[Bug 527241] Review Request: libvtemm - C++ bindings for vte

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527241





--- Comment #5 from Krzesimir Nowak <qdlacz at gmail.com>  2009-11-05 10:31:33 EDT ---
In the end I decided to:
- leave documentation and doxytagfile in original place, that is -
%{_docdir}/libvtemm-1.2/.
- put .devhelp2 file to gtk-doc dir, that is -
%{_datadir}/gtkdoc/html/libvtemm-1.2/.
- leave examples in original place also, that is - %{_datadir}/libvtemm-1.2/.

So:
- docs package depend on gtk-doc, instead of devhelp.
- packaging is easier, because I don't have to process certain files
(.devhelp2, .pc, .tag) with sed to set new paths.
- documentation sits where it should, that is - in %{_docdir}.

With this, docs are still readable by devhelp. About other tools I don't know -
they could use .devhelp2 file sitting in path they are reading.

new spec: http://krnowak.fedorapeople.org/libvtemm.spec
new srpm: http://krnowak.fedorapeople.org/libvtemm-0.22.1-3.fc11.src.rpm
new koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1789971
new rpmlint outputs:

libvtemm.spec:
libvtemm-0.22.1-3.fc11.src.rpm:
libvtemm-0.22.1-3.fc12.i686.rpm:
libvtemm-debuginfo-0.22.1-3.fc12.i686.rpm:
libvtemm-devel-0.22.1-3.fc12.i686.rpm:
libvtemm-docs-0.22.1-3.fc12.i686.rpm:
5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.