[Bug 477683] Review Request: fltk2 - C++ user interface toolkit

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Nov 8 04:13:05 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477683





--- Comment #23 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu>  2009-11-07 23:13:02 EDT ---
Just FYI, outside of the rpmlint complaints posted in comment 17, there are
also a very large number of undefined-non-weak-symbol complaints along with a
few unused-direct-shlib-dependency warnings.  There are a couple hundred
complaints in total; to see them, install the package and run "rpmlint fltk2".

It is possible that these aren't problematic; the undefined-non-weak-symbol
complaints indicate that you can't make use of the library without also linking
to the libraries which provide those symbols.  Bad practise and good to fix if
possible, but probably not a serious issue.

The unused-direct-shlib-dependency complaints indicate that the libraries in
question are linked against various libraries but don't actually call into
them.  Again, this may not be problematic; if there aren't any extra
dependencies caused by this and the libraries are going to be in memory anyway.

You should check those and verify that there aren't any actual problems
indicated.

The versioning of this package doesn't seem to follow Fedora guidelines,
although I can't really tell.  What do you expect the actual release version to
be?  If it's 2.0.0 or something, then note that you'll have to use epoch to
keep ordering. because '0' (or indeed any digit) is less than 'x'.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list