[Bug 514221] Review Request: ovirt-node - The oVirt Node daemons/scripts

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Oct 7 21:44:25 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514221





--- Comment #11 from David Huff <dhuff at redhat.com>  2009-10-07 17:44:23 EDT ---
Ok, we have decided include include the recipe, ks file for the node image, and
the deployment tools in a sub package of this rpm.  This simplifies things and
only requires maintenance of one package.  The new srpm and spec file are here:

http://huff.fedorapeople.org/ovirt-node-1.0.3-4.fc12.src.rpm
http://huff.fedorapeople.org/ovirt-node.spec


rpmlint output below only real issue is with ovirt-functions,a nd form
dgilmore's comments above looks like the can be ignored.

$ rpmlint
/home/david/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/ovirt-node-tools-1.0.3-4.fc12.noarch.rpm
ovirt-node-tools.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized oVirt Node tools for
building and running an oVirt Node image
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

$ rpmlint /home/david/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/ovirt-node-1.0.3-4.fc12.x86_64.rpm 
ovirt-node.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-functions
ovirt-node.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-functions
ovirt-node.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-functions
0644 None
ovirt-node.x86_64: E: init-script-non-executable
/etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-functions
ovirt-node.x86_64: W: no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-functions
ovirt-node.x86_64: E: no-chkconfig-line /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-functions
ovirt-node.x86_64: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-functions
ovirt-node.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-firstboot
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 3 warnings.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list