[Bug 531988] Review Request: lekhonee-gnome - The gnome frontend for lekhonee wordpress client

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Nov 5 11:10:20 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531988


Parag AN(पराग) <panemade at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




--- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade at gmail.com>  2009-11-05 06:10:18 EDT ---
Review:
+ package builds in mock (rawhide i686).
koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1789391
+ rpmlint is not silent for SRPM and for RPM.
lekhonee-gnome.src: W: no-buildroot-tag
lekhonee-gnome.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency lekhonee-lib
==> Both can be ignored.
+ source files match upstream url(sha1sum)
178cec79d757a7f1a30475af0e35558e0e67d1b2  lekhonee-gnome-0.8.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc is present.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no headers or static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage
+ no .la files.
+ translations are available
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no scriptlets present.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ Desktop file installed correctly.
+ GUI application

APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list