From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 00:03:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:03:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489728] Review Request: kcheckers - Checkers board game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010003.n9103igA004169@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489728 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-30 20:03:43 EDT --- kcheckers-0.8.1-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 00:03:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:03:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489728] Review Request: kcheckers - Checkers board game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010003.n9103L03003999@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489728 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-30 20:03:18 EDT --- kcheckers-0.8.1-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 00:02:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:02:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522732] Review Request: perl-Text-Diff-Parser - Parse patch files containing unified and standard diffs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010002.n9102vAU003863@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522732 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-30 20:02:56 EDT --- perl-Text-Diff-Parser-0.1001-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 00:03:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:03:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489728] Review Request: kcheckers - Checkers board game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010003.n9103RpA004070@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489728 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.8.1-4.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 00:03:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:03:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489728] Review Request: kcheckers - Checkers board game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010003.n9103qXG022245@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489728 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.8.1-4.fc11 |0.8.1-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 00:01:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:01:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010001.n9101xKT021672@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-30 20:01:57 EDT --- ghc-HTTP-4000.0.6-5.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 00:05:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:05:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518799] Review Request: gtk-splitter - A file splitter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010005.n9105owA023070@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518799 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.2.1-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 00:03:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:03:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522732] Review Request: perl-Text-Diff-Parser - Parse patch files containing unified and standard diffs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010003.n910338Q022021@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522732 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.1001-1.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 00:05:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:05:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516059] Review Request: dokuwiki - Standards compliant simple to use wiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010005.n91058LC022857@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516059 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-30 20:05:07 EDT --- dokuwiki-0-0.2.20090214.b.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update dokuwiki'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-10148 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 00:02:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:02:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516059] Review Request: dokuwiki - Standards compliant simple to use wiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010002.n9102IbA021824@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516059 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-30 20:02:16 EDT --- dokuwiki-0-0.2.20090214.b.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update dokuwiki'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-10126 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 00:06:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:06:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524888] Review Request: vecmath - The 3D vector math Java package, javax.vecmath In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010006.n91062IB023145@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524888 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-30 20:06:01 EDT --- vecmath1.2-1.14-5.fc10, vecmath-0-2.20090922cvs.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update vecmath1.2 vecmath'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-10150 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 00:06:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:06:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518799] Review Request: gtk-splitter - A file splitter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010006.n91068kJ005553@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518799 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-30 20:06:07 EDT --- gtk-splitter-2.2.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 00:05:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:05:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518799] Review Request: gtk-splitter - A file splitter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010005.n9105iVU005430@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518799 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-30 20:05:43 EDT --- gtk-splitter-2.2.1-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 00:05:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:05:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522732] Review Request: perl-Text-Diff-Parser - Parse patch files containing unified and standard diffs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010005.n9105Voh005320@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522732 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-30 20:05:30 EDT --- perl-Text-Diff-Parser-0.1001-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 00:05:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:05:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522732] Review Request: perl-Text-Diff-Parser - Parse patch files containing unified and standard diffs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010005.n9105aSm005370@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522732 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.1001-1.fc10 |0.1001-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 00:06:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:06:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518799] Review Request: gtk-splitter - A file splitter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010006.n9106DZn005593@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518799 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.2.1-2.fc11 |2.2.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 00:04:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:04:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507223] Review Request: dalston - Moblin System Information Icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010004.n9104Dsi004435@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(rc040203 at freenet. | |de) --- Comment #32 from Christoph Wickert 2009-09-30 20:04:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #28) > Addressing this is trivial: > > He can run "make dist" in advance to building and either use this "make dist" > generated tarball, or use diffs between the upstream tarball and his generated > tarball. I tried to follow your suggestion, but I didn't manage to get it done. Obviously it's not as trivial as you claim. Can you give us more detailed instructions please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 00:07:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:07:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524888] Review Request: vecmath - The 3D vector math Java package, javax.vecmath In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010007.n9107AVW023742@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524888 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-30 20:07:09 EDT --- vecmath1.2-1.14-5.fc11, vecmath-0-2.20090922cvs.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update vecmath1.2 vecmath'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-10156 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 01:05:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:05:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526607] New: Review Request: openfontlibrary-smonohand-font - A handwritten monospace font Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: openfontlibrary-smonohand-font - A handwritten monospace font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526607 Summary: Review Request: openfontlibrary-smonohand-font - A handwritten monospace font Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michael.silvanus at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/fonts/openfontlibrary-smonohand-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/fonts/openfontlibrary-smonohand-fonts-20090423-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: SMonohand is a handwritten monospace Latin font with German characters. It is comparable to Microsoft's Comic Sans or Apple's Chalkboard. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 01:09:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:09:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526607] Review Request: openfontlibrary-smonohand-font - A handwritten monospace font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010109.n91191UW025095@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526607 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com --- Comment #1 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-30 21:09:00 EDT --- This is my first font package, so please be very thorough. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 01:09:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:09:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010109.n91198Rh010949@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 --- Comment #24 from Luke Macken 2009-09-30 21:09:05 EDT --- Here is a quick status update of the TG2 stack from my notes python-catwalk [_] EL-5 Pending stable push [X] F-11 [X] rawhide python-repoze-what-quickstart [_] EL-5 Pending stable push [_] F-11 Pending stable push [X] Rawhide python-repoze-what-plugins-sql [_] EL-5 pending stable push [X] F-11 [X] Rawhide TurboGears2 [X] Rawhide [_] EL-5 python-zope-sqlalchemy Built and requests stable push python-pylons Branch request made (#526576) [_] F-11 Waiting for python-repoze-what-quickstart python-tg-devtools Needs python-migrate0.5 (#507697) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 01:38:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:38:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526607] Review Request: openfontlibrary-smonohand-font - A handwritten monospace font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010138.n911cOgL002806@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526607 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |https://fedoraproject.org/w | |iki/SMonohand_Fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 04:58:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 00:58:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512079] Review Request: oflb-prociono-fonts - A serif font created by Barry Schwartz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010458.n914wpKW001523@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512079 Ankur Sinha changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Ankur Sinha 2009-10-01 00:58:50 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: oflb-prociono-fonts Short Description: A text roman with standard and discretionary ligatures, class-based kerning Owners: ankursinha Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 05:38:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 01:38:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524545] Review Request: snacc - Sample Neufeld ASN.1 to C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010538.n915cxIp010629@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524545 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-01 01:38:58 EDT --- snacc-1.3-4.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/snacc-1.3-4.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 05:38:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 01:38:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524545] Review Request: snacc - Sample Neufeld ASN.1 to C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010538.n915csWw029247@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524545 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-01 01:38:53 EDT --- snacc-1.3-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/snacc-1.3-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 05:39:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 01:39:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524545] Review Request: snacc - Sample Neufeld ASN.1 to C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010539.n915d3CO029300@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524545 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-01 01:39:03 EDT --- snacc-1.3-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/snacc-1.3-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 05:36:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 01:36:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526303] Review Request: fped - A footprint editor used by openmoko developers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010536.n915aSae028969@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526303 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-01 01:36:27 EDT --- fped-0-0.1.r5664.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fped-0-0.1.r5664.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 05:36:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 01:36:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526303] Review Request: fped - A footprint editor used by openmoko developers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010536.n915aWbG029008@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526303 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-01 01:36:32 EDT --- fped-0-0.1.r5664.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fped-0-0.1.r5664.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 05:42:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 01:42:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526274] Review Request: gplcver - An interpreted Verilog HDL simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010542.n915gB0j011425@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526274 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-01 01:42:11 EDT --- gplcver-2.11a-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gplcver-2.11a-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 05:42:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 01:42:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526274] Review Request: gplcver - An interpreted Verilog HDL simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010542.n915g7nS011393@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526274 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-01 01:42:06 EDT --- gplcver-2.11a-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gplcver-2.11a-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 05:42:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 01:42:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526274] Review Request: gplcver - An interpreted Verilog HDL simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010542.n915g2p2030044@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526274 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-01 01:42:01 EDT --- gplcver-2.11a-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gplcver-2.11a-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 05:48:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 01:48:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525453] Review Request: yum-rhn-plugin - RHN support for yum In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010548.n915mR0D012523@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525453 --- Comment #12 from Thomas Janssen 2009-10-01 01:48:26 EDT --- Found one last thing. You have a single comment in your source code "Distributed under GPL" (in packages.py). Could you change that to what you reference in the spec file "GPLv2". Thanks. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 06:01:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 02:01:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010601.n91618p3001348@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-01 02:01:07 EDT --- haskell-platform-2009.2.0.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/haskell-platform-2009.2.0.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 06:25:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 02:25:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010625.n916PKjK005974@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 --- Comment #25 from Jan ONDREJ 2009-10-01 02:25:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > Here is a quick status update of the TG2 stack from my notes > python-catwalk > [X] F-11 python-catwalk is still missing in F11. Please build it. > python-tg-devtools > Needs python-migrate0.5 (#507697) python-migrate-0.5.3 is a part of F11, no need to wait for it for F11. Other dependencies for F11 looks to be OK, I have TG2 installed from your repo and currently only these are not found in fedora and updates repository: TurboGears2-2.0.3-3.fc11.noarch python-catwalk-2.0.2-1.fc11.noarch python-repoze-what-quickstart-1.0-3.fc11.noarch python-tg-devtools-2.0.2-2.fc11.noarch quickstart package will be available soon. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 06:25:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 02:25:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524190] Review Request: flowcanvas - an interactive Gtkmm/ =?utf-8?q?Gnomecanvasmm_widget_for_=E2=80=9Cboxes_and_lines?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=80=9D_environments?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010625.n916P3i4019471@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524190 Alexander changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady BuildFails | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 06:27:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 02:27:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524190] Review Request: flowcanvas - an interactive Gtkmm/ =?utf-8?q?Gnomecanvasmm_widget_for_=E2=80=9Cboxes_and_lines?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=80=9D_environments?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010627.n916R1LS019726@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524190 --- Comment #2 from Alexander 2009-10-01 02:27:00 EDT --- Thank you for helping Jason. I have now learned how to use mock to do a clean build and using it I've found the problem with the patch and another dependency I overlooked. It should build properly now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 06:43:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 02:43:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523540] Review Request: opentracker - Bit Torrent Tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010643.n916hWRW022765@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523540 --- Comment #6 from Simon Wesp 2009-10-01 02:43:31 EDT --- * Provide the exact way of how to build Source0 K, I will add this *please explain: Provides: opentracker-static rpmlint: opentracker.i586: E: statically-linked-binary /usr/bin/opentracker I had an equal rpmlint-output at libowfat with dietlibc. These packages are very static. I had to add "provides: libowfat-static" in the libowfat, there is a "provides dietlibc-static" in dietlibc, too. So this would make sense (for me) to continue this procedure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 06:43:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 02:43:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010643.n916hkgf022800@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 Ankur Sinha changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com --- Comment #1 from Ankur Sinha 2009-10-01 02:43:45 EDT --- hi, As always, I'm not too sure of the fontconfig. The prio seems okay? I'm not sure if its a sans-serif or a fantasy, since I can't decide if this font can be used for long professional texts. It's the Devanagari script, so could be used. regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 06:39:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 02:39:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526633] New: Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 Summary: Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sanjay.ankur at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/gargi/gargi-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/gargi/gargi-fonts-1.9-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: A Free Unicode OpenType Font more info on the mock build etc. can be found here: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/gargi/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 07:07:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 03:07:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520477] Review Request: picprog - Microchip PIC micro-controller serial programmer software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010707.n91773O4027432@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520477 --- Comment #16 from Alex Musolino 2009-10-01 03:07:01 EDT --- Done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 07:09:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 03:09:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524346] Review Request: avra - ATmel AVR 8-bit RISC microcontroller assembler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010709.n9179BVX027655@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524346 --- Comment #18 from Alex Musolino 2009-10-01 03:09:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > Let me know when you have built it for F-12, I'll add avra to the FEL Livedvd. Built successfully for F-10, F-11, F-12. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 07:29:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 03:29:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481668] Review Request: spacewalk-koan: provides integration between spacewalk and koan. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010729.n917TbSx017231@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481668 Miroslav Such? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 07:29:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 03:29:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010729.n917TrWk017390@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #71 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-10-01 03:29:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #70) > I've reviewed the new spec file and the new src.rpm: > > You've stated in the %changelog of the new spec file, that the following > changes were done: > - Own %%{_datadir}/%%{name} instead of %%{_datadir}/%%{name}/classes > - Add Requires: %%{name} = %%{version}-%%{release} in subpackage. > Unfortunately the fixes are not done in this spec file. Please can you verify, > whether you've uploaded the wrong version of the spec file? Sorry-sorry! Off course it is my mistake. I fix it (Note, without release increase) http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/x11vnc/x11vnc.spec > Regarding the packaging of the GCJ AOT bits I've asked in #fedora-java whether > it is really necessary in this specific case (jar files mostly used in a > browser on the client) and they've agreed that it is not needed here. > > So once all changes are done which are stated in the spec file, I think all > issues are solved. ;-) Fine! Christian Krause, very thanks for that long and detailed review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 07:32:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 03:32:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227027] Review Request: ant-contrib-1.0-0.b2.1jpp - Collection of tasks for Ant In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010732.n917WLwg032093@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227027 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com --- Comment #16 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-10-01 03:32:17 EDT --- I'll do the review in a couple (2 to n) weeks if no one wants to take it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 07:30:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 03:30:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525453] Review Request: yum-rhn-plugin - RHN support for yum In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010730.n917UZQA031861@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525453 Miroslav Such? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Miroslav Such? 2009-10-01 03:30:34 EDT --- Good catch. Changed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 07:51:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 03:51:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225954] Merge Review: junit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010751.n917pM4G003403@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225954 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |akurtako at redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-10-01 03:51:18 EDT --- This package is approved. Can we close the Merge review now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 08:57:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 04:57:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520477] Review Request: picprog - Microchip PIC micro-controller serial programmer software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010857.n918vtTL004692@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520477 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-10-01 04:57:54 EDT --- Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 09:38:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 05:38:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526567] Review Request: mongodb - high-performance, open source, schema-free document-oriented database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010938.n919cBLd026122@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526567 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |526564 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 09:37:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 05:37:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507697] Review Request: python-migrate0.5 - schema migration tools for SQLAlchemy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010937.n919b9oE025941@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507697 Alan Pevec changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |apevec at redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Alan Pevec 2009-10-01 05:37:07 EDT --- Same error with koji build --scratch dist-5E-epel-testing-candidate ~/Download/python-migrate0.5-0.5.3-3.fc10.src.rpm Luke, do you want to fix this or just drop %check ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 09:38:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 05:38:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526564] Review Request: unittest - C++ unit testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010938.n919c9nW026078@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526564 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |526567, | |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt 2009-10-01 05:38:07 EDT --- > I'm not a packager yet, but I have a sponsor Really? This package needs a lot of love, since it isn't ready yet and doesn't pass the guidelines Btw, your sponsor must be the one to do the final package review: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process#Reviewer > rpmlint is a bit scary Well, it's more scary that you don't comment on those rpmlint warnings and errors at all. Some of the errors found by rpmlint are obvious packaging mistakes. You don't even ask any questions about that. Also run rpmlint on the src.rpm. Please become familiar with the Packaging Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines In particular take a look at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries But that's not the only problem. At the top of the list are misplaced files, such as -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/collection.html -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/default.css -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/index.html -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/misc.html -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/mixin.html -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/setup-teardown.html -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/test-advanced.html -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/test.html and drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/doc/unittest-devel-0.50/test -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/unittest-devel-0.50/test/ExistingBaseTest.cpp -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/unittest-devel-0.50/test/ExistingBaseTest.d -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/unittest-devel-0.50/test/ExistingBaseTest.o -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/unittest-devel-0.50/test/Helper.cpp -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/unittest-devel-0.50/test/Helper.d -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/unittest-devel-0.50/test/Helper.hpp -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/unittest-devel-0.50/test/Helper.o -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/unittest-devel-0.50/test/Makefile -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/unittest-devel-0.50/test/Makefile.in -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/unittest-devel-0.50/test/RegistryTest.cpp -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/unittest-devel-0.50/test/RegistryTest.d -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/unittest-devel-0.50/test/RegistryTest.o -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/unittest-devel-0.50/test/SuiteTest.cpp -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/unittest-devel-0.50/test/SuiteTest.d -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/unittest-devel-0.50/test/SuiteTest.o -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/unittest-devel-0.50/test/TestHolderTest.cpp -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/unittest-devel-0.50/test/TestHolderTest.d -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/unittest-devel-0.50/test/TestHolderTest.o -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/unittest-devel-0.50/test/TestPtrTest.cpp -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/unittest-devel-0.50/test/TestPtrTest.d -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/unittest-devel-0.50/test/TestPtrTest.o -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/unittest-devel-0.50/test/TestTest.cpp -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/unittest-devel-0.50/test/TestTest.d -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/unittest-devel-0.50/test/TestTest.o -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/unittest-devel-0.50/test/unittesttest -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/unittest-devel-0.50/test/unittesttest.cpp -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/unittest-devel-0.50/test/unittesttest.d -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/unittest-devel-0.50/test/unittesttest.hpp -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/unittest-devel-0.50/test/unittesttest.o That's why rpmlint prints the arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share errors. /usr/share is for arch-independent data. -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/unittest-devel-0.50/INSTALL That one is irrelevant to RPM package end-users. > %{__sed} -i 's|/usr/lib|%{buildroot}%{_libdir}|g' Makefile That transformation breaks the build on 64-bit platforms where libdir is /usr/lib64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 09:40:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 05:40:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010940.n919eoqV027018@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 --- Comment #26 from Alan Pevec 2009-10-01 05:40:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > (In reply to comment #24) > > Here is a quick status update of the TG2 stack from my notes > > python-catwalk > > [X] F-11 > > python-catwalk is still missing in F11. Please build it. Build is in koji but Bodhi update request is missing. > > python-tg-devtools > > Needs python-migrate0.5 (#507697) > > python-migrate-0.5.3 is a part of F11, no need to wait for it for F11. Yes, python-migrate0.5 is for EPEL/F10. Luke, please resolve https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507697#c5 so it can be approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 09:44:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 05:44:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526567] Review Request: mongodb - high-performance, open source, schema-free document-oriented database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010944.n919iXRl014426@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526567 --- Comment #2 from Michael Schwendt 2009-10-01 05:44:32 EDT --- [this is not a full review] Package builds and includes a static library and doesn't meet the guidelines on static libraries. $ rpmlint mongodb-1.0.0-1.fc11.src.rpm mongodb.src:78: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{buildroot}/lib 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 09:51:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 05:51:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472144] Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010951.n919pDle016200@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady | Flag|needinfo?(red at fedoraproject | |.org) | --- Comment #23 from Sandro Mathys 2009-10-01 05:51:08 EDT --- Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/tvbrowser.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/tvbrowser-2.7.4-1.fc11.src.rpm New version - no other changes were needed to get this working. As for the legal blocker: - upstream changed skinlf to be ASL 2.0 _only_ in CVS - mycae updates the skinlf pkg in Fedora to the latest CVS revision - new skinlf pkg in rawhide and updates-testing, not yet in updates - I will wait with pushing tvbrowser to updates until the new skinlf pkg has landed there - I Require the latest skinlf pkg version for tvbrowser -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 09:57:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 05:57:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010957.n919vJlj030003@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 --- Comment #27 from Alan Pevec 2009-10-01 05:57:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > (In reply to comment #24) > > python-tg-devtools > > Needs python-migrate0.5 (#507697) > > python-migrate-0.5.3 is a part of F11, no need to wait for it for F11. Right, just need to fix spec to require correct migrate package. Luke, in devel branch you imported original spec http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/python-tg-devtools/devel/python-tg-devtools.spec?revision=1.1&view=markup which fails to build on >= F-11 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1721250&name=root.log Proposed patch in bug 468804 comment 5 moves python-migrate BR under conditional %if 0%{?fedora} > 10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 10:03:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 06:03:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503495] Review Request: sblim-cim-client - Java CIM Client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011003.n91A3jZE018457@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503495 Vitezslav Crhonek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(vcrhonek at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #2 from Vitezslav Crhonek 2009-10-01 06:03:43 EDT --- Changed version to latest upstream - 1.3.9.1. (In reply to comment #1) > According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java, there is missing > BuildRequires: java-devel [>= specific_version] and Requires: java >= > specific_version Fixed. > Does not contain binaries -> should be noarch Fixed. > Mark config files as noreplace Fixed. > Correct EOL in files Fixed. > (funny, javadoc has no documentation :) ) > Check CPL license Changed to EPL in 1.3.9.1, which is fine to use with Fedora (like CPL). > Fix URL and SOURCE tags Fixed. > All packages having files in /usr/share/doc/sblim-cim-client-1.3.3 should own > it Fixed. New SPEC and SRPM available at http://vcrhonek.fedorapeople.org/sblim-cim-client/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 10:04:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 06:04:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011004.n91A49FL018539@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 --- Comment #17 from Pravin Satpute 2009-10-01 06:04:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > 3. your -fixed subpackage contains font files that declare themselves as > "Console". These should go in a "console" subpackage as it has only console fonts in it dropping this subpackage and will have bitmap-console-fonts subpackage > > 6. why do you add a Requires(pre): fontconfig ? We do not require fontconfig in > font packages. Do you have a special need? > > 7. what do you need xorg-x11-font-utils as BR for ? > > 8. I think you can specify a different LICENSE field per subpackage, can you > check with spot how he'd prefer the licensing reported ? (mixed licensing > packages are a PITA) I feel if it'd be better if each subpackage was tagged > with just the necessary license info (and included the corresponding license > files) > can you guide me little bit about what is exact LICENSES of fangsongati, just test is give but not mention which GPL version etc. > 9. fontconfig will happily use pcf.gz files, please compress your pcf files (if > you're feeling ambitious ask behdad if he intends to support pcf.xz soon) > > That's all for this first partial review, will look more in depth tomorrow ok, so fontdir will contain pcf.gz file, looks ok thanks for first review as we are targeting this for f13 we have some time now :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 10:06:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 06:06:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525929] Review Request: youtube-dl - Small command-line program to download videos from YouTube In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011006.n91A6e4G031908@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525929 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mschwendt at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mschwendt at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt 2009-10-01 06:06:39 EDT --- > Source1: http://bitbucket.org/rg3/youtube-dl/wiki/Home > %prep > cp %{SOURCE1} . > mv Home index.html Why the extra "mv"? cp %{SOURCE1} index.html or: cp --preserve=timestamps %{SOURCE1} index.html or (to match your %install section): install -p -m0644 %{SOURCE1} index.html Beyond that: APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 10:11:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 06:11:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526651] New: Review Request: xpaint - An X Window System image editing or paint program Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xpaint - An X Window System image editing or paint program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526651 Summary: Review Request: xpaint - An X Window System image editing or paint program Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: https://sourceforge.net/projects/sf-xpaint OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: promac at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: SRPM URL: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/src/xpaint-2.8.2-5.fc10.src.rpm Spec URL: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/SPECS/xpaint.spec XPaint is an X Window System color image bitmap editing program. It does not try to compete with more advanced tools such as 'gimp' but aims at being very easy to use. XPaint however supports most standard paint program operations. It also supports more advanced features, such as image processing algorithms and scripting. XPaint allows the edition of multiple images simultaneously and supports a wide variety of image formats, including: GIF, JPG, PNG, PPM, TIFF, XBM, XPM, etc. Install xpaint if you need an easy to use paint program for X. Xpaint now uses the Xaw3d widget set for a bit nicer look. The package includes several examples of C scripts: filters, image scripts adding some new editing features including user filters. Some example filter code is included. rpmlint is clean. need to recheck license. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 10:21:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 06:21:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514452] Review Request: trac-agilo-plugin - a trac plugin to support the Scrum process. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011021.n91ALOAY002247@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514452 --- Comment #4 from Felix Schwarz 2009-10-01 06:21:23 EDT --- Agilo won't work on EL4 (Python 2.4 required) so you can use '--skip-build' in the spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 10:33:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 06:33:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011033.n91AXonC024733@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 --- Comment #28 from Jan ONDREJ 2009-10-01 06:33:48 EDT --- One more thing. Current TurboGears2 package requires only python-repoze-tm2-1.0-0.3.a3, but when trying to start my application, this is displayed: pkg_resources.VersionConflict: (repoze.tm2 1.0a3 (/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages), Requirement.parse('repoze.tm2>=1.0a4')) Looks like we need to update repoze.tm2 to at least 1.0a4. Please rebuild this package for F11 too (currently only in rawhide). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 10:55:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 06:55:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522920] Review Request: tnef - Extract files from email attachments like winmail.dat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011055.n91AtsLl030000@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522920 --- Comment #8 from Naoki IIMURA 2009-10-01 06:55:53 EDT --- Hi, (In reply to comment #7) > > # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in > > the review. > > => FAIL(1 warning) > > I had tried to fix this, and found that it made no difference. I realize now > that I was running rpmlint on the -1 version of my package, doh. > So fixed that. => Now OK > > # MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an > > architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in > > ExcludeArch. > > => FAIL(build error on ppc and ppc64) > I had not tried build on non intel arches, thanks for triggering a mock build. You are welcome. > > koji build result(ppc): > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1716349 > ===== > mv -f .deps/mapi_types.Tpo .deps/mapi_types.Po > mv -f .deps/tnef_names.Tpo .deps/tnef_names.Po > mapi_names.c:1307: fatal error: error writing to -: Broken pipe > compilation terminated. > The bug is not reproducible, so it is likely a hardware or OS problem. > gcc: Internal error: Interrupt (program as) > Please submit a full bug report. > See for instructions. > ===== > No idea what is happening here. I also have no idea. This might be a temporary problem. > > koji build result(ppc64) (a test failed): > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1716351 > ===== > PASS: directory.test > PASS: maxsize.test > \'diff ./body.output ./body.baseline > ./body.diff\' -- Test Failed! > FAIL: body.test > PASS: mime-types.test > cat: write error: Broken pipe > PASS: stdin.test > ===== > again broken pipe. Yes, but seems that 'body.test' fails. I've checked the file in 'tests/cmdline' directory, but I don't find any cause of the error. > I tried to queue some new scratch builds, but I don't remember the proper > commands to set it up. (certificate error). I guess this page will help you: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/UsingKoji#Fedora_Certificates You may need to update cert file. > > # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any > > that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; > > inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. > > => FAIL > > And, since the installed .desktop file wouldn't be owned without out this > package, I am including it now as both Requires and BR. => OK > > # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop > Hmmn, that is an unfortunate side effect. The app is not a gui app, and it > doesn't make sense for an icon to appear in the normal Application (or other) > menu, because the app needs an input tnef file to extract to be useful. > > It does make sense to have the right click (open with) menu in nautilus/doplhin > though. It seems you get one when you want the other, unless there is another > way to achieve this file mime-type association ? > > I have asked on fedora-packaging list about this item. Perhaps I'm doing > something that isn't allowed for other reasons ? => pending I don't have enough knowledge about nautilus/dolphin integration. I'm watching fedora-packaging list. I hope we can find better solution of this issue. > > # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other > > packages. > > => I can't judge. > > > > Because I don't know who owns '%{_datadir}/mimelnk/application/' directory. > rpm -qf /usr/share/mimelnk/application/ > kde-filesystem-4-25.fc11.noarch > , but I think other non kde items (eg gnome desktop uses that folder) live > there as well. => OK Thanks for the information. > > # SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. > > => FAIL > > > > > As you mention above, that is probably because the macro is not defined, so > adding the build requires fixes that. => Now OK > > # SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A > > package should not segfault instead of running, for example. > > => OK(tested with some files in tests/files/datafiles) > Did you try the menu integration from either nautilus or dolphin ? > I would appreciate your feedback on testing from both if you are able ;-) I had not tested the menu integration. I've installed the new package and tried to right-click on 'winmail.dat' but I couldn't see any difference in the menu. Do I need more action after the installation? I'm using nautilus. Naoki -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 11:28:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 07:28:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503939] Review Request: sblim-cim-client2 - Java CIM Client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011128.n91BSIYr004986@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503939 --- Comment #1 from Vitezslav Crhonek 2009-10-01 07:28:17 EDT --- Latest verison of SPEC and SRPM is here http://vcrhonek.fedorapeople.org/sblim-cim-client2/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 11:40:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 07:40:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507585] Review Request: python-psi - Shows real time system information in python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011140.n91BerPr008161@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507585 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 11:40:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 07:40:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507585] Review Request: python-psi - Shows real time system information in python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011140.n91BeaJn008116@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507585 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com AssignedTo|sundaram at redhat.com |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-10-01 07:40:34 EDT --- It seems, that Rahul quite busy now, so I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 11:41:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 07:41:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503496] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-params - SBLIM params instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011141.n91Bfpp7021422@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503496 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 11:41:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 07:41:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507585] Review Request: python-psi - Shows real time system information in python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011141.n91BfAWn008349@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507585 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 11:58:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 07:58:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526682] New: Review Request: django-debug-toolbar - Django debug information about the current request/response Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: django-debug-toolbar - Django debug information about the current request/response https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526682 Summary: Review Request: django-debug-toolbar - Django debug information about the current request/response Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: allisson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-debug-toolbar/django-debug-toolbar.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-debug-toolbar/django-debug-toolbar-0.8.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Django Debug Toolbar is a configurable set of panels that display various debug information about the current request/response and when clicked, display more details about the panel's content. Currently, the following panels have been written and are working: - Django version - Request timer - A list of settings in settings.py - Common HTTP headers - GET/POST/cookie/session variable display - Templates and context used, and their template paths - SQL queries including time to execute and links to EXPLAIN each query - List of signals, their args and receivers - Logging output via Python's built-in logging module Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1721974 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 12:10:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 08:10:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526688] New: Review Request: umlgraph - Automated Drawing of UML Diagrams Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: umlgraph - Automated Drawing of UML Diagrams https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526688 Summary: Review Request: umlgraph - Automated Drawing of UML Diagrams Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: akurtako at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/umlgraph.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/umlgraph-5.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: UMLGraph allows the declarative specification and drawing of UML class and sequence diagrams. The specification is done in text diagrams, that are then transformed into the appropriate graphical representations. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 12:41:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 08:41:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469002] Review Request: sblim-gather - SBLIM Gatherer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011241.n91CfuBa028874@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469002 --- Comment #5 from Vitezslav Crhonek 2009-10-01 08:41:54 EDT --- Latest SPEC and SRPM (based on 2.1.9 upstream version) here: http://vcrhonek.fedorapeople.org/sblim-gather/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 13:02:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 09:02:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496133] Review Request: EMBOSS - The European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011302.n91D2fAI009795@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496133 --- Comment #12 from Rasmus Ory Nielsen 2009-10-01 09:02:40 EDT --- FYI, /usr/bin/chaos conflicts with the 'chaos aligment tool' from the lagan package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 13:08:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 09:08:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524346] Review Request: avra - ATmel AVR 8-bit RISC microcontroller assembler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011308.n91D8Jrh029702@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524346 --- Comment #19 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-10-01 09:08:18 EDT --- Push avra and picprog to fedora stable repositories https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ don't forget to add the bugzilla number of both package reviews to your package submission. Bodhi will automatically close these bugzilla reports. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 13:16:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 09:16:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526688] Review Request: umlgraph - Automated Drawing of UML Diagrams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011316.n91DGQX2032758@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526688 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |523844 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 13:20:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 09:20:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525786] Review Request: popfile - Automatic Email Classification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011320.n91DKjGc015792@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525786 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-01 09:20:44 EDT --- popfile-1.1.1-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/popfile-1.1.1-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 13:20:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 09:20:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525786] Review Request: popfile - Automatic Email Classification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011320.n91DKoXI015827@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525786 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-01 09:20:49 EDT --- popfile-1.1.1-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/popfile-1.1.1-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 13:32:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 09:32:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522920] Review Request: tnef - Extract files from email attachments like winmail.dat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011332.n91DWwkw019836@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522920 --- Comment #9 from David Timms 2009-10-01 09:32:57 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=363329) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=363329) screen shot of popup menu for tnef mime-types (In reply to comment #8) > You may need to update cert file. Yeah, I'm in action again, and triggered a build with the package as in my last post. Unfortunately, it still fails on both ppc arches. Since the test log requests emailing the upstream, I have done so, providing a link to the koji logs. > > Did you try the menu integration from either nautilus or dolphin ? > > I would appreciate your feedback on testing from both if you are able ;-) > > I had not tested the menu integration. > I've installed the new package and tried to right-click on 'winmail.dat' > but I couldn't see any difference in the menu. I attach a screen shot of what I get and intend a user installing the package to have available once installed. Sounds like it didn't work for you. Perhaps it only works on F11, or maybe possibly need to retest on another machine now that I have changed the package a little to validate the .desktop file that causes the mime-type menu...I'll have some more time by the weekend or so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 13:47:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 09:47:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526607] Review Request: openfontlibrary-smonohand-font - A handwritten monospace font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011347.n91DlNQQ009411@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526607 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sven at lank.es --- Comment #2 from Sven Lankes 2009-10-01 09:47:21 EDT --- The files are not available due to the fedorapeople.org crash. Could you please re-upload them? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 13:57:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 09:57:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523199] Review Request: ncrack - high-speed network authentication cracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011357.n91DvM38026372@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523199 Steve Milner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #28 from Steve Milner 2009-10-01 09:57:20 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ncrack Short Description: a high-speed network authentication cracking tool Owners: smilner Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 14:04:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 10:04:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522920] Review Request: tnef - Extract files from email attachments like winmail.dat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011404.n91E4OEM027926@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522920 --- Comment #10 from Naoki IIMURA 2009-10-01 10:04:23 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=363333) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=363333) screen shot of popup menu on my Fedora 11 (amatubu) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 14:04:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 10:04:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503591] Review Request: python-catwalk - A way to view your models using TurboGears In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011404.n91E4VvI014531@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503591 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-01 10:04:29 EDT --- python-catwalk-2.0.2-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-catwalk-2.0.2-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 14:07:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 10:07:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522920] Review Request: tnef - Extract files from email attachments like winmail.dat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011407.n91E79Ec028856@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522920 --- Comment #11 from Naoki IIMURA 2009-10-01 10:07:07 EDT --- (From update of attachment 363333) (In reply to comment #9) > Yeah, I'm in action again, and triggered a build with the package as in my last > post. Unfortunately, it still fails on both ppc arches. > > Since the test log requests emailing the upstream, I have done so, providing a > link to the koji logs. I hope the upstream can handle the issue. > I attach a screen shot of what I get and intend a user installing the package > to have available once installed. Thanks. I've also uploaded a screen shot on my Fedora 11. > Sounds like it didn't work for you. Perhaps it only works on F11, or maybe > possibly need to retest on another machine now that I have changed the package > a little to validate the .desktop file that causes the mime-type menu...I'll > have some more time by the weekend or so. OK. I'll test the new package when it is available. Naoki -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 14:13:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 10:13:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487097] Review Request: ReviewBoard - web based code review tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011413.n91EDtoT030435@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487097 --- Comment #13 from Dave Malcolm 2009-10-01 10:13:52 EDT --- (FWIW, my motivation here is that I'm hoping that Fedora Infrastructure can deploy an instance of reviewboard; see: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1196 "Deploy Review Board for use by hosted projects") -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 14:23:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 10:23:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472144] Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011423.n91ENlOJ019275@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | --- Comment #24 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-10-01 10:23:46 EDT --- Lifting FE-Legal, as this is resolved in rawhide (at least). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 14:43:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 10:43:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011443.n91EhUw5005219@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 --- Comment #29 from Nils Philippsen 2009-10-01 10:43:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) > F-11 build is waiting on python-repoze-what-quickstart, which will be going out > in the next updates push. FTFY: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/2260 ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 15:04:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 11:04:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487097] Review Request: ReviewBoard - web based code review tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011504.n91F4tH3011054@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487097 --- Comment #14 from Stephen Gallagher 2009-10-01 11:04:54 EDT --- Please re-add the "BuildRequires: python-setuptools-devel" to the spec. I was unable to build it cleanly in mock without this. I attempted to build on a fully up-to-date F11 x86_64 box on mock using the fedora-11-x86_64 target. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 15:05:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 11:05:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525786] Review Request: popfile - Automatic Email Classification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011505.n91F5OA6011433@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525786 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-10-01 11:05:23 EDT --- Closing. Note that currently bodhi has not been set up to accept F-12 updates request. When bodhi begins to do so (a notification will be sent to fedora-devel-list ), please submit updates request for F-12. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 15:13:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 11:13:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524346] Review Request: avra - ATmel AVR 8-bit RISC microcontroller assembler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011513.n91FDojN013628@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524346 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-01 11:13:49 EDT --- avra-1.2.3-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/avra-1.2.3-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 15:17:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 11:17:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524346] Review Request: avra - ATmel AVR 8-bit RISC microcontroller assembler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011517.n91FHS8g001352@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524346 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-01 11:17:27 EDT --- avra-1.2.3-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/avra-1.2.3-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 15:32:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 11:32:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011532.n91FWVg6004887@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 --- Comment #30 from Luke Macken 2009-10-01 11:32:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > (In reply to comment #25) > > (In reply to comment #24) > > > Here is a quick status update of the TG2 stack from my notes > > > python-catwalk > > > [X] F-11 > > > > python-catwalk is still missing in F11. Please build it. > > Build is in koji but Bodhi update request is missing. I just pushed it into bodhi, thanks for the heads up. > > > python-tg-devtools > > > Needs python-migrate0.5 (#507697) > > > > python-migrate-0.5.3 is a part of F11, no need to wait for it for F11. > > Yes, python-migrate0.5 is for EPEL/F10. > Luke, please resolve https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507697#c5 > so it can be approved. Looking into it now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 15:33:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 11:33:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011533.n91FXxRX005193@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 --- Comment #31 from Luke Macken 2009-10-01 11:33:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #27) > (In reply to comment #25) > > (In reply to comment #24) > > > python-tg-devtools > > > Needs python-migrate0.5 (#507697) > > > > python-migrate-0.5.3 is a part of F11, no need to wait for it for F11. > > Right, just need to fix spec to require correct migrate package. > > Luke, in devel branch you imported original spec > http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/python-tg-devtools/devel/python-tg-devtools.spec?revision=1.1&view=markup > > which fails to build on >= F-11 > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1721250&name=root.log > > Proposed patch in bug 468804 comment 5 moves python-migrate BR > under conditional %if 0%{?fedora} > 10 Ah, I committed the unpatched specfile yesterday, sorry about that. I just committed a new revision with your patch and I'm building python-tg-devtools now. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 15:30:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 11:30:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526738] New: Review Request: py-radix - Radix tree data structure for Python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: py-radix - Radix tree data structure for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526738 Summary: Review Request: py-radix - Radix tree data structure for Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: matt_domsch at dell.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://domsch.com/linux/fedora/py-radix/py-radix.spec SRPM URL: http://domsch.com/linux/fedora/py-radix/py-radix-0.5-2.src.rpm Description: py-radix is an implementation of a radix tree for Python, which supports storage and lookups of IPv4 and IPv6 networks. The radix tree (a.k.a Patricia tree) is the data structure most commonly used for routing table lookups. It efficiently stores network prefixes of varying lengths and allows fast lookups of containing networks. py-radix's implementation is built solely for networks (the data structure itself is more general). I expect to use this in MirrorManager. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 15:34:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 11:34:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526567] Review Request: mongodb - high-performance, open source, schema-free document-oriented database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011534.n91FY9EC018425@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526567 --- Comment #3 from Ionu? Ar??ri?i 2009-10-01 11:34:08 EDT --- > Package builds and includes a static library and doesn't meet the guidelines on > static libraries. Thanks for pointing this out. That file is the C++ driver. I've added a virtual Provides for it in the -devel package. $ rpmlint mongodb-1.0.0-1.fc11.src.rpm mongodb.src:78: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{buildroot}/lib 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. That seems to be a rpmlint error since it comes from this line in the spec file: mv %{buildroot}/lib %{buildroot}/bin %{buildroot}/include %{buildroot}%{_prefix} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 15:38:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 11:38:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487097] Review Request: ReviewBoard - web based code review tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011538.n91FcGI1006461@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487097 --- Comment #15 from Cristian Ciupitu 2009-10-01 11:38:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > Please re-add the "BuildRequires: python-setuptools-devel" to the spec. I was > unable to build it cleanly in mock without this. > > I attempted to build on a fully up-to-date F11 x86_64 box on mock using the > fedora-11-x86_64 target. I'm running an up-to-date Fedora 11 x86_64 too I was able to rebuild ReviewBoard-1.0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm after removing the python-setuptools-devel package. What errors are you getting? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 16:04:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 12:04:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468223] Review Request: python-repoze-tm2 - Zope-like transaction manager via WSGI middleware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011604.n91G4BDp012605@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468223 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-01 12:04:10 EDT --- python-repoze-tm2-1.0-0.5.a4.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-repoze-tm2-1.0-0.5.a4.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 16:06:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 12:06:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011606.n91G6qks013436@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 --- Comment #32 from Luke Macken 2009-10-01 12:06:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #28) > One more thing. Current TurboGears2 package requires only > python-repoze-tm2-1.0-0.3.a3, but when trying to start my application, this is > displayed: > > pkg_resources.VersionConflict: (repoze.tm2 1.0a3 > (/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages), Requirement.parse('repoze.tm2>=1.0a4')) > > Looks like we need to update repoze.tm2 to at least 1.0a4. > Please rebuild this package for F11 too (currently only in rawhide). Built and queued for pushing: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-repoze-tm2-1.0-0.5.a4.el5 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-repoze-tm2-1.0-0.5.a4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 16:14:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 12:14:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526746] New: Review Request: yaz - Z39.50/SRW/SRU programs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: yaz - Z39.50/SRW/SRU programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526746 Summary: Review Request: yaz - Z39.50/SRW/SRU programs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: guido.grazioli at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://guidograzioli.fedorapeople.org/packages/yaz/yaz.spec SRPM URL: http://guidograzioli.fedorapeople.org/packages/yaz/yaz-3.0.49-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Z39.50 is a client-server protocol for searching and retrieving information from remote computer databases (ANSI/NISO Z39.50 protocol). yaz was orphaned and i took ownership on devel, F-10, F-11 branches. As it was last updated more than three months ago, i have to let it pass again under a review process. In this update the package is moved to upstream version 3.0.49 and Requires: pkgconfig was added to -devel subpackage as it installs .pc files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 16:18:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 12:18:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526607] Review Request: openfontlibrary-smonohand-font - A handwritten monospace font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011618.n91GIGgN031292@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526607 --- Comment #3 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-10-01 12:18:15 EDT --- Looks like the restore is now complete, and the files are back there. I didn't even notice the crash! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 16:41:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 12:41:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523553] Review Request: mutrace - Mutex Tracer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011641.n91GfkRT024411@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523553 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(lpoetter at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #11 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-10-01 12:41:44 EDT --- Lennart? Would be nice to see this packaged soon-ish, especially since building for F-12 now require rel-eng to manually tag a package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 16:51:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 12:51:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011651.n91GpEF6007568@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #84 from Scott Williams 2009-10-01 12:51:01 EDT --- With the RPM you've provided for 1.2.0-1, any playback causes a segfault: (songbird-bin:20179): GStreamer-WARNING **: Failed to load plugin '/home/scott/.gstreamer-0.10/plugins/libgstflump3dec.so': /home/scott/.gstreamer-0.10/plugins/libgstflump3dec.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32 /usr/lib64/songbird-1.2.0/songbird: line 134: 20175 Segmentation fault "$prog" ${1+"$@"} The seg fault does not just happen with mp3 format. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 16:59:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 12:59:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011659.n91Gxjer028252@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #85 from David Halik 2009-10-01 12:59:42 EDT --- That looks like an issue with whatever gst plugins you're using. It's basically saying that you're running a 64bit songbird against a 32bit libgstflump3dec.so. Make sure that all your gstreamer packages are 64bit and the latest release if you're on a x86_64 install and try it again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 17:00:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 13:00:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526567] Review Request: mongodb - high-performance, open source, schema-free document-oriented database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011700.n91H08Xc028641@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526567 --- Comment #4 from Ionu? Ar??ri?i 2009-10-01 13:00:07 EDT --- Sorry, I forgot to link to the new files: SPEC: http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/mongodb/mongodb.spec.1 SRPM: http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/mongodb/mongodb-1.0.0-2.fc11.src.rpm * Thu Oct 1 2009 Ionu? Ar??ri?i - 1.0.0-2 - added virtual -static package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 17:05:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 13:05:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216519] Review Request: sdparm - List or change SCSI disk parameters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011705.n91H5B9n029947@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216519 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dan at danny.cz Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Dan Hor?k 2009-10-01 13:05:08 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: sdparm New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: sharkcz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 17:18:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 13:18:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525211] Review Request: rubygem-ditz - A command-line issue tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011718.n91HI6WP013962@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525211 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-10-01 13:18:05 EDT --- Okay, removing FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 17:23:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 13:23:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526564] Review Request: unittest - C++ unit testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011723.n91HNO4X015828@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526564 --- Comment #2 from Ionu? Ar??ri?i 2009-10-01 13:23:23 EDT --- Thanks for the review, Michael! > > I'm not a packager yet, but I have a sponsor > Really? This package needs a lot of love, since it isn't ready yet and doesn't > pass the guidelines > Btw, your sponsor must be the one to do the final package review: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process#Reviewer It's gotten a bit more complicated I think, since I've submitted more packages after I've found a sponsor for the calibre package. As I understood from my sponsor, he will watch all my submissions and reviews and help me get sponsored. > rpmlint is a bit scary > Well, it's more scary that you don't comment on those rpmlint warnings and > errors at all. Some of the errors found by rpmlint are obvious packaging > mistakes. You don't even ask any questions about that. Also run rpmlint on the > src.rpm. > Please become familiar with the Packaging Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines > In particular take a look at > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries Sorry for not commenting on the rpmlint errors. I was actually looking for feedback as I didn't know what to do about all those errors. I knew what they meant, but I also falsely assumed that all tests provided by the package must be included in the final rpm. The package now removes all the tests after they are run. > But that's not the only problem. At the top of the list are misplaced files, > such as > -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/collection.html > -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/default.css > -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/index.html > -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/misc.html > -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/mixin.html > -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/setup-teardown.html > -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/test-advanced.html > -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/test.html Fixed. > -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/unittest-devel-0.50/INSTALL > That one is irrelevant to RPM package end-users. I found nothing in the Guidelines saying that irrelevant files should be excluded, though I found a lot of INSTALL files that are written in a similar manner and included. Originally I followed the example of the eject.spec described in: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CreatingPackageHowTo # yum provides */INSTALL|echo $((`wc -l`/7)) 553 > > %{__sed} -i 's|/usr/lib|%{buildroot}%{_libdir}|g' Makefile > That transformation breaks the build on 64-bit platforms where libdir is > /usr/lib64. Fixed. SPEC: http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/unittest/unittest.spec.1 SRPM: http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/unittest/unittest-0.50-62.2.fc11.src.rpm * Thu Oct 1 2009 Ionu? Ar??ri?i - 0.50-62.2 - don't include tests - move html docs to the right dir - add Provides: -static - fixed Group: - fixed /usr/lib problem for 64-bit systems in Makefile -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 17:30:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 13:30:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011730.n91HUuUN017945@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #86 from Scott Williams 2009-10-01 13:30:53 EDT --- I regressed to 1.1.2 with the same plugin set and it's working. Looks related to the upstream bug: http://www.getsatisfaction.com/songbird/topics/songbird_segfault_on_fedora_10 I am running fedora 11 x86_64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 17:46:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 13:46:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525210] Review Request: rubygem-trollop - A command-line option parsing library for ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011746.n91HkRLM008496@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525210 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-10-01 13:46:26 EDT --- Well, upstream released 1.15, so please upgrade. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 18:24:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 14:24:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225697] Merge Review: distcache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011824.n91IO132018492@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225697 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |steve.traylen at cern.ch AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |steve.traylen at cern.ch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 18:21:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 14:21:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520479] Review Request: myproxy - Manage X.509 Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011821.n91ILlUE003610@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520479 --- Comment #4 from Steve Traylen 2009-10-01 14:21:45 EDT --- http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/myproxy/myproxy.spec http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/myproxy/myproxy-4.8-3.fc11.src.rpm .spec file altered so that it now builds on .el5 as well. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1722508 still looking for a review. Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 18:48:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 14:48:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526055] Review Request: alure - AL Utilities REtooled In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011848.n91Im4Ax009303@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526055 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |martin.gieseking at uos.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Martin Gieseking 2009-10-01 14:48:02 EDT --- Here is my review of your package. I only found a few minor issues to be fixed. The -devel package should get its own license tag since GPLv2+ of NaturalDocs applies to the -devel package only. Additionally, some further suggestions: - The tarball contains two example files that could help developers to understand how to use the library. You should add the folder examples/ to the -devel package. - I recommend to explicitly list the name of the include directory since it's easier to see where the header files go: %{_includedir}/AL/ - please add a blank line between the changelog entries $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-11-x86_64/result/alure-* 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. --------------------------------- keys used in following checklist: [+] OK [.] OK, not applicable [X] needs work --------------------------------- [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license. - files in tarball and the website indicate LGPLv2 - according to the link given above, LGPLv2+ is intended - tarball contains files from NaturalDocs which is licensed under GPLv2+ - website of NaturalDocs links to GPLv3+ license text [X] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. - the base package is licensed under LGPLv2+ only - the devel package contains the NaturalDocs files, so that its own license tag should be "LGPLv2+ and GPLv2+" [+] MUST: file containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. - COPYING added to %doc [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. $ sha1sum alure-1.0-src.tar.bz2* ec97ff5d418b8e1fd89b8c056b9ea22c98671b65 alure-1.0-src.tar.bz2 ec97ff5d418b8e1fd89b8c056b9ea22c98671b65 alure-1.0-src.tar.bz2.1 [+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1722519 [.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, ... [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. [.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. - no locales [+] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. - not relocatable [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. - NaturalDocs documentation of the library placed in -devel package [+] MUST: files in %doc must not affect the runtime of the application. [+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. - no static libraries built [+] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' [+] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. libalure.so added to -devel package [+] MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. - .la files removed in %install section [.] MUST: GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file. - no GUI [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. - directory %{_includedir}/AL/ is also owned by openal-devel - this is OK according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot}. [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [X] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. - upstream should be ask to include the GPLv2 license text needed for the NaturalDocs files [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. - builds in mock [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. - builds in koji [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. - the examples coming with the tarball build and work as expected [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. [.] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [+] SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) should be placed in a -devel pkg. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 18:51:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 14:51:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525211] Review Request: rubygem-ditz - A command-line issue tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011851.n91IpZcZ025163@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525211 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-10-01 14:51:33 EDT --- Some notes: * Unneeded macros - The defined macro ruby_sitelib does not seem to be used anywhere. * License - Please change the license tag to "GPLv3 with exceptions" * Virtual (Build)Requires - For ruby(gem) modules related (Build)Requires, please don't use rpm names directly but use virtual Provides like perl: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#Perl_Requires_and_Provides * Macros - Use macros properly. /usr/bin should be %{_bindir}. * Duplicate files - "LICENSE README.txt" are installed twice (one under %geminstdir, one under %_defaultdocdir/%name-%version) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 18:55:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 14:55:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507697] Review Request: python-migrate0.5 - schema migration tools for SQLAlchemy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011855.n91ItPg8011474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507697 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(lmacken at redhat.co | |m) | --- Comment #6 from Luke Macken 2009-10-01 14:55:23 EDT --- Ugh, I loathe setuptools. So, with this patch, the test suite runs fine: --- migrate/__init__.py.orig 2009-10-01 09:44:50.865973980 -0400 +++ migrate/__init__.py 2009-10-01 09:44:51.972973558 -0400 @@ -4,3 +4,6 @@ :mod:`migrate.changeset` that allows to define database schema changes using Python. """ +__requires__ = 'SQLAlchemy>=0.5' +import pkg_resources +pkg_resources.require('SQLAlchemy>=0.5') http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1722497 However, when adding python-sqlalchemy (0.3) to the build requires, it explodes with a VersionConflict. I've lost many a day in setuptools-hell. Not today though, so I'm in favor of dropping the %check until we can figure this out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 18:56:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 14:56:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225697] Merge Review: distcache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011856.n91IuGPL026628@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225697 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen 2009-10-01 14:56:15 EDT --- Hi, I presume a merge review is the same as a normal review just a different starting point: Comments: 1) $ rpmlint distcache.spec distcache.spec:57: E: use-of-RPM_SOURCE_DIR Yes you should not install from the SOURCE_DIR but instead in %prep move things to unpacked directory. i.e. cp -p %{SOURCE1} . after your %setup. 2) The 3 patches have no comments or upstream bugs attached. 3) The useradd section in the %post could be a litte more complicated as recommended here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UsersAndGroups (It's odd its in the %post and not in the %pre, is it really not needed till then? It looks like it may be in the passwd file already though. 4) The two scripts in the .src.rpm should not be executable. 5) What about splitting to a client and server package? Is that sensible? 6) You could mark /etc/sysconfig/distcache as a %gfile -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 19:04:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 15:04:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466047] Review Request: tcl-mysqltcl - MySQL interface for Tcl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011904.n91J4Kq1013432@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466047 --- Comment #24 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-10-01 15:04:16 EDT --- Well, would you answer this question? (In reply to comment #21) > One thing I forgot to ask: > > * Obsoletes > - Would you explain why you want "Obsoletes: > %{real_name} < %{version}-%{release}" on Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 19:17:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 15:17:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526738] Review Request: py-radix - Radix tree data structure for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011917.n91JH5Jr031797@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526738 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |steve.traylen at cern.ch AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |steve.traylen at cern.ch Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen 2009-10-01 15:17:03 EDT --- Hi, 1) $ rpmlint py-radix.spec py-radix.spec:28: W: setup-not-quiet py-radix.spec: E: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install %setup needs a -q and first line of install should be rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT 2) The release should have a dist tag. i.e https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag 3) There is no need to have Requires: python since it is automatically worked out. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Explicit_Requires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 19:20:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 15:20:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519282] Review Request: calibre - e-book converter and library manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011920.n91JKN0d032750@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519282 --- Comment #5 from Michael Schwendt 2009-10-01 15:20:21 EDT --- Directory %{python_sitelib}/%{name}/ is not included. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FileAndDirectoryOwnership -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 19:24:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 15:24:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472144] Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011924.n91JOkBA001017@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144 --- Comment #25 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-10-01 15:24:45 EDT --- Well I checked the latest rawhide skinlf source and skinlf CVS repository, however the following files are still under ASL 1.1 (total: 10 files) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- src/main/com/l2fprod/gui/plaf/skin/SkinLookAndFeel.java src/main/com/l2fprod/gui/plaf/skin/Window.java src/main/com/l2fprod/gui/plaf/skin/impl/AbstractSkinProgress.java src/main/com/l2fprod/gui/plaf/skin/impl/gtk/parser/*.java ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 19:27:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 15:27:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521909] Review Request: ne7ssh - SSH Library is a Secure Shell client software written in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011927.n91JRfw5001761@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909 --- Comment #19 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-10-01 15:27:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > Splitting-hairs. You *could* include these tiny example source files in the > -devel package, but it really doesn't matter. It's cleaner to treat them as > documentation. If we treat this as documentation it should be included in -doc. What is a big problem set nw7ssh-devel as dependency for nw7ssh-doc? > * The examples don't even build from scratch. They fail. You haven't tried to > compile them at all, which shows how unimportant they are to you. Most of them > are missing to include the cstdio header. You are wrong. I try build it. I can say more - I start learning this library by examples (as many do, it is why I pay such attention for that). But you a right, there is cstdio header issue. As I mail about it to upstream author in main library. This is trivial to fix errors. So, I hope it will be fixed soon. Or you think I should expand my patch on examples too? > * The examples won't build inside their directory as only superuser root can > write to that directory. A normal user would need to copy them somewhere else. Yes. I known. But user can copy example "as is" and build it. > * The examples don't even work if built without modifications, since some > contain only examplary values instead of real-life configuration values. They > are really just an add-on to the API documentation, not ready-to-run demos. Modifications needed only dfor user/password. Other work fine with included Makefile. Furthermore, examples built ok (except cstdio header issue) it only may not functional properly (but user/pass is extremal private values to provide "commons"). > * Documentation packages also need a program that can display the > documentation. For example, a browser for HTML pages. Or a viewer for PDF > files. Such requirements are _not_ hardcoded as package dependencies. No special tools needed. Standard cat, more or less commands may act as documentation reader. Especially for C-files. It is generic, it is not required listed as dependencies. > * All -devel packages need a matching development environment, i.e. compilers > and tools, standard libraries. Such requirements are _not_ hardcoded as package > dependencies either. Off course. But -devel packages itself must be listed as dependencies. > > * A packaging issue is left, too. > This is Fedora's cmake invocation with the %{cmake} macro: > > %build > -CFLAGS="%{optflags}" CXXFLAGS="%{optflags}" cmake . > +%{cmake} . > make all %{?_smp_mflags} > > Look at "rpm --eval %cmake" to see what it does. Not only does it set the > optflags, it also increases verbosity to fill the build log with relevant > output. This is very helpful hint. Thank you. I've fixed it. http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/ne7ssh/ne7ssh.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 19:36:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 15:36:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526564] Review Request: unittest - C++ unit testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011936.n91Ja9vh021863@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526564 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 19:35:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 15:35:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526564] Review Request: unittest - C++ unit testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011935.n91JZfmZ021704@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526564 --- Comment #3 from Michael Schwendt 2009-10-01 15:35:40 EDT --- Aha, I see you've found somebody who has started the sponsoring process but has not sponsored you yet (and hasn't approved the first package yet). [...] > I found nothing in the Guidelines saying that irrelevant files > should be excluded, There is nothing in the guidelines which says you should explicitly include useless files which aren't installed automatically by "make install". ;-P And there is one guideline above all other guidelines. It's called "common sense". ;-) The trick is to not include such files as %doc. Simpy write %doc COPYING instead of: %doc COPYING INSTALL :) > though I found a lot of INSTALL files that are written in a similar > manner and included. Packaging mistakes. Not good examples. Especially not if it's the "standard" FSF Installation Instructions "INSTALL" file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 19:42:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 15:42:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526567] Review Request: mongodb - high-performance, open source, schema-free document-oriented database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011942.n91JggxT005776@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526567 --- Comment #5 from Michael Schwendt 2009-10-01 15:42:41 EDT --- > mongodb.src:78: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{buildroot}/lib It's not a failure in rpmlint. The package will fail to build for 64-bit multi-arch targets where %_libdir is /usr/lib64 instead of /usr/lib You move %{buildroot}/lib to %{buildroot}%{_prefix}, but you don't include any files in %{buildroot}%{_prefix}/lib (!) but %{buildroot}%{_libdir} which is not the same. Needs a fix. Read up on how to do scratch-builds with koji (the Fedora Build System). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 19:45:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 15:45:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526126] Review Request: python3 - Python 3.x (backwards incompatible version) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011945.n91JjJsD024365@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126 Dave Malcolm changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dmalcolm at redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Dave Malcolm 2009-10-01 15:45:18 EDT --- I also had a go at packaging 3.1.1, before I saw either of your efforts, so we now have 3 separate SRPMS... I'll have a look and compare the 3 SRPMs. To liven things up further, I think it would be good if the python 3 specfile closely resembled the python 2 specfile. (It may be necessary to clean up the python 2 specfile to do this, see bug 226342). I've written up some thoughts about getting Python 3 into Fedora here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-October/msg00054.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 19:48:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 15:48:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525346] Review Request: papi - Performance Application Programming Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011948.n91JmDl3007019@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525346 --- Comment #7 from William Cohen 2009-10-01 15:48:12 EDT --- Updated srpm for a couple SPEC file cleanups (proper URL for download location and requires for -devel RPM); Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/wcohen/papi/papi.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/wcohen/papi/papi-3.7.0-7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 19:56:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 15:56:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466047] Review Request: tcl-mysqltcl - MySQL interface for Tcl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011956.n91Jum84010144@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466047 --- Comment #25 from Rene Ploetz 2009-10-01 15:56:47 EDT --- The guidelines do not seem to say anything about Obsoletes, but the main reason behind is that you obviously remove all packages which do provide an unversioned %{real_name} as well as the versioned ones below this release. There are only few use-cases for this, the main one is to remove any user-built (or third party) rpm versions which were installed before. If you do not see that this will be necessary I can easily remove the line. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 19:57:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 15:57:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526805] New: Review Request: lua-loop - Class models for Lua Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lua-loop - Class models for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526805 Summary: Review Request: lua-loop - Class models for Lua Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michael.silvanus at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/funpl/lua-loop.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/funpl/lua-loop-2.3-0.1.beta.fc12.src.rpm Description: LOOP stands for Lua Object-Oriented Programming and is a set of packages for supporting different models of object-oriented programming in the Lua language. LOOP models are mainly concerned with dynamicity, although there is an attempt to keep them as simple and efficient as possible. Additionally, LOOP uses fundamental Lua concepts like tables (objects) and meta-tables (classes), traditionally used to enable an object-oriented programming style, to provide a common ground for the interoperability of objects and classes of its different models. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 20:03:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 16:03:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910012003.n91K3f2x011614@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 --- Comment #33 from Luke Macken 2009-10-01 16:03:40 EDT --- Here's an updated status... python-catwalk [X] EL-5 Pending stable push [X] F-11 Pending stable push [X] rawhide python-repoze-what-quickstart [X] EL-5 Pending stable push [X] F-11 Pending stable push [X] Rawhide python-repoze-what-plugins-sql [X] EL-5 pending stable push [X] F-11 [X] Rawhide TurboGears2 [X] Rawhide [_] EL-5 python-zope-sqlalchemy Built and requests stable push python-pylons Branch request made (#526576) [_] python-routes EL branch request (#526803) [_] python-webhelpers EL- branch request (#526801) [_] python-beaker EL-5 branch request (#526800) [X] python-weberror [X] python-webtest Headed to testing [_] F-11 Waiting for python-repoze-what-quickstart python-tg-devtools [_] rawhide [X] python-tw-forms-0.9.8 [X] Rawhide [X] F-11 Headed to testing [X] EL-5 Headed to testing [X] python-toscawidgets-0.9.8 [X] EL-5 Headed to testing [X] F-11 Headed to testing [_] F-11 [_] EL-5 Needs python-migrate0.5 (#507697) python-repoze-tm2 [X] Rawhide [X] F11 Headed to updates-testing [X] EL-5 Headed to updates-testing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 20:01:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 16:01:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526651] Review Request: xpaint - An X Window System image editing or paint program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910012001.n91K1UY5029199@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526651 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-10-01 16:01:29 EDT --- A couple of notes: - URL should be http://sf-xpaint.sourceforge.net/ - Source0 should be http://downloads.sourceforge.net/sf-xpaint/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 20:07:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 16:07:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910012007.n91K75Kc012548@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 --- Comment #34 from Luke Macken 2009-10-01 16:07:04 EDT --- I should also note that I will be unavailable for most of tomorrow, and parts of next week. So please feel free to continue pushing this forward if I'm not around to do so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 20:08:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 16:08:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523799] Review Request: ascii - nteractive ascii name and synonym chart In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910012008.n91K80jv030549@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523799 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |martin.gieseking at uos.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Martin Gieseking 2009-10-01 16:07:59 EDT --- Here's my review of this small package. It's pretty clean and I couldn't find any major issues to fix. However, I'm not sure if ascii is a valid package name. As far as I understand the naming rules and comments from other reviews, generic terms should not be used as package names. What do you think? - You can simplify the make statement to make %{?_smp_mflags} CFLAGS="${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}" $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-11-x86_64/result/ascii-* ascii.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary ascii ascii.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary ascii 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. If ascii is a proper package name, these warnings can be ignored. --------------------------------- keys used in following checklist: [+] OK [.] OK, not applicable [X] needs work --------------------------------- [X] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - I'm not sure if ascii is a valid package name because generic terms should be avoided [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license. - source file header refers to file COPYING that contains the GPLv2 license text [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: file that contains the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. - COPYING added to %doc [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. $ sha1sum ascii-3.8.tar.gz* c7a513cd52c0fec64491566b5db18fa070639ca4 ascii-3.8.tar.gz c7a513cd52c0fec64491566b5db18fa070639ca4 ascii-3.8.tar.gz.1 [+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1722862 [.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, ... [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. - no explicit BRs necessary [.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. - no locales [.] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. - no shared libs [.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, ... - not relocatable [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. - no large docs [+] MUST: Files in %doc must not affect the runtime of the application. [.] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. - no header files [.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. - no static libs [.] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' - no .pc files [.] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. - no shared libs [.] MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} - no devel package [.] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. - no .la files [.] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file. - no GUI [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. - builds in mock [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. - builds in koji [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. [.] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. - no scriptlets [.] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. - no subpackages [.] SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in a -devel pkg. - no .pc files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 20:10:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 16:10:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515164] Review Request: gnomenu - A consolidated menu for gnome that brings eye candy to the world of the Gnome menu's In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910012010.n91KAevx013706@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515164 --- Comment #13 from Michael Schwendt 2009-10-01 16:10:38 EDT --- * repeat "rpmlint -i gnomenu-1.9.9-3.fc11.src.rpm" as some of the older issues are still there * you should really not mix usage of %buildroot and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#macros * multiple directories are not included: %{_sysconfdir}/%{name} /usr/lib/%{name} %{_datadir}/gnomenu %{_datadir}/gnomenu/Themes https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FileAndDirectoryOwnership -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 20:14:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 16:14:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910012014.n91KENl6014557@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 --- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-01 16:14:21 EDT --- TurboGears2-2.0.3-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/TurboGears2-2.0.3-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 20:34:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 16:34:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526738] Review Request: py-radix - Radix tree data structure for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910012034.n91KY725020041@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526738 --- Comment #2 from Matt Domsch 2009-10-01 16:34:06 EDT --- Thanks Steve. All fixed, new versions posted at the same URLs above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 20:39:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 16:39:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521909] Review Request: ne7ssh - SSH Library is a Secure Shell client software written in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910012039.n91Kd428021374@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909 --- Comment #20 from Michael Schwendt 2009-10-01 16:39:03 EDT --- > What is a big problem set nw7ssh-devel as dependency for nw7ssh-doc? It creates a superfluous chain of dependencies. It adds several packages, which are not really needed by anyone who may want to evaluate the API Documentation (such as the included PDF). At least the following four packages would be pulled in: ne7ssh-devel + ne7ssh + botan-devel + botan. It's unexpected for a Documentation package to have such requirements. > Or you think I should expand my patch on examples too? No. Unless you insist on claiming it would be important that users could simply build them by executing "make" without having to install any needed packages. ;-) Just like many _optional_ test-suites, such examples often are out-of-sync with the main library anyway. Especially if they are not built by default. That means less users will build them and will notice build problems. Less users will report build failures with _optional_ files to upstream. > No special tools needed. You misunderstood me. Surely, a PDF file needs a special viewer to display it. With that my earlier comments should be more clear. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 20:42:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 16:42:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526738] Review Request: py-radix - Radix tree data structure for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910012042.n91KgZT5007036@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526738 --- Comment #3 from Steve Traylen 2009-10-01 16:42:34 EDT --- Hi Matt, Given one of the items was to add a dist tag its kind of impossible for them to be at the same URLs since the file name will have changed. More over between each of revisions could you please increase the Release number, otherwise it all becomes rather confusing. Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 21:03:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 17:03:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526351] Review Request: tito - A tool for managing rpm based git projects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910012103.n91L3bH8012776@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526351 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de --- Comment #1 from Martin Gieseking 2009-10-01 17:03:36 EDT --- The package doesn't build in mock on my F-11 system. A koji scratch build fails too: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1723028 Excerpt from the build log: + /usr/bin/python setup.py build Traceback (most recent call last): File "setup.py", line 19, in from setuptools import setup, find_packages ImportError: No module named setuptools You should also add AUTHORS and COPYING to %doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 21:35:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 17:35:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507697] Review Request: python-migrate0.5 - schema migration tools for SQLAlchemy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910012135.n91LZ612021336@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507697 --- Comment #7 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-10-01 17:35:05 EDT --- You probably don't want to drop the %check as it's alerting you to a real problem. Looking into this.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 21:50:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 17:50:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526055] Review Request: alure - AL Utilities REtooled In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910012150.n91LoGN1027176@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526055 --- Comment #4 from Guido Grazioli 2009-10-01 17:50:14 EDT --- Hello thanks for looking into this. I applied your change requests and will contact upstream asap asking to include the license for NaturalDocs files, and possibly the two patches i wrote. Updated files here: http://guidograzioli.fedorapeople.org/packages/alure/alure.spec http://guidograzioli.fedorapeople.org/packages/alure/alure-1.0-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 21:53:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 17:53:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526607] Review Request: openfontlibrary-smonohand-font - A handwritten monospace font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910012153.n91LrROT011704@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526607 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(michael.silvanus@ | |gmail.com) --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-01 17:53:24 EDT --- Thank you for submitting a new font package for review. I hope you'll find the process smooth and friendly, please do not hesitate to tell us what could be made better if something bugs you. Anyway, for the review 1. we use oflb as prefix for openfontlibrary fonts 2. the author claims he created this font in fontforge, so it'd be a good idea to beg for the sfd file upstream and build the font from source in the rpm 3. there is no licensing trace in the ttf file, and web pages are unfortunately not future proof. Please ask upstream to release the font in a zip file that includes a detached .txt licensing file (or at least use the fontforge button that embeds the OFL text in the .ttf) 4. IMHO this font should be classified as "fantasy" not "monospace" (see fontconfig-generics.txt in fontpackages-devel) 5. Why do you reference Droid Sans Mono in your fontconfig file? If that's because you cut and pasted from the Droid file, you have clean and documented fontconfig templates in fontpackages-devel (in /usr/share/fontconfig/templates/). The lastest rawhide version is probably the best reference for anything ? F11 (I'll probably push it to F11 if I stop finding things to improve every other week) 6. IMHO it is wrong to alias Chalkboard or Comic Sans MS if you're not sure Smonohand is very close both in looks and metrics. The reason being looks only are not sufficient, if the letters are different sizes documents written will one of the other fonts will end up repaginated with smonohand. Usually when we alias a font is much closer than just 'looks like it' 7. 65 is probably too high a prio for a fantasy latin font, 63-64 should be fine (see fontconfig-priorities.txt) For a first try this is a nice package, you just need to spend some time reading the little documentation we have in fontpackages-devel and you'll be fine. NEEDINFO till this submission progresses -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 21:56:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 17:56:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526607] Review Request: openfontlibrary-smonohand-font - A handwritten monospace font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910012156.n91LutiS013232@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526607 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-01 17:56:53 EDT --- 8. and I forgot: please use the font package name as .spec name -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 21:58:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 17:58:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526564] Review Request: unittest - C++ unit testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910012158.n91Lwi4O029955@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526564 --- Comment #4 from Ionu? Ar??ri?i 2009-10-01 17:58:43 EDT --- Ok. :) http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/unittest/unittest.spec.2 http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/unittest/unittest-0.50-62.3.fc11.src.rpm * Fri Oct 2 2009 Ionu? Ar??ri?i - 0.50-62.3 - removed INSTALL file - moved all doc files to the same dir -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 22:05:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 18:05:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440676] Review Request: lua-filesystem - File System Library for Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910012205.n91M5CqE016264@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440676 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michael.silvanus at gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-10-01 18:05:10 EDT --- Discussed with Tim; we'd want to eventually have the entire Lua stack on EPEL. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: lua-filesystem New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: timn salimma -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 22:08:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 18:08:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910012208.n91M8npM001230@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-01 18:08:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > I'm not > sure if its a sans-serif or a fantasy, since I can't decide if this font can be > used for long professional texts. It's the Devanagari script, so could be used. Well, I don't read Devanagari at all, and the font has no OS/2 metadata, please ask upstream or the i18n for clarification (and as last resort use fantasy as that's the safest choice) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 22:12:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 18:12:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524992] Review Request: toppler - platform game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910012212.n91MCTpH018789@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524992 --- Comment #4 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-10-01 18:12:28 EDT --- New version : - Fix License. - Fix buffer overflow in level editor Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/toppler.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/toppler-1.1.3-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 22:09:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 18:09:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521909] Review Request: ne7ssh - SSH Library is a Secure Shell client software written in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910012209.n91M9Vsb017682@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909 --- Comment #21 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-10-01 18:09:30 EDT --- Ok, ok. Proposed soft-dependencies in RPM will be cool in this situation. But in nowadays we haven't them... So, now I've delete ne7ssh-devel dependency from ne7ssh-doc, but add warning about it in description. Do you are agree with that solution? > No. Unless you insist on claiming it would be important that users could > simply build them by executing "make" without having to install any needed > packages. I'm insist on claiming it important :) > You misunderstood me. Surely, a PDF file needs a special viewer to display it. > With that my earlier comments should be more clear. I understood you. You misunderstood my point. Such dependency is very generic and very ambiguous to be explicit. Really, all binary file require elf-interpreter, but we do not add kernel into any binary package as dependency!!! PDF also have many graphical tools and also many console converters like pdf2text. Absolutely different situation with source code. BR-dependency like gcc in most cases automatically deducted and written in package. And we also do not want explicit add it. But, if we want compile some code, we MUST write all dependency on concrete package to do that. It is a main work of maintainers. Off course, I partial agree with yours arguments what it is not fully logical in -doc package (it is why it was listed as Requires, not BuildRequires) and it why I try search reasonable compromise in this situation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 22:13:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 18:13:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526607] Review Request: openfontlibrary-smonohand-font - A handwritten monospace font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910012213.n91MD8KY018981@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526607 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(michael.silvanus@ | |gmail.com) | --- Comment #6 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-10-01 18:13:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Thank you for submitting a new font package for review. I hope you'll find the > process smooth and friendly, please do not hesitate to tell us what could be > made better if something bugs you. > > Anyway, for the review > > 1. we use oflb as prefix for openfontlibrary fonts Ah, thanks. That's why yum search openfont did not find anything of interest > 2. the author claims he created this font in fontforge, so it'd be a good idea > to beg for the sfd file upstream and build the font from source in the rpm I'll contact him and ask. > 3. there is no licensing trace in the ttf file, and web pages are unfortunately > not future proof. Please ask upstream to release the font in a zip file that > includes a detached .txt licensing file (or at least use the fontforge button > that embeds the OFL text in the .ttf) Ditto. > 4. IMHO this font should be classified as "fantasy" not "monospace" (see > fontconfig-generics.txt in fontpackages-devel) > > 5. Why do you reference Droid Sans Mono in your fontconfig file? If that's > because you cut and pasted from the Droid file, you have clean and documented > fontconfig templates in fontpackages-devel (in Em. Guilty as charged. I recently installed it, so when looking for a reference spec, I looked there. Somehow I skipped over the notice at the top of the packaging page. > /usr/share/fontconfig/templates/). The lastest rawhide version is probably the > best reference for anything ? F11 (I'll probably push it to F11 if I stop > finding things to improve every other week) I'm on Rawhide, so that's good. > 6. IMHO it is wrong to alias Chalkboard or Comic Sans MS if you're not sure > Smonohand is very close both in looks and metrics. The reason being looks only > are not sufficient, if the letters are different sizes documents written will > one of the other fonts will end up repaginated with smonohand. Usually when we > alias a font is much closer than just 'looks like it' Ah, OK. > > 7. 65 is probably too high a prio for a fantasy latin font, 63-64 should be > fine (see fontconfig-priorities.txt) Where's this file? I tried looking in fontpackages{,-devel} and fontconfig{,-devel}. I was trying to go for as low a priority as possible, since it looked that 50 is for a user override, and the number goes up from there. > For a first try this is a nice package, you just need to spend some time > reading the little documentation we have in fontpackages-devel and you'll be > fine. > Will do that and reupload an updated spec later today, thanks for the feedback! Actually, one more question: the font filename (TTF) -- is there a naming convention? right now it has the author's name -- dalles_-_SMonohand.ttf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 22:12:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 18:12:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521909] Review Request: ne7ssh - SSH Library is a Secure Shell client software written in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910012212.n91MCBBa002738@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909 --- Comment #22 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-10-01 18:12:10 EDT --- http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/ne7ssh/ne7ssh-1.3.1-6.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 22:22:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 18:22:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910012222.n91MM0oa021813@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |psatpute at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(sanjay.ankur at gmai | |l.com) --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-01 18:21:57 EDT --- Anyway, thanks a lot for adding a new font package in the review pipe Appart from the CSS classification I can't really help you with, here is some review: 1. non LGC font ? please use a priority ? 65 as per fontconfig-priorities.txt 2. please ask the lohit people what they think about this font. IMHO it is highly likely one of the lohit fonts shares a common ancestry with gargi (and in that case they should at least cross-alias each other) 3. Licensing should be GPLv2+ 4. (non blocking) please ask upstream to add the standard FSF GPL font exception to their licensing 5. (non blocking) description could use some meat Anyway, this package is mostly fine, except for the classification problem. NEEDINFO till this is resolved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 22:27:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 18:27:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526607] Review Request: openfontlibrary-smonohand-font - A handwritten monospace font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910012227.n91MRc9V023662@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526607 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-01 18:27:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #4) > > 7. 65 is probably too high a prio for a fantasy latin font, 63-64 should be > > fine (see fontconfig-priorities.txt) > Where's this file? I tried looking in fontpackages{,-devel} and > fontconfig{,-devel}. /usr/share/fontconfig/templates/fontconfig-priorities.txt fontpackages-devel > Actually, one more question: the font filename (TTF) -- is there a naming > convention? right now it has the author's name -- dalles_-_SMonohand.ttf Fontconfig does not care. I'd personnally remove the dalles_-_ stuff as it's junk added by the oflb upload process, but we have no hard convention one way or another PS meld or any other interactive diff tool is your friend to convert fontpackages-devel templates in actual spec/fontconfig files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 22:40:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 18:40:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468633] Review Request: wput - A utility for uploading files or whole directories to remote ftp-servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910012240.n91MeTOS011847@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468633 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #21 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-10-01 18:40:26 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: wput New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: itamarjp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 22:42:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 18:42:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526607] Review Request: openfontlibrary-smonohand-font - A handwritten monospace font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910012242.n91MgZtk029117@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526607 --- Comment #8 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-10-01 18:42:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > > 2. the author claims he created this font in fontforge, so it'd be a good idea > > to beg for the sfd file upstream and build the font from source in the rpm > I'll contact him and ask. > > > 3. there is no licensing trace in the ttf file, and web pages are unfortunately > > not future proof. Please ask upstream to release the font in a zip file that > > includes a detached .txt licensing file (or at least use the fontforge button > > that embeds the OFL text in the .ttf) > Ditto. OFLB's web contact form is currently broken, so I'm not sure whether the message I sent actually got through or not. I'm checking on IRC to see if anyone could fix it. > > 7. 65 is probably too high a prio for a fantasy latin font, 63-64 should be > > fine (see fontconfig-priorities.txt) > Where's this file? I tried looking in fontpackages{,-devel} and > fontconfig{,-devel}. I was trying to go for as low a priority as possible, > since it looked that 50 is for a user override, and the number goes up from > there. Ignore my silliness here. I was typing fontpackage, not fontpackages, and grep swallowed the error. > Actually, one more question: the font filename (TTF) -- is there a naming > convention? right now it has the author's name -- dalles_-_SMonohand.ttf Also, presumably the suffix -fonts stays regardless of whether the package contains only one font or more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 22:50:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 18:50:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526607] Review Request: openfontlibrary-smonohand-font - A handwritten monospace font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910012250.n91MoNg7015434@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526607 --- Comment #9 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-10-01 18:50:22 EDT --- Updated SRPM: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/fonts/oflb-smonohand-fonts-20090423-2.fc12.src.rpm This incorporates everything but the build-from-source/documentation issues, which is pending a response from upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 23:09:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 19:09:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522935] Review Request: mod_gnutls - GnuTLS module for the Apache HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910012309.n91N9edY020093@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522935 --- Comment #19 from Erick Calder 2009-10-01 19:09:39 EDT --- the package failed building for EL-5, but for F-10 I can't seem to submit the package via bodhi. the command I use is: # cd ~/cvs/mod_gnutls/F-10 # bodhi -n -r F10 -t bugfix mod_gnutls-0.5.5-5.fc10 Creating a new update for mod_gnutls-0.5.5-5.fc10 Password for rpm: I presume "rpm" refers to the account I'm using to build this stuff but entering the password just causes another password prompt. Creating a new update for mod_gnutls-0.5.5-5.fc10 Password for rpm: is that what it is, or there is some other password I need? what am I missing? also, if the package fails to build for EL-5, that's ok right? I can still publish for the other distros? here's what I got on the failed build: Package: mod_gnutls-0.5.5-5.el5 Tag: dist-5E-epel-testing-candidate Status: failed Built by: ekkis ID: 134763 Started: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 21:31:37 UTC Finished: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 21:33:12 UTC mod_gnutls-0.5.5-5.el5 (134763) failed on x86-1.fedora.phx.redhat.com (x86_64), x86-5.fedora.phx.redhat.com (i386), x86-4.fedora.phx.redhat.com (noarch): BuildError: error building package (arch i386), mock exited with status 1; see build.log for more information SRPMS: mod_gnutls-0.5.5-5.el5.src.rpm Failed tasks: ------------- Task 1723124 on x86-1.fedora.phx.redhat.com Task Type: buildArch (mod_gnutls-0.5.5-5.el5.src.rpm, x86_64) logs: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1723124&name=build.log http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1723124&name=root.log http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1723124&name=state.log Task 1723125 on x86-5.fedora.phx.redhat.com Task Type: buildArch (mod_gnutls-0.5.5-5.el5.src.rpm, i386) logs: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1723125&name=build.log http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1723125&name=root.log http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1723125&name=state.log Task 1723118 on x86-4.fedora.phx.redhat.com Task Type: build (dist-5E-epel-testing-candidate, /cvs/pkgs:rpms/mod_gnutls/EL-5:mod_gnutls-0_5_5-5_el5) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 23:21:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 19:21:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522935] Review Request: mod_gnutls - GnuTLS module for the Apache HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910012321.n91NLrOP006876@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522935 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-01 19:21:53 EDT --- afraid-dyndns-1.0-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/afraid-dyndns-1.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 23:21:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 19:21:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522935] Review Request: mod_gnutls - GnuTLS module for the Apache HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910012321.n91NLlci006831@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522935 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-01 19:21:46 EDT --- afraid-dyndns-1.0-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/afraid-dyndns-1.0-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 23:24:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 19:24:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522935] Review Request: mod_gnutls - GnuTLS module for the Apache HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910012324.n91NOrfV023312@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522935 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-01 19:24:52 EDT --- mod_gnutls-0.5.5-5.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mod_gnutls-0.5.5-5.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 23:25:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 19:25:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522935] Review Request: mod_gnutls - GnuTLS module for the Apache HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910012325.n91NP45x023684@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522935 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-01 19:25:03 EDT --- mod_gnutls-0.5.5-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mod_gnutls-0.5.5-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 23:21:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 19:21:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522935] Review Request: mod_gnutls - GnuTLS module for the Apache HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910012321.n91NLfED022719@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522935 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-01 19:21:40 EDT --- afraid-dyndns-1.0-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/afraid-dyndns-1.0-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 23:24:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 19:24:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522935] Review Request: mod_gnutls - GnuTLS module for the Apache HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910012324.n91NOxbW023352@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522935 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-01 19:24:58 EDT --- mod_gnutls-0.5.5-5.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mod_gnutls-0.5.5-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 23:43:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 19:43:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522935] Review Request: mod_gnutls - GnuTLS module for the Apache HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910012343.n91NhEEw013038@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522935 --- Comment #26 from Erick Calder 2009-10-01 19:43:13 EDT --- ugh. I put the wrong bugzilla id into the afraid-dyndns package and now I can't figure out how to edit it to correct it. help anyone? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 23:55:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 19:55:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522988] Review Request: afraid-dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910012355.n91Nt54d000767@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 --- Comment #30 from Erick Calder 2009-10-01 19:55:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > 1] use install -p to keep timestamps > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps well... the -C for install broke the F10 install... do you figure I can just not use it? how are these sorts of things handled? because I wouldn't want to take the option off and break it for the other releases -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 00:05:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 20:05:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526738] Review Request: py-radix - Radix tree data structure for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910020005.n9205QNx020204@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526738 --- Comment #4 from Matt Domsch 2009-10-01 20:05:25 EDT --- Steve, thanks for your comments. In general I don't like to bump revision during review, but it's not that big a deal so is done. As for the dist tag, yes I had added it, but as for review purposes (or when not built for a particular dist), I tend to: rpmbuild --define "dist %{nil}" ... http://domsch.com/linux/fedora/py-radix/py-radix.spec http://domsch.com/linux/fedora/py-radix/py-radix-0.5-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 00:19:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 20:19:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507697] Review Request: python-migrate0.5 - schema migration tools for SQLAlchemy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910020019.n920Jpc1024166@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507697 --- Comment #8 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-10-01 20:19:49 EDT --- Okay adding: __requires__ = 'SQLAlchemy>=0.5' import pkg_resources pkg_resources.require('SQLAlchemy>=0.5') to the top of setup.py fixes the tests *that use the inprocess python*. The tests in test_shell.py are not fixed by this because they fork a subprocess to do their work. In production, the script that invokes these is a light wrapper created by setuptools. Those use __requires__='' in order to perform that function. In the test, the migrate/versioning/shell.py file is being invoked directly. So __requires__ is not being set. There's several ways to fix these tests. We could have a wrapper that mimics setuptool's wrapper. We could add __requires__ ; import pkg_resources to versioning/shell.py. We could set the PYTHON_PATH environment variable in test_shell.py when it invokes the shell.py script so that it finds the proper SQLAlchemy. Of these, I think that the best one for upstream is the wrapper. A wrapper is how the script will be invoked from the shell and the test purports to test invokation of the script from the shell so it matches up best. Second best (and probably the easiest if we aren't going to get it upstream as well) is the environment variable solution. I'll go about making this happen. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 01:54:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 21:54:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507697] Review Request: python-migrate0.5 - schema migration tools for SQLAlchemy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910020154.n921sIvQ007054@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507697 --- Comment #9 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-10-01 21:54:17 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=363412) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=363412) Fix unittests As promised, one part of this adds the __requires__ lines to setup.py which fixes most of the unittests. The other adds the sqlalchemy path to PYTHONPATH before we call shell.py as a script. koji scratch build that works even when we have both python-sqlalchemy-0.3 and python-sqlachemy0.5-0.5.5 installed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 02:04:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 22:04:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526351] Review Request: tito - A tool for managing rpm based git projects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910020204.n9224E8d010417@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526351 --- Comment #2 from Devan Goodwin 2009-10-01 22:04:13 EDT --- %changelog * Thu Oct 01 2009 Devan Goodwin 0.1.1-2 - Add AUTHORS and COPYING to doc. - Add BuildRequires on python-setuptools. Spec URL: http://dgoodwin.fedorapeople.org/tito/tito.spec SRPM URL: http://dgoodwin.fedorapeople.org/tito/tito-0.1.1-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 02:31:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 22:31:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526844] New: Review Request: cirkuit - A frontend for TikZ and circuit_macros Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cirkuit - A frontend for TikZ and circuit_macros https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526844 Summary: Review Request: cirkuit - A frontend for TikZ and circuit_macros Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mathstuf at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/cirkuit/cirkuit.spec SRPM URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/cirkuit/cirkuit-0.2.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Cirkuit is a KDE4 application to generate publication-ready figures. It is a KDE frontend for the Circuit macros by Dwight Aplevich and for the TikZ language. Cirkuit builds a live preview of the source code and can export the resulting images in several formats (EPS, PDF, PNG, SVG, ...). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 04:10:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 00:10:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519483] Review Request: zikula-module-pagemaster - Creates pages with dynamic content like news, articles, etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910020410.n924AS4R021611@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519483 --- Comment #8 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-10-02 00:10:27 EDT --- Okay. We need updated packages that depend on: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526595 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 04:29:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 00:29:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526595] Review Request: zikula-module-filterutil - Pagesetter like filter rules for Zikula In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910020429.n924TNxs009634@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526595 Nick Bebout changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |nb at fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nb at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 04:51:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 00:51:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526844] Review Request: cirkuit - A frontend for TikZ and circuit_macros In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910020451.n924pYqU015936@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526844 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chitlesh at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-10-02 00:51:33 EDT --- #001: Requires: pdf2svg Is there a package called pdf2svg on fedora repositories ? #002: missing icon on gnome menu #003: Upon launch, I got a dialog box stating: Circuit Macros could not be found on your system. The application will not work if the macros are not installed. Do you want to proceed with the installation? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 05:06:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 01:06:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524545] Review Request: snacc - Sample Neufeld ASN.1 to C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910020506.n9256bY8020358@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524545 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-02 01:06:35 EDT --- snacc-1.3-4.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update snacc'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0563 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 05:06:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 01:06:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526274] Review Request: gplcver - An interpreted Verilog HDL simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910020506.n9256Olp020288@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526274 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-02 01:06:23 EDT --- gplcver-2.11a-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gplcver'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0561 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 05:06:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 01:06:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516059] Review Request: dokuwiki - Standards compliant simple to use wiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910020506.n9256UmS005130@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516059 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-02 01:06:29 EDT --- dokuwiki-0-0.2.20090214.b.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update dokuwiki'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0562 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 05:07:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 01:07:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524888] Review Request: vecmath - The 3D vector math Java package, javax.vecmath In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910020507.n9257MWc005380@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524888 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-02 01:07:20 EDT --- vecmath-0-2.20090922cvs.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update vecmath'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0571 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 05:07:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 01:07:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522935] Review Request: mod_gnutls - GnuTLS module for the Apache HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910020507.n9257FaM005334@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522935 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-02 01:07:14 EDT --- afraid-dyndns-1.0-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update afraid-dyndns'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0570 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 05:59:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 01:59:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526607] Review Request: openfontlibrary-smonohand-font - A handwritten monospace font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910020559.n925xYMk031447@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526607 --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-02 01:59:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Also, presumably the suffix -fonts stays regardless of whether the package > contains only one font or more. yes the suffix does not depend on the actual number of packaged files. That makes it safer if upstream adds a bold or italic later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 06:00:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 02:00:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513345] Review Request: iwak - Detect the openssh keys affected by CVE-2008-0166 among authorized_keys In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910020600.n9260Y9N031999@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513345 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(jchadima at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #12 from Matej Cepl 2009-10-02 02:00:33 EDT --- ping? what's going on with this package. Has it been already built in Rawhide? Why it hasn't been closed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 06:11:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 02:11:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526855] New: Review Request: webacula - Web interface of a Bacula backup system Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: webacula - Web interface of a Bacula backup system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526855 Summary: Review Request: webacula - Web interface of a Bacula backup system Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tim4dev at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://webacula.sourceforge.net/files/webacula.spec SRPM URL: http://webacula.sourceforge.net/files/webacula-3.2.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Webacula - Web Bacula - web interface of a Bacula backup system. Currently it can run Job, restore all files or selected files, restore the most recent backup for a client, restore backup for a client before a specified time, mount/umount Storages, show scheduled, running and terminated Jobs and more. Supported languages: English, French, German, Portuguese Brazil, Russian. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 06:15:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 02:15:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526855] Review Request: webacula - Web interface of a Bacula backup system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910020615.n926F9gR002397@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526855 Yuri Timofeev changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tim4dev at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Yuri Timofeev 2009-10-02 02:15:08 EDT --- That this is my first package and I need a sponsor. Project Home Page: http://webacula.sourceforge.net/ mock build - ok. koji build - ok : https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1723734 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 06:22:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 02:22:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526855] Review Request: webacula - Web interface of a Bacula backup system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910020622.n926MTML020935@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526855 Yuri Timofeev changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 06:51:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 02:51:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526564] Review Request: unittest - C++ unit testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910020651.n926pBA9009053@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526564 --- Comment #5 from Michael Schwendt 2009-10-02 02:51:10 EDT --- I've found the section, so actually it is covered by the guidelines: | Irrelevant documentation include build instructions, | the omnipresent INSTALL file containing generic build instructions, | for example, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Documentation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 06:54:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 02:54:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522935] Review Request: mod_gnutls - GnuTLS module for the Apache HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910020654.n926sWUD026701@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522935 --- Comment #28 from Tomas Mraz 2009-10-02 02:54:31 EDT --- The mod_gnutls will not be buildable on EL-5 due to the old gnutls version in EL-5. I don't think it is any problem that the EL-5 branch was created in the CVS. I'd just commit there some text file describing why the build fails so future rebuilds are not attempted there. Use the web interface to bodhi to edit the updates - the bugzilla numbers can be updated as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 07:08:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 03:08:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521909] Review Request: ne7ssh - SSH Library is a Secure Shell client software written in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910020708.n9278Rg9029466@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909 --- Comment #23 from Michael Schwendt 2009-10-02 03:08:25 EDT --- We're going in circles... As pointed out before, source code examples are technical documentation. The guidelines are explicit on where to put "API Documentation": https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Documentation Nothing wrong with putting them into the -devel package as %doc examples. It's the right place for them. Except that they still lack and fail to compile. ;) > But, if we want compile some code, we MUST write all dependency on > concrete package to do that. It is a main work of maintainers. No, that doesn't apply to documentation. More often than not, in documentation we explicitly get rid of superfluous dependencies. For example: Perl scripts included as %doc. Typically, these are explicitly made non-executable, so rpmbuild's dependency generator does not add any Perl Module dependencies automatically. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 07:56:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 03:56:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526738] Review Request: py-radix - Radix tree data structure for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910020756.n927uJ7r006223@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526738 --- Comment #5 from Steve Traylen 2009-10-02 03:56:18 EDT --- Thanks, Matt, I'll take a look later, if you are able to comment review on bug #526544 that would be great since it is also python review. Of course I'll do this what ever, many thanks. Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 08:06:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 04:06:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521909] Review Request: ne7ssh - SSH Library is a Secure Shell client software written in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910020806.n9286lJ9024534@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909 --- Comment #24 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-10-02 04:06:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) > We're going in circles... > > As pointed out before, source code examples are technical documentation. The > guidelines are explicit on where to put "API Documentation": > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Documentation > > Nothing wrong with putting them into the -devel package as %doc examples. It's > the right place for them. Cite from this link: "Pay also attention about which subpackage you include documentation in, for example API documentation belongs in the -devel subpackage, not the main one. Or if there's a lot of documentation, consider putting it into a subpackage. In this case, it is recommended to use *-doc as the subpackage name, and Documentation as the value of the Group tag." So, I think we must threat it as "documentation in -devel OR -doc" (as I make decision what it is big and create this sub-package), not in both! > Except that they still lack and fail to > compile. ;) Well, I extend patch to examples too. > No, that doesn't apply to documentation. More often than not, in documentation > we explicitly get rid of superfluous dependencies. For example: Perl scripts > included as %doc. Typically, these are explicitly made non-executable, so > rpmbuild's dependency generator does not add any Perl Module dependencies > automatically. Yes, I known rpmlint have this check check - http://rpmlint.zarb.org/cgi-bin/trac.cgi/browser/trunk/DocFilesCheck.py#L88 Please run command: $ repoquery '*-doc' --requires and you can see ho many -doc subpackages have dependencies. There perl, perl modules, -devel packages and just many other programs. Off course some of that is errors, but I do not see any trouble have such dependency when it can have worth. http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/ne7ssh/ne7ssh-1.3.1-6.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 08:12:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 04:12:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526866] New: Review Request: torium - A minimalistic, easily configurable torrent client for Linux Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: torium - A minimalistic, easily configurable torrent client for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526866 Summary: Review Request: torium - A minimalistic, easily configurable torrent client for Linux Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: leigh123linux at googlemail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/review/torium/1/torium.spec SRPM URL: http://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/review/torium/1/torium-0.4.2-2.fc11.src.rpm Description: A minimalistic, easily configurable torrent client for Linux. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 08:15:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 04:15:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526866] Review Request: torium - A minimalistic, easily configurable torrent client for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910020815.n928FJvr010839@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526866 leigh scott changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cwickert at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 08:34:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 04:34:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526866] Review Request: torium - A minimalistic, easily configurable torrent client for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910020834.n928YKUE014736@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526866 --- Comment #1 from leigh scott 2009-10-02 04:34:19 EDT --- It builds OK at koji. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1723819 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 08:34:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 04:34:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503495] Review Request: sblim-cim-client - Java CIM Client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910020834.n928Y9ED030858@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503495 --- Comment #3 from Roman Rakus 2009-10-02 04:34:08 EDT --- Downloaded src zip files from upstream are different than that in src rpm (md5sum). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 08:38:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 04:38:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462297] Review Request: perl-o2sms - A perl module to send SMS messages using .ie websites In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910020838.n928cIFF031704@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462297 Bug 462297 depends on bug 462296, which changed state. Bug 462296 Summary: Review Request: testgen4web-runner - Perl module to replay files recorded with TestGen4Web https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462296 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 08:38:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 04:38:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462296] Review Request: testgen4web-runner - Perl module to replay files recorded with TestGen4Web In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910020838.n928cHqC031667@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462296 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com Depends on| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-10-02 04:38:15 EDT --- Dead review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 08:40:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 04:40:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448458] Review Request: postal - mail server benchmark In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910020840.n928e0b6015812@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448458 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Depends on|201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 08:40:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 04:40:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461757] Review Request: libdwarf - library for producing and consuming DWARF debugging information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910020840.n928esaG016226@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461757 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Depends on|201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 08:39:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 04:39:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462296] Review Request: testgen4web-runner - Perl module to replay files recorded with TestGen4Web In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910020839.n928d5Q7015695@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462296 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Depends on|201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 08:39:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 04:39:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462297] Review Request: perl-o2sms - A perl module to send SMS messages using .ie websites In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910020839.n928dahw031940@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462297 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(nsheridan at gmail.c | |om) | --- Comment #9 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-10-02 04:39:34 EDT --- Closing as FE-DEADREVIEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 08:41:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 04:41:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479876] Review Request: yabasic - Small basic interpreter with simple graphics and printing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910020841.n928fR2t016496@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479876 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Depends on|201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 08:53:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 04:53:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503495] Review Request: sblim-cim-client - Java CIM Client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910020853.n928r5Mx018884@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503495 --- Comment #4 from Roman Rakus 2009-10-02 04:53:04 EDT --- Also missing requires for subpackages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 08:55:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 04:55:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503495] Review Request: sblim-cim-client - Java CIM Client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910020855.n928tU60019421@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503495 Roman Rakus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(vcrhonek at redhat.c | |om) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 08:55:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 04:55:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503939] Review Request: sblim-cim-client2 - Java CIM Client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910020855.n928t1LP002574@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503939 Roman Rakus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(vcrhonek at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #2 from Roman Rakus 2009-10-02 04:54:59 EDT --- # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review.[1] [rrakus at dhcp-lab-170 sblim-cim-client2]$ rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/sblim-cim-client2-* 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . >ok # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] . >ok # MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . >BAD missing requires in subpackages # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . >ok # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [3] >ok # MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] >ok # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] # MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] >ok # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. >ok # MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [7] >ok # MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8] # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. >ok # MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9] # MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] # MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.[11] # MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [12] >ok # MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [13] >ok # MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [14] >ok # MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [15] >ok # MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [16] >ok # MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [17] >ok # MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [18] >ok # MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [19] >ok # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [19] # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [20] # MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [21] # MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [22] # MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [20] # MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [23] # MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built.[21] # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [24] # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [25] >ok # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [26] >ok # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [27] >ok ---- Summary: Add requires for subpackages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 09:13:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 05:13:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483863] Review Request: g3dviewer - A 3D file/object viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910020913.n929D1a2006605@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483863 --- Comment #9 from Fabian Affolter 2009-10-02 05:13:00 EDT --- Thanks guys...as soon libg3d (#483859) is done this package will go into the Fedora Package Collection -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 09:19:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 05:19:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526876] New: Review Request: php-pecl-gmagick - Provides a wrapper to the GraphicsMagick library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-gmagick - Provides a wrapper to the GraphicsMagick library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526876 Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-gmagick - Provides a wrapper to the GraphicsMagick library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pahan at hubbitus.info QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/php-pecl-gmagick/php-pecl-gmagick.spec SRPM URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/php-pecl-gmagick/php-pecl-gmagick-1.0.1b1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: php-pecl-gmagick is a php extension to create, modify and obtain meta information of images using the GraphicsMagick API. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1723870 P.S. Spec file format assume 5-space tab with. Please, do not complain about it. Just do not start review if it is not acceptable for yours. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 09:26:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 05:26:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502614] Review Request: stfl - STFL implements a curses-based widget set for text terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910020926.n929QHXR026315@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502614 --- Comment #28 from Thomas Janssen 2009-10-02 05:26:15 EDT --- Ok. Did some minor spec changes like ($RPM_BUILD_ROOT to %{buildroot}), converting to tabs instead of spaces. Added Requires pkgconfig. Noted the rpmlint output after installation to upstream: http://www.rocklinux.net/pipermail/stfl/2009-October/000115.html Waiting for answer there. According to some threads from IIRC fedora-devel ML, is "W: undefined-non-weak-symbol" not a blocker criteria. Though i will take care that it gets fixed. By the way, the libstfl.so is linked against libncursesw.so At least according to the Makefile: export LDLIBS += -lncursesw >From my understanding. Spec URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/stfl.spec SRPM URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/stfl-0.21-2.fc10.src.rpm [thomas at tusdell SPECS]$ rpmlint stfl.spec ../SRPMS/stfl-0.21-2.fc10.src.rpm ../RPMS/x86_64/stfl*-2* 7 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1723919 I'm already sponsored. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 09:48:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 05:48:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526866] Review Request: torium - A minimalistic, easily configurable torrent client for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910020948.n929mHxI030146@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526866 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Christoph Wickert 2009-10-02 05:48:16 EDT --- Stay tuned for a full review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 10:03:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 06:03:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521909] Review Request: ne7ssh - SSH Library is a Secure Shell client software written in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910021003.n92A371J000614@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909 --- Comment #25 from Michael Schwendt 2009-10-02 06:03:05 EDT --- > So, I think we must threat it as "documentation in -devel OR -doc" There is one unwritten guideline above all others. It's called "consider common sense". If a -devel package included a couple of "man 3" pages for its API headers and also at least one large PDF file or a huge HTML tree, would you move _all_ %doc files into a separate -doc package? No. Nothing in the guidelines says you must decide between either -devel OR -doc. You are free to move the large files into -doc and keep other documentation files in -devel. It's the obvious solution. And convenient, too. Just as you're free to put further non-development oriented documentation files into other sub-packages. The original idea to create a -examples package for only six tiny source files was a weird and unpractical idea, and I think now you just don't want to let loose. That's why you show resistance. ;) > Please run command: > $ repoquery '*-doc' --requires > and you can see ho many -doc subpackages have dependencies. So what? --v > Off course some of that is errors, Exactly. :-) Don't treat them as good examples. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 10:21:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 06:21:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503336] Review Request: newsbeuter - console based feed reader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910021021.n92ALdfl004558@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503336 Thomas Janssen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |thomasj at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #8 from Thomas Janssen 2009-10-02 06:21:37 EDT --- Ok, i take over that one, information is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502614 Some minor spec changes Spec URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/newsbeuter.spec SRPM URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/newsbeuter-2.0-7.fc10.src.rpm [thomas at tusdell SPECS]$ rpmlint newsbeuter.spec ../SRPMS/newsbeuter-2.0-7.fc10.src.rpm ../RPMS/x86_64/newsbeuter-* 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 10:27:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 06:27:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526263] Review Request: l7-protocols - Protocol definitions files for l7-filter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910021027.n92ARUsC005583@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526263 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |cwickert at fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cwickert at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 10:27:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 06:27:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526265] Review Request: l7-filter-userspace - Userspace version of l7-filter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910021027.n92ARuXk005664@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526265 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |cwickert at fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cwickert at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 11:32:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 07:32:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503727] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-dhcp - SBLIM WBEM-SMT DHCP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910021132.n92BW6Hw019070@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503727 Roman Rakus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(vcrhonek at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #1 from Roman Rakus 2009-10-02 07:32:04 EDT --- # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review.[1] [rrakus at dhcp-lab-170 sblim-cmpi-dhcp]$ rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/sblim-cmpi-dhcp-* sblim-cmpi-dhcp.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libuniquekey.so libuniquekey.so sblim-cmpi-dhcp.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libRaToolsDhcp.so.0.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 sblim-cmpi-dhcp-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . >ok # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] . >ok # MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . >ok # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [3] >ok # MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] >ok # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] # MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] >ok # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. >ok # MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [7] >ok # MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8] # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. >ok # MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9] >BAD # MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] >ok # MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.[11] # MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [12] >ok # MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [13] >ok # MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [14] >ok # MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [15] >ok # MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [16] >ok # MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [17] >ok # MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [18] >ok # MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [19] >ok # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [19] >ok # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [20] # MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [21] # MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [22] # MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [20] >BAD # MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [23] >ok # MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built.[21] # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [24] # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [25] # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [26] >ok # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [27] >ok ----- Summary: Move .so files into -devel subpackage Remove locale files from %files section (find_lang make it alone) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 11:46:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 07:46:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469002] Review Request: sblim-gather - SBLIM Gatherer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910021146.n92BkraG007235@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469002 Roman Rakus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rrakus at redhat.com AssignedTo|praveen_paladugu at dell.com |rrakus at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 11:49:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 07:49:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521909] Review Request: ne7ssh - SSH Library is a Secure Shell client software written in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910021149.n92BnamN022492@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909 --- Comment #26 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-10-02 07:49:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > There is one unwritten guideline above all others. It's called "consider common > sense". Only after real guidelines. > If a -devel package included a couple of "man 3" pages for its API headers and > also at least one large PDF file or a huge HTML tree, would you move _all_ %doc > files into a separate -doc package? Man file must stay in main package I though, not in -devel. > No. Nothing in the guidelines says you must > decide between either -devel OR -doc. You are free to move the large files into > -doc and keep other documentation files in -devel. It's the obvious solution. > And convenient, too. Just as you're free to put further non-development > oriented documentation files into other sub-packages. I don't known really. I ask in devel ml: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-October/msg00109.html > The original idea to create a -examples package for only six tiny source files > was a weird and unpractical idea, and I think now you just don't want to let > loose. That's why you show resistance. ;) What? Loose? What loose?? I'm 2 times remade it as you want! But also I want do work as best as can. I only search best way. > Exactly. :-) Don't treat them as good examples. Why? I try "consider common sense". ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 12:04:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 08:04:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526055] Review Request: alure - AL Utilities REtooled In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910021204.n92C4aR3025399@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526055 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Martin Gieseking 2009-10-02 08:04:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > I applied your change requests and will contact upstream asap asking to include > the license for NaturalDocs files, and possibly the two patches i wrote. OK, fine. Maybe you can also ask upstream to add the complete copyright notice to the source files (as mentioned in section "How to Apply These Terms to Your New Programs" of the LGPL license text). Otherwise it's hard to determine that LGPLv2+ is intended. Furthermore, COPYING contains the text of the old outdated GNU *Library* General Public License. Perhaps the author also wants to update it to the GNU *Lesser* General Public License. The license issues are things to be fixed upstream and no blockers here. Apart from them, everything looks fine now. ------------------------ The package is APPROVED. ------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 12:23:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 08:23:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469002] Review Request: sblim-gather - SBLIM Gatherer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910021223.n92CNEmf029377@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469002 Roman Rakus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(vcrhonek at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #6 from Roman Rakus 2009-10-02 08:23:12 EDT --- Should own dir /usr/lib64/gather Dir /usr/share/sblim-testsuite should not be owned -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 12:50:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 08:50:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521909] Review Request: ne7ssh - SSH Library is a Secure Shell client software written in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910021250.n92CoSnm003032@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #27 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-10-02 08:50:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > (In reply to comment #25) > > There is one unwritten guideline above all others. It's called "consider common > > sense". > Only after real guidelines. Nonsense. The guidelines are supposed to be a reflection of the "common sense" and are not a law (and even laws can be changed). > > If a -devel package included a couple of "man 3" pages for its API headers and > > also at least one large PDF file or a huge HTML tree, would you move _all_ %doc > > files into a separate -doc package? > Man file must stay in main package I though, not in -devel. Wrong again. Man pages must be part of the subpackage they document. This normally means, *1's need to go to the base package, *3's need to go to *-devel. > > No. Nothing in the guidelines says you must > > decide between either -devel OR -doc. You are free to move the large files into > > -doc and keep other documentation files in -devel. The same as with man-pages. In general, doc's need to be part (Or be pulled in through package deps) of the package they document. => user-documentation goes into the base package => devel-docs into *devel packages unless there are technical reasons to do otherwise -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 12:53:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 08:53:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526651] Review Request: xpaint - An X Window System image editing or paint program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910021253.n92Cruvx003606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526651 --- Comment #2 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-10-02 08:53:55 EDT --- Fixed.Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 13:03:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 09:03:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526004] Review Request: fapg - Fast Audio Playlist Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910021303.n92D3xAg006537@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526004 --- Comment #2 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-10-02 09:03:58 EDT --- Fixed. Thanks. SRPM URL: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/src/fapg-0.41-2.fc10.src.rpm Spec URL: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/SPECS/fapg.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 13:04:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 09:04:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910021304.n92D4UO5006752@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 --- Comment #36 from Nils Philippsen 2009-10-02 09:04:28 EDT --- I've attempted to build python-tg-devtools in F-12, F-11, but now TurboGears2 is missing in the build roots. The dist CVS branches have spec file, patches, etc. and are tagged but building needs TurboGears2 on the builders which you can request from re-eng (as I did in comment #29). I'll be on vacation for the next two weeks, so I'll leave this to you ;-). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 13:14:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 09:14:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526265] Review Request: l7-filter-userspace - Userspace version of l7-filter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910021314.n92DE2gQ026965@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526265 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br --- Comment #1 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-10-02 09:14:01 EDT --- seems to be good, will work without patching the kernel ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 13:37:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 09:37:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526567] Review Request: mongodb - high-performance, open source, schema-free document-oriented database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910021337.n92Dbr4q000887@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526567 --- Comment #6 from Ionu? Ar??ri?i 2009-10-02 09:37:52 EDT --- Fixed. This one was a bit more subtle. Thanks! I previously thought I needed to be a packager to use koji. I tried a few scratch builds today, but the problem with this package is that it has unittest as a dependency and I haven't figured a way to send dependencies to koji. http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/mongodb/mongodb-1.0.0-3.fc11.src.rpm http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/mongodb/mongodb.spec.3 * Fri Oct 2 2009 Ionu? Ar??ri?i - 1.0.0-3 - fixed libpath issue for 64bit systems -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 13:40:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 09:40:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526265] Review Request: l7-filter-userspace - Userspace version of l7-filter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910021340.n92DeOoj001915@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526265 --- Comment #2 from Marcus Moeller 2009-10-02 09:40:23 EDT --- At least on my F11 box it seems to work without further modifications as nf_conntrack_netlink is compiled into the kernel. For further information about the current requirements, please take a look at: http://l7-filter.sourceforge.net/HOWTO-userspace#Doing Best Regards Marcus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 13:48:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 09:48:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526055] Review Request: alure - AL Utilities REtooled In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910021348.n92Dm7TI003941@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526055 Guido Grazioli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Guido Grazioli 2009-10-02 09:48:05 EDT --- Thanks Martin New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: alure Short Description: AL Utilities REtooled Owners: guidograzioli Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 13:47:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 09:47:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526567] Review Request: mongodb - high-performance, open source, schema-free document-oriented database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910021347.n92DlI4G018391@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526567 --- Comment #7 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-10-02 09:47:17 EDT --- I think it will be built fine without unittest in my machine worked, what are the koji scratch build ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 13:50:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 09:50:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526844] Review Request: cirkuit - A frontend for TikZ and circuit_macros In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910021350.n92DoxFv019622@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526844 --- Comment #2 from Ben Boeckel 2009-10-02 09:50:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > #001: Requires: pdf2svg > Is there a package called pdf2svg on fedora repositories ? Whoops, I also threw a pdf2svg package together. I'll put that up for review today. > #002: missing icon on gnome menu I'll look at the .desktop file. The icon also probably need to be put into %{_datadir}/icons/ > #003: Upon launch, I got a dialog box stating: > Circuit Macros could not be found on your system. The application will not work > if the macros are not installed. Do you want to proceed with the installation? I'm not sure what this is. With some testing, I could get some drawings. Maybe the code to checks whether it exists needs some tweaking. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 13:56:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 09:56:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526916] New: Review Request: liborc - The Oil Runtime Compiler Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: liborc - The Oil Runtime Compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526916 Summary: Review Request: liborc - The Oil Runtime Compiler Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian.deutsch at gmx.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~fabiand/fedora/orc/1/liborc.spec SRPM URL: http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~fabiand/fedora/orc/1/liborc-0.4.2-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Orc is a library and set of tools for compiling and executing very simple programs that operate on arrays of data. The "language" is a generic assembly language that represents many of the features available in SIMD architectures, including saturated addition and subtraction, and many arithmetic operations. liborc is needed in future versions of libschroedinger -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 13:57:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 09:57:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526916] Review Request: liborc - The Oil Runtime Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910021357.n92DvCSh021457@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526916 --- Comment #1 from Fabian Deutsch 2009-10-02 09:57:11 EDT --- Koji Task: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1724156 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 13:58:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 09:58:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502614] Review Request: stfl - STFL implements a curses-based widget set for text terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910021358.n92DwWkg021798@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502614 --- Comment #29 from Thomas Janssen 2009-10-02 09:58:30 EDT --- Fixed installed rpmlint output. Spec URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/stfl.spec SRPM URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/stfl-0.21-3.fc10.src.rpm [thomas at tusdell SPECS]$ rpmlint stfl.spec ../SRPMS/stfl-0.21-3.fc10.src.rpm ../RPMS/x86_64/stfl*-3* 7 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [thomas at tusdell ~]$ rpmlint stfl 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1724203 -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 14:02:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 10:02:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521909] Review Request: ne7ssh - SSH Library is a Secure Shell client software written in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910021402.n92E2jc9008142@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909 --- Comment #28 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-10-02 10:02:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #27) > Nonsense. The guidelines are supposed to be a reflection of the "common sense" > and are not a law (and even laws can be changed). Off course. There procedure propose draft and change guidelines if "common case" changed. After ratification new guidelines must be required for anything without exception. > Wrong again. Man pages must be part of the subpackage they document. > This normally means, *1's need to go to the base package, *3's need to go > to *-devel. I did not know. Please, can you point where it is described more precisely. > The same as with man-pages. In general, doc's need to be part (Or be pulled in > through package deps) of the package they document. > => user-documentation goes into the base package > => devel-docs into *devel packages > unless there are technical reasons to do otherwise We speak about separate -doc sub-packages now instead of "user-documentation goes into the base package" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 14:18:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 10:18:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526451] Review Request: crunchyfrog - A multi-engine SQL client and database front-end In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910021418.n92EI2k5026702@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526451 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pahan at hubbitus.info AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pahan at hubbitus.info Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-10-02 10:18:00 EDT --- I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 14:58:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 10:58:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526928] New: Review Request: blokkal - A KDE blogging client that supports multiple protocols and sites Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: blokkal - A KDE blogging client that supports multiple protocols and sites https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526928 Summary: Review Request: blokkal - A KDE blogging client that supports multiple protocols and sites Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: thomasj at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/blokkal.spec SRPM URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/blokkal-0.1.1-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: Blokkal is a KDE blogging client that supports multiple protocols and blogging sites. The goal is to provide a uniform way to access the most-commonly-used blogging systems. It has been designed for a maximum of modularity allowing for easy extension. Currently the following protocols are supported: LiveJournal Blogger 1.0 Blogger/GData MetaWeblog API MovableType Blokkal is capable of creating new entries as well as loading and editing entries that have already been posted into a blog. Additionally, new entries can be posted into multiple blogs at the same time and entries can be previewed before being posted. A couple of formatting options help to apply some common text formattings while editing the HTML-code of an entry, while syntax-highlighting aids in ensuring correct code. There exist dialogs that help inserting links and images, which can be dragged and dropped into the editor from other applications such as webbrowsers. [thomas at tusdell SPECS]$ rpmlint blokkal.spec ../SRPMS/blokkal-0.1.1-2.fc10.src.rpm ../RPMS/x86_64/blokkal-0.1.1-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm ../RPMS/x86_64/blokkal-debuginfo-0.1.1-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm ../RPMS/x86_64/blokkal-libs-0.1.1-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1724321 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 15:05:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 11:05:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910021505.n92F5Ia8005912@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 --- Comment #37 from Alan Pevec 2009-10-02 11:05:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #36) > TurboGears2 is missing in the build roots For F11 it will be in the build roots once update from comment 35 hits stable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 15:42:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 11:42:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526916] Review Request: liborc - The Oil Runtime Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910021542.n92FgCbT002216@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526916 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de --- Comment #2 from Martin Gieseking 2009-10-02 11:42:11 EDT --- Some quick comments: - the package name should be "orc" without the leading "lib" - add Requires: pkgconfig to the devel package - remove the rpaths from libtool (see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Beware_of_Rpath) - in %files tools, swap the %doc and %defattr lines $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-11-x86_64/result/liborc-* liborc.src:75: E: files-attr-not-set liborc.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/liborc-pixel-0.4.so.0.0.0 ['/usr/lib64'] liborc.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/liborc-test-0.4.so.0.0.0 ['/usr/lib64'] liborc.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/liborc-float-0.4.so.0.0.0 ['/usr/lib64'] liborc-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/orc/generate_opcodes_sys ['/usr/lib64'] liborc-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/orc/example1 ['/usr/lib64'] liborc-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/orc/exec_opcodes_float ['/usr/lib64'] liborc-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/orc/compile_opcodes_sys_c ['/usr/lib64'] liborc-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/orc/generate_xml_table2 ['/usr/lib64'] liborc-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/orc/compile_opcodes_float ['/usr/lib64'] liborc-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/orc/test-schro ['/usr/lib64'] liborc-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/orc/generate_xml_table ['/usr/lib64'] liborc-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/orc/test_accsadubl ['/usr/lib64'] liborc-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/orc/exec_opcodes_pixel ['/usr/lib64'] liborc-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/orcc ['/usr/lib64'] liborc-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/orc/compile_opcodes_float_c ['/usr/lib64'] liborc-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/orc/compile_opcodes_pixel_c ['/usr/lib64'] liborc-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/orc/mt19937ar ['/usr/lib64'] liborc-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/orc/compile_opcodes_sys ['/usr/lib64'] liborc-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/orc/compile_opcodes_pixel ['/usr/lib64'] liborc-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/orc/exec_opcodes_sys ['/usr/lib64'] 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 21 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 15:56:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 11:56:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526311] Review Request: mysql-mmm - Multi-Master Replication Manager for MySQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910021556.n92Fu0EM005577@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526311 --- Comment #1 from BJ Dierkes 2009-10-02 11:55:59 EDT --- Please note, I am more interested in maintaining this package for Fedora EPEL. As it is more of a production/server application its more suitable for RHEL+EPEL... that said I have no qualms with maintaining for both EPEL and Fedora Core. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 15:57:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 11:57:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520663] Review Request: telepathy-qt4 - Qt4 bindings for telepathy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910021557.n92FvwZW021059@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520663 --- Comment #5 from Ionu? Ar??ri?i 2009-10-02 11:57:56 EDT --- Thank you, Michel! > ? rpmlint > OK package name > OK spec file name > OK package guideline-compliant > OK license complies with guidelines > FIX license field accurate > should be LGPLv2+ Fixed > OK license file not deleted > ? spec in US English > FIX spec legible > Patch0 should not use %{version}, but hardcode the version number instead. > Sometimes patches continue to apply unchanged for several versions, and thus > you don't want to have to keep updating the patch filename. Fixed > regarding configure.ac: why modify both configure.ac and configure? If you > only modify the latter, you don't have to play tricks with timestamps Fixed > any reason tests are not run? Fixed > Why does doc require telepathy-farsight-devel to build? I was including tests in the -doc package so I thought it was fair to keep the BuildRequires in there. I deleted the tests now and moved the BuildRequires for them in the main BuildRequires section. > Oh, and the doc subpackage should be declared "BuildArch: noarch" too. Fixed http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/telepathy-qt4/telepathy-qt4.spec.2 http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/telepathy-qt4/telepathy-qt4-0.1.10-3.fc11.src.rpm * Tue Sep 29 2009 Ionu? Ar??ri?i - 0.1.10-3 - Changed license - Don't mess with the tests - Remove hidden directories - Add more dependencies in order to build tests and examples - Don't include tests in the final rpm - Added virtual -static package - Mark -doc package as BuildArch: noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 16:12:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 12:12:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526567] Review Request: mongodb - high-performance, open source, schema-free document-oriented database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910021612.n92GClwR009315@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526567 --- Comment #8 from Ionu? Ar??ri?i 2009-10-02 12:12:45 EDT --- https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1724587 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 16:59:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 12:59:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524238] Review Request: libclaw - C++ Library Absolutely Wonderful In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910021659.n92GxfeX018854@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524238 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady BuildFails | --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-10-02 12:59:40 EDT --- SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/libclaw-1.5.4-2.fc11.src.rpm SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/libclaw.spec * Fri Oct 02 2009 Lubomir Rintel - 1.5.4-2 - Merge in changes from Xavier Bachelot's package: - More sensible Group name - Fix libdir name for 64bit archs - Add examples to documentation - Fix examples encoding - Let -devel require cmake http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1724665 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 17:27:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 13:27:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526738] Review Request: py-radix - Radix tree data structure for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910021727.n92HRNsP008016@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526738 --- Comment #6 from Steve Traylen 2009-10-02 13:27:22 EDT --- $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/py-radix-0.5-3.fc11.x86_64.rpm py-radix.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.5-2 ['0.5-3.fc11', '0.5-3'] other than that it is looking pretty good I would say. I'll through the review list afterwards. Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 18:17:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 14:17:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466047] Review Request: tcl-mysqltcl - MySQL interface for Tcl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910021817.n92IHw6U003107@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466047 --- Comment #26 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-10-02 14:17:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > The guidelines do not seem to say anything about Obsoletes, but the main reason > behind is that you obviously remove all packages which do provide an > unversioned %{real_name} as well as the versioned ones below this release. > There are only few use-cases for this, the main one is to remove any user-built > (or third party) rpm versions which were installed before. > If you do not see that this will be necessary I can easily remove the line. Usually we don't have to take care of user-built/or third party rpms (and actually it is almost impossible). Usually if such Obsoletes are not needed for Fedora users, they should simply removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 18:26:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 14:26:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525796] Review Request: winwrangler - Small desktop daemon to perform advanced window manipulations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910021826.n92IQDwv020611@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525796 --- Comment #5 from Mads Villadsen 2009-10-02 14:26:11 EDT --- I see no reason that is needs gtk2-devel >= 2.17.11. It builds just fine on my F-11 system. Anyway I updated the spec file with a few BuildRequires (libwnck-devel, gtk2-devel) and it now builds just fine. For the scratch build I made see here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1724728 New spec and src.rpm: http://krakoa.dk/fedora/winwrangler.spec http://krakoa.dk/fedora/winwrangler-0.2.3-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 19:03:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 15:03:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519483] Review Request: zikula-module-pagemaster - Creates pages with dynamic content like news, articles, etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910021903.n92J3nKq015132@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519483 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 19:04:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 15:04:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526451] Review Request: crunchyfrog - A multi-engine SQL client and database front-end In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910021904.n92J49kI015321@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526451 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 19:08:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 15:08:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525786] Review Request: popfile - Automatic Email Classification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910021908.n92J8rgS030405@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525786 --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-10-02 15:08:52 EDT --- Now bodhi began to accept F-12 updates request, so please submit it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 22:03:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 18:03:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488563] Review Request: pure - The Pure programming language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910022203.n92M3Lda013615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488563 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-02 18:03:16 EDT --- pure-0.35-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pure-0.35-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 22:04:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 18:04:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251805] Review Request: postgresql-orafce - Implementation of some Oracle functions into PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910022204.n92M4FcN013933@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251805 Devrim G??nd??z changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |devrim at gunduz.org --- Comment #20 from Devrim G??nd??z 2009-10-02 18:04:10 EDT --- Here is the new spec: https://projects.commandprompt.com/public/pgcore/browser/rpm/redhat/8.5/orafce/F-11/orafce.spec Downloadable version: https://projects.commandprompt.com/public/pgcore/repo/rpm/redhat/8.5/orafce/F-11/orafce.spec SRPM: http://yum.pgsqlrpms.org/srpms/8.4/fedora/fedora-11-i386/orafce-3.0.1-1.f11.src.rpm No rpmlint errors detected. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 22:04:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 18:04:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488563] Review Request: pure - The Pure programming language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910022204.n92M4PRu028816@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488563 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-02 18:04:23 EDT --- pure-0.35-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pure-0.35-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 22:04:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 18:04:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488563] Review Request: pure - The Pure programming language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910022204.n92M4VIh028880@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488563 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-02 18:04:29 EDT --- pure-0.35-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pure-0.35-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 22:05:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 18:05:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251805] Review Request: postgresql-orafce - Implementation of some Oracle functions into PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910022205.n92M5JEo029505@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251805 --- Comment #21 from Devrim G??nd??z 2009-10-02 18:05:16 EDT --- BTW, I changed package name to orafce, instead of postgresql-orafce. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 22:05:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 18:05:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251805] Review Request: orafce - Implementation of some Oracle functions into PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910022205.n92M5kqb029649@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251805 Devrim G??nd??z changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: orafce - |postgresql-orafce - |Implementation of some |Implementation of some |Oracle functions into |Oracle functions into |PostgreSQL |PostgreSQL | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 22:11:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 18:11:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251805] Review Request: orafce - Implementation of some Oracle functions into PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910022211.n92MBbOk016302@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251805 Devrim G?ND?Z changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(devrim at commandpro | |mpt.com) | --- Comment #22 from Devrim G?ND?Z 2009-10-02 18:11:34 EDT --- I was wondering whether this package should be a requirement for spacewalk. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 22:56:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 18:56:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251805] Review Request: orafce - Implementation of some Oracle functions into PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910022256.n92MuHZV013624@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251805 Devrim G?ND?Z changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias|postgresql-orafce |orafce -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 23:00:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 19:00:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520663] Review Request: telepathy-qt4 - Qt4 bindings for telepathy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910022300.n92N0dA4014790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520663 --- Comment #6 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-10-02 19:00:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > > Why does doc require telepathy-farsight-devel to build? > > I was including tests in the -doc package so I thought it was fair to keep the > BuildRequires in there. I deleted the tests now and moved the BuildRequires > for them in the main BuildRequires section. > I see. Well, if you intend for the users to be able to build the tests, then it should have been a Requires:, not a BuildRequires: . But it's better to get the tests run as part of the build process anyway. > http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/telepathy-qt4/telepathy-qt4.spec.2 > http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/telepathy-qt4/telepathy-qt4-0.1.10-3.fc11.src.rpm The patch can be cleaned up further: it appears that only the last part, that modifies Makefile.in to not build examples, need to be kept. You can drop all the touch scriptlets too. - the Requires: qt in the main package is unnecessary, as your package currently only generates static library archives. If/when it generates dynamic .so.* files, the requirement on the correct libqt will be automatically computed by RPM anyway. Also, your -devel package currently Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}, but the main package is not actually generated (because it contains no files). You'd want to remove that requirement. And modify it for -doc, to require the -devel subpackage instead. (and hold on for a bit on the last paragraph -- I'll clarify on the packaging list, just in case. static libs don't come often). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 23:02:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 19:02:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447755] Review Request: postgresql-plpgpsm - Implementation of SQL/PSM language for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910022302.n92N217H032759@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447755 Devrim G?ND?Z changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |devrim at gunduz.org Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Devrim G?ND?Z 2009-10-02 19:01:58 EDT --- I'm no longer interested in maintaining this package (Also 8.3+ version is not around). Closing bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 23:22:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 19:22:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520663] Review Request: telepathy-qt4 - Qt4 bindings for telepathy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910022322.n92NMcaf004888@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520663 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-10-02 19:22:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Also, your -devel package currently Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}, > but the main package is not actually generated (because it contains no files). > You'd want to remove that requirement. And modify it for -doc, to require the > -devel subpackage instead. This bit is actually slightly incorrect (or malformed): the main package isn't generated since it does not have a %files section. However, had you put in an empty %files section, e.g. %files then the main package would be generated, even though it doesn't contain any files. ** Instead of %exclude %{_libdir}/*.la you can just run run rm -f %{_libdir}/*.la at the end of %install, which IMHO is a cleaner solution. ** %{__chmod} 0644 tests/lib/account-manager.py should be in %prep, shouldn't it? ** I think you are missing Requires: telepathy-filesystem in the -devel package for dir ownership. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 23:42:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 19:42:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520663] Review Request: telepathy-qt4 - Qt4 bindings for telepathy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910022342.n92NgQFU024578@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520663 --- Comment #8 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-10-02 19:42:24 EDT --- Could you contact upstream and find out if there is a reason this library currently only builds a static archive? If the only reason is that it's not implemented yet, we could update the build scripts and send the changes back to upstream, and avoid shipping a static package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 00:01:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 20:01:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506232] Review Request: rekonq - KDE browser based on Webkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910030001.n93019Y8015766@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506232 --- Comment #24 from Ben Boeckel 2009-10-02 20:01:05 EDT --- Should this be closed now that it is in the repos? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 23:59:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 19:59:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526844] Review Request: cirkuit - A frontend for TikZ and circuit_macros In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910022359.n92Nxscx015072@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526844 Ben Boeckel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |526997 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 23:59:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 19:59:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526997] Review Request: pdf2svg - Small tool to convert PDF files into SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910022359.n92NxrP9015041@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526997 Ben Boeckel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |526844 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 23:58:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 19:58:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526997] New: Review Request: pdf2svg - Small tool to convert PDF files into SVG Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pdf2svg - Small tool to convert PDF files into SVG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526997 Summary: Review Request: pdf2svg - Small tool to convert PDF files into SVG Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mathstuf at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/pdf2svg/pdf2svg.spec SRPM URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/pdf2svg/pdf2svg-0.2.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: A small tool to convert PDF files into SVG using poppler and cairo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 00:01:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 20:01:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503019] Review Request: kde-plasma-daisy - a simple application launcher for Plasma In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910030001.n9301Rae030903@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503019 --- Comment #4 from Ben Boeckel 2009-10-02 20:01:24 EDT --- Ping? Any progress? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 00:01:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 20:01:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492749] Review Request: kde-plasma-system_status_ng - A plasmoid to show your CPU and memory usage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910030001.n9301i0n030991@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492749 --- Comment #2 from Ben Boeckel 2009-10-02 20:01:41 EDT --- Ping? Any progress? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 00:03:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 20:03:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526998] New: Review Request: volpack - Portable library for fast volume rendering Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: volpack - Portable library for fast volume rendering https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526998 Summary: Review Request: volpack - Portable library for fast volume rendering Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sm at sandro-mathys.ch QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/volpack.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/volpack-1.0c7-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: VolPack is a portable library of fast volume rendering algorithms that produce high-quality images. $ rpmlint {SPECS,RPMS/i586,SRPMS}/volpack* volpack.i586: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libvolpack.so.1.0.4 exit at GLIBC_2.0 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. I think this warning can be ignored, but I'm not very familiar with it. Did successful mock builds for fedora-11-i386 and fedora-devel-i386. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 00:35:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 20:35:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525786] Review Request: popfile - Automatic Email Classification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910030035.n930ZX37025993@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525786 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-02 20:35:31 EDT --- popfile-1.1.1-3.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/popfile-1.1.1-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 00:42:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 20:42:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520343] Review Request: clc - command line client for MUDs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910030042.n930g0wG010435@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520343 Sean Middleditch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 00:56:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 20:56:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506232] Review Request: rekonq - KDE browser based on Webkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910030056.n930ujYX000758@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506232 --- Comment #25 from Kevin Kofler 2009-10-02 20:56:44 EDT --- Bodhi is going to close it once the updates go stable. (By the way, they should be queued for stable now, one week of testing is enough!) But review requests can in principle be closed as soon as the package is imported. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 00:23:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 20:23:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525796] Review Request: winwrangler - Small desktop daemon to perform advanced window manipulations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910030023.n930NYlf004918@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525796 Guido Grazioli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Guido Grazioli 2009-10-02 20:23:32 EDT --- I get this one on my system building rpms: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.4.1/../../../../lib64/libgtkhotkey.so: undefined reference to `gdk_x11_window_get_drawable_impl' so i searched for that function and it happened to be included in gtk 2.17.11 (it seems to be gtkhotkey related, but gtkhotkey itself was built successfully here). However if it builds in koji i'm happy with that. Please note i noticed that in the libgtkhotkey package, you still need to add the *explicit* Requires: pkgconfig to the -devel package (and only there). Consider adding it on next update. Addendum to the review above: OK - The package MUST successfully compile and build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1724728 OK - rpmlint output 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Package APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 00:19:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 20:19:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526866] Review Request: torium - A minimalistic, easily configurable torrent client for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910030019.n930JjZ5020960@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526866 --- Comment #3 from Christoph Wickert 2009-10-02 20:19:43 EDT --- OK - MUST: rpmlint is silent: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/torium-* 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK - MUST: named according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK - MUST: spec file name matches the base package %{name} OK - MUST: package meets the Packaging Guidelines OK - MUST: Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines: ISC OK - MUST: license field in spec file matches the actual license OK - MUST: license file included in %doc OK - MUST: spec is in American English OK - MUST: spec is legible OK - MUST: sources match the upstream source by MD5 fa1980cef7e248dbd82526f247541442 OK - MUST: successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on x86_64 N/A - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. OK - MUST: all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. N/A - MUST: handles locales properly with %find_lang N/A - MUST: every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review OK - MUST: owns all directories that it creates (none) OK - MUST: no duplicate files in the %files listing OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly, includes %defattr(...) OK - MUST: package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. FIX - MUST: macro usage not consistent, you are mixing different styles OK - MUST: package contains code, or permissible content N/A - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application OK - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix, then library files that end in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK - MUST: The package contains a GUI application and includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file is properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. OK - MUST: packages does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: at the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. OK - MUST: all filenames valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: OK - SHOULD: Source package includes license text(s) as a separate file. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK - SHOULD: builds in mock. OK - SHOULD: compiles and builds into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK - SHOULD: functions as described. OK - SHOULD: Scriptlets are sane. N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A - SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in a -devel pkg N/A - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Other items: OK - latest stable version OK - SourceURL valid OK - Fedora specific compiler flags honored OK - Debuginfo complete Issues: - You are using both $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot}, please only use one for consistency. - No need to remove the flags as the flag policy was revoked. If you want to remove them, make a -flags subpackage. - Timestamp of Source0 does not match. Although this is minor I'd like to ask you to download it again and keeping the timestamps intact, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps - I'm not happy with the desktop file: "Encoding" is obsolete and IMO the app should also been shown in KDE. And it should hate FileTransfer as additional category to allow nested menus. You can fix this in the spec with desktop-file-install \ --delete-original \ --add-category=FileTransfer \ --remove-key=Encoding \ --remove-key=NotShowIn \ --dir=%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications \ %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/applications/torium.desktop Note: During %configure I see - ./configure: line 5288: gconftool-2: command not found although gconf is not needed: I guess this is just a relict of borrowing the Makefile from another package, so we ignore it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 01:10:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 21:10:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459211] Review Request: oolite - A space sim game, inspired by Elite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910030110.n931AIJ7020134@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459211 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(redhat-bugzilla.j | |a at oolite.org) --- Comment #17 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-10-02 21:10:11 EDT --- Status update: Fedora has a test libjs that is built with JS_C_STRINGS_ARE_UTF8, but when building oolite against it, it crashes right after the splash screen is displayed. The background music never got played. Is there any patches that Oolite apply to the stock libjs, that is needed for Oolite to run? $ gdb ./oolite GNU gdb (GDB) Fedora (6.8.91.20090930-2.fc12) Copyright (C) 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying" and "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu". For bug reporting instructions, please see: ... Reading symbols from /usr/lib64/GNUstep/Applications/oolite.app/oolite...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/GNUstep/Applications/oolite.app/oolite.debug...done. done. (gdb) run Starting program: /usr/lib64/GNUstep/Applications/oolite.app/oolite [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] warning: "/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/gconv/libJIS.so.debug": The separate debug info file has no debug info warning: "/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/gconv/libJIS.so.debug": The separate debug info file has no debug info warning: "/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/gconv/libGB.so.debug": The separate debug info file has no debug info warning: "/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/gconv/libKSC.so.debug": The separate debug info file has no debug info warning: "/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/gconv/libGB.so.debug": The separate debug info file has no debug info warning: "/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/gconv/libKSC.so.debug": The separate debug info file has no debug info [New Thread 0x7fffedaf3710 (LWP 16882)] [New Thread 0x7fffe3de4710 (LWP 16886)] [Thread 0x7fffe3de4710 (LWP 16886) exited] [New Thread 0x7fffe3de4710 (LWP 16887)] [New Thread 0x7fffe1fc3710 (LWP 16893)] [New Thread 0x7fffe15c2710 (LWP 16894)] [New Thread 0x7fffe0bc1710 (LWP 16895)] [New Thread 0x7fffd3fff710 (LWP 16896)] [Thread 0x7fffedaf3710 (LWP 16882) exited] [Thread 0x7fffd3fff710 (LWP 16896) exited] [Thread 0x7fffe0bc1710 (LWP 16895) exited] [Thread 0x7fffe15c2710 (LWP 16894) exited] [Thread 0x7fffe1fc3710 (LWP 16893) exited] [Thread 0x7fffe3de4710 (LWP 16887) exited] Program exited with code 01. (gdb) bt No stack. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 02:55:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 22:55:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525786] Review Request: popfile - Automatic Email Classification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910030255.n932tlb0023710@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525786 --- Comment #18 from Naoki IIMURA 2009-10-02 22:55:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > Now bodhi began to accept F-12 updates request, so please submit > it. Thanks. I've submitted update request. Naoki -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 07:44:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 03:44:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506232] Review Request: rekonq - KDE browser based on Webkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910030744.n937iXH3025023@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506232 --- Comment #26 from Eelko Berkenpies 2009-10-03 03:44:31 EDT --- Now marked as stable. I'll leave it up to Bodhi to close this one for me and next time I'll do it myself. :) Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 07:50:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 03:50:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522988] Review Request: afraid-dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910030750.n937oWla026376@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 --- Comment #32 from Erick Calder 2009-10-03 03:50:31 EDT --- question: I've updated the SRPM with a new (fixed) copy of the Makefile... now how do I get that new package into the system? originally I did: /home/rpm/cvs # ./common/cvs-import.sh -b F-10 ~/SRPMS/afraid-dyndns-1.0-2.fc11.src.rpm but now that the package has been imported, it can't be imported again... so if I've made a change, how do I tell it to use the new 1.0-2.fc11 source package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 07:58:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 03:58:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522988] Review Request: afraid-dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910030758.n937wLDm012201@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br --- Comment #33 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-10-03 03:58:20 EDT --- when you run cvs-import.sh it's tag the cvs, then if you need to change again you will need to bump release and run cvs-import.sh again I think you should not change Makefile because it's overwritten by configure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 07:06:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 03:06:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522988] Review Request: afraid-dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910030706.n93764NU019599@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 --- Comment #31 from Erick Calder 2009-10-03 03:06:03 EDT --- ok, I guess it doesn't really matter about the -C because the install script isn't going to run when the package gets installed anyway. so I'm going to just yank it. objections anyone? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 08:05:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 04:05:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526997] Review Request: pdf2svg - Small tool to convert PDF files into SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910030805.n9385s14014048@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526997 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de --- Comment #1 from Martin Gieseking 2009-10-03 04:05:53 EDT --- Just two quick comments: - Requires: groff doesn't seem to be necessary - drop INSTALL from %doc as it's not of much use in a binary package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 08:30:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 04:30:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525796] Review Request: winwrangler - Small desktop daemon to perform advanced window manipulations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910030830.n938U3Du018459@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525796 Mads Villadsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Mads Villadsen 2009-10-03 04:30:01 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: winwrangler Short Description: Small desktop daemon to perform advanced window manipulations Owners: maxx Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: maxx -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 08:14:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 04:14:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526866] Review Request: torium - A minimalistic, easily configurable torrent client for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910030814.n938EF9f031058@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526866 --- Comment #4 from leigh scott 2009-10-03 04:14:14 EDT --- OK I have made the changes that you recommended. Spec URL: http://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/review/torium/2/torium.spec SRPM URL: http://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/review/torium/2/torium-0.4.2-3.fc11.src.rpm >Note: >During %configure I see >- ./configure: line 5288: gconftool-2: command not found >although gconf is not needed: I guess this is just a relict of borrowing the >Makefile from another package, so we ignore it. gconf can be used in torium for schemas I have added --disable-schemas-install to the ./configure options, is this OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 08:35:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 04:35:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526998] Review Request: volpack - Portable library for fast volume rendering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910030835.n938ZJb1019299@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526998 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de --- Comment #1 from Martin Gieseking 2009-10-03 04:35:18 EDT --- A few comments: - in summary and description of the devel package, replace "static" by "shared" - replace Requires: volpack = %{version} by Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} - you can drop -n %{name}-%{version} from %setup - replace %{_datadir}/man/man3/*.gz by %{_mandir}/man3/*.3* - drop the docs from devel since they are already added by the base package - add a doc subpackage containing the documentation and the examples coming with the tarball -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 08:40:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 04:40:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526651] Review Request: xpaint - An X Window System image editing or paint program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910030840.n938es9s020229@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526651 Thomas Janssen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |thomasj at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #3 from Thomas Janssen 2009-10-03 04:40:53 EDT --- Ok, i cant get the source from that URL in the spec, 404 is given. There's not even a downloadlink on the page that comes up with the URL: from the spec. A page with a downloadlink comes up with: https://sourceforge.net/projects/sf-xpaint A working downloadlink is: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/sf-xpaint/sf-xpaint/%{name}-%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. Where did you find the MIT license? There's no license file in the tarball and the project homepage says: License: "Other license" which is a link to a page with other projects. MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Upstream has released 2.8.3 by the way. MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. Can you post the 'Task Info' link to a koji scratch build here, thanks. Icon tag in Desktop Files, the icon tag can be specified in two ways: Full path to specific icon file or shortname without file extension. You use shortname with file extension. Missing: BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils desktop-file-install MUST be used if the package does not install the file or there are changes desired to the .desktop file (such as add/removing categories, etc). http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 08:43:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 04:43:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454585] Review Request: perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptive - Getopt::Long with usage text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910030843.n938hDLI003539@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454585 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |emmanuel.seyman at club-intern | |et.fr --- Comment #7 from Chris Weyl 2009-10-03 04:43:11 EDT --- *** Bug 524781 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 08:51:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 04:51:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526651] Review Request: xpaint - An X Window System image editing or paint program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910030851.n938phmi022035@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526651 Thomas Janssen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |thomasj at fedoraproject.org Status Whiteboard| |NotReady Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Thomas Janssen 2009-10-03 04:51:42 EDT --- If this is your first package (i cant find your email in FAS) you need to: add FE-NEEDSPONSOR to the bugs being blocked by your review request. There's also: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora&format=extras-review for reviews. Maybe next time ;) I added NotReady to the whiteboard due to the license question. Clear the whiteboard when it's fixed. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 08:58:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 04:58:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488563] Review Request: pure - The Pure programming language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910030858.n938wDtx022981@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488563 --- Comment #29 from Peter Robinson 2009-10-03 04:58:11 EDT --- You'd be better filing a ticket with rel-eng to get it tagged into the release rather than waiting for a 0 day update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 09:05:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 05:05:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472144] Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910030905.n9395sp6024296@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144 --- Comment #26 from Sandro Mathys 2009-10-03 05:05:50 EDT --- Thanks for the pointer, Mamoru. I notified skinlf's upstream and skinlf's pkg maintainer about this issue and will keep in touch with both to resolve this. As soon as everything's ASL 2.0, I'll update the status here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 09:05:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 05:05:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459211] Review Request: oolite - A space sim game, inspired by Elite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910030905.n9395vYK024351@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459211 Jens Ayton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(redhat-bugzilla.j | |a at oolite.org) | --- Comment #18 from Jens Ayton 2009-10-03 05:05:51 EDT --- I don?t believe there are any patches, but there may be incompatibilities and usage errors. Since I haven?t yet managed to build an up-to-date libjs for Mac OS X, I have not been able to test it. However, that looks like a clean exit, in which case there should be something logged in ~/.Oolite/Logs/Latest.log. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 09:49:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 05:49:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522988] Review Request: afraid-dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910030949.n939ndoa014065@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 --- Comment #34 from Christoph Wickert 2009-10-03 05:49:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #32) > but now that the package has been imported, it can't be imported again... so if > I've made a change, how do I tell it to use the new 1.0-2.fc11 source package? Just commit the spec and the files you changed from your local cvs. make clog (this will create a file called "clog" with your latest changelog entry) cvs commit -F clog (clog will be used as commit message) make tag build As ling as a particular version of a package hasn't sucessfully been build, you can also re-tag something with TAG_OPTS=-F make tag But please be careful with this, never overwrite a package that has already been built. Finally, if you really need to bump the release on an older branch, make sure you don't break the upgrade path, this means the F11 package must not be higher than the F12 one. So you'd use -1.fc11.1 instead of -2.fc11. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Minor_release_bumps_for_old_branches for more info. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 10:09:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 06:09:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526444] Review Request: MyGUI - Fast, simple and flexible GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031009.n93A9Aq5002506@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526444 Thomas Janssen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |thomasj at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #4 from Thomas Janssen 2009-10-03 06:09:09 EDT --- Trying to build your package here to get rpmlint output for the packages built and rpmlint for the installed packages: [thomas at tusdell SPECS]$ rpmbuild -ba mygui.spec Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.naOtPu + umask 022 + cd /home/thomas/rpmbuild/BUILD + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + cd /home/thomas/rpmbuild/BUILD + rm -rf mygui + @__XZ@ -dc /home/thomas/rpmbuild/SOURCES/mygui-2.3.0-1861svn.tar.xz /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.naOtPu: line 29: @__XZ@: command not found + /bin/tar -xf - /bin/tar: This does not look like a tar archive /bin/tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.naOtPu (%prep) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.naOtPu (%prep) ------------------------------------------- [root at tusdell thomas]# rpm -q xz xz-4.999.8-0.8.beta.20090817git.fc10.x86_64 I guess there's a reason why you use xz over gz. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 10:30:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 06:30:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526998] Review Request: volpack - Portable library for fast volume rendering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031030.n93AUoGA006150@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526998 --- Comment #2 from Sandro Mathys 2009-10-03 06:30:49 EDT --- Thanks for that initial input. Regarding the doc subpackage: - Do I just add doc and examples to %doc or where (path-wise) do I put them? - What do I include from examples? Sources only? Binaries too? Makefile? Makefile.*? - I guess I just add doc/*.{pdf,ps,html} from that folder? Everything else is already fixed in my local version, will make a new release as soon as the doc subpkg is in there, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 09:42:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 05:42:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526544] Review Request: stomppy - Python stomp client for messaging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910030942.n939g18f012982@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526544 Thomas Janssen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |thomasj at fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |thomasj at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Thomas Janssen 2009-10-03 05:42:00 EDT --- Version 2.0.4-1 built fine in koji scratch. Approved. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 09:53:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 05:53:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526866] Review Request: torium - A minimalistic, easily configurable torrent client for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910030953.n939rHZh032210@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526866 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Christoph Wickert 2009-10-03 05:53:16 EDT --- Really? I can't see a reverence to gconf in the code. Anyway: OK - macro usage consistent OK - torium.desktop is fine OK - timestamp of Source0 matches One last thing: Please Add INSTALL='install -p' to make install to preserve the time stamps of the flags. It didn't matter before, because all files were generated or changed during build, but for static data like the flags the timestamps should be preserved. Not a blocker, change it later, the package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 10:33:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 06:33:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526997] Review Request: pdf2svg - Small tool to convert PDF files into SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031033.n93AXd6R021207@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526997 --- Comment #2 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-10-03 06:33:39 EDT --- Ben, I'll do both reviews. Do you mind reviewing this small package for me please ? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505264 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 10:30:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 06:30:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526844] Review Request: cirkuit - A frontend for TikZ and circuit_macros In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031030.n93AUbSw020971@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526844 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|chitlesh at gmail.com | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chitlesh at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-10-03 06:30:36 EDT --- I'm taking up the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 08:43:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 04:43:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524781] Review Request: perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptive - Getopt::Long with usage text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910030843.n938hCJo003510@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524781 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2009-10-03 04:43:11 EDT --- Getopt::Long::Descriptive is already in Fedora :) *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 454585 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 10:31:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 06:31:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526997] Review Request: pdf2svg - Small tool to convert PDF files into SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031031.n93AVM8Z006326@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526997 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chitlesh at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 10:59:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 06:59:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526651] Review Request: xpaint - An X Window System image editing or paint program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031059.n93AxBGZ025566@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526651 --- Comment #5 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-10-03 06:59:10 EDT --- I fixed the spec, but still have to check the license: SRPM URL: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/src/xpaint-2.8.3-5.fc10.src.rpm Spec URL: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/SPECS/xpaint.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 11:16:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 07:16:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520663] Review Request: telepathy-qt4 - Qt4 bindings for telepathy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031116.n93BGNrP014048@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520663 --- Comment #10 from Ionu? Ar??ri?i 2009-10-03 07:16:22 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=363552) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=363552) #telepathy.log about the static libraries in telepathy-qt4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 11:10:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 07:10:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526998] Review Request: volpack - Portable library for fast volume rendering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031110.n93BAMSE027495@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526998 --- Comment #3 from Martin Gieseking 2009-10-03 07:10:21 EDT --- I suggest to add the following to the %install section: # remove doc and example files we don't want to package rm -f doc/vp_userguide..pdf doc/Makefile* cd examples make clean rm -f Makefile.* Then you can keep the %files section of the doc package rather brief: %files doc %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc doc/ examples/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 11:13:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 07:13:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520663] Review Request: telepathy-qt4 - Qt4 bindings for telepathy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031113.n93BDMHA027792@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520663 --- Comment #9 from Ionu? Ar??ri?i 2009-10-03 07:13:21 EDT --- Thank you Michel and Jussi, I followed the packaging list mails and I guess that removing the -doc package and keeping the virtual -static requires on the -devel package is the way to go, at least for now. I've hopefully cleared all the other issues you mentioned aswell. > Instead of > %exclude %{_libdir}/*.la > you can just run run > rm -f %{_libdir}/*.la > at the end of %install, which IMHO is a cleaner solution. Doing that anywhere in the install section, somehow fails: RPM build errors: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/libtelepathy-qt4.la http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/telepathy-qt4/telepathy-qt4-0.1.10-4.fc11.src.rpm http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/telepathy-qt4/telepathy-qt4.spec.3 * Sat Oct 3 2009 Ionu? Ar??ri?i - 0.1.10-4 - Replaced patch with simpler sed command - Removed -doc subpackage - Removed qt Requires - Added telepathy-filesystem Requires I'm attaching the log of a conversation I had on the #telepathy at irc.freenode.net channel. After reading a bit more in the README and on the project's website, I suppose it would be a good idea to put this package to sleep for a few months until the upstream developers come up with a stable version which will probably also have dynamic libraries. Right now it seems to me that they don't really want it distributed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 11:33:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 07:33:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526866] Review Request: torium - A minimalistic, easily configurable torrent client for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031133.n93BXJD2031028@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526866 --- Comment #6 from leigh scott 2009-10-03 07:33:18 EDT --- Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 11:35:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 07:35:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526998] Review Request: volpack - Portable library for fast volume rendering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031135.n93BZvlX017103@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526998 --- Comment #4 from Martin Gieseking 2009-10-03 07:35:56 EDT --- Oh, I just noticed that there's also a binary file (test.csh) in the examples folder. If you would like to add it to the package, you should probably change its file permissions to 0644. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 11:36:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 07:36:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526866] Review Request: torium - A minimalistic, easily configurable torrent client for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031136.n93Ba2bC031655@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526866 leigh scott changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from leigh scott 2009-10-03 07:36:01 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: torium Short Description: A minimalistic, easily configurable torrent client for Linux Owners: leigh123linux Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 InitialCC: leigh123linux -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 11:43:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 07:43:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526651] Review Request: xpaint - An X Window System image editing or paint program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031143.n93BhGb1032748@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526651 --- Comment #6 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-10-03 07:43:15 EDT --- In the source there is a file debian/copyright: --------------------------------------------------------- This package was debianized by Mark W. Eichin eichin at kitten.gen.ma.us on Wed, 26 Feb 1997 12:37:58 -0500. The current Debian maintainer is Hugo Vanwoerkom . The sourcecode can be downloaded from https://sourceforge.net/projects/sf-xpaint/ Note that parts of this are GPL and parts are redistributable as-is. Copyright: Copyright (C) 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, David Koblas Copyright (C) 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, Torsten Martinsen Copyright (C) 1996-2003, Greg Roelofs Copyright (C) 1997, Scott D. Nelson Copyright (C) 1995, Tor Lillqvist ............ It is not clear for me, reading the whole file, if I can use just GPLv2 or stick with MIT: The link for the debian, ubuntu, and alt linux packages are these: http://packages.debian.org/unstable/graphics/xpaint http://packages.ubuntu.com/karmic/xpaint http://sisyphus.ru/en/srpm/xpaint Any clue here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 11:41:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 07:41:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520663] Review Request: telepathy-qt4 - Qt4 bindings for telepathy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031141.n93BfGM0018099@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520663 --- Comment #11 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-10-03 07:41:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > > Instead of > > %exclude %{_libdir}/*.la > > you can just run run > > rm -f %{_libdir}/*.la > > at the end of %install, which IMHO is a cleaner solution. > > Doing that anywhere in the install section, somehow fails: > > RPM build errors: > Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: > /usr/lib/libtelepathy-qt4.la Ugh. I meant, of course rm -f %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/*.la as you won't be (at least SHOULD NOT be) able to remove files from %{_libdir}.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 12:38:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 08:38:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510376] Review Request: bluemodem - A bluetooth modem configuration utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031238.n93Cch2u009702@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510376 --- Comment #2 from Christoph Wickert 2009-10-03 08:38:40 EDT --- Ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 12:36:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 08:36:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526651] Review Request: xpaint - An X Window System image editing or paint program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031236.n93CaQaG009365@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526651 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Janssen 2009-10-03 08:36:25 EDT --- Yes, if in doubt, and that's the case here, ask upstream. Would be perfect if they provide a proper LICENSE file. You could add that then with sourceX. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 13:25:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 09:25:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525210] Review Request: rubygem-trollop - A command-line option parsing library for ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031325.n93DPiqq017767@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525210 --- Comment #6 from Jan Klepek 2009-10-03 09:25:43 EDT --- updated Spec URL: http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/packages/rubygem-trollop.spec SRPM URL: http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/packages/rubygem-trollop-1.15-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 13:48:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 09:48:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520663] Review Request: telepathy-qt4 - Qt4 bindings for telepathy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031348.n93Dmao9006488@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520663 --- Comment #12 from Ionu? Ar??ri?i 2009-10-03 09:48:35 EDT --- Right. Sorry, I don't know why I didn't see that one. http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/telepathy-qt4/telepathy-qt4-0.1.10-5.fc11.src.rpm http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/telepathy-qt4/telepathy-qt4.spec.4 * Sat Oct 3 2009 Ionu? Ar??ri?i - 0.1.10-5 - transformed exclude into a rm -f -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 13:31:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 09:31:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524781] Review Request: perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptive - Getopt::Long with usage text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031331.n93DV1hP018798@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524781 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|panemade at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-10-03 09:30:59 EDT --- Thanks forgot to close this when I also saw its present in Fedora :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 14:28:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 10:28:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466047] Review Request: tcl-mysqltcl - MySQL interface for Tcl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031428.n93ESgw1028488@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466047 --- Comment #27 from Rene Ploetz 2009-10-03 10:28:38 EDT --- I removed the unnecessary Obsoletes tag: Spec URL: http://www.reneploetz.de/fedora/tcl-mysqltcl.spec SRPM URL: http://www.reneploetz.de/fedora/tcl-mysqltcl-3.05-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 14:47:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 10:47:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526238] Review Request: python-guppy - A Python Programming Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031447.n93Elrtd031633@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526238 Thomas Janssen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |thomasj at fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |thomasj at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Thomas Janssen 2009-10-03 10:47:52 EDT --- Installed and running rpmlint is silent as well. Approved. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 14:56:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 10:56:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519483] Review Request: zikula-module-pagemaster - Creates pages with dynamic content like news, articles, etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031456.n93EulFh000803@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519483 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |526595 --- Comment #9 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-10-03 10:56:46 EDT --- http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/zikula-module-pagemaster-0.3.1-3.fc11.src.rpm http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/zikula-module-pagemaster.spec Updated package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 14:56:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 10:56:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526595] Review Request: zikula-module-filterutil - Pagesetter like filter rules for Zikula In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031456.n93Eum7i000826@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526595 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |519483 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 15:16:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 11:16:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526058] Review Request: sil-scheherazade-fonts - SIL Scheherazade Arabic Script Unicode Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031516.n93FGHei021458@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526058 Hedayat Vatankhah changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(hedayat at grad.com) | --- Comment #3 from Hedayat Vatankhah 2009-10-03 11:16:16 EDT --- All done. This is the koji build link: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1725774 Sorry for the mistakes in the previous package. I overlooked some details! Thanks for the offer. I'm already a packager. I hope that this one will pass your filter ;) Thanks again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 15:22:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 11:22:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461849] Review Request: garmintools - Communication tools for Garmin devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031522.n93FMPVW005325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461849 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Fabian Affolter 2009-10-03 11:22:22 EDT --- Thanks for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: garmintools Short Description: Communication tools for Garmin devices Owners: fab Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 15:04:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 11:04:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526100] Review Request: django-registration - A user-registration application for Django In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031504.n93F4H3E019120@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526100 Thomas Janssen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |thomasj at fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |thomasj at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Thomas Janssen 2009-10-03 11:04:16 EDT --- The website from "Url:" has heavy problems right now. Dunno if that's a criteria to wait and get a new url for registration first (hardcoded link), or if it's easily setup after registration via a conf-file. I'm not a py coder. A koji Task Info link from a scratch build and the rpmlint output would be nice. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 15:02:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 11:02:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525211] Review Request: rubygem-ditz - A command-line issue tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031502.n93F2MVL001755@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525211 --- Comment #10 from Jan Klepek 2009-10-03 11:02:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Some notes: > > * Unneeded macros > - The defined macro ruby_sitelib does not seem to be used anywhere. > > * License > - Please change the license tag to "GPLv3 with exceptions" > > * Virtual (Build)Requires > - For ruby(gem) modules related (Build)Requires, please don't use > rpm names directly but use virtual Provides like perl: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#Perl_Requires_and_Provides > Fixed, however I never saw this in Ruby packaging guidelines. Is there any draft of new ruby guidelines which will cover this? > * Macros > - Use macros properly. /usr/bin should be %{_bindir}. > > * Duplicate files > - "LICENSE README.txt" are installed twice (one under %geminstdir, > one under %_defaultdocdir/%name-%version) Spec URL: http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/packages/rubygem-ditz.spec SRPM URL: http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/packages/rubygem-ditz-0.5-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 16:09:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 12:09:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505264] Review Request: wb_builder - Wishbone Bus Builder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031609.n93G9D5L013129@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505264 Ben Boeckel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mathstuf at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mathstuf at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Ben Boeckel 2009-10-03 12:09:11 EDT --- I'll take this (swaps for pdf2svg/cirkuit). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 16:35:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 12:35:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031635.n93GZbX9017523@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #72 from Christian Krause 2009-10-03 12:35:30 EDT --- Unfortunately 2 minor issues remained: 1. There is still a small inconsistency between the changelog and the actual spec file: "- Add Requires: %%{name} = %%{version}-%%{release} in subpackage." but Requires: %{name} = %{version} 2. At least in my F10 installation the install step fails since the %doc line of the subpackage: %doc classes/ssl/README classes/ssl/src/tight/README classes/ssl/src/ultra/README tries to copy all README files to the same location (so that finally the package would contain only one README file): Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /home/rpmbuild/tmp/rpm-tmp.zbaPMi + umask 022 + cd /home/rpmbuild/BUILD + cd x11vnc-0.9.8 + DOCDIR=/home/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/x11vnc-0.9.8-12.fc10.i386/usr/share/doc/x11vnc-javaviewers-0.9.8 + export DOCDIR + rm -rf /home/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/x11vnc-0.9.8-12.fc10.i386/usr/share/doc/x11vnc-javaviewers-0.9.8 + /bin/mkdir -p /home/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/x11vnc-0.9.8-12.fc10.i386/usr/share/doc/x11vnc-javaviewers-0.9.8 + cp -pr classes/ssl/README classes/ssl/src/tight/README classes/ssl/src/ultra/README /home/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/x11vnc-0.9.8-12.fc10.i386/usr/share/doc/x11vnc-javaviewers-0.9.8 cp: will not overwrite just-created `/home/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/x11vnc-0.9.8-12.fc10.i386/usr/share/doc/x11vnc-javaviewers-0.9.8/README' with `classes/ssl/src/tight/README' cp: will not overwrite just-created `/home/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/x11vnc-0.9.8-12.fc10.i386/usr/share/doc/x11vnc-javaviewers-0.9.8/README' with `classes/ssl/src/ultra/README' error: Bad exit status from /home/rpmbuild/tmp/rpm-tmp.zbaPMi (%doc) Most likely it is necessary to rename to README files which are in the %doc section of the subpackage so that they have distinct names. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 16:58:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 12:58:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466047] Review Request: tcl-mysqltcl - MySQL interface for Tcl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031658.n93GwvlR021203@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466047 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #28 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-10-03 12:58:55 EDT --- Okay. ----------------------------------------------------------- This package (tcl-mysqltcl) is APPROVED by mtasaka ----------------------------------------------------------- I checked FAS and it seems that the mail address used in FAS differs from what is used in bugzilla in upper/lowercase. Is this expected? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 16:31:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 12:31:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526058] Review Request: sil-scheherazade-fonts - SIL Scheherazade Arabic Script Unicode Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031631.n93GVmoQ001385@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526058 --- Comment #4 from Hedayat Vatankhah 2009-10-03 12:31:48 EDT --- Oops! There is something wrong with me! :P SPEC URL: http://hedayat.fedorapeople.org/reviews/sil-scheherazade-fonts/sil-scheherazade-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://hedayat.fedorapeople.org/reviews/sil-scheherazade-fonts/sil-scheherazade-fonts-1.001-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 16:42:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 12:42:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526595] Review Request: zikula-module-filterutil - Pagesetter like filter rules for Zikula In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031642.n93Ggm8i003403@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526595 Nick Bebout changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Nick Bebout 2009-10-03 12:42:47 EDT --- rpmlint is clean. [nb at nb SPECS]$ rpmlint zikula-module-filterutil.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [nb at nb SRPMS]$ rpmlint zikula-module-filterutil-0-0.2.20090915svn15.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [nb at nb noarch]$ rpmlint zikula-module-filterutil-0-0.2.20090915svn15.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Licensing appears to be correct. Package appears to conform to rest of packaging and review guidelines. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 17:23:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 13:23:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527046] New: Review Request: perl-Tk-ObjScanner - Tk data scanner Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Tk-ObjScanner - Tk data scanner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527046 Summary: Review Request: perl-Tk-ObjScanner - Tk data scanner Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Tk-ObjScanner/perl-Tk-ObjScanner.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Tk-ObjScanner/perl-Tk-ObjScanner-2.012-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This perl module provides a GUI to scan the attributes of an object. It can also be used to scan the elements of a hash or an array. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 17:24:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 13:24:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525210] Review Request: rubygem-trollop - A command-line option parsing library for ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031724.n93HOsP6010320@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525210 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-10-03 13:24:52 EDT --- Okay. ------------------------------------------------------------- This package (rubygem-trollop) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 17:26:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 13:26:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524781] Review Request: perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptive - Getopt::Long with usage text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031726.n93HQ6XS026207@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524781 --- Comment #3 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-10-03 13:26:05 EDT --- Sorry about this. A coworker reported it absent from Fedora and I blindly built the package and submitted it without checking. Won't happen again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 17:27:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 13:27:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509158] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_fedora-gnat-project-commo?= =?utf-8?q?n_=E2=80=93_files_shared_by_Ada_libraries?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031727.n93HR0mx026307@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509158 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-03 13:26:57 EDT --- fedora-gnat-project-common-1.2-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fedora-gnat-project-common-1.2-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 17:24:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 13:24:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518779] Review Request: libnfc - NFC SDK and Programmers API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031724.n93HOWOV010259@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518779 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |martin.gieseking at uos.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Martin Gieseking 2009-10-03 13:24:30 EDT --- Here's my review of your package. You've done a good job, the package is pretty clean. Just three minor suggestions: - You should prefix the filenames of the patches with libnfc, e.g. libnfc_no_cflags.patch - I recommend to replace %{_datadir}/man/man1/* by %{_mandir}/man1/* - in Requires, I would prefer to use the macro %{name} instead of explicitely mention libnfc $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-11-x86_64/result/libnfc-* libnfc-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. The warning is expected and can be ignored. --------------------------------- keys used in following checklist: [+] OK [.] OK, not applicable [X] needs work --------------------------------- [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license. - LGPLv3+ according to source file headers [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: File(s) containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. - COPYING added to %doc [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. $ sha1sum libnfc-1.2.1.tar.gz* 2e0c4798d47c0bed3ef52bb0bce31b44210b2266 libnfc-1.2.1.tar.gz 2e0c4798d47c0bed3ef52bb0bce31b44210b2266 libnfc-1.2.1.tar.gz.1 [+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1725893 [.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, ... [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. [.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. - no locales [+] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, ... - not relocatable [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. - no large docs [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. - no static libs packaged [+] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' [+] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [+] MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. - .la files removed [.] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file. - no GUI [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. - builds in mock [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. - builds in koji [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. [+] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. - tools package requires base package [+] SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in a -devel pkg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 18:05:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 14:05:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522988] Review Request: afraid-dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031805.n93I5L76000422@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 --- Comment #35 from Erick Calder 2009-10-03 14:05:20 EDT --- ok, so just so it's clear in my head... if a change if only so an older branch builds, I should just add a .1 to the %{dist} e.g. afraid-dyndns-1.0-2.fc11.src.rpm turns into afraid-dyndns-1.0-2.fc11.1.src.rpm and now that I have that, do I cvs-import.sh it into F10 only, right? (In reply to comment #33) > I think you should not change Makefile because it's overwritten by configure. this module does not have a Configure script (In reply to comment #34) > Just commit the spec and the files you changed from your local cvs. for managing my code I use SVN, so the spec and changed files are committed there... I then build an SRPM from a tarball which is what I use for the cvs-import.sh in that context, I'm unsure what you're suggesting > make clog (this will create a file called "clog" with your latest changelog > entry) do I do this in ~/cvs/F10? > cvs commit -F clog (clog will be used as commit message) > make tag build > > As ling as a particular version of a package hasn't sucessfully been build, you > can also re-tag something with > > TAG_OPTS=-F make tag what is the value of this tag? > But please be careful with this, never overwrite a package that has already > been built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 18:13:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 14:13:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527049] New: Review Request: python-ssl - SSL wrapper for socket objects (2.3, 2.4, 2.5 compatible) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-ssl - SSL wrapper for socket objects (2.3, 2.4, 2.5 compatible) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527049 Summary: Review Request: python-ssl - SSL wrapper for socket objects (2.3, 2.4, 2.5 compatible) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve.traylen at cern.ch QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This will never build on current and recent fedora where Python 2.6 is present It will only be released and should only be tested for EPEL4 and EPEL5. Spec URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/python-ssl/python-ssl.spec SRPM URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/python-ssl/python-ssl-1.15-1.el5.src.rpm Description: SSL wrapper for socket objects (2.3, 2.4, 2.5 compatible) The old socket.ssl() support for TLS over sockets is being superseded in Python 2.6 by a new 'ssl' module. This package brings that module to older Python releases. $ rpmlint python-ssl.spec \ ../SRPMS/python-ssl-1.15-1.el5.src.rpm \ /var/lib/mock/epel-5-x86_64/result/python-ssl-1.15-1.el5.x86_64.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. EPEL 4 & 5 builds. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1725937 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1725941 I realize this will need some handling when EPEL6 arrives one day. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 18:26:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 14:26:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525211] Review Request: rubygem-ditz - A command-line issue tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031826.n93IQnCn021365@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525211 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-10-03 14:26:48 EDT --- For -3: * License - Well, actually it should be "GPLv3+ with exceptions", sorry. * Local copy of system-wide files - As rubygem-trollop is packaged seperately, this package should not include %geminstdir/lib/trollop.rb . * %files entry consideration - As ditz script is installed under %_bindir (as symlink), it is better that the corresponding man file is moved to %_mandir/man1 (currently under %geminstdir/man) - "INSTALL" file is probably not needed (this type of files are usually needed for people to install a software by themselves and not needed for people using rpm) - "Changelog" "LICENSE" and so on should correctly be marked as %doc. About using virtual Provides: - This is not specific to ruby or perl. Using virtual Provides for (Build)Requires is recommended in many cases, because this usage is one of the reasons we add virtual Provides. For example: - We use "BR: libGL-devel" instead of "BR: mesa-libGL-devel" - We use "R: tex(latex)" instead of "R: texlive-latex" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 18:53:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 14:53:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509158] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_fedora-gnat-project-commo?= =?utf-8?q?n_=E2=80=93_files_shared_by_Ada_libraries?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031853.n93Irs6C008384@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509158 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-03 14:53:52 EDT --- fedora-gnat-project-common-1.2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 18:53:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 14:53:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520721] Review Request: gprof2dot - Generate dot graphs from the output of several profilers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031853.n93IrQSD008297@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520721 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.0-0.2.20090901svn.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 18:52:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 14:52:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522988] Review Request: afraid-dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031852.n93IqWoK008148@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 --- Comment #37 from Erick Calder 2009-10-03 14:52:31 EDT --- > You shouldn't do that, because when importing whole srpms all the time, you > effectively have no version control of the changes you did to the spec. I mean, > how would you compare the changes? When you are working in the local checkout > of the cvs, you can easily check the changes with cvs diff -u before you commit > them. hmm... I think in this case it's a little different because I'm the developer so I've included the spec file in the tarball (and it lives with my source code, under SVN) but I do see your issue. I'm also navigating mod_gnutls (for which I'm not the developer) through this process so my spec file isn't revisioned as it just sits in ~rpm/SPECS I read through your link above but it does not talk about how to keep your spec (and possibly, patch files) in cvs... do you have a reference for that? > > what is the value of this tag? > > Every package must have a corresponding tag. You can checkout cvs by that > particular tag and will get exactly the state that the package was built from. ok, I've decided to roll back the changes to the Makefile. the better solution is to create a patch file specific for F10. so now the only thing is I don't know how to apply a patch file conditionally i.e. for F10 only. can you help with that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 18:53:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 14:53:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520721] Review Request: gprof2dot - Generate dot graphs from the output of several profilers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031853.n93IrKpU025680@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520721 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-03 14:53:19 EDT --- gprof2dot-1.0-0.2.20090901svn.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 18:53:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 14:53:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522935] Review Request: mod_gnutls - GnuTLS module for the Apache HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031853.n93IrF5D025649@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522935 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-03 14:53:13 EDT --- mod_gnutls-0.5.5-5.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update mod_gnutls'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-10158 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 18:58:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 14:58:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031858.n93Iw6aB009761@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.9-6.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 18:54:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 14:54:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526274] Review Request: gplcver - An interpreted Verilog HDL simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031854.n93IsTHV008653@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526274 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.11a-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 18:57:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 14:57:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517643] Review Request: php-doctrine-Doctrine - PHP Object Relational Mapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031857.n93IvFqW009560@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517643 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.1.3-4.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 18:54:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 14:54:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509310] Review Request: gpointing-device-settings - Configuration tool for pointing devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031854.n93Isvcu008782@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509310 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.3.1-5.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 18:56:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 14:56:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522935] Review Request: mod_gnutls - GnuTLS module for the Apache HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031856.n93IuERT009373@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522935 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-03 14:56:13 EDT --- mod_gnutls-0.5.5-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update mod_gnutls'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-10167 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 18:54:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 14:54:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031854.n93IskZ0008725@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #38 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-03 14:54:42 EDT --- TurboGears2-2.0.3-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update TurboGears2'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-10162 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 18:57:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 14:57:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517643] Review Request: php-doctrine-Doctrine - PHP Object Relational Mapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031857.n93IvAfr027171@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517643 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-03 14:57:09 EDT --- php-doctrine-Doctrine-1.1.3-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 18:58:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 14:58:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525795] Review Request: libgtkhotkey - Platform independent hotkey handling for Gtk+ applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031858.n93IwNKs027362@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525795 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-03 14:58:22 EDT --- libgtkhotkey-0.2.1-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 19:00:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 15:00:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503591] Review Request: python-catwalk - A way to view your models using TurboGears In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031900.n93J0peJ028206@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503591 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.0.2-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 18:54:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 14:54:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167525] Review Request: cpptasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031854.n93IsFlf008582@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167525 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-03 14:54:11 EDT --- cpptasks-1.0b5-5.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 18:57:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 14:57:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031857.n93Ivv9r009715@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 --- Comment #47 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-03 14:57:52 EDT --- mathgl-1.9-6.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 18:54:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 14:54:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526274] Review Request: gplcver - An interpreted Verilog HDL simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031854.n93IsO7v008616@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526274 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-03 14:54:23 EDT --- gplcver-2.11a-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 18:58:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 14:58:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524346] Review Request: avra - ATmel AVR 8-bit RISC microcontroller assembler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031858.n93IwXsJ027419@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524346 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-03 14:58:32 EDT --- avra-1.2.3-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 18:58:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 14:58:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526303] Review Request: fped - A footprint editor used by openmoko developers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031858.n93IwnVt027474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526303 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-03 14:58:48 EDT --- fped-0-0.1.r5664.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 18:55:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 14:55:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475065] Review Request: givaro - C++ library for arithmetic and algebraic computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031855.n93ItChB026299@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475065 --- Comment #37 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-03 14:55:09 EDT --- givaro-3.2.15-0.2.rc1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 18:54:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 14:54:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509310] Review Request: gpointing-device-settings - Configuration tool for pointing devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031854.n93IsqGi025944@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509310 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-03 14:54:50 EDT --- gpointing-device-settings-1.3.1-5.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 18:58:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 14:58:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524346] Review Request: avra - ATmel AVR 8-bit RISC microcontroller assembler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031858.n93Iwdvo009848@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524346 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.2.3-4.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 18:58:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 14:58:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526303] Review Request: fped - A footprint editor used by openmoko developers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031858.n93Iwsfc009909@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526303 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0-0.1.r5664.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 18:55:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 14:55:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475065] Review Request: givaro - C++ library for arithmetic and algebraic computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031855.n93ItHrv026352@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475065 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |3.2.15-0.2.rc1.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 18:53:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 14:53:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509158] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_fedora-gnat-project-commo?= =?utf-8?q?n_=E2=80=93_files_shared_by_Ada_libraries?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031853.n93Irxrw008433@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509158 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.2-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 19:00:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 15:00:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523756] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_iwl1000-firmware_-__Firmw?= =?utf-8?q?are_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO?= /Wireless 1000 B/G/N network adaptors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031900.n93J0SDL028088@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523756 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |128.50.3.1-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 18:36:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 14:36:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525210] Review Request: rubygem-trollop - A command-line option parsing library for ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031836.n93IaWVP005639@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525210 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Jan Klepek 2009-10-03 14:36:31 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-trollop Short Description: A command-line option parsing library for ruby Owners: hpejakle Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 18:49:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 14:49:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518779] Review Request: libnfc - NFC SDK and Programmers API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031849.n93InWrI024896@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518779 --- Comment #2 from Fran?ois Kooman 2009-10-03 14:49:31 EDT --- Thanks for your review! :) I've been working with upstream to smooth some things. I've packaged now an SVN snapshot so no patches are required. I addressed your remarks. I would like to hold of adding libnfc until the 1.3.0 release. Or would it be better to import 1.2.1 (with your remarks addressed)? * Sat Oct 03 2009 Fran?ois Kooman 1.3.0-0.1 - next version will be 1.3.0 - use better macro for mandir - use name macro instead of "libnfc" in Requires and includedir * Mon Sep 12 2009 Fran?ois Kooman 1.2.2-0.1 - update to SVN snapshot - use CMake instead of autotools Spec URL: http://fkooman.fedorapeople.org/libnfc/libnfc.spec SRPM URL: http://fkooman.fedorapeople.org/libnfc/libnfc-1.3.0-0.1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 19:00:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 15:00:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526303] Review Request: fped - A footprint editor used by openmoko developers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031900.n93J0BPe010827@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526303 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-03 15:00:10 EDT --- fped-0-0.1.r5664.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 19:00:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 15:00:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503591] Review Request: python-catwalk - A way to view your models using TurboGears In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031900.n93J0kbT011099@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503591 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-03 15:00:44 EDT --- python-catwalk-2.0.2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 19:00:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 15:00:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526303] Review Request: fped - A footprint editor used by openmoko developers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031900.n93J0FOK010933@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526303 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0-0.1.r5664.fc10 |0-0.1.r5664.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 19:00:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 15:00:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523756] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_iwl1000-firmware_-__Firmw?= =?utf-8?q?are_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO?= /Wireless 1000 B/G/N network adaptors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031900.n93J0OAd011001@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523756 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-03 15:00:22 EDT --- iwl1000-firmware-128.50.3.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 19:03:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 15:03:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524545] Review Request: snacc - Sample Neufeld ASN.1 to C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031903.n93J3kFx011807@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524545 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.3-4.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 19:02:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 15:02:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501576] Review Request: python-repoze-what-quickstart - A plugin enabling a simple authentication system with repoze.who and repoze.what In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031902.n93J2sqF011492@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501576 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.0.1-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 18:04:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 14:04:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524781] Review Request: perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptive - Getopt::Long with usage text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031804.n93I49dE032364@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524781 --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-10-03 14:04:08 EDT --- Don't worry about it -- I've done that a few times myself :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 18:28:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 14:28:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522988] Review Request: afraid-dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031828.n93ISl4C004149@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 --- Comment #36 from Christoph Wickert 2009-10-03 14:28:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #35) > (In reply to comment #34) > > Just commit the spec and the files you changed from your local cvs. > > for managing my code I use SVN, so the spec and changed files are committed > there... I then build an SRPM from a tarball which is what I use for the > cvs-import.sh You shouldn't do that, because when importing whole srpms all the time, you effectively have no version control of the changes you did to the spec. I mean, how would you compare the changes? When you are working in the local checkout of the cvs, you can easily check the changes with cvs diff -u before you commit them. For more info, please read https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_HOWTO > > make clog (this will create a file called "clog" with your latest changelog > > entry) > > do I do this in ~/cvs/F10? Yes, in the branch you want to change something. > what is the value of this tag? Every package must have a corresponding tag. You can checkout cvs by that particular tag and will get exactly the state that the package was built from. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 18:18:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 14:18:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526004] Review Request: fapg - Fast Audio Playlist Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031818.n93IIYss002394@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526004 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |martin.gieseking at uos.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Martin Gieseking 2009-10-03 14:18:33 EDT --- Here's my full review. The package is rather small and I couldn't find any further issues to be fixed. However, you should call "make" with %{?_smp_mflags}. Remove it only if it introduces problems with building the package (see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Parallel_make). $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-11-x86_64/result 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. --------------------------------- keys used in following checklist: [+] OK [.] OK, not applicable [X] needs work --------------------------------- [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license. - GPLv2+ according to source file header [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: File(s) containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. - COPYING added to %doc [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. $ sha1sum fapg-0.41.tar.gz* 575bb2b4c6310da3ad2da4fdb3620889961657cf fapg-0.41.tar.gz 575bb2b4c6310da3ad2da4fdb3620889961657cf fapg-0.41.tar.gz.1 [+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1725932 [.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, ... [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. [.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. - no locales [.] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, ... - not relocatable [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. - no large docs [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [.] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. - no header files [.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. - no static libs [.] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' - no .pc files [.] MUST: .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. - no shared libs [.] MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} - no devel package [.] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. - no .la files [.] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file. - no GUI [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot}. [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. - builds in mock [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. - builds in koji [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. - seems to work as expected [.] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. - no scriptlets [.] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. - no subpackages [.] SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in a -devel pkg. - no .pc files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 19:03:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 15:03:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524545] Review Request: snacc - Sample Neufeld ASN.1 to C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031903.n93J3f5R029283@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524545 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-03 15:03:40 EDT --- snacc-1.3-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 19:06:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 15:06:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475065] Review Request: givaro - C++ library for arithmetic and algebraic computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031906.n93J68fe030316@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475065 --- Comment #38 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-03 15:06:06 EDT --- givaro-3.2.15-0.2.rc1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 19:04:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 15:04:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524346] Review Request: avra - ATmel AVR 8-bit RISC microcontroller assembler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031904.n93J4J8M029446@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524346 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.2.3-4.fc10 |1.2.3-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 19:04:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 15:04:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524332] Review Request: dualscreen-mouse-utils - Utilities for use with dual head setups using independend screens In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031904.n93J4TjF029489@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524332 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-03 15:04:27 EDT --- dualscreen-mouse-utils-0.5-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 19:09:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 15:09:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031909.n93J90MC013567@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-03 15:08:58 EDT --- haskell-platform-2009.2.0.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 19:06:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 15:06:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475065] Review Request: givaro - C++ library for arithmetic and algebraic computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031906.n93J6EJY013084@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475065 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.2.15-0.2.rc1.fc10 |3.2.15-0.2.rc1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 19:10:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 15:10:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526274] Review Request: gplcver - An interpreted Verilog HDL simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031910.n93JAe0X031958@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526274 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-03 15:10:39 EDT --- gplcver-2.11a-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 19:08:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 15:08:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031908.n93J8fVT031293@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.9-6.fc10 |1.9-6.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 19:07:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 15:07:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524545] Review Request: snacc - Sample Neufeld ASN.1 to C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031907.n93J7UZ2031053@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524545 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.3-4.fc11 |1.3-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 19:06:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 15:06:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509158] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_fedora-gnat-project-commo?= =?utf-8?q?n_=E2=80=93_files_shared_by_Ada_libraries?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031906.n93J6VQj030775@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509158 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-03 15:06:30 EDT --- fedora-gnat-project-common-1.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 19:07:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 15:07:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521851] Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin-Beanstalk - Nagios plugin to observe Beanstalkd queue server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031907.n93J7uXL031139@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521851 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-03 15:07:55 EDT --- perl-Nagios-Plugin-Beanstalk-0.04-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Nagios-Plugin-Beanstalk'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-10208 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 19:12:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 15:12:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167525] Review Request: cpptasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031912.n93JC2tM014886@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167525 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-03 15:12:01 EDT --- cpptasks-1.0b5-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 19:10:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 15:10:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526274] Review Request: gplcver - An interpreted Verilog HDL simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031910.n93JAjjf014436@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526274 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.11a-2.fc11 |2.11a-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 19:12:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 15:12:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522935] Review Request: mod_gnutls - GnuTLS module for the Apache HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031912.n93JCfmp015050@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522935 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-03 15:12:40 EDT --- afraid-dyndns-1.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update afraid-dyndns'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-10235 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 19:09:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 15:09:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522657] Review Request: kmymoney2-aqbanking - Online banking plugin for KMyMoney In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031909.n93J9TeO013866@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522657 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-03 15:09:28 EDT --- kmymoney2-1.0.1-1.fc11, kmymoney2-aqbanking-1.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update kmymoney2 kmymoney2-aqbanking'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-10215 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 19:12:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 15:12:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520701] Review Request: seeker - Random access disk benchmark utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031912.n93JCAAn032646@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520701 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-03 15:12:09 EDT --- seeker-3.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 19:38:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 15:38:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526998] Review Request: volpack - Portable library for fast volume rendering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031938.n93JcBZC005730@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526998 --- Comment #5 from Sandro Mathys 2009-10-03 15:38:10 EDT --- Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/volpack.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/volpack-1.0c7-2.fc11.src.rpm Thanks for all the input :) Fixed/Added all in the new release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 19:41:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 15:41:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527059] New: Review Request: earcandy - Sound level manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: earcandy - Sound level manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527059 Summary: Review Request: earcandy - Sound level manager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/earcandy.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/earcandy-0.5.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: A sound level manager that nicely fades applications in and out based on their profile and window focus. It is useful if you need to fade out music or video players during VoIP calls, switch to music player with focus when more using than one, push sound to USB headsets on plugin, etc. Settings can be configured via nice and simple UI. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 19:43:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 15:43:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527059] Review Request: earcandy - Sound level manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031943.n93Jh47u021676@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527059 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-10-03 15:43:03 EDT --- rpmlint complains about various files in python_sitelib having a shebang despite not being executable. Those files are really not meant to be executable and patching away the shebang is not worth since it does not affect functionality at all. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1726062 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 19:28:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 15:28:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488563] Review Request: pure - The Pure programming language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031928.n93JSwGn018916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488563 --- Comment #30 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-10-03 15:28:57 EDT --- That might be a better idea, yes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 19:08:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 15:08:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031908.n93J8YIS013497@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 --- Comment #48 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-03 15:08:33 EDT --- mathgl-1.9-6.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 19:07:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 15:07:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524545] Review Request: snacc - Sample Neufeld ASN.1 to C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031907.n93J7Pjk031018@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524545 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-03 15:07:24 EDT --- snacc-1.3-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 19:04:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 15:04:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524346] Review Request: avra - ATmel AVR 8-bit RISC microcontroller assembler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031904.n93J4Dmd012135@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524346 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-03 15:04:12 EDT --- avra-1.2.3-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 19:06:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 15:06:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509158] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_fedora-gnat-project-commo?= =?utf-8?q?n_=E2=80=93_files_shared_by_Ada_libraries?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031906.n93J6bLd030816@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509158 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.2-1.fc11 |1.2-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 19:02:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 15:02:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501576] Review Request: python-repoze-what-quickstart - A plugin enabling a simple authentication system with repoze.who and repoze.what In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031902.n93J2nU6011444@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501576 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-03 15:02:47 EDT --- python-repoze-what-quickstart-1.0.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 19:04:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 15:04:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524332] Review Request: dualscreen-mouse-utils - Utilities for use with dual head setups using independend screens In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031904.n93J4YS8012302@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524332 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.5-4.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 20:00:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 16:00:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522988] Review Request: afraid-dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910032000.n93K0ZCJ024684@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 --- Comment #38 from Christoph Wickert 2009-10-03 16:00:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #37) > but I do see your issue. Fine. Remember, the changes must be visible not only for you, but also for the other maintainers in Fedora. Sometimes, e. g. when a person is on vacation, someone else jumps the gun in case of an urgent problem. > I read through your link above but it does not talk about how to keep your spec > (and possibly, patch files) in cvs... do you have a reference for that? Not sure if I understand your question correctly. Basically it's just like what you do with your development in SVN. > so now the only thing is I don't > know how to apply a patch file conditionally i.e. for F10 only. can you help > with that? Simple as that: %if 0%{?fedora} = 10 %patch0 -p1 -b .orig %endif See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag#Conditionals -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 20:19:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 16:19:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523650] Review Request: qmpdclient - A Qt4 based MPD client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910032019.n93KJFjY012558@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523650 Thomas Janssen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |thomasj at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #16 from Thomas Janssen 2009-10-03 16:19:13 EDT --- A few quick comments: License is GPLv2+ (Look at the source code "either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.") There's no need to include BR: gcc-c++ That's part of the minimal build environment: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRequires MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. Source0: http://files.4-web.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{release}.tar.gz Source1: %{name}.desktop why do you use capital letters there? Patch: %{name}.pro.patch What's with the patch anyways? You have it there but dont use it. You could comment it. But that's up to you. Be consistent: %{_datadir} %_datadir %doc is empty, fill it with AUTHOR COPYING INSTALL README MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. Please post it here. Please post as well the "Task Info link" of a koji scratch build here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 20:19:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 16:19:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485638] Review Request: dmenu - Dynamic X menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910032019.n93KJ2Wq012503@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485638 Jason Woofenden changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jason310 at herkamire.com --- Comment #21 from Jason Woofenden 2009-10-03 16:18:59 EDT --- Jan, I'm getting a 403 error when I try to download your srpm :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 20:54:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 16:54:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526544] Review Request: stomppy - Python stomp client for messaging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910032054.n93KstQY001417@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526544 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Steve Traylen 2009-10-03 16:54:54 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: stomppy Short Description: Python stomp client for messaging Owners: stevetraylen Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: I'll do EL5/4 one later but depends upon a review and inclusion of bug #527049 Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 20:36:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 16:36:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485638] Review Request: dmenu - Dynamic X menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910032036.n93KaIHm030714@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485638 --- Comment #22 from Jan Blazek 2009-10-03 16:36:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > Jan, > > I'm getting a 403 error when I try to download your srpm :( Sorry, that account doesn't work anymore. I've moved it to new url and added bitmap-fonts to Requires. http://appolito.ic.cz/packages/dmenu-4.0-4.fc11.src.rpm http://appolito.ic.cz/packages/dmenu.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 21:11:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 17:11:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526444] Review Request: MyGUI - Fast, simple and flexible GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910032111.n93LBZOe022642@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526444 --- Comment #5 from Guido Grazioli 2009-10-03 17:11:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Trying to build your package here to get rpmlint output for the packages built > and rpmlint for the installed packages: > > [thomas at tusdell SPECS]$ rpmbuild -ba mygui.spec > /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.naOtPu: line 29: @__XZ@: command not found xz is not enough to build using xz, you need rpm-4.6.1-2 for F-10 which currently is in update-testing (see bug 514480). Build against F-11 or rawhide is fine (see koji build above). > > I guess there's a reason why you use xz over gz. > Yep, that's why: -rw-rw-r--. 1 guido guido 5583126 2009-10-03 20:50 mygui-2.3.0-1861svn.tar.gz -rw-rw-r--. 1 guido guido 3910552 2009-09-28 20:45 mygui-2.3.0-1861svn.tar.xz And for coherency because of: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/XZRpmPayloads Thanks for looking into this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 21:17:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 17:17:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526544] Review Request: stomppy - Python stomp client for messaging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910032117.n93LHAqH024200@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526544 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-03 17:17:08 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 21:21:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 17:21:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525796] Review Request: winwrangler - Small desktop daemon to perform advanced window manipulations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910032121.n93LLjqg007925@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525796 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-03 17:21:43 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 21:25:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 17:25:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526055] Review Request: alure - AL Utilities REtooled In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910032125.n93LPhZt026003@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526055 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-03 17:25:42 EDT --- cvs done with F-12 branch added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 21:24:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 17:24:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523199] Review Request: ncrack - high-speed network authentication cracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910032124.n93LO2RN025500@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523199 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #29 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-03 17:24:01 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 21:28:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 17:28:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502854] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-nfsv3 - SBLIM nfsv3 instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910032128.n93LSmBJ009173@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502854 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-03 17:28:47 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 21:26:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 17:26:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525210] Review Request: rubygem-trollop - A command-line option parsing library for ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910032126.n93LQfaT026362@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525210 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-03 17:26:39 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 21:22:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 17:22:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461849] Review Request: garmintools - Communication tools for Garmin devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910032122.n93LMl4B025320@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461849 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-03 17:22:46 EDT --- cvs done with F-12 branch added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 21:20:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 17:20:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526866] Review Request: torium - A minimalistic, easily configurable torrent client for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910032120.n93LKGnB024879@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526866 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-03 17:20:15 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 21:30:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 17:30:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512079] Review Request: oflb-prociono-fonts - A serif font created by Barry Schwartz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910032130.n93LUNoL010088@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512079 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-03 17:30:21 EDT --- cvs done with F-12 added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 21:09:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 17:09:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250747] Review Request: Linux-Complete-Backup-and-Recovery-HOWTO - bare metal recovery scripts & docs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910032109.n93L9UwV004824@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250747 Thomas Janssen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |thomasj at fedoraproject.org Flag| |needinfo?(charlescurley at cha | |rlescurley.com) --- Comment #5 from Thomas Janssen 2009-10-03 17:09:27 EDT --- Are you still interested in this or is it dead? -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 21:33:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 17:33:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216519] Review Request: sdparm - List or change SCSI disk parameters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910032133.n93LXSgf028440@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216519 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-03 17:33:27 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 21:48:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 17:48:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526544] Review Request: stomppy - Python stomp client for messaging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910032148.n93LmmVl015602@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526544 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-03 17:48:46 EDT --- stomppy-2.0.4-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/stomppy-2.0.4-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 21:45:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 17:45:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526544] Review Request: stomppy - Python stomp client for messaging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910032145.n93LjM18015135@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526544 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-03 17:45:22 EDT --- stomppy-2.0.4-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/stomppy-2.0.4-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 21:46:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 17:46:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526544] Review Request: stomppy - Python stomp client for messaging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910032146.n93Lkdtg015293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526544 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 21:34:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 17:34:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440676] Review Request: lua-filesystem - File System Library for Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910032134.n93LYNso028738@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440676 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-03 17:34:22 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 21:32:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 17:32:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468633] Review Request: wput - A utility for uploading files or whole directories to remote ftp-servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910032132.n93LWA23010692@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468633 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #22 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-03 17:32:09 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 21:55:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 17:55:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526444] Review Request: MyGUI - Fast, simple and flexible GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910032155.n93LtIF8003084@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526444 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Janssen 2009-10-03 17:55:17 EDT --- Just for the record ;) # rpm -q rpm rpm-4.6.1-2.fc10.x86_64 Koji scratch build dist F10 from your SRPM http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1726120 MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. Please run it on the installed packages as well. Saves me the time to build it on another box. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 22:13:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 18:13:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507223] Review Request: dalston - Moblin System Information Icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910032213.n93MDKSw024138@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223 --- Comment #34 from Peter Robinson 2009-10-03 18:13:19 EDT --- SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/dalston.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/dalston-0.1.6-3.fc11.src.rpm koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1726127 Spec file updated with a make dist tarball and the details of how the tarball is generated. I think this fixes everything. Ralf is this OK? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 22:11:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 18:11:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507223] Review Request: dalston - Moblin System Information Icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910032211.n93MBgg2009174@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(rc040203 at freenet. | |de) | --- Comment #33 from Peter Robinson 2009-10-03 18:11:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #32) > (In reply to comment #28) > > Addressing this is trivial: > > > > He can run "make dist" in advance to building and either use this "make dist" > > generated tarball, or use diffs between the upstream tarball and his generated > > tarball. > > I tried to follow your suggestion, but I didn't manage to get it done. > Obviously it's not as trivial as you claim. Can you give us more detailed > instructions please? Um. Try: ./autogen.sh ./configure make dist -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 22:31:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 18:31:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518586] Review Request: gdata-sharp - .NET library for the Google Data API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910032231.n93MVpEE031042@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518586 --- Comment #11 from Juan Manuel Rodriguez 2009-10-03 18:31:49 EDT --- rpmlint: clean Header files must be in a -devel package. Done Patches have a link to the upstream change, which means we'll no longer need them soon. Builds correctly on F11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1726178 F12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1726186 Package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 22:42:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 18:42:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507223] Review Request: dalston - Moblin System Information Icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910032242.n93MgEBY019606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223 --- Comment #35 from Christoph Wickert 2009-10-03 18:42:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #33) > Um. Try: > ./autogen.sh > ./configure > make dist Now I'm getting really confused: 1. I tried that with 0.1.6-1 and it failed for me. 2. This still doesn't fix the "-style pattern rules" errors. 3. Obviously you changed the source from 0.1.6-1 to 0.1.6-2. Please make notice of things like this in the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 22:45:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 18:45:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526444] Review Request: MyGUI - Fast, simple and flexible GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910032245.n93MjZkN003169@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526444 --- Comment #7 from Guido Grazioli 2009-10-03 18:45:34 EDT --- If you target dist-f10 in koji or mock, you dont get 4.6.1-2 but 4.6.1-1: [...] DEBUG util.py:256: Installed: DEBUG util.py:256: patch.i386 0:2.5.4-35.fc10 redhat-rpm-config.noarch 0:9.0.3-7.fc10 DEBUG util.py:256: rpm-build.i386 0:4.6.1-1.fc10 sed.i386 0:4.1.5-11.fc10 [...] DEBUG util.py:256: Dependency Installed: [...] DEBUG util.py:256: rpm.i386 0:4.6.1-1.fc10 DEBUG util.py:256: rpm-libs.i386 0:4.6.1-1.fc10 [...] However, if you cant build with F-10 and 4.6.1-2, it means the bug isn't fixed yet; for the sole purpose to test against rpmlint please consider downloading koji generated rpms built here for dist-f12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1721377 or running yourself a build against dist-f12. Anyway, i will only request devel and F-11 (and F-12) branches for this one; thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 22:49:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 18:49:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525510] Review Request: geda-gaf - Design Automation toolkit for electronic design In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910032249.n93MnHQg021955@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525510 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 22:57:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 18:57:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518586] Review Request: gdata-sharp - .NET library for the Google Data API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910032257.n93MvXgS024359@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518586 Juan Manuel Rodriguez changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 22:56:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 18:56:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507223] Review Request: dalston - Moblin System Information Icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910032256.n93MuBvY024219@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223 --- Comment #36 from Peter Robinson 2009-10-03 18:56:10 EDT --- > Now I'm getting really confused: > 1. I tried that with 0.1.6-1 and it failed for me. > 2. This still doesn't fix the "-style pattern rules" errors. I don't actually see how they are an issue here with regards to a package review. The job of the package review is to review the packaging not the source code. I don't see how the style pattern rules are an issue of the package review, they should be handled upstream. They would only be an issue if it was to be built with none gnu automake which isn't the case in Fedora. > 3. Obviously you changed the source from 0.1.6-1 to 0.1.6-2. Please make notice > of things like this in the review. Nope. Same one, otherwise I would have made note of it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 23:32:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 19:32:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507223] Review Request: dalston - Moblin System Information Icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910032332.n93NWlo6013659@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223 --- Comment #37 from Christoph Wickert 2009-10-03 19:32:46 EDT --- Huh? 0.1.6-1.fc11 contained a bz2 while 0.1.6-2.fc11 has gz. $ md5sum dalston-0.1.6-1.fc11.src/dalston-0.1.6.tar.bz2 1749759cf14192ccf94260733e22b93c dalston-0.1.6-1.fc11.src/dalston-0.1.6.tar.bz2 $ md5sum dalston-0.1.6-2.fc11.src/dalston-0.1.6.tar.gz 276042f0e53344f14ece080b37e58d8d dalston-0.1.6-2.fc11.src/dalston-0.1.6.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 23:38:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 19:38:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507223] Review Request: dalston - Moblin System Information Icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910032338.n93NcG87014889@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223 --- Comment #38 from Peter Robinson 2009-10-03 19:38:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #37) > Huh? 0.1.6-1.fc11 contained a bz2 while 0.1.6-2.fc11 has gz. > > $ md5sum dalston-0.1.6-1.fc11.src/dalston-0.1.6.tar.bz2 > 1749759cf14192ccf94260733e22b93c > dalston-0.1.6-1.fc11.src/dalston-0.1.6.tar.bz2 > $ md5sum dalston-0.1.6-2.fc11.src/dalston-0.1.6.tar.gz > 276042f0e53344f14ece080b37e58d8d dalston-0.1.6-2.fc11.src/dalston-0.1.6.tar.gz Umm.... from the top of the spec file: # Creation of the tarball as follows: # wget http://git.moblin.org/cgit.cgi/%{name}/snapshot/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 # tar xf %{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 # cd %{name}-%{version} # patch -p1 dalston-nbtk-1.2.patch # patch -p1 0001-Update-to-latest-gnome-volume-control-code.patch # make dist the 'make dist' creates a .gz file. I may have over written the -2 file but -3 is the current build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 00:03:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 20:03:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250747] Review Request: Linux-Complete-Backup-and-Recovery-HOWTO - bare metal recovery scripts & docs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910040003.n9403ers022305@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250747 Charles Curley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(charlescurley at cha | |rlescurley.com) | --- Comment #6 from Charles Curley 2009-10-03 20:03:38 EDT --- It's dead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 00:07:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 20:07:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440676] Review Request: lua-filesystem - File System Library for Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910040007.n94079cg023465@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440676 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-03 20:07:06 EDT --- lua-filesystem-1.4.2-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lua-filesystem-1.4.2-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 01:04:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 21:04:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526004] Review Request: fapg - Fast Audio Playlist Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910040104.n9414Vqg008861@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526004 --- Comment #4 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-10-03 21:04:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Here's my full review. The package is rather small and I couldn't find any > further issues to be fixed. However, you should call "make" with > %{?_smp_mflags}. Remove it only if it introduces problems with building the > package (see > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Parallel_make). > > $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-11-x86_64/result > 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. > Fixed. Using make %{?_smp_mflags} Same URLS. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 01:23:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 21:23:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524707] Review Request: chronojump - A measurement, management and statistics sport testing tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910040123.n941NLAB032474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524707 --- Comment #7 from Ismael Olea 2009-10-03 21:23:20 EDT --- Spec URL: http://olea.org/tmp/chronojump.spec SRPM URL: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1726288&name=chronojump-0.8.11-2.fc11.src.rpm fixed! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 01:36:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 21:36:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522988] Review Request: afraid-dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910040136.n941aqYT004346@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 --- Comment #39 from Erick Calder 2009-10-03 21:36:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #38) > Fine. Remember, the changes must be visible not only for you, but also for the > other maintainers in Fedora. Sometimes, e. g. when a person is on vacation, > someone else jumps the gun in case of an urgent problem. ok. what I've done is added the spec file to ~rpm/cvs/afraid-dyndns and converted ~/prj/afraid-dyndns/spec to a link that points to it so the spec file is included in the tarball and lives with the rest of the source. is that ok? I don't need the tarball too do I? and the patches? (In reply to comment #38) > %if 0%{?fedora} = 10 > %patch0 -p1 -b .orig > %endif for some reason -p1 breaks the process with the error: Patch (afraid-dyndns.F10.patch): + /bin/cat /builddir/build/SOURCES/afraid-dyndns.F10.patch + /usr/bin/patch -s -p1 -b --suffix .orig --fuzz=0 missing header for unified diff at line 5 of patch The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: Makefile |=================================================================== |--- Makefile (revision 2470) |+++ Makefile (revision 2471) -------------------------- File to patch: Skip this patch? [y] 1 out of 1 hunk ignored however, -p0 seems to fix that problem. now, in getting all this to work, I bumped up the spec file to -5. It wasn't really my intention but I haven't figure out my workflow so testing was done at points after a commitment. sigh. now my question is: if I have a -5 in F-10, do I then have to build -5 for F-11 and up (I'm not sure I understood the point in the link you had sent), or is it ok to leave those at -2? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 03:30:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 23:30:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519483] Review Request: zikula-module-pagemaster - Creates pages with dynamic content like news, articles, etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910040330.n943Uvw3024783@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519483 Nick Bebout changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nb at fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|mel at redhat.com |nb at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 04:26:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 00:26:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512079] Review Request: oflb-prociono-fonts - A serif font created by Barry Schwartz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910040426.n944QZwF008771@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512079 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-04 00:26:34 EDT --- oflb-prociono-fonts-20090715-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/oflb-prociono-fonts-20090715-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 04:59:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 00:59:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521909] Review Request: ne7ssh - SSH Library is a Secure Shell client software written in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910040459.n944x472017673@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909 --- Comment #29 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-10-04 00:59:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #28) > > Wrong again. Man pages must be part of the subpackage they document. > > This normally means, *1's need to go to the base package, *3's need to go > > to *-devel. > I did not know. Please, can you point where it is described more precisely. It's "common sense" - c.f. the "MANUAL SECTIONS" in man man. > > The same as with man-pages. In general, doc's need to be part (Or be pulled in > > through package deps) of the package they document. > > => user-documentation goes into the base package > > => devel-docs into *devel packages > > unless there are technical reasons to do otherwise > We speak about separate -doc sub-packages now instead of "user-documentation > goes into the base package" I don't understand this remark. In general, separate *-doc (sub-)packages only make real sense in very few occasions, e.g. 1) when docs are optional supplements (e.g. a pdf's formated docs, which are already available in some other formats) 2) when docs are "big" and can be shared as "noarch"-subpackages between architectures. 3) when upstream ships docs as separate package ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 05:06:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 01:06:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526426] Review Request: OpenGL-gle - A Tubing and Extrusion Library for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910040506.n9456Rc9019965@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526426 --- Comment #6 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-10-04 01:06:25 EDT --- One question: Why do you name the package OpenGL-gle? The upstream tarball is named "gle", so naming this package "gle" or "libgle" would be natural choices to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 05:17:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 01:17:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512079] Review Request: oflb-prociono-fonts - A serif font created by Barry Schwartz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910040517.n945HFp9022874@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512079 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-04 01:17:14 EDT --- oflb-prociono-fonts-20090715-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/oflb-prociono-fonts-20090715-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 04:25:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 00:25:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512079] Review Request: oflb-prociono-fonts - A serif font created by Barry Schwartz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910040425.n944PoEf026453@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512079 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-04 00:25:49 EDT --- oflb-prociono-fonts-20090715-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/oflb-prociono-fonts-20090715-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 03:17:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 23:17:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466047] Review Request: tcl-mysqltcl - MySQL interface for Tcl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910040317.n943HWdR020419@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466047 --- Comment #29 from Rene Ploetz 2009-10-03 23:17:30 EDT --- Well, I registered myself to bugzilla long before to FAS, and I was using the lowercase version of my email address at this time. But as there is no difference in capitalized and uncapitalized mail addresses and because my whole name would be clearly visible just by looking at the address, I decided to capitalize surname and name a while ago. But, as I don't find any method to change the address in bugzilla, I changed it in FAS to prevent any confusion in the future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 02:42:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 22:42:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518586] Review Request: gdata-sharp - .NET library for the Google Data API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910040242.n942gNVM008831@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518586 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-10-03 22:42:21 EDT --- Many thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gdata-sharp Short Description: .NET library for the Google Data API Owners: salimma Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 06:07:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 02:07:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526004] Review Request: fapg - Fast Audio Playlist Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910040607.n9467KP1019850@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526004 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Martin Gieseking 2009-10-04 02:07:19 EDT --- > Fixed. Using > make %{?_smp_mflags} OK, fine. ------------------------ The package is APPROVED. ------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 06:14:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 02:14:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250747] Review Request: Linux-Complete-Backup-and-Recovery-HOWTO - bare metal recovery scripts & docs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910040614.n946EFjf020860@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250747 Thomas Janssen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |thomasj at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 06:26:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 02:26:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518779] Review Request: libnfc - NFC SDK and Programmers API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910040626.n946Qnrc023269@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518779 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #3 from Martin Gieseking 2009-10-04 02:26:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Thanks for your review! :) You're welcome. > I would like to > hold of adding libnfc until the 1.3.0 release. Or would it be better to import > 1.2.1 (with your remarks addressed)? To me, it's fine if you want to wait until version 1.3.0 is released. When the new package is ready, clear the Whiteboard field above. Then I'll have a look into it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 06:47:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 02:47:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526426] Review Request: OpenGL-gle - A Tubing and Extrusion Library for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910040647.n946lmju027072@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526426 --- Comment #7 from Mary Ellen Foster 2009-10-04 02:47:47 EDT --- "gle" is already taken in Fedora -- "libgle" sounds like a better idea though and I'll probably rename it shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 08:29:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 04:29:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526651] Review Request: xpaint - An X Window System image editing or paint program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910040829.n948TPJO013081@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526651 --- Comment #8 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-10-04 04:29:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Yes, if in doubt, and that's the case here, ask upstream. Would be perfect if > they provide a proper LICENSE file. > > You could add that then with sourceX. > > This is the answer to my consult: > > I would like to include xpaint in Fedora, but it is not > clear for me > what is its license., even reading the file debian/copyright. > > Would it be possible to have an official license file in the > project? > Hi: I am sorry that I cannot really clarify the issue. Xpaint has a long history and combined different parts with different licences, including MIT and GPL. Everything seems to be GPL compatible and I consider all my additions to be GPL whenever this can apply - I don't think there is any issue, but I am not an expert in these legalities... In any case I'll add the text of GPLv2 in the next release and I encourage you to do so for the Fedora package if you feel this is desirable. Best, Jean-Pierre Demailly -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 08:21:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 04:21:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526998] Review Request: volpack - Portable library for fast volume rendering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910040821.n948L1KM025004@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526998 --- Comment #6 from Martin Gieseking 2009-10-04 04:20:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Thanks for all the input :) You're welcome. :) I just wanted to start the full review but then I noticed that the package doesn't build on ppc systems: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1726513 There seems to be an error in vp_compA.m4 that generates further C files during the build process. At least in one of these files some preprocessor statements don't match when building for ppc64: vp_compAR3NB.c:966:1: error: unterminated #ifdef You should report this to upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 08:21:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 04:21:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525211] Review Request: rubygem-ditz - A command-line issue tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910040821.n948L0wO024980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525211 --- Comment #12 from Jan Klepek 2009-10-04 04:20:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > For -3: > > * License > - Well, actually it should be "GPLv3+ with exceptions", sorry. - fixed > * Local copy of system-wide files > - As rubygem-trollop is packaged seperately, this package > should not include %geminstdir/lib/trollop.rb . - oh, sorry, I must have somehow missed this in first place, fixed > * %files entry consideration > - As ditz script is installed under %_bindir (as symlink), > it is better that the corresponding man file is moved > to %_mandir/man1 (currently under %geminstdir/man) - not sure if i got the best solution... I'm gzipping man page and symlink it to %_mandir/man1, without gzip it create dangling symlink and move of manpage will corrupt gem structure. > - "INSTALL" file is probably not needed (this type of files > are usually needed for people to install a software by > themselves and not needed for people using rpm) > > - "Changelog" "LICENSE" and so on should correctly be > marked as %doc. - fixed Spec URL: http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/packages/rubygem-ditz.spec SRPM URL: http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/packages/rubygem-ditz-0.5-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 09:00:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 05:00:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526004] Review Request: fapg - Fast Audio Playlist Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910040900.n9490S3q018105@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526004 Paulo Roma Cavalcanti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-10-04 05:00:27 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fapg Short Description: Fast Audio Playlist Generator Owners: roma Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: roma -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 09:12:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 05:12:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526651] Review Request: xpaint - An X Window System image editing or paint program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910040912.n949COUi020200@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526651 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Janssen 2009-10-04 05:12:23 EDT --- Sounds not too good. I will have fedora-legal look over it. Sorry. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 09:25:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 05:25:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525210] Review Request: rubygem-trollop - A command-line option parsing library for ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910040925.n949Pxur022976@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525210 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-04 05:25:57 EDT --- rubygem-trollop-1.15-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-trollop-1.15-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 09:26:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 05:26:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525210] Review Request: rubygem-trollop - A command-line option parsing library for ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910040926.n949Q4IF023095@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525210 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-04 05:26:03 EDT --- rubygem-trollop-1.15-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-trollop-1.15-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 09:26:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 05:26:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525210] Review Request: rubygem-trollop - A command-line option parsing library for ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910040926.n949Q8oM023134@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525210 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-04 05:26:08 EDT --- rubygem-trollop-1.15-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-trollop-1.15-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 09:28:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 05:28:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526444] Review Request: MyGUI - Fast, simple and flexible GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910040928.n949ScaF023569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526444 Thomas Janssen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |thomasj at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 09:38:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 05:38:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462580] Review Request: wstx - Woodstox Stax Implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910040938.n949cStn025378@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462580 Thomas Janssen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |thomasj at fedoraproject.org Flag| |needinfo?(guthrie at counterex | |ample.org) --- Comment #5 from Thomas Janssen 2009-10-04 05:38:25 EDT --- What exactly means soon in this case? The last response is already 5+ months ago. Are you still with us or is it now dead? -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 09:45:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 05:45:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463035] Review Request: pyroman - Very fast firewall configuration tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910040945.n949j3Sj009471@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463035 Thomas Janssen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |thomasj at fedoraproject.org Flag| |needinfo?(bloch at verdurin.co | |m) --- Comment #12 from Thomas Janssen 2009-10-04 05:45:00 EDT --- Ping? -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 10:00:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 06:00:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526998] Review Request: volpack - Portable library for fast volume rendering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910041000.n94A0OBW012019@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526998 --- Comment #7 from Sandro Mathys 2009-10-04 06:00:23 EDT --- I was wondering why ppc was cancelled and did a new scratch build. The strange thing is I can't reproduce the above. Mine was successful, I even did another one to confirm the results: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1726608 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1726613 Any idea why my scratch builds are so different from yours? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 10:29:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 06:29:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526928] Review Request: blokkal - A KDE blogging client that supports multiple protocols and sites In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910041029.n94ATE60001421@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526928 --- Comment #1 from Thomas Janssen 2009-10-04 06:29:13 EDT --- Better use of macro %{name} in spec. Spec URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/blokkal.spec SRPM URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/blokkal-0.1.1-3.fc10.src.rpm [thomas at tusdell ~]$ rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/blokkal.spec rpmbuild/SRPMS/blokkal-0.1.1-3.fc10.src.rpm rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/blokkal-*-3* 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 10:38:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 06:38:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526998] Review Request: volpack - Portable library for fast volume rendering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910041038.n94Acp6h018571@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526998 --- Comment #8 from Martin Gieseking 2009-10-04 06:38:50 EDT --- That's indeed rather strange. I also did another scratch build and it failed again, but this time on a different target with a different error: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1726629 I have no idea why the results differ. Maybe some of the ppc build servers use different versions of m4. Could you please ask on fedora-devel for further information? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 10:47:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 06:47:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525759] Review Request: qtcurve-kde4 - A set of widget styles for Qt4/KDE4 based apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910041047.n94AlDce019961@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525759 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Janssen 2009-10-04 06:47:12 EDT --- - Added Build comment - better use of name macro Spec URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/qtcurve-kde4.spec SRPM URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/qtcurve-kde4-0.68.1-3.fc10.src.rpm [thomas at tusdell ~]$ rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/qtcurve-kde4.spec rpmbuild/SRPMS/qtcurve-kde4-0.68.1-3.fc10.src.rpm rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/qtcurve-kde4-*-3* 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 10:44:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 06:44:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526998] Review Request: volpack - Portable library for fast volume rendering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910041044.n94AiDHs019331@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526998 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-10-04 06:44:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > I just wanted to start the full review but then I noticed that the package > doesn't build on ppc systems: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1726513 It seems that gcc was trying to compile incomplete vp_compAR3NB.c which was still being generated by another make process. This type of build error which seems to occur randomly is quite often due to parallel make issue. I tried to use -j8 explicitly and it failed: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1726634 Try to remove %{?_smp_mflags} (and add some comments for this) (or fix Makefiles so that parallel make passes) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 10:46:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 06:46:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463035] Review Request: pyroman - Very fast firewall configuration tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910041046.n94AkQqC004407@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463035 Adam Huffman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(bloch at verdurin.co | |m) | --- Comment #13 from Adam Huffman 2009-10-04 06:46:24 EDT --- As far as I can tell, the upstream project is inactive - no commits since August 2008. Wondering whether it's worth persisting? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 11:16:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 07:16:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525831] Review Request: vim-perl-tt2 - Syntax highlighting for the Template-Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910041116.n94BG5qa009654@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525831 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |emmanuel.seyman at club-intern | |et.fr --- Comment #4 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-10-04 07:16:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > > Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/vim-perl-tt2.spec This still contains the vim-perl-support req. > SRPM URL: > http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/vim-perl-tt2-0.1.3-2.fc11.src.rpm 404 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 11:30:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 07:30:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458974] Review Request: OpenCASCADE - The OpenCASCADE framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910041130.n94BUIgV027948@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458974 --- Comment #13 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-10-04 07:30:14 EDT --- For the record: I'm interested in opencascade as it seems to be used by openmoko developers. With Fedora 12, we already have 60% environment for openmoko hardware development. https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab/ticket/55 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 12:10:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 08:10:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526997] Review Request: pdf2svg - Small tool to convert PDF files into SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910041210.n94CAsEr018818@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526997 --- Comment #3 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-10-04 08:10:53 EDT --- Missing timestamps during make install : make INSTALL="install -p" install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} The package looks good. Update the spec file too in accordance to the comment #1. I'll finalize the package review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 12:23:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 08:23:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526844] Review Request: cirkuit - A frontend for TikZ and circuit_macros In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910041223.n94CNljA020907@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526844 --- Comment #4 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-10-04 08:23:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > > #002: missing icon on gnome menu > I'll look at the .desktop file. The icon also probably need to be put into > %{_datadir}/icons/ This can be fixed by using the proper scriptlets. Please read the following section http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache #001: Missing desktop file treatment with desktop-file-utils https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Desktop_files #002: You have %{_kde4_datadir}/mime/packages/cirkuit.xml Hence you should abide to mimeinfo scriptlets http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#mimeinfo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 12:26:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 08:26:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 511204] Review Request: wicd - A wireless and wired network manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910041226.n94CQNd1021607@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511204 leigh scott changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |leigh123linux at googlemail.co | |m --- Comment #12 from leigh scott 2009-10-04 08:26:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > NetworkManager works fine here, no complainants except that it requires a lot > of Gnome stuff. This is why I was looking for alternatives for my upcoming LXDE > spin. I know many LXDE users use it, so I gave it a try. > > First I was very disappointed, because I could not get it to work with WPA/WPA2 > encryption. Others confirmed that there were issues and they had to connect > several times until it worked. But since 1.5.8 it seems these problems have > been solved. I'm using 1.5.9 now for a nearly three weeks and it has always > worked flawlessly. The only issue is that it does not work with SELinux > currently. > > I'm going to review this package when Rangeen gives us an updated spec. I > really like to see this in Fedora ASAP, but first we need to fix > selinux-policy-targeted. There is a bugreport for the selinux issue. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481511 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 12:45:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 08:45:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526998] Review Request: volpack - Portable library for fast volume rendering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910041245.n94CjRBb024876@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526998 --- Comment #10 from Sandro Mathys 2009-10-04 08:45:26 EDT --- Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/volpack.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/volpack-1.0c7-3.fc11.src.rpm Thanks for the hint Mamoru. I should have thought about parallel builds being the problem earlier, pretty typical. The new release has now %{?_smp_mflags} removed. Several scratch builds on different build hosts were all successful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 12:44:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 08:44:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526844] Review Request: cirkuit - A frontend for TikZ and circuit_macros In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910041244.n94Cid2H007832@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526844 --- Comment #5 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-10-04 08:44:38 EDT --- Can you give me an example for * Tikz file and * gnuplot file so that I can test cirkuit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 12:47:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 08:47:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526844] Review Request: cirkuit - A frontend for TikZ and circuit_macros In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910041247.n94ClAXR025259@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526844 --- Comment #6 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-10-04 08:47:09 EDT --- I think the .desktop file should be in the "Electronics" category rather than "Graphics". Also add "Requires : electronics-menu" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 13:10:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 09:10:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527046] Review Request: perl-Tk-ObjScanner - Tk data scanner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910041310.n94DAHpk029529@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527046 Thomas Janssen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |thomasj at fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |thomasj at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Thomas Janssen 2009-10-04 09:10:16 EDT --- MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. The README says: This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as Perl itself. http://dev.perl.org/licenses/ So it's: GPLv2+ or Artistic MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 13:28:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 09:28:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526876] Review Request: php-pecl-gmagick - Provides a wrapper to the GraphicsMagick library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910041328.n94DSaYt032388@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526876 Thomas Janssen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |thomasj at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #1 from Thomas Janssen 2009-10-04 09:28:35 EDT --- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [thomas at tusdell ~]$ rpmlint srpm-review-test/php-pecl-gmagick.spec srpm-review-test/php-pecl-gmagick.spec: E: specfile-error sh: php-config: command not found srpm-review-test/php-pecl-gmagick.spec: E: specfile-error error: Macro %php_extdir has empty body 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 14:18:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 10:18:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525510] Review Request: geda-gaf - Design Automation toolkit for electronic design In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910041418.n94EIsAn008897@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525510 --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-10-04 10:18:52 EDT --- Well, I don't think we should close review request when build fails on "rawhide" (currently F-12). The problem is that gattrib/src/gtkitementry_2_2.c uses members of struct GtkEntry which is "declared" as "private" in gtk-2.0/gtk/gtkentry.h. The following can be a workaround, however in the future gattrib/src/gtkitementry_2_2.c should be fixed not to use "private" member of GtkEntry. ---------------------------------------------------------- %if 0%{?fedora} >= 12 sed -i.gtkver -e 's|2.17.3|2.19.0|' configure sed -i.gtkver \ -e 's|entry->text_size|entry->x_text_size|g' \ -e 's|entry->n_bytes|entry->x_n_bytes|g' \ gattrib/src/gtkitementry_2_2.c %endif ---------------------------------------------------------- c.f. https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-commits/2009-September/msg01015.html This seems to be using the exactly same code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 14:19:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 10:19:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525510] Review Request: geda-gaf - Design Automation toolkit for electronic design In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910041419.n94EJAth024339@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525510 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 14:22:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 10:22:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522920] Review Request: tnef - Extract files from email attachments like winmail.dat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910041422.n94EM4Va025047@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522920 --- Comment #12 from David Timms 2009-10-04 10:22:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > I'll test the new package when it is available. OK, I worked out what was wrong (I had missed one of the files needed to provide the menu entry), and retested on a separate kde machine, and all seems well now. Also, tidied up the .desktop files so that they are legit according to desktop-file-install. Updated package: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/tnef/tnef.spec http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/tnef/tnef-1.4.6-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 14:25:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 10:25:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525796] Review Request: winwrangler - Small desktop daemon to perform advanced window manipulations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910041425.n94EPxFP010218@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525796 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-04 10:25:58 EDT --- winwrangler-0.2.4-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/winwrangler-0.2.4-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 14:26:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 10:26:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525796] Review Request: winwrangler - Small desktop daemon to perform advanced window manipulations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910041426.n94EQsOq025855@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525796 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-04 10:26:54 EDT --- winwrangler-0.2.4-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/winwrangler-0.2.4-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 14:28:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 10:28:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525795] Review Request: libgtkhotkey - Platform independent hotkey handling for Gtk+ applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910041428.n94ES300010536@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525795 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-04 10:28:02 EDT --- libgtkhotkey-0.2.1-3.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libgtkhotkey-0.2.1-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 14:32:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 10:32:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522920] Review Request: tnef - Extract files from email attachments like winmail.dat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910041432.n94EWumq011305@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522920 --- Comment #13 from David Timms 2009-10-04 10:32:55 EDT --- scratch: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1726892 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 15:56:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 11:56:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526876] Review Request: php-pecl-gmagick - Provides a wrapper to the GraphicsMagick library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910041556.n94Fu241008262@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526876 --- Comment #2 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-10-04 11:56:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > sh: php-config: > command not found You simply does not have php-devel installed. If you install this package erro must be gone. php-devel listed as BR, so nothing error there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 16:05:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 12:05:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466047] Review Request: tcl-mysqltcl - MySQL interface for Tcl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910041605.n94G5POp027074@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466047 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #30 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-10-04 12:05:24 EDT --- Okay. Now I am sponsoring you. Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Install the Client Tools (Koji)". If you want to import this package into Fedora 10/11/12, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. Removing NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 16:04:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 12:04:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527046] Review Request: perl-Tk-ObjScanner - Tk data scanner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910041604.n94G4T1i009577@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527046 --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-10-04 12:04:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > > http://dev.perl.org/licenses/ > So it's: GPLv2+ or Artistic No. Perl is licensed under GPLv1 or later and the Artistic license. It should be "GPL+ or Artistic". See the perl packaging guidelines for details. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Perl > MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the > review. ??? You are doing the review, not me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 16:10:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 12:10:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520637] Review Request: mdk - GNU MIX Development Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910041610.n94GAF62028147@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520637 --- Comment #10 from Stjepan Gros 2009-10-04 12:10:13 EDT --- I talked to the developer of MDK and he's unable to reproduce this error. It seems that this particular error occurs somewhere in the GTK initialization code. I'll try the package on some other Fedora or CentOS in next few days to see what will happen. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 16:07:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 12:07:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525211] Review Request: rubygem-ditz - A command-line issue tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910041607.n94G7cgq027483@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525211 Bug 525211 depends on bug 525210, which changed state. Bug 525210 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-trollop - A command-line option parsing library for ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525210 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 16:07:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 12:07:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525210] Review Request: rubygem-trollop - A command-line option parsing library for ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910041607.n94G7b2r027454@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525210 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-10-04 12:07:35 EDT --- Please submit push request also for F-12 (now bodhi accepts push request for F-12). Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 16:20:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 12:20:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910041620.n94GKZAH012609@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 --- Comment #6 from Roshan Singh 2009-10-04 12:20:34 EDT --- I have made the necessary changes to the spec file and the srpm, I have uploaded the new files. spec: http://lug.nitdgp.ac.in/users/roshan/gscribble.spec srpm: http://lug.nitdgp.ac.in/users/roshan/gscribble-0.0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 16:25:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 12:25:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526451] Review Request: crunchyfrog - A multi-engine SQL client and database front-end In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910041625.n94GP5Ls013310@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526451 --- Comment #3 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-10-04 12:25:04 EDT --- Full review follow, but now it is even fail to build - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1726931 I think you miss (Build)Requires pyxdg. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 16:32:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 12:32:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527046] Review Request: perl-Tk-ObjScanner - Tk data scanner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910041632.n94GWIST014705@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527046 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |516281 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 16:32:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 12:32:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516281] Review Request: perl-Config-Model-TkUI - Tk GUI to edit config data through Config::Model In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910041632.n94GWHaL014685@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516281 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |527046 --- Comment #3 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-10-04 12:32:15 EDT --- I've submitted perl-Tk-ObjScanner for review (#527046). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 16:41:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 12:41:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527046] Review Request: perl-Tk-ObjScanner - Tk data scanner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910041641.n94GfeID001620@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527046 Thomas Janssen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|thomasj at fedoraproject.org |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 16:41:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 12:41:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527046] Review Request: perl-Tk-ObjScanner - Tk data scanner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910041641.n94GfGQV001541@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527046 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Janssen 2009-10-04 12:41:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > > > http://dev.perl.org/licenses/ > > So it's: GPLv2+ or Artistic > > No. Perl is licensed under GPLv1 or later and the Artistic license. > It should be "GPL+ or Artistic". See the perl packaging guidelines for details. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Perl > > > MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the > > review. > > ??? > You are doing the review, not me. My bad, i wasn't aware of the Packaging:Perl page (i should/will check about other pages as well) and i learned that the packager has to provide the rpmlint output as well. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 16:50:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 12:50:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525831] Review Request: vim-perl-tt2 - Syntax highlighting for the Template-Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910041650.n94Go9k3017929@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525831 --- Comment #5 from Chris Weyl 2009-10-04 12:50:09 EDT --- Huh, weird. They're both out there now, in any case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 17:42:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 13:42:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519483] Review Request: zikula-module-pagemaster - Creates pages with dynamic content like news, articles, etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910041742.n94HgawI026499@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519483 --- Comment #10 from Mel Chua 2009-10-04 13:42:34 EDT --- Note: I just tested http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/zikula-module-pagemaster-0.3.1-3.fc11.noarch.rpm on publictest6. The package installs, and the resulting module installs and activates just fine on the Fedora Insight zikula testbed we have on http://publictest6.fedoraproject.org/zikula, so everything appears to be working. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 17:43:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 13:43:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519483] Review Request: zikula-module-pagemaster - Creates pages with dynamic content like news, articles, etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910041743.n94HhraX012291@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519483 --- Comment #11 from Mel Chua 2009-10-04 13:43:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Okay. We need updated packages that depend on: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526595 The package referred to has just been approved: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526595#c2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 17:42:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 13:42:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526595] Review Request: zikula-module-filterutil - Pagesetter like filter rules for Zikula In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910041742.n94HgT7Q012152@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526595 --- Comment #3 from Mel Chua 2009-10-04 13:42:28 EDT --- Note: I just tested http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/zikula-module-filterutil-0-0.2.20090915svn15.fc11.noarch.rpm on publictest6. The package installs and places the correct files in /usr/share/zikula/config/classes/filterutil/ and subdirectories, so everything appears to be in order. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 17:44:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 13:44:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525211] Review Request: rubygem-ditz - A command-line issue tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910041744.n94HiSL2012370@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525211 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-10-04 13:44:27 EDT --- Well, I still think %{geminstdir}/INSTALL is not needed, however I will leave it to you where you remove this file or not. ------------------------------------------------------------- This package (rubygem-ditz) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 18:01:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 14:01:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461849] Review Request: garmintools - Communication tools for Garmin devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910041801.n94I1gE4029594@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461849 --- Comment #13 from Fabian Affolter 2009-10-04 14:01:41 EDT --- Thanks Kevin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 18:14:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 14:14:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 511204] Review Request: wicd - A wireless and wired network manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910041814.n94IEcND031507@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511204 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com --- Comment #13 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-10-04 14:14:36 EDT --- That bug report seems to be resolved with an updated policy. If it is not working for anyone yet, they should add comments to the bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 18:28:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 14:28:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461849] Review Request: garmintools - Communication tools for Garmin devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910041828.n94ISEtW001541@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461849 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-04 14:28:13 EDT --- garmintools-0.10-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/garmintools-0.10-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 18:28:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 14:28:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461849] Review Request: garmintools - Communication tools for Garmin devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910041828.n94ISKo4001600@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461849 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-04 14:28:19 EDT --- garmintools-0.10-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/garmintools-0.10-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 18:28:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 14:28:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461849] Review Request: garmintools - Communication tools for Garmin devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910041828.n94IS8Se019875@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461849 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-04 14:28:07 EDT --- garmintools-0.10-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/garmintools-0.10-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 18:33:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 14:33:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502614] Review Request: stfl - STFL implements a curses-based widget set for text terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910041833.n94IXHC4020713@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502614 --- Comment #30 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-10-04 14:33:14 EDT --- Some random notes * Requires - There is no needed that main package (stfl) should have "Requires: pkgconfig". - "Requires: python" is not needed for -python subpackage. python(abi) dependency is automatically added by rpmbuild itself. * About sed/patch - Well, I am one of the person who uses sed command many times in spec files, however as you already created Patch0/1, I think it is better that you create Patch2 instead of using sed (and also see below: at least one more patch is needed) * Fedora specific compilation flags - are not honored correctly (check the arguments passed to gcc in build.log). For example: ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 57 gcc -pthread -I. -Wall -Os -ggdb -D_GNU_SOURCE -fPIC -c -o public.o public.c 58 gcc -pthread -I. -Wall -Os -ggdb -D_GNU_SOURCE -fPIC -c -o base.o base.c 59 gcc -pthread -I. -Wall -Os -ggdb -D_GNU_SOURCE -fPIC -c -o parser.o parser.c 60 gcc -pthread -I. -Wall -Os -ggdb -D_GNU_SOURCE -fPIC -c -o dump.o dump.c 61 gcc -pthread -I. -Wall -Os -ggdb -D_GNU_SOURCE -fPIC -c -o style.o style.c .... ------------------------------------------------------------------------- * pkgconfig file - stfl.pc.in contains: ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 libdir=${exec_prefix}/lib ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is wrong on 64 bits architecure because libdir should be /usr/lib64 there. * Duplicate documents - You don't have to include the same documents in each subpackage when other package which the package depends on (usually the main package) already contains the documents. * %exclude - I prefer to remove unneeded files at %install instead of using %exclude unless unavoided. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 19:21:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 15:21:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526998] Review Request: volpack - Portable library for fast volume rendering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910041921.n94JLQZg010334@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526998 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |martin.gieseking at uos.de Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Martin Gieseking 2009-10-04 15:21:25 EDT --- With the latest SRPM I was also able to build the package successfully. It was indeed quite obvious that the problem could be caused by %{?_smp_mflags}. Next time I'll know better. :) Anyway, the package looks good now. I couldn't find any further issues to be fixed. $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-11-x86_64/result/volpack-* volpack.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libvolpack.so.1.0.4 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 volpack-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Both warnings can be ignored. --------------------------------- keys used in following checklist: [+] OK [.] OK, not applicable [X] needs work --------------------------------- [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license. - BSD license (3 clause variant) [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: File(s) containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. $ sha1sum volpack-1.0c7.tgz* e8e2f8d4fcc569417aef51d429556068d9205060 volpack-1.0c7.tgz e8e2f8d4fcc569417aef51d429556068d9205060 volpack-1.0c7.tgz.1 [+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1726997 [.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, ... [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. [.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. - no locales [+] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, ... - not relocatable [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [+] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. [+] MUST: Files in %doc must not affect the runtime of the application. [+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. - no static libs packaged [.] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' no .pc files [+] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix, then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [+] MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. - .la files removed [.] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file. - no GUI [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot}. [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. - builds in mock [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. - builds in koji [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. [+] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. - doc package [.] SHOULD: .pc files should be placed in a -devel pkg. - no .pc files ------------------------ The package is APPROVED. ------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 19:43:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 15:43:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521909] Review Request: ne7ssh - SSH Library is a Secure Shell client software written in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910041943.n94JhkYN014348@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909 --- Comment #30 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-10-04 15:43:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #29) > > I did not know. Please, can you point where it is described more precisely. > It's "common sense" - c.f. the "MANUAL SECTIONS" in man man. Its nothing say about packaging... In any case, man pages even shouldn't be marked as %doc as I known... Or not? > In general, separate *-doc (sub-)packages only make real sense in very few > occasions, e.g. > 1) when docs are optional supplements (e.g. a pdf's formated docs, which are > already available in some other formats) > 2) when docs are "big" and can be shared as "noarch"-subpackages between > architectures. > 3) when upstream ships docs as separate package > ... Guidelines mention only case 2. 3 - I think is clear, it is not our case now. Global, you are speak about cases when we should make separate -doc sub-package, but I think it is not forbidden in other cases too. I repeat, decision make separate -doc was done, so, nowadays question another: in described 1 and 2 (in 3 content is known from upstream) should be all documentation go into sub-package, or we free separate it as we want?? And one more - would (can) -doc sub-package have any dependency (in concrete situation to build examples)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 19:47:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 15:47:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515053] Review Request: sugar-getiabooks - Internet Archive Books receiver for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910041947.n94JlBi7000780@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515053 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2009-10-04 15:47:09 EDT --- Here are the updated files Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-getiabooks.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-getiabooks-3-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 20:12:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 16:12:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910042012.n94KCEMC005785@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #73 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-10-04 16:12:07 EDT --- Thanks, fixed. And one small question - should be -javawievers sub-package noarch? http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/x11vnc/x11vnc-0.9.8-13.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 20:20:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 16:20:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521909] Review Request: ne7ssh - SSH Library is a Secure Shell client software written in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910042020.n94KKGpQ007266@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909 --- Comment #31 from Michael Schwendt 2009-10-04 16:20:12 EDT --- > man pages even shouldn't be marked as %doc as I known... You are mistaken. %{_mandir} is automatically marked as %doc. > should be all documentation go into sub-package, or we free > separate it as we want?? Apply "common sense". Btw, that question has been answered before in this ticket, too. > would (can) -doc sub-package have any dependency (in concrete > situation to build examples)? It would reduce flexibility if you added such dependencies to a Documentation package. [...] The problem in this review is that you put way too much emphasis on those six tiny example source code files. The target group of that 25K of source code is *very* small, the target group of built examples is even smaller. IMHO, including the files in the -devel package (without adding any extra dependencies) would be the most convenient thing to do for developers. Anything beyond that would not be worth the effort. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 20:29:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 16:29:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521707] Review Request: python-zc.buildout - System for managing Python development buildouts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910042029.n94KTpDv008700@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521707 Jonathan Steffan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 20:31:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 16:31:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524332] Review Request: dualscreen-mouse-utils - Utilities for use with dual head setups using independend screens In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910042031.n94KV3B3022773@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524332 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-04 16:31:01 EDT --- dualscreen-mouse-utils-0.5-4.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dualscreen-mouse-utils-0.5-4.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 21:05:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 17:05:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524707] Review Request: chronojump - A measurement, management and statistics sport testing tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910042105.n94L5e6T015682@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524707 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-10-04 17:05:38 EDT --- Just one thing -- rather than creating a tempfile, sed-ing into it and then renaming the temp, why not use sed -i (in-place) instead? Also, sed can use different separator tokens, so when the string you want to replace is full of slashes, use something else -- say pipe -- instead sed -i 's|share/doc/chronojump|share/doc/chronojump-%{version}|g' src/utils.cs Otherwise, you might want to use $(mktemp) rather than `mktemp` -- backquote is a bash-ism (I just noticed it being frowned on in the Python merge review). The program's output is *very* noisy, but I guess that's more of an upstream problem. But you can make these changes when you commit the files to CVS -- everything else looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 21:23:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 17:23:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526998] Review Request: volpack - Portable library for fast volume rendering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910042123.n94LNIUd019517@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526998 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Sandro Mathys 2009-10-04 17:23:16 EDT --- Thanks for the formal review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: volpack Short Description: Portable library for fast volume rendering Owners: red Branches: EL-5 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 21:41:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 17:41:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524707] Review Request: chronojump - A measurement, management and statistics sport testing tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910042141.n94Lfvfx004170@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524707 Ismael Olea changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Ismael Olea 2009-10-04 17:41:55 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: Chronojump Short Description: A measurement, management and statistics sport testing tool Owners: olea Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 InitialCC: salimma -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 21:42:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 17:42:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524707] Review Request: chronojump - A measurement, management and statistics sport testing tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910042142.n94LgmD2023145@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524707 --- Comment #10 from Ismael Olea 2009-10-04 17:42:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) I take note of your suggestion > APPROVED Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 22:38:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 18:38:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526055] Review Request: alure - AL Utilities REtooled In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910042238.n94Mc0K9024889@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526055 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-04 18:37:56 EDT --- alure-1.0-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/alure-1.0-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 22:38:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 18:38:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526055] Review Request: alure - AL Utilities REtooled In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910042238.n94Mc9Uc011540@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526055 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-04 18:38:08 EDT --- alure-1.0-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/alure-1.0-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 00:40:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 20:40:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480279] Review Request: gnome-globalmenu - centralized menu bar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910050040.n950e2Uu014273@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 Feng Yu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #52 from Feng Yu 2009-10-04 20:39:53 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gnome-globalmenu Short Description: Centralized menu bar for GNOME Owners: fengyu Branches: InitialCC: bernie -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 01:02:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 21:02:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526997] Review Request: pdf2svg - Small tool to convert PDF files into SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910050102.n9512spn002428@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526997 --- Comment #4 from Ben Boeckel 2009-10-04 21:02:51 EDT --- Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/pdf2svg/pdf2svg.spec SRPM URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/pdf2svg/pdf2svg-0.2.1-2.fc11.src.rpm Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 03:04:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 23:04:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512021] Review Request: zikula-module-advanced_polls - Advanced voting system for Zikula In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910050304.n9534kVZ030728@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512021 Nick Bebout changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Nick Bebout 2009-10-04 23:04:44 EDT --- OMG, I'm sorry it has taken so long to do this review. I had forgotten about it and just realized it when I clicked on "My Requests" in bugzilla. rpmlint is clean. [nb at nb SPECS]$ rpmlint zikula-module-advanced_polls.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [nb at nb SRPMS]$ rpmlint [nb at nb SRPMS]$ rpmlint zikula-module-advanced_polls-1.5.1-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [nb at nb noarch]$ rpmlint zikula-module-advanced_polls-1.5.1-1.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Licensing appears to be correct. Package appears to conform to rest of packaging and review guidelines. Please fix the URL in the spec file to be http://code.zikula.org/a*d*vancedpolls/downloads (without the * of course, they are just there for emphasis to show the missing d) With that minor correction, this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 03:15:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 23:15:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519483] Review Request: zikula-module-pagemaster - Creates pages with dynamic content like news, articles, etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910050315.n953FBpb002279@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519483 Nick Bebout changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Nick Bebout 2009-10-04 23:15:08 EDT --- rpmlint is clean [nb at nb SPECS]$ rpmlint zikula-module-pagemaster.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [nb at nb SRPMS]$ rpmlint zikula-module-pagemaster-0.3.1-3.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [nb at nb noarch]$ rpmlint zikula-module-pagemaster-0.3.1-3.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Licensing appears to be correct. Package appears to conform to rest of packaging and review guidelines. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 03:29:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 23:29:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525989] Review Request: rubygem-extlib - Support library for DataMapper and Merb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910050329.n953T3xl007062@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525989 --- Comment #7 from Matthew Kent 2009-10-04 23:28:56 EDT --- Removed the %% in the %changelog as requested. I've applied to the 'packager' group under the name 'mkent'. Let me know if I should be doing anything further. Thanks for your time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 03:48:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 23:48:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439627] Review Request: gluegen - Java/JNI glue code generator to call out to ANSI C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910050348.n953mspm024802@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439627 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |loganjerry at gmail.com --- Comment #28 from Jerry James 2009-10-04 23:48:48 EDT --- Is there interest in reopening this review bug now that cpptasks is available? If so, who is the submitter? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 06:29:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 02:29:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526181] Review Request: rubygem-mixlib-log - Ruby mixin for log functionality In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910050629.n956T7Rt021929@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526181 --- Comment #1 from Matthew Kent 2009-10-05 02:29:06 EDT --- Spec URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SPECS/rubygem-mixlib-log.spec SRPM URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SRPMS/rubygem-mixlib-log-1.0.3-2.fc12.src.rpm * Sun Oct 4 2009 Matthew Kent - 1.0.3-2 - Remove redundant path in doc package (#526181). - Use global over define (#526181). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 06:30:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 02:30:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526179] Review Request: rubygem-mixlib-cli - Simple ruby mixin for CLI interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910050630.n956UlYc022393@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526179 --- Comment #2 from Matthew Kent 2009-10-05 02:30:47 EDT --- Spec URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SPECS/rubygem-mixlib-cli.spec SRPM URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SRPMS/rubygem-mixlib-cli-1.0.4-2.fc12.src.rpm * Sun Oct 4 2009 Matthew Kent - 1.0.4-2 - Remove redundant path in doc package (#526179). - Use global over define (#526179). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 06:29:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 02:29:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527059] Review Request: earcandy - Sound level manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910050629.n956T7RC003036@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527059 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de --- Comment #2 from Martin Gieseking 2009-10-05 02:29:06 EDT --- A couple of comments: - the file pulseaudio/lib.py is licensed under BSD - you should replace the shebang of file ear_candy according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Script_Interpreters_%28draft%29 $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-11-x86_64/result/earcandy-0.5.1-1.fc11.* earcandy.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency pulseaudio-libs earcandy.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ear_candy/window/WindowWatcher.py 0644 /usr/bin/env earcandy.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ear_candy/Freedesktop.py 0644 /usr/bin/env earcandy.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ear_candy/ear_candy.py 0644 /usr/bin/env earcandy.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ear_candy/TrayIcon.py 0644 /usr/bin/env earcandy.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ear_candy/__init__.py 0644 /usr/bin/env 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 6 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 06:36:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 02:36:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526180] Review Request: rubygem-mixlib-config - Simple ruby config mixin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910050636.n956aUPQ004563@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526180 --- Comment #2 from Matthew Kent 2009-10-05 02:36:29 EDT --- Spec URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SPECS/rubygem-mixlib-config.spec SRPM URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SRPMS/rubygem-mixlib-config-1.0.12-1.fc12.src.rpm * Sun Oct 4 2009 Matthew Kent - 1.0.12-1 - Remove redundant path in doc package (#526180). - Use global over define (#526180). - New upstream version (#526180). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 07:20:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 03:20:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525989] Review Request: rubygem-extlib - Support library for DataMapper and Merb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910050720.n957KPuO032198@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525989 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-10-05 03:20:24 EDT --- Okay, now I am sponsoring you. Please follow "Join" wiki again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 07:57:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 03:57:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527059] Review Request: earcandy - Sound level manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910050757.n957v6oU007212@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527059 --- Comment #3 from Martin Gieseking 2009-10-05 03:57:05 EDT --- Even if the shebangs don't hurt, I would remove them anyway, e.g. with for f in `find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{python_sitelib}/ear_candy/ -name '*.py'`; do sed '/^#!\/usr\/bin\/env python/d' $f >$f.new touch -r $f $f.new mv $f.new $f done After doing so, there's still a remaining error. It can be ignored because package pulseaudio-libs is not picked up automatically. $ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/earcandy-0.5.1-1.fc11.noarch.rpm earcandy.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency pulseaudio-libs 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 08:06:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 04:06:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514150] Review Request: ibus-qt - The qt support tools for ibus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910050806.n958667o023784@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514150 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-05 04:06:04 EDT --- ibus-qt-1.2.0.20090822-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ibus-qt-1.2.0.20090822-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 08:20:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 04:20:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524896] Review Request: perl-Nagios-NSCA - Perl client for Nagios - NSCA. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910050820.n958KAU2027148@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524896 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | --- Comment #5 from Steve Traylen 2009-10-05 04:20:09 EDT --- I believe this to be no longer blocked by legal items. The licesnse is clear even if I missed it the first time. Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 08:40:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 04:40:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527059] Review Request: earcandy - Sound level manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910050840.n958eT8s017396@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527059 --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-10-05 04:40:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > A couple of comments: Thanks for them! > - the file pulseaudio/lib.py is licensed under BSD Fixed. > - you should replace the shebang of file ear_candy according to > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Script_Interpreters_%28draft%29 Fixed. > Even if the shebangs don't hurt, I would remove them anyway, e.g. with Done > After doing so, there's still a remaining error. It can be ignored because > package pulseaudio-libs is not picked up automatically. I do not think so; even if we dlopen libpulse, we still do assumptions about ABI, therefore I changed this to depend on specific ABI version and the rpmlint warning went away. SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/earcandy.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/earcandy-0.5.1-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 08:58:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 04:58:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492749] Review Request: kde-plasma-system_status_ng - A plasmoid to show your CPU and memory usage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910050858.n958wmrl002893@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492749 --- Comment #3 from Radek Novacek 2009-10-05 04:58:46 EDT --- I'm sorry, I missed notification of your previous post somehow. I think this plasmoid is now superseded by "system load viewer" applet which is part of kdeplasma-addons. Actually, "system_status_ng" is a port of the "system load viever" but according to changelog[1] change of appearance was backported to "system load viewer". [1]: http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php/System+Status?content=74891 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 10:05:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 06:05:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496133] Review Request: EMBOSS - The European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051005.n95A5Iwp016957@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496133 --- Comment #13 from Julian Sikorski 2009-10-05 06:05:15 EDT --- New release: Spec URL: http://belegdol.fedorapeople.org/EMBOSS.spec SRPM URL: http://belegdol.fedorapeople.org/EMBOSS-6.1.0-4.fc11.src.rpm Changes: * Mon Oct 05 2009 Julian Sikorski - 6.1.0-4 - Renamed conflicting binaries - Disabled jemboss * Tue Sep 29 2009 Julian Sikorski - 6.1.0-3 - Re-enabled system pcre usage - Initial attempt at using system-wide .jar files I have decided to yank jemboss for the time being. The shared-lib-calls-exit issue has been reported upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 10:55:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 06:55:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051055.n95AtHwR011648@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 --- Comment #4 from Pravin Satpute 2009-10-05 06:55:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > 2. please ask the lohit people what they think about this font. IMHO it is > highly likely one of the lohit fonts shares a common ancestry with gargi (and > in that case they should at least cross-alias each other) while comparing lohit devanagari script fonts (marathi, hindi, konkani, nepali, sindhi and kashmiri) There are little bit differences in lohit and Gargi i.e Gargi fonts shape are little more Bold compare to lohit, space of gargi is more than lohit there are also little bit differences in characters shape but overall as said above yes, they share common style(Sans) and ancestry. between how corss-alias will work? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 11:01:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 07:01:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503495] Review Request: sblim-cim-client - Java CIM Client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051101.n95B17JX028517@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503495 Vitezslav Crhonek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(vcrhonek at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #5 from Vitezslav Crhonek 2009-10-05 07:01:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Also missing requires for subpackages Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 11:06:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 07:06:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524992] Review Request: toppler - platform game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051106.n95B6llS029536@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524992 Andrea Musuruane changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |musuruan at gmail.com Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #5 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-10-05 07:06:46 EDT --- Toppler is a reimplementation of an '80s game called Nebulus in Europe and Tower Toppler in the US. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nebulus_%28computer_game%29 I don't think it is acceptable for Fedora. Blocking FE-LEGAL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 11:13:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 07:13:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051113.n95BDKXx015375@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-05 07:13:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > 2. please ask the lohit people what they think about this font. IMHO it is > > highly likely one of the lohit fonts shares a common ancestry with gargi (and > > in that case they should at least cross-alias each other) > > while comparing lohit devanagari script fonts (marathi, hindi, konkani, nepali, > sindhi and kashmiri) > > There are little bit differences in lohit and Gargi > i.e Gargi fonts shape are little more Bold compare to lohit, > space of gargi is more than lohit > there are also little bit differences in characters shape Ok, that means that they probably were not forked from a common root after all, so no need to cross-alias > but overall as said above yes, they share common style(Sans) and ancestry. > > between how corss-alias will work? cross-alias is when package B tells fontconfig : if app asks for font A, and it is not present, use my font B instead (and the reverse in package A). We do it for DejaVuLGC/DejaVu for example. But this kind of aliasing is only worth it when fonts are very close in style or metrics, typically when two projects took the same origin font and froked it in different ways -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 11:16:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 07:16:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051116.n95BG4M0031353@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-05 07:16:03 EDT --- Ankur, please use Sans as classification and I'll approve the package (if you fixed the other bits. Also, please make sure your fontconfig prio is > Lohit Devanagari so Lohit stays the default -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 11:23:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 07:23:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520637] Review Request: mdk - GNU MIX Development Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051123.n95BN06W017455@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520637 --- Comment #11 from Stjepan Gros 2009-10-05 07:22:57 EDT --- I tried to recompile, intall and run this package on CentOS and the gmixvm application come instantly. So, it seems that this is something specific to Fedora 11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 12:18:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 08:18:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508922] Review Request: system-config-selinux - GUI Code for system-config-selinux, polgen, and lockdown In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051218.n95CI9eV030329@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508922 --- Comment #16 from David Timms 2009-10-05 08:18:06 EDT --- Had a few cycles to look further at the package... Additional items to sort out: 15. source0: upstream src location doesn't seem to be correct (or I am doing something wrong): $ wget http://fedorahosted.org/released/s/y/system-config-selinux/system-config-selinux-0.2.tar.gz --2009-10-05 21:26:11-- http://fedorahosted.org/released/s/y/system-config-selinux/system-config-selinux-0.2.tar.gz Resolving fedorahosted.org... 66.135.52.17 Connecting to fedorahosted.org|66.135.52.17|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 301 Moved Permanently Location: https://fedorahosted.org/released/s/y/system-config-selinux/system-config-selinux-0.2.tar.gz [following] --2009-10-05 21:26:12-- https://fedorahosted.org/released/s/y/system-config-selinux/system-config-selinux-0.2.tar.gz Connecting to fedorahosted.org|66.135.52.17|:443... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found 2009-10-05 21:26:13 ERROR 404: Not Found. ===== or via web browser: Environment not found ===== this means I can't check the md5sum. 16. builds on f11 with the setools-libs-python from rawhide, OK. 17. rpmlint for .src.rpm: $ rpmlint /home/davidt/rpmbuild/SRPMS/system-config-selinux-0.2-3.fc11.src.rpm system-config-selinux.src: W: strange-permission selinux-polgengui.desktop 0755 system-config-selinux.src: W: strange-permission system-config-selinux.desktop 0755 system-config-selinux.src: W: strange-permission system-config-selinux.spec 0755 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. -> change those file's perms to 644 before building the srpm, should solve this. 18. rpmlint for built package: $ rpmlint /home/davidt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/system-config-selinux-0.2-3.fc11.noarch.rpm system-config-selinux.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog -0.2 ['0.2-3.fc11', '0.2-3'] -> as mentioned, need to have the release version matching the current spec release. system-config-selinux.noarch: E: file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/PolicyKit/policy/org.fedoraproject.selinux.policy -> I don't know whether in this case this actually makes sense, and would be allowed from the packaging perspective ? Is there another package you can point to that does this already ? system-config-selinux.noarch: W: no-documentation -> suggest creating at least a basic %doc piece describing basic usage of the two apps. system-config-selinux.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/dbus-1/system.d/org.fedoraproject.selinux.config.conf -> is that supposed to be adjustable by the user ie does it need %config, so that a user adjustment won't be overwritten during rpm -U ? system-config-selinux.noarch: W: empty-%post -> was there supposed to be something here, like reload of a service or similar ? 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings. 19. running application: -> I haven't installed to test. My machine is F11, and doesn't have selinux-policy >= 3.6.28-4. Would installing that version and running it cause issues ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 12:52:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 08:52:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526651] Review Request: xpaint - An X Window System image editing or paint program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051252.n95CqUxX021906@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526651 Andrea Musuruane changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |musuruan at gmail.com --- Comment #10 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-10-05 08:52:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Sounds not too good. I will have fedora-legal look over it. Sorry. Here it is stated that MIT license is compatible with both GPLv2 and GPLv3: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Good_Licenses This means that you can combine code released under the MIT license with code released under the GNU GPL in one larger program: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#WhatDoesCompatMean HTH, Andrea -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 12:59:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 08:59:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508922] Review Request: system-config-selinux - GUI Code for system-config-selinux, polgen, and lockdown In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051259.n95Cxl73007739@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508922 David Timms changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|dtimms at iinet.net.au |nobody at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #17 from David Timms 2009-10-05 08:59:46 EDT --- Looking at admin.fp.org suggests you have signed the cla, but are not yet in the packager group. This means that you will need a sponsor to oversee your packaging efforts. Unfortunately, I am not a sponsor, so that will have to be someone else. I'm removing myself from assignee. With regard to getting sponsored, sponsors want to see that you are following / understanding / improving upon your knowledge of packaging for Fedora. This typically involves performing some pre-reviews on other packages in the Review Request queue: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html Also, I think there is a way to mark this review request as need sponsor, so that potential sponsors may find it more easily. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 13:08:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 09:08:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481442] Review Request: clutter-perl - Perl bindings to the Clutter OpenGL canvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051308.n95D8Flk010088@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481442 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX Flag|needinfo?(allisson at gmail.co | |m) | --- Comment #3 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-10-05 09:08:14 EDT --- I drop this request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 13:11:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 09:11:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481442] Review Request: clutter-perl - Perl bindings to the Clutter OpenGL canvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051311.n95DBpXw027058@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481442 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 13:10:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 09:10:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483453] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Method - Method declaration with type checking In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051310.n95DAFWS026826@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483453 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(allisson at gmail.co | |m) | --- Comment #12 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-10-05 09:10:13 EDT --- I dropped this request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 13:11:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 09:11:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051311.n95DBhlc026995@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 Ankur Sinha changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(sanjay.ankur at gmai | |l.com) | --- Comment #7 from Ankur Sinha 2009-10-05 09:11:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Anyway, thanks a lot for adding a new font package in the review pipe > > Appart from the CSS classification I can't really help you with, here is some > review: > > 1. non LGC font ? please use a priority ? 65 as per fontconfig-priorities.txt > I'll check up the prio for the lohit font and fix this.. > 3. Licensing should be GPLv2+ Fixed. Will upload a new build in a day max. > > 4. (non blocking) please ask upstream to add the standard FSF GPL font > exception to their licensing Contacted upstream, no response yet :( > > 5. (non blocking) description could use some meat I copied whatever I got from the font homepage. There's no readme etc to get more from. > Anyway, this package is mostly fine, except for the classification problem. > > NEEDINFO till this is resolved (In reply to comment #6) > Ankur, please use Sans as classification and I'll approve the package (if you > fixed the other bits. Also, please make sure your fontconfig prio is > Lohit > Devanagari so Lohit stays the default Okay, ill fix up the fontconfig. I cant do much about some of the other bits (stated above) regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 13:16:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 09:16:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510743] Review Request: aranym - Atari Running on Any Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051316.n95DGV1V011928@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510743 David Timms changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dtimms at iinet.net.au --- Comment #22 from David Timms 2009-10-05 09:16:29 EDT --- Note that at this time, both the review spec and srpm are awol: Object not found! The requested URL was not found on this server. If you entered the URL manually please check your spelling and try again. If you think this is a server error, please contact the webmaster. Error 404 home.mnet-online.de Mon Oct 5 15:09:46 2009 Apache ==== Andreas, is that an accident, changed provider, or what ? If you don't see yourself as continuing to squash your package into shape, then you might consider closing the Review Request, otherwise we'll be needing updated URLs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 13:20:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 09:20:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526651] Review Request: xpaint - An X Window System image editing or paint program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051320.n95DKXY6029388@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526651 --- Comment #11 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-10-05 09:20:32 EDT --- I had a glance about the package. This is what else I noticed. * rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-11-i386/result/*.rpm xpaint.src:246: W: macro-in-%changelog config xpaint-devel.i586: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. There are two occurences of % that haven't been escaped in the %changelog. Please fix them. * Missing SMP flags. If it doesn't build with it, please add a comment (wiki: Packaging/Guidelines#parallelmake) * Duplicate BuildRequires: zlib-devel (by libpng-devel), libXpm-devel (by libXaw-devel), xorg-x11-proto-devel (by libXaw-devel), libSM-devel (by Xaw3d-devel), libXext-devel (by Xaw3d-devel) * Not end user documentation files installed: /usr/share/doc/xpaint-2.8.2/INSTALL Install instruction must not be installed /usr/share/doc/xpaint-2.8.2/Doc/CHANGES This changelog is so old that I really doubt it is useful /usr/share/doc/xpaint-2.8.2/Doc/Imakefile /usr/share/doc/xpaint-2.8.2/Doc/Makefile /usr/share/doc/xpaint-2.8.2/Doc/Makefile.bak 3 not documentation files. /usr/share/doc/xpaint-2.8.2/Doc/Operator.doc Developer file. /usr/share/doc/xpaint-2.8.2/Doc/sample.Xdefaults Maybe this is useful but because it will be the only useful file in this directory I think it will be better to move it to the parent dir. * Probably it is a good idea to include README.old among docs. Debian does this too. * There is no suggest in RPM therefore I think you should require gv, netpbm, lpr, xv, emacs Or otherwise make a README.Fedora file where you state what other program can be installed and why. "In the C Script Editor of XPaint, the External editor in the File menu will invoke . The gs package will be needed for PDF/PS reading, netpbm will be needed for external conversion, lpr for printing. " * In the desktop file: Categories=Application;Graphics; is not good. Application is not a registered category: http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html Please use: Graphics;2DGraphics;RasterGraphics; * Please use Mandriva description because it is more accurate (and based on author feedback too) http://svn.mandriva.com/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/packages/cooker/xpaint/current/SPECS/xpaint.spec?revision=452128&view=markup * Devel package is probably not needed and wrong. Xpaint uses some very strange C scripting. Without files you package in devel it cannot work. BTW, both Debian and Mandriva do not have a devel package. "The C script Editor can be used to write a script in language C, defining e.g. a programmable filter. This possibility will appeal to programmers who want to design their own filter routines. The "Compile" button compiles the C script as a shared ???.so library, and, if successful, links dynamically that library to Xpaint. Several examples will be found in the share/filters subdirectory. Notice that you can use this feature only if gcc has been installed on your system." * The following lines seem unneeded because both variables should be correctly set when invoking make. perl -p -i -e "s|CXXDEBUGFLAGS = .*|CXXDEBUGFLAGS = $RPM_OPT_FLAGS|" Makefile perl -p -i -e "s|CDEBUGFLAGS = .*|CDEBUGFLAGS = $RPM_OPT_FLAGS|" Makefile * You should probably patch Local.config to use "better" Fedora programs. This is what you can find there: EDITOR = emacs -fn 9x15 -cr green -ms red -bg lightyellow -fg black POSTSCRIPT_VIEWER = gv EXTERN_VIEWER = xv -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 13:44:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 09:44:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527231] New: Review Request: couchdb-glib - A glib api to access CouchDB servers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: couchdb-glib - A glib api to access CouchDB servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527231 Summary: Review Request: couchdb-glib - A glib api to access CouchDB servers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/couchdb-glib.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/couchdb-glib-0.5.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: CouchDB-GLib is a GLib-based API to access CouchDB servers (http://couchdb.apache.org), a replication/synchronization schema-free database of JSON documents, used in online services like Midgard. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 13:50:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 09:50:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526651] Review Request: xpaint - An X Window System image editing or paint program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051350.n95DoVTR004805@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526651 --- Comment #12 from Thomas Janssen 2009-10-05 09:50:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > Sounds not too good. I will have fedora-legal look over it. Sorry. > > Here it is stated that MIT license is compatible with both GPLv2 and GPLv3: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Good_Licenses > > This means that you can combine code released under the MIT license with code > released under the GNU GPL in one larger program: > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#WhatDoesCompatMean Yes, that's true. My point is "different parts with different licences, *including* MIT and GPL". Including MIT and GPL means there are others. As long as we dont know *what* licenses the others are, it's a no-go from my understanding. Upstream could be bothered to find out. On the plus side would be that it's included in Debian. But i have no idea what "debianized" means. He could ask the Debian developer to find out. Sorry. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 13:52:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 09:52:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507585] Review Request: python-psi - Shows real time system information in python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051352.n95Dqg2T005088@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507585 --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-10-05 09:52:41 EDT --- REVIEW: + rpmlint is silent [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/ppc/python-psi-* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ - The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. However I found two possible issues - it looks like this is a pre-release package, so it probably should be versioned as 0.3.1-0.%{release}.b1, however I'm not sure. The second possible issue is the capitalization of name - perhaps, it would be better to name it as python-PSI. - Please, use %global instead of %define in the very first line of spec. - Please, consider adding examples as %doc + Otherwise, the package meets the Packaging Guidelines. + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. + The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included in %doc. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ sha256sum PSI-0.3b1.1.tar.gz* 80a3c917f108e500e1c4381e81dfb4cb42cfa504a3bef69fc6c34144ced3b744 PSI-0.3b1.1.tar.gz 80a3c917f108e500e1c4381e81dfb4cb42cfa504a3bef69fc6c34144ced3b744 PSI-0.3b1.1.tar.gz.1 [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. + The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries. + The package owns all directories that it creates. + The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. + Permissions on files were set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + The package consistently uses macros. + The package contains code, or permissible content. + Everything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. + The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives. + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. Please, comment/fix issues, mentioned above, and I'll continue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 13:53:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 09:53:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527231] Review Request: couchdb-glib - A glib api to access CouchDB servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051353.n95DraT1021993@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527231 --- Comment #1 from Peter Robinson 2009-10-05 09:53:36 EDT --- koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1727893 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 13:53:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 09:53:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508922] Review Request: system-config-selinux - GUI Code for system-config-selinux, polgen, and lockdown In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051353.n95DrXsL021967@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508922 --- Comment #18 from Daniel Walsh 2009-10-05 09:53:32 EDT --- I can own this package and have Chris as a contributer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 13:57:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 09:57:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503495] Review Request: sblim-cim-client - Java CIM Client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051357.n95DvnFa023035@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503495 Roman Rakus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Roman Rakus 2009-10-05 09:57:47 EDT --- Now it's ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 13:59:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 09:59:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526651] Review Request: xpaint - An X Window System image editing or paint program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051359.n95DxnXQ007025@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526651 --- Comment #13 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-10-05 09:59:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > Yes, that's true. My point is "different parts with different licences, > *including* MIT and GPL". Including MIT and GPL means there are others. As long > as we dont know *what* licenses the others are, it's a no-go from my > understanding. Ops... sorry for my misunderstanding. > Upstream could be bothered to find out. On the plus side would be that it's > included in Debian. But i have no idea what "debianized" means. He could ask > the Debian developer to find out. +1. I agree that asking Debian package maintainer is the way to go. Debian is usually very careful about license issues. PS "Debianized" just means that someone has make a Debian .deb package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 14:05:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 10:05:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524147] Review Request: libnetdevname -Development environment for libnetdevname In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051405.n95E5UCt008945@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147 --- Comment #16 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-10-05 10:05:28 EDT --- Is there a reason to explicitly mention Provides: %{release_name} = %{version}-%{release} Is this checked in any other package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 14:10:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 10:10:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523199] Review Request: ncrack - high-speed network authentication cracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051410.n95EAa3e026123@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523199 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-05 10:10:33 EDT --- ncrack-0.01-0.6.ALPHA.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ncrack-0.01-0.6.ALPHA.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 14:13:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 10:13:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526263] Review Request: l7-protocols - Protocol definitions files for l7-filter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051413.n95EDP7A010773@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526263 --- Comment #1 from Marcus Moeller 2009-10-05 10:13:24 EDT --- rpmlint {SPECS,SRPMS,RPMS/noarch}/l7-protocols* l7-protocols.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/l7-protocols-20090528/testing/data/chikka-b-1 l7-protocols.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/l7-protocols-20090528/testing/data/chikka-b-3 l7-protocols.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/l7-protocols-20090528/testing/data/chikka-b-5 l7-protocols.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/l7-protocols-20090528/testing/data/chikka-b-7 l7-protocols.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/l7-protocols-20090528/testing/data/gnutella-connect-2 l7-protocols.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/l7-protocols-20090528/testing/data/http-wunderground-2 l7-protocols.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/l7-protocols-20090528/testing/data/http-wunderground-2 l7-protocols.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/l7-protocols-20090528/testing/data/http-wunderground-1 l7-protocols.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/l7-protocols-20090528/testing/data/ftp-2 l7-protocols.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/l7-protocols-20090528/testing/data/imap-4 l7-protocols.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/l7-protocols-20090528/testing/data/imap-6 l7-protocols.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/l7-protocols-20090528/testing/data/ftp-3 l7-protocols.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/l7-protocols-20090528/testing/data/http-digg-304-2 l7-protocols.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/l7-protocols-20090528/testing/data/chikka-b-2 l7-protocols.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/l7-protocols-20090528/testing/data/chikka-b-4 l7-protocols.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/l7-protocols-20090528/testing/data/chikka-a-2 l7-protocols.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/l7-protocols-20090528/testing/data/chikka-a-1 l7-protocols.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/l7-protocols-20090528/testing/data/chikka-a-3 l7-protocols.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/l7-protocols-20090528/example_traffic/msn_chat_and_file_transfer.txt l7-protocols.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/l7-protocols-20090528/testing/data/imap-5 l7-protocols.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/l7-protocols-20090528/testing/data/imap-2 l7-protocols.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/l7-protocols-20090528/testing/data/chikka-b-6 l7-protocols.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/l7-protocols-20090528/testing/data/ssdp-1 l7-protocols.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/l7-protocols-20090528/testing/data/imap-3 l7-protocols.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/l7-protocols-20090528/testing/data/gnutella-3 l7-protocols.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/l7-protocols-20090528/testing/data/gnutella-2 l7-protocols.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/l7-protocols-20090528/testing/data/gnutella-1 l7-protocols.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/l7-protocols-20090528/testing/data/ftp-4 l7-protocols.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/l7-protocols-20090528/testing/data/ftp-5 l7-protocols.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/l7-protocols-20090528/testing/data/ftp-1 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 30 warnings. Still got a few warnings concerning the file format. I have asked upstream if it's necessary to keep the tests in the original encoding. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 14:14:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 10:14:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526265] Review Request: l7-filter-userspace - Userspace version of l7-filter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051414.n95EEuJC027291@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526265 --- Comment #3 from Marcus Moeller 2009-10-05 10:14:55 EDT --- rpmlint {SPECS,SRPMS,RPMS/i586}/l7-filter-userspace* 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 14:24:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 10:24:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051424.n95EOHbT029687@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 --- Comment #48 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-10-05 10:24:12 EDT --- Adam, I suggest you to start another Review Request and close this as DUPLICATE. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 14:30:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 10:30:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492749] Review Request: kde-plasma-system_status_ng - A plasmoid to show your CPU and memory usage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051430.n95EURb4031420@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492749 --- Comment #4 from Ben Boeckel 2009-10-05 10:30:26 EDT --- Alright, so the review is probably not needed then. Could you close the bug then? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 14:35:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 10:35:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508922] Review Request: system-config-selinux - GUI Code for system-config-selinux, polgen, and lockdown In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051435.n95EZb9N000446@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508922 --- Comment #19 from Christopher Pardy 2009-10-05 10:35:35 EDT --- Dave, thanks for the comments, again. Yes I had "released" instead of "releases", I've fixed that, I removed the post section, fixed up the file permissions. Running rpmlint on the srpm and spec now returns no errors. running on the rpm returns warnings for the lack of docs and a false warning for the .config file being in /etc (freedesktop's fault not mine). Dan, if you want to take ownership and get this approved please go ahead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 14:37:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 10:37:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527241] New: Review Request: libvtemm - C++ bindings for vte Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libvtemm - C++ bindings for vte https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527241 Summary: Review Request: libvtemm - C++ bindings for vte Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: qdlacz at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://krnowak.fedorapeople.org/libvtemm.spec SRPM URL: http://krnowak.fedorapeople.org/libvtemm12-0.22.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: libvtemm provides a C++ interface to the VTE library. spec file is based on gtkmm.spec from http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/gtkmm24/devel/gtkmm.spec?revision=1.57 (this is last revision). package builds on koji on all architectures. rpmlint output on spec (libvtemm.spec): 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint output on srpm (libvtemm12-0.22.0-1.fc11.src.rpm): libvtemm12.src: E: invalid-spec-name 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. Same error is displayed while checking gtkmm24 srpm. Should package be named just libvtemm or spec renamed to libvtemm12 - its API version is 1.2. I left it in this state just to be consistent with other *mm packages (gtkmm24, glibmm24). rpmlint output on main package (libvtemm12-0.22.0-1.fc12.i686.rpm): 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint output on debuginfo package (libvtemm12-debuginfo-0.22.0-1.fc12.i686.rpm): 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint output on devel package (libvtemm12-devel-0.22.0-1.fc12.i686.rpm): libvtemm12-devel.i686: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. I put all not installed documentation (AUTHORS, NEWS, ChangeLog and such) in main package. API docs are in separate package. Maybe in later upstream release of libvtemm example source codes will be distributed, so they would be put into documentation of devel package. rpmlint output on docs package (libvtemm12-docs-0.22.0-1.fc12.i686.rpm): libvtemm12-docs.i686: E: devel-dependency libvtemm12-devel 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. Having API docs without devel package does not make much sense. I only was wondering if moving whole API documentation to gtk-doc directory is really necessary since recently mm packages provide their own .devhelp files, so html documentation could reside in docdir being still viewable by devhelp. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 14:39:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 10:39:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508922] Review Request: system-config-selinux - GUI Code for system-config-selinux, polgen, and lockdown In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051439.n95EdYlW001491@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508922 --- Comment #20 from Christopher Pardy 2009-10-05 10:39:32 EDT --- source rpm: http://fedorahosted.org/releases/s/y/system-config-selinux/system-config-selinux-0.2-5.fc11.src.rpm spec: http://fedorahosted.org/releases/s/y/system-config-selinux/system-config-selinux.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 14:41:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 10:41:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051441.n95Efkjf018235@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 Bug 468230 depends on bug 501576, which changed state. Bug 501576 Summary: Review Request: python-repoze-what-quickstart - A plugin enabling a simple authentication system with repoze.who and repoze.what https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501576 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA --- Comment #39 from Luke Macken 2009-10-05 10:41:41 EDT --- https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/2125#comment:9 Waiting on python-webtest to get tagged into the EL buildroots so I can build python-routes and python-weberror. Will then have to tag python-routes into buildroot to then build python-webhelpers. I also just build python-beaker and queued it up for testing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 14:43:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 10:43:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502614] Review Request: stfl - STFL implements a curses-based widget set for text terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051443.n95Eh7lv018474@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502614 --- Comment #31 from Thomas Janssen 2009-10-05 10:43:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #30) > Some random notes > > * Requires > - There is no needed that main package (stfl) should have > "Requires: pkgconfig". Fixed > - "Requires: python" is not needed for -python subpackage. > python(abi) dependency is automatically added by rpmbuild itself. Fixed > * About sed/patch > - Well, I am one of the person who uses sed command many times > in spec files, however as you already created Patch0/1, > I think it is better that you create Patch2 instead of > using sed (and also see below: at least one more patch > is needed) Fixed, but i converted the patches to sed. I like sed over patch (Byron did the patch stuff). > * Fedora specific compilation flags > - are not honored correctly (check the arguments passed to gcc in > build.log). For example: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > 57 gcc -pthread -I. -Wall -Os -ggdb -D_GNU_SOURCE -fPIC -c -o public.o > public.c > 58 gcc -pthread -I. -Wall -Os -ggdb -D_GNU_SOURCE -fPIC -c -o base.o > base.c > 59 gcc -pthread -I. -Wall -Os -ggdb -D_GNU_SOURCE -fPIC -c -o parser.o > parser.c > 60 gcc -pthread -I. -Wall -Os -ggdb -D_GNU_SOURCE -fPIC -c -o dump.o > dump.c > 61 gcc -pthread -I. -Wall -Os -ggdb -D_GNU_SOURCE -fPIC -c -o style.o > style.c > .... > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- No idea what to do here. If i sed the export CFLAGS from the Makefile and use ?RPM_OPT_FLAGS it fails miserably to build. If i add the optflags and dont sed nothing changes. > * pkgconfig file > - stfl.pc.in contains: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > 5 libdir=${exec_prefix}/lib > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This is wrong on 64 bits architecure because libdir should be > /usr/lib64 there. Fixed and patch sent to upstream. > * Duplicate documents > - You don't have to include the same documents in each subpackage > when other package which the package depends on (usually the main > package) already contains the documents. Removed. Of course i get a rpmlint warning about the missing docs for those packages. > * %exclude > - I prefer to remove unneeded files at %install instead of using > %exclude unless unavoided. I was able to rm -f one of the three. Two %exlude are still in since i honestly dont know exactly where they come from. I'm not a coder. They just come up as: Writing /home/thomas/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/stfl-0.21-4.fc10.x86_64/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/auto/stfl/.packlist Appending installation info to /home/thomas/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/stfl-0.21-4.fc10.x86_64/usr/lib64/perl5/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/perllocal.pod Nothing i was able to find out with checking the source code. But as i said, i'm not a coder. I can find *some* stuff and fix it. Not yet good enough to understand everything. So i leave it in. Thanks by the way for reviewing it. Spec URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/stfl.spec SRPM URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/stfl-0.21-4.fc10.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1728311 -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 14:48:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 10:48:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527231] Review Request: couchdb-glib - A glib api to access CouchDB servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051448.n95Emwvd020372@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527231 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |527245 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 14:45:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 10:45:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250904] Review Request: fuse-python - Python bindings for FUSE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051445.n95EjE7t019561@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250904 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-10-05 10:45:11 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: fuse-python New Branches: EL-5 Owners: peter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 14:48:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 10:48:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527245] New: Review Request: evolution-couchdb - An evolution backend to CouchDBs for PIM information Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: evolution-couchdb - An evolution backend to CouchDBs for PIM information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527245 Summary: Review Request: evolution-couchdb - An evolution backend to CouchDBs for PIM information Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 527231 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/evolution-couchdb.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/evolution-couchdb-0.3.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: CouchDB-GLib is a GLib-based API to access CouchDB servers (http://couchdb.apache.org), a replication/synchronization schema-free database of JSON documents, used in online services like Midgard. This is a plugin to evolution to allow access to PIM information stored in a CouchDB. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 14:46:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 10:46:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051446.n95Ekcjk003917@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 --- Comment #49 from Adam Williamson 2009-10-05 10:46:36 EDT --- peter: um. why? there doesn't appear to be any process problem with handling it here, that I can see? -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 14:54:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 10:54:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051454.n95EsBP2005893@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 --- Comment #50 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-10-05 10:54:10 EDT --- I thought that there will be some issues with rights for setting/unsetting fedora-flags. However, I'm not sure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 14:54:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 10:54:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526179] Review Request: rubygem-mixlib-cli - Simple ruby mixin for CLI interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051454.n95EsmTK005986@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526179 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-10-05 10:54:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > SRPM URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SRPMS/rubygem-mixlib-cli-1.0.4-2.fc12.src.rpm Seems 404... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 14:52:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 10:52:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503495] Review Request: sblim-cim-client - Java CIM Client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051452.n95Eqk9i005567@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503495 Vitezslav Crhonek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Vitezslav Crhonek 2009-10-05 10:52:44 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sblim-cim-client Short Description: The purpose of this package is to provide a CIM Client Class Library for Java applications. Owners: vcrhonek Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 14:57:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 10:57:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525988] Review Request: rubygem-systemu - Multi-platform command execution and capture In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051457.n95EvPvu007116@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525988 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-10-05 10:57:24 EDT --- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 14:59:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 10:59:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527250] New: Review Request: dumpet - A tool to dump and debug bootable CD images Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dumpet - A tool to dump and debug bootable CD images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527250 Summary: Review Request: dumpet - A tool to dump and debug bootable CD images Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://pjones.fedorapeople.org/dumpet/dumpet.spec SRPM URL: http://pjones.fedorapeople.org/dumpet/dumpet-1.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: DumpET is a utility to aid in the debugging of bootable CD-ROM images. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 15:00:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 11:00:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527250] Review Request: dumpet - A tool to dump and debug bootable CD images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051500.n95F0gY1023949@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527250 Josh Boyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jwboyer at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jwboyer at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 15:05:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 11:05:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051505.n95F5Bt8009373@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 --- Comment #51 from Adam Williamson 2009-10-05 11:05:09 EDT --- I have supah cow powahz in Bugzilla, I can set any flags I like ;) -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 15:01:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 11:01:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527250] Review Request: dumpet - A tool to dump and debug bootable CD images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051501.n95F1QZL008452@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527250 Josh Boyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 15:10:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 11:10:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051510.n95FAKC2026827@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #52 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-10-05 11:10:18 EDT --- Heh, we'll see. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 15:15:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 11:15:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527250] Review Request: dumpet - A tool to dump and debug bootable CD images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051515.n95FFUoo011766@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527250 Josh Boyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Josh Boyer 2009-10-05 11:15:29 EDT --- * MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [jwboyer at hansolo rpm]$ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/dumpet-1.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [jwboyer at hansolo rpm]$ rpmlint SRPMS/dumpet-1.1-1.fc11.src.rpm dumpet.src: W: no-buildroot-tag dumpet.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 9) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. [jwboyer at hansolo rpm]$ rpmlint SPECS/dumpet.spec SPECS/dumpet.spec: W: no-buildroot-tag SPECS/dumpet.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 9) 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. [jwboyer at hansolo rpm]$ * MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines [OK] * MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [OK] * MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines [OK] * MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines [OK] * MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [OK] * MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[OK] * MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [OK] * MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [OK] * MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [OK] [jwboyer at hansolo SOURCES]$ sha1sum dumpet-1.1.tar.bz2.srpm b43e4ab6cb1390079b12b796ab10252cc86b52db dumpet-1.1.tar.bz2.srpm [jwboyer at hansolo SOURCES]$ sha1sum dumpet-1.1.tar.bz2 b43e4ab6cb1390079b12b796ab10252cc86b52db dumpet-1.1.tar.bz2 [jwboyer at hansolo SOURCES]$ * MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [OK, built on x86_64] [jwboyer at hansolo rpm]$ rpmbuild -ba SPECS/dumpet.spec Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.w8psgg + umask 022 + cd /home/jwboyer/rpm/BUILD + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + cd /home/jwboyer/rpm/BUILD + rm -rf dumpet-1.1 + /usr/bin/bzip2 -dc /home/jwboyer/rpm/SOURCES/dumpet-1.1.tar.bz2 + /bin/tar -xf - + STATUS=0 + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' + cd dumpet-1.1 + /bin/chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w . + exit 0 Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.HH87ii + umask 022 + cd /home/jwboyer/rpm/BUILD + cd dumpet-1.1 + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + make -j2 'CFLAGS=-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic' cc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -c -o dumpet.o dumpet.c dumpet.c: In function 'dumpBootImage': dumpet.c:227: warning: ignoring return value of 'asprintf', declared with attribute warn_unused_result cc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -o dumpet dumpet.o -lpopt + exit 0 Executing(%install): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.alsxes + umask 022 + cd /home/jwboyer/rpm/BUILD + '[' /home/jwboyer/rpm/BUILDROOT/dumpet-1.1-1.fc11.x86_64 '!=' / ']' + rm -rf /home/jwboyer/rpm/BUILDROOT/dumpet-1.1-1.fc11.x86_64 ++ dirname /home/jwboyer/rpm/BUILDROOT/dumpet-1.1-1.fc11.x86_64 + mkdir -p /home/jwboyer/rpm/BUILDROOT + mkdir /home/jwboyer/rpm/BUILDROOT/dumpet-1.1-1.fc11.x86_64 + cd dumpet-1.1 + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + rm -rf /home/jwboyer/rpm/BUILDROOT/dumpet-1.1-1.fc11.x86_64 + mkdir -p /home/jwboyer/rpm/BUILDROOT/dumpet-1.1-1.fc11.x86_64//usr/bin + make DESTDIR=/home/jwboyer/rpm/BUILDROOT/dumpet-1.1-1.fc11.x86_64 install install -m 0755 dumpet /home/jwboyer/rpm/BUILDROOT/dumpet-1.1-1.fc11.x86_64/usr/bin/dumpet + /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh --strict-build-id /home/jwboyer/rpm/BUILD/dumpet-1.1 extracting debug info from /home/jwboyer/rpm/BUILDROOT/dumpet-1.1-1.fc11.x86_64/usr/bin/dumpet 47 blocks + /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-compress + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-static-archive /usr/bin/strip + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-comment-note /usr/bin/strip /usr/bin/objdump + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-python-bytecompile + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-python-hardlink + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-java-repack-jars Processing files: dumpet-1.1-1.fc11.x86_64 Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.xZVG2E + umask 022 + cd /home/jwboyer/rpm/BUILD + cd dumpet-1.1 + DOCDIR=/home/jwboyer/rpm/BUILDROOT/dumpet-1.1-1.fc11.x86_64/usr/share/doc/dumpet-1.1 + export DOCDIR + rm -rf /home/jwboyer/rpm/BUILDROOT/dumpet-1.1-1.fc11.x86_64/usr/share/doc/dumpet-1.1 + /bin/mkdir -p /home/jwboyer/rpm/BUILDROOT/dumpet-1.1-1.fc11.x86_64/usr/share/doc/dumpet-1.1 + cp -pr README TODO COPYING /home/jwboyer/rpm/BUILDROOT/dumpet-1.1-1.fc11.x86_64/usr/share/doc/dumpet-1.1 + exit 0 Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 Requires: libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.8)(64bit) libpopt.so.0()(64bit) libpopt.so.0(LIBPOPT_0)(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) Processing files: dumpet-debuginfo-1.1-1.fc11.x86_64 Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /home/jwboyer/rpm/BUILDROOT/dumpet-1.1-1.fc11.x86_64 Wrote: /home/jwboyer/rpm/SRPMS/dumpet-1.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Wrote: /home/jwboyer/rpm/RPMS/x86_64/dumpet-1.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm Wrote: /home/jwboyer/rpm/RPMS/x86_64/dumpet-debuginfo-1.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm Executing(%clean): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.V16tGw + umask 022 + cd /home/jwboyer/rpm/BUILD + cd dumpet-1.1 + rm -rf /home/jwboyer/rpm/BUILDROOT/dumpet-1.1-1.fc11.x86_64 + exit 0 [jwboyer at hansolo rpm]$ * MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. [OK] * MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.[OK] * MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [OK] * MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [OK] * MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [OK] * MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [OK] * MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [OK] * MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [OK] * MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [OK] * MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [OK] * MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [OK] Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 15:20:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 11:20:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527250] Review Request: dumpet - A tool to dump and debug bootable CD images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051520.n95FK8fS029580@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527250 Peter Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 15:19:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 11:19:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527250] Review Request: dumpet - A tool to dump and debug bootable CD images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051519.n95FJa8w029184@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527250 --- Comment #2 from Peter Jones 2009-10-05 11:19:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dumpet Short Description: DumpET is a utility to aid in the debugging of bootable CD-ROM images. Owners: pjones Branches: F-12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 15:46:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 11:46:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525192] Review Request: python-mpmath - A pure Python library for multiprecision floating-point arithmetic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051546.n95Fk6Xi003870@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525192 Michael J Gruber changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mjg at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #4 from Michael J Gruber 2009-10-05 11:46:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Scratch koji build at > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1701929 What's happening with mpmath? Are you planning to add another build? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 15:49:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 11:49:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524147] Review Request: libnetdevname -Development environment for libnetdevname In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051549.n95FnYBo019575@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147 --- Comment #17 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-10-05 11:49:33 EDT --- Review: #user1 rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/libnetdevname-0.0.3-1.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. #user1 rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/libnetdevname-0.0.3-1.i386.rpm libnetdevname.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.0.3 ['0.0.3-1', '0.0.3-1'] libnetdevname.i386: E: useless-provides libnetdevname libnetdevname.i386: W: self-obsoletion libnetdevname <= 0.0.3-1 obsoletes libnetdevname = 0.0.3-1 libnetdevname.i386: W: self-obsoletion libnetdevname <= 0.0.3-1 obsoletes libnetdevname = 0.0.3-1 libnetdevname.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libnetdevname.so.0.0.3 exit at GLIBC_2.0 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings. #user1 rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/libnetdevname-devel-0.0.3-1.i386.rpm libnetdevname-devel.i386: E: useless-provides libnetdevname-devel libnetdevname-devel.i386: W: self-obsoletion libnetdevname-devel <= 0.0.3-1 obsoletes libnetdevname-devel = 0.0.3-1 libnetdevname-devel.i386: W: self-obsoletion libnetdevname-devel <= 0.0.3-1 obsoletes libnetdevname-devel = 0.0.3-1 libnetdevname-devel.i386: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings. #user1 rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/libnetdevname-debuginfo-0.0.3-1.i386.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Few more: 1) "INSTALL -p" in the spec file is not required, since the Makefile.in already adds the "-p" flag 2) No need to explicitly mention gcc in BuildRequires. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 3) Since gcc package requires libgcc, there is no need to mention libgcc as well. (can be verified with rpm -qi --requires gcc) To fix the rpmlint errors: 1) Do not use <= in obsoletes, use < only. 2) No need to explicitly mention %Provides: %{name}= %{version}-%{release}. This is automatically captured. can be verified with rpm -qpi --provides rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/libnetdevname-0.0.3-1.i386.rpm 3) the above two comments apply for devel package as well. 4) Make sure to add release number also in the changelog. 5) rpmlint -I shared-lib-calls-exit shared-lib-calls-exit: This library package calls exit() or _exit(), probably in a non-fork() context. Doing so from a library is strongly discouraged - when a library function calls exit(), it prevents the calling program from handling the error, reporting it to the user, closing files properly, and cleaning up any state that the program has. It is preferred for the library to return an actual error code and let the calling program decide how to handle the situation. Thank you Praveen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 15:51:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 11:51:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517488] Review Request: vhostmd - Virtualization host metrics daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051551.n95Fpv4E020461@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517488 Russell Doty changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdoty at redhat.com Blocks| |511263(SAP5.5) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 16:05:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 12:05:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525192] Review Request: python-mpmath - A pure Python library for multiprecision floating-point arithmetic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051605.n95G50fS023157@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525192 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-10-05 12:05:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > Scratch koji build at > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1701929 > > What's happening with mpmath? Are you planning to add another build? Uhh.. what? I'm waiting for someone to review this package, so I can import it in Fedora and build it for real. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 16:21:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 12:21:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527231] Review Request: couchdb-glib - A glib api to access CouchDB servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051621.n95GL2Ee026550@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527231 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-10-05 12:21:01 EDT --- I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 16:22:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 12:22:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526444] Review Request: MyGUI - Fast, simple and flexible GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051622.n95GMcoe026907@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526444 --- Comment #8 from Alexey Torkhov 2009-10-05 12:22:36 EDT --- Some comments, most are cosmetic :) (In reply to comment #2) > I'm targeting that specific revision (with minor changes ahead of the released > 2.2.2) because its a dependency of http://dungeonhack.sourceforge.net, an ogre > game i plan to package in the near future. 2.2.3 was released some time ago, I think best would be package either latest release or latest revision from svn. > Boost license used in MyGUI_Any.h > License: LGPLv3+ and Boost They ?wrapped? boost license in this header with LGPL, so no need to specify boost license separately. > Summary: Mygui demo executables and media May be, call it ?MyGUI? in summary? > # Strip away unittests media and a code sample in media dir > rm -rf %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/MYGUI/Media/Tools/LayoutEditor/CodeTemplates/ Are you sure that this is not used in generating layout? I can't check it right now. > %package devel > Requires: pkgconfig, ois-devel May be require ogre-devel too? > %doc Readme.txt This is some compilation instructions - no need to include. May be split devel documentation in devel-doc subpackage? And, please, split changelog entries by empty line. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 16:36:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 12:36:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520808] Review Request: slf4j - Simple Logging Facade for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051636.n95Gav9w029495@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520808 Orion Poplawski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orion at cora.nwra.com --- Comment #10 from Orion Poplawski 2009-10-05 12:36:55 EDT --- Any reason not to build this for F-11? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 16:54:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 12:54:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520808] Review Request: slf4j - Simple Logging Facade for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051654.n95GsgTS018310@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520808 --- Comment #11 from Andrew Overholt 2009-10-05 12:54:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Any reason not to build this for F-11? It requires maven >= that which is in F-11. A back-port of all the maven packages and dependencies would be a lot of work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 17:51:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 13:51:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513896] Review Request: pcp - performance monitoring and collection service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051751.n95HpqDI012816@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513896 --- Comment #22 from Jarod Wilson 2009-10-05 13:51:48 EDT --- Finally getting back to looking at this again, sorry for the delay. Formal review check list from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines: MUST items- * rpmlint output: still rather noisy, but has all been explained acceptably * package naming: ok * spec file name: ok * package meets guidelines: almost... Just noticed the use of %makeinstall, which I don't think we've touched on yet... Its use is HIGHLY frowned upon... * license: ok * license in spec matches: ok * license doc included: ok * spec in english: ok * spec legible: ok * sources match upstream: ok $ md5sum pcp-3.0.0-5.src.tar.gz* de5b6be8fcd08985756a01fc276774d7 pcp-3.0.0-5.src.tar.gz de5b6be8fcd08985756a01fc276774d7 pcp-3.0.0-5.src.tar.gz.1 * compiles and packages correctly: ok (F12/x86_64 smoke-tested) * ExcludeArch where necessary: n/a * ExcludeArch for build failure filed and noted: n/a * sane BuildRequires: ok * locales handled properly: n/a * ldconfig called where appropriate: ok * no bundled copies of system libs: ok * relocatable justification: n/a * owns created directories: ok * files not listed 2x: ok * permissions: ok * consistent macros: ok * permissible code: ok * documentation: ok * header files in -devel: ok (with exceptions as noted earlier in review) * static libs: n/a * pkgconfig bits: n/a * versioned libs properly split up: ok * devel packages requires its base package: ok * no libtool archives: ok * gui .desktop file: n/a * no owning others files: ok * %install starts w/rm -rf BR: ok * %files all UTF-8: ok SHOULD items- * source needs license text: n/a * spec translations, if available: n/a * package builds in mock: ok * builds on all supported arches: untested * package functions as expected: presumed * sane scriptlets: ok * fully version requires for sub-packages: ok and/or n/a * pkgconfig stuff: n/a * file-based deps: n/a Just the %makeinstall bit that needs fixing up, and I think we're all set. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Why_the_.25makeinstall_macro_should_not_be_used -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 18:35:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 14:35:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502614] Review Request: stfl - STFL implements a curses-based widget set for text terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051835.n95IZPml006528@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502614 --- Comment #32 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-10-05 14:35:23 EDT --- For -4: * About sed/patch - Well, I would say that sed lines used in your spec file are very difficult to read. If no better usage of sed usage is found, please create patches again. ( Again I frequently use sed, however even for me patches seems preferable for this case ) * cflags (In reply to comment #31) > No idea what to do here. If i sed the export CFLAGS from the Makefile and use > ?RPM_OPT_FLAGS it fails miserably to build. If i add the optflags and dont sed > nothing changes. - Actually it is incorrect. You should add %optflags to CFLAGS, not replace CFLAGS completely. For this Makefile, try below: --------------------------------------------------- export CFLAGS="%{optflags}" make prefix=%{_prefix} libdir=%{_lib} --------------------------------------------------- * %exclude -> rm > > - I prefer to remove unneeded files at %install instead of using > > %exclude unless unavoided. > > I was able to rm -f one of the three. Two %exlude are still in since i honestly > dont know exactly where they come from. I'm not a coder. They just come up as: - This is normal when installing perl modules (i.e. these files are created automatically), and you can just remove these files at the end of %install ( like "rm -f %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/libstfl.a" ) * Documents - Empty %doc is not needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 18:40:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 14:40:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459548] Review Request: php-gtk - GTK PHP extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051840.n95IeuAd007785@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459548 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(metal3d at gmail.com | |) --- Comment #29 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-10-05 14:40:52 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 19:14:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 15:14:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526180] Review Request: rubygem-mixlib-config - Simple ruby config mixin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051914.n95JEOh6014990@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526180 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-10-05 15:14:23 EDT --- Some notes: * Unneeded macros - Please remove unneeeded (unused) macros. * SourceURL - Please specify full URL for Source0. ! Redundant Requires - "Requires: ruby(rubygems)" is redundant for -doc subpackage because main package already has it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 20:00:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 16:00:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910052000.n95K0XdV007306@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #31 from Tim Fenn 2009-10-05 16:00:27 EDT --- Finally got some action from upstream. Most of the rpmlint issues have been resolved except for some unused-direct-shlib-dependencies and shared-lib-calls-exit issues. I've also fixed the startup script so the python modules are resolved properly. Spec URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/coot.spec SRPM URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/coot-0.6-3.20091005svn2400.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 20:01:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 16:01:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497622] Review Request: apbs - adaptive poisson boltzmann solver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910052001.n95K1o74024626@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622 --- Comment #41 from Tim Fenn 2009-10-05 16:01:47 EDT --- builds for F-11 and devel done, but EL-5 fails due to arpack not being available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 20:12:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 16:12:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520637] Review Request: mdk - GNU MIX Development Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910052012.n95KC3AY010215@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520637 --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-10-05 16:12:01 EDT --- For me this occurs when Assistive technology is enabled on GNOME session. Would you check it? (please check "System" -> "Preferences" -> "Assistive Technologies") -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 20:39:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 16:39:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527250] Review Request: dumpet - A tool to dump and debug bootable CD images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910052039.n95Kd4hx032078@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527250 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-05 16:39:02 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 20:59:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 16:59:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526204] Review Request: ucs-fixed-fonts selected set of bitmap fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910052059.n95Kx6uu004550@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526204 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag|fedora-review? |needinfo?(psatpute at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-05 16:59:04 EDT --- Full review: 1. Please add a fontconfig file (fixed is monospace, that's easy) 2. Please correct the licensing tag, I doubt fixed uses 3 different licenses 3. Please remove Requires(pre): fontconfig BuildRequires: xorg-x11-font-utils (or tell me where they are used) 4. Please add a %build section (even if empty). rpm does not like specs without %build 5. Please put the URL in URL not in description (and limit your description line lenght to 80c) 6. Please compress the resulting pcf files 7. Why do you ship the Lucida license file ? 8. It would be neat to edit the readme so it does not references fonts not present in the rpm 9. it seems fontconfig reads the family name in the fonts as "MiscFixed". Please rename yout package ucs-miscfixed-fonts And that should be all -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 20:59:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 16:59:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526204] Review Request: ucs-fixed-fonts selected set of bitmap fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910052059.n95KxJUW020501@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526204 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 20:59:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 16:59:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525831] Review Request: vim-perl-tt2 - Syntax highlighting for the Template-Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910052059.n95KxFgt020475@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525831 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |emmanuel.seyman at club-intern | |et.fr Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #6 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-10-05 16:59:14 EDT --- Let's see what this is about. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 21:08:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 17:08:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508922] Review Request: system-config-selinux - GUI Code for system-config-selinux, polgen, and lockdown In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910052108.n95L8mrT007242@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508922 --- Comment #21 from David Timms 2009-10-05 17:08:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > I can own this package and have Chris as a contributer. OK. Any ideas about whether testing this on f11 (by updating to rawhide / f12 -policy) would be a bad thing (before I kill my machine) ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 21:12:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 17:12:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526058] Review Request: sil-scheherazade-fonts - SIL Scheherazade Arabic Script Unicode Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910052112.n95LCV0Y023814@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526058 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |hedayat at grad.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-05 17:12:29 EDT --- This one is golden ??? APPROVED ??? You can now continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a I hope the process was pleasant, and that it will inspire you to package a other fonts for Fedora. Please do not hesitate to suggest improvements to our organisation on the fonts mailing list. Thank you for your contribution to our font package pool. ? REASSIGNING -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 21:20:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 17:20:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527306] New: Review Request: jericho-html - Jericho HTML Parser Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jericho-html - Jericho HTML Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527306 Summary: Review Request: jericho-html - Jericho HTML Parser Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: orion at cora.nwra.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/jericho-html.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/jericho-html-3.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Jericho HTML Parser is a java library allowing analysis and manipulation of parts of an HTML document, including server-side tags, while reproducing verbatim any unrecognised or invalid HTML. It also provides high-level HTML form manipulation functions. It is an open source library released under both the Eclipse Public License (EPL) and GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL). You are therefore free to use it in commercial applications subject to the terms detailed in either one of these licence documents. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 21:26:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 17:26:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519483] Review Request: zikula-module-pagemaster - Creates pages with dynamic content like news, articles, etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910052126.n95LQoEt027146@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519483 Mel Chua changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Mel Chua 2009-10-05 17:26:49 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: zikula-module-pagemaster Short Description: Creates pages with dynamic content like news, articles, etc Owners: mchua Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: toshio sundaram -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 21:34:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 17:34:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526607] Review Request: openfontlibrary-smonohand-font - A handwritten monospace font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910052134.n95LYkqJ013176@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526607 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |michael.silvanus at gmail.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-05 17:34:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > OFLB's web contact form is currently broken, so I'm not sure whether the > message I sent actually got through or not. I'm checking on IRC to see if > anyone could fix it. The font metadata says the author is stefan.mueller at fgan.de Anyway: you've fixed what you could, the rest depends on upstream, so I'll approve the package now. Please continue to ping upstream, and update this package when he answers. ??? APPROVED ??? You can now continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a I hope the process was pleasant, and that it will inspire you to package other fonts for Fedora. Please do not hesitate to suggest improvements to our organisation on the fonts mailing list. Thank you for your contribution to our font package pool. ? REASSIGNING -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 21:42:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 17:42:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519483] Review Request: zikula-module-pagemaster - Creates pages with dynamic content like news, articles, etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910052142.n95Lg3xJ015733@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519483 --- Comment #14 from Mel Chua 2009-10-05 17:42:02 EDT --- (sorry, please ignore comment #13 and use this CVS request instead) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: zikula-module-pagemaster Short Description: Creates pages with dynamic content like news, articles, etc Owners: mchua toshio sundaram Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 22:00:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 18:00:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527308] New: Review Request: xmltooling - XML signing and encrytion library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xmltooling - XML signing and encrytion library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527308 Summary: Review Request: xmltooling - XML signing and encrytion library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve.traylen at cern.ch QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/xmltooling/xmltooling.spec SRPM URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/xmltooling/xmltooling-1.2.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The XMLTooling library contains generic XML parsing and processing classes based on the Xerces-C DOM. It adds more powerful facilities for declaring element- and type-specific API and implementation classes to add value around the DOM, as well as signing and encryption support. rpmlint: $ rpmlint SPECS/xmltooling.spec \ RPMS/noarch/xmltooling-doc-1.2.2-1.fc11.noarch.rpm \ RPMS/x86_64/xmltooling-* SRPMS/xmltooling-1.2.2-1.el5.src.rpm xmltooling-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. devel has no docs since in the doc sub-package. Koji fc12 & fc13 successful: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1729449 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1729452 (for information an .el5 build is pending on log4cpp leaving testing) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 22:04:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 18:04:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527308] Review Request: xmltooling - XML signing and encrytion library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910052204.n95M4Ipi024502@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527308 --- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen 2009-10-05 18:04:17 EDT --- There is a erroneous empty: /usr/share/doc/xmltooling-1.2.2 in xmltooling-doc-1.2.2-1 I'll remove at the next iteration. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 22:05:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 18:05:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466047] Review Request: tcl-mysqltcl - MySQL interface for Tcl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910052205.n95M5JAE025224@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466047 Rene Ploetz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #31 from Rene Ploetz 2009-10-05 18:05:14 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tcl-mysqltcl Short Description: MySQL interface for Tcl Owners: renep Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: renep -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 22:15:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 18:15:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193894] Review Request: ant-contrib - A collection of tasks for Ant In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910052215.n95MFqhe029378@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=193894 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #19 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-10-05 18:15:47 EDT --- Can you build this for EL-5? I need it to update jmol to the 11.8 series. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 22:15:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 18:15:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465511] Review Request: itext - A Free Java-PDF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910052215.n95MFt05029425@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465511 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #16 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-10-05 18:15:48 EDT --- Can you build this for EL-5? I need it to update jmol to the 11.8 series. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 22:34:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 18:34:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910052234.n95MYNFY003751@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #74 from Christian Krause 2009-10-05 18:34:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #73) > Thanks, fixed. Ok, good. > And one small question - should be -javawievers sub-package noarch? > > http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/x11vnc/x11vnc-0.9.8-13.fc11.src.rpm Good point. Certainly it would be better since the sub-package only contains arch-independent files. There is no hard requirement for this, but if you would still change it, it would be great! ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 22:36:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 18:36:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524896] Review Request: perl-Nagios-NSCA - Perl client for Nagios - NSCA. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910052236.n95MajTc018887@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524896 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xavier at bachelot.org --- Comment #6 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-10-05 18:36:44 EDT --- some quick notes : - the %doc section is empty, you can remove it - /usr/bin/nsca might be confusing as there is already a send_nsca provided in /usr/sbin with the nsca-client package. - other than that, the package looks good. I have no time to write a full review now, but I will do it if no one beats me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 22:59:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 18:59:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527316] New: Review Request: python-oauth - Library for OAuth version 1.0a Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-oauth - Library for OAuth version 1.0a https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527316 Summary: Review Request: python-oauth - Library for OAuth version 1.0a Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sebastian at when.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/python-oauth.spec SRPM URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/python-oauth-1.0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Koji Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1729587 [sebastian at localhost SRPMS]$ rpmlint -vi python-oauth-1.0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm python-oauth.src: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [sebastian at localhost noarch]$ rpmlint -vi python-oauth-1.0.1-1.fc11.noarch.rpm python-oauth.noarch: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. This is the first requirement in an effort to get TypePad Motion packaged for Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 23:02:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 19:02:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527317] New: Review Request: django-flash - A Django extension to provide support for Rails-like flash Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: django-flash - A Django extension to provide support for Rails-like flash https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527317 Summary: Review Request: django-flash - A Django extension to provide support for Rails-like flash Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sebastian at when.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/django-flash.spec SRPM URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/django-flash-1.6.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Koji Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1729589 [sebastian at localhost SRPMS]$ rpmlint -vi django-flash-1.6.2-1.fc11.src.rpm django-flash.src: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [sebastian at localhost noarch]$ rpmlint -vi django-flash-1.6.2-1.fc11.noarch.rpm django-flash.noarch: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. This is the second requirement in an effort to get TypePad Motion packaged for Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 23:07:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 19:07:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527316] Review Request: python-oauth - Library for OAuth version 1.0a In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910052307.n95N7xGF015014@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527316 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |527319 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 23:08:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 19:08:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527317] Review Request: django-flash - A Django extension to provide support for Rails-like flash In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910052308.n95N802Z015036@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527317 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |527319 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 23:07:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 19:07:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527319] Review Request: typepad-motion - A microblogging application for building online communities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910052307.n95N7wFW014987@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527319 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |527316, 527317 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 23:04:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 19:04:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525831] Review Request: vim-perl-tt2 - Syntax highlighting for the Template-Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910052304.n95N4sVM014220@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525831 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-10-05 19:04:52 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (dist-f13 i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1729479 + rpmlint issues a warning for the RPMS, is silent for the SRPM vim-perl-tt2.noarch: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. + source files match upstream url 3e70d82171456550855a8b9612226c11 tt2.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is not included in package. + %doc is not present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does not create any directories. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application Looks good to me (shame about the lack of documentation, though). APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 23:07:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 19:07:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472792] Review Request: jempbox - A Java library that implements Adobe's XMP specification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910052307.n95N7fKf028982@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472792 Orion Poplawski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orion at cora.nwra.com Flag| |needinfo?(mefoster at gmail.co | |m) --- Comment #6 from Orion Poplawski 2009-10-05 19:07:39 EDT --- I'm working on packaging up jempbox 0.8.0 from Apache Incubating: http://incubator.apache.org/pdfbox/ Are you still wanting to proceed with this review or shall I close and submit my own? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 23:07:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 19:07:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527319] New: Review Request: typepad-motion - A microblogging application for building online communities Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: typepad-motion - A microblogging application for building online communities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527319 Summary: Review Request: typepad-motion - A microblogging application for building online communities Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sebastian at when.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/typepad-motion.spec SRPM URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/typepad-motion-1.0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Koji Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1729590 [sebastian at localhost SRPMS]$ rpmlint -vi typepad-motion-1.0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm typepad-motion.src: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [sebastian at localhost noarch]$ rpmlint -vi typepad-motion-1.0.1-1.fc11.noarch.rpm typepad-motion.noarch: I: checking typepad-motion.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-httplib2 You must let rpm find the library dependencies by itself. Do not put unneeded explicit Requires: tags. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. Does this need to be fixed? I'm asking since it's written in Python... This package also requires python-oauth and django-flash, which have both been submitted for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 23:26:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 19:26:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508922] Review Request: system-config-selinux - GUI Code for system-config-selinux, polgen, and lockdown In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910052326.n95NQsbA001142@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508922 --- Comment #22 from Christopher Pardy 2009-10-05 19:26:52 EDT --- That's what I'm doing and my machine isn't dead so I think it's ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 23:48:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 19:48:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524896] Review Request: perl-Nagios-NSCA - Perl client for Nagios - NSCA. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910052348.n95NmqgL024457@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524896 --- Comment #7 from Steve Traylen 2009-10-05 19:48:51 EDT --- Xavier, Those comments make sense. send_nsca I have instead included as a %doc for the sake of example given we are lacking documentation. http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/perl-Nagios-NSCA/perl-Nagios-NSCA-0.1-3.fc11.src.rpm http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/perl-Nagios-NSCA/perl-Nagios-NSCA.spec rpmlint perl-Nagios-NSCA.spec \ ../SRPMS/perl-Nagios-NSCA-0.1-3.fc11.src.rpm \ ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Nagios-NSCA-0.1-3.fc11.noarch.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 00:26:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 20:26:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526866] Review Request: torium - A minimalistic, easily configurable torrent client for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060026.n960Q81D018622@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526866 --- Comment #9 from Christoph Wickert 2009-10-05 20:26:06 EDT --- You will need to rebuild torium in rawhide once again because rb_libtorrent had a soname bump, see https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-announce/2009-October/msg00001.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 00:54:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 20:54:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527336] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527336 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve.traylen at cern.ch QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/opensaml/opensaml.spec SRPM URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/opensaml/opensaml-2.2.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: OpenSAML is an open source implementation of the OASIS Security Assertion Markup Language Specification. It contains a set of open source C++ classes that support the SAML 1.0, 1.1, and 2.0 specifications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 00:59:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 20:59:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527308] Review Request: xmltooling - XML signing and encrytion library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060059.n960xiB2029263@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527308 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |527336 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 00:59:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 20:59:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527336] Review Request: opensaml - Security Assertion Markup Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060059.n960xhvK029234@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527336 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |527308 Summary|Review Request:
- |Language --- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen 2009-10-05 20:59:40 EDT --- rpmlint SPECS/opensaml.spec \ SRPMS/opensaml-2.2.1-1.fc11.src.rpm \ RPMS/noarch/opensaml-doc-2.2.1-1.fc11.noarch.rpm \ RPMS/x86_64/opensaml-2.2.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ RPMS/x86_64/opensaml-devel-2.2.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ RPMS/x86_64/opensaml-debuginfo-2.2.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm opensaml-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. no documentation in -devel since in -doc package. Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 01:44:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 21:44:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466047] Review Request: tcl-mysqltcl - MySQL interface for Tcl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060144.n961iBYa012325@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466047 --- Comment #32 from Ray Van Dolson 2009-10-05 21:44:07 EDT --- Please consider branching for EPEL (4 & 5), or, add me as a co-maintainer and I will be happy to maintain for EPEL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 02:06:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 22:06:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465511] Review Request: itext - A Free Java-PDF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060206.n9626D8Z006326@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465511 --- Comment #17 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-10-05 22:06:11 EDT --- Feel free to take it in EL. I have no interest in EL-*. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 02:32:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 22:32:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526651] Review Request: xpaint - An X Window System image editing or paint program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060232.n962W87E015873@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526651 --- Comment #14 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-10-05 22:32:06 EDT --- SRPM URL: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/src/xpaint-2.8.3-6.fc10.src.rpm Spec URL: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/SPECS/xpaint.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 03:02:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 23:02:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526855] Review Request: webacula - Web interface of a Bacula backup system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060302.n9632jXN027034@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526855 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |david at gnsa.us --- Comment #2 from David Nalley 2009-10-05 23:02:42 EDT --- First of all, thanks, this looks like a great aid to bacula users. I can not sponsor you but a few comments to help you clean things up a bit: ValidateDateTime.php in source is a bundled library - and needs to use a system lib. Unfortunately a quick search didn't reveal this library in Fedora's package repository. A google search for the function names only reveals a pointer to your software, so this might be something that really is part of webacula, but given it's purpose I doubt it. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries If I were reviewing your packages I'd evaluate that (along with the other libraries) on these factors first: 1. Does the library have a separate repository 2. Does or could any other application use this library A yes answer to either makes me lean towards it being a bundled library and needing to be packaged separately. rpmlint: [ke4qqq at nalleyt43 SRPMS]$ rpmlint webacula-3.2.1-1.fc11.src.rpm webacula.src: W: strange-permission webacula_clean_tmp_files 0775 You may want to change that to 755, but don't really see that as a blocker. [ke4qqq at nalleyt43 noarch]$ rpmlint webacula-3.2.1-1.fc11.noarch.rpm webacula.noarch: E: htaccess-file /usr/share/webacula/html/.htaccess webacula.noarch: E: htaccess-file /usr/share/webacula/install/.htaccess webacula.noarch: E: htaccess-file /usr/share/webacula/html/test_mod_rewrite/.htaccess webacula.noarch: E: htaccess-file /usr/share/webacula/docs/.htaccess webacula.noarch: E: htaccess-file /usr/share/webacula/application/.htaccess webacula.noarch: E: htaccess-file /usr/share/webacula/languages/.htaccess 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 6 errors, 0 warnings. content from .htaccess files should ideally be consolidated in your .conf file and the file removed during installation. Also consider writing an INSTALL.fedora document much like exists for debian. Essentially you want to take them from the point right after 'yum install webacula' completes, to having a working system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 03:08:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 23:08:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492091] Review Request: zikula-module-Content - Page editing module for Zikula In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060308.n96384mi028929@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492091 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #25 from David Nalley 2009-10-05 23:08:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > (In reply to comment #23) > > Any news concerning the license for lightboxXL.js? > > David, Eric, J5, did any of you hear anything back about this? > > IIRC -- the first option was lighthbox relicense and the analysis here was that > would probably not happen. David, I know you sent off an email; did you hear > back? > I heard no response back from lightbox folks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 04:27:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 00:27:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525831] Review Request: vim-perl-tt2 - Syntax highlighting for the Template-Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060427.n964R2di002856@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525831 --- Comment #8 from Chris Weyl 2009-10-06 00:27:01 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: vim-perl-tt2 Short Description: Syntax highlighting for the Template-Toolkit Owners: cweyl Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 04:47:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 00:47:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526607] Review Request: oflb-smonohand-fonts - A handwritten monospace font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060447.n964lmgk026587@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526607 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |openfontlibrary-smonohand-f |oflb-smonohand-fonts - A |ont - A handwritten |handwritten monospace font |monospace font | Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-10-06 00:47:46 EDT --- Yup, forgot to mention(In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #8) > > > OFLB's web contact form is currently broken, so I'm not sure whether the > > message I sent actually got through or not. I'm checking on IRC to see if > > anyone could fix it. > > The font metadata says the author is stefan.mueller at fgan.de Yup, forgot to mention that I did install fontforge, found the email, and emailed the author. Have not heard back from him yet. > ??? APPROVED ??? Thanks! > I hope the process was pleasant, and that it will inspire you to package > other fonts for Fedora. Please do not hesitate to suggest improvements to our > organisation on the fonts mailing list. Oh, it was. Quite a model for other SIGs -- I'd have to borrow some of your pages for the Mono and GNUstep SIGs when I get the time. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: oflb-smonohand-fonts Short Description: A handwritten monospace font Owners: salimma Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 04:58:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 00:58:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524888] Review Request: vecmath - The 3D vector math Java package, javax.vecmath In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060458.n964wGlH029527@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524888 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |giallu at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 05:00:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 01:00:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522148] Review Request: sound-theme-fedora - Sound theme for Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060500.n96502YN030132@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522148 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |adel.gadllah at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 05:00:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 01:00:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498390] Review Request: rakudo - Rakudo - A Perl compiler for Parrot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060500.n9650hJC030493@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498390 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cwickert at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 05:03:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 01:03:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521707] Review Request: python-zc.buildout - System for managing Python development buildouts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060503.n9653UGJ031022@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521707 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-10-06 01:03:29 EDT --- (The submitter should not change fedora-review flag, revoking) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 05:48:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 01:48:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526180] Review Request: rubygem-mixlib-config - Simple ruby config mixin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060548.n965mo2r012309@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526180 --- Comment #4 from Matthew Kent 2009-10-06 01:48:49 EDT --- Spec URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SPECS/rubygem-mixlib-config.spec SRPM URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SRPMS/rubygem-mixlib-config-1.0.12-2.fc12.src.rpm * Mon Oct 5 2009 Matthew Kent - 1.0.12-2 - Missing complete source url (#526180). - Remove unused ruby_sitelib macro (#526180). - Remove redundant doc Requires on rubygems (#526180). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 05:44:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 01:44:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525989] Review Request: rubygem-extlib - Support library for DataMapper and Merb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060544.n965iBbR011143@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525989 Matthew Kent changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Matthew Kent 2009-10-06 01:44:10 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-extlib Short Description: Support library for DataMapper and Merb Owners: mkent Branches: F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 05:50:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 01:50:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526179] Review Request: rubygem-mixlib-cli - Simple ruby mixin for CLI interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060550.n965okvY027571@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526179 --- Comment #4 from Matthew Kent 2009-10-06 01:50:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > SRPM URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SRPMS/rubygem-mixlib-cli-1.0.4-2.fc12.src.rpm > > Seems 404... My apologies! Take two: Spec URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SPECS/rubygem-mixlib-cli.spec SRPM URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SRPMS/rubygem-mixlib-cli-1.0.4-3.fc12.src.rpm * Mon Oct 5 2009 Matthew Kent - 1.0.4-3 - Remove unused ruby_sitelib macro (#526179). - Remove redundant doc Requires on rubygems (#526179). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 05:51:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 01:51:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526181] Review Request: rubygem-mixlib-log - Ruby mixin for log functionality In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060551.n965pph7013308@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526181 --- Comment #2 from Matthew Kent 2009-10-06 01:51:51 EDT --- Spec URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SPECS/rubygem-mixlib-log.spec SRPM URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SRPMS/rubygem-mixlib-log-1.0.3-3.fc12.src.rpm * Mon Oct 5 2009 Matthew Kent - 1.0.3-3 - Missing complete source url (#526181). - Remove unused ruby_sitelib macro (#526181). - Remove redundant doc Requires on rubygems (#526181). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 05:54:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 01:54:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525988] Review Request: rubygem-systemu - Multi-platform command execution and capture In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060554.n965suhH013871@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525988 Matthew Kent changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Matthew Kent 2009-10-06 01:54:54 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-systemu Short Description: Multi-platform command execution and capture Owners: mkent Branches: F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 07:06:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 03:06:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525192] Review Request: python-mpmath - A pure Python library for multiprecision floating-point arithmetic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060706.n96760YR011200@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525192 --- Comment #6 from Michael J Gruber 2009-10-06 03:05:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > (In reply to comment #3) > > > Scratch koji build at > > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1701929 > > > > What's happening with mpmath? Are you planning to add another build? > > Uhh.. what? > > I'm waiting for someone to review this package, so I can import it in Fedora > and build it for real. Maybe I'm misreading procedures, but both builds have been scratched from koji. So we're supposed to get the build from your site? OK, I'll check that one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 07:31:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 03:31:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502614] Review Request: stfl - STFL implements a curses-based widget set for text terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060731.n967VT2Z001545@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502614 --- Comment #33 from Thomas Janssen 2009-10-06 03:31:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #32) > For -4: > > * About sed/patch > - Well, I would say that sed lines used in your spec file > are very difficult to read. If no better usage of sed > usage is found, please create patches again. I changed and documented the sed lines. If you think they're still not good enough, then please educate me. > * cflags > (In reply to comment #31) > > No idea what to do here. If i sed the export CFLAGS from the Makefile and use > > ?RPM_OPT_FLAGS it fails miserably to build. If i add the optflags and dont sed > > nothing changes. > - Actually it is incorrect. You should add %optflags to CFLAGS, not > replace CFLAGS completely. For this Makefile, try below: > --------------------------------------------------- > export CFLAGS="%{optflags}" > make prefix=%{_prefix} libdir=%{_lib} > --------------------------------------------------- /me bangs head on desk.. I fiddled around with it but haven't seen the obviously, thanks. > * %exclude -> rm > > > - I prefer to remove unneeded files at %install instead of using > > > %exclude unless unavoided. > > > > I was able to rm -f one of the three. Two %exlude are still in since i honestly > > dont know exactly where they come from. I'm not a coder. They just come up as: > - This is normal when installing perl modules (i.e. these files are created > automatically), and you can just remove these files at the end of %install > ( like "rm -f %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/libstfl.a" ) Done. > * Documents > - Empty %doc is not needed. Removed. Spec URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/stfl.spec SRPM URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/stfl-0.21-5.fc10.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1729999 -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 07:44:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 03:44:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502614] Review Request: stfl - STFL implements a curses-based widget set for text terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060744.n967ixr0004101@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502614 --- Comment #34 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-10-06 03:44:58 EDT --- Use a patch instead of sed, since sed will quietly do nothing if the makefile changes in the future, whereas patch will fail and let you know. ** I'd say you have to modify the default CFLAGS: export CFLAGS += -I. -Wall -Os -ggdb -D_GNU_SOURCE -fPIC You were probably failing due to the missing -I. -D_GNU_SOURCE which modifies compilation behaviour when you tried export CFLAGS += $(RPM_OPT_FLAGS) Just replace this occurrence with export CFLAGS += -I. -D_GNU_SOURCE -fPIC You need to do this, since -Os will override the default Fedora optimization flag (-O2). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 07:53:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 03:53:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525192] Review Request: python-mpmath - A pure Python library for multiprecision floating-point arithmetic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060753.n967rYwC022262@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525192 --- Comment #7 from Michael J Gruber 2009-10-06 03:53:33 EDT --- OK, rpmbuild --rebuilding on F11 x86_64, no gmpy: Missing BR for the doc (math formulas): dvipng Even with dvipng, the warnings (see below) go down from 3 to 2 only. Two pics are missing from the plot doc. All tests run fine, yeah! Should matplotlib really be required? It's optional as per the mpmath doc. >From the build log: Running Sphinx v0.6.3 No builder selected, using default: html building [html]: targets for 29 source files that are out of date updating environment: 29 added, 0 changed, 0 removed reading sources... [100%] technical /home/mjg/rpmbuild/BUILD/mpmath-0.13/doc/source/basics.txt:221: WARNING: image file not readable: plot.png /home/mjg/rpmbuild/BUILD/mpmath-0.13/doc/source/basics.txt:227: WARNING: image file not readable: cplot.png looking for now-outdated files... none found pickling environment... done checking consistency... done preparing documents... done WARNING: dvipng command 'dvipng' cannot be run (needed for math display), check the pngmath_dvipng setting writing output... [100%] technical writing additional files... genindex search copying static files... done dumping search index... done dumping object inventory... done build succeeded, 3 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 08:20:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 04:20:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060820.n968KrET012313@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #32 from J R Jones 2009-10-06 04:20:48 EDT --- I can't unpack the SRPM. I have tried wget'ing it several times just in case, but always with the same result: [cs1jrj at torbay cs1jrj]$ rpm -Uvh coot-0.6-3.20091005svn2400.fc11.src.rpm 1:coot warning: user fennt does not exist - using root warning: group fennt does not exist - using root ########################################### [100%] error: unpacking of archive failed on file /tmp/cs1jrj/SOURCES/__init__.py;4acaf6b0: cpio: MD5 sum mismatch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 08:31:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 04:31:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526058] Review Request: sil-scheherazade-fonts - SIL Scheherazade Arabic Script Unicode Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060831.n968V5hO031423@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526058 --- Comment #7 from Hedayat Vatankhah 2009-10-06 04:30:47 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sil-scheherazade-fonts Short Description: An Arabic script unicode font Owners: hedayat Branches: F10 F11 F12 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 08:27:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 04:27:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526058] Review Request: sil-scheherazade-fonts - SIL Scheherazade Arabic Script Unicode Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060827.n968RnCD030609@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526058 Hedayat Vatankhah changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Hedayat Vatankhah 2009-10-06 04:27:48 EDT --- Thanks a lot, I'll go for other steps. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 08:31:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 04:31:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502614] Review Request: stfl - STFL implements a curses-based widget set for text terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060831.n968VioB015206@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502614 --- Comment #35 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-10-06 04:31:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #34) > Use a patch instead of sed, since sed will quietly do nothing if the makefile > changes in the future, whereas patch will fail and let you know. I always think that even if patches created against the older version "seem" to apply to the newer version "correctly", it does not guarantee that the modified code is what we expect and we should check them _anyway_ so I don't see so much advantage on using patch over using sed for this purpose > I'd say you have to modify the default CFLAGS: > export CFLAGS += -I. -Wall -Os -ggdb -D_GNU_SOURCE -fPIC > You were probably failing due to the missing -I. -D_GNU_SOURCE which modifies > compilation behaviour when you tried > export CFLAGS += $(RPM_OPT_FLAGS) > Just replace this occurrence with > export CFLAGS += -I. -D_GNU_SOURCE -fPIC > You need to do this, since -Os will override the default Fedora optimization > flag (-O2). Well, I ignored this because for me -Os and -O2 doesn't differ so much. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 08:36:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 04:36:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527402] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527402 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tejasdinkar at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://tejas.fedorapeople.org/gmock.spec SRPM URL: http://tejas.fedorapeople.org/gmock-1.4.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Inspired by jMock, EasyMock, and Hamcrest, and designed with C++'s specifics in mind, Google C++ Mocking Framework (or Google Mock for short) is a library for writing and using C++ mock classes. Google Mock: * lets you create mock classes trivially using simple macros, * supports a rich set of matchers and actions, * handles unordered, partially ordered, or completely ordered expectations, * is extensible by users, and * works on Linux, Mac OS X, Windows, Windows Mobile, minGW, and Symbian. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 08:37:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 04:37:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526866] Review Request: torium - A minimalistic, easily configurable torrent client for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060837.n968bQEV000491@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526866 --- Comment #10 from leigh scott 2009-10-06 04:37:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > You will need to rebuild torium in rawhide once again because rb_libtorrent had > a soname bump, see > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-announce/2009-October/msg00001.html Thanks for the info, I checked the buildroot log and it was built against the new version. DEBUG util.py:256: ================================================================================ DEBUG util.py:256: Package Arch Version Repository DEBUG util.py:256: Size DEBUG util.py:256: ================================================================================ DEBUG util.py:256: Installing: DEBUG util.py:256: boost-devel x86_64 1.39.0-6.fc12 build 4.0 M DEBUG util.py:256: desktop-file-utils x86_64 0.15-8.fc12 build 44 k DEBUG util.py:256: gtkmm24-devel x86_64 2.18.1-1.fc12 build 538 k DEBUG util.py:256: libnotify-devel x86_64 0.4.5-3.fc12 build 21 k DEBUG util.py:256: rb_libtorrent-devel x86_64 0.14.6-1.fc13 build 885 k Should I apply to rel-eng for a buildroot override for rb_libtorrent in F12 so I can build qbittorrent and torium against the new version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 08:48:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 04:48:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527402] Review Request: gmock - Google C++ Mocking Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060848.n968m0rh002721@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527402 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br Summary|Review Request:
- |Framework -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 08:52:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 04:52:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060852.n968qsNo019754@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #33 from J 2009-10-06 04:52:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #32) > I can't unpack the SRPM. I have tried wget'ing it several times just in case, > but always with the same result: > > [cs1jrj at torbay cs1jrj]$ rpm -Uvh coot-0.6-3.20091005svn2400.fc11.src.rpm > 1:coot warning: user fennt does not exist - using root > warning: group fennt does not exist - using root > ########################################### [100%] > error: unpacking of archive failed on file > /tmp/cs1jrj/SOURCES/__init__.py;4acaf6b0: cpio: MD5 sum mismatch Are you using a Fedora 11 machine? The checksum changed in Fedora 11 from MD5 to SHA256 so the author of the source needs to use: rpmbuild -bs --define _source_filedigest_algorithm=1 specfilename instead of just rpmbuild -bs not certain how to go the other way? How is the weather in Bath today? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 08:51:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 04:51:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226117] Merge Review: mailman In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060851.n968p7x1019569@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226117 Radek B?ba changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rbiba at redhat.com --- Comment #13 from Radek B?ba 2009-10-06 04:51:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > rpmlint on SRPM: > mailman.src:41: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/%{name} > A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, > /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. Well, thank you for this. By moving stuff to /usr/lib64 on x86_64, my mailman scripts relying on a fixed path to a binary, like /usr/lib/mailman/bin/newlist, stopped working. I've just checked Debian and openSUSE x86_64 mailman packages, and they have these files files under /usr/lib. Are you guys sure it was the right thing to do? Does Fedora really need to be so special? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 08:52:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 04:52:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503939] Review Request: sblim-cim-client2 - Java CIM Client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060852.n968qfJ4003712@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503939 Vitezslav Crhonek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(vcrhonek at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #3 from Vitezslav Crhonek 2009-10-06 04:52:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) [snip] > Summary: > Add requires for subpackages Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 08:52:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 04:52:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527406] New: Review Request: sil-lateef-fonts - An Arabic script unicode font Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sil-lateef-fonts - An Arabic script unicode font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527406 Summary: Review Request: sil-lateef-fonts - An Arabic script unicode font Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: hedayat at grad.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hedayat.fedorapeople.org/reviews/sil-lateef-fonts/1.001-1/sil-lateef-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://hedayat.fedorapeople.org/reviews/sil-lateef-fonts/1.001-1/sil-lateef-fonts-1.001-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Lateef is named after Shah Abdul Lateef Bhitai, the famous Sindhi mystic and poet. It is intended to be an appropriate style for use in Sindhi and other languages of the South Asian region. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 09:00:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 05:00:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060900.n9690J7o021306@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #34 from J 2009-10-06 05:00:18 EDT --- To clarify the src only needs the different rpmbuild to be backwards compatible Fedora 11 swings both ways so is not bothered. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 08:59:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 04:59:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525192] Review Request: python-mpmath - A pure Python library for multiprecision floating-point arithmetic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060859.n968xbKD020809@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525192 --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-10-06 04:59:36 EDT --- Thanks; added BR: dvipng and check phase. Now it should be OK. Well, I think the Requires: python-matplotlib is reasonable, since it adds some functionality. Opened bug #527407 to reduce the size of the python-matplotlib package. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/python-mpmath.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/python-mpmath-0.13-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 09:28:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 05:28:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060928.n969Sk8K010767@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #35 from J R Jones 2009-10-06 05:28:45 EDT --- No, I just wanted to unpack the sources so that I can repack them and put them through our koji server, for our RHEL rebuild. PS The weather here is quite wet. It is drizzling now but it was raining more heavily earlier. At least it is fairly warm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 09:32:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 05:32:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502614] Review Request: stfl - STFL implements a curses-based widget set for text terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060932.n969W3Da011567@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502614 --- Comment #36 from Thomas Janssen 2009-10-06 05:32:02 EDT --- I keep track on every change i make to the source with sed. Not just in the spec file, i have a local file as well. I post every change i make to upstream and have it included into the next release, if possible. When upstream gives out a new release i check again what has changed and remove then the needed workarounds. I think that's enough to make sure there's no unneeded stuff hanging out in a spec. I hope i fixed the CFLAGS now. I'm sorry that i dont understand them so well. I will work harder on that and try to find a webpage, explaining those flags. Or what flag overrides another flag needed. Spec URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/stfl.spec SRPM URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/stfl-0.21-6.fc10.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1730080 -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 09:45:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 05:45:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060945.n969jIqT030541@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #36 from J R Jones 2009-10-06 05:45:17 EDT --- I hadn't realised that there was a change to the checksum in FC11. I have unpacked using rpmcpio/cpio directly, and that works fine, so you can disregard my previous comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 09:58:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 05:58:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523326] Review Request: gnome-applet-window-picker - Window picker applet for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060958.n969wfLs000712@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523326 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.5.6-3.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 09:57:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 05:57:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526055] Review Request: alure - AL Utilities REtooled In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060957.n969v8sp000389@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526055 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-06 05:57:07 EDT --- alure-1.0-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update alure'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-10241 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 10:00:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 06:00:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506232] Review Request: rekonq - KDE browser based on Webkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061000.n96A0JL1017891@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506232 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-06 06:00:16 EDT --- rekonq-0.2.0-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 09:59:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 05:59:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516717] Review Request: viewnior - Elegant Image Viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060959.n969xhJZ017205@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516717 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-06 05:59:32 EDT --- viewnior-0.7-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 10:00:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 06:00:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521431] Review Request: lxde-icon-theme - Default icon theme for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061000.n96A0rNe018048@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521431 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-06 06:00:52 EDT --- lxde-icon-theme-0.4.2-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 10:00:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 06:00:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525210] Review Request: rubygem-trollop - A command-line option parsing library for ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061000.n96A0ZvR017992@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525210 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-06 06:00:35 EDT --- rubygem-trollop-1.15-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 09:59:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 05:59:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525210] Review Request: rubygem-trollop - A command-line option parsing library for ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060959.n969xu6L017344@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525210 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-06 05:59:55 EDT --- rubygem-trollop-1.15-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 09:58:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 05:58:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523326] Review Request: gnome-applet-window-picker - Window picker applet for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060958.n969wa5X017004@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523326 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-06 05:58:35 EDT --- gnome-applet-window-picker-0.5.6-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 09:58:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 05:58:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524468] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-espeak - A simple gstreamer plugin to use espeak In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060958.n969w5wG016875@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524468 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-06 05:58:03 EDT --- gstreamer-plugins-espeak-0.3.3-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 09:59:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 05:59:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516717] Review Request: viewnior - Elegant Image Viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060959.n969xmHK017258@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516717 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.7-1.fc10 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 10:00:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 06:00:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525210] Review Request: rubygem-trollop - A command-line option parsing library for ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061000.n96A01Ek017580@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525210 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.15-1.fc11 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 10:00:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 06:00:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506232] Review Request: rekonq - KDE browser based on Webkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061000.n96A0ORu017942@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506232 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.2.0-3.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 09:58:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 05:58:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524468] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-espeak - A simple gstreamer plugin to use espeak In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060958.n969wAZl016923@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524468 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.3.3-2.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 09:57:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 05:57:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488563] Review Request: pure - The Pure programming language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060957.n969vLQB016653@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488563 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-06 05:57:16 EDT --- pure-0.35-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pure'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-10242 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 09:56:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 05:56:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461849] Review Request: garmintools - Communication tools for Garmin devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060956.n969uwDO016576@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461849 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-06 05:56:55 EDT --- garmintools-0.10-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update garmintools'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-10240 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 10:00:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 06:00:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525210] Review Request: rubygem-trollop - A command-line option parsing library for ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061000.n96A0fGI001868@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525210 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.15-1.fc11 |1.15-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 10:02:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 06:02:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514509] Review Request: pyhunspell - Python bindings for hunspell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061002.n96A242L002145@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514509 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.1-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 10:00:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 06:00:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521431] Review Request: lxde-icon-theme - Default icon theme for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061000.n96A0wBJ001926@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521431 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.4.2-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 10:00:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 06:00:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512079] Review Request: oflb-prociono-fonts - A serif font created by Barry Schwartz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061000.n96A0BKZ001656@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512079 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-06 06:00:10 EDT --- oflb-prociono-fonts-20090715-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update oflb-prociono-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-10250 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 10:01:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 06:01:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514509] Review Request: pyhunspell - Python bindings for hunspell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061001.n96A1xwl018796@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514509 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-06 06:01:57 EDT --- pyhunspell-0.1-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 10:03:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 06:03:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514509] Review Request: pyhunspell - Python bindings for hunspell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061003.n96A35qO019110@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514509 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-06 06:03:04 EDT --- pyhunspell-0.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 10:03:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 06:03:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514509] Review Request: pyhunspell - Python bindings for hunspell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061003.n96A3AKP019149@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514509 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.1-2.fc11 |0.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 10:03:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 06:03:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524413] Review Request: xfce4-xfswitch-plugin - User switching plugin for the Xfce4 Panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061003.n96A3YWH019259@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524413 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-06 06:03:33 EDT --- xfce4-xfswitch-plugin-0.0.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 10:03:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 06:03:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524413] Review Request: xfce4-xfswitch-plugin - User switching plugin for the Xfce4 Panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061003.n96A3dOa019298@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524413 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.0.1-1.fc10 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 10:05:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 06:05:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526055] Review Request: alure - AL Utilities REtooled In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061005.n96A5EH6019978@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526055 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-06 06:05:13 EDT --- alure-1.0-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update alure'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-10267 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 10:06:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 06:06:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488563] Review Request: pure - The Pure programming language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061006.n96A6gxQ004039@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488563 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-06 06:06:40 EDT --- pure-0.35-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pure'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-10280 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 10:06:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 06:06:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461849] Review Request: garmintools - Communication tools for Garmin devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061006.n96A6ZnX003993@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461849 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-06 06:06:34 EDT --- garmintools-0.10-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update garmintools'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-10278 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 10:08:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 06:08:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516717] Review Request: viewnior - Elegant Image Viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061008.n96A8LCZ021039@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516717 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-06 06:08:20 EDT --- viewnior-0.7-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 10:09:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 06:09:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521431] Review Request: lxde-icon-theme - Default icon theme for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061009.n96A9fbo021303@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521431 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-06 06:09:41 EDT --- lxde-icon-theme-0.4.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 10:08:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 06:08:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516717] Review Request: viewnior - Elegant Image Viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061008.n96A8R9J021088@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516717 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.7-1.fc10 |0.7-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 10:09:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 06:09:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521431] Review Request: lxde-icon-theme - Default icon theme for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061009.n96A9kGu021377@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521431 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.4.2-2.fc11 |0.4.2-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 10:08:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 06:08:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523326] Review Request: gnome-applet-window-picker - Window picker applet for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061008.n96A84ia020938@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523326 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-06 06:08:02 EDT --- gnome-applet-window-picker-0.5.6-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 10:09:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 06:09:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525796] Review Request: winwrangler - Small desktop daemon to perform advanced window manipulations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061009.n96A9NFD021227@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525796 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-06 06:09:22 EDT --- winwrangler-0.2.4-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 10:08:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 06:08:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523326] Review Request: gnome-applet-window-picker - Window picker applet for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061008.n96A89fT020976@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523326 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.5.6-3.fc11 |0.5.6-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 10:06:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 06:06:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512079] Review Request: oflb-prociono-fonts - A serif font created by Barry Schwartz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061006.n96A6E5A020372@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512079 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-06 06:06:13 EDT --- oflb-prociono-fonts-20090715-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update oflb-prociono-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-10273 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 10:09:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 06:09:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061009.n96A9Uc7004830@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #78 from Michal Nowak 2009-10-06 06:09:23 EDT --- awesome-3.4 + upstream patch here: http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.4-0.2.rc2.fc12.src.rpm Works quite nice; adapt your rc.lua. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 10:10:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 06:10:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524468] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-espeak - A simple gstreamer plugin to use espeak In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061010.n96AAc8v005453@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524468 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.3.3-2.fc10 |0.3.3-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 10:10:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 06:10:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524468] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-espeak - A simple gstreamer plugin to use espeak In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061010.n96AAXOI005408@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524468 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-06 06:10:32 EDT --- gstreamer-plugins-espeak-0.3.3-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 10:12:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 06:12:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506232] Review Request: rekonq - KDE browser based on Webkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061012.n96ACUuf022589@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506232 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-06 06:12:28 EDT --- rekonq-0.2.0-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 10:12:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 06:12:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506232] Review Request: rekonq - KDE browser based on Webkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061012.n96ACaRa022636@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506232 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.2.0-3.fc11 |0.2.0-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 10:11:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 06:11:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524413] Review Request: xfce4-xfswitch-plugin - User switching plugin for the Xfce4 Panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061011.n96ABIut022244@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524413 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-06 06:11:16 EDT --- xfce4-xfswitch-plugin-0.0.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 10:11:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 06:11:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524413] Review Request: xfce4-xfswitch-plugin - User switching plugin for the Xfce4 Panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061011.n96ABNkr022365@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524413 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.0.1-1.fc10 |0.0.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 10:28:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 06:28:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527319] Review Request: typepad-motion - A microblogging application for building online communities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061028.n96ASxpW025937@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527319 --- Comment #1 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-10-06 06:28:58 EDT --- Just noticed I was missing a few more dependencies; packaging them now, watch out for updates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 10:54:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 06:54:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492749] Review Request: kde-plasma-system_status_ng - A plasmoid to show your CPU and memory usage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061054.n96Asxcr029844@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492749 Radek Novacek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 10:55:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 06:55:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492749] Review Request: kde-plasma-system_status_ng - A plasmoid to show your CPU and memory usage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061055.n96At0vl029884@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492749 Radek Novacek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 10:56:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 06:56:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061056.n96AuuuK013551@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #37 from J R Jones 2009-10-06 06:56:52 EDT --- For backwards compatibility, the dependency on tex(latex) has to be modified to refer to tetex-latex. Is it really necessary for mmdb to be >= 1.20? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 10:55:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 06:55:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492749] Review Request: kde-plasma-system_status_ng - A plasmoid to show your CPU and memory usage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061055.n96At1EA012738@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492749 Radek Novacek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 11:32:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 07:32:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526997] Review Request: pdf2svg - Small tool to convert PDF files into SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061132.n96BW5mf006363@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526997 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-10-06 07:32:03 EDT --- - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name} - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed (GPLv2+) with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - MUST: the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. - MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files - MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - MUST: The spec file for the package is be legible. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least i586. - MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires. - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly.: No locales in this package - MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package contains code, or permissible content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: There are no Large documentation files - MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - MUST: There are no Header files or static libraries - MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix - MUST: Package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: The source package doesn't include license text(s) as COPYING - SHOULD: mock builds succcessfully in i586. - SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. - SHOULD: Those scriptlets used are sane. - SHOULD: No subpackages present. Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 11:40:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 07:40:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525192] Review Request: python-mpmath - A pure Python library for multiprecision floating-point arithmetic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061140.n96Beei8007951@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525192 --- Comment #9 from Michael J Gruber 2009-10-06 07:40:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Thanks; added BR: dvipng and check phase. Now it should be OK. > > Well, I think the Requires: python-matplotlib is reasonable, since it adds some > functionality. Opened bug #527407 to reduce the size of the python-matplotlib > package. It adds functionality, sure, but it's neither required at build time nor at run time. It's not a *dependency*. It is used if it is present, and as such you (rightly) advertise it in the package description. > http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/python-mpmath.spec > http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/python-mpmath-0.13-3.fc11.src.rpm There's also a new dependency python-py. Do we run these longish tests during rebuild for other python packages as well? plot.png, cplot.png are still missing, btw. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 11:46:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 07:46:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524147] Review Request: libnetdevname -Development environment for libnetdevname In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061146.n96Bk81M024167@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147 --- Comment #18 from srinivas 2009-10-06 07:46:06 EDT --- Fixed all the rpmlint errors/warnings. Here's the current rpmlint o/p: rpmlint libnetdevname.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint ../SRPMS/libnetdevname-0.0.3-3.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/libnetdevname-* 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. The updated spec and srpm can be found at: http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/libnetdevname/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 11:48:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 07:48:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527317] Review Request: django-flash - A Django extension to provide support for Rails-like flash In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061148.n96BmxCG009480@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527317 --- Comment #1 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-10-06 07:48:59 EDT --- Just a new build, removing an unneeded BR. Spec URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/django-flash.spec SRPM URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/django-flash-1.6.2-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 11:55:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 07:55:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527428] New: Review Request: python-remoteobjects - An Object RESTational Model Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-remoteobjects - An Object RESTational Model https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527428 Summary: Review Request: python-remoteobjects - An Object RESTational Model Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sebastian at when.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/python-remoteobjects.spec SRPM URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/python-remoteobjects-1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Koji Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1730270 [sebastian at localhost SRPMS]$ rpmlint -vi python-remoteobjects-1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm python-remoteobjects.src: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [sebastian at localhost noarch]$ rpmlint -vi python-remoteobjects-1.0-1.fc11.noarch.rpm python-remoteobjects.noarch: I: checking python-remoteobjects.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-httplib2 You must let rpm find the library dependencies by itself. Do not put unneeded explicit Requires: tags. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. Ignoring this since it's written in Python... This is another requirement in the effort to package TypePad Motion for Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 11:59:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 07:59:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520637] Review Request: mdk - GNU MIX Development Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061159.n96BxwtM026643@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520637 --- Comment #13 from Stjepan Gros 2009-10-06 07:59:56 EDT --- No, I don't have enabled Assistive technologies (the checkbox is not enabled) but it still occurs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 12:08:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 08:08:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518949] Review Request: brlcad - computer aided solid modelling and design In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061208.n96C8grL028597@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518949 --- Comment #6 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-10-06 08:08:41 EDT --- Ping any progress on this, Matt ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 12:06:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 08:06:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527428] Review Request: python-remoteobjects - An Object RESTational Model In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061206.n96C6xDe028394@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527428 --- Comment #1 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-10-06 08:06:58 EDT --- New build to add a previously missing BR. Spec URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/python-remoteobjects.spec SRPM URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/python-remoteobjects-1.0-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 12:05:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 08:05:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502596] Review Request: sblim-tools-libra - SBLIM Common Resource Access Library for WBEM-SMT tasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061205.n96C5PAe028140@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502596 Vitezslav Crhonek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(praveen_paladugu@ | |dell.com) --- Comment #3 from Vitezslav Crhonek 2009-10-06 08:05:23 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 12:07:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 08:07:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527431] New: Review Request: python-batchhttp - Parallel fetching of HTTP resources through MIME multipart Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-batchhttp - Parallel fetching of HTTP resources through MIME multipart https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527431 Summary: Review Request: python-batchhttp - Parallel fetching of HTTP resources through MIME multipart Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sebastian at when.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/python-batchhttp.spec SRPM URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/python-batchhttp-1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Koji Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1730283 [sebastian at localhost SRPMS]$ rpmlint -vi python-batchhttp-1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm python-batchhttp.src: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [sebastian at localhost noarch]$ rpmlint -vi python-batchhttp-1.0-1.fc11.noarch.rpm python-batchhttp.noarch: I: checking python-batchhttp.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-httplib2 You must let rpm find the library dependencies by itself. Do not put unneeded explicit Requires: tags. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. Ignoring this since it's a Python package. It's another requirement for bringing TypePad Motion into Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 12:14:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 08:14:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527433] New: Review Request: python-typepad - Connectivity to the TypePad API through remote objects Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-typepad - Connectivity to the TypePad API through remote objects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527433 Summary: Review Request: python-typepad - Connectivity to the TypePad API through remote objects Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sebastian at when.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/python-typepad.spec SRPM URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/python-typepad-1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Koji Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1730291 [sebastian at localhost SRPMS]$ rpmlint -vi python-typepad-1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm python-typepad.src: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [sebastian at localhost noarch]$ rpmlint -vi python-typepad-1.0-1.fc11.noarch.rpm python-typepad.noarch: I: checking python-typepad.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-httplib2 You must let rpm find the library dependencies by itself. Do not put unneeded explicit Requires: tags. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. I guess this can be ignored (it's a Python package). This is another requirement for getting TypePad Motion into Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 12:18:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 08:18:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527316] Review Request: python-oauth - Library for OAuth version 1.0a In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061218.n96CIJ6L015266@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527316 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |527433 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 12:18:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 08:18:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527428] Review Request: python-remoteobjects - An Object RESTational Model In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061218.n96CIKb0015286@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527428 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |527433 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 12:18:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 08:18:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527431] Review Request: python-batchhttp - Parallel fetching of HTTP resources through MIME multipart In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061218.n96CILJA015307@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527431 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |527433 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 12:18:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 08:18:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527433] Review Request: python-typepad - Connectivity to the TypePad API through remote objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061218.n96CIIsx015242@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527433 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |527316, 527431, 527428 --- Comment #1 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-10-06 08:18:17 EDT --- On a side-note, this package depends on python-batchhttp, python-oauth, and python-remoteobjects, which have all been submitted for review, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 12:23:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 08:23:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527428] Review Request: python-remoteobjects - An Object RESTational Model In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061223.n96CNajH032168@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527428 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |527319 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 12:23:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 08:23:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527431] Review Request: python-batchhttp - Parallel fetching of HTTP resources through MIME multipart In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061223.n96CNb67032189@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527431 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |527319 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 12:23:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 08:23:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527433] Review Request: python-typepad - Connectivity to the TypePad API through remote objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061223.n96CNc1t032209@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527433 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |527319 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 12:23:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 08:23:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527319] Review Request: typepad-motion - A microblogging application for building online communities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061223.n96CNZ6T032142@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527319 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |527428, 527431, 527433 --- Comment #2 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-10-06 08:23:34 EDT --- Here's a new build which should now require all the dependencies. Out of those, all have been packaged and submitted for review, except django-typepad, on which I'm working, too. Spec URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/typepad-motion.spec SRPM URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/typepad-motion-1.0.1-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 12:25:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 08:25:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526855] Review Request: webacula - Web interface of a Bacula backup system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061225.n96CPvxD017274@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526855 --- Comment #3 from Yuri Timofeev 2009-10-06 08:25:56 EDT --- Thank you for your reply. 1. My class ValidateDateTime.php moved to appropriate directory. 2. Create INSTALL.fedora documentation But: $ rpmlint webacula-3.2.2-1.fc10.noarch.rpm webacula.noarch: E: htaccess-file /usr/share/webacula/html/.htaccess webacula.noarch: E: htaccess-file /usr/share/webacula/html/test_mod_rewrite/.htaccess 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings. Options "RewriteBase" and "RewriteRule" in httpd.conf does not work. So I left them at the same place, in .htaccess file. koji build - OK : https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1730293 Spec URL: http://webacula.sourceforge.net/files/webacula.spec SRPM URL: http://webacula.sourceforge.net/files/webacula-3.2.2-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 12:36:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 08:36:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522148] Review Request: sound-theme-fedora - Sound theme for Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061236.n96CaCbQ019499@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522148 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #8 from Matthias Clasen 2009-10-06 08:36:11 EDT --- Ok, don't need this after all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 12:47:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 08:47:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527445] New: Review Request: django-typepad - A helper Django app for making TypePad applications Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: django-typepad - A helper Django app for making TypePad applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527445 Summary: Review Request: django-typepad - A helper Django app for making TypePad applications Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sebastian at when.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/django-typepad.spec SRPM URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/django-typepad-1.0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Koji Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1730337 [sebastian at localhost SRPMS]$ rpmlint -vi django-typepad-1.0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm django-typepad.src: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [sebastian at localhost noarch]$ rpmlint -vi django-typepad-1.0.1-1.fc11.noarch.rpm django-typepad.noarch: I: checking django-typepad.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-httplib2 You must let rpm find the library dependencies by itself. Do not put unneeded explicit Requires: tags. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. This should be ignorable since it's a Python package. It's the last requirement to get TypePad Motion into Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 12:49:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 08:49:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527445] Review Request: django-typepad - A helper Django app for making TypePad applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061249.n96CnIDo005914@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527445 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |527319 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 12:49:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 08:49:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527319] Review Request: typepad-motion - A microblogging application for building online communities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061249.n96CnHDg005890@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527319 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |527445 --- Comment #3 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-10-06 08:49:17 EDT --- Adding the last requirement, django-typepad, as it has been submitted for review, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 13:10:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 09:10:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503727] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-dhcp - SBLIM WBEM-SMT DHCP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061310.n96DARHk027021@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503727 Vitezslav Crhonek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(vcrhonek at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #2 from Vitezslav Crhonek 2009-10-06 09:10:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) [snip] > Summary: > Move .so files into -devel subpackage Moved .so file to the cmpi subdirectory of %{_libdir}. > Remove locale files from %files section (find_lang make it alone) Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 13:26:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 09:26:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061326.n96DQ1El015788@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #75 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-10-06 09:25:56 EDT --- Ok, ready http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/x11vnc/x11vnc-0.9.8-14.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 13:48:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 09:48:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526866] Review Request: torium - A minimalistic, easily configurable torrent client for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061348.n96Dmf1X021912@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526866 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |peter at thecodergeek.com --- Comment #11 from Christoph Wickert 2009-10-06 09:48:39 EDT --- No, because we shouldn't do any version upgrades during freeze. Peter, what do you think? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 13:49:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 09:49:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527462] New: Review Request: python-gmpy - Python interface to GMP Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-gmpy - Python interface to GMP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527462 Summary: Review Request: python-gmpy - Python interface to GMP Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mjg at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC URL: http://mjg.fedorapeople.org/rpmdev/python-gmpy.spec (based on mandriva version 1.01-3) SRPM URL: http://mjg.fedorapeople.org/rpmdev/python-gmpy-1.04-1.fc11.src.rpm Upstream URL: http://code.google.com/p/gmpy/ Description: The General Multiprecision PYthon project (GMPY) focuses on Python-usable modules providing multiprecision arithmetic functionality to Python programmers. The project mission includes both C and C++ Python-modules (for speed) and pure Python modules (for flexibility and convenience); it potentially includes integral, rational and floating-point arithmetic in any base. Only cross-platform functionality is of interest, at least for now. Additional comments: python-mpmath (in review) makes use of gmpy when present. This speeds up the mpmath unit tests by a factor 2.3 for me. Of course, gmpy is of independent interest (e.g. standalone, sage). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 13:50:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 09:50:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527462] Review Request: python-gmpy - Python interface to GMP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061350.n96DoGwq005406@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527462 --- Comment #1 from Michael J Gruber 2009-10-06 09:50:16 EDT --- Yet another additional comment: I'm a noob regarding package submission, please guide me through if necessary... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 13:51:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 09:51:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525192] Review Request: python-mpmath - A pure Python library for multiprecision floating-point arithmetic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061351.n96DpJe2022845@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525192 --- Comment #10 from Michael J Gruber 2009-10-06 09:51:18 EDT --- Related note: Works great when used with gmpy, see #527462 for a corresponding review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 13:59:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 09:59:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508922] Review Request: system-config-selinux - GUI Code for system-config-selinux, polgen, and lockdown In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061359.n96DxCLx024521@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508922 --- Comment #23 from Daniel Walsh 2009-10-06 09:59:09 EDT --- F12 policy should work fine on F11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 14:02:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 10:02:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526688] Review Request: umlgraph - Automated Drawing of UML Diagrams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061402.n96E2Po4008702@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526688 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 14:09:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 10:09:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525274] Review Request: eclipse-callgraph - generates function call graph linked to Eclipse CDT In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061409.n96E9cut010818@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525274 Charley Wang changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 14:20:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 10:20:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519652] Review Request: sabnzbdplus - Heavily Featured Automatic Binary Newsgrabber In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061420.n96EKcQb030349@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519652 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | --- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-10-06 10:20:37 EDT --- Looking this over, the code doesn't actually decompress RAR files, it just calls out to unrar to do the work. (It also does a lot of header checking and manipulation, but none of that is taken from the proprietary unrar code). Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 14:32:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 10:32:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518949] Review Request: brlcad - computer aided solid modelling and design In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061432.n96EWLtp018048@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518949 --- Comment #7 from matt chan 2009-10-06 10:32:19 EDT --- Ack. I'm sorry, I don't know how, but I missed the email about Kevin's comment. I guess there's a downside to too many bugzilla emails. I will have some time to work on this in the weekend to fix the license and rpmlint errors. I thought they were only trivial ones, but I didn't test the most recent changes. The libraries are somewhat of a sticky issue. I consulted with the BRL-CAD devs on the possibility of abstracting out the libraries while building this package. It appears that they have made heavy 3rd party modifications to most of these libraries, especially Utah, Template Numerical, openNURBS, and NIST STEP, and the upstream projects are unwilling to accept them or are no longer active. TkHTML is a dead project as far as I know. None of those libraries listed should be present in fedora 11. Is it still considered a good idea to abstract out the libraries, or should we just consider them a part of the BRL-CAD package? According to the BRL-CAD devs, they don't really resemble the original libraries/projects anymore. To my knowledge, there is no project outside of BRL-CAD that makes use of their modifications to these libs. Thoughts? Matt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 14:44:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 10:44:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525389] Review Request: madwimax - Driver for mobile WiMAX devices based on Samsung CMC-730 chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061444.n96Ei1rP004977@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525389 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | --- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-10-06 10:44:00 EDT --- Lifting FE-Legal, this seems to be acceptable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 14:40:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 10:40:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524992] Review Request: toppler - platform game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061440.n96EeN3J004466@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524992 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | --- Comment #6 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-10-06 10:40:22 EDT --- There are no current US trademarks (live or dead) for "Toppler" or "Tower Toppler". This isn't terribly surprising since the original company died off in the early 1990s. Gameplay is not copyrightable/patentable, so there is no issue there. There is also no indication that the original source code was ever available, or used in the creation of this clone. Looks fine to me, lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 14:48:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 10:48:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525389] Review Request: madwimax - Driver for mobile WiMAX devices based on Samsung CMC-730 chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061448.n96EmhxU006808@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525389 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-10-06 10:48:42 EDT --- Thanks, Tom. This package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 14:47:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 10:47:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452321] Review Request: PyGreSQL - Python client library for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061447.n96ElvGM006659@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452321 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #19 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-10-06 10:47:52 EDT --- Just FYI, I'm leaving this blocked against FE-Legal until the License tag is corrected (MIT is correct). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 14:50:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 10:50:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525192] Review Request: python-mpmath - A pure Python library for multiprecision floating-point arithmetic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061450.n96EoOxt007826@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525192 --- Comment #11 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-10-06 10:50:23 EDT --- You mean bug #527462.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 14:51:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 10:51:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527462] Review Request: python-gmpy - Python interface to GMP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061451.n96EpQxK008088@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527462 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-10-06 10:51:25 EDT --- OK, I'll take the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 14:50:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 10:50:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525389] Review Request: madwimax - Driver for mobile WiMAX devices based on Samsung CMC-730 chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061450.n96Eoe7Q007935@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525389 Alexey Torkhov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Alexey Torkhov 2009-10-06 10:50:39 EDT --- Thanks. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: madwimax Short Description: Driver for mobile WiMAX devices based on Samsung CMC-730 chip Owners: atorkhov Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 14:52:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 10:52:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525389] Review Request: madwimax - Driver for mobile WiMAX devices based on Samsung CMC-730 chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061452.n96EqbCP024110@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525389 --- Comment #7 from Alexey Torkhov 2009-10-06 10:52:36 EDT --- > Please, shorten these lines. Yes, and will do this before importing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 14:52:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 10:52:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455622] Review Request: scriptaculous-js - JavaScript libraries for web user interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061452.n96EqITk024011@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455622 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | --- Comment #8 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-10-06 10:52:14 EDT --- It is clear from the various entries on Jules Gravinese's website that he is not only aware of Scriptaculous, but is aware of his specific contributions to it, and that they were made by him. Thus, I see no reason why there is a licensing concern around sound.js. Lifting FE-Legal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 14:57:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 10:57:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525192] Review Request: python-mpmath - A pure Python library for multiprecision floating-point arithmetic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061457.n96EveGK025385@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525192 --- Comment #12 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-10-06 10:57:39 EDT --- Replaced R: python-matplotlib with a comment in %description. Added missing BR: python-matplotlib to make building of docs work. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/python-mpmath.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/python-mpmath-0.13-4.fc11.src.rpm ** It's a general packaging guideline that the %check phase should be used whenever testing is possible (and it doesn't take ridiculously long amounts of time, i.e. hours). And it only affects building, not installation or use. Most of the time of the build process is spent on the documentation, anyway.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 15:04:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 11:04:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455622] Review Request: scriptaculous-js - JavaScript libraries for web user interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061504.n96F46SO026996@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455622 --- Comment #9 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-10-06 11:04:05 EDT --- Ok, sounds good, thank you Tom. Dave Malcolm, there stay only one major issue - bundled prototypejs. Other things is optional or easy fixable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 15:05:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 11:05:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527462] Review Request: python-gmpy - Python interface to GMP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061505.n96F56ge012144@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527462 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-10-06 11:05:05 EDT --- First notes: - Don't use %define version 1.04 or %define name python-%{module} Just use the Version: and Name: tag. The corresponding macros will be automatically defined. - I don't recommend using %define module gmpy either, but that's more of a stylistic point. If you decide to stick with it, use %global instead of %define http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define - You are missing the Source URL http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL - The license tag is incorrect (you need to version it) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Good_Licenses http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ#How_do_I_figure_out_what_version_of_the_GPL.2FLGPL_my_package_is_under.3F - Drop the explicit Requires: gmp, it is automatically picked up by rpm http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Explicit_Requires - Instead of %__python it is possible to use just python - Don't use %files -f INSTALLED_FILES list the files explicitly instead. Here you will need the python-sitearch macro from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#System_Architecture - Consider using a more recommended value of buildroot %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag - The changelog entry from Thu May 04 2006 has broken UTF-8, the ? should be ?. You can probably just drop the old changelog, since you will end up rewriting a major part of the spec file anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 15:15:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 11:15:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226117] Merge Review: mailman In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061515.n96FF1Ae030462@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226117 --- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla 2009-10-06 11:14:58 EDT --- /usr/lib/mailman/mail/mailman is a binary, as are the bits in cgi-bin. You've also got /usr/lib/mailman/pythonlib/japanese/c/_japanese_codecs.so. These would, as far as I know, necessitate %{_libdir}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 15:20:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 11:20:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502596] Review Request: sblim-tools-libra - SBLIM Common Resource Access Library for WBEM-SMT tasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061520.n96FKuNL032740@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502596 Praveen K Paladugu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(praveen_paladugu@ | |dell.com) | --- Comment #4 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-10-06 11:20:55 EDT --- Sorry for the delay. Since the release number wasn't changed, I thought the new sources were not available yet. Few more things to take care of: 1) #user1 rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/sblim-tools-libra-devel-0.2.3-1.fc10.i386.rpm sblim-tools-libra-devel.i386: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Please add some documentation to doc package. 2) The devel package seems to own /usr/include/sblim directory. I suggest a "Requires:" be added to a package which owns this directory. This is just to make sure that the same directory is not owned by different packages. sblim-cmpi-base-devel seems to be a good choice. Please suggest if you have any other package in mind. Please bump up the release number of the package to avoid further confusion. This package is good to go after handling the above comments. Thank you Praveen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 15:32:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 11:32:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527462] Review Request: python-gmpy - Python interface to GMP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061532.n96FWUpE023192@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527462 --- Comment #4 from Michael J Gruber 2009-10-06 11:32:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > You can probably just drop the old changelog, since you will end up rewriting a > major part of the spec file anyway. Thanks for the hints. I guess it's better starting from scratch than starting from mandrake... I'll try my best, after recovering from the shock that the sheer amount of fedora package submission guidelines created. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 15:33:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 11:33:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526688] Review Request: umlgraph - Automated Drawing of UML Diagrams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061533.n96FXZUB006886@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526688 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Overholt 2009-10-06 11:33:34 EDT --- Only issue: missing BR/R on graphviz - sources fine (md5sums match) - naming fine - license fine - builds fine - files good - macros good - rpmlint fine (ignore maven fragment warning) $ rpmlint ../SRPMS/umlgraph-5.2-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/umlgraph-* umlgraph.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/umlgraph 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 15:34:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 11:34:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527488] New: Review Request: drbd - drbd tools Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: drbd - drbd tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527488 Summary: Review Request: drbd - drbd tools Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: philipp.reisner at linbit.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://git.drbd.org/?p=drbd-8.3.git;a=blob;f=drbd.spec.in SRPM URL: Description: DRBD mirrors a block device over the network to another machine. Think of it as networked raid 1. It is a building block for setting up high availability (HA) clusters. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 15:39:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 11:39:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525192] Review Request: python-mpmath - A pure Python library for multiprecision floating-point arithmetic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061539.n96FdoOl025934@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525192 --- Comment #13 from Michael J Gruber 2009-10-06 11:39:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > Replaced R: python-matplotlib with a comment in %description. > Added missing BR: python-matplotlib to make building of docs work. > > http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/python-mpmath.spec > http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/python-mpmath-0.13-4.fc11.src.rpm plot.png and cplot.png are still MIA over here. This is not helped by having matplotlib as BR. See file:///usr/share/doc/python-mpmath-doc-0.13/basics.html#plotting > ** > > It's a general packaging guideline that the %check phase should be used > whenever testing is possible (and it doesn't take ridiculously long amounts of > time, i.e. hours). And it only affects building, not installation or use. Most > of the time of the build process is spent on the documentation, anyway.. OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 15:44:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 11:44:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526997] Review Request: pdf2svg - Small tool to convert PDF files into SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061544.n96Fiqfu010140@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526997 Ben Boeckel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Ben Boeckel 2009-10-06 11:44:51 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pdf2svg Short Description: Small tool to convert PDF files into SVG Owners: mathstuf Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 15:51:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 11:51:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518949] Review Request: brlcad - computer aided solid modelling and design In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061551.n96FpF7s029014@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518949 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-06 11:51:13 EDT --- Well, the guideline is at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries I really wish projects wouldn't do this kind of thing. It makes it much harder to get them packaged for a distribution. ;( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 15:52:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 11:52:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527492] New: Review Request: jilter - Sendmail milter protocol for Java Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jilter - Sendmail milter protocol for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527492 Summary: Review Request: jilter - Sendmail milter protocol for Java Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: orion at cora.nwra.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/jilter.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/jilter-1.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Sendmail-Jilter is an Open Source implementation of the Sendmail milter protocol, for implementing milters in Java that can interface with the Sendmail MTA. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 15:53:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 11:53:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505264] Review Request: wb_builder - Wishbone Bus Builder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061553.n96FrfvN012203@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505264 Ben Boeckel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Ben Boeckel 2009-10-06 11:53:39 EDT --- [OK] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. % rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/*.rpm 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [OK] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [OK] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [OK] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . [OK] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . [OK] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [OK] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [OK] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [OK] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [OK] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [OK] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [OK] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. [OK] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [OK] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [OK] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [OK] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [OK] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [OK] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [OK] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [OK] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [OK] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [OK] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [OK] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [OK] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [OK] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [OK] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [OK] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [OK] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. [OK] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [OK] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [OK] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [OK] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [OK] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [OK] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [OK] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [OK] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [OK] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. Works fine (afaik), but closing the window just goes in a loop of opening new windows. Upstream bug? [OK] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. [OK] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [OK] SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. [OK] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 15:58:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 11:58:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516312] Review Request: ueagle-atm-firmware4 - Firmwares for usb adsl modems based on Eagle IV chipset In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061558.n96Fwwso030988@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516312 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | --- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-10-06 11:58:57 EDT --- Eh, its okay for a firmware license. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 16:00:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 12:00:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521166] Review Request: OpenGTL - Graphics Transformation Languages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061600.n96G0dFe014017@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521166 --- Comment #8 from Ben Boeckel 2009-10-06 12:00:37 EDT --- Any update on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 16:08:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 12:08:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518949] Review Request: brlcad - computer aided solid modelling and design In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061608.n96G8rYx016426@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518949 --- Comment #9 from matt chan 2009-10-06 12:08:52 EDT --- Hmm that's the first time I've read that page. So what do we do now? Would applying to FeSCo be appropriate? This lib problem is also the reason other distributions are having trouble accepting BRL-CAD. (The lib naming problem being the other one. BRL-CAD's been in development for 20 years, so it doens't follow standard naming schemes.) Matt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 16:09:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 12:09:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226117] Merge Review: mailman In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061609.n96G95QL016469@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226117 --- Comment #15 from Radek B?ba 2009-10-06 12:09:04 EDT --- Actually, the former would rather fit into /usr/libexec IMHO; no objection to having japanese codecs in %{_libdir}. I'm really only interested in the path to mailman control utilities, because that's what I execute. How can one write an arch-independent script that controls mailing lists now? I mean, sure there are hacks like "`rpm -ql mailman | grep /mailman/bin$`" or "`awk -F= '/MAILMANHOME=/ {print $2 }' /etc/rc.d/init.d/mailman`/bin" to determine the path, but... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 16:13:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 12:13:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521166] Review Request: OpenGTL - Graphics Transformation Languages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061613.n96GD9GW017766@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521166 --- Comment #9 from Rex Dieter 2009-10-06 12:13:08 EDT --- Waiting on OpenGTL-0.9.11 release to fix llvm-2.6 issue, tracked here: http://bugs.opengtl.org/index.php?do=details&task_id=33 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 16:18:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 12:18:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 511841] Review Request: wordpress-plugin-bad-behavior - Spam prevention plugin for WordPress In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061618.n96GIRYt021103@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511841 --- Comment #1 from Nick Bebout 2009-10-06 12:18:25 EDT --- rpmlint is not clean. [nb at nb noarch]$ rpmlint wordpress* wordpress-mu-plugin-bad-behavior.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/wordpress-mu/wp-content/plugins/bad-behavior/index.html wordpress-mu-plugin-bad-behavior.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/wordpress-mu/wp-content/plugins/bad-behavior/bad-behavior/index.html wordpress-plugin-bad-behavior.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.0.28 ['2.0.28-1.fc11', '2.0.28-1'] wordpress-plugin-bad-behavior.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/bad-behavior/index.html wordpress-plugin-bad-behavior.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/bad-behavior/bad-behavior/index.html 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 1 warnings. Please add -1 to the version in the changelog to fix the incoherent-version warning. I'm not sure what the zero-length files are? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 16:40:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 12:40:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526595] Review Request: zikula-module-filterutil - Pagesetter like filter rules for Zikula In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061640.n96GeDUY008709@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526595 Mel Chua changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Mel Chua 2009-10-06 12:40:11 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: zikula-module-filterutil Short Description: pagesetter like filter rules for zikula Owners: mchua toshio sundaram Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 16:48:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 12:48:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525192] Review Request: python-mpmath - A pure Python library for multiprecision floating-point arithmetic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061648.n96GmTD9010309@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525192 --- Comment #14 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-10-06 12:48:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #12) > > Replaced R: python-matplotlib with a comment in %description. > > Added missing BR: python-matplotlib to make building of docs work. > > > > http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/python-mpmath.spec > > http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/python-mpmath-0.13-4.fc11.src.rpm > > plot.png and cplot.png are still MIA over here. This is not helped by having > matplotlib as BR. See > file:///usr/share/doc/python-mpmath-doc-0.13/basics.html#plotting Ugh. You're right. I have no idea why it doesn't work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 16:52:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 12:52:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475135] Review Request: portmidi - Real-time Midi I/O Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061652.n96GqDAb011140@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475135 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 17:03:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:03:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061703.n96H33cv013525@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #38 from Tim Fenn 2009-10-06 13:02:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #37) > For backwards compatibility, the dependency on tex(latex) has to be modified to > refer to tetex-latex. > I'm going by the information given in comment 20 - is that inaccurate? > Is it really necessary for mmdb to be >= 1.20? According to upstream: "Thanks for your efforts with this whole thing - I'm looking forward to it working eventually. I've moved to mmdb-1.21, fixes a LINK format problem, IIRC." So it may build with earlier versions, I'm only using >= 1.20 to coincide with Paul. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 17:03:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:03:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518949] Review Request: brlcad - computer aided solid modelling and design In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061703.n96H3CUJ013585@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518949 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com --- Comment #10 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-10-06 13:03:10 EDT --- Could we get some more information on this? How many libraries are included? How many are dead upstream and how many won't accept brl-cad's patches? Where were the patches sent to? Where the libraries are dead upstream, the best thing to do would be for brl-cad upstream to take over (or release a renamed fork) with their modified versions. Where the upstreams don't want the changes we should find out why (a) the upstreams don't want them and (b) why brl-cad does. Then we'd have to decide whether to work with brl-cad to phase out the need for the library, work with the library upstream to clean up the changes for inclusion, or get someone (hopefully brl-cad) to maintain the forked version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 17:24:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:24:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061724.n96HOKPf003667@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #39 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-10-06 13:24:18 EDT --- Comment 20 isn't inaccurate in the least, but neither is comment 37. The issue is "backwards compatibility". Frankly it's up to you; I review packages for Fedora according to the guidelines which relate to supported Fedora releases, but if you want to push packages to EPEL you'll have to deal with an ever-increasing number of incompatibilities. Personally I prefer for the Fedora packages to be clean and for EPEL-related cruft to be kept to the EPEL branches (if you even intend to request them); someone who intends to take the Fedora package and rebuild it on some old release may grumble about backwards compatibility but that's really their problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 17:28:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:28:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526058] Review Request: sil-scheherazade-fonts - SIL Scheherazade Arabic Script Unicode Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061728.n96HSInT019011@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526058 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-06 13:28:17 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 17:27:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:27:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526997] Review Request: pdf2svg - Small tool to convert PDF files into SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061727.n96HRD0d018857@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526997 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-06 13:27:11 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 17:25:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:25:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526179] Review Request: rubygem-mixlib-cli - Simple ruby mixin for CLI interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061725.n96HPlS7018708@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526179 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-10-06 13:25:46 EDT --- -------------------------------------------------------------- This package (rubygem-mixlib-cli) is APPROVED by mtasaka -------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 17:29:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:29:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525389] Review Request: madwimax - Driver for mobile WiMAX devices based on Samsung CMC-730 chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061729.n96HTJIV004631@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525389 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-06 13:29:18 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 17:30:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:30:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526998] Review Request: volpack - Portable library for fast volume rendering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061730.n96HUFpc019678@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526998 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-06 13:30:14 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 17:32:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:32:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526607] Review Request: oflb-smonohand-fonts - A handwritten monospace font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061732.n96HWE3F020003@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526607 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-06 13:32:13 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 17:33:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:33:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466047] Review Request: tcl-mysqltcl - MySQL interface for Tcl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061733.n96HXXDM005612@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466047 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #33 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-06 13:33:32 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 17:35:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:35:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526595] Review Request: zikula-module-filterutil - Pagesetter like filter rules for Zikula In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061735.n96HZJaT006147@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526595 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-06 13:35:18 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 17:34:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:34:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519483] Review Request: zikula-module-pagemaster - Creates pages with dynamic content like news, articles, etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061734.n96HYXf8005755@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519483 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-06 13:34:32 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 17:39:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:39:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503495] Review Request: sblim-cim-client - Java CIM Client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061739.n96Hd6Vl006809@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503495 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-06 13:39:05 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 17:37:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:37:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518586] Review Request: gdata-sharp - .NET library for the Google Data API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061737.n96HbabN006627@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518586 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-06 13:37:35 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 17:39:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:39:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526180] Review Request: rubygem-mixlib-config - Simple ruby config mixin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061739.n96HdKIN006857@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526180 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-10-06 13:39:19 EDT --- ---------------------------------------------------------------- This package (rubygem-mixlib-config) is APPROVED by mtasaka ---------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 17:46:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:46:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250904] Review Request: fuse-python - Python bindings for FUSE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061746.n96HkBPa008571@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250904 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-06 13:46:10 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 17:41:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:41:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480279] Review Request: gnome-globalmenu - centralized menu bar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061741.n96HfxPu007698@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #53 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-06 13:41:53 EDT --- This request seems to have already been processed. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 17:44:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:44:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526004] Review Request: fapg - Fast Audio Playlist Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061744.n96HiIiT022241@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526004 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-06 13:43:12 EDT --- cvs done with F-12 branch added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 17:45:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:45:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525989] Review Request: rubygem-extlib - Support library for DataMapper and Merb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061745.n96HjZLR022818@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525989 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-06 13:45:34 EDT --- All packages have been mass branched already for F-12. Please use 'cvs update -d' to get the new directories. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 17:45:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:45:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525988] Review Request: rubygem-systemu - Multi-platform command execution and capture In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061745.n96Hj6xE022657@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525988 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-06 13:45:05 EDT --- All packages have been mass branched for F-12 already. Make sure to do a 'cvs update -d' to pick up new directories from cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 17:44:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:44:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524707] Review Request: chronojump - A measurement, management and statistics sport testing tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061744.n96HiSTm022287@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524707 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-06 13:44:26 EDT --- You have a uppercase "Chronojump" in your request, but the package seems to be "chronojump" can you confirm the correct case and reset the fedora-cvs flag to ? when you are ready? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 17:51:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:51:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478806] Review Request: simh - A highly portable, multi-system emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061751.n96HpqT2009856@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478806 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | --- Comment #9 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-10-06 13:51:51 EDT --- Citing the emulator rule: "If it requires ROMs (or image files in any format) of copyrighted or patented material to be useful (and the owners of those copyrights and patents have not given their express written permission), then it's not permitted." In reviewing this, the intent from upstream is: "The goal of the project is to create highly portable system simulators and to publish them as freeware on the Internet, with freely available copies of significant or representative software." Also, there is a significant amount of software (many versions of UNIX) for this emulator which are under Fedora acceptable licenses, and none of the software prominently available seems to be stolen/pirated. So, it passes that test. ***** The licensing is mostly MIT, but there is also some GPL+ (literally, v1+) code in there, notably in AltairZ80/. The license tag should be: License: MIT and GPL+ (each target is compiled into its own binary, so only AltairZ80 is GPL+) ***** Until the firmware license for the IBM1130 is resolved, please leave it out (and the VAX firmware). Since they are removed, I see no other legal issues here. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 18:11:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 14:11:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061811.n96IB0ke015281@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #40 from Tim Fenn 2009-10-06 14:10:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #37) > > Is it really necessary for mmdb to be >= 1.20? I should also mention an issue regarding versions is that clipper needs to be 2.1-090520 SVN or later, but the soname and library version didn't change (I'll mention this to upstream), so that dependency may not get picked up - see comment 24. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 18:18:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 14:18:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 421871] Review Request: libvirt-cim - A CIM provider for libvirt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061818.n96IIki7029226@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421871 --- Comment #11 from Kaitlin Rupert 2009-10-06 14:18:44 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: libvirt-cim Owners: danms kailtin danms is the current owner and I am a co-maintainer. Dan has not been maintaining the project for the past 7 months. Would like to switch ownership over to Kaitlin and remove Dan as a co-maintainer. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 18:21:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 14:21:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 421871] Review Request: libvirt-cim - A CIM provider for libvirt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061821.n96ILtUR030024@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421871 --- Comment #12 from Dan Smith 2009-10-06 14:21:54 EDT --- Seconded :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 18:25:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 14:25:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 421871] Review Request: libvirt-cim - A CIM provider for libvirt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061825.n96IPOW3018116@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421871 --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-06 14:25:23 EDT --- You guys can do this yourself. ;) Dan, go to: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/libvirt-cim and orphan the package, and Kaitlin can take full ownership. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 18:51:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 14:51:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525211] Review Request: rubygem-ditz - A command-line issue tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061851.n96IpU1k003449@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525211 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Jan Klepek 2009-10-06 14:51:28 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-ditz Short Description: A command-line issue tracker Owners: hpejakle Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 18:50:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 14:50:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525914] Review Request: perl-Net-GitHub - Perl interface for github.com In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061850.n96Io0Io002879@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525914 Bug 525914 depends on bug 525913, which changed state. Bug 525913 Summary: Review Request: perl-WWW-Mechanize-GZip - Fetch compressed webpages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525913 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #1 from Jan Klepek 2009-10-06 14:49:59 EDT --- sorry for late response, i tried to build it in koji and it failed, seems that it runs cpan to do dependency checks. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1731189 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 18:59:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 14:59:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527488] Review Request: drbd - drbd tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061859.n96Ix2MO004906@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527488 LINBIT changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |partner at linbit.com --- Comment #1 from LINBIT 2009-10-06 14:59:01 EDT --- The DRBD source tarball is at http://oss.linbit.com/drbd/8.3/drbd-8.3.4.tar.gz. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 19:02:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 15:02:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527488] Review Request: drbd - drbd tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061902.n96J2whk005942@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527488 Fabio Massimo Di Nitto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fdinitto at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fdinitto at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 19:05:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 15:05:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525989] Review Request: rubygem-extlib - Support library for DataMapper and Merb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061905.n96J5dMd026183@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525989 --- Comment #11 from Matthew Kent 2009-10-06 15:05:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > All packages have been mass branched already for F-12. > > Please use 'cvs update -d' to get the new directories. Apologies if I've confused something in the process here, but this is a new package. I'll try again and include the current release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 19:07:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 15:07:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525989] Review Request: rubygem-extlib - Support library for DataMapper and Merb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061907.n96J72v9006905@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525989 Matthew Kent changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Matthew Kent 2009-10-06 15:07:01 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-extlib Short Description: Support library for DataMapper and Merb Owners: mkent Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 19:07:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 15:07:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525988] Review Request: rubygem-systemu - Multi-platform command execution and capture In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061907.n96J7qCZ007045@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525988 Matthew Kent changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Matthew Kent 2009-10-06 15:07:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > All packages have been mass branched for F-12 already. > > Make sure to do a 'cvs update -d' to pick up new directories from cvs. Apologies if I've confused something in the process here, but this is a new package. I'll try again and include the current release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 19:08:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 15:08:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525988] Review Request: rubygem-systemu - Multi-platform command execution and capture In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061908.n96J8Kw4026701@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525988 --- Comment #11 from Matthew Kent 2009-10-06 15:08:20 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-systemu Short Description: Multi-platform command execution and capture Owners: mkent Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 19:26:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 15:26:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525988] Review Request: rubygem-systemu - Multi-platform command execution and capture In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061926.n96JQhAQ030447@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525988 --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-06 15:26:42 EDT --- oops. No, it's my fault for not looking closely enough. ;( You don't need a F-11 branch if you don't want one. Do you want one? Or should I do the request with just F-12/devel? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 19:31:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 15:31:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523553] Review Request: mutrace - Mutex Tracer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061931.n96JVlUb012165@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523553 Lennart Poettering changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(lpoetter at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #12 from Lennart Poettering 2009-10-06 15:31:45 EDT --- Yepp, the .spec file was actually belonging to an older tarball. Since I didn't really do a proper release of mutarce yet I just updated the tarball, but didn't update the spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 19:49:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 15:49:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523553] Review Request: mutrace - Mutex Tracer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061949.n96Jnk0N004649@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523553 --- Comment #13 from Lennart Poettering 2009-10-06 15:49:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > ? license complies with guidelines > complies with guidelines, yes. However, I recall a discussion in -devel about > the licensing of Fedora Infrastructure projects.These are supposed to be > LGPLv2+ for libraries and GPLv2+ for applications. Yours most likely is not > bound by these guidelines, and should the infrastructure team decide to use > mutrace, they can (the combination becomes GPLv3+), so this is up to you. I don't see how mutrace should ever be used for Fedora infrastructure. > OK license field accurate > OK license file not deleted > OK spec in US English > OK spec legible > FIX source matches upstream > $ sha1sum mutrace-0.1.tar.gz ../SOURCES/mutrace-0.1.tar.gz > dcb16f9a80262cb608f641ee5c960b15def6ad83 mutrace-0.1.tar.gz > 6017fc40158663eeffec4c70ba69cf04cde11ef2 ../SOURCES/mutrace-0.1.tar.gz Fixed now. > FIX build dependencies complete > missing binutils-devel Fixed. > FIX no dupes in %files > no dupes, but some unpackaged files: %{_libdir}/libmatrace.so and > libmutrace-backtrace-symbols.so Fixed. > SHOULD > FIX if license text missing, ask upstream to include it > corresponding GPL license text not included It is included. > FIX package build in mock on all architectures > not using mock yet, BR problem Uh? > OK package functioned as described > FIX require package not files > require util-linux-ng rather than /usr/bin/getopt ? /usr/bin/getopt is pretty generic and changed packages a couple of times in the past, which is is why I decided to stick with a path dependency instead of package dependency. Spec file and srpm nowupdated: Spec URL: http://0pointer.de/public/mutrace.spec SRPM URL: http://0pointer.de/public/mutrace-0.1-3.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 19:50:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 15:50:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523553] Review Request: mutrace - Mutex Tracer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061950.n96Jo3km019703@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523553 Lennart Poettering changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(michael.silvanus@ | |gmail.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 19:54:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 15:54:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523553] Review Request: mutrace - Mutex Tracer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061954.n96Jslwf020360@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523553 --- Comment #14 from Lennart Poettering 2009-10-06 15:54:46 EDT --- Just a small side note: this newer snapshot of mutrace now includes a copy of libacktrace-symbols which is licensed GPLv2+. I have hence updated the spec file license tag accordingly. Oh, and I now did the proper release of mutrace 0.1, so the confusion between tarballs and srpms shouldn't happen anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 20:00:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 16:00:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527488] Review Request: drbd - drbd tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910062000.n96K0DZd021913@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527488 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de --- Comment #2 from Martin Gieseking 2009-10-06 16:00:13 EDT --- Please also provide a link to the SRPM. But before doing so, you should revise the spec file in order to meet the Fedora packaging guidelines (see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines). I also can't find you in the account system. If this is your first submission, you need a sponsor. To find one, add FE-NEEDSPONSOR to the Blocks field above. For further information see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 20:05:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 16:05:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525988] Review Request: rubygem-systemu - Multi-platform command execution and capture In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910062005.n96K5AcI008234@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525988 --- Comment #13 from Matthew Kent 2009-10-06 16:05:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > oops. No, it's my fault for not looking closely enough. ;( > > You don't need a F-11 branch if you don't want one. > Do you want one? Or should I do the request with just F-12/devel? Both please, I probably would have requested one shortly. Still getting accustomed to this process :) Same goes for bug 525989. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 20:06:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 16:06:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505264] Review Request: wb_builder - Wishbone Bus Builder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910062006.n96K65QC023488@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505264 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-10-06 16:06:03 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: wb_builder Short Description: Wishbone Bus Builder Owners: chitlesh Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 20:05:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 16:05:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910062005.n96K5wW6023449@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 --- Comment #40 from Luke Macken 2009-10-06 16:05:54 EDT --- Here's another status update for getting TG2 & Pylons into EL-5 TurboGears2 [X] Rawhide [X] F-11 [X] EL-5 [X] python-zope-sqlalchemy https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0574 [_] python-pylons [_] python-decorator We need version 3.0+ for the python-repoze-what-pylons package. Toshio is building a python-decorator3 package for EL-5 [X] python-nose-0.10.4-1.el5 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-nose-0.10.4-1.el5 [X] python-webob-0.9.6.1-2.el5 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-webob-0.9.6.1-2.el5 [X] python-webhelpers-0.6.4-4.el5 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-webhelpers-0.6.4-4.el5 [X] python-routes-1.10.3-2.el5 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-routes-1.10.3-2.el5 [X] python-beaker https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-beaker-1.3.1-6.el5 [X] python-weberror https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-weberror-0.10.1-1.el5 [X] python-webtest https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-webtest-1.2-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 20:28:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 16:28:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526607] Review Request: oflb-smonohand-fonts - A handwritten monospace font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910062028.n96KSk5N028276@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526607 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-06 16:28:45 EDT --- oflb-smonohand-fonts-20090423-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/oflb-smonohand-fonts-20090423-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 20:25:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 16:25:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524238] Review Request: libclaw - C++ Library Absolutely Wonderful In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910062025.n96KP4cw027771@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524238 --- Comment #5 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-10-06 16:25:03 EDT --- rpmlint is still complaining : libclaw-devel.i586: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/libclaw-devel-1.5.4/examples/graphe/algos.cpp libclaw-devel.i586: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/libclaw-devel-1.5.4/examples/ia_jeux/allumettes/allumettes.cpp libclaw-devel.i586: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/libclaw-devel-1.5.4/examples/ia_jeux/allumettes/allumettes.hpp libclaw-devel.i586: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/libclaw-devel-1.5.4/examples/ia_jeux/allumettes/allumettes_main.cpp libclaw-devel.i586: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/libclaw-devel-1.5.4/examples/ia_jeux/allumettes/allumettes_main.hpp libclaw-devel.i586: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/libclaw-devel-1.5.4/examples/ia_jeux/morpion_console/morpion.cpp libclaw-devel.i586: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/libclaw-devel-1.5.4/examples/ia_jeux/morpion_console/morpion.hpp libclaw-devel.i586: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/libclaw-devel-1.5.4/examples/ia_jeux/morpion_console/morpion_main.cpp libclaw-devel.i586: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/libclaw-devel-1.5.4/examples/ia_jeux/morpion_console/morpion_main.hpp libclaw-devel.i586: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/libclaw-devel-1.5.4/examples/avl/main.cpp libclaw-devel.i586: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/libclaw-devel-1.5.4/examples/ia_jeux/allumettes/allumettes.cpp libclaw-devel.i586: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/libclaw-devel-1.5.4/examples/ia_jeux/allumettes/allumettes.hpp libclaw-devel.i586: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/libclaw-devel-1.5.4/examples/ia_jeux/allumettes/allumettes_main.cpp libclaw-devel.i586: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/libclaw-devel-1.5.4/examples/ia_jeux/morpion_console/morpion.cpp libclaw-devel.i586: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/libclaw-devel-1.5.4/examples/ia_jeux/morpion_console/morpion.hpp libclaw-devel.i586: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/libclaw-devel-1.5.4/examples/ia_jeux/morpion_console/morpion_main.cpp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 20:28:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 16:28:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526607] Review Request: oflb-smonohand-fonts - A handwritten monospace font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910062028.n96KSp2J013365@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526607 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-06 16:28:50 EDT --- oflb-smonohand-fonts-20090423-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/oflb-smonohand-fonts-20090423-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 20:32:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 16:32:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524707] Review Request: chronojump - A measurement, management and statistics sport testing tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910062032.n96KWTSr029118@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524707 Ismael Olea changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Ismael Olea 2009-10-06 16:32:28 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: chronojump Short Description: A measurement, management and statistics sport testing tool Owners: olea Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 InitialCC: salimma -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 20:33:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 16:33:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518949] Review Request: brlcad - computer aided solid modelling and design In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910062033.n96KXHUi029240@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518949 Christopher Sean Morrison changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |brlcad at mac.com --- Comment #11 from Christopher Sean Morrison 2009-10-06 16:33:16 EDT --- We wish we didn't have to do that kind of thing too. Alas, there is not a universal cross-platform package management system that we can rely on to be default installed cross-platform. With the exception of openNURBS and NIST SCL, our external dependencies are unmodified and primarily provided as a download convenience for users. Our build aims hard to "just work" by default, regardless of platform and environment. We go to great lengths in our build system to perform compilation testing to detect installed libraries and to use them when we can. Additionally, there are compilation options to force all or individual dependencies on and off so that package management systems can be sure they're getting a system-installed library. The default is merely "auto-detect". I'm really not sure what Matt meant by not following standard naming schemes. Is there even such a thing? The problem has been simple naming conflicts as our core public libraries are sub-projects in themselves with trade mark identity. The solution there is to install our libraries in a sub-directory (e.g., /usr/lib/brlcad/librt.so) and update the system linker search paths so the conflict is avoided. To get more specific on our external dependencies and respond to Toshio's request .. here's the list of installable dependencies their status: tkhtml3: no source changes, build convenience tkImg: no source changes, build convenience Utah Raster Toolkit: no upstream, we apply security and build fixes (but otherwise do not modify) TNT: no source changes (it's only header files) openNURBS: some source mods, upstream is not interested (competes with their business) NIST SCL: no upstream, heavily modified (we'll eventually manage it as a sub-project) We're using openNURBS in a way that upstream specifically doesn't support. It's a fantastic library that provides (a) geometric representation and (b) conversion facilities, yet is a subset of their larger commercial Rhino SDK which includes (c) geometric analysis facilities. We need a, b, and c for the same reasons they did, so we have to implement a portion of what they intentionally remove. We're looking into ways to refactor our modifications so they are an independent superset (so upstream is unmodified), but that's not where things are at today. Big thanks and appreciation to Matt Chan for taking this up. Thanks to everyone else for taking the time to review and critique. It will be great to see BRL-CAD integrated. Cheers! Sean -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 20:33:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 16:33:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524707] Review Request: chronojump - A measurement, management and statistics sport testing tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910062033.n96KX2Xs014302@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524707 --- Comment #13 from Ismael Olea 2009-10-06 16:33:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > You have a uppercase "Chronojump" in your request, but the package seems to be > "chronojump" > can you confirm the correct case and reset the fedora-cvs flag to ? when you > are ready? Sorry! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 20:32:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 16:32:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524107] Review Request: qbrew - A Brewing Recipe Calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910062032.n96KWxuK014274@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524107 --- Comment #12 from Chris St. Pierre 2009-10-06 16:32:58 EDT --- Following a conversation with Kevin Fenzi, I've made a few changes: - Help files have been moved to /usr/share/doc/qbrew/, which is where qbrew expects them to be. Help now works. - Help files are no longer marked as %doc, since they are required for the software to function. - Simplified the inclusion of things that actually are %doc. A new specfile is up and a new SRPM is at http://www.nebrwesleyan.edu/people/stpierre/qbrew-0.4.1-5.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 20:44:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 16:44:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518949] Review Request: brlcad - computer aided solid modelling and design In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910062044.n96Ki6Sl031854@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518949 --- Comment #12 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-10-06 16:44:05 EDT --- There is also a problem with the librt.so from brlcad that may conflicts with the glibc one on linux. Any progress on this side ? (specially using pkg-config will be an easy way to abstract the problem). At least that was the pending question when I took care of the package some time ago: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=236856 There are also well known duplicates: (took from my spec file). #Rename wall #mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/wall $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/brlcad-wall mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/dstat $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/brlcad-dstat mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/istat $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/brlcad-istat -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 20:48:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 16:48:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527539] New: Review Request: 9wm - Emulation of the Plan 9 window manager 8 1/2 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: 9wm - Emulation of the Plan 9 window manager 8 1/2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527539 Summary: Review Request: 9wm - Emulation of the Plan 9 window manager 8 1/2 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/9wm.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/9wm-1.2-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: 9wm is an X window manager which attempts to emulate the Plan 9 window manager 8-1/2 as far as possible within the constraints imposed by X. It provides a simple yet comfortable user interface, without garish decorations or title-bars. Or icons. And it's click-to-type. Koji Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1731554 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 20:57:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 16:57:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507223] Review Request: dalston - Moblin System Information Icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910062057.n96KvoXA003064@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223 --- Comment #39 from Peter Robinson 2009-10-06 16:57:47 EDT --- New upstream release: SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/dalston.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/dalston-0.1.8-1.fc11.src.rpm koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1731572 I don't see that there's anything else to do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 20:58:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 16:58:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492834] Review Request: spawn-fcgi - Simple program for spawning FastCGI processes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910062058.n96KwJ4v020175@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492834 Matthias Saou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Matthias Saou 2009-10-06 16:58:17 EDT --- Builds on all current branches have been done, and I've also updates lighttpd to 1.4.23, the first release to no longer include spawn-fcgi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 21:03:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 17:03:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527544] New: Review Request: python-decorator3 - Module to simplify usage of decorators Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-decorator3 - Module to simplify usage of decorators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527544 Summary: Review Request: python-decorator3 - Module to simplify usage of decorators Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: a.badger at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-decorator3.spec SRPM URL: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-decorator3-3.1.2-2.fc11.1.src.rpm Description: The aim of the decorator module is to simplify the usage of decorators for the average programmer, and to popularize decorators usage giving examples of useful decorators, such as memoize, tracing, redirecting_stdout, locked, etc. The core of this module is a decorator factory called decorator. This package contains version 3.x of the decorator module. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 21:05:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 17:05:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527544] Review Request: python-decorator3 - Module to simplify usage of decorators In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910062105.n96L5Rm6022107@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527544 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lmacken at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-10-06 17:05:26 EDT --- Note: This package is currently only intended for EL-5 where it will be a forward compatibility package for programs which need python-decorator-3.x instead of python-decorator-2.x -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 21:16:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 17:16:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518949] Review Request: brlcad - computer aided solid modelling and design In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910062116.n96LGSLt008376@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518949 --- Comment #13 from Christopher Sean Morrison 2009-10-06 17:16:26 EDT --- Ah yes, can't forget the *long* efforts of kwizart that started us down this path (thanks to you too Nicolas!).. The 'wall' command was renamed about 20 months ago. I don't recall dstat/istat ever being raised as an issue, though. Do you have a reference link for the istat conflict? Regardless, dstat and istat are non-critical tools that can be easily renamed. I'll put it in our queue for the next release (7.16.2). We provide pkg_config files (as well as a brlcad-config script) so installing libraries into a subdirectory should take care of the librt/libbu/libbn conflicts. Cheers! Sean -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 21:23:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 17:23:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527544] Review Request: python-decorator3 - Module to simplify usage of decorators In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910062123.n96LN6cc027508@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527544 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 21:25:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 17:25:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525988] Review Request: rubygem-systemu - Multi-platform command execution and capture In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910062125.n96LP6WO011129@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525988 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-06 17:25:05 EDT --- sorry about that. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 21:28:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 17:28:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505264] Review Request: wb_builder - Wishbone Bus Builder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910062128.n96LSX1p029800@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505264 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-06 17:28:32 EDT --- cvs done with F-12 added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 21:29:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 17:29:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525211] Review Request: rubygem-ditz - A command-line issue tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910062129.n96LTTAs030144@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525211 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-06 17:29:28 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 21:26:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 17:26:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525989] Review Request: rubygem-extlib - Support library for DataMapper and Merb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910062126.n96LQRFc029152@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525989 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-06 17:26:26 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 21:30:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 17:30:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524707] Review Request: chronojump - A measurement, management and statistics sport testing tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910062130.n96LUlaN030824@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524707 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-06 17:30:46 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 21:28:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 17:28:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527544] Review Request: python-decorator3 - Module to simplify usage of decorators In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910062128.n96LShbb029870@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527544 --- Comment #2 from Luke Macken 2009-10-06 17:28:42 EDT --- [X] 100% Must [X] rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [X] The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [X] The spec file name must match the base package 100%{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [X] The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [X] The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. [X] The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [X] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in 100%doc. [X] The spec file must be written in American English. [X] The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [X] The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. [X] The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [X] If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [X] All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. [X] The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the 100%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. [X] Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in 100%post and %postun. [X] Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. [X] If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [X] A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [X] A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's 100%files listings. [X] Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every 100%files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [X] Each package must have a 100%clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [X] Each package must consistently use macros. [X] The package must contain code, or permissable content. [X] Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [X] If a package includes something as 100%doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [X] Header files must be in a -devel package. [X] Static libraries must be in a -static package. [X] Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [X] If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [X] In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: 100%{name} = %{version}-%{release} [X] Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. [X] Packages containing GUI applications must include a 100%{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [X] Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [X] At the beginning of 100%install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [X] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [X] 100% Should [X] If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [X] The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [X] The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [X] The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [X] The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. [X] If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. [X] Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [X] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. [X] If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 21:50:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 17:50:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527549] New: Review Request: osm2go - A simple openstreetmap editor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: osm2go - A simple openstreetmap editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527549 Summary: Review Request: osm2go - A simple openstreetmap editor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/osm2go.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/osm2go-0.7.19-1.fc11.src.rpm Project URL: http://www.harbaum.org/till/maemo/index.shtml#osm2go Description: OSM2Go is an editor for openstreetmap.org map data. OSM2Go is designed for simplicity and user friendlyness and not for maximim feature count. It is meant for simple mapping on the road. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1731585 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop016 SRPMS]$ rpmlint osm2go-0.7.19-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop016 x86_64]$ rpmlint osm2go* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 21:59:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 17:59:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527544] Review Request: python-decorator3 - Module to simplify usage of decorators In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910062159.n96LxhLq007757@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527544 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-10-06 17:59:42 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-decorator3 Short Description: Module to simplify usage of decorators Owners: toshio lmacken Branches: EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 22:02:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 18:02:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522988] Review Request: afraid-dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910062202.n96M2otX023107@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 --- Comment #40 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-06 18:02:49 EDT --- afraid-dyndns-1.0-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/afraid-dyndns-1.0-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 22:23:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 18:23:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527406] Review Request: sil-lateef-fonts - An Arabic script unicode font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910062223.n96MNvxI016730@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527406 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |hedayat at grad.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-06 18:23:55 EDT --- Nothing to say here ??? APPROVED ??? You can now continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a (please do not forget the wiki and comps bits) Thank you for your contribution to our font package pool. ? REASSIGNING -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 22:25:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 18:25:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910062225.n96MPvZp031693@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 Christian Krause changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #76 from Christian Krause 2009-10-06 18:25:50 EDT --- I've reviewed your latest package and all issues are solved. Thank you very much for all your work on this package. -> APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 22:27:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 18:27:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514634] Review Request: gpx-viewer - A simple gpx viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910062227.n96MRXFq018168@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514634 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-06 18:27:31 EDT --- gpx-viewer-0.1.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gpx-viewer-0.1.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 23:43:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 19:43:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524707] Review Request: chronojump - A measurement, management and statistics sport testing tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910062343.n96NhspN023500@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524707 Ismael Olea changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 00:25:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 20:25:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507223] Review Request: dalston - Moblin System Information Icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910070025.n970PE7F023054@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #40 from Christoph Wickert 2009-10-06 20:25:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #38) > Umm.... from the top of the spec file: Well, if you want this package reviewed ASAP, then you should make notice of the fact that you changes Source0 in order to fix the autotools mismatch. I thought we were still waiting for something all the time. (In reply to comment #39) > I don't see that there's anything else to do. The gtk-update-icon-cache stuff still is wrong. It is only needed when a package puts icons into gtk's icon search path [1], this means into /usr/share/icons. %{_datadir}/dalston/icons is a private location, nothing except dalston will ever look there. Just drop the scriptlets. I don't see any blockers left, so the package is finally APPROVED. [1] http://standards.freedesktop.org/icon-theme-spec/latest/ar01s03.html http://standards.freedesktop.org/icon-theme-spec/latest/ar01s05.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 01:16:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 21:16:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524107] Review Request: qbrew - A Brewing Recipe Calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910070116.n971GEFw021725@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524107 --- Comment #13 from Jon Stanley 2009-10-06 21:16:12 EDT --- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License OK - License field in spec matches NO - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English NO (see notes) - Spec is legible. OK- Sources match upstream md5sum: $ md5sum qbrew-0.4.1.tar.gz ../SOURCES/qbrew-0.4.1.tar.gz bf5009cf5ce5f3ea5069161012966cf7 qbrew-0.4.1.tar.gz bf5009cf5ce5f3ea5069161012966cf7 ../SOURCES/qbrew-0.4.1.tar.gz OK - Package needs ExcludeArch OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang N/A - Package is relocatable and has a reason to be. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) OK - Package is code or permissible content. N/A- Doc subpackage needed/used. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. N/A - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. N/A- Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun N/A - .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig N/A - .so files in -devel subpackage. N/A - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} N/A - .la files are removed. OK - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. NO - No rpmlint output. qbrew.src:84: W: macro-in-%changelog doc qbrew.src:85: W: macro-in-%changelog doc qbrew.src:90: W: macro-in-%changelog doc You can't include macros (%doc) in the changelog without escaping them - i.e. %%doc. OK - final provides and requires are sane: SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1732086 OK - Should function as described.1 OK - Should have sane scriptlets. N/A - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version N/A - check for outstanding bugs on package. (For core merge reviews) Notes: 1. Include a blank line between versions of a changelog entry. As such from one of my packages: * Fri Feb 20 2009 Jon Stanley - 0.914-4 - Fix *.ttf to *.otf * Fri Feb 20 2009 Jon Stanley - 0.914-3 - Remove comments from spec - Something else - Something 3 2. Include the LICENSE file as %doc (as well as in addition to where it already is if it's actually needed by the help) Just fix these things and it should be good! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 02:59:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 22:59:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466047] Review Request: tcl-mysqltcl - MySQL interface for Tcl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910070259.n972xP6n011839@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466047 --- Comment #34 from Rene Ploetz 2009-10-06 22:59:23 EDT --- I will submit a CVS change request to enable the EPEL 4 and 5 branches. The only issue of this is that EPEL4 does not have the %bcond_without macro so I have to redefine it (which is not a problem, but will change the original reviewed spec file). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 03:01:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 23:01:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466047] Review Request: tcl-mysqltcl - MySQL interface for Tcl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910070301.n9731K6b027810@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466047 Rene Ploetz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #35 from Rene Ploetz 2009-10-06 23:01:18 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: tcl-mysqltcl New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: renep -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 03:09:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 23:09:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521851] Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin-Beanstalk - Nagios plugin to observe Beanstalkd queue server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910070309.n97395kP030503@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521851 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-06 23:09:03 EDT --- perl-Nagios-Plugin-Beanstalk-0.04-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 03:08:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 23:08:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462530] Review Request: jarbundler - Mac OS X JarBundler ANT Task In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910070308.n9738QH6030195@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462530 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(guthrie at counterex | |ample.org) | --- Comment #4 from Jerry James 2009-10-06 23:08:20 EDT --- Due to no response from the submitter, I am closing this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 03:12:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 23:12:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226024] Merge Review: libgssapi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910070312.n973C2sB032127@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226024 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-06 23:11:59 EDT --- libgssapi-0.11-7.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 03:13:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 23:13:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226024] Merge Review: libgssapi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910070313.n973DAGx032583@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226024 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-06 23:13:10 EDT --- libgssapi-0.11-7.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 03:09:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 23:09:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521851] Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin-Beanstalk - Nagios plugin to observe Beanstalkd queue server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910070309.n9739DJB030643@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521851 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.04-3.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 03:11:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 23:11:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523199] Review Request: ncrack - high-speed network authentication cracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910070311.n973BG87031834@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523199 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-06 23:11:10 EDT --- ncrack-0.01-0.7.ALPHA.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ncrack'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-10297 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 03:12:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 23:12:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225886] Merge Review: hfsutils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910070312.n973CNOS017176@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225886 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-06 23:12:21 EDT --- hfsutils-3.2.6-19.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 03:14:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 23:14:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225886] Merge Review: hfsutils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910070314.n973Eslo018286@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225886 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-06 23:14:54 EDT --- hfsutils-3.2.6-19.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 03:14:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 23:14:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525510] Review Request: geda-gaf - Design Automation toolkit for electronic design In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910070314.n973EVGZ018138@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525510 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-06 23:14:29 EDT --- geda-gaf-1.6.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 03:15:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 23:15:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525510] Review Request: geda-gaf - Design Automation toolkit for electronic design In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910070315.n973Feii018948@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525510 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-06 23:15:39 EDT --- geda-gaf-1.6.0-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 03:14:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 23:14:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525510] Review Request: geda-gaf - Design Automation toolkit for electronic design In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910070314.n973EcPr018196@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525510 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.6.0-1.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 03:13:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 23:13:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462932] Review Request: echomine-muse - Java API for XMPP/Jabber In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910070313.n973DJ4N017648@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462932 Bug 462932 depends on bug 462560, which changed state. Bug 462560 Summary: Review Request: xmlpull-api - XmlPull v1 API is a simple to use XML pull parsing API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462560 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NOTABUG Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 03:13:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 23:13:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462923] Review Request: jibx - Framework for binding XML data to Java objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910070313.n973DGc7017608@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462923 Bug 462923 depends on bug 462560, which changed state. Bug 462560 Summary: Review Request: xmlpull-api - XmlPull v1 API is a simple to use XML pull parsing API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462560 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NOTABUG Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 03:13:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 23:13:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462560] Review Request: xmlpull-api - XmlPull v1 API is a simple to use XML pull parsing API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910070313.n973DCkM017547@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462560 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(guthrie at counterex | |ample.org) | --- Comment #9 from Jerry James 2009-10-06 23:13:07 EDT --- Due to no response from the submitter, I am closing this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 03:15:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 23:15:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525510] Review Request: geda-gaf - Design Automation toolkit for electronic design In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910070315.n973FlVQ001711@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525510 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.6.0-1.fc10 |1.6.0-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 03:18:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 23:18:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523553] Review Request: mutrace - Mutex Tracer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910070318.n973Ih30002623@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523553 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(michael.silvanus@ | |gmail.com) | --- Comment #15 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-10-06 23:18:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #10) > > > ? license complies with guidelines > I don't see how mutrace should ever be used for Fedora infrastructure. Fair enough. > > FIX source matches upstream > > $ sha1sum mutrace-0.1.tar.gz ../SOURCES/mutrace-0.1.tar.gz > > dcb16f9a80262cb608f641ee5c960b15def6ad83 mutrace-0.1.tar.gz > > 6017fc40158663eeffec4c70ba69cf04cde11ef2 ../SOURCES/mutrace-0.1.tar.gz > > Fixed now. > Verified $ sha1sum mutrace-0.1.tar.gz ../SOURCES/mutrace-0.1.tar.gz ea972f8666933fb297b9791187858ccca3fecff7 mutrace-0.1.tar.gz ea972f8666933fb297b9791187858ccca3fecff7 ../SOURCES/mutrace-0.1.tar.gz > > FIX build dependencies complete > > missing binutils-devel > > Fixed. OK > > > FIX no dupes in %files > > no dupes, but some unpackaged files: %{_libdir}/libmatrace.so and > > libmutrace-backtrace-symbols.so > > Fixed. OK > > > SHOULD > > FIX if license text missing, ask upstream to include it > > corresponding GPL license text not included > > It is included. Em, I don't see it. I see these license files: GPL ==> GPL v2 (needed) LGPL ==> LGPL v3 (needed) per the LGPL file, """ This version of the GNU Lesser General Public License incorporates the terms and conditions of version 3 of the GNU General Public License, supplemented by the additional permissions listed below. """ Per the FSF's instructions: http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl-howto.html """ You should also include a copy of the license itself somewhere in the distribution of your program. All programs, whether they are released under the GPL or LGPL, should include the text version of the GPL. In GNU programs the license is usually in a file called COPYING. """ since you use LGPLv3+, you must bundle the GPLv3 license text as well. > > FIX package build in mock on all architectures > > not using mock yet, BR problem > > Uh? I didn't build the package in mock, since the build dependencies were not complete (and there were unpackaged files), and I figured I'd have to test the fixed package anyway. There are some failures on PPC, both with F-11 and F-12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1732211 In mutrace.c, you define DEBUG_TRAP on non-x86 architectures as raise(SIGTRAP), but you are not #ifdef-including signal.h > > OK package functioned as described > > FIX require package not files > > require util-linux-ng rather than /usr/bin/getopt ? > > /usr/bin/getopt is pretty generic and changed packages a couple of times in the > past, which is is why I decided to stick with a path dependency instead of > package dependency. Fair enough I'm attaching the patch, which allows building on non-x86 architectures; incorporate that and add the missing GPLv3 text and this package should be ready to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 03:19:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 23:19:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523553] Review Request: mutrace - Mutex Tracer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910070319.n973JhqT003081@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523553 --- Comment #16 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-10-06 23:19:40 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=363922) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=363922) Patches mutrace.c to include signal.c on non-x86 archs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 03:19:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 23:19:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525831] Review Request: vim-perl-tt2 - Syntax highlighting for the Template-Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910070319.n973JhHm003082@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525831 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 06:27:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 02:27:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479598] Review Request: aopalliance - AOP offers a better solution to many problems than do existing technologies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910070627.n976RWjN026101@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479598 --- Comment #9 from Sandro Mathys 2009-10-07 02:27:30 EDT --- Upstream is dead, no activity on the mailing list at all. I don't think they'll ever re-license anything. Does that mean this pkg is a no-go? FYI: JBoss depends on aopalliance ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 06:24:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 02:24:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507223] Review Request: dalston - Moblin System Information Icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910070624.n976OWCh025334@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #41 from Peter Robinson 2009-10-07 02:24:31 EDT --- Thank you. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dalston Short Description: Moblin System Information Icons Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 06:37:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 02:37:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527316] Review Request: python-oauth - Library for OAuth version 1.0a In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910070637.n976bpl5028155@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527316 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-10-07 02:37:50 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1729587 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url b2d7609e4852b33d0d33f0bc6ae5cab8fadca014 oauth-1.0.1.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application Suggestions: 1) you can add example directory to %doc for that you need to add following line to %prep rm -f oauth/example/._* ==> This will make sure remove unnecessary files from installing and also to silent rpmlint output. Then, use %doc in spec as %doc oauth/example LICENSE.txt APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 07:02:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 03:02:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527428] Review Request: python-remoteobjects - An Object RESTational Model In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910070702.n97727Au019286@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527428 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-10-07 03:02:06 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1732363 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM gave python-remoteobjects.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-httplib2 ==> can be ignored. + source files match upstream url b2dd7e22a99d8726dd31b41b11efd2d47135bbf3 remoteobjects-1.0.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 07:02:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 03:02:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527431] Review Request: python-batchhttp - Parallel fetching of HTTP resources through MIME multipart In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910070702.n9772Ahq019314@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527431 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-10-07 03:02:08 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1730283 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM gave python-batchhttp.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-httplib2 ==> can be ignored. + source files match upstream url 0bfcf198eb969102fd07f83678a5fc9656472fb2 batchhttp-1.0.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 08:17:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 04:17:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910070817.n978Hic4001791@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #41 from Jess R Jones 2009-10-07 04:17:42 EDT --- Re #39, it isn't 'some old release', I'm making sure it builds for the current RHEL. The reason we don't use CentOS is because they use a bastardised plague (in contrast we use koji), which causes their packages to have some odd quirks. We have a mixture of people with supported RHEL installations and our rebuild of it. FC11 isn't stable enough for our needs, and the RH support is a requirement for many of our users. Re #40, thanks for that. I'll have to check what clipper version we are using. It is almost certainly whatever is currently shipped by either RHEL or EPEL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 08:51:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 04:51:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527488] Review Request: drbd - drbd tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910070851.n978p5Bs009228@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527488 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-10-07 04:51:03 EDT --- It seems, that DRBD is depending on specific kernel module, which I cannot find in the default Fedora kernel. Unfortunately, if it's true, then this would be a blocker, since we don't allow packages with standalone kernel modules. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 08:53:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 04:53:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526263] Review Request: l7-protocols - Protocol definitions files for l7-filter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910070853.n978raKg023313@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526263 --- Comment #2 from Marcus Moeller 2009-10-07 04:53:35 EDT --- Update: The above files are byte for byte transcripts of network data and must not be changed in any way. Best Regards Marcus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 08:57:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 04:57:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527488] Review Request: drbd - drbd tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910070857.n978vqQW010542@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527488 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br --- Comment #4 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-10-07 04:57:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > It seems, that DRBD is depending on specific kernel module, which I cannot find > in the default Fedora kernel. > > Unfortunately, if it's true, then this would be a blocker, since we don't allow > packages with standalone kernel modules. there are no drdb kernel modules in fedora, but I think It can be built. for example, we have user-mode-linux userland here, but no user-mode-linux modules enabled in fedora kernel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 09:01:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 05:01:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520479] Review Request: myproxy - Manage X.509 Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910070901.n97911ST011172@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520479 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Mattias Ellert 2009-10-07 05:00:59 EDT --- Fedora review myproxy-4.8-3.fc11.src.rpm 2009-10-07 rpmlint results: myproxy-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation myproxy-server.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/myproxy myproxy myproxy-server.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/myproxy myproxy myproxy-server.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/myproxy 0700 myproxy-server.x86_64: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/myproxy-server $prog 8 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings. All fine. + OK - needs some work + package name follows naming guidelines + spec file name matches package name + The package license tag (NCSA and BSD) is a Fedoara approved license - In addition to the license tags stated - which corresponds to the license statements in the license files - the following source files contain license statements saying they are licensed under Apache license v 2.0: pubcookie.h, safe_id_range_list.[ch], safe_is_path_trusted.[ch] + License files in the sources are installed as %doc: LICENSE, LICENSE.netbsd, LICENSE.sasl + Specfile is written in legible English + Source matches upstream - and is the latest upstream version. $ md5sum myproxy-4.8.tar.gz src/myproxy-4.8.tar.gz 85f29d553bfec5fa5f2042440542524f myproxy-4.8.tar.gz 85f29d553bfec5fa5f2042440542524f src/myproxy-4.8.tar.gz + Package builds in mock (Fedora-11) + BuildRequires are sane + Library package calls ldconfig appropiately + No bundled system libraries - The package owns most directories it creates except /etc/grid-security I know this is a tricky one, since many exernal third party non-Fedora packages put files there - the IGTF CA packages in particular. But currently the only package that is in Fedora that owns this directory is the voms server which the myproxy server does not have a dependency on. + No duplicate files + File permissions are sane and all %files sections have %defattr + %clean clears buildroot + Specfile uses macros consistently + Package contains code + Documentation is in doc sub package + %doc is not runtime essential + Headers are in devel + No static libraries + .so symlink in devel + devel requires main with full version + No libtool archives + Package does not own other's files + %install clears buildroot + filenames are valid UTF8 So formally mostly OK Some additional comments: The %_initddir macro is (as you noticed) not available in RHEL4/5, but the older (now considered misspelled) %_initrddir macro is. You could use the following definition to define the new macro to the value of the old macro if the new macro is not available: %{!?_initddir: %global _initddir %{_initrddir}} The %define should be replaced by %global anyway - see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define Since the package name (unlike the globus packages) does not contain any underscores, the %_name macro is not really needed for this package and the %name can be used instead. The main package rpm tags values are aligned on column 16, while the subpackage tag values are separated by a single space - except for the Group tag. I can see why you might want to do it differently for the main and the sub packages, but not really why you then treat the Group tag differently. The voms not available yet comment should be removed (the --with-voms option to configure is already there). Many of the %attr statements in the %files sections look redundant and seems to be covered by the %defattr. There is a missing empty line between two entries in the changelog. In Fedora 11 the autogenerated requires in the devel package from the pkg-config dependencies will be sufficient, but if you intend to put the package in EPEL these will not be present, and there will be no dependency that will drag in globus-gss-assist-devel package when installing myproxy-devel. Adding a requires on globus-gss-assist-devel in the devel package would help. $ rpm -q --requires -p myproxy-devel-4.8-3.fc11.x86_64.rpm /usr/bin/pkg-config libmyproxy.so.4()(64bit) myproxy = 4.8-3.fc11 pkgconfig(globus-gss-assist) >= 3 < This will not be there in EPEL rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 09:06:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 05:06:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527488] Review Request: drbd - drbd tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910070906.n9796RHF012699@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527488 --- Comment #5 from Fabio Massimo Di Nitto 2009-10-07 05:06:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > It seems, that DRBD is depending on specific kernel module, which I cannot find > in the default Fedora kernel. > > Unfortunately, if it's true, then this would be a blocker, since we don't allow > packages with standalone kernel modules. DRDB kernel module is being included upstream. There is no need to build the kmod in fedora, and I really see no issue at all to make userland ready for inclusion. Also other packages (as noted) that would require an external kernel module, are being shipped without it. While there is absolutely no disagreement that external kmods are bad, there is also nothing wrong to allow users to have userland there ready for them, if they wish to build/install their kmod. I explicitly asked to start the review process earlier because I did expect a lot of people to jump to the package throat :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 09:24:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 05:24:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910070924.n979OC8t016082@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #42 from Adam Huffman 2009-10-07 05:24:11 EDT --- I would certainly be interested in an EPEL branch. Happy to maintain it myself, if necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 09:25:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 05:25:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527317] Review Request: django-flash - A Django extension to provide support for Rails-like flash In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910070925.n979PeIE030361@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527317 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-10-07 05:25:38 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1732522 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 848eccac89400631209c0bea3ba714012e8e118f django-flash-1.6.2.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 09:29:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 05:29:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527488] Review Request: drbd - drbd tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910070929.n979TSct017086@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527488 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #6 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-10-07 05:29:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) Peter Lemenkov is ok for you, ready to start review process ? (In reply to comment #5) for me is ok, I think you can review it, if you have sponsor power. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 09:33:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 05:33:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527488] Review Request: drbd - drbd tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910070933.n979XZk1031793@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527488 --- Comment #8 from Fabio Massimo Di Nitto 2009-10-07 05:33:34 EDT --- I don't have sponsor power, but I'll do my review too since it integrates with several other packages I maintain or co-maintain and I do have test environments for it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 09:30:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 05:30:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527488] Review Request: drbd - drbd tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910070930.n979UoVW031494@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527488 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(philipp.reisner at l | |inbit.com) --- Comment #7 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-10-07 05:30:49 EDT --- Philipp Reisner is this your first package ? do you have a fedora account ? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Get_a_Fedora_Account -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 09:40:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 05:40:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527445] Review Request: django-typepad - A helper Django app for making TypePad applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910070940.n979e2iv000689@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527445 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-10-07 05:39:41 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1730337 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM gave django-typepad.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-httplib2 ==> can be ignored. + source files match upstream url de402299b4693915d989e7f35ce2b00ba7efa015 typepadapp-1.0.1.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application I got installation dependency error for python-typepad. If this package requires python-typepad then it must be added in Depends filed of this bugzilla. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 09:46:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 05:46:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527433] Review Request: python-typepad - Connectivity to the TypePad API through remote objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910070946.n979kkXn001893@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527433 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-10-07 05:46:43 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1730291 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM gave python-typepad.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-httplib2 ==> can be ignored. + source files match upstream url eb641271caf164e38174c28c72fca7c9e712deb4 typepad-1.0.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 09:50:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 05:50:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910070950.n979o6vH021328@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #43 from Tim Fenn 2009-10-07 05:50:05 EDT --- The clipper for EL will need updating if/when this package is accepted. In the meantime, use the version in -devel to test this package with (mmdb in EL5 is 1.19, which may work OK for coot, please test and let me know!). I'd also be glad to have a comaintainer for the EL branch. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 09:54:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 05:54:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910070954.n979sKdt003367@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #44 from Jess R Jones 2009-10-07 05:54:19 EDT --- mmdb 1.21 does build against RHEL, although I've not had a chance to test it yet. The patches that had been in the package for 1.19 appear to have been accepted so they weren't needed for 1.21. I'll have to check what else will be affected by updating clipper before I can look at that one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 10:06:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 06:06:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463035] Review Request: pyroman - Very fast firewall configuration tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071006.n97A6Zo7006215@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463035 --- Comment #14 from Thomas Janssen 2009-10-07 06:06:31 EDT --- If you still want it, you could try to ask upstream if they're still alive :) If they gave up you could become upstream ;) Question is, is it worth. But that's up to you. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 10:09:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 06:09:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527231] Review Request: couchdb-glib - A glib api to access CouchDB servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071009.n97A956g025577@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527231 --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-10-07 06:09:04 EDT --- REVIEW: + rpmlint is silent [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ rpmlint ~/fuse/sshfs/work/Desktop/couchdb-glib-* couchdb-glib-devel.ppc: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec . + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines . + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines . + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. + The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included in %doc. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/couchdb-glib/0.5/couchdb-glib-0.5.0.sha256sum 0e04edd440706f031b952011b8a12f99d9a13b356f2a2abf778ada786e4540ae couchdb-glib-0.5.0.tar.bz2 + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture (see koji logs above). + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. + The package calls ldconfig in %post and %postun. + The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries. + The package owns all directories that it creates. + The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + The package consistently uses macros. + The package contains code, or permissible content. + Everything, a package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. + Header files are in a -devel package. + Since the package contains pkgconfig(.pc) files, it 'Requires: pkgconfig'. + A library files that ends in .so (without suffix) are in a -devel package. + The devel sub-package requires the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} + The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives. + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. BTW ver. 0.5.1 is out, while you packaged 0.5.0. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 10:15:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 06:15:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071015.n97AFWw4008194@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #45 from Pascal Parois 2009-10-07 06:15:31 EDT --- Clipper compiles just fine on Centos (clipper-2.1-11.20090714cvs) gtkglext is missing on centos/epel. Is the name different or it's really missing? I have seen a rpm on DAG, I'll try with this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 10:23:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 06:23:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071023.n97ANETe009876@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #46 from Jess R Jones 2009-10-07 06:23:13 EDT --- I have clipper-2.1.5 on our koji server, and gtkglext-1.2.0. I can put those both up somewhere more publicly accessible if that would be helpful? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 10:22:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 06:22:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503939] Review Request: sblim-cim-client2 - Java CIM Client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071022.n97AMgtf028607@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503939 Roman Rakus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Roman Rakus 2009-10-07 06:22:41 EDT --- It's ok now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 10:26:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 06:26:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502614] Review Request: stfl - STFL implements a curses-based widget set for text terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071026.n97AQCKq010742@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502614 --- Comment #37 from Kevin Kofler 2009-10-07 06:26:08 EDT --- It's the maintainer's call whether to use patch or sed. This should not block the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 10:29:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 06:29:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503727] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-dhcp - SBLIM WBEM-SMT DHCP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071029.n97AT422030200@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503727 Roman Rakus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Roman Rakus 2009-10-07 06:29:03 EDT --- It's ok now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 10:47:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 06:47:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503939] Review Request: sblim-cim-client2 - Java CIM Client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071047.n97AlxuJ002777@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503939 Vitezslav Crhonek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Vitezslav Crhonek 2009-10-07 06:47:58 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sblim-cim-client2 Short Description: The purpose of this package is to provide a CIM Client Class Library for Java applications. Owners: vcrhonek Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 10:49:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 06:49:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527231] Review Request: couchdb-glib - A glib api to access CouchDB servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071049.n97AnDIa002907@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527231 --- Comment #4 from Peter Robinson 2009-10-07 06:49:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > BTW ver. 0.5.1 is out, while you packaged 0.5.0. I was aware of 0.5.1 being out but the first time I tried to build it it looked there was a requirement of a new json. But it seems when I try now its not the case so I must have missed something. Updated: SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/couchdb-glib.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/couchdb-glib-0.5.1-1.fc12.src.rpm koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1732705 Is there anything else outstanding? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 10:49:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 06:49:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503727] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-dhcp - SBLIM WBEM-SMT DHCP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071049.n97AnF2N015652@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503727 Vitezslav Crhonek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Vitezslav Crhonek 2009-10-07 06:49:14 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sblim-cmpi-dhcp Short Description: The cmpi-dhcp package provides access to the DHCP configuration data via CIMOM technology/infrastructure. Owners: vcrhonek Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 10:55:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 06:55:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527245] Review Request: evolution-couchdb - An evolution backend to CouchDBs for PIM information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071055.n97AtXjb004597@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527245 --- Comment #1 from Peter Robinson 2009-10-07 06:55:32 EDT --- Update to 0.3.1 release SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/evolution-couchdb.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/evolution-couchdb-0.3.1-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 10:59:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 06:59:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513896] Review Request: pcp - performance monitoring and collection service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071059.n97AxGHd017730@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513896 --- Comment #23 from Mark Goodwin 2009-10-07 06:59:12 EDT --- Thanks Jarod, we've moved along a little bit and now have the perl-PCP packages being built from the same spec. I've nuked %makeinstall and further tweaked things for rpmlint - we (the PCP community developers) are just going thru final QA now and expect to be all done by the end of this week. So I'll UPDATE here again with the new spec and tarball details when that occurs. Thanks again -- Mark -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 11:09:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 07:09:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527231] Review Request: couchdb-glib - A glib api to access CouchDB servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071109.n97B9VUK007388@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527231 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-10-07 07:09:30 EDT --- I just checked - it seems, that this package is only for F-12+ http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1732761 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1732743 As for F-10 - it will be EOLed soon. Anyway, keep this in mind when you'll request cvs branches. From ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/couchdb-glib/0.5/couchdb-glib-0.5.1.sha256sum : 8112eded52aa706963e139b771a3d336da64176d08dbf1cc45fe983459e784d6 couchdb-glib-0.5.1.tar.bz2 [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ sha256sum couchdb-glib-0.5.1.tar.bz2 8112eded52aa706963e139b771a3d336da64176d08dbf1cc45fe983459e784d6 couchdb-glib-0.5.1.tar.bz2 [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ sha256sums matches and no other changes, so this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 11:27:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 07:27:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503490] Review Request: ayttm - Universal Instant Messaging Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071127.n97BRD29024038@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503490 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Parag AN(????) 2009-10-07 07:27:11 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1732372 + rpmlint output forSRPM and for RPM. ayttm.i686: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/ayttm-0.6.0/AUTHORS => Fix this before cvs import. + source files match upstream url 21a59beb5b67f02a8c3bc8679475afd4a8fe62dc ayttm-0.6.0.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + desktop file installed correctly. + Package ayttm-0.6.0-1.fc12.i686 => Provides: aim-oscar.so autotrans.so config(ayttm) = 0.6.0-1.fc12 custmsg.so img2jpc.so import_everybuddy.so import_gaim.so import_gnomeicu.so importicq.so importlicq.so irc.so jabber.so middle.so msn2.so notes.so rainbow.so smiley-themer.so smtp.so video_capture.so yahoo2.so Requires: /bin/bash libX11.so.6 libXpm.so.4 libaspell.so.15 libatk-1.0.so.0 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.7) libcairo.so.2 libcrypto.so.10 libdl.so.2 libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.0) libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.1) libesd.so.0 libfontconfig.so.1 libfreetype.so.6 libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 libgio-2.0.so.0 libglib-2.0.so.0 libgmodule-2.0.so.0 libgobject-2.0.so.0 libgthread-2.0.so.0 libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 libjasper.so.1 libjpeg.so.62 libltdl.so.7 libm.so.6 libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libpango-1.0.so.0 libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 libpthread.so.0 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.0) libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.1) librt.so.1 libssl.so.10 libstdc++.so.6 libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4) rtld(GNU_HASH) + GUI application Suggestions: 1) we have moved to hunspell now so please ask upstream to add support for using hunspell dictionaries. 2) fix rpmlint warning message by using following in %prep tr -d '\r' < AUTHORS > AUTHORS.new iconv -f ISO-8859-2 -t UTF-8 AUTHORS.new > AUTHORS APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 11:41:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 07:41:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527231] Review Request: couchdb-glib - A glib api to access CouchDB servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071141.n97Bf6i2014273@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527231 --- Comment #6 from Peter Robinson 2009-10-07 07:41:05 EDT --- Thanks. It actually does build on F-11 (I think possibly F-10 too but wasn't planning on doing so) but the libuuid dep requirement is actually contained in e2fsprogs-devel so that's a know issue but easily fixed :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 11:42:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 07:42:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527231] Review Request: couchdb-glib - A glib api to access CouchDB servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071142.n97BgAN6027229@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527231 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Peter Robinson 2009-10-07 07:42:09 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: couchdb-glib Short Description: A glib api to access CouchDB servers Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-12 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 12:32:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 08:32:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527704] New: Review Request: mingw-proj - MinGW port of the proj cartographic projection library package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw-proj - MinGW port of the proj cartographic projection library package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527704 Summary: Review Request: mingw-proj - MinGW port of the proj cartographic projection library package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dave at adsllc.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.adsllc.com/tmp/mingw32-proj.spec SRPM URL: http://www.adsllc.com/tmp/mingw32-proj-4.6.1-2.fc11.src.rpm Description: MinGW port of the proj cartographic projection library package Proj and invproj perform respective forward and inverse transformation of cartographic data to or from cartesian data with a wide range of selectable projection functions. Proj docs: http://www.remotesensing.org/dl/new_docs/ This is my first package submission and I am looking for a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 12:34:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 08:34:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527704] Review Request: mingw-proj - MinGW port of the proj cartographic projection library package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071234.n97CYFX5026338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527704 Dave Ludlow changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 12:41:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 08:41:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527706] New: Review Request: mingw32-libgeotiff - MinGW port of libgeotiff Georeferenced image library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libgeotiff - MinGW port of libgeotiff Georeferenced image library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527706 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libgeotiff - MinGW port of libgeotiff Georeferenced image library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dave at adsllc.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.adsllc.com/tmp/mingw32-libgeotiff.spec SRPM URL: http://www.adsllc.com/tmp/mingw32-libgeotiff-1.3.0-svn1664.fc11.src.rpm Description: MinGW port of libgeotiff Georeferenced image library GeoTIFF represents an effort by over 160 different remote sensing, GIS, cartographic, and surveying related companies and organizations to establish a TIFF based interchange format for georeferenced raster imagery. This is my second package submission, and I am looking for a sponsor. See also: mingw32-proj. The source for this is SVN rev 1664 from https://svn.osgeo.org/metacrs/geotiff/trunk/libgeotiff, then './autogen.sh' and 'mingw32-configure' and 'make dist'. The latest release has build system issues that make porting difficult so a SVN snapshot is used instead for now - I expect libgeotiff-1.3.0 to fix this when it is released. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 12:56:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 08:56:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517488] Review Request: vhostmd - Virtualization host metrics daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071256.n97CusX8031599@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517488 Matthew Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mbooth at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mbooth at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 13:07:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 09:07:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515090] Review Request: moblin-menus - Moblin config and data file for desktop menus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071307.n97D7aCF015039@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515090 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #3 from Peter Robinson 2009-10-07 09:07:35 EDT --- Closing as the redhat-menus provides enough of what's required. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 13:10:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 09:10:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503495] Review Request: sblim-cim-client - Java CIM Client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071310.n97DARNF002268@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503495 Vitezslav Crhonek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Vitezslav Crhonek 2009-10-07 09:10:25 EDT --- Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 13:39:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 09:39:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527316] Review Request: python-oauth - Library for OAuth version 1.0a In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071339.n97DdSSN023433@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527316 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |527445 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 13:39:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 09:39:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527428] Review Request: python-remoteobjects - An Object RESTational Model In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071339.n97DdTuD023496@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527428 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |527445 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 13:39:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 09:39:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527433] Review Request: python-typepad - Connectivity to the TypePad API through remote objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071339.n97DdVCY023554@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527433 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |527445 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 13:39:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 09:39:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527431] Review Request: python-batchhttp - Parallel fetching of HTTP resources through MIME multipart In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071339.n97DdUGg023529@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527431 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |527445 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 13:39:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 09:39:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527445] Review Request: django-typepad - A helper Django app for making TypePad applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071339.n97DdRjN023401@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527445 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |527316, 527428, 527431, | |527433 --- Comment #2 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-10-07 09:39:25 EDT --- Whoa! Thanks for all the reviews - great stuff... :) Yes, you're right. Sorry, I missed the dependencies in this request (and have added them now). The ones in the other reviews should be accurate, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 13:47:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 09:47:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527319] Review Request: typepad-motion - A microblogging application for building online communities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071347.n97DlRm2025619@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527319 --- Comment #4 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-10-07 09:47:26 EDT --- And another build, which adds sqlite as a dependency. Spec URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/typepad-motion.spec SRPM URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/typepad-motion-1.0.1-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 13:48:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 09:48:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527445] Review Request: django-typepad - A helper Django app for making TypePad applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071348.n97Dm6rN025726@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527445 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-10-07 09:48:05 EDT --- thanks. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 14:02:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 10:02:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502614] Review Request: stfl - STFL implements a curses-based widget set for text terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071402.n97E266n029702@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502614 Ben Boeckel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mathstuf at gmail.com --- Comment #38 from Ben Boeckel 2009-10-07 10:02:03 EDT --- FWIW, with sed as complex as that, I would suggest using a patch, but I do agree with Kevin here. The patch would be much easier to maintain than sed commands (if a flag gets added, the sed line has to be fixed then tested to make sure something else doesn't get chomped where the patch just needs updated). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 14:05:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 10:05:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071405.n97E5oQ4018036@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #47 from Pascal Parois 2009-10-07 10:05:45 EDT --- I used http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=118213 but it's not compiling on centos, because of the conditions %if 0%{?fedora} < 8 I managed to get a rpm anyway. About Coot which is the main thing here, centos is not happy: + find . -executable '(' -name '*.cc' -o -name '*.cpp' -o -name '*.h' -o -name '*.hh' ')' -exec chmod 644 '{}' ';' find: invalid predicate `-executable' [pascal at localhost rpmbuild]$ find --version GNU find version 4.2.27 I just removed -executable to continue I also modified the latex part: %if "%{dist}" >= ".fc" BuildRequires: tex(latex) %else BuildRequires: tetex-latex %endif I built it against mmdb 1.19 Finally it's working. I don't know coot, so I couldn't test correctly. I load a mdb file and got the structure on the screen, that's it. I don't know the consequence of using an old mmdb either. I can also try on fedora 10. Is there anything specific to try? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 14:08:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 10:08:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479598] Review Request: aopalliance - AOP offers a better solution to many problems than do existing technologies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071408.n97E85BI031622@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479598 --- Comment #10 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-10-07 10:08:04 EDT --- That's unfortunate for JBoss. You might try reaching out to the members individually: http://aopalliance.sourceforge.net/members.html Also, you could try emailing Andrei Popovici directly: popovici at inf.ethz.ch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 14:12:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 10:12:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495577] Review Request: xsw - A simple slideshow producer and viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071412.n97ECMw5000771@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #21 from Fabian Affolter 2009-10-07 10:12:20 EDT --- There is still no new upstream release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 14:09:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 10:09:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513775] Review Request: pyfuzzy - Python framework for fuzzy sets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071409.n97E9Eh0032092@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513775 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2009-10-07 10:09:12 EDT --- According to upstream a new release will come out soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 14:15:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 10:15:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479763] Review Request: seam - The Simple Extensible Abstract Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071415.n97EFixk020978@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479763 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 14:14:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 10:14:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467641] Review Request: sugar-maze - Maze for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071414.n97EEIhU001572@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467641 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 14:26:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 10:26:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071426.n97EQXTo005594@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #48 from Adam Huffman 2009-10-07 10:26:30 EDT --- Re https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150#c46 - yes, that would be helpful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 15:03:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 11:03:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502854] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-nfsv3 - SBLIM nfsv3 instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071503.n97F3u4L017619@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502854 Vitezslav Crhonek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Vitezslav Crhonek 2009-10-07 11:03:55 EDT --- Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 15:05:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 11:05:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527245] Review Request: evolution-couchdb - An evolution backend to CouchDBs for PIM information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071505.n97F5EOl005846@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527245 Ionu? Ar??ri?i changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mapleoin at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #2 from Ionu? Ar??ri?i 2009-10-07 11:05:13 EDT --- Hi! (this is not a review) couchdb-glib-devel is listed as a BuildRequirement, but I can't find it in bugzilla. Have you submitted it for review? Also, why does the description describe couchdb-glib? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 15:05:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 11:05:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470293] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-network - SBLIM Network Instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071505.n97F5Nbb018755@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470293 Vitezslav Crhonek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #19 from Vitezslav Crhonek 2009-10-07 11:05:22 EDT --- Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 15:05:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 11:05:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526688] Review Request: umlgraph - Automated Drawing of UML Diagrams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071505.n97F5Xjc018861@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526688 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-10-07 11:05:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Only issue: missing BR/R on graphviz Fixed. New sources: Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/umlgraph.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/umlgraph-5.2-2.fc11.src.rpm > > - sources fine (md5sums match) > - naming fine > - license fine > - builds fine > - files good > - macros good > - rpmlint fine (ignore maven fragment warning) > > $ rpmlint ../SRPMS/umlgraph-5.2-1.fc11.src.rpm > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. > $ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/umlgraph-* > umlgraph.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/umlgraph > 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 15:10:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 11:10:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527245] Review Request: evolution-couchdb - An evolution backend to CouchDBs for PIM information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071510.n97FAsQm007731@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527245 --- Comment #3 from Peter Robinson 2009-10-07 11:10:53 EDT --- > couchdb-glib-devel is listed as a BuildRequirement, but I can't find it in > bugzilla. Have you submitted it for review? Check the dependencies of this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 15:13:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 11:13:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524107] Review Request: qbrew - A Brewing Recipe Calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071513.n97FDnr1020917@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524107 --- Comment #14 from Chris St. Pierre 2009-10-07 11:13:47 EDT --- Fixed and fixed. New spec file is up, and new SRPM is at http://www.nebrwesleyan.edu/people/stpierre/qbrew-0.4.1-5.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 15:19:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 11:19:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526688] Review Request: umlgraph - Automated Drawing of UML Diagrams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071519.n97FJxAR010116@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526688 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Andrew Overholt 2009-10-07 11:19:58 EDT --- Thanks, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 15:28:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 11:28:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527753] New: An EPEL branch request for sblim-cmpi-devel Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: An EPEL branch request for sblim-cmpi-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527753 Summary: An EPEL branch request for sblim-cmpi-devel Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vcrhonek at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Vitezslav Crhonek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? The existing sblim-cmpi-devel package is missing review ticket, so I'm opening new bug in accordance with http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure#other to request an EPEL branch. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: sblim-cmpi-devel New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: vcrhonek I'm not sure if "Package Review" is correct component, please let me know if not - because there will be probably need to do this procedure with few more packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 15:37:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 11:37:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071537.n97Fb20N014749@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #49 from Jess R Jones 2009-10-07 11:37:00 EDT --- I've thrown up the clipper and gtkglext packages here: http://people.bath.ac.uk/cs1jrj/software/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 15:45:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 11:45:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527402] Review Request: gmock - Google C++ Mocking Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071545.n97FjP0R029665@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527402 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de --- Comment #1 from Martin Gieseking 2009-10-07 11:45:24 EDT --- A couple of comments: - you must probably add Requires: gtest >= 1.4.0 because it's not recognized automatically - is the required gtest version always greater or equal than the version of gmock? If not, I'd suggest to replace BR:gtest-devel >= %{version} by BR:gtest-devel >= 1.4.0 - the lines in the %description section shouldn't exceed 80 characters - add the version and revision number to the first line of the changelog entry: Sun Oct 4 2009 Tejas Dinkar - 1.4.0-1 $ rpmlint /home/mgieseki/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/gmock-* gmock.i586: E: description-line-too-long Inspired by jMock, EasyMock, and Hamcrest, and designed with C++'s specifics in mind, gmock.i586: E: description-line-too-long Google C++ Mocking Framework (or Google Mock for short) is a library for writing and using C++ mock classes. Google Mock: gmock.i586: W: no-version-in-last-changelog gmock.i586: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libgmock.so.0.0.0 _exit at GLIBC_2.0 gmock-debuginfo.i586: W: no-version-in-last-changelog gmock-devel.i586: W: no-version-in-last-changelog gmock-devel.i586: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 5 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 15:55:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 11:55:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523601] Review Request: swish-e - Simple Web Indexing System for Humans - Enhanced In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071555.n97FtLGI019081@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523601 --- Comment #3 from Ionu? Ar??ri?i 2009-10-07 11:55:19 EDT --- > [rakesh at dhcp1-96 SPECS]$ rpmlint swish-e.spec > swish-e.spec:92: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/swish-e/*cgi > swish-e.spec:94: E: hardcoded-library-path in > %{_prefix}/lib/swish-e/swishspider > swish-e.spec:95: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/swish-e/*pl > 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings. > Ignore all of them .. I cannot find any macro which specially expands to > /usr/lib/ on 64bit and not to /usr/lib64/ Strangely, it seems that the configure sets a hardcoded library path of /lib and your hardcoding actually counters that, so it's ok. > file-not-utf8 please ignore this one as some names are in not utf-8 and > changing them would make sense either. I skimmed the text in those files and failed to find any non-utf-8 characters. The problem with those files is that they're in the old iso-8859-1 charset (as `file -i` reveals). Converting them to UTF-8 is painless: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_tricks#Convert_encoding_to_UTF-8 Please don't mix macros styles: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS These errors also require changed permissions https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#script-without-shebang perl-SWISH.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/SWISH/Filter.pm perl-SWISH.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/SWISH/TemplateFrame.pm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 15:57:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 11:57:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525210] Review Request: rubygem-trollop - A command-line option parsing library for ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071557.n97FvfOW032562@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525210 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-07 11:57:40 EDT --- rubygem-ditz-0.5-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-ditz-0.5-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 15:57:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 11:57:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525210] Review Request: rubygem-trollop - A command-line option parsing library for ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071557.n97FvpWQ032608@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525210 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-07 11:57:50 EDT --- rubygem-ditz-0.5-4.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-ditz-0.5-4.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 15:57:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 11:57:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525210] Review Request: rubygem-trollop - A command-line option parsing library for ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071557.n97FvuJH032696@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525210 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-07 11:57:55 EDT --- rubygem-ditz-0.5-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-ditz-0.5-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 15:57:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 11:57:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525210] Review Request: rubygem-trollop - A command-line option parsing library for ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071557.n97FvkqH019834@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525210 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-07 11:57:45 EDT --- rubygem-ditz-0.5-4.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-ditz-0.5-4.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 16:11:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 12:11:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517488] Review Request: vhostmd - Virtualization host metrics daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071611.n97GBSsu003783@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517488 --- Comment #1 from Matthew Booth 2009-10-07 12:11:27 EDT --- MUST items: *** rpmlint reports errors shown above [1] Package is named according to the package naming guidelines spec file name matches the base package name Package meets the packaging guidelines Package is licensed with a Fedora approved license License field in spec file matches actual license Spec file is written in American English Spec file is legible *** Upstream sources are not available [2] Package successfully builds on i686 and x86_64 *** Package uses ExclusiveArch [3] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires Upstream does not contain localisation ldconfig is called in %post and %postun for vm-dump-metrics Package does not bundle copies of system libraries Package is not relocatable Package owns all directories that it creates No files are listed more than once in %files Permissions on files are set properly Package has a %clean section containing rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT Package uses macros consistently Package contains only code Package does not include 'large documentation files' %doc files are not required for correct function Header files are in -devel package Static libraries are not built Package does not include pkgconfig files (but autoconf still uses pkgconfig) Bare .so file is in -devel pacakge -devel subpackage requires parent subpackage Package does not contain .la libtool archives Package does not contain a gui application Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages %install runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT All filenames are valid UTF-8 SHOULD items: Source package includes license text *** Description and summary sections do not contain translations (not blocker) Package builds in mock (see koji build in original submission) Package compiles and builds for supported architectures (but see [3]) *** Package caused system to become unstable requiring reboot [4] Scriptlets are sane Subpackage does not need to require base package in this case Package does not contain pkgconfig files Package does not have file dependencies Misc: Did you consider any of the other approaches to removing the use of rpath in the spec file? Notes: [1] If the 2 DTDs are genuinely not configuration files, they should be removed. I note that they're already in %doc, which seems appropriate. [2] It's not clear how the tarball was obtained or can be reproduced exactly from source. I'm not able to verify this. [3] I'm taking ExclusiveArch here to be semantically equivalent to ExcludeArch. I note that xen (which is a dependency), also has an ExclusiveArch. libvirt has a solution to this which involves not building against xen where it is not available. Is this possible in this package? [4] Starting vhostmd on my F-11 host flooded /var/log/messages with: Oct 7 14:51:06 mbooth libvirtd: 14:51:06.616: error : qemudDomainLookupByID:3028 : Domain not found: no domain with matching id 0 Oct 7 14:51:06 mbooth libvirtd: 14:51:06.619: error : qemudDomainLookupByName:3080 : Domain not found: no domain with matching name '0' Oct 7 14:53:51 mbooth vhostmd: Error retrieving metric UsedMem Oct 7 14:53:53 mbooth vhostmd: Failed to collect vm metrics during update and the following 2 AVC messages: Oct 7 14:42:33 mbooth kernel: type=1400 audit(1254922953.004:17101): avc: denied { read write } for pid=32590 comm="virsh" path="/dev/shm/vhostmd/disk0" dev=tmpfs ino=2946820 scontext=unconfined_u:system_r:xm_t:s0 tcontext=unconfined_u:object_r:tmpfs_t:s0 tclass=file Oct 7 14:42:33 mbooth kernel: type=1400 audit(1254922953.012:17102): avc: denied { getsched } for pid=32590 comm="virsh" scontext=unconfined_u:system_r:xm_t:s0 tcontext=unconfined_u:system_r:xm_t:s0 tclass=process The system became sluggish after only a few seconds, and unresponsive requiring a reboot shortly after that. This may be a problem with SELinux policy or the default configuration file. Either way, I'd be uncomfortable shipping the package with this as the default behaviour. Is this still a problem on rawhide? I didn't test there. ----- Rich, Can you respond to Misc and 4 Notes above first? Matt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 16:49:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 12:49:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526688] Review Request: umlgraph - Automated Drawing of UML Diagrams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071649.n97GnWmU032708@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526688 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-10-07 12:49:31 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: umlgraph Short Description: Automated Drawing of UML Diagrams Owners: akurtakov Branches: F-12 InitialCC: akurtakov -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 16:56:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 12:56:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502920] Review Request: polkit-gnome - PolicyKit integration for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071656.n97Guk3g002216@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502920 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 18:01:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 14:01:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523553] Review Request: mutrace - Mutex Tracer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071801.n97I1wX2019212@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523553 --- Comment #17 from Lennart Poettering 2009-10-07 14:01:56 EDT --- Thanks. Merged your patch (thanks for prepping that!), and added the GPL3 license text. Spec URL: http://0pointer.de/public/mutrace.spec SRPM URL: http://0pointer.de/public/mutrace-0.2-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 18:05:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 14:05:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523553] Review Request: mutrace - Mutex Tracer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071805.n97I54rI030571@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523553 Lennart Poettering changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(michael.silvanus@ | |gmail.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 18:15:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 14:15:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527317] Review Request: django-flash - A Django extension to provide support for Rails-like flash In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071815.n97IFc3B022151@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527317 --- Comment #3 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-10-07 14:15:37 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: django-flash Short Description: A Django extension to provide support for Rails-like flash Owners: sdz Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 18:15:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 14:15:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527316] Review Request: python-oauth - Library for OAuth version 1.0a In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071815.n97IF11T032516@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527316 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-10-07 14:15:00 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-oauth Short Description: Library for OAuth version 1.0a Owners: sdz Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 18:16:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 14:16:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527317] Review Request: django-flash - A Django extension to provide support for Rails-like flash In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071816.n97IGQrr022409@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527317 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-10-07 14:16:25 EDT --- Ah! Missed the fedora-cvs flag, adding that now. Request as above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 18:19:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 14:19:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527428] Review Request: python-remoteobjects - An Object RESTational Model In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071819.n97IJ8OQ022698@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527428 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-10-07 14:19:07 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-remoteobjects Short Description: An Object RESTational Model Owners: sdz Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 18:21:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 14:21:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527431] Review Request: python-batchhttp - Parallel fetching of HTTP resources through MIME multipart In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071821.n97ILAk6023430@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527431 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-10-07 14:21:09 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-batchhttp Short Description: Parallel fetching of HTTP resources through MIME multipart Owners: sdz Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 18:24:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 14:24:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527433] Review Request: python-typepad - Connectivity to the TypePad API through remote objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071824.n97IO0Z7002298@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527433 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-10-07 14:24:00 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-typepad Short Description: Connectivity to the TypePad API through remote objects Owners: sdz Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 18:24:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 14:24:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527445] Review Request: django-typepad - A helper Django app for making TypePad applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071824.n97IOtZY002725@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527445 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-10-07 14:24:54 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: django-typepad Short Description: A helper Django app for making TypePad applications Owners: sdz Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 19:18:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 15:18:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520479] Review Request: myproxy - Manage X.509 Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071918.n97JIFmT004602@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520479 --- Comment #6 from Steve Traylen 2009-10-07 15:18:13 EDT --- Thanks. Updated packages include white space changes, change in how initddir is set for epel, removal of useless _name variable and removal of redundant %attr flags. Also: - Add ASL 2.0 license as well. - Explicitly add /etc/grid-security to files list - For .el4/5 build only add globus-gss-assist-devel as requirement to myproxy-devel package. i.e everything you mentioned. Also I swapped %{_sharedstatedir} for %{_var}/lib since the former is /usr/com on .el5 it seems. rpmlint is unchanged: myproxy-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation myproxy-server.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/myproxy myproxy myproxy-server.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/myproxy myproxy myproxy-server.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/myproxy 0700 myproxy-server.x86_64: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/myproxy-server $prog a .fc13 and .el5 koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1733813 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1733819 and the update: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/myproxy/myproxy.spec http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/myproxy/myproxy-4.8-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 19:26:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 15:26:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468329] Review Request: sblim-indication_helper - Toolkit for CMPI Indication Providers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071926.n97JQ7F8007114@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468329 --- Comment #23 from Bill Nottingham 2009-10-07 15:26:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > sblim-sfcb-base will need a minor update after this package is approved, to BR: > sblim-indication_helper-devel, to automatically pick up indication support. This part didn't appear to happen. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 19:34:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 15:34:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499476] Review Request: orbited - A browser(javascript)->tcp bridge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071934.n97JYUKu019140@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499476 --- Comment #7 from Luke Macken 2009-10-07 15:34:28 EDT --- I sent a modified version of spots patch upstream for inclusion. I also tested the patch locally, and it seems to do the trick. http://groups.google.com/group/orbited-users/browse_thread/thread/2fe09fefb9295421 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 19:38:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 15:38:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499476] Review Request: orbited - A browser(javascript)->tcp bridge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071938.n97JcVUl009892@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499476 --- Comment #8 from Luke Macken 2009-10-07 15:38:31 EDT --- http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/orbited-0.7.10-1.fc11.src.rpm http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/orbited.spec * Wed Oct 07 2009 Luke Macken - 0.7.10-1 - Update to 0.7.10 - Apply a patch to add a --daemon argument * Sat Aug 08 2009 Luke Macken - 0.7.9-2 - Ship a working version of urlparse for Orbited on RHEL5 http://orbited.org/ticket/24 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 19:43:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 15:43:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503727] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-dhcp - SBLIM WBEM-SMT DHCP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071943.n97Jhh4q021340@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503727 --- Comment #5 from Bill Nottingham 2009-10-07 15:43:42 EDT --- For these sorts of things, do they *require* the server program (dhcp, bind, etc.) to be present, or will they return appropriate "not configured/not installed" data to the requester if it's not? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 19:44:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 15:44:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503939] Review Request: sblim-cim-client2 - Java CIM Client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071944.n97JiEeT021492@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503939 --- Comment #6 from Bill Nottingham 2009-10-07 15:44:13 EDT --- Why do we need two versions of this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 19:49:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 15:49:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524147] Review Request: libnetdevname -Development environment for libnetdevname In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071949.n97JnXk8022822@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147 --- Comment #19 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-10-07 15:49:31 EDT --- Everything looks good. Please go ahead and request CVS. Thanks Praveen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 19:49:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 15:49:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524147] Review Request: libnetdevname -Development environment for libnetdevname In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071949.n97Jnt15022902@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147 Praveen K Paladugu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 20:20:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 16:20:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516280] Review Request: perl-Config-Model-CursesUI - Curses interface to edit config data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910072020.n97KKAlu019145@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516280 --- Comment #4 from David Hannequin 2009-10-07 16:20:09 EDT --- It 's build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 20:24:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 16:24:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910072024.n97KOjHw019862@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #50 from Tim Fenn 2009-10-07 16:24:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #47) > > I can also try on fedora 10. Is there anything specific to try? I'm working on setting up a %check macro in the rpm now, I'll try to have that ready soon. I'm also working with upstream to clarify the license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 20:38:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 16:38:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470293] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-network - SBLIM Network Instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910072038.n97KcjSK022596@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470293 --- Comment #20 from Bill Nottingham 2009-10-07 16:38:43 EDT --- Was someone going to request this to be tagged for F-12? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 20:43:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 16:43:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516287] Review Request: perl-Config-Model-Itself - Model editor for Config::Model In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910072043.n97KhCX7001745@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516287 --- Comment #2 from David Hannequin 2009-10-07 16:43:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > Spec URL: > http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/perl-modules/perl-Config-Model-Itself/perl-Config-Model-Itself.spec > SRPM URL: > http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/perl-modules/perl-Config-Model-Itself/perl-Config-Model-Itself-1.211-1.fc10.src.rpm > Description: The Config::Itself and its model files provide a model of Config:Model. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 20:44:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 16:44:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516293] Review Request: perl-Config-Model-OpenSsh - OpenSsh configuration files editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910072044.n97KiwpP023934@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516293 David Hannequin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |516281 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 20:44:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 16:44:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516281] Review Request: perl-Config-Model-TkUI - Tk GUI to edit config data through Config::Model In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910072044.n97KixbL023967@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516281 David Hannequin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |516293 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 21:39:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 17:39:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527840] New: Review Request: parole - Media player for the Xfce desktop Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: parole - Media player for the Xfce desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527840 Summary: Review Request: parole - Media player for the Xfce desktop Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cwickert at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/parole.spec SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/parole-0.1.90-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Parole is a modern simple media player based on the GStreamer framework and written to fit well in the Xfce desktop. Parole features playback of local media files, DVD/CD and live streams. Parole is extensible via plugins. The project still in its early developments stage, but already contains the following features: * Audio playback * Video playback with optional subtitle * Playback of live sources Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1734083 Notes: The 'Mute' menu entry doesn't work. Should I remove it from the menu for now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 21:40:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 17:40:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470293] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-network - SBLIM Network Instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910072140.n97LekaK017560@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470293 --- Comment #21 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-10-07 17:40:44 EDT --- This package is already available in F-12 branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 21:41:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 17:41:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527840] Review Request: parole - Media player for the Xfce desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910072141.n97Lfhko017842@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527840 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-07 17:41:40 EDT --- I'd be happy to review this. Look for a full review later tonight. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 21:44:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 17:44:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514221] Review Request: ovirt-node - The oVirt Node daemons/scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910072144.n97LiPPM018699@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514221 --- Comment #11 from David Huff 2009-10-07 17:44:23 EDT --- Ok, we have decided include include the recipe, ks file for the node image, and the deployment tools in a sub package of this rpm. This simplifies things and only requires maintenance of one package. The new srpm and spec file are here: http://huff.fedorapeople.org/ovirt-node-1.0.3-4.fc12.src.rpm http://huff.fedorapeople.org/ovirt-node.spec rpmlint output below only real issue is with ovirt-functions,a nd form dgilmore's comments above looks like the can be ignored. $ rpmlint /home/david/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/ovirt-node-tools-1.0.3-4.fc12.noarch.rpm ovirt-node-tools.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized oVirt Node tools for building and running an oVirt Node image 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint /home/david/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/ovirt-node-1.0.3-4.fc12.x86_64.rpm ovirt-node.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-functions ovirt-node.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-functions ovirt-node.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-functions 0644 None ovirt-node.x86_64: E: init-script-non-executable /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-functions ovirt-node.x86_64: W: no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-functions ovirt-node.x86_64: E: no-chkconfig-line /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-functions ovirt-node.x86_64: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-functions ovirt-node.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-firstboot 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 3 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 23:08:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 19:08:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462982] Review Request: buffer - General purpose buffer program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910072308.n97N8AtS002511@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462982 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |spurath at students.uni-mainz. | |de --- Comment #25 from Thomas Spura 2009-10-07 19:08:06 EDT --- ping: bcornec, wolfy any update on this? If you don't plan to add these packages, cvs can be deleted again? How to commit it to cvs is described at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/UpdatingPackageHowTo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 23:51:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 19:51:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462982] Review Request: buffer - General purpose buffer program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910072351.n97NpggH015213@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462982 --- Comment #26 from Bruno Cornec 2009-10-07 19:51:41 EDT --- Yes, I still plan to ork on this. I'm waiting for an approval by HP OSRB to be able to work on this. Shouldn't take too long now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 00:35:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 20:35:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227027] Merge Review: ant-contrib-1.0-0.b2.1jpp - Collection of tasks for Ant In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080035.n980Zo54006931@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227027 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Merge Review: |ant-contrib-1.0-0.b2.1jpp - |ant-contrib-1.0-0.b2.1jpp - |Collection of tasks for Ant |Collection of tasks for Ant -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 00:40:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 20:40:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193894] Review Request: ant-contrib - A collection of tasks for Ant In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080040.n980esXU029919@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=193894 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rafaels at redhat.com --- Comment #20 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-10-07 20:40:47 EDT --- *** Bug 227027 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 00:40:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 20:40:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227027] Review Request: ant-contrib-1.0-0.b2.1jpp - Collection of tasks for Ant In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080040.n980eqtk029874@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227027 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE Summary|Merge Review: |Review Request: |ant-contrib-1.0-0.b2.1jpp - |ant-contrib-1.0-0.b2.1jpp - |Collection of tasks for Ant |Collection of tasks for Ant --- Comment #17 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-10-07 20:40:47 EDT --- Hmm, maybe this isn't a merge review. This package has a proper review request and was accepted. I assume this ticket was simply filed in error, because the package had been in the distro for several months when this ticket was submitted. Orcan, of course you're welcome to look over the existing package and suggest improvements if you think that's a good use of your time. We currently have no mechanism for doing re-reviews, however. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 193894 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 01:16:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 21:16:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525005] Review Request: libmxp - MUD eXtension protocol library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080116.n981G2BY009083@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525005 --- Comment #11 from Ryan Rix 2009-10-07 21:16:00 EDT --- Hi Jason, just seeing how this is coming along... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 01:21:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 21:21:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491946] Review Request: odfpy07 - compat package for odfpy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080121.n981LakS011000@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491946 --- Comment #6 from Matthew Daniels 2009-10-07 21:21:34 EDT --- This package became irrelevant when Ian Weller updated mw-render anyway, so I'm closing the bug request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 01:22:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 21:22:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491946] Review Request: odfpy07 - compat package for odfpy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080122.n981M1Vr011117@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491946 Matthew Daniels changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 01:30:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 21:30:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525005] Review Request: libmxp - MUD eXtension protocol library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080130.n981U00c024462@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525005 --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-10-07 21:29:58 EDT --- I'm very low on time right now; let me see if I can carve some out over the next couple of days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 01:44:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 21:44:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525005] Review Request: libmxp - MUD eXtension protocol library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080144.n981i6AH029204@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525005 --- Comment #13 from Ryan Rix 2009-10-07 21:44:05 EDT --- Okay, it's no hurry, just want to make sure it didn't fall into a black hole. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 02:24:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 22:24:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080224.n982Ob2q010854@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #79 from Jens Petersen 2009-10-07 22:24:29 EDT --- (I just mention in passing that people who like awesome might want to take a look at bluetile too: which is also pretty cool and works in fedora today... See pkg review bug 522821 or something like this should work: # yum install cabal-install ghc-X11-devel ghc-gtk-devel ghc-glade-devel # cabal update # cabal install bluetile # ~/.cabal/bin/bluetile to give it a spin.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 02:51:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 22:51:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459211] Review Request: oolite - A space sim game, inspired by Elite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080251.n982pmVb021248@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459211 Rich Mattes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |richmattes at gmail.com --- Comment #19 from Rich Mattes 2009-10-07 22:51:42 EDT --- I downloaded and built the latest Oolite SRPM on F11 x86 (1.73.4-1) for an informal review. Here are some of my observations: 1. No errors in rpmlint. 2. gcc-objc not specified in BuildRequires. My machine tried to build it without that package, and obviously failed. 3. Launcher in Applications/Games folder doesn't work for me, I have to launch it from the command line. 4. Program runs fine when launched from command line. Hope this helps! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 04:46:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 00:46:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526204] Review Request: ucs-fixed-fonts selected set of bitmap fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080446.n984kdCi015733@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526204 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(psatpute at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute 2009-10-08 00:46:38 EDT --- Done all the changes, not much sure about license, please guide me if any problem SPEC URL : http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/ucs-miscfixed-fonts.spec SRPM URL : http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/ucs-miscfixed-fonts-0.3-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 05:17:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 01:17:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527840] Review Request: parole - Media player for the Xfce desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080517.n985HCEw001259@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527840 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-08 01:17:10 EDT --- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License GPLv2+ OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: acf9085b49cf41469ce41076e6915253 parole-0.1.90.tar.bz2 acf9085b49cf41469ce41076e6915253 parole-0.1.90.tar.bz2.orig See below - BuildRequires correct OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. OK - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package obey's FHS standard (except for 2 exceptions) OK - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have sane scriptlets. OK - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version OK - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin Notes: Two of the files are LGPLv2+, but that should make the package still GPLv2+. (parole-subtitle-encoding.[ch]) rpmlint is silent. Issues: 1. A few optional packages we might be able to build with: checking for optional package libnotify >= 0.4.1... not found checking for optional package taglib >= 1.4... not found Other than that I don't see any blockers, so this package is APPROVED. Check into the optional packages above before importing. Let me know if you would like a co-maintainer, happy to help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 05:25:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 01:25:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080525.n985PU0J025328@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 --- Comment #18 from Pravin Satpute 2009-10-08 01:25:27 EDT --- updated SPEC : http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/bitmap-fonts.spec updated SRPM : http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/bitmap-fonts-0.3-11.fc11.src.rpm different license for each subpackage is done in smc-fonts, but i am not sure about license of these fonts, please guide if anything -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 05:36:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 01:36:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524147] Review Request: libnetdevname -Development environment for libnetdevname In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080536.n985aTVH006464@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147 srinivas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #20 from srinivas 2009-10-08 01:36:27 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libnetdevname Short Description: development files required to build libnetdevname-based software. Owners: srini praveenp Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: mdomsch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 05:48:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 01:48:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466047] Review Request: tcl-mysqltcl - MySQL interface for Tcl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080548.n985mEhx009698@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466047 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #36 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-08 01:48:13 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 05:47:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 01:47:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527753] An EPEL branch request for sblim-cmpi-devel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080547.n985lWpO009488@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527753 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #1 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-08 01:47:31 EDT --- cvs done. Better than package review here would just be the package that you are needing the cvs for. ie, in this case just file it against sblim-cmpi-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 05:53:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 01:53:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527316] Review Request: python-oauth - Library for OAuth version 1.0a In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080553.n985rOQu011016@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527316 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-08 01:53:23 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 05:52:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 01:52:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526688] Review Request: umlgraph - Automated Drawing of UML Diagrams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080552.n985q7N2032714@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526688 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-08 01:52:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 05:51:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 01:51:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527544] Review Request: python-decorator3 - Module to simplify usage of decorators In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080551.n985pJG5032550@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527544 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-08 01:51:18 EDT --- cvs done. Note that devel is always created, so you might dead.package and get it blocked in devel now and only leave the EL-5 branch active. ;) Luke: I assume the "APPROVED" is good enough, but could you set the fedora-review flag to + just to follow the procedure? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 05:55:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 01:55:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527428] Review Request: python-remoteobjects - An Object RESTational Model In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080555.n985t6Ej011807@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527428 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-08 01:55:05 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 05:56:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 01:56:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527433] Review Request: python-typepad - Connectivity to the TypePad API through remote objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080556.n985uxV4012291@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527433 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-08 01:56:58 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 05:54:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 01:54:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527317] Review Request: django-flash - A Django extension to provide support for Rails-like flash In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080554.n985sPLH011335@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527317 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-08 01:54:24 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 05:56:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 01:56:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527431] Review Request: python-batchhttp - Parallel fetching of HTTP resources through MIME multipart In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080556.n985u68a012100@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527431 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-08 01:56:05 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 05:59:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 01:59:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507223] Review Request: dalston - Moblin System Information Icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080559.n985xRnR002192@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #42 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-08 01:59:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 05:57:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 01:57:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527445] Review Request: django-typepad - A helper Django app for making TypePad applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080557.n985vjHv001779@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527445 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-08 01:57:44 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 06:00:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 02:00:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525831] Review Request: vim-perl-tt2 - Syntax highlighting for the Template-Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080600.n9860QE7002745@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525831 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-08 02:00:24 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 06:01:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 02:01:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527231] Review Request: couchdb-glib - A glib api to access CouchDB servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080601.n9861QF9003249@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527231 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-08 02:01:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 06:20:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 02:20:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507223] Review Request: dalston - Moblin System Information Icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080620.n986K7KK007760@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #43 from Peter Robinson 2009-10-08 02:20:04 EDT --- Imported and built. Thanks all for your assistance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 06:27:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 02:27:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527245] Review Request: evolution-couchdb - An evolution backend to CouchDBs for PIM information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080627.n986RB6O019379@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527245 Bug 527245 depends on bug 527231, which changed state. Bug 527231 Summary: Review Request: couchdb-glib - A glib api to access CouchDB servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527231 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 06:27:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 02:27:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527231] Review Request: couchdb-glib - A glib api to access CouchDB servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080627.n986RAcA019347@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527231 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #9 from Peter Robinson 2009-10-08 02:27:09 EDT --- Imported and built in F-13 rawhide. F-12 on its way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 06:41:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 02:41:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080641.n986fD9J011489@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #51 from Tim Fenn 2009-10-08 02:41:11 EDT --- Sorry to continue changing things, but this version is close to complete: Spec URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/coot.spec SRPM URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/coot-0.6-4.20091007svn2404.fc11.src.rpm I've rechecked which files fall under which license, and updated to SVN 2404 (which clarifies the licensing on some of the source files). I also added the tetex conditional for EL builds. Finally, I've updated the Buildrequires: mmdb must be >= 1.19, according to upstream. clipper must be >= 2.1-7 (which corresponds to the 090522 snapshot release, required according to upstream and testing). So Jess, would you mind updating your packages? If J. Tibbitts is still watching this bugreport, I'd appreciate feedback - things are "review-worthy" for fedora, IMO. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 06:40:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 02:40:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521723] Review Request: perl-Makefile-Parser - Simple parser for Makefiles In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080640.n986eCUU021818@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521723 Ruediger Landmann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |521724 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 06:40:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 02:40:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521724] Review Request: perl-Makefile-DOM - Simple DOM parser for Makefiles In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080640.n986eD35021842@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521724 Ruediger Landmann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |521723 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 06:51:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 02:51:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503727] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-dhcp - SBLIM WBEM-SMT DHCP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080651.n986piSA023683@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503727 --- Comment #6 from Vitezslav Crhonek 2009-10-08 02:51:42 EDT --- The server program is in Requires, so it needs to be installed. (In case of sblim-cmpi-dhcp bind is in Requires too.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 07:02:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 03:02:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479598] Review Request: aopalliance - AOP offers a better solution to many problems than do existing technologies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080702.n9872B7o015016@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479598 --- Comment #11 from Sandro Mathys 2009-10-08 03:02:09 EDT --- That would mean that every single member would have to agree with the license chance, wouldn't it? I doubt that's even possible because most members didn't leave any contact information. As for the contact information von Andrei Popovici - he left the ETHZ (where I work nowadays) years ago, i.e. that email address doesn't work anymore for a long time already. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 07:01:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 03:01:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226065] Merge Review: libXcomposite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080701.n9871fUl014946@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226065 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-10-08 03:01:40 EDT --- I will not go for detailed review here. Package looks ok now. APPROVING libXcomposite-0.4.0-10.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 07:06:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 03:06:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503939] Review Request: sblim-cim-client2 - Java CIM Client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080706.n9876nee026525@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503939 --- Comment #7 from Vitezslav Crhonek 2009-10-08 03:06:48 EDT --- AFAIK Java CIM Client 1.x and 2.x release implements different API. Both are requested and used by SBLIM users, because the API change is disruptive. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 07:05:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 03:05:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226086] Merge Review: libXres In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080705.n98753B8026165@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226086 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-10-08 03:05:02 EDT --- I will not go for detailed review here. koji build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=127251 verified upstream source as 60fdf5e612feac9ba379d0a5c755b8dd3c0bc489 libXres-1.0.3.tar.bz2 rpmlint is silent. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 07:10:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 03:10:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527753] An EPEL branch request for sblim-cmpi-devel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080710.n987AXXW028123@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527753 Vitezslav Crhonek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #2 from Vitezslav Crhonek 2009-10-08 03:10:32 EDT --- Thanks for creating branches and for information! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 07:38:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 03:38:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503490] Review Request: ayttm - Universal Instant Messaging Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080738.n987ch0A021768@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503490 Minto Joseph changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Minto Joseph 2009-10-08 03:34:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ayttm Short Description: Universal Instant Messaging Client Owners: mintojoseph Branches: F-11, F12 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 07:55:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 03:55:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080755.n987tWhP004125@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #52 from Jess R Jones 2009-10-08 03:55:25 EDT --- I'm still checking what else depends on clipper, so that I can make sure that none of the other packages we have is adversely affected by the update, but I have an updated mmdb (1.21). Once I'm happy that upgrading clipper isn't an issue, I'll replace the one I uploaded with a newer version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 08:06:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 04:06:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526855] Review Request: webacula - Web interface of a Bacula backup system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080806.n9886AL9028070@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526855 --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-10-08 04:06:09 EDT --- Yuri, I can sponsor you, but I can't find your FAS name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 08:50:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 04:50:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526451] Review Request: crunchyfrog - A multi-engine SQL client and database front-end In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080850.n988oFdI006574@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526451 --- Comment #4 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-10-08 04:50:14 EDT --- SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/crunchyfrog.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/crunchyfrog-0.4.0-2.fc12.src.rpm Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 08:50:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 04:50:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526855] Review Request: webacula - Web interface of a Bacula backup system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080850.n988og8G016182@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526855 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-10-08 04:50:41 EDT --- Unblocking FE-NEEDSPONSOR - I just sponsored Yuri. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 09:02:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 05:02:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167943] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-base In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080902.n9892hEO018295@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167943 Vitezslav Crhonek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vcrhonek at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Vitezslav Crhonek 2009-10-08 05:02:40 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: sblim-cmpi-base New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: vcrhonek -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 09:04:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 05:04:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526855] Review Request: webacula - Web interface of a Bacula backup system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080904.n9894lWH008817@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526855 --- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-10-08 05:04:46 EDT --- David, you may proceed with actual review now. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 09:18:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 05:18:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526238] Review Request: python-guppy - A Python Programming Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080918.n989IcVD011536@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526238 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-10-08 05:18:37 EDT --- Thomas, thanks for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-guppy Short Description: A Python Programming Environment Owners: peter Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 09:31:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 05:31:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523601] Review Request: swish-e - Simple Web Indexing System for Humans - Enhanced In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080931.n989VBqI014564@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523601 --- Comment #4 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-10-08 05:31:09 EDT --- > > Please don't mix macros styles: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS > > I am not fixing them. SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/swish-e.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/swish-e-2.4.7-3.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 09:32:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 05:32:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523601] Review Request: swish-e - Simple Web Indexing System for Humans - Enhanced In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080932.n989W9wE024445@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523601 --- Comment #5 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-10-08 05:32:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > > > > Please don't mix macros styles: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS > > > > > > I am not fixing them. > I meaning mixing. I am not using RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot} in same spec neither for other one. > SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/swish-e.spec > SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/swish-e-2.4.7-3.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 10:10:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 06:10:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507773] Review Request: python-daemon - Library to implement a well-behaved Unix daemon process In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910081010.n98AAcxc000391@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507773 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #9 from Parag AN(????) 2009-10-08 06:10:29 EDT --- Its enough wait from submitter (as he said he will close this) now. CLOSED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 10:12:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 06:12:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910081012.n98ACZ7o023378@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 Paul Lange changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #56 from Paul Lange 2009-10-08 06:12:26 EDT --- This is in F11 and devel. Closing this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 10:14:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 06:14:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526855] Review Request: webacula - Web interface of a Bacula backup system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910081014.n98AEAu1000932@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526855 --- Comment #7 from Alexey Torkhov 2009-10-08 06:14:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Options "RewriteBase" and "RewriteRule" in httpd.conf does not work. > So I left them at the same place, in .htaccess file. RewriteRule does work, but you need to specify full path in it. Sources and readme say that license is GPL version 3 or later. If this is correct, license tag should be changed to GPLv3+. Documentation that is installed in %doc must not be also installed to %{_datadir}/%{name}. Remove those duplicated files after copying. Use macros consistently - either "rm" or "%{__rm}". I prefer first way :) And please split changelog entries by empty line. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 10:28:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 06:28:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472792] Review Request: jempbox - A Java library that implements Adobe's XMP specification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910081028.n98ASjrn026384@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472792 Mary Ellen Foster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(mefoster at gmail.co | |m), | |needinfo?(mefoster at gmail.co | |m) | --- Comment #7 from Mary Ellen Foster 2009-10-08 06:28:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > I'm working on packaging up jempbox 0.8.0 from Apache Incubating: > > http://incubator.apache.org/pdfbox/ > > Are you still wanting to proceed with this review or shall I close and submit > my own? You can go ahead and submit your package -- sorry I let this sit for so long. :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 10:42:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 06:42:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526122] Review Request: vim-latex - Tools to view, edit and compile LaTeX documents in Vim In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910081042.n98AgAap029191@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526122 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |spurath at students.uni-mainz. | |de --- Comment #2 from Thomas Spura 2009-10-08 06:42:09 EDT --- This is a nice program, writing and compiling is ok, but as described in the doc \lv for viewing the .dvi file does *not* work here. Can't see why atm. Does this work for you? evince can't open the dvi file either, so I'd suggest to patch vim-latex for using pdf or ps as output format. What do you think, Jussi? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 10:56:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 06:56:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225902] Merge Review: intltool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910081056.n98AuATR032226@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225902 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |spurath at students.uni-mainz. | |de --- Comment #3 from Thomas Spura 2009-10-08 06:56:09 EDT --- * changelog is now in utf8. * rpmlint ../SRPMS/intltool-0.41.0-1.fc11.src.rpm ../RPMS/noarch/intltool-0.41.0-1.fc11.noarch.rpm intltool.src:18: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes xml-i18n-tools intltool.noarch: E: devel-dependency gettext-devel intltool.noarch: W: self-obsoletion xml-i18n-tools obsoletes xml-i18n-tools = 0.11 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. * rpmlint intltool.spec intltool.spec:18: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes xml-i18n-tools 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Obsoletes: xml-i18n-tools < 0.11 solves all 3 issues in this direction. Stays intltool.noarch: E: devel-dependency gettext-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 11:17:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 07:17:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226068] Merge Review: libXdmcp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910081117.n98BHmmP014199@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226068 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-10-08 07:17:46 EDT --- Review: + koji build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=135669 + verified upstream source as 7efd71d29d6cfba797b8791398e4d81ade677d77 libXdmcp-1.0.3.tar.bz2 + rpmlint is silent. + Package libXdmcp-1.0.3-2.fc13.i686 => Provides: libXdmcp.so.6 Requires: libXdmcp.so.6 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) rtld(GNU_HASH) + Package libXdmcp-devel-1.0.3-2.fc13.i686=> Provides: pkgconfig(xdmcp) = 1.0.3 Requires: /usr/bin/pkg-config libXdmcp.so.6 pkgconfig(xproto) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 11:15:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 07:15:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226066] Merge Review: libXcursor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910081115.n98BFbgS013946@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226066 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-10-08 07:15:36 EDT --- Review: + koji build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=135668 + verified upstream source as 096d0e538d37fd865705e5f45b0e96c7294c1f2f libXcursor-1.1.10.tar.bz2 + rpmlint output can be ignored libXcursor.i686: E: file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/icons/default/index.theme + Package libXcursor-1.1.10-2.fc13.i686 Provides: config(libXcursor) = 1.1.10-2.fc13 libXcursor.so.1 Requires: libX11.so.6 libXcursor.so.1 libXfixes.so.3 libXrender.so.1 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) rtld(GNU_HASH) + Package libXcursor-devel-1.1.10-2.fc13.i686 Provides: pkgconfig(xcursor) = 1.1.10 Requires: /usr/bin/pkg-config libXcursor.so.1 pkgconfig(x11) pkgconfig(xfixes) pkgconfig(xproto) pkgconfig(xrender) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 11:17:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 07:17:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226071] Merge Review: libXfixes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910081117.n98BHMZ5004251@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226071 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-10-08 07:17:20 EDT --- Review: + koji build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=135673 + verified upstream source as 37297e64239e1cc2a7b4372e27c5f9325f9f29dc libXfixes-4.0.3.tar.bz2 + rpmlint is silent. + PAckage libXfixes-4.0.3-9.fc13.i686=> Provides: libXfixes.so.3 Requires: libX11.so.6 libXfixes.so.3 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) rtld(GNU_HASH) + Package libXfixes-devel-4.0.3-9.fc13.i686 => Provides: pkgconfig(xfixes) = 4.0.3 Requires: /usr/bin/pkg-config libXfixes.so.3 pkgconfig(fixesproto) >= 4.0 pkgconfig(x11) pkgconfig(xproto) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 11:22:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 07:22:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526122] Review Request: vim-latex - Tools to view, edit and compile LaTeX documents in Vim In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910081122.n98BMxJk015384@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526122 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-10-08 07:22:58 EDT --- I haven't tried it myself- I packaged this just because there have been some requests on fedora-list. Anyway, it's fixed now. I added the missing Requires: tex(latex) and xdvi. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/vim-latex.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/vim-latex-1.5-2.20090901.r1069.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 11:20:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 07:20:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226069] Merge Review: libXevie In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910081120.n98BK76G014882@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226069 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-10-08 07:20:06 EDT --- Review: + koji build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=135672 + verified upstream source as d22fd24d8f096fdff54d303d63fea1422f0cfeea libXevie-1.0.2.tar.bz2 + rpmlint is silent. + PAckage libXevie-1.0.2-8.fc13.i686 => Provides: libXevie.so.1 Requires: libX11.so.6 libXevie.so.1 libXext.so.6 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) rtld(GNU_HASH) + Package libXevie-devel-1.0.2-8.fc13.i686=> Provides: pkgconfig(xevie) = 1.0.2 Requires: /usr/bin/pkg-config libXevie.so.1 pkgconfig(x11) pkgconfig(xext) pkgconfig(xproto) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 12:23:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 08:23:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527539] Review Request: 9wm - Emulation of the Plan 9 window manager 8 1/2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910081223.n98CNf3x019510@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527539 Thomas Janssen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |thomasj at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #1 from Thomas Janssen 2009-10-08 08:23:39 EDT --- I can't find any explanation for your uasge of "%defattr(-,root,root)". Shouldn't it be "%defattr(-,root,root,-)" then? -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 12:37:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 08:37:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527971] Review Request: ocaml-react - OCaml framework for Functional Reactive Programming (FRP) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910081237.n98CbCif002423@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527971 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-10-08 08:37:11 EDT --- rpmlint is silent on this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 12:36:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 08:36:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527971] New: Review Request: ocaml-react - OCaml framework for Functional Reactive Programming (FRP) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-react - OCaml framework for Functional Reactive Programming (FRP) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527971 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-react - OCaml framework for Functional Reactive Programming (FRP) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-react.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-react-0.9.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: OCaml framework for Functional Reactive Programming (FRP) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 12:39:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 08:39:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527971] Review Request: ocaml-react - OCaml framework for Functional Reactive Programming (FRP) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910081239.n98CduGS023186@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527971 --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-10-08 08:39:55 EDT --- Koji scratch build is here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1735265 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 12:40:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 08:40:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527539] Review Request: 9wm - Emulation of the Plan 9 window manager 8 1/2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910081240.n98CecVl003517@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527539 --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-10-08 08:40:37 EDT --- Yeah, it should be. Old spec, no good excuse. :) Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/9wm.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/9wm-1.2-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 13:01:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 09:01:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527971] Review Request: ocaml-react - OCaml framework for Functional Reactive Programming (FRP) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910081301.n98D18Ux028757@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527971 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #3 from Till Maas 2009-10-08 09:01:05 EDT --- Instead of %define, %global should be used nowadays. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 13:13:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 09:13:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527971] Review Request: ocaml-react - OCaml framework for Functional Reactive Programming (FRP) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910081313.n98DD2F4010777@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527971 --- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-10-08 09:13:01 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-react.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-react-0.9.0-2.fc11.src.rpm Changed %define -> %global. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 13:30:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 09:30:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527539] Review Request: 9wm - Emulation of the Plan 9 window manager 8 1/2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910081330.n98DUK8T004707@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527539 Thomas Janssen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |thomasj at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Thomas Janssen 2009-10-08 09:30:19 EDT --- The spec in the bugreport above is still the old one, but it's fixed in the one in the srpm. rpmlint is silent, installed as well silent. APPROVED. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 13:32:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 09:32:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910081332.n98DWr9R016408@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 --- Comment #20 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-10-08 09:32:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > Licensing > ========== > > * 10x20.bdf, 4x6.bdf, 5x7.bdf, 5x8.bdf, 6x10.bdf, 6x12.bdf, 6x13B.bdf, > 6x13.bdf, 6x9.bdf, 7x14B.bdf, 7x14.bdf, 9x15B.bdf, 9x15.bdf, 9x18B.bdf, > 9x18.bdf : Public Domain > * fangsongti16.bdf, fangsongti24.bdf : MIT > * lutBS*.bdf : Lucida and... lutRS*.bdf : Lucida -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 13:32:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 09:32:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910081332.n98DWOxh005379@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 --- Comment #19 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-10-08 09:32:21 EDT --- Licensing ========== * 10x20.bdf, 4x6.bdf, 5x7.bdf, 5x8.bdf, 6x10.bdf, 6x12.bdf, 6x13B.bdf, 6x13.bdf, 6x9.bdf, 7x14B.bdf, 7x14.bdf, 9x15B.bdf, 9x15.bdf, 9x18B.bdf, 9x18.bdf : Public Domain * fangsongti16.bdf, fangsongti24.bdf : MIT * lutBS*.bdf : Lucida -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 13:42:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 09:42:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523650] Review Request: qmpdclient - A Qt4 based MPD client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910081342.n98DgEf1018935@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523650 --- Comment #17 from Julian G 2009-10-08 09:42:12 EDT --- Thanks for your reply, Thomas. The patch gets applied in the %prep section. Should I replace $RPM_BUILD_ROOT with %{buildroot}? Are there any not documented options for desktop-file-install? How do i tell the doc tag to copy the files AUTHOR COPYING INSTALL README Changelog? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 13:44:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 09:44:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479598] Review Request: aopalliance - AOP offers a better solution to many problems than do existing technologies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910081344.n98DiX8n008308@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479598 --- Comment #12 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-10-08 09:44:31 EDT --- It depends on who the copyright holder is. If the AOP Alliance is a legal entity, then that entity could be the copyright holder. If so, then whomever legally speaks for that group could relicense the work. If the AOP Alliance is just a name that these individuals gave to themselves, but is not legally recognized as an entity (a company or a non-profit), then all of the individuals who committed code would have to give permission to relicense. Because of: http://www.systems.ethz.ch/people/alumni I'm pretty sure that this is the right Andrei Popovici: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/andrei-popovici/0/26b/735 . You might be able to contact him through that URL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 14:16:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 10:16:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523650] Review Request: qmpdclient - A Qt4 based MPD client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910081416.n98EG3BW018579@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523650 --- Comment #18 from Thomas Janssen 2009-10-08 10:16:02 EDT --- I use %{buildroot} over $RPM_BUILD_ROOT, but that's up to you. As long as you dont mix it. * %doc question You use: %doc AUTHOR COPYING README Changelog Thats it. * desktop-file-install question http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage Don't apply a vendor tag. Well, there's a man page for desktop-file-install online. But the host is veeeeeery slow. http://olympus.het.brown.edu/cgi-bin/man/man2html?desktop-file-install+8 Why you're useing capital letters for your .desktop file? * patch question Normal you use: Patch0: foo.patch and : %patch0 OR %patch -P 0 -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 14:22:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 10:22:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527986] New: Review Request: taoframework - Multimedia bindings for Mono Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: taoframework - Multimedia bindings for Mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527986 Summary: Review Request: taoframework - Multimedia bindings for Mono Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: palango at gmx.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://palango.fedorapeople.org/tao/taoframework.spec SRPM URL: http://palango.fedorapeople.org/tao/taoframework-2.1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Tao Framework for .NET is a collection of bindings to facilitate cross-platform media application development utilizing the .NET and Mono platforms. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 14:45:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 10:45:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527059] Review Request: earcandy - Sound level manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910081445.n98EjrNZ028477@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527059 --- Comment #5 from Martin Gieseking 2009-10-08 10:45:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > I do not think so; even if we dlopen libpulse, we still do assumptions about > ABI, therefore I changed this to depend on specific ABI version and the rpmlint > warning went away. Yes, I think you're right. Could you please upload the SRPM again, e.g. to fedorapoeple.org? The above link doesn't work (404). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 14:45:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 10:45:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472792] Review Request: jempbox - A Java library that implements Adobe's XMP specification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910081445.n98EjKG9028259@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472792 Orion Poplawski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #8 from Orion Poplawski 2009-10-08 10:45:18 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 527996 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 14:45:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 10:45:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527996] Review Request: jempbox - Java library for working with XMP metadata In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910081445.n98EjKnP028279@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527996 Orion Poplawski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mefoster at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Orion Poplawski 2009-10-08 10:45:18 EDT --- *** Bug 472792 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 14:45:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 10:45:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527996] New: Review Request: jempbox - Java library for working with XMP metadata Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jempbox - Java library for working with XMP metadata https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527996 Summary: Review Request: jempbox - Java library for working with XMP metadata Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: orion at cora.nwra.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/jempbox.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/jempbox-0.8.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Apache JempBox is an open source Java library for working with XMP metadata. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 15:12:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 11:12:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528003] New: Review Request: Xinha - Javascript library for making