changes elsewhere. That would add a "--with nautilus" rpmbuild option. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 13:07:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:07:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539606] Review Request: rubygem-marc - Ruby library for MARC catalog In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911231307.nAND79Dq019515@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539606 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-23 08:07:07 EDT --- Thank you! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-marc Short Description: Ruby library for MARC catalog Owners: mtasaka Branches: F-12 F-11 InitialCC: (nobody) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 13:34:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:34:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539472] Review Request: libmemcache - C API to memcached In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911231334.nANDY5vp028677@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539472 --- Comment #2 from Michael Schwendt 2009-11-23 08:34:04 EDT --- No full review, just some observations: > rm -rf test/unit > > %{__rm} -rf %{buildroot} Either use %{__rm} or "rm" consistently, but mixing them only raises doubts about whether using the macro %{__rm} is needed at all? > %build > rm -rf test/unit > sed -i -e 's/unit//g' test/Makefile.am > sed -i -e 's/test\/unit\/Makefile//g' configure.ac That's a good example of stuff you ought to add comments to in the spec file. Not only to answer the "Why?" question, but also to confirm what this is supposed to achieve and whether the first sed translation might not kill anything unexpectedly with a future version upgrade. > %files > %defattr (-,root,root,-) > %doc COPYING INSTALL ChangeLog > ... > > %files devel > %defattr (-,root,root,-) > %doc COPYING INSTALL ChangeLog > ... Is it really necessary to duplicate %doc files like that? Especially with Fedora, the -devel package requires the base package anyway. > %{_includedir}/memcache* '*' as in "many/any"? Or as in "I don't care whether any version upgrade might move the API headers from to a location that's different from previous releases? > %{_libdir}/%{name}.so.* Macros, in particular %{name}, are overrated. If you wanted to simply rename this package from "libmemcache" to "libmemcache1" or "compat-libmemcache1", you would need to touch the %files section, too. So, %{_libdir}/libmemcache.so.* would be much more readable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 14:24:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:24:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507083] Review Request: poco - C++ class libraries for network-centric applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911231424.nANEOL2T015632@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507083 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lemenkov at gmail.com |mschmidt at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 14:24:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:24:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521166] Review Request: OpenGTL - Graphics Transformation Languages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911231424.nANEOOcr015681@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521166 --- Comment #15 from Rex Dieter 2009-11-23 09:24:21 EDT --- SPEC: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/OpenGTL/OpenGTL.spec SRPM: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/OpenGTL/OpenGTL-0.9.12-1.fc12.src.rpm f12 scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1824913 %changelog * Fri Nov 20 2009 Rex Dieter - 0.9.12-1 - OpenGTL-0.9.12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 15:05:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:05:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538327] Review Request: otpd - One Time Password daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911231505.nANF5SXV029314@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538327 --- Comment #15 from R P Herrold 2009-11-23 10:05:26 EDT --- clean compile, but in a upgrade situation, I get the following error. I assume a conditional to test state is needed in the relevant script? [herrold at centos-5 otpd]$ sudo rpm -Uvh /home/herrold/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/otpd-3.2.4-1.x86_64.rpm Preparing... ########################################### [100%] 1:otpd ########################################### [100%] Stopping /usr/sbin/otpd: [FAILED] Starting /usr/sbin/otpd: /usr/sbin/otpd: /etc/otpd.conf: statedir '/etc/otpstate': No such file or directory [FAILED] error: %postun(otpd-3.2.3-1.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status 1 [herrold at centos-5 otpd]$ or, perhaps the state directory is now in /var/run ? -- Russ herrold -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 15:34:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:34:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521166] Review Request: OpenGTL - Graphics Transformation Languages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911231534.nANFYege007384@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521166 --- Comment #16 from Rex Dieter 2009-11-23 10:34:38 EDT --- SPEC: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/OpenGTL/OpenGTL.spec SRPM: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/OpenGTL/OpenGTL-0.9.12-1.fc12.src.rpm f12 scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1825143 %changelog * Mon Nov 23 2009 Rex Dieter - 0.9.12-2 - BR: ImageMagick ghostscript texlive-latex texlive-dvips (docs) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 15:36:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:36:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508922] Review Request: system-config-selinux - GUI Code for system-config-selinux, polgen, and lockdown In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911231536.nANFaol2005201@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508922 --- Comment #27 from Daniel Walsh 2009-11-23 10:36:46 EDT --- David, I will fix these bugs when this package gets released. I currently have to support pretty much the same tool in F13. policycorutils-gui. If we release this, we can remove that package and concentrate on fixing this tool -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 15:43:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:43:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538327] Review Request: otpd - One Time Password daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911231543.nANFhX05010879@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538327 --- Comment #16 from Giuseppe Paterno 2009-11-23 10:43:32 EDT --- Mmmh, I should create an empty state dir, forgot :((( Getting old ... ;) SRPM: http://www.gpaterno.com/external/otpd-3.2.4-2.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.gpaterno.com/external/otpd.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 15:54:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:54:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540539] New: Review Request: gpdftext - Ebook PDF editor for converting to plain text Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gpdftext - Ebook PDF editor for converting to plain text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540539 Summary: Review Request: gpdftext - Ebook PDF editor for converting to plain text Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sundaram at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/gpdftext.spec SRPM URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/gpdftext-0.0.2-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: gPDFText is a text editor that opens PDF documents for ebook readers, converts the text contents into plain ASCII text, restores the original paragraphs and removes unwanted line breaks to allow easier zooming on the reader. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 16:21:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:21:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528108] Review Request: Vuurmuur - Firewall manager built on top of iptables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911231621.nANGLW27021624@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528108 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-23 11:21:28 EDT --- Vuurmuur-0.7-7.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/Vuurmuur-0.7-7.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 16:51:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:51:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538046] Review Request: spacewalk-certs-tools - Spacewalk SSL Key/Cert Tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911231651.nANGphP1001956@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538046 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-11-23 11:51:41 EDT --- Good: + Package contains verbain copy of the license text + Could download upstream tarball via spectool -g + Packaged tar ball matches with upstream (md5sum: a918530536865e24b7d9a7f2be956626) + Local build works fine + Scratch build on koji works fine + All files and dirs are owned by a package *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 16:55:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:55:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526544] Review Request: stomppy - Python stomp client for messaging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911231655.nANGtd1u031428@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526544 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-23 11:55:38 EDT --- stomppy-2.0.4-1.el5.1 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 16:55:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:55:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526544] Review Request: stomppy - Python stomp client for messaging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911231655.nANGtKWu031316@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526544 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-23 11:55:19 EDT --- stomppy-2.0.4-1.el4.1 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 16:55:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:55:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516522] Review Request: globus-nexus - Globus Toolkit - Nexus Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911231655.nANGtmXu031479@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516522 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-23 11:55:47 EDT --- globus-nexus-6.7-1.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 16:56:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:56:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516522] Review Request: globus-nexus - Globus Toolkit - Nexus Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911231656.nANGuO8j031763@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516522 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-23 11:56:23 EDT --- globus-nexus-6.7-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 16:56:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:56:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516522] Review Request: globus-nexus - Globus Toolkit - Nexus Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911231656.nANGuTJD031815@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516522 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|6.7-1.el4 |6.7-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 16:55:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:55:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516522] Review Request: globus-nexus - Globus Toolkit - Nexus Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911231655.nANGtrkr031517@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516522 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|6.7-1.fc11 |6.7-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 16:55:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:55:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516527] Review Request: globus-gass-server-ez - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Server_ez In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911231655.nANGtRex031352@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516527 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-23 11:55:26 EDT --- globus-gass-server-ez-2.5-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 16:55:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:55:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516527] Review Request: globus-gass-server-ez - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Server_ez In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911231655.nANGtWwe031387@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516527 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.5-1.el4 |2.5-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 16:54:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:54:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538337] Review Request: dia-Digital - Dia Digital Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911231654.nANGsdoO030846@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538337 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-23 11:54:38 EDT --- dia-Digital-0.1-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update dia-Digital'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0884 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 16:54:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:54:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538340] Review Request: dia-electronic - Dia electronic Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911231654.nANGsjEx030888@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538340 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-23 11:54:44 EDT --- dia-electronic-0.1-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update dia-electronic'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0886 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 16:54:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:54:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508521] Review Request: jettison - A JSON StAX implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911231654.nANGspQc002660@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508521 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-23 11:54:49 EDT --- jettison-1.1-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 16:55:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:55:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516527] Review Request: globus-gass-server-ez - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Server_ez In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911231655.nANGt6T9003046@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516527 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-23 11:55:05 EDT --- globus-gass-server-ez-2.5-1.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 16:55:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:55:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516527] Review Request: globus-gass-server-ez - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Server_ez In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911231655.nANGtBWS003080@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516527 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.5-1.fc11 |2.5-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 16:54:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:54:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508521] Review Request: jettison - A JSON StAX implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911231654.nANGsuNs002707@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508521 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.1-1.el5 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 16:56:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:56:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538335] Review Request: dia-CMOS - Dia CMOS Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911231656.nANGuEmY003449@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538335 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-23 11:56:13 EDT --- dia-CMOS-0.1-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update dia-CMOS'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0891 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 16:56:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:56:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538339] Review Request: dia-electric2 - Dia electric2 Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911231656.nANGuIK4003490@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538339 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-23 11:56:18 EDT --- dia-electric2-0.1-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update dia-electric2'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0892 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 17:30:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:30:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537639] Review Request: hyena - A C# library used to make awesome applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911231730.nANHUTLC009254@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537639 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-11-23 12:30:28 EDT --- It would be more useful to users to get a functional description instead of a marketing description of the app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 17:37:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:37:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540328] Review Request: gtkhash - GTK+ utility for computing message digests or checksums In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911231737.nANHbN5u011476@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540328 --- Comment #2 from Christoph Wickert 2009-11-23 12:37:22 EDT --- Thanks for the suggestion. Package updated: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/gtkhash.spec http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/gtkhash-0.3.0-2.fc13.src.rpm I also renamed gtkhash-nautilus-extension to gtkhash-nautilus, but I'm still not 100% sure about the name, see https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2009-November/msg00091.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 17:43:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:43:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433174] Review Request: squeeze - A modern and advanced archive manager for the Xfce Desktop Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911231743.nANHhbZV013080@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433174 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-23 12:43:34 EDT --- Yeah, I think it may be: http://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4598 I guess I can try and gather more info and update that bug or file a new one. ;( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 17:55:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:55:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911231755.nANHtwJs021752@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #33 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-11-23 12:55:55 EDT --- @Peter Where is the upload? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 18:23:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:23:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534135] Review Request: xstream - Java XML serialization library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911231823.nANINJZ3022060@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534135 --- Comment #4 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-11-23 13:23:18 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=373195) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=373195) Build log Failed build log on mock agains fedora-development-x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 18:46:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:46:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522272] New Package for Dogtag PKI: symkey In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911231846.nANIkxjm000935@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522272 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-23 13:46:57 EDT --- symkey-1.3.0-4.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/symkey-1.3.0-4.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 18:52:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:52:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532523] Review request: jarjar - Jar Jar Links In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911231852.nANIqg0A029717@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532523 --- Comment #6 from Steve Traylen 2009-11-23 13:52:40 EDT --- Sorry for the delay. $ rpmlint SPECS/jarjar.spec SRPMS/jarjar-0.9-4.fc13.src.rpm \ RPMS/x86_64/jarjar-* SPECS/jarjar.spec:174: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package) %attr(-,root,root) %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name} jarjar.src:174: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package) %attr(-,root,root) %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name} jarjar-maven2-plugin.x86_64: W: no-documentation which is all expected so fine. The javadoc can and probably should be noarch though. %package javadoc Summary: Javadocs for %{name} Group: Documentation %if %{?fedora}%{!?fedora:0} >= 10 || %{?rhel}%{!?rhel:0} >= 6 BuildArch: noarch %endif -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 19:09:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:09:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528108] Review Request: Vuurmuur - Firewall manager built on top of iptables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911231909.nANJ995d006127@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528108 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #22 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-23 14:09:07 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 19:13:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:13:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532523] Review request: jarjar - Jar Jar Links In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911231913.nANJD5uH007310@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532523 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #7 from Steve Traylen 2009-11-23 14:13:03 EDT --- Hi Mary, The review looks good, just change the docs to noarch and I'll approve. Steve http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1825761 yes: rpmlint above. yes: package name. yes: spec file name yes: package guidelines. yes: GPLv2+ in .SPEC yes: GPLv2+ in reality. yes: COPYING file included. yes: english spec. yes: legible spec. yes: source matches upstream. $ md5sum jarjar-src-0.9.zip ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/jarjar-src-0.9.zip 61825e60d0466e328c7d24a6cef2c643 jarjar-src-0.9.zip 61825e60d0466e328c7d24a6cef2c643 /home/steve/rpmbuild/SOURCES/jarjar-src-0.9.zip yes: builds (fc13) yes: build requires sane. yes: buils on archs - see koji yes: no locaes. yes: no ldconfig needed. yes: no system libs. yes: not reloc' yes: no duplicates. yes: pulls in jpackage-utils to own directories yes: everything %defatt yes: cleans everything. yes: macro use good. yes: contains code. yes: java doc in seperate package. yes: %doc not needed runtime. yes: no devel package. yes: no static libs. yes: no pkgconfig files. yes: no devel packages. yes: no .la files. yes: no gui. yes: %install cleans itself. yes: utf8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 19:29:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:29:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537639] Review Request: hyena - A C# library used to make awesome applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911231929.nANJT61u010755@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537639 --- Comment #2 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-11-23 14:29:05 EDT --- Yeah, agreed. Maybe something like "A library of C# classes" would make more sense. From what I understand, this is not really more than a small dependency, so I wouldn't expect too many people users to worry about taking it into production use. Anyway, your point is valid. I'll change this with the next release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 19:47:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:47:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540617] New: Review Request: django-lint - lint for (python) django web-framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: django-lint - lint for (python) django web-framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540617 Summary: Review Request: django-lint - lint for (python) django web-framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mrunge at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/django-lint.spec SRPM URL: http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/django-lint-0.11-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Django Lint is a static analysis tool that checks (or "lints") projects and applications that use the Django web development framework. It reports on common programming errors and bad code smells, including checking for nullable CharField field types, the use of brittle or deprecated Django features (such as auto_now_add) as well as the absence of recommended options in settings.py. It aims to encourage the development of high-quality re-usable Django applications. Django Lint is currently implemented as a wrapper around PyLint. Project homepage can be found here: http://chris-lamb.co.uk/projects/django-lint/ Attention: This is my first package, so I will need a sponsor. Any help is appreciated! Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 19:50:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:50:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540617] Review Request: django-lint - lint for (python) django web-framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911231950.nANJoJY3011237@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540617 Matthias Runge changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 20:09:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:09:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 518546] Review Request: libva - VAAPI video playback acceleration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911232009.nANK9qUm022568@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518546 --- Comment #15 from Adam Williamson 2009-11-23 15:09:49 EDT --- Oh bugger, you just found me a bug - that SRPM is _supposed_ to contain sds7, but I didn't update the relevant macro so it doesn't. Heh. I'll bump to sds8 and do it right. Thanks. legal update - we've established the i965 plugin definitely does evil stuff so Fedora will need a build that drops that code. ajax is also not willing to commit himself to the core bits of libva not doing anything evil, yet, so still waiting. I'll try and stick an updated srpm without the i965 plugin into this report soon. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 20:23:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:23:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508922] Review Request: system-config-selinux - GUI Code for system-config-selinux, polgen, and lockdown In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911232023.nANKN5gw020930@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508922 David Timms changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dtimms at iinet.net.au Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #28 from David Timms 2009-11-23 15:23:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #27) > If we release > this, we can remove that package and concentrate on fixing this tool OK, assuming the release early, release often mantra, and I'm expecting this would only be added to F13 (rawhide). One thing concerns me: ln -sf %{_datadir}/system-config-selinux/polgengui.py \ %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/selinux-polgengui ln -sf %{_datadir}/system-config-selinux/system-config-selinux.py \ %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/system-config-selinux $ rpm --eval %{_bindir} /usr/bin $ rpm --eval %{buildroot} /home/davidt/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}.i386 $ rpm --eval %{_datadir} /usr/share So these are making a link from / to the raw build machine's buildroot location ? I'm probably misunderstanding how that works. Otherwise, given the main app doesn't even start up, I'm happy enough to approve the package, so that it is in rawhide as soon as possible. Please consider the package APPROVED by dtimms. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 20:47:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:47:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508922] Review Request: system-config-selinux - GUI Code for system-config-selinux, polgen, and lockdown In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911232047.nANKlWNC032256@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508922 --- Comment #29 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-11-23 15:47:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #28) > One thing concerns me: > ln -sf %{_datadir}/system-config-selinux/polgengui.py \ > %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/selinux-polgengui > ln -sf %{_datadir}/system-config-selinux/system-config-selinux.py \ > %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/system-config-selinux > So these are making a link from / to the raw build machine's > buildroot location ? > I'm probably misunderstanding how that works. This is normal for symbolic links. For instance the upper one creates a symbolic link that points to /usr/share/system-config-selinux/polgengui.py and places it in the bindir of the buildroot (since obviously you cannot create it elsewhere). The link is broken when it is created (unless, of course, a previous version of the package is installed on the build system), but works in the rpm itself as long as there's no mistake in the spelling. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 20:55:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:55:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539873] netgen-mesher - automatic 3d tetrahedral mesh generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911232055.nANKth2s030317@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539873 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tomspur at fedoraproject.org Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #2 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-23 15:55:42 EDT --- Just a few comments, because I'm no sponsor anyway: - You are not yet in the packager group and therefor you need a sponsor for your fist package, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process#Contributor - Is this Review Requrest about togl17 or netgen? If you want to have both in fedora, you should have added 2 review requests. - Could you upload the SPEC *and* SRPM to somewhere on the web and not just pastebin? The first SPEC isn't available anymore... - See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines for details about how packaging should be done. e.g. to the togl17 spec: That package owns /* which is not what you want. The package must only own the directories it creates and the subfiles/folders. Guessing in netgen you did the same. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 21:08:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:08:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516535] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-scripts - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Job ManagerScripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911232108.nANL82g1005478@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516535 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |steve.traylen at cern.ch Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Steve Traylen 2009-11-23 16:08:00 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1825910 yes: rpmlint above. yes: package name. yes: spec file name yes: globus package guidelines. yes: ASL 2.0 in .SPEC yes: ASL 2.0 in reality. yes: GLOBUS_LICENSE file included. yes: english spec. yes: legible spec. yes: source matches upstream. yes: builds (fc13) yes: build requires sane. yes: buils on archs - see koji yes: no locaes. yes: no ldconfig needed. yes: no system libs. yes: not reloc' yes: no duplicates. yes: Package contains all directories it creates or pulls them. yes: everything %defatt yes: cleans everything. yes: macro use good. yes: contains code. yes: java doc in seperate package. yes: %doc not needed runtime. yes: no devel package. yes: no static libs. yes: no pkgconfig files. yes: no devel packages. yes: no .la files. yes: no gui. ?: Owns files from other packages. see below. yes: %install cleans itself. I notice quite a few packages seem to own /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Globus including this one. Steve yes: utf8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 21:40:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:40:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540653] Review Request: jazzy - Java-based spell checker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911232140.nANLeE9i010086@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540653 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-23 16:40:13 EDT --- RPMlint mostly silent, only complains about "aspell" not being correct en_US. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 21:38:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:38:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540653] New: Review Request: jazzy - Java-based spell checker Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jazzy - Java-based spell checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540653 Summary: Review Request: jazzy - Java-based spell checker Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/jazzy.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/jazzy-0.5.2-1.fc13.src.rpm scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1825998 Description: Jazzy is a pure Java library implementing a spell checking algorithm similar to aspell. It may be used to spell check a variety of sources. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 21:58:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:58:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540659] Review Request: svnkit - Subversion client library for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911232158.nANLwZKZ018519@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540659 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-23 16:58:34 EDT --- RPMLint silent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 21:58:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:58:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540659] New: Review Request: svnkit - Subversion client library for Java Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: svnkit - Subversion client library for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540659 Summary: Review Request: svnkit - Subversion client library for Java Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/svnkit.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/svnkit-1.3.1-1.fc13.src.rpm scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1826040 Description: SVNKit is a Subversion Version Control System client library written in Java. It's based on Subversion JavaHL, official Java bindings for Subversion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 22:10:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:10:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526126] Review Request: python3 - Python 3.x (backwards incompatible version) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911232210.nANMARDr017533@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126 --- Comment #55 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-23 17:10:22 EDT --- Sorry for the delay: You could add a %check section: %check LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. ./runtests.sh This runs the python3 testsuite on each build to verify nothing is broken. Currently here on my pc: 18 BAD 296 GOOD 23 SKIPPED 337 insgesamt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 23:15:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:15:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524283] Review Request: plee-the-bear - 2D platform game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911232315.nANNF56K002452@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524283 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-23 18:15:03 EDT --- Thanks for the review New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: plee-the-bear Short Description: 2D platform game Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 23 23:49:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:49:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540539] Review Request: gpdftext - Ebook PDF editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911232349.nANNnkaj011874@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540539 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: gpdftext - |Review Request: gpdftext - |Ebook PDF editor for |Ebook PDF editor |converting to plain text | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 00:03:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:03:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540708] New: Review Request: gant - Groovy-based build system that uses Ant tasks Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gant - Groovy-based build system that uses Ant tasks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540708 Summary: Review Request: gant - Groovy-based build system that uses Ant tasks Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/gant.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/gant-1.8.1-1.src.rpm Description: Gant is a tool for scripting Ant tasks using Groovy instead of XML to specify the logic. A Gant specification is a Groovy script and so can bring all the power of Groovy to bear directly, something not possible with Ant scripts. Whilst it might be seen as a competitor to Ant, Gant uses Ant tasks for many of the actions, so Gant is really an alternative way of doing things using Ant, but using a programming language rather than XML to specify the rules. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 00:04:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:04:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540708] Review Request: gant - Groovy-based build system that uses Ant tasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240004.nAO04ZQr015945@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540708 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-23 19:04:35 EDT --- RPMLint quiet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 00:14:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:14:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532709] Review Request: xmlbeans - XML-Java binding tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240014.nAO0E2Fq018652@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532709 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |F13FeatureIDEA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 00:14:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:14:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540653] Review Request: jazzy - Java-based spell checker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240014.nAO0E96U018814@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540653 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |F13FeatureIDEA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 00:14:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:14:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534135] Review Request: xstream - Java XML serialization library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240014.nAO0E5cC018712@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534135 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |F13FeatureIDEA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 00:14:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:14:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540659] Review Request: svnkit - Subversion client library for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240014.nAO0EA06018835@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540659 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |F13FeatureIDEA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 00:14:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:14:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532315] Review Request: nanoxml - Small XML parser for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240014.nAO0E0eM018602@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532315 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |F13FeatureIDEA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 00:14:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:14:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540708] Review Request: gant - Groovy-based build system that uses Ant tasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240014.nAO0EBpN018856@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540708 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |F13FeatureIDEA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 00:13:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:13:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532205] Review Request: microba - Set of JFC (Swing) components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240013.nAO0DwWN018536@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532205 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |F13FeatureIDEA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 00:14:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:14:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534168] Review Request: groovy - Agile dynamic language for the Java Platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240014.nAO0E58K018733@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534168 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |F13FeatureIDEA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 00:14:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:14:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532664] Review Request: saxon9 - Java XPath, XSLT 2.0 and XQuery implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240014.nAO0E192018626@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532664 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |F13FeatureIDEA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 00:13:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:13:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508521] Review Request: jettison - A JSON StAX implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240013.nAO0DtvC018470@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508521 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |F13FeatureIDEA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 00:14:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:14:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537585] Review Request: picocontainer - Dependency-injection container In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240014.nAO0E82v018793@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537585 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |F13FeatureIDEA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 00:14:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:14:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534021] Review Request: apache-ivy - Java-based dependency manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240014.nAO0E3uL018682@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534021 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |F13FeatureIDEA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 00:14:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:14:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537066] Review Request: cglib - Code generation library for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240014.nAO0E7Pp018763@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537066 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |F13FeatureIDEA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 00:13:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:13:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532203] Review Request: jgraph - Java-based Diagram Component and Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240013.nAO0Dvne018511@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532203 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |F13FeatureIDEA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 00:16:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:16:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540539] Review Request: gpdftext - Ebook PDF editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240016.nAO0GuYn021688@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540539 --- Comment #1 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-11-23 19:16:55 EDT --- Scratch build at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1826212 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 00:59:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:59:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530688] Review Request: ghc-language-c - Haskell language-c library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240059.nAO0x4ev031609@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530688 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2009-11-23 19:59:02 EDT --- Michel will you do a CVS Request? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 01:14:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:14:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 499476] Review Request: orbited - A browser(javascript)->tcp bridge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240114.nAO1Etnd004766@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499476 Fabian Deutsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian.deutsch at gmx.de --- Comment #9 from Fabian Deutsch 2009-11-23 20:14:53 EDT --- X Daemon There is still need for some initscript/upstart-integration and config-file as discussed earlier. It is a standalone daemon, is it? X User As noted in http://www.orbited.org/browser/trunk/daemon/orbited.cfg, the daemon can fall back to some user, so it might be good to add an appropriate user. X SPEC: Wrong indentation of Source1 and Patch0 X KOJI: Ok. X RPMLINT: $ rpmlint -v /home/fabiand/Downloads/orbited-0.7.10-1.fc12.* orbited.noarch: I: checking orbited.noarch: W: spelling-error-in-summary en_US javascript orbited.noarch: W: spelling-error-in-summary en_US tcp orbited.noarch: W: spelling-error-in-description en_US plugins orbited.noarch: W: no-documentation orbited.src: I: checking orbited.src: W: spelling-error-in-summary en_US javascript orbited.src: W: spelling-error-in-summary en_US tcp orbited.src: W: spelling-error-in-description en_US plugins orbited.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 12, tab: line 4) 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings. - Correct spelling - Add documentation Note: This is my first review, thanks for some constructive feedback :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 02:07:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:07:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539837] Review Request: mppenc - Musepack audio compressor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240207.nAO27VvW018158@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539837 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-23 21:07:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 02:09:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:09:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539606] Review Request: rubygem-marc - Ruby library for MARC catalog In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240209.nAO29Okn018502@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539606 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-23 21:09:23 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 02:08:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:08:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536683] Review Request: eclipse-mdt-uml2 - Implementation of the UML2 OMG metamodel for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240208.nAO28O9e018321@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536683 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-23 21:08:23 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 02:10:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:10:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533803] Review Request: libcue - CUE sheet parser library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240210.nAO2AWq6018220@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533803 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-23 21:10:31 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 02:11:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:11:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538303] Review Request: rubygem-minitest - Small and fast replacement for ruby's huge and slow test/unit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240211.nAO2Bj3S018545@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538303 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-23 21:11:44 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 02:12:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:12:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539442] Review Request: rubygem-ZenTest - Automated test scaffolding for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240212.nAO2CwJG019586@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539442 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-23 21:12:56 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 02:16:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:16:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540034] Review Request: lxdm - Lightweight X11 Display Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240216.nAO2Gicj019675@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540034 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-23 21:16:43 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 02:21:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:21:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524283] Review Request: plee-the-bear - 2D platform game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240221.nAO2L94u020823@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524283 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-23 21:21:07 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 02:21:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:21:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 442473] Review Request: parcellite - A lightweight GTK+ clipboard manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240221.nAO2Lm98020954@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442473 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #24 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-23 21:21:47 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 02:21:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:21:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 502991] Review Request: erlang-erlsom - Support for XML Schema in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240221.nAO2L050020683@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502991 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-23 21:20:58 EDT --- cvs done (with typo in name corrected). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 02:22:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:22:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526204] Review Request: ucs-miscfixed-fonts selected set of bitmap fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240222.nAO2MnXa021814@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526204 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+, |fedora-cvs? |needinfo?(kevin at tummy.com) | --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-23 21:22:47 EDT --- Yes, please do reset the flag again if you have a cvs request. Don't set needinfo on me, as there are (at least in theory) a pool of folks who do these requests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 02:24:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:24:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537652] Review Request: eclipse-m2m-qvtoml - Implementation of Operational QVT for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240224.nAO2OWJI021448@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537652 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-23 21:24:31 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 02:54:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:54:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521989] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-util In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240254.nAO2so49031181@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521989 --- Comment #7 from Matthew Harmsen 2009-11-23 21:54:49 EDT --- >From the comment above: "Exceptions include JNI-using JAR files, and application-specific JAR files (ie. JAR files that can only reasonably be used as part of an application and therefore constitute application-private data)." Since all jars and directories under "/usr/share/java/pki/" are specific to the Dogtag application (e. g. - "pki"), are you simply asking us to change "%{_datadir}/java/pki/" to "%{_javadir}/pki/"? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 03:12:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:12:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540761] New: Review Request: deja-dup - Simple backup tool and frontend for duplicity Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: deja-dup - Simple backup tool and frontend for duplicity https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540761 Summary: Review Request: deja-dup - Simple backup tool and frontend for duplicity Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sundaram at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/deja-dup.spec SRPM URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/deja-dup-11.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: D?j? Dup is a simple backup tool. It hides the complexity of doing backups the 'right way' (encrypted, off-site, and regular) and uses duplicity as the backend. Features: ? Support for local or remote backup locations, including Amazon S3 ? Securely encrypts and compresses your data ? Incrementally backs up, letting you restore from any particular backup ? Schedules regular backups ? Integrates well into your GNOME desktop Note to reviewers: You need atleast Vala 0.7.6 to rebuild the SRPM. For Fedora 12, the latest Vala is in updates testing repo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 03:36:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:36:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521989] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-util In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240336.nAO3anab012166@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521989 --- Comment #8 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-11-23 22:36:48 EDT --- im asking why should it be in %{_javadir}/pki/ and not %{_javadir}/ is there some reason the jars should not be easily available for other jars? at the least you should be using %{_javadir}/pki/ but i dont see why it should not be available for all to use. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 04:47:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:47:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526204] Review Request: ucs-miscfixed-fonts selected set of bitmap fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240447.nAO4lKKQ000538@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526204 --- Comment #17 from Pravin Satpute 2009-11-23 23:47:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > Don't set needinfo on me, as there are (at least in theory) a pool of folks who > do these requests. sure, no next time thanks for setting flag for me -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 05:06:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:06:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538303] Review Request: rubygem-minitest - Small and fast replacement for ruby's huge and slow test/unit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240506.nAO56D8d005660@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538303 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 00:06:12 EDT --- rubygem-minitest-1.4.2-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-minitest-1.4.2-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 05:07:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:07:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538303] Review Request: rubygem-minitest - Small and fast replacement for ruby's huge and slow test/unit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240507.nAO57cYo005610@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538303 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 00:07:37 EDT --- rubygem-minitest-1.4.2-3.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-minitest-1.4.2-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 05:23:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:23:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507912] Review Request: alp - Advanced Linux Programming, Book By CodeSourcery LLC, PDF format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240523.nAO5N2M8010203@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507912 steve changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |11 --- Comment #5 from steve 2009-11-24 00:23:00 EDT --- Updating this review request for F11. The dist tag remains. I've found it useful now that I have packaged a couple of similar rpms (ldd-pdf and javanotes). The newer spec and src are at: Spec URL: http://lonetwin.net/yum/SPECS/alp.spec SRPM URL: http://lonetwin.net/yum/SRPMS/alp-1.0-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 06:02:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:02:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 512663] Review Request: langpack-support - Meta packages for Yum langpack support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240602.nAO62T3D019731@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512663 --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen 2009-11-24 01:02:28 EDT --- (See bug 536737 for yum-langpacks.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 06:05:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:05:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516535] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-scripts - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Job ManagerScripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240605.nAO65DfG020505@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516535 --- Comment #8 from Mattias Ellert 2009-11-24 01:05:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > ?: Owns files from other packages. > see below. > > I notice quite a few packages seem to own > > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Globus > > including this one. This is necessary in order to comply to the Perl packaging guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#Directory_Ownership "As an example, assume that perl-A-B depends on perl-A and installs files into /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi/A/B. The base Perl package guarantees that it will own /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi for as long as it remains compatible with version 5.10.0, but a future upgrade of the perl-A package may install into (and thus own) /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.11.0/i386-linux-thread-multi/A. So the perl-A-B package needs to own /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi/A as well as /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/A/B in order to maintain proper ownership." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 06:11:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:11:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540791] Review Request: rubygem-RubyInline - Write foreign code within your ruby code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240611.nAO6BpQW021480@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540791 Matthew Kent changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |539442 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 06:11:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:11:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539442] Review Request: rubygem-ZenTest - Automated test scaffolding for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240611.nAO6Br8S021507@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539442 Matthew Kent changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |540791 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 06:11:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:11:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540791] New: Review Request: rubygem-RubyInline - Write foreign code within your ruby code Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-RubyInline - Write foreign code within your ruby code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540791 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-RubyInline - Write foreign code within your ruby code Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mkent at magoazul.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SPECS/rubygem-RubyInline.spec SRPM URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SRPMS/rubygem-RubyInline-3.8.3-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: Inline allows you to write foreign code within your ruby code. It automatically determines if the code in question has changed and builds it only when necessary. The extensions are then automatically loaded into the class/module that defines it. mkent at fedora-devel-chef:~/rpmbuild/SPECS$ rpmlint rubygem-RubyInline.spec /var/tmp/results/rubygem-RubyInline-* rubygem-RubyInline-doc.noarch: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 06:52:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:52:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533803] Review Request: libcue - CUE sheet parser library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240652.nAO6qmpb031302@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533803 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 01:52:47 EDT --- libcue-1.3.0-2.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libcue-1.3.0-2.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 06:52:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:52:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533803] Review Request: libcue - CUE sheet parser library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240652.nAO6qqe4032284@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533803 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 01:52:52 EDT --- libcue-1.3.0-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libcue-1.3.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 06:52:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:52:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533803] Review Request: libcue - CUE sheet parser library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240652.nAO6qg9H032233@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533803 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 01:52:42 EDT --- libcue-1.3.0-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libcue-1.3.0-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 06:52:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:52:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533803] Review Request: libcue - CUE sheet parser library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240652.nAO6qc9R032193@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533803 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 01:52:36 EDT --- libcue-1.3.0-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libcue-1.3.0-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 06:55:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:55:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 502991] Review Request: erlang-erlsom - Support for XML Schema in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240655.nAO6tGFm000505@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502991 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 01:55:13 EDT --- erlang-erlsom-1.2.1-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-erlsom-1.2.1-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 06:55:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:55:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 502991] Review Request: erlang-erlsom - Support for XML Schema in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240655.nAO6tRwF000581@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502991 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 01:55:26 EDT --- erlang-erlsom-1.2.1-3.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-erlsom-1.2.1-3.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 06:55:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:55:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 502991] Review Request: erlang-erlsom - Support for XML Schema in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240655.nAO6tMDS000543@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502991 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 01:55:21 EDT --- erlang-erlsom-1.2.1-3.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-erlsom-1.2.1-3.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 06:55:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:55:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 502991] Review Request: erlang-erlsom - Support for XML Schema in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240655.nAO6tXji032151@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502991 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 01:55:32 EDT --- erlang-erlsom-1.2.1-3.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-erlsom-1.2.1-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:27:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:27:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540791] Review Request: rubygem-RubyInline - Write foreign code within your ruby code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240727.nAO7RC4A006582@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540791 --- Comment #1 from Matthew Kent 2009-11-24 02:27:12 EDT --- Spec URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SPECS/rubygem-RubyInline.spec SRPM URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SRPMS/rubygem-RubyInline-3.8.3-2.fc13.src.rpm * Mon Nov 23 2009 Matthew Kent - 3.8.3-2 - Remove unused ruby_sitelib macro -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:33:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:33:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527336] Review Request: opensaml - Security Assertion Markup Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240733.nAO7XTRG008869@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527336 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 02:33:27 EDT --- opensaml-2.2.1-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:33:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:33:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538335] Review Request: dia-CMOS - Dia CMOS Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240733.nAO7Xl0J008924@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538335 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.1-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:33:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:33:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538337] Review Request: dia-Digital - Dia Digital Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240733.nAO7X3Be008764@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538337 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.1-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:33:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:33:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538335] Review Request: dia-CMOS - Dia CMOS Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240733.nAO7XgQY009830@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538335 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 02:33:41 EDT --- dia-CMOS-0.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:32:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:32:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538337] Review Request: dia-Digital - Dia Digital Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240732.nAO7Wwgl009676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538337 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 02:32:57 EDT --- dia-Digital-0.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:36:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:36:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529465] Review Request: thunar-vcs-plugin - SVN integration for the Thunar filemanager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240736.nAO7aECF010882@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529465 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 02:36:13 EDT --- thunar-vcs-plugin-0.1.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:36:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:36:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529465] Review Request: thunar-vcs-plugin - SVN integration for the Thunar filemanager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240736.nAO7aJne010918@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529465 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.1.2-2.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:35:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:35:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522272] New Package for Dogtag PKI: symkey In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240735.nAO7Zrv7010714@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522272 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 02:35:51 EDT --- symkey-1.3.0-4.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update symkey'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-11900 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:38:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:38:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538340] Review Request: dia-electronic - Dia electronic Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240738.nAO7cVpR011224@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538340 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 02:38:30 EDT --- dia-electronic-0.1-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:38:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:38:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532816] Review Request: gdouros-alexander-fonts - A Greek typeface inspired by Alexander Wilson In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240738.nAO7cIvm011152@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532816 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 02:38:16 EDT --- gdouros-alexander-fonts-3.01-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:37:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:37:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538340] Review Request: dia-electronic - Dia electronic Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240737.nAO7boFQ012126@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538340 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 02:37:49 EDT --- dia-electronic-0.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:41:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:41:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538340] Review Request: dia-electronic - Dia electronic Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240741.nAO7f1pM013279@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538340 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 02:41:00 EDT --- covered-0.7.7-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:38:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:38:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538340] Review Request: dia-electronic - Dia electronic Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240738.nAO7cbEI012324@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538340 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.1-1.fc11 |0.1-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:37:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:37:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538340] Review Request: dia-electronic - Dia electronic Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240737.nAO7btA3012166@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538340 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.1-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:42:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:42:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532817] Review Request: gdouros-analecta-fonts - An eccleastic scripts font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240742.nAO7gNQm013024@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532817 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 02:42:22 EDT --- gdouros-analecta-fonts-2.52-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:41:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:41:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538340] Review Request: dia-electronic - Dia electronic Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240741.nAO7f6WU012747@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538340 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.1-1.fc12 |0.7.7-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:43:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:43:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524896] Review Request: perl-Nagios-NSCA - Perl client for Nagios - NSCA. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240743.nAO7hEQs013261@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524896 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 02:43:12 EDT --- perl-Nagios-NSCA-0.1-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:44:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:44:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538339] Review Request: dia-electric2 - Dia electric2 Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240744.nAO7i5uq013496@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538339 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.1-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:44:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:44:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538339] Review Request: dia-electric2 - Dia electric2 Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240744.nAO7i00s014461@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538339 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 02:43:59 EDT --- dia-electric2-0.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:45:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:45:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539231] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm - Create sticky forms with HTML::SuperForm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240745.nAO7j5tT015088@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539231 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 02:45:04 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm-0.4-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-11945 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:45:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:45:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532817] Review Request: gdouros-analecta-fonts - An eccleastic scripts font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240745.nAO7jIws014338@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532817 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 02:45:16 EDT --- gdouros-analecta-fonts-2.52-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:50:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:50:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538339] Review Request: dia-electric2 - Dia electric2 Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240750.nAO7oOim017689@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538339 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.1-1.fc11 |0.1-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:51:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:51:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516535] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-scripts - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Job ManagerScripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240751.nAO7pZpT018078@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516535 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Steve Traylen 2009-11-24 02:51:34 EDT --- Agreed. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:50:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:50:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538339] Review Request: dia-electric2 - Dia electric2 Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240750.nAO7oJ4O016455@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538339 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 02:50:19 EDT --- dia-electric2-0.1-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:52:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:52:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538335] Review Request: dia-CMOS - Dia CMOS Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240752.nAO7qN81016928@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538335 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.1-1.fc11 |0.1-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:53:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:53:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532818] Review Request: gdouros-musica-fonts - A font for musical symbols In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240753.nAO7rLko017253@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532818 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 02:53:20 EDT --- gdouros-musica-fonts-2.52-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:53:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:53:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516343] Review Request: metadata-extractor - JPEG metadata extraction framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240753.nAO7rE6x017202@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516343 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 02:53:10 EDT --- metadata-extractor-2.3.1-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:54:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:54:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522272] New Package for Dogtag PKI: symkey In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240754.nAO7sZZw017584@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522272 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 02:54:33 EDT --- symkey-1.3.0-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update symkey'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-11988 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:51:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:51:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 515053] Review Request: sugar-getiabooks - Internet Archive Books receiver for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240751.nAO7paPI016771@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515053 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 02:51:34 EDT --- sugar-getiabooks-3-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update sugar-getiabooks'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-11963 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:52:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:52:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538335] Review Request: dia-CMOS - Dia CMOS Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240752.nAO7qIgQ018851@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538335 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 02:52:18 EDT --- dia-CMOS-0.1-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:52:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:52:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522935] Review Request: mod_gnutls - GnuTLS module for the Apache HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240752.nAO7q3pL018550@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522935 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 02:52:00 EDT --- mod_gnutls-0.5.5-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:55:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:55:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522935] Review Request: mod_gnutls - GnuTLS module for the Apache HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240755.nAO7thmA019909@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522935 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 02:55:42 EDT --- mod_gnutls-0.5.5-5.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:52:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:52:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522935] Review Request: mod_gnutls - GnuTLS module for the Apache HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240752.nAO7q8Kh018717@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522935 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.0-2.fc11 |0.5.5-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:54:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:54:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529465] Review Request: thunar-vcs-plugin - SVN integration for the Thunar filemanager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240754.nAO7sdTd019397@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529465 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 02:54:38 EDT --- thunar-vcs-plugin-0.1.2-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:54:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:54:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529465] Review Request: thunar-vcs-plugin - SVN integration for the Thunar filemanager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240754.nAO7si7k019430@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529465 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.1.2-2.fc10 |0.1.2-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:54:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:54:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539230] Review Request: perl-Authen-Simple - Simple Authentication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240754.nAO7s9kf019306@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539230 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 02:54:08 EDT --- perl-Authen-Simple-0.4-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Authen-Simple'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-11980 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:55:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:55:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538337] Review Request: dia-Digital - Dia Digital Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240755.nAO7t2Gt018289@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538337 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 02:55:01 EDT --- dia-Digital-0.1-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:55:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:55:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538337] Review Request: dia-Digital - Dia Digital Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240755.nAO7t7l2018323@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538337 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.1-1.fc11 |0.1-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:55:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:55:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522935] Review Request: mod_gnutls - GnuTLS module for the Apache HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240755.nAO7tmn4018598@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522935 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.5.5-5.fc10 |0.5.5-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:54:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:54:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516343] Review Request: metadata-extractor - JPEG metadata extraction framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240754.nAO7ssxp017950@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516343 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 02:54:53 EDT --- metadata-extractor-2.3.1-5.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:56:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:56:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 515053] Review Request: sugar-getiabooks - Internet Archive Books receiver for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240756.nAO7uQqo018721@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515053 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 02:56:26 EDT --- sugar-getiabooks-3-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update sugar-getiabooks'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-11999 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:55:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:55:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538558] Review Request: kde-partitionmanager - KDE Partition Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240755.nAO7tMrE018480@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538558 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 02:55:21 EDT --- kde-partitionmanager-1.0.0-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update kde-partitionmanager'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-11994 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:58:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:58:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536796] Review Request: kde-plasma-smooth-tasks - KDE taskbar replacement with window peeking ability In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240758.nAO7w7Xc019063@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536796 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 02:58:05 EDT --- kde-plasma-smooth-tasks-0.0.1-0.1.wip20091116.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update kde-plasma-smooth-tasks'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-12009 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:58:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:58:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530743] Review Request: tmux - A terminal multiplexer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240758.nAO7wbOX020968@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530743 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 02:58:35 EDT --- tmux-1.1-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:57:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:57:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538340] Review Request: dia-electronic - Dia electronic Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240757.nAO7vAhF020600@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538340 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 02:57:09 EDT --- covered-0.7.7-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:57:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:57:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538340] Review Request: dia-electronic - Dia electronic Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240757.nAO7vFLc020635@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538340 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.7.7-1.fc12 |0.7.7-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 08:00:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:00:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508521] Review Request: jettison - A JSON StAX implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240800.nAO80BDE021693@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508521 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.1-1.el5 |1.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:58:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:58:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532818] Review Request: gdouros-musica-fonts - A font for musical symbols In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240758.nAO7wCt5020811@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532818 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 02:58:11 EDT --- gdouros-musica-fonts-2.52-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:58:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:58:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516343] Review Request: metadata-extractor - JPEG metadata extraction framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240758.nAO7wo6p021084@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516343 --- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 02:58:49 EDT --- metadata-extractor-2.3.1-5.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:58:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:58:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530743] Review Request: tmux - A terminal multiplexer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240758.nAO7wgwB021029@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530743 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.1-1.fc12 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:57:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:57:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539230] Review Request: perl-Authen-Simple - Simple Authentication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240757.nAO7vxWw020757@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539230 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 02:57:58 EDT --- perl-Authen-Simple-0.4-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Authen-Simple'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-12007 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 07:59:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:59:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539231] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm - Create sticky forms with HTML::SuperForm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240759.nAO7xMX0021196@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539231 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 02:59:21 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm-0.4-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-12016 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 08:00:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:00:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508521] Review Request: jettison - A JSON StAX implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240800.nAO807vl020063@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508521 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 03:00:04 EDT --- jettison-1.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 08:18:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:18:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459125] Review Request: FreeCAD - An extensible Open Source CAx program for Unix/X11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240818.nAO8IxDc026343@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459125 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |sundaram at redhat.com Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 08:19:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:19:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459125] Review Request: FreeCAD - An extensible Open Source CAx program for Unix/X11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240819.nAO8Ji90024063@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459125 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|Reopened | Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 08:28:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:28:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522777] Review Request: perl-Verilog-Perl - Verilog parsing routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240828.nAO8SHBK026420@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522777 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 03:28:16 EDT --- perl-Verilog-Perl-3.221-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Verilog-Perl-3.221-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 08:28:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:28:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522777] Review Request: perl-Verilog-Perl - Verilog parsing routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240828.nAO8S7Qt026323@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522777 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 03:28:06 EDT --- perl-Verilog-Perl-3.221-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Verilog-Perl-3.221-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 08:28:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:28:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538046] Review Request: spacewalk-certs-tools - Spacewalk SSL Key/Cert Tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240828.nAO8STVn026472@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538046 Miroslav Such? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Miroslav Such? 2009-11-24 03:28:27 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: spacewalk-certs-tools Short Description: Spacewalk SSL Key/Cert Tool Owners: msuchy Branches: F-11, F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 09:17:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 04:17:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540659] Review Request: svnkit - Subversion client library for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240917.nAO9HbxQ009023@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540659 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |akurtako at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review- --- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-11-24 04:17:34 EDT --- Svnkit is in Fedora since version 6 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/svnkit Also your srpm is keeping private copy of sqljet. Please close this bug open a new one for reviewing sqljet and after that I'll update sqljet to the version you need. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 09:23:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 04:23:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 501960] Review Request: webinject - Web/HTTP Test Tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240923.nAO9NqOB010467@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501960 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(david.hannequin at g | |mail.com) Bug 501960 depends on bug 501957, which changed state. Bug 501957 Summary: Review Request: perl-Tk-ProgressBar-Mac - Mac ProgressBar for Perl::Tk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501957 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA Resolution| |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #15 from Jan Klepek 2009-11-24 04:23:49 EDT --- 1] ah, just found out, could you please link do symlink from %{_bindir}/webinject to %{_datadir}/%{name}/webinject.pl that if user type "webinject" into command line that it will start the webinject? 2] desktop file i disagree that this type of application should be in Graphics category Categories=Graphics; -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 09:28:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 04:28:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540659] Review Request: svnkit - Subversion client library for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911240928.nAO9Sdhl010272@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540659 --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-24 04:28:37 EDT --- Alexander: thanks. How come I did not notice... And I don't think I need sqljet, thus closing this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 10:07:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:07:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536683] Review Request: eclipse-mdt-uml2 - Implementation of the UML2 OMG metamodel for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241007.nAOA7P3o020461@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536683 Mat Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Mat Booth 2009-11-24 05:07:22 EDT --- Built successfully for Rawhide, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 10:07:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:07:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536684] Review Request: eclipse-mdt-ocl - Implementation of the OCL OMG metamodel for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241007.nAOA7Qve020486@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536684 Bug 536684 depends on bug 536683, which changed state. Bug 536683 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-mdt-uml2 - Implementation of the UML2 OMG metamodel for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536683 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 10:07:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:07:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540659] Review Request: svnkit - Subversion client library for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241007.nAOA7bQj021769@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540659 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #4 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-11-24 05:07:35 EDT --- Really close it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 10:13:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:13:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507083] Review Request: poco - C++ class libraries for network-centric applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241013.nAOADsW8023103@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507083 --- Comment #29 from Michal Schmidt 2009-11-24 05:13:51 EDT --- Peter, you assigned the bug back to me without comment. Is there something you want me to do? I approve Maxim's package. FAS shows that Maxim is not sponsored into the 'packager' group yet. I am not a sponsor. You said you'd sponsor Maxim when the review is done. Please proceed. Thanks, Michal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 10:24:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:24:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507083] Review Request: poco - C++ class libraries for network-centric applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241024.nAOAONGr024651@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507083 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #31 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-11-24 05:24:22 EDT --- Unblocking FE-NEEDSPONSOR - I just sponsored Maxim. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 10:22:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:22:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507083] Review Request: poco - C++ class libraries for network-centric applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241022.nAOAMLZH025176@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507083 --- Comment #30 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-11-24 05:22:19 EDT --- Ah, sorry Michal - I completely missed your comment, regarding your reassignment of this ticket. I thought it was reassigned to me by mistake. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 10:36:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:36:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537452] Review Request: eclipse-emf-validation - Verify the integrity of EMF models In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241036.nAOAaX82027560@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537452 --- Comment #4 from Mat Booth 2009-11-24 05:34:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > 1.) is answered in bug #536683. > Please re-format the description before importing to CVS! > Done: Spec URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/eclipse-emf-validation.spec SRPM URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/eclipse-emf-validation-1.3.1-2.fc12.src.rpm > APPROVED New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: eclipse-emf-validation Short Description: Verify the integrity of EMF models Owners: mbooth Branches: F-12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 10:36:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:36:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526444] Review Request: MyGUI - Fast, simple and flexible GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241036.nAOAahYK027655@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526444 Thomas Janssen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #25 from Thomas Janssen 2009-11-24 05:36:37 EDT --- Ok. There are some warnings left we can't get rid of. I still would change the main Summary and get rid of "GUI" there. Or change the sentence that it's clear that this is a library to create/generate GUIs. Else you fixed all the problems. APPROVED. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 10:41:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:41:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540617] Review Request: django-lint - lint for (python) django web-framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241041.nAOAfW3t030308@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540617 --- Comment #1 from Matthias Runge 2009-11-24 05:41:30 EDT --- new SRPM: http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/django-lint-0.11-3.fc12.src.rpm Build in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1826767 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 10:41:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:41:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528150] Review Request: invulgotracker - Tasks & projects tracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241041.nAOAfCNn030170@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528150 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #5 from Christoph Wickert 2009-11-24 05:41:09 EDT --- REVIEW FOR 394a8a56bfaf7df638640d9ebc4b8c15 invulgotracker-0.53.1-1.fc13.src.rpm OK - MUST: rpmlint is silent: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/invulgotracker-* 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK - MUST: named according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK - MUST: spec file name matches the base package %{name} OK - MUST: package meets the Packaging Guidelines OK - MUST: Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines (GPLv3+) OK - MUST: License field in spec file matches the actual license OK - MUST: license file included in %doc OK - MUST: spec is in American English OK - MUST: spec is legible OK - MUST: sources match the upstream source by MD5 79ac959f374ee8ab931287e35131d1d3 OK - MUST: successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on x86_64 N/A - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. OK - MUST: all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. OK - MUST: handles locales properly with %find_lang N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. OK - MUST: owns all directories that it creates OK - MUST: no duplicate files in the %files listing OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly, includes %defattr(...) OK - MUST: package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. OK - MUST: consistently uses macros OK - MUST: package contains code N/A - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix, then library files that end in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK - MUST: The package contains a GUI application and includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file is properly validated with desktop-file-validate in the %install section. OK - MUST: package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: at the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. OK - MUST: all filenames valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: OK - SHOULD: Source package includes license text(s) as a separate file. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK - SHOULD: builds in mock. OK - SHOULD: compiles and builds into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK - SHOULD: functions as described. N/A - SHOULD: Scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A - SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in a -devel pkg N/A - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Other items: OK - latest stable version OK - SourceURL valid OK - Compiler flags ok OK - Debuginfo complete Issues: Timestamp of Source0 does not match timestamp of SourceURL. Please download the source again with wget or spectool -g invulgotracker.spec For more info, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps /usr/share/icons/InvulgoTracker.png should be /usr/share/pixmaps/InvulgoTracker.png or /usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/InvulgoTracker.png There should be no icons in the toplevel folder /usr/share/icons. Please patch Makefile to do this. InvulgoTracker.desktop is very sparse. Please add "ProjectManagement" as additional category to allow nested menus. You can do this if you use desktop-file-install instead of desktop-file-validate as decribed in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage BTW: The icon tag in the desktop file is "InvulgoTracker.png", but should be InvulgoTracker. This is is why you see a warning from desktop-file-validate during build: <---- desktop-file-validate /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/invulgotracker-0.53.1-1.fc13.i386/usr/share/applications/InvulgoTracker.desktop /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/invulgotracker-0.53.1-1.fc13.i386/usr/share/applications/InvulgoTracker.desktop: warning: value "InvulgoTracker.png" for key "Icon" in group "Desktop Entry" is an icon name with an extension, but there should be no extension as described in the Icon Theme Specification if the value is not an absolute path ----> For the background see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Icon_tag_in_Desktop_Files and for a fix https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/PackagingTricks#.desktop_files >From a formal point of view your package is already good as is, but please fix the remaining issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 10:40:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:40:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537452] Review Request: eclipse-emf-validation - Verify the integrity of EMF models In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241040.nAOAeHvc029042@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537452 Mat Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Mat Booth 2009-11-24 05:40:15 EDT --- Apologies, I rebuilt the SRPM on a F-10 box, so please s/fc12/fc10/ in my last comment. Also forgot to set the cvs flag... d'oh. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 10:46:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:46:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540328] Review Request: gtkhash - GTK+ utility for computing message digests or checksums In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241046.nAOAkG4K031868@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540328 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |taljurf at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 10:45:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:45:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528150] Review Request: invulgotracker - Tasks & projects tracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241045.nAOAjoTs030748@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528150 --- Comment #6 from Christoph Wickert 2009-11-24 05:45:49 EDT --- One last thing: If you do rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_docdir} you can drop --docdir=%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} from configure. It's up to you to ether use --docdir=%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} and %exclude the files you don't want or use %doc to install them. But please don't mix both to keep the spec simple. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 10:49:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:49:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528150] Review Request: invulgotracker - Tasks & projects tracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241049.nAOAnmHe000639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528150 --- Comment #7 from Christoph Wickert 2009-11-24 05:49:46 EDT --- One more thing. :) You have deleted the first %changelog entry. Please don't do this, 0.53.1-1 is not the "initial build", 0.53-1 was. In the future, make sure to list all changes in the changelog. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 10:53:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:53:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 290771] Review Request: gsoap - Generator Tools for Coding SOAP/XML Web Services in C and C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241053.nAOArqpC002015@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290771 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Mattias Ellert 2009-11-24 05:53:50 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: gsoap New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: ellert >From my e-mail communication with the Fedora maintainer: "I currently don't have any plans to push gsoap into EPEL. If you're interested you're welcome to do it." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 11:03:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:03:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537454] Review Request: eclipse-emf-transaction - A model management layer for managing EMF resources In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241103.nAOB3Qqv004553@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537454 Mat Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Mat Booth 2009-11-24 06:03:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > 1.) is answered in bug #536683. > Please re-format the description before importing to CVS! > Done: Spec URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/eclipse-emf-transaction.spec SRPM URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/eclipse-emf-transaction-1.3.1-2.fc10.src.rpm > APPROVED New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: eclipse-emf-transaction Short Description: A model management layer for managing EMF resources Owners: mbooth Branches: F-12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 11:09:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:09:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539837] Review Request: mppenc - Musepack audio compressor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241109.nAOB9iHs006305@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539837 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #8 from Michael Schwendt 2009-11-24 06:09:42 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=142793 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 11:11:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:11:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530986] Review Request: janino - An embedded Java compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241111.nAOBBT1K006965@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530986 Mary Ellen Foster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Mary Ellen Foster 2009-11-24 06:11:27 EDT --- Sorry about that ... :( New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: janino Short Description: An embedded Java compiler Owners: mef Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 11:11:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:11:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540034] Review Request: lxdm - Lightweight X11 Display Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241111.nAOBB7x3005838@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540034 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 06:11:06 EDT --- lxdm-0.0.3-0.2.20091116svn2145.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lxdm-0.0.3-0.2.20091116svn2145.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 11:11:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:11:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540034] Review Request: lxdm - Lightweight X11 Display Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241111.nAOBBfrQ006078@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540034 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 06:11:40 EDT --- lxdm-0.0.3-0.2.20091116svn2145.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lxdm-0.0.3-0.2.20091116svn2145.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 11:42:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:42:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537451] Review Request: eclipse-emf-query - Specify and execute queries against EMF models In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241142.nAOBgCle014350@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537451 --- Comment #3 from Mat Booth 2009-11-24 06:42:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > * Package name and version are in accordance with packaging guidelines > * SPEC file clean, legible and well-commented > * License tag correct, license packaged as %doc > * Filelist okay, for directories it uses and does now it depends on packages > that provide them > * Provides/Require list ok > (mock build did not finish yet) > > Objections: > > 1.) Why do you check stuff out from CVS? > This should be satisfactorily answered in bug #536683. > 2.) Please don't pretty-format the Description, please use complete sentences. > It does not always look well in package management front-ends. > > 3.) RPMLint: > > eclipse-emf-query.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/eclipse-emf-query-1.3.0/epl-v10.html > The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one > that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are > desired, and remove if not. > > eclipse-emf-query.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/eclipse-emf-query-1.3.0/notice.html > The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one > that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are > desired, and remove if not. Done and done: Spec URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/eclipse-emf-query.spec SRPM URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/eclipse-emf-query-1.3.0-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 11:55:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:55:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516535] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-scripts - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Job ManagerScripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241155.nAOBtOux018128@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516535 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Mattias Ellert 2009-11-24 06:55:22 EDT --- Thank you for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: globus-gram-job-manager-scripts Short Description: Globus Toolkit - GRAM Job ManagerScripts Owners: ellert Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 12:20:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:20:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508922] Review Request: system-config-selinux - GUI Code for system-config-selinux, polgen, and lockdown In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241220.nAOCKrWm025153@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508922 --- Comment #30 from David Timms 2009-11-24 07:20:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #29) > This is normal for symbolic links. For instance the upper one creates a > symbolic link that points to /usr/share/system-config-selinux/polgengui.py and > places it in the bindir of the buildroot (since obviously you cannot create it > elsewhere). > > The link is broken when it is created (unless, of course, a previous version of > the package is installed on the build system), but works in the rpm itself as > long as there's no mistake in the spelling. OK, thanks Jussi for the explanation. Is there any other package issues that you can see present (well, I approved it anyway (earlier)) ? (In reply to comment #18) (Dan Walsh) > I can own this package and have Chris as a contributer. Can/should the reporter be changed to Dan (as it is he who will request CVS, import it, own and so forth) ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 12:57:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:57:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241257.nAOCvfeu001846@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 Dean Mander changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |knolderpoor at gmail.com --- Comment #88 from Dean Mander 2009-11-24 07:57:26 EDT --- Hi guys, since the last build of F11 wasn't working on my F12 (i686) I've rebuilt the source rpm: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~knol/rpms/songbird/songbird-1.2.0-1.fc12.i686.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 13:09:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:09:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540885] New: Review Request: cableswig - Create interfaces to interpreted languages for templated code Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cableswig - Create interfaces to interpreted languages for templated code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540885 Summary: Review Request: cableswig - Create interfaces to interpreted languages for templated code Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mrceresa at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.4shared.com/file/158702324/388014a1/cableswig.html SRPM URL: http://www.4shared.com/file/158702512/fe439ee5/cableswig-cvs20091120-1fc12src.html Description: CableSwig is used to create interfaces (i.e. "wrappers") to languages such as Java, Tcl and Python. It was created to produce wrappers for ITK because the toolkit uses C++ structures that SWIG cannot parse (deeply nested template instantiations). CableSwig is a combination tool that uses GCC_XML as the c++ parser. The input files are Cable style input files. The XML produced from the Cable/GCC_XML input files are then parsed and feed into a modified version of SWIG. SWIG is a software development tool that connects programs written in C and C++ with a variety of high-level programming languages. It is used to generate the language bindings to the target language. This is my second package! (but my first one at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539387 still needs some love from reviewers :( ) $ rpmlint cableswig-cvs20091120-1.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint cableswig.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/i686/cableswig-cvs20091120-1.fc12.i686.rpm cableswig.i686: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog cableswig-cvs20091120-1.fc12 ['cvs20091120-1.fc12', 'cvs20091120-1'] cableswig.i686: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/i686/cableswig-devel-cvs20091120-1.fc12.i686.rpm cableswig-devel.i686: W: manpage-not-compressed-with-gzip /usr/lib/CableSwig/share/man/man1/gccxml.1 cableswig-devel.i686: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib cableswig-devel.i686: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 13:10:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:10:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540885] Review Request: cableswig - Create interfaces to interpreted languages for templated code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241310.nAODAOKo005806@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540885 Mario Ceresa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mrceresa at gmail.com Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Alias| |cableswig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 13:14:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:14:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508922] Review Request: system-config-selinux - GUI Code for system-config-selinux, polgen, and lockdown In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241314.nAODEqoi007484@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508922 --- Comment #31 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-11-24 08:14:47 EDT --- OK, I had a look at the spec file and came up with a few comments: - instead of %dir %{_datadir}/system-config-selinux %{_datadir}/system-config-selinux/* I would suggest using just %{_datadir}/system-config-selinux/ which does the same thing. (Same for the python_sitelib). - Isn't there a Python egg...? - I think you should Requires: dbus for dir ownership. - Dir issue: $ yum provides /usr/share/PolicyKit/policy/ results in no matches. $ yum provides /usr/share/PolicyKit/ results in no matches. Filed bug #540888. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 14:04:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:04:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539387] Review Request: InsightToolkit - Medical imaging processing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241404.nAOE4fTc021901@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539387 --- Comment #1 from Mario Ceresa 2009-11-24 09:04:39 EDT --- Hello! I hope not to bother: I'd only like to say that I submitted the second ITK related package at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540885 and that developers and users from upstream are waiting too for the packages to be reviewed: http://www.itk.org/pipermail/insight-users/2009-November/034011.html http://www.itk.org/pipermail/insight-users/2009-November/034053.html Is there anything I could do to contact someone who might want to review the packages? Thanks and regards, Mario -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 14:14:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:14:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539989] Review Request: nettop - top-like program for network packets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241414.nAOEEU71025123@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539989 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-11-24 09:14:29 EDT --- Change the summary to "A top-like program for network packets" to fix the rpmlint warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 14:19:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:19:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539989] Review Request: nettop - top-like program for network packets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241419.nAOEJ0u6025914@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539989 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-11-24 09:18:59 EDT --- And a few more comments: use %{version} in the Source0 line to ease up the maintaining of the spec file. The upstream project server seems to be down, so a review cannot be performed at this stage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 14:16:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:16:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539989] Review Request: nettop - top-like program for network packets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241416.nAOEGogk025509@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539989 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-11-24 09:16:49 EDT --- Furthermore, add comments in the spec file as to why Source1-2 and Patch0-2 are needed. Also, please rename your patches to start with nettop-, e.g. # Patch to fix compilation errors Patch0: nettop-compile.patch This way build directories stay cleaner. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 14:33:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:33:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537897] Review Request: mingw32-openjpeg - mingw32 package for openjpeg In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241433.nAOEXjH1030123@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537897 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-11-24 09:33:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > BTW, shouldn't the file ChangeLog be included as %doc? In many cases - not necessary. The ChangeLog is always too exhaustive for the average users (our intended auditory) - very often it contains descriptions of almost every commit, so NEWS file with more simplified history would be far more valuable. > hope this helps, > Stefan Yes, indeed! You almost finished the Review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 15:30:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:30:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507083] Review Request: poco - C++ class libraries for network-centric applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241530.nAOFUq1V020770@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507083 Maxim Udushlivy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #32 from Maxim Udushlivy 2009-11-24 10:30:47 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: poco Short Description: C++ class libraries for network-centric applications Owners: udushlivy Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 15:38:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:38:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537897] Review Request: mingw32-openjpeg - mingw32 package for openjpeg In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241538.nAOFc9D3018653@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537897 --- Comment #3 from Adam Goode 2009-11-24 10:38:08 EDT --- This is the mingw32 version of a package. So we don't want to ship the documentation that is a duplicate of what is in the native package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 15:43:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:43:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521719] Review Request: pycryptopp - Python wrappers for the Crypto++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241543.nAOFhr5v020211@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521719 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #20 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-11-24 10:43:49 EDT --- I have the exact same issue on ext3 in a local mockbuild. Only on rawhide though. I've just done builds for F-11 and F-12 and will work with upstream on fixing this for rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 15:53:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:53:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526204] Review Request: ucs-miscfixed-fonts selected set of bitmap fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241553.nAOFrjmK027527@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526204 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #18 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-11-24 10:53:43 EDT --- rename done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 16:04:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:04:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527488] Review Request: drbd - drbd tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241604.nAOG40EF030804@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527488 --- Comment #86 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 11:03:53 EDT --- drbd-8.3.6-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drbd-8.3.6-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 16:04:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:04:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 510195] Review Request: eclipse-slice2java - A plugin that integrates Eclipse with Ice object middleware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241604.nAOG4iB1027657@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510195 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Overholt 2009-11-24 11:04:43 EDT --- Sorry, this somehow slipped off of my to-do list. A few comments: - is this commented-out line okay? BuildRequires: ice-java >= 3.3.1 - you probably don't need to build gcj bits since the rest of the Eclipse SDK doesn't have them - I believe Alex fixed the pdebuild wrapper script to avoid the need for -a "-DjavacSource=1.5 -DjavacTarget=1.5" but it's not harming anything so feel free to leave it - there appears to be a typo in the readme file. I think "Activating the Plugin for a Project" should be on a new line. Otherwise: OK naming good OK file locations fine OK licensing fine OK md5sum matches upstream OK rpmlint fine $ rpmlint eclipse-slice2java-3.3.1-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/eclipse-slice2java-3.3.1-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. PLEASEFIX please use either %{buildroot} OR $RPM_BUILD_ROOT but not both -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 16:22:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:22:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540984] New: Review Request: aduna-root-poms - Root POMs for Aduna projects Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: aduna-root-poms - Root POMs for Aduna projects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540984 Summary: Review Request: aduna-root-poms - Root POMs for Aduna projects Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mefoster at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/soprano-sesame/aduna-root-poms.spec SRPM URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/soprano-sesame/aduna-root-poms-11-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This package contains the root POMs for all projects from Aduna Software (http://www.aduna-software.org/), which are needed to build any Aduna packages using Maven. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 16:25:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:25:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540986] New: Review Request: logback - A Java logging library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: logback - A Java logging library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540986 Summary: Review Request: logback - A Java logging library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mefoster at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/soprano-sesame/logback.spec SRPM URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/soprano-sesame/logback-0.9.17-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Logback is intended as a successor to the popular log4j project. At present time, logback is divided into three modules, logback-core, logback-classic and logback-access. The logback-core module lays the groundwork for the other two modules. The logback-classic module can be assimilated to a significantly improved version of log4j. Moreover, logback-classic natively implements the SLF4J API so that you can readily switch back and forth between logback and other logging frameworks such as log4j or java.util.logging (JUL). The logback-access module integrates with Servlet containers, such as Tomcat and Jetty, to provide HTTP-access log functionality. Note that you could easily build your own module on top of logback-core. **NOTE** This package depends on janino, which is currently (24/11/2009) approved but awaiting package creation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 16:25:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:25:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540986] Review Request: logback - A Java logging library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241625.nAOGPkbG004543@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540986 Mary Ellen Foster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |530986 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 16:25:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:25:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530986] Review Request: janino - An embedded Java compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241625.nAOGPlvN004573@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530986 Mary Ellen Foster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |540986 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 16:25:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:25:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539606] Review Request: rubygem-marc - Ruby library for MARC catalog In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241625.nAOGPNvC004475@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539606 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-24 11:25:22 EDT --- Rebuilt on all branches, submitted push requests on bodhi, closing. Thank you for reviewing this and CVS procedure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 16:39:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:39:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529375] Review Request: emerillon - A map viewer for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241639.nAOGd6DQ007488@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529375 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 16:40:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:40:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452321] Review Request: PyGreSQL - Python client library for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241640.nAOGeMAw004955@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452321 Tom Lane changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #20 from Tom Lane 2009-11-24 11:40:19 EDT --- I checked with the author and it seems that his intent is actually to dual-license under both the postgres license and Python's. Hopefully the next upstream release will make that a bit more clear, but it seems that in the meantime the appropriate tag is "License: MIT or Python". Is this sufficient or do I need more documentation about it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 16:46:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:46:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452321] Review Request: PyGreSQL - Python client library for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241646.nAOGkrhG007121@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452321 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #21 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-11-24 11:46:52 EDT --- That license tag looks fine to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 16:50:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:50:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529375] Review Request: emerillon - A map viewer for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241650.nAOGo2Xj010823@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529375 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cwickert at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #4 from Christoph Wickert 2009-11-24 11:50:01 EDT --- License is unclear: COPYING is GPLv3, headers are LGPLv2+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 17:07:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:07:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540996] Review Request: rubygem-ffi - Foreign Function Interface package for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241707.nAOH7PAH016012@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540996 --- Comment #1 from Bryan Kearney 2009-11-24 12:07:24 EDT --- *** Bug 533291 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 17:07:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:07:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533291] Review Request: ruby-ffi - Foreign Function Interface package for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241707.nAOH7Ou5015990@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533291 Bryan Kearney changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #8 from Bryan Kearney 2009-11-24 12:07:24 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 540996 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 17:06:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:06:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540996] New: Review Request: rubygem-ffi - Foreign Function Interface package for Ruby Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-ffi - Foreign Function Interface package for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540996 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-ffi - Foreign Function Interface package for Ruby Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bkearney at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SRPM: http://bkearney.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-ffi-0.5.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Spec File: http://bkearney.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-ffi.spec Description: Ruby-ffi is a package which allows for ruby code to access C libraries without the need for writing messy ext code. The website for the library is http://wiki.github.com/ffi/ffi. [bkearney at localhost ~]$ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/rubygem-ffi-0.5.2-1.fc11.i586.rpm rubygem-ffi.i586: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ffi-0.5.2/.require_paths 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. * clean koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1802185 I am copying over bug 533291 since the name of the package has changed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 17:19:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:19:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 515230] Review Request: python-dmidecode - python extension module to access DMI data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241719.nAOHJ92s015071@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515230 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-24 12:19:07 EDT --- Some notes: * %define -> %global - Now Fedora prefers to use %global instead of %define: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define * Source - Source0 in your srpm differs from what I could download from the URL written as %SOURCE0: --------------------------------------------------------------- 97986 2009-09-23 18:24 python-dmidecode-3.10.7.tar.gz 97487 2009-09-23 18:25 python-dmidecode-3.10.7-1.fc11.src/python-dmidecode-3.10.7.tar.gz --------------------------------------------------------------- * Requires - (Here I am speaking of Requires, not BuildRequires) dmidecode.py contains: --------------------------------------------------------------- 28 import libxml2 29 from dmidecodemod import * --------------------------------------------------------------- This means that this package should have "Requires: libxml2-python". * Parallel make - Support parallel make if possible: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Parallel_make * Macros - Use macros properly. /usr/share should be %{_datadir}. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros * Directory ownership issue - The directory /usr/share/python-dmidecode/ must be owned by this package: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 17:33:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:33:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541004] New: Review Request: pkcs11-dump - Small utility for querying PKCS#11 modules Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pkcs11-dump - Small utility for querying PKCS#11 modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541004 Summary: Review Request: pkcs11-dump - Small utility for querying PKCS#11 modules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kalev at smartlink.ee QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/pkcs11-dump.spec SRPM URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/pkcs11-dump-0.3.3-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: pkcs11-dump is a small utility for querying PKCS#11 provider modules for objects available on a specific crypto device and dumping them to stdout in a human-readable format. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 17:37:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:37:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529374] Review Request: ethos - Plugin framework for GLib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241737.nAOHbStY023427@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529374 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson 2009-11-24 12:37:26 EDT --- > NOT OKAY - MUST: Named according to the Package Naming Guidelines > the name of the package should be libethos, because it is a lib > Group: System Environment/Libraries > NOT OKAY - MUST: Spec file name matches the base package %{name} > should be libethos Actually ethos is fine because that's what the upstream name of the project is. > NOT OKAY - MUST: Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines > License is LGPLv2+, and this is a good license > NOT OKAY - MUST: License field in spec file matches the actual license > License: LGPLv2+ The README file states that it uses the LGPLv2.1 license and doesn't state 'or later versions' hence the reason the + wasn't added. I believe this is correct. > NOT OKAY - MUST: Sources match the upstream source by MD5 > your command "git clone git://git.dronelabs.com/ethos" give me a newer > revision, you should add the command to co this version. then the md5sum od DL > and pacakge should match. There's now a new official upstream 0.2.2 release. I was using the git snapshot as it was required by emerillon. I will update the package shortly. Also its the second 'git archive' command below the clone that actually gives you the correct version of the tar ball if you use the defined variables in the spec file so you can get the exact same version. > # git clone git://git.dronelabs.com/ethos > you have girrevision: 9d3aae9 as source0 you should add the command how to co > (explicit) this version and not the newest one. > If i tried this I would get a newer one co You can. See this is the spec # Tarfile created using git # git clone git://git.dronelabs.com/ethos # git archive --format=tar --prefix=%{name}-%{version}/ %{git_version} | bzip2 > %{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 %define git_version 9d3aae9 %define tarfile %{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 17:38:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:38:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537631] Review Request: moblin-panel-web - Moblin Panel for Web Browsing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241738.nAOHcgal020610@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537631 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jburgess777 at googlemail.com --- Comment #4 from Peter Robinson 2009-11-24 12:38:40 EDT --- *** Bug 540695 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 17:54:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:54:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538303] Review Request: rubygem-minitest - Small and fast replacement for ruby's huge and slow test/unit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241754.nAOHssX8028741@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538303 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-24 12:54:53 EDT --- Closing this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 17:54:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:54:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539442] Review Request: rubygem-ZenTest - Automated test scaffolding for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241754.nAOHsuSS028772@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539442 Bug 539442 depends on bug 538303, which changed state. Bug 538303 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-minitest - Small and fast replacement for ruby's huge and slow test/unit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538303 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 18:07:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:07:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225697] Merge Review: distcache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241807.nAOI7k71032551@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225697 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW CC|steve.traylen at cern.ch | AssignedTo|steve.traylen at cern.ch |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #4 from Steve Traylen 2009-11-24 13:07:45 EDT --- For me no response, removing myself. Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 18:08:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:08:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523224] Review Request: mingw32-xerces-c - MingGW Windows validating XML parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241808.nAOI8VXK030598@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523224 Kalev Lember changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kalev at smartlink.ee AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kalev at smartlink.ee Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Kalev Lember 2009-11-24 13:08:29 EDT --- Fedora review mingw32-xerces-c-3.0.1-1.fc12.src.rpm 2009-11-24 + OK ! needs attention rpmlint says: mingw32-xerces-c.src: W: spelling-error-in-description en_US Namespaces mingw32-xerces-c.noarch: W: spelling-error-in-description en_US Namespaces mingw32-xerces-c-debuginfo.noarch: W: spelling-error-in-summary en_US mingw mingw32-xerces-c-debuginfo.noarch: W: spelling-error-in-description en_US mingw mingw32-xerces-c-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings. All these rpmlint warnings are harmless and can be ignored. The debuginfo-without-sources doesn't mean that anything is wrong with this package, but rather that mingw32 debug package generator doesn't put sources in the package. + rpmlint output + Package is named according to Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines + Specfile name matches the package base name + Package follows the Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines + The stated license (ASL 2.0) is a Fedora approved license + The stated license is the same as the one for the corresponding native Fedora package + The package contains the license file (LICENSE) + Spec file is written in American English + Spec file is legible + Upstream sources match sources in the srpm. sha1sum: 71e4efee5397dd45d6bafad34bf3bc766bc2a085 xerces-c-3.0.1.tar.gz 71e4efee5397dd45d6bafad34bf3bc766bc2a085 Download/xerces-c-3.0.1.tar.gz + Package builds in mock/koji n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires look sane n/a The spec file MUST handle locales properly n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + Does not use Prefix: /usr + Package owns all directories it creates + No duplicate files in %files + %files has %defattr + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Consistent use of macros + Package must contain code or permissible content n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + Files marked %doc should not affect package n/a Header files should be in -devel Fedora MinGW guidelines allow headers in main package n/a Static libraries should be in -static + Packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' n/a Library files that end in .so must go in a -devel package n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base n/a Packages should not contain libtool .la files Fedora MinGW guidelines allow .la files n/a Packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + Packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install begins with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Filenames must be valid UTF-8 Looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 18:18:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:18:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541004] Review Request: pkcs11-dump - Small utility for querying PKCS#11 modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241818.nAOII0Vj003415@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541004 Kalev Lember changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |pkcs11-dump --- Comment #1 from Kalev Lember 2009-11-24 13:17:59 EDT --- Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1827769 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 18:16:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:16:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516523] Review Request: globus-duct-common - Globus Toolkit - Globus Duct Common In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241816.nAOIGsM2001079@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516523 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |steve.traylen at cern.ch AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |steve.traylen at cern.ch Flag| |fedora-review? Bug 516523 depends on bug 516522, which changed state. Bug 516522 Summary: Review Request: globus-nexus - Globus Toolkit - Nexus Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516522 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA Resolution| |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 18:21:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:21:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516525] Review Request: globus-duroc-common - Globus Toolkit - DUROC Common Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241821.nAOIL4Mp002423@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516525 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |steve.traylen at cern.ch AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |steve.traylen at cern.ch Flag| |fedora-review? Bug 516525 depends on bug 516519, which changed state. Bug 516519 Summary: Review Request: globus-gram-client - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Client Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516519 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |ERRATA Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 516525 depends on bug 516522, which changed state. Bug 516522 Summary: Review Request: globus-nexus - Globus Toolkit - Nexus Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516522 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA Resolution| |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 18:23:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:23:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516531] Review Request: globus-gass-cache-program - Globus Toolkit - Tools to manipulate local and remote GASS cache s In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241823.nAOINolu004807@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516531 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |steve.traylen at cern.ch AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |steve.traylen at cern.ch Flag| |fedora-review? Bug 516531 depends on bug 516527, which changed state. Bug 516527 Summary: Review Request: globus-gass-server-ez - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Server_ez https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516527 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA Resolution| |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 18:34:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:34:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516525] Review Request: globus-duroc-common - Globus Toolkit - DUROC Common Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241834.nAOIYKOS006792@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516525 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen 2009-11-24 13:34:19 EDT --- Review of globus-duroc-common: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1827787 yes: rpmlint $ rpmlint globus-duroc-common.spec \ ../SRPMS/globus-duroc-common-2.1-1.fc13.src.rpm \ ../RPMS/x86_64/globus-duroc-common-* globus-duroc-common-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. A very simple globus library built in a standard no nonsense way. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 18:37:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:37:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516523] Review Request: globus-duct-common - Globus Toolkit - Globus Duct Common In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241837.nAOIbCIN007823@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516523 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen 2009-11-24 13:37:11 EDT --- $ rpmlint globus-duct-common.spec \ ../SRPMS/globus-duct-common-2.1-1.fc13.src.rpm \ ../RPMS/x86_64/globus-duct-common-* globus-duct-common-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Standard globus lib, all very trivial. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 18:40:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:40:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516531] Review Request: globus-gass-cache-program - Globus Toolkit - Tools to manipulate local and remote GASS cache s In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241840.nAOIeVoI008481@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516531 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen 2009-11-24 13:40:29 EDT --- $ rpmlint globus-gass-cache-program.spec \ ../RPMS/x86_64/globus-gass-cache-program-* \ ../SRPMS/globus-gass-cache-program-2.7-1.fc13.src.rpm 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Again a simple globus package following the guidelines, source code looks and matches upstream. Everything the same as every other globus package. Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 19:24:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:24:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522272] New Package for Dogtag PKI: symkey In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241924.nAOJOgpC021054@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522272 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 14:24:40 EDT --- symkey-1.3.0-4.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update symkey'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0902 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 19:24:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:24:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 502991] Review Request: erlang-erlsom - Support for XML Schema in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241924.nAOJOAf3020935@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502991 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 14:24:08 EDT --- erlang-erlsom-1.2.1-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update erlang-erlsom'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0897 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 19:24:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:24:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 502991] Review Request: erlang-erlsom - Support for XML Schema in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241924.nAOJOwKk019415@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502991 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 14:24:58 EDT --- erlang-erlsom-1.2.1-3.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update erlang-erlsom'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-4/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0905 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 19:24:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:24:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533803] Review Request: libcue - CUE sheet parser library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241924.nAOJOKcP019214@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533803 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 14:24:18 EDT --- libcue-1.3.0-2.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libcue'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-4/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0899 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 19:24:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:24:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522777] Review Request: perl-Verilog-Perl - Verilog parsing routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241924.nAOJOaq1019323@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522777 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 14:24:34 EDT --- perl-Verilog-Perl-3.221-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Verilog-Perl'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0901 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 19:24:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:24:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533803] Review Request: libcue - CUE sheet parser library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241924.nAOJOrlZ021292@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533803 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-24 14:24:53 EDT --- libcue-1.3.0-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libcue'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0904 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 19:27:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:27:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521989] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-util In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241927.nAOJRO7U020427@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521989 --- Comment #9 from Matthew Harmsen 2009-11-24 14:27:23 EDT --- This bug was reviewed during the daily PKI scrum meeting on November 24, 2009, and all on the PKI team agreed that the jar files constitute application-specific data, not general-use libraries. All of these jars constitute a PKI application consisting of four separate servers that sit on top of tomcat5, and although some of these jars have the notion of being "public" versus "private", these "public" API jars are intended to be used for development of plug-ins specific to this PKI application. As such, while it was determined that it makes more sense for the jars to remain in their current directories, the changes from "%{_datadir}/java/pki/" to "%{_javadir}/pki/" will be made to the spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 19:42:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:42:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474549] Review Request: ca-cacert.org - CAcert.org CA root certificates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241942.nAOJgPNs025662@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549 --- Comment #10 from Matthias Saou 2009-11-24 14:42:23 EDT --- I've just re-read the latest version of the document linked above, and not only do I still not know if it'll become official at any point, it also still seems like a big mess to me. >From the main website, the current "policy" still seems to be this one : http://www.cacert.org/policy/NRPDisclaimerAndLicence.php Which still contains the very confusion and saddening "You may NOT distribute certificates or root keys under this licence, nor make representation about them.". So my feeling is that we're still at the exact same point as before. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 19:42:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:42:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538087] Review Request: dgc - A system for the creation of digital circuits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241942.nAOJgkT6025732@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538087 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-11-24 14:42:44 EDT --- - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name} - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed (GPL) with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - MUST: the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - MUST: The spec file for the package is be legible. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least i386. - MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires. - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly. - MUST: If the package does not contain shared library files located in the dynamic linker's default paths - MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable - MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: There are no Large documentation files - MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - MUST: There are no Header files or static libraries - MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix - MUST: Package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives - MUST: Package containing GUI applications includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: The source package does include license text(s) - SHOULD: mock builds succcessfully in i386. - SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. - SHOULD: No scriptlets were used, those scriptlets must be sane. - SHOULD: No subpackages present. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 19:43:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:43:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538332] Review Request: covered - Verilog code coverage analyzer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241943.nAOJhvB6023938@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538332 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 19:45:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:45:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541004] Review Request: pkcs11-dump - Small utility for querying PKCS#11 modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241945.nAOJjMuR024448@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541004 Antti Andreimann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |antti.andreimann at mail.ee AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |antti.andreimann at mail.ee Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Antti Andreimann 2009-11-24 14:45:21 EDT --- Reviewed according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines Legend: OK - no problems N/A - requirement not applicable for this package ERR - requirement not met ATN - requirement met, but needs attention DNR - item was not checked by the reviewer (usually because it's optional) Required items: [ OK ] no rpmlint errors or warnings [ OK ] correct package naming [ OK ] correct spec naming [ OK ] acceptable license [ OK ] correct license field [ OK ] license file in %doc [ OK ] correct spec language [ OK ] acceptable spec legibility [ OK ] sources match upstream 96b8eb05037d3033638f54ae46b1bbb3 pkcs11-dump-0.3.3.tar.bz2 [ OK ] builds on primary architectures (i686, x86_64) [ N/A ] correct ExcludeArchs [ OK ] correct BuildRequires [ N/A ] properly handled locales [ N/A ] ldconfig in %post and %postun [ OK ] no system libraries [ OK ] no relocation [ OK ] correct directory ownership [ OK ] no duplicates in %files section [ OK ] permissions set correctly [ OK ] %clean section removes build root [ OK ] consistent macro usage [ OK ] contains only code (no standalone content) [ OK ] large documentation in -doc sub-package [ OK ] files in %doc not required to function [ N/A ] header files in -devel sub-package [ N/A ] static libraries in -static sub-package [ N/A ] proper use of Requires: pkgconfig [ N/A ] .so files in -devel sub-package [ N/A ] fully versioned dependency in -devel package [ N/A ] no libtool archives (.la files) in package [ N/A ] %{name}.desktop file(s) installed for GUI applications [ OK ] does not claim ownership to other package directories [ OK ] %install section removes buildroot [ OK ] filenames in UTF-8 Optional items: [ N/A ] ask upstream to include license text in separate file [ N/A ] description and summary available in different languages [ OK ] package builds in mock [ DNR ] package builds on all supported architectures [ DNR ] package functions as described [ N/A ] rpm scriptlets are sane [ N/A ] all sub-packages have fully versioned dependency [ N/A ] .pc files in -devel sub-package [ OK ] no file dependencies outside of "bin" directories Additional items by the reviewer: [ OK ] verbose build logs, compiler flags are visible [ OK ] RPM_OPT_FLAGS are honoured [ OK ] original timestamps are preserved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 19:53:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:53:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541004] Review Request: pkcs11-dump - Small utility for querying PKCS#11 modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911241953.nAOJrAmg028290@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541004 Kalev Lember changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Kalev Lember 2009-11-24 14:53:09 EDT --- Thanks for the quick review, Antti! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pkcs11-dump Short Description: Small utility for querying PKCS#11 modules Owners: kalev Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 21:09:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:09:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452321] Review Request: PyGreSQL - Python client library for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911242109.nAOL9ZK6016509@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452321 --- Comment #22 from Tom Lane 2009-11-24 16:09:33 EDT --- I have updated the submission here: Spec URL: http://tgl.fedorapeople.org/PyGreSQL.spec SRPM URL: http://tgl.fedorapeople.org/PyGreSQL-3.8.1-2.fc13.src.rpm This changes the License tag and makes all the scripts under tutorial non-executable, as per discussion. I did not do anything about the permissions on the scripts under site-packages/ --- AFAICS, if you don't like those you ought to file a bug against the python build system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 21:27:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:27:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452321] Review Request: PyGreSQL - Python client library for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911242127.nAOLRUgN022726@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452321 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | --- Comment #23 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-11-24 16:27:29 EDT --- Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 22:00:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:00:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452306] Review Request: tcl-pgtcl - Tcl client library for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911242200.nAOM0mm5028570@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452306 --- Comment #4 from Tom Lane 2009-11-24 17:00:47 EDT --- I've updated the License: tag to "MIT" as per discussion in bug #452321. Perhaps the logjam is about to break here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 24 22:10:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:10:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541072] New: Review Request: certmonger - certificate status monitor and PKI enrollment client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: certmonger - certificate status monitor and PKI enrollment client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541072 Summary: Review Request: certmonger - certificate status monitor and PKI enrollment client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nalin at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://nalin.fedorapeople.org/certmonger.spec SRPM URL: http://nalin.fedorapeople.org/certmonger-0.13-1.src.rpm Description: Certmonger is a service which is primarily concerned with getting your system enrolled with a certificate authority (CA) and keeping it enrolled. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 01:33:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:33:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539989] Review Request: nettop - top-like program for network packets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911250133.nAP1Xbl8029300@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539989 --- Comment #4 from Bernard Johnson 2009-11-24 20:33:36 EDT --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~bjohnson/nettop.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~bjohnson/nettop-0.2.3-2.fc12.src.rpm * Tue Nov 24 2009 Bernard Johnson - 0.2.3-2 - begin summary line with 'A' - source0 by name/version macros - better comments regarding additional sources & patches - source1/2 were reversed $ rpmlint *rpm 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 02:43:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:43:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521989] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-util In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911250243.nAP2hSAR013820@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521989 --- Comment #10 from Kevin Wright 2009-11-24 21:43:26 EDT --- * Tue Nov 24 2009 Matthew Harmsen 1.3.0-3 - Bugzilla Bug #521989 - packaging for Fedora Dogtag - Use "_javadir" macro when appropriate Updated spec file and src rpm: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-util/pki-util.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-util/pki-util-1.3.0-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 03:24:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:24:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521989] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-util In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911250324.nAP3OXKI021104@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521989 --- Comment #11 from Matthew Harmsen 2009-11-24 22:24:31 EDT --- Comment #9 applies to this "pki-util" package (as well as other application-specific packages such as "pki-common"). Other "top-level" packages such as "pki-ca" and "pki-java-tools" among others will move their packages to be directly under %{_javadir}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 03:26:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:26:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521989] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-util In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911250326.nAP3QOpm026915@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521989 --- Comment #12 from Matthew Harmsen 2009-11-24 22:26:22 EDT --- Comment #11 should say: Other "top-level" packages such as "pki-ca" and "pki-java-tools" among others will move their "jars" to be directly under %{_javadir}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 04:07:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:07:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541154] New: Review Request: xfce4-volumed - Daemon to add additional functionality to the volume keys of the keyboard Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-volumed - Daemon to add additional functionality to the volume keys of the keyboard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541154 Summary: Review Request: xfce4-volumed - Daemon to add additional functionality to the volume keys of the keyboard Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cwickert at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/xfce4-volumed.spec SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/xfce4-volumed-0.1.8-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: The xfce4-volumed adds additional functionality to the volume up/down and mute keys of the keyboard. It makes the keys work without configuration and uses the XFCE 4 mixer's defined card and track for choosing which track to act on. The volume level is shown in a notification. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 06:34:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:34:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539442] Review Request: rubygem-ZenTest - Automated test scaffolding for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911250634.nAP6YBNs011701@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539442 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-25 01:34:10 EDT --- rubygem-ZenTest-4.1.4-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-ZenTest-4.1.4-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 06:36:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:36:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539442] Review Request: rubygem-ZenTest - Automated test scaffolding for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911250636.nAP6aO7W017297@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539442 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-25 01:36:24 EDT --- rubygem-ZenTest-4.1.4-3.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-ZenTest-4.1.4-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 06:39:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:39:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539442] Review Request: rubygem-ZenTest - Automated test scaffolding for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911250639.nAP6dBiU017725@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539442 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-25 01:39:10 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 06:39:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:39:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540791] Review Request: rubygem-RubyInline - Write foreign code within your ruby code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911250639.nAP6dCmZ017750@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540791 Bug 540791 depends on bug 539442, which changed state. Bug 539442 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-ZenTest - Automated test scaffolding for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539442 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 06:46:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:46:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541185] New: Review Request: rubygem-sexp_processor - A branch of ParseTree providing generic sexp processing tools Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-sexp_processor - A branch of ParseTree providing generic sexp processing tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541185 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-sexp_processor - A branch of ParseTree providing generic sexp processing tools Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mkent at magoazul.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SPECS/rubygem-sexp_processor.spec SRPM URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SRPMS/rubygem-sexp_processor-3.0.3-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: sexp_processor branches from the ParseTree gem bringing all the generic sexp processing tools with it. Sexp, SexpProcessor, Environment, etc... all for your language processing pleasure. f-13 build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1829766 mkent at fedora-devel-chef:~/rpmbuild/SPECS$ rpmlint rubygem-sexp_processor.spec /var/tmp/results/rubygem-sexp_processor-* rubygem-sexp_processor-doc.noarch: W: no-documentation rubygem-sexp_processor-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/sexp_processor-3.0.3/ri/SexpAny/%3d%3d-i.yaml %3d rubygem-sexp_processor-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/sexp_processor-3.0.3/ri/Sexp/array_type%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-sexp_processor-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/sexp_processor-3.0.3/ri/Sexp/%3d%7e-i.yaml %3d rubygem-sexp_processor-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/sexp_processor-3.0.3/ri/SexpProcessor/Environment/%5b%5d%3d-i.yaml %5b rubygem-sexp_processor-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/sexp_processor-3.0.3/ri/CompositeSexpProcessor/%3c%3c-i.yaml %3c rubygem-sexp_processor-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/sexp_processor-3.0.3/ri/SexpAny/%3d%3d%3d-i.yaml %3d rubygem-sexp_processor-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/sexp_processor-3.0.3/ri/SexpProcessor/Environment/%5b%5d-i.yaml %5b rubygem-sexp_processor-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/sexp_processor-3.0.3/ri/Sexp/%3d%3d%3d-i.yaml %3d 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 07:31:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 02:31:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533744] Review Request: ImageJ - Image Processing and Analysis in Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911250731.nAP7VI0J026007@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533744 --- Comment #9 from Fabien Georget 2009-11-25 02:31:17 EDT --- Thanks for the review, I contacted upstream, he did not answer yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 08:04:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 03:04:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452306] Review Request: tcl-pgtcl - Tcl client library for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911250804.nAP84tEu008275@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452306 --- Comment #5 from Marcela Ma?l??ov? 2009-11-25 03:04:06 EDT --- Let me know when it will be ready. It looks like #452321 will take some time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 08:30:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 03:30:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538458] Review Request: perl-Format-Human-Bytes - Format a bytecount and make it human readable In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911250830.nAP8UldI010266@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538458 Marcela Ma?l??ov? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 08:38:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 03:38:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541207] New: Review Request: liborigin2 - library for reading OriginLab Origin 7.5 project files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: liborigin2 - library for reading OriginLab Origin 7.5 project files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541207 Summary: Review Request: liborigin2 - library for reading OriginLab Origin 7.5 project files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: supercyper at 163.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description: Liborigin2 is a library for reading OriginLab Origin 7.5 project files. OriginLab Origin provides extensive scientific graphing and data analysis capabilities and includes several new tools that simplify common operations. Liborigin2 is also a requirement for building qtiplot 0.9.7.10. SPEC: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/liborigin2.spec SRPM: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/liborigin2-06042009-0.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 08:40:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 03:40:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541207] Review Request: liborigin2 - library for reading OriginLab Origin 7.5 project files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911250840.nAP8eg3A018634@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541207 supercyper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://soft.proindependent. | |com/liborigin2/ CC| |supercyper at 163.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 09:14:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 04:14:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538327] Review Request: otpd - One Time Password daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911250914.nAP9EfEt027394@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538327 --- Comment #17 from Giuseppe Paterno 2009-11-25 04:14:34 EDT --- No feedback?? Should I assume everything is fine??? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 09:53:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 04:53:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529374] Review Request: ethos - Plugin framework for GLib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911250953.nAP9r50X032300@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529374 --- Comment #3 from Simon Wesp 2009-11-25 04:53:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Actually ethos is fine because that's what the upstream name of the project is. ACK. There is no rule to name a lib lib* > The README file states that it uses the LGPLv2.1 license and doesn't state 'or > later versions' hence the reason the + wasn't added. > I believe this is correct. The README file? Please look in the COPYING. This is the file to figure out the correct license. > # Tarfile created using git > # git clone git://git.dronelabs.com/ethos > # git archive --format=tar --prefix=%{name}-%{version}/ %{git_version} | bzip2 > > %{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 > %define git_version 9d3aae9 > %define tarfile %{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 This part is okay, but not what she meaned. Josephine, if you create this tarball you get another md5sum. But this is normal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 10:04:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 05:04:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537897] Review Request: mingw32-openjpeg - mingw32 package for openjpeg In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251004.nAPA4s6T003197@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537897 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-11-25 05:04:52 EDT --- Ok, after the informal but thorough review from Stefan, someone should just say APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 10:10:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 05:10:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537563] Review Request: mingw32-plib - Fedora mingw set of portable game related libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251010.nAPAAEPO005004@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537563 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-11-25 05:10:13 EDT --- Unblocking FE-NEEDSPONSOR - I just sponsored Stefan. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 10:10:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 05:10:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529423] Review Request: mingw32-OpenSceneGraph - Fedora mingw high performance real-time graphics toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251010.nAPAAOfe016022@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529423 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-11-25 05:10:22 EDT --- Unblocking FE-NEEDSPONSOR - I just sponsored Stefan. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 11:29:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 06:29:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 510195] Review Request: eclipse-slice2java - A plugin that integrates Eclipse with Ice object middleware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251129.nAPBToN5008680@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510195 --- Comment #3 from Mary Ellen Foster 2009-11-25 06:29:49 EDT --- Thanks for the review! Here are updated files: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/eclipse-slice2java/eclipse-slice2java.spec http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/eclipse-slice2java/eclipse-slice2java-3.3.1.20090330-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 11:33:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 06:33:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529423] Review Request: mingw32-OpenSceneGraph - Fedora mingw high performance real-time graphics toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251133.nAPBXZjI028955@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529423 --- Comment #4 from Stefan Riemens 2009-11-25 06:33:34 EDT --- Thanks for sponsoring! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 11:36:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 06:36:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 231861] Merge Review: cyrus-imapd - high-performance mail server (IMAP, POP3, ...) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251136.nAPBaDcU010674@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231861 Michal Hlavinka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW --- Comment #15 from Michal Hlavinka 2009-11-25 06:36:08 EDT --- another round completed > 6 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 20 errors, 61 warnings. reduced to 17/17, but hitting the ground here, remaining W/E are because of cyrus user and some non-world readable directories there is still some work to be done, but I think it's ready for some initial comments from any reviewer. The most important remaining part is looking into deep dark past and trying to find out something about that ancient patches/additional sources. (I'm accepting crystal balls as gifts ;) I'll try (again) to send patches upstream when I know more about them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 11:43:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 06:43:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469931] Review Request: ipmiutil - IPMI Management Utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251143.nAPBhU9m031962@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469931 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 11:46:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 06:46:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537563] Review Request: mingw32-plib - Fedora mingw set of portable game related libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251146.nAPBk8k8013459@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537563 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-11-25 06:46:07 EDT --- I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 11:50:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 06:50:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529423] Review Request: mingw32-OpenSceneGraph - Fedora mingw high performance real-time graphics toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251150.nAPBoNkL001845@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529423 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-11-25 06:50:22 EDT --- I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 11:55:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 06:55:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251155.nAPBtHc7016231@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 --- Comment #32 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-11-25 06:55:14 EDT --- # remove .la files find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name *.la | xargs rm -rf # remove .a files find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name *.a | xargs rm -rf I preffer this way. find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name *.la -exec rm {} \; find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name *.a -exec rm {} \; -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 11:59:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 06:59:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537563] Review Request: mingw32-plib - Fedora mingw set of portable game related libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251159.nAPBxdWQ004625@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537563 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-11-25 06:59:37 EDT --- Notes: * Why not to drop static libraries completely? Other things looks sane. + rpmlint is not silent, but all these messages are just false positive and may be ignored. [petro at Workplace Desktop]$ rpmlint mingw32-plib-1.8.5-0.fc12.noarch.rpm mingw32-plib.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibsg.dll.a mingw32-plib.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibsl.dll.a mingw32-plib.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibpu.dll.a mingw32-plib.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibjs.dll.a mingw32-plib.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibfnt.dll.a mingw32-plib.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibssg.dll.a mingw32-plib.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibul.dll.a mingw32-plib.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibssgaux.dll.a mingw32-plib.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibpuaux.dll.a mingw32-plib.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibpw.dll.a mingw32-plib.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibsm.dll.a mingw32-plib.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibnet.dll.a mingw32-plib.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibpsl.dll.a mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibsg.dll.a mingw32-plib.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibsg.dll.a mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibsl.dll.a mingw32-plib.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibsl.dll.a mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/plib/netSocket.h mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/plib/ssg.h mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/plib/sg.h mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/plib/pu.h mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/plib/puAux.h mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/plib/puGLUT.h mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/plib/net.h mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/plib/psl.h mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/plib/sm.h mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/plib/ssgAux.h mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/plib/puNative.h mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibpu.dll.a mingw32-plib.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibpu.dll.a mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibjs.dll.a mingw32-plib.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibjs.dll.a mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/plib/ssgconf.h mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/plib/pw.h mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/plib/ssgaWaveSystem.h mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/plib/ssgaBillboards.h mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibfnt.dll.a mingw32-plib.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibfnt.dll.a mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/plib/netMonitor.h mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/plib/puAuxLocal.h mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/plib/puFLTK.h mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/plib/ssgKeyFlier.h mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/plib/netMessage.h mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/plib/netBuffer.h mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/plib/fnt.h mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/plib/ssgaShapes.h mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibssg.dll.a mingw32-plib.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibssg.dll.a mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/plib/ulRTTI.h mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibul.dll.a mingw32-plib.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibul.dll.a mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibssgaux.dll.a mingw32-plib.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibssgaux.dll.a mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/plib/netChannel.h mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/plib/ul.h mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibpuaux.dll.a mingw32-plib.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibpuaux.dll.a mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibpw.dll.a mingw32-plib.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibpw.dll.a mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/plib/ssgaLensFlare.h mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/plib/ssgaParticleSystem.h mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/plib/sl.h mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibsm.dll.a mingw32-plib.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibsm.dll.a mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/plib/js.h mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/plib/netChat.h mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/plib/puPW.h mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/plib/ssgaFire.h mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/plib/ssgMSFSPalette.h mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/plib/ssgaSphere.h mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/plib/ssgaScreenDump.h mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/plib/pcx.h mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/plib/ssgaSky.h mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibnet.dll.a mingw32-plib.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibnet.dll.a mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/plib/slPortability.h mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibpsl.dll.a mingw32-plib.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibpsl.dll.a mingw32-plib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/plib/puSDL.h mingw32-plib.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr i686-pc-mingw32 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 13 errors, 67 warnings. [petro at Workplace Desktop]$ + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. + The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included in %doc. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package, match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ sha256sum plib-1.8.5.tar.gz* 485b22bf6fdc0da067e34ead5e26f002b76326f6371e2ae006415dea6a380a32 plib-1.8.5.tar.gz 485b22bf6fdc0da067e34ead5e26f002b76326f6371e2ae006415dea6a380a32 plib-1.8.5.tar.gz.1 [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1830025 + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. 0 No need to handle locales. 0 No need to run ldconfig for mingw32 libraries. + The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries. + The package is not designed to be relocatable. + The package owns all directories that it creates. + The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + The package consistently uses macros. + The package contains code, or permissible content. 0 No extremely large documentation files. + Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. 0 No need to separate header files from main package for mingw32-related package. + Static libraries are packaged separately. 0 No pkgconfig(.pc) files. 0 The package doesn't contain library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1). 0 No need in creating devel sub-package (see note about header files above) + The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives. 0 Not a GUI application. + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 12:45:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 07:45:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516525] Review Request: globus-duroc-common - Globus Toolkit - DUROC Common Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251245.nAPCjRbc019931@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516525 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert 2009-11-25 07:45:24 EDT --- Thank you for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: globus-duroc-common Short Description: Globus Toolkit - DUROC Common Library Owners: ellert Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 12:45:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 07:45:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516523] Review Request: globus-duct-common - Globus Toolkit - Globus Duct Common In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251245.nAPCjP1l019903@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516523 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert 2009-11-25 07:45:22 EDT --- Thank you for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: globus-duct-common Short Description: Globus Toolkit - Globus Duct Common Owners: ellert Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 12:49:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 07:49:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537563] Review Request: mingw32-plib - Fedora mingw set of portable game related libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251249.nAPCnRnT000503@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537563 --- Comment #6 from Stefan Riemens 2009-11-25 07:49:26 EDT --- Thanks for the review! (also for osg) Regarding the static packages: I like the ability to just create a single binary and take that with me, knowing it will work on just about any computer a happen to need to work with. Besides, a lot of other mingw packages ship static subpackages as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 12:45:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 07:45:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516531] Review Request: globus-gass-cache-program - Globus Toolkit - Tools to manipulate local and remote GASS caches In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251245.nAPCjW6a032406@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516531 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |globus-gass-cache-program - |globus-gass-cache-program - |Globus Toolkit - Tools to |Globus Toolkit - Tools to |manipulate local and remote |manipulate local and remote |GASS cache s |GASS caches Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert 2009-11-25 07:45:29 EDT --- Thank you for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: globus-gass-cache-program Short Description: Globus Toolkit - Tools to manipulate local and remote GASS caches Owners: ellert Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 13:11:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:11:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539912] Review Request: javacsv - Stream-based Java library for reading and writing CSV and other delimited data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251311.nAPDBFMq007134@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539912 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Osowski 2009-11-25 08:11:14 EDT --- Based upon some discussion in #fedora-devel today, this missing license file appears not to be a violation of the license, I guess the rpmlint message for no doc files included can be ignored... (and the package be reviewed as it is right now) Sorry for that violation talk in #1 then :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 13:37:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:37:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225749] Merge Review: fetchmail In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251337.nAPDbho2014869@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225749 Michal Hlavinka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mhlavink at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mhlavink at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 13:38:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:38:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226211] Merge Review: openhpi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251338.nAPDcCnG014956@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226211 Michal Hlavinka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mhlavink at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mhlavink at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 13:40:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:40:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226567] Merge Review: xmltex In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251340.nAPDecZW004087@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226567 Michal Hlavinka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mhlavink at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mhlavink at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 13:40:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:40:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226546] Merge Review: wvdial In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251340.nAPDevID015751@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226546 Michal Hlavinka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mhlavink at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mhlavink at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 13:40:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:40:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226231] Merge Review: passivetex In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251340.nAPDeNS0015661@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226231 Michal Hlavinka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mhlavink at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mhlavink at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 13:45:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:45:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226313] Merge Review: ppp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251345.nAPDj0rH005072@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226313 Jiri Popelka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jpopelka at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 13:42:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:42:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226665] Merge Review: yp-tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251342.nAPDgAi3004594@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226665 Jiri Popelka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jpopelka at redhat.com, | |kklic at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jpopelka at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 13:48:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:48:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226206] Merge Review: ntp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251348.nAPDmjsf017551@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226206 Jiri Popelka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jpopelka at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 13:51:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:51:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225726] Merge Review: emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251351.nAPDpVcG018374@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225726 Vitezslav Crhonek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vcrhonek at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |vcrhonek at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 13:53:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:53:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226355] Merge Review: rarpd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251353.nAPDroBl018751@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226355 Jiri Popelka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jmoskovc at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jpopelka at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 13:55:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:55:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226209] Merge Review: nut In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251355.nAPDt1eR007612@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226209 Vitezslav Crhonek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vcrhonek at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |vcrhonek at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 13:58:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:58:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226102] Merge Review: lockdev In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251358.nAPDw1Zp019939@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226102 Miroslav Lichvar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mlichvar at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mlichvar at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 13:58:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:58:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541317] New: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Structured - Medium-weight, MVC, DB web framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Structured - Medium-weight, MVC, DB web framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541317 Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Structured - Medium-weight, MVC, DB web framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Structured/perl-CGI-Application-Structured.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Structured/perl-CGI-Application-Structured-0.003-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: CGI::Application::Structured is an opinionated framework, based on CGI::Application. It takes the view that developer time and consistent projects structures can often be more cost-effective than focusing on the highest performance on low cost hosting solutions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 14:03:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:03:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225851] Merge Review: gob2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251403.nAPE34NS021237@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225851 Miroslav Lichvar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mlichvar at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mlichvar at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 14:01:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:01:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225731] Merge Review: epic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251401.nAPE1DOK020876@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225731 Jiri Popelka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |vcrhonek at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jpopelka at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 14:04:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:04:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541317] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Structured - Medium-weight, MVC, DB web framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251404.nAPE4JGq011159@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541317 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 14:04:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:04:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226165] Merge Review: mt-st In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251404.nAPE4vii021635@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226165 Miroslav Lichvar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mlichvar at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mlichvar at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 14:08:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:08:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226106] Merge Review: lrzsz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251408.nAPE8CiW012498@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226106 Jiri Popelka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jpopelka at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 14:19:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:19:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508922] Review Request: system-config-selinux - GUI Code for system-config-selinux, polgen, and lockdown In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251419.nAPEJtTX026172@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508922 --- Comment #32 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-11-25 09:19:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #31) > - Dir issue: > $ yum provides /usr/share/PolicyKit/policy/ > results in no matches. > $ yum provides /usr/share/PolicyKit/ > results in no matches. Filed bug #540888. Be advised, this has been fixed in control-center (the only other package that placed files in /usr/share/PolicyKit/policy/). You're using the wrong directory as well. Use %{_datadir}/polkit-1/actions/ for the policy file and add Requires: polkit for dir ownership. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 14:37:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:37:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225720] Merge Review: eject In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251437.nAPEbJvL021053@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225720 Kamil Dudka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |2.1.5-16.fc13 Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Kamil Dudka 2009-11-25 09:37:17 EDT --- Thanks for review! I've just committed the changes and built it as eject-2.1.5-16.fc13. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 14:58:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:58:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 502991] Review Request: erlang-erlsom - Support for XML Schema in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251458.nAPEwofa027892@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502991 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-25 09:58:48 EDT --- erlang-erlsom-1.2.1-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update erlang-erlsom'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-12035 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 15:04:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:04:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 424841] Review Request: ndisc6 - IPv6 diagnostic tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251504.nAPF4X3W008592@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424841 --- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-25 10:04:28 EDT --- ndisc6-0.9.9-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 15:04:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:04:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 492810] Review Request: RabbIT - proxy for a faster web In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251504.nAPF4LkH008518@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492810 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-25 10:04:17 EDT --- RabbIT-4.1-9.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 14:59:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:59:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538303] Review Request: rubygem-minitest - Small and fast replacement for ruby's huge and slow test/unit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251459.nAPExsiE006651@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538303 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-25 09:59:52 EDT --- rubygem-minitest-1.4.2-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 14:59:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:59:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538303] Review Request: rubygem-minitest - Small and fast replacement for ruby's huge and slow test/unit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251459.nAPExxxo006825@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538303 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.4.2-3.fc11 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 15:01:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:01:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522777] Review Request: perl-Verilog-Perl - Verilog parsing routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251501.nAPF1XXU007651@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522777 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-25 10:01:31 EDT --- perl-Verilog-Perl-3.221-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Verilog-Perl'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-12052 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 15:04:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:04:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540034] Review Request: lxdm - Lightweight X11 Display Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251504.nAPF4l6E030091@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540034 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-25 10:04:46 EDT --- lxdm-0.0.3-0.2.20091116svn2145.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 15:06:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:06:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 515230] Review Request: python-dmidecode - python extension module to access DMI data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251506.nAPF6UIc031091@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515230 --- Comment #6 from David Sommerseth 2009-11-25 10:06:28 EDT --- Thanks again for another review! First of all, I'm sorry for the mix up between the .src.rpm and the .spec file. I'm not sure how that has happened. I'm not in direct control over that web space, so I've posted new versions where I have full control over the files. The community website will be updated again when the review is completed. Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/~dsommers/python-dmidecode/python-dmidecode.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~dsommers/python-dmidecode/python-dmidecode-3.10.7-2.fc11.src.rpm In regards to the "Requires" section, this contradicts the message in comment #1, where Jason Tibbits says: "rpm finds the delepdency on libxml2.so.2 itself; there's no need to specify it manually." And now, rpmlint do give an error: python-dmidecode.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libxml2-python I've added it, according to your request, but I am willing to take it away if this is not correct. * Parallel make I've looked into this. As the building is done via python setup.py/Distutil, I don't see any possibility to support parallel building. Therefore, I find it rather misleading adding %{_smp_mflags} to the make command. I hope you don't mind me that I have not modified this. * Macros Fixed! * Directory ownership issue Fixed! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 15:05:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:05:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 492810] Review Request: RabbIT - proxy for a faster web In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251505.nAPF5ked009558@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492810 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-25 10:05:45 EDT --- RabbIT-4.1-9.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 15:09:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:09:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536796] Review Request: kde-plasma-smooth-tasks - KDE taskbar replacement with window peeking ability In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251509.nAPF94Pl010314@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536796 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-25 10:09:03 EDT --- kde-plasma-smooth-tasks-0.0.1-0.1.wip20091116.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 15:09:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:09:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536796] Review Request: kde-plasma-smooth-tasks - KDE taskbar replacement with window peeking ability In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251509.nAPF99jJ010391@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536796 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.0.1-0.1.wip20091116.fc12 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 15:04:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:04:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540034] Review Request: lxdm - Lightweight X11 Display Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251504.nAPF4qTr008856@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540034 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.0.3-0.2.20091116svn2145.f | |c12 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 15:12:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:12:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 424841] Review Request: ndisc6 - IPv6 diagnostic tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251512.nAPFCZpY012226@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424841 --- Comment #40 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-25 10:12:34 EDT --- ndisc6-0.9.9-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 15:12:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:12:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225789] Merge Review: genromfs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251512.nAPFCWpm001939@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225789 --- Comment #2 from Kamil Dudka 2009-11-25 10:12:31 EDT --- Appended %{?dist} to the Release tag and built as genromfs-0.5.2-4.fc13. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 15:11:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:11:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540034] Review Request: lxdm - Lightweight X11 Display Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251511.nAPFBuoR001487@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540034 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-25 10:11:55 EDT --- lxdm-0.0.3-0.2.20091116svn2145.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 15:12:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:12:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540034] Review Request: lxdm - Lightweight X11 Display Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251512.nAPFC1tN001658@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540034 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.0.3-0.2.20091116svn2145.f |0.0.3-0.2.20091116svn2145.f |c12 |c11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 15:13:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:13:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533803] Review Request: libcue - CUE sheet parser library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251513.nAPFDBci002135@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533803 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-25 10:13:10 EDT --- libcue-1.3.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libcue'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-12113 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 15:14:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:14:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 502991] Review Request: erlang-erlsom - Support for XML Schema in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251514.nAPFE7d3002409@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502991 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-25 10:14:06 EDT --- erlang-erlsom-1.2.1-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update erlang-erlsom'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-12119 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 15:16:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:16:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225789] Merge Review: genromfs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251516.nAPFGNYU014611@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225789 Kamil Dudka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pmachata at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 15:27:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:27:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526876] Review Request: php-pecl-gmagick - Provides a wrapper to the GraphicsMagick library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251527.nAPFREYk020092@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526876 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-25 10:27:12 EDT --- php-pecl-gmagick-1.0.2b1-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 15:27:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:27:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527488] Review Request: drbd - drbd tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251527.nAPFRgCo020232@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527488 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |8.3.6-2.fc12 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 15:26:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:26:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477542] Review Request: mpdscribble - A mpd client which submits information about tracks being played to Last.fm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251526.nAPFQBDm019754@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477542 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-25 10:26:07 EDT --- mpdscribble-0.18.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 15:27:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:27:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538303] Review Request: rubygem-minitest - Small and fast replacement for ruby's huge and slow test/unit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251527.nAPFRsbQ020293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538303 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.4.2-3.fc11 |1.4.2-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 15:27:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:27:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527488] Review Request: drbd - drbd tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251527.nAPFRYEo009422@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527488 --- Comment #87 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-25 10:27:30 EDT --- drbd-8.3.6-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 15:30:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:30:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525432] Review Request: openxcap - Fully featured XCAP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251530.nAPFUlv9010957@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525432 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-25 10:30:46 EDT --- openxcap-1.1.2-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 15:27:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:27:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538303] Review Request: rubygem-minitest - Small and fast replacement for ruby's huge and slow test/unit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251527.nAPFRn6N009494@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538303 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-25 10:27:49 EDT --- rubygem-minitest-1.4.2-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 15:30:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:30:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538558] Review Request: kde-partitionmanager - KDE Partition Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251530.nAPFUdtK010893@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538558 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.0.0-2.fc12 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 15:30:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:30:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525432] Review Request: openxcap - Fully featured XCAP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251530.nAPFUqpp022193@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525432 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.1.2-1.fc11 |1.1.2-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 15:30:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:30:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538558] Review Request: kde-partitionmanager - KDE Partition Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251530.nAPFUZUW022116@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538558 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-25 10:30:34 EDT --- kde-partitionmanager-1.0.0-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 15:33:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:33:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477542] Review Request: mpdscribble - A mpd client which submits information about tracks being played to Last.fm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251533.nAPFXIjV023139@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477542 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-25 10:33:17 EDT --- mpdscribble-0.18.1-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 15:32:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:32:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528108] Review Request: Vuurmuur - Firewall manager built on top of iptables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251532.nAPFWPGX022753@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528108 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.7-7.fc12 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 15:33:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:33:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533803] Review Request: libcue - CUE sheet parser library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251533.nAPFXWAO023221@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533803 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-25 10:33:31 EDT --- libcue-1.3.0-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libcue'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-12194 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 15:32:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:32:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528108] Review Request: Vuurmuur - Firewall manager built on top of iptables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251532.nAPFWKnP011941@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528108 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-25 10:32:17 EDT --- Vuurmuur-0.7-7.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 15:38:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:38:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 510195] Review Request: eclipse-slice2java - A plugin that integrates Eclipse with Ice object middleware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251538.nAPFcKme013688@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510195 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Overholt 2009-11-25 10:38:19 EDT --- Thanks for the changes. Everything looks fine now except for the date in the version string. Upstream is sort of confusing in this regard, but it looks like 3.3.1 is the version. Unless you think I'm mis-interpreting upstream's version number, I think you can avoid including it in the Version/Release entirely. Also, there's a newer snapshot available (20091005) if you want to get that one in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 15:45:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:45:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538087] Review Request: dgc - A system for the creation of digital circuits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251545.nAPFjsqr016369@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538087 Shakthi Kannan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-11-25 10:45:52 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dgc Short Description: Digital Gate Compiler Owners: shakthimaan chitlesh Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 15:47:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:47:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226423] Merge Review: smartmontools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251547.nAPFlcrw028010@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226423 --- Comment #7 from Michal Nowak 2009-11-25 10:47:36 EDT --- /smartmontools-5.38-24.20091119svn.fc12.i686.rpm /home/newman/rpmbuild/RPMS/i686/smartmontools-debuginfo-5.38-24.20091119svn.fc12.i686.rpm smartmontools.i686: W: incoherent-init-script-name smartd ('smartmontools', 'smartmontoolsd') 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. (Now installed the new smartmontools.) newman ~ $ rpmlint smartmontools smartmontools.i686: W: incoherent-init-script-name smartd ('smartmontools', 'smartmontoolsd') 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. I guess this is OK. > BuildRequires: /usr/bin/aclocal Should be better automake. > Source0: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.snap20091119.tar.gz I don't see such file there. Just keep the filename part. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control > Version: 5.38 > Release: 24.20091119svn%{?dist} > [...] > %setup -q -n %{name}-5.39 Shouldn't we have "Version: 5.39" + "Release: 0.20091119svn%{?dist}", since the tarball's version is "5.39"? I'd rather call it 5.39 pre-release than 5.38 release bump. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 15:49:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:49:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539863] Review Request: perl-Pod-PseudoPod - Extending the POD tags for book manuscripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251549.nAPFn4vA017312@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539863 --- Comment #1 from Gerd Pokorra 2009-11-25 10:49:03 EDT --- The URL of the latest scratch build is: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1830099 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 15:51:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:51:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225789] Merge Review: genromfs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251551.nAPFpYO2029388@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225789 Petr Machata changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #3 from Petr Machata 2009-11-25 10:51:34 EDT --- Clean fedora-review flag that the last reviewer left around. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 15:52:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:52:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523540] Review Request: opentracker - BitTorrent Tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251552.nAPFqjOm029692@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523540 Matt Domsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(matt_domsch at dell. | |com) | --- Comment #43 from Matt Domsch 2009-11-25 10:52:41 EDT --- One nit here: s/ipv4/ipv6/. %preun ipv6 if [ $1 = 0 ] ; then /sbin/service %{name}-ipv4 stop >/dev/null 2>&1 /sbin/chkconfig --del %{name}-ipv4 fi I would not include README_v6 in the -ipv6 package. It is obsolete, and removed from upstream. it's listening on ports properly now, and I'm trying to set up a torrent to play with to be sure it's working as expected. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 15:52:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:52:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225789] Merge Review: genromfs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251552.nAPFq1Kp018345@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225789 Petr Machata changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Petr Machata 2009-11-25 10:52:01 EDT --- Starting formal review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 15:52:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:52:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541346] New: Review Request: polkit-kde - PolicyKit integration for KDE Desktop Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: polkit-kde - PolicyKit integration for KDE Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541346 Summary: Review Request: polkit-kde - PolicyKit integration for KDE Desktop Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jreznik at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://rezza.hofyland.cz/fedora/packages/polkit-kde/polkit-kde.spec SRPM URL: http://rezza.hofyland.cz/fedora/packages/polkit-kde/polkit-kde-0.95-0.1.20091125svn.fc12.src.rpm Description: Provides Policy Kit Authentication Agent that nicely fits to KDE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 15:55:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:55:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541346] Review Request: polkit-kde - PolicyKit integration for KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251555.nAPFtxM8030869@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541346 --- Comment #1 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-11-25 10:55:58 EDT --- Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1830517 RPMLINT polkit-kde.spec:23: W: unversioned-explicit-provides PolicyKit-authentication-agent Comment: polkit-gnome does not specify version neither What about obsoletes? PolicyKit-kde? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 16:01:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:01:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541346] Review Request: polkit-kde - PolicyKit integration for KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251601.nAPG1Tj3021346@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541346 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Kofler 2009-11-25 11:01:29 EDT --- #1 issue in this package: this needs a .desktop file so it actually get started! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 15:57:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:57:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523540] Review Request: opentracker - BitTorrent Tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251557.nAPFvk0a020114@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523540 --- Comment #44 from Matt Domsch 2009-11-25 10:57:45 EDT --- A fatal runtime crash noted by skvidal: mdomsch: try hitting: http://torrenthost:torrentport/stats?mode=everything mdomsch: if opentracker doesn't fall over then that's progresss whoops bang dead $ wget -6 'http://[2001:4830:1602:1::2]:6969/stats?mode=everything' --2009-11-25 09:55:17-- http://[2001:4830:1602:1::2]:6969/stats?mode=everything Connecting to 2001:4830:1602:1::2:6969... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... No data received. Retrying. --2009-11-25 09:55:18-- (try: 2) http://[2001:4830:1602:1::2]:6969/stats?mode=everything Connecting to 2001:4830:1602:1::2:6969... failed: Connection refused. [mdomsch at p opentracker]$ netstat -apn | grep 6969 (Not all processes could be identified, non-owned process info will not be shown, you would have to be root to see it all.) yes, it's crashing when hitting that URL. That'll have to be fixed before it can be released. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 16:00:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:00:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541346] Review Request: polkit-kde - PolicyKit integration for KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251600.nAPG0kiA032305@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541346 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org --- Comment #2 from Kevin Kofler 2009-11-25 11:00:45 EDT --- To answer your question: 1. Obsoletes: PolicyKit-kde should be moved here from kdebase-workspace. 2. kdebase-workspace should get Requires: polkit-kde instead of PolicyKit-authentication-agent as only polkit-kde will run in KDE. 3. polkit-gnome needs to be switched back to being disabled in KDE (as it originally was). These 3 changes need to happen at the same time to prevent chaos. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 16:07:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:07:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 510195] Review Request: eclipse-slice2java - A plugin that integrates Eclipse with Ice object middleware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251607.nAPG7NFN023331@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510195 --- Comment #5 from Mary Ellen Foster 2009-11-25 11:07:22 EDT --- Thanks for pointing out the newer version -- hadn't noticed that. (I wonder what they changed ...) I can remove the date, but it does kind of seem like the date is part of the version -- I mean, these are all 3.3.1 (because they work with Ice 3.3.1) but there are new versions within that. But this isn't a big deal and I can remove it again without difficulty. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 16:06:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:06:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541346] Review Request: polkit-kde - PolicyKit integration for KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251606.nAPG6pD5022969@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541346 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu --- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter 2009-11-25 11:06:50 EDT --- +1 to what Kevin said, though 2/3 is arguably for f13 only (can provide as tech-preview/whatever to those who really want it in f12, but they'll need to manage the integration by hand, similar to how nm-applet/knetworkmanager is in f12). I'll try to take a closer look here soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 16:12:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:12:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226423] Merge Review: smartmontools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251612.nAPGCD1j004373@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226423 --- Comment #8 from Michal Hlavinka 2009-11-25 11:12:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > > BuildRequires: /usr/bin/aclocal > > Should be better automake. > fixed > > Source0: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.snap20091119.tar.gz > > I don't see such file there. Just keep the filename part. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control fixed > > Version: 5.38 > > Release: 24.20091119svn%{?dist} > > [...] > > %setup -q -n %{name}-5.39 > > Shouldn't we have "Version: 5.39" + "Release: 0.20091119svn%{?dist}", since the > tarball's version is "5.39"? I'd rather call it 5.39 pre-release than 5.38 > release bump. 5.39 in setup section is there because smartmontools package is created by "make dist" and (as usual) upstream bumbs version in autotools config files just after releasing any new version. I think it's better to use snapshot versioning as specified in: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 16:16:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:16:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541346] Review Request: polkit-kde - PolicyKit integration for KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251616.nAPGGj2t005835@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541346 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Kofler 2009-11-25 11:16:44 EDT --- Doing 1. without 2. and 3. is not a good idea, it will lead to polkit-kde getting dragged in on upgrades from F11, but not new installs. These changes are all dependent on each other and on 4. adding a .desktop file as per comment #3. Doing parts of it doesn't make sense. In fact I'd argue that shipping this package without doing 4. makes no sense at all and that 4. is a recipe for chaos without 3., which requires 1. and 2. to fix the upgrade path. So shipping this package for F12 is only going to work properly if we do all 4 changes from comment #2 and comment #3. And I don't see why we wouldn't do that. There are no worries about user data as all the data/configuration is in the polkit backend. It should be a drop-in replacement. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 16:23:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:23:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226313] Merge Review: ppp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251623.nAPGN70M028612@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226313 --- Comment #1 from Jiri Popelka 2009-11-25 11:23:05 EDT --- formal review is here, see the notes below: YES source files match upstream: 183800762e266132218b204dfb428d29 ppp-2.4.4.tar.gz YES package meets naming and versioning guidelines. YES specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. YES dist tag is present. YES build root is correct. BuildRoot in spec file has value: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-root According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag the BuildRoot value MUST contain at least %{name}, %{version} and %{release}. I'm giving YES because the RPM in Fedora 10 and above defines a default buildroot so in Fedora 10 and above it is no longer necessary to define a buildroot tag. YES license field matches the actual license. YES license is open source-compatible. NO License text included in package. I didn't find license text NO latest version is being packaged. ppp-2.4.5.tar.gz has been released 11/17/2009 NO BuildRequires are proper. Build requirements are proper but they are defined in BuildPrereq (should be BuildRequires) YES compiler flags are appropriate. YES %clean is present. YES package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). YES debuginfo package looks complete. NO rpmlint is silent. ppp.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot The PPP (Point-to-Point Protocol) daemon. ppp.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary PPP ppp.src: W: no-url-tag ppp.src:33: E: buildprereq-use pam-devel, libpcap-devel ppp.src:84: W: configure-without-libdir-spec ppp.src:337: W: macro-in-%changelog %{_mandir} ppp.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 51, tab: line 303) ppp.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot The PPP (Point-to-Point Protocol) daemon. ppp.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary PPP ppp.x86_64: W: no-url-tag ppp.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/log/ppp 0700 ppp.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/sbin/pppoe-discovery 0555 ppp.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/ppp/chap-secrets 0600 ppp.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/ppp/pap-secrets 0600 ppp.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/sbin/pppd 0555 ppp-debuginfo.x86_64: W: no-url-tag ppp-devel.x86_64: W: no-url-tag 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 6 errors, 11 warnings. YES final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. YES no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. YES owns the directories it creates. YES doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. YES no duplicates in %files. NO file permissions are appropriate. see rpmlint errors YES no scriptlets present. YES code, not content. YES documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. YES %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. YES no headers. YES no pkgconfig files. YES no libtool .la droppings. YES not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 16:25:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:25:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541346] Review Request: polkit-kde - PolicyKit integration for KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251625.nAPGPvv1009069@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541346 --- Comment #6 from Rex Dieter 2009-11-25 11:25:56 EDT --- Ah, good point. Maybe it is best an all-or-nothing proposition then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 16:29:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:29:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 510195] Review Request: eclipse-slice2java - A plugin that integrates Eclipse with Ice object middleware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251629.nAPGTM8W009939@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510195 --- Comment #6 from Mary Ellen Foster 2009-11-25 11:29:20 EDT --- Also, looking at the changelog, it contains things like "Changes since version 3.3.1.20090330" which sort of implies that the date is part of the version number. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 16:29:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:29:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 510195] Review Request: eclipse-slice2java - A plugin that integrates Eclipse with Ice object middleware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251629.nAPGTxk3030870@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510195 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Overholt 2009-11-25 11:29:58 EDT --- Okay, then the date is part of the upstream version. At least it appears to be monotonically increasing :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 16:33:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:33:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226423] Merge Review: smartmontools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251633.nAPGXN6T011594@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226423 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Michal Nowak 2009-11-25 11:33:22 EDT --- OK. Just verified in CVS. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 16:37:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:37:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 510195] Review Request: eclipse-slice2java - A plugin that integrates Eclipse with Ice object middleware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251637.nAPGbuX7013082@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510195 --- Comment #8 from Mary Ellen Foster 2009-11-25 11:37:55 EDT --- I've updated to the newer version from upstream and added the CHANGELOG to the %doc -- no other changes. http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/eclipse-slice2java/eclipse-slice2java.spec http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/eclipse-slice2java/eclipse-slice2java-3.3.1.20091005-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 16:37:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:37:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251637.nAPGbBpf001016@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 --- Comment #33 from Nathanael Noblet 2009-11-25 11:37:09 EDT --- * Wed Nov 25 2009 Nathanael Noblet - 3.9.0-0.9.BETA4 - Modified the line removing .la and .a files http://www.gnat.ca/dspam.spec http://www.gnat.ca/dspam-3.9.0-0.9.BETA4.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 16:41:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:41:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251641.nAPGfIZC002481@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #34 from Arun SAG 2009-11-25 11:41:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #33) > @Peter > > Where is the upload? Source tar ball: http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/e/emacs-goodies-el/emacs-goodies-el_31.1.orig.tar.gz patch: http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/e/emacs-goodies-el/emacs-goodies-el_31.1-1.diff.gz url: http://packages.debian.org/unstable/editors/emacs-goodies-el -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 16:43:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:43:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 510195] Review Request: eclipse-slice2java - A plugin that integrates Eclipse with Ice object middleware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251643.nAPGhXXc015101@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510195 --- Comment #9 from Mary Ellen Foster 2009-11-25 11:43:32 EDT --- (If you were *very* fast, you'll need to download again -- I just noticed that the CHANGELOG was in the tarball so I don't need to download it again from the website.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 17:03:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:03:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541355] New: Review Request: python-couchdb - A Python library for working with CouchDB Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-couchdb - A Python library for working with CouchDB https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541355 Summary: Review Request: python-couchdb - A Python library for working with CouchDB Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sebastian at when.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/python-couchdb.spec SRPM URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/python-couchdb-0.6-1.fc12.src.rpm Koji Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1830708 [sebastian at localhost SRPMS]$ rpmlint python-couchdb-0.6-1.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [sebastian at localhost noarch]$ rpmlint python-couchdb-0.6-1.fc12.noarch.rpm python-couchdb.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-httplib2 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. The latter one should be fine, since it's a python package. This package is also a dependency for desktopcouch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 17:08:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:08:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225789] Merge Review: genromfs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251708.nAPH8jq7010582@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225789 Petr Machata changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |needinfo?(kdudka at redhat.com | |) --- Comment #5 from Petr Machata 2009-11-25 12:08:44 EDT --- The package is OK overall, I found just a couple nits: * rpmlint report: $ rpmlint x86_64/genromfs-0.5.2-4.fc13.x86_64.rpm \ genromfs-0.5.2-4.fc13.src.rpm genromfs.spec 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. * ExclusiveOS: I don't see a reason to state this explicitly. The fact that it's a Fedora package guarantees that it will only ever be compiled for Linux machines. * BuildRoot tag is ignored in Fedora 10+. Consider removing it. * Package COPYING, and consider also packaging NEWS (via %doc) * %files section should include %defattr(-,root,root,-) (Notice the last dash.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 17:13:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:13:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 515230] Review Request: python-dmidecode - python extension module to access DMI data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251713.nAPHDrnn024479@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515230 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-25 12:13:52 EDT --- For -2: * %define -> %global - I meant here: ------------------------------------------------------------- 1 %{!?python_sitearch: %define python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib(1)")} ^^here^^ 2 %{!?python_ver: %define python_ver %(%{__python} -c "import sys ; print sys.version[:3]")} ^^here^^ ------------------------------------------------------------- * Tarball (In reply to comment #6) > First of all, I'm sorry for the mix up between the .src.rpm and the .spec file. > I'm not sure how that has happened. I'm not in direct control over that web > space, so I've posted new versions where I have full control over the files. > The community website will be updated again when the review is completed. - Well, is my recognition correct that you are explaining here why the source tarball changed? (by the way the tarball changed again). * Duplicate files - Now build.log complains: ------------------------------------------------------------- 157 warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/python-dmidecode/pymap.xml ------------------------------------------------------------- Note that %files entry: ------------------------------------------------------------- %files foo/ ------------------------------------------------------------- (where foo/ is a directory) contains the directory foo/ itself and all files/directories/etc under foo/: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories#Unversioned !! Requires (In reply to comment #6) > In regards to the "Requires" section, this contradicts the message in comment > #1, where Jason Tibbits says: "rpm finds the delepdency on libxml2.so.2 itself; > there's no need to specify it manually." And now, rpmlint do give an error: > > python-dmidecode.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libxml2-python > > I've added it, according to your request, but I am willing to take it away if > this is not correct. - Well, Jason actually said the correct thing (and it has no contradiction with my comment). Actually - "Requires: libxml2" is not needed (and should be removed) because rpmbuild actomatically detects library related dependency (in this case libxml2.so.2) and adds such dependency into binary rpms automatically, which pulls libxml2 in when trying to install this package by yum. - However "Requires: libxml2-python" is needed because rpmbuild cannot detect such python module based dependency. Now rpmlint throws out the error message you pointed out, because the package name "libxml2-python" contains "lib" string. However "this one (rpmlint) is bogus; ignore it." (as Jason said). > * Parallel make > I've looked into this. As the building is done via python setup.py/Distutil, I > don't see any possibility to support parallel building. Therefore, I find it > rather misleading adding %{_smp_mflags} to the make command. I hope you don't > mind me that I have not modified this. + Okay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 17:24:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:24:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226206] Merge Review: ntp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251724.nAPHO13O015163@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226206 --- Comment #1 from Jiri Popelka 2009-11-25 12:24:00 EDT --- YES source files match upstream: 8c19ff62ed4f7d64f8e2aa59cb11f364 ntp-4.2.4p7.tar.gz YES package meets naming and versioning guidelines. YES specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. YES dist tag is present. YES build root is correct. YES license field matches the actual license. YES license is open source-compatible. YES License text included in package. YES latest version is being packaged. YES BuildRequires are proper. YES compiler flags are appropriate. YES %clean is present. YES package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). YES debuginfo package looks complete. NO rpmlint is silent. ntp.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary NTP ntp.src: W: strange-permission ntpdate.init 0775 ntp.src: W: strange-permission ntp.dhclient 0775 ntp.src: W: strange-permission ntpd.init 0775 ntp.src: W: %ifarch-applied-patch Patch5: ntp-4.2.4-linkfastmath.patch ntp.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary NTP ntp.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/ntp/crypto/pw 0600 ntp.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/ntp/crypto 0750 ntp.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/ntpstats ntp.x86_64: W: missing-lsb-keyword Default-Stop in /etc/rc.d/init.d/ntpd ntpdate.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/ntp/keys 0600 ntpdate.x86_64: W: missing-lsb-keyword Required-Stop in /etc/rc.d/init.d/ntpdate ntpdate.x86_64: W: missing-lsb-keyword Default-Stop in /etc/rc.d/init.d/ntpdate ntp-perl.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided ntp 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 11 warnings. YES final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. YES no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. YES owns the directories it creates. YES doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. YES no duplicates in %files. ?? file permissions are appropriate. see rpmlint errors YES scriptlets must be sane. YES code, not content. YES large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. YES %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. YES no headers. YES no pkgconfig files. YES no libtool .la droppings. YES not a GUI app. Please look at the rpmlint errors/warnings and either fix them or confirm they are reasonable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 17:29:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:29:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530754] Review Request: scour - A script to clean SVG files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251729.nAPHT90C028801@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530754 Jeff Schiller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |codedread at gmail.com --- Comment #9 from Jeff Schiller 2009-11-25 12:29:07 EDT --- fwiw, I downloaded and tried the attachment 367321 with the latest version of scour (0.22) and it seems to convert perfectly. I also tried it with 0.21 and the same result. Btw, by default, scour converts files to have width="100%" and height="100%" which I've found out recently causes problems in some viewers (browsers are fine, but Eye on Gnome has a problem for instance). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 17:34:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:34:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226206] Merge Review: ntp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251734.nAPHYjRq030477@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226206 --- Comment #2 from Miroslav Lichvar 2009-11-25 12:34:44 EDT --- I think they are all false positives. The permissions are ok, the missing-lsb-keyword is not in the recommended fedora init script template and the obsolete in ntp-perl would be wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 17:40:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:40:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225789] Merge Review: genromfs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251740.nAPHeh4C000708@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225789 Kamil Dudka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(kdudka at redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #6 from Kamil Dudka 2009-11-25 12:40:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) Thanks for review! I've just committed the proposed changes to CVS, excluding the BuildRoot related one. (+ fixed spelling error with the latest rpmlint filesystem --> file system) > * ExclusiveOS: I don't see a reason to state this explicitly. The > fact that it's a Fedora package guarantees that it will only ever be > compiled for Linux machines. Good idea. 'cvs annotate' says the line has been there since the initial import. > * BuildRoot tag is ignored in Fedora 10+. Consider removing it. However removing it triggers a warning with the latest rpmlint: $ rpmlint --version rpmlint version 0.92 Copyright (C) 1999-2007 Frederic Lepied, Mandriva $ rpmlint genromfs.spec genromfs.spec: W: no-buildroot-tag 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. > * Package COPYING, and consider also packaging NEWS (via %doc) Fixed. > * %files section should include %defattr(-,root,root,-) (Notice the > last dash.) Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 17:46:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:46:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 510195] Review Request: eclipse-slice2java - A plugin that integrates Eclipse with Ice object middleware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251746.nAPHkg2X002819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510195 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Andrew Overholt 2009-11-25 12:46:40 EDT --- Everything looks good. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 17:53:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:53:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226206] Merge Review: ntp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251753.nAPHrRTl005029@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226206 Jiri Popelka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jiri Popelka 2009-11-25 12:53:26 EDT --- This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 18:07:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:07:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529374] Review Request: ethos - Plugin framework for GLib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251807.nAPI7HZ6009781@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529374 --- Comment #4 from Peter Robinson 2009-11-25 13:07:15 EDT --- > > The README file states that it uses the LGPLv2.1 license and doesn't state 'or > > later versions' hence the reason the + wasn't added. > > I believe this is correct. > The README file? Please look in the COPYING. This is the file to figure out the > correct license. The COPYING file just contain the LGPL2.1 and doesn't say anything about using a later version of the license. Sometimes you get the license text in the COPYING file and a note in the README on how to apply the license. IE LGPLv2.1 only or LGPLv2.1 or any later version at the users choice. Hence my point. > > # Tarfile created using git > > # git clone git://git.dronelabs.com/ethos > > # git archive --format=tar --prefix=%{name}-%{version}/ %{git_version} | bzip2 > > > %{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 > > %define git_version 9d3aae9 > > %define tarfile %{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 > This part is okay, but not what she meaned. > Josephine, if you create this tarball you get another md5sum. But this is > normal. Nope. That's incorrect. you should be able to recreate the tar ball with the same md5sum by using the procedure. That's the whole point of the md5sum.... to ensure the source code isn't modified from upstream official code/release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 18:17:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:17:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537563] Review Request: mingw32-plib - Fedora mingw set of portable game related libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251817.nAPIH10T031255@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537563 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-11-25 13:17:00 EDT --- In fact I have no strong opinion whether we need to provide static libraries for mingw, so I won't insist here. OK, this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 18:34:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:34:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539863] Review Request: perl-Pod-PseudoPod - Extending the POD tags for book manuscripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251834.nAPIYF3x016279@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539863 --- Comment #2 from Gerd Pokorra 2009-11-25 13:34:14 EDT --- The "BuildArch is set to "noarch". The file under the Spec-URL is updated. ftp://ftp.uni-siegen.de/pub/parrot.rpms/PseudoPod/perl-Pod-PseudoPod.spec You can find latest SRPM at the URL: ftp://ftp.uni-siegen.de/pub/parrot.rpms/PseudoPod/perl-Pod-PseudoPod-0.15-1.fc11.src.rpm The latest scratch build is: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1830833 The rpmlint output reports: 0 errors, 0 warnings -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 18:41:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:41:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225789] Merge Review: genromfs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251841.nAPIfXun018351@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225789 Petr Machata changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Petr Machata 2009-11-25 13:41:32 EDT --- > > * BuildRoot tag is ignored in Fedora 10+. Consider removing it. > > However removing it triggers a warning with the latest rpmlint: Hmm, right. I think we could overrule rpmlint at this point, it's complaining about something that's in fact not mandatory per the guidelines. But I'll leave that up to you, I don't have any strong feelings either way. I think the package is now OK and I'm going to ACCEPT it. Thanks for cooperation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 18:53:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:53:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225789] Merge Review: genromfs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251853.nAPIrg2F007017@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225789 --- Comment #8 from Petr Machata 2009-11-25 13:53:41 EDT --- The rest of the process doesn't really apply to merge review, so just close the review request as soon as you build that package with those fixes in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 19:06:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:06:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225789] Merge Review: genromfs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251906.nAPJ6baf024447@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225789 Kamil Dudka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.5.2-5.fc13 Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #9 from Kamil Dudka 2009-11-25 14:06:36 EDT --- Built as genromfs-0.5.2-5.fc13. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 19:14:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:14:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251914.nAPJEE6V026474@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #35 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-11-25 14:14:13 EDT --- Sorry, I'm expect a SPEC file and a source package. It's your task to create a working package based on the files with you have cited on comment #34 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 19:16:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:16:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539480] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL - Simple http server class with SSL support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251916.nAPJGlUe027617@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539480 Gerd Pokorra changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |gp at zimt.uni-siegen.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |gp at zimt.uni-siegen.de Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 19:51:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:51:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508922] Review Request: system-config-selinux - GUI Code for system-config-selinux, polgen, and lockdown In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251951.nAPJpF3E003773@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508922 --- Comment #33 from Daniel Walsh 2009-11-25 14:51:14 EDT --- Ok I am changing the package location. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 19:55:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:55:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 198928] Review Request: lsscsi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911251955.nAPJtNob005463@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=198928 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dan at danny.cz Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #19 from Dan Hor?k 2009-11-25 14:55:19 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: lsscsi New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: sharkcz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 20:14:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:14:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541355] Review Request: python-couchdb - A Python library for working with CouchDB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911252014.nAPKETo4009441@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541355 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |terjeros at phys.ntnu.no --- Comment #1 from Terje R??sten 2009-11-25 15:14:25 EDT --- Tiny comments, you might want to more explicit in the %files section. This is a couchdb client? Is then couchdb really needed on the client host? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 20:53:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:53:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541355] Review Request: python-couchdb - A Python library for working with CouchDB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911252053.nAPKrgGa019408@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541355 --- Comment #2 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-11-25 15:53:42 EDT --- Agreed on the %files section, will do so with the next release. It's, from what I understand, a library for accessing couchdb through python. So couchdb would be required (the author's page says so in the requirements: http://code.google.com/p/couchdb-python/). I was actually packaging it because it's a dependency for desktopcouch, which has so goal to integrate couchdb into desktop applications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 21:15:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:15:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530617] Review Request: libixp - Stand-alone client/server 9P library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911252115.nAPLFlS0025670@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530617 --- Comment #5 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-11-25 16:15:45 EDT --- I suggest you should modified the mk/gcc.mk file, so that $RPM_OPT_FLAGS will be added to CFLAGS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 21:37:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:37:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225720] Merge Review: eject In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911252137.nAPLbKAN030731@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225720 --- Comment #3 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-11-25 16:37:19 EDT --- Wow, it almost took 3 years ;-) I'll have another look at the newer version soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 21:56:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:56:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225720] Merge Review: eject In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911252156.nAPLuTv3003288@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225720 --- Comment #4 from Kamil Dudka 2009-11-25 16:56:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Wow, it almost took 3 years ;-) Glad to see the review is not actually dead! Sorry for the delay, I am new to eject, so that I somehow missed the bug before. I've spotted yet another issue with eject. Its upstream seems to be dead and the source URL is no longer valid for 2.1.5. Moreover I didn't find any other mirror providing this version of eject. I don't know what's the proper way to deal with it. Any idea? > I'll have another look at the newer version soon. Thanks in advance! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 21:57:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:57:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225720] Merge Review: eject In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911252157.nAPLvC9I021336@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225720 Kamil Dudka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|than at redhat.com |ruben at rubenkerkhof.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 22:11:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:11:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225720] Merge Review: eject In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911252211.nAPMBxd0007448@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225720 --- Comment #5 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-11-25 17:11:58 EDT --- I guess that just made Fedora the upstream :-) If you want you can ask for a project on fedorahosted: https://fedorahosted.org/web/new -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 22:39:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:39:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911252239.nAPMdDo1032356@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #36 from Peter Galbraith 2009-11-25 17:39:11 EDT --- > @Peter > > Where is the upload? Since the question was directly at me, I presume that Arun assumed that you were talking about the _upstream_ sources that I provide, not the RedHat packaging that he provides. That appears to be at : http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/ http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/emacs-goodies.spec but the very latest isn't packaged. It can sometimes be a fast-moving target followed by months of inactivity. Peter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 23:11:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:11:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225720] Merge Review: eject In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911252311.nAPNB4AE008395@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225720 --- Comment #6 from Kamil Dudka 2009-11-25 18:11:03 EDT --- A long term plan is to include its sources to linux-util-ng project. As a side effect we can share part of its code with other utilities (e.g. mount). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 23:34:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:34:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538297] Review Request: openvas-server - Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911252334.nAPNY6Dc029664@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538297 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |538298 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 23:32:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:32:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538296] Review Request: openvas-libnasl - Support for NASL scripting language in OpenVAS Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911252332.nAPNWhbU029389@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538296 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |538297 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 23:34:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:34:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538296] Review Request: openvas-libnasl - Support for NASL scripting language in OpenVAS Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911252334.nAPNY53n029642@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538296 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |538298 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 23:32:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:32:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538035] Review Request: openvas-libraries - Support libraries for Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911252332.nAPNWgUR029367@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538035 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |538297 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 23:34:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:34:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538035] Review Request: openvas-libraries - Support libraries for Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911252334.nAPNY5PG029619@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538035 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |538298 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 23:32:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:32:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538297] Review Request: openvas-server - Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911252332.nAPNWfVW029338@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538297 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xavier at bachelot.org Depends on| |538035, 538296 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 23:34:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:34:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538298] Review Request: openvas-plugins - Security check plugins for OpenVAS server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911252334.nAPNY4vN029590@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538298 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xavier at bachelot.org Depends on| |538035, 538297, 538296 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 23:33:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:33:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538297] Review Request: openvas-server - Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911252333.nAPNX81Z014607@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538297 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |538299 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 23:33:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:33:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538299] Review Request: openvas-client - Client component of Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911252333.nAPNX7tp014582@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538299 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xavier at bachelot.org Depends on| |538297 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 23:32:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:32:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538035] Review Request: openvas-libraries - Support libraries for Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911252332.nAPNWBN4014390@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538035 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |538296 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 23:32:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:32:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538296] Review Request: openvas-libnasl - Support for NASL scripting language in OpenVAS Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911252332.nAPNWAQO014357@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538296 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xavier at bachelot.org Depends on| |538035 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 23:35:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:35:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538035] Review Request: openvas-libraries - Support libraries for Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911252335.nAPNZTxo015374@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538035 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |525159 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 23:32:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:32:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541462] New: Review Request: rasmol - Molecular Graphics Visualization Tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rasmol - Molecular Graphics Visualization Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541462 Summary: Review Request: rasmol - Molecular Graphics Visualization Tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: carl at five-ten-sg.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.five-ten-sg.com/rasmol.spec SRPM URL: http://www.five-ten-sg.com/rasmol-2.7.5-3.fc12.src.rpm Description: RasMol is an X Window System tool intended for the visualization of proteins and nucleic acids. It reads Brookhaven Protein Database (PDB) files and interactively renders them in a variety of formats on either an 8-bit or 24/32-bit color display. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 23:51:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:51:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541463] New: Review Request: garmin-sync - Download data from Garmin fitness computers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: garmin-sync - Download data from Garmin fitness computers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541463 Summary: Review Request: garmin-sync - Download data from Garmin fitness computers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tony at bakeyournoodle.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://bakeyournoodle.com/~tony/fedora/garmin-sync/garmin-sync.spec SRPM URL: http://bakeyournoodle.com/~tony/fedora/garmin-sync/garmin-sync-0.3-3.fc12.src.rpm Description: garmin-sync allows you to download information from your Garmin Edge and Forerunner devices. NOTE: this is a review request as garmin-sync has been orphaned/retired for F-12 but is still maintained for F-11. I'd like to maintain it for F-12 and later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 23:53:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:53:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541463] Review Request: garmin-sync - Download data from Garmin fitness computers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911252353.nAPNrENe002773@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541463 --- Comment #1 from Tony Breeds 2009-11-25 18:53:13 EDT --- FWIW, here is a koji build and RPMlint output http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1831252 [tony at thor F-12]$ rpmlint -vi *spec ~/Download/garmin-sync* garmin-sync.noarch: I: checking garmin-sync.src: I: checking 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 00:04:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:04:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521995] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-java-tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911260004.nAQ04cIZ005373@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521995 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Wright 2009-11-25 19:04:36 EDT --- * Tue Nov 24 2009 Matthew Harmsen 1.3.0-3 - Bugzilla Bug #521995 - Packaging for Fedora Dogtag PKI - Use "_javadir" macro when appropriate - Move jar file to top-level Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-java-tools/pki-java-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-java-tools/pki-java-tools-1.3.0-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 00:54:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:54:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533993] Review Request: wordpress-plugin-bad-behavior - Spam prevention plugin for WordPress In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911260054.nAQ0sAnm003208@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533993 Nick Bebout changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Nick Bebout 2009-11-25 19:54:08 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: wordpress-plugin-bad-behavior Short Description: Bad Behavior is a PHP-based solution for blocking link spam and the robots which deliver it. Owners: nb Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 00:55:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:55:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533765] Review Request: fedora-accessibility-guide-en-US - Using Fedora with a visual, hearing, or mobility impairment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911260055.nAQ0tXTM019271@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533765 Ryan Rix changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |phrkonaleash at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Ryan Rix 2009-11-25 19:55:32 EDT --- I can take this :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 00:57:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:57:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533765] Review Request: fedora-accessibility-guide-en-US - Using Fedora with a visual, hearing, or mobility impairment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911260057.nAQ0vXJQ003963@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533765 Ryan Rix changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |phrkonaleash at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 01:30:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:30:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 231861] Merge Review: cyrus-imapd - high-performance mail server (IMAP, POP3, ...) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911260130.nAQ1UZwj027982@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231861 --- Comment #16 from Mads Kiilerich 2009-11-25 20:30:31 EDT --- Ok, another round of comments/questions: MIT license? AFAICS the COPYRIGHT file is BSD. The CMU entry on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing is internally inconsistent, and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/MIT#CMU_Style isn't the cyrus license - AFAIK that license has never applied to cyrus. _cyrusconf seems like a bit of overkill. Haven't all the versions in the requirements been irrelevant for ages? Shouldn't most of the renamings and other file hackings in %build be in %prep? Why this "if pkg-config openssl" thing? When and why does it apply? pushd before "perl -pi" and use of "$(ls *x)" isn't needed - I would prefer the simple version It seems like there is no need for cleanup of "*~" and "*.html.*". Why do %pre stop the service but pretend it is running? Is the chattr in %post OK? It might be a good idea, but is it OK that a package does it automatically? Shouldn't it be in README.RPM instead? Anyway, why not just chattr -R +S %{_var}/lib/imap/{user,quota} %{_var}/spool/imap Shouldn't the certificate creation be moved to service start where it is more transparent what goes on, just like /etc/rc.d/init.d/sshd does? Why is the user and group (and csync) created by the utils package %pre which doesn't use them? Move to main package? Wouldn't it be better if csync were included in the setup packages /etc/services? Is it relevant to include html versions of the man pages? Much of README.RPM is outdated or irrelevant. I think "chkconfig cyrus-imapd on" should be mentioned. README.buildoptions doesn't exist. And postfix shouldn't be discriminated ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 02:13:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:13:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541483] New: Review Request: MakerDialog - Utility that conveniently handle configuration properties Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: MakerDialog - Utility that conveniently handle configuration properties https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541483 Summary: Review Request: MakerDialog - Utility that conveniently handle configuration properties Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dchen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/MakerDialog.spec SRPM URL: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/MakerDialog-0.1.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: MakerDialog is an utility that conveniently handle configuration properties by producing corresponding UI widgets and load/save functions. It generates corresponding UI widgets according to the specification of configuration properties, such as data type, default value, valid values and limitation. Developers no longer need to worry about the event handling details of various toolkit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 03:33:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:33:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541491] Review Request: rubygem-ruby_parser - A ruby parser written in pure ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911260333.nAQ3XpHa027283@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541491 Matthew Kent changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |541185 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 03:33:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:33:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541185] Review Request: rubygem-sexp_processor - A branch of ParseTree providing generic sexp processing tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911260333.nAQ3Xqme027307@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541185 Matthew Kent changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |541491 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 03:33:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:33:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541491] New: Review Request: rubygem-ruby_parser - A ruby parser written in pure ruby Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-ruby_parser - A ruby parser written in pure ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541491 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-ruby_parser - A ruby parser written in pure ruby Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mkent at magoazul.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SPECS/rubygem-ruby_parser.spec SRPM URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SRPMS/rubygem-ruby_parser-2.0.4-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: ruby_parser (RP) is a ruby parser written in pure ruby (utilizing racc - which does by default use a C extension). RP's output is the same as ParseTree's output: s-expressions using ruby's arrays and base types. mkent at fedora-devel-chef:~/rpmbuild/SPECS$ rpmlint rubygem-ruby_parser.spec /var/tmp/results/rubygem-ruby_parser-* rubygem-ruby_parser-doc.noarch: W: no-documentation rubygem-ruby_parser-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/ruby_parser-2.0.4/ri/RubyParser/Environment/dynamic%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-ruby_parser-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/ruby_parser-2.0.4/ri/RubyParser/Environment/used%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-ruby_parser-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/ruby_parser-2.0.4/ri/RubyParser/Environment/%5b%5d%3d-i.yaml %5b rubygem-ruby_parser-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/ruby_parser-2.0.4/ri/RubyLexer/src%3d-i.yaml %3d rubygem-ruby_parser-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/ruby_parser-2.0.4/ri/RubyLexer/lex_state%3d-i.yaml %3d rubygem-ruby_parser-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/ruby_parser-2.0.4/ri/RubyParserGauntlet/should_skip%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-ruby_parser-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/ruby_parser-2.0.4/ri/RubyParser/Environment/%5b%5d-i.yaml %5b rubygem-ruby_parser-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/ruby_parser-2.0.4/ri/RPStringScanner/begin_of_line%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-ruby_parser-doc.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ruby_parser-2.0.4/.autotest 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 10 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 04:24:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 23:24:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541494] New: Review Request: openvas-client : openvas-client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: openvas-client : openvas-client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541494 Summary: Review Request: openvas-client : openvas-client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: huzaifas at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/spec/openvas-client.spec SRPM URL: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/srpms/openvas-client-2.0.5-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: I already have openvas-libraries in Fedora, i want to complete the entire stack. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1831391 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 04:46:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 23:46:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526204] Review Request: ucs-miscfixed-fonts selected set of bitmap fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911260446.nAQ4kJNJ029790@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526204 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #19 from Pravin Satpute 2009-11-25 23:46:18 EDT --- built for rawhide :) thanks nicholas, kevin and toshio for helping in completing new package process -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 05:43:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 00:43:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520352] Review Request: python-pip - Pip installs packages. Python packages. An easy_install replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911260543.nAQ5h0SX025303@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520352 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-26 00:42:59 EDT --- python-pip-0.4-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-pip-0.4-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 05:46:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 00:46:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520352] Review Request: python-pip - Pip installs packages. Python packages. An easy_install replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911260546.nAQ5kIse010663@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520352 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-26 00:46:18 EDT --- python-pip-0.4-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-pip-0.4-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 05:50:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 00:50:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520352] Review Request: python-pip - Pip installs packages. Python packages. An easy_install replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911260550.nAQ5ocW9011539@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520352 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-26 00:50:37 EDT --- python-pip-0.4-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-pip-0.4-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 05:47:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 00:47:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520352] Review Request: python-pip - Pip installs packages. Python packages. An easy_install replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911260547.nAQ5lPaN010845@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520352 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-26 00:47:25 EDT --- python-pip-0.4-1.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-pip-0.4-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 06:07:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:07:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539486] Review Request: perl-Data-AsObject - Easy OO access to complex perl data structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911260607.nAQ67QDg030838@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539486 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-11-26 01:07:25 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1824122 - rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM. perl-Data-AsObject.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/perl-Data-AsObject-0.05/Changes perl-Data-AsObject.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/perl-Data-AsObject-0.05/README ==> Fix this + source files match upstream url (sha1sum) 9dcabb784c07512611dc4d033fc2652d027c0a2d Data-AsObject-0.05.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=13, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.00 sys + 0.10 cusr 0.00 csys = 0.13 CPU) + Package perl-Data-AsObject-0.05-1.fc13.noarch => Provides: perl(Data::AsObject) = 0.05 perl(Data::AsObject::Array) perl(Data::AsObject::Hash) Requires: perl(Carp) perl(Data::AsObject) perl(Data::AsObject::Array) perl(Data::AsObject::Hash) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application Suggestions: 1) you can fix rpmlint warnings by adding following lines to %prep section of spec sed -i 's/\r//' Changes README APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 06:31:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:31:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539983] Review Request: qjson - qt-based library that maps JSON data to QVariant object In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911260631.nAQ6VgiU021525@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539983 --- Comment #4 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-11-26 01:31:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > OK... Its gonna be obvious now that I'm no developer. I've managed to address > some of the issues as detailed below. It's all okay. Nobody is born as a programmer. I will try to be as explicit as possible. > > - Split off development libraries to its own package > - Modified licensing in spec file to reflect GPL2 code though docs state that > qjson licensed under LPGL > - Uncommeted and corrected sed line in this spec file > > > I'm open to any suggestions and comments you may have regarding the following > issues: > > - I have no idea how to run the tests. When you are running "%{cmake} ..", you can add the flag "-DQJSON_BUILD_TESTS=1" so the tests are built. i.e. %{cmake} .. -DQJSON_BUILD_TESTS=1 Then in the %check section you will execute these tests. Something like %check LD_PRELOAD=%{_target_platform}/%{_lib}/libqjson.so %{_target_platform}/tests/testparser LD_PRELOAD=%{_target_platform}/%{_lib}/libqjson.so %{_target_platform}/tests/testserializer If you don't use LD_PRELOAD, the tests will fail because it can't access the library you just built. > - How do I compile the doxygen doc? Can that be done during rpmbuild? Add BR: doxygen. Then in the doc/ directory, just run doxygen It will create an html/ direcory inside doc/ add this directory to the %doc of the devel subpackage. > - Since this is a development package, it would probably be best if this > was a multilib package. How do I accomplish that? You don't need to do anything about multilib. Releng takes care of that. > - I thought the %defattr macro conferred ownership to files and directories > being installed. Please correct me. Think of it this way: All files and directories are some entries in the filesystem. Directories are special kind of "files". Now each RPM must either own the directory it puts a file inside, or it must require a package that owns a directory. This package puts a file inside %{_includedir}/qjson/ but this directory is not owned by any package! You must own this directory with the devel subpackage. So replace the line %{_includedir}/qjson/*.h with either %{_includedir}/qjson/ or %dir %{_includedir}/qjson %{_includedir}/qjson/*.h so that the directory is owned. I hope you got the idea. This must be satisfied by any package in Fedora. > - Where can I find an example to properly add FindQJSON.cmake as a requirment? > Or better yet and quicker if you could detail the correct line. > I don't know exactly. You might want to do some research. However, I see that cmake package put a lot of modules into /usr/share/cmake/Modules/ so you might want to move that file into that directory in %install. Also I believe that this file must go to the devel package. Note that you will need to require cmake (for the devel package) for directory ownership. But as I said, I don't know exactly. Please check this. > Looking very forward to your feedback and thankyou very much for your help > > > Spec URL: http://orbsky.homelinux.org/packages/qjson.spec > SRPM URL: http://orbsky.homelinux.org/packages/qjson-0.6.3-2.fc11.src.rpm You are welcome. One more thing (at least) need to be fixed. In Fedora the files %{_libdir}/libfoo.so.* go to the main library package, whereas the single file, which is a symlink %{_libdir}/libfoo.so goes to the devel package. Please fix this in your package accordingly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 06:38:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:38:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226313] Merge Review: ppp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911260638.nAQ6cnTU006342@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226313 --- Comment #2 from Jiri Popelka 2009-11-26 01:38:47 EDT --- Sorry for the false positive about latest version not being packaged. There's ppp-2.4.5.tar.gz in devel branch and matches upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 06:45:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:45:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541317] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Structured - Medium-weight, MVC, DB web framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911260645.nAQ6jbE5024975@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541317 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-11-26 01:45:36 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1831408 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url (sha1sum) 45930fb4af73e549dbc02fd4639be21110e66c0e CGI-Application-Structured-0.003.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=2, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.01 sys + 0.16 cusr 0.03 csys = 0.22 CPU) + Package perl-CGI-Application-Structured-0.003-1.fc13.noarch=> Provides: perl(CGI::Application::Structured) = 0.003 Requires: perl(CGI::Application::Plugin::AutoRunmode) perl(CGI::Application::Plugin::ConfigAuto) perl(CGI::Application::Plugin::DBH) perl(CGI::Application::Plugin::DBIC::Schema) perl(CGI::Application::Plugin::FillInForm) perl(CGI::Application::Plugin::Forward) perl(CGI::Application::Plugin::LogDispatch) perl(CGI::Application::Plugin::Redirect) perl(CGI::Application::Plugin::Session) perl(CGI::Application::Plugin::SuperForm) perl(CGI::Application::Plugin::TT) perl(CGI::Application::Plugin::ValidateRM) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 07:03:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 02:03:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541491] Review Request: rubygem-ruby_parser - A ruby parser written in pure ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911260703.nAQ73xBW012535@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541491 Matthew Kent changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |541512 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 07:03:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 02:03:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541512] Review Request: rubygem-ruby2ruby - Generate pure ruby from RubyParser compatible Sexps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911260703.nAQ73vVS012486@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541512 Matthew Kent changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |541185, 541491 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 07:03:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 02:03:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541185] Review Request: rubygem-sexp_processor - A branch of ParseTree providing generic sexp processing tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911260703.nAQ73wPS012517@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541185 Matthew Kent changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |541512 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 07:03:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 02:03:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541512] New: Review Request: rubygem-ruby2ruby - Generate pure ruby from RubyParser compatible Sexps Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-ruby2ruby - Generate pure ruby from RubyParser compatible Sexps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541512 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-ruby2ruby - Generate pure ruby from RubyParser compatible Sexps Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mkent at magoazul.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SPECS/rubygem-ruby2ruby.spec SRPM URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SRPMS/rubygem-ruby2ruby-1.2.4-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: ruby2ruby provides a means of generating pure ruby code easily from RubyParser compatible Sexps. This makes making dynamic language processors in ruby easier than ever! mkent at fedora-devel-chef:~/rpmbuild/SPECS$ rpmlint rubygem-ruby2ruby.spec /var/tmp/results/rubygem-ruby2ruby-* rubygem-ruby2ruby-doc.noarch: W: no-documentation rubygem-ruby2ruby-doc.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ruby2ruby-1.2.4/.autotest 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 07:59:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 02:59:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541524] New: Review Request: a2jmidid - Daemon for exposing ALSA sequencer applications in JACK MIDI system Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: a2jmidid - Daemon for exposing ALSA sequencer applications in JACK MIDI system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541524 Summary: Review Request: a2jmidid - Daemon for exposing ALSA sequencer applications in JACK MIDI system Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oget.fedora at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/a2jmidid.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/a2jmidid-5-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: a2jmidid is a project that aims to ease usage of legacy ALSA sequencer applications, in a JACK MIDI enabled system. There are two ways to use legacy ALSA sequencer applications in JACK MIDI system. The first approach is to use automatic bridging. For every ALSA sequencer port you get one JACK MIDI port. If ALSA sequencer port is both input and output one, you get two JACK MIDI ports, one input and output. The second approach is to static bridges. You start application that creates one ALSA sequencer port and one JACK MIDI port. Such bridge is unidirectional. rpmlint is silent. koji rawhide build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1831682 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 08:35:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:35:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541317] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Structured - Medium-weight, MVC, DB web framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911260835.nAQ8ZiIt020030@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541317 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-11-26 03:34:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > > APPROVED. Thank you! Requesting CVS. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-CGI-Application-Structured Short Description: Medium-weight, MVC, DB web framework Owners: eseyman Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 08:32:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:32:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539486] Review Request: perl-Data-AsObject - Easy OO access to complex perl data structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911260832.nAQ8W8MK019297@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539486 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-11-26 03:32:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > > 1) you can fix rpmlint warnings by adding following lines to %prep section of > spec > sed -i 's/\r//' Changes README Done. Thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Data-AsObject Short Description: Easy OO access to complex perl data structures Owners: eseyman Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 08:52:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:52:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529548] Review Request: mingw32-libogg - MinGW build of the libogg bitstream library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911260852.nAQ8qqjk007831@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529548 --- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-11-26 03:52:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > But there is no way to say to Koji that a > package is noarch, but should be built anyway on i386. Few months ago koji and/or rpm were upgraded, so we can specify builder for the noarch subpackages! See this specs as a starting point: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/openbios/devel/openbios.spec?view=markup -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 08:57:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:57:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541533] New: Review Request: hunspell-si - Sinhala hunspell dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-si - Sinhala hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541533 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-si - Sinhala hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pnemade at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SPECS/hunspell-si.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SRPMS/hunspell-si-0.2-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Sinhala hunspell dictionaries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 08:57:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:57:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529548] Review Request: mingw32-libogg - MinGW build of the libogg bitstream library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911260857.nAQ8vBjG026306@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529548 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-11-26 03:57:09 EDT --- I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 09:01:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 04:01:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541533] Review Request: hunspell-si - Sinhala hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911260901.nAQ91q2k010946@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541533 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |caolanm at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 09:05:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 04:05:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225731] Merge Review: epic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911260905.nAQ95huT029506@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225731 --- Comment #1 from Jiri Popelka 2009-11-26 04:05:42 EDT --- formal review of epic-2.10-6.fc12 is here, see the notes below: YES source files match upstream: 865424a56eaaf674847d0e48bcdbc2c5 sf-1.35.irc.gz 8ed73a76ac758f581d764dc60b708e86 sf-bitchx-scheme.irc.gz dd75ad70b46b331b008d976880899233 sf-eggsandham-scheme.irc.gz 3a7151f0b2913964eb5e38b6c1a2697d sf-light-scheme.irc.gz 90c9dc5fc9f372843f8a0732fba61eb1 sf-perry-scheme.irc.gz 92789d75f12882696817865ea072e44a epic4-2.10.tar.bz2 b28872ca9234650eda6842ffc3425849 epic4-help-current.tar.bz2 YES package meets naming and versioning guidelines. YES specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. YES dist tag is present. YES build root is correct. YES license field matches the actual license. YES license is open source-compatible. YES License text included in package. NO latest version is being packaged. epic4-2.10.1.tar.bz2 was released 09/05/2009 YES BuildRequires are proper. YES compiler flags are appropriate. YES %clean is present. YES package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). YES debuginfo package looks complete. NO rpmlint is silent. >rpmlint epic-2.10-6.fc12.src.rpm epic-2.10-6.fc12.x86_64.rpm epic.x86_64: E: file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/epic/ircII.servers epic.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/epic/help/8_Scripts/nopaste ... epic.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/epic/help/8_Scripts/mkpdir epic.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/epic/script/epic-crypt-gpg-aa 0644 /bin/bash epic.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/epic/script/epic-crypt-gpg 0644 /bin/bash epic.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/epic-2.10/COPYRIGHT epic.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/epic/help/5_Programming/fec epic.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /usr/share/epic/ircII.servers epic.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/epic/ircII.servers 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 87 errors, 1 warnings. YES final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. YES no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. YES owns the directories it creates. YES doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. YES no duplicates in %files. ?? file permissions are appropriate. See some rpmlint errors. YES scriptlets are sane. YES code, not content. YES documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. YES %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. YES no headers. YES no pkgconfig files. YES no libtool .la droppings. YES not a GUI app. Please look at the rpmlint errors and either fix them or confirm they are false positives. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 09:06:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 04:06:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541535] New: Review Request: raul - Realtime Audio Utility Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: raul - Realtime Audio Utility Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541535 Summary: Review Request: raul - Realtime Audio Utility Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oget.fedora at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/raul.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/raul-0.5.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Raul (Realtime Audio Utility Library) is a lightweight C++ convenience library for realtime programming, with a bias towards audio applications on GNU/Linux machines. rpmlint is silent. koji rawhide build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1831767 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 09:08:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 04:08:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541533] Review Request: hunspell-si - Sinhala hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911260908.nAQ98Zsm013272@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541533 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Caolan McNamara 2009-11-26 04:08:33 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1831772 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM except for "Sinhala" not being in the US English dictionary + source files match upstream. 2bca6e63410493f9c70c1b594c55c661 sinhala_spellchecker-0.2-fx.xpi + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English except for "Sinhala" not being in the US English dictionary + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. - License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 09:14:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 04:14:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541533] Review Request: hunspell-si - Sinhala hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911260914.nAQ9E7TI015092@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541533 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Parag 2009-11-26 04:14:05 EDT --- Caolan thanks for quick review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-si Short Description: Sinhala hunspell dictionaries Owners: pnemade Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 09:09:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 04:09:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524190] Review Request: flowcanvas - an interactive Gtkmm/ =?utf-8?q?Gnomecanvasmm_widget_for_=E2=80=9Cboxes_and_lines?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=80=9D_environments?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911260909.nAQ99kDs013663@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524190 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-11-26 04:09:43 EDT --- I believe that the OP wanted to have patchage [1] in Fedora. This is one of the dependencies. Another dependency is raul which I just submitted to review here: bug 541535 [1] http://drobilla.net/software/patchage/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 09:13:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 04:13:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529548] Review Request: mingw32-libogg - MinGW build of the libogg bitstream library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911260913.nAQ9D5Mo031623@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529548 --- Comment #8 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-11-26 04:13:03 EDT --- + rpmlint is silent [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/mingw32-libogg-1.1.4-3.fc12.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. +/- The package meets the Packaging Guidelines, except I don't see any reasons for uysing %defattr(0644,roor,root,0755) instead of %defattr(-,roor,root,-). Could you, please, comment this? + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. + The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included in %doc. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package, match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ sha256sum libogg-1.1.4.tar.gz* 9354c183fd88417c2860778b60b7896c9487d8f6e58b9fec3fdbf971142ce103 libogg-1.1.4.tar.gz 9354c183fd88417c2860778b60b7896c9487d8f6e58b9fec3fdbf971142ce103 libogg-1.1.4.tar.gz.1 [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture (ppc). + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. 0 No need to handle locales. 0 No need to run ldconfig for mingw32 libraries. + The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries. + The package is not designed to be relocatable. + The package owns all directories that it creates. + The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + The package consistently uses macros. + The package contains code, or permissible content. 0 No extremely large documentation files. + Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. 0 No need to separate header files from main package for mingw32-related package. 0 No static libraries. 0 No need to specifically handle pkgconfig(.pc) files for mingw32 (mingw32-filesystem already contains %{_mingw32_libdir}/pkgconfig directory). 0 The package doesn't contain library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1). 0 No devel sub-package for mingw32 packages, since they are intended for devel entirely. 0 The mingw32 package may contain necessary .la libtool archives. This is not a blocker. 0 Not a GUI application. + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. Please, comment/correct %defattr and I'll continue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 09:22:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 04:22:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226106] Merge Review: lrzsz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911260922.nAQ9MkMK002355@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226106 Jiri Popelka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jiri Popelka 2009-11-26 04:22:45 EDT --- formal review of lrzsz-0.12.20-27.fc12 is here, see the notes below: YES source files match upstream: b5ce6a74abc9b9eb2af94dffdfd372a4 lrzsz-0.12.20.tar.gz YES package meets naming and versioning guidelines. YES specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. YES dist tag is present. YES build root is correct. YES license field matches the actual license. YES license is open source-compatible. YES License text included in package. YES latest version is being packaged. YES BuildRequires are proper. YES compiler flags are appropriate. YES %clean is present. YES package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). YES debuginfo package looks complete. YES rpmlint is silent. YES final provides and requires look sane. YES %check is present and all tests pass. YES no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. YES owns the directories it creates. YES doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. YES no duplicates in %files. YES file permissions are appropriate. YES no scriptlets present. YES code, not content. YES documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. YES %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. YES no headers. YES no pkgconfig files. YES no libtool .la droppings. YES not a GUI app. This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 09:50:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 04:50:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526263] Review Request: l7-protocols - Protocol definitions files for l7-filter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911260950.nAQ9oml3010713@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526263 --- Comment #11 from Marcus Moeller 2009-11-26 04:50:47 EDT --- Reworked. Christoph suggested in IRC to include the tests and to place the protocols in %{_datadir} instead of docs. Spec URL: http://www.marcus-moeller.de/share/build/l7-protocols/20090528-4/l7.spec SRPM URL: http://www.marcus-moeller.de/share/build/l7-protocols/20090528-4/l7-20090528-4.fc11.src.rpm Best Regards Marcus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 10:19:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 05:19:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226665] Merge Review: yp-tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911261019.nAQAJWNb004286@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226665 Jiri Popelka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jiri Popelka 2009-11-26 05:19:30 EDT --- formal review of yp-tools-2.9-8.fc12 is here, see the notes below: YES source files match upstream: 19de06a04129ec26773f9198e086fcd4 yp-tools-2.9.tar.bz2 YES package meets naming and versioning guidelines. YES specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. YES dist tag is present. YES build root is correct. YES license field matches the actual license. YES license is open source-compatible. YES License text included in package. NO latest version is being packaged. http://www.linux-nis.org/nis/yp-tools/index.html claims current version is yp-tools-2.10 N/A BuildRequires are proper. YES compiler flags are appropriate. YES %clean is present. YES package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). YES debuginfo package looks complete. NO rpmlint is silent. yp-tools.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot NIS (or YP) client programs. yp-tools.src:11: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes yppasswd yp-tools.src:11: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes yp-clients yp-tools.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot NIS (or YP) client programs. yp-tools.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided yppasswd yp-tools.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided yp-clients YES final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. YES no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. YES owns the directories it creates. YES doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. YES no duplicates in %files. YES file permissions are appropriate. YES no scriptlets present. YES code, not content. YES documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. YES %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. YES no headers. YES no pkgconfig files. YES no libtool .la droppings. YES not a GUI app. I think these above mentioned rpmlint warnings may be omitted. yp-tools-2.9-8.fc12 is all right (I hope version 2.10 will be included in next release) so I'm giving APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 10:18:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 05:18:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226106] Merge Review: lrzsz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911261018.nAQAIP3V019813@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226106 --- Comment #2 from Jiri Popelka 2009-11-26 05:18:24 EDT --- - YES %check is present and all tests pass. + N/A %check is present and all tests pass. But still APPROVED :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 10:46:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 05:46:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537563] Review Request: mingw32-plib - Fedora mingw set of portable game related libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911261046.nAQAkabI027916@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537563 Stefan Riemens changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 10:46:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 05:46:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537563] Review Request: mingw32-plib - Fedora mingw set of portable game related libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911261046.nAQAk6MD027681@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537563 --- Comment #8 from Stefan Riemens 2009-11-26 05:46:04 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-plib Short Description: Fedora mingw set of portable game related libraries Owners: stefanriemens Branches: F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 12:34:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 07:34:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541589] New: Review Request: sqljet - Pure Java SQLite Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sqljet - Pure Java SQLite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541589 Summary: Review Request: sqljet - Pure Java SQLite Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: akurtako at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/sqljet.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/sqljet-1.0.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: SQLJet is an independent pure Java implementation of a popular SQLite database management system. SQLJet is a software library that provides API that enables Java application to read and modify SQLite databases. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 12:41:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 07:41:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541589] Review Request: sqljet - Pure Java SQLite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911261241.nAQCf8o1012980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541589 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 12:51:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 07:51:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524190] Review Request: flowcanvas - an interactive Gtkmm/ =?utf-8?q?Gnomecanvasmm_widget_for_=E2=80=9Cboxes_and_lines?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=80=9D_environments?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911261251.nAQCpeER016949@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524190 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(alibobar at gmail.co | |m) --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-26 07:51:37 EDT --- Setting needinfo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 12:54:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 07:54:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540653] Review Request: jazzy - Java-based spell checker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911261254.nAQCsdwU003328@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540653 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |akurtako at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |akurtako at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 13:04:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:04:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540653] Review Request: jazzy - Java-based spell checker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911261304.nAQD4KJ7020405@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540653 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-11-26 08:04:18 EDT --- First sight: You need to change VER=$(echo $BASE |sed 's/\.jar$/%{version}.jar/') to VER=$(echo $BASE |sed 's/\.jar$/-%{version}.jar/') Note the dash before version it is needed to be that way to keep jpackage scripts differentiating versioned and non-versioned jars. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 13:22:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:22:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526444] Review Request: MyGUI - Fast, simple and flexible GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911261322.nAQDMelC014489@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526444 Guido Grazioli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #26 from Guido Grazioli 2009-11-26 08:22:35 EDT --- Thanks Thomas for your time; i'm changing the summary as requested upstream, which should reflect your request also. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mygui Short Description: free cross-platform GUI library for graphics APIs / engines Owners: guidograzioli Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 13:39:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:39:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 231861] Merge Review: cyrus-imapd - high-performance mail server (IMAP, POP3, ...) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911261339.nAQDdoH9032093@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231861 --- Comment #17 from Michal Hlavinka 2009-11-26 08:39:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > Ok, another round of comments/questions: > > MIT license? AFAICS the COPYRIGHT file is BSD. The CMU entry on > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing is internally inconsistent, and > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/MIT#CMU_Style isn't the cyrus license - > AFAIK that license has never applied to cyrus. oops, you're right, it's BSD license fixed > _cyrusconf seems like a bit of overkill. this was here to set config file version (prefork/no-prefork), but we did not change that for ages, removed fixed > > Haven't all the versions in the requirements been irrelevant for ages? > verified and removed fixed > Shouldn't most of the renamings and other file hackings in %build be in %prep? > fixed > Why this "if pkg-config openssl" thing? When and why does it apply? > (afaik) this was there because there were problems with makefiles, but it's not needed now, removed fixed > pushd before "perl -pi" and use of "$(ls *x)" isn't needed - I would prefer the > simple version > fixed > It seems like there is no need for cleanup of "*~" and "*.html.*". > fixed > Why do %pre stop the service but pretend it is running? > I guess it's for keeping condrestart working. I don't know why there is not just condrestart itself, but I thought it's because there were some race conditions. After searching through cvs history and filled bugs, I was not able to find any complain that condrestart alone does not work. removed fixed > Is the chattr in %post OK? It might be a good idea, but is it OK that a package > does it automatically? Shouldn't it be in README.RPM instead? Anyway, why not > just > chattr -R +S %{_var}/lib/imap/{user,quota} %{_var}/spool/imap > afaik cyrus-imapd expect this behaviour and I don't think this makes any problems. Simplified fixed > Shouldn't the certificate creation be moved to service start where it is more > transparent what goes on, just like /etc/rc.d/init.d/sshd does? > well, would it make any real difference? For example dovecot does the same think. Yes, I know it's bad example since I'm its owner, but I didn't add that part in specs and don't know any other package that creates certificates after installation (except dovecot, cyrus-imapd and openssh). > Why is the user and group (and csync) created by the utils package %pre which > doesn't use them? Move to main package? > well, just a little complicated here. cyrus-imapd requires utils and some of them are executed as cyrus user. But yes, user creation should be in main package. Moved fixed > Wouldn't it be better if csync were included in the setup packages > /etc/services? > I've asked setup maintainer to add csync in /etc/services ( http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=setup.git;a=summary ) waiting for new setup release > Is it relevant to include html versions of the man pages? they are making no harm, but yes, they are not necessary, removed. fixed > > Much of README.RPM is outdated or irrelevant. I think "chkconfig cyrus-imapd > on" should be mentioned. README.buildoptions doesn't exist. And postfix > shouldn't be discriminated ;-) this file seems outdated and not too useful for Fedora, removed fixed -------- btw, there is "discussion" on mailing list where someone asked for including autocreate patch in upstream's repository. I've added there my "me too". Watching for upstream's decision. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 13:53:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:53:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225708] Merge Review: dovecot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911261353.nAQDrnMO023940@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225708 --- Comment #15 from Michal Hlavinka 2009-11-26 08:53:46 EDT --- ping, any update? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 13:59:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:59:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226423] Merge Review: smartmontools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911261359.nAQDxIE3005256@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226423 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 14:02:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:02:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526682] Review Request: django-debug-toolbar - Django debug information about the current request/response In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911261402.nAQE2qKU026605@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526682 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tomspur at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #2 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-26 09:02:51 EDT --- Hi Allisson, this is a nice program, but I currently look into django and start learning it. Without actually know something about django, I don't want to review this ;) _______________________ I did what README.rst told me, but can't get it working... You can find my little testing intro at: http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/django_test/ Maybe you see, what's going wrong... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 14:49:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:49:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 515230] Review Request: python-dmidecode - python extension module to access DMI data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911261449.nAQEnFTP018406@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515230 --- Comment #8 from David Sommerseth 2009-11-26 09:49:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > For -2: > > * %define -> %global > - I meant here: > ------------------------------------------------------------- > 1 %{!?python_sitearch: %define python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c "from > distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib(1)")} > ^^here^^ > 2 %{!?python_ver: %define python_ver %(%{__python} -c "import sys ; print > sys.version[:3]")} > ^^here^^ > ------------------------------------------------------------- Ouch! I oversaw that one. Sorry about that. > * Tarball > (In reply to comment #6) > > First of all, I'm sorry for the mix up between the .src.rpm and the .spec file. > > I'm not sure how that has happened. I'm not in direct control over that web > > space, so I've posted new versions where I have full control over the files. > > The community website will be updated again when the review is completed. > > - Well, is my recognition correct that you are explaining here why > the source tarball changed? (by the way the tarball changed again). The rpms are created by calling 'make rpm' in the source tree. This creates a directory and copy over the needed files and tar is down to a new tarball. This tarball is then used for the rpmbuild which is called via make. When we did this round the last time with the upstream community site, the version numbers did not match complete between the tarball and the spec file, and for some reason I believe an older src.rpm turned up in the community website than what I anticipated. Anyhow, I'm using my space at people.redhat.com now, to avoid any issues. > > * Duplicate files > - Now build.log complains: > ------------------------------------------------------------- > 157 warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/python-dmidecode/pymap.xml > ------------------------------------------------------------- > Note that %files entry: > ------------------------------------------------------------- > %files > foo/ > ------------------------------------------------------------- > (where foo/ is a directory) contains the directory foo/ itself and > all files/directories/etc under foo/: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories#Unversioned Fixed. Unfortunately, I missed that one when reading through the build log yesterday. > !! Requires > (In reply to comment #6) > > In regards to the "Requires" section, this contradicts the message in comment > > #1, where Jason Tibbits says: "rpm finds the delepdency on libxml2.so.2 itself; > > there's no need to specify it manually." And now, rpmlint do give an error: > > > > python-dmidecode.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libxml2-python > > > > I've added it, according to your request, but I am willing to take it away if > > this is not correct. > > - Well, Jason actually said the correct thing (and it has no contradiction > with > my comment). > > Actually > - "Requires: libxml2" is not needed (and should be removed) because > rpmbuild > actomatically detects library related dependency (in this case > libxml2.so.2) > and adds such dependency into binary rpms automatically, which pulls > libxml2 in when trying to install this package by yum. > > - However "Requires: libxml2-python" is needed because rpmbuild cannot > detect > such python module based dependency. > Now rpmlint throws out the error message you pointed out, because the > package name "libxml2-python" contains "lib" string. > However "this one (rpmlint) is bogus; ignore it." (as Jason said). Ahh got it! Okay, then this thing is fixed. I've not done any changes here. Let's hope this version makes you happier :) Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/~dsommers/python-dmidecode/python-dmidecode.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~dsommers/python-dmidecode/python-dmidecode-3.10.7-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 16:02:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:02:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 515230] Review Request: python-dmidecode - python extension module to access DMI data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911261602.nAQG2XBj005542@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515230 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-26 11:02:31 EDT --- Okay. ----------------------------------------------------------- This package (python-dmidecode) is APPROVED by mtasaka ----------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 16:35:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:35:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530301] Review Request: bmpanel2 - NETWM compliant panel for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911261635.nAQGZkl2001409@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530301 --- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-26 11:35:43 EDT --- Well, should I wait until Christoph sponsors you or do you want me to sponsor you? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 16:36:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:36:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 498723] Review Request: eZ Publish In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911261636.nAQGahgg001711@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498723 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|10 |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 16:36:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:36:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541661] New: Merge Review: perl-DBD-SQLite - Self Contained RDBMS in a DBI Driver Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Merge Review: perl-DBD-SQLite - Self Contained RDBMS in a DBI Driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541661 Summary: Merge Review: perl-DBD-SQLite - Self Contained RDBMS in a DBI Driver Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SRPM: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/MergeReview/perl-DBD-SQLite-1.27-2.fc13.src.rpm Spec: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/MergeReview/perl-DBD-SQLite.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 16:41:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:41:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530198] Review Request: rubygem-columnize - Sorts an array in column order In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911261641.nAQGfhlQ003339@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530198 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(kanarip at kanarip.c | |om) --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-26 11:41:42 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 16:44:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:44:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 506100] Review Request: opennhrp - An NHRP implementation for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911261644.nAQGi64X015023@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506100 --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-26 11:44:04 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 16:42:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:42:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911261642.nAQGgXkp014771@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(singh.roshan08 at gm | |ail.com) --- Comment #32 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-26 11:42:31 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 16:40:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:40:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541662] New: Merge Review: perl-Pod-Coverage - Checks if the documentation of a module is comprehensive Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Pod-Coverage - Checks if the documentation of a module is comprehensive https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541662 Summary: Merge Review: perl-Pod-Coverage - Checks if the documentation of a module is comprehensive Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SRPM: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/MergeReview/perl-Pod-Coverage-0.20-3.fc13.src.rpm Spec: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/MergeReview/perl-Pod-Coverage.spec Description: Developers hate writing documentation. They'd hate it even more if their computer tattled on them, but maybe they'll be even more thankful in the long run. Even if not, perlmodstyle tells you to, so you must obey. This module provides a mechanism for determining if the pod for a given module is comprehensive. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 16:43:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:43:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533725] Review Request: rubygem-linecache - Caches (Ruby source) files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911261643.nAQGhHq7003722@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533725 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-26 11:43:16 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 16:49:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:49:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541664] New: Merge Review: perl-Test-Pod - Perl module for checking for POD errors in files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Test-Pod - Perl module for checking for POD errors in files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541664 Summary: Merge Review: perl-Test-Pod - Perl module for checking for POD errors in files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SRPM: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/MergeReview/perl-Test-Pod-1.40-1.fc13.src.rpm Spec: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/MergeReview/perl-Test-Pod.spec Description: Perl module for checking for POD errors in files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 17:00:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 12:00:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911261700.nAQH01E1007300@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #37 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-11-26 11:59:59 EDT --- Bad: - I couldn't download tar ball from upstream vis spectool -g At an additional comment to #36, if you have a new package release, please post the URL to the SPEC file and the source package in the same form as at the beginning of the review request. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 17:00:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 12:00:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541666] New: Merge Review: perl-Test-Pod-Coverage - Check for pod coverage in your distribution Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Test-Pod-Coverage - Check for pod coverage in your distribution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541666 Summary: Merge Review: perl-Test-Pod-Coverage - Check for pod coverage in your distribution Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SRPM: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/MergeReview/perl-Test-Pod-Coverage-1.08-8.fc13.src.rpm Spec: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/MergeReview/perl-Test-Pod-Coverage.spec Description: Perl module for checking for POD errors in files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 17:04:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 12:04:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529254] Review Request: i3 - Improved tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911261704.nAQH4Xft019639@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529254 Andreas Osowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |th0br0 at mkdir.name AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |th0br0 at mkdir.name --- Comment #4 from Andreas Osowski 2009-11-26 12:04:32 EDT --- Koji F13 scratch build: (Status Builds) Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: Koji F12 scratch build: (Status Builds) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1832416 [] Rpmlint output: Source RPM: - Binary RPM(s): i3.i686: W: executable-stack /usr/bin/i3 [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: BSD [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [!] Spec file is legible and written in American English. Please be aware i3 is primarily targeted at advanced users and developers. should rather be: Please be aware that i3 is primarily targeted at advanced users and developers. [!] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 4201fcea46e23e75eaa70bff5bd2bd0abe9aba19 SHA1SUM of download: 0ebfd82125a067730135e9e4fdda7ee8c4877482 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [!] Latest version is packaged. Latest version is 3.d [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. (see Koji scratch build) [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: F12 [x] Package functions as described. [x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. Remaining issues: Fix description Fix source! Package 3.d ? If you can, fix the rpmlint output. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 17:06:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 12:06:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541668] New: Merge Review: perl-XMLPath - XPath parser and evaluator for Perl Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Merge Review: perl-XMLPath - XPath parser and evaluator for Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541668 Summary: Merge Review: perl-XMLPath - XPath parser and evaluator for Perl Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SRPM: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/MergeReview/perl-XML-XPath-1.13-9.fc13.src.rpm Spec: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/MergeReview/perl-XML-XPath.spec Description: XPath parser and evaluator for Perl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 17:28:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 12:28:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541185] Review Request: rubygem-sexp_processor - A branch of ParseTree providing generic sexp processing tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911261728.nAQHSw6G014027@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541185 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-26 12:28:56 EDT --- Okay (I actually reviewed this) ------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (rubygem-sexp_processor) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 18:23:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:23:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537983] Review Request: vpython - 3D Programming In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911261823.nAQINCQH005546@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537983 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-26 13:23:10 EDT --- With boost in the F12-testing repository, the boost patch is not needed anymore. Furthermore, I removed the devel package and ship the *.so file in the main package, because without this program won't work anyway and allways needs to be 'Require'd. ________________________________ Rpmlint is now completely clean: $ rpmlint vpython.spec vpython-5.13-3.fc12.src.rpm noarch/* x86_64/* 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ________________________________ Spec URL: http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/review/vpython.spec SRPM URL: http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/review/vpython-5.13-3.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 18:25:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:25:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 231861] Merge Review: cyrus-imapd - high-performance mail server (IMAP, POP3, ...) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911261825.nAQIPg4q027661@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231861 --- Comment #18 from Mads Kiilerich 2009-11-26 13:25:41 EDT --- >> Shouldn't most of the renamings and other file hackings in %build be in %prep? >> > > fixed How about "Fix permissions on perl programs"? And the removal of cvs files? >> Why do %pre stop the service but pretend it is running? >> > > I guess it's for keeping condrestart working. I don't know why there is not > just condrestart itself, but I thought it's because there were some race > conditions. After searching through cvs history and filled bugs, I was not able > to find any complain that condrestart alone does not work. removed Right. It might be the same as bug 518753#c12 - perhaps it would be better to add a sleep in restart? >> Is the chattr in %post OK? It might be a good idea, but is it OK that a package >> does it automatically? Shouldn't it be in README.RPM instead? Anyway, why not >> just >> chattr -R +S %{_var}/lib/imap/{user,quota} %{_var}/spool/imap >> > > afaik cyrus-imapd expect this behaviour and I don't think this makes any > problems. Simplified Yes, but that behaviour isn't observable by cyrus anyway and "only" serves to "guarantee" the RFC requirement that mails must have reached the discs before being accepted - and that can't be guaranteed that way anyway. 10 years ago it was pushed as best practice by Brad Knowles & co, but I don't think it applies in modern times. AFAICS neither postfix nor sendmail nor dovecot does the same. I suggest asking some FS guru at RH. >> Shouldn't the certificate creation be moved to service start where it is more >> transparent what goes on, just like /etc/rc.d/init.d/sshd does? > > well, would it make any real difference? For example dovecot does the same > think. Yes, I know it's bad example since I'm its owner, but I didn't add that > part in specs and don't know any other package that creates certificates after > installation (except dovecot, cyrus-imapd and openssh). Isn't it more like database initialization - which AFAIK is done in startup script? I think the killer argument is that for live-images and appliances it is very bad that the certificates is created at rpm-install-time. >> Why is the user and group (and csync) created by the utils package %pre which >> doesn't use them? Move to main package? >> > > well, just a little complicated here. cyrus-imapd requires utils and some of > them are executed as cyrus user. But yes, user creation should be in main > package. Moved I noticed the "TODO: merge all sub-packages" - I assume that will solve it anyway? (Even though IIRC some the tools are imap client tools and can be used remotely.) A couple of other nits: Inconsistent use of xargs and -exec for file removal - shouldn't one of them be used consistently? "Generate db config file" isn't exactly legible ... "[ -x /usr/lib/rpm/brp-compress ]" - isn't that a mandatory build requirement? Bashisms in cyrus-imapd.init which is /bin/sh - that is very common, but I guess it is bad? I assume you will give a notice here when the attempt of getting patches upstreamed has been concluded somehow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 18:35:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:35:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541694] Review Request: php-phpunit-File-Iterator - FilterIterator implementation that filters files based on a list of suffixes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911261835.nAQIZ6YX030066@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541694 --- Comment #1 from Christof Damian 2009-11-26 13:35:05 EDT --- This is a dependency for a new version of php-phpunit-phploc rpmlint output: php-phpunit-File-Iterator.noarch: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 18:34:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:34:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541694] New: Review Request: php-phpunit-File-Iterator - FilterIterator implementation that filters files based on a list of suffixes Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-phpunit-File-Iterator - FilterIterator implementation that filters files based on a list of suffixes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541694 Summary: Review Request: php-phpunit-File-Iterator - FilterIterator implementation that filters files based on a list of suffixes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: christof at damian.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SPECS/php-phpunit-File-Iterator.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SRPMS/php-phpunit-File-Iterator-1.1.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: FilterIterator implementation that filters files based on a list of suffixes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 19:23:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 14:23:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529073] Review Request: php-phpunit-phploc - A tool for quickly measuring the size of a PHP project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911261923.nAQJNURv022250@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529073 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 19:51:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 14:51:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540791] Review Request: rubygem-RubyInline - Write foreign code within your ruby code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911261951.nAQJpLWV029474@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540791 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-26 14:51:20 EDT --- Anyway no blockers. --------------------------------------------------------------- This package (rubygem-RubyInline) is APPROVED by mtasaka --------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 19:50:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 14:50:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540791] Review Request: rubygem-RubyInline - Write foreign code within your ruby code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911261950.nAQJoQ8f029284@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540791 --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-26 14:50:25 EDT --- Some notes: * BuildRequires - "BR: gcc" is redundant because gcc is always installed with mockbuild: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 ( Well, I can guess why you added such explicit "BR: gcc" because actually "rake check" calls gcc while the rebuilt rpm itself is noarch, however still I think "BR: gcc" is redundant ) ! example scripts ------------------------------------------------------- # Organize this in a more typical way mkdir %{buildroot}%{geminstdir}/examples mv %{buildroot}%{geminstdir}/*.rb %{buildroot}%{geminstdir}/examples/ ------------------------------------------------------- - I don't object to this, however I am not sure this is really needed or not, as * these scripts are packaged into -doc subpackage so people will easily find that these scripts are examples or so. * Also $ gem contents --prefix RubyInline expects that these scripts are under %geminstdir. This is NOT a blocker, because we already delete or move files which are expected by $ gem contents, however for this case I don't strictly feel the necessity for moving these files. However again I don't object to this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 20:14:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:14:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529256] Review Request: i3status - Generates a status line for dzen2 or wmii In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911262014.nAQKE9qA002470@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529256 --- Comment #4 from Simon Wesp 2009-11-26 15:14:08 EDT --- http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/i3/i3status.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 20:13:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:13:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529254] Review Request: i3 - Improved tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911262013.nAQKDi0H002384@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529254 --- Comment #5 from Simon Wesp 2009-11-26 15:13:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Remaining issues: > Fix description i did it, but i haven't create a changelog entry for this. > Fix source! Please download the source defined in source0 and not another one. > Package 3.d ? Done (I already built it but haven't update BZ for it.) > If you can, fix the rpmlint output. I can't http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/i3/i3-3.d-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 20:14:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:14:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529256] Review Request: i3status - Generates a status line for dzen2 or wmii In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911262014.nAQKEPSs022448@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529256 --- Comment #5 from Simon Wesp 2009-11-26 15:14:24 EDT --- http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/i3/i3status-2.0-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 20:23:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:23:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529254] Review Request: i3 - Improved tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911262023.nAQKNLdk004565@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529254 Andreas Osowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Andreas Osowski 2009-11-26 15:23:21 EDT --- ******************** ***** APPROVED ***** ******************** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 20:27:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:27:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529544] Review Request: php-phpunit-bytekit - A command-line tool built on the PHP Bytekit extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911262027.nAQKReel025437@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529544 --- Comment #4 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-11-26 15:27:39 EDT --- SPEC: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/php-phpunit-bytekit.spec SRPM: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/php-phpunit-bytekit-1.0.0-2.fc12.src.rpm RPM: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/php-phpunit-bytekit-1.0.0-2.fc12.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 20:43:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:43:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541724] New: Review Request: gtk-chtheme - Gtk+ 2.0 theme preview and selection made slick Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gtk-chtheme - Gtk+ 2.0 theme preview and selection made slick https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541724 Summary: Review Request: gtk-chtheme - Gtk+ 2.0 theme preview and selection made slick Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iamdexpl at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dexpl.shell.tor.hu/rpms/fc12/gtk-chtheme-0.3.1/gtk-chtheme.spec SRPM URL: http://dexpl.shell.tor.hu/rpms/fc12/gtk-chtheme-0.3.1/gtk-chtheme-0.3.1-2.fc12.src.rpm Description: This little program lets you change your Gtk+ 2.0 theme. The aim is to make theme preview and selection as slick as possible. Themes installed on the system are presented for selection and previewed on the fly. A large variety of widgets provides a comprehensive demonstration. Hello! This app could be useful for gtk applications users, especially for those who use gtk apps outside of GNOME. It successfully builds in mock and runs at least on x86_64. Build log is available at http://dexpl.shell.tor.hu/rpms/fc12/gtk-chtheme-0.3.1/ . rpmlint output is $ rpmlint -v fc12/gtk-chtheme-0.3.1/*.rpm gtk-chtheme.src: I: checking gtk-chtheme.x86_64: I: checking gtk-chtheme-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. This is my first package and I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 20:47:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:47:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541724] Review Request: gtk-chtheme - Gtk+ 2.0 theme preview and selection made slick In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911262047.nAQKlv56010512@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541724 Vadim Raskhozhev changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 20:49:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:49:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541724] Review Request: gtk-chtheme - Gtk+ 2.0 theme preview and selection made slick In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911262049.nAQKnunx030872@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541724 Vadim Raskhozhev changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 20:51:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:51:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541724] Review Request: gtk-chtheme - Gtk+ 2.0 theme preview and selection made slick In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911262051.nAQKpg5P011483@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541724 Vadim Raskhozhev changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |gtk-chtheme -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 20:53:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:53:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541589] Review Request: sqljet - Pure Java SQLite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911262053.nAQKrkcd031894@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541589 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-26 15:53:45 EDT --- 0.) The -javadoc subpackage should requires jpackage-utils ...that owns %_javadocdir 1.) Does not build you probably meant to add junit4 to the classpath 2.) You don't use macros consistently please use either $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot} macro but not both The rest is just matter of clean style. Just for your considerations, probably nothing that would block the review: You can do this in one shot, without calling rm: -find -name '*.class' -exec rm -f '{}' \; -find -name '*.jar' -exec rm -f '{}' \; +find \( -name '*.class' -o -name '*.jar' \) -delete -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 21:03:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:03:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541589] Review Request: sqljet - Pure Java SQLite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911262103.nAQL3Xlw014015@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541589 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-26 16:03:32 EDT --- 3.) You do not run the test suite Please do so, ideally in %check section. Seems like you'd need to add a dependency on hamcrest. I'd also suggest replacing Summary with something more descriptive, (i.e. adding "database library" at the end or something like that). The rest looks well * Named and versioned in accordance with guidelines * License ok, license tag correct, license present in package documentation * spec file clean and legible * filelist sane -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 21:02:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:02:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541694] Review Request: php-phpunit-File-Iterator - FilterIterator implementation that filters files based on a list of suffixes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911262102.nAQL2krl001669@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541694 --- Comment #2 from Christof Damian 2009-11-26 16:02:45 EDT --- Spec URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SPECS/php-phpunit-File-Iterator.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SRPMS/php-phpunit-File-Iterator-1.1.0-2.fc12.src.rpm rpmlint output: php-phpunit-File-Iterator.noarch: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. updated files to allow older pear versions, also replaced some command with macros -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 21:13:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:13:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532709] Review Request: xmlbeans - XML-Java binding tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911262113.nAQLDnmA016566@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532709 Bug 532709 depends on bug 532664, which changed state. Bug 532664 Summary: Review Request: saxon9 - Java XPath, XSLT 2.0 and XQuery implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532664 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 21:13:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:13:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532664] Review Request: saxon9 - Java XPath, XSLT 2.0 and XQuery implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911262113.nAQLDmYK016545@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532664 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #9 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-26 16:13:47 EDT --- Saxon 6 is no longer needed. Everything that BRs it was verified to rebuild cleanly; only diveintopython needed Saxon 6 for processing XSLT 1.0 docbook stylesheets. Xalan-J seems to do the job as well. Closing this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 21:17:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:17:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 494695] Review Request: qutim - Multiplatform Instant Messenger on Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911262117.nAQLHk8u017527@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494695 --- Comment #17 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-11-26 16:17:44 EDT --- Thank you. All mentioned issue fixed, except one: > * Also consider removing entirely %doc sections from plugin sub-packages. paths fixed instead, and in plugins packages included its docs (only mrim do not have it because it is absent in upstream tarball) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1832695 http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/qutim/qutim-0.2.0-1.20.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 21:36:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:36:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911262136.nAQLaa5p021856@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 --- Comment #58 from Adam Williamson 2009-11-26 16:36:31 EDT --- OK, I'm looking at the external libraries now. None of the stuff in support/ is actually used. The configure script properly checks for system-wide copies of all those libraries before using the internal copies; they're just there for platforms where systemwide copies aren't available (like WinCE, for instance). you can see this happening in configure.in , and if you run a build of navit in mock and kill it halfway through, you can see that the SUBDIRS variable in navit/navit/support/Makefile is empty. I can stick something in %prep to remove this subdirectory, but I'm not sure anything in the guidelines actually requires that, and I'm reluctant to do anything in the spec file which is not actually necessary to the build or required by the guidelines - can you cite a specific point in the guidelines that requires this kind of thing to actually be *removed* prior to build? On the shapefile stuff, I see what you mean. I'm not getting very far trying to hack it up to build against the system shapefile instead. I'll try and get help from upstream with that. just a note that I'm working on it... -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 21:49:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:49:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541738] New: Review Request: pulseaudio-equalizer - PulseAudio Equalizer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio-equalizer - PulseAudio Equalizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541738 Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio-equalizer - PulseAudio Equalizer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: hicham.haouari at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/pulseaudio-equalizer.spec SRPM URL: http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/pulseaudio-equalizer-2.4-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: PulseAudio Equalizer rpmlint output : none -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 22:30:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:30:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529544] Review Request: php-phpunit-bytekit - A command-line tool built on the PHP Bytekit extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911262230.nAQMUt4G000959@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529544 Christof Damian changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Christof Damian 2009-11-26 17:30:54 EDT --- OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. mock build worked on F10 - rawhide APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 00:24:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:24:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541760] Review Request: bluemindo - Simple yet powerful Audio Player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270024.nAR0ObDA024969@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541760 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |louizatakk at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-26 19:24:34 EDT --- *** Bug 458440 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 00:24:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:24:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458440] Review Request: bluemindo - Simple audio player in python/GTK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270024.nAR0OaUP024931@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458440 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tomspur at fedoraproject.org Blocks|201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) | Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #14 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-26 19:24:34 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 541760 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 00:22:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:22:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541760] New: Review Request: bluemindo - Simple yet powerful Audio Player Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: bluemindo - Simple yet powerful Audio Player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541760 Summary: Review Request: bluemindo - Simple yet powerful Audio Player Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tomspur at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/review/bluemindo.spec SRPM URL: http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/review/bluemindo-0.3-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Bluemindo aims to provide a very simple audio player without any GNOME dependencies. Actually, there are a few players that make everything (but the coffee). That's not Bluemindo's goal: with Bluemindo, you can play your music. That's all. rpmlint is clean. Builds in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1832947 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 00:43:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:43:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270043.nAR0hA55029183@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #38 from Peter Galbraith 2009-11-26 19:43:09 EDT --- Please don't expect to find prior than current versions of the "upstream" source tar file when it is no longer current. Debian doesn't keep them. If you seek that kind of stability, it would be wise to package the stable release which should be still for around a year or so: http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/e/emacs-goodies-el/emacs-goodies-el_29.3.orig.tar.gz http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/e/emacs-goodies-el/emacs-goodies-el_29.3-2.diff.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 00:44:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:44:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270044.nAR0iQxS016321@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #39 from Peter Galbraith 2009-11-26 19:44:25 EDT --- Sorry: s/should be still for around a year/should be still available for around a year/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 01:10:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 20:10:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541764] New: Review Request: gle - Tubing and extrusion library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gle - Tubing and extrusion library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541764 Summary: Review Request: gle - Tubing and extrusion library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fitzsim at fitzsim.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fitzsim.org/packages/gle.spec SRPM URL: http://fitzsim.org/packages/gle-3.1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The GLE tubing and extrusion library consists of a number of C language subroutines for drawing tubing and extrusions. It uses the OpenGL programming API to perform the actual drawing of the tubing and extrusions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 01:16:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 20:16:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541760] Review Request: bluemindo - Simple yet powerful Audio Player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270116.nAR1GLWb023295@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541760 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #2 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-26 20:16:20 EDT --- There are more and more bugs in this programm ( every minute more you have it opened, another one appears... ) Sorry for the noise. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 01:20:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 20:20:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541765] New: Review Request: NanoEngineer-1 - Nano-composite modeling and simulation program Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: NanoEngineer-1 - Nano-composite modeling and simulation program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541765 Summary: Review Request: NanoEngineer-1 - Nano-composite modeling and simulation program Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fitzsim at fitzsim.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fitzsim.org/packages/NanoEngineer-1.spec SRPM URL: http://fitzsim.org/packages/NanoEngineer-1-1.1.1.12-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: NanoEngineer-1 is a 3D multi-scale modeling and simulation program for nano-composites with special support for structural DNA nanotechnology. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 01:20:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 20:20:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541764] Review Request: gle - Tubing and extrusion library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270120.nAR1KrtP005156@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541764 Thomas Fitzsimmons changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |541765 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 01:20:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 20:20:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541765] Review Request: NanoEngineer-1 - Nano-composite modeling and simulation program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270120.nAR1KqgA005133@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541765 Thomas Fitzsimmons changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |541764 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 02:22:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 21:22:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270222.nAR2MKpH017697@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #40 from Arun SAG 2009-11-26 21:22:19 EDT --- Updated to version 31.1-1 SRPMS: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/emacs-goodies-31.1-1.fc11.src.rpm SPECS: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/emacs-goodies.spec koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1832998 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 03:27:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 22:27:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541185] Review Request: rubygem-sexp_processor - A branch of ParseTree providing generic sexp processing tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270327.nAR3RA7e000992@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541185 Matthew Kent changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Matthew Kent 2009-11-26 22:27:09 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-sexp_processor Short Description: A branch of ParseTree providing generic sexp processing tools Owners: mkent Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 03:26:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 22:26:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541185] Review Request: rubygem-sexp_processor - A branch of ParseTree providing generic sexp processing tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270326.nAR3QtGq019877@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541185 --- Comment #2 from Matthew Kent 2009-11-26 22:26:54 EDT --- Thank you for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 03:49:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 22:49:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540791] Review Request: rubygem-RubyInline - Write foreign code within your ruby code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270349.nAR3nHAk007380@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540791 Matthew Kent changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Matthew Kent 2009-11-26 22:49:16 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-RubyInline Short Description: Write foreign code within your ruby code Owners: mkent Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 03:48:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 22:48:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540791] Review Request: rubygem-RubyInline - Write foreign code within your ruby code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270348.nAR3m9MX026248@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540791 --- Comment #4 from Matthew Kent 2009-11-26 22:48:08 EDT --- Thank you for the review. (In reply to comment #2) > Some notes: > > * BuildRequires > - "BR: gcc" is redundant because gcc is always installed > with mockbuild: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 > ( Well, I can guess why you added such explicit "BR: gcc" because > actually "rake check" calls gcc while the rebuilt rpm itself > is noarch, however still I think "BR: gcc" is redundant ) > Noted, thank you for the link. > ! example scripts > ------------------------------------------------------- > # Organize this in a more typical way > mkdir %{buildroot}%{geminstdir}/examples > mv %{buildroot}%{geminstdir}/*.rb %{buildroot}%{geminstdir}/examples/ > ------------------------------------------------------- > - I don't object to this, however I am not sure this is > really needed or not, as > * these scripts are packaged into -doc subpackage so people > will easily find that these scripts are examples or so. > * Also $ gem contents --prefix RubyInline expects that these > scripts are under %geminstdir. > This is NOT a blocker, because we already delete or move files > which are expected by $ gem contents, however for this > case I don't strictly feel the necessity for moving these > files. > > However again I don't object to this. You're right - I should leave this up to the upstream developers. Spec URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SPECS/rubygem-RubyInline.spec SRPM URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SRPMS/rubygem-RubyInline-3.8.3-3.fc13.src.rpm * Thu Nov 26 2009 Matthew Kent - 3.8.3-3 - Drop redundant BR for gcc (#540791) - Leave examples as upstream intended (#540791) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 03:54:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 22:54:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541793] New: Review Request: woffTools - Tool for manipulating and examining WOFF files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: woffTools - Tool for manipulating and examining WOFF files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541793 Summary: Review Request: woffTools - Tool for manipulating and examining WOFF files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pnemade at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SPECS/woffTools.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SRPMS/woffTools-0.1-0.1.684svn.fc12.src.rpm Description: Tool for manipulating and examining WOFF files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 03:54:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 22:54:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541792] New: Review Request: woff - Encoding and Decoding for Web Open Font Format(Woff) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: woff - Encoding and Decoding for Web Open Font Format(Woff) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541792 Summary: Review Request: woff - Encoding and Decoding for Web Open Font Format(Woff) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pnemade at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SPECS/woff.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SRPMS/woff-0.20091126-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Encoding and Decoding for Web Open Font Format(Woff) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 05:19:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:19:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541512] Review Request: rubygem-ruby2ruby - Generate pure ruby from RubyParser compatible Sexps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270519.nAR5JS4R030003@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541512 Matthew Kent changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |541807 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 05:19:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:19:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540791] Review Request: rubygem-RubyInline - Write foreign code within your ruby code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270519.nAR5JR4U029964@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540791 Matthew Kent changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |541807 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 05:19:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:19:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541807] Review Request: rubygem-ParseTree - Extracts the parse tree for a class/method and returns an s-expression In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270519.nAR5JQln029938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541807 Matthew Kent changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |541512, 540791, 541185 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 05:19:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:19:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541185] Review Request: rubygem-sexp_processor - A branch of ParseTree providing generic sexp processing tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270519.nAR5JRd4029985@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541185 Matthew Kent changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |541807 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 05:19:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:19:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541807] New: Review Request: rubygem-ParseTree - Extracts the parse tree for a class/method and returns an s-expression Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-ParseTree - Extracts the parse tree for a class/method and returns an s-expression https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541807 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-ParseTree - Extracts the parse tree for a class/method and returns an s-expression Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mkent at magoazul.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SPECS/rubygem-ParseTree.spec SRPM URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SRPMS/rubygem-ParseTree-3.0.4-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: ParseTree is a C extension (using RubyInline) that extracts the parse tree for an entire class or a specific method and returns it as a s-expression (aka sexp) using ruby's arrays, strings, symbols, and integers. mkent at fedora-devel-chef:~/rpmbuild/SPECS$ rpmlint rubygem-ParseTree.spec /var/tmp/results/rubygem-ParseTree-* rubygem-ParseTree-doc.noarch: W: no-documentation rubygem-ParseTree-doc.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ParseTree-3.0.4/.autotest rubygem-ParseTree-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/ParseTree-3.0.4/ri/ParseTreeGauntlet/should_skip%3f-i.yaml %3f 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 05:21:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:21:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540127] =?utf-8?q?_Review_Request=EF=BC=9A_qterm_---_BBS_cli?= =?utf-8?q?ent_designed_for_BBS_browsing?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270521.nAR5LK8n017666@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540127 supercyper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Rquest? qterm --- |Review Request? qterm --- |BBS client designed for BBS |BBS client designed for BBS |browsing |browsing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 05:27:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:27:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530986] Review Request: janino - An embedded Java compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270527.nAR5RChR032165@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530986 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-27 00:27:10 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 05:25:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:25:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541004] Review Request: pkcs11-dump - Small utility for querying PKCS#11 modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270525.nAR5P0VE031441@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541004 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-27 00:24:59 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 05:27:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:27:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541533] Review Request: hunspell-si - Sinhala hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270527.nAR5Rvdc019035@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541533 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-27 00:27:55 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 05:29:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:29:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538087] Review Request: dgc - A system for the creation of digital circuits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270529.nAR5TRjf019242@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538087 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-27 00:29:26 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 05:31:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:31:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537454] Review Request: eclipse-emf-transaction - A model management layer for managing EMF resources In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270531.nAR5ViTd019984@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537454 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-27 00:31:43 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 05:30:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:30:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537452] Review Request: eclipse-emf-validation - Verify the integrity of EMF models In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270530.nAR5USam000564@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537452 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-27 00:30:27 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 05:32:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:32:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540791] Review Request: rubygem-RubyInline - Write foreign code within your ruby code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270532.nAR5WdDc000926@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540791 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-27 00:32:38 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 05:34:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:34:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539486] Review Request: perl-Data-AsObject - Easy OO access to complex perl data structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270534.nAR5YB6A001324@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539486 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-27 00:34:10 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 05:33:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:33:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541185] Review Request: rubygem-sexp_processor - A branch of ParseTree providing generic sexp processing tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270533.nAR5XOBg001182@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541185 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-27 00:33:23 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 05:36:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:36:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516523] Review Request: globus-duct-common - Globus Toolkit - Globus Duct Common In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270536.nAR5aC9b002177@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516523 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-27 00:36:11 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 05:35:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:35:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541317] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Structured - Medium-weight, MVC, DB web framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270535.nAR5Z219001879@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541317 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-27 00:35:01 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 05:39:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:39:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516535] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-scripts - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Job ManagerScripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270539.nAR5dXWT002851@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516535 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-27 00:39:32 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 05:38:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:38:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516531] Review Request: globus-gass-cache-program - Globus Toolkit - Tools to manipulate local and remote GASS caches In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270538.nAR5cOVG002644@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516531 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-27 00:38:23 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 05:36:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:36:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516525] Review Request: globus-duroc-common - Globus Toolkit - DUROC Common Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270536.nAR5assj021378@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516525 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-27 00:36:53 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 05:51:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:51:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526444] Review Request: MyGUI - Fast, simple and flexible GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270551.nAR5pEH8024716@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526444 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #27 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-27 00:51:12 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 05:52:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:52:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538046] Review Request: spacewalk-certs-tools - Spacewalk SSL Key/Cert Tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270552.nAR5qPpa025020@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538046 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-27 00:52:24 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 05:54:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:54:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507083] Review Request: poco - C++ class libraries for network-centric applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270554.nAR5suXs025448@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507083 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #33 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-27 00:54:55 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 05:53:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:53:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537563] Review Request: mingw32-plib - Fedora mingw set of portable game related libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270553.nAR5rNM8025176@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537563 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-27 00:53:22 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 05:56:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:56:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533993] Review Request: wordpress-plugin-bad-behavior - Spam prevention plugin for WordPress In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270556.nAR5uBOx026010@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533993 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-27 00:56:10 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 05:57:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:57:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 198928] Review Request: lsscsi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270557.nAR5vZFf007222@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=198928 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #20 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-27 00:57:34 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 05:56:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:56:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 290771] Review Request: gsoap - Generator Tools for Coding SOAP/XML Web Services in C and C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270556.nAR5uus1026304@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290771 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-27 00:56:55 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 06:34:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 01:34:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541533] Review Request: hunspell-si - Sinhala hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270634.nAR6YHON003456@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541533 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 01:34:16 EDT --- hunspell-si-0.2-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hunspell-si-0.2-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 06:44:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 01:44:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541185] Review Request: rubygem-sexp_processor - A branch of ParseTree providing generic sexp processing tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270644.nAR6iWUS019706@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541185 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 01:44:32 EDT --- rubygem-sexp_processor-3.0.3-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-sexp_processor-3.0.3-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 06:44:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 01:44:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541533] Review Request: hunspell-si - Sinhala hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270644.nAR6iK4K006414@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541533 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 01:44:19 EDT --- hunspell-si-0.2-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hunspell-si-0.2-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 06:43:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 01:43:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541185] Review Request: rubygem-sexp_processor - A branch of ParseTree providing generic sexp processing tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270643.nAR6hpdH006308@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541185 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 01:43:51 EDT --- rubygem-sexp_processor-3.0.3-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-sexp_processor-3.0.3-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 06:49:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 01:49:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541533] Review Request: hunspell-si - Sinhala hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270649.nAR6n6UA007736@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541533 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 07:39:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 02:39:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533744] Review Request: ImageJ - Image Processing and Analysis in Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270739.nAR7dfZ2003046@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533744 --- Comment #10 from D Haley 2009-11-27 02:39:39 EDT --- Hello, Just to be clear, this package is approved and you can place a CVS request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 07:39:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 02:39:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541004] Review Request: pkcs11-dump - Small utility for querying PKCS#11 modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270739.nAR7dlhB003140@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541004 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 02:39:46 EDT --- pkcs11-dump-0.3.3-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pkcs11-dump-0.3.3-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 07:39:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 02:39:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541004] Review Request: pkcs11-dump - Small utility for querying PKCS#11 modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270739.nAR7dqJ8003180@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541004 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 02:39:51 EDT --- pkcs11-dump-0.3.3-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pkcs11-dump-0.3.3-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 07:46:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 02:46:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270746.nAR7khhJ005329@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 Roshan Singh changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(singh.roshan08 at gm | |ail.com) | --- Comment #33 from Roshan Singh 2009-11-27 02:46:40 EDT --- i am having exams right now, i will be free on 30th november. Please tell me what is to be done now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 08:05:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 03:05:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270805.nAR85G10028217@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 --- Comment #34 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-27 03:05:13 EDT --- Current status is that I am waiting for your other review requests submit (as you commented so on the comment 31) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 08:07:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 03:07:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541185] Review Request: rubygem-sexp_processor - A branch of ParseTree providing generic sexp processing tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270807.nAR870rG009686@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541185 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-27 03:06:58 EDT --- Closing this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 08:07:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 03:07:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541512] Review Request: rubygem-ruby2ruby - Generate pure ruby from RubyParser compatible Sexps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270807.nAR873r7009734@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541512 Bug 541512 depends on bug 541185, which changed state. Bug 541185 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-sexp_processor - A branch of ParseTree providing generic sexp processing tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541185 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 08:07:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 03:07:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541807] Review Request: rubygem-ParseTree - Extracts the parse tree for a class/method and returns an s-expression In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270807.nAR875MH009756@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541807 Bug 541807 depends on bug 541185, which changed state. Bug 541185 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-sexp_processor - A branch of ParseTree providing generic sexp processing tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541185 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 08:07:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 03:07:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541491] Review Request: rubygem-ruby_parser - A ruby parser written in pure ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270807.nAR872Hc009713@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541491 Bug 541491 depends on bug 541185, which changed state. Bug 541185 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-sexp_processor - A branch of ParseTree providing generic sexp processing tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541185 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 08:48:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 03:48:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541764] Review Request: gle - Tubing and extrusion library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270848.nAR8mFGY018231@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541764 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |terjeros at phys.ntnu.no --- Comment #1 from Terje R??sten 2009-11-27 03:48:14 EDT --- Note: a package named gle is already in the distro: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/gle Your package need a different name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 09:29:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:29:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539948] Review Request: fqterm ---BBS client based on Qt library in linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270929.nAR9TUuI016345@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539948 supercyper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request? fqterm |Review Request: fqterm |---BBS client based on Qt |---BBS client based on Qt |library in linux |library in linux -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 09:28:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:28:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539948] =?utf-8?q?_Review_Request=EF=BC=9A_fqterm_---BBS_cli?= =?utf-8?q?ent_based_on_Qt_library_in_linux?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270928.nAR9SpZb016163@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539948 supercyper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Rquest? fqterm |Review Request? fqterm |---BBS client based on Qt |---BBS client based on Qt |library in linux |library in linux --- Comment #7 from supercyper 2009-11-27 04:28:49 EDT --- New upstream 0.9.6.3 SPEC: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/fqterm.spec SRPM: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/fqterm-0.9.6.3-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 09:33:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:33:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540127] Review Request: qterm --- BBS client designed for BBS browsing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270933.nAR9X4WH017684@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540127 supercyper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request? qterm --- |Review Request: qterm --- |BBS client designed for BBS |BBS client designed for BBS |browsing |browsing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 09:32:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:32:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541668] Merge Review: perl-XMLPath - XPath parser and evaluator for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270932.nAR9WuRG017645@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541668 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-11-27 04:32:55 EDT --- I wonder how can this package got missed at time of FC-6 when all core packages submitted for their merge-reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 09:32:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:32:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541664] Merge Review: perl-Test-Pod - Perl module for checking for POD errors in files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270932.nAR9WsWN017580@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541664 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-11-27 04:32:52 EDT --- I wonder how can this package got missed at time of FC-6 when all core packages submitted for their merge-reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 09:32:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:32:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541661] Merge Review: perl-DBD-SQLite - Self Contained RDBMS in a DBI Driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270932.nAR9WWOY017463@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541661 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-11-27 04:32:30 EDT --- I wonder how can this package got missed at time of FC-6 when all core packages submitted for their merge-reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 09:32:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:32:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541662] Merge Review: perl-Pod-Coverage - Checks if the documentation of a module is comprehensive In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270932.nAR9WqCc017554@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541662 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-11-27 04:32:32 EDT --- I wonder how can this package got missed at time of FC-6 when all core packages submitted for their merge-reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 09:32:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:32:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541666] Merge Review: perl-Test-Pod-Coverage - Check for pod coverage in your distribution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270932.nAR9WtGI017609@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541666 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-11-27 04:32:54 EDT --- I wonder how can this package got missed at time of FC-6 when all core packages submitted for their merge-reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 09:36:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:36:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225877] Merge Review: guile In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270936.nAR9aXBm032507@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225877 Ondrej Vasik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |ovasik at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ovasik at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 09:38:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:38:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226379] Merge Review: rsh In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270938.nAR9ceAw019104@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226379 Ondrej Vasik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |ovasik at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ovasik at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 09:40:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:40:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226484] Merge Review: telnet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270940.nAR9enY9019908@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226484 Ondrej Vasik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |atkac at redhat.com, | |ovasik at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ovasik at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Ondrej Vasik 2009-11-27 04:40:47 EDT --- Adding current maintainer to CC and taking this review... Adam, could you please take a look on the objections from Patrice ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 09:44:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:44:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226476] Merge Review: talk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270944.nAR9iBCU020686@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226476 Ondrej Vasik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |ovasik at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ovasik at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 09:48:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:48:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225729] Merge Review: enscript In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911270948.nAR9mk29022120@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225729 Ondrej Vasik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |ovasik at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ovasik at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 10:08:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 05:08:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526426] Review Request: OpenGL-gle - A Tubing and Extrusion Library for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271008.nARA8Y45027885@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526426 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fitzsim at fitzsim.org --- Comment #8 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-11-27 05:08:31 EDT --- *** Bug 541764 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 10:08:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 05:08:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541765] Review Request: NanoEngineer-1 - Nano-composite modeling and simulation program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271008.nARA8a1P027907@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541765 Bug 541765 depends on bug 541764, which changed state. Bug 541764 Summary: Review Request: gle - Tubing and extrusion library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541764 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 10:08:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 05:08:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541764] Review Request: gle - Tubing and extrusion library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271008.nARA8Xbk027844@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541764 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-11-27 05:08:31 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 526426 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 10:10:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 05:10:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 510195] Review Request: eclipse-slice2java - A plugin that integrates Eclipse with Ice object middleware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271010.nARAAIXE010332@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510195 Mary Ellen Foster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Mary Ellen Foster 2009-11-27 05:10:14 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: eclipse-slice2java Short Description: A plugin that integrates Eclipse with Ice object middleware Owners: mef Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 10:16:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 05:16:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537563] Review Request: mingw32-plib - Fedora mingw set of portable game related libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271016.nARAGSMm012216@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537563 --- Comment #10 from Stefan Riemens 2009-11-27 05:16:26 EDT --- Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 10:27:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 05:27:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530986] Review Request: janino - An embedded Java compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271027.nARAR3jx015480@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530986 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 05:27:01 EDT --- janino-2.5.15-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/janino-2.5.15-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 10:27:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 05:27:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530986] Review Request: janino - An embedded Java compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271027.nARARweh015700@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530986 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 05:27:58 EDT --- janino-2.5.15-3.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/janino-2.5.15-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 10:29:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 05:29:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539486] Review Request: perl-Data-AsObject - Easy OO access to complex perl data structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271029.nARAT15a001827@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539486 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 05:29:00 EDT --- perl-Data-AsObject-0.05-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Data-AsObject-0.05-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 10:29:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 05:29:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539486] Review Request: perl-Data-AsObject - Easy OO access to complex perl data structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271029.nARAT6aY001868@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539486 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 05:29:05 EDT --- perl-Data-AsObject-0.05-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Data-AsObject-0.05-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 10:40:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 05:40:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225708] Merge Review: dovecot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271040.nARAePPw005355@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225708 Paul Howarth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(jspaleta at gmail.co | |m) --- Comment #16 from Paul Howarth 2009-11-27 05:40:20 EDT --- Jef, are you still interested in completing this review or would it be OK for someone else to take over? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 10:56:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 05:56:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540368] Review Request: llk_linux - A very popular game from internet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271056.nARAunZ3010162@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540368 supercyper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 10:55:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 05:55:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541207] Review Request: liborigin2 - library for reading OriginLab Origin 7.5 project files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271055.nARAtML2009826@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541207 supercyper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 10:57:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 05:57:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539948] Review Request: fqterm ---BBS client based on Qt library in linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271057.nARAvTu4024730@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539948 supercyper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 10:57:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 05:57:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540127] Review Request: qterm --- BBS client designed for BBS browsing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271057.nARAvc1c010526@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540127 supercyper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 11:00:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 06:00:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541207] Review Request: liborigin2 - library for reading OriginLab Origin 7.5 project files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271100.nARB0fuQ011421@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541207 supercyper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |liborigin2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 11:04:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 06:04:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540368] Review Request: llk_linux - A very popular game from internet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271104.nARB43sr012385@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540368 supercyper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |llk_linux -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 11:05:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 06:05:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531987] Review Request: wtop - top for webserver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271105.nARB5GEq027321@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531987 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 06:05:14 EDT --- lekhonee-gnome-0.8-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lekhonee-gnome-0.8-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 11:09:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 06:09:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539428] Review Request: sparcy - Command line utility for Sparc Systems GPS loggers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271109.nARB9Mib028116@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539428 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 06:07:12 EDT --- sparcy-0.1-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sparcy-0.1-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 11:13:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 06:13:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541668] Merge Review: perl-XML-XPath - XPath parser and evaluator for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271113.nARBDfH3015208@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541668 Marcela Ma?l??ov? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Merge Review: perl-XMLPath |Merge Review: |- XPath parser and |perl-XML-XPath - XPath |evaluator for Perl |parser and evaluator for | |Perl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 11:16:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 06:16:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225286] Merge Review: aspell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271116.nARBGHiW015998@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225286 --- Comment #17 from Ivana Varekova 2009-11-27 06:16:13 EDT --- Hello, thanks for the comments, they are incorporated in aspell-0.60.6-8.fc13 in the last version I move aspell-import to documentation part (in the previous version aspell-import have not executable bit and nobody wants the rights back so I think the better solution is ot put it to the documentation). (In reply to comment #15) > I would even prefer a yet more radical splitting: > > * a -lib package with content of /usr/lib/aspell-0.60, the libs and > the .mo files > > * move the precat, preunzip, prezip, prezip-bin and word-list-compress > binaries either into -devel (afais, they are only used to create > dictionaries), or into a new -utils subpackage > > * move 'aspell-import' into -utils > > * keep aspell, ispell, run-with-aspell, spell and related man pages in > main package. 'aspell' adds a ncurses dep which is not needed by > -libs > > * at first glance, 'aspell.info' contains end user information only > and should stay in main and does not need to be moved into -lib For me the current system seems to be good enough (aspell-import is in documentation section - but nobody wants it) > Other issues: > > * remove the explicit 'Requires: aspell-en'; I am pretty sure that my > mom will never have use for the english dictionary but uses the > german one only fixed > * are all the 'Conflicts:' really required for a recent system? thanks, removed > * the > | Provides: pspell < 0.13 > | Obsoletes: pspell < 0.13 thanks, removed > does not seem to make sense; either write 'Provides: pspell = 0.13', > or remove it completely. Ditto for -devel > > * the > > | Requires(pre): /sbin/install-info > > is wrong and should be 'Requires(post)' thanks, fixed > * /sbin/ldconfig MUST be required the dependency is automatically added - so no need to be there > * afair, there was a rule, that Summary: must not begin with 'A'. thanks, fixed > * the 'exit 0' in the scriptlets does not make sense thanks, fixed Add #16 | exec "$@" is bogus - try e.g. exec "echo hello". Is the package ok now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 11:42:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 06:42:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531987] Review Request: wtop - top for webserver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271142.nARBg2HM004584@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531987 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 06:42:00 EDT --- wtop-0.6.1-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wtop-0.6.1-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 11:58:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 06:58:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534135] Review Request: xstream - Java XML serialization library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271158.nARBw7wi009206@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534135 --- Comment #6 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-27 06:58:06 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1833640 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 11:58:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 06:58:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534168] Review Request: groovy - Agile dynamic language for the Java Platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271158.nARBwjoQ027380@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534168 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-27 06:58:43 EDT --- SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/groovy.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/groovy-1.6.5-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 11:57:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 06:57:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534135] Review Request: xstream - Java XML serialization library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271157.nARBveOQ027145@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534135 --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-27 06:57:38 EDT --- Jochen: Changed to build with OpenJDK, and since we don't build with gcj, AOT was removed as well. SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/xstream.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/xstream-1.2.2-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 12:10:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 07:10:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226484] Merge Review: telnet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271210.nARCAKuh013012@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226484 --- Comment #3 from Adam Tkac 2009-11-27 07:10:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > rpmlint not silent: > > telnet.src:31: W: buildprereq-use ncurses-devel > telnet.src:331: W: macro-in-%changelog setup > telnet.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 79, tab: line 81) > telnet.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch9: telnet-0.17-env-5x.patch > telnet.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch17: telnet-0.17-linemode.patch > telnet.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot The client program for the telnet remote > login protocol. ^^^ Fixed. > telnet.src: W: no-url-tag The telnet client is based on BSD telnet. I've found no official URL for that. I guess source was created as a CVS checknout from (Free)BSD repository. > Buildroot is not among the preferred ones. Fixed. > Where does the telnet-client.tar.gz archive come from? As I wrote above I guess it is checkout from FreeBSD repository. > And also how was generated: > telnet-client-cvs.patch It is probably update from FreeBSD repo. Note that this decision was made by previous maintainer. It's not so wise to completely throw away FreeBSD source and replace it by "official" code. It will cause many regressions. > What is all the strange pie stuff? Important servers are usually compiled as PIEs. Due low-level architecture differences s390 & s390x needs -fPIE. All other supported archs need -fpie. > I would suggest using -p in > install -p -m644 %SOURCE3 ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/etc/xinetd.d/telnet > > It would certainly be better to use %{_sysconfdir} instead of /etc. > > I suggest using %defattr(-,root,root,-) instead of %defattr(-,root,root) > > Also -g is already in RPM_OPT_FLAGS? > > is > export CC_FLAGS="$CC_FLAGS" > really useful since CC_FLAGS looks empty? ^^^ Fixed. All issues should be fixed in telnet-0.17-46.fc13. Rest of rpmlint warnings are not problems: $ rpmlint telnet-0.17-46.fc13.src.rpm telnet.src: W: spelling-error-in-summary en_US login telnet.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary C Telnet telnet.src: W: no-url-tag $ rpmlint telnet-server-0.17-46.fc13.x86_64.rpm telnet-server.x86_64: W: spelling-error-in-summary en_US login telnet-server.x86_64: W: spelling-error-in-description en_US logins telnet-server.x86_64: W: spelling-error-in-description en_US xinetd telnet-server.x86_64: W: no-url-tag $ rpmlint telnet-0.17-46.fc13.x86_64.rpm telnet.x86_64: W: spelling-error-in-summary en_US login telnet.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary C Telnet telnet.x86_64: W: no-url-tag -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 12:13:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 07:13:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532709] Review Request: xmlbeans - XML-Java binding tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271213.nARCD0hP032076@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532709 --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-27 07:12:59 EDT --- SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/xmlbeans.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/xmlbeans-2.4.0-5.src.rpm Please note that the above package has bootstrapping enabled; it would be disable after it's initially built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 12:14:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 07:14:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536684] Review Request: eclipse-mdt-ocl - Implementation of the OCL OMG metamodel for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271214.nARCELTY032466@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536684 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-27 07:14:19 EDT --- Looks well now. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 12:14:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 07:14:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537451] Review Request: eclipse-emf-query - Specify and execute queries against EMF models In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271214.nARCEkPI014099@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537451 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-27 07:14:44 EDT --- Thank you! APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 12:47:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 07:47:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225809] Merge Review: gmp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271247.nARClOwc010151@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225809 --- Comment #26 from Ivana Varekova 2009-11-27 07:47:19 EDT --- Thanks - fixed in gmp-4.3.1-6.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 12:54:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 07:54:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538046] Review Request: spacewalk-certs-tools - Spacewalk SSL Key/Cert Tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271254.nARCsgMT024384@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538046 Miroslav Such? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 12:56:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 07:56:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225719] Merge Review: efax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271256.nARCuetq025212@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225719 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jreznik at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jreznik at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 13:00:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 08:00:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534135] Review Request: xstream - Java XML serialization library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271300.nARD00gg013270@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534135 Michal Ingeli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Michal Ingeli 2009-11-27 07:59:58 EDT --- - builds in koji - license ok * rpmlint not silent: - xstream.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/xstream-1.2.2/LICENSE.txt I also think, that it's not good to touch license, so this is OK. - xstream.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0:1.2.2-3 ['1.2.2-3', '1.2.2-3'] Remove epoch also from changelog Dropping that AOT seems OK, according to [1] it will be no longer required in F13. APPROVED [1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-java-list/2009-November/msg00025.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 13:06:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 08:06:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532709] Review Request: xmlbeans - XML-Java binding tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271306.nARD6peT015176@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532709 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mmahut at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmahut at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 13:06:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 08:06:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540708] Review Request: gant - Groovy-based build system that uses Ant tasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271306.nARD6ZV3028040@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540708 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mmahut at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmahut at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 13:35:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 08:35:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530806] Review Request: Pyrit - A GPGPU-driven WPA-PSK key cracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271335.nARDZtrT022584@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530806 --- Comment #1 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-27 08:35:53 EDT --- *** Bug 491428 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 13:35:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 08:35:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225719] Merge Review: efax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271335.nARDZevq022486@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225719 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-11-27 08:35:39 EDT --- - rpmlint: NOT OK!!! efax.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot A program for faxing using a Class 1, 2 or 2.0 fax modem. efax.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/fax - spec file name: OK - package name: OK - package version: release should start with 0., alpha tag should go to release instead version according to Package Guidelines but as this package can be considered as successor to 0.9 (not pre 0.9) this is OK - license: OK - group: OK - url: OK - sources URL: FAILED to download tarball * correct URL http://www.cce.com/efax/download/efax-0.9a-001114.tar.gz - md5sum: OK (compared to upstream tarball above) - exclude arch: no rules for s390, OK - buildroot: OK - requires: make and probably netpbm-progs (?) should be BuildRequires, not Requires, NOT OK!!! - description: OK - build flags: missing smp_mflags, custom build flags?, NOT OK!!! - macros used consistently: OK - clean section: OK - file attributes: OK - docs: OK - package owns directories: OK - no duplicate files: OK - package builds on: F-12/x86_64 OK Than, please fix/comment issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 13:45:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 08:45:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225916] Merge Review: isdn4k-utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271345.nARDjfWl025257@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225916 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jreznik at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jreznik at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 13:49:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 08:49:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530806] Review Request: Pyrit - A GPGPU-driven WPA-PSK key cracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271349.nARDnUkW026060@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530806 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tomspur at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #2 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-27 08:49:28 EDT --- Just a few comments, because I'm no sponsor anyway: - Some tests are currently failing ( to long to copy&paste here ) - Missing Requires: scapy ( one test fails because of this... ) - The license (as you noted in setup.py) should be GPLv3+ - tests should be part of doc and not installed in /usr/share, except you need them on runtime. Please delete all install* lines from %install and include the tests in the %files section as: %doc test/* This will copy all files from test to /usr/share/doc/%{name}-%{version}/ - You don't own %{_datadir}/%{name}/ just the subfiles. If this package will be deleted on any system out there, the folder %{_datadir}/%{name}/ will stay there... When you install the tests with %doc, this won't be needed anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 13:58:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 08:58:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226192] Merge Review: net-snmp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271358.nARDwx6R029112@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226192 Jan Safranek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #6 from Jan Safranek 2009-11-27 08:58:53 EDT --- Huh, the review is still open... I should have noticed it earlier. It has been quite long time since the review has started and now the net-snmp package looks differently and hopefuly simpler. I have just fixed the errors noted above and prepared net-snmp-5.5-3.fc13 in rawhide, which should be review-able again. X build root is not correct. Fixed ? license field matches the actual license. Fixed (BSD and MIT) ? %check is not present but there seems to be a test suite. I've added the %check. I am not sure it will work when the package is compiled on system with net-snmp already installed. It works in mock and in koji though. The whole %check is not executed when %{netsnmp_check} == 0 to speed up my local builds. X file permissions are appropriate. rpmlint still complains about executable flag on agent/helpers/table_row.c, I have fixed it upstream, see http://net-snmp.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/net-snmp?view=rev&revision=17839 . I hope it's enough - I don't want to add another .spec voodoo just because of this one file. X scriptlets present without proper dependencies. Fixed X rpmlint has many valid complaints. Fixed most of them, following remain: net-snmp.i686: W: dangerous-command-in-%post mv net-snmp.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%post mv There is one mv, which moves net-snmp data from /var/net-snmp to /var/lib/net-snmp, IMHO it's valid usage. net-snmp.src: W: strange-permission net-snmp-config 0755 net-snmp.src: W: strange-permission net-snmpd.init 0755 net-snmp.src: W: strange-permission net-snmptrapd.init 0755 These files are stored in CVS with executable bit set, AFAIK there is no easy way how to remove it. And IMHO it's pretty harmless. net-snmp.src: W: %ifarch-applied-patch Patch1: net-snmp-5.4.1-pie.patch IA64 has some problems with -pie, I'll look into it. Maybe it's not needed anymore - is IA64 secondary architecture? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 14:06:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 09:06:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537451] Review Request: eclipse-emf-query - Specify and execute queries against EMF models In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271406.nARE6U9n011894@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537451 Mat Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Mat Booth 2009-11-27 09:06:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Thank you! > > APPROVED Thanks. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: eclipse-emf-query Short Description: Specify and execute queries against EMF models Owners: mbooth Branches: F-12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 14:05:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 09:05:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536684] Review Request: eclipse-mdt-ocl - Implementation of the OCL OMG metamodel for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271405.nARE56UQ011578@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536684 Mat Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Mat Booth 2009-11-27 09:05:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Looks well now. > > APPROVED Nice one, thanks. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: eclipse-mdt-ocl Short Description: Implementation of the OCL OMG metamodel for Eclipse Owners: mbooth Branches: F-12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 14:16:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 09:16:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541902] New: Review Request: almanah - Application for keeping an encrypted diary Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: almanah - Application for keeping an encrypted diary https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541902 Summary: Review Request: almanah - Application for keeping an encrypted diary Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: th0br0 at mkdir.name QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://th0br0.fedorapeople.org/almanah-0.6.1/almanah.spec SRPM URL: http://th0br0.fedorapeople.org/almanah-0.6.1/almanah-0.6.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Almanah Diary is a small application to ease the management of an encrypted personal diary. It's got good editing abilities, including text formatting and printing. Evolution tasks and appointments will be listed to ease the creation of diary entries related to them. At the same time, you can create diary entries using multiple events. This package was already reviewed and pushed but given that it's orphaned and the last update was more than 3 months ago, I had to create a new review request according to the guidelines. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447751 I removed the smp flags from the make command as they gave me problems when building. Rpmlint remains silent -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 14:27:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 09:27:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529256] Review Request: i3status - Generates a status line for dzen2 or wmii In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271427.nARERwfB017451@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529256 Andreas Osowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |th0br0 at mkdir.name AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |th0br0 at mkdir.name Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Andreas Osowski 2009-11-27 09:27:56 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: [x] F12/i686 [x] Rpmlint output: Source RPM: - Binary RPM(s): - [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: MIT [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 0c6e737d5af661feaa6c4d9c09d2a34abe1f8571 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: F12/i786 [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: - [x] Package functions as described. [x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. Remaining issues: For aestheticism, remove the spare space in the Conflict: line ;) Other than that ******************** ***** APPROVED ***** ******************** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 14:37:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 09:37:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534135] Review Request: xstream - Java XML serialization library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271437.nAREb3uS019844@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534135 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-27 09:37:02 EDT --- O kruwa, dziekuje. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xstream Short Description: Java XML serialization library Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 14:37:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 09:37:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529255] Review Request: i3lock - A slightly improved version of slock In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271437.nAREblUU019996@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529255 Andreas Osowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |th0br0 at mkdir.name AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |th0br0 at mkdir.name Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Andreas Osowski 2009-11-27 09:37:46 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: [x] F12/i686 [x] Rpmlint output: Source RPM: - Binary RPM(s): - [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: MIT [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 8fcca5adea7b0c6e3ae3e4e1032c548dd96bbee9 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: F12/i686 [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [x] Package functions as described. [x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [x] File based requires are sane. Remaining issues: One spare space in the Conflicts: line again, but that's just for aestheticism :D ********************* ***** APPROVED ****** ********************* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 14:48:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 09:48:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225916] Merge Review: isdn4k-utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271448.nAREmDc3010152@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225916 --- Comment #1 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-11-27 09:48:10 EDT --- - rpmlint: NOT OK!!! isdn4k-utils.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot Utilities for configuring an ISDN subsystem. isdn4k-utils.src: W: no-url-tag isdn4k-utils.src: W: strange-permission isdn.init 0775 isdn4k-utils.src: W: strange-permission capi.init 0775 isdn4k-utils.src: W: strange-permission isdnhangup 0775 isdn4k-utils.src: W: strange-permission isdndial 0775 isdn4k-utils.src: W: strange-permission isdnstatus 0775 isdn4k-utils.src:70: E: prereq-use /sbin/chkconfig isdn4k-utils.src:71: E: prereq-use /sbin/ldconfig isdn4k-utils.src:72: E: prereq-use /bin/ln isdn4k-utils.src:73: E: prereq-use sh-utils isdn4k-utils.src:220: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{buildroot}/usr/lib/libfreecdb.a isdn4k-utils.src:221: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{buildroot}/usr/lib/libfreecdbmake.a isdn4k-utils.src:255: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/X11 isdn4k-utils.src:858: W: macro-in-%changelog %config isdn4k-utils.src:860: W: macro-in-%changelog %post isdn4k-utils.src:870: W: macro-in-%changelog %doc isdn4k-utils.src:948: W: macro-in-%changelog %preun isdn4k-utils.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 177, tab: line 130) isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot Utilities for configuring an ISDN subsystem. isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: no-url-tag isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: shared-lib-without-dependency-information /usr/lib64/pppd/2.4.4/userpass.so isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/rc.d/init.d/capi isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/rc.d/init.d/isdn isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/_example/ipfwadm.txt isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/_example/ipfwadm.txt isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/capi isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: non-readable /sbin/vboxd 0750 isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /sbin/vboxd 0750 isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/_howto/pppcosts.txt isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /etc/ppp/ioptions isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/ppp/peers/isdn/avm-ml 0600 isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: version-control-internal-file /usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/Mini-FAQ/CVS/Repository isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/_howto/vbox_sound.txt isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/_howto/vbox_sound.txt isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: version-control-internal-file /usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/Mini-FAQ/CVS/Entries isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/vbox.txt isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: non-readable /sbin/pcbitctl 0750 isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /sbin/pcbitctl 0750 isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/_howto/masquerade.txt isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: version-control-internal-file /usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/_example/CVS/Root isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/vbox/vboxd.conf 0640 isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: non-readable /sbin/avmcapictrl 0750 isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /sbin/avmcapictrl 0750 isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/vbox/vboxgetty.conf 0640 isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: version-control-internal-file /usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/_howto/CVS/Root isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/_example/config.txt isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: non-readable /sbin/ipppd 0700 isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /sbin/ipppd 0700 isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/_howto/pppbind.txt isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/_howto/pppbind.txt isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: non-readable /sbin/hisaxctrl 0750 isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /sbin/hisaxctrl 0750 isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: version-control-internal-file /usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/_howto/CVS/Entries isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/_howto/www-vbox.tar.gz isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/_howto/xp-howto.txt isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/_howto/xp-howto.txt isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: version-control-internal-file /usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/_howto/CVS/Repository isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: non-readable /usr/sbin/imon 0750 isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/sbin/imon 0750 isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/EN-i4l.sgml isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/isdn isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: version-control-internal-file /usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/_example/CVS/Entries isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/standard.msg.example isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/_howto/leased_hisax2.txt isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/README.isdnlog isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/ppp/peers/isdn/leased 0600 isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: version-control-internal-file /usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/CVS/Repository isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/_howto/leafsite.tar.gz isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/ppp/peers/isdn/arcor 0600 isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/Mini-FAQ/isdn-faq.txt isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/ppp/peers/isdn/otelo 0600 isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: non-readable /sbin/iprofd 0750 isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /sbin/iprofd 0750 isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/vbox.sgml isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/_howto/dns.txt isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: version-control-internal-file /usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/Mini-FAQ/CVS/Root isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: version-control-internal-file /usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/CVS/Root isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: non-readable /sbin/mkzonedb 0750 isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /sbin/mkzonedb 0750 isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/vbox 01777 isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/ppp/peers/isdn/avm 0600 isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: version-control-internal-file /usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/_example/CVS/Repository isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/man5/rate-files.5.gz isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: setuid-binary /usr/sbin/userisdnctl root 04755 isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/sbin/userisdnctl 04755 isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: version-control-internal-file /usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/CVS/Entries isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/_howto/lzscomp.txt isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/ppp/peers/isdn/talkline 0600 isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: non-readable /sbin/icnctrl 0750 isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /sbin/icnctrl 0750 isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: non-readable /sbin/loopctrl 0750 isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /sbin/loopctrl 0750 isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: version-control-internal-file /usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/Mini-FAQ/.cvsignore isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: non-readable /sbin/isdnctrl 0750 isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /sbin/isdnctrl 0750 isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/Mini-FAQ/htmlify.pl isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/_howto/isdnpool.txt isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/vbox isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/Mini-FAQ/htmlify.pl /usr/bin/perl isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%trigger chmod isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/capi isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/capi isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/isdn isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/isdn isapnp_isdn isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/isdn isapnp_isdn isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/isdn isapnp_isdn isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/isdn isdnlog isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/isdn isdnlog isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/isdn isdnlog isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/isdn isdn4k-utils-debuginfo.x86_64: W: no-url-tag isdn4k-utils-devel.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot Static library and header files for capi development. isdn4k-utils-devel.x86_64: W: no-url-tag isdn4k-utils-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation isdn4k-utils-vboxgetty.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot ISDN voice box (getty). isdn4k-utils-vboxgetty.x86_64: W: no-url-tag isdn4k-utils-vboxgetty.x86_64: E: non-readable /usr/sbin/vboxgetty 0750 isdn4k-utils-vboxgetty.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/sbin/vboxgetty 0750 xisdnload.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot An ISDN connection load average display for the X Window System. xisdnload.x86_64: W: no-url-tag - spec file name: OK - package name: OK - package version: Release tag should be in form 0.67.20091020cvs but as it's already out... NEED COMMENT - license: no license found in ibod!!! legal concerns in LEGAL.ipppcomp NOT OK - group: OK - url: NOT OK, missing - sources URL: NOT FOUND!!! - md5sum: CAN'T CHECK - exclude arch: OK, no s390 policy - buildroot: NOT OK, should be %{name} not %name - requires: OK - descriptions: OK but summaries ends with dot - build flags: missing smp_mflags, custom build flags?, NOT OK!!! - macros used consistently: NOT OK, uses %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT - clean section: OK - file attributes: NEED COMMENT, see rpmlint output - docs: OK - devel package: contains static library, should go to -static! NOT OK - package builds on: F-12/x86_64 OK Than, please commnent/fix, rpmlint is really big, I'll do final checks after this is solved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 15:26:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 10:26:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507083] Review Request: poco - C++ class libraries for network-centric applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271526.nARFQ8Ql001618@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507083 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 10:26:04 EDT --- poco-1.3.5-8.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/poco-1.3.5-8.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 15:38:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 10:38:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226546] Merge Review: wvdial In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271538.nARFc14x004265@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226546 --- Comment #2 from Michal Hlavinka 2009-11-27 10:37:59 EDT --- 0) MUST: * MUST: rpmlint : $ rpmlint wvdial.spec wvdial-*.src.rpm x86_64/wvdial-* wvdial.x86_64: E: zero-length /etc/wvdial.conf wvdial.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/ppp/peers/wvdial 0600 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings. looks ok Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable + MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines + MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec + MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines + MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . - MUST(4): The License field in spec match the actual license + MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file must be included in %doc + MUST: The spec file written in American English + MUST: The spec file for the package is legible - MUST(6): The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL + MUST: The package successfully compile + MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires + MUST: The spec file handle locales properly 0 MUST: Every package which stores shared library files in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + MUST: Packages does not bundle copies of system libraries + MUST: Package own all directories that it creates + MUST: Package does not list a file more than once in the spec file + MUST(2): Permissions on files must be set properly. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line + MUST(1): Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) + MUST: Package use macros consistently + MUST: Package contains code, or permissable content + MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage + MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application 0 MUST: Header files in a -devel package 0 MUST: Static libraries in a -static package 0 MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' 0 MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package 0 MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} + MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built 0 MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file + MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages + MUST(1): At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) + MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [27] Comments: 1) Checking RPM_BUILD_ROOT != / is not necessary per Packaging Guidelines ( https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25clean ): > In the past, some packages checked that %{buildroot} was not / before deleting it. This is not necessary in Fedora, .... rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT is enough 2) %attr in %files section is used too much %attr(0755,root,root) %{_bindir}/* %attr(0644,root,root) %{_mandir}/man1/* %attr(0644,root,root) %{_mandir}/man5/* these are default permissions, thus not required to explicitly add there 3) too much wildcards under %files section If upstream makes some changes in tarball and add/remove some files, this is not going to catch anything. It's good practice to list at least all files under %{_bindir}. This will let you know if there is any new/missing one. 4) License There is no license info in the package except COPYING - LGPL. This means License tag should be set to LGPLv2+ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing : """A GPL or LGPL licensed package that lacks any statement of what version that it's licensed under in the source code/program output/accompanying docs is technically licensed under *any* version of the GPL or LGPL, not just the version in whatever COPYING file they include. Note that this is LGPLv2+, not LGPL+, because version 2 was the first version of LGPL.""" 5) Versioned requires ( https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requires ) > First, if the lowest possible requirement is so old that nobody has a version older than that installed on any target distribution release, there's no need to include the version in the dependency at all. In that case we know the available software is new enough. For example, the version in gtk+-devel 1.2 dependency above is unnecessary for all Red Hat Linux distributions since (at least) release 6.2. As a rule of thumb, if the version is not required, don't add it just for fun. all 'ppp' versions (even in old RHELs) are newer than version specified, please remove it 6)Url and Source0 links does not work wget http://alumnit.ca/download/wvdial-1.61.tar.gz --2009-11-27 16:16:56-- http://alumnit.ca/download/wvdial-1.61.tar.gz Resolving alumnit.ca... 69.196.152.118 Connecting to alumnit.ca|69.196.152.118|:80... failed: Connection refused. wget 'http://alumnit.ca/wiki/?WvDial' --2009-11-27 16:17:30-- http://alumnit.ca/wiki/?WvDial Resolving alumnit.ca... 69.196.152.118 Connecting to alumnit.ca|69.196.152.118|:80... failed: Connection refused. 7) Missing info for patches https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment Every patch in spec file should contain a comment describing: * why is that patch used - bug number is enough * upstream information - was it sent upstream (and when)? taken from upstream? was it accepted/rejected? is this patch "fedora specific" ? please fix these issues, thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 16:01:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 11:01:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533594] Review Request: Pootle - Localization and translation management web application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271601.nARG14AQ010351@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533594 --- Comment #1 from Dwayne Bailey 2009-11-27 11:01:02 EDT --- Updated to a newer release candidate: Spec URL: http://dwayne.fedorapeople.org/pootle-2.0.0-0.1.rc2.spec SRPM URL: http://dwayne.fedorapeople.org/pootle-2.0.0-0.1.rc2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 16:07:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 11:07:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271607.nARG7AH6031604@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #41 from Peter Galbraith 2009-11-27 11:06:58 EDT --- I don't know whether there is a place for this in the SPEC file, but another URL for emacs-goodies-el sources is: https://alioth.debian.org/projects/pkg-goodies-el/ The CVS repo is hosted there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 16:15:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 11:15:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 515230] Review Request: python-dmidecode - python extension module to access DMI data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271615.nARGFceN015445@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515230 David Sommerseth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from David Sommerseth 2009-11-27 11:15:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-dmidecode Short Description: Python module to access DMI data Owners: dsommers Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 16:54:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 11:54:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226546] Merge Review: wvdial In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271654.nARGsRuL027392@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226546 --- Comment #3 from Ondrej Vasik 2009-11-27 11:54:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > - MUST(4): The License field in spec match the actual license Ok, used LGPLv2+ instead of LGPLv2 > - MUST(6): The sources used to build the package must match the upstream > source, as provided in the spec URL Must be some kind of alumnit temporary shutdown, I downloaded new version of wvdial (1.61) from there ~2 weeks ago... > Comments: > > 1) Checking RPM_BUILD_ROOT != / is not necessary > > per Packaging Guidelines ( > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25clean ): > > In the past, some packages checked that %{buildroot} was not / before deleting it. This is not necessary in Fedora, .... > > rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT is enough Ok, changed... > 2) %attr in %files section is used too much > > %attr(0755,root,root) %{_bindir}/* > %attr(0644,root,root) %{_mandir}/man1/* > %attr(0644,root,root) %{_mandir}/man5/* > > these are default permissions, thus not required to explicitly add there Ok, removed... > 3) too much wildcards under %files section > > If upstream makes some changes in tarball and add/remove some files, this is > not going to catch anything. It's good practice to list at least all files > under %{_bindir}. This will let you know if there is any new/missing one. files under %{_bindir} and man pages listed more specifically. > 4) License > > There is no license info in the package except COPYING - LGPL. This means > License tag should be set to LGPLv2+ > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing : > > """A GPL or LGPL licensed package that lacks any statement of what version that > it's licensed under in the source code/program output/accompanying docs is > technically licensed under *any* version of the GPL or LGPL, not just the > version in whatever COPYING file they include. Note that this is LGPLv2+, not > LGPL+, because version 2 was the first version of LGPL.""" Ok, changed LGPLv2 to LGPLv2+ > 5) Versioned requires ( > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requires ) > > > First, if the lowest possible requirement is so old that nobody has a version older than that installed on any target distribution release, there's no need to include the version in the dependency at all. In that case we know the available software is new enough. For example, the version in gtk+-devel 1.2 dependency above is unnecessary for all Red Hat Linux distributions since (at least) release 6.2. As a rule of thumb, if the version is not required, don't add it just for fun. > > all 'ppp' versions (even in old RHELs) are newer than version specified, please > remove it Removed versioned requires... > 6)Url and Source0 links does not work > > wget http://alumnit.ca/download/wvdial-1.61.tar.gz > --2009-11-27 16:16:56-- http://alumnit.ca/download/wvdial-1.61.tar.gz > Resolving alumnit.ca... 69.196.152.118 > Connecting to alumnit.ca|69.196.152.118|:80... failed: Connection refused. > > > wget 'http://alumnit.ca/wiki/?WvDial' > --2009-11-27 16:17:30-- http://alumnit.ca/wiki/?WvDial > Resolving alumnit.ca... 69.196.152.118 > Connecting to alumnit.ca|69.196.152.118|:80... failed: Connection refused. I guess it is temporary issue... we'll see on Monday... > 7) Missing info for patches > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment > > Every patch in spec file should contain a comment describing: > * why is that patch used - bug number is enough > * upstream information - was it sent upstream (and when)? taken from upstream? > was it accepted/rejected? is this patch "fedora specific" ? I added the informations why the patch is used with bug numbers/short comments. Some patches - like remotename and 9nums are Fedora specific. Compuserve patch is just change to use more new Compuserve style (which increases the chance of succesful connection). That one wvdial.conf manpage patch - I don't know, I'll try to submit it once the website will be up. Anyway the package is not really "alive" - current update was just to fix issues with new gcc/glibc. Fixed in rawhide ... wvdial-1.61-2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 17:04:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 12:04:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537563] Review Request: mingw32-plib - Fedora mingw set of portable game related libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271704.nARH4PpY016995@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537563 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 12:04:23 EDT --- mingw32-plib-1.8.5-0.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-plib-1.8.5-0.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 18:52:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 13:52:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541978] New: Review Request: pulseaudio-equalizer - PulseAudio Equalizer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio-equalizer - PulseAudio Equalizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541978 Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio-equalizer - PulseAudio Equalizer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: hicham.haouari at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/pulseaudio-equalizer.spec SRPM URL: http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/pulseaudio-equalizer-2.4-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: PulseAudio Equalizer rpmlint output : none -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 19:17:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 14:17:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541902] Review Request: almanah - Application for keeping an encrypted diary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271917.nARJH8XD018414@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541902 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sundaram at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 19:26:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 14:26:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530617] Review Request: libixp - Stand-alone client/server 9P library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271926.nARJQlsT002751@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530617 --- Comment #6 from Simon Wesp 2009-11-27 14:26:45 EDT --- http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/libixp/libixp-0.5-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 19:55:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 14:55:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529254] Review Request: i3 - Improved tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271955.nARJtLhR027957@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529254 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Simon Wesp 2009-11-27 14:55:20 EDT --- Thanks for the review New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: i3 Short Description: improved tiling window manager Owners: cassmodiah Branches: F-12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 19:55:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 14:55:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529255] Review Request: i3lock - A slightly improved version of slock In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271955.nARJtOaE027987@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529255 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Simon Wesp 2009-11-27 14:55:23 EDT --- Thanks for the review New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: i3lock Short Description: Slightly improved version of slock Owners: cassmodiah Branches: F-12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 19:55:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 14:55:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529256] Review Request: i3status - Generates a status line for dzen2 or wmii In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911271955.nARJtWll028028@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529256 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Simon Wesp 2009-11-27 14:55:31 EDT --- Thanks for the review New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: i3status Short Description: Generates a status line for dzen2 or wmii Owners: cassmodiah Branches: F-12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 20:22:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:22:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225726] Merge Review: emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272022.nARKM812015340@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225726 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chitlesh at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-11-27 15:22:06 EDT --- I assume you guys have directly communication with emacs's upstream. Could you guys please ask upstream to update their * vhdl-mode * verilog-mode I would be nice that to see these be fixed upstream so that I can obsolete emacs-verilog-mode on rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 20:54:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:54:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541992] New: Review Request: perl-PDF-Create - Create PDF files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-PDF-Create - Create PDF files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541992 Summary: Review Request: perl-PDF-Create - Create PDF files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cooly at gnome.eu.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/perl-PDF-Create.spec SRPM URL: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/perl-PDF-Create-1.04-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This module allows you to create PDF documents using a large number of primitives, and emit the result as a PDF file or stream. PDF stands for Portable Document Format. Documents can have several pages, a table of content, an information section and many other PDF elements. More functionalities will be added as needs arise. Documents are constructed on the fly so the memory footprint is not tied to the size of the pages but only to their number. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 21:19:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:19:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541764] Review Request: gle - Tubing and extrusion library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272119.nARLJfq5028984@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541764 Thomas Fitzsimmons changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|541765 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 21:19:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:19:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541765] Review Request: NanoEngineer-1 - Nano-composite modeling and simulation program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272119.nARLJdkJ028928@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541765 Thomas Fitzsimmons changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|541764 |526426 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 21:19:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:19:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526426] Review Request: OpenGL-gle - A Tubing and Extrusion Library for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272119.nARLJe4M028959@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526426 Thomas Fitzsimmons changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |541765 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 21:18:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:18:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526426] Review Request: OpenGL-gle - A Tubing and Extrusion Library for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272118.nARLIgYg028658@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526426 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Fitzsimmons 2009-11-27 16:18:41 EDT --- I also packaged this independently. I compared our three versions. Here are my suggestions for a combined package. I like gle as a name, but since that's already taken, libgle is fine. The license field is complicated. The closest representation I came up with is: License: GPLv2+ or (Artistic clarified and MIT) where MIT is an approximation of: gle-3.1.0/src/COPYING.src which, as far as I can tell, is an IBM MIT-like license that's not present in Fedora's list: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#SoftwareLicenses URL and Source0 should point to gle's new home: URL: http://linas.org/gle/ Source0: http://linas.org/gle/pub/gle-%{version}.tar.gz Ralf got the minimal set of BuildRequires but since this is a Fedora package, I prefer to reference the actual dependencies directly, rather than use virtual provides: BuildRequires: mesa-libGL-devel BuildRequires: freeglut-devel BuildRequires: libXmu-devel BuildRequires: libXi-devel The guidelines don't mention anything about not referencing virtual provides, so this is a personal preference (the choice between compatibility with other distros and future-proofing wrt to Fedora). I like Ralf's use of --disable-static rather than deleting the .a file after the build. To be explicit I added: Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig Requires(postun): /sbin/ldconfig but the guidelines don't mention that: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Shared_Libraries so omitting them is fine. I think Ralf's package is the closest to complete. It only needs the License, URL and Source0 (and possibly BuildRequires) changes. Who wants to be the libgle maintainer for Fedora? I'd prefer not to be; I only packaged GLE because it is a dependency of NanoEngineer-1: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541765 which I do want to maintain. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 21:22:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:22:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526426] Review Request: OpenGL-gle - A Tubing and Extrusion Library for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272122.nARLMv9j030031@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526426 --- Comment #10 from Mary Ellen Foster 2009-11-27 16:22:57 EDT --- Thomas -- I'm willing to be the maintainer; I'll incorporate changes from Ralf's package as appropriate. Want to swap reviews? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 21:30:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:30:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541902] Review Request: almanah - Application for keeping an encrypted diary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272130.nARLU6iJ019819@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541902 Andreas Osowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|sundaram at redhat.com |cassmodiah at fedoraproject.or | |g -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 21:36:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:36:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541004] Review Request: pkcs11-dump - Small utility for querying PKCS#11 modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272136.nARLaSUs021598@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541004 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 16:36:26 EDT --- pkcs11-dump-0.3.3-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 21:36:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:36:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541004] Review Request: pkcs11-dump - Small utility for querying PKCS#11 modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272136.nARLaWFI021639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541004 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.3.3-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 21:35:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:35:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539486] Review Request: perl-Data-AsObject - Easy OO access to complex perl data structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272135.nARLZqkn021351@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539486 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 16:35:52 EDT --- perl-Data-AsObject-0.05-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Data-AsObject'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-12200 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 21:38:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:38:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541004] Review Request: pkcs11-dump - Small utility for querying PKCS#11 modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272138.nARLct1T002412@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541004 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 16:38:54 EDT --- pkcs11-dump-0.3.3-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 21:37:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:37:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541185] Review Request: rubygem-sexp_processor - A branch of ParseTree providing generic sexp processing tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272137.nARLbMHK001839@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541185 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |3.0.3-1.fc12 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 21:38:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:38:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520352] Review Request: python-pip - Pip installs packages. Python packages. An easy_install replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272138.nARLcm4T002370@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520352 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.4-1.fc11 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 21:38:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:38:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539231] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm - Create sticky forms with HTML::SuperForm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272138.nARLcKuR002254@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539231 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.4-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 21:39:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:39:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541004] Review Request: pkcs11-dump - Small utility for querying PKCS#11 modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272139.nARLd166022780@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541004 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.3.3-1.fc11 |0.3.3-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 21:38:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:38:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520352] Review Request: python-pip - Pip installs packages. Python packages. An easy_install replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272138.nARLchhq022716@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520352 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 16:38:42 EDT --- python-pip-0.4-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 21:37:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:37:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541185] Review Request: rubygem-sexp_processor - A branch of ParseTree providing generic sexp processing tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272137.nARLbHXL022275@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541185 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 16:37:16 EDT --- rubygem-sexp_processor-3.0.3-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 21:38:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:38:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539231] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm - Create sticky forms with HTML::SuperForm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272138.nARLcGww022606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539231 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 16:38:15 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm-0.4-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 21:40:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:40:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539231] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm - Create sticky forms with HTML::SuperForm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272140.nARLeviN023727@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539231 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 16:40:55 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm-0.4-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 21:40:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:40:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530986] Review Request: janino - An embedded Java compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272140.nARLe3aG023267@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530986 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 16:40:02 EDT --- janino-2.5.15-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update janino'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-12215 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 21:41:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:41:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541533] Review Request: hunspell-si - Sinhala hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272141.nARLfB23004293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541533 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 16:41:10 EDT --- hunspell-si-0.2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 21:43:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:43:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539230] Review Request: perl-Authen-Simple - Simple Authentication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272143.nARLhWTw006103@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539230 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 16:43:31 EDT --- perl-Authen-Simple-0.4-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 21:42:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:42:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520352] Review Request: python-pip - Pip installs packages. Python packages. An easy_install replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272142.nARLgru5005871@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520352 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 16:42:52 EDT --- python-pip-0.4-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 21:41:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:41:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539231] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm - Create sticky forms with HTML::SuperForm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272141.nARLf2i4003839@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539231 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.4-2.fc11 |0.4-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 21:42:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:42:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520352] Review Request: python-pip - Pip installs packages. Python packages. An easy_install replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272142.nARLgwj8005905@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520352 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.4-1.fc11 |0.4-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 21:41:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:41:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541533] Review Request: hunspell-si - Sinhala hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272141.nARLfJ3o004626@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541533 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.2-1.fc11 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 21:43:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:43:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531987] Review Request: wtop - top for webserver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272143.nARLhuuq025940@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531987 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 16:43:55 EDT --- wtop-0.6.1-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 21:44:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:44:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541902] Review Request: almanah - Application for keeping an encrypted diary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272144.nARLiSNo026163@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541902 --- Comment #1 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-11-27 16:44:27 EDT --- Well, I assume you are not interested in getting a review from me since you explicitly removed me. I am not sure you get to arbitrarily pick a reviewer however. Whatever works. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 21:44:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:44:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531987] Review Request: wtop - top for webserver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272144.nARLi1On025997@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531987 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.6.1-2.fc12 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 21:43:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:43:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539230] Review Request: perl-Authen-Simple - Simple Authentication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272143.nARLhbcc025810@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539230 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.4-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 21:48:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:48:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530986] Review Request: janino - An embedded Java compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272148.nARLma6m009269@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530986 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 16:48:35 EDT --- janino-2.5.15-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update janino'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-12239 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 21:48:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:48:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539442] Review Request: rubygem-ZenTest - Automated test scaffolding for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272148.nARLmfoj028270@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539442 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 16:48:40 EDT --- rubygem-ZenTest-4.1.4-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 21:51:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:51:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539442] Review Request: rubygem-ZenTest - Automated test scaffolding for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272151.nARLpano029456@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539442 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 16:51:35 EDT --- rubygem-ZenTest-4.1.4-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 21:48:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:48:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539442] Review Request: rubygem-ZenTest - Automated test scaffolding for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272148.nARLmkl3028319@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539442 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |4.1.4-3.fc12 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 21:48:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:48:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539486] Review Request: perl-Data-AsObject - Easy OO access to complex perl data structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272148.nARLmrYs028362@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539486 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 16:48:52 EDT --- perl-Data-AsObject-0.05-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Data-AsObject'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-12242 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 21:53:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:53:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532315] Review Request: nanoxml - Small XML parser for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272153.nARLr3g6011194@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532315 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 16:53:01 EDT --- nanoxml-2.2.3-6.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 21:50:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:50:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524107] Review Request: qbrew - A Brewing Recipe Calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272150.nARLoHFG010434@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524107 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 16:50:14 EDT --- qbrew-0.4.1-6.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 21:51:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:51:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539442] Review Request: rubygem-ZenTest - Automated test scaffolding for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272151.nARLpfU1010878@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539442 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|4.1.4-3.fc12 |4.1.4-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 21:50:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:50:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524107] Review Request: qbrew - A Brewing Recipe Calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272150.nARLoMm8010492@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524107 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.4.1-6.fc11 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 21:53:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:53:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532315] Review Request: nanoxml - Small XML parser for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272153.nARLr7Us030214@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532315 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.2.3-6.fc12 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 21:58:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:58:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541185] Review Request: rubygem-sexp_processor - A branch of ParseTree providing generic sexp processing tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272158.nARLwTtu013634@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541185 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 16:58:28 EDT --- rubygem-sexp_processor-3.0.3-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 21:58:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:58:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526564] Review Request: unittest - C++ unit testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272158.nARLwjVC032248@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526564 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 16:58:42 EDT --- unittest-0.50-62.6.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 21:58:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:58:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541185] Review Request: rubygem-sexp_processor - A branch of ParseTree providing generic sexp processing tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272158.nARLwX5c032173@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541185 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.0.3-1.fc12 |3.0.3-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 21:58:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:58:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526564] Review Request: unittest - C++ unit testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272158.nARLwovq032310@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526564 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.50-62.6.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 22:02:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:02:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539428] Review Request: sparcy - Command line utility for Sparc Systems GPS loggers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272202.nARM22pv015100@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539428 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.1-1.fc12 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 22:01:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:01:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539428] Review Request: sparcy - Command line utility for Sparc Systems GPS loggers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272201.nARM1v1v001390@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539428 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 17:01:56 EDT --- sparcy-0.1-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 22:08:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:08:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531988] Review Request: lekhonee-gnome - The gnome frontend for lekhonee wordpress client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272208.nARM8g8n017454@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531988 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 17:08:41 EDT --- lekhonee-gnome-0.8-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 22:06:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:06:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541533] Review Request: hunspell-si - Sinhala hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272206.nARM6x6E003927@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541533 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 17:06:59 EDT --- hunspell-si-0.2-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 22:07:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:07:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539230] Review Request: perl-Authen-Simple - Simple Authentication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272207.nARM7j69004235@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539230 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 17:07:44 EDT --- perl-Authen-Simple-0.4-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 22:07:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:07:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541533] Review Request: hunspell-si - Sinhala hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272207.nARM740D004089@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541533 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.2-1.fc11 |0.2-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 22:07:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:07:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539230] Review Request: perl-Authen-Simple - Simple Authentication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272207.nARM7n2O004271@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539230 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.4-1.fc11 |0.4-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 22:08:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:08:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531988] Review Request: lekhonee-gnome - The gnome frontend for lekhonee wordpress client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272208.nARM8l8D004465@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531988 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.8-2.fc12 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 23:29:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 18:29:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466379] Review Request: zfs-fuse - ZFS ported to Linux FUSE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272329.nARNTutt022080@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466379 --- Comment #28 from Uwe Kubosch 2009-11-27 18:29:52 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: zfs-fuse New Branches: F-12 EL-5 Owners: donv -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 23:37:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 18:37:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466379] Review Request: zfs-fuse - ZFS ported to Linux FUSE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272337.nARNbdb8024073@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466379 Uwe Kubosch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 27 23:42:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 18:42:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526426] Review Request: OpenGL-gle - A Tubing and Extrusion Library for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911272342.nARNgXba025402@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526426 --- Comment #11 from Thomas Fitzsimmons 2009-11-27 18:42:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Thomas -- I'm willing to be the maintainer; I'll incorporate changes from > Ralf's package as appropriate. Want to swap reviews? Sure! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 00:15:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 19:15:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477948] Review Request: simple-ccsm - Simplified plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911280015.nAS0FAEs000582@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477948 --- Comment #9 from Julian Aloofi 2009-11-27 19:15:07 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 00:22:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 19:22:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542027] New: Review Request: php-nusoap - SOAP toolkit for PHP Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-nusoap - SOAP toolkit for PHP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542027 Summary: Review Request: php-nusoap - SOAP toolkit for PHP Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: david at gnsa.us QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-nusoap.spec SRPM URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-nusoap-0.7.3-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: NuSOAP is a rewrite of SOAPx4, provided by NuSphere and Dietrich Ayala. It is a set of PHP classes - no PHP extensions required - that allow developers to create and consume web services based on SOAP 1.1, WSDL 1.1 and HTTP 1.0/1.1. [ke4qqq at nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint php-nusoap.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/php-nusoap-0.7.3-1.fc12.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/php-nusoap-0.7.3-1.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 00:44:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 19:44:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542028] New: Review Request: php-pear-Spreadsheet-Excel-Writer - Package for generating Excel spreadsheets Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Spreadsheet-Excel-Writer - Package for generating Excel spreadsheets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542028 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Spreadsheet-Excel-Writer - Package for generating Excel spreadsheets Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: david at gnsa.us QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-Spreadsheet-Excel-Writer.spec SRPM URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-Spreadsheet-Excel-Writer-0.9.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Spreadsheet_Excel_Writer was born as a porting of the Spreadsheet::WriteExcel Perl module to PHP. It allows writing of Excel spreadsheets without the need for COM objects. It supports formulas, images (BMP) and all kinds of formatting for text and cells. It currently supports the BIFF5 format (Excel 5.0), so functionality appeared in the latest Excel versions is not yet available. rpmlint output: [ke4qqq at nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/php-pear-Spreadsheet-Excel-Writer-0.9.1-1.fc12.noarch.rpm php-pear-Spreadsheet-Excel-Writer.noarch: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/php-pear-Spreadsheet-Excel-Writer-0.9.1-1.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint php-pear-Spreadsheet-Excel-Writer.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. (No documentation is bundled with source) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 01:44:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 20:44:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533765] Review Request: fedora-accessibility-guide-en-US - Using Fedora with a visual, hearing, or mobility impairment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911280144.nAS1iexO019929@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533765 --- Comment #2 from Ryan Rix 2009-11-27 20:44:39 EDT --- Since there are no formal package review guidelines outside of SPEC file review, I am approving this package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 01:45:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 20:45:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533765] Review Request: fedora-accessibility-guide-en-US - Using Fedora with a visual, hearing, or mobility impairment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911280145.nAS1j969020310@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533765 Ryan Rix changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 01:47:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 20:47:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542036] New: Review Request: php-fpdf - PHP library to generate PDF files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-fpdf - PHP library to generate PDF files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542036 Summary: Review Request: php-fpdf - PHP library to generate PDF files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: david at gnsa.us QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-fpdf.spec SRPM URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-fpdf-1.6-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: FPDF is a PHP class which allows to generate PDF files with pure PHP, that is to say without using the PDFlib library. F from FPDF stands for Free: you may use it for any kind of usage and modify it to suit your needs. rpmlint output: [ke4qqq at nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/php-fpdf-1.6-1.fc12.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/php-fpdf-1.6-1.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint php-fpdf.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 03:08:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 22:08:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542045] New: Review Request: php-htmlpurifier - standards-compliant HTML filter library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-htmlpurifier - standards-compliant HTML filter library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542045 Summary: Review Request: php-htmlpurifier - standards-compliant HTML filter library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: david at gnsa.us QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-htmlpurifier.spec SRPM URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-htmlpurifier-4.0.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Standards-compliant HTML filter library written in PHP. HTML Purifier will not only remove all malicious code (better known as XSS) with a thoroughly audited, secure yet permissive whitelist, it will also make sure your documents are standards compliant, something only achievable with a comprehensive knowledge of W3C's specifications. rpmlint output: php-htmlpurifier.src: W: summary-not-capitalized standards-compliant HTML filter library 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/php-htmlpurifier-4.0.0-1.fc12.noarch.rpm php-htmlpurifier.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized standards-compliant HTML filter library 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. The warning being announced by rpmlint appears to be due to the capitilization of HTML. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 03:54:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 22:54:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540791] Review Request: rubygem-RubyInline - Write foreign code within your ruby code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911280354.nAS3sgU6017361@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540791 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 22:54:41 EDT --- rubygem-RubyInline-3.8.3-4.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-RubyInline-3.8.3-4.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 03:55:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 22:55:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540791] Review Request: rubygem-RubyInline - Write foreign code within your ruby code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911280355.nAS3tOw0017767@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540791 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 22:55:24 EDT --- rubygem-RubyInline-3.8.3-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-RubyInline-3.8.3-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 04:05:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 23:05:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541992] Review Request: perl-PDF-Create - Create PDF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911280405.nAS45Dwj019965@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541992 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 05:25:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 00:25:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541154] Review Request: xfce4-volumed - Daemon to add additional functionality to the volume keys of the keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911280525.nAS5PgjM005008@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541154 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-28 00:25:41 EDT --- I'd be happy to review this. Look for a full review in a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 05:26:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 00:26:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541154] Review Request: xfce4-volumed - Daemon to add additional functionality to the volume keys of the keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911280526.nAS5Q1qu018102@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541154 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 05:57:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 00:57:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541154] Review Request: xfce4-volumed - Daemon to add additional functionality to the volume keys of the keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911280557.nAS5vnFW012405@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541154 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-28 00:57:48 EDT --- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPLv3+) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 9f95a7e002c3c165733e19b70de22c6b xfce4-volumed-0.1.8.tar.bz2 9f95a7e002c3c165733e19b70de22c6b xfce4-volumed-0.1.8.tar.bz2.orig OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package obey's FHS standard (except for 2 exceptions) See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version OK - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin Issues: 1. rpmlint says: xfce4-volumed.i586: W: spelling-error-in-description en_US xfce xfce4-volumed.src: W: spelling-error-in-description en_US xfce xfce4-volumed-debuginfo.i586: W: spelling-error-in-summary en_US xfce xfce4-volumed-debuginfo.i586: W: spelling-error-in-description en_US xfce Doublecheck the spelling in summary and description. xfce4-volumed.i586: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/xdg/autostart/xfce4-volumed.desktop Can be ignored I think. I don't see any blockers, just run the summary and description through a spell checker before you import. ;) This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 06:36:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 01:36:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911280636.nAS6aOJF022094@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 --- Comment #35 from Roshan Singh 2009-11-28 01:36:22 EDT --- I have written the spec, I want to know how to determine the default package version of the libraries in the BuildRequire as shipped by fedora, so that I can remove the versions. I dont remember if I have installed/updated any from the update repository. These are the packages wordnet-devel, glib2-devel, gtk2-devel, libnotify-devel, dbus-glib-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 07:55:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 02:55:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541694] Review Request: php-phpunit-File-Iterator - FilterIterator implementation that filters files based on a list of suffixes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911280755.nAS7tfCI019866@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541694 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at famillecollet.com --- Comment #3 from Remi Collet 2009-11-28 02:55:40 EDT --- > BuildRequires: php-pear >= 1.7.2 This is not correct because we have php-pear-4.3.9 in EL4 Shoud be BuildRequires: php-pear >= 1:1.7.2 or BuildRequires: php-pear(PEAR) >= 1.7.2 + -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 08:00:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 03:00:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541694] Review Request: php-phpunit-File-Iterator - FilterIterator implementation that filters files based on a list of suffixes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911280800.nAS80CXX020916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541694 --- Comment #4 from Remi Collet 2009-11-28 03:00:11 EDT --- Please also requires php-common rather than php to avoid dependecy on httpd + -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 08:31:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 03:31:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542075] New: Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL2 - Class for parsing and handling URL Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL2 - Class for parsing and handling URL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542075 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL2 - Class for parsing and handling URL Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at famillecollet.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-Net-URL2.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-Net-URL2-0.3.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Provides parsing of URLs into their constituent parts (scheme, host, path etc.), URL generation, and resolving of relative URLs. Rpmlint is silent Scratch Build : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1835078 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 08:56:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 03:56:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542077] New: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Request2 - Provides an easy way to perform HTTP requests Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Request2 - Provides an easy way to perform HTTP requests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542077 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Request2 - Provides an easy way to perform HTTP requests Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at famillecollet.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-HTTP-Request2.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-HTTP-Request2-0.5.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: PHP5 rewrite of HTTP_Request package. Provides cleaner API and pluggable Adapters. Currently available are: * Socket adapter, based on old HTTP_Request code, * Curl adapter, wraps around PHP's cURL extension, * Mock adapter, to use for testing packages dependent on HTTP_Request2. Supports POST requests with data and file uploads, basic and digest authentication, cookies, proxies, gzip and deflate encodings, monitoring the request progress with Observers... rpmlint is silent Scratch build : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1835082 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 08:57:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 03:57:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542075] Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL2 - Class for parsing and handling URL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911280857.nAS8vIIr021553@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542075 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |542077 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 08:57:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 03:57:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542077] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Request2 - Provides an easy way to perform HTTP requests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911280857.nAS8vHFZ021529@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542077 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |542075 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 09:03:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 04:03:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541694] Review Request: php-phpunit-File-Iterator - FilterIterator implementation that filters files based on a list of suffixes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911280903.nAS93BFV023125@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541694 --- Comment #5 from Christof Damian 2009-11-28 04:03:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > > BuildRequires: php-pear >= 1.7.2 > > This is not correct because we have php-pear-4.3.9 in EL4 > > Shoud be > BuildRequires: php-pear >= 1:1.7.2 > or > BuildRequires: php-pear(PEAR) >= 1.7.2 (In reply to comment #4) > Please also requires php-common rather than php to avoid dependecy on httpd I fixed both of these. New files: Spec URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SPECS/php-phpunit-File-Iterator.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SRPMS/php-phpunit-File-Iterator-1.1.0-3.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 09:31:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 04:31:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542084] New: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-OAuth - Implementation of the OAuth spec Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-OAuth - Implementation of the OAuth spec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542084 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-OAuth - Implementation of the OAuth spec Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at famillecollet.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-HTTP-OAuth.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-HTTP-Request2-0.5.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Allows the use of the consumer and provider angles of the OAuth spec. rpmlint is silent Scratch build : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1835092 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 09:31:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 04:31:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542077] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Request2 - Provides an easy way to perform HTTP requests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911280931.nAS9VtMV011591@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542077 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |542084 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 09:31:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 04:31:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542084] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-OAuth - Implementation of the OAuth spec In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911280931.nAS9Vsg0011568@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542084 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |542077 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 09:38:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 04:38:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541154] Review Request: xfce4-volumed - Daemon to add additional functionality to the volume keys of the keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911280938.nAS9cIss031484@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541154 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Christoph Wickert 2009-11-28 04:38:17 EDT --- Thanks for the review. (In reply to comment #2) > Doublecheck the spelling in summary and description. The spelling is correct. This comes from "xfce-volumed", but this is the name of the package. The summary of the debuginfo package is created automatically, there is nothing I could change. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xfce-volumed Short Description: Daemon to add additional functionality to the volume keys of the keyboard Owners: cwickert Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 09:56:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 04:56:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542084] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-OAuth - Implementation of the OAuth spec In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911280956.nAS9upWR016815@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542084 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |542087 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 09:56:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 04:56:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542087] Review Request: php-pear-Services-Twitter - PHP interface to Twitter's API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911280956.nAS9uoGa016795@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542087 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |542084 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 09:56:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 04:56:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542087] New: Review Request: php-pear-Services-Twitter - PHP interface to Twitter's API Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Services-Twitter - PHP interface to Twitter's API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542087 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Services-Twitter - PHP interface to Twitter's API Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at famillecollet.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-Services-Twitter.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-Services-Twitter-0.4.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: An interface for communicating with Twitter's public API. Send status updates, fetch information, add friends, etc. rpmlint output : W: no-documentation Scratch build : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1835094 Mini test script : http://blog.famillecollet.com/public/php/twit -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 10:32:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 05:32:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911281032.nASAWLH0010648@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 --- Comment #33 from Conrad Meyer 2009-11-28 05:32:19 EDT --- Ok, what else needs to be done before this is acceptable? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 11:06:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 06:06:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487913] Review Request: culmus-fancy-fonts - Fancy fonts for Hebrew In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911281106.nASB6ZgH020100@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487913 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(danken at cs.technio | |n.ac.il) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 11:06:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 06:06:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487913] Review Request: culmus-fancy-fonts - Fancy fonts for Hebrew In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911281106.nASB6G9T019995@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487913 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-11-28 06:06:13 EDT --- This srpm does not build at all. Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.vWyOk7 + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + rm -rf culmus-fancy-0.20051122 + /usr/bin/gzip -dc /builddir/build/SOURCES/comix.tar.gz + /bin/tar -xf - + STATUS=0 + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' + cd culmus-fancy-0.20051122 /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.vWyOk7: line 34: cd: culmus-fancy-0.20051122: No such file or directory RPM build errors: error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.vWyOk7 (%prep) Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.vWyOk7 (%prep) Child returncode was: 1 EXCEPTION: Command failed. See logs for output. It is not easy to write a multi-source srpm. It is definitely not recommended to try when you can go without. Since in your case, upstream already publishes each font set in a separate tar.gz, why don't you just do one simple mono-source srpm per tar.gz, instead of trying to force them all to collaborate in a single monster srpm ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 11:38:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 06:38:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487913] Review Request: culmus-fancy-fonts - Fancy fonts for Hebrew In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911281138.nASBcxTh009645@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487913 Dan Kenigsberg changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 11:38:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 06:38:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487913] Review Request: culmus-fancy-fonts - Fancy fonts for Hebrew In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911281138.nASBcGB6009405@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487913 Dan Kenigsberg changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #367959|0 |1 is obsolete| | Flag|needinfo?(danken at cs.technio | |n.ac.il) | --- Comment #8 from Dan Kenigsberg 2009-11-28 06:38:12 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=374387) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=374387) srpm with fixes to several of the problems you are perfectly correct. I should not waste any more of your or anybody else's time about this. I just wanted to leave a useful rpm behind, but uploaded a broken old attempt instead. thanks for your help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 13:50:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 08:50:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541694] Review Request: php-phpunit-File-Iterator - FilterIterator implementation that filters files based on a list of suffixes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911281350.nASDoXLq026758@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541694 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at famillecollet.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 14:03:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:03:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541694] Review Request: php-phpunit-File-Iterator - FilterIterator implementation that filters files based on a list of suffixes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911281403.nASE3KGh010944@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541694 --- Comment #6 from Remi Collet 2009-11-28 09:03:19 EDT --- REVIEW: + rpmlint is ok php-phpunit-File-Iterator.src: I: checking php-phpunit-File-Iterator.noarch: I: checking php-phpunit-File-Iterator.noarch: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. + package name ok + spec file name ok + package meet the PHP Guidelines + License ok : BSD + License is upstream + spec in english and legible + no license file in sources + sources match the upstream sources 8bd52abf03f3c8f86d296b4ee5d3d39d File_Iterator-1.1.0.tgz + Source URL ok + build on F12.x86_64 + BuildRequires (php-pear >= 1:1.7.2, php-channel(pear.phpunit.de)) ok + no locale + no .so - DONT own all directories that it creates + no duplicate file + %defattr ok + %clean section + use macros consistently + contain code + no documentation + no devel + no pkgconfig + no sub-package + no GUI + don't own files or directories already owned by other packages + %install start with rm -rf + valid UTF-8 + build in koji (dist-f13) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1835237 + no test suite + scriptlets ok + Final Requires ok /usr/bin/pear php-channel(pear.phpunit.de) php-common >= 5.2.0 + Final Provides ok php-pear(pear.phpunit.de/File_Iterator) = 1.1.0 php-phpunit-File-Iterator = 1.1.0-3.fc8 Changing minimal dependency for PEAR seems acceptable as it's only for "installer" MUST fix: - own /usr/share/pear/File -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 14:10:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:10:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538087] Review Request: dgc - A system for the creation of digital circuits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911281410.nASEAgE9031744@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538087 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-28 09:10:39 EDT --- dgc-0.98-3.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dgc-0.98-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 14:10:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:10:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538087] Review Request: dgc - A system for the creation of digital circuits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911281410.nASEAluO031784@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538087 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-28 09:10:46 EDT --- dgc-0.98-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dgc-0.98-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 14:10:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:10:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538087] Review Request: dgc - A system for the creation of digital circuits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911281410.nASEAror013117@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538087 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-28 09:10:52 EDT --- dgc-0.98-3.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dgc-0.98-3.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 14:15:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:15:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542028] Review Request: php-pear-Spreadsheet-Excel-Writer - Package for generating Excel spreadsheets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911281415.nASEFhEH000378@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542028 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at famillecollet.com --- Comment #1 from Remi Collet 2009-11-28 09:15:42 EDT --- It seems to be an auto-generated spec : > # Expand this as needed to avoid owning dirs owned by our dependencies > # and to avoid unowned dirs So you MUST own all the dir you create (as explicit writen in the Guidelines and in this comment) and you should, then, remove this comment. > Requires: php-(OLE) This is a bug, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536756 But I don't think php-pear-OLE is available in Fedora. So you must submit it for review first and set the it as a blocker for this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 14:19:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:19:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533765] Review Request: fedora-accessibility-guide-en-US - Using Fedora with a visual, hearing, or mobility impairment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911281419.nASEJ5NU000956@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533765 Eric Christensen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Eric Christensen 2009-11-28 09:19:04 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fedora-accessibility-guide-en-US Short Description: Fedora Accessibility Guide assists people with disabilities in using Fedora on their computers. Owners: sparks Branches: F-12, F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 14:22:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:22:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528469] Review Request: php-ezc-EventLogDatabaseTiein - eZ Components EventLogDatabaseTiein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911281422.nASEMSw8015766@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528469 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at famillecollet.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at famillecollet.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 14:22:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:22:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542036] Review Request: php-fpdf - PHP library to generate PDF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911281422.nASEMDDL015698@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542036 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tomspur at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #1 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-28 09:22:11 EDT --- Just a few comments for now: - You don't provide a source url, please add a comment like in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Troublesome_URLs - More than half of the package are docs/tutorials, how about spliting in a seperate package? Ok, its very small anyway, but I'd like to always install as less as nessessary, just a point of view ;) - You do a lot with chmod -x and the timestamps while converting to utf-8 are not preserved: How about: find -type f | xargs chmod -x dos2unix tutorial/* dos2unix install.txt license.txt # Convert to utf-8 pushd tutorial for file in calligra.z 20k_c1.txt; do iconv -f ISO-8859-1 -t UTF-8 -o $file.new $file && \ touch -r $file $file.new && \ mv $file.new $file done popd ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 14:22:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:22:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533744] Review Request: ImageJ - Image Processing and Analysis in Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911281422.nASEMRha001983@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533744 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mycae at yahoo.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 14:22:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:22:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530617] Review Request: libixp - Stand-alone client/server 9P library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911281422.nASEMwCU002096@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530617 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jochen at herr-schmitt.de -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 14:34:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:34:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540791] Review Request: rubygem-RubyInline - Write foreign code within your ruby code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911281434.nASEYc2D018707@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540791 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-28 09:34:37 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 14:34:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:34:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541807] Review Request: rubygem-ParseTree - Extracts the parse tree for a class/method and returns an s-expression In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911281434.nASEYdlm018734@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541807 Bug 541807 depends on bug 540791, which changed state. Bug 540791 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-RubyInline - Write foreign code within your ruby code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540791 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 14:32:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:32:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528469] Review Request: php-ezc-EventLogDatabaseTiein - eZ Components EventLogDatabaseTiein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911281432.nASEWGDC004624@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528469 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Remi Collet 2009-11-28 09:32:15 EDT --- REVIEW: + rpmlint is ok php-ezc-EventLogDatabaseTiein.src: I: checking php-ezc-EventLogDatabaseTiein.noarch: I: checking 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + package name ok + spec file name ok + package meet the PHP Guidelines (new update) + License ok : BSD + License is upstream + spec in english and legible + license file in sources is provided + sources match the upstream sources d261edd630fe9741cfc6be0cf3c41f93 EventLogDatabaseTiein-1.0.2.tgz + Source URL ok + build on F12.x86_64 + BuildRequires (php-pear >= 1:1.4.9-1.2, php-channel(components.ez.no)) ok + no locale + no .so + own all directories that it creates + no duplicate file + %defattr ok + %clean section + use macros consistently + contain code + small documentation not required to run + no devel + no pkgconfig + no sub-package + no GUI + don't own files or directories already owned by other packages + %install start with rm -rf + valid UTF-8 + build in koji http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1835253 + no test suite + scriptlets ok + Final Requires ok /usr/bin/pear php-common >= 5.2.1 php-pear(components.ez.no/Database) >= 1.2 php-pear(components.ez.no/EventLog) >= 1.0.3 + Final Provides ok php-pear(components.ez.no/EventLogDatabaseTiein) = 1.0.2 php-ezc-EventLogDatabaseTiein = 1.0.2-1.fc8 I think you should keep the Requires php-pear(components.ez.no/Base) >= 1.2. If this package is already required, version could be useful for documentation. **** APPROVED **** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 14:44:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:44:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911281444.nASEibLt021322@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 --- Comment #36 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-28 09:44:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #35) > I have written the spec, I want to know how to determine the default package > version of the libraries in the BuildRequire as shipped by fedora, so that I > can remove the versions. If you are asking here if explicit version dependency is needed for BuildRequires such as BuildRequires: gtk2-devel ">= 2.0", very simply saying it is basically unneeded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 14:57:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:57:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533919] Review Request: mplus fonts - The M+ family of fonts designed by Coji Morishita In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911281457.nASEvfsT024959@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533919 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(igshaan.mesias at gm | |ail.com) --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-11-28 09:57:38 EDT --- Here is my package review. Sorry it took longer than usual, was busy hacking a packager checker script (and given m+ is composed of 43 files, I'm so glad I took the time to finish the script before looking at it; could not have done the same level of review manually) This is an awesome font set, thank you very much for packaging it! Anyway, the review: 1. (not blocking) you don't include any fontconfig files, they would make your user's life a lot easier (however, CJK is quite a mess in fontconfig, so maybe it's better that way for now. Let's see what CJK users think of it) 2. (not blocking) rpmlint complains at the licensing string. I know the MPlus license has been approved by spot, so it's not a legal problem. However I fear all the repo-checking scripts will complain at you because of that. Please open a fedora rpmlint bug so the license gets added to its list. (however upstream would have made our life easier by using a standard font license such as the OFL or the GPL with font exception) 3. (not blocking) rpmlint complains some of the lines you used in descriptions are too long. Please break them in smaller (<80) bits 4. (blocking) same problem for at least one for your summaries 5. (not blocking) it seems rpmlint grew a spell-checker in fedora-devel. Please fix the spelling mistakes it has identified (ie everything which is not a human name) 6. (blocking) please make sure your Source0 is a full URL pointing to the source file. That will make your future packager life a lot easier (we have many sf-hosted projects in Fedora, so it can be done) 7. (not blocking) you don't need to repeat the "Group: User Interface/X" line in Fedora releases with a recent rpm 8. (not blocking) it would be nice if each sub-package had a different summary. What is the difference between 1c and 2c ? 9. (blocking) m++ipa.pe is a build script, it has nothing to do in %doc 10. (not blocking) you don't need to specify %dir %{_fontdir} in the common subpackage, it will be added automatically to each font subpackage 11. (not blocking) it's mostly cosmetic, but it would be nice if the font files cased the style names they declare (ie "Bold" instead of "bold"). Apps are not always smart enough to correct this 12. (not blocking) a few font files declare an "heavy" weight. The standard qualifier for "heavy" is "Black". That means weight selection won't work as expected in apps not smart enough to try every possible "Black" legacy alias. Please ask upstream to change this (also please have upstream check they did mean "Black" and not some other weight). Standard style qualifiers and their meaning have been described by Microsoft in the following whitepaper: http://blogs.msdn.com/text/attachment/2249036.ashx 13. (not blocking) the fonts fall just short of complete coverage for several languages and unicode blocks (we only test if a language/block needs less than 10 glyphs to be finished). Please relay upstream so it gets a chance to complete them (for example, ab is incomplete because the Unicode consortium added two glyphs to it this year IIRC) 14. (not blocking) it would be nice if upstream included the text of their license in the fonts copyright field, and not just "Copyright(c) 2009 M+ FONTS PROJECT" without licensing info 15. (not blocking) it would be nice if upstream released a source archive with source files and build scripts, so we can re-build in Fedora using our own fontforge version (that helps finding bugs in fontforge, and as our fontforge improves, so do the fonts we build with it) Please fix whatever you can and relay the requests to upstream when appropriate. I'll attach the output of latest repo-font-audit for your package so you have a copy of rpmlint errors, font naming warnings, and font coverage analysis. There are a lot of requests here but your package is quite complex. Given the number of packaged font files both you and upstream did a very good job, I've seen much worse in packages that only included a couple font files. NEEDINFO for now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 15:02:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 10:02:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533919] Review Request: mplus fonts - The M+ family of fonts designed by Coji Morishita In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911281502.nASF2WoI012157@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533919 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-11-28 10:02:31 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=374418) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=374418) repo-font-audit data for this package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 15:10:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 10:10:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911281510.nASFAMXq028116@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 --- Comment #37 from Roshan Singh 2009-11-28 10:10:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #36) > (In reply to comment #35) > > If you are asking here if explicit version dependency is needed > for BuildRequires such as BuildRequires: gtk2-devel ">= 2.0", > very simply saying it is basically unneeded. okay, being specific the dependencies are: wordnet-devel >= 3.0, glib2-devel >= 2.14, gtk2-devel >= 2.12, libnotify-devel >= 0.4.1, dbus-glib-devel >= 0.74 which ones can i omit -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 15:41:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 10:41:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911281541.nASFfiU0022185@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 --- Comment #38 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-28 10:41:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #37) > okay, being specific the dependencies are: > wordnet-devel >= 3.0, glib2-devel >= 2.14, gtk2-devel >= 2.12, libnotify-devel > >= 0.4.1, dbus-glib-devel >= 0.74 > > which ones can i omit All unneeded (on currently supported Fedora branches) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 15:59:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 10:59:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487913] Review Request: culmus-fancy-fonts - Fancy fonts for Hebrew In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911281559.nASFx4vs007349@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487913 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG | --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-11-28 10:59:02 EDT --- Please calm down, I couldn't guess you already went through the multi-source spec hackery in an unpublished srpm. Given you did it this way I'll review the result. I still think it would have been faster to drop the multi-sourcing and propose several srpms, but there is no need to go back now if the result works -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 15:58:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 10:58:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541491] Review Request: rubygem-ruby_parser - A ruby parser written in pure ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911281558.nASFwrsT007293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541491 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-28 10:58:51 EDT --- Some notes: * Explicit version dependency - ">= 3.0" on Requires: rubygem(sexp_processor) is redundant because all rubygem-sexp_processor shipped on Fedora satisfies this version dependency: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Explicit_Requires * %check ---------------------------------------------------------------- 16 # These test cases are carried in the ParseTree gem in test/. Carry them here 17 # rather than attempting to install ParseTree-doc in check and introducing a circular 18 # dependency 19 Source1: pt_testcase.rb 79 %check 80 pushd .%{geminstdir} 81 cp %{SOURCE1} test/ 82 rake test ---------------------------------------------------------------- - IMO if this script is really needed for "rake test" (and actually it seems so), this script should also be included in the rebuilt binary rpm (i.e. better to move the lines 80-81 to %build). ? Dependency loop - lib/gauntlet_rubyparser.rb contains: ---------------------------------------------------------------- 8 require 'rubygems' 9 require 'ruby2ruby' 10 require 'ruby_parser' 11 12 require 'gauntlet' ---------------------------------------------------------------- i.e. this script needs two other gems: "ruby2ruby" "gauntlet" - The formar one causes dependency loop - The latter one is not found on Fedora (even on review request) Can this dependency (rather, this script) be ignored? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 16:31:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 11:31:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542165] Review Request: testng - Java-based testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911281631.nASGVUAO002275@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542165 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-28 11:31:29 EDT --- scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1834451 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 16:27:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 11:27:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542165] New: Review Request: testng - Java-based testing framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: testng - Java-based testing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542165 Summary: Review Request: testng - Java-based testing framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPECS: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/testng.spec SRPMS: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/testng-5.10-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: TestNG is a testing framework inspired from JUnit and NUnit but introducing some new functionality, including flexible test configuration, and distributed test running. It is designed to cover unit tests as well as functional, end-to-end, integration, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 16:31:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 11:31:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542166] New: Review Request: patricia-trie - Java prefix tree library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: patricia-trie - Java prefix tree library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542166 Summary: Review Request: patricia-trie - Java prefix tree library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/patricia-trie.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/patricia-trie-0.2-1.20091116svn.fc12.src.rpm Description: Patricia is a prefix-tree (trie) implementation written in Java. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 16:36:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 11:36:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487913] Review Request: culmus-fancy-fonts - Fancy fonts for Hebrew In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911281636.nASGa7id016874@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487913 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(danken at cs.technio | |n.ac.il) --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-11-28 11:36:05 EDT --- Anyway, review check: 1. (informative) I'm afraid you're going to receive "bad font naming" warnings for Comix regularly. The current font naming is acceptable, however some of the very aggressive font name munging we have to perform because of the brokeness in other Fedora fonts seems to result in a spurious warning in your case (and I don't see how to avoid this without renouncing to detect the other broken fonts) 2. (not blocking) fontlint does not like anka, please relay upstream 3. (not blocking) you do not need to repeat "Group: User Interface/X" in Fedora releases that use a recent rpm 4. (not blocking) you do not need to require the common subpackage in your compat subpackage 5. (blocking) you don't want to obsolete fonts-hebrew-fancy < 0.20051122-7, you want to obsolete fonts-hebrew-fancy < 0.20051122-9 (assuming you'll never build anything newer as fonts-hebrew-fancy) 6. (not blocking) I'm sure users would appreciate descriptions that tell them the difference between each of those subpackages 7. (not blocking) you don't need the "%dir %{_fontdir}" in common, it will be auto-added to every font subpackage 8. (not blocking) your fontconfig rules are incomplete, you need to use the complete substitution pattern documented in /usr/share/fontconfig/templates/substitution-font-template-* 9. (not blocking) the way you package the licensing file is dangerous, if upstream ever changes the licensing file in one package but not the others you'll end up shipping the wrong legal info 10. (not blocking) some of the fonts have broken encoding in their copyright info when opened by gnome-font-viewer (no idea which one of gnome-font-viewer or the fonts is broken) 11. (not blocking) it would be nice if upstream's license included the FSF font exception that make a GPL font safe to use in a PDF (Looking at all those clm fonts I realise we should have used clm and not culmus as foundry prefix in the naming of culmus font rpms. Bah, not worth fixing it now) Anyway, apart from the broken obsolete, everything else can be fixed over time after Fedora import. Please fix the obsolete so I can approve this package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 16:54:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 11:54:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541512] Review Request: rubygem-ruby2ruby - Generate pure ruby from RubyParser compatible Sexps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911281654.nASGsSYC021211@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541512 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-28 11:54:27 EDT --- My comments are almost as the same as on bug 541491 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 17:32:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 12:32:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911281732.nASHWVQA030736@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(nobody at fedoraproj | |ect.org) --- Comment #34 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-11-28 12:32:26 EDT --- Ok, looking at this srpm, most of the warnings and errors are gone. Good! However: 1. (not blocking) fontlint does not like any of the resulting font files, they all need fixing but I guess it's not worse than before 2. (not blocking) the lucida typewriter files declare broken style naming that really needs fixing or apps won't be happy 3. (not blocking) all the files have almost-complete (but not complete) coverage of one or more unicode blocks (probably reflects unicode changes since they were last updated) 4. (blocking) License: Lucida is probably wrong for the base package, it should be GPLv2 and MIT 5. (not blocking) Requires: fontpackages-filesystem is not needed for the base package 6. (blocking) since the bitmap-fonts package does not exist anymore, it needs to be garbage-collected. Please add an Obsoletes: bitmap-fonts < 0.3-14 to the bitmap-fixed-fonts subpackage (let's not be fancy, it's not worth it) It seems I was a little optimistic before, this package needs some tweaking yet. But it has progressed a lot -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 17:36:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 12:36:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540885] Review Request: cableswig - Create interfaces to interpreted languages for templated code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911281736.nASHa0HR018260@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540885 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-28 12:35:59 EDT --- Do you have any place which you can put your spec/srpm on and we can download them by wget (for example) directly from? If not, you can check: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedorapeople.org and you can have about 150 MiB on fedorapeople.org. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 17:35:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 12:35:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911281735.nASHZmDq018211@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(psatpute at redhat.c | |om) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 17:35:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 12:35:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911281735.nASHZ5Ii031516@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 --- Comment #35 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-11-28 12:35:03 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=374438) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=374438) repo-font-audit test results for this package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 17:36:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 12:36:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911281736.nASHa5XO031815@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(nobody at fedoraproj | |ect.org) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 17:42:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 12:42:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541792] Review Request: woff - Encoding and Decoding for Web Open Font Format(Woff) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911281742.nASHgtgC019960@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541792 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(pnemade at redhat.co | |m) --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-11-28 12:42:53 EDT --- IMHO woff is a terrible idea, a waste of resources, will only muddy waters, and I doubt defining a new format just in case ie may want to pick it up sometime will end up well, but I guess that if this format starts being used in the field we may as well be able to decode it. However, this package does not even build in mock + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + cd woff-0.20091126 + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + make 'CFLAGS=-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic' -j2 cc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -c -o sfnt2woff.o sfnt2woff.c cc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -c -o woff.o woff.c cc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -c -o woff2sfnt.o woff2sfnt.c woff.c:43:18: error: zlib.h: No such file or directory woff.c: In function 'woffEncode': woff.c:255: error: 'uLong' undeclared (first use in this function) woff.c:255: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once woff.c:255: error: for each function it appears in.) woff.c:255: error: expected ';' before 'sourceLen' woff.c:276: error: 'sourceLen' undeclared (first use in this function) woff.c:280: error: 'destLen' undeclared (first use in this function) woff.c:280: warning: implicit declaration of function 'compressBound' woff.c:287: warning: implicit declaration of function 'compress2' woff.c:287: error: 'Bytef' undeclared (first use in this function) woff.c:287: error: expected expression before ')' token woff.c:288: error: expected ')' before 'Bytef' woff.c:288: warning: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'type name' woff.c:288: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size woff.c:289: error: 'Z_OK' undeclared (first use in this function) woff.c:135: warning: unused variable 'tableBase' woff.c: In function 'rebuildWoff': woff.c:406: warning: unused variable 'tableData' woff.c: In function 'woffSetMetadata': -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 18:00:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 13:00:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542036] Review Request: php-fpdf - PHP library to generate PDF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911281800.nASI07NE005591@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542036 --- Comment #2 from David Nalley 2009-11-28 13:00:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Just a few comments for now: > > - You don't provide a source url, > please add a comment like in > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Troublesome_URLs Done, I provided additional explanation in addition to the url. > > - More than half of the package are docs/tutorials, how about spliting in a > seperate package? > Ok, its very small anyway, but I'd like to always install as less as > nessessary, just a point of view ;) Done > > - You do a lot with chmod -x and the timestamps while converting to utf-8 are > not > preserved: > > How about: > find -type f | xargs chmod -x > dos2unix tutorial/* > dos2unix install.txt license.txt > # Convert to utf-8 > pushd tutorial > for file in calligra.z 20k_c1.txt; do > iconv -f ISO-8859-1 -t UTF-8 -o $file.new $file && \ > touch -r $file $file.new && \ > mv $file.new $file > done > popd As you can likely tell, I just iterated over the files. Thanks for pointing out the need to clean that up. I think that's done now. SPEC: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-fpdf.spec SRPM: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-fpdf-1.6-2.fc12.src.rpm Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 19:36:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 14:36:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 509798] Review Request: armv5tel-unknown-linux-gnueabi-binutils - A GNU collection of binary utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911281936.nASJaarB028015@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509798 --- Comment #11 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-11-28 14:36:33 EDT --- Sync with the latest binutils from F-12. http://peter.fedorapeople.org/armv5tel-unknown-linux-gnueabi-binutils.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/armv5tel-unknown-linux-gnueabi-binutils-2.19.51.0.14-35.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 20:27:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 15:27:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539912] Review Request: javacsv - Stream-based Java library for reading and writing CSV and other delimited data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911282027.nASKROYi005754@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539912 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sm at sandro-mathys.ch AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sm at sandro-mathys.ch Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Sandro Mathys 2009-11-28 15:27:23 EDT --- MUST Items Items marked as MUST are things that the package (or reviewer) MUST do. If a package fails a MUST item, that is considered a blocker. No package with blockers can be approved on a review. Those items must be fixed before approval can be given. * MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. OK $ rpmlint {SPECS,RPMS/noarch,SRPMS}/javacsv* javacsv.noarch: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings There's nothing in the upstream package that could be added to %doc so it's fine to ignore this warning. * MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK * MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. OK * MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. OK * MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK * MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK * MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. N/A * MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK * MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK * MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK $ sha1sum javacsv2.0.zip SOURCES/javacsv2.0.zip 3c9208d4584b7163023757ff7c928befca7ef56c javacsv2.0.zip 3c9208d4584b7163023757ff7c928befca7ef56c SOURCES/javacsv2.0.zip * MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. OK * MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. N/A * MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK * MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. N/A * MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A * MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. OK * MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. N/A * MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK * MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK * MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK * MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK * MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. OK * MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK * MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). OK (javadoc) * MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. N/A * MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A * MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A * MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). N/A * MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in.so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A * MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} N/A * MUST: Packages must NOT contain any.la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. N/A * MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a.desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. N/A * MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK * MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK * MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK SHOULD Items: Items marked as SHOULD are things that the package (or reviewer) SHOULD do, but is not required to do. * SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. N/A - upstream is unresponsive * SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. N/A * SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. OK * SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK * SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. N/A * SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. N/A * SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK * SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. N/A * SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. N/A --- This package is ready for approval but I ask you to fix the thing I mentioned earlier tonight in IRC: In %{_javadir} and %{_javadocdir} there should be a symlink from %{name} to %{name}-%{version}. Also, I'd not add %{_javadir}/* to %files as this is _very_ generic and dangerous. You should add %{_javadir}/%{name} and %{_javadir}/%{name}-%{version} to the list instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 21:26:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 16:26:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542210] New: Review Request: python-execnet - Elastic Python Deployment Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-execnet - Elastic Python Deployment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542210 Summary: Review Request: python-execnet - Elastic Python Deployment Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: thomas.moschny at gmx.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/python-execnet/python-execnet.spec SRPM URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/python-execnet/python-execnet-1.0.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Note: execnet was part of pylib (python-py) until python-py-1.0.2, and is no longer included starting with python-py-1.1.0. Description: The execnet package allows to: * instantiate local/remote Python Interpreters * send code for execution to one or many Interpreters * send and receive data between codeInterpreters through channels execnet performs zero-install bootstrapping into other interpreters; package installation is only required at the initiating side. execnet enables interoperation between CPython 2.4-3.1, Jython 2.5 and PyPy 1.1 and works well on Windows, Linux and OSX systems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 21:46:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 16:46:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541462] Review Request: rasmol - Molecular Graphics Visualization Tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911282146.nASLk6Ob023653@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541462 --- Comment #1 from Carl Byington 2009-11-28 16:46:05 EDT --- koji scratch build now works. http://www.five-ten-sg.com/rasmol.spec http://www.five-ten-sg.com/rasmol-2.7.5-5.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 22:36:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 17:36:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542222] Review Request: gradle-open-api - Open API definition for gradle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911282236.nASMaOGH022323@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542222 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-28 17:36:23 EDT --- RPMlint silent. Note that I did not package gradle itself. The package only generates open-api subpackage. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1835682 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 22:34:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 17:34:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542165] Review Request: testng - Java-based testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911282234.nASMYnSG003280@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542165 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |F13FeatureIDEA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 22:34:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 17:34:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542166] Review Request: patricia-trie - Java prefix tree library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911282234.nASMYj0E003225@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542166 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |F13FeatureIDEA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 28 22:35:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 17:35:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542222] New: Review Request: gradle-open-api - Open API definition for gradle Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gradle-open-api - Open API definition for gradle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542222 Summary: Review Request: gradle-open-api - Open API definition for gradle Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Status Whiteboard: F13FeatureIDEA Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/gradle.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/gradle-0.9-0.1.20091127git.fc12.src.rpm Description: Open API definition for gradle. It provides a simple versioned way to interact with gradle. The open API jar is all that is needed to develop/distribute a plugin. It provides some static functions that dynamically load gradle from a directory you specify to do things like create the UI or execute gradle commands directly (and I think some gradle debugger information may soon be accessible there). All you need is the gradle home directory and the open API jar. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 00:34:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 19:34:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540539] Review Request: gpdftext - Ebook PDF editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911290034.nAT0YDbc028714@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540539 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tomspur at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #2 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-28 19:34:12 EDT --- Just a few comments for now: - Why do you provide a own desktop file? The original desktop file will be translated, your provided one probably never. You should patch the desktop file and send your patch upstream to correct the missing ';'... - The desktop file contains a mime type: see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 01:34:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 20:34:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542028] Review Request: php-pear-Spreadsheet-Excel-Writer - Package for generating Excel spreadsheets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911290134.nAT1YvPP027939@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542028 --- Comment #2 from David Nalley 2009-11-28 20:34:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > It seems to be an auto-generated spec : Indeed it is. > > > # Expand this as needed to avoid owning dirs owned by our dependencies > > # and to avoid unowned dirs > > So you MUST own all the dir you create (as explicit writen in the Guidelines > and in this comment) and you should, then, remove this comment. ouch, thanks for catching that. > > Requires: php-(OLE) > > This is a bug, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536756 > > But I don't think php-pear-OLE is available in Fedora. So you must submit it > for review first and set the it as a blocker for this one. So it is. I have a spec file I am building. I'll submit it hopefully tonight and mark it as blocking this review. Thanks for the review Remi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 02:03:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 21:03:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542028] Review Request: php-pear-Spreadsheet-Excel-Writer - Package for generating Excel spreadsheets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911290203.nAT23iQ7002547@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542028 --- Comment #3 from David Nalley 2009-11-28 21:03:43 EDT --- Bah - forgot links to updated SPEC and SRPM SPEC: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-Spreadsheet-Excel-Writer.spec SRPM: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-Spreadsheet-Excel-Writer-0.9.1-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 02:02:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 21:02:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474549] Review Request: ca-cacert.org - CAcert.org CA root certificates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911290202.nAT22rVD002384@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #11 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-11-28 21:02:50 EDT --- Agreed. The above draft license gives me a headache. I really hope they find a lawyer at some point. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 06:40:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 01:40:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542292] Review Request: mintmenu - gnome-panel menu from LinuxMint In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911290640.nAT6etne002164@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542292 William Witt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 06:37:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 01:37:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542292] New: Review Request: mintmenu - gnome-panel menu from LinuxMint Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mintmenu - gnome-panel menu from LinuxMint https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542292 Summary: Review Request: mintmenu - gnome-panel menu from LinuxMint Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: william at witt-family.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.witt-family.net/mintmenu-4.9.0-1.fc12.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://www.witt-family.net/mintmenu.spec Description: One of the most advanced menus under Linux. MintMenu supports filtering, favorites, easy-uninstallation, autosession, and many other features. This is my forst package and I am in need of a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 07:03:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 02:03:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541207] Review Request: liborigin2 - library for reading OriginLab Origin 7.5 project files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911290703.nAT73TAJ008136@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541207 --- Comment #1 from supercyper 2009-11-29 02:03:28 EDT --- add API documentation SPEC: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/fqterm.spec SRPM: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/liborigin2-06042009-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 07:50:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 02:50:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526426] Review Request: OpenGL-gle - A Tubing and Extrusion Library for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911290750.nAT7okLM017932@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526426 Thomas Fitzsimmons changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fitzsim at fitzsim.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 07:57:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 02:57:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533753] Review Request: python-pep8 - Python style guide checker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911290757.nAT7vWjR032108@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533753 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-29 02:57:32 EDT --- python-pep8-0.4.2-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-pep8-0.4.2-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 07:57:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 02:57:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533753] Review Request: python-pep8 - Python style guide checker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911290757.nAT7vNx3019304@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533753 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-29 02:57:21 EDT --- python-pep8-0.4.2-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-pep8-0.4.2-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 07:57:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 02:57:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533753] Review Request: python-pep8 - Python style guide checker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911290757.nAT7vS1q019347@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533753 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-29 02:57:27 EDT --- python-pep8-0.4.2-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-pep8-0.4.2-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 07:58:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 02:58:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542292] Review Request: mintmenu - gnome-panel menu from LinuxMint In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911290758.nAT7wVec019516@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542292 --- Comment #1 from William Witt 2009-11-29 02:58:30 EDT --- Updated spec to account for python builddep and rebuilt srpm Spec URL: http://www.witt-family.net/mintmenu.spec SRPM URL: http://www.witt-family.net/mintmenu-4.9.0-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 09:14:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 04:14:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542313] New: Review Request: QTeXEngine - Add-on for QtiPlot to enable the export of 2D plots to TeX Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: QTeXEngine - Add-on for QtiPlot to enable the export of 2D plots to TeX Alias: QTeXEngine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542313 Summary: Review Request: QTeXEngine - Add-on for QtiPlot to enable the export of 2D plots to TeX Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://soft.proindependent.com/qtexengine/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: supercyper at 163.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, supercyper at 163.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description: QTeXEngine enables Qt based applications to easily export graphics created using the QPainter class to TeX. QTeXEngine is also a requirement for building qtiplot 0.9.7.10. SPEC: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/QTeXEngine.spec SRPM: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/QTeXEngine-0.2-0.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 09:14:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 04:14:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542313] Review Request: QTeXEngine - Add-on for QtiPlot to enable the export of 2D plots to TeX In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911290914.nAT9Eo8q017787@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542313 supercyper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 09:29:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 04:29:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528150] Review Request: invulgotracker - Tasks & projects tracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911290929.nAT9T795009713@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528150 --- Comment #8 from Tareq Al Jurf 2009-11-29 04:29:04 EDT --- Package Updated: Spec URL: http://taljurf.fedorapeople.org/Packages/i586/invulgotracker/invulgotracker.spec SRPM URL: http://taljurf.fedorapeople.org/Packages/i586/invulgotracker/invulgotracker-0.53.1-1.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 09:54:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 04:54:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542320] Review Request: plexus-lang - Plexus language bundle access component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911290954.nAT9saxx028620@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542320 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-29 04:54:35 EDT --- rpmlint unhappy: plexus-lang.noarch: W: no-documentation -- none was shipped by upstream plexus-lang.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/plexus-lang -- I believe rpmlint is correct here (this should really go into %_datadir), unfortunately we can't do anything about, the correct fix would require a change of %update_maven_depmap. Tens of other packages use this. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1836063 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 09:52:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 04:52:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542320] New: Review Request: plexus-lang - Plexus language bundle access component Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: plexus-lang - Plexus language bundle access component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542320 Summary: Review Request: plexus-lang - Plexus language bundle access component Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Status Whiteboard: F13FeatureIDEA Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/plexus-lang.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/plexus-lang-1.2-0.1.20091129svn.fc12.src.rpm Description: The Plexus project seeks to create end-to-end developer tools for writing applications. At the core is the container, which can be embedded or for a full scale application server. There are many reusable components for hibernate, form processing, jndi, i18n, velocity, etc. This package contains a language bundle access component. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 10:17:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 05:17:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538327] Review Request: otpd - One Time Password daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911291017.nATAHiS1002432@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538327 --- Comment #18 from Antoine Brenner 2009-11-29 05:17:38 EDT --- Hello Giuseppe, I am trying to build otpd on my centos5 workstation, but the src rpm does not work for me (I guess that the rpm format has changed between fedora12 and rhel5 because even trying to download multiple times did not help): error: unpacking of archive failed on file rpmbuild/otpd/otpd-3.2.4.tar.gz;4b1247dc: cpio: MD5 sum mismatch Here is my md5sum for the srpm otpd-3.2.4-2.src.rpm a8cf26978f45a69c3dbd6c65a353218f otpd-3.2.4-2.src.rpm Anyway, I thought I could try to build from the spec file directly. However, the released otpd-3.2.4.tar.gz is not available on google code: wget http://otpd.googlecode.com/files/otpd-3.2.4.tar.gz Resolving otpd.googlecode.com... 74.125.79.82 Connecting to otpd.googlecode.com|74.125.79.82|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found 11:04:21 ERROR 404: Not Found. Can you please add otpd-3.2.4.tar.gz to the downloadable files on googlecode ? Best regards, Antoine -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 10:33:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 05:33:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539912] Review Request: javacsv - Stream-based Java library for reading and writing CSV and other delimited data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911291033.nATAXJ1Z026249@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539912 Andreas Osowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 from Andreas Osowski 2009-11-29 05:33:17 EDT --- Thanks for the review. SPEC URL: http://th0br0.fedorapeople.org/javacsv-2.0/javacsv.spec SRPM URL: http://th0br0.fedorapeople.org/javacsv-2.0/javacsv-2.0-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 11:32:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 06:32:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542320] Review Request: plexus-lang - Plexus language bundle access component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911291132.nATBWCX4019719@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542320 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-29 06:32:10 EDT --- Removed redundant dependencies (urls remain the same, new scratch build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1836094) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 11:34:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 06:34:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542341] New: Review Request: mercury - Replacement for the Maven Artifact subsystem Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mercury - Replacement for the Maven Artifact subsystem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542341 Summary: Review Request: mercury - Replacement for the Maven Artifact subsystem Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Status Whiteboard: F13FeatureIDEA Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/mercury.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/mercury-1.0-0.1.alpha6.fc12.src.rpm Description: Maven Mercury is a replacement for the Maven Artifact subsystem, and a complete replacement for the HTTP/HTTPS/DAV/DAVS portions of the existing transport. This package only contains Logging, Artifact, External Dependencies and Event Framework. Transports, Mercury Repositories, Crypto, Metadata, Ant Tasks, Shared Utilities, Maven resolusion comparison, Wagon provider and Plexus Component are not provided. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 11:34:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 06:34:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542341] Review Request: mercury - Replacement for the Maven Artifact subsystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911291134.nATBYrSS007433@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542341 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-29 06:34:52 EDT --- Rpmlint silent and happy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 11:37:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 06:37:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542320] Review Request: plexus-lang - Plexus language bundle access component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911291137.nATBb1tM020845@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542320 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |542341 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 11:37:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 06:37:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542341] Review Request: mercury - Replacement for the Maven Artifact subsystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911291137.nATBb03m020820@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542341 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |542320 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 11:38:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 06:38:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539912] Review Request: javacsv - Stream-based Java library for reading and writing CSV and other delimited data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911291138.nATBcuBJ021055@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539912 --- Comment #4 from Sandro Mathys 2009-11-29 06:38:54 EDT --- I see all I asked for is done but the legibility somewhat suffered from this. Creating the correct symlinks is much easier than you think. Instead of: pushd . cd $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadir} ln -s %{name}-%{version}.jar %{name}.jar popd Simply do: ln -s %{name}-%{version}.jar $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadir}/%{name}.jar This will have the very same result. Still, if you prefer your way of creating the symlink at least replace: pushd . cd $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadir} With: pushd $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadir} That will result in the same thing (i.e. popd bringing you back to where you were). Of course, all of the above also goes for the javadoc stuff. We should finally be ready for approval after those changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 11:48:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 06:48:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541355] Review Request: python-couchdb - A Python library for working with CouchDB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911291148.nATBmdn3010204@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541355 --- Comment #3 from Terje R??sten 2009-11-29 06:48:38 EDT --- More comments: - the srpm linked don't work, however the koji srpm builds fine - please include the doc/ dir - do chmod more elegante e.g. find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{python_sitelib}/couchdb -name \*.py -print0 | xargs --null chmod 0644 - switch to %{__python} in build and install Fix these and I will do a formal review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 11:51:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 06:51:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528150] Review Request: invulgotracker - Tasks & projects tracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911291151.nATBpsLw023890@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528150 --- Comment #9 from Christoph Wickert 2009-11-29 06:51:52 EDT --- Your versioning is wrong: The package should now be 0.53.1-2 First version was 0.53-1. Then upsteam made a new release to fix the docdir problem. This was 0.51.1, so your second package was 0.53.1-1. Then you fixed some issues in 0.53.1-2 and now you fixed the icon thing, so you should be at 0.35.1-3. Please change this before I can approve the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 12:32:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 07:32:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537431] Review Request: mono-bouncycastle - Bouncy Castle Crypto Package for Mono In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911291232.nATCW8BB032597@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537431 --- Comment #2 from Kalev Lember 2009-11-29 07:32:06 EDT --- Scratch build (for F-12, since nant in rawhide is currently broken wrt bug 538908): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1836123 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 14:03:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 09:03:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539912] Review Request: javacsv - Stream-based Java library for reading and writing CSV and other delimited data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911291403.nATE3JqW020995@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539912 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Osowski 2009-11-29 09:03:17 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://th0br0.fedorapeople.org/javacsv-2.0/javacsv.spec SRPM URL: http://th0br0.fedorapeople.org/javacsv-2.0/javacsv-2.0-3.fc12.src.rpm * Sun Nov 29 2009 Andreas Osowski - 2.0-3 - Cosmetic Changes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 14:09:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 09:09:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539912] Review Request: javacsv - Stream-based Java library for reading and writing CSV and other delimited data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911291409.nATE9WLn009171@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539912 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Sandro Mathys 2009-11-29 09:09:31 EDT --- ------------------------------------------------------------- This package (javacsv) is APPROVED by red (Sandro Mathys) ------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 14:11:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 09:11:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539912] Review Request: javacsv - Stream-based Java library for reading and writing CSV and other delimited data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911291411.nATEBw3M023121@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539912 Andreas Osowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Andreas Osowski 2009-11-29 09:11:57 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: javacsv Short Description: Stream-based Java library for reading and writing CSV and other delimited data Owners: th0br0 Branches: F-11 F-12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 17:06:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:06:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527706] Review Request: mingw32-libgeotiff - MinGW port of libgeotiff Georeferenced image library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911291706.nATH63pH018503@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527706 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(dave at adsllc.com) --- Comment #17 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-11-29 12:06:01 EDT --- Ping, Dave. We are waiting for you :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 17:03:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:03:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 494695] Review Request: qutim - Multiplatform Instant Messenger on Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911291703.nATH3oRg017895@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494695 --- Comment #18 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-11-29 12:03:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > Thank you. All mentioned issue fixed, except one: > > * Also consider removing entirely %doc sections from plugin sub-packages. > paths fixed instead, and in plugins packages included its docs (only mrim do > not have it because it is absent in upstream tarball) > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1832695 > > http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/qutim/qutim-0.2.0-1.20.fc11.src.rpm Some new issues :) * In main package you forgot to mark owned directory %{_libdir}/%{name} as %dir * I believe, that instead of installing small icon to %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/16x16/ you intended to install to %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 17:17:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:17:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541793] Review Request: woffTools - Tool for manipulating and examining WOFF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911291717.nATHHm2n001482@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541793 --- Comment #1 from Parag 2009-11-29 12:17:47 EDT --- koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1836273 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 17:16:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:16:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541792] Review Request: woff - Encoding and Decoding for Web Open Font Format(Woff) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911291716.nATHGqUE001341@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541792 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(pnemade at redhat.co | |m) | --- Comment #2 from Parag 2009-11-29 12:16:50 EDT --- Thanks for having look at this package. Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SPECS/woff.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SRPMS/woff-0.20091126-2.fc12.src.rpm koji build:- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1836270 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 17:45:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:45:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538327] Review Request: otpd - One Time Password daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911291745.nATHjMZv008512@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538327 Giandomenico De Tullio changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ghisha at email.it --- Comment #19 from Giandomenico De Tullio 2009-11-29 12:45:19 EDT --- Hi Anto' >From Centos5 you can get-around for install .src.rpms builded on f12 (rpm + XZa payload). Try install mc, use mc to /enter/ into rpm, /enter/ in the CONTENT.cpio, select and copy the files -but .spec- in SOURCES and spec file in SPECS :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 18:05:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:05:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538327] Review Request: otpd - One Time Password daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911291805.nATI52vL013943@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538327 --- Comment #20 from Antoine Brenner 2009-11-29 13:05:00 EDT --- Hello, The mc trick worked like a charm, and the rpm was built without any errors. Thanks, Antoine -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 18:30:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:30:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542416] Review Request: - In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911291830.nATIUwe6007481@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542416 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cassmodiah at fedoraproject.or | |g Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 18:29:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:29:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542416] New: Review Request: - Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542416 Summary: Review Request: - Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian.kanngiesser at yahoo.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/yagtd/yagtd.spec SRPM URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/yagtd/yagtd-0.3.0-1.fc12.noarch.rpm Description:**yaGTD** project is a very simple utility designed to make the management of your to-do list quick and easy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 18:46:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:46:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911291846.nATIkEFs011423@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #34 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-29 13:46:10 EDT --- Some notes A. Description, etc. * Naming - Please explain why you want to name subpackages in libdspam(-foo) style. On Fedora usually subpackages are named as "dspam-libs" or "dspam-devel" or "dspam-hash" or so. ! By the way, but for "libdspam" and "libdspam-devel", the naming of libdspam-foo subpackages are definitely wrong because none of these package contains system-wide libraries. - Files under %_libdir/dspam are just plugins and not system-wide libraries. Also see below (about calling ldconfig) - "%package -n dspam-web" can simply be "%package web" * Dependency between subpackages https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package - "dspam" binary rpm should have "dspam-libs = %{version}-%{release}" - "dspam-hash" should have "dspam = %{version}-%{release}" (and other subpackage should have similar dependency). ! Note that dependency between subpackages should usually be EVR (Epoch-Version-Release) specific, not just version. * Other dependency - "Requires: pkgconfig" (for -devel subpackage) is no longer needed (for F-11/12/13) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/PkgconfigAutoRequires (This is still a draft, however will be accepted on 2009-12-03). - For perl module related dependency, please use virtual provides names instead of using rpm names directly. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#Perl_Requires_and_Provides B. %prep, %build, %install, %check * Timestamp - Please consider to use --------------------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" --------------------------------------------------------------- to keep timestamps on installed files. This method usually works for Makefiles generated by recent autotools. C. scriptlets / service * "source"ing /etc/profile - Why do you "source" /etc/profile? (note that rpm executes these scriptlets in subshells and subshell exits when those scriptlets are done) * Calling /sbin/ldconfig - You don't have to call /sbin/ldconfig for rpms not containing system-wide libraries (i.e. needed only for dspam-libs binary rpm) * restart service on %postun - is wrong because "restart" activates service even if the service was off before (this should be condrestart) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#Initscripts_in_spec_file_scriptlets * Missing Requires - Add missing "Requires(post): chkconfig" or so: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#Initscripts_in_spec_file_scriptlets * service-default-enabled https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#.23_chkconfig:_line - rpmlint shows: ------------------------------------------------------------- dspam.i686: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/dspam ------------------------------------------------------------- i.e. currently dspam service is enabled by default once dspam rpm is enabled, which is usually not desided. Usually service should be off by default, i.e. change the line ------------------------------------------------------------- # chkconfig: 345 70 30 ------------------------------------------------------------- to ------------------------------------------------------------- # chkconfig: - 70 30 ------------------------------------------------------------- D. %files * %defattr - Now we usually use %defattr(-.root.root,-) * Owner/Group/Permission --------------------------------------------------------------- -r-x--s--x 1 root root 88252 Nov 29 16:10 /usr/bin/dspam --------------------------------------------------------------- - However your spec file shows: --------------------------------------------------------------- 120 %configure \ 137 --with-dspam-owner='%{dspam_user}' \ 138 --with-dspam-group='%{dspam_group}' \ --------------------------------------------------------------- and build.log shows: --------------------------------------------------------------- 779 chown: changing ownership of `/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/dspam-3.9.0-0.9.BETA4.fc13.i386/usr/bin/dspam': Operation not permitted 784 chgrp: changing group of `/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/dspam-3.9.0-0.9.BETA4.fc13.i386/usr/bin/dspam': Operation not permitted 801 chown: changing ownership of `/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/dspam-3.9.0-0.9.BETA4.fc13.i386/var/lib/dspam': Operation not permitted 802 chgrp: changing group of `/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/dspam-3.9.0-0.9.BETA4.fc13.i386/var/lib/dspam': Operation not permitted 815 chown: changing ownership of `/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/dspam-3.9.0-0.9.BETA4.fc13.i386/var/log/dspam': Operation not permitted 816 chgrp: changing group of `/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/dspam-3.9.0-0.9.BETA4.fc13.i386/var/log/dspam': Operation not permitted --------------------------------------------------------------- So the owner/group of these files/directories seem wrong (in the binary rpms). Set these explicitly by %attr. - Also build.log shows: --------------------------------------------------------------- 798 chmod "770" /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/dspam-3.9.0-0.9.BETA4.fc13.i386/var/lib/dspam; \ 812 chmod "770" /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/dspam-3.9.0-0.9.BETA4.fc13.i386/var/log/dspam; \ --------------------------------------------------------------- However, currently these directories have 0755 permission (in the binary rpm). Please check if permissions are set correctly. * %files entry unification - By the way %files entry --------------------------------------------------------------- %files %dir foo/ foo/* --------------------------------------------------------------- (where foo/ is a directory) can be unified as --------------------------------------------------------------- %files foo/ --------------------------------------------------------------- This style contains the directory foo/ itself and all files/directories/etc under foo/. * Macros - Use %{_initddir} for %_sysconfdir/rc.d/init.d: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#Initscripts_on_the_filesystem * Directory ownership issue - The following directories are not owned by any packages: -------------------------------------------------------------- /usr/share/dspam/ /usr/share/dspam/sql-scripts/ -------------------------------------------------------------- E. Misc * Permission of files in srpm -------------------------------------------------------------- dspam.src: W: strange-permission dspam-logrotate 0600 dspam.src: W: strange-permission dspam-cron 0775 dspam.src: W: strange-permission dspam-init.d 0600 -------------------------------------------------------------- - Usually we request that all files in srpm should be 0644. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 18:50:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:50:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542416] Review Request: yagtd - Yet Another Getting Things Done In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911291850.nATIoNYI025609@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542416 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: yagtd - Yet | - | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 19:16:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 14:16:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911291916.nATJGORS031751@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #42 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-11-29 14:16:22 EDT --- If there no ftp or http source for the upstream sources which you are used in your package, you can specified a plain file name. In this case you should add a comment in your package in which you should explain exactly, how you have created the source file based on your CVS repository. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 19:34:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 14:34:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542416] Review Request: yagtd - Yet Another Getting Things Done In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911291934.nATJYrQK022782@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542416 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sven at lank.es --- Comment #1 from Sven Lankes 2009-11-29 14:34:51 EDT --- Some quick comments as mentioned on IRC: 1. you need to upload the SRPM, not the RPM (you should add a link to a koji scratch build of the package) 2. You need to click through the fedora-cla - without that you cannot become a packager 3. Something needs to be done about the 1.4 MiB scan of the 'mindmap' - it either needs to be dropped or moved to a -docs-subpackage. That png is much much larger than the rest of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 19:47:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 14:47:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542292] Review Request: mintmenu - gnome-panel menu from LinuxMint In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911291947.nATJlLth006410@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542292 --- Comment #2 from William Witt 2009-11-29 14:47:21 EDT --- Koji Build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1836352 Spec URL: http://www.witt-family.net/mintmenu.spec SRPM URL: http://www.witt-family.net/mintmenu-4.9.0-3.fc12.src.rpm Fixed a bug in launching a terminal from the system manager plugin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 19:48:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 14:48:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542436] New: Review Request: python-rackspace - Python language bindings for Rackspace CloudFiles API Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-rackspace - Python language bindings for Rackspace CloudFiles API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542436 Summary: Review Request: python-rackspace - Python language bindings for Rackspace CloudFiles API Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: acturneruk at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://c0456722.cdn.cloudfiles.rackspacecloud.com/python-cloudfiles.spec SRPM URL: http://c0456722.cdn.cloudfiles.rackspacecloud.com/python-cloudfiles-1.6.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: python-cloudfiles provides a simple interface to the Rackspace Cloud Files service. "Cloud Files is reliable, scalable and affordable web-based storage for backing up and archiving all your static content". Find out more at . This is my first package for Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 20:28:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 15:28:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530617] Review Request: libixp - Stand-alone client/server 9P library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911292028.nATKSx2O015316@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530617 --- Comment #7 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-11-29 15:28:57 EDT --- Good: + Basename of the SPEC file matches with package name. + Package fullfill naming guildelines + Consistently usage of rpm macros + URL tag shows on proper project homepage + Package contains most recent version of the software + Could download upstream tarball via spectool -g + Package tar ball matches with upstream (md5sum: 2a394310c209605ba54ecf5eab518bff) + License tag states MIT and LPL as valid oSS licenses + Package conatins verbain copy of the license text + Package contains subpackages + Subpackage has proper Requies to main package + Package has proper definition of BuildRoot + Package use smp_mflags + Buildroot will be cleaned at the beginning fo %clean and %install + Local build works fine + Rpmlint is silent on source rpm Bad: - License tag should be MIT and LPL and Public Domain, because I have found a source files which is declared as public domain oh the head of the source file - Package doesn't create a so file of the library. - Devel package shouldn't contains a static library - libixp package missing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 20:36:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 15:36:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534168] Review Request: groovy - Agile dynamic language for the Java Platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911292036.nATKagHD017020@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534168 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de --- Comment #3 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-11-29 15:36:41 EDT --- Some prereview question: * Why you have 'Reguires: groovy' on your package? * should 'Requires: ivy' be 'Requires apache-ivy'? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 20:48:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 15:48:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542416] Review Request: yagtd - Yet Another Getting Things Done In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911292048.nATKm5FS006458@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542416 --- Comment #2 from Simon Wesp 2009-11-29 15:48:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > 1. you need to upload the SRPM, not the RPM (you should add a link to a koji > scratch build of the package) my fault! http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/yagtd/yagtd-0.3.0-1.fc12.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1836547 btw, you know that only members of the packer-group can use koji? > 3. Something needs to be done about the 1.4 MiB scan of the 'mindmap' - it > either needs to be dropped or moved to a -docs-subpackage. That png is much > much larger than the rest of the package. The 'mindmap' is a bad file for a documentation. It should be dropped. It's not a meaningfully file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 20:48:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 15:48:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542458] New: Review Request: libqt4intf - Wrapper library for Qt4 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libqt4intf - Wrapper library for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542458 Summary: Review Request: libqt4intf - Wrapper library for Qt4 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: matthias at nlinux.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://listaller.nlinux.org/factory/rpmbuild/libqtintf4.spec SRPM URL: http://listaller.nlinux.org/factory/rpmbuild/libqt4intf5-1.72_Qt4.5.2-6.1.src.rpm Description: The libqt4intf library allows applications which use Free Pascal and Lazarus to be compiled for Qt4. The binding can be used with Lazarus >= 0.9.28 or without the LCL in "pure Pascal" programs. It is also possible for other non-C++ languages to link against libqt4intf.so access Qt4. I'm new to RPM packaging, I hope this package isn't too buggy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 20:58:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 15:58:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542461] New: Review Request: digna-fonts - Handwriting font Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: digna-fonts - Handwriting font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542461 Summary: Review Request: digna-fonts - Handwriting font Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: musuruan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://musuruan.fedorapeople.org/digna-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://musuruan.fedorapeople.org/digna-fonts-20031109-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Phranzysko's sister handwriting. Note: This package is required by zaz. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 21:00:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:00:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542463] New: Review Request: zaz - A puzzle game where the player has to arrange balls in triplets Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: zaz - A puzzle game where the player has to arrange balls in triplets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542463 Summary: Review Request: zaz - A puzzle game where the player has to arrange balls in triplets Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: musuruan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://musuruan.fedorapeople.org/zaz.spec SRPM URL: http://musuruan.fedorapeople.org/zaz-0.3.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Zaz is an arcade action puzzle game where the goal is to get rid of all incoming balls by rearranging their order and making triplets. It currently includes 6 different levels. The game's name is recursive and stands for "Zaz ain't Z". Notes: F12+ only. It requires digna-fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 21:02:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:02:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542461] Review Request: digna-fonts - Handwriting font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911292102.nATL2q9o022586@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542461 Andrea Musuruane changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |542463 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 21:02:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:02:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542463] Review Request: zaz - A puzzle game where the player has to arrange balls in triplets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911292102.nATL2pQL022561@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542463 Andrea Musuruane changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |542461 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 21:07:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:07:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 494695] Review Request: qutim - Multiplatform Instant Messenger on Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911292107.nATL72JW023648@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494695 --- Comment #19 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-11-29 16:06:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > * In main package you forgot to mark owned directory %{_libdir}/%{name} as %dir Oh, yes, thank you. > * I believe, that instead of installing small icon to > %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/16x16/ you intended to install to > %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps Fixed. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1836516 http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/qutim/qutim-0.2.0-1.21.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 21:11:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:11:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542416] Review Request: yagtd - Yet Another Getting Things Done In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911292111.nATLBQeO011765@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542416 --- Comment #3 from Sven Lankes 2009-11-29 16:11:24 EDT --- > btw, you know that only members of the packer-group can use koji? AFAIK this is wrong. Everyone who has signed/clicked-through the cla can submit scratch builds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 21:10:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:10:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541462] Review Request: rasmol - Molecular Graphics Visualization Tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911292110.nATLAD7U024416@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541462 Stefan Riemens changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fgfs.stefan at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Stefan Riemens 2009-11-29 16:10:12 EDT --- Just a really quick comment after skimming over the spec: %{__cp} -a data %buildroot%{_datadir}/%{name} %{__mv} %buildroot%{_libdir}/%{name}/* %buildroot%{_datadir}/%{name} %{__install} -D -m 644 src/%{name}.png %buildroot%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/%{name}.png Please use %{buildroot} consistently... Stefan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 21:31:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:31:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 519071] Review Request: wiipresent - Giving presentations (or control applications) with your Wiimote In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911292131.nATLVgFW016006@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519071 Dominic Hopf changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(bugzilla-redhat at j | |ens.kuehnel.org) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 21:33:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:33:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 519074] Review Request: fakeroot-ng - Fools programs into thinking they are running with root permission In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911292133.nATLXTXx029440@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519074 Dominic Hopf changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(bugzilla-redhat at j | |ens.kuehnel.org) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 21:32:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:32:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 519073] Review Request: chrootuid - This tool offers su and chroot fuctionaltity in one program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911292132.nATLWFBg016149@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519073 Dominic Hopf changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(bugzilla-redhat at j | |ens.kuehnel.org) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 22:23:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 17:23:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542416] Review Request: yagtd - Yet Another Getting Things Done In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911292223.nATMN7GT008867@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542416 --- Comment #4 from Simon Wesp 2009-11-29 17:23:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > AFAIK this is wrong. Everyone who has signed/clicked-through the cla can submit > scratch builds. Yes, you are right... There is a delay... Fabian tried it too early! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 22:35:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 17:35:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542292] Review Request: mintmenu - gnome-panel menu from LinuxMint In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911292235.nATMZOEZ030937@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542292 --- Comment #3 from William Witt 2009-11-29 17:35:23 EDT --- Fixed problems with rpmlint [unamanic at gimli ~]$ rpmlint /home/unamanic/rpmbuild/SRPMS/mintmenu-4.9.0-4.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1836647 Spec URL: http://www.witt-family.net/mintmenu.spec SRPM URL: http://www.witt-family.net/mintmenu-4.9.0-4.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 22:39:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 17:39:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541462] Review Request: rasmol - Molecular Graphics Visualization Tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911292239.nATMdGMQ012514@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541462 --- Comment #3 from Carl Byington 2009-11-29 17:39:15 EDT --- Fixed. http://www.five-ten-sg.com/rasmol.spec http://www.five-ten-sg.com/rasmol-2.7.5-6.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 23:48:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:48:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542500] New: Review Request: php-pear-OLE - Package for reading and writing OLE containers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-OLE - Package for reading and writing OLE containers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542500 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-OLE - Package for reading and writing OLE containers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: david at gnsa.us QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-OLE.spec SRPM URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-OLE-1.0.0-0.1.rc1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This package allows reading and writing of OLE (Object Linking and Embedding) compound documents. This format is used as container for Excel (.xls), Word (.doc) and other Microsoft file formats. rpmlint output: [ke4qqq at nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/php-pear-OLE-1.0.0-0.1.rc1.fc12.noarch.rpm php-pear-OLE.noarch: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/php-pear-OLE-1.0.0-0.1.rc1.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint php-pear-OLE.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. WRT the no doc warning - no documentation is shipped with the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 23:58:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:58:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542500] Review Request: php-pear-OLE - Package for reading and writing OLE containers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911292358.nATNwu3H030743@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542500 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |542028 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 29 23:58:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:58:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542028] Review Request: php-pear-Spreadsheet-Excel-Writer - Package for generating Excel spreadsheets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911292358.nATNwtSB030721@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542028 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |542500 --- Comment #4 from David Nalley 2009-11-29 18:58:54 EDT --- Adding php-pear-OLE as a blocker -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 00:37:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 19:37:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538327] Review Request: otpd - One Time Password daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911300037.nAU0bRBc006635@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538327 --- Comment #21 from Antoine Brenner 2009-11-29 19:37:25 EDT --- Hello, I am not sure if I should further comment on this bug or open a new one since what I am reporting is not 'packaging' related but more about the software itself. I could also report on the bugtracker of http://otpd.googlecode.com if needed. Please let me know which method is preferred. (I think googlecode might be the best place) As for my current issue, it is related to resynctool. The man page states that the output of resynctool (using a > redirection) is suitable as /etc/otpstate/username directly. However on my system, resynctool does not produce a one-liner suitable as state, but two lines. Example below: $ /usr/sbin/resynctool -1 990878 -2 457035 -u testuser -k 3cd0f53cd4d94b08d249b1f861e655d774fcf0e5 0: 990878 5:testuser:0000000000000002:::0:0:0: $ I do not know where the first line ("0: 990878\n") comes from, but it needs to be removed to fix the "5 (service error)" I get when testing with otpauth. IMO, this is a bug in resynctool. Regards, Antoine PS: A small command line HOTP client in the documentation folder would be a nice addition (for tests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 00:55:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 19:55:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542436] Review Request: python-rackspace - Python language bindings for Rackspace CloudFiles API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911300055.nAU0t9Em029128@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542436 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tomspur at fedoraproject.org Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #1 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-29 19:55:08 EDT --- Just a few comments, because I am no sponsor anyway: - There is no documentation. You should at least add %doc ChangeLog The folder doc would also be interesting -> %doc ChangeLog doc - There is no license file in the tarball: see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text - see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define Anything else looks good at the first sight. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 01:42:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:42:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542518] New: Review Request: usbview - USB topology and device viewer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: usbview - USB topology and device viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542518 Summary: Review Request: usbview - USB topology and device viewer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: itamar at ispbrasil.com.br QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://itamarjp.fedorapeople.org/usbview/usbview.spec SRPM URL: http://itamarjp.fedorapeople.org/usbview/usbview-1.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Display information about the topology of the devices connected to the USB bus on a Linux machine. It also displays detailed information on the individual devices. usbview is written by Greg Kroah-Hartman ---- koji scratch build -> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1836779 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 04:04:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 23:04:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542087] Review Request: php-pear-Services-Twitter - PHP interface to Twitter's API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911300404.nAU44X9l011873@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542087 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |david at gnsa.us Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 04:30:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 23:30:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542087] Review Request: php-pear-Services-Twitter - PHP interface to Twitter's API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911300430.nAU4U8pc018452@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542087 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from David Nalley 2009-11-29 23:30:06 EDT --- OK: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [ke4qqq at nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint ./php-pear-Services-Twitter.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/php-pear-Services-Twitter-0.4.0-1.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/php-pear-Services-Twitter-0.4.0-1.fc12.noarch.rpm php-pear-Services-Twitter.noarch: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Source indicates New BSD - which Fedora shortname is BSD which matches the spec file. NA: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK: The spec file must be written in American English. OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. [ke4qqq at nalleyx60 SOURCES]$ md5sum Services_Twitter-0.4.0* 443aea93d76934b26948e3c5b5c46c8e Services_Twitter-0.4.0.tgz 443aea93d76934b26948e3c5b5c46c8e Services_Twitter-0.4.0.tgz.1 OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. (see referenced koji build - no real build anyway) NA: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. NA: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. NA: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. OK: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. NA: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: Each package must consistently use macros. OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. NA: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). NA: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. NA: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. NA: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. This package of course is dependent on php-pear(HTTP_OAuth) >= 0.1.2 as you have noted in the bug. this package is APPROVED with the knowledge that you know you'll have to get HTTP_OAuth approved, built, and pushed before pushing this to the repos. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 04:35:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 23:35:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542087] Review Request: php-pear-Services-Twitter - PHP interface to Twitter's API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911300435.nAU4ZgY3031906@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542087 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |david at gnsa.us -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 04:37:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 23:37:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542075] Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL2 - Class for parsing and handling URL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911300437.nAU4b6DI032167@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542075 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |david at gnsa.us AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |david at gnsa.us Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 04:37:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 23:37:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542077] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Request2 - Provides an easy way to perform HTTP requests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911300437.nAU4bN0O032257@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542077 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |david at gnsa.us AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |david at gnsa.us Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 04:37:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 23:37:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542084] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-OAuth - Implementation of the OAuth spec In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911300437.nAU4bc0E020109@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542084 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |david at gnsa.us AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |david at gnsa.us Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 05:10:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 00:10:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542075] Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL2 - Class for parsing and handling URL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911300510.nAU5AtBg027141@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542075 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from David Nalley 2009-11-30 00:10:53 EDT --- OK: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [ke4qqq at nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint ./php-pear-Net-URL2.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/php-pear-Net-URL2-0.3.0-1.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/php-pear-Net-URL2-0.3.0-1.fc12.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Spec notes BSD - source in URL.php has BSD license text. NA: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK: The spec file must be written in American English. OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. [ke4qqq at nalleyx60 SOURCES]$ md5sum Net_URL2-0.3.0.tgz* 4fca066d249abdc3cd3c3018d424d82b Net_URL2-0.3.0.tgz 4fca066d249abdc3cd3c3018d424d82b Net_URL2-0.3.0.tgz.1 OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. NA: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. NA: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. NA: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. OK: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. OK: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. See Question Below: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Remi: I notice that in %files you have: %{pear_phpdir}/Net This probably belongs under the section below regarding single file/directory owned by multiple packages. This strikes me as wrong, as a number of things put files in that directory, and this line strikes me as taking ownership of the directory. However, you are the php packaging expert, so perhaps this is a place for me to learn. I may be way off, as yum whatprovides returns 13 responses for that directory, and multiple packages seem to own it when queried with rpm -qf OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: Each package must consistently use macros. OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. NA: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. NA: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. NA: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. See question above: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. I'll try and get the remaining two looked at tomorrow morning. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 05:34:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 00:34:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542084] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-OAuth - Implementation of the OAuth spec In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911300534.nAU5YXjC031960@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542084 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from David Nalley 2009-11-30 00:34:32 EDT --- OK: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [ke4qqq at nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint ./php-pear-HTTP-Request2.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/php-pear-HTTP-Request2-0.5.1-1.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/php-pear-HTTP-Request2-0.5.1-1.fc12.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Source contains New BSD license - shortname in Fedora licensing guidelines is BSD, which matches spec. NA: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK: The spec file must be written in American English. OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. [ke4qqq at nalleyx60 SOURCES]$ md5sum HTTP_Request2-0.5.1.tgz* 8096a3e9bbebf11780006e2c347ef650 HTTP_Request2-0.5.1.tgz 8096a3e9bbebf11780006e2c347ef650 HTTP_Request2-0.5.1.tgz.1 OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. NA: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. NA: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. NA: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. OK: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. NA: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: Each package must consistently use macros. OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. NA: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. NA: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. NA: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. Question : Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. Same question here as in 542077 - there is a %files entry that says: %{pear_phpdir}/HTTP OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 05:41:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 00:41:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542077] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Request2 - Provides an easy way to perform HTTP requests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911300541.nAU5f0Oh000965@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542077 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from David Nalley 2009-11-30 00:40:59 EDT --- OK: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [ke4qqq at nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint ./php-pear-HTTP-Request2.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/php-pear-HTTP-Request2-0.5.1-1.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/php-pear-HTTP-Request2-0.5.1-1.fc12.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Source contains New BSD license - shortname in Fedora licensing guidelines is BSD, which matches spec. NA: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK: The spec file must be written in American English. OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. [ke4qqq at nalleyx60 SOURCES]$ md5sum HTTP_Request2-0.5.1.tgz* 8096a3e9bbebf11780006e2c347ef650 HTTP_Request2-0.5.1.tgz 8096a3e9bbebf11780006e2c347ef650 HTTP_Request2-0.5.1.tgz.1 OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. NA: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. NA: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. NA: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. OK: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. NA: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: Each package must consistently use macros. OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. NA: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. NA: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. NA: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. Question : Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. Same question here as in 542075 - there is a %files entry that says: %{pear_phpdir}/HTTP OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 05:42:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 00:42:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542084] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-OAuth - Implementation of the OAuth spec In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911300542.nAU5g9nT013965@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542084 --- Comment #2 from David Nalley 2009-11-30 00:42:08 EDT --- Bah - blindly followed the srpm link - it contained the link to the srpm for 542077 - Ignore the above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 05:58:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 00:58:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542084] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-OAuth - Implementation of the OAuth spec In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911300558.nAU5w0pk017280@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542084 --- Comment #3 from Remi Collet 2009-11-30 00:57:59 EDT --- Sorry for the mistake Right link : http://remi.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-HTTP-OAuth.spec http://remi.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-HTTP-OAuth-0.1.5-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 06:00:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 01:00:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542077] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Request2 - Provides an easy way to perform HTTP requests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911300600.nAU60AIH005160@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542077 --- Comment #2 from Remi Collet 2009-11-30 01:00:09 EDT --- HTTP dir must be owned because HTTP_Request2 doesn't require any other package that already own it. + -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 06:01:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 01:01:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542075] Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL2 - Class for parsing and handling URL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911300601.nAU61Xqg018619@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542075 --- Comment #2 from Remi Collet 2009-11-30 01:01:32 EDT --- NET dir must be owned because Net_URL2 doesn't require any other package that already own it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 06:02:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 01:02:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542084] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-OAuth - Implementation of the OAuth spec In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911300602.nAU62a1X018795@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542084 --- Comment #4 from Remi Collet 2009-11-30 01:02:35 EDT --- This package doesn't own HTTP dir because it requires HTTP_Request2 which owns it. + -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 06:04:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 01:04:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542084] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-OAuth - Implementation of the OAuth spec In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911300604.nAU64Cs9005992@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542084 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from David Nalley 2009-11-30 01:04:11 EDT --- OK: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [ke4qqq at nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint php-pear-HTTP-OAuth.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/php-pear-HTTP-OAuth-0.1.5-1.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/php-pear-HTTP-OAuth-0.1.5-1.fc12.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Spec file cites BSD - source has New BSD license. NA: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK: The spec file must be written in American English. OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. [ke4qqq at nalleyx60 SOURCES]$ md5sum HTTP_OAuth-0.1.5.tgz* ae5829122e2356890dd72e4dd5094b6e HTTP_OAuth-0.1.5.tgz ae5829122e2356890dd72e4dd5094b6e HTTP_OAuth-0.1.5.tgz.1 OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. NA: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. NA: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. NA: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. OK: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. NA: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: Each package must consistently use macros. OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. NA: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). NA: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. NA: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. NA: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. APPROVED Thanks for the work Remi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 06:28:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 01:28:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541483] Review Request: MakerDialog - Utility that conveniently handle configuration properties In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911300628.nAU6SAdK026221@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541483 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2009-11-30 01:28:09 EDT --- Thanks I tried to build the examples and got to: $ cd examples $ cmake . $ make : /usr/include/MakerDialog/gtk/maker-dialog-gtk.h:30:23: error: ../config.h: No such file or directory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 06:26:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 01:26:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542075] Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL2 - Class for parsing and handling URL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911300626.nAU6Q3xj025478@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542075 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from David Nalley 2009-11-30 01:26:01 EDT --- While I understand that, I'd imagine that this is a pervasive problem (as indicated 13 packages already own that directory.) Perhaps the php packaging guidelines need to have an exception, or perhaps all the subdirectories that aren't package-specific be owned by php-pear. Anyway, APPROVED Thanks for the work -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 06:39:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 01:39:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542075] Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL2 - Class for parsing and handling URL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911300639.nAU6dZ2a016394@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542075 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Remi Collet 2009-11-30 01:39:34 EDT --- Thanks for the review New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-Net-URL2 Short Description: Class for parsing and handling URL Owners: remi Branches: F-12, F-11, EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 06:53:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 01:53:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528150] Review Request: invulgotracker - Tasks & projects tracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911300653.nAU6rx9c001325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528150 --- Comment #10 from Tareq Al Jurf 2009-11-30 01:53:57 EDT --- Fixed: SRPM http://taljurf.fedorapeople.org/Packages/i586/invulgotracker/invulgotracker-0.53.1-3.fc13.src.rpm SPEC: http://taljurf.fedorapeople.org/Packages/i586/invulgotracker/invulgotracker.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 06:53:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 01:53:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541491] Review Request: rubygem-ruby_parser - A ruby parser written in pure ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911300653.nAU6r9Cf001135@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541491 --- Comment #3 from Matthew Kent 2009-11-30 01:53:08 EDT --- Spec URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SPECS/rubygem-ruby_parser.spec SRPM URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SRPMS/rubygem-ruby_parser-2.0.4-2.fc13.src.rpm * Sun Nov 29 2009 Matthew Kent - 2.0.4-2 - Move pt_testcase.rb to the build stage so it's included in the rpm (#541491). - Drop version requirements for sexp_processor as it is a new package (#541491). - Exclude gauntlet_rubyparser.rb as it introduces a circular dependency (#541491). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 06:51:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 01:51:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541491] Review Request: rubygem-ruby_parser - A ruby parser written in pure ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911300651.nAU6pocT000844@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541491 --- Comment #2 from Matthew Kent 2009-11-30 01:51:49 EDT --- Thank you for the review. (In reply to comment #1) > Some notes: > > * Explicit version dependency > - ">= 3.0" on Requires: rubygem(sexp_processor) is redundant > because all rubygem-sexp_processor shipped on Fedora satisfies > this version dependency: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Explicit_Requires > Noted, thanks. > * %check > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > 16 # These test cases are carried in the ParseTree gem in test/. Carry > them here > 17 # rather than attempting to install ParseTree-doc in check and > introducing a circular > 18 # dependency > 19 Source1: pt_testcase.rb > 79 %check > 80 pushd .%{geminstdir} > 81 cp %{SOURCE1} test/ > 82 rake test > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > - IMO if this script is really needed for "rake test" (and actually > it seems so), this script should also be included in the rebuilt > binary rpm (i.e. better to move the lines 80-81 to %build). > Good idea. > ? Dependency loop > - lib/gauntlet_rubyparser.rb contains: > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > 8 require 'rubygems' > 9 require 'ruby2ruby' > 10 require 'ruby_parser' > 11 > 12 require 'gauntlet' > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > i.e. this script needs two other gems: "ruby2ruby" "gauntlet" > - The formar one causes dependency loop > - The latter one is not found on Fedora (even on review request) > Can this dependency (rather, this script) be ignored? Ah you noticed this as well, I should have added some notes inline. I chose to ignore it's dependencies as the developer didn't add it as either a primary or development dependency in the Rakefile. It's also not a library as far as I can tell, more of a script used in testing, and not included/invoked in any of the unit testing. Plus looking at the gauntlet gem itself it's clearly geared toward library development rather than providing functionality to a library. What's the correct approach here, %exclude the script? Add a note about it and leave dependencies as is? Will go on the assumption you'd rather it be excluded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 06:54:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 01:54:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541512] Review Request: rubygem-ruby2ruby - Generate pure ruby from RubyParser compatible Sexps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911300654.nAU6sGEE020447@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541512 --- Comment #2 from Matthew Kent 2009-11-30 01:54:15 EDT --- Spec URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SPECS/rubygem-ruby2ruby.spec SRPM URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SRPMS/rubygem-ruby2ruby-1.2.4-2.fc13.src.rpm * Sun Nov 29 2009 Matthew Kent - 1.2.4-2 - Move pt_testcase.rb to the build stage so it's included in the rpm (#541512). - Drop version requirements for sexp_processor and ruby_parser as they are new packages (#541512). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 06:55:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 01:55:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541807] Review Request: rubygem-ParseTree - Extracts the parse tree for a class/method and returns an s-expression In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911300655.nAU6tw22021053@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541807 --- Comment #1 from Matthew Kent 2009-11-30 01:55:57 EDT --- Spec URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SPECS/rubygem-ParseTree.spec SRPM URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SRPMS/rubygem-ParseTree-3.0.4-2.fc13.src.rpm * Sun Nov 29 2009 Matthew Kent - 3.0.4-2 - Exclude gauntlet_rubyparser.rb as it introduces a circular dependency. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 07:03:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 02:03:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542559] New: Review Request: rubygem-thor - Scripting framework that replaces rake, sake and rubigen Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-thor - Scripting framework that replaces rake, sake and rubigen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542559 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-thor - Scripting framework that replaces rake, sake and rubigen Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mkent at magoazul.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SPECS/rubygem-thor.spec SRPM URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SRPMS/rubygem-thor-0.12.0-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: Thor is a scripting framework that replaces rake, sake and rubigen. mkent at fedora-devel-chef:~/rpmbuild/SPECS$ rpmlint rubygem-thor.spec /var/tmp/results/rubygem-thor-* rubygem-thor-doc.noarch: W: no-documentation rubygem-thor-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/thor-0.12.0/ri/Thor/Shell/shell%3d-i.yaml %3d rubygem-thor-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/thor-0.12.0/ri/Thor/Shell/Basic/no%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-thor-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/thor-0.12.0/ri/Thor/Shell/Basic/padding%3d-i.yaml %3d rubygem-thor-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/thor-0.12.0/ri/Thor/Actions/ClassMethods/add_runtime_options%21-i.yaml %21 rubygem-thor-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/thor-0.12.0/ri/Thor/Base/ClassMethods/exit_on_failure%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-thor-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/thor-0.12.0/ri/Thor/Shell/Basic/yes%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-thor-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/thor-0.12.0/ri/Thor/Base/shell%3d-c.yaml %3d rubygem-thor-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/thor-0.12.0/ri/Thor/Actions/destination_root%3d-i.yaml %3d 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 07:08:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 02:08:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541491] Review Request: rubygem-ruby_parser - A ruby parser written in pure ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911300708.nAU78wG2004987@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541491 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-30 02:08:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > What's the correct approach here, %exclude the script? Add a note about it and > leave dependencies as is? > > Will go on the assumption you'd rather it be excluded. - If you are sure that no one would need this script, then simply exclude the script. However if there may be some people who wants this script, rather leave this script as it is (and also leave the dependency as it is). Those who want to use this script can install the needed dependency by him/herself ( note that I don't know how this script is to be used, so I would keep this script as it is ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 07:47:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 02:47:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540539] Review Request: gpdftext - Ebook PDF editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911300747.nAU7laR9014901@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540539 --- Comment #3 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-11-30 02:47:35 EDT --- Yes, upstream has been notified about the problems in the supplied desktop file and it has been fixed for the upstream release. It is not just the missing semi colons. I have provided my own as a temporary workaround update-desktop-database has been added. http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/gpdftext.spec http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/gpdftext-0.0.2-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 08:04:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:04:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541978] Review Request: pulseaudio-equalizer - PulseAudio Equalizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911300804.nAU84TZG018893@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541978 --- Comment #1 from Felix Kaechele 2009-11-30 03:03:05 EDT --- *** Bug 541738 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 08:04:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:04:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541738] Review Request: pulseaudio-equalizer - PulseAudio Equalizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911300804.nAU84SPG018863@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541738 Felix Kaechele changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |felix at fetzig.org Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Felix Kaechele 2009-11-30 03:03:05 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 541978 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 08:04:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:04:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542292] Review Request: mintmenu - gnome-panel menu from LinuxMint In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911300804.nAU84RFH005648@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542292 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |terjeros at phys.ntnu.no --- Comment #4 from Terje R??sten 2009-11-30 03:02:31 EDT --- Comments marked with ### #%global _libdir /usr/lib ### Remove Summary: Advanced Gnome menu Name: mintmenu Version: 4.9.0 ### align Name tag? BuildRequires: python-devel Requires: deskbar-applet, tracker, python >= 2.4, python < 3.0, pyxdg, gnome-python2-gnomedesktop, pygtk2, pygtk2-libglade, alacarte ### Split this line, many reviewers like only one package one each line. %description One of the most advanced menus under Linux. MintMenu supports filtering, favorites, easy-uninstallation, autosession, and many other features ### You could be a bit more informative here. %prep %setup -q -n mintmenu %install rm -rf %{buildroot} mkdir %{buildroot} cp -R usr %{buildroot}/ ### I would change that to cp -a ... cp %SOURCE1 %{buildroot}/%{_libdir}/linuxmint/mintMenu/ ### And this to cp -a %{SOURCE1} ... %post %postun ### Remove these %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %attr(0755, root, root) %{_bindir}/mintmenu %{_libdir}/bonobo/servers/mintMenu.server %{_libdir}/linuxmint/mintMenu/applications.list %{_libdir}/linuxmint/mintMenu/compile.py ### You have to redo the file listing, should the package own ### %{_libdir}/linuxmint and %{_libdir}/linuxmint/mintMenu? ### Remove the leading spaces. %{_libdir}/linuxmint/mintMenu/compile.pyc %{_libdir}/linuxmint/mintMenu/dotted.png %{_libdir}/linuxmint/mintMenu/icon.png -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 08:09:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:09:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542292] Review Request: mintmenu - gnome-panel menu from LinuxMint In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911300809.nAU89kOV020251@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542292 --- Comment #5 from Terje R??sten 2009-11-30 03:09:45 EDT --- Forgot, two more issues: - you should add a note why %build is empty. - seems like pure python code(?), then the package should be noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 08:13:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:13:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540539] Review Request: gpdftext - Ebook PDF editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911300813.nAU8D9CV008012@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540539 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cwickert at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #4 from Christoph Wickert 2009-11-30 03:13:08 EDT --- Why not use a quick sed fix as described in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/PackagingTricks#.desktop_files ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 08:55:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:55:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542580] New: Review Request: statusnet - Open Source microblogging platform Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: statusnet - Open Source microblogging platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542580 Summary: Review Request: statusnet - Open Source microblogging platform Product: Fedora Version: 12 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rpandit at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description: StatusNet is a Free and Open Source microblogging platform. It helps people in a community, company or group to exchange short (140 character) messages over the Web. Users can choose which people to "follow" and receive only their friends' or colleagues' status messages. SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/statusnet.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/statusnet-0.8.2-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 09:01:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 04:01:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542580] Review Request: statusnet - Open Source microblogging platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911300901.nAU91oe2021801@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542580 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |487388 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 09:01:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 04:01:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542580] Review Request: statusnet - Open Source microblogging platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911300901.nAU91i5q021718@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542580 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |487391 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 09:01:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 04:01:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542580] Review Request: statusnet - Open Source microblogging platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911300901.nAU91eaS021671@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542580 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |520771 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 09:01:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 04:01:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542580] Review Request: statusnet - Open Source microblogging platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911300901.nAU91klP021755@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542580 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |487389 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 08:57:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:57:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542580] Review Request: statusnet - Open Source microblogging platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911300857.nAU8vKUg020093@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542580 --- Comment #1 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-11-30 03:57:18 EDT --- Few things to note down: 1. Rpmlint says: statusnet.noarch: E: non-executable-script /var/www/statusnet/extlib/DB/DataObject/createTables.php 0644 /usr/bin/php statusnet.noarch: E: non-executable-script /var/www/statusnet/scripts/sessiongc.php 0644 /usr/bin/env statusnet.noarch: E: non-executable-script /var/www/statusnet/scripts/uncache_users.php 0644 /usr/bin/env statusnet.noarch: E: non-executable-script /var/www/statusnet/scripts/deleteuser.php 0644 /usr/bin/env statusnet.noarch: E: non-executable-script /var/www/statusnet/scripts/decache.php 0644 /usr/bin/env statusnet.noarch: E: non-executable-script /var/www/statusnet/scripts/reportsnapshot.php 0644 /usr/bin/env statusnet.noarch: E: non-executable-script /var/www/statusnet/scripts/triminboxes.php 0644 /usr/bin/env statusnet.noarch: E: non-executable-script /var/www/statusnet/scripts/showcache.php 0644 /usr/bin/env statusnet.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /var/www/statusnet/scripts/update_pot.sh statusnet.noarch: E: non-executable-script /var/www/statusnet/scripts/makegroupadmin.php 0644 /usr/bin/env statusnet.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /var/www/statusnet/extlib/facebook/facebookapi_php5_restlib.php statusnet.noarch: E: non-executable-script /var/www/statusnet/scripts/pingqueuehandler.php 0644 /usr/bin/env statusnet.noarch: E: non-executable-script /var/www/statusnet/scripts/registeruser.php 0644 /usr/bin/env statusnet.noarch: E: non-executable-script /var/www/statusnet/scripts/createsim.php 0644 /usr/bin/env 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 14 errors, 0 warnings. These can be ignored. 2. extlib carries external libraries which needs to be removed and instead dependencies from already existing packages need to be used. Will work on second point in coming days and update next release bump. Feel free to start review. Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 09:05:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 04:05:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541512] Review Request: rubygem-ruby2ruby - Generate pure ruby from RubyParser compatible Sexps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911300905.nAU958So023300@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541512 Matthew Kent changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |542559 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 09:05:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 04:05:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542559] Review Request: rubygem-thor - Scripting framework that replaces rake, sake and rubigen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911300905.nAU957WF023271@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542559 Matthew Kent changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |541807, 541512 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 09:05:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 04:05:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541807] Review Request: rubygem-ParseTree - Extracts the parse tree for a class/method and returns an s-expression In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911300905.nAU959pd023319@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541807 Matthew Kent changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |542559 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 09:10:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 04:10:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534168] Review Request: groovy - Agile dynamic language for the Java Platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911300910.nAU9AwYe024811@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534168 --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-30 04:10:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Some prereview question: > > * Why you have 'Reguires: groovy' on your package? Probably a mistake. > * should 'Requires: ivy' be 'Requires apache-ivy'? apache-ivy provides ivy. At least in jpackage the package is called ivy, therefore I find this good for cross-distro compatibility. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 09:14:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 04:14:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225786] Merge Review: gd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911300914.nAU9EMbq006490@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225786 --- Comment #18 from Marcela Ma?l??ov? 2009-11-30 04:14:19 EDT --- Problems in F-12: gd.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libgd.so.2.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 In previous review was mentioned problem with -f in these commands, but it's okay now. rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/libgd.la rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/libgd.a Could you comment the rpmlint's warning for finishing this review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 09:17:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 04:17:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226546] Merge Review: wvdial In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911300917.nAU9HUwe007593@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226546 --- Comment #4 from Michal Hlavinka 2009-11-30 04:17:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Comments: > > > > 1) Checking RPM_BUILD_ROOT != / is not necessary > > > > per Packaging Guidelines ( > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25clean ): > > > In the past, some packages checked that %{buildroot} was not / before deleting it. This is not necessary in Fedora, .... > > > > rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT is enough > > Ok, changed... improvement There's no need to check RPM_BUILD_ROOT != / in other sections too. It can be removed from %install section. This section is executed during build, not during package install, so it's not going to eat / neither. > > 2) %attr in %files section is used too much > > > > %attr(0755,root,root) %{_bindir}/* > > %attr(0644,root,root) %{_mandir}/man1/* > > %attr(0644,root,root) %{_mandir}/man5/* > > > > these are default permissions, thus not required to explicitly add there > > Ok, removed... verified > > 3) too much wildcards under %files section > > > > If upstream makes some changes in tarball and add/remove some files, this is > > not going to catch anything. It's good practice to list at least all files > > under %{_bindir}. This will let you know if there is any new/missing one. > > files under %{_bindir} and man pages listed more specifically. verified > > > 4) License > > > > There is no license info in the package except COPYING - LGPL. This means > > License tag should be set to LGPLv2+ > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing : > > > > """A GPL or LGPL licensed package that lacks any statement of what version that > > it's licensed under in the source code/program output/accompanying docs is > > technically licensed under *any* version of the GPL or LGPL, not just the > > version in whatever COPYING file they include. Note that this is LGPLv2+, not > > LGPL+, because version 2 was the first version of LGPL.""" > > Ok, changed LGPLv2 to LGPLv2+ verified > > 5) Versioned requires ( > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requires ) > > > > > First, if the lowest possible requirement is so old that nobody has a version older than that installed on any target distribution release, there's no need to include the version in the dependency at all. In that case we know the available software is new enough. For example, the version in gtk+-devel 1.2 dependency above is unnecessary for all Red Hat Linux distributions since (at least) release 6.2. As a rule of thumb, if the version is not required, don't add it just for fun. > > > > all 'ppp' versions (even in old RHELs) are newer than version specified, please > > remove it > > Removed versioned requires... verified > > > 6)Url and Source0 links does not work > > > > wget http://alumnit.ca/download/wvdial-1.61.tar.gz > > --2009-11-27 16:16:56-- http://alumnit.ca/download/wvdial-1.61.tar.gz > > Resolving alumnit.ca... 69.196.152.118 > > Connecting to alumnit.ca|69.196.152.118|:80... failed: Connection refused. > > > > > > wget 'http://alumnit.ca/wiki/?WvDial' > > --2009-11-27 16:17:30-- http://alumnit.ca/wiki/?WvDial > > Resolving alumnit.ca... 69.196.152.118 > > Connecting to alumnit.ca|69.196.152.118|:80... failed: Connection refused. > > I guess it is temporary issue... we'll see on Monday... Url link works, but Source0 link does not (http error 404). It seems sources has been moved to http://wvstreams.googlecode.com/files/wvdial-1.61.tar.gz $ curl -s http://wvstreams.googlecode.com/files/wvdial-1.61.tar.gz | md5sum acd3b2050c9b65fff2aecda6576ee7bc - $ cat sources acd3b2050c9b65fff2aecda6576ee7bc wvdial-1.61.tar.gz verified: sources matches latest upstream release, but Source0 link needs to be fixed > > 7) Missing info for patches > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment > > > > Every patch in spec file should contain a comment describing: > > * why is that patch used - bug number is enough > > * upstream information - was it sent upstream (and when)? taken from upstream? > > was it accepted/rejected? is this patch "fedora specific" ? > > I added the informations why the patch is used with bug numbers/short comments. > Some patches - like remotename and 9nums are Fedora specific. Compuserve patch > is just change to use more new Compuserve style (which increases the chance of > succesful connection). That one wvdial.conf manpage patch - I don't know, I'll > try to submit it once the website will be up. Anyway the package is not really > "alive" - current update was just to fix issues with new gcc/glibc. verified, but try to send them upstream please fix 1) and 6) and we're done here -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 09:30:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 04:30:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538327] Review Request: otpd - One Time Password daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911300930.nAU9UHnh030352@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538327 --- Comment #22 from Giuseppe Paterno 2009-11-30 04:29:49 EDT --- Sorry for the missing tar.gz, I'm always travelling and it's difficult to cope with everythihg :) I strongly suggest to try to get out of SVN the tree if the tar.gz is not in googlecode. the resynctool stuff is not a bug, it's an output of the sequence of OTPs, therefore only the last line has to be taken into consideration to be put in the status file. However, since it's more practical to "script" resynctool, I might decide to put a "verbose" flag into resynctool and get rid of that output if not requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 09:33:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 04:33:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541807] Review Request: rubygem-ParseTree - Extracts the parse tree for a class/method and returns an s-expression In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911300933.nAU9XL0u012071@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541807 --- Comment #2 from Matthew Kent 2009-11-30 04:33:20 EDT --- Spec URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SPECS/rubygem-ParseTree.spec SRPM URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SRPMS/rubygem-ParseTree-3.0.4-3.fc13.src.rpm * Mon Nov 30 2009 Matthew Kent - 3.0.4-3 - Remove exclude for gauntlet_parsetree.rb, let user deal with dependencies if they need it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 09:34:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 04:34:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541491] Review Request: rubygem-ruby_parser - A ruby parser written in pure ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911300934.nAU9Y28r031364@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541491 --- Comment #6 from Matthew Kent 2009-11-30 04:34:02 EDT --- Spec URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SPECS/rubygem-ruby_parser.spec SRPM URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SRPMS/rubygem-ruby_parser-2.0.4-3.fc13.src.rpm * Mon Nov 30 2009 Matthew Kent - 2.0.4-3 - Remove exclude for gauntlet_rubyparser.rb, let user deal with dependencies if they need it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 09:33:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 04:33:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541491] Review Request: rubygem-ruby_parser - A ruby parser written in pure ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911300933.nAU9XUZB031283@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541491 --- Comment #5 from Matthew Kent 2009-11-30 04:33:29 EDT --- Spec URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SPECS/rubygem-ruby_parser.spec SRPM URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SRPMS/rubygem-ruby_parser-2.0.4-2.fc13.src.rpm (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #2) > > What's the correct approach here, %exclude the script? Add a note about it and > > leave dependencies as is? > > > > Will go on the assumption you'd rather it be excluded. > > - If you are sure that no one would need this script, then simply > exclude the script. However if there may be some people who wants > this script, rather leave this script as it is (and also leave > the dependency as it is). Those who want to use this script can > install the needed dependency by him/herself > ( note that I don't know how this script is to be used, so I would > keep this script as it is ) Yeah I suppose I can't be certain no one would use it. I'll leave it in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 09:51:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 04:51:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226546] Merge Review: wvdial In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911300951.nAU9pR34003819@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226546 --- Comment #5 from Ondrej Vasik 2009-11-30 04:51:26 EDT --- 1) and 6) fixed in wvdial-1.61-3.fc13. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 10:09:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 05:09:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226546] Merge Review: wvdial In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301009.nAUA97wR008682@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226546 Michal Hlavinka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Michal Hlavinka 2009-11-30 05:08:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > 1) and 6) fixed in wvdial-1.61-3.fc13. verified, no other objections thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 10:24:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 05:24:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539480] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL - Simple http server class with SSL support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301024.nAUAOeER013086@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539480 --- Comment #1 from Gerd Pokorra 2009-11-30 05:24:39 EDT --- It looks good for me. I only would change "%{_mandir}/man3/*" to "%{_mandir}/man3/HTTP::Daemon::SSL.3pm.gz" because it is only one file. Gerd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 10:53:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 05:53:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226546] Merge Review: wvdial In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301053.nAUAreP2001364@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226546 --- Comment #7 from Ondrej Vasik 2009-11-30 05:53:33 EDT --- Thanks for review... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 10:57:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 05:57:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 504405] Review Request: jaxodraw - A Java program for drawing Feynman diagrams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301057.nAUAvtNY002460@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504405 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-30 05:57:54 EDT --- jaxodraw-2.0.1-4.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jaxodraw-2.0.1-4.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 10:57:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 05:57:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 504405] Review Request: jaxodraw - A Java program for drawing Feynman diagrams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301057.nAUAvKOu022039@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504405 --- Comment #20 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-11-30 05:57:13 EDT --- Whoops, slipped under my radar. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 10:58:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 05:58:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 504405] Review Request: jaxodraw - A Java program for drawing Feynman diagrams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301058.nAUAw1Nv022156@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504405 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-30 05:58:00 EDT --- jaxodraw-2.0.1-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jaxodraw-2.0.1-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 11:02:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 06:02:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538327] Review Request: otpd - One Time Password daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301102.nAUB2wP4003857@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538327 --- Comment #23 from Antoine Brenner 2009-11-30 06:02:55 EDT --- Hello, If the resynctool output is not a bug, then the bug is in the manpage of resynctool, that states that the output CAN be used to generate the status file. I agree with you that a verbose flag in resynctool would be a nicer way of fixing the problem. Regards, Antoine PS: Concerning the bugtracker choice, should I continue to report all my issues here ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 11:04:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 06:04:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539480] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL - Simple http server class with SSL support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301104.nAUB4eDX023651@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539480 --- Comment #2 from Steve Traylen 2009-11-30 06:04:39 EDT --- Hi Gerd, Updates for Comment #1 http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL/perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL.spec http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL/perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL-1.04-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 11:14:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 06:14:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540653] Review Request: jazzy - Java-based spell checker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301114.nAUBEE2C026146@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540653 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-11-30 06:14:12 EDT --- OK: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK: The spec file must be written in American English. OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires OK: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: Each package must consistently use macros. OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [26] OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [27] Once the issue in comment #2 is fixed package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 11:22:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 06:22:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541765] Review Request: NanoEngineer-1 - Nano-composite modeling and simulation program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301122.nAUBMw9u008789@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541765 Mary Ellen Foster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mefoster at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mefoster at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Mary Ellen Foster 2009-11-30 06:22:56 EDT --- Summary: a few minor points, and one more major one: - Can you verify that the license really is GPLv2+ and not GPLv2? - It would be helpful to add comments indicating what each of the patches does - The rpmlint output warns on the explicit Require: libgle after the renaming; please verify that it's really needed - Please create a .desktop file for the GUI application - My local build of this package segfaults when I run the NanoEngineer-1 executable. :( Here's the full checklist: [+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. With the s/gle/libgle/ modification, I get this: NanoEngineer-1.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libgle This is probably not an issue, as the package doesn't have an automatic dependency on libgle from anything else, but can you confirm that it really does need libgle at runtime? [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. -- As far as I can tell, the combined package is GPLv2 -- how do you get the +? (I'm prepared to be convinced because of all of the other License files shipped for libraries that it links against) [+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. -- md5sum Downloads/NanoEngineer-1_Suite_v1.1.1.12.tar.gz rpmbuild/SOURCES/NanoEngineer-1_Suite_v1.1.1.12.tar.gz 65646dc685d14156631d6c31d95b1b56 Downloads/NanoEngineer-1_Suite_v1.1.1.12.tar.gz 65646dc685d14156631d6c31d95b1b56 rpmbuild/SOURCES/NanoEngineer-1_Suite_v1.1.1.12.tar.gz [+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [7] [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. -- Looks good, and it was nice of upstream to create the page you reference. Don't forget to change "gle" to "libgle" [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [13] [+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [14] [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [15] [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [16] [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [17] [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [18] [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [19] [-] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [26] [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [27] [*] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [30] -- Can't test this yet until libgle gets accepted [-] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. I built this package locally on my x86_64, Fedora 12 machine, and here's what happened when I try to run it: starting NanoEngineer-1 in [/home/mef3], Mon Nov 30 11:14:04 2009 using Python: 2.6.2 (r262:71600, Aug 21 2009, 12:23:57) [GCC 4.4.1 20090818 (Red Hat 4.4.1-6)] on path: /usr/bin/python Version: NanoEngineer-1 v1.1.1 (running a GPL distribution) enabling developer features DISABLE_SLOT_ARGCOUNT_RETRY = True samevals.so/dll or Numeric not available, not using SAMEVALS_SPEEDUP made prefs db, basename /home/mef3/Nanorex/Preferences/bsddb-shelf didn't find /home/mef3/Nanorex/Preferences/default_prefs_v1-1-1.txt note: KNOWN_MMPFORMAT_VERSIONS contains more recent versions than the one we're writing by default, '080327 required; 080529 preferred' (saving history in file "/home/mef3/Nanorex/Histories/h20091130-111407.txt") Traceback (most recent call last): File "./main.py", line 142, in File "./main.py", line 137, in _start_NE1 File "/usr/lib64/NanoEngineer-1_0.9.2.app/program/ne1_startup/main_startup.py", line 201, in startup_script foo = MWsemantics() # This does a lot of initialization (in MainWindow.__init__) File "/usr/lib64/NanoEngineer-1_0.9.2.app/program/ne1_ui/MWsemantics.py", line 192, in __init__ self.setupUi() # Ui_MainWindow.setupUi() File "/usr/lib64/NanoEngineer-1_0.9.2.app/program/ne1_ui/Ui_MainWindow.py", line 97, in setupUi self.commandToolbar = CommandToolbar(self) File "/usr/lib64/NanoEngineer-1_0.9.2.app/program/commandToolbar/CommandToolbar.py", line 162, in __init__ self.setupUi() File "/usr/lib64/NanoEngineer-1_0.9.2.app/program/ne1_ui/toolbars/Ui_CommandToolbar.py", line 171, in setupUi self.flyoutToolBar = FlyoutToolBar(self) File "/usr/lib64/NanoEngineer-1_0.9.2.app/program/ne1_ui/toolbars/FlyoutToolbar.py", line 35, in __init__ self._setExtensionButtonIcon() File "/usr/lib64/NanoEngineer-1_0.9.2.app/program/ne1_ui/toolbars/FlyoutToolbar.py", line 71, in _setExtensionButtonIcon extension_button.setIcon(geticon( AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'setIcon' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 11:27:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 06:27:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526426] Review Request: OpenGL-gle - A Tubing and Extrusion Library for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301127.nAUBR00N009827@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526426 --- Comment #12 from Mary Ellen Foster 2009-11-30 06:26:58 EDT --- I've made a couple more updates to the package following the above comments: - use --disable-static on the build - tidy up the BuildRequires - rename to libgle The result is here: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/libgle/libgle-3.1.0-3.src.rpm http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/libgle/libgle.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 11:27:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 06:27:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526426] Review Request: libgle - A Tubing and Extrusion Library for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301127.nAUBRJWC029407@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526426 Mary Ellen Foster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: OpenGL-gle |Review Request: libgle - A |- A Tubing and Extrusion |Tubing and Extrusion |Library for OpenGL |Library for OpenGL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 11:35:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 06:35:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539480] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL - Simple http server class with SSL support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301135.nAUBZFnL013265@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539480 Gerd Pokorra changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 12:04:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 07:04:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540653] Review Request: jazzy - Java-based spell checker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301204.nAUC4Mk1020878@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540653 --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-30 07:04:20 EDT --- Thank you. New package: SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/jazzy.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/jazzy-0.5.2-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 12:03:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 07:03:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541694] Review Request: php-phpunit-File-Iterator - FilterIterator implementation that filters files based on a list of suffixes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301203.nAUC3Jfj020553@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541694 --- Comment #7 from Christof Damian 2009-11-30 07:03:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > > MUST fix: > - own /usr/share/pear/File I changed it to own all files and directories including and below /usr/share/pear/File Spec URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SPECS/php-phpunit-File-Iterator.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SRPMS/php-phpunit-File-Iterator-1.1.0-4.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 12:05:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 07:05:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539480] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL - Simple http server class with SSL support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301205.nAUC55U3021597@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539480 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Steve Traylen 2009-11-30 07:05:04 EDT --- Thanks for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL Short Description: Simple http server class with SSL support Owners: stevetraylen Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 EL-4 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 12:16:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 07:16:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540653] Review Request: jazzy - Java-based spell checker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301216.nAUCGSKm025308@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540653 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-11-30 07:16:26 EDT --- Thanks, APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 12:23:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 07:23:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226661] Merge Review: yaboot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301223.nAUCNeEE013641@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226661 Ivana Varekova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rrakus at redhat.com, | |varekova at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |varekova at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Ivana Varekova 2009-11-30 07:23:38 EDT --- My comments: - BAD: rpmlint flags an error: yaboot.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot Linux bootloader for Power Macintosh "New World" computers. yaboot.src:48: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes ybin yaboot.src:110: E: hardcoded-library-path in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/lib/yaboot/ yaboot.src:123: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/yaboot/addnote yaboot.src:124: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/yaboot/ofboot yaboot.src:125: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/yaboot/yaboot yaboot.src:126: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/yaboot/yaboot.debug yaboot.ppc: W: summary-ended-with-dot Linux bootloader for Power Macintosh "New World" computers. yaboot.ppc: W: obsolete-not-provided ybin yaboot.ppc: E: statically-linked-binary /usr/lib/yaboot/yaboot yaboot.ppc: W: executable-stack /usr/lib/yaboot/yaboot yaboot.ppc: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/yaboot/yaboot.debug yaboot.ppc: E: statically-linked-binary /usr/lib/yaboot/yaboot.debug yaboot.ppc: W: executable-stack /usr/lib/yaboot/yaboot.debug yaboot.ppc: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/yaboot-1.3.14/yaboot-howto.de.sgml - GOOD: package is named according to guidelines - GOOD: spec file named properly - BAD: wrong build root see Packaging/Guidelines - GOOD: package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines - GOOD: the License field in the package spec file does not match the actual license - GOOD: license files are shipped, but not marked as documentation (see below) - CHECK: spec file must be written in American English () - CHECK: The spec file is legible summary ends with dot - should not be there - GOOD: source upstream - GOOD: builds in mock - CHECK: no build dependencies necessary beyond base packages is ybin necessary, isn it obsolete - GOOD: doesn't ship locale files - GOOD: no libraries shipped - BAD: package is not relocatable see rpmlint output - BAD: shipped directories owned by package, direct dependency or filesystem: /usr/lib/yaboot/ is not owned - GOOD: no duplicates in %files - CHECK: wrong location of files -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 6132 Oct 29 12:02 /usr/lib/yaboot/addnote -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 11410 Oct 29 12:02 /usr/lib/yaboot/ofboot -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 198192 Oct 29 12:02 /usr/lib/yaboot/yaboot -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 454294 Oct 29 12:02 /usr/lib/yaboot/yaboot.debug is the location of these files ok? smoreover the last three have no executable permissions - seems to be bogus location for me - CHECK: permissions on files are set properly see the previous - GOOD: package has a %clean section - GOOD: package uses macros consistently - GOOD: no large documentation files - GOOD: header files - GOOD: no static libraries - GOOD: no pkgconfig files - GOOD: no libraries included - GOOD: no devel package - GOOD: no *.la libtool archives - GOOD: no desktop file - GOOD: owns files or directories owned by other packages: - BAD: build root is cleaned at the beginning of %install is not cleaned - GOOD: all file names are valid UTF-8 /usr/share/doc/yaboot-1.3.14/README.man.patch and /usr/share/doc/yaboot-1.3.14/Makefile should not be in documentation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 12:38:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 07:38:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541589] Review Request: sqljet - Pure Java SQLite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301238.nAUCcsKP031541@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541589 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-11-30 07:38:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > 0.) The -javadoc subpackage should requires jpackage-utils > ...that owns %_javadocdir Fixed. > > 1.) Does not build > you probably meant to add junit4 to the classpath Fixed. > > 2.) You don't use macros consistently > please use either $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot} macro but not both Fixed. > > The rest is just matter of clean style. Just for your considerations, probably > nothing that would block the review: > > You can do this in one shot, without calling rm: > -find -name '*.class' -exec rm -f '{}' \; > -find -name '*.jar' -exec rm -f '{}' \; > +find \( -name '*.class' -o -name '*.jar' \) -delete Fixed. (In reply to comment #2) > 3.) You do not run the test suite > Please do so, ideally in %check section. Seems like you'd need to add a > dependency on hamcrest. Test suite is failing for me and upstream build is a nightmare. I've submitted a few issues about that but no response yet. Hopefully this is not a blocker. > > I'd also suggest replacing Summary with something more descriptive, (i.e. > adding "database library" at the end or something like that). Hmm, I'm not sure I understand what you want. I picked the first paragraph of sqljet.com assuming upstream devs will describe their work best. > > The rest looks well > * Named and versioned in accordance with guidelines > * License ok, license tag correct, license present in package documentation > * spec file clean and legible > * filelist sane New package: Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/sqljet.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/sqljet-1.0.1-2.fc12.src.rpm Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1837449 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 12:38:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 07:38:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457279] Review Request: cerebro - Cerebro provides mesh network services and presence information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301238.nAUCcB8M017876@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 12:40:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 07:40:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457279] Review Request: cerebro - Cerebro provides mesh network services and presence information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301240.nAUCes7N032383@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 13:03:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:03:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540653] Review Request: jazzy - Java-based spell checker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301303.nAUD3ett006964@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540653 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-30 08:03:38 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: jazzy Short Description: Java-based spellchecker Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 13:02:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:02:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541589] Review Request: sqljet - Pure Java SQLite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301302.nAUD2WgC006754@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541589 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-30 08:02:30 EDT --- Thanks for the fixes. (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > 3.) You do not run the test suite > > Please do so, ideally in %check section. Seems like you'd need to add a > > dependency on hamcrest. > Test suite is failing for me and upstream build is a nightmare. I've submitted > a few issues about that but no response yet. Hopefully this is not a blocker. Sounds fair. > > I'd also suggest replacing Summary with something more descriptive, (i.e. > > adding "database library" at the end or something like that). > Hmm, I'm not sure I understand what you want. I picked the first paragraph of > sqljet.com assuming upstream devs will describe their work best. That was just a suggestion, feel free to keep your Summary if you feel it's better; definitely not a blocker or anything. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 13:12:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:12:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527706] Review Request: mingw32-libgeotiff - MinGW port of libgeotiff Georeferenced image library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301312.nAUDCrSS009534@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527706 Dave Ludlow changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(dave at adsllc.com) | --- Comment #18 from Dave Ludlow 2009-11-30 08:12:50 EDT --- Thanks for the ping... I now seem to be stuck. I've gotten to "Tag Or Update Your Branches" on this list: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join But I'm getting this error: [davel at myth F-12]$ make tag rpm: no arguments given for query cvs tag -c mingw32-libgeotiff-- ERROR: Tag mingw32-libgeotiff-- is not in name-version-release format cvs tag: Pre-tag check failed cvs [tag aborted]: correct the above errors first! make: *** [tag] Error 1 I've never seen this with any previous packages - suggestions? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 13:16:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:16:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529544] Review Request: php-phpunit-bytekit - A command-line tool built on the PHP Bytekit extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301316.nAUDGTn2028538@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529544 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-11-30 08:16:27 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-phpunit-bytekit Short Description: A command-line tool built on the PHP Bytekit extension Owners: llaumgui cdamian Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 13:17:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:17:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528469] Review Request: php-ezc-EventLogDatabaseTiein - eZ Components EventLogDatabaseTiein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301317.nAUDHLIG010812@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528469 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-11-30 08:17:19 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-ezc-EventLogDatabaseTiein Short Description: Contains the database writer backend for the EventLog component Owners: llaumgui Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 13:20:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:20:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541589] Review Request: sqljet - Pure Java SQLite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301320.nAUDKb8x029754@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541589 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-11-30 08:20:36 EDT --- Thanks for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sqljet Short Description: Pure Java SQLite Owners: akurtakov Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 13:43:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:43:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539863] Review Request: perl-Pod-PseudoPod - Extending the POD tags for book manuscripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301343.nAUDhadA003707@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539863 --- Comment #3 from Gerd Pokorra 2009-11-30 08:43:35 EDT --- Changed the basis to an autogenerated specfile. ExtUtils::MakeMaker is replaced with Module::Build. The file under the URLs are updated: ftp://ftp.uni-siegen.de/pub/parrot.rpms/PseudoPod/perl-Pod-PseudoPod.spec ftp://ftp.uni-siegen.de/pub/parrot.rpms/PseudoPod/perl-Pod-PseudoPod-0.15-1.fc11.src.rpm The latest scratch build is: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1838062 The rpmlint output reports: 0 errors, 0 warnings -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 13:57:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:57:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527706] Review Request: mingw32-libgeotiff - MinGW port of libgeotiff Georeferenced image library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301357.nAUDv2Di008242@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527706 --- Comment #19 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-11-30 08:57:01 EDT --- It seems that you forgot to checkout spec-file first. $ ./common/cvs-import.sh -b "branch name" -m "message" ~/path/to/mingw32-libgeotiff.srpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 14:14:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:14:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540539] Review Request: gpdftext - Ebook PDF editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301414.nAUEEW3d026249@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540539 --- Comment #5 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-11-30 09:14:30 EDT --- I prefer not using sed since the file can change upstream without me noticing with undesirable side effects. Anyway, it is temporary workaround since upstream is releasing a new version soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 14:12:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:12:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226661] Merge Review: yaboot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301412.nAUECOs1012326@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226661 --- Comment #2 from Roman Rakus 2009-11-30 09:12:22 EDT --- >- BAD: rpmlint flags an error: >yaboot.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot Linux bootloader for Power Macintosh "New >World" computers. fixed >yaboot.src:48: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes ybin fixed >yaboot.src:110: E: hardcoded-library-path in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/lib/yaboot/ >yaboot.src:123: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/yaboot/addnote >yaboot.src:124: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/yaboot/ofboot >yaboot.src:125: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/yaboot/yaboot >yaboot.src:126: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/yaboot/yaboot.debug This is special case. Yaboot binaries are needed to be in /usr/lib/yaboot dir. >yaboot.ppc: W: summary-ended-with-dot Linux bootloader for Power Macintosh "New >World" computers. fixed >yaboot.ppc: W: obsolete-not-provided ybin fixed >yaboot.ppc: E: statically-linked-binary /usr/lib/yaboot/yaboot >yaboot.ppc: W: executable-stack /usr/lib/yaboot/yaboot >yaboot.ppc: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/yaboot/yaboot.debug >yaboot.ppc: E: statically-linked-binary /usr/lib/yaboot/yaboot.debug >yaboot.ppc: W: executable-stack /usr/lib/yaboot/yaboot.debug Special case. Yaboot is bootloader, is not linux executable file, is meant to be executed only by OpenFirmware >yaboot.ppc: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/yaboot-1.3.14/yaboot-howto.de.sgml fixed >- GOOD: package is named according to guidelines >- GOOD: spec file named properly >- BAD: wrong build root >see Packaging/Guidelines fixed >- GOOD: package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the >Licensing Guidelines >- GOOD: the License field in the package spec file does not match the actual >license >- GOOD: license files are shipped, but not marked as documentation (see below) >- CHECK: spec file must be written in American English () Is or isn't? >- CHECK: The spec file is legible >summary ends with dot - should not be there fixed >- GOOD: source upstream >- GOOD: builds in mock >- CHECK: no build dependencies necessary beyond base packages >is ybin necessary, isn it obsolete fixed >- GOOD: doesn't ship locale files >- GOOD: no libraries shipped >- BAD: package is not relocatable >see rpmlint output see above >- BAD: shipped directories owned by package, direct dependency or >filesystem: >/usr/lib/yaboot/ is not owned fixed >- GOOD: no duplicates in %files >- CHECK: wrong location of files >-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 6132 Oct 29 12:02 >/usr/lib/yaboot/addnote >-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 11410 Oct 29 12:02 >/usr/lib/yaboot/ofboot >-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 198192 Oct 29 12:02 >/usr/lib/yaboot/yaboot >-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 454294 Oct 29 12:02 >/usr/lib/yaboot/yaboot.debug >is the location of these files ok? smoreover the last three have no executable >permissions - seems to be bogus location for me See above. >- CHECK: permissions on files are set properly >see the previous >- GOOD: package has a %clean section >- GOOD: package uses macros consistently >- GOOD: no large documentation files >- GOOD: header files >- GOOD: no static libraries >- GOOD: no pkgconfig files >- GOOD: no libraries included >- GOOD: no devel package >- GOOD: no *.la libtool archives >- GOOD: no desktop file >- GOOD: owns files or directories owned by other packages: >- BAD: build root is cleaned at the beginning of %install >is not cleaned fixed >- GOOD: all file names are valid UTF-8 > >/usr/share/doc/yaboot-1.3.14/README.man.patch >and >/usr/share/doc/yaboot-1.3.14/Makefile > should not be in documentation fixed See task http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1838144 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 14:18:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:18:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225729] Merge Review: enscript In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301418.nAUEIDk6014252@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225729 --- Comment #1 from Adam Tkac 2009-11-30 09:18:12 EDT --- Package enscript-1.6.4-15.fc13 should be fine, there is only one warning: enscript.spec:27: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes nenscript I wasn't able to figure which version of nenscript was the latest existing so I think warning is acceptable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 14:22:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:22:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540984] Review Request: aduna-root-poms - Root POMs for Aduna projects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301422.nAUEMkXt015744@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540984 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |akurtako at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |akurtako at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-11-30 09:22:46 EDT --- I'm taking this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 14:26:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:26:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540984] Review Request: aduna-root-poms - Root POMs for Aduna projects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301426.nAUEQp7m030184@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540984 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-11-30 09:26:50 EDT --- In order to make the maven builds behave normally i.e. correct dependencies you have to make this package depend on the packages providing the following artifacts (all listed in root pom): slf4j-api slf4j-simple jcl-over-slf4j logback-core logback-classic junit If you don't do that you will have to guess these dependencies on all the child poms because they expect to be satisfied from this pom. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 14:38:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:38:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225889] Merge Review: htdig In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301438.nAUEcZ0N000771@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225889 --- Comment #1 from Adam Tkac 2009-11-30 09:38:35 EDT --- Package htdig-3.2.0-0.9.b6.fc13 should be fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 14:48:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:48:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538327] Review Request: otpd - One Time Password daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301448.nAUEmmOp004016@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538327 --- Comment #24 from R P Herrold 2009-11-30 09:48:46 EDT --- The question was asked about how to unpack a SRPM made by a later RPM version -- the '--nomd5' sub option solved that, by omitting the checksum test. I see no problems with the packaging at this point. As I am not eligible to 'sign off' on a packaging, I will ask a friend to do the formal review. Was it possible to get the 'resynctool' added here, or in a side packaging? -- Russ herrold [herrold at centos-5 ~]$ cd build [herrold at centos-5 build]$ cd otpd/ [herrold at centos-5 otpd]$ wget http://www.gpaterno.com/external/otpd-3.2.4-2.src.rpm --2009-11-30 09:43:59-- http://www.gpaterno.com/external/otpd-3.2.4-2.src.rpm Resolving www.gpaterno.com... 78.46.44.108 Connecting to www.gpaterno.com|78.46.44.108|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 1198392 (1.1M) [application/x-rpm] Saving to: `otpd-3.2.4-2.src.rpm' 100%[======================================>] 1,198,392 280K/s in 5.4s 2009-11-30 09:44:06 (218 KB/s) - `otpd-3.2.4-2.src.rpm' saved [1198392/1198392] [herrold at centos-5 otpd]$ rpm -Uvh --nomd5 otpd-3.2.4-2.src.rpm 1:otpd ########################################### [100%] [herrold at centos-5 otpd]$ rpmbuild -ba ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/otpd.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 14:51:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:51:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226379] Merge Review: rsh In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301451.nAUEpRih024180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226379 --- Comment #1 from Adam Tkac 2009-11-30 09:51:26 EDT --- Package rsh-0.17-59.fc13 should be fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 14:46:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:46:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540986] Review Request: logback - A Java logging library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301446.nAUEkxI7022553@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540986 Mary Ellen Foster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |540984 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 14:46:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:46:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540984] Review Request: aduna-root-poms - Root POMs for Aduna projects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301446.nAUEkwF6022501@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540984 Mary Ellen Foster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |540986 --- Comment #3 from Mary Ellen Foster 2009-11-30 09:46:57 EDT --- Done -- good point. I've also fixed the versions in the changelog (cut-and-paste error). I guess this will now depend on the logback review ... http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/soprano-sesame/aduna-root-poms.spec http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/soprano-sesame/aduna-root-poms-11-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 14:50:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:50:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527706] Review Request: mingw32-libgeotiff - MinGW port of libgeotiff Georeferenced image library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301450.nAUEoIFI004929@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527706 --- Comment #20 from Dave Ludlow 2009-11-30 09:50:17 EDT --- I had done ./common/cvs-import.sh ~/path/to/mingw32-libgeotiff.srpm. To be safe, I just did ./common/cvs-import.sh -b "F-12" -m "Initial F-12 import" /home/davel/rpmbuild/SRPMS/mingw32-libgeotiff-1.3.0-0.1.svn1664.fc12.src.rpm and ./common/cvs-import.sh -b "F-11" -m "Initial F-11 import" /home/davel/rpmbuild/SRPMS/mingw32-libgeotiff-1.3.0-0.1.svn1664.fc12.src.rpm per your suggestion. I still get the same error. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 15:09:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:09:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225286] Merge Review: aspell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301509.nAUF9Fsi010286@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225286 Roman Rakus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rrakus at redhat.com AssignedTo|varekova at redhat.com |rrakus at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 15:15:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:15:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225243] Merge Review: amanda In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301515.nAUFF3bQ031264@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225243 --- Comment #18 from Daniel Novotny 2009-11-30 10:14:59 EDT --- hello Orion, All changes for the package review are made. Do you think it's enough (and you can do "fedora-review+") or do I need to change something more? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 15:16:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:16:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538327] Review Request: otpd - One Time Password daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301516.nAUFGNNs031681@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538327 --- Comment #25 from Giuseppe Paterno 2009-11-30 10:16:22 EDT --- I put a more confortable "-d" (debug) in resynctool in the new version. SPEC: http://www.gpaterno.com/external/otpd.spec SRPM: http://www.gpaterno.com/external/otpd-3.2.5-2.src.rpm Sources: http://otpd.googlecode.com/files/otpd-3.2.5.tar.gz Thank you all for your cooperation!!! @Antoine: if are related to this package, please do. If they are related to features/general issues, please consider also on http://code.google.com/p/otpd/issues/list Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 15:24:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:24:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540986] Review Request: logback - A Java logging library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301524.nAUFOXDQ015048@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540986 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |akurtako at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-11-30 10:24:32 EDT --- Few questions: * What is the maven problem that caused the need to use build.xml from debian? Please open a bug report against maven for that. * Is updating javamail out of question? Sounds like a way better option than patching out methods.With this patch we will be using text/plain mime type always which will break HTMLLayout of the the smtp appender. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 15:28:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:28:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541346] Review Request: polkit-kde - PolicyKit integration for KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301528.nAUFSVMO003504@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541346 --- Comment #7 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-11-30 10:28:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > #1 issue in this package: this needs a .desktop file so it actually get > started! Ops, you're right! How should obsoletes look then? As in kdebase-workspace there's %{version}-%{release} part - is it OK just to match current kdebase-workspace version/release? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 15:36:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:36:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226552] Merge Review: xdelta In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301536.nAUFa4ut018950@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226552 --- Comment #5 from Adam Tkac 2009-11-30 10:36:02 EDT --- All issues should be fixed in xdelta-1.1.4-8.fc13. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 15:43:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:43:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537897] Review Request: mingw32-openjpeg - mingw32 package for openjpeg In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301543.nAUFhESm008252@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537897 Adam Goode changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Adam Goode 2009-11-30 10:43:12 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-openjpeg Short Description: mingw32 package for openjpeg Owners: agoode Branches: F-11 F-12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 15:46:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:46:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225286] Merge Review: aspell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301546.nAUFkleH009163@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225286 Roman Rakus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ASSIGNED --- Comment #18 from Roman Rakus 2009-11-30 10:46:40 EDT --- # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review.[1] rpmlint ~/Download/aspell-* aspell.spec aspell.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/aspell-0.60/nroff-filter.so ['/usr/lib64'] aspell.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/aspell-0.60/sgml-filter.so ['/usr/lib64'] aspell.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/aspell-0.60/context-filter.so ['/usr/lib64'] aspell.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/aspell-0.60/email-filter.so ['/usr/lib64'] aspell.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/aspell-0.60/tex-filter.so ['/usr/lib64'] aspell.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/aspell-0.60/texinfo-filter.so ['/usr/lib64'] aspell.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/aspell ['/usr/lib64'] aspell.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libpspell.so.15.1.4 ['/usr/lib64'] aspell.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/aspell-0.60.6/aspell-import aspell.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/aspell-0.60.6/aspell-import /usr/bin/perl aspell-devel.x86_64: W: self-obsoletion pspell-devel < 0.13 obsoletes pspell-devel < 0.13 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 8 errors, 3 warnings. # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . ok # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] . ok # MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . ok # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [3] BAD # MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] ok # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] ok # MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] ok # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. ok # MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [7] ok # MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8] ok # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. ok # MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9] BAD # MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] ok # MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.[11] ok # MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [12] ok # MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [13] ok # MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [14] ok # MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [15] ok ------- # MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [16] # MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [17] # MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [18] # MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [19] # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [19] # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [20] # MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [21] # MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [22] # MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [20] # MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [23] # MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built.[21] # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [24] # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [25] # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [26] # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [27] ---- Got to go. I will finish it later... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 15:48:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:48:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538327] Review Request: otpd - One Time Password daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301548.nAUFmDIV022320@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538327 Giuseppe Paterno changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 15:55:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:55:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541462] Review Request: rasmol - Molecular Graphics Visualization Tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301555.nAUFtKaD024700@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541462 --- Comment #4 from Carl Byington 2009-11-30 10:55:19 EDT --- scratch build koji reference: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1838391 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 15:58:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:58:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538327] Review Request: otpd - One Time Password daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301558.nAUFwBjv012832@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538327 --- Comment #26 from R P Herrold 2009-11-30 10:58:09 EDT --- I see that even though I had disabled the otpd, it was started by a upgrade -- should there be a '[condrestart]' rather than an a formal [stop and start always] here? [herrold at centos-5 otpd]$ sudo rpm -Uvh /home/herrold/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/otpd-3.2.5-2.x86_64.rpm Password: Preparing... ########################################### [100%] 1:otpd ########################################### [100%] Stopping /usr/sbin/otpd: [FAILED] Starting /usr/sbin/otpd: [ OK ] [herrold at centos-5 otpd]$ An admin might want the man pages or the resynctool, but not the daemon, I think This is sort of discussed with implementations, at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484345 -- Russ herrold -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 16:04:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:04:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226521] Merge Review: uucp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301604.nAUG4WhJ027379@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226521 Adam Tkac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |atkac at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |atkac at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 16:05:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:05:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225901] Merge Review: inn In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301605.nAUG57g9015077@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225901 Adam Tkac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |atkac at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |atkac at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 16:13:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:13:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538327] Review Request: otpd - One Time Password daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301613.nAUGDQRe030507@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538327 --- Comment #27 from Giuseppe Paterno 2009-11-30 11:13:24 EDT --- I'm working to update the sources and the spec for a condrestart. I don't agree with you on splitting the package, IMHO in this release it doesn't have much sense to have resynctool and man pages without daemon. In next releases, where I think to use DB support, it might have sense to split packages. I'll wait for more feedbacks before regenerating the SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 16:24:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:24:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542715] New: Review Request: RabbitVCS - Easy version control Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: RabbitVCS - Easy version control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542715 Summary: Review Request: RabbitVCS - Easy version control Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nushio at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://nushio.fedorapeople.org/rabbitvcs/rabbitvcs.spec SRPM URL: http://nushio.fedorapeople.org/rabbitvcs/rabbitvcs-0.12-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: RabbitVCS is a set of graphical tools written to provide simple and straightforward access to the version control systems you use. Currently, it is integrated into the Nautilus file manager and only supports Subversion, but their goal is to incorporate other version control systems as well as other file managers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 16:36:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:36:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541694] Review Request: php-phpunit-File-Iterator - FilterIterator implementation that filters files based on a list of suffixes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301636.nAUGadDJ007001@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541694 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Remi Collet 2009-11-30 11:36:37 EDT --- All must fixed ***** APPROVED ***** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 16:47:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:47:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540986] Review Request: logback - A Java logging library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301647.nAUGlOlh010135@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540986 --- Comment #2 from Mary Ellen Foster 2009-11-30 11:47:22 EDT --- Good point about Maven -- I originally this package before I understood Maven very well. I was kind of scared of the (apparently optional) requirement for geronimo-jms in a couple of the POMs because geronimo-specs frankly scares me. The issue with javamail is: Fedora currently has classpathx-javamail, which has only ever implemented the 1.3 spec as far as I can tell (http://www.gnu.org/software/classpathx/javamail/javamail.html). I don't think there's currently a 1.4 implementation packaged for Fedora, so that would be a completely new package (see http://java.sun.com/products/javamail/FAQ.html#source). I guess I was feeling lazy, but I guess I really should address that. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 16:50:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:50:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542077] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Request2 - Provides an easy way to perform HTTP requests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301650.nAUGofgp029918@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542077 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from David Nalley 2009-11-30 11:50:38 EDT --- OK - thanks for the work APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 16:53:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:53:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541694] Review Request: php-phpunit-File-Iterator - FilterIterator implementation that filters files based on a list of suffixes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301653.nAUGr9mp030578@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541694 Christof Damian changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Christof Damian 2009-11-30 11:53:08 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-phpunit-File-Iterator Short Description: FilterIterator implementation that filters files based on a list of suffixes Owners: cdamian Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 16:56:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:56:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527706] Review Request: mingw32-libgeotiff - MinGW port of libgeotiff Georeferenced image library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301656.nAUGuHUF012751@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527706 --- Comment #21 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-11-30 11:56:16 EDT --- Perhaps you forgot to type $ cvs up in the mingw32-libgeotiff cvs directory. Since my last comment I see that you're uploaded all necessary files, and it's time to download them locally :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 17:01:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:01:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542084] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-OAuth - Implementation of the OAuth spec In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301701.nAUH19XZ000914@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542084 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 17:00:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:00:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542084] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-OAuth - Implementation of the OAuth spec In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301700.nAUH0ZDR014088@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542084 --- Comment #6 from Remi Collet 2009-11-30 12:00:34 EDT --- Thanks for the review New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-HTTP-OAuth Short Description: Implementation of the OAuth spec Owners: remi Branches: F-12, F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 17:02:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:02:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542087] Review Request: php-pear-Services-Twitter - PHP interface to Twitter's API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301702.nAUH22s6014372@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542087 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Remi Collet 2009-11-30 12:02:01 EDT --- Thanks for the review New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-Services-Twitter Short Description: PHP interface to Twitter's API Owners: remi Branches: F-12, F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 16:59:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:59:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542077] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Request2 - Provides an easy way to perform HTTP requests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301659.nAUGxqOJ013531@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542077 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Remi Collet 2009-11-30 11:59:51 EDT --- Thanks for the review New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-HTTP-Request2 Short Description: Provides an easy way to perform HTTP requests Owners: remi Branches: F-12, F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 17:21:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:21:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534168] Review Request: groovy - Agile dynamic language for the Java Platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301721.nAUHLGgX006822@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534168 --- Comment #5 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-11-30 12:21:14 EDT --- The project homepage of groovy offer groovy-1.6.6 as the current stable release. It may be nice, if you can offer a new package based on this release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 17:20:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:20:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542292] Review Request: mintmenu - gnome-panel menu from LinuxMint In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301720.nAUHK9i6006403@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542292 --- Comment #6 from William Witt 2009-11-30 12:20:07 EDT --- I copied the description tag directly from upstream. I can update it with something more descriptive if there is no reason to tay in sync with the description from them. How does one specify /usr/lib in a no arch package without using an absolute path? This is where upstream places the files. [unamanic at gimli ~]$ rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/mintmenu-4.9.0-5.fc12.src.rpm mintmenu.src:68: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package) %{_libdir}/bonobo/servers/mintMenu.server mintmenu.src:69: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package) %{_libdir}/linuxmint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1838646 Spec URL: http://www.witt-family.net/mintmenu.spec SRPM URL: http://www.witt-family.net/mintmenu-4.9.0-5.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 17:25:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:25:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] New: Review Request: f2c - The f2c Fortran to C/C++ conversion program and static libraries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: f2c - The f2c Fortran to C/C++ conversion program and static libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 Summary: Review Request: f2c - The f2c Fortran to C/C++ conversion program and static libraries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: carl at five-ten-sg.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://five-ten-sg.com/f2c.spec SRPM URL: http://five-ten-sg.com/f2c-20031026-3.0.2.fc12.src.rpm Description: F2c converts Fortran 77 source code to C or C++ source files. If no Fortran files are named on the command line, f2c can read Fortran from standard input and write C to standard output. koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1838661 This is part of my project to get ghemical and its dependencies into Fedora. ghemical buildrequires: f2c libSC-devel mopac7-devel oglappth-devel libghemical-data libghemical buildrequires: f2c libSC-devel mopac7-devel mopac7 buildrequires: f2c mpqc provides libSC7, libSC-devel oglappth provides oglappth-devel f2c provides f2c -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 17:37:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:37:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542292] Review Request: mintmenu - gnome-panel menu from LinuxMint In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301737.nAUHbDUC024067@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542292 --- Comment #7 from Terje R??sten 2009-11-30 12:37:12 EDT --- You might want to move to %{_datadir}. You then need to patch sources, /usr/lib seems to be hard coded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 17:35:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:35:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - The f2c Fortran to C/C++ conversion program and static libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301735.nAUHZgXr023820@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 --- Comment #1 from Carl Byington 2009-11-30 12:35:42 EDT --- It helps if I use the proper URLs. Spec URL: http://www.five-ten-sg.com/f2c.spec SRPM URL: http://www.five-ten-sg.com/f2c-20031026-3.0.2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 17:35:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:35:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542747] New: Review Request: oglappth - Libraries for the oglappth chemistry package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: oglappth - Libraries for the oglappth chemistry package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542747 Summary: Review Request: oglappth - Libraries for the oglappth chemistry package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: carl at five-ten-sg.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.five-ten-sg.com/oglappth.spec SRPM URL: http://www.five-ten-sg.com/oglappth-0.98-2.fc12.src.rpm Description: Library for creating portable OpenGL applications with easy-to-code scene setup and selection operations. koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1838670 This is part of my project to get ghemical and its dependencies into Fedora. ghemical buildrequires: f2c libSC-devel mopac7-devel oglappth-devel libghemical-data libghemical buildrequires: f2c libSC-devel mopac7-devel mopac7 buildrequires: f2c mpqc provides libSC7, libSC-devel oglappth provides oglappth-devel f2c provides f2c -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 17:42:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:42:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541491] Review Request: rubygem-ruby_parser - A ruby parser written in pure ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301742.nAUHgNdB025515@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541491 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-30 12:42:21 EDT --- One comment: ----------------------------------------------------- +# Script creates a circular dependency and is primarily for development +# Included, but it's dependencies aren't met. +%{geminstdir}/lib/gauntlet_rubyparser.rb ----------------------------------------------------- - This %files entry causes duplicate %files entry: ----------------------------------------------------- 120 warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ruby_parser-2.0.4/lib/gauntlet_rubyparser.rb ----------------------------------------------------- as this file is already included in ----------------------------------------------------- %{geminstdir}/lib ----------------------------------------------------- Just leave the line as a comment and avoid duplicate %files entry. -------------------------------------------------------------- This package (rubygem-ruby_parser) is APPROVED by mtasaka -------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 17:56:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:56:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542754] New: Review Request: artha - A handy thesaurus based on WordNet Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: artha - A handy thesaurus based on WordNet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542754 Summary: Review Request: artha - A handy thesaurus based on WordNet Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: singh.roshan08 at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lug.nitdgp.ac.in/users/roshan/artha/artha.spec SRPM URL: http://lug.nitdgp.ac.in/users/roshan/artha/artha-0.9.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Artha is a thesaurus that works completely off-line and is based on WordNet. Key features include hot key lookup, suggestions for incorrectly typed words, synonyms, antonyms and other similar words and notifications. Details can be found at http://artha.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Home . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 17:59:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:59:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301759.nAUHxx2x029365@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 --- Comment #39 from Roshan Singh 2009-11-30 12:59:57 EDT --- Here is my new review request for 'artha': https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542754 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 18:03:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:03:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527706] Review Request: mingw32-libgeotiff - MinGW port of libgeotiff Georeferenced image library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301803.nAUI3x1T030582@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527706 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-30 13:03:57 EDT --- mingw32-libgeotiff-1.3.0-0.1.svn1664.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-libgeotiff-1.3.0-0.1.svn1664.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 18:04:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:04:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527706] Review Request: mingw32-libgeotiff - MinGW port of libgeotiff Georeferenced image library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301804.nAUI4471018157@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527706 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-30 13:04:03 EDT --- mingw32-libgeotiff-1.3.0-0.1.svn1664.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-libgeotiff-1.3.0-0.1.svn1664.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 18:06:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:06:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542759] New: Review Request: mpqc - Ab-inito chemistry program Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mpqc - Ab-inito chemistry program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 Summary: Review Request: mpqc - Ab-inito chemistry program Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: carl at five-ten-sg.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mpqc.spec SRPM URL: http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mpqc-2.3.1-11.fc12.src.rpm Description: MPQC is the Massively Parallel Quantum Chemistry Program. It computes properties of atoms and molecules from first principles using the time independent Schr?dinger equation. It runs on a wide range of architectures ranging from individual workstations to symmetric multiprocessors to massively parallel computers. Its design is object oriented, using the C++ programming language. koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1838765 This is part of my project to get ghemical and its dependencies into Fedora. ghemical buildrequires: f2c libSC-devel mopac7-devel oglappth-devel libghemical-data libghemical buildrequires: f2c libSC-devel mopac7-devel mopac7 buildrequires: f2c mpqc provides libSC7, libSC-devel oglappth provides oglappth-devel f2c provides f2c -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 18:07:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:07:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527706] Review Request: mingw32-libgeotiff - MinGW port of libgeotiff Georeferenced image library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301807.nAUI7mL0019254@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527706 --- Comment #24 from Dave Ludlow 2009-11-30 13:07:47 EDT --- Thanks Peter. You were spot-on. I swear I tried that before. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 18:10:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:10:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542760] Review Request: mopac7 - Semi-empirical quantum mechanics suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301810.nAUIAca6020179@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542760 Carl Byington changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |542740 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 18:10:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:10:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - The f2c Fortran to C/C++ conversion program and static libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301810.nAUIAd3R020205@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 Carl Byington changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |542760 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 18:09:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:09:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542760] New: Review Request: mopac7 - Semi-empirical quantum mechanics suite Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mopac7 - Semi-empirical quantum mechanics suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542760 Summary: Review Request: mopac7 - Semi-empirical quantum mechanics suite Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: carl at five-ten-sg.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mopac7.spec SRPM URL: http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mopac7-1.15-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: MOPAC7 is a semi-empirical quantum-mechanics code written by James J. P. Stewart and co-workers. The purpose of this project is to maintain MOPAC7 as a stand-alone program as well as a library that provides the functionality of MOPAC7 to other programs. no scratch build yet, since this depends on f2c This is part of my project to get ghemical and its dependencies into Fedora. ghemical buildrequires: f2c libSC-devel mopac7-devel oglappth-devel libghemical-data libghemical buildrequires: f2c libSC-devel mopac7-devel mopac7 buildrequires: f2c mpqc provides libSC7, libSC-devel oglappth provides oglappth-devel f2c provides f2c -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 18:14:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:14:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-inito chemistry program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301814.nAUIEfQF021079@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 Carl Byington changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |542765 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 18:14:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:14:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542760] Review Request: mopac7 - Semi-empirical quantum mechanics suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301814.nAUIEgtO021101@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542760 Carl Byington changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |542765 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 18:14:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:14:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542765] Review Request: libghemical - Libraries for the Ghemical chemistry package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301814.nAUIEdIL021033@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542765 Carl Byington changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |542740, 542759, 542760 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 18:14:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:14:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - The f2c Fortran to C/C++ conversion program and static libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301814.nAUIEeA4021059@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 Carl Byington changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |542765 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 18:13:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:13:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542765] New: Review Request: libghemical - Libraries for the Ghemical chemistry package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libghemical - Libraries for the Ghemical chemistry package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542765 Summary: Review Request: libghemical - Libraries for the Ghemical chemistry package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: carl at five-ten-sg.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.five-ten-sg.com/libghemical.spec SRPM URL: http://www.five-ten-sg.com/libghemical-2.99.1-5.fc12.src.rpm Description: Library and data files for the ghemical computation chemistry package. no scratch build yet since this has dependencies. This is part of my project to get ghemical and its dependencies into Fedora. ghemical buildrequires: f2c libSC-devel mopac7-devel oglappth-devel libghemical-data libghemical buildrequires: f2c libSC-devel mopac7-devel mopac7 buildrequires: f2c mpqc provides libSC7, libSC-devel oglappth provides oglappth-devel f2c provides f2c -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 18:19:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:19:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-inito chemistry program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301819.nAUIJ6YY002158@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 Carl Byington changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |542767 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 18:19:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:19:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542760] Review Request: mopac7 - Semi-empirical quantum mechanics suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301819.nAUIJ7Ob002183@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542760 Carl Byington changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |542767 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 18:19:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:19:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542747] Review Request: oglappth - Libraries for the oglappth chemistry package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301819.nAUIJ5Y4002134@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542747 Carl Byington changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |542767 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 18:19:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:19:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542765] Review Request: libghemical - Libraries for the Ghemical chemistry package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301819.nAUIJ9gf002205@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542765 Carl Byington changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |542767 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 18:19:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:19:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - The f2c Fortran to C/C++ conversion program and static libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301819.nAUIJ4dF002109@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 Carl Byington changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |542767 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 18:19:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:19:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542767] Review Request: ghemical - Molecular mechanics and quantum mechanics frontend for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301819.nAUIJ3qE002085@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542767 Carl Byington changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |542740, 542759, 542747, | |542760, 542765 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 18:17:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:17:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542767] New: Review Request: ghemical - Molecular mechanics and quantum mechanics frontend for GNOME Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghemical - Molecular mechanics and quantum mechanics frontend for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542767 Summary: Review Request: ghemical - Molecular mechanics and quantum mechanics frontend for GNOME Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: carl at five-ten-sg.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.five-ten-sg.com/ghemical.spec SRPM URL: http://www.five-ten-sg.com/ghemical-2.99.2-4.fc12.src.rpm Description: Ghemical is a computational chemistry application. Ghemical is written in C++. It has a graphical user interface (in fact, a couple of them), and it supports both quantum-mechanics (semi-empirical and ab initio) models and molecular mechanics models (there is an experimental Tripos 5.2-like force field for organic molecules). Also a tool for reduced protein models is included. Geometry optimization, molecular dynamics and a large set of visualization tools are currently available. This is part of my project to get ghemical and its dependencies into Fedora. ghemical buildrequires: f2c libSC-devel mopac7-devel oglappth-devel libghemical-data libghemical buildrequires: f2c libSC-devel mopac7-devel mopac7 buildrequires: f2c mpqc provides libSC7, libSC-devel oglappth provides oglappth-devel f2c provides f2c -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 18:50:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:50:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542500] Review Request: php-pear-OLE - Package for reading and writing OLE containers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301850.nAUIokA6011532@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542500 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at famillecollet.com --- Comment #1 from Remi Collet 2009-11-30 13:50:45 EDT --- Just a quick note (I will try to do the full review ASAP) Requires: php >= 4.0.0 This have probably no interest (no php version 3 available anywhere) and this will bring a dependency on http (some use php in cli mode only or with another web server) When you need a minimal php version, you should Requires php-common >= #.#.# In this case, I think, you should remove this Requires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 19:15:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:15:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542754] Review Request: artha - A handy thesaurus based on WordNet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301915.nAUJFCRY006412@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542754 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-30 14:15:11 EDT --- Some quick notes: * Unneeded macros - You don't have to define %name, %version macros * Source - Source tarball included in your srpm does not match with what I could download fromt the URL written as Source0: --------------------------------------------------------- 165485 2009-05-17 14:22 artha-0.9.1.tar.gz 165078 2009-11-28 02:13 artha-0.9.1-1.fc11.src/artha-0.9.1.tar.gz --------------------------------------------------------- * License - Should be "GPLv2+" * BuildArch - "i386" is wrong because F-11 uses i586 and F-12 uses i686. And this BuildArch is completely unneeded (because this builds on ix86/x86_64/ppc/ppc64) * BuildRequires - "BR: autoconf, automake, libtool" don't seem to be needed because autotools are not called during build. - Please try to remove redundant BR. For example: * "gtk2-devel" always requires "glib2-devel", so "BR: glib2-devel" is redundant. * Note that "libnotify-devel" requires "glib2-devel" "gtk2-devel" "dbus-glib-devel" so these 3 BRs can be removed, however I don't object to keep writing "BR: gtk2-devel dbus-glib-devel" if you want. * Parallel make - Support parallel make if possible: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Parallel_make * Timestamp - Please consider to use --------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} INSTALL="install -p" --------------------------------------------------- to keep timestamps on installed files as much as possible. This method usually works for Makefiles generated by recent autotools. * %defattr - Now we usually use %defattr(-,root,root,-) * Directory ownership issue - The directory %{_datadir}/artha/ itself is not owned by any packages: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UnownedDirectories#Common_Mistakes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 19:18:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:18:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531605] Review Request: packmol - Packing Optimization for Molecular Dynamics Simulations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301918.nAUJIg1n007506@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531605 --- Comment #8 from Fabien A. 2009-11-30 14:18:40 EDT --- Hello, sorry to do a little up on this Review. Thanks in advance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 19:17:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:17:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541512] Review Request: rubygem-ruby2ruby - Generate pure ruby from RubyParser compatible Sexps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301917.nAUJHQv2006994@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541512 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-30 14:17:25 EDT --- Assigning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 19:23:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:23:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541491] Review Request: rubygem-ruby_parser - A ruby parser written in pure ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301923.nAUJNDIm008938@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541491 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-30 14:23:12 EDT --- One more thing * Timestamp - Use "cp -p" instead of just "cp" to keep timestamps on installed files: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps Still approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 19:27:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:27:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541512] Review Request: rubygem-ruby2ruby - Generate pure ruby from RubyParser compatible Sexps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301927.nAUJRPZ5022366@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541512 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-30 14:27:24 EDT --- Fix timestamp issue as in bug 541491. ------------------------------------------------------------- This package (rubygem-ruby2ruby) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 19:29:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:29:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542754] Review Request: artha - A handy thesaurus based on WordNet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301929.nAUJTnch010707@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542754 --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-11-30 14:29:49 EDT --- One more issue: * %buildroot vs $RPM_BUILD_ROOT - Please choose one and don't use both: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 19:43:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:43:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-inito chemistry program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301943.nAUJhjOB026689@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-11-30 14:43:44 EDT --- Well, this is a parallel program so MPI versions should be packaged as well. Currently the MPI stuff in Fedora is still in a bit of a state of flux, as the last tweaks are done to conform to the MPI guidelines http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/MPI (these were approved by FESCo months ago). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 19:47:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:47:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542760] Review Request: mopac7 - Semi-empirical quantum mechanics suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301947.nAUJl9xx016630@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542760 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-11-30 14:47:08 EDT --- Why don't you package OpenMopac 7.1? It's still under maintenance, MOPAC7 is not... http://openmopac.net/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 19:49:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:49:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531605] Review Request: packmol - Packing Optimization for Molecular Dynamics Simulations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911301949.nAUJnr5h017359@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531605 --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-11-30 14:49:51 EDT --- Well, I guess I am willing to sponsor you, even though I am a bit busy with work. Do you have any other submissions? Please fill in your surname in bugzilla. You should do a few informal reviews, so that I can see that you are familiar with the guidelines. An overview of the review process is available here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process Here are the most important guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines In addition to these, there are a bunch of language and application specific guidelines, that are linked to in the Packaging guidelines. Furthermore, you may need these http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_tricks http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues Please perform informal reviews only on _unassigned_ bugs that are *not* marked with the FE-NEEDSPONSOR tag, as I will need to do the formal review after you have done the informal one. PS. Adjust your spec file to 80 character width. This is most important to do with the stuff that can be seen with $ rpm -qi packmol i.e. the summary, description and changelog (which can be seen with rpm -q --changelog packmol). Are you sure you ran rpmlint on *all* of the packages? If you didn't run it on the srpm, you need to run it on the spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 20:09:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:09:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534168] Review Request: groovy - Agile dynamic language for the Java Platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911302009.nAUK9ud4023286@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534168 --- Comment #6 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-30 15:09:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > The project homepage of groovy offer groovy-1.6.6 as the current stable > release. > > It may be nice, if you can offer a new package based on this release. Sure, here you are: SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/groovy.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/groovy-1.6.6-1.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 20:10:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:10:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - The f2c Fortran to C/C++ conversion program and static libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911302010.nAUKAD9B023641@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 20:26:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:26:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - The f2c Fortran to C/C++ conversion program and static libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911302026.nAUKQkVF028525@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-11-30 15:26:45 EDT --- - Move the static library to a -static subpackage (or don't ship it at all - why bother with static libraries?). - You are mixing styles, i.e. $RPM_BUILD_ROOT vs. %{buildroot}, $RPM_OPT_FLAGS vs. %{optflags}. - I think you can safely drop the alpha stuff ("%ifarch axp" and %patch0). Otherwise, add a comment to the spec about the patch. - If you drop the patch, replace make RPM_OPT_FLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" MFLAG="$MFLAG" with make CFLAGS="%{optflags}" - Please use %{_bindir}/f2c %{_includedir}/f2c.h instead of using wildcards when referring to single files. Don't mix %{name} and f2c interchangeably in the spec. - Preserve time stamps in %install with "install -p". - Don't use "install -s" which strips the binary. - You don't need to create the installation directories with mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_libdir} mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_includedir} mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_bindir} mkdir -p %{buildroot}/%{_mandir}/man1 if you just use install -D. => e.g. %install rm -rf %{buildroot} install -D -p -m 644 libf2c/libf2c.a %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/libf2c.a install -D -p -m 644 f2c.h %{buildroot}%{_includedir}/f2c.h install -D -p -m 755 src/f2c %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/f2c install -D -p -m 644 src/f2c.1t %{buildroot}/%{_mandir}/man1/f2c.1 install -D -p -m 755 libf2c/libf2c.so.0.22 %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/libf2c.so.0.22 ln -sf libf2c.so.0.22 %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/libf2c.so - I guess you can tidy the changelog by removing the oldest entries that are not versioned. - rpmlint is not clean: f2c.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot The f2c Fortran to C/C++ conversion program and static libraries. f2c.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary f2c f2c.src:12: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes f2c-libs f2c.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot The f2c Fortran to C/C++ conversion program and static libraries. f2c.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary f2c f2c.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided f2c-libs f2c.x86_64: E: no-ldconfig-symlink /usr/lib64/libf2c.so.0.22 f2c.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libf2c.so.0.22 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 f2c.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libf2c.so f2c.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/f2c.h f2c.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libf2c.a 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 10 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 20:28:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:28:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - The f2c Fortran to C/C++ conversion program and static libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911302028.nAUKStMd006937@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-11-30 15:28:54 EDT --- - You don't need to obsolete f2c-libs anymore. Drop it. - You don't need to care about the shared-lib-calls-exit warning. Once you have fixed the issues raised above, I will do the full review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 20:32:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:32:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534135] Review Request: xstream - Java XML serialization library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911302032.nAUKWpUx008149@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534135 --- Comment #9 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-11-30 15:32:49 EDT --- @Mical Please assign this bug to you. At least: from my point of view your review is very poor. I'm waiting for the CVS import, because I want to do the review for groovy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 20:30:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:30:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542760] Review Request: mopac7 - Semi-empirical quantum mechanics suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911302030.nAUKUXkU007720@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542760 --- Comment #2 from Carl Byington 2009-11-30 15:30:32 EDT --- http://openmopac.net/Downloads/Mopac_7.1source.zip only contains microsoft .dsp style make files, nothing to help with building on linux. http://www.uku.fi/~thassine/projects/download/current/mopac7-1.15.tar.gz is the version used by the author of ghemical. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 20:36:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:36:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-inito chemistry program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911302036.nAUKadvQ009419@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 --- Comment #2 from Carl Byington 2009-11-30 15:36:38 EDT --- For the purposes of ghemical, we just need the libSC stuff from mpqc. Those libraries are then used by ghemical. The only executable is a command line 'molrender' and a gui tkmolrender frontend. Do you have any suggested .spec changes to enable MPI versions? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 21:01:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:01:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542436] Review Request: python-cloudfiles - Python language bindings for Rackspace CloudFiles API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911302101.nAUL1kQT005946@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542436 Andrew Turner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |python-rackspace - Python |python-cloudfiles - Python |language bindings for |language bindings for |Rackspace CloudFiles API |Rackspace CloudFiles API --- Comment #2 from Andrew Turner 2009-11-30 16:01:45 EDT --- Changed incorrect package name in Summary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 21:06:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:06:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911302106.nAUL6E0r017938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #58 from Tim Fenn 2009-11-30 16:06:08 EDT --- libcurl support is due in 0.6.1 according to upstream. Therefore, a few menu options do not work in this build: Spec URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/coot.spec SRPM URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/coot-0.6-5.20091130svn2528.fc12.src.rpm However, its trivial to download the deprecated guile libraries to add support for those that are interested, until 0.6.1 comes along. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 21:30:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:30:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542436] Review Request: python-cloudfiles - Python language bindings for Rackspace CloudFiles API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911302130.nAULUZXi025056@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542436 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Turner 2009-11-30 16:30:33 EDT --- Thomas, Thanks for your reply. I have added %doc ChangeLog docs to the spec file, and changed the %define to %global. The original source package contains a COPYING file, which contains the license - is this okay, or do I need to add my own? Kind regards, Andrew -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 21:45:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:45:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-inito chemistry program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911302145.nAULjtdN019115@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-11-30 16:45:54 EDT --- I'll have to take a look later on. I remember I had a look at mpqc some time ago, but decided not to package it myself. - Create the desktop file in %prep, not in %install. - Is there any reason why you want to use macros for make and rm...? - I think it would be better if the library package was just -libs. - IMO the development package should be -devel, not libSC-devel. - -data and -html should be BuildArch: noarch. - -html should be called -doc. - Drop Mandriva's obsoletes and provides. No need for them in Fedora. - It's the Schr?dinger equation, not Schr??dinger... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 21:49:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:49:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530230] Review Request: plpa - Portable Linux Processor Affinity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911302149.nAULnKCC019875@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530230 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #9 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-11-30 16:49:18 EDT --- FYI, I'm waiting on Red Hat Legal here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 21:54:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:54:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542436] Review Request: python-cloudfiles - Python language bindings for Rackspace CloudFiles API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911302154.nAULsKtU000960@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542436 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-30 16:54:19 EDT --- Hi Andrew, you are welcome. No, you *should* query upstream to add a COPYING file, if it doesn't exist already. If there is a COPYING file, this *has* to be in %doc. You 'just' changed the spec file and rebuilded the src.rpm. Please always bump the relase and add a changelog line, when you have changed anything: Like ============================= %changelog * Mon Oct 30 2009 Andrew "acturneruk" Turner 1.6.0-2 - adding %%doc - %%global instead of %%define * Mon Oct 20 2008 Andrew "acturneruk" Turner 1.6.0-1 - Initial package for Fedora ============================= Note the %%doc and not %doc. When just using %doc, rpmlint complains about 'using a macro in %changelog'. After that, you should repost the SPEC and SRPM url and not just point to the ones in your first comment. Thomas -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 22:11:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:11:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-inito chemistry program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911302211.nAUMBs14007930@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 --- Comment #4 from Carl Byington 2009-11-30 17:11:53 EDT --- desktop file - if we create it in prep, we still need a line in %install to install it. Does that buy us any clarity? macros for make,rm - no, just the mandriva spec file had it that way. I presume all the ${__xxx} instances should be simply xxx - fixed in the next version. library package name - that contains a whole bunch of libSC*.so objects, which is the primary purpose of that library. Same for the name of the devel package. Schr?dinger - an artifact of the web server sending the wrong charset. curl can properly fetch the spec file, which is utf-8. data, html, obsoletes - fixed in the next version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 22:20:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:20:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530230] Review Request: plpa - Portable Linux Processor Affinity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911302220.nAUMKTtW030439@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530230 --- Comment #10 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-11-30 17:20:28 EDT --- Red Hat Legal agrees with me that this license is non-free, because of the "legal action" clause. This probably means that htop needs to come out too, unless the license issue can be clarified (or that code removed from plpa). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 22:21:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:21:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530230] Review Request: plpa - Portable Linux Processor Affinity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911302221.nAUMLcg9010935@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530230 --- Comment #11 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-11-30 17:21:38 EDT --- In addition, if AMD was to drop that clause, the rest of the license would still be GPL incompatible, so it would not be appropriate for htop. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 22:31:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:31:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467324] Review Request: mingw32-portablexdr - MinGW Windows PortableXDR XDR / RPC library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911302231.nAUMVmeT014108@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467324 --- Comment #20 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-11-30 17:31:44 EDT --- Any update here? Sun gave us permission to relicense these bits back in May. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 22:32:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:32:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461119] Review Request: libtiger - Rendering library for Kate streams using Pango and Cairo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911302232.nAUMW0HS002203@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461119 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady | --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-11-30 17:31:59 EDT --- SRPM: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/libtiger-0.3.3-1.fc11.src.rpm SPEC: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/libtiger.spec Summary: Rendering library for Kate streams using Pango and Cairo This package is known to be in usable state from upstream. (remove NotReady on Whiteboard) This package is open for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 23:13:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:13:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-inito chemistry program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911302313.nAUNDVg1014093@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-11-30 18:13:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > desktop file - if we create it in prep, we still need a line in %install to > install it. Does that buy us any clarity? Yes, since I find it a bit odd that you still create contents in %install. > library package name - that contains a whole bunch of libSC*.so objects, which > is the primary purpose of that library. Same for the name of the devel package. .. but normally Fedora packages aren't named that way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 23:23:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:23:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-inito chemistry program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911302323.nAUNNXIH017077@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 --- Comment #6 from Carl Byington 2009-11-30 18:23:32 EDT --- Is it acceptable to have package mpqc...src.rpm which builds mpqc-libs...rpm which contains (mostly) libSC*.so libraries? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 23:34:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:34:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534135] Review Request: xstream - Java XML serialization library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911302334.nAUNYjVx020323@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534135 --- Comment #10 from Michal Ingeli 2009-11-30 18:34:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > @Mical > Please assign this bug to you. I already have. > At least: from my point of view your review is very poor. It's more "brief". I tried to build package locally, in mock and finally in koji, and it passed. Another important thing is license, and that's also ok. I gave it another check. There is missing one "must" from java guidelines, and that is "Require: java", jpackage-utils is not enough. - correctly named - source matches upstream - license in %doc - clean, legible, american english * I think, javadoc shouldn't be in %doc, but there is not a guideline for that %doc %{_javadocdir}/%{name}-%{version} * add java require (shame, that I missed this one!) * drop epoch from current changelog entry If you see anything, that is not fulfilling the guidelines, feel free to point it out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 23:56:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:56:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - The f2c Fortran to C/C++ conversion program and static libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911302356.nAUNuMmW026180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 --- Comment #4 from Carl Byington 2009-11-30 18:56:21 EDT --- Those should all be fixed in: http://www.five-ten-sg.com/f2c.spec http://www.five-ten-sg.com/f2c-20031026-3.0.3.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 30 23:58:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:58:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-inito chemistry program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200911302358.nAUNwSxB026658@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-11-30 18:58:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Is it acceptable to have package mpqc...src.rpm which builds mpqc-libs...rpm > which contains (mostly) libSC*.so libraries? Yes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.