[Bug 538303] Review Request: rubygem-minitest - Small and fast replacement for ruby's huge and slow test/unit

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538303





--- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>  2009-11-21 15:19:52 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> > * Requires/BuildRequires
> >   - Would you check if "Requires: rubygem(hoe)" is really needed?  
>
> Seems to be. The Rakefile uses hoe's lib/hoe/test.rb to provide the following
> tasks:

However
- In my opinition, to begin with Rakefile is usually somewhat similar
  with Makefiles on autotool based tarball. So I usually put Rakefile
  to -doc subpackage as I don't think people usually need Rakefile.

- As you know usually I always request to execute "rake test" in
  rpmbuild (i.e. executing test should be done by _us_, like "make check").
  If the dependency for "rake test" is needed, perhaps we have to
  add "Requires: rubygem(rake)" (not BuildRequires) for binary gem-based
  rpm, which I think is not desired.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.