[Bug 531040] Review Request: jsmath-fonts - A collection of Math symbol fonts

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Nov 13 11:27:57 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531040


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(rdieter at math.unl.
                   |                            |edu)




--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-11-13 06:27:55 EDT ---
/me cries for all the ifdefing

At this point you should use the simple font template. The multi style of
packaging is only useful if you produce more than one font subpackage

That's probably the only thing needed to bring it to "good enough" level of
packaging. Though you will receive regularly packaging alerts because of the
non-standard font naming (see attached file, the only pure packager alert is
test #3 and it's a consequence of this font set state ; the rest needs relaying
upstream)

I hope STIX finally publishes a non-beta version so we can tell TeXies to drop
this kind of gross legacy font hack

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list