[Bug 527840] Review Request: parole - Media player for the Xfce desktop

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Oct 8 05:17:12 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527840


Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




--- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com>  2009-10-08 01:17:10 EDT ---
OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name. 
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. 
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. 
OK - License GPLv2+
OK - License field in spec matches
OK - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
acf9085b49cf41469ce41076e6915253  parole-0.1.90.tar.bz2
acf9085b49cf41469ce41076e6915253  parole-0.1.90.tar.bz2.orig
See below - BuildRequires correct
OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. 
OK - Package has a correct %clean section. 
OK - Package has correct buildroot
OK - Package is code or permissible content. 
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. 
OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install

OK - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. 
OK - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
OK - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file

OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. 
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. 
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. 
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. 
OK - Package obey's FHS standard (except for 2 exceptions)
OK - No rpmlint output. 
OK - final provides and requires are sane.

SHOULD Items:

OK - Should build in mock. 
OK - Should build on all supported archs
OK - Should function as described. 
OK - Should have sane scriptlets. 
OK - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. 
OK - Should have dist tag
OK - Should package latest version
OK - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or
/usr/sbin

Notes:

Two of the files are LGPLv2+, but that should make the package still GPLv2+. 
(parole-subtitle-encoding.[ch])

rpmlint is silent. 

Issues: 

1. A few optional packages we might be able to build with: 

checking for optional package libnotify >= 0.4.1... not found
checking for optional package taglib >= 1.4... not found

Other than that I don't see any blockers, so this package is APPROVED. 
Check into the optional packages above before importing. 

Let me know if you would like a co-maintainer, happy to help.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list