[Bug 226206] Merge Review: ntp

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226206





--- Comment #1 from Jiri Popelka <jpopelka at redhat.com>  2009-11-25 12:24:00 EDT ---
YES source files match upstream:
  8c19ff62ed4f7d64f8e2aa59cb11f364  ntp-4.2.4p7.tar.gz
YES package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
YES specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros
consistently.
YES dist tag is present.
YES build root is correct.
YES license field matches the actual license.
YES license is open source-compatible.
YES License text included in package.
YES latest version is being packaged.
YES BuildRequires are proper.
YES compiler flags are appropriate.
YES %clean is present.
YES package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64).
YES debuginfo package looks complete.

NO rpmlint is silent.
ntp.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary NTP
ntp.src: W: strange-permission ntpdate.init 0775
ntp.src: W: strange-permission ntp.dhclient 0775
ntp.src: W: strange-permission ntpd.init 0775
ntp.src: W: %ifarch-applied-patch Patch5: ntp-4.2.4-linkfastmath.patch
ntp.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary NTP
ntp.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/ntp/crypto/pw 0600
ntp.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/ntp/crypto 0750
ntp.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/ntpstats
ntp.x86_64: W: missing-lsb-keyword Default-Stop in /etc/rc.d/init.d/ntpd
ntpdate.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/ntp/keys 0600
ntpdate.x86_64: W: missing-lsb-keyword Required-Stop in
/etc/rc.d/init.d/ntpdate
ntpdate.x86_64: W: missing-lsb-keyword Default-Stop in /etc/rc.d/init.d/ntpdate
ntp-perl.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided ntp
5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 11 warnings.

YES final provides and requires look sane.
N/A %check is present and all tests pass.
YES no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
YES owns the directories it creates.
YES doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
YES no duplicates in %files.

?? file permissions are appropriate.
see rpmlint errors

YES scriptlets must be sane.
YES code, not content.
YES large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
YES %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
YES no headers.
YES no pkgconfig files.
YES no libtool .la droppings.
YES not a GUI app.

Please look at the rpmlint errors/warnings and either fix them or confirm they
are reasonable.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.