[Bug 530205] New: Review Request: AntTweakBar - GUI library for videogame property editing UIs
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Oct 21 20:57:06 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: AntTweakBar - GUI library for videogame property editing UIs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530205
Summary: Review Request: AntTweakBar - GUI library for
videogame property editing UIs
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: sean at middleditch.us
QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://middleditch.us/sean/fedora/AntTweakBar/AntTweakBar.spec
SRPM URL:
http://middleditch.us/sean/fedora/AntTweakBar/AntTweakBar-1.13-1.fc12.src.rpm
Description:
Library for easily creating and using tweakable properties in an OpenGL
or SDL application, designed primarily for professional game developers.
There are a few ugly hacks I put in the spec file to get things to build and to
get rid of rpmlint warnings. Upstream is Windows-centric and has a pretty
crappy build setup for Linux.
I also had to apply two patches, and these are the first time I've applied
patches with any of my packages, so hopefully I did that part right.
The only thing I'm particularly unsure about with this package is whether or
not I should put the examples/demos into a sub-package. I'm not sure they're
really useful to people without the source. I've seen a few packages that
include the example source in the docs directory, but I'm not a huge fan of
that approach myself. I decided to just leave them out entirely for now.
rpmlint of spec file:
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
rpmlint of source RPM:
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
rpmlint of binary RPMs:
AntTweakBar-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
(I was told during the libtelnet review that that warning was bogus and to
ignore it, since there's no particular extra documentation to add to the -devel
package.)
The Koji scratch build for F12:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1761658
And Koji scratch build for F11:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1761680
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list